Seeking SC determination; UNP says Prez should have consulted Govt. allies

January 12th, 2018

Kelum Bandara Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The United National Party (UNP) said yesterday it would have been much better for President Maithripala Sirisena to have consulted the government allies before seeking a determination from the Supreme Court on the expiry of his term of office.

In an interview with Daily Mirror, Minister and House Leader Lakshman Kiriella said this had caused some uneasiness among the government allies.

He said even if the Court ruled it to be at the end of six years, the President had the option of calling for an early presidential election at the end of five years.

The Supreme Court is expected to convey its determination to the President on Sunday.

With Parliament approving the 19th Amendment to the Constitution the President’s term of office was reduced from the previous six years to five creating an ambiguity. ()

Ready to leave presidency even today: President Maithripala Sirisena

January 12th, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

President Maithripala Sirisena said today he would accept the Supreme Court determination whatever it might be on his term of office and was ready to leave the presidency even today.

The President told a public rally at Akuressa that no one needs to get worked up over him seeking a SC determination on the expiry of his tenure.

I sought an SC determination to clarify the two public opinions expressed on the term of the presidency and not to find out how many years I can continue to function as President,” he said.

The President said he didn’t come to stay in the presidency forever. However, I will stay committed to fulfil the dream of uplifting the country which is well-accepted by the world and that is where reconciliation reigns,” he said.

The March of Folly Understanding why Mahinda Rajapaksa lost

January 12th, 2018

By Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha Courtesy Ceylon Today

I looked last week at Nalaka Godahewa’s account of why Mahinda Rajapaksa lost, which he attributed to the excessive influence of eight people who “were not listening to the voices of the grassroots anymore.” Though an intelligent analysis of some aspects of the last years of the Rajapaksa Administration, the article failed to distinguish between positive influences and those who contributed heavily to the defeat.

I was happy though that Godahewa was complimentary about Gotabaya Rajapaksa, and I wished he had also noted how effectively P.B. Jayasundera and Ajith Nivard Cabraal had contributed to the economic wellbeing of the country, certainly in comparison with the current mess. And I felt too that there was more to be said for Lalith Weeratunga, though he failed to exercise his undoubted influence productively.

With regard to the four others Godahewa identifies, I feel he is generally right, though again the analysis could have been less perfunctory. And I was sorry he left out two characters who I felt did more than anyone else to destroy the President, though again neither has been accused of financial misdemeanours.

One was G.L. Peiris, whose influence Godahewa belittles in asserting that “Sajin de Vass Gunawardena was a huge influence in the External Affairs Ministry, though officially, Peiris was in charge.”

Peiris endemic insecurity

That does not reduce Peiris’ culpability for disastrous foreign relations, and his failure for instance to go to America to meet Hillary Clinton when she invited him, to reply to Manmohan Singh’s letter when the Indians were debating which way to vote at the Human Rights Council in March 2014, to move on matters which were agreed with the TNA when we were negotiating with them and the President told us to proceed.

But Godahewa does have a point in that perhaps Peiris’ endemic insecurity was exacerbated by the way Sajin was, as it was put, in charge of him. And certainly perhaps the worst influence on the President was Sajin. What finally convinced me to come out against the President (as opposed to staying neutral, for we had told him we could not support him if there were no reforms) was Sajin’s attack on Chris Nonis, and the fact that Mahinda Rajapaksa took Sajin’s side when that outrageous assault occurred.

Sajin’s evil influence, in also sabotaging talks with the TNA, and in helping Kshenuka Seneviratne destroy our foreign relations, in particular with India, I can testify to, having indeed written about it.

I cannot, however, comment on another individual Godahewa mentions, Gamini Senarath who allegedly ‘influenced all key appointments in the government.’ But that may be true and perhaps indicates why Lalith failed. Though it is said he “had the power to make or break anyone’s relationship with the former President,” the influence attributed to Senarath suggests Lalith had been superseded (which is why he should indeed have resigned, when he could no longer influence policy either).

Responsiveness to peoples needs

Senarath was not one of my dwarfs, but someone else Godahewa mentions, namely Namal Rajapaksa was amongst them.

Though I now realize that a story Arjuna Ranatunga told me about him, which I credited, may not have been true, it is certainly true that Mahinda Rajapaksa could not control him and some of his initiatives did not benefit the country or the people. That worried me, for right to the end I felt that, while Basil Rajapaksa was not responsive in many respects to people’s needs, Mahinda had his measure and could rein him in when necessary.

Basil indeed is the most complicated of those Godahewa identifies as having exercised seminal influence during the Rajapaksa Administration.

I myself felt that this influence was perverse, not least because he usurped the authority of many SLFP ministers, which is why none of them are mentioned in the article, but at the same time he achieved much in terms of development.

Though he failed to consult people in the areas in which he worked, and contributed to the alienation of the Tamils, his contribution should not be ignored, not least because it is far in advance of anything this government has done.

Bribery Commission commences preliminary steps on bond report

January 12th, 2018

By Yusuf Ariff  Courtesy adaderana

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption says that the preliminary steps with regard to implementing the recommendations of the Bond Commission report.

A copy of the report has been received by the Bribery Commission, according to a spokesman. He said that the commission’s investigative officers will carry out the necessary investigations based on the report.

He further added that the commission would not need to utilize external parties to carry out the investigations as its officers and attorneys would suffice.

The spokesman said that the commission intends to complete the investigations as soon as possible and present facts to the court.

Omalpe Sobitha Thero condemns Finance Minister’s decision on liquor

January 12th, 2018

By Manushi Silva Courtesy Adaderana

Ven. Omalpe Sobitha Thero condemns the decision taken by the Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera on liquor.

Sobitha Thero said that firm actions will be taken against the decision.

Finance Ministry revoked the ban on selling liquor to females and employing females in places where liquor is manufactured or sold on January 10.

Minister Samaraweera signed the Excise notification Gazette Extraordinary in this regard under the Excise Ordinance.

Excise Notification No 666 of the Gazette Extraordinary had imposed bar on selling liquor to women and employing women in the liquor related fields.

SriLankan & Mihin probe will expose more corrupt politicians – President

January 12th, 2018

In my tenure as President, I will not only build a clean party, but to create a clean government and a clean country,” he tweeted.

SriLankan & Mihin probe will expose more corrupt politicians - President

Sirisena also said that more revelations will be made and more corrupt politicians will be exposed when he appoints a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to probe Sri Lanka’s national carrier and the budget airline, Mihin Lanka.

When I appoint the Presidential Commission on Mihin Lanka and Sri Lankan Airlines, more revelations will be made, and more corrupt politicians will be exposed.”

Debacles suffered by our forces under Chandrika’s reign – Part II

January 11th, 2018

By: A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA.

Victor Ivan’s notorious Bandit Queen Chandrika in her dementia keeps on telling the blatant lie that it is she who completed ¾ of the 30 year’ of war.  Although this claim is not even believed by her trusted friends and acolytes this is part II of the article that disproves her malicious claim with some detailed accounts of facts outlining the misery and setbacks suffered by our armed forces during her reign.

Tiger terrorisrs overran government military units in the northern town of Pallai on April 30, just one week after taking the strategic Elephant Pass, which had guarded access to the rest of the Jaffna Peninsula in northern Sri Lanka. The victories made it increasingly likely that the traditional Tamil capital of Jaffna will fall to the guerrillas after five years in government hands.

The increasing success of the campaign by the Tiger Terrorists created the seeds of disarray for the government. The terrorists progressed quickly from hit-and-run guerrilla warfare to coordinated, combined arms action and Chandrika faced growing pressure from opposition political parties and a humiliated military. A coordinated and renewed military campaign began in November 1999, when the terrorists overran 10 bases in less than a week. During the offensive, LTTE forces made extensive use of long-range artillery, a tactic repeated in their recent defeat of government forces at Elephant Pass, a vital northern route into the regional capital at Jaffna.

The fall of Elephant Pass and the continued advance of the terrorists had sent shockwaves through Colombo and the leader of the opposition United National Party (UNP), Ranil Wickremesinghe, called the loss of Elephant Pass “a military and political setback” and blamed it squarely on the president.

LTTE terrorisrs hauling away artillery pieces following the fall of Elephant Pass

Chandrika’s moves to engage the LTTE in peace negotiations mediated by Norway drew increasing opposition and commentators said that the losses also exposed rifts between military commanders and Chandrikaa herself, who served as both defense minister and commander-in-chief. On April 28, in a public address to the nation, Chandrika accused the military of showing weakness at Elephant Pass by withdrawing troops and she accused some military officials of placing personal interest above that of the nation.

To counter claims that she is to blame for the army’s humiliating string of defeats, without any strategic planning and on her own decision making Chandrika suspended several military officers and  sacked or replaced some others.  Her government’s punitive measures against military officers were matched by accelerating purchases of military supplies and equipment. However, experts said that it was unlikely the army will be able to resupply fast enough to avoid the loss of the Jaffna Peninsula.

Listed below are some other strategic military gains made by the terrorists mainy due to ill treatment of the forces and demoralising them by the President o the country.

  • Operation Unceasing Waves II:The LTTE launched Operation Unceasing Waves II also known as 1998 Battle of Kilinochchi. . LTTE recaptured Kilinochchi town from Army after 3 days of intense battle.
  • Operation Unceasing Waves III: The LTTE launched Operation Unceasing Waves III on the first week of November 1999. On the first day LTTE began Oddusuddan offensive (1999). After capturing the base they attacked Kanakarayankulam Army HQ. After the fall of the base LTTE recaptured most part of Vanni .
  • Second Battle of Elephant Pass:The LTTE after liberating Vanni launched their attack to liberate Jaffna Peninsula. Known as Second Battle of Elephant Pass. The LTTE stepped up operation inside Jaffna Peninsula. Under the leadership of Kandiah Balasegaran the LTTE launched Sri Lanka’s Terrorist War’s largest behind enemy line operation. After 34 days long battle Elephant Pass base fell to Tamil Tigers.
  • Operation Unceasing Waves IV:On 26th September 2000 the LTTE launched Operation Unceasing Waves IV. The objective of the operation was to liberate Jaffna.
  • LTTE’s Unilateral ceasefire:On 24th December 2000 LTTE declared Unilateral ceasefire. It was ended on 24th April 2001. Analysts said that anticipating a large scale military operation by Army Prabhakatan used these 4 months effectively organising his fighting formations..
  • Operation Agni keela:The Army launched Operation Agnikeela on 25th April 2001 within few hours after LTTE ended their unilateral ceasefire. It’s main objective was to retake Elephant Pass Garrison which they lost to LTTE one year back. LTTE had Booby trapped the whole paths and effectively positioned their artillery and mortar units. Due to heavy casualties the Army abandoned the operation.

List o Civilian Killings

Kallarawa massacre

The Kallarawa massacre is an incident that took place on May 25, 1995 during which LTTE terrorists massacred 42 Sinhalese men, women and children in Kallarawa All the remaining civilian survivors fled the village after this incident leading to its depopulation However survivors from the Sinhalese, Tamil and Muslim communities returned to Kallarawa several months later under the protection of the Sri Lankan Army

Gonagala massacre

The Gongala Massacre was a massacre that occurred on September 18, 1999, in the small village of Gonagala, located in the Ampara District. Over 50 men, women and children were inhumany hacked to death in the middle of the night by the terrorists who stormed the village.

The Gonagala massacre is one of several such attacks carried out by the terrorists.. However Gonagala murders gained notoriety because, unlike previous attacks, most of the terrorists who took part in it were women. According to survivors, there was a significant presence of female terrorists among the 75 terrorists who took part in the killings

The Tamilnation.org website reported on 26rg Jul, 2000 that the human rights record of Sri Lanka under President Chandrika Kumaratunga is increasingly coming under international scrutiny. Criticism against President and her government it said was swelling in frequency and tempo and Richard Howitt and Robert Evans, two MEPs who visited Sri Lanka recently, without mincing words accused the Sri Lankan government “of not doing enough to protect civilians caught up in the war against Tamil Tiger rebels and is covering up their suffering.” They compared the plight of the displaced Tamil people in and around the conflict zone with those of Sierra Leone and Chechnya the website said.  It said earlier the two MEPs visited the border town of Vavuniya, where they met Tamil civilians displaced by fighting in the northern Jaffna peninsula and Vanni. The two MEPs directed their harshest criticism against the government for implementing an oppressive press-censorship policy and of not allowing essential supplies, including baby food and medicine, to be distributed in areas controlled by the Tamil Tigers.

Writing further the website said that Mr.Evans, a member of the Parliament’s South Asia delegation, said that President Kumaratunga’s proposals to end the civil war would not work unless she sat down and negotiated with the Tamil Tigers.
The website also stated that before the diplomatic and political ripples raised by the MEPs could die down came hot on the heels a report by Amnesty International (AI). It said that in a hard hitting report dated July 20, 2000, the human rights watchdog AI slammed the Sri Lankan government for continued violation of the rights of the Tamil detainees arrested under the emergency regulations.
The Amnesty International said that it has received reports of at least 540 cases of “disappearance” since the change of government in 1994.

The promulgation of the new emergency regulations was presented by the government as part of a package of measures to put the country on a “war footing”. Other measures included the suspension of all non-essential development activities for three months and the acquisition of sophisticated arms from abroad.

The government also depreciated the rupee as much as 6%, the first in 22 years, and the Central Bank linked the one-stroke depreciation to the ballooning defence expenditure.

The sharp depreciation followed a 14 percent drop in Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves to 1.40 billion dollars at the end of May compared to 1.64 billion dollars at the end of the previous year. There was a further drain on the foreign reserves as the government announced in May that it hoped to spend an additional 175 million dollars to buy urgently needed military hardware. Consequently, the defence budget ballooned to 880 million dollars up from the original estimate of about 706 million dollars.

Military analysts pointed out that when Chandrika assumed office large military bases including Thalladi, Elephant Pass, Mulaitivu, Pooneryn and Kilinochchi were under army control. These were defended with valuable sacrifices of Hasalaka Gamini and the like. However, when she left office these bases had fallen and the terrorists controlled not only the North but the East as well.  They said that the fall of Elephant Pass in 2000 is the worst military debacle of Sri Lanka and the region.

They also pointed that the terrorists killed Denzil Kobbekaduwa, Lalith Athulathmudali, Premadasa and Gamini Dissanayake in rapid succession and if not for these killings she would be unknown to most.

The military analysts said that the fall of Mulaitivu camp (1996) was a turning point in the war. On 19th July the Mulaitivu camp fell killing 1,200 soldiers. They were not given instructions to attack. The air force and the navy were not sent in offensive missions to eliminate the Tamil Tigers.

They pointed out that to cover up the debacle, Chandrika administration launched Operation Sathjaya and later Operation Jayasikuru and both operations failed to weaken the LTTE to the point of surrender. The operation was then reversed causing the fall of previously held army camps as well.  The militry analysts emphasized that it is absurd for Chandrika to claim any credit for war victory.

Having got defeated militarily Chandrika sought to pass her political package as a solution to the problem and allowed the Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) to be signed under her watch which is termed the greatest betrayal of modern times.

The Indian website Radiff.com rported on 23rd May, 2000 that upon a request made by Sri Lankan President Mrs. Chandrika Kumaratunga the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government is seriouslay considering evacuation of a large number of trapped Lankan troops amounting to more than 40,000 from Jaffna peninsula to the Indian shores.  But Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi has insisted that the Sri Lankan forces should not be brought to Tamil Nadu shores even for a temporary passage as it could incite political passions in the state.

The report said that a[i]senior Indian Navy official at the Southern Command said evacuating all the trapped Sri Lankan troops, their military equipment, arms and ammunition and hundreds of stranded civilians to safer places will be a mammoth operation. “If it happens it will be the biggest such operation the Indian forces have ever undertaken. It is impossible to airlift all of them. So the most possible route is through the sea, and since Karunanidhi has insisted that the Sri Lankan troops should not be brought to the Tamil Nadu state, it is likely that they could be taken to the Indian Navy and Air Force bases in Bangalore, Thiruvananthapuram, Mangalore and Cochin.

The website also stated that Sri Lankan Chief of Defence Staff General Rohan de Silva Daluvatte and the country’s Deputy External Affairs Minister Lakshman Kiriella held high-level talks with Indian officials in Bangalore and discussed the logistics of the proposed Indian operation in Jaffna.

(To be continued)

කොමිෂන් සමග අවසන් වන මැසිවිල්ල -සිංහල අපට පමණයි මේ රැවටිල්ල

January 11th, 2018

මතුගම සෙනෙවිරුවන්

මහ බැංකුවේ භාණ්ඩාගාර බිල්පත් අරභයා කරන ලද වංචා සෙවීමට පත් කරන ලද ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව දැන් නිකුත්ව ඇත.එහි අන්තර්ගතය තුළින් පැහැදිලි වන්නේ විශාල වංචාවක්  සිදුව පවතින බවයි. නමුත් මෙම කරුණු සම්බන්ධයෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරාය කළ ප්‍රකාශයේ පරමාර්ථය වී තිබුණේ මෙම වංචාවට  අගමැතිවරයා ගේ සම්බන්ධයක් නොමැති බව දැක්වීමටයි.2016 දී මෙම වංචාව ගැන රැස්කළ කෝප් කමිටු වාර්තාව නිකුත් වීමට තිබියදී ද ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසිරුවා හැර අගමැතිවරයා එම චෝදනාවෙන් ගලවා ගත් ආකාරය කවුරුත් දනී. එම කරුණු ඔහු විසින් ඊට පසු මාධ්‍ය වලටද ප්‍රකාශ කොට තිබුණි .මේ වන විට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට පවා මෙම වාර්තාව ඉදිරිපත් නොකර මගහරිනු ලබන්නේ සත්‍ය වශයෙන්ම අගමැතිවරයා වංචාවට සම්බන්ධ බැවින් යැයි පැහැදිලිය. මේ අනුව මෙම කොමිෂමෙන් පසු චූදිතයන් අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනීම සහ මුදල් අය කර ගැනීම සිදු විය හැකි දැයි සැකයක් පවතී.

       ලංකාවට නිදහස ලැබීමටත් ප්‍රථම 1833 දී පත් කරන ලද කෝල්බෘක් කැමරන් කොමිෂන් සභාව මගින් අතීතයේදී තිබූ රාජ්‍ය ක්‍රමය සහ ඉඩම් භුක්ති ක්‍රම සියල්ල කණපිට හැරවෙන පරිදි නිර්දේශ ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී.ඉන්පසු  1948 දී ලංකාවට නිදහස ලබා දීමෙන් අනතුරුව පත් වූ රජයයන් විසින් විශේෂ කරුණු අරභයා පත් කරන ලද කමිටු මෙන්ම කොමිෂන් සභා ද රාශියක්ද විය.කොමිෂන් සභා ගණනින් පණහකට ආසන්න විය.කාරක සභා ද රාශියක් විය. එයින් පළමු වැන්න 1948 දී පත් කරන ලද කොඩි කාරක සභාවයි. ලංකාවට අවශ්‍ය ජාතික කොඩිය කුමක්දැයි එහිදී තීරණ කරන ලදී. එස්.ඩබ්.ආර්.ඩී. බණ්ඩාරනායක ජෝන් කොතලාවල ජේ.ආර් ජයවර්ධන ලලිත රාජපක්ෂ ටී.බී.ජයා සෙනරත් පරණවිතාන ජී.ජි. පොන්නම්බලම් සහ එස් නඩේසන් යන අය සාභාගි වූ මෙම කමිටුව මගින් සිංහල රජකීය කොඩිය විකෘති කොට පටි දෙකක් ගැසීමට නිර්දේශ කල බව 1951 දී නිකුත් කළ එම වාර්තාව කියැවූ කවුරුත් දනිති.

        මින් අනතුරුව 1958 දී පත් කල බුද්ධ ශාසන කොමිෂන් සභාව දැක්විය හැකිය.මෙම විෂයට මුලින්ම තොරතුරු පරීක්ෂණ සභාවක් පත් කරන ලද්දේ  සමස්ත ලංකා බෞද්ධ සම්මේලනය විසිනි.පසුව එම වාර්තාවේ නිර්දේශ තවදුරටත් විමර්ශනය කරලීම පිණිස අග්‍රාණ්ඩුකාර ඔලිවර් ගුණතිලක විසින් කොමිෂන් සභාවක් ද පත් කරන ලදී. එම වාර්තාව නිකුත් කරන ලද්දේ 1959 වසරේදීය.  බුද්ධ ශාසනය අරභයා නිර්දේශ රාශියක් එහි ඇතුලත් විය. එයින් ප්‍රකාශ වූ සත්‍යය ක්‍රියාවට නැගීමට බණ්ඩාරනායක රජය සහ ඉක්බිතිව පත් වූ රජයයන් කටයුතු නොකළහ. කෙසේ වෙතත් සිරිමා බණ්ඩාරනායක රජය යටතේ උඩරට ගැමි පුනරුත්ථාපන කොමිෂන් සභාව පත් කරන ලදී. එහි නිර්දේශ මත යම් කිසි ප්‍රමාණයකින් සිරිමා ශාස්ත්‍රී ගිවිසුම ක්‍රියාත්මක විය. නමුත් කෝපි වගාවට තේ වගාවට යටවූ උඩරට කඳුකරයේ ඉඩම් වලින් කොටසක් හෝ නැවත සිංහලයන්ට ලබා ගැණීමට හැකි වූයේ නුවර එළිය මහජන මන්ත්‍රීවරයාව සිටි විලියම් ප්‍රනාන්දු මහතා ගේ ඉදිරිපත් වීමෙනි.එසේම ලංකාවේ ගම් නම් පිලිබඳ සෙයා බැලීමට සිරිමා බණ්ඩාරනාය මහත්මිය යටතේ 1962 දී පත් කරන ලද කමිටුවට ඒ.එම්.එස්.පෙරේරා නන්දදේව විජේසේකර සී.ඊ.ගොඩකුඹුර  මහාචාර්ය තෙන්නකෝන් විමලානන්ද එම් ශ්‍රී කාන්තා සහ පීසී.ඒ.පී. ද සිල්වා යන අය ඇතුලත් වූ අතර එයට වැඩි වශයෙන් සාක්ෂි සපයා ඇත්තේ දෙමළ මුස්ලිම් ජනතාවයි.සිංහල පිරිස සාක්ෂි සැපයීමේදී කුල පදනමින් නම් කරන ලද ගම් පමණක් වෙනස් කිරීමට ඉල්ලීම් ලැබුණ අතර මුස්ලිම් අය කම්මල්පිටිය නම් ග්‍රාමය ජෙෆ්රි ටවුන් ලෙසට නම් කිරීම සඳහා ප්‍රථම වරට අවසර ඉල්වන ලදහ. නමුත් සිංහලයන් කිසිවෙක් උතුරු නැගෙනහිර පවතින ඓතිහාසික නාමයන්හි විකෘතිය නිවරදි  කර ගැනීමට උනන්දුවක් නොදැක්වූ බව කිව යුතුය.

        1964 වර්ෂයේ දී පත් කරන ලද පෙළපත් වලට අදාල පුරවැසිකම් දීම පිළබඳ කමිටුවේ(Report of the Committee Citizenship by Descent ) සාමාජිකයන් වූයේ  ඩී.සී.ආර්. ගුණවර්ධන එම්. එස්. අලිෆ් සහ ඊ.ආර්.එස්.ආර්.කුමාරස්වාමි යන තිදෙනය. මේ යුගයේදී කොමිටි හෝ කොමිෂන් පත් කිරීමේදී සිංහල දෙමළ සහ මුස්ලිම් යන කොටස් තුනම නියෝජනය වන පරිදි සාමාජිකයන් පත් කරලීම සිදු විය. මේ කමිටුවේ නිර්දේශ මත ඉන්දීය දෙමළ පෙළපත් වලටද මරක්කල ජන කොටස් වලටද පුරවැසි කම් දීමට පමණක් නොව චන්ද බලය හිමිකර දීමටද නිර්දේශ විය. එහෙත් එම කමිටුවේ සිටි සිංහල නියෝජිතයා අතින් සිංහලයන්ට සාපේක්ෂකව කිසිම ප්‍රකාශයක් සිදුව නොමැත. පුර වැසි කම් දීමේදී විදේශිකයන් විසින් පිළිපැදිය යුතු දේශීය ආචාර ධර්ම හෝ ස්වභාවකරණයට ලක්වීමට පැනවිය යුතු නීති රීති කිසිවක් එහි අන්තර්ගත නොවුණි. එහි ප්‍රතිඵලය වූයේ වතු වගාවට ලංකාවට පැමිණි දෙමළ වතු කම්කරුවන් බහුතරයකට පුරවැසි කම් ලැබීම සහ සිංහල දේශපාලනඥයන් හට එම චන්ද වලින් බලපෑම් කිරීමට සහ කේවල් කිරීමට ඉඩ ලැබීමයි.අද පවතින උඩරට වතුකරයේ ඉන්දීය දෙමළ ප්‍රශ්ණය සහ දෙමළ දේශපාලනඥයන් ගේ නැගී ඒම සිදුව පවතින්නේ සිංහලයන් ගේ දුර්වල කමින් උපරිම ප්‍රයෝජනය ලබමිනි.

         සෝල්බරි ව්‍යවස්ථාව යටතේ ලංකාවේ මැතිවරණයන්ට අදාලව පළමු සීමා නිර්ණ කොමිෂම 1953  සිට 1968 දක්වා ක්‍රියා කළහ.ඉන් අනතුරුව දෙවනි සීමා නිර්ණ කොමිසමේ වාර්තාව 1976 දී නිකුත් විය.එහි සාමාජිකයන් වූයේ නොයෙල් තිත්තවැල්ල සුබයිර් ෆාරුක් සහ මානික්කම් සිවනාදන්ය.මෙහි නිර්දේශ අනුව ලංකාවේ පළාත් නවය තව දුරටත් මැතිවරණ කොට්ඨාශ වලට වෙන්කරන ලදහ. නමුත් ඒවා සිදු කරන ලද්දේ දෙමළ මුස්ලිම් යන දෙපිරිසට වාසි අත්වන පරිදිය.මැතිවරණ කොට්ඨාශයක ජනතාව 95000 කට සීමා කරන ලදහ. එහෙත් යාපනය හා තදාසන්න දිස්ත්‍රික්කයන්හි මැතිවරණ සිතියම සකස් කරන ලද්දේ එම නිර්ණායක පදනම් කොට නොවෙති.

       චන්ද්‍රිකා බණ්ඩාරනායක ජනාධිපතිවරිය කාලයේදී පත් කරන ලද බුද්ධ ශාසන කොමිෂන් වාර්තාව ද ඉතා වැදගත් ලියවිල්ලකි. එහි නිර්දේශයන්හි  පොතුවිල් මුහුදු මහා විහාරය කූරගල ආදී සිද්ධස්ථානයන් ට අත්ව ඇති ඉරණම විස්තර විය. එමෙන්ම බුද්ධ ශාසනයේ චිරස්ථිතිය අරභයා රජය විසින් කළ යුතු ක්‍රියාකාරකම් රාශියක්ද නිර්දේශ විය.2008 සම්බුද්ධත්ව ජයන්ති සැමරුම සහ ඊට සමගාමී කරුණු වලට පසුබිම සකස් කරන  ලද්දේ මෙම වාර්තාව විසිනි. නමුත් සම්බුද්ධත්ව ජයන්තියට පිළිවෙතින් පෙළ ගැසෙමු යයි බැනර් සහ දැන්වීම පුවරු ප්‍රදර්ශනය කිරීමට එය සීමා විය. රජ්‍ය ආයතන වල පිරිවෙන් වල කළ යුතු වැඩ වලට වඩා ගොඩනැගිලි තැනීම සීඝ්‍ර විය.

         මේ ආකාරයට කොමිෂන් සභා රාශියක් වරින් වර නොයෙකුත් කරුණු විමර්ශනය කරලීමට පත් කරන ලද අතර ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ මූලික අයිතිවාසිකම් පරිඡේදය ආවරණය වන ලෙස මානව හිමිකම් කොමිෂන් සභාවක් ද ස්ථාපනය කරන ලදී. එම කොමිෂන් සභාවේ අරක්ගත් බහුතර පිරිස දෙමළ ජාතිවාදීන්ට හිතවත් නීතිඥයන් ගෙන් සහ සභාපති වරුන් ගෙන් සමන්විත. විය. එම කොමිෂමට නීතිමය බලයක් ලබා දෙන ලද්දේ 2016 දී 19 වන ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව යටතේය. මානව හිමකම් කොමිෂන් සභාව මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව අල්ලස් සහ දූෂණ විමර්ශන කොමිෂන් සභාව රාජ්‍ය භාෂා කොමිෂන් සභාව පොලිස් කොමිෂන් සභාව සහ සීමා නිර්ණ කොමිෂන් සභාව මෙලෙස නීතිය මගින් බලයක් පැරුණු ආයතන බවට පත් විය.

        මැතිවරණ කොමසාරිස් ජනරාල් වරයෙකු යටතේ පාලනය වූ මැතිවරණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව මැතිවරණ කොමිෂම යටතට පත් කර එහි සභාපති වරයා ලෙස හිටපු කොමසාරිස් මහින්ද දේශප්‍රිය මහතා පත් කරන ලද්දේ යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවයි. ඔහුගේ හැසිරීම සහ වාග් විලාෂය ජනතාවගේ කුතුහලය අවුස්සන්ක් වුවද මැතිවරණ කොමිසම  බලයට පත්ව සිටින රජයේ අතකොලුවක් ලෙස ක්‍රියා කරයි. එයට උදාහරණ රාශියක් ඉදිරිපත් කළ හැකිය.රාජ්‍ය භාෂා කොමිෂන් සභාව පවතින්නේ ජාතික සහජීවනය සංවාද සහ සහරාජ්‍ය භාෂා අමාත්‍යංශය යටතේය. එහි කාර්ය භාරයන් අතර රාජ්‍ය භාෂා ප්‍රතිපත්තිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම මූලික වෙයි. නමුත් එම ආයතනය යාපනයේ සහ මඩකලපුවේ වසන දෙමළ ජනතාවගේ ප්‍රශ්න ගැන මෙන්ම උඩරට වතුකරයේ ජනතාවගේ භාෂා අයිතිය ගැන වැඩ කටයුතු කිරීමට මූලකත්වය ගෙන කටයුතු කරනවා ඇරුණු කොට සිංහල භාෂාව රජ්‍ය භාෂවක් ලෙසට ශක්තිමත් කිරීමට අවස්ථාවක් නොදේ.එයට හේතුව එහි ප්‍රධාන අමාත්‍යවරයාව සිට ජාතිවාදී ලෙස කටයුතු කරන මනෝ ගනේෂන් මහතාගේ ක්‍රියාකලාපයයි.

         මෙම කොඹිෂන් සභාවන් අතර වඩාත්ම වැදගත් කොමිෂන් සභාවක් ලෙස වර්තමාන සීමා නිර්ණ කොමිෂම හඳුන්වා දිය හැකිය. එහි සභාපති වරයා වන්නේ කේ .තවලිංගම් මහතාය. දෙවැන්නා මහාචාර්ය හිස්බුල්ලා මහතාය. තෙවැන්නිය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා ගේ ඥාතියෙකු වන අනිලා ඩයස් බණ්ඩාරනායක මහත්මියයි. ඇය උතුර සහ නැගනහිර දෙමළ ජනතාවගේ අයිතීන් වෙනුවෙන් වැඩ කළ රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධාන ක්‍රියා කාරිණයකි. තවලිංගම් මහතා මිනුම් දෝරු දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සේවය කළ කාලයේ ප්‍රභාකරන් හිතවාදියෙකු විය.  මහාචාර්ය හිස්බුල්ලා පේරාදෙණිය විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ සිටි විශ්‍රාමික මහාචාර්ය වරයෙකි. මුස්ලිම් අන්තවාදය පෝෂණය කිරීමට ඔහුගෙන් දායකත්වය ලැබෙනවාට සැක නැත.දැනටමත් ඉදිරි පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණයට අදාල මැතිවරණ කොට්ඨාශ තීරණය කිරීම ඔවුන් සතු කාර්ය භාරයයි.මෙම ලේඛකයා එයට සාක්ෂි දීමට ගිය අවස්ථාවේදී එහි සාමාජිකයන් විසින් දිගින් දිගටම බාධාවන් එල්ල කරන ලදී. ඒ මගින් මගින් ගම්‍ය වන්නේ සිංහලයන් ගේ යෝජනා වලට සවන් දීමට කැමැත්තක් නොමැති බවයි. ඒ නයින් බලන කල්හි මෙ කොමිෂන් සියල්ල ක්‍රියාත්මක වන්නේ  දෙමළ  ජාතිවාදි සහ මුස්ලිම් අන්තවාදී අන්තයක සිට බව පැහැදිලිය.ඒ අතර බැඳුම් කර කොමිසමෙන් අගමැතිවරයා නිර්දෝෂ කිරීමට උත්සාහ දැරීම තුළ අපට තේරුම් යන්නේ මෙකී අන්තවාදය භාවිතා කර රට කැබලි වලට කැඩීමට අගමැතිවරයා බලයේ සිටීම අත්‍යවශ්‍ය බවයි. කොමිෂන් වාර්තාව පුස්සක් වන්නේ එම පසුබිම තුළයි.

මතුගම සෙනෙවිරුවන්

Constitution bars Sirisena from getting extra year in office, CPA tells Supreme Court

January 11th, 2018

By   newsin.asia Courtesy newsin.asia on 

Colombo, January 12 (newsin.asia): The Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) told the Sri Lankan Supreme Court on Thursday that the 19 th. Amendment of the constitution makes it very clear that the term of the President, including the incumbent Maithripa Sirisena, is five years and not six.

CPA’s position on the 19 th. Amendment to the Constitution is very clear. The Amendment makes express provision that the President’s term is limited to five years: Article 30(2) of the Constitution says that the President of the Republic shall be elected by the People, and shall hold office for a term of five years,” the think tank said in its intervening submission.

Further, the Amendment’s transitional provisions explicitly state that this five-year term limit applies equally to the sitting President. Section 49(1)(b) of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution says, for the avoidance of doubt it is hereby declared that … the persons holding office respectively, as the President and Prime Minister on the day preceding April 22, 2015 shall continue to hold such office after such date, subject to the provisions of the Constitution as amended by this Act.”

Constitution bars Sirisena from getting extra year in office, CPA tells Supreme Court

Furthermore, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution clearly states which parts of the amendment do not apply to President Sirisena as the incumbent President and the reduction of the term of office is not such a provision (Section 51 of the 19th Amendment).”

Accordingly, President Sirisena’s term must be understood as being for five years from 9 January 2015 (i.e. until 9 January 2020) and not for six years (i.e. until 9 January 2021),” the CPA said.

Sirisena Should Not Go Back On Word

The CPA said in its submission that in the lead up to the enactment of the 19th Amendment in 2015, President Sirisena himself noted that the reduced Presidential term of five years will apply to himself.

CPA hopes the President is mindful of his earlier assertions.”

CPA also urges constitutional and political actors to act in a manner that upholds the spirit of the 19th Amendment. CPA appreciates that the Chief Justice and the other judges of the Supreme Court facilitated and permitted interventions from members of the public to make representations in this instance.”

CPA notes that there have been previous occasions wherein only the Attorney General was heard during similar proceedings. CPA has consistently stated that the process in Article 129 (1) of the Constitution relating to a reference could lead to a lack of transparency. As such CPA respectfully calls on the Supreme Court to ensure that the ensuing Advisory Opinion is made public.”

President’s Query

On 8 January President Sirisena had sought an opinion from the Supreme Court under Article 129(1) of the Constitution asking: Whether, in terms of Provisions of the Constitution, I, as the person elected and succeeding to the office of President and having assumed such office in terms of Article 32(1) of the Constitution on January 9 2015, have any impediment to continue in the office of President for a period of six years from January 9 2015, the date on which the result of my election to the office of President was declared.”

The case was listed for January 11,  and the Supreme Court’s opinion is to be communicated to the President on January 14.

(The image at the top shows Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena)

Toilets everywhere in Sri Lanka are in appalling conditions …

January 11th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Toilets at railway stations………….

BY  RUFUS R.

I am enjoying travel in trains these days and it is amazing that their fare is half of bus fares. Unfortunately, most of these trains are covered with filth in and out. Plenty of tourists travel by train and the impression they get of our trains, railway stations and toilets could be very negative. They are a good source of our income, but the Minister of Transport must do something soon to treat the visitors well, that they wouldn’t discourage their friends who plan to come to this beautiful country.I took time to see some toilets at our railway stations with the idea of seeing how well they facilitate our train passengers. The station master at Ja Ela railway station must be ashamed of how he keeps the men’s toilet padlocked. It may need some repairs but the male passengers who buy the tickets and enter the platform have their right to relieve themselves when they want. The ladies’ toilet is open, and men too, go in there to find only one is usable if they choose to go ahead in spite of overwhelming stench. Several stations have their toilets padlocked showing no concern for their dependent passengers. When asked, one worker said that is to prevent outsiders coming to use the station toilet. Every railway station has a number of workers who are idling all the time. These salaried employees could maintain the cleanliness of station toilets, ladies and gents rest rooms, as well as the platforms. Two stations were neat and pleasing to the eye with flower pots. With walls newly painted and maintained, they no doubt bring praise to the station staff.One interesting thing I must mention about a railway station toilet. I went into the toilet and came out with a disgusting anger. Whole day no one had dashed some water in there and the urine smell was unbearable. Right there at the entrance, a bearded man was asleep on a bench. He had a plate by his head and I saw a man who came out before me placing a ten rupee coin in the plate. So I thought that was the toilet cleaner who had not done his work for the day. As I gave him a hard pat to ask why he had not cleaned the toilet, he opened his eyes and said that if you don’t want to pay, never mind you may go. His reply puzzled me and he had several 20 rupee bills and ten rupee coins in his plate. I went to the station master to report this money collector and he said they have not assigned a man to do that job and charge the toilet users. Further, he said they have asked the canteen staff to take care of the toilet. What this stranger had done was sleeping at the entrance of the toilet with a plate knowing that gullible passengers place money in his plate.

When I read the article today in the Island ,I also whole heartedly agree that not only in Railway stations ,but everywhere in the island toilets are in appalling conditions ,I also wrote a snippet in the papers about how bad toilets are in Sigiriya

Quote
Sigiriya toilets out of order; tourists asked to go to jungle
Posted on February 24th, 2017

Dr Sarath Obeysekera 

I wrote about the Sad State of Sigiriya few months back .I mentioned the issues faced by not only tourists and our locals who are second class citizens” !Security and officers of and the officers of  the department of archaeology hang around the gates looking for foreigners who want to cheat the system by trying visit with tickets for locals which is much cheaper  and do not inquire about the sanitary conditions of the premises..During my visit I noted that touts selling artefacts at three –four time the price just before the entrance to Tourist car park where shops are located .When I confronted one and ask them why they rip off foreigners and even locals one local thud came charging at me .SigirIya management is a disgrace and the minister in charge should visit Sigiriya incognito and see it himself and may opt commit suicide

Quote below is what I wrote to Lanka web  last November

SAD STATE OF SIGIRIYA

We Just returned from one of the World Heritage Sites in Sri Lanka today. Despite the fact that I should not be climbing up the lion rock due to my age  ,I had a lion’s heart to overcome my own reluctance and fear  and I concurred.Rock was full of foreigners of European ,Chinese and many other nationalities who are charged 4350 Rs where I was charged only  80 Rs   ,Of course for 80 Rs I was not supposed to bring my car to the gate hence we had to hire three wheeler paying 300 Rs to get to the Local” gate after  a de tour .I did not get the wash room facility like in foreign sectors ( which reminded me of apartheid in South Africa ) where an attendant was standing at the door ( interestingly there was a notice board that it is free to use) ,who expected the foreigner (who discharged his refuse” on our land  ) is rewarded with a toilet paper half-roll when you enter and he keeps smiling .

I knew all these as I came down running to have pee and found that with all the precautions, toilet was smelling .I did not mind because local toilet is worse and stinks.If your remember I wrote about toilets in the museum in Pollonnaruwa .there were notice boards indicating for locals” and for foreigners”

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2017/02/24/go-to-the-jungle/

I noted that so called guides  carrying an umbrella pestering locals as well as foreigners to use them and charging exorbitant prices. I also observed that  quite elderly men and women  were trying hard  to climb up with the help of guides who lose consciousness after hearing about  their fee after they descend.

We should ask UNESCO to provide a First Aid with some ambulance type device to bring down and person who can get ill due to steep climbing .Even at half way point there are no officers or para medics to attend to any emergency .Some stairs were badly rusting and wobbly and yet Department of Archaeology turns blind eye to defective structures. At the entry point they could have given some printed    material about the rock as the guides who speak foreign languages were uttering nonsense

Department guards look at local people who may be fair in colour with suspicion and my wife who was wearing a foreign attire was almost stopped until she blabbered in our language

On the way down scrupulous traders were milking money out of ignorant foreigners by charging 10 times for their artefacts and destroy the Sri Lankan name .

Department should privatize the whole Sigiriya Rock to a  party who may  run the establishment in a better  way so that they spend more money for the welfare of locals as well as foreigners .

THEY SHOULD ISSUE  AN EOI (EXPRESSION OF INTEREST )  ( OR USE SWISS CHALLENEG !)  AND ISSUE RFP (REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ) AND THEN HAND OVER THE MAANGEMENT TO A FOREIGN PARTY AT A ROCK” BOTTOM PRICE AS USULLUALLY  THEY DO .THEN THEY CAN GIVE THE JOB OF RUNNING SIGIRIYA TO A SOMEONE IN THEIR OWN DYNASTY !

Unquote,

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Yesterday I landed in Colombo Airport and rushed to the toilet just by the exit near customs with my luggage ,which was entrusted to the porter .When you enter the toilet you can feel the repugnant  smell of urine and excreta in the toilet which is often used not only by Sri Lankans but many foreigners .There was  a toilet cleaner in the premises who kept asking money from visitors leaving the toilet after using it.One foreigner said loudly ,I do not have money with me to pay you.

Airport is charging every passenger through the air ticket a certain amount as airport taxes .I wonder what the  management in the airport are doing  to improve the situation ?

If you decide to travel by car or by bus for site seeing or visiting ancient cities in Sri Lanka ,you find many posh looking eating places with fancy names and a buffet laid in style which looks appetizing. Obviously the people who patronize the restaurant intends to go to wash rooms to clean yourself before consuming the food .

None of the eating placed have a proper wash room which does not smell of urine and have proper washing facililties or toilet papers .

We see slogans where Sri Lankans are asked to keep the country clean from rubbish ,but we need a have a new slogan to say Let us keep our toilets Clean

Dr Sarath Obeyskera

Thuggery and obscenity: the order of the day – Parliament degenerates into madness

January 11th, 2018

BY Gagani Weerakoon and Methmalie Dissanayake Courtesy Ceylon Today

The hallowed Chamber of Parliament once again turned into a rowdy arena with Members throwing punches, hurling objects and invective as the proceedings into the much hyped debate into the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry, which investigated and inquired into the issuance of Treasury Bonds was taken up yesterday.

Some MPs were injured when Joint Opposition (JO) Members invaded the well of the House carrying placards and shouting ‘Hora (thief)’ when Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe rose to make a statement.

The fracas erupted when Opposition members protested against Speaker Karu Jayasuriya and the Government for failing to table the report of the controversial Treasury Bonds scam in Parliament as promised at the Party Leaders’ meeting held on 9 January.

When the House commenced sittings, Speaker Jayasuriya announced that the Presidential Secretariat had informed him that the Bond Commission report and 34 reports of Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate and Inquire into Serious Acts of Fraud, Corruption and Abuse of Power, State Resources and Privileges (PRECIFAC) would be made available to Parliament after one more week. The Secretary to the President had also informed that copies of the Bonds Commission report had been referred to the Attorney General, the Central Bank and the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption.

Leader of the House, Minister Lakshman Kiriella: “The JO and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party asked for a debate. We are ready for the debate. There is no report. Without getting ready they demand a debate.”

Chief Opposition Whip Anura Kumara Dissanayake: “We have been demanding that the Bonds Commission report be tabled. At the last Party Leaders’ meeting we came to an agreement that the Speaker would get the report tabled and thereafter we would hold a Party Leaders’ meeting to decide on the debate. A summary of the report had been publicized by the President in his address to the nation. In his summary, the President said that there was a loss of Rs 11,000 million to the country, out of which a loss of Rs 8,500 million was to public funds. In addition, public funds were used for the conduct of the affairs of the Commission. These details should not be hidden or only limited to the knowledge of a few. The Parliament should be informed of these. We have asked for these reports under the provisions of the Right to Information Act.”

JO Parliamentary Group Leader Dinesh Gunawardena: We had requested the President to give us a copy of the report. The Secretary to the President has said that he would a give a copy to the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna. The JO has 53 MPs. We asked at the Party Leaders’ meeting for the tabling of these reports in Parliament. This is a serious question. The Government says it does not have the report. It was promised at the Party Leaders’ meeting on 9 January that the first item on the cards for Parliament yesterday (10) would be the tabling of the report. Now, the officials cannot override the promise given by the Speaker and ask for more time. Former Speakers Anura Bandaranaike and Chamal Rajapaksa have established that Parliament is above other institutions, including the Judiciary. Now it is up to you as the Speaker to use your powers. You have the powers to summon any public official and ask for any public document. The entire country is waiting to see the report. You can summon the Secretary to the President and ask him to come with the report.”

Prime Minister Wickremesinghe: “MP Dinesh Gunawardena called and asked me to convene Parliament. It is not easy to call the MPs for an urgent sitting as they are campaigning in their villages for the forthcoming elections. When I convene Parliament, as per the provisions of the Standing Order Number 14, I have to reveal the reasons for convening. Then, I said that I would convene Parliament to make a statement, and to convene Parliament on 10 January. It is upto the President to decide whether he would make the reports public. Before presenting the report to the House, it should be presented to the Cabinet.”

MP Bandula Gunawardena: “Parliament has been convened to debate the Bonds Commission report and not to listen to a statement from the Prime Minister.”

Prime Minister: You could blame me more after this statement. But I can make this statement. We have enough numbers in the House.”

Opposition Leader R. Sampanthan: “The reports should be tabled at its earliest possible time. This is a matter pertaining to public funds and the Parliament has responsibility over public finances. This should be debated. We should investigate frauds and find the truth. There was a time when we did not know what happened to similar Commission reports. I thank the President and the Prime Minister for this report. The public should not be given the impression that we are shying away from the Commission report or from the debate.”

Prime Minister: “We need to talk about the follow up action to be taken on the Committee on Public Enterprises report, on Treasury Bonds issuances. The Speaker could decide when the debate on the Bonds Commission report is to be held when he receives the report. That is why we convened the Parliament yesterday.”

MP Vasudeva Nanayakkara: “When we convened the Parliament, the objective for the special sittings had been mentioned as debating the Bonds Commission report. The report is not on our tables. We cannot let the Prime Minister make a statement on a report we have not seen.”

Prime Minister: “Special sittings are convened for a special purpose. I need to make this statement. I will make it and thereafter you could debate or state your opinion. I did not know whether the report would be made available or not. I was asked to convene the Parliament, I convened it.”

Speaker: “The Presidential Secretariat has promised to give us the reports next week. I do not want to see a conflict between the President and the Parliament.”

Dissanayake: “We too demanded that the Parliament be summoned. We asked for the special sittings to debate the Bonds Commission report and not to listen to the Prime Minister’s speech. The President says that he would give the reports in a week. We cannot accept that. Some of reports had been handed over to the President in 2016. You are delaying the reports targeting the elections. Summon the Secretary to the President to the Parliament and ask him as to why he cannot give us a copy. When the Bonds Commission report was given to the President, there were already three copies. Ask for one of them for the Parliament.”

Speaker: “One has been sent to the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).”

Dissanayake: “We should have been given it before it was given to the CIABOC. Since when does the CIABOC come above the Parliament?”

Tamil National Alliance MP M.A. Sumanthiran: The report should have been sent to the Parliament before it had been directed to other institutions. We call on the Speaker to instruct the Secretary to the President to come to the Parliament at 1.30 p.m. on this day (yesterday – 10 January) with a copy of the report.”

Prime Minister: The President is in Anuradhapura today (yesterday – 10 January). Many Ministers too are there, in Anuradhapura.”

Dinesh Gunawardena: “The Speaker has powers to summon any public official. Call the relevant officials and table the report.”

Prime Minister: “At the end of this session, we could hold another Party Leaders’ meeting. I too will attend it.”

At this juncture, the Prime Minister started to read out his statement, but the JO MPs shouted slogans and held placards above their heads protesting against the Prime Minister making the statement. The Prime Minister continued while the JO MPs came down to the Well of the House shouting at him. JO MPs led by Dinesh Gunawardena marched towards the Mace. Sergeant-at-Arms, Anil Parakrama Samarasekera and his Deputy Kushan Jayaratne, held the Mace in the bracket when the Opposition MPs tried to grab it. While the Prime Minister kept reading out his statement, United National Party MPs too came down to the Well. JO MPs shouted ‘Kavuda Hora, Ranil Hora (Who is the thief, Ranil is the thief)’ while the UNP Members shouted ‘Mahinda Hora (Mahinda is the thief)’, the latter a reference to former President and current MP Mahinda Rajapaksa. Speaker Jayasuriya then suspended the sittings for 10 minutes at 11.05 a.m.

Though sittings were suspended, the protesting MPs remained in the Well and what followed was a regular donnybrook. The UNP MPs tried to grab the placards from the JO MPs and confronted them. In the melee, UNP MP S.M. Marikkar punched JO MP Gamini Lokuge. Lokuge was then seen slapping Marikkar. MP Kavinda Jayawardena who had been in the front line trying to grab the placards from the JO MPs was seen falling in the Well. Then MPs Marikkar and Minister Dr. Harsha de Silva came to the help of MP Jayawardena who had fainted and took him to the backbenches and sprinkled water on his face. When he could stand up, MP Marikkar helped him out of the Chamber. MP Johnston Fernando was seen punching UNP MPs Chaminda Wijesiri and Hector Appuhamy. When the MPs exchanged blows shouting vulgar words, MP Prasanna Ranaweera was seen being dragged away by his colleagues. Ranaweera’s shirt was torn by UNP MP Chaminda Wijesiri. MP Rohini Wijeratne was also caught in the melee and was seen kicked by other MPs. MP Prasanna Ranatunga was seen hitting MP Chaminda Wijesiri and running out of the place while the latter chased him. MP Ranjith Zoysa too was punched and kicked by the UNP MPs. Deputy Minister Ranjan Ramanayake however did not participate in the brawl as he was seen standing up, capturing the brawl on his mobile phone. MP Marikkar, who came from behind hit MP Gamini Lokuge again. Lokuge fell on his chair. Some MPs were seen throwing books at their colleagues. As the bloody brawl continued, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe too made advances but was prevented by Ministers Sagala Ratnayake and Vajira Abeywardena.

When the House resumed sittings around 11.50 a.m., the Speaker announced that he had received a letter from the President and then read it to the House. He said that he would meet the Attorney General in the evening. He said that he would let the Prime Minister deliver his speech again for the latter had been disturbed on the earlier occasion.

MP Anura Kumara Dissanayake protested saying that they would boycott the Party Leaders’ meeting where one thing is promised and the Speaker allows another thing to happen in the chamber, adding that it was easy to sort out the matters in the Chamber before the eyes of everybody. “There was bloodshed in this House as the Speaker failed to stick to his word. We won’t be here to listen to the Premier,” he said and walked out if the Chamber with his MPs.

When the Prime Minister got up to deliver his speech, JO MPs booed him and walked out of the Chamber.

Whither yahapalanaya?

January 11th, 2018

Editorial Courtesy The Island


A five-member bench of the Supreme Court (SC), in response to a question posed by President Maithripala Sirisena, is deliberating whether he can serve a six-year term. The 19th Amendment to the Constitution has reduced the presidential term to five years. We refrain from commenting on it out of deference to the apex court.

Co-Cabinet Spokesman Rajitha Senaratne has told the media the President is right in having consulted the SC to clear some doubts about the duration of his term. One cannot but agree with the minister on this score. The President can seek opinions from the SC. But, the issue at hand is different from other constitutional ambiguities in that the public was given to understand that President Sirisena had voluntarily reduced his term by one year. He was expected to leave office after serving a five-year term. He earned admiration of the general public and some political commentators went so far as to call the President a modern-day Sirisangabo (a king who ‘donated’ his head to a stranger according to legend). President used to boast that he was the only head of state in the world to have his term shortened. The yahapalana camp has been flaunting his ‘sacrifice’ to boost its image. But, owing to his question to the Supreme Court at issue he has come to be seen as yet another politician who can’t bring himself to let go of power.

Interestingly, President Sirisena, who has consulted the Supreme Court on an issue concerning his own term, did not care to do so in 2015 as for the controversy over the appointment of the then Chief Justice Mohan Peiris, whom he simply deemed to have never been the head of the judiciary. He declared that the post of the Chief Justice had never fallen vacant because the impeachment of Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake was wrong. (He himself voted for impeaching her!) He also arbitrarily reinstated Dr. Bandaranayake as the Chief Justice. Besides, immediately after being sworn in as the President he sacked the then Prime Minister and appointed Ranil Wickremesinghe, who had only about 40 seats in Parliament, to that post. Now, he is worrying about his own term!

A monk has filed an intervention paper in the SC in favour of the President serving a six-year term. This is an interesting development. His intervention came within hours of the President’s question to the Supreme Court being reported. We don’t believe the monk is blessed with precognition. He must have had prior knowledge of the President’s decision to consult the SC.

The unfolding drama reminds us of the fate that befell President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga in 2005, when the issue of the duration of her second term was referred to the SC. Her lawyers were of the view that she could complete six years, but the apex court was convinced otherwise. She lost one year.

Even if there had been some confusion over the duration of his term, President Sirisena should have decided to hang up his boots after completing his fifth year in keeping with his boastful claim that he had forgone one year without making an issue of it.

What would Ven. Maduluwawe Sobitha Thera, the chief architect of the yahapalana administration, say about the current issue if he was alive today? While speaking at a public function, after the 2015 regime change, the late Thera, obviously frustrated with the tardy progress the constitutional reform process was making, famously asked the President to make the constitutional roti while the griddle was hot. Greedy politicians at the helm of the previous government and their successors who renege on their yahapalana promises are like the two sides of the same roti.

The government has decided to spend a whopping sum of taxpayers’ money to erect a monument in memory of Sobitha Thera. The prelate led a simple life and considered such measures de trop. The best way the politicians who craftily used the Thera to capture power can honour him is to make good on the promises he together with them made to the public.

එතකොට මෛත්‍රී බොරුද කිව්වේ?

January 11th, 2018

BY MALINDA SENEVIRATNE

තමන්ගේ ධූරකාලය අවසන් වන්නේ කවදාද කියල මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන ජනාධිපති තුමා ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයෙන් විමසලා තියෙනවා. ජනාධිපති මාධ්‍ය ඒකකයට අනුව එහෙම විමසලා තියෙන්නේ “ධූරකාලය පිලිබඳ මත දෙකක කතිකාවක් සිවිල් සහ දේශපාලන ක්ෂේත්‍ර වල පවතින නිසා” ලු.  එහෙම කතිකාවක් ගැන ඇහුවමයි!

‘මගේ ධූරකාලය ස්වකැමැත්තෙන් අවුරුදු හයේ සිට පහකට අඩුකරා…..එහෙම අඩු කරපු වෙන නායකයෙක් මේ ලෝකේ කොහෙවත් නැහැ’ වගේ කතා කියද්දී ඔය කියන කතිකාවක් ගැන වත් අපහදිලිතාවයක් ගැන වත් සිරිසේන මහත්තයා කිව්වේ නැහැ.  ‘වැඩේ අහවරයි’ කියන විදිහේ ස්වරයක් තමයි පාවිච්චි කෙරුවේ.

සිරිසේන මහත්තය දේශපාලන වේදිකාවට නැගල කිව්වේ ආයේ ජනාධිපතිවරණයකට ඉදිරිපත් වෙන්නේ නැහැ කියල විතරක් නෙවෙයි විධායක ජනාධිපති ක්‍රමය අහෝසි කරනවා කරනවාමයි කියලයි.  එහෙම කෙරුවේ නැහැ.

ඒ වුනාට 19 වැනි ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයෙන් ජනපති ධූරකාලය අවුරුදු පහකට සීමා කෙරුව. ඒ විතරක් නෙවෙයි, ඔය ධූරකාලය පිළිබඳව පැහැදිලි කිරීමකුත් සංශෝධනයට එකතු කෙරුව.  ධූරකාලයට අදාලව ලියල තියෙන්නේ 2015 අප්‍රේල් 22 දා ට පෙර දිනයේ ජනාධිපති ධූරයේ සිටින පුද්ගලයා එම ධූරයේ ම සිටින අතර (ධූරකාලය ට) ඔහු හෝ ඇය අදාළ ව 19වැනි සංශෝධනයේ කරුණු වලට යටත් වන බවයි. 

තත්ත්වය මෙසේ තිබිය දී නීතිපති මහත්තයා කියන්නේ සිරිසේන ජනපති තුමා ධූරයට පැමිණියේ 19වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සම්මත වීමට පෙර බැවින් එහි විධිවිධාන (ධූරකාලය පිළිබඳව) ඔහුට අදාළ නොවන බවයි. 

ලොක්කා පත් කල සොක්කා ලොක්ක ගේ කැමැත්තට සැලූට් දාන එක සාමාන්‍ය දෙයක්. විශේෂයෙන් ම සොක්කා ගේ උසස්වීම් තියෙන්නේ ලොක්කගේ අතේ නිසා.  නීතිපති ල අගවිනිසුරු වෙන රටක් මේක.  දූෂිත ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයක් තියෙන රටක් මේක.  ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය විධායකයට අවනත වෙන රටක් මේක. 

බලය එපා, බලතල එපා, ඥාති සංග්‍රහය එපා කිය කිය බලයට බලතලවට ලොබ බඳින, ඥාතීන්ට හිතවතුන්ට සංග්‍රහ කරන රටක් මේක.  නීතියට අවනත වෙමි කියල නීති කඩන, නීතිය නවන, නීතිය වටේ වංගු ගහන නායකයින් ඉන්න රටක් මේක.  ප්‍රේමදාස ජේආර් වුන, චන්ද්‍රිකා ප්‍රේමදාස වුන, මහින්ද චන්ද්‍රිකා වුන, මෛත්‍රී මහින්ද වුන රටක් මේක. 

ඒ නිසා මෛත්‍රිපාල බොරු ද කිව්වේ කියල අහන්න අවශ්‍ය නැහැ.  අහන්න ඕන මෛත්‍රිපාල බොරු නොකිය ඉඳියි ද කියලයි. 

‘මං අවුරුදු පහෙන් ගෙදර යනවා..හයක් එපා..’ ජනාධිපති කලින් කී කතාව උපරිමාධිකරණයේ ඇසේ… ජනපතිට හයක් ඉල්ලන් ආ අය තක්කු මුක්කු වේ..

January 11th, 2018

 lanka C news

තමන්ගේ අදහස වන්නේ විධායක ජනාධිපතිවරයාට හිමි වසර හයක කාලය වසර හතරක් දක්වා අඩු කිරීමට වුවත් ව්‍යවස්ථා විශේෂඥයින්ගේ කරුණු පෙන්වා දීම මත එය වසර පහක් බලට පත් කිරීම තීරණය කල බවත් තමන් වසර පහකින් ගෙදර යන බවත් ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා විසින් කරන ලද ප‍්‍රකාශයක් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය හමුවේ ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබීය.

තම ධුර කාලය වසර හයක්ද පහක්දැයි නිගමනට කරන ලෙස ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයෙන් කරන ලද ඉල්ලීමක් අනුව විවිධ පාර්ශව ඒ සදහා අද දිනයේ කරුණු දැක්වීය.

ඒතාබද්ද විපක්‍ෂය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි නීතීඥ මහෝහරද සිල්වා මහතා කියා සිටියේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා එසේ කියා ඇති නිසා බලහතක්කාරයෙන් ඔහුට තවත් වසරක කාලයක් ලබා දීම ඔහුට අනවශ්‍ය පීඩනයක් ඇති කිරීමක් විය හැකි බවයි.

ඔහු එසේ කියා සිටියේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාට වසර හයක් සිය ධුරයෙ සිටිය හැකි යයි නීතිපතිවරයා විසින් කරුණු දැක්වීමෙන් පසුය.

මනෝහරද සිල්වා මහතාගේ එම ප‍්‍රකාශයත් සමග අධිකරණ ශාලාවේ සිටි සියළු දෙනාට සිනා නැගෙනු පෙනිනි.

2015 ජනවාරි 26 වන දින පොලොන්නරුව තෝපාවැව ක‍්‍රිඩාංගනයේදී පැවති උත්සවයක් අමතමින් ජනාධිපතිවයා විධායක ජනාධිපතිවරයකුට තියෙන අසීමිත බලතල ඉවත් කරලා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට වැඩි බලයක් දීලා කටයුතු කිරීමේ කටයුතු මේ දිනවල කර ගෙන යනවා. මම පෙරේදා ඒ සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගී වෙලා කිව්වා – මගේ නිල කාලයට තියෙනවා අවුරුදු හයක්. මේක අවුරුදු හතරක් කරමුයි කියලා හිටන්. ඒත් ව්‍යවස්ථා විශේෂඥ කමිටුව සහ දේශපාලන නායකයන් අවුරුදු හතරට කැමති වුනේ නැහැ. අවුරුදු හතරකට සැරයක් මැතිවරණයකට යාම රටට හොඳ නැහැ කියල හිටන්. මගේ දැඩි ඉල්ලීම උඩ අවුරුදු හය පහ කරන්න ඒ ගොල්ලෝ කැමති වුනා. දැන් (අවුරුදු) හයෙන් එකක් ඒගොල්ලෝ අඩු කරලා තියෙනවා, පහෙන් ගෙදර යන්න ඒක මගේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය” ලෙස කියා ඇති බවද ඔහු අධිකරණය හමුවේ කියා සිටියේය.

ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ එම ප‍්‍රකාශය පහත වීඩියෝවේද වෙයි.

Hiru News 7.00 PM January 26, 2015 | Part 1

මුග්ධ භාවය

January 11th, 2018

වෛද්‍ය රුවන් එම් ජයතුංග

මධ්‍යතන යුගයේදී යුරෝපයේ දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ  බයිබලය පමණි. මේ නිසා යුරෝපය අන්ධකාරයේ ගැලී ගියේය​.  නව පුනරුදය තෙක් යුරෝපය පුරා නූගත්කම පැතිර ගියේය​. යුරෝපයට එළිය ලැබුනේ නව පුනරුදයත් සමගය​. ඉන් පසු ඔවුන් ක්‍රිස්තියානි ආගම වෙනුවට විද්‍යාව හරහා දැණුම ලබා ගැනීම ආරම්භ කලේය​. 
යුරෝපය අන්ධකාරයේ ගැලී සිටින විට අරාබිය දැණුම අතින් පොහොසත් විය​. ගණිතය , රසායණ විද්‍යාව , වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාව තාරකා විද්‍යාව අතින් අරාබිය යුරෝපය පසු කරමින් යන්නට විය​. එහෙත් අරාබිය  දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස  ඉස්ලාම් ආගම භාවිතා කිරීමත් සමගම අරාබියේ ඥාණ පුනරුදය ඇණ හිටියේය​. 
කලක් ඉන්දියාව දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ හින්දු ආගමය​.  එහි ප්‍රතිඑලය වූයේ ඒක පුද්ගල වැසිකිලි වලට වඩා ඉන්දියාවේ තිබෙන දේවාල ප්‍රමාණය වැඩිවීමය​. 
ලංකාව දැනුම ලබා ගන්නා එක ම ප්‍රභවය ලෙස භාවිත කළේ බුද්ධාගම පමණි . මේ නිසා ලංකාව විද්‍යාව සහ තාක්‍ෂණය අතින් යුරෝපයට පරාජය විය​.  
ඕනෑම ආගමක් අනවශ්‍ය ලෙස සෑම විශයක් වෙතම ආදේශ කිරීමට යාම භයානකය​. ප්‍රතිඑලය මුග්ධ භාවයයි 

Sri Lanka : Darusman Report

January 11th, 2018

Asoka Weerasinghe Kings Grove Crescent . Gloucester . Ontario . Canada

1 January 2018

Garnett Genuis, MP

Conservative MP for Sherwood Park-Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta

Cc. Matt DeCourcey, Liberal MP

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister  of Foreign Affairs

Dear Garnett Genuis:

May the year ahead be filled with Happiness, Love and Joy and hopefully will bring

some sane conclusions about Sri Lanka in the Canadian parliament  when commenting on the alleged criminality of her soldiers that brought the end of Tamil Tiger terrorism that hemorrhaged that pretty island for 27 years for the want of their mono-ethnic, racist, separate Tamil state, Eelam  That too to be  33 % of the northern and eastern real estate bordered by 66%  of the coastline for 12.6% of the Tamil population (census 1981). This percentage was reduced to 4.8% by 2011 (World populations) after the foreign countries floodgates were opened for the Tamils after the July 1983 riots who claimed that they were  discriminated and persecuted by the majority Sinhalese population of the island. They are in the scores of 1000s as refugees in Canada, UK, USA, France, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Australia,  to name a few.  With such exodus of Tamils searching for greener pastures, the Tamil population couldn’t be held at 12.6%, any more.  No way.

I would like you to consider this letter as a continuation of my response of 2 December 2017, to your Statement in Parliament on Sri Lanka’s Tamil community in Canada.

My point Number 7 of that letter was on Human Rights in Sri Lanka, and your statement to Parliament on November 20th, 2017 said – the Liberals promised to support justice and reconciliation, to address the terrible crimes committed at the end of the civil war.”

I dealt with that statement of yours truthfully in detail, and concluded that there were cartloads of buckets of Hogwash, and the lack of honesty makes most of the Canadian parliamentarians look like a bunch of fools having sold their souls for Tamils votes so that they could sit on a chair in the parliament’s chamber during daily Question Period telling us that they are working hard and have done their homework on Sri Lanka’s violation of Human Rights.  What Tosh! What poppycock!

If harassing the Sri Lankan soldiers for eliminating the internationally sponsored (including Canada) Tamil Tiger terrorism is based on the UN’s Darusman Report, then let me make some comments on this Report for you to understand where I am coming from, and what my concerns are.  Which I hope would be your concerns too.

The Darusman Report:  When former South Korean Secretary-General of the UN Ban Ki-Moon was reduced to be a puppet by his Western pay-masters and being ordered to go on the warpath to hurt Sri Lanka, he appointed a Special panel of three to advise him on Sri Lanka’s alleged war crimes, the very issue that was dealt in June 2009 at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva where members decided in a 29 to 12 votes not to intervene in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs.  Yet,  Ban Ki-Moon exceeded his powers prescribed in Chapter XV of the UN Charter where his authority was detailed clearly in Articles 97 and 98.

Although Ban Ki-Moon is South Korean I believe he was competent enough in his English to read and understand the UN Charter written in English.  But this South Korean failed in that endeavour to comprehend.

So what did Ban Ki-Moon, the former UN Secretary-General do to satisfy his Western paymasters?  He appointed three panelists two of whom were viscerally prejudiced against the Sri Lanka Government and were suspect.  Yet, he still went ahead foolishly with this panel which ended up with the Darusman Report.  What a

shady fool he was, who was up to a lot of mischief.

  • Garnett Genuis, here are some facts that you should consider about the Canadian Liberal and Conservative Governments Bible on Sri Lanka – the Darusman Report, which is used to harass the Sri Lankan Government’s alleged human rights criminality during the last five months of the 27 year long Tamil Tiger Terrorists separatist war which ended militarily on 19 May 2009
  1. The Three Panel Report should not be termed UN Panel Report, but should be recognized as the Moon Panel Report”, as the composition of the panel of the so called ‘experts’ is from outside the UN organization. As such it violates the authority under which the Secretary-General of the  UN is expected to function under Article 100, Clause 1 of the UN Charter.  This is the Charter that provides guidance to the Secretary-General to maintain his/her strict neutrality of the UN.
  2. b. Ban Ki-Moon, the Secretary-General of the UN did clearly violate Article 2 (7) of the UN Charter which prohibits intervention in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, thus this UN Panel Report known as the Darusman Report and released for international consumption is a good reason for the Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon to have been impeached.
  3. The Panel that Ban Ki-Moon had appointed was headed by Marzuki Darusman, a former Attorney General of Indonesia who was also a member of the International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) invited to observe the working of Sri Lanka’s Presidential Commission looking into alleged serious violations of human rights in March 2008.

Darusman left the Commision in a huff disagreeing with the Sri Lanka Government and yet signed the IIGEP Report without paying a single visit to Sri Lanka to ascertain himself the actual ground situation.   Ummmm…….interesting, isn’t it!    Obviously, Ban Ki-Moon may have known that Marzuki had some telepathic power

which absolved him of  being a dishonest Humbug. Then his signature on the Report entitled him to accept a handsome consultant fee.  That is how the UN’s questionable cookie crumbles

d   The second Panelist Steven Ratner was an adviser to a Non-Governmental Organization known as Human Rights Watch (HRW) that has been very critical of Sri Lanka from the very inception of the Eelam War.  Ratner co-authored a book with Jason Adams titled ‘Accountability of Human Rights: Atrocities in international law beyond the Nuremberg legacy’ where in page 123 he has stated that the convention on banning apartheid should be invoked in relations to countries such as Sri Lanka.”  That statement itself should have disqualified him to be a panelist.  But then Ban Ki-Moon had to satisfy his western pay masters, and so he decided to go ahead with Steven Ratner as a panelist, also to gain another opportunity to Moon at Sri Lanka one more time.   Shish….what power these UN characters have to go after a pound of flesh of a puny island, notwithstanding that her soldiers by eliminating the Tamil Tiger terrorists gave back her 21 million peoples their right-to life which had been hijacked by the Tamil Tiger terrorists for 27 bloody-years. Garnett, I hope you are following my thread,  There is honesty in every word I said so far  Steven Ratner also had written elsewhere that the Tamils represented by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (aka Tamil Tigers) are an oppressed minority.  More than his ignorance this statement revealed his bias when he calls the most privileged” minority, the  Tamils (12.6%) during the British Rule for 131 years and many years after Independence in February 4, 1948, as the oppressed minority”, compared to the wronged” majority, the Sinhalese (74%).  What a crock of codswallop!

Well, Garnett, let’s be honest, what expert knowledge, can Steven Ratner give Ban Ki-Moon when he comes with this kind of ill-informed punditry.  This statement should have disqualified Steven Ratner instantly.

e,   And the third panellist, the South African lawyer Yasmin Sooka, was heavily dependent on EU funds to be impartial.  She was also a close associate of the South African-Tamil Navi Pillay who was then a patron of the Sooka Foundation, and also responsible for the failed resolution that was brought against Sri Lanka before the UNHCR in May 2009.

  1. With such credentials none of the three panelists would qualify to be an honest non-partisan member of any panel dealing with the alleged human rights violations in Sri Lanka as they carry with them full baggages of anti-Sri Lanka attitudes. It clearly showed that Ban Ki-Moon was up to a lot of mischief wanting to hang Sri Lanka cold by denying the island the much deserved prosperity of reconstruction, rejuvenation and reconciliation since the end of the 27 year war on 19 May, 2009, thus Ban Ki-Moon should not have held that all important office of neutrality as Secretary-General in the UN, and had a good reason to be impeached.
  2. g. Let us not ignore the fact that, in Canada’s anti-Sri Lanka Bible – the Darusman Report, where the authors Darusman, Ratner and Sooka insists that they have no investigating power and that they are not embarking on any investigation at all.   So why is the Canadian Government on such vengeful hoopla, such crap and after a pound of flesh of every Sri Lankan Government soldier who gave back to 21 million people their paramount human right, their right-to-life after eliminating the Tamil Tiger terrorists who had hijacked that human right for 27-bloody years.  Are you able to respond to that, Garnett.  Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau able to respond to that too other than telling me – Hey, Asoka, come on Man, you know that we are soliciting every Tamil vote in the Greater Toronto Area to come to us Liberals. And that is why we have accepted the Darusman Report with all the lies and warts.”  Right, Garnett!
  3. h. In the Executive Summary of the Darusman Report they say, The panel’s mandate however does not extend to fact finding or investigation.” In confirmation of this, the page 3 of this Report says, The panel has not conducted fact finding as that term is understood in United Nations practice.”  Again on page 6 of the report the Darusman, Ratner, Sooka panel says, The panel and the United Nations officials repeatedly made clear to the government the scope of its mandate as an advisory panel to the Secretary-General including that it was not engaged in any investigation.”

And again the Darusman, Ratner, Sooka panel stresses on page 14 of the Report that the panel’s mandate precludes fact finding or investigation.”

  1. Garnett, here is a bit of cunning to get at Sri Lanka and nail her onto a burning cross  which is not kosher in my eyes.  And I say POX to all these nasty players who are after a pound of flesh of Sri Lanka.

If Canada is so concerned  about the alleged numbers (40,000) of deaths during the last 5 months of the 27 year long war, why is that Sri Lanka does not fit into the American and British formula that such deaths happen to be collateral damage and that they are sorry.  Surely what is good for the goose should be good for the gander.  Tell my why Garnett!

The panelists Darusman, Ratner and Sooka, I believe, had taken the assignment with preconditioned minds wanting to destroy the progress of the development and reconciliation among the ethnic communities of this sovereign island state and play Russian roulette with the lives of 21 million peoples when their cunning becomes so transparent when on page 15 of the Report says :”The panel has chosen to present the allegations it finds credible, in a narrative account.”  And again on the same page they say, this account should not be taken as proven facts.”  This contradiction proves the fact the panelists Darusman, Ratner and Sooka wrote a  Halloween  horror story of fiction hoping that it would be a bestseller

among the gullibles like the Canadian Government and her Parliamentarians.  But it turned out to be a sick attempt by these three Musketeer- voyeurs in Halloween masks, and this book of fiction is nothing to get excited about and will no way win the Pulitzer Prize nor the Booker Prize.

  1. Now let me comment on the point of contention of this discussion – the alleged 40,000 Tamilian deaths during the last five months of the Eelam IV War, as mentioned as the Holy Truth, and nothing but the Truth” as endorsed by the then Secretary-General of the UN, Ban Ki-Moon who had the habit of Mooning at my Motherland, Sri Lanka.

I concluded my letter to you of 2 December 2017 thus:

7.   The whole exercise based on the Darusman Report which is used as the Bible to nail Sri Lanka’s armed forces, the only national army in the world that whipped the most ruthless terrorists in the world, the Tamil Tigers, says that their credible sources are protected by the UN confidentiality Clause until 2031.  And there lies the gutless, spineless HUMBUGS.  What! what is their problem?

When 2031 comes around Ban Ki-Moon who appointed the panel of experts will be 87 years old, Marzuki Darusman will be 86.  Steven R. Ratner and Yasmin Sooka, hopefully are young enough to be still around in 2031.

The chances are that the Sri Lankan Army personnel whose dignity was assaulted by the UNHRC will get a chance to challenge them in court to prove that the UN’s panel of experts had done a con job, a botched up job on them to try and haul them to an International Criminal Court of Law to charge them on Human Rights violations to satisfy the Tamil separatists who have bought their voices with votes and funds.

That will be when the fireworks start, if it did happen, Garnett.

Stay tuned as UKs Lord Naseby’s well researched assertion that the Vanni death toll maximum is 7,000 to 8,000, and not 40,000 as reported in the Darusman Report by Ban Ki-Moon which will be hard for the UN to dismiss his unchallengeable position as his revelations are based on sound diplomatic dispatches sent from Colombo by the British military Attache Lt. Colonel Anton Gash to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Stay tuned Garnett, it is going to be interesting as there will be a lot of rotten eggs slapped on so many embarrassed International-caucasian lobster-red faces…….”

Garnett, Stay tuned” I said.  Much has happened since 2nd December 2017.  Lord Michael Naseby has presented in the British Parliament the most damning evidence, that his government lied and concealed the truth about what really happened during the last five months of the  27 year long Tamil Eelam war in north and east of Sri Lanka when the Tamil Tiger terrorists were whipped and wiped out militarily on the 19th May 2009.

Lord Naseby, in his speech to the British parliament paid scant respect to the guesstimate number of 40,000 civilians killed during the last five months  of the Tamil Tiger terrorist Eelam war. Several sources he cited estimated the number to be in the range of 7000 to 8000.   The material evidence that he had elicited and

received with much effort from the Commissioner of Information under UK’s Freedom of Information Act, were the dispatches to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office from the UK’s own Defence Attache in Colombo, Lt.Col. Anton Gash from 1st January  until 19th May 2009.   Although the material received by Lord Naseby were highly redacted he was sure that the UK government knew the ground realities which contradicted the negative propaganda that had been extracted from the questionable and suspect Darusman Report presented by the UN.

He spoke to the British parliamentarians in search of support from the sane among them.  It was in  September 2011 that the British Labour Party MP Siobhan McDonough (Mitcham and Morden) told the House of Commons that 100,000 Tamil civilians perished during January and May 2009 during military operations.  I suspected that she threw the number at her colleagues in support of her Sri Lankan- Tamil  constituents, the Subramaniams, the Nadarajahs, the Sellathambis, the Pakiasorthy’s who had promised her their votes and those of other Tamils too.   This bizarre number prompted me to ask her in a letter to tell me what she had smoked when she woke up that morning..  Not a word from her.

Lord Naseby said that he hoped that as a result of the debate in Parliament on Sri Lanka, the UK will recognize the truth that no one in the Sri Lankan Government ever wanted to kill Tamil civilians.  This fact is evidence and shows proof, when by 19 May 2009, the Sri Lankan soldiers rescued 295,873 Tamil civilians from the clutches of the Tamil Tigers who used them as a human shield and herded them like unwashed cattle from the west coast to the east coast under the scorching Jaffna sun for 30  months.  Not only that Garnett, the Sri Lankan soldiers were part of the army of cooks who prepared a million hearty breakfasts, lunches and dinners  daily to feed and sustain the Tamil refugees housed in temporary camps.  No one seems to want to talk of these amazing humanitarian efforts of love and compassion by the majority Sinhalese towards the minority Tamils.  Not a single Canadian parliamentarian, not a single person of the Foreign Ministry nor members with halos over their heads of the concerned Human Rights Organizations have spoken of these acts of humanitarianism.   Why…why not, Garnett?  There lies the cruel, disingenuous and  hypocritical Canadian-Humbugs who want to get at my Motherland, Sri Lanka, who are resting their bleeding hearts in nests of ballots for the Tamil separatist cause.  But, Oh, No, when Quebec wanted to separate from Canada, the anglophones sang in unison -” Hell, No…We won’t let you Go.”  Remember!  And that is the rub Garnett.

Garnett, we all got choices in life…and you have arrived at one of them.   Either to accept the Darusman Report’s, 40,000 Tamil civilians killed during the last five months of the Tamil separatist War in 2009, or rubbish the Darusman Report and go with what Lord Naseby’s well established number somewhere between 7000 and 8000.    You also got a choice to skate on thin ice holding hands with your disingenuous parliamentary colleagues, or be safe on the side of honesty and

keep away from the treacherous lying ethnic-politics thin-ice.

Which ever the number that your honest dice fall on, you should clear your conscience by asking – show me the bodies…show me the skeletons so you could reconcile and accept the touted number of 40,000.

Sincerely,

Asoka Weerasinghe

(a former card-carrying Conservative -C11255047, and a Sustaining Donor)

 

 

මගේ කාලයේ බැඳුම්කර නිකුතු ගැන ඕනෑම පරීක්‌ෂණයකට මා සූදානම් – හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් අභියෝග කරයි

January 10th, 2018

ශ්‍යාම් නුවන් ගනේවත්ත උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

තමාගේ අධිපති ධුර කාලයට අදාළව ඕනෑම පරීක්‌ෂණයකට තමා සුදානම් යෑයි හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා පවසයි .මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපතිවරයා ඉකුත් ජනවාරි 08 වැනිදා කොළඹ රාමඩා හෝටලයේදී මාධ්‍ය හමුවක්‌ද පවත්වා බැඳුම්කර ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව ගැන ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සිදු කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයට ප්‍රතිචාර දැක්‌වීය. ජනාධිපතිවරයා සිය විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ එක්‌ තැනක zමෙම කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාවලින් හෙළිවන කරුණුවලට සමාන තත්ත්වය 2008 වසරේ සිට සිදුව ඇති බව කොමිෂන් සභාවේ අදහසයි.

fea8 2

එම කටයුතු සොයා බැලීම සඳහා එනම් 2008 වසරේ සිට සිදුවූ දූෂණ සහ අක්‍රමිකතා පිළිබඳව මුලින්ම කළ යුත්තේ වෝහාරික විගණනයක්‌ බවත් එය ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව විසින් කළ යුතු අතර, ඉන් පසු ලැබෙන තොරතුරු මත නීතිමය ක්‍රියාමාර්ගවලට යා යුතු බවත් කොමිසම දන්වා සිටිනවා.z යනුවෙන් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. මේ කාරණය ඇතුළු බැඳුම්කර ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව ගැන හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා දැක්‌වූ අදහස්‌ මෙසේය.

fea8 3ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා 2018 ජනවාරි 03 දින කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රටකාශයෙන් බැඳුම්කර කොල්ලය පිළිබඳව 2016 ජූනි මස අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගේ ධූර කාල සීමාව අවසන් වන විටත් රටේ ජනතාව දැන සිටි දේවලට අමතරව අලුත් යමක්‌ කියවුණේa නැහැ. අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතා දින 487 ක්‌ම තම ධුරයේ රාජකාරි කළා. ඉන් දින 91ක්‌ම ගෙවුනේ 2016 මාර්තු මස සිදුවූ දෙවන බැඳුමකර මංකොල්ලයටද පසුවය. මුළු රටම මේ සිද්ධිය ගැන කතා කරද්දීද, රටේ ආර්ථිකයට විශාල හානියක්‌ වී ඇති බව විද්වතුන් හා දේශපාලනඥයන් පෙන්වා දෙද්දීද ජනාධිපතිවරයා හෝ අගමැතිවරයා අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන්ගේ සම්පූර්ණ ධුර කාලය අවසන් වනතුරුම ඔහුව මහ බැංකු අධිපති ධුරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීමට ක්‍රියාකළේ නැහැ .

පළමු මහ බැංකු බැඳුම්කර සිද්ධියට දිනකට පෙර රවි කරුණානයක, මලික්‌ සමරවික්‍රම, කබිර් හෂීම් යන මහත්වරු මහ බැංකුවට ගොස්‌ අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් සමඟ කළ සාකච්ඡාව ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ අඩංගු වූයේත් නැහැ. බැඳුම්කර මගඩියේ ඉතා වැදගත් සාක්‌ෂියක්‌ විය යුතුව තිබුණේ ලංකා බැංකුව විසින් රුපියල් බිලියන 10 ක පමණ මුදලක්‌ ප්‍රාථමික ගනුදෙනුකරුවෙකුට දුන්නේ කෙසේද සහ එසේ දුන්නේ කාගේ උපදෙස්‌ මතද යන්නයි. ජනාධිපතිවරයා මේ ගැන ද කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ කළේ නැහැ .

දෙවන බැඳුම්කර කොල්ලය වන රුපියල් බිලියන 40 කට ආසන්න ගනුදෙනුව සඳහා මහ බැංකුව විසින්ම මුල්‍ය ක්‍ෂේaත්‍රයේ සමාගම් වල හදිසි අවස්‌ථා සඳහා මුදල් නිකුත් කරන දෛනික ද්‍රවශීලතා පහසුකම භාවිතා කරමින් අදාළ සමාගමට මුදල් ලබා දී තිබීම ගැන ජනාධිපතිවරයා කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ කළේ නැහැ.

දෙවන බැඳුම්කර සිද්ධියේදී මුදල් ඇමතිවරයා විසින් රාජ්‍ය බැංකු තුනක ප්‍රධානීන් ගෙන්වා අඩුවෙන් ලංසු තබන්නට උපදෙස්‌ දුන් බව බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම හමුවේ හෙළිවිය. මේ ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශයේ ඇතුළත්ව නැහැ.

µqට්‌ නෝට්‌ කල්ලිය යනුවෙන් ජනතාව හඳුන්වන කෝප් කමිටු සාමාජිකයන් පිරිසක්‌ අවසාන කෝප් කමිටු වාර්තාවට බලපෑම් කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළ හැටි, විගණකාධිපතිට බලපෑම කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළ හැටි, සැකකාර සමාගමේ ප්‍රධානීන් සමඟ දුරකථන සම්බන්ධතා පවත්වාගෙන ගිය හැටි මීට පෙර වාර්තාවී තිබුණා. ඔවුන්ගේ µqට්‌ නොට්‌ සම්බන්ධයෙන් කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරමින් මහ බැංකුව විසින් එවු ලිපියක්‌ අගමැතිවරයාගේ විරෝධය නිසා ඉල්ලා අස්‌කරගත් බවක්‌ද වාර්තා වී තිබුණා. මේ අය ගැන කිසිදු සඳහනක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශය තුළ නැහැ.

බැඳුම්කර මංකොල්ලය නිසා සේවක අර්ථ සාධක අරමුදලට වූ විශාල පාඩුව යම් දුරකට ලඝූ කොට පෙන්වීමක්‌ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ප්‍රකාශයෙන් සිදුවෙලා තිබෙනවා. මීට පෙර වාර්තා වී තිබුණේ එම පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 20ක්‌ පමණ වන බවයි.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා කියනා ආකාරයට කොමිසමේ එක්‌ යෝජනාවක්‌ වනුයේ 2008 -2014 කාලය තුළ මහ බැංකුව බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු කළ ආකාරය පිළිබඳවද පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ කළ යුතු බවයි. ඔහුට අමතක වී ඇත්තේ හිටපු මුදල් ඇමතිවරයා විසින් මුල්‍ය පනතේ 43(2) වගන්තිය යටතේ 2016 අගෝස්‌තු 19 දා කළ ඉල්ලීමක්‌ අනුව රජයේ විගණකාධිපතිවරයා විසින් මේ පිළිබඳ සම්පූර්ණ පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ සිදුකර 2017 ජනවාරි 17 වනදා සිය වාර්තාව බාර දී ඇති බවයි. ජනාධිපතිවරයාට කරන්නට ඉතුරුව තිබෙන්නේ එම වාර්තාව ගෙන්වාගෙන කියවීම පමණයි. මේ වාර්තාව දැනටමත් විගණකාධිපතිවරයාගේ වෙබ් අඩවියේ තිබෙනවා.

2008 -2014 කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන එතරම් අවධානයක්‌ බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම යොමුකළ බවක්‌ පසුගිය කාලයේ මේ පිළිබඳ මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා අධ්‍යයනය කරන්නෙකුට දකින්නට නැහැ. නමුත් 2008 -2014 කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන පදනම් විරහිත ප්‍රකාශයක්‌ 2017 මාර්තු 17 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ කරමින් මහා ඝෝෂාවක්‌ නගමින් අතීතයේදී බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනුවල දූෂණ සිදුවී ඇති බවට මතයක්‌ ජනගත කරන්නට උත්සාහ කළේ 2015 පෙබරවාරි 27 සිදු වූ බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය හෙළිවීම නිසා කුපිතව සිටි අගමැතිවරයා විසින් බව නම් ජනතාවට මතක තිබෙනවා.

රුපියල් බිලියන 2000 ක පමණ අගයකට සිදුවන භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර නිකුතූන් යනු වාර්ෂිකව රජය විසින් කරනු ලබන විශාලතම ගනුදෙනු වන අතර රුපියල් බිලියන 375 ක පමණ අගයකට සිදුවන තෙල් මිලදී ගැනීම්ද එයට දෙවෙනි වෙයි. ඒ නිසා මෙම භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර නිකුතූන් දේශපාලන ඇඟිsලිගැසීම්වලින් තොරවූ ඉතාමත්ම නීත්‍යානුකූල හා පාරදෘෂ්‍ය ක්‍රමයකට අතීතයේ පටන්ම කරගෙන එනු ලැබුවා. 2014 අවසන් වන විට රජයේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර සුරැකුම්පත් හා බැඳුම්කර වගකීම රුපියල් බිලියන 4000කට වැඩි වී තිබූ අතර ඒවායේ පොලී අනුපාතයේ 1% ක ඉහල යැමක්‌ වුව රජයට රුපියල් බිලියන 40 ක පමණ විශාල පාඩුවක්‌ ගෙන දෙන බව මුල්‍ය ක්‌ෂේත්‍ර්‍රයට සම්බන්ධ ඕනෑම අයෙක්‌ දන්නා කරුණක්‌. උදාහරණයක්‌ වශයෙන් මත්තල ගුවන් තොටුපළ විකුණා රජය ඉපැයීමට බලාපොරොත්තු වන මුදල ඉන් අඩක්‌ පමණ වෙනවා. බැඳුම්කර නිකුතුව සඳහා වෙන්දේසි හා Rජු ක්‍රමවල සම්මිශ්‍රණයක්‌ 1997 සිටම මහ බැංකුව අනුගමනය කළේ රජයට අඩුම වියදමකින් මේ කටයුත්ත කළ හැකි ක්‍රමය බව විශේෂඥයන් විසින් සොයාගෙන තිබුණ නිසාය. නමුත් 2015 දී මෙයට ප්‍රථමවරට දේශපාලන ඇඟිලි ගැසීමක්‌ කළ අගමැතිවරයා එතෙක්‌ පැවති ක්‍රමය වෙනස්‌ කරන ලෙස හිටපු මහබැංකු අධිපති අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන්ට Rජුවම උපදෙස්‌ දීම නිසා රටට අති විශාල පාඩුවක්‌ සිදුවුණා. මේ හරහා ඉතිහාසයේ විශාලතම මුල්‍ය වංචාවට මඟපෑදුනා පමණක්‌ නොව එවකට රටේ පැවති පොලී අනුපාතයන් 2% කටත් වඩා ඉහළ යමින් රටේ ආර්ථිකයේ විශාල අර්බුදයකට හේතුසාධක වූ බව ද කිව යුතුයි.

මේ තත්ත්වය රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා හා අගමැතිවරයා අතිශයින් ලැඡ්ජාවට හා අපහසුතාවට පත්කරවන්නක්‌ බව තේරුම් ගැනීම අපහසු නැත. ඒ නිසා සත්‍යය වසන් කිරීම සඳහා ජනතාවගේ අවධානය වෙනතකට යොමුකිරීමේ අරමුණින් අතීතයේ බැඳුම්කර නිකුත් කිරීමේදී දූෂණ සිදුවී යෑයි පදනම් විරහිත චෝදනාවක්‌ කිරීම ගැන පුදුම වන්නට හේතුවක්‌ නැහැ. ඉන් ඔවුන් උත්සාහ කරන්නේ රජය තුළම සිටින සැබෑ හොරුන්ගෙන් ජනතා අවධානය ඉවත් කර ගැනීමටයි.

මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් තවත් හොඳම උදාහරණයක්‌ වන්නේ 2015 දී ඩිව් ගුණසේකර කෝප් කමිටු වාර්තාව සභාගත කිරීම වැළැක්‌වීම සඳහා ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරවමින් හොරුන් ආරක්‌ෂා කළ ආකාරයයි. මේ ආකාරයට හොරුන් ආරක්‌ෂා කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයා ක්‍රියා කිරීමේ ප්‍රතිපලය වූයේ 2016 මාර්තු මස යළිත් වරක්‌ ඊටත් වඩා විශාල බැඳුම්කර මගඩියක්‌ කිරීමට ඔවුන්ට අවස්‌ථාව ලැබීමයි.

හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‌ෂ මහතා දැනටමත් කියා ඇත්තේ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාද කැබිනට්‌ ඇමතිවරයෙකුව සිටි පසුගිය රජය කාලයේ සිදුවූ බැඳුම්කර ගනුදෙනු ගැන පූර්ණ විගණනයක්‌ කිරීමට තමුන් කිසිදු විරුද්ධත්වයක්‌ නැති බවයි. අගමැතිවරයාගේ හා ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ප්‍රකාශවල සත්‍ය අසත්‍යභාවය ඉන් තහවුරු වේවි.

පසුගිය රජය කාලයේ සිදුවූවා යෑයි කියන දූෂණ වංචා ගැන සෙවීමේදී ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන මහතාගේ විශේෂ අවධානය යොමුවිය යුතු කරුණක්‌ වන්නේ ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියාවේ ෙµඩරල් පොලිසිය විසින් විධිමත් පරීක්‌ෂණයකින් පසු සොයාගත්තා යෑයි විදේශ මාධ්‍යවල විශාල ප්‍රචාරයක්‌ දෙනු ලැබු z ස්‌නෝවි මවුන්ටන් ඉංජිනියරිං (Sබදඅහ ඵදමබඒසබි Eබටසබැeරසබට) නමැති සමාගමක්‌ විසින් ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියන් ඩොලර් මිලියන 2.3 ක්‌ වටිනා අපජලය කළමනාකරණ ව්‍යාපෘතියක කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව ලබා ගැනීම සඳහා පසුගිය රජයේ ප්‍රබල ඇමතිවරයෙකුට අල්ලසක්‌ ලබා දුන්නාය යන සිද්ධියයි. මීට අමතරව ලෝක බැංකු ආධාරය යටතේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වූ ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියන් ඩොලර් මිලියන 1.82 ක්‌ වටිනා තවත් ව්‍යාපෘතියක වේල්ලක්‌ ඉදිකිරීම සඳහා දේශපාලන අල්ලසක්‌ ඉල්ලීම පිළිබඳවද ඊ මේල් සාක්‌කි අදාළ සමාගමේ අභ්‍යන්තර පරිගණක පරීක්‌ෂාවේදී හමුවූ බවක්‌ද කියෑවුනි. මේ ඇමතිවරයාගේ නම ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියානු මාධ්‍ය මගින් ප්‍රචාරය කරන ලද නිසා එය රහසක්‌ නොවෙයි. යහපාලනය පිළිබඳ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ඇති විශේෂ කැපවීම සලකා බැලීමේදී ඔස්‌ටේ්‍රලියාවේ zසිඩ්නි මොර්නින් හෙරල්ඩ්z යන පුවත්පතේ පිටු ගණනාවක්‌ පුරා විස්‌තර සහිතව පළවී තිබූ මේ සිද්ධිය ගැනද වහාම රජය විසින් පරීක්‌ෂණයක්‌ ආරම්භ කිරීමෙන් දූෂිතයන් සොයා ඔවුන්ට දඬුවම් දීමට රජයට ඇති දැඩි අවශ්‍යතාව තවදුරටත් ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ තහවුරු වෙනවා.

මේ කරුණු තුළින් ගත හැකි නිගමනය වන්නේ මෙයයි . එනම් ජනාධිපතිවරයා 2018 ජනවාරි 03 දින කළ විශේෂ ප්‍රකාශය හා ඉන් පසුව රජයේ ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ හැසිරීම අධ්‍යයනය කිරීමෙන් පෙනී යන්නේ මේ මහා මුදල් වංචාවට රටට හෙළිදරව් වීම නිසා ඔවුන්ට වන දේශපාලන අවාසිය අවම කරගැනීමේ යම් එකඟතාවකට රජය කරවන දෙපාර්ශ්වය විසින් පැමිණ ඇති බවයි. එමගින් මේ වංචාවේ Rජු හා වක්‍ර කොටස්‌ කරුවන් ලෙස රජයේ ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ ඇති සම්බන්ධතාව යට ගැසීම ඔවුන්ගේ අරමුණ බව පැහැදිලියි.

බැඳුම්කර කොමිසම් වාර්තාව අනුව වරදක්‌ සිදුවී ඇති බව දැනටමත් ඔප්පුවී අවසන්. අපරාධයක්‌ කිරීම, කුමන්ත්‍රණ කිරීම මෙන්ම අපරාධයට ආධාර අනුබල දීමද නීතිය අනුව වරදක්‌. මේ බව දණ්‌ඩ නීති සංග්‍රහයේ පැහැදිලිවම සඳහන් වෙනවා. එසේම සාක්‌ෂි ආඥාපනතට අනුව අපරාධයට පෙර හා පසු සැකකරුවන්ගේ හැසිරීම නඩුවකදී සැලකිල්ලට ගත යුතුයි. බැඳුම්කර මංකොල්ලය සිදුවීමට පෙරත් පසුවත් රජයේ යම් ප්‍රධානීන්ගේ හැසීරීම අනුව ඔවුන් මේ මහා කොල්ලය කිරීම සඳහා කුමන්ත්‍රණය කිරීම, සම්බන්ධවීම හෝ ආධාර අනුබල දීමේ චෝදනා යටතේ යම් දිනක නීතිය හමුවට ගෙන ආ හැකියි .

ශ්‍යාම් නුවන් ගනේවත්ත 

JO’s ‘No-Faith’ motion against PM to Speaker today

January 10th, 2018

BY Kaushi Sendanayake, Ravi Ladduwahetty and W.K. Prasad Manju Courtesy Ceylon Today

Joint Opposition (JO) and Sri Lanka Freedom Party Kandy District Parliamentarian Mahindananda Aluthgamage said that the No Confidence motion, drafted by the JO, against Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe for his alleged involvement in the Central Bank Bonds scam, will be handed over to the Speaker during the special session of Parliament set to convene today (10) morning.

The MP said that the JO had compiled the motion against the Premier, having gained input from several prominent lawyers in the country and expressed confidence of winning the motion against Wickremesinghe, who he described as one of the biggest culprits behind the Bonds scandal.

Aluthgamage added that the no confidence motion will be submitted to Speaker Karu Jayasuriya after all of the JO MPs had signed it this morning.

He noted that all MPs of the legislature will have the opportunity to sign the motion against the Prime Minister which he said will ultimately force the President to remove him from office for the hefty sum that had robbed from the State.

Aluthgamage stressed that the MPs from the United National Party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna, the Tamil National Alliance and other small parties will also have an opportunity to cast their vote in support of the No Confidence Motion brought against the Premier. He warned that if any MP attempts to defeat the motion brought against the Premier, he or she will be exposed before the nation as those who had colluded with the Prime Minister to rob the Central Bank.

Meanwhile, Minister of Higher Education and Highways and Leader of the House, Lakshman Kiriella said that the decision taken by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe to permit a debate in Parliament on the Central Bank Bond scam shows the transparency existing within the Government.

Kiriella added that Premier Wickremesinghe and the United National Party were ready to engage in any kind of debate and would not under any circumstance run away from the debate relating to the Central Bank Bond scam, unlike the previous regime of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Meanwhile, Colombo District United People’s Freedom Alliance and JO MP Bandula Gunawardena, speaking at a press conference yesterday (9), mentioned that the JO Leader in Parliament, Dinesh Gunawardena, had requested President Maithripala Sirisena, via an official letter, to release the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry, which investigated the issuance of Treasury Bonds immediately, according to which contents the No Confidence Motion would be drafted.

Expressing his views at the same press conference held in Colombo, Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna Professor G.L. Peiris said that the Prime Minister should at least resign temporarily from office. He added that the report’s recommendations would not be implemented while he remained in office. He alleged that the Prime Minister is to be blamed for the scandal. He pointed out to the evidence given by the former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran before the Commission that he had clearly received orders from the Premier to change the system in place at the Central Bank, which subsequently led to the whole scam.

The vice of vices!

January 10th, 2018

Laksiri Warnakula  

This kind of a letter may not be fitting in the circumstances that it should only be on a cheerful note instead as a year ended and another just began. Yet fake must never be allowed to mask fact, even at the expense of fashion or tradition!

A lot has been written about it by many concerned citizens. If not talk of the town any more as it has now become such a common sight, it still is a topic very often referred to and spoken about by as many in the country.

Alas, only the leaders don’t seem to take much notice of what the people say. That is if their repertoire of eloquently-delivered sermons cloaked in colourful verbiage, which however is mostly nothing but garbage, rhetoric and blame often peppered with attention-getting obscenities mostly directed at their opponents, is anything to go by.

The corruption and vice have taken our country in a vice-like grip so much so that to any sane person, the situation may seem hopeless and beyond salvation. It has been going on for many decades now and almost all the governments both past and present in spite of their promises did next to nothing to pry open the rotten fist and break themselves and the country free from it.

The tentacles of these vile practises have now spread so far, climbed so high and gone so deep, the escape seems impossible. The murmurs of a soon-to-come thunder-like boom, unless urgent measures are taken, of a society slowly collapsing under its own weight of immorality, can be heard already.

Yes. It is not an exaggeration to say that we are now standing not far from the edge of the abyss of moral doom.

From the smallest village boutique to the largest commercial or any other enterprise or organisation, the governing philosophy of running the business has now become ‘grab while you can’!

And the leaders of the country have been doing a very good job at it and for many decades too, by setting excellent examples as to how most effectively and efficiently this can be done.

Dreams of ‘Sooner or later all will be well’ don’t last long like all other dreams. And we will have to confront the bitter reality one day, only to realise that it’s too late to do anything about it then!

I sincerely hope that the ‘New Year’ will see all conscientious from all walks of life united as one working towards making our beautiful land aglow with moral health too.

Laksiri Warnakula

Heated exchange in Parliament during PM’s address පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටිබැට හුවමාරුවක්

January 10th, 2018

 

COLOMBO MUNICIPALITY GRANTS SRILANKAN JOBS TO INDIANS.

January 10th, 2018

Susantha Wijesinghe

 The Colombo Municipality has granted   a  Parking Fees contract to an INDIAN COMPANY.  Does this Municipality have Authority to give Jobs to Foreigners ? Have they received authority from the Ministry of Local Government to grant Silankan jobs to Foreigners ? I firmly believe that it is serious breach of the Srilankan Constitution.
This contract is for  jobs as  Parking Attendants, and  does not require High Educational Qualifications, and is a low remuneration job.  There are thousands of Boys and Girls of low income Family households who are awaiting for such jobs for a livelihood. Some of them go without a meal for a day. They have no income at all to meet daily needs. What needs to be addressed immediately is as follows.
a)…..Who is the Officer in the Municipality who took the Final decision, to award this contract to an Indian Company, who Charges Rs.50.00 for even TWO MINUTES Parking.
b)…..Has this Officer looked around to see if he could find Emloyees within  the Municipality to handle this Administration of Parking Attendants. If not, Why not ?
c)…..This Officer appears to have  no Organisational Skills, or was he attracted by a quick reward for awarding the contract ? If so, HE should be moved to another lower seat.
d)…..This Job is not a temporary Job, but a Permanent day to day Job, and as such the Municipality should absorb them as Permanent Parking Attendants, with all facilities. This is EMPLOYMENT.
e)…..WE HAVE TO EMPLOY SRILANKANS AND NOT INDIANS.
It is my point of view that this Contract to an Indian Company, should be withdrawn immediately, and local Boys and Girls employed. Iam astonished to know that an INDIAN COMPANY is in Srilanka as an Employment Agent, and it would be interesting to know whether this Company is registered with the Registrar of Companies, and in what Capacity of Services rendered is reflected. If the Company is acting over and above their mandate, they should be asked to leave the Country immediately.
OVER TO THE MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR HIS RESPONSE.

මම කෑගහනකොට ඔය ගොල්ලාත් කෑ ගහන්න‘ ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ ලැජ්ජා නැති ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව!

January 10th, 2018

ගොනු කළේ – කැෆේ සංවිධානයේ විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්.

බැදුම්කර වාර්තාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් රවී කරුණානායක මහතා බිල්ලට දී ජාම බේරා ගැනීම සදහා බැදුම්කර වාර්තාව නොමැතිව පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසියක් පැවැත්වීමට ගොස් අද නැවත වරක් ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පොර පිටියක් බවට පත්වී ඇත.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍ර‍මසිංහ මහතා ‘මහින්ද හොරා යැයි කෑගැසීමත් සමගම’ එජාප මන්ත්‍රී මරික්කාර් හා ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ ගාමිණී ලොකුගේ අතර ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවක් සිදු විය.  එයට චමින්ද විජේසිරි, මරික්කාර්, ජොන්ස්ටන්, හෙක්ටර් අප්පුහාමි ද එක් වූ අතර මන්ත්‍රීනි කවිරත්න මහත්මිය ඇතුළු මන්ත්‍රීවරු එයට මැදිවිය.  සැලසුම් සහගත ලෙස පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසිය කඩාකල්පල් කිරීමට උපදෙස් ලබාදීමෙන් පසුව මෙම ගැටුම ඇති වූ බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිව හදුණා ගත හැකිය.

ගැටුමක් ඇති කර ගැනීමේ මුලික අපේක්ෂාව සහිතව ‘ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවක් ඇති කර ගත් පළමු අවස්ථාව ලෙස’ අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව ඉතිහාසයට එක්වනු ඇති අතර අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයෙකු විසින් ඒ සදහා පූර්ණ අනුග්‍රාහාත්මක ප්‍රවේශයක් දැරූ පළමු අවස්ථාව ලෙස ද එය ඉතිහාසයට එක් වනු ඇත.

කලකට පෙර මා ලියූ ‘ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි කෙළි පුරාණය’ ලිපිය මේ සමග නැවත අමුණා ඇත!

ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි කෙළි පුරාණය

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් අතර පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භයේ, කොරිඩෝවේ, සහ ලොබියේ දී ඇති වූ ගුටි බැට හුවරමාර් පිළිබද කෙටි ඉතිහාසය අද සවස මරදාන සීඑස්ආර් හි පැවති පුවත්පත් සාකච්ඡාවක දී මා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබීය.

මලල්ගොඩ බන්දුතිලක මහතා ට මැතිවරණ පුරාණයේ හෝ කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්ට වාරණ පුරාණය’ කෘතියේ ලියන්නට අවශ්‍ය නොවූ මේ කථාව මා අද ලියා තබන්නේ ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ පළමුවරට සැලසුම් සහගතව, මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකුට එරෙහිව තවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් ප්‍ර‍චණ්ඩත්වය වැපිරවූ පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය වන බැවිනි.

1. පිලිප් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා විසින් සර් ජෝන් කොතලාවල මහතා ට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කොරිඩෝවේ දී සිදු කළ පහරදීම ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් දෙදෙනෙකු අතර සිදු වූ පළමු ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුවයි.

2. 1956 ආණ්ඩුවේ මැද කොළඹ තුන්වන මන්ත්‍රී ඇම්.අස්.තේමිස් සර් ජොන් කොතලාව ට ‘හලෝ ජෝන්’ යැයි ඇමතීමෙන් පසුව ඔහුට පහරදීමට කොතලාවල මහතා ඔහු බිත්තියට හේත්තුකොට ඇත. මේ ගැන බණ්ඩාරනායක මහතා පවසා ඇත්තේ “මමත් ජොන් ට කථා කරන්නේ සර් ජොන් කියාල යි. හලෝ ජොන් කිව්වාම නොගහ ඉදීද?” (කෙසේ නමුත් තමන්ට සර් ජෝන් පහර නොදුන් බව තේමිස් මහතා ඉතා මෑතක දී පුවත්පතකට ප්‍ර‍කාශ කොට තිබුණි)

3. බණ්ඩාරනායක ඝාතනය සම්බන්ධයෙන් වූ විවාදය පැවැත්වෙන අතර තුර ඩඩ්ලි සේනානායක සහ මෛත්‍රීපාල සේනානායක මහතා ට පහරදීමට උත්සහ දැරීය. ඩඩ්ලි සේනානායක මහතා කථා කරමින් සිටින අතර මෛත්‍රීපාල සේනානායක මහතා අසා ඇත්තේ Who? (ඒ කවුද?) කියා ය. නමුත් එය ඩඩ්ලිට ඇසී ඇත්තේ YOU (ඔබ) කියාය. සාමාන්‍යයෙන් ඉතා නිහඩ පුද්ගයෙකු වූ ඩඩ්ලි තමන්ට ඇසුණු දේ වැරදියට වටහා ගැනීමෙන් කෝප වූ නිසා මෙම සිදුවීම සිදුවූ අතර ඉලංගරත්න මහතා වැනි කිහිප දෙනෙකු සිද්ධිය වළවක්වා ගෙන ඇත.

4. 1965-70 ආණ්ඩු සමයේ වලපනේ මන්ත්‍රී ටී.බී.එම්.හේරත් හා රඹුක්කන මන්ත්‍රී සමාජ සේවා අමාත්‍ය අශෝක කරුණාරත්න අතර කුල ප්‍ර‍ශ්ණයක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් වචන හුවමාරුවක් සිදු විය. සභා ගර්භයෙන් පිටතට පැමිණෙන තෙක් රැක සිටි හැඩි දැඩි අශෝක කරුණාරත්න ශරීර ප්‍ර‍මාණයෙන් කුඩා මිනිසෙකු වූ හේරත් මහතාට සැගවෙන තෙක් පන්න පන්නා පහර දුන්නේය.

5. 1974 දී සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය ඩබ්ලිව්. පී.ජී. ආරියදාස මහතාට කර්මාන්ත අමාත්‍ය එස්.කේ.කේ.සුරිආරච්චි විසින් සිදු කළ පහරදීක් සිදු විය. එකම ආණ්ඩුවේ අමත්‍යවරුන් දෙදෙනෙකු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගුටි ඇණගත් පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය යි.

6. වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මහතා ට ගාමිණී ලොකුගේ අතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ දී පහරදෙනු ලැබූවේ වාසුදේව සොන්කෝලය ඔසවාගෙන යාමට උත්සහ දැරීමේ දී ය. 1992-1993 දී එම ප්‍ර‍හාරයට සම්බන්ධ වූ කිහිප දෙනෙකුම වත්මන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරයි.

7. මර්වින් සිල්වා ඇතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් ජාතික හෙළ උරුමය කොළාන්නාවේ සුමංගල හිමියන්ගේ ලිංගික අවයව මිරිකා පහර දෙනු ලැබූවේ ය. පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භය තුළ ඇති වු බලවත්ම ප්‍ර‍චණ්ඩක්‍රියාව එය විය.

8. කෑගල්ල දිස්ත්‍රික් මන්ත්‍රී සන්දීප් සමරසිංහ මහතාට ගම්පහ දිස්ත්‍රික් මන්ත්‍රී ප්‍ර‍සන්න රණවීර විසින් 2016 මැයි 4 දින පහරදීම හා පාලිත තෙවරප්පෙරුම සම්බන්ධ වූ ගුටි බැට හුවමාරුව පාර්ලිමේන්තු සභා ගර්භය තුළ දී මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු තවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු ගේ ලේ සෙලවීම සිදු කළ පළමු අවස්ථාව යි.

 

බත් පාර්සලයක්‌ රු.10 කින් ඉහළට

January 10th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

 ප්රදීප් ප්රසන්න සමරකෝන් සහ චමින්ද සිල්වා

ලන්ච් ෂීට්සහ ෂොපින් බෑග් මිල ඉහළ යාම නිසා බත් පාර්සලයක මිල රුපියල් 10 කින් ඉහළ දමන බව ආපන ශාලා හිමියන්ගේ සංගමයේ ජාතික සංවිධායක අසේල සම්පත් මහතාදිවයින ඊයේ (09 වැනිදා) පැවැසීය.මේ අතර මාසයක්ඇතුළත බත් පාර්සලයක මිල රුපියල් 10 කින් වැඩි කළ දෙවැනි අවස්ථාව මෙය බව පාරිභෝගිකයෝ පවසති.
කොළඹ නගරයේ බත් පැකට්ඇතුළු ඇසුරුම් කරන ලද ආහාරවල මිල ගණන් රුපියල් 20 ත් 30 ත් අතර මිලකින් ඊයේ සිටම ඉහළ දමා ඇති බවත්, මෙය අසාධාරණ බවත් පාරිභෝගිකයෝ රැසක්‌ “දිවයින පැවසූහ.මෙතෙක්රුපියල් 100 ත් 120 ත් අතර මිලකට අලෙවි වූ බත් පාර්සලය ඊයේ වනවිට රුපියල් 150 දක්වා ඉහළ නැග ඇතැයි පාරිභෝගිකයෝ කියා සිටියහ.

I usually take my lunch in a box or wrapped in a banana leaf ( I cannot consume  ripened  bananas in my plot as urban monkeys keep eating them !)  .So I decided that feeding monkeys may also be a meritable act  and decided to use the leaf for wrappig food .Some people use the internal stem of the banana tree to cook with dahl rather that throwing away .

Back to food parcel

When I leave early with no time to cook rice and curry I buy a food  parcel from the canteen near by .

I have noted that the quantity of rice in a parcel is so excessive and Sri Lankans try to consume the whole amount despite the fact that over eating rice can increase threat to advance  diabetes and obesity  .Excessive starch is also converted into fat hence one’s cholesterol level rapidly increases.

All the researchers in Sri Lanka shall get together and decide the optimum size of a cup which shall be used to measure the amount of rice to be placed in a parcel.

People who thrive on cooking and selling food parcels can surly reduce cost of rice by just reducing 10% of the rice quantity. One kilo gram of cooked  rice may be enough to wrap seven packs instead of six ?

By doing Price increase of food parcel due to high cost of wrapping can be avoided

( I  noted that soap,toffees ,cool drink packs ,etc etc are reduced is size by he manufacturers in order to keep the price at it is )  .

 

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

බදුල්ල ප්‍රදේශයේ  විදුහල්පතිනියක් දණගස්වා පාසැලට දරුවන් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලපෑම් කිරීම  සම්බන්ධයෙනි

January 10th, 2018

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය 

2018/ 01/ 10

අධ්‍යාපන ලේකම්තුමා

අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යංශය

ඉසුරුපාය

බත්තරමුල්ල

ලේකම්තුමනි,

බදුල්ල ප්‍රදේශයේ  විදුහල්පතිනියක් දණගස්වා පාසැලට දරුවන් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලපෑම් කිරීම  සම්බන්ධයෙනි

 ඌව පළාත් ප්‍රමුඛ දේශපාලනඥයෙකු විසින්  ඌව පලාත් සභාව යටතේ පාලනය වන බදුල්ල දෙමළ බාලිකා විද්‍යාලයක විදුහල්පතිනියක්   තම නිල නිවසට කැඳවා දණ ගස්වා සිසුවියක් ඇතුළත් කිරීමට බලැපෑම් කළ බවට අප වෙත තොරතුරු වාර්තා වී ඇත.  එම දමිළ බාලිකා විද්‍යාලයට සිසුවියක් ඇතුලත් කරගැනීම සඳහා අදාල සිසුවියගේ දෙමව්පියන් විසින් අදාළ දේශපාලනඥයාගේ  ලිපියක් රැගෙන  විදුහල්පතිනිය හමුවීමට ගොස් ඇති අතර අදාල විදුහල්පතිනිය එම ලිපිය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරමින් පවසා ඇත්තේ තමන් බැඳී සිටින්නේ දේශපාලඥයන්ගේ නියෝග ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට නොවන බවයි.   අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යංශ බලධාරීන්ගේ නියෝග වලට අනුව පමණක් තමන් කටයුතු කරන බව මෙම විදුහල් පතිනිය අදාල දෙමව්පියන්ට දන්වා තිබේ.

මේ  බව එම දෙමව්පියන් විසින් එම දේශපාලනඥයා  වෙත දැන්වීමෙන් පසුව පළාත් අධ්‍යාපන බලධාරීන් හරහා එම විදුහල්පතිනිය  බදුල්ලේ පිහිට තම නිල නිවසට ගෙන්වා ගෙන  තමන්ගෙන් වැඳ සමාව ගන්නා ලෙස අදාල විදුහල්පතිනියට දන්වා බලහත්කාරයෙන් වන්දවා ගෙන තිබේ.

මෙම ක්‍රියාව රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ ගරුත්වය කෙලෙසන ශිෂ්ඨ සම්පන්න නොවන, අමානුෂික ක්‍රියාවක් බව අපගේ හැඟීමයි.  එබැවින් මේ පිළිබඳව සොයා බලා සුදුසු පියවරක් ගන්නා මෙන් කාරුණිකව ඉල්ලමි.

මීට

කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්

විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ

කැෆේ සංවිධානය  සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය

Propaganda as poetry

January 10th, 2018

By Rohana R. Wasala (Courtesy The Island)

(This is The Mask of Anarchy continued from January 6, 2018)

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 151-155)

Shelley composed ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ with the explicit and express purpose of communicating a powerful political message to the working Men of England that would rouse them to ‘Rise like Lions’ in the manner suggested in the lines quoted above. The new title under which I am here presenting to the reader the second or the concluding part of my essay on ‘The Mask of Anarchy’ is intended as a tribute to the poet, in spite of the well known negative connotations of the word ‘propaganda’. It is true that the term usually refers to biased, misleading information designed to promote a political or other viewpoint whose inherent badness or hollowness requires such distortion of the truth for its existence. Shelley’s reformist ideas are based on democracy, egalitarianism, peace, humanity, and justice. The method he advocates for the workers to achieve freedom from slavery is nonviolent resistance. But the implicit insistence that they envisage no failure means that Shelley’s nonviolence should not be equated with blind pacifism (a sort of peace at any cost).  Awakened lions are not known for pacifism. Shelley’s message has this ambiguity. But there is no attempt at misleading his principal target audience, the workers of the early 19th century England. On the contrary, he is determined to bring them awareness  of their own enslaved state, and to persuade them to free themselves from it through peaceful nonviolent democratic means using their vast numerical superiority over the minority ruling elite  : ‘Ye are many – they are few’.

The speech is delivered by an indistinct, rather airy, flitting ‘Shape’, which appears to be a persona for the poet himself. The ‘I’ found at the beginning of the poem (‘I lay asleep in Italy’)seems to have dissolved into the voice of this Shape. Where does the Shape originate in the dream narrative?

The ‘maniac maid’  or Hope lay in the street before the horse’s feet patiently expecting ‘Murder, Fraud and Anarchy’ (lines 98-101). Then ‘a mist, a light, an image’ arose between Hope and her foes, growing into ‘a Shape arrayed in mail’ (line 110). The Shape fled past over ‘the prostrate multitude’ (line 126).  Its momentary presence revived the maiden Hope. Though the Shape was insubstantial and very quickly vanished into ‘empty air’, it was something powerful that registered on the ‘heads of men’ (that is, it was something intellectual), and ‘Thoughts sprung where’er that step did fall.’. ….. The Shape’s soft fleeting touch gives rise to ‘Thoughts’ in the same manner that the spring brings forth flowers, ‘As flowers beneath May’s footstep waken’ (line 122).

And the prostrate multitude

Looked — and ankle-deep in blood,

Hope, that maiden most serene,

Was walking with a quiet mien: (lines 126-129)

When this happened, Anarchy died along with the murderers thronged behind him (as described in the following lines).

And Anarchy, the ghastly birth,

Lay dead earth upon the earth;

The Horse of Death tameless as wind

Fled, and with his hoofs did grind

To dust the murderers thronged behind. (lines 130-134)

The death of Anarchy and his murderous companions would have marked a happy conclusion to a story that started in despair. But then a moment of reflection tells us that Shelley is still dreaming, and he hasn’t finished relating what he sees and hears while dreaming. Though he has passed the nightmare part of the dream narrative, he implies that he has much more to say. To Shelley a dream-delivered closure in the theatre of his sub-conscious mind to a   problem in the real world that he so passionately feels about is of no use. If he was satisfied with that, then he could not be the politically engaged authentic Shelley that we usually come across in his poetry. So lines 135 – 146 announce: These words of joy and fear arose” as if the ‘indignant Earth – Which gave the Sons of England birth’ …… ‘had turned every drop of blood’ that had ‘bedewed her face’

To an accent unwithstood” –

As if her heart had cried out aloud:

Men of England, heirs of Glory”, (lines 145-147)

The words of joy and fear ‘arose’, not ‘were spoken’; no speaker is given.  (The Shape that we identify as the persona through which Shelley himself speaks is an indeterminate presence.) This is similar to the earlier phrase Thoughts sprung….”.  The ‘indignant Earth’ of England (Mother England) is not the speaker either, for it is only ‘As if’ she cried them out. The words of joy and fear which apparently spontaneously arose constitute a long political harangue. It accounts for more than half of the poem, from line 147 to the end of the 372-line poem. The voice or the idiom or the verbal mechanism that the poet is searching for, by which to rouse the ordinary working men of England (the previously ‘adoring’, ‘prostrate’ benighted, benumbed ‘multitude’) to Rise like Lions” should be found, if at all, in this latter part of the poem.

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 151-155)

The same lines are repeated at the end of the poem. (They are printed at the top as an epigraph to this essay.) The rest of the poem embodies material that infuses these memorable lines with special potency.

The speaker addresses the ‘prostrate multitude’. He asks them the most important question. ‘What is Freedom?’ (l. 156).  But he doesn’t expect them to answer that question, because he knows that they have no idea about freedom. So he  approaches the question  through its opposite, slavery, which they can describe

…………..too well —

For its very name has grown

To an echo of your own. (lines 157-159)

We, the readers, could find an allusion here to slavery practiced in Europe and North America at that time. Just as the word ‘slavery’ echoes the name of its well known victims the Africans, it has grown to echo the name of the working men of England. They have been reduced to the state of the tools of their trades:  Loom, and plough, and sword, and spade, for the ‘defence and nourishment’ of the tyrannical , oppressive rulers. The workers will be treated like this until a point comes when they are strong and

……………… feel revenge

Fiercely thirsting to exchange

Blood for blood — and wrong for wrong — (lines 193-195)

But the speaker admonishes them in line 196: Do not thus when ye are strong.” (i.e., Do not think of taking revenge or of resorting to violence, when you have become strong through enhanced awareness and unity). He advocates only non-violent  resistance. Yet again, the speaker says that even forest-dwelling savages, birds and beasts in the wild and domestic animals have food to eat and somewhere to rest, except Englishmen! Even those jungle men or wild animals would not endure deprivation, without resistance, unlike you (as suggested in lines 197-204). These are words hardly likely to promote nonviolence!

This is Slavery — savage men,

Or wild beasts within a den

Would endure not as ye do —

But such ills they never knew. (lines 205-208)

In spite of his advocacy of non-violent resistance a moment ago, this sort of language could provoke violence among the oppressed workers.

Then, in the next section of his speech the speaker asks the question to Freedom itself: ‘What art thou Freedom?’ The slaves cannot answer the question from their ‘living graves’; the tyrants would flee at this demand, as they would be compelled to do if the workers who currently show the ignorance and passivity of a ‘slave in soul’ were to articulate what freedom actually is; at present they cannot do that though they are familiar with slavery through experience. In an apostrophe to Freedom, the speaker (who must be the poet himself) launches into a long series of instances where freedom manifests itself.

Thou art clothes, and fire, and food

For the trampled multitude —

No — in countries that are free

Such starvation cannot be

As in England now we see”. (lines 221-225)

To the rich you are a check on their oppression of the poor (trampled multitude). You are Justice – your righteous laws are not sold for gold as they are in England. You are Wisdom. ‘Freemen never dream’ that

All those who think those things untrue

Of which Priests make much ado” (lines 236-237)

will be damned for ever!

Science, Poetry, and Thought are Freedom’s lamps, the speaker continues. Let deeds, not words, express your (i.e., Freedom’s) loveliness. Then the speech makes a practical proposal: Let there be a great Assembly ‘On some spot of English ground’ attended by people from ‘the haunts of daily life’ and even from the ‘palaces’,

Ye who suffer woes untold,

Or to feel or to behold

Your Lost country bought and sold

With a price of blood and gold” (lines 291-294)

Such a gathering is for the purpose of making a solemn declaration ‘with measured words’ that  ye (i.e., the working men of England) are free ‘as God has made ye’. ‘Let your strong and simple words be keen to wound as sharpened swords, and wide as targes (small shields) to protect you’. But all this must be within the law.

It sounds as if the speaker fears that he would be mistaken to be an advocate of violence. Even if the tyrants should violate the old laws of England, ‘the blood will rest on them, not on you’;

(you, i.e., the working men of England, should let them)

Slash, and stab, and maim, and hew –

What they like, that let them do.

……………………………………………………….

With folded arms and steady eyes,

………………………………………………………

Look upon them as they slay.” (lines 342…..347)

 

Then the ‘tyrants’ will be ashamed of themselves:

‘And the bold, true warriors

Who have hugged Danger in wars

Will turn to those who would be free,

Ashamed of such base company.’ (lines 356-359)

 

Men of England will need great courage and forbearance to abide by Shelley’s admonition. But he is confident that

‘….. these words shall then become

Like Oppression’s thundered doom

Ringing through each heart and brain,

Heard again — again — again —‘ (lines 364-367)

‘These words’ here may be interpreted as referring to lines 151-155, which are repeated at the conclusion of the poem:

‘Rise like Lions after slumber

In unvanquishable number,

Shake your chains to earth like dew

Which in sleep had fallen on you —

Ye are many — they are few.’ (lines 368-372)

Shelley was writing two hundred years ago. But his refined rational voice against oppression of different kinds – political, economic, religious – resonates with meaning for many nations in the world even today.

Kaduwela-Fort light trains from 2018: Champika

January 10th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

 

SEE COMMENTS BELOW

Fort bound Light Railway Service would be initiated from Kaduwela funded by the Japanese Government, Megapolis and Western Development Minister Champika Ranawaka said.He said the feasibility study for the project was being conducted and the Ministry was acquiring lands in the area for the purpose.Participating in an event to the Kaduwela Public Fair and the additional bus halt, the Minister said the construction of the light railway service would be initiated end of 2018.Apart from Colombo, he said the Kaduwela and Homagama areas had been identified economically valuable areas and would be populated more in the near future.Therefore, Minister Ranawaka said a proper city planning had been proposed by Ministry to the Government considering the commercial demand of the lands in the areaHe said it had been proposed to develop the areas surrounding Parliament to create office complex, including the Prime Minister Office and offices of various Independent Commissions.It is our vision to develop the Kaduwela – Battaramulla area as professionals’ city with many State institutions. The construction work of three large buildings for the purpose will commence soon,” he said.He said the area between Malabe and Homagama would be converted in to a tech city, including technical colleges and technology institutions.

He said 16 companies had already come forward in favour of the Ministry’s strategy

An election is at the door step .Rjagiriya fly over has been declared open.Traffic is still moving in a snarling speed ,Canal passenger Trans port plan was  given wide publicity .Water is flowing and no boats as yet. Completion of connection of Kaduwela Kerawapitiya from Airport highway to Souhern highway is still in the horizon .Improvement to Kelaniweli Rail Line  is still far behind .

It takes over 1 -1.5 hours to reach Colombo from Kaduwela.

Building  an elevated light railway will take at least three years in Sri Lanka.How can it be completed  in 1 year  .Officials and politicians are all talking in many forums ,professors from Universities giving lectures about the transport technology .But the poor people who use public transport keep cursing the rulers .

Why are we hoodwinked by the politicians?

How long can the people wait ?

Battling stress the most effective way

January 10th, 2018

Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

A new book, ‘Stress in Security Forces’ edited by Anil Varma with Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge, Dr. Franklin D. Jones, Stephen A. Young and Gautam Navalakha has been published by the ICFAI University Press, India.

Stress management is vital in the fields of defence and public safety. Positive stress management is a decisive factor in mission accomplishment. The articles covered in this book endeavour to extend the discussion and consolidation of stress management beyond just breath or exercise solutions often promoted in short articles addressing the topic. Instead the information provided will offer insight into stress dynamics so that individual readers can determine appropriate management solutions.

 

Anil Varma and Dr. Ruwan M. Jayatunge who have studied the deep psychological impacts of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) emphasize the importance of psychological therapies such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and EMDR (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing ), the latest and effective psychotherapy mode which is accepted by the APA (American Psychiatric Association).

Stress in Security Forces is an important book for the members of the armed forces, trainers and policy makers.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) – A Malady Shared by East and West

January 10th, 2018

Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is an anxiety disorder that can occur in people who have experienced or witnessed life-threatening events such as natural disasters, serious accidents, terrorist incidents, war, or violent personal assaults. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) occurs in an estimated 8% of men and 20% of women who are exposed to traumatic events.

The cross-cultural validity of the PTSD has been questioned by many experts. Some consider PTSD is a Western culture-bound disorder. However psychological trauma is a universal phenomenon. Traumatic experiences are universal and it has psychological, neurological, biological, and social impacts. Although there are ethnocultural variations in PTSD it is a common occurrence around the globe. Many cultures report PTSD type anxiety based reactions.

 The History of PTSD
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a relatively newly defined disorder with a very long medical history. Historical literature reveals clinical symptoms similar to PTSD dating back to the ancient Egyptian civilization. In 1900 B.C. an Egyptian physician eloquently described hysterical reactions of a patient after traumatic experience.

Great literature from around the world provides stories of individuals and peoples with extraordinary suffering due to the trauma experienced in great calamities. For example, the biblical story of Job records a heartbreaking story of human trauma. Job was subjected to extreme suffering, loss of material possessions, and psychological anguish.

In his 1952 book Answer to Job, pioneer psychiatrist Carl Jung analyzed the psychological components associated with the nature of his emotional suffering. Job was deeply shattered by the trauma that fell upon him. He expresses self-pity and troubled desolation. The trauma left him feeling hopeless, and his mental agony is similar to one who suffers from PTSD. Job could very well be diagnosed with PTSD within today’s clinical definitions.

Another ancient sacred text from a separate cultural tradition, the Mahabharata, describes vivid combat stress reactions exhibited by the ancient warriors. This epic tale of India chronicles a great war between the Pandavas and the Kauravas in 3139 B.C. The horrendous combat events described in the Mahabharata and the demeanor and death of the main warrior characters such as Jayadratha graphically illustrate the trauma and symptoms now recognized in the PTSD diagnosis.

Homer’s great epic, The Iliad, which was composed circa 730 B.C., narrates a series of harrowing episodes of battle stress that were experienced by the ancient Hellenic combatants. He clearly paints the picture of the horror of war and trauma of combat. Achilles, the archetypal warrior, cries out in anguish and rage at the death and mutilation of his friend Patroklos.

Battle scenes and human suffering occupy much of The Iliad. When exposed to the atmosphere of combat, soldiers have feelings that become more intense and unpredictable. They may include amplified emotional responses or the reawakening of past mental disturbance. Homer artfully captures such responses. In The Iliad some combatants suffer from extreme confusion and experience feelings of insecurity. Their reactions are similar to modern-day combat-related PTSD.

The Iliad epitomizes another tragedy of war: the agony of war widows when encompassed with physical and mental trauma. The pages of The Iliad echo the woe and affliction of the Trojan women. Homer expounds their lamentation and helplessness comprehensively. Trojan women have become the ultimate symbol of the consequences of war on the survivors.

Buddhist Jataka Stories 
According to archaeological and literary evidence, the Jataka stories were compiled in the 3rd Century B.C. to the 5th Century A.D. The Khuddaka Nikaya contains 550 stories the Buddha told of his previous lifetimes as an aspiring Bodhisattva. According to Professor Rhys Davids, Jataka stories are one of the oldest fables.  The Jataka stories deeply analyze the human mind. They contain profound psychological content. In the Jataka stories there are numerous characters who have displayed hysteria-type reactions. For instance, in the Maranabheruka Jataka one monk shows anxiety-based reactions that are similar to modern day PTSD. This monk displays extreme fear, hyper-arousal, avoidance, having frightful mental pictures (flashbacks?) and emotional anesthesia.

Shakespearian Work and British Experience of PTSD
The eminent English poet and playwright William Shakespeare created many characters that appear to be afflicted by psychological and psychiatric disorders. Shakespeare had an extraordinary ability to grasp the dynamics of the human mind and fathom the dysfunctions of the human psyche. Indeed, Shakespeare was very comprehensive in his descriptions of various psychological and psychiatric symptoms. Shakespeare’s influence on psychopathology was immeasurable. Many of Shakespeare’s lead characters seem to be having mental disorders and even psychoses.

Macbeth, probably written sometime between 1603 and 1607, reveals an act for which the perpetrator is subsequently filled with guilt, one that is emotionally overwhelming, replete with nightmares, hallucinations, and disturbing reminiscences. Macbeth was a Scottish Army general who wanted to rise to nobility and become the king of Scotland. To fulfill his ambition he was pushed to kill King Duncan by his ambitious wife. Macbeth murders Duncan while Duncan is a guest at his castle. After the murder Macbeth and his wife become emotionally unstable. Lady Macbeth sleepwalks (a form of dissociation that is evident in trauma). She continuously washes and wrings her hands in an attempt to make them clean (an obsessive-compulsive disorder type of behavior that could be co-morbid with PTSD). Her nights are full of disturbances and she becomes hyper-vigilant. Following the distressing mental condition, Lady Macbeth commits suicide.

Around half a century after Shakespeare’s death English civil servant Samuel Pepys witnessed the great fire of London in 1666. His diary famously and vividly described nightmares, intrusions, and flashbacks, all of which are associated with what we today call PTSD.

PTSD victims of Russo-Turkish War 
From 1676 to 1681 a series of military conflicts occurred between the Russian and Ottoman Empires. Professor V.I Buganov, a renowned Soviet Historian, described unusual events that occurred during the war between the Turkish troops and the forces of Peter the Great. According to Buganov, some soldiers lost their voices (became aphonic as a result of a hysteria-type dissociative reaction). Some manifested fear feelings and became insane (possibly a stress-related behavior following acute stress disorder).

Railway Hysteria 
In 1800 a condition was identified that bore a remarkable resemblance to modern-day PTSD. It was called railway hysteria or railway spine. The sufferers of this condition showed anxiety and somatoform symptoms after having been in catastrophic railway accidents. Railway spine was a nineteenth-century diagnosis for the post-traumatic symptoms. A large numbers of casualties were reported on Britain’s Victorian railways between the 1840s and the 1860s. The medical experts regarded Railway as a condition produced by a jolted and shaken spinal cord to one of traumatically-induced mental and nervous collapse fraught with implications of hysteria, neurasthenia and degeneration.

Neurasthenia 
In 1879 neurologist George Beard called a group of symptoms he observed neurasthenia.”9 This was characterized by chronic fatigue and weakness, loss of memory, and generalized aches and pains, formerly thought to result from exhaustion of the nervous system.

Soldier’s Heart
In 1876 US Civil War physician Dr. Mandez Da Costa introduced the term soldier’s heart,” which illustrated the physical and emotional symptoms displayed by Civil War veterans, including startle responses, hyper-vigilance, dyspnea (difficulty in breathing), palpitation, chest pain, fatigue, faintness and heart arrhythmias. Soldier’s heart or Da Costa’s syndrome is considered the manifestation of an anxiety disorder, and treatment is primarily behavioral, involving modifications to lifestyle and daily exertion.

Effort Syndrome
The term effort syndrome” was introduced in 1900. This condition was characterized by chest pain, dizziness, fatigue, palpitations, cold moist hands, and sighing respiration. The condition is often associated with soldiers in combat, but occurs also in other individuals. The pain often mimics angina pectoris, but is more closely associated with anxiety states and occurs after, rather than during exercise. (7) Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (introduced in 1900) Chronic fatigue syndrome is a complicated disorder characterized by extreme fatigue that may worsen with physical or mental activity, but does not improve with rest. There are many theories about what causes this condition, ranging from viral infections to psychological stress.

Shell Shock 
By 1918 British military doctors identified a group of symptoms that included tiredness, irritability, giddiness, lack of concentration and headaches among the soldiers who fought in  World War I. Colonel Fredrick Mott, a British pathologist, coined the term shell shock,”11 and he considered it an organic condition produced by miniature hemorrhages of the brain. Between 1914 and 1918 the British Army identified 80,000 men as suffering from shell shock. Shell shock was generally seen as a sign of emotional weakness or cowardice.

Combat Fatigue 
Over 110 million persons were mobilized for military services in World War II. The term combat fatigue” was introduced to describe the combat trauma reactions that occurred during the war. Combat fatigue was characterized by hypersensitivity to stimuli such as noises, movements, and light, accompanied by overactive responses that include involuntary defensive jerking or jumping, easy irritability progressing even to acts of violence, and sleep disturbances, including battle dreams, nightmares, and inability to fall asleep. A longitudinal study of Harvard University alumni found 56% of World War II veterans who experienced heavy combat were chronically ill or dead by age 65.

Pierre Janet on Trauma
In 1889 Pierre Janet published L’automatisme psychologique, his first work to deal with how the mind processes traumatic experiences. Janet coined the word dissociation” and explained the effects of dissociation of the traumatic memories and their return as fragmentary reliving experiences

Jean-Martin Charcot
In 1901 the Parisian clinical neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot, known as the founder of modern neurology,” described traumatic memories as parasites of the mind. He formulated a comprehensive, neurogenic model of the great neurosis.” For Charcot, hysteria was strictly a dysfunction of the central nervous system. In Charcot’s view, traumatic hysteria and male hysteria were identical. He acknowledged the relevance of psychological traumas, dissociated from the patient’s consciousness, in determining the nature of its symptoms. Charcot’s views immensely affected Sigmund Freud’s early theory of hysteria and the notion of psychical trauma.

Sigmund Freud and Traumatic Neurosis
Sigmund Freud used the term traumatic neurosis,” to describe the condition that resembles the present-day PTSD. The term designates a psychopathological state characterized by various disturbances arising after an intense emotional shock, either immediately or even sometimes long after the event occurred. Freud specifically wrote about effects of traumatic memories and traumatic shock.

In Freud’s words, The symptomatic picture presented by traumatic neurosis approaches that of hysteria in the wealth of its similar motor symptoms, but surpasses it as a rule in its strongly marked signs of subjective ailment . . . as well as in the evidence it gives of a far more general enfeeblement and disturbance of the mental capacities.”  Freud’s understanding of trauma was well represented in his works, mainly in Mourning & Melancholia (1917), Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920), and Symptoms, Inhibitions & Anxiety (1926).

Freud assumed that the negative emotional energy associated with traumatic memories unconsciously converted into the somatic manifestations of hysteria. Freud’s lectures in 1917– 1918 eloquently described the broad clinical picture of what we know today as PTSD. In one of his famous lectures, Traumatic Fixation – The Unconscious, which he gave in America.

Freud states: The closest analogy to this behavior in our nervous patients is provided by the forms of illness recently made so common by the war – the so-called traumatic neurosis. Of course, similar cases have occurred before the war, after railway accidents and other terrifying experiences involving danger to life. The traumatic neuroses are not fundamentally the same as those which occur spontaneously…. The traumatic neurosis demonstrates very clearly that a fixation to the moment of the traumatic occurrence lies at their root. These patients regularly produce the traumatic situation in their dreams, in case showing attacks of a hysterical type in which analysis is possible; it appears that the attack constitutes a complete reproduction of this situation. It is as though these persons had not yet been able to deal adequately with the situation, as if this task were still actually before them unaccomplished.

In 1910 Freud stated that hysterical patients suffer from intrusive reminiscences. There is much evidence to suggest that Sigmund Freud knew the spacious clinical picture of PTSD.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 
1952 DSM 1 – The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 1) was published in 1952 by the American Psychiatric Association and provided new diagnostic criteria for neurotic reaction (stress response syndrome).

1968 DSM 2 : Transient Situational Disturbance Transient situational disturbance is defined as a form of maladaptive reactions to identifiable psychosocial stressors occurring within a short time after the onset of the stressor. They are manifested by either impairment in social or occupational functioning or by symptoms (depression, anxiety, etc.) that are in excess of a normal and expected reaction to the stressor.

1980 DSM 3 PTSD In 1980 the American Psychiatric Association added PTSD to the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) nosologic classification scheme. In its initial DSM-III formulation, a traumatic event was conceptualized as a catastrophic stressor that was outside the range of usual human experience.

In 1993 World Health Organization (WHO) Recognizes PTSD The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) is a coding of diseases, signs, symptoms, abnormal findings, complaints, social circumstances and external causes of injury or diseases, as classified by the World Health Organization (WHO). ICD-10 was endorsed by the Forty-Third World Health Assembly in May 1990 and came into use in WHO member states. The ICD is the international standard diagnostic classification for all general epidemiology, and is used for many health management purposes and clinical use. In 1993 it recognized PTSD as a separate diagnostic entity.

1994 DSM 4 The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Fourth Edition (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) defines PTSD as a constellation of symptoms and behaviors that includes three core clusters: re-experience of the trauma in the form of intrusive thoughts, dreams and images; avoidance of thoughts or reminders of the trauma, together with emotional numbing and withdrawal; and signs of increased central and autonomic arousal. In 2000 the American Psychiatric Association revised the PTSD diagnostic criteria in the fourth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR).

DSM 5: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) is the 2013 update to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) classification and diagnostic tool. It is the product of more than 10 years of effort by hundreds of international experts in all aspects of mental health. Compared to DSM-4, the diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 draw a clearer line when detailing what constitutes a traumatic event. DSM-5 introduced a preschool subtype of PTSD for children ages six years and younger.

PTSD in the Soviet Union
Since the October Revolution and the Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991 USSR faced a number of internal and external socio- political calamities that generated immense stresses among its population. Unsurprisingly these manmade and natural disasters had caused waves of traumatic stress among the people. But little is known to the outside world about the psychological trauma experienced by the Soviet People. The state governed Medical and Psychological establishments imposed heavy restrictions to study and publish psycho trauma that prevailed among the people of the Soviet Union. The state media constantly promoted the Soviet Socialist way of life as an idealist society and highlighted the maladies of the Western Capitalist World.

The accurate statistics of the psychological ailments such as PTSD that existed within the Soviet Society are still not known. The term PTSD or Traumatic Neurosis were not profusely used by the Soviet researchers. To denote psycho trauma the terms such as Dushevnaya Bolezen”  Stresavaya Situatsia , Pshicheskaya Rastroisthva were often used. However by the end of the Soviet era the Russian clinicians assertively used the term   Posttrumaticheskaya Stresovaya Rastroistva (PTSD) to diagnose anxiety based traumatic stress using DSM or ICD -10 classifications.

US Focus on PTSD
The US military’s historic concern with PTSD was revived during combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, as over two million personnel have served in these theaters since 2001. Of that total, 1,353, 627 have since left the military and 711,986 have used Veterans Administration (VA) health care between fiscal year 2002 and the third-quarter fiscal year 2011.19

The National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Survey (NVVRS) report provided the following information about PTSD among Vietnam War veterans: the estimated lifetime prevalence of PTSD among American Vietnam theater veterans is 30.9% for men and 26.9% for women. An additional 22.5% of male Vietnam veterans and 21.2% of female Vietnam veterans have had partial PTSD at some point in their lives. Thus, more than half of all male Vietnam veterans and almost half of all female Vietnam veterans – about 1,700,000 Vietnam veterans in all – have experienced clinically serious stress reaction symptoms.” 15.2% of all male Vietnam theater veterans (479,000 out of 3,140,000 men who served in Vietnam) and 8.1% of all female Vietnam theater veterans (610 out of 7,200 women who served in Vietnam) were diagnosed with PTSD at the time the survey was conducted (1986-1988).

There is not a consensus on the PTSD rates for the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts. Science magazine reports that of the total American military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, 4.3% of troops developed PTSD. This is a composite of the deployed combatants, (7.6% of whom developed PTSD) and the deployed noncombatants (1.4% of whom developed PTSD).21 A fact sheet from the RAND Center for Military Health Policy Research concludes the true rates of PTSD are not known and that studies existing as of 2010 vary too widely to be helpful.22 The United States Department of Veteran Affairs asserts that 11-20% of veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have PTSD.23 The VA estimate could point to 20,000 to 40,000 current cases of PTSD.

Americanization of Mental Illness
There is a growing critique of the conventional Western psychological approaches to trauma and PTSD. Voices from academia, clinical practice, and victims themselves are joining to proclaim the widespread variations across ethno-cultural boundaries.”

Author Ethan Watters examined trauma and cultural factors in depth. He states that the Western conception of mental health and illness might be shaping the expression of illnesses in other cultures, and that this is rarely discussed in the professional literature. Many modern mental health practitioners and researchers believe that the scientific standing of Western drugs, Western illness categories and Western theories of the mind have put the field beyond the influence of endlessly shifting cultural trends and beliefs. Others still seek to understand the cultural context as a diagnostic factor.

Dr. Sing Lee a psychiatrist and researcher at the Chinese University of Hong Kong watched the Westernization of a mental illness firsthand. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, he was busy documenting a rare and culturally specific form of anorexia nervosa in Hong Kong. Unlike American anorexics, most of his patients did not intentionally diet nor did they express a fear of becoming fat. The complaints of Lee’s patients were typically somatic — they complained most frequently of having bloated stomachs. Lee was trying to understand this indigenous form of anorexia and, at the same time, figure out why the disease remained so rare.

PTSD: Universal Experience and Cultural Treatment
War is institutionalized violence that has intrinsically unique elements. It is a multidimensional manmade disaster. War can be an individual as well as a collective form of trauma.26 Wars represent a mental health emergency. Mental health is the springboard of thinking and communication skills, learning, emotional growth, resilience, and self-esteem. War trauma can shift the parameters of mental health towards the negative side. The circumstances of the armed conflict can produce a range of emotional and behavioral stress reactions among soldiers and civilians alike. In a war situation combat stress is an inevitable factor.

Combat stress is a specific stress factor that can affect both mental and physical health. It is a form of psychological pathology that results from traumatic exposure to battle events. Combat in most cases involves fear, despair, shock and anxiety. Combat stress is the result of internal and external stresses. Combat stress does not come from the enemy action alone. Some stress is generated from the soldiers’ own unit leaders and mission demands. Combat stress symptoms and reactions interfere with mission performance. Battle stress affects both combatants and civilians, especially those living in the war zone. War disrupts the existing social structure. The major impact of war includes disintegration of psychological well being; creating a specific calamity subculture that often generates vicious cycles that echo even after the war.

Sri Lankan Experience: 
Sri Lanka experienced a prolonged armed conflict that changed the psychological landscape of the islanders. From 1983 until 2009 a large number of government combatants, civilians and members of the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) underwent the detrimental repercussions of combat trauma.

The concept of trauma in general was not new to the Sri Lankans. Throughout history Sri Lankans have experienced natural and manmade disasters. The religion and culture have provided great resilience to cope with trauma. Culture consists of traditions, values, customs, folklore, rituals and artifacts that help give meaning to the physical world. It is transmitted primarily through language and everyday interactions. These cultural factors sometimes act as buffers to trauma and assist in coming to terms with psychological trauma.

Combat Trauma in Sri Lanka
Combat trauma, a notion that is not new to Sri Lankans, has been of profound historical, cultural, social, and religious significance to them. The written history of Sri Lanka dates back to 600-500 BC.29 According to the Mahavamsa , the great chronicle history of Sri Lanka and one of the oldest chronologies in the world, the great Battle of Vijithapura that occurred in 205 B.C. was hard fought, with great carnage and death. The triumphant King Dutthagamani experienced severe depression soon after the battle.

Throughout the Sri Lankan history there were foreign invasions and internal conflicts in which the islanders had to fight fearsome battles. Western nations arrived in 1505 AD, and until 1815 AD the Sri Lankans fought against three of them: Portuguese, Dutch   and English.  Some of the local warriors who fought against the foreign invaders later became the victims of combat trauma.

The Portuguese came to Sri Lanka in 1505 and launched a massive armed campaign against the islanders. King Seethawaka Rajasinghe (1544 A.D – 1593 A.D) was a great warrior who came to the battlefield at the age of 16. He fought against the Portuguese invaders and witnessed many deaths and much destruction. He was a fearless fighter who used proficient war tactics and overpowered the fully equipped and fully trained Portuguese Army, considered a superpower in the 16th-century world. He defeated the Portuguese in a number of decisive battles. His military campaigns prevented Sri Lanka from becoming a Portuguese colony.

Following long years of combat King Seethawaka Rajasinghe was exhausted and unquestionably suffered from battle fatigue. In later years he displayed outbursts of anger, irritability, deep mistrust, alienation, emotional numbing and various other PTSD-related symptoms. King Seethawaka Rajasinghe probably suffered from combat-related PTSD. The king’s abnormal behavior pattern was described by the Portuguese historian Fernão de Queyroz in his multivolume work, Temporal and Spiritual Conquest of Ceylon.

The culture and history of Sri Lanka reveals that PTSD types of illnesses were common in the ancient days, and the recognition of this malady was not unique to the West. Ancient and modern narratives tell of the posttraumatic symptomatology of the trauma victims.

The Eelam War in Sri Lanka and PTSD Denial
Over 200,000 members of the Sri Lankan armed forces and police had been directly or indirectly exposed to combat situations during the recent 30-year conflict. Traumatic experiences include seeing fellow soldiers being killed or wounded, seeing unburied decomposing bodies,   hearing screams for help from the wounded, and helplessly watching the wounded die without the possibility of being rescued.

Following the Eelam War in Sri Lanka, a significant number of combatants suffered from PTSD, but remained undiagnosed. For a number of years the Sri Lankan authorities denied the fact that combat-related PTSD was emerging in the military. PTSD was regarded as an American illness and there was an unofficial taboo to use the term PTSD.

The tension of combat trauma was mounting in the Sri Lankan military over the years, and there had been suicides and incidents of self-harming reported from the battlefield. The soldiers affected by war trauma had behavioral problems and their productivity was plummeting. Many soldiers who had symptoms of combat-related PTSD, but without any physical disabilities, were compelled to continue to serve in the operational areas and engage in active combat. Some were charged with malingering when they sought medical attention. Many traumatized veterans deserted the army and even joined underworld criminal gangs.

Until 2005 the Sri Lankan Army did not medically discharge any combatant on psychological grounds. The monumental work of Dr. Neil J Fernando, the former consultant psychiatrist of the Sri Lanka Army, eventually provided insight to the authorities, resulting in having war trauma and PTSD thought of more seriously. The first soldier who was able to get a medical discharge with PTSD was a lance corporal with malignant PTSD. He was a POW who had been held by the LTTE for nearly five years.

Combat Trauma and Cultural Factors
Psychological trauma is a very complex and damaging factor to the human psyche. It is a unique individual experience and the individual’s interpretation is mostly based on his subjective experience. Individual differences in posttraumatic response have been known to the mental health clinician for many decades. Numerous psychologists indicate the close association between trauma and the cultural factors. Some argue that the impact of trauma and trauma recovery sometimes depends on cultural factors as well. Therefore the victims of trauma should be treated in a culturally appropriate manner. Batista & Wiese argue that trauma must be considered within a culture, because it is the cultural context that shapes life experiences, including the ones that are considered traumatic.

No culture is immune to the pain and suffering caused by catastrophic or life-threatening events, but there are important cultural differences in how these events are interpreted and dealt with.  The cultural impact of combat trauma in Sri Lanka can be followed from the earliest beginnings of the Tamil insurgency in the north. Combatants and civilians experienced the aftermath of combat trauma. It is significant that their religious beliefs played a key role in trauma management. Many Sri Lankan combatants believe in reincarnation and the effects of Karma. The victims believe that their physical and psychological symptoms are due to karmic actions in past lives. Often these concepts help them to come to terms with their trauma by providing an explanation and cultural context for the traumatic events.

During World War I conversion reactions (characterized by the presence of bodily symptoms having no discernible physical cause) were commonplace. Even Freud wrote about these war hysteria reactions, which he termed as traumatic neurosis.”

Although in Europe and North America the number of conversion reaction cases was minimal in WWII, the Vietnam War and the Iraq War, the Eelam War in Sri Lanka has generated a large number of such cases.  This could be due to several factors.

In the Sri Lankan conflict soldiers had no psychological debriefing or similar trauma management soon after the traumatic combat events. The combatants were not informed about possible combat trauma reactions. Although the Sri Lankan Army had top surgeons and physicians throughout the war, for the last 30 years it did not have even a single combat psychologist. The field military doctors had little knowledge about traumatic combat reactions and the effects of PTSD. The psychological victims were often charged with malingering. In addition, the soldiers were reluctant to admit to emotional problems, which would have been considered cowardice. Therefore, many combat reactions were expressed through dissociative channels.

Dissociative reactions have a special cultural significance in Sri Lanka, especially in rural areas. Some combat-related dissociative reactions are often interpreted as disturbances created by bad spirits.” In many rural parts of Sri Lanka psychogenic paralysis is considered an act of black magic, and traditional healers use a ritual called Thovilaya (this ancient ritual is a form of psycho drama) to treat the sufferers. The possession state, which is categorized as a dissociative disorder, could be observed among soldiers with combat trauma.
In possession the person enters an altered state of conscious and feels taken over by a spirit, power, deity, or other person who assumes control over his or her mind and body. In many rural areas the possession state is often regarded as mediation with the gods and goddesses. Some ex-soldiers with possession state have become so-called spiritual mediators.

On most occasions cultural factors and religious beliefs have helped the victims of combat trauma to integrate their traumatic experience into a meaningful context, and have worked as a buffer to prevent further traumatization. After exposure to combat trauma many people have embraced their cultural and religious practices more holistically and completely. These individuals interpret their posttraumatic symptoms in spiritual terms. Somehow these traumatic experiences have been transformed into a meaningful attitude and non-self-destructive manner.

Sri Lankan combatants have more somatic ailments when they manifest anxiety and depression. Many combat trauma victims with depression get treatment for migraine or joint pains before seeking medical assistance for the psychological trauma that underlies the symptoms and ailments.

The relationship between trauma and culture is an important one because traumatic experiences are part of the life cycle, universal in manifestation and occurrence, and typically demand a response from culture in terms of healing, treatment, interventions, counseling, and medical care… The concept of traumatic stress and the multidimensional nature of cultures require a conceptual framework by which to address core issues that have direct relevance to understanding the nature of trauma as embedded within a culture and its assumptive systems of belief and patterns of behavioral regulation.  Summerfield argues that when it comes to the issue of cultural differences and posttraumatic syndromes (e.g., PTSD) it cannot automatically be assumed that advances in Western psychotherapeutic techniques can be exported and applied to non-Western cultures.

Treating Combat Trauma in Sri Lanka
Combat trauma can be identified soon after a traumatic combat operation or exposure to a violent combat-related event. Some combat reactions manifest themselves as immediate acute stress reactions and some take months, even years to develop. Many victims have clinical features, as well as behavioral issues, after facing traumatic combat events. Some go in to negative stress-coping methods, such as alcoholism, drug abuse, and social violence or self-harm. Traumatic post-combat reactions can cause significant distress to the victim and to his family, and in the long run it could negatively affect society.

In Sri Lanka the psychological victims of war trauma are treated with allopathic medicine (mainstream Western medical practice), traditional Ayurvedic medicine, psychotherapy and spiritual therapies. Psychiatrists treat war trauma victims with depression and PTSD and other anxiety-related disorders by using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and sometimes combine antipsychotics when there are signs of severe disturbed behavior with psychotic manifestations. Ayurvedic specialists use various types of traditional remedies to ease the anxiety.

Psychologists and psychotherapists often use cognitive behavior therapy, which is an effective form of insight therapy. Exposure therapy is one form of cognitive behavior therapy unique to trauma. It is a treatment which uses careful repeated, detailed imaging of the trauma (exposure) in a safe controlled context. This is meant to help the survivor face and gain control of the fear and distress that were overwhelming in the trauma.

Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) is one of the effective modes of psychotherapy that has been used to treat Sri Lankan combatants. In a white paper published by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs the authors conclude that …Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing is considered a first-line treatment for PTSD and has a strong evidence base. The United States VA/ DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Post-Traumatic Stress states that, Results of clinical trials, meta-analytic studies, review articles, and extant practice guidelines suggest that EMDR successfully treats symptoms of PTSD when compared to no treatment or delayed treatment conditions. When compared to other treatment modalities, most studies reviewed indicated that EMDR possessed comparable efficacy to other well-accepted cognitive behavioral treatments to include stress inoculation training (SIT) and exposure therapies.

Spiritual therapy frequently helps war victims to reduce their depression and anxiety- related symptoms. Many Sri Lankan clinicians have observed that spiritual therapy diminishes the suicidal ideation in combat trauma victims. Many combatants and civilians with war trauma are encouraged to practice meditation and yoga. Meditation methods such as metta meditation (meditation of loving-kindness) and vipassanna meditation (mindfulness mediation) are widely used in rehabilitation centers.

Conclusions
Every culture is unique and has distinctive ways of interpreting psychological trauma. The client’s religious and cultural beliefs play an important role in the treatment process. Using these innate factors in trauma management obviously gives more effective results. Since psychological traumas are a universal human experience, every nation and culture would do well to learn from one another the successful means to treat PTSD.

Acknowledgements

  • Ivan Welch- The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas USA
  • Professor Daya Somasundaram -Clinical Associate Professor: University of Adelaide –Australia
  • Roger Brooke -Professor of Psychology at Duquesne University USA
  • Dr Sarath Panduwawala – Consultant Psychiatrist Sri Lnakna

Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), Prof. G.L. Peiris doubtful of impartial justice over bond scam

January 10th, 2018

By Yusuf Ariff Courtesy Adaderana

Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), Prof. G.L. Peiris, says that the public is unable to place their trust on punishment being carried out in an impartial manner against the wrongdoers identified by the report of the Bond Commission.

He claimed that a paragraph in the special statement made by President Maithripala Sirisena, after the commission’s report was handed over to him, has been omitted before it was uploaded to the internet.

He alleged that a paragraph with reference to former finance minister Ravi Karunanayake and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had been edited out in this manner and that it had been included again later.

Under such circumstances, there is a doubt as to whether the onward action will proceed in an impartial manner, the former foreign minister said, addressing a press briefing in Colombo today (9).

Prof. Peiris charged that the government is doing many things in order to cover up the bond scam and stressed that although the Bond Commission’s report is to be taken up for debate in Parliament tomorrow, the MPs have almost no understanding regarding the report.

He added that if the President is to keep true to his word and met out punishment using the sword” he is wielding over the bond scam irrespective of positions, then the first person that should come under the sword is the Prime Minister.

Can Mahinda be ejected from SLFP?

January 10th, 2018

By Faizer Shaheid Courtesy Ceylon Today

There is nothing new in seeing dirty politics at play. The tactical ploys of those in power are somewhat a musical comedy to some and a rather frustrating melodrama to others, yet it continues. The latest saga once again concerns Mahinda Rajapaksa, the deposed President of Sri Lanka, who continues to be the face of the SLFP, no matter which party he contests from. Ever since Rajapaksa was defeated three years ago, the political bigwigs have been tailing his every move, pointing fingers at him no matter which direction they turn.

The negative publicity was always negated by the disappointment of the people that the Government had to resort to the blame game instead of manning up and owning their blunders. While the bond scam and corruption charges continue to be flung at the Rajapaksas, three years since his defeat, no charges have yet been proved. Either the due process must be incredibly slow, or the Government is merely going to repeat the same dialogues until the next elections.

The Local Government Elections are now approaching and once again, it appears that Mahinda Rajapaksa is the man of the hour.

On one hand, the United National Party (UNP) appears to be taunting and tainting Rajapaksa with corruption allegations at the turn of the bond scam report, while on the other hand Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) appears to be having problems with Rajapaksa for supporting the Joint People’s Front (JPF) and not the SLFP.

Ethical factor

The UNP on one hand cannot seem to come out of their election victory mood from three years ago. It sometimes feels like they are stuck in a time loop that keeps taking them back to their election victory days. No amount of nudging appears enough to wake them back to reality.

On the other hand, SLFP have made it abundantly clear that they are contemplating action against Rajapaksa for openly advocating a different political party. True enough, Rajapaksa had contested and won from the SLFP and has indeed been a staunch member of the SLFP for over 40 years. The jealousy stems from the fact that, when Western Province Chief Minister Isura Devapriya had proposed to use the image of Mahinda Rajapaksa in SLFP posters, Mahinda had objected to the Commissioner of Elections. Yet, he had permitted those contesting under the Pohottuwa (Flower Bud) symbol of JPF to use his image.

The SLFP have threatened action against Mahinda Rajapaksa and his supporting politicians with expulsion from the party since the very first day, yet no action has since commenced. Neither is it likely to commence at any point in the near future.

No matter what some SLFP politicos may claim, Rajapaksa is simply following the precedent set by his presidential successor and incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena. Sirisena had set a swing in motion when he crossed over and contested his own party member at the presidential election in 2008. He not only supported a different party by the name of the New Democratic Front (NDF), he became its candidate and contested against the SLFP candidate.

With his election victory, he also returned to take over the reins of SLFP and dictate terms to those in the party. Sirisena had completely gone off the books of ethical politics in order to pull off this blinder, but it worked. Being so, it is completely unethical for the same man and his supporters to once again point fingers at Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Expulsion plans will fail

Very recently, Sports Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara had claimed that the Central Committee of the SLFP were currently evaluating the case of Mahinda Rajapaksa and his support for the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP). Apparently, he had claimed that the process will take time, and that stern action will be taken against party members who attend the rallies of other parties.

The problem is, nothing at all will matter to Mahinda Rajapaksa and his supporters except for expulsion from the SLFP. The reason being, an expulsion from a political party will automatically result in expulsion from Parliament. This is noted in Article 99 (13) of the Constitution.

However, the law comes with a proviso that if the expulsion is challenged in the Supreme Court within a month of expulsion, then the expulsion will not be valid unless Supreme Court upholds its validity. Herein lays the problem.

The very first expulsion happened in 1991, when Gamini Dissanayake, Lalith Athulathmudali and seven other Parliamentarians were expelled from the UNP for attempting to impeach then President Ranasinghe Premadasa. The Supreme Court upheld the expulsion and the Parliamentarians lost their seats in Parliament.

However, since that date, no party -based expulsion has ever been upheld in the Supreme Court. The wisdom is gathered from the dictum of Justice Kulatunge in the same case (referred to as Gamini Dissanayake vs. M. C. M. Kaleel and others):

“The right of a member of Parliament under Article 99(13)(a) is a legal right and forms part of his constitutional rights as a Member of Parliament. If his complaint is that he has been expelled from the membership of his party in breach of the rules of natural justice he will be ordinarily entitled to relief and this Court may not determine such expulsion to be valid unless there are overwhelming reasons warranting such a decision.”

This dictum was given very wide effect in all forthcoming cases, and no case in respect of expulsions was ever satisfied well enough to warrant an approval from the Supreme Court. For over 25 years, there has been no expulsion that has been validated by the Supreme Court, and this is highly unlikely to change in the near future. In many cases before the court, where the intentions of the expelled members have appeared to be fairly clear, and where the party has conducted a proper investigation into the matter, the matter has still not won the approval of the court.

This is the prime reason why, despite the straightforward violation of party principles and outright challenge of the party itself, incumbent President Maithripala Sirisena, was able to contest and win the election without being expelled from the SLFP.

Furthermore, Mahinda Rajapaksa contested from the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA). Therefore, regardless of circumstances, even if he is expelled from the SLFP, he will not automatically be stripped out of his position as a Parliamentarian.

Other party action

The SLFP may attempt to cause trouble one way or another to the former President. Perhaps, his actions may result in a suspension from the SLFP, or perhaps, he may be stripped out from other party positions such as that of an organizer or from being a Central Committee member. However, any move of such nature will only embolden him further and make him even more popular among his followers.

Besides, whether or not he is penalised from the SLFP, Rajapaksa has not washed his hands off SLFP and embarked on a renewed journey. No matter what the consequences are within the SLFP, the effect on him will be only minimal.

Conclusion

Mahinda Rajapaksa and the members of his party have been acting fearlessly against the threats of the present Leader of SLFP, Maithripala Sirisena. They refused to sit with Government and refused to vote in favour of the Bills presented by their fellow SLFP members in Parliament. They have no care for any repercussions as they already know the limits to the possible actions. Each of the Rajapaksa members already knows that no expulsion has mandated a vacation of Parliamentary seats since 1991. They are also very well informed of the expansion of the definition of the proviso by former Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva in the 2006 case of Ameer Ali vs SLMC, where it was determined that no expulsion will be valid unless overwhelming reasons warranted it.

They are also aware that they are protected as far as they were elected from the UPFA and not the SLFP. The SLFPers are aware of this, just as much as the Mahinda Rajapaksa faction, yet it appears that the drama will continue until the opportune moment.

Only when Mahinda Rajapaksa proves to be a direct threat to Sirisena we will get to see what all of these stacked up chargesresult in.

(The writer is a political analyst and an independent researcher of laws. He holds a Postgraduate Degree in the field of Human Rights and Democratization from the University of Colombo and an Undergraduate Degree in Law from the University of Northumbria, United Kingdom)

(faizer@Live.com)


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress