ජල සම්පාදන මණ්ඩලයේ පාලනාධිකාරීගේ අත්තනෝමතික ක‍්‍රියා සහ නීති විරෝධීව ඉංජිනේරුවන් බඳවා ගැනීමට යෑම සම්බන්ධව

April 2nd, 2017

ඉංජිනේරු ඩිප්ලෝමාධාරීන්ගේ සංගමය කාර්මික නිලධාරීන්ගේ සංගමය

ජල සම්පාදන මණ්ඩලයේ පාලනාධිකාරීගේ අත්තනෝමතික රියා සහ නීති විරෝධීව ඉංජිනේරුවන් බඳවා ගැනීමට යෑම සම්බන්ධව

ජල සම්පාදන මණ්ඩලයේ ඉංජිනේරු ඩිප්ලෝමාධාරීන්ගේ සංගමයත්, කාර්මික නිලධාරීන්ගේ සංගමයත් පසුගිය පෙබරවාරි 9 වනදා සිට ආරම්භ කළ වෘත්තීය ක‍්‍රියා මාර්ගය අඛණ්ඩව ඉදිරියට යයි. දැන් මාස දෙකකට ආසන්න වෙමින් තිබේ.

සිදුවන ජල නාස්තිය අනුව මේ වන විට රුපියල් මිලියන 300කට වැඩි පාඩුවක් සිදුවී ඇත. එසේම අක‍්‍රිය ජල මනු මාරු නොකිරීම, බිල්පත් නොගෙවන්නන්ගේ ජල විසන්ධි වැඩසටහන් ක‍්‍රියාත්මක නොවීම, නව ජල සම්බන්ධතා ලබානොදීම් ආදිය නිසාද රුපියල් මිලියන 200කට වඩා වැඩි පාඩුවක් මණ්ඩලයට සිදුවී ඇත. ඒ අනුව මේ වන විට රුපියල් මිලියන 500කට වැඩි පාඩුවක් ආයතනයට සිදුවී තිබියදීත් වෘත්තීය ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ගයට අදාළ ගැටලූ විසඳීමට කටයුතු නොකර එය මර්ධනය කර කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට කටයුතු කරමින් සිටී.

ඒ සඳහා නීති විරෝධීව හදිසියේම ඉංජිනේරුවන් 30ක් බඳවා ගැනීමට පත්වීම් ලිපි නිකුත් කිරීමට කටයුතු සූදානම් කර තිබේ.

මේ සඳහා අනුමත ඇබෑර්තු නැත. භාණ්ඩාගාර අනුමැතිය නැත. අමාත්‍යාංශ ලේකම්වරයාද මෙය අනුමත කර නැත. මුදල් අංශයද ඒ සඳහා මුදල් ලබාදිය නොහැකි බව කියද්දී අධ්‍යක්ෂ මණ්ඩලයේ සහ කීප දෙනෙකුගේ උද්දච්ච වුවමනාව මත මෙම නීති විරෝධී, සදාචාර විරෝධී බඳවා ගැනීම කිරීමට කටයුතු යොදා ඇත.

ජල සම්පාදන මණ්ඩලයේ පාලනාධිකාරියේ මෙම ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ගය මහජන මුදල් අවභාවිතයක් මෙන්ම නීති විරෝධී ක‍්‍රියාවකි.

මේ සඳහා දැඩි විරෝධය පල කරන අප අල්ලස් කොමිසමට පැමිණිලි කිරීමටත් වෙනත් ගත හැකි නීති ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග ගෙන වැරදිකරුවන් නීතිය ඉදිරියට පැමිණවීමටත් කටයුතු කරනු ලබන බව සඳහන් කරන්නෙමු.

එසේම නව රැකියා ලබාදීමට අප විරුද්ධ නොවන අතර මෙහි ඇති නීති විරෝධීභාවයත්, බඳවා ගැනීමේ අරමුණ සද්භාවයෙන් තොර අරමුණක් බැවිනුත් මෙයට අප දැඩි සේ විරෝධය පළ කරන බව වැඩිදුරටත් සඳහන් කරමු.

ස්තූතියි

උපාලි රත්නායක

සභාපති

ඉංජිනේරු ඩිප්ලෝමාධාරීන්ගේ සංගමය

කෙරවලපිටිය සංයුක්ත චක්‍ර විදුලි බලාගාරය විදුලිබල අමාත්‍යාංශය ඩොලර් මිලියන 3700 ක ආයෝජන යෝජනා ප්‍රතිකේෂ කොට රු. බිලියන 7 ක් ගිලින්න හදයි.

April 2nd, 2017

කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන් උපදේශක/දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණ

ජනතා බදු මුදල් රු. බිලියන 7 ක් වැය කරමින් ලංකා විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය කෙරවලපිටියේ සංයුක්ත චක්‍ර විදුලි බලාගාරයක් ඉදිකිරීම සදහා වන යෝජනාව දුෂිත විදුලි මාෆියාවේ මංකොල්ලකාරී වැඩපිළිවළේ තවත් පියවරක් බව දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණයේ උපදේශක කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන් මහතා නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් පවසයි. 

කිලෝ වෝට් 30 ඩීසල් විදුලි බලගාරයක් ලෙස ඉදිකිරීම් ආරම්භ කොට වසර තුනකින් ස්වභාවික ද්‍රව්‍ය වායු බලාගාරයක් බවට පත් කිරීම සදහා වන ව්‍යාපෘතියකට විදුලිබල හා පුණර්ජනීය බලශක්ති අමත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් ආචාර්ය සුරේන් බටගොඩ විසින් උපදෙස් ලබා දී ඇත.  ඒ සදහා ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය රුපියල් බිලියන 6.7 ක් හෝ එයට වැඩි මුදලක් වැය කළ යුතුය.

ණය වාරික ගෙවා ගත නොහැකිව රටේ ආර්ථික මර්මස්ථාන කුණු කොල්ලයට විකුණන තත්වයකට ආර්ථික බංකොලොත් වී ඇති රටට මේ ඉදි කිරීම් සදහා මුදල් සපයා ගැනීමට විදුලි බිල ඉහළ නැංවීමට මේ වන විටත් විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය යෝජනා සකස් කොට ඇත.

ලංකාවේ ස්වභාවික ද්‍රව්‍ය වායු විදුලි බලගාර ඉදිකිරීම සදහා අවස්ථා ගණනාවක දී සමාගම් 7 ක් මෙරටට පැමිණ ඇත.  විදුලිබල මාෆියාව මෙම එකම සමාගමකට හෝ ලංකාවේ ආයෝජන අවස්ථාව ලබාදී නැත.  Lanka Aloka A B (Pvt) Ltd,  M/s Sithe Global Power Ventures LLCM,  Energy World International Limited, M/s Energy World International Limited, M/s Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Pvt Ltd, M/s China Machinery Engineering Corporation (CMEC) එම සමාගම් වෙති.  ලංකා ආලෝක සමාගම ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආයෝජන මණ්ඩලය කෙරවලපිටියේ මෙවෝ. 488 ක බලාගාරයක් ඉදිකිරීම සදහා 2005 දී යෝජනා ඉදිරිපත් කළේය.  විදුලි මාෆියාව අදටත් ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 550 ක කැනඩා ආයෝජනයට අනුමැතිය ලබා දී නැත.  2011 දී සිත්හේ ගෝබල් පවර් සමාගම මෙගාවෝට් 500 ක ඩොලර් මිලියන 1000 ක වියදමින් හම්බන්තොට බලාගාරයක් ඉදිකිරීමට උත්සහ දැරීය.  හොංකොං හා එනජි වර්ල් සමාගම මෙගාවෝට් 600 ක බලාගාරයක් ඩොලර් මිලියන 450 ක විදයමින් කෙරවලපිටියේ ඉදිකිරීමට යෝජනා කළේය. විදුලි බල අමාත්‍යාංශයේ හිටපු සහ වත්මන් ලේකම්වරුන් විසින් මෙහෙයවන මාෆියාව මෙම සියලු ආයෝජන  ප්‍රතිකේෂප කළේය.

යහපාලන රජය බලයට පත්වීමෙන් පසුව සමාගම් හයක් මේ වන විට ස්වභාවික ද්‍රව වායු විදුලි බලාගාර කේෂ්ත්‍රයේ ආයෝජනය සදහා ඉදිරිපත් වී ඇත.    මෙම ආයෝජකයින් සියලු දෙනා ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ගේ ප්‍රධාන්තවයෙන් රැස්වීම් පවත්වා මාස 3 ක් තුල ලංකාවේ විදුලි අවශ්‍යතාව සම්පූර්ණ කිරීමට ගිවිසුම් අත්සන් කිරීමට එකගත්වය පළ කළේය.  එම යෝජනා සියල්ල කුණු කූඩයට දමා ජනතාව මත ඇදහිය නොහැකි විදුලි බිලක් පටවා ඇත්තේ විදුලිබල අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් සුරේන් බටගොඩ විසින් මෙහෙයවමින් සිටින විදුලි මාෆියාව යි.   

විදුලිබල කේෂ්ත්‍රයේ ආයෝජන සදහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මුදල් වැය කිරීමේ හැකියාවක් නොමැති බව අගමැතිවරයා ද, විදුලි බල අමාත්‍යාංශයේ දේශපාලන නායකත්වයට හා නිලධාරීන්ට අවධාරණය කොට තිබුණි. 

ලංකාවේ අද විදුලි අවශ්‍යතාව පමණක් නොව අනාගත විදුලි අවශ්‍යතාවන් ද සපුරාලිය හැකි වෝට් 2100 ක විදුලි උත්පාදන යෝජනා සදහා ඇස්තමේන්තුගත සමාගම් ආයෝජනය ඩොලර් මිලියන 3700 කි.  මෙම මුදල් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආයෝජනය කිරීම වලක්වන්නේ විදුලි බල ලේකම්වරයා ය.  ඔහු අද වන විට ලෝක වෙළෙදපොළේ අලෙවි මිලට ඩොලර් 10 කට වැඩි මුදලකට ගෙවා ගල් අගුරු මිලදී ගනිමින් සිටී.  (හිටපු ලේකම් ෆර්නැන්ඩස් ඔස්ට්‍රේලියාවේ තම දරුවන්ගේ නම් වලින් දේපල මිලදී ගෙන ඇති බව දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණ මෙයට පෙර හෙළි කර ඇත)  ස්වාභාවික ගෑස් විදුලි නිශ්පාදනය සදහා වැය කළ යුතු මිලට වඩා දෙගුණයකට වැඩි මුදලකට පුද්ගලික අංශය නිශ්පාදනය කරන ඩීසල් විදුලි මිල දී ගනිමින් විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලයට ඒකකයට රු. 14 කා පාඩුවක් සිදු කරමින් සිටී.

මේ වන විට ගල් අගුරු වංචාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ පැමිණිල්ලකට අනුව රහස් පොලීසිය විදුලිබල ලේකම්වරයාගේ දුෂිත ගල් අගුරු ටෙන්ඩරය පිළිබද විමර්ශනයක් ආරම්භ කොට ඇති නමුත්, වැඩි මිලට ගල් අගුරු මිලදී ගැනීම අඛණ්ඩව සිදුවේ.  වත්මන් රජය බලයට පැමිණීමෙන් පසුව වසා දමා තිබු පුද්ගලික විදුලි බලාගාර එකිනෙක විවෘත කෙරෙමින් සිටින බව ද තෙන්නකෝන් මහතා නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනයෙන් අවධාරණය කරයි. .

බැදුම්කර වංචාවට පමණක් දෙවැනි දුෂිත විදුලිබල ගනුදෙනු සදහා රැකවරණය සැපයෙන්නේ 2015 ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ මහින්ද රජය වෙනුවෙන් දේශපාලනයේ නිරත වූ ‘මංගල සමරවීර අමාත්‍යවරයාගේ කළුපොතේ ද නම සදහන් වූ’ නිලධාරීන් සිව් දෙනෙකි. 

ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආයෝජන මණ්ඩලයේ සභාපති නීතිඥ උපුල් ජයසූරිය මහතා ‘මාස හයක් තුල ආරම්භ කිරීමට එකගතාව පළ කළ හම්බන්තොට, කෙරවලපිටිය, සීතාවක, බියගම, කටුනායක ස්වභාවික ද්‍රව වායු ඉන්ධන බලාගාර ඉදි කිරීම වලක්වන බලවේග කවුරුන්ද යන්න මහජන සුබසෙත උදෙසා රටට හෙළි කළ යුතු බව ‘දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණ’ අවධාරණය කරයි.

තරගකාරී ක්‍රමයක් යටතේ විදුලි බල කේෂ්ත්‍රයේ ආයෝජන සදහා ඉඩ ලබාදීම තුලින්, ඩීසල් විදුලි මාෆියාව අවසන් කිරීම විදුලි බිල ඉහළ දැමීමට වලක්වා ගත හැකි එකම මාර්ගය බව දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණ නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනයේ තවදුරටත් දැක්වේ.

කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්

උපදේශක/දුෂණ විරෝධී පෙරමුණ

මහ පාරේ බිම දාගෙන නීතිය නමයි.. යතුරුපැදිකරුවෙකුට පොලීසිය බිම දමාගෙන අතින් පයින් ගුටි නෙලයි..[Video]

April 2nd, 2017

ලංකා සී නිවුස්

යතුරුපැදිකරුවෙකුට දොඩංඩගොඩ පොලීසියේ රථ වාමන ආශයේ නිලධාරීන් දෙනෙකු විසින් මහ මග බිම පෙරලාගෙන පහර දෙන අයුරු වීඩියෝවක් සිරස රූපවාහිනිය විකාශණය කරනු ලැබීය.

පොලීසිය පවසන්නේ අණ තොතකා ධාවනය වූ යතුරු පැදිය පොලීසිය විසින් ලූහු බැන්ද බවත් යතුරු පැදි කරුට රියදුරු බලපත‍්‍රයක්ද නොතිබූ බවයි.

පොලිස් පහර දීම හේතුවෙන් යතුරුපැදිකරු රෝහල්ගත කර තිබේ.

ආයුෂ කොටයි: පුපුරන්න ළඟයි

April 2nd, 2017

උපුටා ගැන්ම මව්බිම

මෛත්‍රිට හේත්තු වී යහපාලනයට උදවු කරන්න කටයුතු කරමින් ඉන්න ශ්‍රී ලනිප මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්ට හිතේ හැටියට කටයුතු කරන්න ඉඩක් නැති බව රටම දක්නා කරුණක්ය. මේ බැරිකම මෛත්‍රි ළඟට ගියත් විසඳගන්නට බැරි තරමට නරක අතටය. මෛත්‍රි වැනෙන උත්තර දෙද්දී අන්ද මන්ද වන ශ්‍රී ලනිප මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්ට කර කියා ගන්නට දෙයක් නැති ගාණට වැටිලාය. ඒ බැරියාවට වැට බැඳ තියෙන්නේ අගමැති ප්‍රමුඛ යූඑන්පී බලය ශක්තිමත් නිසා බව මෛත්‍රි නොදන්නා ගාණට හැසිරෙන බව තැන තැන කතා වෙන්නේය.
“ශ්‍රී ලනිප මැති ඇමැතිවරු හා අගමැතිගේ වැඩ අතර බරපතළ අර්බුදයක් මතුවෙලා”.

මෙහෙම කියන්නේ මහ පොළොවේ යථාර්ථය කියාපාන දේශපාලන විචාරකයෝය. ඒ වුණාට තවත් පිරිසක් කියන්නේ “ශ්‍රී ලංකා එකේ මැති ඇමැතිවරු විතරක් නොවේ යූඑන්පියේ මැති ඇමැතිවරුත් කලකිරිලා. රනිල් – මලික් හා පිරිස පාලනය කරන රටක යූඑන්පියට ශක්තියක් වෙච්ච මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්ට කටක් අරින්න බෑ. තමන්ගේ පළාත වෙනුවෙන් සේවයක් කරන්න කොන්ද කෙළින් තියාගෙන තීන්දුවක් ගන්න බෑ” කියලාය. ඒ බව ඔප්පු වන, හැඟෙන, දැනෙන කතාවක් යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව ගෙන එන්න කසකාරයෙක් වෙලා උෟවේ යූඑන්පී සටන කරට ගත්තු හරීන් ප්‍රනාන්දු මෙහෙමත් කියුවේය.

“කරන්න පුළුවන්නම් කරනවා නැත්නම් දමල ගහලා යනවා”
හරීන්ට වැඩක් කරන්න දෙන්නේ නැති විදියට ටෙලිකොම් එකට අරක්ගත්ත බලවන්තයා කවුදැයි රටම දන්නේය. මෛත්‍රිගේ බලය තියෙන ටෙලිකොම් එකට හරීන්ගෙ අලියාගේ ප්‍රමාණයවත් නැත. ඒ නිසා යාදෙක නොරත රත කීවාක් මෙන් මේ එකතුවීම හරියන්නේ නැත. ගැළපෙන්නේ නැත. මේ කැඳ හැළියෙන් වැඩක්ම නැත කියලා හරීන් වැනි කෙනකුටම තේරෙනවා නම් ඡන්ද දීලා යහපාලනයක් බලාපොරොත්තුවෙන් ඉන්න ඡන්දදායකයන්ට මොනවා නොහිතේද කියලා කියන්නට පුළුවන්ය.
මේ පෙළ ගැහෙන සිදුවීම් ගැන හොඳ සිහියෙන් බලා සිටින මහින්ද, ශ්‍රී ලනිප මැති ඇමැතිවරුන්ගේ වගේම යූඑන්පියේ හිත කලකිරී බලාඉන්න මැති ඇමැතිවරුන්ගේද හදවතට කතාකරන්නා වගේ මෙහෙමත් කීවේය.

“ජනතාව දැන් හිතන්නේ තමන්ගේ දුක දෙවියන්ටවත් කියනවාද කියලයි”.
ජනතාවගේ කලකිරීම දැඩිව තියෙද්දී මහින්ද මේ කියන දෙයින් කුපිත වන මැති ඇමැතිවරු වෙන්න යන විපත්තිය දැනගෙන දැනුවත්ව ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහි වන දිනය වැඩි අෑතක නොවේය.

ඊටත් වඩා දේශපාලන හේතු මත මැති ඇමැතිවරුන් සිරගත කරන, චෝදනා ගොනු කරන යාන්ත්‍රණයත් සිර කූඩු ඇතුළේ සිරගත කළ ඇත්තන්ගේ හද ගැස්මත් මහින්ද ජනතාවට හෙළි කළේ මෙහෙමය.

“අද මම විමල් වීරවංශ මහත්තයා බලන්න හිරගෙදරට ගියා. එතුමා උපවාසයක් ආරම්භ කර තිබෙනවා. එතුමාගේ ඉස්සරහ කූඩුවේ ඉන්නේ රණවිරුවන් හය දෙනෙක්. ඊළඟට තවත් රණවිරුවන් කණ්ඩායමක් ඉස්පිරිතාලේ ඉන්නවා. ඒ අය බලන්න මම ගියා. මේ හැමෝම යුද්ධය ජයග්‍රහණය කරගන්න කොටින්ට එරෙහිව දිවිහිමියෙන් සටන් කරපු අයයි. මරාගෙන මැරෙන කොටියා ඒක පුපුරුවා ගන්න ඉස්සෙල්ලා අත්අඩංගුවට අරන් කූඩුවට දාපු පුද්ගලයා අද ඇතුළේ. බෝම්බය ගෙනාපු කොටියා එළියේ”.
මේ සිරගත කළ රණවිරුවන්ගේ හද ගැස්මය. සැබෑවය. මෙය ජනතාව අතරට යන වේගය අනුව තව තවත් යහපාලකයන්ගේ නිරුවත හෙළි වන්නේය. ඒ තරමටම ජනතාව අතර ඔවුන් කලකිරවන්නේය.

“රටේ හැමෝම නීතිය ඉදිරියේ සමානය කියනවා නම් මුල ඉඳලා පටන් ගන්න” කියල මේ අතර පැවැසුවේ බොදුබල සේනාවේ ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥානසාර හිමියෝය. ඊටම තවත් යමක් එකතු කළාක් වාගේ පැවිදි හඬ සංවිධානයේ සභාපති මුරුත්තෙට්ටුවේ ආනන්ද හිමියෝ පැවැසුවේ….
“රටට වෙලා තියෙන දේ ගැන දැන්වත් පාලකයන් හිතා බලන්න ඕනෑ. පලතුරු වට්ටි ගත්තා ඇති. සම්මාන ගත්තා ඇති”ය කියලාය.
මෙය රට්ටු කියන පදේට නටලා හොඳම මුදල් ඇමැති සම්මානය ගත්තට මොකෝ මීට වඩා රට කරවද්දී
හොඳ වෙන්න ඕනෑය කියා නොකියා කියා පෑමක් වැනිය.

පෙළ ගැහෙන ආණ්ඩු විරෝධය තියුණු බව පසක් කරමින් වගේ ජාතික බලවේග නියෝජනය කරමින් වෙන් වෙන්ව කටයුතු කරන සියලු බෞද්ධ ආගමික සංවිධාන එක්කර වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහි එක් ප්‍රබල බෞද්ධ සංවිධානයක් ස්ථාපිත කිරීමට තීරණය වී තිබීමත් තීරණාත්මක සාධකයක්ය.
සයිටම් ගැටලුවටද ආණ්ඩුව දෙන විසඳුමක් නැති නිසා රජයේ වෛද්‍යවරු රජයට සතියක් කල් දී ඇත. එම කාලය තුළදී එය විසඳුවේ නැත්නම් යළි විරෝධතා ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් වෙත යෑමට එම සංවිධානය තීරණය කිරීමට නියමිතය.

රට උද්ඝෝෂණ හා අවුල් වියවුල්වලින් රත් වෙද්දී උතුර නැඟෙනහිර පළාත්වල ආරක්‍ෂාවව පිළිබඳ රික්තයක් ඇති බව යළි යළිත් තහවුරු වන සිදුවීම් දැක ගන්නට හැකිය. ඒ අනුව කෝටි 2ක කුඩු තොගයක් සමඟ වැලිවැටිතුරේදී අයකු අත්අඩංගුවට පත්ව ඇත. කෝටි ගණනින් කුඩු උතුරින් කොළඹට එන තත්ත්වයට පත් වූ ආරක්‍ෂාව හා සම්බන්ධ කාරණා දැඩි සැලකිල්ලට ගත යුතු තැනකය.

එහෙත් මේ වන විට පැහැදිලිවම රට, ජාතිය ගැන කතා කරන බලවේග මොට කර දමන යාන්ත්‍රණයක් ක්‍රියාත්මක බවත් එම කටයුතුවලදී ප්‍රමුඛ වන පුද්ගලයන් සිරගත කර දැමීම එහි එක් ජවනිකාවක් බවත් ප්‍රකට හිමිවරු කිහිප දෙනෙක් වරින් වර හෙළි කළහ. උන්වහන්සේ තදින්ම කියා සිටින්නේ….
“අපි ආණ්ඩුවට කියන්නේ ජාතික බලවේගවල ඉවසීමේ සීමාවන් පරීක්‍ෂා කර බලන්න එපා කියලයි. රතු කට්ට පැන්නොත් මේ ජාතික බලවේග ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහිව මහා බලවේගයක්ව නැඟී සිටිනවා සත්තයි” කියලාය. මේ අතර ලෝකෙටම ඇහෙන්න හොඳම සෞඛ්‍ය ඇමැතිගෙ පාට් එකට ඇඳලා කතා කරපු රාජිතලගෙ දත කට පූට්ටු වෙන වැඩක් රාජ්‍ය ඔෟෂධ සංස්ථා ගබඩා තුළින් රටටම හෙළි වුණේය. ජනතාවට දෙන්න තිබුණු කෝටි 11ක බෙහෙත් තොගයක් කල් ඉකුත්වී විනාශ කර දමන තත්ත්වයකය. ගමේ ඉස්පිරිතාලෙට එන ජනතාවට පැනඩොල් පෙත්තක් දීගන්න බැරිව ළතැවෙන යහපාලකයන්ට මේ හෙණගහන අපරාධ නොපෙනීම ගැන ජනතාව හිතන දේ අපට කියන්නට ඕනෑ නැත.

රට කොයිතරම්ද කියනවා නම් මානසික රෝග පිළිබඳ විශේෂඥවරියක් පෙන්වා දෙන විදියට සෑම වසරකම තුන්දාහකට වැඩි පිරිසක් සියදිවි නසා ගන්නා බවත්, ඉන් බහුතරයක් නව යොවුන් වියේ දරුවන් බවත් කියැවෙන්නේය.
මේ අතර ඕස්ට්‍රේලියාවේදී මන්ත්‍රි ප්‍රසන්න රණතුංග අමුතු හෙළිදරව්වක්ද පසුගියදා කළේය. ඔහු කියන්නේ ඇතැම් දේශපාලනඥයන් සමඟ කොටි කිහිපදෙනකු එකතු වී ඇතැයි කියලාය. තත්ත්වය එසේනම් යුද්ධයට නායකත්වය දුන් මහින්දටත් ප්‍රගතිශීලී පිලේ සැමටත් අවදානමක් ඇති බව පෙනෙන්නේය.
තත්ත්වය මෙසේ තියෙද්දී ගෝඨාභය උගතුන්, වියතුන් හා ව්‍යාපාරිකයන්ගේ ඉල්ලීමකට අනුව “වියත් මඟ සංවිධානය” හරහා රටේ ඇතිවී තිබෙන ප්‍රශ්නය අධ්‍යයනය කරමින් ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ගතයුතු ක්‍රියාමාර්ග අධ්‍යයනය කරමින් සිටින්නේ නිකමට නොවේය කියා ජනතාව හිතන්නට පටන් අරන්ය. ගෝඨා මේ දිනවල පොත්පත් කියවමින් දැනුවත් වෙමින් සිටින්නේය. දේශපාලනයට එනවාය කියලා කෙළින් නොකීවත් ඔහු දේශපාලනමය නොවන ප්‍රමුඛ කාර්ය භාරයක් වෙනුවෙන් හෝ දැනුවත් වෙමින්, සූදානම් වෙමින් සිටීම ගැන රට ජාතිය ගැන හිතන රටවැසියන් සිටින්නේ ප්‍රබෝධයෙනි.

මේ සියල්ල එකට ගෙන සාරාංශගත කරමින් මහින්ද එක් දෙයක් පැහැදිලිව කීවේ….
“ආර්ථික අර්බුදය හමුවේ ආණ්ඩුවට දැන් කරකියා ගන්න දෙයක් නෑ. ආණ්ඩුවේ ආයුෂ කෙටියි. ළඟදීම පිපිරෙනවා” කියලාය.
ඒක මහින්ද කියලා කරවගන්නවාට වඩා යහපාලකයන්ම හත්පොළේ ගාගෙන දහ අතේ අනාගෙනම කරගන්න හැටි කාට කාටත් හොඳ හැටි පෙනෙනවාය. මහින්දට තියෙන්නේ මේ අනාගැනීම තව තවත් වෙන හැටි කියන එකය. ජනතාවට ඒ අනාගැනීම දැනෙන්නේය. එහෙව් පල්ලම් බැහිල්ලකට වැටී තියෙන යහපාලනය පෙරළා දමා ජනතාව වෙනසක් කරන්නට වැඩි කලක් ගත වන්නේ නැත.

If not Maithri or Ranil, who wants foreign judges?

April 2nd, 2017

BY GAGANI WEERAKOON Courtesy Ceylon Today

President Maithipala Sirisena clearly states that he, as the Head of the State, does not want foreign judges or would not allow the setting up of a Hybrid Court in the accountability process where Sri Lanka is under international scrutiny for alleged war crimes committed by government’s very own military forces in the final stages of 4th Eelam War.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, irrespective of his longstanding image of being a ‘non-patriot’ or a ‘non-nationalist’ made it clear that setting up a Hybrid Court or the involvement of foreign Judges – except experts on certain areas including forensic – is not feasible.

Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera told media in Colombo, meanwhile, that the inclusion of foreign judicial personnel in a domestic process as recommended by the 2015 UNHRC resolution that was recently extended by two years, was not the sole obsession of the government or of the international community.

Insisting government’s main concern was establishing a fair, independent and credible judicial process that will address the needs of all stakeholders, Samaraweera explained, the recommendation for foreign judicial officers to be part of the domestic process was recommended as faith in the Judiciary had declined under the previous regime.

“We will establish a transparent mechanism that will be accepted by all, and the international community knows this. The resolution is not something that is carved in stone and as the High Commissioner for Human Rights himself said in Sri Lanka, there are certain proposals they think is necessary to be followed, but the final decision will be made by Sri Lanka. This was what was promoted under the system that we proposed in 2015.”

Speaking of allegations of war crimes levelled against the Sri Lanka Army, Samaraweera said, whether they indeed amounted to war crimes would have to be decided by a Court. However, Samaraweera was unable to divulge the exact nature of the mechanism, but assured the final product would be something that would be acceptable to all stakeholders.

Every time, the topic of foreign Judges, being included in the accountability process, surfaces, many point the finger at former President Mahinda Rajapaksa as being responsible for inviting foreign Judges to get involved in internal matters.

The former Head of State, Rajapaksa, under whose period the ruthless LTTE terrorists were militarily defeated, despite immense international pressure calling for a slowdown, seems to have spent time and getting expert opinion in drafting his recent response which titled ‘The Great Betrayal in Geneva’. In this, Rajapaksa does not hesitate to in fact point a finger at the UN mechanism and accuse the UN authorities of foul play.

He also accuses the Yahapalana Government of hiding or suppressing important documents which otherwise, could have been used in favour of Sri Lanka at the UNHRC Session, held recently, and for meekly accepting the US co-sponsored resolution for the second time.

At the recently concluded session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Yahapalana Government pledged to implement in full the resolution they co-sponsored in October 2015.

Legitimacy issues

“Thereby they renewed their earlier undertaking to establish a war crimes tribunal with foreign Judges, prosecutors and investigators; to remove through an administrative process members of the armed forces suspected of war crimes, even if there isn’t enough evidence to take them before a judicial inquiry; to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act and to replace it with a law acceptable to the Western powers; and to allow the war crimes tribunal and other mechanisms to be set up in Sri Lanka to obtain funding from overseas. Though, the President and Prime Minister repeatedly say that no foreign Judges will be brought to try our armed forces, the pledge given in Geneva last week is exactly the opposite.”

According to Rajapaksa, the most dangerous aspect of the UNHRC resolutions of 2015 and 2017 is that the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL)has accepted without any reservations the report of the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) of September 2015 which had accused the Government of Sri Lankan of a whole range of war crimes including indiscriminate killings of non-combatants, torture, rape, illegal detention, abduction and deprivation of humanitarian assistance.

“There was no compelling reason for the Yahapalana Government to have accepted the OHCHR report other than their own inherent anti-national attitude. In 2010, the UN Secretary General commenced an inquiry against Sri Lanka and its report was published in April 2011. My government resolutely refused to accept that report and today, nobody even remembers that such a document existed,” he noted.

“The UN Secretary General can appoint a panel of experts to advise him on a country only on the instructions of the UN Security Council. Yet, under pressure from the Obama administration, Ban Ki-moon appointed a panel of experts to advise him about Sri Lanka without the sanction of the Security Council thus going against the practices in the UN that had evolved over seven decades. The investigation against Sri Lanka by the OHCHR which began in 2014 had similar issues of legitimacy. When the UNHRC appoints a Commission of Inquiry to go into the situation in a country, the members of the commission are appointed by the President of the UNHRC who is the Ambassador of a member nation. But in the case of Sri Lanka, the inquiry panel was appointed by the UN Human Rights Commissioner – a second tier UN official, not by the President of the UNHRC.

“Thus this report of the OHCHR which the Yahapalana Government has accepted is not the report of a properly constituted UNHRC Commission of Inquiry. Moreover, the UNHRC itself passes resolutions each year (with a two thirds majority) against the OHCHR accusing it of being overly dependent on Western countries for funding and having too many Westerners on its staff. Thus the present government has accepted the report of an inquiry carried out by a body regularly accused of bias by the UNHRC itself. In order to meet the allegations being made against our armed forces by various interested parties, my government commissioned six of the world’s foremost experts in the law of armed conflict, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, Desmond de Silva QC, Rodney Dixon QC, Prof. David M. Crane, Prof. Michael Newton and Maj. Gen. John Holmes to provide us with written opinions about the allegations and purported evidence against Sri Lanka.

no violations

“All six experts wrote well-reasoned analyses declaring unequivocally that no violations of the law of armed conflict had taken place in Sri Lanka. My government wanted to table these six reports before the UNHRC, but we were voted out of power in January 2015. The new government deliberately suppressed all these documents. (However, these expert opinions were published in full by ‘The Island’ newspaper and they are in the public domain now for everyone to read). After suppressing these written opinions of international experts which were all in Sri Lanka’s favour, the yahapalana government accepted without a murmur, the OHCHR report on Sri Lanka which accused us of committing every war crime imaginable. Now they have through two co-sponsored resolutions in the UNHRC, agreed to implement the recommendations in that biased and tainted report. This is the extent of the outright treachery practised by the Yahapalana Government against its own armed forces and people,” he pointed out.

In their report on the legal Issues pertaining to the use of human shields and hostage taking by the LTTE by Prof. David M. Crane, Sir Desmond de Silva, QC and Advisory Council of Experts, have observed that after the fall of Kilinochchi on 2 January 2009 to the Sri Lanka Army (SLA), in order to secure the safety of hundreds of thousands of civilian Tamils the government set up a series of No Fire Zones (NFZs). Despite this effort, the LTTE allegedly refused to recognize the NFZs. International law requires that safe areas, ceasefires and truces are accepted by both warring parties: agreement is a pre-requisite for legitimacy. Due to the refusal of the LTTE to recognize any such NFZs the laws relating to such zones have less relevance to any analysis of the situation in the last stages of the conflict. It is asserted that the LTTE fighters took advantage of the NFZs, embedded themselves in the NFZs and began firing at the military forces from within the zones. Additionally, the LTTE allegedly held thousands of civilians and some UN aid workers hostage in the NFZs as human shields in order to deter the military from firing upon them, while they conducted their attacks.

Eventually, the GOSL declared victory on 19 May 2009, but allegations that tens of thousands of civilians were killed in the final phase of the war and that civilian property, such as local hospitals, were damaged have been used to support the argument that the government committed war crimes during this operation. However, the government contends that civilians and hospitals were never the intended target of their attacks, rather the SLA were returning fire against enemy targets embedded as they were amidst civilians and close to hospitals.

Discussion

On whether the LTTE’s attempts to immunize its military leadership and assets through the criminal act of hostage taking and the subsequent internment of civilians near areas of strategic importance constitutes the international crime of Human Shielding; the experts opined that there is evidence to suggest that the LTTE were firing artillery at the SLA from the NFZ from the very outset of its creation. The Bishop of Jaffna in a letter to the President on 25 January 2009, stated:

“We are also urgently requesting the Tamil Tigers not to station themselves among the people in the Safety Zone and fire their artillery shells and their rockets at the Army. This will only increase more and more the death of civilians thus endangering the safety of the people.

Monadic Court

“Throughout the final months of the Sri Lanka Conflict in 2009, it has been asserted that the LTTE kept up its attacks on the SLA from all NFZs that were set up by the government. This was allegedly done with the intent to immunize themselves from attacks by government security forces; the very same activity and intent which the Monadic Court found sufficient to constitute human shielding.

While a distinction may be drawn between the facts in Mladic, where the accused individuals were placing protected persons in strategic areas, and the instant case, where the LTTE were merely entering NFZs where civilians were already heavily concentrated, this distinction is not legally relevant. As Blaskic noted, Geneva Convention IV, stands for the premise that even the mere presence of protected persons cannot be used to render a military target immune from attack. In other words, a belligerent who hides within an area with high concentrations of civilians is committing the crime of Human Shielding even if the belligerent party is not ‘actively placing them into a location. Furthermore, there are numerous reports of LTTE holding UN personnel and their families hostage in the NFZs in order to prevent or make difficult any counter attack by the SLA; facts which are nearly identical to those which the Mladic Court relied upon in its determination of the sufficiency of the indictment against the defendants for the crime of Human Shielding.”

For all the aforementioned reasons, the LTTE’s activities as alleged, both in hostage taking and redeployment to the NFZs with the intent of immunizing its assets from attack – if true – would likely support LTTE liability for the crime of Human Shielding, they opined.

However, it is not clear as to why the Government of Sri Lanka remained unable to present these in its favour, if we were to believe the arguments of former President Rajapaksa.

A FOLLY COMPOUNDED! -Dr. Palitha Kohona

April 2nd, 2017

 By Ravi Ladduwahetty – Courtesy Ceylon Today

Veteran Sri Lankan diplomat, Sri Lanka’s former Permanent Representative to the United Nations and Secretary to the Ministry of External Affairs Dr. Palitha Kohona said the UN Human Rights Resolution which Sri Lanka cosponsored in March 2017, was a folly compounded. “The onerous nature of Resolution 30/1 and the likely negative reaction to it by the majority of the population, and the need for constitutional amendment to implement some of its provisions so enthusiastically endorsed by us, would have been pretty obvious in 2015, he told Ceylon Today in an interview.

?: Sri Lanka had agreed to a new resolution which would grant further two years to implement Resolution 30/1. Do you believe we have made progress in the past 18 months to warrant an extension?

A. Let me turn your question around as I do not believe that the premise on which it is founded is sustainable. The simple issue is whether, as a sovereign nation, we should have cosponsored the Human Rights Council Resolution adopted on 1 October 2015.

Was that a responsible act by those in charge of managing the international affairs of a sovereign state? Sri Lanka’s co- sponsorship of Resolution 30/1 has been the subject of constant criticism. Then, compounding the initial apparent lack of judgment, we went on to cosponsor the resolution of March 2017 committing ourselves to implement the first resolution within two years. Resolution A/HRC/34/L.1 requests the High Commissioner for Human Rights and his special procedure mandate holders to strengthen their technical assistance to Sri Lanka on the promotion and protection of human rights, truth, justice, reconciliation and accountability. More importantly, the resolution calls for a written update on the implementation of resolution 30/1 (of 2015) at the 37th session of the UNHRC, and a comprehensive report at its 40th session. While the domestic political disquiet this will engender can be readily guessed, it will also damage Sri Lanka’s international image as the country struggles to implement its voluntary commitments.

There are many who do not believe that Sri Lanka should have cosponsored Res 30/1.

Despite the confrontational attitude of the previous government of Sri Lanka, the HRC resolutions adopted in the years 2012, 2013 and 2014, were nowhere near as onerous or intrusive as the resolution cosponsored by us in 2015. In 2009, the Human Rights Council had actually adopted a resolution praising Sri Lanka for eliminating a dreaded terrorist menace. If the government thought it necessary to cosponsor 30/1 in order to recover the favour of the West, the content could have been modified through a more astute negotiation process. This was eminently feasible as, in March 2015, the newly elected President commanded considerable goodwill in the West and this sentiment could have been leveraged in our favour. The key promoters of the resolution would not have done anything to destabilize or cause inconvenience to the government of President Maithripala Sirisena whose accession to power was received with scarcely disguised relief in the West. Top Sri Lankan leaders from the new regime were feted lavishly in Western capitals. This was not an environment in which Sri Lanka ran the risk of being discomfited by the West.

The onerous nature of the resolution and the likely negative reaction to it by the majority of the population, and the need for constitutional amendment to implement some of its provisions so enthusiastically adopted, would have been pretty obvious in 2015. The lack of sensitivity to the country’s constitutional requirements borders on abject naivety. The damage that such international undertakings, which are difficult or impossible to implement, can do to the national credibility is incalculable.

The obvious was also ignored. UNHRC resolutions are not binding and there is no direct mechanism for their implementation. The High Commissioner and the Council have no powers of implementation. But co-sponsorship would create at least a moral obligation to give effect to the content of the Resolution. In international relations, moral commitments carry considerable weight.

The government has in the process created a commitment not only for itself, but for future governments as well. As has been commented recently by Sanja de Silva, there should be a legitimate question asked as to who should be accountable for agreeing so readily to the resolution, including such external intrusions into our domestic affairs.

Sri Lanka’s enthusiasm for cosponsoring this resolution is further intriguing given that internal US cables published by Wikileaks make it abundantly clear that the US judged that any effort to take Sri Lanka before the UN Security Council would have failed.

Implicitly admitting that success against Sri Lanka was feasible only in the smaller forum of the HRC. Any disappointment of the West with the progress in Geneva would not have caused consequences in NY. In fact, no effort was undertaken by any of the countries sponsoring Resolution 30/1 to produce Sri Lanka’s case before the UN in New York. Not being a party to the ICC, the possibility of taking Sri Lankan security personnel before that Tribunal was also non- existent.

Already there is considerable seething opposition to the resolution that Sri Lanka cosponsored to keep career oriented and ambitious human rights functionaries of foreign governments, NGOs dependent on foreign funding, extreme minority elements, et al, satisfied. The wave of opposition is only likely to be exacerbated in the coming months compounding the problems connected with constitutional amendment. We, being a democracy, popular sentiments deserve sensitivity and respect unless we wish to precipitate a situation like that in the Ukraine. In the circumstances, it is no surprise that important parts of the resolution remain unimplemented. The overwhelming problems will continue to hamper future implementation efforts.

There is no doubt in the minds of most people that any breaches of the legal rules of the country should be firmly dealt with in accordance with the law. This is the sacred responsibility of any government. Similarly, any minority concerns must be addressed to ensure justice and equity, both for the minorities and the majority. But accepting onerous prescriptions of foreign governments, some of which are based on conjecture and superficial assumptions, are an unwarranted offence to the national dignity.

The co-sponsorship of the resolution has given the High Commissioner a continuing role to intrusively intervene in Sri Lanka on issues within his mandate and, more importantly, outside his defined powers. The Human Rights Council and the High Commissioner’s office were established to assist all countries of the world to improve their human rights performance and not to intervene selectively in countries which fall into disfavour with the West. We have, through our own actions, created an opportunity for the Council and the High Commissioner to intrude into our domestic affairs. In addition, elements within the country have begun to use the resolution to exert pressure on the government, in the process, aggravating already sensitive ethnic relations.

In the circumstances our primary concern should be not whether we could deliver the commitments undertaken in the resolution, but whether we should have agreed to those undeliverable commitments in the first place.

?: What can we expect over the next two years?

A. The resolution would likely strengthen the extremist elements in our society, both among the Sinhalese and the Tamils. It would contribute in no small measure to deepening the existing divisions amongst us, and aggravating the suspicions that separatism is back rearing its ugly head. Already demands, based on the resolutions that we voluntarily cosponsored, are being made by extremist Tamil elements that military installations be removed from the North and the East. The same elements were meekly quiescent when the LTTE built vast military complexes in the same locales. In any event, the national security forces should be based wherever there is a need for them. This is the case with any sovereign State. The determination of the locations where the security forces should be deployed should be left essentially to the policymakers and security experts and not to ill informed external entities, including the High Commissioner.

I might venture to suggest that the national economy, given its current perilous state, should be the prime concern of the government, rather than deploying its resources to give effect to the resolutions, including by amending the Constitution, which constitutes a diversion from today’s pressing realities. The government must concentrate its attention on the economy and give it priority. It would be a delusion to think that implementing the provisions of an HRC resolution, so unpopular within the country, will contribute to solving the myriad of other problems. It would seem that the government would only be inviting more unpopularity by focusing so single mindedly on implementing Res 30/1.

Any ethnic disturbance would only aggravate the difficult economic circumstances already confronting the country. One of the few areas of the economy that is continuing to be robust is tourism. This sector will quickly disintegrate, if underlying ethnic tensions result in disturbances.

?: Although we now have the Constitutional Council, Independent Police Commission and other independent commissions, there appears to be a lot of tampering of investigations at the hands of politicians. What is your call on this?

A. The country expects these institutions to remain independent and their integrity to be respected. If there are cases of illegal or improper interference in their functions, whether by politicians or not, the law should be enforced vigorously. No politician should be above the law. After almost 70 years of Independence we should not need the Human Rights Council or any other outside entity to give us lessons on these basic principles.

?: Resolution 30/1 talks of setting up a hybrid court among other things, and Sri Lanka has cosponsored this resolution. Could you tell us how this hybrid Court system will be set up?

A. I have already discussed above the deep divisions, the ethnic tensions and the opportunities for outside intrusions into our domestic affairs facilitated by resolution 30/1. Any effort to introduce hybrid courts would involve amendments to the Constitution with all the attendant divisions that it would create. The legal profession and the judiciary should feel incensed with the suggestion that they lack the impartiality and integrity to conduct the investigations into alleged war crimes and violations of the principle of crimes against humanity. While there may be some bad apples in the judicial basket, like in every other country including those that initiated resolution 30/1, the judiciary commands high regard in this country. It is mystifying that Sri Lanka voluntarily agreed to a resolution that unfairly casts a pall on the entire judiciary.

In this context, quite rightly, the President and the Prime Minister have both firmly refused to countenance the inclusion of foreign judges in the envisaged tribunals.

Transparency should not be an issue. It is always possible for the media and others to observe the proceedings in our Courts. It happens now as court proceedings are conducted with ample public access.

In any event, in Sri Lanka criminal investigations are not carried out by the judiciary. That is the responsibility of the Police. What is needed is firm policy guidance and technical support for the Police to do their job impartially and professionally.

Curiously, the current discourse seems to be focused on alleged infractions of the military that lost over 21,000 personnel while defeating a ruthless terrorist group. It is important to bring a balance to the discussion by refocusing also on the LTTE which massacred thousands of villagers, worshippers at religious sites, monks, and people praying, engaged in widespread ethnic cleansing, bombed civilians going about their daily affairs, recruited thousands of children for combat purposes. The discourse, in its current form, will only result in further acrimony unless the need for balance is emphasized. The High Commissioner’s report also lacks a sense of impartiality. If he had produced a similar report on any Western country against whom there are allegations, for example Israel or the US, they would have played hell.

It is also interesting that the UK and the US have refused to countenance prosecutions of their soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Prime Minister, Teresa May, has categorically stated that UK soldiers who served in those theatres will not be allowed to be brought before the Courts. A public litigation firm pursuing claims on behalf of Iraqi nationals has had its funding withdrawn.

?: Do you truly and honestly believe these recommendations in Resolution 30/1 will achieve their purpose in Sri Lanka?

A. The short answer is an emphatic “NO”. On the other hand, existing divisions are likely to be exacerbated and ethnic tensions aggravated and a drift towards another disastrous confrontation becomes a possibility with serious damage to the economy.

Ex-President extends conditional support to mega Chinese investment

April 2nd, 2017

By Norman Palihawadana Courtesy The Island

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa has offered conditional support to a mega Chinese investment project in the Hambantota District.

Former President Rajapaksa yesterday told The Island that his support would depend on the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government and China agreeing to adopt the original investment plan finalised during his administration.

Dismissing allegations that he had planned to sell land in Hambantota to the Chinese, the former President said that during a visit to Beijing last year he had explained the situation. “The extent of land we planned to hand over in Hambantota was much smaller,” he said.

Rishad moves to rescind President’s Wilpattu Gazettes by Cabinet Paper

April 2nd, 2017

Courtesy The Island

Four gazettes reportedly impacting the Northern Muslim resettlement process in Wilpattu proximity are to be rescinded.

“I informed the officials that I will present a Cabinet Paper to do way with the gazettes affecting resettlement of Northern Muslim IDPs.” said Minister of Industry and Commerce and Vanni District MP Rishad Bathiudeen on 31 March in Colombo.

Minister Bathiudeen was speaking to some members of the press shortly after meeting a team of government officials led by Secretary to the President P. B. Abeykoon at the Presidential Secretariat.

article_image

Minister Bathiudeen, who met them to present his side of story, demanded the degazetting of the Weppal, Karadikkuli/Marichakatti, and Wilathikulam areas declared by Extraordinary Gazette 2011/34 of March 24, 2017 since they were inhabited by people including Northern Muslims displaced due to terrorism. The recent Gazette 2011/34 also has also declared Mavillu, and Periyamadu reserves in addition. “But, I did not insist on these two locations since they are not inhabited and gazetting them do not affect Northern Muslim IDPs,” he said.

The gazettes Minister Bathiudeen wants done away with through a Cabinet Paper are the Gazette 1779/15 of 10 October 2012 which claimed 6,042 Hectares  of  Marichikaddi/Karadikkuli Forest Reserve,  the gazette bearing the number 1759/2 of 21 May 2012 which claimed 2,108 hectares of Vilathikulam Forest Reserve, and  gazette 2011/34 dated 24 March 2012  which claimed 40,030.525 Hectares of Mavillu Conservation Forest. “I have asked them to return to the original families living in those villages prior to eviction in 1990. Apart from presenting Cabinet paper seeking the withdrawal of the three gazettes of 2012, I have requested the officials to withdraw the recent Extraordinary Gazette 2011/34 of March 24, 2017. “The LTTE forcibly evicted the entire Muslim Population of the North in 1990-the worst ethnic cleansing exercise in the history of Sri Lanka.  These Muslim victims were forced to leave their homes in 24 hours from these lands now declared as conserved forests.”

Among the 24,000 Northern Muslim families expelled by LTTE on October 30, 1990 from their traditional homes and became overnight IDPs, was the eight-member family of the present Vanni MP and Minister Rishad Bathiudeen.

Power sector corruption second only to CB bond scams –Anti-Corruption Front

April 2nd, 2017

Over USD 3,700 mn worth foreign investment on hold while costly diesel plants in operation

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

Accusing the Power and Renewable Energy Ministry of favoring costly diesel power generation, the Anti Corruption Front (ACF) has urged the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government to immediately review a series of investment proposals to establish liquified natural gas (LNG) plants.

The ACF has called for reappraisal of the entire power generation plan to prevent an influential few from making a killing at the expense of the national economy.

ACF’s Executive Director Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon yesterday told The Island that both the previous government and the present administration hadn’t taken advantage of several proposals to set up LNG plants.

Tennakoon alleged that fresh investments had been blocked by top bureaucrats with the connivance of politicians. In fact, the situation had deteriorated since the change of government in January 2015 with those at the helm of the power sector taking decisions severely inimical to the national economy. Tennakoon cited the purchasing of coal from Swiss Singapore Overseas Enterprises Pvt Ltd at nearly USD 10 per tonne more than the market price as an example. “Each shipment cost Sri Lanka nearly Rs 100 mn more than the current market price,” Tennakoon said.

Tennakoon claimed that Sri Lanka’s premier investment promotion agency the Board of Investment (BoI) had been struggling to secure necessary approvals for LNG projects.Responding to a query, Tennakoon said that a Canadian investment amounting to USD 550 mn in LNG sector had been on hold since Sept 2005.

“Corruption in the lucrative power sector is second only to the Central Bank bond scam. The country is paying a very heavy price for corruption,” Tennakoon said. Four top officials who had been directly involved in the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s re-election bid in January 2015 were responsible for ruining the power sector today.

Attorney-at-law and BOI chief Upul Jayasuriya said that the Canadian investment was meant to establish 488 MW LNG plant at Kerawalapitiya. Jayasuriya said that instead of acting swiftly and decisively to secure the investment those responsible for decision making in the vital power sector had been delaying projects. Asked whether he couldn’t confirm Tennakoon’s allegations that several projects had been held up for want of approvals, Jayasuriya said that altogether five projects estimated to be worth USD 3753.8 mn had been pending though the delay couldn’t be blamed on one party in respect of all proposals.

The Canadian project had been held up since 2005 pending CEB approval, Jayasuriya said, adding that a proposal made in Sept 2011 in respect of an American investment amounting to US 1000 mn couldn’t get off the ground for want of CEB approval. The US investment had been the largest of the five projects and was intended to establish LNG storage and regasification plant as well as 500 MW power plant at Hambantota, Jayasuriya said.

According to him, the previous government hadn’t been able to secure an investment amounting to US 750 mn from Hong Kong for the establishment of 600 MW LNG plant and LNG intake terminal in June 2008 for want of CEB’s approval. Jayasuriya said that the same Hong Kong investor had proposed the setting up of LNG power plants for Katunayake and Biyagama Export processing Zones (EPZs) as well as LNG intake facility at Kerawalapitiya. The proposal worth USD 325 mn made in Nov 2016 had been pending subject to necessary approvals, Jayasuriya said.

The BOI Chief said Sri Lanka couldn’t afford to prolong the decision making process especially at a time foreign investment was required.

In addition to the Hong Kong investment proposal that had been made in Nov 2016, the BoI received two other project proposals from Indian and Chinese investors in July and Dec 2016, respectively The Indian investment worth USD 400 mn was to establish LNG intake and processing facility at Kerawalapitiya and the Chinese investment amounting to USD 728.8 was to be made at Hambantota. According to the BOI chief, in respect of the Indian project cabinet approval as well as Petroleum Resources Development ministry were required whereas the Chinese project awaited releasing of land in Hambantota.

Tennakoon said that the CEB’s controversial move to build a combined cycle power plant at Kerawalapitiya with the intention of transforming it to LNG facility in three years at a colossal cost to the cash-strapped government should be examined against the backdrop of long overdue approval for foreign investments in the same sector. Tennakoon said that the CEB was planning to invest nearly Rs 7 bn on the project at a time the government was struggling to meet its overseas loan commitments.

Both Jayasuriya and Tennakoon said that inordinate delay in accepting foreign investments was causing losses to the economy.

Tennakoon revealed that the foreign investors had been denied approval even after they received an assurance from President Maithripala Sirisena that their projects would be facilitated. The assurance had been received by investors when they met President Maithripala Sirisena early last year, Tennakoon said, alleging that yahapalana government seemed to be as corrupt as the previous lot.

Tennakoon urged parliament to inquire into what was happening in the power sector. The ACF official pointed out that since the change of government, the yahapalana administration had paved the way for gradual re-launch of diesel power generation facilities at a tremendous cost to the country.

The Greatest Circus in Town –the Circus of Bond Scam, and Sirisena’s Commisions.

April 1st, 2017

By Charles.S.Perera

Now its two years since the greatest Bank Robbery in Sri Lanka –the Bond Scam was committed. Two COPE reports were out confirming the theft and showing where the  smell had taken them to. The thief  every one in Sri Lanka is quite aware of  is still unharmed living  a comfortable  respectable life working as the adviser to the Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe, proving without doubt that they are bound to each other  more than ever before by the robbery they committed together.

When the facts are so evident, if the Prime Minister  has any respect to democracy he should  resign from his office of Prime Minister and give himself up together with Arjun Manoharan one as the instigator and the other as the perpetrator.

When the whole country knows how the Bond Scam took place and who are primarily responsible, the President Maithripala Sirisena has no courage either  to ask his Prime Minister to resign, or ask him to have Arjun Mahendran arrested by the infamous FCID. 

Sirisena instead waits two COPE reports and two years to pass before he appoints a Commission of Investigation.  One may rightly ask why the hell did  Sirisena wait two years before he  appointed a Commission to Investigate on the Bond Scam ?  Having had  appointed the Investigation Commission what is the guarantee Maithripala Sirisena will take action on the Commission report ?

But it did not take such a long time for Sirisena to dissolve the Parliament to avoid  DEW Goonesakra from presenting his COPE report to the Parliament. It also did not take long time for Sirisena to connive with Ranil Wickramasinghe to arrest Wimal Weerawansa and ask his favourite judge to put him in jail.

It also did not take long for Sirisena to dismiss the General Secretaries of SLFP and UPFA and appoint two new Secretaries and announce that even if Mahinda Rajapakse were to win the general  elections he will not be made the Prime Minister.  Maithripala Sirisena thinks that people of Sri Lanka are all  fools, and would give party allegiance and confidence, friendly trust, and affection , if someone were to  propose highlife and a high position. No all Sri Lankans are  back stabbers.

Sirisena is politically married to Ranil Wickramasinghe and he will never allow Ranil to resign. Ranil Wickramasinghe is the support on whom Maithripala Sirisena keeps his hold. Without him he will crash. Ranil Wickramasinghe  does not want to waste the precious time he has to ruin Sri Lanka as the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka giving into Sirisena’s pathetic call of order.  Sirisena  had been wanting to reshuffle the Cabinet, but Ranil wants nothing of it. Ranil is not only ruining Sri Lanka but also ruining his own party the UNP, proposing to elect Sarath Fonseka as the Assistant leader of the UNP.

Will the UNP wakeup to throw its leader out ?

In the meantime the Bond Scam Circus is in full swing, despite the fear of the witnesses to give evidence through fear of Yahapalanaya revengeful tactics. Ranil Wickramasinghe  may be readying himself to pounce upon the courageous witnesses from the Central Banka any time to force them to withdraw their evidence or go backtrack  on them for the benefit of the thief, as the Bond Scam had been a pre-arranged affair to benefit the empty treasury of the  UNP.

The Chief Minister of the Western Province  Isura Devapriya had on 30 March,2017,  blamed the IGP for not providing protection to those witnesses giving evidence before the presidential Commission.

Has  Maithripala Sirisena as the President the power to step in and stop this  Bond Scam Circus now ?

He should have done it long time ago without waiting two years to wake up.  The Governor of the Central Bank is also a public officer  therefore under the Administrative Regulations when he is suspected to have committed an illegal act in the  performance of his duties he should have been interdicted from service, before charges are framed against him.

But in the case of this individual –Arjun Mahendran, he has been given more responsibility and provided gainful employment. Why cannot the President if he has any power,  to at least now have the miscreant interdicted, and his passport impounded ?

While the Presidential Commission is sitting other matters  pertaining to the Bond Scam are coming to light. Now it has been reported that EPF had incurred a loss of Rupees Nine and a Half Billion because of the Bond Scam, while the Perpetual treasuries has got a benefit of  Thirteen Billion Rupees.

The Central Bank it appears could have burrowed One Billion rupees from the EPF without selling the famous Bonds and avoided the lost to the Central Bank.

But what we cannot understand is how was it that the three man Committee appointed by the Prime Minister immediately after the Bond Scam on 27 February,2015  reported that no irregularity has taken place and no blame could be placed on the  Governor of the Central Bank ? 

What did they investigate and how did they made their investigations  ?  The three men who were lawyers attached to the Sirikotha should be held responsible for making a wrong report and  debarred from practicing law.

As the profit of Thirteen Billion Rupees had been earned by the Perpetual Treasuries on questionable terms, the Government should confiscate the amount at least  until the end of the investigations by the Presidential Commission. It is a matter for the Chairman of the Commission to Order.  If not the President Maithripala Sirisena should issue instructions to the Chairman of the Commission to do so.

Some such decision should be taken to stop the Perpetual Treasuries from using this ill earned  Thirteen Billion Rupees as it has been announced that the Government is allowing the Perpetual Treasuries to open a Distillery in the East. Maithripala Sirisena who pretends to be a Buddhist cannot let these rougues open a Distillery in Buddhist Sri Lanka, and that too with the ill earned money causing a loss of Nine and a Half Billion Rupees to the Employees Provident Fund.

Most surprisingly the recently Highly Recognised Asia’s Best Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake has not deemed it fit to tax the Perpetual Treasuries for its Distillery and waived a tax of  Four Billion Rupees.

All this while they claim that the Government has a huge debt  to pay which had been caused by the previous government. Who are these Yahapalanaya Circus Band trying to fool ?

Isn’t it  time that Maithripala Sirisena stops for a while his speech making and look seriously as to what his Prime Minister is actually up to  and take corrective  action. But his moments are limited.

Maithripala Sirisena wanted to reshuffle the Cabinet of Ministers before he left to meet President Putting in Russia. Then he said he would attend to a change of Ministers on his return from Russhia, and now he says he will look into it after the new year. Will it ever happen ?

However,  we see some already lining up for different Ministries –Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe is hoping to get the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  In preparing his claim for   Mahinda Samarasinghe praises Maithripala Sirisena as a person invited by all foreign  countries and, says  that Sri Lanka is no more a subservient country thanks to Maithripala Sirsena.

But the fact is that President Sirisena is being invited everywhere in East and West Europe, but Sri Lanka is soon going  to face bankruptcy , unless Maithripala Sirisena wakes up and  shows the door to his Prme Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe and appoints an able man as the Minister of Finance.

Maithripala Sirisena should also leave aside things which are not urgent now such as the writing of a New Constitution, giving more concessions to Tamils on account of reconciliation and stop the Muslim Ministers from going ahead with forest clearing for  Muslim Settlements

President Maithripala Sirisena should also instruct his Prime Minster to take a court order to stop the Perpetual Treasuries from carrying on its business. Its  Bank accounts should be  blocked. Their investment for the construction of the  Distilleries and the launching of a News Paper in Sri Lanka should also be stayed  until the end of the sittings of the Presidential Commission of Investigation on  the Bond Scam.

THE PERFIDY OF THE KDU INVITE. NO SHAME AT ALL, REALLY, NONE WHATSOEVER

April 1st, 2017

RAJPAL ABEYNAYAKE

Why did the Sri Lanka Army recently invite somebody who sold the entire country down the drain as the Chef Guest at the Kotelawala Defence University’s Graduate Studies Department’s Inauguration of Masters Programs for the year 2017? This invitee, Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu also delivered the keynote address.

Probable answers:
1. They want to make sure that no person with even a modicum of integrity or self respect would join the army anymore, and that all future armed campaigns/wars if any, would be lost as a result.

2. They want to completely destroy the army’s reputation for an eternity, and the average soldier’s morale to boot.

3. They want to make sure that now that there is no war, the army would be known alternately, not for having fighting men and true warriors — but for having standup comedians and comics, or simple clowns, who think nothing of inviting their own destroyers, to enable their own destruction.

image

The Rajpal Abeynayake Column

image

But seriously, it is unlikely that the army top brass per se invited this palpable anti-people agitprop agent as the chief guest. (See links below for confirmation if you need any. There is much more evidence of this person’s anti Sri Lankan advocacy, but what’s linked here would suffice for the moment.)
This is a guy who has constantly maintained that the Sri Lankan Army committed excesses etc. and that an an international investigation with foreign judges should be the way to set about post war retribution, which his ilk has conveniently and cynically labelled ‘reconciliation’.

Of course we all know that the current Sri Lankan ‘Yahapalana’ government specializes in rubbing the faces of our valiant soldier heroes in the sand.
In fact they specialize in rubbing the faces of all Sri Lankans in the sand.
This dispensation also seems to like getting the country molested at will by all sorts of ghouls representing rapacious foreign interests — and others allied to these foreign interests. However this latest stunt stinks to high heaven and beyond. Inviting this zero-integrity character to be the Chief Guest at an army inauguration event is akin to inviting the fox to grace the Hen Party,
Or asking Jack the Ripper to be the Chief Guest at a Women’s Welfare Conference.
It’s not time for jesting of course. Seriously, don’t these people – the inviters and the invited have no sense of shame at all? NO SENSE OF SHAME AT ALL?
We doubt the Army per se did the inviting anyway. Somebody obviously did the inviting for the Army, and that was somebody the army which is in the process of getting its collective face rubbed in the sand, could obviously not say no to.
Really doesn’t anybody concerned with this stinking affair have no sense of shame whatsoever?
Answer: No they DO NOT
Of course the army would now probably be made to write to all and sundry saying ‘we did the inviting on our own’. Well, we know the meaning of the word coercion.
Also, the million dollar question in all of this is, doesn’t the man who was invited not have a smidgen of shame, going before an army he denigrated so viciously — and baring his teeth in a grin? This man must have the hide of a rhinoceros.

http://allasiaweb.com/?p=956#more-956

Some references:

nation

rape report

human rights

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/02/war-crime-claims-re-emerge-sri-lanka-201425121848920663.html

A post script: There would no doubt be the usual culprits who would want to sanitize the man and his antics, and the recent case of this ignoble invite, and paint us as victimizers and the Paikiasothys of this world as victims.
Such perfidy doesn’t impress us.

IMF trying to ‘foist’ Ghana’s tax laws on Sri Lanka? Business groups convey concerns to PM & FM

April 1st, 2017

The proposed new Inland Revenue Act has run into stiff opposition from key industry players, who described the controversial move to replace the existing law, as a “retrograde step that’s bound to create confusion and impinge on the overall revenue collection mechanism”.

Asserting that the proposed law departs from the very foundation and fabric of the existing Act, financial sector experts warned that if the new proposals are adopted and implemented in their current form, hardly any judicial precedence, interpretations, practices and principles could be applied in the imposition, payment and recovery of income tax in Sri Lanka.

Apart from the phraseology used, which has no relation to the present Act, the new law attempts to fundamentally change the sources of income, method of calculating the taxable income, claiming deductions, assessment procedure and the administrative provisions, they pointed out.

“The biggest disaster is that the envisaged Inland Revenue Act was inspired by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in a bid to generate more tax revenue but, instead of drafting a law to suit the country’s needs and demands, what this international lending agency did was to impose word by word the tax law of Ghana on Sri Lanka”, the experts noted.

“The IMF didn’t do anything extraordinary for Sri Lanka.It was a case of merely foisting Ghana’s tax law on us”, they said.

The IMF was good at imposing tax laws on dictatorships in countries such as Congo, Ghana, Libya and Myanmar, which had no history of laws. But, there was no fundamental basis to introduce a new tax regime without any knowledge of Sri Lankan businesses and the fundamentals of taxation, which have existed in the country for over 75 years, they said.

“The IMF will not be here everyday; they will slap it on us and go away”.

“If the objective was to modernize the law, the government should have drawn examples from developed systems such as in Singapore or Malaysia for adoption. The objective of falling back on a country like Ghana to enact legislation on taxation was necessarily flawed; the whole approach to this process was flawed”, they observed.

Any new tax law takes at least 10 years to settle down. Under these circumstances, who will take care of the loss of revenue? Moreover, there is no guarantee that the proposed Act will increase revenue. People will interpret it the way they want as nobody will know the correct definition of the new law, industry officials said.

“What happened was that the government discussed with the IMF the financial crisis facing the country and the relief package to stave off the balance of payment crisis. At that point, the IMF had observed that the tax law in Sri Lanka is too complicated and insisted on strengthening revenue collection. It would have been acceptable if this process was accomplished through more computerization, better HR resources, IT and software”, the experts explained.

The government, instead of saying the situation could be rectified by asking the Inland Revenue Department to draft a new tax law, had wanted the IMF to shoulder this task. It was entirely the government’s fault, they said.

“It will be a big achievement for IMF’s CV to say they drafted the tax law of Sri Lanka. For that matter, even an individual credited with drafting our tax law can secure a top job in the US, they added.

Any tax law in the world is complicated. There are no uncomplicated tax laws as taxation itself is inherently complicated, and it’s not everybody who can understand it. What was the fundamental concept and principle behind the attempt to replace the present Inland Revenue Act and change the status quo in a sphere that generates enormous tax revenue for the government?, they queried.

The fundamental question that arises in this backdrop is: who wanted these drastic changes through a new tax law? Was a new Act being envisaged because revenue collection is poor or the existing law has drawbacks due to bad drafting that people cannot understand it? If mistakes exist, the relevant provisions can be redrafted and there is no reason to kick out the whole Act, they explained.

The Sunday Island understands that representatives of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka, Ceylon Chamber of Commerce and industry practitioners had raised their concerns with Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake at a recent meeting.

“The premier understood our position that there was no requirement for a new Act, but it was too late as the IMF had warned that the reversal of the process would mean there will no tranche forthcoming. As there was no choice, the IMF was asked to go ahead, the experts asserted.

“On examining the draft law, we wanted certain amendments incorporated, and it was with great difficulty that we managed to get something in, not everything. However, the proposed Act is still fundamentally flawed”,

Financial sector experts who have evaluated the Inland Revenue draft law believe that the proposed Act does not add any new sources of revenue and instead of plugging the existing loopholes would add new ones due to the brevity of the drafting. The existing knowledge of Inland Revenue officers will be obliterated overnight and they will need at least four to five years to study and understand the new law.

“The wealth of knowledge acquired over the past few decades by the Inland Revenue Department, judicial system, practitioners, students and tax payers will be lost overnight”, they cautioned.

The proposed Act is also not consistent with the existing law and until the transitional period ends, two regimes of law will continue. For example, taxation of finance leasing will change dramatically and until existing leasing agreements expire, two regimes will continue creating confusion and making administration more difficult, they pointed out.

The experts were of the view that the current law has more depth, better drafting and most parts of it are consistent with international best practices. The proposed Act also gives undue emphasis to less important sections, which have little relevance to the economy and ignores the more important sections on imposition and recovery.

If revenue collection falls below expectations, the main reason for loss of potential revenue is poor administration and collection effort and government policy on continued tax incentives. Introducing a new Act will not increase revenue collection, but instead reduce it due to lack of understanding of the law amongst tax payers as well as revenue officers at least in the short to medium term, they elaborated.

Recommending the rationalizing of tax incentives over a period of time to enhance the tax net, the experts called for the consolidation of the IR Act of 2006 and subsequent legislation enacted each year into one Act and remove repugnant sections, change the language, if certain sections are unclear or in doubt and introduce some sections drafted in the new Act especially on transfer pricing, international tax and advance rulings into the existing law without changing its fundamental structure.

If the government’s concern is to enhance tax collection, what needs to be done is to plug the loopholes in the law that leads to tax avoidance or evasion and make the IR department a more efficient and vibrant tax collection body. The solution is not to abolish the existing Act which was in force for over a century and replace it with a new law unknown to the IR department and the public, which, in any case, will not guarantee a higher collection of tax revenue, the experts noted.

Commissioner-General of Inland Revenue, Mrs. Kalyani Dahanayake, said that the proposed Act drafted by the IMF was referred to her department for observations.

There are some good aspects in the proposed law, she emphasized. “In fact, they agreed with us to a certain extent on the proposals we made”.

On the proposed adoption of the new law, she said it was the wish of the government that the Inland Revenue Act be replaced in keeping with international best practices.

With some amendments proposed by the Inland Revenue Department, professional bodies and industry practitioners, the draft law has now reverted to the Legal Draftsman for incorporation, The Sunday Island learns.

ඉන්දියාවේ අජිත් ඩෙවොල් රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව බලයෙන් පහකළ කතාව පරිවර්තනය කොට ඉන්දීය ජනතාවට දෙන්න

April 1st, 2017

සී. ඒ. චන්ද්‍රප්‍රේම උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

අජිත් ඩොවාල් යනු ලංකාවේ ජනතාවට කොහෙත්ම හුරු නමක්‌ නොවේ. නමුත් 2014 ඉන්දියාවේ නරේන්ද්‍ර මෝඩි බලයට පත්වූදා සිට ඉන්දීය විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්තියේ, විශේෂයෙන්ම ඉන්දියාවේ අසල්වාසි රටවල් සම්බන්ධ ප්‍රතිපත්තියේ ප්‍රධානම තීරකයා වන්නේ ඉන්දියාවේ විදේශ ඇමතිනී සුශ්මා ස්‌වරාඡ් නොව ජාතික ආරක්‌ෂක උපදේශකවරයා වන අජිත් ඩොවාල්ය. එසේ තිබියදී අජිත් ඩොවාල් නමැති පුද්ගලයකු ගැන බොහෝ ලාංකිකයන් අසාවත් නොතිබීමට ප්‍රධානම හේතුව ඩොවාල් යනු රාජතාන්ත්‍රිකයකු හෝ පරිපාලකයකු නොව චරපුරුෂයකු වන නිසා විය හැක. එවන් අයගේ සාමාන්‍ය ක්‍රියා කලාපය වන්නේ විශේෂයෙන්ම වැඩක නියෑළී සිටින විට හැකිනම් “ගේමක්‌ දෙමින්” සිටින විට අප්‍රසිද්ධියේ කිසිවකුගේත් අවධානයට යොමු නොවී ඒ රාජකාරිය කිරීමේ පුරුද්ද නිසා විය හැක.

තමන් රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රිකයකු නොව ආරක්‌ෂාව පිළිබඳ විශේෂඥයකු බව ඩොවාල් එළිපිටම කියයි. ඉන්දීය ජනතාව අතර ඔහුට ඇත්තේ ජාතික වීරයකුගේ ප්‍රතිරූපයයි. ජීවමාන “ඡේම්ස්‌ බොන්ඩ්” කෙනකු හැටියට බොහෝ ඉන්දියානුවන් ඔහුව දකී. ඉන්දියාවේ චර පුරුෂ සේවය වන රෝ සංවිධානයේ ඔහු ගතකළ කාලය තුළ පකිස්‌තානයේ චරපුරුෂ සේවයේ යෙදීමත්, කාශ්මීරයේ මිසෝරාම් ප්‍රාන්තයේ හා පන්ජාබයේ සීක්‌ ජාතිකයන්ගේ කැරැලි මර්දනය කිරීමටද ඉන්දීය ගුවන් යානා පැහැර ගැනීම් දුසිමකට වඩා විසඳීමද, ඉරාකයේ “අයිසිස්‌” ත්‍රස්‌තවාදීන්ගේ ග්‍රහනයට හසුවූ ඉන්දීය හෙද සේවකයන් බේරා ගැනීම ඇතුළු රහස්‌ මෙහෙයුම් ගණනාවකට මැදිහත් වී ඩොවාල් ඉන්දීය ජනතාව අතර සුවිශෙෂ තැනක්‌ දිනාගෙන සිටී. ඔහුගේ විශිෂ්ටතම මෑතකාලීන මෙහෙයුම හැටියට ඉන්දීය මෙන්ම ජාත්‍යන්තර මාධ්‍යයද සලකන්නේ 2015 ජනවාරි 8 වැනිදා ලංකාවේ රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව බලයෙන් පහ කිරීමයි.

2015 ජනවාරි 08 බල පෙරළියත් සමඟම රොයිටර්ස්‌ ජාත්‍යන්තර පුවත් සේවය පවසා සිටියේ ඩොවාල් මේ පෙරළියේ ප්‍රධානම සංවිධායකවරයෙක්‌ බවත්, පොදු විපක්‌ෂ අපේක්‍ෂකයකු වෙනුවෙන් රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා තරගයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීමත්, මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන ශ්‍රීලනිපයෙන් එළියට ගැනීමත්, ලංකාවේ සියලුම විපක්‌ෂ බලවේග එක වේදිකාවට ගැනිමත් සියලුම සුළු ජාතික පක්‍ෂ මහින්දට එරෙහි වන තත්ත්වයක්‌ නිර්මාණය කිරීමත් සියල්ල ඩොවාල්ගේ මෙහෙයුමෙන් සිදුවූ බවය. ඉන්දියාවේ “සිටිසන් බියුරෝ” නමැති ප්‍රසිද්ධ වෙබ් අඩවියද පවසා සිටියේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සිදු වූයේ සම්භාවනීය ගනයේ “ඩොවාල් මෙහෙයුමක්‌” බවයි. 2014 නොවැම්බර් මාසයේ දී කොළඹට පැමිණ මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන ඇතුළු අය හමුවී මේ සියල්ල සංවිධානය කළ ආකාරය එම වෙබ් අඩවිය පැහැදිලි කරයි. ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට එතරම් මැදිහත්වීමක්‌ කළ පුද්ගලයකුගේ නමවත් බොහෝ ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් අසාවත් නොතිබීම ම චර පුරුෂයකු හැටියට අප්‍රසිද්ධියේ වැඩ කිරීමට ඩොවාල්ගේ ඇති නැඹුරුවට අමතරව තවත් හේතුවක්‌ වන්නේ ඉන්දියාව ලංකාවේ කළ මේ ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළිය ඉතා කෙටි කලකින් වැරැදි පැත්තට යැමට ආරම්භ වූ නිසා ඩොවාල් මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් නිහඬ ප්‍රතිපත්තියක්‌ අනුගමනය කිරීමට තීන්දු කිරීමද විය හැක.

ඉන්දියාව විසින් රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව පලවා හැරීමට කටයුතු කිරීමට ප්‍රධානම හේතුවක්‌ වූයේ කොළඹ වරාය නගර ව්‍යාපෘතියයි. චීනය විසින් ඉදිකරන මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඉන්දියාවේ ආරක්‌ෂාවට තර්ජනයක්‌ වන නිසා එය නවතා දමන්නැයි ඩොවාල් 2014 දී කීප වතාවක්‌ම එවක සිටි ආරක්‌ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්‌ෂ මහතාට කියා තිබිණි. ඒ කාලයේ හම්බන්තොට වරාය චීන සමාගමකට විකිණීමට හෝ බදු දීමට රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුවේ කිසිදු සැලසුමක්‌ නොතිබුණු නිසා හම්බන්තොට පිළිබඳ ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ ඉන්දියාවට නොවීය. රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව පලවා හැරීමට ඉන්දියාව තීරණය කිරීමට ආසන්නම හේතු වූයේ චීන සබ්මැරීනයක්‌ කොළඹ වරායට පැමිණීමයි. මේ සබ්මැරීනයේ පැමිණීම ගැන ඉන්දියාවට දැනුම් දුන්නේ නැතැයි ඉන්දියානුවන් කියයි. මේ අනුව අජිත් ඩොවාල් වැඩ ආරම්භ කළේය. රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව පලවා හරිනු ලැබීය. චීන ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින්ම ආරම්භ කරන ලද ව්‍යාපෘතියක්‌ වුවද වරාය නගරයේ කටයුතු අලුත් ආණ්‌ඩුව විසින් නවතා දමනු ලැබීය. ඉන්දීය අගමැති නරේන්ද්‍ර මෝදිද අලුතෙන් යටත් කරගත් දේශයක්‌ නැරැඹීමට එන අධිරාජ්‍යයකුගේ විලාසයෙන් ලංකාවට පැමිණ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අමතා ආපසු ගියේය. ටික කලක්‌ යන තුරු ඩොවාල්ගේ සියලු සැලසුම් සාර්ථක වී ඇති බවත් ලංකාව දැන් සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම ඉන්දියාවේ ග්‍රහනයට නතුවී ඇති බවකුත් පෙනෙන්නට තිබිණි. නමුත් ඉතා කෙටි කලකින් මේ සියල්ල අනිත් පැත්තට කැරකීමට පටන් ගත්තේය.

මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන උතුරු නැගෙනහිර ප්‍රදේශවල විශාල වැඩි ඡන්ද ප්‍රමාණයකින් දිනා තිබුණත් රටේ සෙසු ප්‍රදේශවල ඔහුගේ ඡන්ද පදනම ගැන ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ තිබිණි. 2015 ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ දී උතුරු නැගෙනහිරින් පිට පළාත්වල පුත්තලම, පොළොන්නරුව, නුවර, බදුල්ල, කොළඹ, ගම්පහ සහ නුවරඑළිය දිස්‌ත්‍රික්‌ක සිරිසේන දිනා තිබුණද සමස්‌තයක්‌ වශයෙන් උතුරු නැගෙනහිර ප්‍රදේශවලින් පිට සිරිසේනට වඩා ඡන්ද ලක්‌ෂ 2 කට වැඩිය මහින්ද රාජපක්‌ෂට ලැබී තිබුණි. මෙවන් වාතාවරණයක්‌ තුළ තව කෙටි කලකින් එළඹීමට නියමිතව තිබූ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය ජය ගැනීම යහපාලන පාර්ශ්වයට විශාල ප්‍රශ්නයක්‌ විය. දකුණේ ජනතාවගේ හිත දිනා ගැනීමට කුමක්‌ හෝ කිරීමට ඔවුන්ට සිදුවිය. මේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසඳීමට සිරිසේන වික්‍රමසිංහ ආණ්‌ඩුවේ උපාය මාර්ගය වූයේ සියලුම රජයේ සේවකයන්ට පෙර නොවූ විරූ ආකාරයේ මසකට රුපියල් 10,000 ක දීමනාවක්‌ ලබාදීමත්, ඉන්ධන, ගෑස්‌, විදුලි බලය හා ආහාර ද්‍රව්‍ය ගණනාවක මිල අඩු කිරීමත්ය.

මේ ආකාරයට එක්‌වරම ආණ්‌ඩුවේ වියදම විශාල වශයෙන් වැඩිවීමත්, බදු ආදායම එක්‌වරම විශාල වශයෙන් අඩුවීමත් නිසා හිඟ මුදල් ලබා ගැනීමට ආණ්‌ඩුව මහ පරිමාණයේ දේශීයව පමණක්‌ නොව විදේශීය මූලාශ්‍රවලින්ද ණය ගැනීමට පටන් ගත්තේය. මේ ආකාරයට කිසිදු සැලසුමක්‌ නොමැතිව ගන්නා ලද කෙටිකාලීන විදෙස්‌ ණය ගෙවීමට රට තුළට විදේශ විනිමය ගලා ඒම වැඩි කිරීමට අවශ්‍යතාවක්‌ තිබුණත් අලුත් ආණ්‌ඩුව බටහිර රටවලින් හා ඉන්දියාවෙන් බලාපොරොත්තු වූ ආයෝජන ලංකාවට නොපැමිණියේය. මාස කීපයක්‌ ගිය තැන මේ අර්බුදය උත්සන්න වත්ම නවතා දමා තිබූ වරාය නගර ව්‍යාපෘතිය චීනයට නැවත ආරම්භ කිරීමට ඉඩදීමට ආණ්‌ඩුවට සිදුවිය. මේ වරාය නගරය ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 1400 ක වියදමෙන් චීනය ඉදිකරන අතර මේ මුදල් ලංකාවට ඒම යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුවට මහා අස්‌වැසිල්ලක්‌ විය. තවත් මාස කීපයක්‌ ගිය තැන දේශපාලනිකව ඇති කරන ලද ආර්ථික අර්බුදය පාලනය කරගත නොහැකිව ඔඩු දුවද්දී අලුත් ආණ්‌ඩුව තව ටිකක්‌ ඉදිරියට ගොස්‌ හම්බන්තොට වරායත් චීනයට ලබාදී මුදල් ලබා ගැනීමට ඉදිරිපත් විය. හම්බන්තොට වරායට අයත් අක්‌කර 5000 ක භූමි භාගයට අමතරව ඉන් පිටත තවත් අක්‌කර 15,000 ක භූමි භාගයක්‌ද චීන සමාගමකටදී මුදල් ලබා ගැනීම ආණ්‌ඩුවේ අභිප්‍රාය විය.

මේ අනුව චීනයට ලබාදීමට නියමිත වූ මුළු භූමි ප්‍රමාණය අක්‌කර 20,000 ක්‌ නැතිනම් වර්ග කිලෝමීටර් 80 ක්‌ විය. මෙය වතිකානු රාජ්‍යය, මොනාකෝ රාජ්‍යය, ජිබ්රෝල්ටා, කොකෝස්‌ දූපත්, නාවුරු දූපත්, ස්‌ප්‍රැට්‌ලි දූපත් හා මකාමේ යන කුඩා රාජ්‍යයන් සියල්ලටම වඩා විශාල භූමි භාගයකි. චීනයට මේ ආකාරයට හම්බන්තොට වරාය හා කුඩා රාජ්‍යයන් 7 කට වඩා විශාල භූමි භාගයක්‌ ලැබුණු පසු චීනයේ පරමාණු සබ්මැරීන පවා හම්බන්තොටට ගෙන්වා නතර කරගතහොත් එයට විරුද්ධ වන්නේ කවුද? හම්බන්තොට වරාය හමුදාමය නැතිනම් යුදමය කටයුතුවලට යොදවාගත නොහැකි යෑයි වගන්තියක්‌ එයට අදාළ ගිවිසුමට ඇතුළත් කළද එවැනි වගන්ති බලාත්මක කරන්නේ කවුද? කොළඹ වරයාට චීන සබ්මැරීනයක්‌ ආවා යෑයි කියා රාජපක්‌ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව පළවා හැරීමට කුමන්ත්‍රණ දියත් කළ ඉන්දියාව තමාගෙන්ම අසාගත යුතු ප්‍රශ්නය එයයි. හම්බන්තොට වරාය, හමුදාමය කටයුතුවලට යොදවාගත නොහැකි යෑයි වගන්තියක්‌ ගිවිසුමේ තිබුණත් ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආණ්‌ඩුවට එය බලාත්මක කිරීමට හැකියාවක්‌ තබා වුවමනාවක්‌ වත් පහළ වන්නේ නැත. එමෙන්ම හම්බන්තොට වරාය චීනයට කැමති ඕනෑම දේකට යොදවා ගැනීම වැළැක්‌වීමට ඉන්දියාවට හැකියාවක්‌ද නැත.

අජිත් ඩොවාල් සහ රෝ සංවිධානය එකතුවී ලංකාවේ ඇතිකළ ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළියෙන් පසු හටගෙන තිබෙන මේ තත්ත්වය තවමත් ඉන්දියාවේ ජනතාවගේ හෝ විපක්‌ෂයේ අවධානයට යොමුවී නැත. වරාය නගරය තවමත් ඉදිවෙමින් පවතී. හම්බන්තොට වරාය තවමත් චීනයට භාර දී නැත. නමුත් වරාය නගරය ඉදිවූ පසුව හා හම්බන්තොට වරාය කුඩා රාජ්‍යයන් 7 කට වඩා විශාල භූමි භාගයක්‌ ද සහිතව චීනයට ලබාදුන් පසු අජිත් ඩොවාල්ගේ කුමන්ත්‍රණ අතේ පත්තු වී ඇති බව ඉන්දීය ජනතාවට අවබෝධ වනු ඇත. රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව කාලයේදී ඉන්දයාවේ ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂාවට තර්ජනයක්‌ පැවැති බවක්‌ ඔවුන්ට හැඟුන ද ඩොවාල්ගේ ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළියෙන් පසු එය සිය දහස්‌ වාරයක්‌ වැඩිවී ඇති බවක්‌ ඔවුන්ට හැඟෙනු ඇත. අජිත් ඩොවාල් මේ දිනවල ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ගැන එක වචනයක්‌ හෝ කතා කරනු කිසිවකුටත් ඇසී නැත. ඩොවාල් මෝඩ ලෙස ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට කළ අත පෙවීම නිසා අද වනවිට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආණ්‌ඩුවත් විපක්‍ෂයත් යන දෙකම චීනය පැත්තට නැඹුරු වී ඔවුන් අන් කවරදාටත් වඩා ලංකාව තුළ බලවත් වී සිටී.

මෑතකදී චීන කර්මාන්තපුරයක්‌ හම්බන්තොට ආරම්භ කිරීමට එරෙහිව ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය උද්ඝෝෂණයක්‌ ආරම්භ කළ ද ඔවුන්ගේ අරගලය ආණ්‌ඩුවට එරෙහි අරගලයන් මිස චීනයට එරෙහි අරගලයක්‌ නොවීය. ආණ්‌ඩුවත් ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයත්a අතර වෙනස වන්නේ රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව චීනය සමග ගනුදෙනු කිරීමේදී සෑමවිටම ලංකාවට වාසිදායක ගනුදෙනුවක්‌ කිරීමට උත්සාහ ගත් අතර යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුවට එවැනි තාර්කික ප්‍රවේශයක්‌ ගැනීමට තරම් මානසිකත්වයක්‌ නැති වීමය. යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුව දැන් සිටින්නේ මුදල් දෙනවා නම් ඕනෑම කෙනකුට ඕනෑම දෙයක්‌ දීමට සූදානම් තත්ත්වයකයි. ඇත්ත වශයෙන් ම චීනය කිසිම රටක්‌ අසාධාරණ ලෙස ගසා කන්නේ නැත. හම්බන්තොට වරාය බදු ගැනීමේ කාරණයේදී ද චීන සමාගම් දෙකක්‌ ලන්සු ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. මෙයින් චයිනා හාබර් සමාගම ලංකාවට වාසිදායක ලංසුවකුත් චයිනා මර්චන්ට්‌ aසමාගම ලංකාවට අවාසිදායක ලංසුවකුත් ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. මෙහිදී ලංකාවේ ආණ්‌ඩුව චයිනා හාබර් සමාගමේ ලංසුව පිළිගනු ඇති බවට චීනය බලාපොරොත්තු වූවා විය හැක. නමුත් චීනය පමණක්‌ නොව ලංකාවේ ජනතාව ද මවිතයට පත් කරමින් යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුව පිළිගෙන තිබෙන්නේ ලංකාවට අවාසිදායක ලංසුවයි.

රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව යටතේ චයිනා හාබර් සහ චයිනා මර්චන්ට්‌ යන සමාගම් දෙකම ඒකාබද්ධ ව්‍යාපෘතියක්‌ හැටියට හම්බන්තොට වරායේ බහාලුම් පර්යන්තය පමණක්‌ ලංකාවට ඉතා වාසිදායක කොන්දේසි යටතේ අවුරුදු 40 කට බදු ගැනීමට ගිවිසුමක්‌ අත්සන් කොට තිබිණි. රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව චීනයත් සමග ඉන්නා ගමන් වත්මන් ආණ්‌ඩුවට වඩා ඔවුන් සමග වාසිදායක ගනුදෙනුවලට එළැඹුණු බව ප්‍රත්‍යක්‍ෂ කරුණකි. ඒ කෙසේ වෙතත් චීනය පැත්තට දැන් රාජපක්‍ෂවරු ප්‍රමුඛ විපක්‍ෂය පමණක්‌ නොව යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුවත්a සිටින අතර ඉන්දියාවට අල්ලපු අත්තත් නැති පය ගහපු අත්තත් නැති තත්ත්වයක්‌ උදා වී ඇත. ඉන්දියානු ආණ්‌ඩුව ලංකාව තුළ රෝ සංවිධානය යොදවා කරන මේ සෙල්ලම් ගැන ඉන්දියාවේ දේශපාලන විචාරකයන් ද අනතුරු ඇඟවීම් කර ඇත. රොහාන් වෙන්කටරාම ක්‍රිෂ්ණන් නමැති විශ්ලේෂකයකු 2015 ජනවාරි ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළියත් සමඟම ඒ රටේ ප්‍රධානම වෙබ් අඩවියක්‌ පවසා තිබුණේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළියට රෝ සංවිධානය මැදිහත් වූ බවට පැතිර යන කතා ඉන්දියාවට දැඩි ලෙස අවාසිදායක බවයි. නේපාලය උදාහරණයට ගනිමින් ඔහු පවසා සිටියේ රෝ සංවිධානය ඒ රටේ දේශපාලනයට මැදිහත් වී කළ සෙල්ලම් නිසා අද ඉන්දියාවට හිතවත් සෑම දේශපාලනඥයකුටම එරෙහිව නේපාල ජනතාව පෙළගැසෙන බවයි. ලංකාවේ මේ ආණ්‌ඩු පෙරළියටද රෝ සංවිධානය මැදිහත් වූ බව ලංකාවේ ජනතාව දනී. එපමණක්‌ද නොව 1980 ගණන්වල ඉන්දියාව මේ රටේ කළ වින්නැහියද ජනතාවට තවම අමතක වී නැත. මේ ආකාරයට අජිත් ඩොවාල් ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට ඇඟිලි ගැසීමට ගොස්‌ ලංකාව තුළ ඉන්දීය විරෝධී හැඟීම් උත්සන්න කර තිබෙන අතර ඔහු මහත් පරිශ්‍රමයක්‌ දරා බලයට ගෙනා ආණ්‌ඩුවද දැන් ඔහුගේ පාලනයෙන් ගිලිහී ඇත. ඩොවාල් කාශ්මීර බෙදුම්වාදීන්ට එරෙහිව කළ එක්‌ මෙහෙයුමකදී මොහොමඩ් යූසුµa නමැති කාශ්මීර් බෙදුම්වාදී ත්‍රස්‌තවාදියකු ඉන්දීය ආණ්‌ඩුව පැත්තට ගෙන බෙදුම්වාදයට එරෙහිව ප්‍රති ත්‍රස්‌තවාදී මෙහෙයුම් දියත් කිරීමට හැකි විය. නමුත් වරාය නගර ව්‍යාපෘතිය හෝ හම්බන්තොට වරාය චීනයට ලබාදීම නැවැත්වීමට ඔහුට සිරිසේන ජනාධිපතිවරයාට හෝ රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ අගමැතිවරයාට බලපෑම් කිරීමට හැකිවී නැත.

පකිස්‌තානයේ එක්‌ පුවත් වෙබ් අඩවියක පළ වූ ලිපියක සඳහන් වූයේ අජිත් ඩොවාල්ගේ විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය දැන් ඉන්දියාවේ ජාතික ආරක්‍ෂාවට තර්ජනයක්‌ වී ඇති බවට අදහසක්‌ භාරතීය ජනතා පක්‍ෂය තුළත් පැතිරෙමින් පවතින බවයි. ඉන්දියාවේ “ද වයර්” නමැති වෙබ් අඩවියේ ද ඉන්දීය විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය රෝ සංවිධානය විසින් “හයි ජැක්‌”කර ඇති බවට ලිපියක්‌ පළ විය. මේ වෙබ් අඩවියේම නැවතත් පවසා තිබුණේ ඩොවාල්ගේ සම්ප්‍රදායික රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රික ප්‍රවේශයෙන් බැහැර කර තිබෙන බවයි. මේ ආකාරයට අජිත් ඩොවාල් විසින් ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට මැදිහත් වී කරගත් වින්නැහිය ලංකාව තුළ ඉන්දියාව ලැබූ දෙවැනි මහා පරාජයයි.

1980 ගණන්වලදීද ඉන්දීය මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුව ලංකාවේ බෙදුම්වාදී ත්‍රස්‌තවාදීන්ට උදව් දුන්නේ තමිලනාඩුවේ බලපෑම නිසා නොව බටහිරට නැඹුරු වූ විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්තියක්‌ සහිත ඡේ. ආර්. ජයවර්ධන ආණ්‌ඩුව මට්‌ටු කිරීමට ඉන්දීය මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුවට තිබු උවමනාව නිසාය. එය අවසන් වූයේ ඉන්දියාව කිසිදාක නොලැබූ තරම් දරුණු යුදමය පරාජයක්‌ කොටි සංවිධානය හමුවේ ලැබීමත්, ඉන්දියාව පරාජිතයකු හැටියට ලංකාවෙන් ඉවත් වීමත්, කොටි සංවිධානයේ පළිගැනීමකට ලක්‌වී රජීව් ගාන්ධිට තම ජීවිතයත්a අහිමි වීම යන සිදුවීම් මාලාවෙනි. 1980 ගණන්වලදී ඉන්දියාව ලංකාව තුළ කළ මෙහෙයුමෙන් ඉන්දීය හමුදාවේ සෙබලුන් 1155 ක්‌ මැරුම් කෑ අතර 36 දෙනකු සදාකාලික ආබාධිතයන් බවට පත් විය. ඉන්දියාව, චීනය හා පකිස්‌තාය සමග කරන ලද යුද්ධ වලදීවත් එවැනි ජීවිත විනාශයකට මුහුණදී නැත. මේ ජවනිකාවේ ලැඡ්ජා සහගතම කාරණය වන්නේ තමිල්නාඩුවේ අප්‍රසාදයට තිබෙන බිය නිසා ලංකාවේ මියගිය තම සෙබලුන් සැමරීමටවත් ඉන්දීය මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුව දශක දෙකකටත් වඩා කාලයක්‌ බියෙන් සිටීමයි. ලංකාවේ ආණ්‌ඩුව විසින් බත්තරමුල්ලේ ඉන්දීය සෙබලුන් සිහි කිරීමට ඉදිකොට ඇති ස්‌මාරකය ඉදිරිපිට මල්වඩමක්‌ හෝ තැබීමට ඉන්දීය හමුදාපතිවරයකුට අවස්‌ථාව ලැබුණේ රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව විසින් කොටි සංවිධානය විනාශ කළ පසුව පමණි.

2014 දී ඉන්දීය මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුව ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට මැදිහත් වූයේ තමිල්නාඩුවේ බලපෑමක්‌ නිසා නොව රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව චීනය සමග පවත්වාගෙන ගිය සම්බන්ධය නිසාය. 1980 ගණන්වල මෙන්ම අදත් ඉන්දියාවට විනකෙරුවේ, වින කරන්නේත් ඔවුන් ම කවා පොවා ලංකාව තුළ ඇති කළ ගෝලයන්ය. 1980 ගණන්වලදී ඉන්දියාවෙන් යුද පුහුණුව හා ආයුධ ලබාගත් කොටි සංවිධානය පෙරළා ඉන්දියාවට පහර දුන්නේය. අද ද රාජපක්‍ෂ ආණ්‌ඩුව කිසිදාක චිනයට ලබාදුන් නැති තරමේ වරප්‍රසාද හා පහසුකම් ඔවුන්ට ලබා දෙමින් සිටින්නේ ඉන්දියාව විසින්ම බලයට ගෙන ආ යහපාලන ආණ්‌ඩුවයි. මේ ඇති වී තිබෙන වින්නැහිය හමුවේ තම ආත්මගරුත්වය බේරා ගැනීමට ඉන්දියාව එට්‌කා ගිවිසුම තුළින් ලංකාව තම ග්‍රහණයට ගැනීමට උත්සාහ කිරීමෙන් සිදුවී තිබෙන්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සාමාන්‍ය ජනතාව අතර ඉන්දීය විරෝධය තවත් උත්සන්න වීමක්‌ පමණි.

2014 දී ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට අත පොවා ඩොවාල් ඉන්දියාවට කර ඇත්තේ විනාශයක්‌ බව පැහැදිලිය. දැන් අවුරුදු 70 ට වඩා වයස ඩොවාල් මුළු ජීවිත කාලයක්‌ පුරා ගොඩනඟාගත් කීර්ති නාමය අද අවදානමට ලක්‌වී ඇත. ඔහුගේ ආත්මගෞරවය බේරා ගැනීමට නම් චීන වරාය නගර ව්‍යාපෘතිය මෙන්ම හම්බන්තොට වරාය බදු දීමද ඔහු කෙසේ හෝ නවතා දැමිය යුතුය. නමුත් එවැන්නක්‌ කිරීමට ඔහුට හැකියාවක්‌ නැත. මේ සියල්ලෙන්ම පැහැදිලි වන්නේ ලංකාව කෙරෙහි ඉන්දීය ආණ්‌ඩුවේ ප්‍රවේශය වෙනස්‌ විය යුතු බවයි. 1980 ගණන්වලදී රජීව් ගාන්ධි විසින්ද 2014 දී අජිත් ඩොවාල් විසින් ද ලංකාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් ගත් ක්‍රියාදාමවලින් ඉන්දියාවට අත් වූයේ තමන් බලාපොරොත්තු වූ ප්‍රතිඵලයට හාත්පසින්ම විරුද්ධ ප්‍රතිඵලයකි. රාජතාන්ත්‍රික කටයුතු වෙනුවට රෝ මෙහෙයුම් යෙදවීමේ ආදීනව එයයි.

බොහෝ ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් ඉන්දීය විරෝධීන් නොවේ. සියලු බෞද්ධයන් ඉන්දියාව දෙස බලන්නේ බුදුන්ගේ ජන්ම භූමිය වූ ජම්බුද්වීපය දෙසය. මේ ආකාරයට සංස්‌කෘතික සමානකම් තිබෙන රටක්‌ වන ලංකාව සමගත් ඉන්දියාවට මිත්‍රශීලී සම්බන්ධතා පවත්වාගෙන යැමට නොහැකි වීම ඉන්දීය විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්තියේ අසාර්ථකත්වයේ ලක්‍ෂණයකි. අප කලින් පෙන්වා දුන් පරිදි ඉන්දියාවේ මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුව ලංකාවේ දේශපාලනයට මැදිහත්වී අත පුච්චාගත් අවස්‌ථාව දෙකේදීම ඔවුන් එසේ කළේ තමිල්නාඩුවේ බලපෑමට නොවේ. ඒ තත්ත්වයන්වලට වගකිවයුත්තේ ඉන්දීය මධ්‍යම ආණ්‌ඩුව පමණි. මේ සියල්ලෙන්ම ඉන්දියාව ඉගෙන ගත යුතු පාඩම වන්නේ තම අසල්වාසී රටවල් තුළ රෝ සංවිධානය යෙදවීම ඉන්දියාවේ වුවමනාවන් ඉටු කර ගැනීමේ හොඳම ක්‍රමය නොවන බවයි.

හෙජින් ගනුදෙනවේ ඇත්ත මෙන්න…

April 1st, 2017

ඔස්‌මන් චන්ද්‍රවංශ හිටපු විනිමය පාලක සහ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ අර්ථශාස්‌ත්‍රඥ

යහපාලන රජය විසින් සිදු කර ඇති වංචා, පාඩු සහ වන්දි ගෙවීම් මෑතක සිට, අගමැතිවරයා සහ මුදල් ඇමැතිවරයා ඇතුළු මැති ඇමැතිවරු කීප දෙනකුම පසුගිය රජයේ – හෙජින් ගනුදෙනුව ඔස්‌සේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට සිදුවූ පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 500 ක්‌ පමණ වී යයි පවසා ඇත. ඒ නිසා ජනතාවට වර්තමානයේදී අලෙවි කරන ඉන්ධන මිල අඩුකරන්නට රජය අපොහොසත් වන්නේ යෑයි ද ඔවුහු කියති. එහෙයින්, එම හෙජින් ගනුදෙනුව පිළිබඳව යථාර්ථය සහ සත්‍යයද, වර්තමාන යහපාලන රජයේ නිල කාලයේදී සිදුවී ඇති වංචා, පාඩු සහ වන්දි ගෙවීම් පිළිබඳ කෙටි විග්‍රහයක්‌ද, ජනතාවගේ අධ්‍යයනය පිණිස මෙම කෙටි ලිපියෙන් උපුටා දක්‌වා ඇත.

අවදානම් සහිත ආර්ථික තත්ත්වයන් මතුවන අවස්‌ථා වලදී -හෙජින් යනුවෙන් හැඳින්වෙන රක්‌ෂණ වැනි ක්‍රමවේදයන් හරහා ආර්ථික සහ මූල්‍යමය අවදානම් අවම කර ගැනීමේ මූල ධර්මය සියලු ආර්ථික විශේෂඥයන් හොඳින් දන්නා, කරුණකි. එහෙයින්, 2006 වසරේ දෙවැනි භාගයේදී ලෝක තෙල් මිල ශීඝ්‍ර ලෙස වැඩිවෙන බව පෙනී යන අවස්‌ථාවේදී, -හෙජින් ක්‍රමවේදය අනුගමනය කරමින් මෙම අවදානම් තත්ත්වයට මුහුණදී රට තුළ ආර්ථික ස්‌ථායිභාවය රැකගත හැකි බව පෙන්වා දෙන වාර්තාවක්‌ ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුවේ ආර්ථික පර්යේෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව විසින් මුදල් මණ්‌ඩලයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. ඉන් පසු එම වාර්තාව පදනම් කොටගෙන මහ බැංකුව විසින් කැබිනට්‌ මණ්‌ඩලයට මේ පිළිබඳව සංකල්පය හඳුන්වා දෙන ලදී. මහ බැංකුවේ ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම (Presentation) සැළකීමෙන් අනතුරුව, මෙම විෂය පිළිබඳව වඩාත් විස්‌තරාත්මක වාර්තාවක්‌ ලබා ගැනීම පිණිස, විශේෂිත දැනුම ඇති කණ්‌ඩායමක්‌ කැබිනට්‌ මණ්‌ඩලය විසින් පත් කරන ලදී. එම කණ්‌ඩායමේ වාර්තාව අනුව, ලංකා ඛජිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාව විසින් -හෙජින් ක්‍රමවේදය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම යෝග්‍ය යෑයි නිර්දේශ කරන ලදී. එම උපදෙස පිළිගනිමින්, -හෙජින් ක්‍රියාවලියේ නිරතවන්නට ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාවට, කැබිනට්‌ මණ්‌ඩලය විසින් අවසර ලබා දෙන ලදී.

ඒ අනුව, 2007 මුල් භාගයේ සිට අදාළ රේ‚ය අමාත්‍යාංශයේ අධීක්‌ෂණයට යටත්ව, ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාව, ඔවුනට අවශ්‍ය ඉන්ධනවලින් කොටසක්‌ මිලදී ගනිද්දී ජාත්‍යන්තර බැංකු කීපයක්‌ හරහා -හෙජින් ක්‍රමවේදය අනුගමනය කරන ලදී. ඒ වසර 1 කට ආසන්න කාලයක්‌ තුළ ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාව විසින් සැළකිය යුතු වාසීන් සහ ලාභ අත්පත් කරගන්නා ලදී. එහෙත්, 2008 අග භාගයේදී, අනපේක්‌ෂිත ආකාරයට ලෝක තෙල් මිල පහළ යැම ආරම්භ වුණි. එවිට, හෙජින් ගිවිසුම් කීපයක්‌ ඔස්‌සේ, ජාත්‍යන්තර බැංකු තුනක්‌ ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාවෙන් හෙජින් ගිවිසුම්වලට අනුව පැණ නැගුණායි කියන ලද ගෙවීම් ඉල්ලා සිටි අතර, ඒවා නොපියවූ නිසා, එම මුදල් ඉල්ලමින්, ජාත්‍යන්තර නීතිමය ක්‍රියාවලීන් මාලාවකට පිවිසුණහ. මෙම බැංකු තුනේ මූලික ඉල්ලීම් වල එකතුව මූල්‍යමය වශයෙන් ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 500 ක්‌ පමණ වුණි. එහෙත්, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ නීතිපතිවරයා සහ අදාළ බලධාරීන්, මෙම ඉල්ලීම්වලට විරුද්ධව කටයුතු කරමින්, එම ඉල්ලීම් අතරින් විශාලතම අගය සහිත ඉල්ලීම, සිංගප්පූරුවේ උසාවියක සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම නිශ්ප්‍රභ කර ගැනීමට සමත් වූහ. ඉතිරි ඉල්ලීම් දෙකෙන්, එක්‌ ඉල්ලීමක්‌ බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය උසාවියකින් එක්‌ බැංකුවකට වාසි වන ආකාරයේ තීන්දුවක්‌ ලබා දෙන ලද අතර, අනිත් ඉල්ලීම සිංගප්පූරු මැදිහත්කරු සංවිධානයක්‌ විසින් පවත්වන ලද ආරවුල්-විසඳුමකින් (arbitration), අනිත් බැංකුවට වාසිදායක තීරණයක්‌ ලබා දෙන ලදී. එහෙත්, මෙම නීතිමය තීන්දුවලින් අනතුරුව, එම ජාත්‍යන්තර බැංකු සමග තව දුරටත් කරන ලද නිල රාජ්‍ය සාකච්ඡා ඔස්‌සේ, ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය සහ ලංකා ඛනිජතෙල් සංස්‌ථාව විසින් ගෙවීමට නියෝග වූ වන්දි මුදල්වලින් 70% ක පමණ ප්‍රමාණයක්‌ අඩු කිරීමකින් පසුව, අවසානයේදී ගෙවන්නට සිදුවූ සම්පූර්ණ මුදල ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 90 කට පමණ (රු. බිලියන 12 ක පමණ) අගයකට සීමා කර ගැනීමට රජය සමත්වුණි.

‘හෙජින් ගනුදෙනුවට සම්බන්ධ වූ එක්‌ බැංකුවක්‌ ඊට අදාළ මුදල් විනිමය පාලන පනත උල්ලංඝනය කරමින් මෙරටින් පෝෂණය කළ බව අනාවරණය වීම නිසා එම බැංකුවට විනිමය පාලන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව විසින් එසේ පෝෂණය කළ මුදල මෙන් තුන් ගුණයක දඩයක්‌ද පනවන ලදී.’

එසේ නම්, සමස්‌තයක්‌ වශයෙන් සියලු කරුණු සලකා බලන විට, මෙම -හෙජින් ගනුදෙනු සියල්ලම හරහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට විඳින්නට සිදුවූ සමස්‌ත අලාභය ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 90 ක්‌ පමණ හෝ රුපියල් බිලියන 12 ක්‌ පමණ යෑයි ගණනය කළ හැක. සත්‍ය පසුබිම මෙසේ වන විට, විවිධ අවස්‌ථා වලදී හෙජින් ගිවිසුම් හරහා ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයට විඳින්නට සිදුවූ පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 500 ක්‌ පමණ වූවායි පවසන වර්තමාන රජයේ දේශපාලනඥයන්ගේ ප්‍රකාශන අසත්‍ය ඒවා බව පැහැදිළිය.

කෙසේ වුවත්, පසුගිය පාලන කාලයේ -හෙජින් පාඩුව වූ රුපියල් බිලියන 12 සහ වර්තමාන යහපාලන රජය විසින් සිදු කරන ලද මගඩි/වංචා/පාඩු කීපයක්‌ පිළිබඳව මේ අවස්‌ථාවේදී සන්සන්දනයක්‌ කිරීම කාලෝචිතය සහ අදාළ නිසා ඒවා ගැනත් යම් විස්‌තරයක්‌ මේවායින් කීපයක්‌ පහත සඳහන් වේ.

1. ශ්‍රී ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ සිදුවී ඇති විශාලතම මගඩිය වන මහ බැංකුවේ සිදුවූ මහා බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය හේතුකොටගෙන, 2015.02.27 සිට 2015.21.31 දක්‌වා කාලය තුළදී, පොලී අනුපාතය කෘත්‍රිම සහ දූෂිත ලෙස ඉහළ නැංවීම නිසා රජයට සිදුවූ පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 145 ක්‌ යෑයි ආර්ථික විශ්ලේෂකයන් විසින් දැනටමත් වෘත්තීමය ආකාරයට ගණනය කොට ඇත. ඊට අමතරව, 2015.02.27 දින පමණක්‌ රජයට සිදුවූ සෘජු පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 2 ක්‌ පමණ වූ බවද, විගණකාධිපතිවරයා පෙන්වා දී තිබේ.

2. 2015.02.27 මහ බැංකු මහා මගඩියෙන් පසු පවත්වන ලද බැඳුම්කර වෙන්දේසි වලදී, හිතාමතාම වෙළෙඳපොළේ පිහිටි පොලී අනුපාතවලට වඩා බෙහෙවින් ඉහළ පොලී අනුපාත (off-market rates) වලට අලෙවි කරන ලද බැඳුම්කර නිකුතු නිසා සිදුවූ පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 55 ක්‌ බව මෑතකදී හෙළිවූ මහ බැංකු අභ්‍යන්තර විගණන වාර්තාව හරහා පෙන්වා දී ඇත.

3. බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය ඔස්‌සේ හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අර්ජුන මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගේ බෑණාගේ සමාගම හරහා, අතිශයින් අඩු මිලකට මිලදී ගන්නා ලද භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර, ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක්‌ තුළදී, ඉහළ මිලකට සේවක අර්ථසාධක අරමුදල වෙත පවරමින්, සියලු ලාංකික වැඩ කරන ජනතාවට අයත් සේවක අර්ථසාධක අරමුදලට රුපියල් බිලියන 10 ක දැවැන්ත පාඩුවක්‌ සිදු කර ඇත.

4. 2015 සහ 2016 දී, ආර්ථිකයේ දුර්වල සහ දූෂිත කළමනාකාරිත්වය නිසා, ශ්‍රී ලංකා රුපියලේ අගය දැවැන්ත ලෙස කඩාවැටීම ඔස්‌සේ, රටේ හෝ රාජ්‍ය සම්පත්වලට කිසිදු භෞතික අගයක්‌ එකතු කිරීමක්‌ නොමැතිව, රාජ්‍ය ණය බර වැඩිවූ නිසා සිදු කරන ලද පාඩුව, 2015 දී රුපියල් බිලියන 285 ක්‌ද, 2016 වසරේ ජනවාරි සිට ජූලි මාසය වන තෙක්‌ රුපියල් බිලියන 141 ක්‌ද වූ බව, මහ බැංකු නිල වාර්තාවලින් දැනටමත් පැහැදිළිව හෙළිවී ඇත.

5. ශ්‍රී ලංකා එයාර් ලයින්ස්‌ සමාගම විසින් පසුගිය රජයේ නිල කාලයේදී ඇණවුම් කරන ලද නව අහස්‌ යානා කීපයක්‌ම, වර්තමාන රජය විසින් පදනම් රහිතව අත්හිටුවීම හරහා, එම අහස්‌ යානා සපයන ආයතනයට ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 98 හෝ රුපියල් බිලියන 15 වන්දියක්‌ (claim for damages) ගෙවීමට රජයට සිදුවී ඇත.

6. කොළඹ -පෝර්ට්‌ සිටි ව්‍යාපෘතිය පදනම් රහිතව අත්හිටුවීම ඔස්‌සේ, එම ව්‍යාපෘතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන චීන සමාගම විසින් රජයට විරුද්ධව ගොනු කරන ලද වන්දි ඉල්ලීම (claim for compensation) වන ඇ.ඩො. මිලියන 143, එනම් රුපියල් බිලියන 21 සමථයකට පත් කිරීම සඳහා, ඉදිරියේදී ගොඩ කරන භූමියෙන් වැඩිපුර අක්‌කර 5 ක්‌ පමණ වටිනා ඉඩමක්‌ චීන පාර්ශවයට ලබා දෙන්නට රජය එකඟවීමෙන්, එම වන්දි ඉල්ලීම දැනටමත් වක්‍රාකාරව පියවා ඇත.

ඉහත කී පාඩු, අලාභ සහ වන්දි ඔස්‌සේ වර්තමාන යහපාලන රජය විසින් පළමු වැනි වසර දෙකක කාලය තුළදී පමණක්‌, රටට සිදු කර ඇති පාඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 674 කි. එම මුදල, කොළඹ – ගාල්ල අධිවේගී මාර්ග 10 ක්‌ පමණ ඉදිකළ හැකි මුදලක්‌ බව හැඳින්විය හැකි අතර, එම මුදල, හෙජින් ගනුදෙනුවලින් සිදුවූ පාඩුව මෙන් 56 ගුණයක්‌ ලෙසද විදහා දැක්‌විය හැක.

Head of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community calls for a curb on Arms Trade and Urges Dialogue between Nations  

April 1st, 2017

By A. Abdul Aziz

 Rather than erecting walls that keep us apart, we should build bridges that bring us closer together” Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad

According to our international Press Desk, U.K., on 25 March 2017, the World Head of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, the Fifth Khalifa (Caliph), His Holiness, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad delivered the keynote address at the 14th National Peace Symposium hosted by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community UK. The theme of the Peace Symposium 2017 was, ‘Global Conflicts and the Need for Justice’. 

The event was held at the Baitul Futuh Mosque in London with an audience of more than 1,000 people, from 30 countries, including over 600 non-Ahmadi guests comprising Government Ministers, Ambassadors of State, Members of both Houses of Parliament and various other dignitaries and guests.

During the event, His Holiness presented Ms. Setsuko Thurlow, a Hiroshima bomb survivor and peace activist, with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Prize for the Advancement of Peace in recognition of her outstanding efforts in campaigning for nuclear disarmament. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGRXJptLb1g

During his address, His Holiness condemned recent terrorist attack in London as a barbaric atrocity” and labelled all forms of extremism and terrorism as a complete violation of Islamic teachings.

Further, His Holiness expressed his grief at continued warfare in the Muslim world, as well as voicing his fears about increasing tensions in the rest of the world. His Holiness also called on world powers to curb the sale of weapons and arms.

Referring to last Wednesday’s attack in Westminster, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

First of all, I would like to extend my deepest condolences to all those affected by Wednesday’s terror attack at Westminster. Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of London at this tragic time. On behalf of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, I wish to make it categorically clear that we condemn all such acts of terrorism and we offer our heartfelt sympathies to the victims of this barbaric atrocity.”

His Holiness said it was a cause of great regret that extremist Muslim groups had turned certain Mosques and Madrassas into centres of extremism”, which had fuelled fear and misconceptions about Islam amongst non-Muslims. In stark contrast, Holiness said that an inherent part of the worship of God was to serve mankind and to live peacefully with the people of all faiths and beliefs.

Based on these Islamic teachings, the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community had established humanitarian projects in various parts of the world, each serving mankind and bringing relief to those in need.

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued:

In this way, rather than becoming frustrated and prone to extremism, they will grow to be responsible and faithful citizens of their nations. Where they will personally develop, they will also help their nations progress and inspire others to follow in their footsteps.”

His Holiness said that despite the teachings of Islam being categorical in rejecting indiscriminate attacks or killings, many people associated Islam with violence or warfare.

Countering the narrative of extremists, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

No matter what terrorists may claim, under no circumstances are indiscriminate attacks or killings ever justified. Islam has enshrined the sanctity of human life in chapter 5, verse 33 of the Holy Quran, which states: ‘Whosoever killed a person – it shall be as if he killed all mankind; and whoso gave life to one, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind’.”

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued:

Islam is that religion which has forever enshrined the universal principles of freedom of religion, freedom of conscience and freedom of belief. Therefore, if today there are so-called Muslim groups or sects that are killing people, it can only be condemned in the strongest possible terms. Their barbaric acts are a complete violation of everything that Islam stands for.”

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

The allegation that the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) was a belligerent leader or a warmonger is an injustice and cruelty of the very highest order and such false claims can only grieve the hearts of the millions of peaceful Muslims worldwide. History bears witness to the fact that with every fibre of his being, the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him) sought peace and reconciliation.”  

Referring to the theme of the Peace Symposium 2017, ‘Global Conflicts and the Need for Justice’, His Holiness said a lack of justice had plagued every segment of society” and that whilst it was undeniable that today certain Muslim countries are at the epicentre of wars and cruelties”, it was wrong to say that the rest of the world was immune from disorder.

His Holiness cited numerous reports indicating increased tensions between the United States and China, and similarly between the United States and Russia.

Speaking about the need for mankind to pull together, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

The need of the hour is for us to knock down the barriers of fear that divide us.  Rather than erecting walls that keep us apart, we should build bridges that bring us closer together… We must stand up against all forms of oppression, hatred and use all our capabilities to try and foster peace in the world.”

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued:

Sadly, with the passing of time, it seems that we are losing our ability to listen and to tolerate opposing views and perspectives. Opening the channels of communication and facilitating dialogue is essential, otherwise the world’s malaise will only get deeper… Instead of pointing fingers and blaming one another, now is the time for solutions.”

Thereafter, His Holiness condemned the international arms trade, which he said was a means of fuelling warfare and ensuring that the world remained bound within a perpetual cycle of violence.

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

In my opinion there is one ready-made solution that can have an instant impact and begin the process of healing the world. I refer to the international arms trade, which I believe has to be curbed and restricted.”

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued:

Whilst the primary interest of every nation should be the well-being of mankind and achieving peace, it is a sad truth that business interests and the pursuit of wealth invariably take priority over such concerns.”

His Holiness deemed the argument that the sale of weapons may ‘encourage’ peace by working as a ‘deterrent’ to be completely senseless” and said such justifications had caused the world to become embroiled in a never ending arms race”. He also said that no nation should think it is immune from danger” because history taught that wars evolved rapidly and often unexpectedly”.

His Holiness warned of the risks of nuclear warfare, which he described as unimaginable” and called on mankind to think long and hard about the type of world it wished to bequeath to future generations.

Speaking of the potential consequences of another world war, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad said:

Rather than leaving behind a legacy of prosperity for our coming generations, we will be guilty of leaving behind only sorrow and despair. Our gift to the world will be a generation of disabled children, born with defects and intellectual disabilities. Who knows if their parents will even survive to care and nurture them?”

Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad continued:

Always remember that if we seek to pursue our own interests at all costs, the rights of others will be usurped and this can only lead to conflict, wars and misery. We must all reflect and understand the precipice upon which we stand.”  

Concluding, Hazrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad prayed:

My message to the world is to look at tomorrow, and not just today.  Let us leave behind a legacy of hope and opportunity for our children, rather than burdening them with the horrific consequences of our sins.”

His Holiness continued:

I pray that God grants sense to the people of the world and that the heavy clouds that loom above us give way to a bright and prosperous future.”

Prior to the keynote address, various dignitaries spoke about the importance of peace and the critical state of today’s world.

Silvio Danio, Executive Director of Religions for Peace, from Italy, said:

I want to thank you, Your Holiness, in a very special way, because listening often to your talks and very many interventions in many parts of the world, you have not only been a promoter, not only a creator of what we badly need today, that is a culture of dialogue, you have been a champion of this, you are an example.”

Ms. Setsuko Thurlow, recipient of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Prize for the Advancement of Peace, said:

In attempting to learn about your organisation’s history, mission and activities, I learned with pain of your struggle and suffering from religious discrimination and persecution. Yet, in spite of that, you have chosen the principles of non-violence, peace and justice and exemplify them in your daily lives through your motto of love to all and hatred to none. What an enlightened role model you are to the world community.”

The full address of His Holiness – the link of which is:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6eDKLVwF7Q

Beggars adopt modern tactics

April 1st, 2017

By Dr. Tilak S. Fernando

Charles Dickens scribed on something completely different from his prose in May 1850, when he portrayed the Nigerian 419 scam where 419 wealthy people were approached seeking financial assistance for orphaned children, emergency surgery and quoting numerous examples of begging letters he had received over the years from various individuals beseeching and supplicating for money. This goes to illustrate the fact that panhandling or begging, adopting various ploys, is equally an old profession, akin to the world famous profession of prostitution.

Last week TV news exposed how people begging on high streets, by walking in and out of traffic lanes, causing traffic jams. When a chap selling burning incense in a crowded traffic lane was gestured by a motorist to move away, vendor’s remarks were: Me Yakka Masso Elawanawa! (This devil is chasing flies). This reveals to what extent these ‘beggars’ are a crafty lot engaged in a daily routine. Panhandling basically signifies pleading from another person or seeking a favour. Some beggars demand cash only.

In the case of a beggar crying out of hunger and his request for food is heeded, surprisingly his stance changes to demand cash only.

In Hinduism, Buddhism, Sufism and Jainism charity is emphasized as an acceptable means of support for certain classes of devotees focussing on spiritual development as against getting caught up in worldly pleasures. Buddhist monks and nuns, from historical times of Gautama Buddha, traditionally lived by begging for alms. Buddhists believe by complying with such religious traditions in giving food, medicine and other vital items to monks, the laity will gain merit to pursue moksha (freedom) from Samsara (death and rebirth in a karmic circle).There are several references in the New Testament too where Jesus Christ considered “beggars as the most wretched portion of society.”

Vagrancy Act

In the UK begging is illegal under the Vagrancy Act of 1824. It is an offence to sleep rough or beg; anyone found scrounging for money for survival could be arrested. However, it neither carries a jail sentence nor rigidly enforced in many cities except on public transport. In Sri Lanka, it is just the opposite where public transport is infested with beggars and all kinds of vendors.

At every street corner, near traffic lights, bus stands, opposite supermarkets, and religious abodes beggars appear as a bunch of flies. Whenever one gets off a motorcar, quite often a man or woman carrying a child approaches with a stretched hand.

Destitution and genuine hardship of a person is understandable as every human heart is impregnated with compassion to a great degree, but should such empathetic hearts be taken as suckers by tricksters, who turn begging into a profession and appear on a daily basis at the same place to take one’s kindness as a weakness? The other side of the coin is, one may argue that every human has a certain amount of self-respect and pride within and no one dares to stoop to degrading levels of humiliating themselves by becoming a nuisance to others, as a means of survival, in the absence of a society which does not have a developed social security system. In such a scenario where does a compassionate heart fit?

Western perspective

More sophisticated methods adopted currently by desperados are linked with the cyber-begging or Internet panhandling, which give them a clear advantage for gambits to plead incognito, making hay while the sun shines. This has helped fraudulent organizations to raise funds ingeniously by making use of the World Wide Web elaborately using Internet techniques.

Karyn Bosnak was a shopaholic, who drowned in credit cards debts up to $20,000 but she managed to panhandle and sell her cherished possessions on eBay to get rid of her debts in just four months. Her charming and cautionary tale of glamorous rise, embarrassing fall and how the kindness of strangers can make a difference, could be read on the Internet (http://www.karynbosnak.com/save-karyn/).

In the Catholic Church, followers of Saint Francis of Assisi and Saint Dominic were mendicants who adopted a lifestyle of poverty, travelling and living in urban areas for the purpose of preaching and evangelisation. They begged for food, while they preached to the villagers. In traditional Christianity the rich are encouraged to serve the poor. In Hindu tradition spiritual seekers begging for food is regarded as a materialistic distraction from the spiritual liberation and begging promotes humility and gratitude, not only towards those who give food, but also towards the universe in general. Dervishes, members of Sufi Muslim Order, have taken vows of poverty and austerity to make Zakat (similar to a wealth tax), which is compulsory during one’s lifetime that is open-ended to one’s heart’s content. In the monastic orders of Buddhism, begging is called Pindapatha. In every such case a meritorious deed of the contributor seems naturally to fulfil another dimension of one’s spiritual self-advancement ‘to seek’ a better spiritual station after death.

Modern tactics

The current trend of begging in Sri Lanka has turned into an industry no doubt, where certain type of ‘pleading familie’ have earned for generations and accumulated sizeable wealth by recruiting new beggars. These groups are supposed to have their own territories where unknown beggars coming to such areas end up with verbal and / or physical abuse. In a world of organized embezzlers, tricksters and felons who begin to play a different ball game by employing beggars on a payroll basis with commissions paid off at the end of each day, it becomes extremely difficult for those who want to genuinely help the poor.

When will the general public be allowed to move freely on roads or avoid having to answer their door bell constantly for numerous categories of begging prevalent in our society today? Solicitation becomes an intimidation when beggars keep on harassing the public without taking ‘no’ for an answer and the innocent citizen becomes subjected to wild gesticulations with abuse, insults, curse or veiled threats by attempting to avoid beggars who follow them in Pied Piper fashion.

“Never stand begging for that which you have the power to earn”

– Miguel de Cervantes.

tilakfernando@gmail.com

Rajapaksa says his govt never decided to sell Hambantota port

April 1st, 2017

By Yusuf Ariff Courtesy Adaderana

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa today rejected allegations that the decision to sell the Hambantota Port was first made during his government in 2014 and asserted that while he was in power they only took back what was already sold.

We never decided to sell anything during our time. I took back what had been sold. I can list all that we got back,” he told reporters after attending the Avurudu celebrations of the Carlton Preschool in Maligawatta.

He stated that what his government wanted was establishing a company for the port and split the shares with the foreign investor while holding on to the administration side of the port.

We wanted to create a company and give its shares to both parties and keep the administration with the government. The administration was always with us.”

Responding to a question regarding bringing international courts to Sri Lanka, he stated that there is no need for an international court as the judiciary here is more than enough for the government to get what it wants”.

– See more at: http://www.adaderana.lk/news/39950/rajapaksa-says-his-govt-never-decided-to-sell-hambantota-port#sthash.Qd0D3Jos.dpuf

Sushma Swaraj’s Amnesia and Indian Duplicity

April 1st, 2017

by Rajeewa Jayaweera Courtesy The Island

Indian External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj has recently made a strongly worded statement related to Sri Lanka’s ‘national question’ in response to questions raised by a member of the Communist Party of India.

Reiterating India’s commitment to the protection of the rights of the Tamils in Sri Lanka, Swaraj has been quoted in the Indian media stating “The anguish with which the members have raised the issue (of crimes committed during the war of 2009), the government associates itself with the same pain.” She has further stated “Our aim is to protect the interests of Tamils in Sri Lanka. You can achieve this through two means: by either doing it forcefully or through persuasion with the friendly country.” Further elaborating, the Indian External Affairs Minister has stated “As Sri Lanka’s closest neighbor, India cannot remain untouched by the developments in that country. We hope that with the sagacity and political will of its people, Sri Lanka will achieve genuine reconciliation and development”.

Swaraj’s involvement in shaping Indian foreign policy has been in the wane since her choice of Foreign Secretary, Sujatha Singh, was made to retire to make way for incumbent Foreign Secretary Dr Subramanyam Jaishankar in January 2015, the handpicked choice of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. From then onwards, foreign policy direction has been from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) rather than from the External Affairs Ministry. The making of Indian foreign policy is currently well entrenched in the hands of the triumvirate of Prime Minister Modi, National Security Advisor Ajith Doval and Foreign Secretary Jaishankar. India rushed Defence Minister Arun Jaitly and Doval to Colombo in November 2014 in the wake of the visit by Chinese nuclear propelled submarine ‘Changzheng 1’ accompanied by PLA Navy escort warship ‘Chang Xing Dao’ to Colombo. This time around, twice hospitalized for suspected pneumonia and kidney failure in April and November 2016, Swaraj’s broadside may be an effort by India to make its displeasure known, in the backdrop of the unfolding Hambantota Port project and visit to Sri Lanka by Chinese Defence Minister General Chang Wanquan. India obviously cannot be overjoyed of current developments related to the Hambantota Port project.
article_image

Sushma Swaraj, Indian External Affairs Minister

Meanwhile, the India Foundation, an independent research center focused on the issues, challenges and opportunities of the Indian polity, in association with the state Government of Haryana and National Investigation Agency hosted the third edition of the Counter Terrorism Conference CTC 2017 from March 14 – 16, 2017 in Delhi. The theme was ‘Terrorism in the Indian Ocean Region’. The Vice President of India, Shri M. Hamid Ansari, addressed the inaugural session and encouraged countries in the region to unite and fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations to curb and eliminate the scourge of terrorism. He added that states sponsored terrorism must be isolated by the international community. The Vice President also stated “in recent years nothing has caused greater pain, disruption and inconvenience to societies, governments and individuals than the phenomenon of terrorism.” On D 3, Indian Foreign Secretary Jaishankar chaired Plenary IV session on ‘Cooperative Mechanisms for Countering Terror in Indian Ocean Region (IOR). Other dignitaries present during the inaugural session were Prime Minister of Sri Lanka Ranil Wickremesinghe (via skype), Deputy Prime Minister of Nepal Shri Bimlendra Nidhi, Union Minister for Railways Shri Suresh Parbhu, Chief Minister of Haryana Shri Manohar Lal Khattar, and Minister of State for External Affairs Shri M.J. Akbar.

Besides Prime Minister Wickramasinghes’s participation, Tamil National Alliance Chief and Sri Lanka’s Leader of Opposition Rajavarothiam Sampanthan participated in the event. In his address, Sampanthan stated 150,000 Tamils lost their lives and fifty percent of the Tamil population had fled the country during the three decades old conflict. Sampanthan’s theme ‘Ballot vs Bullet’ supported LTTE terrorism on the basis of a “classic instance, in which the bullet filled the void created by the failure in the process of the ballot”. He thus justified his canoodling with LTTE terrorists and his stance of the LTTE being the sole representatives of Tamil people in Sri Lanka, which tune he changed after the LTTE was defeated on May 19, 2009. Sampanthan failed to address issues such as the number of Tamil (and other) lives that could have been saved had Operation Liberation (Operation Vadamarachchi) been permitted to be completed without Indian intervention. Neither was there any mention of the number of Tamils (both LTTE and civilians) killed by the LTTE and Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) during its presence in Northern and Eastern Sri Lanka for three years. As Sampanthan is also aware, most of the Tamil political elite were killed not by members of Sri Lankan armed forces but by LTTE terrorists.

It is indeed ironic that most Indian leaders feel compelled to take up the issue of Sri Lanka’s ‘national problem’ involving the Tamil community. Yet, its leaders do not show any inclination towards resolving the ‘Kashmir problem’ in their own backyard which has been festering since 1947. The struggle for autonomy by Kashmiri separatists and efforts by India in containing the separatists has led to India stationing over 500,000 soldiers and para military forces in Jammu & Kashmir since 1987 which it describes as a ‘disturbed area’. J&K is perhaps the most militarized region in the world. It also introduced the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) in 1990. AFSPA considered as ‘draconian’ by activists, protect members of security forces from prosecution for alleged Human Rights abuses and empower security forces to search, detain and use lethal force against any person acting against the law. The much-maligned Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) in force in Sri Lanka till recently does not exempt members of Sri Lankam armed forces committing Human Rights abuse from prosecution. In effect, India does not display towards its own Kashmiri population, half the concern it professes for Sri Lanka’s Tamil population. India’s moral bankruptcy was highlighted when it repeatedly voted against Sri Lanka during successive UNHRC resolutions in Geneva. At the same time, it has repeatedly rejected requests from international bodies to carry out fact finding missions on Human Rights abuse in Kashmir. Interfering in the fight by Tamil people in Sri Lanka for self-determination, yet ignoring the fight by people of Kashmir for self-determination in India’s own backyard, is sheer duplicity.

Should not what’s good for the Goose be good for the Gander? Or, does having a 1.2 million man army besides almost another 1 million reserve troops and a nuclear arsenal exclude India from practicing what it preaches?

Sushma Swaraj refers to “crimes committed during the war of 2009”, but is silent on the crimes committed by all parties including IPKF until 2008. The 300,000 Tamil civilians used by LTTE as human shields and rescued by members of Sri Lanka Armed Forces in 2009 seem to have slipped Swaraj’s memory.

Despite India’s obsession with terrorism since the Mumbai terror attack in November 2008, its involvement in the housing, nurturing, training and arming of LTTE terrorists from early 1980s need no elaboration. Nevertheless, India’s long involvement with LTTE terrorism did not even warrant mention at the recently concluded Counter Terrorism Conference in Delhi. In this backdrop, the call by President of India, Shri M. Hamid Ansari in his inaugural session for countries in the region to unite and fight terrorism in all its forms and manifestations to curb and eliminate the scourge of terrorism sounds hollow. Prior to state sponsored terrorism being isolated by the international community, it would be constructive for states who sponsored terrorism to share lessons learnt from their past misdeeds with terror groups, besides pledging non-recurrence.

Sri Lankan leaders need take note of Sushma Swaraj’s statement “You can achieve this through two means: by either doing it forcefully or through persuasion with the friendly country.” In this day and age, no civilized nation makes such open threats, even to a small and hapless neighbor. It is a thinly veiled threat. If persuasion does not work, it will be done forcefully. Meanwhile, Sri Lankan leaders, in the midst of a severe financial crisis and no tangible assistance forthcoming from the west and India, have no choice but to turn to China. The Colombo and Hambantota Port Projects no doubt is the cause for considerable worry to India. Yet, threats of ‘forceful’ methods, certainly is not the way to wean Sri Lanka away from China.

The LTTE, ISIS and the GMOA

April 1st, 2017


Towards the end of its war to establish an independent state, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) did not allow civilians to move out of those areas from which it was attacking the Sri Lanka Army. It has been accused of deploying these hapless fellow citizens as human shields so as to discourage the security forces from firing in their direction or dropping bombs in their vicinity. The LTTE took advantage of the fact that the government was bound by its inherent obligations to its own people and in line with international humanitarian law. The net effect was that the LTTE treated the lives of the residents of the North as an expendable commodity in the prosecution of its political and military aims.

The ISIS has been doing something similar, but even worse, particularly in the city of Mosul in Iraq. It has effectively compelled the residents of Mosul not to move out of their homes and has then booby-trapped nearby static structures and vehicles of every kind. If a bomb or gunfire from the government side hits one of these booby-trapped locations, the explosives installed by ISIS blow up and multiply the devastation caused by the incoming missile. The ISIS, like the LTTE, is playing fast and loose with the lives and limbs of defenceless men, women and children in its determination to resist the advance of state troops.

article_image

Whenever the Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) calls upon its members to strike, the painful reality is that it is the poorest sections of our society who are subjected to inhuman hardship. Anyone who has seen (on TV) the impotent resignation on the faces and in the words of those suffering patients who had had to travel long distances, in pain, after waking themselves up during the darkest hours before dawn, and spending for their travel from the meagre resources available to them, cannot but fail to be disgusted by the heartless members of the GMOA, who think nothing of depriving these desperate fellow citizens of the medical care which is owed to them in terms of the Hippocratic oath, ordinary humanity and the deep debt that these professionally-qualified ingrates owe to the public of Sri Lanka for having given them free education from the age of 5-6 years until they graduated and completed their training.

What is the significant moral difference, if any, between the LTTE and the ISIS getting civilians killed in furthering the objective of their vicious and inhuman “struggles” and doctors blackmailing the government by using poor, sick citizens as helpless pawns in their dispute with the authorities. How many of these citizens suffer irreparable medical damage or even die is a statistic that the GMOA is hardly likely to publish. Whatever merit there may be in the GMOA’s position on private medical education, it does not justify their callousness and cruelty to the very public, even the poorest of whom have paid indirect taxes all their life to educate our youth and our professionals, including doctors. The public are not so naive as to be fooled by the GMOA’s assertions and justifications about how conscientiously it is looking after the interests of the people of Sri Lanka by its efforts to maintain high medical standards, forgetting that internationally our universities with medical faculties rank between 2100 or so and 9900 and the GMOA does not worry at all about this. Indeed, it has been reported that one or two of our medical faculties employ veterinarians to teach human medicine on account, presumably, of the unwillingness of our medical heroes to go to the outstations to help improve the teaching at our poorer medical facilities.

It is totally unconscionable of the GMOA to use sick members of the public as pawns in the dispute that it has with the government regarding the South Asian Institute of Technology and Medicine (SAITM) and other potential private medical teaching establishments. Doctors are regarded as persons with a high IQ and social sense. Hence, Sri Lankan doctors are treated by the people with a reverence that is greatly misplaced. It is surely worse than immoral for persons of this quality and standing to resort to what amounts to thuggery and blackmail in their dealings with the three arms of government.

Moreover, with the active encouragement of the GMOA, hundreds of students from our state universities have been wantonly squandering the precious resources that members of the public, including their own parents, have contributed to the coffers of the government to provide every kind of infrastructure, laboratories, equipment, libraries, teachers, ancillary staff, financial assistance and much more for their education. Instead of attending lectures, they are spending their time marching, shouting, causing damage to public property, physically attacking law-enforcement personnel and, not least of all, disrupting the lives of thousands of members of the public by recklessly and selfishly hindering people from going to work, to schools, to hospitals and to wherever else that citizens have a right and need to go. Currently, members of the GMOA can hardly be regarded as worthy exemplars for medical students to follow to become competent, responsible and humane professionals who would become entitled to be shown the regard in which the public now holds doctors.

The members of the GMOA insincerely and sanctimoniously assert that it is their great concern for the welfare of the sick that compels them to oppose the establishment of privately-run, profit-making medical teaching institutions. They remain deliberately blind to the fact that the government cannot find enough money even to run efficiently some of the existing poorer universities in the public sector, let alone build more universities to meet the demand for more doctors. They conveniently ignore the fact that the first private medical teaching institution, SAITM, was established with the blessings of the government and the University Grants Commission without objection by members of the GMOA, obviously owing to their dread of President Mahinda Rajapkasa and Secretary of Defence, Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, who also established a fee-paying medical faculty at the Kotelawala Defence University. The medical students at state universities, who are so brave now, also remained prudently silent at the time. It is only after January 8, 2015 that members of the GMOA and medical students appear to have re-discovered their backbones vis-a-vis the government but not the powerful secret groups whose orders they dare not disobey.

If the numbers of doctors were to increase as a consequence of private medical colleges proliferating, the earnings of doctors with their feet in both sectors may tend to diminish a little. The public believes that it is principally to keep doctors’ earnings high that the GMOA does not like to encourage private medical education. Claiming to be highly conscious of their duty to serve the public, they stipulate that anyone is free to run private medical courses providing they do it for free! Would anyone with a modicum of common sense come up with such a hare-brained concept? Would members of the GMOA, even though they were educated solely at public expense, consider giving their services free to the public instead of charging unconscionable fees when they moonlight in private sector hospitals? How do they manage to be so absurd as to insist that investors spend their own money, without any return, to train doctors? Our position is that Sri Lanka needs more doctors. However, the demand for training more and more doctors will level off after two or three private universities churn out enough doctors to meet the national demand. Government regulation of all aspects of the functioning of private medical education institutions is, of course, a must but it should not be done in such a manner as to destroy these institutions.

If it is acceptable for other professionals to pay for private education, what are the grounds on which doctors want to be treated as a super-class of professionals? We are told by them that the reason why they require to be treated as belonging to a superior calling is because it is only their profession which deals with life and death decisions and this entitles them to special consideration. What an utter load of rubbish this is!

Doctors are not the only professionals who deal with safeguarding people from death or unjury. Most engineers, especially those whose work involves interfacing with natural objects like bad soil, floods, earthquakes and so on, cannot rely on book-learned formulas to construct safe buildings, bridges, dams, roads, railway tracks and so on, where a design or construction error could cause the loss of dozens, scores, hundreds or even thousands of lives. They cannot bury their mistakes like doctors inevitably do. What about policemen, soldiers and nurses? Do they not take a multitude of risks to protect the public?

Repeated many times, “Physician, heal thyself!” sums up what needs to be done.

(The writer is President, CIMOGG – Citizens’ Movement for Good Governance)

email: acvisva@gmail.com

The Ramanathan Kannan affair: Showdown over Alagaratnam’s final letter to Chief Justice New BASL President holds out hope of a solution BASL and JSA to meet separately tomorrow

April 1st, 2017

By C. A. Chandraprema Courtesy The Island Courtesy The Island

The controversy over appointing Ramanathan Kannan, a member of the private bar from Batticlaoa, as a High Court judge over the heads of many senior District Court judges and officials of the Attorney General’s Department, is now coming to a head with an emergency general meeting of the Judicial Services Association being called for tomorrow. According to members of the legal fraternity, this is the first time the JSA is holding a meeting of this nature. The main subject to be discussed at this meeting will be the appointment of Ramanathan Kannan to the HC and also the attitude of the BASL with regard to this matter. When Kannan was appointed to the High Court, the Judicial Services Association protested vehemently, writing to the President, the Judicial Services Commission and the BASL against this appointment. In the discussions that ensued, it transpired that the decision making bodies in the BASL – the Executive Committee and the Bar Council and even the Secretary of the BASL had been completely unaware that the then President of the BASL Geoffrey Alagaratnam had recommended Ramanathan Kannan for appointment as a High Court Judge to the President and the Chief Justice.

In any event, the BASL has no constitutional role in the appointment of judges. According to Article 111(2) (a) the President appoints judges to the High Court on the recommendations of the Judicial Service Commission, which is headed by the Chief Justice. Before making such recommendation the JSC will have to consult the Attorney General as well. If the Chief Justice wishes to make inquiries about the suitability of a candidate, he can make such inquiries from prominent members of the legal profession entirely at his own discretion. The President of the BASL can be among the senior lawyers consulted in this manner. But, this will be an inquiry made at the discretion of the CJ or other member of the Judicial Services Commission and the BASL President has no legal right to recommend anybody for appointment to the High Court. However, after the present yahapalana government came into power, a group within the BASL has been trying to arrogate to themselves a key role in the appointment of judges.

 

For their part, the yahapalana authorities have also been trying to give the BASL that power obviously as a reward for the role played by many lawyers in the regime change project of January 2015. The first draft of the 19th Amendment had a provision making it mandatory for the Constitutional Council and the Judicial Services Commission to consult the BASL when appointing judges. This was shouted down by the Opposition and the provision was dropped when the 19th Amendment was finally passed. However, the BASL President appears to have arrogated to himself a de facto power not just to intervene but to take the initiative in the appointment of judges. What happened in the case of Ramanathan Kannan was not anybody in the JSC asking the BASL President for his opinion, but the then BASL President Geoffrey Alagaratnam taking the initiative to canvass for Kannan’s appointment as a HC judge.

The sacking of Mohan Peiris

Following the representations made to him by Geoffrey Alagaratnam, the President had asked the JSC to make a recommendation to appoint Kannan as a High Court judge and the JSC sent him the recommendation. At the time the JSC made this recommendation, they had been under the impression that the entire BASL was behind the representations made by Alagaratnam. After things hit the fan, however, the Secretary to the BASL wrote a letter to the Judicial Services Association stating that neither the BASL Executive Committee nor the Bar Council had made any recommendation that Ramanathan Kannan be appointed a High Court judge and, therefore, the BASL has not made any such recommendation. Following this letter from the BASL Secretary, the Judicial Services Commission wrote to the President on 23 February 2017 (which letter we reproduce with this article) stating that if no proper recommendation has been made by the BASL to appoint Ramanathan Kannan as a High Court judge, the recommendation made by the JSC in terms of Article 111(2)(a) of the Constitution ‘has no force or validity in law’.

The Island exclusively reported on the contents of this letter earlier this month. This letter has effectively retracted the recommendation made earlier by the JSC in favour of Kannan’s appointment to the High Court. Following the receipt of this letter, the Secretary to the President wrote back to the JSC on 8 March 2017 asking for a recommendation that Kannan be removed from the position of High Court judge. (Letter reproduced here.) Up to now, the JSC has not written to the President in terms of Article 111(2)(b) recommending Kannan’s removal. Whether it is necessary for the JSC to make such a recommendation to remove Kannan is questionable because the present government removed Mohan Peiris from the position of Chief Justice saying that there was a flaw in the way his predecessor had been removed and since his predecessor had not in fact been removed, Peiris had never been the CJ! The yahapalana President himself bragged openly in public that he had used his executive power to remove Peiris.

Yet, when it comes to Kannan, that executive power which had enabled the government to sack a Chief Justice with just a chit from the Presidential Secretariat seems to be strangely paralysed. In a situation where the JSC has officially and in writing, retracted the recommendation they made earlier that Kannan be appointed to the HC, his removal by the President on the basis that he had not been constitutionally appointed, should have been automatic. Instead, what we see is the Presidential Secretariat writing back to the JSC asking for a recommendation in terms of Article 111(2) (b) of the Constitution, for Kannan’s removal. In the meantime, the various parties responsible for Kannan’s appointment to the High Court including, of course, Geoffrey Alagaratnam have been fighting tooth and nail to safeguard their protégé in the High Court. One way in which these parties seek to keep Kannan in the High Court is by foisting the blame for his appointment on former Chief Justice K. Sripavan.

As Alagaratnam argued, in his speech, at Sripavan’s farewell, despite any canvassing, importuning, or writing of letters he (Alagaratnam) may have done to the President and to the Chief Justice on behalf of Kannan, it was up to the CJ and the JSC to exercise ‘due diligence’ before recommending Kannan to the President for appointment to the High Court. The gist of this argument is that now that Kannan has been appointed as a judge of the High Court by a mistake made by the former Chief Justice who had assumed that Alagaratnam was speaking on behalf of the BASL, he (Kannan) cannot be removed unless some wrong doing is proved on his part. This mind you, is the argument put forward by the very person who is squarely responsible for misleading both the Chief Justice as well as the President of the country by giving them the impression that he was speaking on behalf of the entire BASL.

Mind numbing perfidy

In a previous interview with this newspaper Hemantha Warnakulasuriya described those promoting the appointment of Ramanathan Kannan as a ‘mafia’ within the BASL. Given the perfidious statements being made to keep Kannan in a position to which he should never have been appointed in the first place, this does indeed look like the work of a mafia in action. What takes the cake is that Geoffrey Alagaratnam just before he stepped down from the position of President of the BASL, had written a letter to the new Chief Justice Priyasath Dep telling him among other things that the BASL at its Special meeting on 21 March 2017 had considered the recommendation of a committee of senior silks and past BASL presidents and had decided that the BASL should not get involved in recommending the removal of a High Court judge who has now been appointed and that this can only be done by the President on the recommendation of the JSC.

In this letter Alagaratnam had also unrepentantly claimed that the BASL has ‘every right’ to make recommendations to the President to appoint eminent members of the bar for judicial appointments and called on the President to consider the recommendations made by the BASL for appointments to the judiciary from time to time. This letter dated 22 March 2017 is also reproduced with this article and in it we once again see an element of absolute perfidy when Alagaratnam says that the BASL decided not to get involved in recommending the removal of a High Court judge who had already been appointed. He seems to have conveniently forgotten that it was he who recommended the appointment of that judge and misleading both the former Chief Justice and the President in the process.

The main question that this letter brings to the fore, is whether the BASL should have any role at all in recommending judges for appointment as asserted in this letter? If the private bar has a role in appointing the judges who will be hearing their cases, that is going to corrupt the entire justice system. What happened in the case of Ramanathan Kannan is precisely what should never happen again. Kannan a lawyer practicing in the Batticlaoa courts was recommended for appointment as a judge by the President of the Batticaloa Bar – which certainly smacks of someone being recommended for high judicial office by a friend and colleague. Now Kannan is a High Court judge who owes his appointment to two practicing lawyers. If this is replicated over and over again, before long we will have a good number of judges at all levels of the judiciary who owe their positions to certain members of the private bar.

In the context where a High Court judge is now holding office without having fulfilled the constitutional requirements to be appointed a HC judge, the Judicial Services Association and the BASL will both be holding important meetings to decide what positions they will take on this matter. Tomorrow will be the acid test for the new President of the BASL U.R. de Silva, who will be presiding over a meeting of the BASL for the first time. Certain comments made by the new BASL President give us reason to believe that he may not follow in the footsteps of his predecessor. Addressing a press conference last Wednesday, De Silva told reporters that the BASL did not approve of the appointment of Kannan to the HC and that the former BASL President Alagaratnam had recommended Kannan in his private capacity, using letterheads of the BASL and that it was wrong to have done so. He had also said that, according to the BASL Constitution, the President of the association could not issue such letters without the knowledge of the Executive Committee. Thus, there is now hope that this whole disreputable episode will be brought to a close with the BASL also standing for Kannan’s removal after the separate BASL and JSA meetings to be held tomorrow.

THE PRESENT WORLD ECONOMY IS ANTI HUMAN – TIME TO RE-THINK – A Sri Lankan Buddhist perspective

March 31st, 2017

Janaka Goonetilleke

Ayn Rand called her philosophy “Objectivism”, describing its essence as “the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.

When Vasgo De Gama Invaded the spice market of Calicut and killed the Arabic Merchants, Sinhalese merchants, the Tamil merchants etc. the harmonious free market was destroyed and a policy of Might is Right was introduced to Asia. It persists even today led by the IMF and World Bank and the imperialistic wars in the whole of the world. The markets were denoted in Gold, Silver etc. quickly to be replaced currencies that the majority of the world does not control. Even Jesus rejected the moneylenders who are today running the world. This was imposed by the colonialists and has become the neo colonial agenda.

Thus a philosophy of lenier assessment where money was the arbitrator of development and human achievement was imposed on the world.  This contradicts to the age-old philosophy of Asia which was assessed by a philosophy of cyclicity making a holistic assessment of development and human achievements. This harmonious balance of assessment was the basis of sustainability learnt through evolution, which minimizes the environmental and human costs in any project.

DRIVING FORCE OF THIS WORLD ECONOMY

  • Creation of Monopoly money
  • Market system initialized and forced on the world By the IMF/World Bank with economic well being assed on GDP (Might is Right)
  • Greed and instant Gratification propagated by the media that drives the markets
  • Creative destruction the philosophy behind the markets
  • Money Democracy that cheats the people

EFFECT OF THE WORLD ECONOMY

  • Dehumanizing Humanity
  • Pollution of the 3 Basic elements of the environment and making it inhospitable to humanity.

THE PHILOSOPHY OF ECONOMICS AND ASSESMENT BY GDP

Linier form of assessment

Creative Destruction is the philosophy of the present world economy led by money economics as it is a linier form of assessment. In its creative accounting the negatives are not taken into account the only account is how much of money you have earned assessed as economic activity or GDP. Large petroleum companies are mainly assed on the money earn but ignores the vast number of people who suffer from respiratory disease, mental problems in the young due to led poisoning and the cancers etc.

Alan Greenspan best expresses the absurdity of this assessment.

In Vermont, the wonderful breeze” rendered air conditioning unnecessary and therefore did not appear as economic activity. Other things equal,” he concluded, the standards of living are the same, but the GDP will be less in Vermont than it will be in the South.”

Thus the truth is manipulated to the final objective of earning money, thus human suffering is ignored as not being important.  In fact the habituation and mindlessness makes them ignorant of the risks even they take as humans. Greed the final aim of the neocolonialists is the driving force.

The main thing holding us back from reality is the institutionalized view of our economy and society encapsulated in GDP. Unfortunately this institutionalized world has been impregnated our policies in Sri Lanka.

We value what is visible — transacted economic activity — and downplay or ignore what is invisible. That affects public policy and even our thinking patterns in insidious ways. We tend to support anything that adds to economic activity, no matter what the adverse consequences, say in environmental degradation or socially destructive working hours. We have come to see our economy — as if it were an entity separate from the world in which we live — turns what could be co-operative, altruistic Homo socialis into selfish, money-grubbing Homo economicus.

 Banks and financial institutions are (still, mostly) macho, testosterone-fuelled environments where making the quick buck trumps almost every other consideration. Plenty of power but no responsibility A company that buys a forest and cuts it down can, of course, repay its loans faster than one that plants a new tree for each one it destroys

This was best expressed by our erudite Minister of finance Dr N M Perera in the 1970 when questioned by a reporter who asked him the question As a former student of the London School of economics what do you think is wrong with the world economy he promptly said London School of economics”.  These are the institutions that have brain washed our elite who will never question the orders of the IMF and WB.

CYCLICAL ASSESMENT

In a cyclically assed programmes a sense of balance is inculcated to the project and there is a proper accounting system the negatives being accounted.” Thus changing numbers in a GDP does not necessarily change the world

The final effect is the destruction of nature the natural wealth the grand finale seams to be the annihilation of humanity. This is against the majority Buddhist view in Sri Lanka (ignored by the macaulayites politicians” as expressed in the following View

Buddhist believe that humanity and nature are interdependent quite contrary to the present western philosophy of the hubris that humanity rules nature and that it is in the power of humanity to destroy nature for her material end without a price to pay. The poverty of that philosophy is now gradually dawning on humanity. The Buddhist ecological perspective is best expressed in the Noble Eightfold Path which is the Right View . This view is contained in the doctrine of Patticcasamuppada or Dependent Co-origination, where things exist interdependently not in their own right. The Image of the jewelled net of Indra reflects it. This holistic model undermines the power of the self over others.

Human Development thus is greatly intertwined with nature and it can never grow in harmony isolated. Urbanization in that sense would never be healthy. Buddhism does not believe in absolutism, it believes in relativism and therefore expects humanity to act with a view to ‘Welfare Of The Many’. In other words a Holistic approach to once actions.

Janaka Goonetilleke

PRESENT WORLD ECONOMY

The present world economy is a progression of colonialism that is geared to the enslavement of people and not to the liberation of majority of people both mentally and physically. Exploitation and benefit unfortunately seam to go to the so colonial powers of the start. The whole world has been enmeshed in this devious plan to exploit and subjugate humanity by a small group of people who create the conditions through the IMF and WB. And if any one challenges like Gadaffi of Libya then the full force of violence is let through.

1) The medium of exploitation seam to be the so called international currencies the monopoly money  thus ensuring that the beneficiaries are the creators of money. The fuel that runs this economy is money which is virtual and has no means of proper assessment  of its value. The value being assessed by the markets restricted in the use of currency in a gamblers den, forced globalization and open markets which are geared to sell the birth right of the citizens  in the market by a corrupt group of politicians who are ironically there for a short period of about 5-6 years. The morality of this process has to be questioned. It is this immoral money that keeps the world economy ticking.

2) Secondly the markets are encouraged to grow by a process of brain washing which encourages instant gratification which is a form of addiction not the need. This process is uneconomic as the bought products are not one of need but one of greed.

3) The Christian work ethic – Servants, be submissive to your masters with all respect, not only to those who      are good and gentle, but also to those who are unreasonable. For this finds favor, if for the sake of conscience toward God a person bears up under sorrows when suffering unjustly. For what credit is there if, when you sin and are harshly treated, you endure it with patience? But if when you do what is right and suffer for it you patiently endure it, this finds favor with God. For you have been called for this purpose. (1 Peter 2:18–21)

Very aptly stated by Bishop Tutu- when the white man came he had the bible and we had the land. Then he said let us close our eyes and prey. When we opened our eyes he had the land and we had the bible.

4) Foreign development assistance  where countries  borrow money and build infra structures so that they can sell the citizens to cheap labour in a IMF targeted scheme. In Sri Lanka it is called Regaining Sri Lanka.

  • Inequitable distribution of wealth, which makes the rich richer and the poor poorer. In the future this would make the markets shrink, as the poor will not be able to participate. At the present the poor are given enough un payable loans to enslave them in the future. Based on this the markets will not be able to sustain themselves in the future. The disparity of income would create hate and destabilization of society. It is this disharmony that brought Donald Trump to be President of the USA.

Unknown to the people the currencies have been so manipulated that two people in the family had to work in 2005 where as in 1970 only one person had to work for the same standard of living– Elizabeth Warren /professor of Law Harvard University Bankruptcy of the middle classes.”

EFFECT ON SOCIETY

 ENSLAVEMENT OF THE MIND AND NEW TECHNOLOGY

New technology with out human emotion is destructive. The short termism led by globalization has encouraged the rapid growth of the Internet and social media. This creates a communication system that lacks emotional interaction creating a self centered humans that are the driving force of this economy.

Urbanization and dehumanization

 Urbanization and megacity development is the latest advice for Sri Lanka that is to be adopted by the government. The basis is increasing economic activity or GDP as assed by the international institutions. The increased restriction of space for humans creates insecurity. It is a well recognized in New York where a study has confirmed increased violence in the home and destruction of family life. It is not surprising that violence has permeated into the society in ever increasing forms from generation to generation not forgetting the increased divorce rate and its effect on society and future generations.

From an economic perspective future job prospects and spending on health care, utilities etc have been ignored.

Investment in major cities deprives the rural economies and it is not surprising that people from rural areas have no option to enslavement in the Middle East and into prostitution in the big cities. The growth of spas in Colombo, which are, glorified brothels is an indication of the deprived rural economy. This social disruption is a result of enslavement of the people by a class of rulers who have lost the basic human qualities of compassion and care of fellow human beings.

DESTRUCTION OF THE THREE BASIC ELEMENTS OF THE EARTH –SOIL, AIR, WATER

The three basic elements of the environment are the soil, water and air, which are essential elements for the sustenance of life and the maintenance of bio diversity. The water is the natural conveyor of nutrients, of the byproducts of nature. Water accounts for 65% of the human body and is the conveyor of oxygen, nutrients and the by products. Water is the natural life giver. Today pollution from industrial waste, Nuclear byproducts, refined medicines, insecticides and weedicides. has converted it into the conveyor of death. To explain the multiple ways of its damage to humanity is not possible in a short article. How ever the following can be enumerated.

WATER THE LIFE GIVER NOW THE CARRIER OF DEATH

  • 70% of cancers of humanity are secondary to the weedicides; insecticides and chemicals used in industry and can be prevented according to the American Cancer association. The conveyor of this toxins to humanity is the life giver water. The American chemical companies are now charged for selling weedicides that are causing malignant lymphomas in the USA. Interestingly it is these companies that export these chemicals to the third world having promoted genetically modified plants which needs the chemicals to prevent the diseases these plants are subjected to in their new environment. Cancer villages in China is a well known product of rapid industrialization, After fukushima disaster in japan the pacific sea was polluted by the heavy water ie nuclear waste that would have been carried to humans by eating fish.
  • Growth of algae in streams and rivers when chemical fertilizers interfere with the eco system. These algae deprive oxygen to the fish and other aquatic animals that deprives humanity of a natural food. In addition the flesh of the fish which is a staple diet of Rural people becomes carriers of toxic products to humans and to diseases such as cancers, kidney disease etc.
  • In Sri Lanka deforestation around 400 hectares of forests in 10 years. Deforestation has major effects on humanity.
  1. When ecosystems are disturbed new diseases are introduced to human societies. They recon 24 new diseases have been introduced. The human elephant conflict is a well known problem created in sri Lanka
  2. Blocking the flow of rainwater by trees allows enough time for it to stagnate so that it is absorbed by the soil. With evo evaporation by the forest trees the water is purified. The flowing rainwater can cause landslides and floods that are a recurrent problem in China that has industrialized and amalgamated its economy to the world economy quickly. The trees also gives shade that encourages actinomyces that prevent soil erosion and allows the soil to retain water and maintains porosity which allows water to be absorbed
  3. Deforestation has allowed the weedicides and fertilizers to be directed through the Mahaweli scheme to the North central province where the high levels of Cadmium and heavy metals from fertilizers have effected 15% of the population with Kidney Disease. These are rural period and up till today no effective measures are taken to detoxify the soil. Mahaweli Scheme was started by an ambitious group of politicians whose desire to earn the commissions far out weighed the need to asses the negatives of the scheme. The scheme has failed the country not reaching its expectations The country still imports the fertilizer, as it is absolutely necessary for the tea industry one of the main foreign exchange earners in Sri Lanka. The political class has done nothing to prevent the damage. The import of fertilizer continues. All Cash crops and mono cultural plantations deplete the soil of the nutrients and need fertilizers for its maintenance compounding the effect on humanity.
  1. D) The heavy metals are now distributed to the rest of the country through the medium of Rice and sold to the unsuspecting consumer. The present economic system has failed to take note of the consequence. ( Best way to minimize the damage is to cook rice with excess water and decant it after the rice is cooked which will wash away the Toxins)

INDUSTRIAL AGRICULTURE

This is another mechanism of causing Global warming and destruction of forests. More concerning is the development of Anti Biotic resistance threatening human health.

POLLUTION OF AIR

The vehicles and industrial by products are emitted to the air, which is recycled by rainwater. Global warming is another effect.

SOIL

Monocultural cultivations deplete the soil of nutrients from a particular layer of the soil, which will not entertain any plants without fertilizers, the hardening of the soil also

HUMAN HEALTH AND DISEASE CAUSED BY THE NEW ECONOMIC ORDER

  • Infertility – Falling sperm counts due to poisons in the water – Sperm count in 1940s in the UK was 100 million /ml today it has fallen to 60million/ml. Other studies have confirmed that 20% of young men have their counts below 20 million /ml which is technically defined as abnormal count with only 15-20% of them being normal sperms. Not forgetting the female infertility due to obesity and late motherhood due to economic necessity.
  • Mental disease due to Stress by living in a confined area and the work ethic that promotes enslavement
  • Increase in cancers. The incident of cancers has doubled from 2005 to 2014 in Sri Lanka.
  • Systemic diseases have increased. From Diabetes, Sleep Apnoea, Obesity, Hypertension etc., which are stress, related.
  • New vector controlled diseases such as dengue etc. due to changes in environment after urbanization.
  • New wave of antibiotic resistance due to industrial agriculture.

Unfortunately these create an extra cost on health care or for the poor who cannot afford it suffering that are not reflected in the Lord of the Economy GDP.

A CYCLICAL ASSESMENT OF THE ECONOMY

A holistic assessment of the economy must adhere to the eastern form of thinking. This gives a holistic view of any project finally giving a well-assessed result. It must be admitted any destruction of the natural state has its consequences nature being perfect which is very much an eastern philosophy. Thus a cyclical assessment will minimize inefficiency and short termism.

CONCLUSION

There is no doubt the present world economy is inefficient. The productive work as expressed by the GDP and other statistical data are misleading hiding the inefficiency of the system. What humans need is happiness and contentment not enslavement. The Great Indian philosopher Rabindranath Tagore in his lecture to the Japanese aptly stated this. He said Modernity is the freedom of the mind not the taste in the tongue Modernization is Imitation. What we are doing today is blindly following a defunct western philosophy that has been forced on our countries in spite of the destruction and destabilization of the environment and never ending proxy wars. Our rulers lack the wisdom that our ancestors firmly believed would establish a fair and just economy. It makes no sense to adopt an economy that increases human suffering but gives the illusion of human well being promoted by fraudulent statistics. The curse of Sri Lanka is that the rulers are far away from the Buddhist Philosophy and too close a western Christian philosophy.

මෛත්‍රිපාලගේ කාර්යභාරය

March 31st, 2017

නලින් ද සිල්වා

මෛත්‍රිපාල නිල වශයෙන් මෙරට ජනාධිපති වෙලා අවුරුදු දෙකකට වැඩියි. දහනවවැනි ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයෙන් විධායක ජනාධිපතිගේ බලතල බිඳක් අගමැති ලබා ගත්තා. සුපුරුදු පරිදි රනිල් එය විස්තර කෙළේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට බලය ලබා දී ඒ ශක්තිමත් කිරීමක් ලෙස. එහෙත් අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අගමැති, සභානායක, කතානායක ඔක්කොම රනිල්. ඒ තනතුරු නිල වශයෙන් දරන්නේ කවුරුන් ද යන ප්‍රශ්නය වැඩකට ඇති එකක් නො වෙයි. රනිල් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කියන්නෙ තමන්ට.

 මෛත්‍රිපාල පසුගිය දා සීතල රුසියාවේ සංචාරයක යෙදුණා. සීතල හරියට ඉවර වෙන්නත් කලින් රුසියාවට යන්න මෛත්‍රිපාලට හොඳ හේතුවක් තියෙන්න ඇති. රනිල් එක්ක සීතල යුද්ධයක් ගැනත් කියැවෙනවා. මෛත්‍රිපාල කුරුණෑගල රණවිරු උත්සවයක දි හොඳ කතා තුනක් කියලා තිබුණා. ඔහු කිවුවා කිසිම රණවිරුවකු යුද්ධාපරාධ සම්බන්ධයෙන් විත්තිකරුවකු නොකරණ බව. දෙවනුව ඔහුට ප්‍රධාන ලෝක නායකයකුගෙන් ආධාර ලැබෙන බව. තුන්වනුව ඔහු නොකියා කීවේ සරත් වීරසේකර රණවිරු විත්තිවාචකයක් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම මගින් රණවිරුවන් විත්තිකරුවන් කර ඇති බව.

 මෛත්‍රිපාලට පුටින් යම් දෙයක් කියා ඇති බව පැහැදිලියි. අද මෛත්‍රිපාල කළ යුත්තේ පුටින්ගේ යාළුවා ට්‍රම්ප් හමුවීමයි. අප ඒ බව කියන්නේ ට්‍රම්ප් ජනාධිපති ලෙස දිවුරුම් දීමටත් කලින්. මෛත්‍රිපාලට පුටින් ලවාත් ට්‍රම්ප්ට යමක් කියවා ගන්න පුළුවන් වෙන්න ඕන. රටවල් පහළොවක් සමග එකතු වී ලංකාව තමන්ට ම  විරුද්ධව ජෙනීවාහි දී 2015 ඔක්තෝම්බර් මස ගෙනෙන ලද දෙමුහුන් අධිකරණ යෝජනාව අකුළා ගන්නා තැනට වැඩ කරන්න පුළුවන්. ඒත් ඒකට ටිකක් හරි ජාතිකත්වයක් ඇති විදේශ ඇමතිවරයකු අවශ්‍යයයි. මංගලට ඇත්තේ සෘණ ජාතිකත්වයක්.

 මෛත්‍රිපාල අතන මෙතන කියන කතා එතරම් වැදගත් නැහැ. ඔහු නිශ්චිත ව යමක් කියන්නෙත් නැහැ. ඔහු සරත් ෆොන්සේකාගේ සුදු කොඩි කතාව ගැන කියන්නේ කුමක් ද? ගෝඨාභය යුද්ධාපරාධකරුවෙක් ද? ගෝඨභය විත්තිකරුවෙක් ද? මේ දිනවල සරත් ෆොන්සේකා කියන දෙය අපරාධ පරීක්‍ෂණ කොට්ඨාසයත් බැරෑරුම් ව ගන්නවා. සරත් ෆොන්සේකා සත්‍යය හා සත්‍යයම මිස වෙනත් දෙයක් නො කියන්නේ ද? ඔහු මෙතෙක් කල් සත්‍යය සඟවා ගෙන සිටීම ගැන මෛත්‍රිපාල හා ඔය කොට්ඨාසය කියන්නේ කුමක් ද? රණවිරුවන් විත්තිකරුවන් කරන්නෙ නැහැ කියලා මෛත්‍රිපාල කියන එකෙන් අදහස් කරන්නෙ කුමක් ද? ඔහු සරත් ෆොන්සේකා කියන දේ විශ්වාස කරනවා ද?

 හම්බන්තොට වරාය ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කරල ද නැද්ද? චම්පක නම් කියන්නෙ අත්සන් කර ඇති බවයි. හම්බන්තොට වරාය චීනයට විකුණීම ගැන අප විරුද්ධ විය යුතුයි. ඒකෙ දෙකක් නැහැ. එහෙත් සමහරු ඒකට විරුද්ධ වෙන්නෙ රෝ ඔත්තු සේවයේ අවශ්‍යතාවට. පසුගිය දා දි අයිලන්ඩ් පුවත්පතේ රෝ ප්‍රධානියාගේ වැඩ ගැන විස්තරාත්මක ලිපියක් පළ කර තිබුණා. ඔහු ලංකාවේ කළ සමහර දේ අසාර්ථක වීම ගැනත් එහි සඳහන් කර තිබුණා. ඔහු අද තම පවු සෝදා ගැනීමට යන්නේ හම්බන්තොට වරාය ගිවිසුම අවලංගු කරවීමෙන් ද? ඒත් ඉන්දියාවට අපට සල්ලි දෙන්න බැහැ. මෙරට රෝ ඔත්තු සේවයේ මැදිහත්වීම් ගැන විස්තර නැතිවාට අපට කතන්දරයක් තියෙනවා. අප ඒ කතන්දරය බොහෝ කලක සිට කියනවා. කතන්දරයක් කියන්නෙ විදග්ධ භාෂාවෙන් නම් ප්‍රවාදයක්. ලැබෙන විස්තර කතන්දරය සමග එකඟ වෙනවා.

 ඒ කුමක් වුවත් රනිල් ගිවිසුමට අත්සන් කරලා නම් දැන් කරන්නේ මොකක් ද?  මහා බැංකු අධිපති පහුගිය දා කියා සිටියේ හම්බන්්තොට වරාය විකුණන්නෙ නැතිව අපට රට මුහුණ පා ඇති ආර්ථික අර්බුදයෙන් ගොඩ එන්න බැරි බව. රනිල් චීනෙට බැණ බැණ හිටියට දැන් චීනෙන් සල්ලි ඕන වෙලා. අදාළ ගිවිසුම ඉතා භයානක බව කියැවෙනවා. ඒත් රනිල්ට ඒකෙන් වැඩක් නැහැ. ඔහුට ඕන උතුර නැගෙනහිර ඇරෙන්න රට විකුණලා හරි තව අවුරුදු දෙකක්වත් ආණ්ඩුව පවත්වා ගෙන ගිහිල්ල දෙමළ ජාතිවාදයට කප්පන් දීමයි. ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂෙ හම්බන්තොට වරාය පිළිබඳ කමිටුවෙන් ඉවත් වෙන්න යනවලු. ඒ්ක හොඳයි. ඔවුන් තවත් කියන්න ඕන තමන් බලයට පත් වූ විගස ගිවිසුම ඒක පාක්‍ෂිකව හරි අවලංගු කරනවා කියලා.ඒකෙ දී ඊනියා ජත්‍යන්තර නීතිය කොහොම බලපානවද කියන එක අපට වැඩක් නැහැ. අනූනව අවුරුදු බදු දීම් කළ නොහැකි බවට අතීතයට බලපාන පරිදි නීති සකස් විය යුතුයි. කොහොමටත් මෛත්‍රිපාල වරාය ගිවිසුමේ සුළු කොන්දේසියක් දෙකක් වෙනස් කරලා රනිල්ගෙ පවු සෝදාවි.

 ජ වි පෙ දැන් කියනවා රනිල් 2002 දී ප්‍රභාකරන් එක්ක ගිවිසුමක් අත්සන් කළා වගේ මෙවරත් චීන සමාගමත් සමග ගිවිසුමක් අත්සන් කරන්න ඇති බව. 2002 දි රනිල් ප්‍රභාකරන් සමග අත්සන් කළ ගිවිසුම ගැන එවකට ජනාධිපතිනි චන්ද්‍රිකාටවත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවටවත් කිවුවෙ නැහැ. රනිල් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට සලකන්නෙ එහෙමයි. ඒත් තවත් ප්‍රශ්නයක් ඉතුරු වෙනවා. ජ වි පෙ රනිල් ගැන හොඳ හැටි දැන දැනත් යමපාලනයට උදවු කෙළේ ඈයි ද කියන එක. ජ වි පෙරමුණටවත් ජාතික හෙළ උරුමයටවත් මේ කපේ දි එම පවු සෝදාගන්න බැහැ. ඒ පක්‍ෂ දෙක ම රටට ද්‍රෝහි වෙලා.

 මෛත්‍රිපාල හම්බන්තොට ගැන නිශ්චිත කිසිවක් මෙතෙක් කියා නැහැ. ඔහු තම පවු කොහොම වෙතත් රනිල්ගෙ පවු සෝදන්න වැඩ කරනවා. මෛත්‍රිපාලගෙ කාර්යභාරය ඒකයි. ඔහුට අවශ්‍ය නම් තම පවු සෝදා ගැනීමට කටයුතු කරන්න පුළුවන්. ඒ රනිල් අගමැති කමෙන් ඉවත් කිරීමෙන්. ජ වි පරමුණටත් ඒකට සම්මාදන් වෙන්න පුළුවන්. මෛත්‍රිපාල සරත් වීරසේකරට විරුද්ධව කියන කතාව හරි නැහැ. ලංකාවට විරුද්ධව 2015 ඔක්තෝම්බර් යෝජනාව ජෙනීවාහි දී සම්මත කර ගත්තෙ යුද්ධාපරාධ ගැන විදේශ විනිසුරුවන් සහිත අධිකරණ පිහිටුවීමට. ඒ යෝජනාව සකස් කිරීමේ දී ලංකාණ්ඩුව, දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය හා එක්සත් රාජ්‍ය එකට එකතු වී ක්‍රියා කළ බව සුමන්තිරන් කියා තිබුණා. එමෙන් ම දින කිහිපයකට පෙර මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් අයිතිකාර හුසේන් ආණ්ඩුව යුද්ධාපරාධ පිළිබඳ නඩු පවරා දඬුවම් නොකිරීම පිළිබඳ තම කණස්සල්ල පළ කර හිටියා. හුසේන් හමුවෙහි රණවිරුවන් විත්තිකරුවන් පමණක් නොව වැරදිකරුවන්. මෛත්‍රිපාල අද කළ යුත්තේ පුටින් හා ට්‍රම්ප් සමග එකතු වී 2015 යෝජනාව අස්කර ගැනීමට ක්‍රියා කිරීමයි. එය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට කල් ඉල්ලීම මගින් ආණ්ඩුව හුසේන්ට හා අබලන් වෙමින් පවතින ජාත්‍යන්තරවාදී සුපිරිව්‍යුහයට යටවෙනවා. 2015 යෝජනාව අස්කර ගත්විට යුද්ධාපරාධ අධිකරණත් නැහැ විත්තිකරුවනුත් නැහැ. මෛත්‍රිපාලට එහි දී ද රනිල් ඉවත් කිරීමට සිදූවේවි. එසේ නොකර අද මෛත්‍රිපාල කරන්නේ රනිල්ගේ පවු සේදීම, එහෙමත් නැත්නම් පවු සමාකරවීමට පූජකවරුන් සොයා යෑම.

නලින් ද සිල්වා

සම්බන්ධන් හා යුද්ධාපරාධ

March 31st, 2017

නලින් ද සිල්වා

මෛත්‍රිපාල කුමක් කීවත් ජෙනීවා හි මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් අයිතිකරු හුසේන් හා පිරිස රණවිරුවන් යුද්ධාපරාධිකරුවන් ලෙස තීන්දු කර අවසන්. ඔවුන්ට අවශ්‍ය විදේශීය විනිශ්චයකරුවන් සහිත අධිකරණයකින් රණවිරුවන්ට දඬුවම් පැමිණවීම පමණයි. ඔවුන් ලංකාවට අවුරුදු දෙකක් කල් දුන්නේ 2015 ඔක්තෝම්බර් යෝජනාව ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට. ඒ යෝජනාව මෙන් ම යෝජනාව ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට කල් දීමට මෙවර සම්මත කර ගත් යෝජනාවත් ඉදිරිපත් කෙරුණේ ලංකාව එක් යෝජකයකු වෙමින්.

මංගල සමරවීර, රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ හා මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන ලංකාවේ දී කුමක් කිවුවත් ඔවුන් බටහිරයන්ට කියන්නේ වෙනත් දෙයක්. ලංකාවේ දී ඔවුන්ට බහුතර සිංහලයන් සතුටු කිරීමට වෙනවා. සිංහලයන් රැවටීම ඉතා පහසුයි. පසුගිය ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ දී සිංහලයන් රැවටූ අන්දම අප දන්නවා. නායකයන් ද රවටන්න පුළුවන්. එය අද ඊයේ දෙයකුත් නො වෙයි. අවුරුදු දෙසියකට පෙර ඩොයිලි සිංහල නිළමෙලා රැවටූ ආකාරය මුතුකුඩ ටෙලිනාට්‍ය නැරඹීමෙන් හිතාගන්න පුළුවන්. එමෙන් ම නිළමෙලා නිළමෙලාත් එකිනෙකා රවටන්න හැදුවා. උදේට එක මුහුණක් පෙන්නන නිළමෙලා සවසට ඩොයිලි එක්ක ඩීල් දැම්මා. ඩොයිලිගේ නම් ඩීල් ඩොයිලි කියා වෙනස් කරන්න පුළුවන්.

බලය දේපොළ හා වරප්‍රසාද වෙනුවෙන් මේ නිළමෙලා නොකළ දෙයක් නැති තරම්. බලය වෙනුවෙන් තම අඹුදරුවන් පවා පාවා දීමට ඔවුන් සූදානමින් සිටියා. එසේ පාවා දුන්නා. අදත් සිංහල නායකයන් බොහෝ දෙනකු ක්‍රියා  කරන්නේ එසේ ම. ආගම මාරු කළ නායකයන් කී දෙනකු එසේ නොකළ ආකාරයෙන් සිටිනවා ද? සමහරු කිහිප වතාවක් ආගම් මාරු කර තිබෙවා. ඒ එක ආගමක් ගැනවත් ඇති විශ්වාසයක් නිසා නො වෙයි. හුදෙක් බලය සඳහා පමණයි.  සී අයි ඒ, රෝ ආදී ඔත්තු සේවාවන්ට සේවය කරන කී දෙනකු සිංහල නායකයන් අතර සිටිනවා ද? මෙරට දේශපාලනය තීරණය කෙරෙන්නේ  මහජනයා විසින් පමණක් නො වෙයි. ඩීල් ඩොයිලිට වඩා දක්‍ෂ ඩීල් කරුවන් අද ලංකාවේ ඉන්නවා.

ඇතැම් සිංහල නායකයන් බලය සඳහා දෙමළ ජාතිවාදයට වුවත් සේවය කිරීමට සූදානම්. අද සම්බන්ධන් විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා වී සිටින්නේ ඔහු විපක්‍ෂයේ සිටින නිසා නො වෙයි. ඔහු අගමැතිගේ විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා. එංගලන්ත පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සම්ප්‍රදාය අනුව එහි  විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා ඔවුන්ගේ රැජනගේ විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා. ලංකාවේ රජ කෙනකු නැහැ. ජනාධිපති කෙනකු හිටියාට වැඩක් නැහැ. මෙරට වැඩ කෙරෙන්නේ බටහිරයන්ට අවශ්‍ය විධියට අගමැති හරහා. මෙරට විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා අගමැතිගේ විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා ලෙස හඳුන්වන්න පුළුවන්. අද එ ජා පක්‍ෂයත් දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානයත් බටහිරත් වැඩ කරන්නේ එකට. ජෙනීවා 2015 ඔක්තෝම්බර් යෝජනාව ගෙන ආවේ ආණ්ඩුවේ, දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානයේ හා  ඔබාමාගේ නියෝජිතයන් එක් ව සාකච්ඡා කිරීමෙන් පසුව බව සුමන්තිරන් කියා තිබෙනවා. එය දි අයිලන්ඩ් පුවත්පතේ පළ වූවා. සුමන්තිරන් එය ප්‍රතික්‍ෂෙප කෙළේ නැහැ. ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය කරන කියන දේකුත් නැහැ. 

පසුගිය දා ඉන්දියාවේ පැවති එක්තරා ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මේලනයක දී සම්බන්ධන් කියා තිබෙනවා යුද්ධය නිසා දෙමළ ජනයා 1,50,000ක් ඝාතනය කෙරුණු බව. මේ ඝාතන සංඛ්‍යාව බඩු මිළ, ඩොලරයේ අගය ආදිය මෙන් ම ඉහළ යනවා. ජෙනීවා ගොස් දෙමළ ජනයා 2,00,000ක් ඝාතනය කෙරුණු බව කීවොත් එයට විශාල ප්‍රසිද්ධියක් ලැබේවි. පසුගිය දිනවල ජෙනීවා ගොස් විසුරුණු දෙමළ ජනයා සිවල් සමාජය ආදිය නියෝජනය කරමින් කී දෙනකු රණවිරුවන් යුද්ධාපරාධ කරුවන් ලෙස නම් කළා ද? මෛත්‍රිපාලට ඒ කිසිවක් පෙනෙන්නේ නැහැ. ඔහුට ගිය සැප්තැම්බරයේ එක්සත් ජාතින්ගේ සංවිධානයේ දී රණවිරුවන් යුද්ධාපරාධ කරුවන් නො වේ කියා කියන්න තිබුණා. ඔහු කුරුණෑගල දී කියන දේ නිව්යෝක්හි දී කියන්නේ නැහැ.

සම්බන්ධන් ඉන්දියාවේ දී කර ඇති ප්‍රකාශය ගැන මෛත්‍රිපාල කියන්නේ කුමක් ද?  සම්බන්ධන් කර ඇත්තේ යුද්ධාපරාධ චෝදනාවක්. දෙමළ ජනයා 1,50,000ක් යුද්ධය නිසා ඝාතනය කෙරුණු බව ඔහු කියන්නේ අගමැතිගේ විපක්‍ෂ නායකයා ලෙස ඉන්දියාවේ පැවති ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මේලනයක දී මිස කිලිනොච්චියේ දී නො වේ. මෙවැනි ප්‍රකාශවලට ලංකාවේ පන්සලක දී හෝ පාසලක දී හෝ පිළීිතුරු දීම පමණක් ප්‍රමාණවත් වන්නේ නැහැ. සම්බන්ධන් බටහිරයන් ඇතුළු පිරිස මෙවැනි ප්‍රකාශ කරන්නේ කිසිම සාධකයක් නැතිව. පරණගම කොමිසමේ ඇතැම් නිර්දේශ නොපිළිගත්තත් එය හමුවේ දෙමළ ජනයා 1,50,0000ක් ඝාතනය කෙරුණු බවට කිසිම සාක්‍ෂියක් ඉදිරිපත් වූයේ නැහැ.

දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය 2001 දී පිහිටුවනු ලැබුයේ කොටි සංවිධානය විසින්. දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය දිගින් දිගට ම කොටි සංවිධානය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටියා. දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය ක්‍රියා කෙළේ කොටි සංවිධානයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු දිගුව ලෙස. සම්බන්ධන්ලා කොටි සංවිධානය ආරක්‍ෂා කළා පමණක් නොව කොටි විසින් කරන ලද ඝාතනවලට විරුද්ධ වූයේ නැහැ. මෙරට යුද්ධාපරාධ කෙළේ කොටි සංවිධානයයි. අවි රහිත කලාපවල සිට ජනතාවට මුවා වී කළ වෙඩි තැබීම්, ජනතාව මිනිස් වළල්ලක් ලෙස යොදා ගැනීම ආදිය යුද්ධාපරාධ. එපමණක් නොව කොටි අරන්තලාවේ කළ භික්‍ෂු ඝාතනය, කැබිතිගොල්ලෑවේ හා වෙනත් තැන්වල සිදු කරන ලද සිවිල් ජන ඝාතන දරුණු ම ගණයේ යුද්ධාපරාධ. ඒ සියල්ල ගැන බටහිරයන් ද මෛත්‍රිපාල ද රනිල් ද සම්බන්ධන් ද නිහඬයි. ඒ සියල්ල කෙරුණේ දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානයේ අනුග්‍රහයෙන්. ඒ සියල්ල සම්බන්ධයෙන්  දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය ද එහි නායකයන් ද වග කිව යුතුයි.

මෛත්‍රිපාල කොටි සංවිධානයට අනුග්‍රහ දැක් වූ සිංහල විරෝධී සිවල් සාමාජිකයන් දෙමළ ජාතික සංධාන නායක කාරකාදීන් ගැන කිනම් ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් අනුගමනය කරන්නේ ද? ඔවුන්ට විරුද්ධව යුද්ධාපරාධ චෝදනා ගෙන ඒමට නීතිපතිට උපදෙස් දෙන්නේ ද? අපරාධවලට අනුබල දීමත් අපරාධ. ඉන්දියාවේ දී උණ්ඩය ද ඡන්දය ද (බුලට් ඕර් බැලට්) යනුවෙන් කතා කර ඇති සම්බන්ධන් කියා ඇත්තේ ඡන්දයෙන් කර ගැනීමට බැරි වූ දේ කර ගැනීමට කොටි ආයුධ අතට ගත් බවයි. මෙය එක්තරා අයුරකින් ඇතැම් ජාතිකවාදීන් අද දෙමළ ජාතිවාදීන් යුද්ධයෙන් දිනා ගැනීමට බැරි වූ දේ පෑනෙන් දිනා ගැනීමට උත්සාහ කරන බව කීම වැරදි බව පෙන්වා දීමක්. එහි දී සිදු වී ඇත්තේ අනෙක් පැත්ත. පෑනෙන් දිනාගැනීමට බැරි වූ ඊළම (බලය බෙදීම හරහා) දිනා ගැනීමට කොටි ආයුධ අතට ගත්තා. කොටි පරාජය කිරීමත් සමග ඒ සියල්ල අවසන්. නැවතත් සාකච්ඡා අවශ්‍ය නැහැ. අද කළ යුත්තේ කොටි සංවිධානය කළ යුද්ධාපරාධවලට කොටින්ට (ඔවුන්ගෙන් සමහරකු ජීවතුන් අතර නොවීම ප්‍රශ්නයක් නො වෙයි) හා කොටින්ට අනුබල දුන් හා අනුග්‍රහය දැක්වු සම්බන්ධන්ලාට, සිවල් සාමාජිකයන්ට හා සිංහල විරෝධී සියල්ලන්ට විරුද්ධව නඩු පැවරීමයි.  

නලින් ද සිල්වා

 

අසාත් සාලිගේ ගිඟුරුමෙන් සිරිසේනගේ කන් කඩා වැටේ

March 31st, 2017

හෙළබිම සිංහල පුවත්

විල්පත්තු රක්‍ෂිත වනාන්තරයට උතුරින් පිහිටා ඇති ප‍්‍රදේශද වන රක්‍ෂිත ලෙස ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත් කරමින් ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා විසින් නිකුත් කරනු ලැබූ ගැසට් නිවේදනය අවලංගු නොකලහොත් රට පුරා මුස්ලිම් පල්ලි මුල් කරමින් දැවැන්ත විරෝධතා ආරම්භ කරන බව ජාතික සමඟි පෙරමුණු නායක අසාද් සාලි පැවසූ අතර මේවන විට ජනාධිපති ලේකම්වරයා එම ගැසට් නිවේදනය අවලංගු කිරීමට කටයුතු කරමින් සිටින බව වාර්තා වේ.

මේ අනුව ජනපති සිරිසේනගේ පරිසර වික්‍රමයත් මුස්ළිම් දේශපාලකයන්ගේ විරෝධය හමුවේ හැකිලී යනු ඇත.

 

MR claims Obama admin pressured Ban Ki-moon

March 31st, 2017

Courtesy Ceylon Today

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa blamed the Obama administration for pressuring UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to take decisions on Sri Lanka against UN protocols.

In a press communiqué released yesterday, he noted that the UN Secretary General can appoint a panel of experts to advise him on a country only on the instructions of the UN Security Council. He went on to note that under pressure from the Obama administration, Ban Ki-moon appointed a panel of experts to advice him about Sri Lanka without the sanction of the Security Council,……thus going against the practices in the UN that had evolved over seven decades. The investigation against Sri Lanka by the OHCHR, which began in 2014, had similar issues of legitimacy, he said.

When the UNHRC appoints a Commission of Inquiry to go into the situation in a country, the members of the Commission are appointed by the President of the UNHRC, who is the ambassador of a member nation, Rajapaksa explained in the press communiqué. But in the case of Sri Lanka the inquiry panel was appointed by the UN Human Rights Commissioner – a second tier UN official, not by the President of the UNHRC, he said.

“Thus this report of the OHCHR, which the yahapalana government has accepted, is not the report of a properly constituted UNHCR Commission of Inquiry. Moreover the UNHRC itself passes resolutions each year (with a two thirds majority) against the OHCHR accusing it of being overly dependent on Western countries for funding and having too many Westerners on its staff.

Thus, the present government has accepted the report of an inquiry carried out by a body regularly accused of bias by the UNHRC itself. In order to meet the allegations being made against our Armed Forces, by various interested parties, my government commissioned six of the world’s foremost experts in the law of armed conflict, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, Desmond de Silva QC, Rodney Dixon QC, Professor David M. Crane, Prof. Michael Newton and Maj. Gen. John Holmes to provide us with written opinions about the allegations and purported evidence against Sri Lanka,” the press communiqué stated.

He further noted that all six experts wrote well reasoned analyses declaring unequivocally that no violations of the law of armed conflict had taken place in Sri Lanka, and added that the Rajapaksa Government wanted to table these six reports before the UNHRC but it was voted out of power in January 2015. The new government deliberately suppressed all these documents, he said.

“After suppressing these written opinions of international experts, which were all in Sri Lanka’s favour, the yahapalana government accepted, without a murmur, the OHCHR report on Sri Lanka which accused us of committing every war crime imaginable. Now, they have through two co-sponsored resolutions in the UNHRC, agreed to implement the recommendations in that biased and tainted report. This is the extent of the outright treachery practiced by the yahapalana government against its own Armed Forces and people,” he said.

ECONOMY PLUNGES LANKA IN POLITICAL TRAP

March 31st, 2017

WINSTON DE VALLIERE Courtesy Ceylon Today

In quite a paradoxical change in policy that at first imbued confidence in India, the US and other countries concerned with what is broadly termed Chinese expansionism, has now done away with the sense of relief in the context of their perceived national security and other fears.

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s dalliance with China and the visits by Chinese subs to Colombo triggered a whole swath of reactions from India, the US and UK while the EU as a whole, including its non-NATO European nations, saw the sudden Chinese foothold in Colombo, far from the Malacca Strait, as a huge quantum leap of the Chinese military presence nearer home. To Narendra Modi, that Rajapaksa Policy set off a chain of decisions in Delhi that ended with Rajapaksa’s ouster from power so quickly that we saw a stupefied former President drive away from Temple Trees and lose control of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party.

The new government quickly set about making a show of altering Rajapaksa’s policies, blew hot and cold on the Colombo Port City and then, after a series of environmental and other sorts of tests which took Delhi for a short ride, restored the Port City project to China with minimal changes to the original agreement. It then followed up, to Delhi’s anger and amazement, with a similar offer to the Chinese relating to the Hambantota Port. That Rajapaksa led his joint opposition to the streets to vociferously condemn the planned farming out of some 20,000 acres of land in his electorate to China had even the Chinese in stitches. It led to the Chinese envoy in Colombo having a chat with Rajapaksa and that protest fizzled out as quickly as it arose. Rajapaksa had just a few weeks before that returned from China with pledges from some quarters that we can only guess at, to back his ‘return-to-power’ campaign. The Chinese envoy also brought an abrupt end to Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake’s ranting about Chinese interest rates…but not about the mountain of debt (estimated at over $8 billion or roughly Rs 1,500 billion), that China’s friendly assistance to Rajapaksa left the country saddled with. Instead of countering with that cogent argument, Karunanayake went into a shell, though the government made noises about the Chinese envoy speaking out of turn and not in the best traditions of diplomatic etiquette. It was following this that Beijing smoothed it over with an official statement. But it came short of censuring its envoy in Colombo. That string of events ended with Beijing subtly tightening the screws on Colombo just enough to force the government to fall into the trap of apparently only having to swap debt for equity.

In fact, as things have turned out and as other factors emerge, it would appear that the government had swapped not merely debt for equity, but has also swapped India’s and the US’s regional security along with that debt. Knowing full well that the Lankan Government had naively blundered beyond belief, instead of risking a confrontation with China, India kept her distance but the US moved quickly as this column pointed out earlier, and arranged for the Pacific Partnership Exercises to be held in Hambantota with perhaps a US presence in the near future in the south itself.

Trincomalee port to India

Minister for Regional Development, Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka, told journalists in New Delhi on 18 January that terms were discussed to give Sri Lanka’s Trincomalee Port to India. Prime Minister Wickremesinghe reportedly vouched for the veracity of that statement in Davos, Switzerland and India is now interested in a stake in the Port of Colombo.

But Hambantota has renewed strains in Indo-Lanka relations because Colombo seems to have naively lost sight of the fact that in India’s perceptions she sees China encroaching inexorably on all sides via so-called development projects in Bangladesh, Myanmar, the Maldives, and Pakistan, in addition to Colombo and Hambantota.

Trincomalee port, initially developed during WWII as a base by the British Royal Navy, has the deepest natural harbour in all of South Asia and holds ten times more water (read larger warships, submarines) but only serves as a minimal cargo port. The need to develop Trincomalee harbour into a major deep sea blue water port is beyond the Lankan government’s capacity and India will want to secure this at least for herself in a bid to counter the once again growing Chinese foothold in Sri Lanka.

President Sirisena and Premier Wickremesinghe have said that Colombo and Hambantota will not be allowed for any form of military use. But just in case, Delhi had several months before decided to increase its own presence in Lanka by pumping in US$ 2 billion into infrastructure projects especially in the North and North-central regions but has shown no real interest in pumping a single dollar into developing the Trincomalee Port.

What Sirisena would need to come to grips with is the fact that just as much as the South Bloc helped him come to power, so can Narendra Modi , who’s more deeply entrenched in power in India unlike Sirisena in Sri Lanka, set in motion new forces to unseat Sirisena and install Wickremesinghe in absolute power. This might see the divided SLFP factions closing ranks once again. But with even the President saying that he can do nothing about saving servicemen found guilty of the killings of journalists and sportsmen, so will Wickremesinghe ensure prosecution of those cases more speedily, not for the intention of merely punishing the servicemen found guilty of those killings, but because the investigations also more importantly point to involvement of persons close to the Rajapaksa regime who will also be allowed, as the President said on Tuesday, to face prosecution.

The question is this: Who are those top politicians who…in addition to those servicemen… who will also face prosecution and hence be sent into political obscurity, perhaps before the next general election? I said over a year ago that the government will hold back its bigger guns for use closer to election time when it can be fully exploited to turn votes against the Rajapaksas.

Suddenly, that seems to be happening now, with the President saying he will not allow soldiers to be prosecuted for war crimes. He has never said he will not permit anyone to be prosecuted for other crimes: soldiers and politicians! Killing two birds with one stone, having dropped another stone!

The plan seems to be to ensure the Rajapaksas never make a successful come-back bid. If that works, Ajit Doval can be content with the fact that China’s apparent victories in Hambantota and Colombo will be no more than pyrrhic.

Uttar Pradesh victory

Modi’s runaway victory in last week’s Bharatiya Janata Party’s stunning landslide rout of other parties in State polls in Uttar Pradesh, not surprisingly evoked great interest in Beijing and Washington, as an upbeat Modi could take a harder line with Colombo on the China issue.

The Uttar Pradesh victory is seen as a virtual 2019 Lok Sabha election victory for Modi, too. The implications of a doubly stronger Modi in Delhi will make him more attractive as an ally in the Indian Ocean region where the border issues with Pakistan ultimately led to SAARC – virtually to a country – sidelining Pakistan from the regional body.

Least of all will Modi’s advances be received in neighbouring Pakistan who was exploring the possibility of creating a greater South Asian Economic Alliance in a bid to break India’s influence in SAARC, in a wider extra-regional grouping including Pakistan’s friends China and Iran. Insiders say Sirisena and Wickremesinghe will have nothing to do with the Pakistani idea that has been floated. But with SAARC set to take a backseat against BRICS, that will see India under Modi assuming wider economic weight in the region via an organization sans Pakistan…and hence without the indirect Chinese influence that Pakistan has tried to bring in to negate India’s control in SAARC. With ETCA about to be entered into, Colombo will increasingly find herself dependent on a wider Indian than on a Chinese market for exports while trade with China will be more China-weighted.

As Modi tightens his grip on power, it is expected that he will not only get tougher with domestic policies but will be able to negotiate more India-centric foreign policy stances with any of the major countries which see India as an increasingly more promising economic and political partner. Modi will, with more power, be a man who can talk down from a position of strength, unlike, for example the Lankan leader who does not have that luxury to negotiate with. And should Sirisena walk too close with China he will be risking the ire of India as a whole and that could have devastating effects on whether he can be a success or a failure in northern politics.

Modi can change Sirisena’s vote base with one single policy shift, should Sirisena’s policies impose such decisions on the Indian Premier.

But, despite not having that facility, President Sirisena still seems to be eminently capable of – to date – ensuring his government is not unduly cowed by any big powers. This is amply underscored by his retaining the right to adopt clear stances on issues such as the major one now before the UNHRC. But again, unlike Modi, Sirisena cannot take the risk of offending any of the major players on the world scene, for the simple fact that his sustainability in power is as, if not more, dependent on those very powers as on domestic factors in Sri Lanka where an aggressive though impotent China-backed opposition is also very pro-Pakistan and anti-Modi cum US. It will hence prove beneficial to Sirisena to now hit while the iron is hot and enter into the long delayed ETCA with India where the export growth potential for Lankan exports far outstrips the advantages a comparatively much smaller market could ever offer Indian exporters. That agreement is one placing the accent on economic and technical cooperation and would suggest a greater inflow of investments technological transfer from India to Sri Lanka, two factors we need most right now even if it means having to permit a limited inflow of Indian expertise as an adjunct to this agreement. It can always be arranged on a mutually agreed phased out time frame to ensure that the agreement is mutually beneficial to both countries. A Modi Government going on all the way through to 2024 with assurances of stability in economic policy will work in Lanka’s favour.

Modi’s close rapport with both Sirisena and Premier Wickremesinghe are bonus factors which need further enhancement and will be much more preferable to have to deal with as a post-2019 administration in Delhi and other States, than with a new administration that might not be as disposed to the Lankan Government on issues before the UNHRC.

While Sirisena keeps his options open relating to foreign policy stances, it is clear that visits such as the one to Moscow are aimed at helping Premier Wickremesinghe to shore up Lanka’s export development process and not stick to a rigid policy stance that Putin could assume is one that runs counter to his own political ambitions.

In this, Modi differs from Sirisena and Wickremesinghe in that, while Modi can afford to some extent to inadvertently or deliberately offend others in his foreign policy stances, Sirisena cannot afford that luxury considering the enormous crises dumped in his lap by the former Rajapaksa administration.

For now, in the emerging Indian Ocean region US-centric maritime and air defence architecture, Sri Lanka and India would seem to be playing complementary roles, though essentially separate ones and this alone will necessitate a mutual Delhi-Colombo interdependence which is something Modi simply cannot depend on from a Rajapaksa-led government. So he can’t turn the screws too tight on Sirisena too. This factor will go a long way in the emerging military dynamics in the immediate Indian Ocean region towards imposing on Modi a need to be on best of terms with Sirisena and Wickremesinghe. The deal will hence be mutually beneficial, and perhaps more so in Sri Lanka’s favour, especially until the furore at the UNHRC blows away hopefully by 2019, about the time when Modi will be returned to power in India.

Assaulting pickpockets

March 31st, 2017

Dushy Ranetunge Courtesy The Island

An alleged pickpocket was mercilessly assaulted at the EXPO railway counter 17 at Fort Railway Station on Wednesday (29th March) morning at 6 a.m. A queue had formed in front of the counter, and no sooner had it opened at 6am, there was a commotion at the back of the queue. A tall man who was in the EXPO train queue was repeatedly assaulting a much smaller poorly dressed man, who was pleading for mercy. He was being accused of attempting to pickpocket the taller man.

Railway officers from behind the ticket counter clad in white, as well as two railway security officers clad in policeman like khaki attire, dragged the man behind the counter into a room and he was being continually assaulted, mainly by the alleged victim of the attempted pickpocketing.

My wife was visibly distraught seeing the man pleading for mercy and being assaulted. At this point I entered the room and called out to the officers to put a stop to the assaulting. The white clad railway officers from behind the counter seem to justify the assaulting, telling me that he was a pickpocket.

article_image

I said “that’s fine, but hand him to the police, as assaulting him is a greater crime, than alleged attempted pick pocketing.” With that he was dragged away out of my sight; presumably to the police post at the Fort Railway Station.

A few minutes later we spoke to several other Railway Security Officers clad in khaki and they too justified assaulting those accused of pickpocketing. When we pointed out that assaulting a man accused of pickpocketing is a greater crime, and that the pickpocket should be handed to the police to deal with, we were told that the Police Post at Fort Railway Station is a waste of time, and that the OIC at the Fort Police Station had said so himself.

They alleged that the OIC at Fort Police had suggested that the Railway Security are more effective and encouraged them to deal with those alleged pickpockets themselves, presumably by assaulting them, circumventing the justice system which was presented as being ineffective.

They suggested that the man arrested that morning was a famous pickpocket, who had been locked up several times before for pickpocketing, and a noted criminal. If this was so, then the system of justice is failing him, as he is allegedly reoffending frequently. The pickpocket was identified as “Badulle ……… ”

We visited the Police Post at the Fort Railway Station, but the police officer on duty was unaware of the incident, or that someone had been dragged away by Railway Security Officers accused of pickpocketing.

Human rights activists have long accused Sri Lanka of having a culture of impunity in law enforcement and routine torture in police custody. This culture of impunity and lack of accountability has clearly spread to the Railway Security Guards as well, as it seems more a general attitude in society, where they seem to think that assaulting alleged criminals is acceptable and justifiable.

It was sad to see that none of the Railway Officials or Railway Security Guards intervened to stop the assault, but participated in it, by their non action.

For a nation trying to attract more tourists, such attitudes are not helpful, especially when it happens in the EXPO train railway counter used by tourists.

As we returned to the platform to board the EXPO train to Kandy, a public TV was broadcasting morning chanting of Pirith and the Dhamma, in this land which claims to follow the teachings of the Buddha.

Dushy Ranetunge

‘Nihanda Hangum’ for a Good Cause

March 31st, 2017

Old Anandians’ Group of 99

Old Anandians’ Group of 99 is organizing Nihanda Hangum program to support children with hearing problems.

There are many babies who are born to this world with hearing difficulties and some of them don’t have both ears functioning. These children have to be supported with various hearing aid equipment and they also may need special attention for their studies.

Lady Ridgeway Hospital (LRH) has advanced facilities to treat such children, and 99 Group of Ananda College will have an event on 8th April (Saturday) at 8am at LRH to hand over essential hearing aid to these children. The project also coordinates with Centre for Education of Hearing Impaired Children located in Dalugama Kelaniya. This organization was founded in 1982, and for over three decades they have become a home for hearing impaired children. These children need hearing aids and battery pack for these equipment regularly. Some parents can’t afford these costs and Centre for Education of Hearing Impaired Children also needs donors to support them. Old Anandians have come forward to support in this very important social need.

At the event on 8th April, needy students will get hearing aid, battery packs, 10 students will get scholarships for a year as a support, bank accounts will be opened for 300 children and books will be handed over to 300 children.

This project aims to donate those necessities with the funds collected by the organizers from fellow old Anandians, various organizations and general public. Old Anandians’ Group of 99 expects to do this project annually and invites long term donors to come forward.

Old Anandians’ Group of 99 works with three pillars identified for their activities – Ananda, Us and Society, where they support their alma mater, themselves, and the society. This project falls under the area of supporting the society.

Please contact Ranga Jayakody 0773077329/rangatechno@gmail.com or Yasas Vishuddhi Abeywickrama at  yvabeywickrama@gmail.com to discuss donations.

Trincomalee Consultations final report including the study of Bay of Bengal and further enhancement of cooperation

March 31st, 2017

Press Release  Pathfinder Foundation

The Centre for Indo-Lanka Initiatives of the Pathfinder Foundation, in partnership with Carnegie India, convened two-day track 1.5 conferences called “Trincomalee Consultations” successfully concluded. Final report including the study, discuss and explore of enhancing regional cooperation for improving political and economic relations, maritime security, blue economic concepts and increasing connectivity among the countries in the Bay of Bengal handed over to Kenichi Suganuma the Japanese Ambassador to Sri Lanka.

Admiral Dr. Jayanath Colombage, Director, Centre for Indo-Lanka Initiatives, Pathfinder Foundation presenting copy of the document to Ambassador Kenichi Suganuma stated that their focuses is the unfolding geo-strategic significance of and assess the regional security cooperation demands in the Bay of Bengal region. ”Examine the current state of cooperation among the countries in the Bay of Bengal region in maritime transport, aviation and other sectors of economic activity for developing Trincomalee as a regional hub for shipping, aviation and other sectors of economic activity to serve the Bay of Bengal region and develop a way forward for further enhancement of cooperation.” project was aimed he add.

This report have been developed as a follow up to analytical studies commissioned by the participated experts including “Growing Strategic Significance of the Bay of Bengal” by Dr. C. Raja Mohan, Director Carnegie India, “One Belt Many Roads” by Mr. Abu Saeed Khan, Consultant on regional connectivity, based in Dhaka, Bangladesh, “Dilemma of Coastal Countries and the Role of Japan-India Strategic Cooperation” by Dr. Satoru Nagao, Research Fellow, Tokyo Foundation, “Strategic Importance of Trincomalee Harbour in the Bay of Bengal” by Admiral Dr. Jayanath Colombage, Director, Centre for Indo-Lanka Initiatives, Pathfinder Foundation, “Pre-conditions for the Success of a Logistic hub serving the Bay of Bengal” by Professor Rohan Samarajiva, Founding Chair, LIRNEasia, “Development of Trincomalee Harbour as a Hub for Bay of Bengal” by Mr. Rohan Masakorala CEO, Shippers’ Academy Colombo and “Functional Regional Cooperation in the Bay of Bengal” by Ambassador Sumith Nakandala, Secretary General of BIMSTEC.

The Centre for Indo-Lanka Initiatives mainly focusing on key proposals for follow-up action included established a Centre for Maritime Domain Awareness and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief in the Trincomalee Harbor, A Maritime Research Centre, Coastal Shipping: service connecting minor and major ports in the Bay of Bengal region, Ship Repair and Ship Lay off and Green Ship Breaking, Energy Hub of the Region & Power Generation/Transmission in this report highlighted in detailed.

Trincomalee Consultations final report including the study of Bay of Bengal further enhancement of cooperation handed over to HE Kenichi Suganuma Ambassador of Japan in Sri Lanka by Admiral Dr. Jayanath Colombage recently.

 

 Wimal obliges to Maha Sangha and ends his fast

March 30th, 2017

By : A.A.M.NZAM – MATARA

I was about to write an article to expose spineless eunuch Sirisena’s blatant lies being uttered assuming that all Sri Lankans are damn idiots and fools and they would unquestionably believe in what he says. The illustrious patriot Wimal Weerawansa’s end of fast against refusal to grant bail for him compelled me to pen this article instead as it is more opportune.

Lankaweb published an article this morning (30th) March by Mr. Sudath Gunasekera who has nicely presented his expertise arguments against the repugnant imprisonment of this contemporary patriot while those who have committed the same kind of the so-called alleged misuse of vehicles and those who have committed horrendous plundering, atrocities, and even crimes by the cronies and members of the government remain scot free due to political immunity and patronage.  The said article has received a very high number of comments by intelligent readers except by one pseudonym westernophile glaringly displaying his inferiority complex.

All Sri Lankans should greatly be thankful to the Maha Sangha headed by the Mahanayaka Thero of the Ramagnya Maha Nikaya and the Anunayaka Thero of the Siyam Maha Nikaya for the distinguished service done by them by timely intervening to save the life of Mr. Weerawansa and taking the responsibility of saving the country by themselves whenever the need arises.

Meanwhile, the statement made by the JVP hooligans saying that they do not believe Mr. Weerawansa, bête-noir and enemy No. 1  drank only water during his fast is highly awful. This deplorable statement has been made by Lal Kantha who is alleged to be well known in the Anuradhaura area as the son of ‘pack pocket Simon’. They too similar to the government wished for the death of Mr. Weerawansa and they have no concern for the life of people since they killed people like stray dogs during 88/89 period. This JVP statement should be vehemently condemned by all Sri Lankans.

The end of fast by Mr. Weerawansa was a huge unexpected blow to the government and its cronies as they inhumanly and eagerly waited for the death of Mr. Weerawansa through which they wanted to silence his thundering voice as they knew that he will be an enormous strength and stimulus to instigate the people to rise up against its future anti national plans which include enactment of a federal constitution ceding to the dictates of the Tamil diaspora the TNA and the Indian Origin Tamils, the IOTs, obliging to the terms and conditions of the anti Sri Lankan UNHRC, selling the valuable assets to foreigners and the cronies of the government for under-valued prices as it was done by the previous UNP governments and under the rule of the old hag Chandrika etc. and arrest and punishment of our valiant war heroes on concocted charges

The inhuman aspirations of the government was clearly expressed through a despicable speech made by one of the senior UNP leaders the heartless John Amaratunge who was being alleged to have carried out many murders and torture activities during the horrendous 88/89 period without any sympathy whatsoever. All the UNPers and the bone chewing SLFP lap dogs in the government including the Eunuch Sirisena should take responsibility to this shameful statement since they never expressed their objection to this speech implying that they condone with it.

This factor also shows the depleted mentality of those in the government and its cronies as generally Sri Lankans are famed for showing kindness, sympathy, and compassion even for their adversaries, opponents and enemies. This matter was clearly displayed in the last stages of the war in which our gallant soldiers rescued more than 300,000 Tamil civilians who were under the clutches of the brutal LTTE as human shields and these civilians were provided all humanitarian assistance after they were rescued.

All those in the Joint Opposition should clearly understand that Wimal Weerawansa episode was not an isolated incident and this threat of revenge taking and making attempts to silence them hangs over the head of all of them. Hence. they should individually and jointly bolster their stern opposition to this anti national government and stage wide spread agitations, protests and Hartals unceasingly until this government is sent home with the blessings of the people.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress