අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා නෝනාගම වෝටර් පාර්ක් ජල උද්‍යානය විවෘත කරයි

February 27th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

නෝනාගම වෝටර් පාර්ක් ජල උද්‍යානය ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා විසින් අද 2021.02.27 දින පස්වරුවේ විවෘත කරනු ලැබුවේය.

දකුණු පළාත් පරිසර අමාත්‍යංශය, රුහුණු සංචාරක කාර්යංශය සහ අම්බලන්තොට ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවේ අරමුදල් සහ සම්පත් යොදා ගනිමින් රුපියල් ලක්ෂ 58ක වියදමෙන් මෙම ජල උද්‍යානය නිම කර තිබේ.

අම්බලන්තොට ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවේ සභාපති එම්.ආර්.පී දර්ශන සංජීව මහතාගේ සංකල්පයකට අනුව කතරගමට-අතරමග ව්‍යාපෘතියේ තවත් එක් පියවරක් ලෙස මෙම උද්‍යානය සංවර්ධනය කර ඇත.

එහි ඇවිදින මංතීරු සහ ළමා උද්‍යාන ඇතුළු ජනතා ආකර්ශනීය ස්ථාන රැසකි.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන චමල් රාජපක්ෂ, නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය ඩී.වී චානක, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්වන අජිත් රාජපක්ෂ, උපුල් ගලප්පත්ති, දකුණු පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාර විලී ගමගේ, දකුණු පළාත් සභා සභාපති සෝමවංශ කෝදාගොඩ, අම්බලන්තොට ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවේ සභාපති එම්.ආර්.පී දර්ශන සංජීව මහත්වරු ඇතුළු ප්‍රාදේශිය සභා මන්ත්‍රිවරු හා ප්‍රදේශවාසීන් රැසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

යතිවර අභිමන්-2021 අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් පැවැත්වෙයි

February 27th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩල යතිවර අභිමන් උපහාර උළෙල-2021 ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් අද 2021.02.27 දින පස්වරුවේ පැවැත්විණි.

හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම් කාර්යාල ශ්‍රවණාගාරයේ දී පැවැති මෙම උත්සවයේ දී හම්බන්තොට ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ හිමිවරු හත් නමකට අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා අතින්ද අනෙකුත් හිමිවරුන්ට මැති ඇමැතිවරු ඇතුළු සම්භාවනීය අමුත්තන් අතින්ද උපහාර ප්‍රදානය කෙරිණි.

වසර හතරකට ආසන්න කාලයක් ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලය වෙනුවෙන් කළ සේවය අගයමින් මහා සංඝරත්නය උදෙසා මෙම උපහාර උළෙල පැවැත්විණි.

දිස්ත්‍රික් ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලය සහ දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම් කාර්යාලය මෙම උපහාර උළෙල සංවිධානය කර තිබේ.

යතිවර අභිමන් උපහාර උළෙල-2021 අමතා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා කළ සම්පූර්ණ කතාව මෙසේය.

හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ ශාසනාරක්ෂක බල මණ්ඩලවල රාජකාරි කටයුතුවල නිරතව සිට තම සේවා කාලය අවසන් කරමින් වසර හතරක් පුරා දහම් පාසල්වල දරුවන් වෙනුවෙන් කළ උතුම් සේවය ඇගයීමට අපට වගකීමක් හා යුතුකමක් තිබෙනවා. එය ඇගයීමට අද දිනයේ මේ මොහොත අවස්ථාවක් කර ගන්නවා. ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම දහම් පාසල්වල උගන්වන ගුරුවරු දරුවන්ට උගන්වන්නේ ඒ කටයුත්ත වෙනුවෙන් කිසිදු වේතනයක් නැතිවයි. මේ කටයුත්ත සම්බන්ධ වැඩිදෙනෙක් ගුරුවරු. ඔවුන් දවස් පහ වැඩකරලා ඔවුන්ගෙ නිවාඩු දිනය දහම් පාසල් වෙනුවෙන් යොදවනවා.

ඒ කටයුත්ත අප හැම අවස්ථාවකම දිරි ගැන්විය යුතුයි. දහම් පාසල්  තුළින් දරුවන් යහපත් පුරවැසියන් කරන්න පුළුවන් කියන විශ්වාසය අපට තිබෙනවා. හිර ගෙවල් බැලුවොත්, හිර ගෙවල්වල පිරිලා ඉන්න වැඩි දෙනෙක් දහම් පාසලකටවත් ගියපු නැති අය.

දහම් පාසලකට ගියාම ළමයෙකුගෙ හික්මීම, ළමයෙකුට දහමට ලැදියාවක් ඇති කිරීම, ඒ තුළින් සමාජයේ හික්මීමක් ඇතිවෙනවා කියන විශ්වාසයෙන් තමයි රටක් දැහැමි සමාජයක් ලෙස ගොඩනගන්න පුළුවන් වන්නේ.

 බුදු දහම ආරක්ෂා කරගන්නත් දරුවන් යහමගට ගන්න භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේලා කරන කැප කිරීමත් අපි හැම අවස්ථාවකම අගය කරනවා. අපේ රටේ බෞද්ධ දහම් පාසල් ආරම්භ කරලා වසර 125ක්  පිරීම නිමිත්තෙන් කසාගල රජමහා විහාරයේදී උත්සවයක් පැවතුණ බව ඔබ වහන්සේලා දන්නවා. ඒ වගේම තමයි මිෂනාරි අධ්‍යාපනය තුළින් අපේ බෞද්ධ අධ්‍යාපනය විනාශවීම වළක්වා ගැනීමට ගිහි පැවිදි දේශමාමක පිරිස් එදා දහම් පාසල් ආරම්භ කළා.

ඕල්කට් තුමාගේ සංකල්පයක් අනුව 1895 අගෝස්තු මාසේ 03 වැනිදා ලංකාවේ පළමුවැනි දහම් පාසල ලෙස ගාල්ල විජයානන්ද දහම් පාසල ආරම්භ වුණා. දහම් පාසල් පවත්වාගෙන යාමට මහා සංඝරත්නය සහ ගුරුවරු කරන කැපකිරීම අප හැමවෙලාවෙම අගය කරනවා.

 දිස්ත්‍රික්කයක්, පළාතක් වගේම රටක් තුළ ආගමට ලැදි ජනතාවක් ගොඩනගනවා නම් ඒ දිස්ත්‍රික්කය, පළාත හෝ රට යහමගට ගෙන එන්න පුළුවන්කම තියෙනවා.

ඒ නිසා අපට දහම් පාසල් තුළින් වේවා, ඉරිදා දිනක හෝ පෝය දිනෙක වේවා හැම ආගමකම ආගමික කටයුතු සිදු කරෙන්නේ නම් ජනතාව ඒ පැත්තට යොමු කිරීම තුළ අපට අපරාධ අඩු කරන්න පුළුවන්කම ලැබෙයි කියලා අපි විශ්වාස කරනවා. හිර ගෙවල් පිරෙන එක නැවතෙයි කියලා අපි විශ්වාස කරනවා.

ඔබ වහන්සේලා ජනතාවට කිට්ටුවෙන් කරන මේ සේවය අප අගය කරනවා යැයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා පැවසීය.

ගිරුවාගම් දොළොස්දාස් රට ප්‍රධාන අධිකරණ සංඝනායක ශාස්ත්‍රවේදී කුඹුක්වැවේ චන්ද්‍රසෝම නාහිමි, කිරිවෙහෙර රජමහා විහාරාධිපති, රුහුණු මාගම්පත්තුවේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝනායක කොබවක ධම්මින්ද නාහිමි, හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ ගරු සභාපති අමරපුර සිරිසද්ධම්ම යුක්තික මාතර මහා නිකායේ වැඩබලන මහානායක උයන්වත්තේ සද්ධාරාම නාහිමි සහ හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ ගරු ප්‍රධාන ලේඛකාධිකාරී රුහුණු මාගම්පත්තුවේ ද්විතීය අධිකරණ සංඝනායක නියෝජ්‍ය පරිවේණාධිපති කැන්දගස්මංකඩ ශ්‍රී රත්නාරාමාධිපති ගලපිටගල ප්‍රේමරතන නාහිමි ප්‍රමුඛ මහා සංඝරත්නය මෙහි වැඩම කළ වදාළහ.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන චමල් රාජපක්ෂ, නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ, මහින්ද අමරවීර, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය ඩී.වී චානක, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්වන අජිත් රාජපක්ෂ, උපුල් ගලප්පත්ති, දකුණු පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාර විලී ගමගේ, දකුණු පළාත් සභාපති සෝමවංශ කෝදාගොඩ, හම්බන්තොට නගරාධිපති එරාජ් රවීන්ද්‍ර, බුද්ධශාසන, ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යංශ ලේකම් මහාචාර්ය කපිල ගුණවර්ධන, හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම් ඩබ්ලිව්.එච් කරුණාරත්න මහත්වරු ඇතුළු පිරිසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් කෘෂි අපනයන කලාප පිහිටුවීමේ ජාතික වැඩසටහන ඇරඹෙයි

February 27th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

 සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්ම” ප්‍රතිපත්තියට අනුව අපනයන කෘෂි කලාප ඇති කිරීමේ ජාතික වැඩසටහන ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් අද 2021.02.27 දින පෙරවරුවේ ඓතිහාසික කසාගල රජමහා විහාරස්ථානයේ දී ආරම්භ විය.

රට පුරා කෘෂි අපනයන ගම්මාන හෝ කලාප පිහිටුවීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙල යටතේ හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් කෘෂි අපනයන ගම්මානය/කලාපය ට ආරම්භය තබමින් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා ටීජේසී අඹ පැළයක් සිටවූයේය.

අනතුරුව ඉහළ අලුත් වැවට අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මත්ස්‍යයන් මුදා හැරියේය.

මෙහිදී අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා විසින් ප්‍රදේශවාසීන්ට අඹ, කජු හා ගම්මිරිස් ඇතුළු අපනයන බෝග පැළ බෙදා දෙනු ලැබුවේය.

මෙම වැඩසටහනට සමගාමීව අනෙකුත් බෝගවලට අමතරව හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ කජු පැළ 100000ක් වගා කිරීමට ශ්‍රී ලංකා කජු සංස්ථාව සැලසුම්කර තිබේ.

වර්තමානයේ දළ ජාතික නිෂ්පාදිතයට අපනයන කෘෂිකාර්මික ක්ෂේත්‍රයෙන් 2% ක් ව පවතින දායකත්වය වර්ෂ 2025 දී 4% ක් දක්වා වැඩි කිරීම හා කෘෂි ව්‍යවසායකත්වය ප්‍රවර්ධනය කිරීම මෙම ජාතික වැඩසටහනේ අරමුණයි.

ඒ අනුව පළාත් නවය තුළ පාරිසරික, දේශගුණික තත්ත්වයන් අනුව සුදුසු අපනයනය ඉලක්ක කර ගත් කජු, ගම්මිරිස්, කුරුඳු, කරාබුනැටි, බුලත් ඇතුළු කුඩා වැවිලි බෝග හා ටීජේසී අඹ, මී මැසි පාලනය වැනි අපනයන ඉලක්ක කර ගත් හා ආනයනය අවම කර ගත් බෝග වගා කිරීම සිදු වේ.

අනුරාධපුර, කුරුණෑගල දිස්ත්‍රික්කයන්හි වගා බිමි හා වගා කරුවන් හඳුනා ගනිමින් වගා කලාප ඇති කිරීමේ මූලික අදියරේ වැඩ කටයුතු දැනට ක්‍රියාත්මක අතර 2021 වසර අවසන් වන විට දිස්ත්‍රික්ක 10ක කෘෂි අපනයන කලාප/ ගම්මාන 100ක් ස්ථාපිත කිරීමට නියමිතය.

මෙමගින් ග්‍රාමීය ජනතාව ඒකරාශි කරමින් ජාතික හා ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළඳපොළ ඉලක්ක කොට නිෂ්පාදන සිදු කිරීමට අපේක්ෂිතය.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා අපනයන කෘෂි කලාප ඇති කිරීමේ ජාතික වැඩසටහන අමතා කළ සම්පූර්ණ කතාව මෙසේය.

මිත්‍රවරුනි,

මට මතකයි මේ ආණ්ඩුව පත්වෙලා නව කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලය දිව්රුම් දීපු වෙලාව. එදා රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිවරුන්ගේ අමාත්‍යාංශයේ විෂය පථයට අයිති නම් කියවනකොට සමහරුන්ට හිනා ගියා. ටික දවසක් යනකම් දයාසිරි ජයසේකරට කිව්වේ බතික් ඇමැති කියලා. ප්‍රසන්න රණවීර ඇමැතිතුමාට කිව්වේ මැටි ඇමැති කියලා. සමහර ඇමතිවරු මේ නම දැකලා අමාත්‍යංශය භාරගන්නත් අදි මදි කළා. අපි මේ අමාත්‍යංශය හඳුන්වන්නේ උක්, බඩ ඉරිඟු, කජු, ගම්මිරිස්, කුරුඳු, කරාබු නැටි, බුලත් ඇතුළු කුඩා වැවිලි භෝග වගා සංවර්ධනය හා අපනයන ප්‍රවර්ධන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යාංශය කියලා. අපි මේ විදිහට බුලත්, කජු, බඩඉරිගු ආදී වශයෙන් අමාත්‍යාංශයට අයිති කුඩා දේවල් පවා නම් කළේ මේ දේවල් වලට විශාල අවධානයක් ලබාදීමේ අරමුණ ඇතුව.

මිත්‍රවරුනි,

තමුන්නාන්සේලා දන්නවා 2005 මහින්ද චින්තනය කියලා ඉදිරිපත්  කරනකොට බොහෝදෙනෙක් ඒ නමට හිනා වුණා. නමුත් ඒ ප්‍රතිපත්ති ප්‍රකාශනය යටතේ යුද්ධය අවසාන කරලා රටේ සංවර්ධනය ඇති කරලා රට ගොඩනගන කොට ඒ හිනා වෙච්ච අයට උත්තර නැති වුණා. ඒ මහින්ද චින්තනයේ දිගුවක් හැටියට තමයි සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්ම අපි ඉදිරිපත් කරලා තියෙන්නේ. සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්මෙන් බලාපොරොත්තු වෙන්නේ මේ රටේ දේශිය නිෂ්පාදන ජාත්‍යන්තර මට්ටමට ගොඩනගලා අපනයනයන් මූලික කරගත්ත ආර්ථික ක්‍රමයක් හඳුන්වාදෙන්න. මේක කරන්න මුලින්ම උත්සහ  කළේ සිරිමාවෝ බණ්ඩාරණායක මැතිණිය. ලබාලතම පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයා හැටියට මට එදා මතකයි එතුමිය මොනතරම් මහන්සි වුණාද කියලා රටේ අපනයනයන් මුල් කරගත් ආර්ථිකයක් ගොඩනගන්න.

මැතිණිය 1972 දී අපනයන කෘෂිකර්ම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව පිහිටෙව්වා. මේ රටේ කුළු බඩු ජාත්‍යන්තරයට ගෙන යාම සඳහා මුල්ම අඩිතාලම එතුමිය දැම්මා. නමුත් දේශීය ආර්ථිකයක් ගොඩනගාගෙන යනකොට එතුමියට විශාල බාධාවල් එදා ඇති කළා. 1977 වෙනකොට එතුමියව පරාදත් කළා. ආර්ථිකය දේශීය වශයෙන් ශක්තිමත් කරන්න හදන කොයි ආණ්ඩුවටත් අතීතයෙන් පාඩම් ඉගෙන ගන්න ඕනෑ.

මිත්‍රවරුනි,

අපේ රටේ කුරුඳු ඇතුළු නිෂ්පාදනවලට ලෝකයෙ ලොකු අනන්‍යතාවක් තියෙනවා. පෘතුගිසින්, ලන්දේසීන් වගේම ඉංග්‍රීසීන් ආවෙත් මේ රටේ තේ, පොල්,රබර් හොයන්න  නොවෙයි. ඒ අය ආවෙත් කුරුඳු, ගම්මිරිස් සාදික්කා වගේ මූලික කුළු බඩු හොයන්න. ඒ අය ඉන් පස්සේ තේ, පොල්, රබර් මුල් කරගත් ආර්ථිකයක් හැදුවා. නිදහස ලැබුණට පස්සේ අපේ අය කුළු බඩු ප්‍රධාන ආර්ථිකය ගැන අවධානය යොමු කරන්නේ නැතුව ඒවා විනාශයට යන්න ඇරියා. විදේශිකයෝ අපට දීපු තේ, පොල්, රබර් ගැන විතරක් විශ්වාසය තිබ්බා.

මෑතක් වන තුරු අපේ රටට කජු, අඹ, පේර, සියඹලා පවා ගෙන්වූවා. ඉදල් කොහු විතරක් නොවෙයි කැටපෝලයත් ගෙන්වූවා. ඉරටුත් ගෙන්වූවා. එහෙම කළාම මේ රටේ විදේශ විනිමය රටට අහිමිවීම විතරක් නෙවෙයි සිද්ධ වෙන්නේ. මේ රටේ ජනතාව උපන්ගෙයි බෝඩිම්කාරයෝ බවට පත් වෙනවා.

මිත්‍රවරුනි,

අපේ රටේ නිෂ්පාදනයන් කරන්නේ නැති වෙනකොට මේ රටේ රැකියා උපදින්නෙත් නැහැ. රස්සා හොයාගෙන පිටරට යන්න වෙනවා. ඊළඟට  ඒ විදේශගත වෙලා ඉන්න අය ලංකාවට එවන මුදල්  වලට වුණේ මොකද්ද. විදේශගත වෙලා ඉන්න අය එවන සල්ලි විදේශවලින් ගෙන්වන බඩු ගන්න වියදම් කරනවා. ඒ සල්ලි ටිකත් ඇදෙන්නේ පිටරටට. අපේ ජනතාව මනසින් මොනතරම් වහලුන් කළාද කිව්වොත් මේ රටට අඹ, කජු, අන්නාසි, පේර,ඉරටු, කැටපෝල ගේනවට නෙමෙයි හිනා වුණේ. කජු වවනවට සියඹලා වවනවට ඒවා වෙනුවෙන් අමාත්‍යංශයක් වෙන් කරන එකට තමයි මේ රටේ අය හිනාවෙන්න පටන් ගත්තේ. නමුත් මතක තියාගන්න ඕන අපේ රටට අපේ ප්‍රතිපත්තියේ ඵලය දැන් ලැබෙමින් තිබෙනවා.

කහ ආනයනය කරන්න රුපියල් මිලියන 1000ක් (දාහක්) අපි වාර්ෂිකව වැය කළා. අපි කහ වසරක් ආනයනය කරන්නේ නැතුව ගොවියාට කහ වවාගන්න ඉඩදීලා තිබුණා. කහ රටින් ගෙන්වන්නේ නැහැ  වෙළෙඳපොළේ කහ හිඟයි කියලා , දැවැන්ත විරෝධයක් මේ රටේ ඇති කළා. නමුත් අපි ඉවසගෙන ඒ විරෝධයන්ට මුහුණදීලා හොරෙන් ගේන කහවත් වෙළඳපොළට දාන්නේ නැතුව අපේ බිමේ කහ උපදිනකන් අපි වැඩ කළා. අද වෙනකොට කහවලට පිටරටට ඇදෙන රුපියල් මිලියන 1000ක් (දාහක්) මේ රටට ඉතුරු වෙනවා.

ඒ විතරක් නොවෙයි 2019 රුපියල් මිලියන 63000ක් (හැටතුන් දහසක්) වෙලා තිබුණ අපනයන කෘෂි භෝග ආදායම අවුරුද්දක් තුළ රුපියල් මිලියන 73000 (හැත්තෑතුන් දහස) දක්වා වර්ධනය කරගන්න අපිට පුළුවන්කම ලැබිලා තියෙනවා. අද වන විට තේ, පොල්, රබර් මත යැපුනු ලංකාවේ ආර්ථිකයට නව ජවයක් ලබාදෙන්න අපිට පුළුවන් වෙලා තිබෙනවා.

මිත්‍රවරුනි,

එදා අපිට මේ රටේ ජනතාවට රැකියා දෙන්න නම් විදේශ ආයෝජකයින්ට වඳින්න සිද්ධ වුණා. විදේශ ආයෝජකයෝ ලංකාවට එනකම් බලාගෙන ඉන්න සිදුවුණා. ඒ අය මේ රටේ කර්මාන්තශාලා ආරම්භ  කරලා රැකියා දුන්නත් ඒ රැකියා වලින් උපදින ආදායමත් ගියේ විදේශ වලට. ඒකට හේතු වුණේ අපිට වවාගන්න පුළුවන් හදාගන්න පුළුවන් සියලු දේ පිටරටින් ගෙනාවම රැකියාවෙන් උපයන ආදායමත් ඒවා මිලදී ගන්නකොට විදේශවලට ඇදිලා ගියා. ඒ තත්ත්වය තමයි අපි දැන් වෙනස් කරගෙන යන්නේ. අපි අලුත් දේ හදන්න ඕනෑ.

ඒ නිසා දැන් අපි අපේ කුළු බඩුවලට අමතරව අළුත්  අපනයන නිෂ්පාදනයක්  හඳුනාගෙන තියෙනවා. ඒ TJC අඹ, TJC අඹ කියන්නේ අපේ රටේ අපේම නිෂ්පාදනයක්. මේ අඹ අපනයනය සදහාම සකස් කරපු වියළි කලාපයට ඉතාම උචිත ඉහල ආදයමක් ලබා ගන්න පුළුවන් භෝගයක්.

ඔබේ ප්‍රදේශයට TJC අඹ පැළ 100,000ක (ලක්ෂයක) අඹ කලාපයක් අද දවසේ නිර්මාණය වෙනවා. ඔබේ වත්තට පැළ 25 ක් ලබා දෙමින් පවුලේ අර්ථිකය ශක්තිමත් කරන්නත් එතුළින් රටේ ජාතික ධනය නිර්මාණය කිරීමට අපි බලාපොරොත්තු වෙනවා. එවගේම කජු පැල ලක්ෂයක් සිටුවා කජු කොරිඩෝවක් අපි හදනව. එදා හදන්න හැදුවේ ඇමෙරිකාවේ ආර්ථික කොරිඩෝවක්. ඒ වෙනුවට අපි හදන්නේ අපේම අපනයන කොරිඩෝවක්.     

මේක තමයි අපේ වෙනස. ඔබ වවන හැම අඹ , කජු, බඩඉරිගු පැළයක්ම මේ රටේ ස්වාධීනත්වය රකින්න කරන උත්සාහයක්. ඒ හැම පැළයක්ම රටේ ආර්ථික නිදහසේ  සලකුණක්.අලුත් සිතුවිලි ඇතිව මේ උත්සාහයට ඔබේ ධෛර්යය අපට ලැබේ යැයි මා විශ්වාස කරනවා.

ප්‍රධාන වැවිලි භෝග ආශ්‍රයෙන් ශ්‍රී ලාංකේය අපනයන ආදායමට විශාල දායකත්වයක් ලැබෙනවා ඒ වගේම කෘෂි කලාප තුළ කුඩා වැවිලි භෝග හා අපනයනය ඉලක්ක කර ගත් භෝග වගාව තුළින් ඉදිරි අනාගතයේදී සැලකිය යුතු මට්ටමේ අපනයන ආදායමක් රටට හිමිකර දීමට හැකියාව ඇති බව මාගේ විශ්වාසයයි. හම්බන්තොටින් නොනැවතී මුළු රට පුරාම නව වගා සංග්‍රාමයක් ඇති කිරීමට මෙම වැඩසටහන හේතු වනු ඇතැයි මම විශ්වාස කරනවා. අපේ බලාපොරොත්තුව තරුණ ශ්‍රම දායකත්වය යොදා ගනිමින් අපේ රටේ ආර්ථිකය ස්වයංපෝෂිත කරමින් ඉහළ අදායම් උපයන ගොවි ව්‍යවසායකයින් බිහි කිරීමයි.

ඔබ සැමට තෙරුවන් සරණයි! යැයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා පැවසීය.

කසාගල රජමහා විහාරාධිපති තලංපෝරුවේ ඉන්ද්‍ර ශ්‍රී සුමන හිමි, කිරිවෙහෙර විහාරාධිපති රුහුණු මාගම්පත්තුවේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝනායක කොබවක ධම්මින්ද නාහිමි, ඉතාලියේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝනායක වගේගොඩ ශ්‍රීලානන්ද නාහිමි ඇතුළු මහා සංඝරත්නය වැඩම කළහ. මෙම අවස්ථාවට අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන චමල් රාජපක්ෂ, නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ, මහින්ද අමරවීර, වෛද්‍ය රමේෂ් පතිරණ, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන ජානක වක්කුඹුර, ඩී.වී චානක, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් වන උපුල් ගලප්පත්ති, අජිත් රාජපක්ෂ, දකුණු පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාර විලී ගමගේ, දකුණු පළාත් සභාපති සෝමවංශ කෝදාගොඩ, වැවිලි කර්මාන්ත අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් රවීන්ද්‍ර හේවාවිතාරණ,උක්, බඩ ඉරිඟු, කජු, ගම්මිරිස්, කුරුඳු, කරාබු නැටි, බුලත් ඇතුළු කුඩා වැවිලි බෝග වගා සංවර්ධනය ආශ්‍රිත කර්මාන්ත හා අපනයන ප්‍රවර්ධන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යංශයේ ලේකම් රෝහණ අභයරත්න මහත්වරු ඇතුළු පිරිසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

ලෝක වෙලදපල හොල්ලමින් ‘කුරුදු සිගරැට්’ ලංකාවෙන්.. බහුජාතික දුම්වැටි සමාගම් කලබලවී වට්ටන්න කුමන්ත‍්‍රණ…

February 27th, 2021

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

ලංකාවෙන් කුරුඳු සිගරැට්ටුවක් ලෝක වෙළෙඳපොළට හඳුන්වා දීමට මේ වනවිට සියල්ල සූදානම් කර ඇතැයි වාර්තා වෙයි.

මේ නිසාල බහු ජාතික දුම්වැටි සමාගම් කලබල වී ඇති අතර මෙම නිෂ්පාදනය එළි දැක්වීමට බාධා එල්ල කරමින් තිබෙන බව අනාවරණය වේ.

මෙම කුරුඳු සිගරැට්ටු නිපදවීම සඳහා වසර 06 ක පමණ කාලයක් වෙහෙස මහන්සි වී තිබෙන අතර මෙම ව්‍යාපෘතියේදී සැලසුම් කර තිබෙන්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කුරුඳු සිගරැට් නිපදවන කර්මාන්තශාලා 100 ක් ආරම්භ කර වසරකට කුරුඳු සිගරැට් අපනයනය කිරීම මගින් ඩොලර් බිලියනයක පමණ අපනයන ආදායමක් රටට ගෙන්වා ගන්නයි.

මේ තුළින් නව රැකියා ලක්ෂයක් පමණ බිහිවේ යැයි අපේක්ෂා කරයි.

In Geneva, India Signals to Sri Lanka that Support in UNHRC Is Not a Given

February 27th, 2021

Courtesy The Wire

India has a national position against resolutions targeting a single country in multilateral bodies. But, with regard to Sri Lanka, India’s record has been varied, as domestic political factors often dictated its voting decision.

New Delhi: Indicating that New Delhi has kept all options open, India has signalled to Sri Lanka that its support for the country at the United Nations Human Rights Council should not be taken for granted.

In Geneva, the UN Human Rights Council is holding its 46th regular session, which will decide the fate of a critical resolution against Sri Lanka. The first draft (also confusingly termed the ‘zero draft’) was circulated earlier this week. The vote will take place in the last couple of days of the session, ending on March 22.

The draft resolution, submitted by the Core Group comprising the United Kingdom, Germany, Malawi, Montenegro and North Macedonia, responds to a scathing report released by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on January 27. 

This report was formally presented to the UN Human Rights Council on Wednesday, February 24, followed by member states offering their views over two days. 

At the meeting, Sri Lankan foreign minister Dinesh Gunawardena had called on the member states to reject the draft resolution.  

Indian permanent representative to the UN in Geneva, Indra Mani Pandey, significantly noted that the UN report had raised important concerns” and aspirations of Tamils contributions to Sri Lanka’s unity and integrity. 

The assessment of the High Commissioner regarding developments nearly 12 years from the end of the conflict raises important concerns,” said Pandey at the virtual meeting.

The UN report warns that lack of accountability of Sri Lanka’s previous violations has not only increased the risk of repetition of those crimes but also highlighted worrying trends over the past year, such as deepening impunity, increasing militarisation of governmental functions, ethno-nationalist rhetoric, and intimidation of civil society”.

India also noted that the Sri Lankan government has articulated its position on these issues as well”. In evaluation of both of these, we should be guided by a commitment to find a lasting and effective solution for this issue,” added Pandey.

Also read: Meeting Expectations of Tamils Is in Sri Lanka’s Interests: Jaishankar in Colombo

He then noted that India’s position rested on two pillars. The first was support for Sri Lanka’s unity and territorial integrity. Commitment to Sri Lankan Tamils’ aspirations for equality, justice, peace and dignity” was the second pillar, said the Indian diplomat. 

India declared that these were not either-or choices”.

We believe that respecting the rights of the Tamil community, including through meaningful devolution, contributes directly to the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka. Therefore, we advocate that delivering on the legitimate aspirations of the Tamil community is in the best interests of Sri Lanka,” said Pandey.

A file photo of ethnic Tamil demonstrators protesting against the Sri Lanka government in Sydney, February 4, 2009. Reuters/Daniel Munoz

Calling on Sri Lanka to address Tamil aspirations, India said that Colombo should take necessary steps” through the process of reconciliation and full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka”.

After the UK-led core group circulated the draft resolution, the first informal consultations with other countries will be held in Geneva on March 1.

It is learnt that India has not yet taken a call on its vote in the resolution, as it awaits the resolution’s final shape. India’s statement on Thursday, however, was an indication that all options were open”.

A clear signal was conveyed through the statement that it was not providing full support to Colombo, said sources.

Speaking to The Wire, the spokesperson of the UK-based group of Sri Lanka Tamils diaspora, Global Tamil Forum, said that he was very happy” with India’s statement.

He even compared it with India’s explanation of the vote when New Delhi voted against Sri Lanka in a critical resolution approved by Human Rights Council in 2013. 

Although the context of this statement made by the current HC Indra Mani Panday yesterday was different from what the then HC Dilip Sinha did in 2013 when India voted in favour, the basic contents remain pretty similar. The importance is that this is possibly the strongest statement by Indian at an interactive dialogue on Sri Lanka, since the end of armed conflict in Sri Lanka,” said GTF spokesperson Suren Surendiran.

He also added that it was significant that India had underlined that resolving the aspiration of Tamils of Sri Lanka for equality, justice, peace and dignity” was fundamental to finding a permanent solution. Note, it includes Justice!” he said.

Similarly, K. Gurupuran, attorney-at-law and formerly Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Jaffna, felt that India’s statement referring to meeting Tamil aspirations and Sri Lanka’s sovereignty as mutually reinforcing is interesting”.

Also read: India-Sri Lanka Talks: Amidst Constitution Concern, Modi Calls for Safeguarding Tamils’ Rights

One wonders whether India also meant the contrary, that not meeting Tamil aspirations will weaken Sri Lanka’s sovereignty,” he asked.

The draft resolution recognises a persistent lack of accountability through domestic mechanisms” and urged the UN human rights commission to devise strategies to support relevant judicial proceedings in Member States with competent jurisdiction”.

India has a national position against resolutions targeting a single country in multilateral bodies. But, with regard to Sri Lanka, India’s record has been varied, as domestic political factors often dictated its voting decision.

In the last 12 years, there have been seven resolutions on Sri Lanka at the UN human rights council.

India’s vote at resolutions on Sri Lanka at UNHRC

After the end of the civil war, Sri Lanka had submitted a resolution (S-11/1) at a special session in May 2009. It was passed by 29 votes in favour, with the western bloc voting against it. India had voted in favour.

Three years later, the United States brought a substantial resolution (19/2) against Sri Lanka, which was approved. For the first time, India joined 23 other states voting in favour of the resolution. 

Next year in March 2013, India again voted in favour of another resolution (22/1) on Sri Lanka, drafted by the United States. Just ahead of the vote, Tamil Nadu’s main opposition party, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), had withdrawn from the Centre’s ruling alliance on the grounds that India was not doing enough to alleviate the alleged human rights violations of Sri Lankan Tamils.

In March 2014, the Human Rights Council, through resolution 25/1, authorised an investigation of war crimes committed in Sri Lanka between February 2002 and 2011. India abstained during the vote on grounds that the resolution ignored steps taken by Sri Lanka at reconciliation.

After the Mahinda Rajapaksa government’s defeat in 2015, Sri Lanka joined resolution 30/1 drafted by the Core Group that called for a domestic accountability mechanism, with the prospect of international judges. The Council adopted the resolution without a vote. 

The next two resolutions in 2017 (34/1) and 2019 (40/1) were also approved by consensus.

However, there will undoubtedly be a vote on a resolution on Sri Lanka before the end of the current HRC session. This will be the first such resolution after the Rajapaksa brothers came back to power in November 2019.

During the discussion on February 24 and 25, the divide between the member states were on expected lines – China, Pakistan defending Sri Lanka, while the UK and the EU were calling on Colombo to show more accountability. However, there was no statement on behalf of the bloc of Islamic countries.

Unlike in previous years, India’s remarks did not list any steps that Sri Lanka had taken on the reconciliation process. 

GTF”s Surendiran was optimistic that India might not just abstain at the voting. I would read the last paragraph as an indication that India could potentially vote in favour of the resolution”.

Sri Lanka has made it clear that it wants a vote from India rejecting the resolution. Sri Lankan foreign secretary Jayanth Colombage told The Hindu that he hoped for proactive” and constructive” commitment, rather than abstention, which is neither here, nor there.”

Gurupuran felt that the Indian statement was indicative of its frustration” with the Sri Lankan government. The frustration is fuelled by the cancelling of the agreement signed during the former regime handing the development of the Eastern Container Terminal of the Colombo Port to India and other developments which reflect a realignment of Sri Lanka’s foreign policy priorities favouring China,” he said.

The Jaffna-based lawyer also felt that India’s vote would be decided with an eye on elections in Tamil Nadu. India’s Election Commission announced on Friday, February 26, that the southern state of Tamil Nadu will have a single-phase polling on April 6.

AIADMK has already started reminding voters that UPA (i.e. Congress and DMK) had failed to stop the Sri Lankan government from committing atrocities during the last phase of the war in 2009. While the Sri Lankan Tamil issue has never been a deciding factor in Tamil Nadu elections, the AIADMK and BJP will be desperate to use anything that comes their way,” he said.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi had raised the issue of Sri Lanka during his last visit to the southern state on February 14, 2021.

Joe Biden Rebooting the Quad in IOR

February 27th, 2021

By Sumanasiri Liyanage Courtesy Ceylon Today

Joe Biden Rebooting the Quad in IOR

It is getting clearer that as far as foreign policy is concerned the change of administration in the United States of America (USA) has no significant impact, at least with regard to the Indian Ocean Region or Asia-Pacific. The Japanese news agency Kyodo reported that the Biden Administration had proposed to the Heads of States of New Delhi, Tokyo and Canberra the idea of holding an online summit meeting of the quadrilateral security dialogue or ‘Quad’ as it is popularly known. Continuing to work within foreign policy paradigm of the Obama Administration, President Joe Biden called up Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the topics discussed included and centred around the close cooperation for a stronger regional architecture through the Quad”. Following the telephone conversation between the two Heads of States, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also called his Indian counterpart S. Jaishankar and expressed the US aspiration and intention to expand regional cooperation through the Quad if possible expanding it with the inclusion of at least some of the ASEAN countries.

The Disturbed History of Quad

It was the Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan who initiated the dialogue in August 2007. His initiative to ensure ‘Seas of Freedom and Prosperity’ won the support of then Prime Minister of India, Dr. Manmohan Singh, Vice President Dick Cheney of the US and Prime Minister John Howard of Australia. The dialogue was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Exercise Malabar in which Australia opted not to participate. This diplomatic and military arrangement may be seen as a response to increased Chinese economic involvement in the Indian Ocean Region. As a counter response, the Chinese Government responded to the Quad by issuing formal diplomatic protests to its members. The Quad has a disturbed and discontinuous history. The allegiance to the concept by the member countries depended on their intended relationship with China, so the nature of the administration in respective countries mattered. However, after negotiations that started during the 2017 ASEAN Summits, Heads of State of four countries with Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull  of Australia, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, and President Donald Trump of the United States agreed in Manila to revive the security pact. Australia joined the Malabar exercise on an invitation from India. So, all member countries of Quad took part in naval exercises for the first time in 2019 making it not only diplomatic but also a military alliance. 

Rebooting the Quad

Reflecting on the new development to reboot Quad mechanism, M. K. Bhadrakumar, a former Indian diplomat, has noted that the Biden Administration strategises to deploy it as the major counter-offensive against the Peoples Republic of China. He opines: ‘The decision to upgrade” the Quad to the highest level of leadership is a major initiative by the Biden administration. The Quad overnight becomes the tip of the spear in the Indo-Pacific strategy. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan recently signaled during an online event that Quad will play a key part in US policy in the Indo-Pacific region facing China’s rise. Sullivan said, I think we really want to carry forward and build on that (Quad) format, that mechanism, which we see as fundamental, a foundation, upon which to build substantial American policy in the Indo-Pacific region.” Interestingly, Robert O’Brien, former National Security Adviser to Trump, also said at the same event that the Quad may be the most important relationship we’ve established since NATO at a high level.” 

He has further pointed out that Joe Biden used the military coup in Myanmar to legitimise rebooting of Quad as ‘the platform to galvanise the restoration of democracy in that country and the promotion of human rights and democracy in the Asia-Pacific in general’. It is interesting to note that Democratic administrations since days of Jimmy Carter have tended to use the human right regime for America’s advantage. Nonetheless, it is clear that the principal objective is to use Quad as a controlling mechanism in the Indian Ocean Region and to use it as a counter offensive to China. China has brilliantly succeeded through the past decade in dominating and shifting the narrative in the Asia-Pacific to the economic agenda. The US cannot possibly retrieve that lost ground. But, in the US assessment, by positioning the Quad as the flag carrier of human rights and democracy in the Asia-Pacific, Washington could carve out a political domain where China is doomed to remain an outsider.”

The involvement of Japan, China and Australia in the Quad mechanism is nothing more than a cover for the direct operation of the USA in the IOR and South Pacific. Hence, US is trying to get the ASEAN countries within Quad mechanism, but because of heavy presence of China in their economies, the Heads of States in those countries are to rethink in joining an apparently purely military and diplomatic ensemble.

India’s Slow Response

Although Joe Biden contacted the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, to organise a quick online meeting between the Heads of States in Quad countries, Modi was a bit hesitant to commit to such an intervention. This may be for many reasons. First, India is the only Quad country that has a common border with the Peoples’ Republic of China. China has on numerous occasions increased the border tension deploying new forces at the border and building permanent structures. Secondly, whatever the rivalry between two countries, China plays an important role in the Indian economy. Thirdly, linking together with the US is always problematic for India’s relations with the countries of the Global South. Close collaboration with the US may cause many problems for India’s stature as a leader of the Global South and the Non-aligned Movement that is weak but not dead. Fourthly, the consensus among the neighbouring countries on the recent developments in Myanmar does not go beyond the objection of the arrest of the leaders of the duly elected Government. Hence, whether it would be possible to materialise the plan for IOR by Joe Biden Administration depends on multiple factors.

Using the military takeover as a scapegoat, Joe Biden and his administration seem to record the US dominance, in the global South, forcing regional leaders to follow the US and his initiative. This effort may be seen also at the on-going Human Rights Commission deliberations.  

The writer is a retired teacher of Political Economy at the University of Peradeniya. 

(sumane_l@yahoo.com) 

Guidelines for Circular on burial of COVID victims drafted

February 27th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Guidelines for the Circular permitting burial of bodies of COVID-19 victims has been drafted, says Director-General of Health Services Dr. Asela Gunawardena.

He added that locations for the burial of COVID victims will be identified within 3 – 4 days.

Drafting of guidelines was completed after the committee of experts appointed to examine methods for disposal of COVID victims met earlier today (February 27).

Speaking in this regard, Dr. Gunawardena said the Circular will be issued after finding the suitable locations and seeking the approval of task force on COVID-19 prevention.

For now, the bodies of COVID victims will be kept in cold storage until the proper procedure for burial is introduced, he said further. However, the bodies of the deceased will be cremated if the next of kin wishes to.

Extraordinary Gazette notification allowing the burial of COVID victims was published on Thursday night (February 25).

It amended the regulations made by the Minister of Health under Sections 2 and 3 of the Quarantine and Prevention of Diseases Ordinance (Chapter 222).

The gazette stated that regulations published in Gazette No.7481 of August 28, 1925 is further amended by the substitution of the words, Cremation of Corpse” with the words Cremation or burial of the corpse”.

In the case of burial, the corpse of such person shall be buried in accordance with the directions issued by the Director General of Health Services at a cemetery or place approved by the proper authority under the supervision of such authority,” it read further.

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa recently informed parliament that permission will be granted for the burial of COVID-19 victims.

In response to a question raised by MP S.M. Marikkar during the parliamentary session on February 10, PM Rajapaksa had noted that permission will be given to bury the victims of novel coronavirus.

Several months after the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic last year, the Sri Lankan government amended a law to make cremation compulsory for those who fall victim to the novel coronavirus with the intention of preventing any potential threat.

The Quarantine and Prevention of Diseases Ordinance (Chapter 222) was accordingly amended by an extraordinary gazette notification issued by Health Minister Pavithra Wanniarachchi.

The decision sparked debate locally and internationally, as concerns were raised stressing that it is against the dictates of Muslim community’s faith.

Several world leaders and international organisations had also called on the Sri Lankan government to allow burial of COVID-19 victims and to end forced cremation of victims.

425 new positive cases of COVID-19 within the day reported

February 27th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka has registered 205 more positive cases of Covid-19 today (February 27), the Ministry of Health confirmed.

Thereby, Sri Lanka has detected 425 new positive cases of COVID-19 within the day.

As per statistics, the total number of Covid-19 infections confirmed so far in the country now stands at 82,855.

Recoveries from the virus meanwhile climbed to 78,373 earlier today, as 748 more patients regained health.

However, 4,018 active cases are still under medical care at selected hospitals and treatment centers located across the island.

Total lives claimed by the pandemic outbreak sits at 464 at present.

GLOBAL SOUTH must STOP UNHRC creating precedents using Sri Lanka: “Today Sri Lanka, Tomorrow Your Country”

February 26th, 2021

Today Sri Lanka, Tomorrow Your Country”is the message that countries of the Global South must internalize from the intrusive nature of the OHCHR Report and unprecedented precedents attempted to take place via Global North backed Resolutions using the UNHRC as puppet. When UNHRC head boldly reads out reports condemning the national judiciary, the national laws, national mechanisms of Sri Lanka insisting they are replaced with international players, it is a stepping stone to doing the same to other countries. Geneva hegemony being created allowing Global North to master R2P must not be allowed by Global South nations.Sri Lanka’s conflict may be too confusing for nations to understand, but countries of the UN must protect their own country and not allow UNHRC precedents to take place. This means countries should vote against the Core Group Resolution on Sri Lanka or help Sri Lanka canvass for a closure. On Sri Lanka’s part, our delegation must request a Global South nation to seek vote on the Core Group Resolution when it is taken up & separately Sri Lanka must begin drafting a resolution of closure. Sri Lanka must not fall prey to attempts by Core Group to trickle down its resolution and present one of compromise! 

An armed conflict, applies international humanitarian laws. Sri Lanka’s conflict is defined a non-international armed conflict. Even Ban Ki Moon’s personal panel applies this term.

UNSC sanctions nations based on violations of IHL and if countries are a threat to international peace.

No UNSC sanctions have taken place for violations of human rights!

If UNHRC can sanction nations and declare them war criminals based on selected nit picking of less than 10 unproven allegations for human rights violations, then the very countries drafting resolutions should be locked up by the World Court.

Look at the allegations by the UNHRC since May 2009 – majority of the allegations are post-conflict and based on hearsay by third party sources and brush stroke statements without evidence. The same names which are less than 10 gets circulated and printed over reports compiled by the same lot of NGOs funded by Global North foreign governments to create mischief.

All of the fundamental allegations completely overlook that it was the LTTE that herded Tamil civilians with them to be kept as hostages and human shields.

The UNHRC overlooks the fact that there is a major blur in distinction of civilians – LTTE had its own civilian armed force. So how many of these ‘civilians’ were actually civilians? The blur of distinction was confounded further as 1/3 of LTTE comprised child combatants – whether they were children, they were trained to kill and they did not qualify to be called a ‘child’ with gun in hand.

What the UNHRC completely overlooks is that the LTTE broke the rules of war by herding Tamils and firing from among them. This violation has to take precedence over the return of fire by Sri Lanka Armed Forces, which they had every right to do.

Then there is also allegation of not providing humanitarian aid – even this allegation can be put to rest by statistics and the fact that foreign envoys sat every 2 weeks since January 2009 to discuss the rescue operation and they had every opportunity to bring to the table any issues without waiting years after the conflict ended. The US and UK Defense Attache secret reports to their respective governments clearly showcases further distortions of successive resolutions.

What UNHRC totally ignores is that UN system did nothing to stop LTTE from 1980s to 2009 and only after Sri Lanka ends terror, UN is asking questions. Where were these questions when LTTE was killing unarmed civilian? UNHRC cannot forget there has been no LTTE terror for 12 years and kudos for that peace goes to Sri Lanka not UNHRC.

There is a well-funded campaign to hype accusations, create a campaign of lies and based on gun-boat diplomacy use the UNHRC to commence bogus tribunals with intent to only carry out R2P for Global North political agendas. This is very clear from the demands being made.

If Sri Lanka falls prey to precedents – the same will be applied to Global South nation’s most of whom are already victims of covert operations by Global North nations. African nations /South American nations & even the Middle East & Asian nations will have enough of examples to give how they have been victimized by Global North nations.

We saw how Libya was liberated. Today Libya is a hell hole. We know the devastation in Iraq and Afghanistan.

We are now seeing Syria being bombed for no reason. Syria is to become the newest means for the war industry to gain profits at the cost of human lives and devastation of countries. Should Global South allow this rampage to continue?

We have also seen no outcome of the tribunals or truth commissions the UN steers. There is no Truth and there is no Justice. It’s only a super means of foreign travel for UN officials and an excellent form of channeling funding legally for agendas that are not accounted for.

Exactly what kind of Justice for the Victims has ensued from the UN Tribunals held thus far: We have had tribunals on Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Cambodia, Sierra Leone, Lebanon, East Timor!

https://www.sinhalanet.net/name-1-un-tribunal-that-has-delivered-justice-for-victims

When UNHRC former head Navi Pillay hid her supposed witnesses for 20 years and based on their supposed evidence the bogus allegations against Sri Lanka are made, we do not want the fate that happened to Serbian leader Milosevic to happen to our war heroes.

The Serbian leader was put in prison in 2002 claiming him to be a war criminal. Milosevic was branded the ‘butcher of the Balkans’. They compared him to Hitler and accused him of genocide. They demonised him just like the same entities are doing with Sri Lanka and its troops. He was given only 4 hours to present his case.  He died mysteriously in his prison cell on 11 March 2006. In 2016, the ICTY says Milosevic did not commit war crimes.The judgement came 14 years too late as Serbia’s leader was dead.

It was all a sham for larger agendas but a leader had to pay with his life. The global south must realize this and protect their nation by taking a stand on Sri Lanka for their own interest. 

Serbia & Sri Lanka have many similarities – genocide was theme in both cases with inflated figures of dead but no dead bodies or names. Marti Ahtisaari who played a role in Kosovo independence was ironically chosen to investigate Sri Lanka by UNHRC in 2014. (OISL)

TNA is Sri Lanka’s version of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) KLA was supported by CIA. LTTE and KLA are known drug traffickers.

Thus, the intrusive nature of HRC and OHCHR Head’s report paving the way for another unfair Core Group Resolution has been opposed by China in the statement by Ambassador Cheng Xu.

The sentiments expressed by the Chinese ambassador is what all Global South ambassadors must resonate, primarily because in allowing HRC and OHCHR head to pass unfounded allegations based on hearsay and intrude into the national laws of Sri Lanka means, the next target can be the 35 nations of the Global South including India.

We must also appreciate Russia for being a Global North nation but consistently backing Sri Lanka in the halls of the UN/UNHRC.

Shenali D Waduge

The UN’s Sri Lanka Inquisition

February 26th, 2021

Senaka Weeraratna

The Report of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is fundamentally an anti – Sri Lanka document. It is a biased and shameful report which is totally one sided. Not a semblance of fairness.

One would not expect the Spanish Inquisition to return to the UN  in the 21st century with total faith placed on mere accusations and falsehood without verification. 

A display of malignant predictability when the party accused happens to be a former British colony showing defiance and no longer prepared to be subservient to the dictates of the inheritors of colonial Empires, is what we see in Reports of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights.

Human Rights has been weaponised and been used as a red herring and a pretext by empire builders to white wash their genocidal crimes against the indigenous people all over the world.

Michelle Bachelet is a woman of Spanish descent from Chile. Most likely a descendant of the Spanish conquerors who ravaged the harmless natives of South America and exterminated them in a manner not very different to the Holocaust in modern times.

It is difficult to forget the crimes of the Spanish Conquistadors who wiped out the Incas, Aztecs and Mayan Civilizations in North, Central and South America. 

While evading Accountability for  colonial crimes and past atrocities, people of Spanish descent have joined hands largely with the current generation of western colonial countries and without a qualm of conscience or sense of collective guilt for the crimes of their forebears, are now earnestly engaged in witch hunting leaders of small countries using inquisitorial tactics.

What is happening to Sri Lanka today at the UNHRC will happen to India tomorrow. The breaking – up of India is the end station of this White Supremacist Christian conspiracy. To get there Sri Lanka has to be balkanized on the pretext of helping the minorities. Similar to the case of Yugoslavia. Dismembering is what is in store for Sri Lanka and eventually India. To trust Britain which looted India and Ceylon during the height of the British Empire is an unpardonable act of folly.

Senaka Weeraratna

මෙවර රාජ්‍ය වෙසක් උත්සවය යාපනය නාගදීප රජ මහා විහාරයේ දී පැවත්වීමට අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගෙන් උපදෙස්

February 26th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

මෙවර රාජ්‍ය වෙසක් උත්සවය උතුරු හා නැගෙනහිර පළාත් මුල්කරගනිමින් නාගදීප රජ මහා විහාරය කේන්ද්‍ර කොට පැවැත්වීමට බුද්ධශාසන, ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍ය හා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ඊයේ 2021.02.25 දින පස්වරුවේ අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ දී උපදෙස් දුන්නේය.

ඒ අනුව උතුරු හා නැගෙනහිර පළාත්වල විහාරස්ථාන 65ක් හා දහම් පාසල් 35ක් සම්බන්ධ කරගනිමින් මෙවර රාජ්‍ය වෙසක් උත්සවය පැවැත්වීමට කටයුතු සංවිධානය කරන ලෙස අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා බුද්ධශාසන, ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යංශ ලේකම් මහාචාර්ය කපිල ගුණවර්ධන මහාතාට දැනුම් දුන්නේය.

මෙවර රාජ්‍ය වෙසක් උත්සවයේ විශේෂත්වය වනුයේ සම්ප්‍රදායක වෙසක් උත්සවයකින් වෙනස් වී අනෙකුත් ආගම් සමඟ එක්ව රාජ්‍ය වෙසක් උත්සවය සංවිධානය කිරීමට තීරණය වීමයි.

ඒ සඳහා බුද්ධශාසන, ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යංශය යටතේ ඇති හින්දු, ක්‍රිස්ත්‍රියානි හා මුස්ලිම් කටයුතු දෙපාර්තමේන්තු එක් වේ.

උතුරු පළාතේ ප්‍රධාන අධිකරණ සංඝනායක, නාගදීප විහාරාධිපති ආචාර්ය ධර්මකීර්ති ශ්‍රී නවදගල පදුමකිත්ති නාහිමි, නැගෙනහිර තමන්කඩුව දෙපළාතේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝනායක මුංහේනේ මෙත්තාරාම නාහිමි, සමස්ත ලංකා ශාසනාරක්ෂක බලමණ්ඩලයේ  ප්‍රධාන ලේඛකාධිකාරී ගෝනදූවේ ගුණානන්ද නාහිමි, මල්වතු පාර්ශවයේ මාතර හම්බන්තොට දෙදිසාවේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝනායක අග්‍රහැරේ කස්සප නාහිමි ඇතුළු මහා සංඝරත්නය මෙම අවස්ථාවට වැඩම කළහ.

India tells UNHRC devolution of power is critical for reconciliation in Sri Lanka

February 26th, 2021

By P.K.Balachandran Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, February 26: India has told the UNHRC’s on-going 46 th.session in Geneva that the full implementation of the 13 th. Amendment of the Sri Lankan constitution, which provides for devolution of power to the provinces, is the way to bring about ethnic reconciliation in the country.

The Indian Ambassador to the UN in Geneva, Indra Mani Pandey told the council that India’s policy towards Sri Lanka rests on two pillars: i). Support for Sri Lanka’s unity and territorial integrity. ii). An abiding commitment to aspirations of the Tamils of Sri Lanka for equality, justice, peace and dignity. But these are not either-or choices, he added.

We believe that respecting the rights of the Tamil community, including through meaningful devolution, contributes directly to the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka,” Pandey said.

While advocating that delivering on the legitimate aspirations of the Tamil community is in the best interests of Sri Lanka, India calls upon Sri Lanka to take necessary steps for addressing such aspirations, including through the process of reconciliation and full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.”

Ambassador Pandey, who is the Permanent Representative of India, said Indian believes that respecting the rights of the Tamil community, including through meaningful devolution, contributes directly to the unity and integrity of Sri Lanka.

We have taken note of the High Commissioner’s report on Sri Lanka and her oral remarks. The Council has adopted 7 Resolutions on the question of human rights in Sri Lanka since May 2009, when the three decades old conflict in that country ended.”

The assessment of the High Commissioner regarding developments nearly 12 years from the end of the conflict raises important concerns. The Sri Lankan Government has articulated its position on these issues as well. In evaluation of both of these, we should be guided by a commitment to find a lasting and effective solution for this issue,” Pandey said.

US Seeks Mandates To Pursue Accountability

United States has urged Sri Lanka to make public a strategy and timetable for the implementation of recommendations in the report compiled by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet.

Daniel Kronenfeld of the US mission in Geneva informed the UN Human Rights Council that the United States shares the concerns of Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Sri Lanka.

We thank High Commissioner Bachelet for her comprehensive report and note the Government of Sri Lanka’s engagement.”

Kronenfeld stressed that the US is concerned by accounts of increasing marginalization of minority communities and shrinking space for civil society, including independent media.

We remain concerned about the lack of accountability, including high-level appointments of military officials credibly accused of conflict-era abuses,” he went on to say.

The US envoy insisted that Sri Lankan government’s efforts to address concerns raised in OHCHR’s report via a domestic process need to be meaningful and credible. We note that the Sri Lankan Commission of Inquiry does not include a mandate to pursue accountability, and that the Office of Missing Persons and Office of Reparations need to operate without political interference.”

We note that respect for the human rights of all Sri Lankans is critical to Sri Lanka’s long-term peace, security and prosperity, and call on the Sri Lankan government to take meaningful, concrete steps to promote accountability, justice, and reconciliation,” he remarked.

China Backs Lanka

Chen Xu, Chinese Ambassador in Geneva

The Chinese Permanent Representative in Geneva Ambassador Chen Xu extended China’s support to Sri Lanka in his official statement in the Interactive Dialogue on the OHCHR Report on Sri Lanka.  

As a friendly neighbor of Sri Lanka, China sincerely hopes that Sri Lanka maintains political stability, ethnic solidarity and national unity and wishes Sri Lanka greater achievements in its national development. We commend the government of Sri Lanka for its efforts to actively promote and protect human rights, advance sustainable economic and social development, improve people’s living standard, protect the rights of the vulnerable groups, advance national reconciliation and combat terrorism.”

It’s the consistent stand of China to oppose politicization and double standards on human rights, as well as using human rights as an excuse in interfering in other countries’ internal affairs. We are concerned about the clear lack of impartiality shown in the OHCHR’s report to this session on Sri Lanka and express our regret over the failure of the OHCHR to use the authoritative information provided by the Sri Lankan government.”

The so-called preventive intervention” and the proposed targeted sanctions contained in the OHCHR’s report are clear interference in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka and exceed the mandate of the OHCHR. We hope that the HRC and the OHCHR will strictly follow impartiality, objectivity, non-selectivity and non-politicization principles, respect the sovereignty and political independence of all nations, respect the efforts of the nations for the protection and promotion of human rights, advocate constructive dialogue and cooperation, and abandon the practice of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and exerting political pressure.”

Prior to the opening of the 46th Session of UNHRC, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa wrote a letter to Chinese President Xi Jinping requesting China’s understanding and assistance on the resolution. On 24th February, Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena also made a telephone call to Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi to seek the continued solidarity and support. Wang Yi reiterated that China is willing to unswervingly support each other with Sri Lanka to jointly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of developing countries, the basic norms governing international relations, and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter including non-interference in other countries’ internal affairs.”

Background to Lanka’s decision to lift ban on burying COVID dead

February 26th, 2021

By P.K.Balachandran Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, February 25: Late on Thursday, February 25, the Sri Lankan Health Minister Pavithra Wanniarachchi issued a gazette extraordinary lifting the year-old ban on burying COVID-19 dead. The Gazette amended the earlier ordinance by putting the words cremation or burial” in place of the single word cremation”.

In the case of burial, the corpse of such person shall be buried in accordance with the directions issued by the Director General of Health Services at a cemetery or place approved by the proper authority under the supervision of such authority,” the gazette said.

The government’s decision brought the curtains down on an issue which deeply agitated the minority Muslims for whom burial is mandated by Islam and therefore inviolable.

Over the past year, the Muslims, who are about 10% of the Sri Lankan population, had brought into play an international expert in virology, to challenge the government’s expert committee’s contention that burying the COVID dead would contaminate ground water and be a public health hazard. Prof. Malik Peiris of the University of Hong Kong said in a widely circulated video: If the body is wrapped in water-resistant material and chemicals are used to expedite the process of decay, the possibility of even a residual amount of the COVID-19 infection seeping through the soil and contaminating water is an entirely non-scientific argument. That is a major reason why the World Health Organization and many countries in the world have no problem with burials.”      

In April 2020, Muslim leaders proposed that a Muslim dying of COVID be wrapped in a body bag and put in a concrete grave which will have one and a half feet of soil in it. A chemical could be sprayed on the body bag to let it and the body inside de-compose in a week or so. The Muslims had also submitted a design for the concrete grave. They suggested that the mourners might stand 50 meters away from the grave after spending three minutes beside it to say the customary prayer. The community would help indigent families bear the expenses involved in constructing the concrete grave and in getting a coffin if a coffin is made mandatory, they added.

The government appeared to be open to this suggestion but was hesitating to take a decision. Frustrated, some leading Muslims appealed to foreign leaders like Mohamed Nasheed, Speaker of the Maldivian parliament, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, and the Malaysian Prime Minister to intercede with the powers-that-be in Colombo. Nasheed sounded Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa about the idea of sending Muslim bodies to the Maldives. The Lankan President made a formal request this his Maldivian counterpart, Ibrahim Solih, who responded favorably. But this idea of airlifting bodies to the Maldives was found to be impractical.  

At the Muslims’ insistence Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa set up a second committee of experts in virology, which challenged the contentions of the earlier experts’ committee and recommended burial as well as cremation as sanctioned by the WHO.  But the first committee, which apparently had the backing of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, stuck to its guns and threw the recommendation of the  second committee out.

However, the Muslims did not lose heart. They took the issue to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The OIC issued a statement om December 10, 2020 which said: The General Secretariat of the OIC expresses concern over reports of Sri Lankan authorities insisting on cremation for COVID-19 Muslim victims. Against this practice, inconsistent with Islamic precepts, the OIC calls for respect to the burial ritual in the Muslim faith.”

The Muslims’ cause began to be taken up by Lankans of other faiths also and their plight became the subject matter of articles in leading Western dailies. Sri Lankans were appalled by the forced cremation of a 20-day old baby Shykh in the absence of his parents, who had stayed away in protest. People tied white cloth on the gates and iron railings of the main crematorium in Colombo even though the police kept removing them.

While the government kept talking about an ‘expert committee’ which had said that COVID-19 bodies would pollute the soil and ground water, a section of the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) led by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and Basil Rajapaksa, had thought it fit to strike a deal with the Muslims. They planned to get the ban lifted in return for votes to pass the controversial 20 th.Constitutional Amendment (20A) with the required two-thirds majority. The 20A was meant to arm the Executive President (Gotabaya Rajapaksa) with enhanced powers which he had been seeking. Six MPs did cross over from the opposition to vote for the 20A as part of the deal but the SLPP did not keep its part of the bargain.

At this stage, an influential factor appeared on the scene: a UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) session where there was to be a resolution condemning Sri Lanka for alleged human rights violations and war crimes and failing to implement earlier resolutions calling for accountability mechanisms. Government feared that apart from the already hostile Western bloc, Muslim countries would also turn against Sri Lanka in the Council. The Muslim burial issue was sure to be on the top of the litany of complaints against Sri Lanka.

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, who always wanted the ban lifted in order to get the Muslim’s political support, announced in parliament that burials would be allowed after a Minister said that the first expert committee had changed its opinion and said that burial will not pollute ground water. But no action followed because government said that the experts’ committee had not given a ruling.   

Meanwhile, international pressure was mounting. Apart from the OIC which called for the lifting of theban, it was feared that Sri Lanka’s time tested friend, Pakistan, would also join the chorus against the ban on burial. The vote of the Muslim countries and Pakistan’s lobbying were crucial to beat the expected hostile resolution against Sri Lanka in the UNHRC in March.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan was to come to Sri Lanka and address the Lankan parliament.  It was feared that he could touch upon the subject in his speech (apart from touching upon Kashmir to embarrass India).

On the excuse that COVID 19 might prevent full attendance of MPs, the Speaker of the parliament asked government to cancel the speech. Imran agreed to call off the speech.

Unfazed, Lankan Muslim leaders continued to urge Pakistan to take up the matter with the powers-that-be. The Pakistanis told the Lankan Muslim interlocutors that while the issue could not be part of the official talks, it could figure in informal interactions. Perhaps it did. In an oblique reference to the issue, the Joint Communique issued at the end of Imran’s visit said: Both sides underlined the importance of inter-religious dialogue and harmony as a key to promote cultural diversity, peaceful co-existence and mutual empathy.”

When Muslim MPs met Imran before his departure from Colombo to find out if indeed he took up the issue at the talks, he said he did and added that the response was positive.” Sure enough, a day after Imran’s departure, the government issued a gazette lifting the ban on burial.

UNHRC හිදී ලෝක බහුතරය ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාව සමගින්.. චීන-රුසියා නිෂේද බලයද එක්වෙයි..

February 26th, 2021

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

මේ දිනවල පැවැත්වෙන එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සලයේ අන්තර් ක්‍රියාකාරී සංවාදයේ දී ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට පක්ෂව රටවල් 21 එකක් අදහස් පල කර ඇත.

ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාවට විරුද්ධව මහකොමසාරිස්වරියගේ යෝජනාව සමග පක්ෂව රටවල් 15 එක්ව ඇත.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට හෝ යෝජනාවට පෂ නොවී ඉන්දියාව, ජපානය හා ඕස්ට්‍රේලියාව මධ්‍යස්ථව සිට ඇත.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට පක්ෂ මත දැරූ රටවල්  කිහිපයක් මෙසේය.

  • රුසියාව
  • චීනය
  • ඉරානය
  • පාකිස්තානය
  • වියට්නාමය
  • කියුබාව
  • පිලිපීනය
  • සිරියාව
  • ඊජිප්තුව
  • මාලදිවයින
  • නේපාලය
  • කාම්බෝජය
  • ලාඕසය
  • නිකරගුවාව
  • එරිත්‍රියාව
  • අසර්බයිජානය
  • බෙලාරුස්
  • ගැබොන්

මහ කොමසාරිස්වරියගේ යෝජනාවට පක්ෂ වූ රටවල් කිහිපයක් මෙසේය.

  • ඇමරිකාව
  • ජර්මනිය
  • එක්සත් රාජධානිය
  • කැනඩාව
  • නෝර්වේ
  • ප‍්‍රංශය
  • ස්විට්සරලන්තය
  • බෙල්ජියම
  • අයර්ලන්තය

AG: Only section of PCoI report received, won’t be able to proceed without balance four volumes

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy The Island

The Attorney General’s Department yesterday (25) said that a section of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (P CoI) report had been received by AG Dappula de Livera, PC.

The AG received the Volume 1, which contains the final report,” a spokesperson for the Department said. According to the official the remaining volumes (2 to 5) containing proceedings, materials and other documentary evidence hadn’t been handed over, the official said.

The official was responding to The Island query regarding the government announcement that the final report of the PCoI presented to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had been handed over to the Attorney General.

The report was handed over by the Director General, Legal Affairs of the Presidential Secretariat Hariguptha Rohanadheera at the Attorney General’s Department.

The AG’s Department emphasized that it could not proceed without the entire set of Volumes. (SF)

AIIB approves USD 180 mn loan to Sri Lanka

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has approved Sri Lanka’s request for USD 180 million loan for the Covid-19 emergency and crisis response facility to be disbursed through the Bank of Ceylon (USD 90 million) and People’s Bank (USD 90 million), Sri Lankan Embassy in Beijing said.

The loan application was submitted in 2019. 

Dr. Kohona met the President of the AIIB (Mr. Jin Liqun) on 1st February 2021 to discuss this loan and other funding matters. 

Sri Lanka Ambassador to China, Dr. Palitha Kohona met Dr. D. J. Pandian, Vice President, at the Bank headquarters yesterday when the approval of the loan was confirmed. 

At the meeting, Dr. Kohona thanked the AIIB for the timely assistance in extending USD 180 million for the Covid19 crisis recovery for Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs). 

Further, Dr. Kohona briefed Dr. Pandian on the current Covid19 situation in Sri Lanka which has received wide commendation. He also spoke of Sri Lanka’s handling of the economic challenges confronting Sri Lanka. 

Dr. Pandian invited the Sri Lanka private and government sectors to consider seeking funding for renewable energy (wind and solar power), electric public transport systems, light rail transport, electric vehicles, digital technology, shipbuilding, water supply and manufacturing. The Bank has sufficient funding for these sectors, especially for those involving renewable energy. 

Dr. Kohona said that Sri Lanka is one of the top 10 countries in the world in managing Covid19 and slowly beginning to normalize the economy. He expressed his confidence that the private sector would welcome the offer of funding. 

Dr. Kohona encourages the private sector to consider the offer of the AIIB and if interested, to contact the AIIB directly or through the Embassy. 

Coronavirus: 497 new infections confirmed within the day

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka registered 250 more positive cases of COVID-19 today (February 26) as total novel coronavirus infections reported within the day reached 497.

Department of Government Information says 487 of today’s cases are close contacts of earlier cases linked to the Peliyagoda cluster.

The remaining 10 are reportedly arrivals from foreign countries.

New development has pushed the country’s confirmed COVID-19 cases count to 82,430.

According to COVID-19 figures, 4,341 active cases are still under medical care at selected hospitals and treatment centres.

Meanwhile, total recoveries reported in the country now stand at 77,625.

Sri Lanka has also witnessed 464 fatalities due to the outbreak of the pandemic.

Five new COVID-related deaths in Sri Lanka

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka has confirmed 05 more COVID-19 related deaths, Director-General of Health Services confirmed today (February 26).

This brings the country’s death toll from the virus to 464, Department of Government Information said.

Details of the recently-reported COVID victims are as follows:

01. A 69-year-old man from Nawadagala area – He had been under medical at the Karapitiya Teaching Hospital. After testing positive for the virus, he was transferred to Homagama Base Hospital where he passed away yesterday (February 25). The cause of death was recorded as COVID pneumonia, acute kidney disease and high blood pressure.

02. A 72-year-old woman from Narahenpita area – She was transferred from Colombo National Hospital to Homagama Base Hospital upon testing positive for the virus. She died today due to COVID infection and shock caused by blood poisoning.

03. A 70-year-old man from Kandy area – He was moved to Theldeniya Base Hosptial after a PCR test carried out at the Kandy National Hospital came out positive for novel coronavirus. Reports revealed that he succumbed to COVID pneumonia and kidney failure yesterday (February 25).

04. A 71-year-old man from Colombo 09 area – He was transferred from Colombo National Hospital to National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) upon testing positive for the virus. According to reports, he had passed away today. The cause of death was cited as shock due to blood poisoning, COVID pneumonia, diabetes and high blood pressure.

05. A 71-year-old man from Veyangoda area – He had initially been under medical at the Apeksha Hospital in Maharagama. Upon testing positive for novel coronavirus, he was moved to NIID where he died yesterday (February 25). COVID pneumonia, shock due to blood poisoning and cancer have been identified as the cause of death.

Four police officers interdicted over assault on law student

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Four police officers – 03 Constables and one Inspector – have been interdicted for allegedly assaulting a law student at the Peliyagoda police station.

Several offices attached to Peliyagoda Police had reportedly assaulted a law student named Migara Gunaratne yesterday (February 25).

The victimized student was identified as the son of former Central Province Governor, President’s Counsel Maithri Gunaratne and the brother of Attorney-at-Law Charitha Gunaratne.

Reports revealed that 10 police officers had assaulted him when he arrived at Peliyagoda Police to visit a suspect detained at the station.

Minister of Public Security Dr. Sarath Weerasekera subsequently directed the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chandana Wickramaratne to probe the incident and to suspend the officers involved in the assault.

Meanwhile, Police Headquarters, issuing a statement on the incident, said 08 suspects – 04 Nigerian males, 02 Belarussian females, one Sri Lankan male and one Sri Lankan female – were arrested on Tuesday (February 23) for possession of 25g 120mg of heroin, racketeering narcotics, defrauding more than Rs. 1.7 million, possession of 25 bundles of paper used for printing counterfeit currency as well as commercial sex work.

The arrest was made by several officers of Kelaniya Division’s crimes unit including Chief Inspector of Police Linton de Silva, the statement pointed out. Reports revealed the said officer is also accused of assaulting the victim.

According to the Police, the law student had arrived at the police station to visit the Sri Lankan female in custody at around 8.35 pm.

On the directives of IGP, two police teams are probing the incident further, the statement read further.

UNHRC Resolution; What is the real agenda?

February 26th, 2021

By Raj Gonsalkorale

US Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken today encouraged the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to support the resolution on Sri Lanka stating that the ‘lack of accountability for past atrocities in Sri Lanka – Daily Mirror Sri Lanka’

The US Secretary of State seems to give an indication as to what the real agenda behind his and his country’s support for this resolution. He speaks of lack of accountability for past atrocities”. This statement implies that atrocities were committed if there is to be accountability for them. This leads to the question, who committed such alleged atrocities? There were two players in the battle against the LTTE. The Sri Lankan Armed Forces and the LTTE. One or both may have committed atrocities. The Sri Lankan government exists to respond to any allegations on atrocities. The LTTE does not exist although the atrocities they committed were many and well documented.

It would have been useful if Mr Blinken amplified how this resolution will address the accountability issue as far as the LTTE is concerned as there is no one from the LTTE who could or would respond to lack of accountability on their part.

LTTE atrocities have been documented, and video footage shown on many world stages. While many very ordinary Tamils, Muslims and Sinhalese were killed by them, they also killed two Heads of State, several cabinet ministers and leading politicians in Sri Lanka, and of course Tamil politicians as well.

Is Mr Blinken saying that since there is no one from the LTTE today who would acknowledge their atrocities or could be held responsible, the UNHRC should concern itself only with the Sri Lankan government and pursue action against them? Mr Blinken should know that Sri Lankans would not stand for this and if the US or any other ally of it thinks they could subjugate the country by stealth and overlook the vile deeds of a ruthless terrorist organisation, they could think twice about it.

Prior to looking for answers to the rhetorical question what is the real agenda?”, it may be worthwhile to pose a counter rhetorical question and look for answers to that. This question is about the geographic location of Sri Lanka. If the country was not where it is now and thousands of kilo meters away and lost to the world in some corner of an ocean, without China having any interest in the country, would the UNHRC or the Core Group or the US have had any interest in Sri Lanka?

Would these concerned” core group countries or the country and its allies suspected openly by many as the driving force behind these resolutions, shown any interest in human rights in Sri Lanka?

Readers are left to ponder and find an answer to this question.

It is reported and believed by some to an extent that the Tamil Eelam lobby groups in the US and in the countries who have allied with the US in targeting Sri Lanka, that these countries are raising this issue at the UNHRC and other forums because of the pressure exerted by these lobby groups. The following extract of a communication sent to the writer by a leading Tamil activist who wished to remain unnamed at this stage, stated what might be the reality in regard to the power and influence of these lobby groups.

This source stated there was much disgust amongst many Tamils, both within and outside Sri Lanka and wishing that the writer would highlight this in an article. The message is quoted in full, quote the Tamil Eelam lobby have the misguided idea that they are a powerful lobby group. If not for China showing an interest in the country, and making the US and India angry, they would have gone down like a lead balloon. They would have then worked with the Sri Lanka government to address issues faced by Tamil people in a spirit of cooperation with all others in Sri Lanka. This lobby has been holding a candle for the most horrible terrorist organisation in the world and never once condemning their atrocities. So many Tamil people were killed by them, not only Sinhala and Muslim people.

They are funding the setting up of a separate state in Sri Lanka and providing funds to Tamils in Sri Lanka to keep separatism alive and preventing the Tamil people and Sinhala and Muslim people in the country to find solutions to outstanding issues. If the Tamil people in Sri Lanka are to find their real enemy, it is this Eelam lobby and their supporters in Sri Lanka, who are their real enemies and preventing reconciliation amongst the people in the country. Please let Sinhala people know that a majority of Tamils want to live in peace with them” unquote. 

So much for these lobby groups who obviously are profiting by preventing the Tamil people living in Sri Lanka working together with all other communities to address any lingering issues that have and are affecting them. Their agents in Sri Lanka seem to be carrying out the dictates of these well-funded lobby groups. Money does talk. One is reminded on an age old saying that a beggar never wishes his or her wounds to heal for fear of not being able to beg and earn money. Keeping the Tamil Eelam issue alive seems to fall into this category of activism as these lobby groups would have to wind up and give up their privileged life style if the issue is addressed and resolved by the people of Sri Lanka and their funding sources dry up.

Leaving aside these lobby group, Sri Lanka is indeed in a vortex, with its proximity to India, its close links to China and the machinations of the US twirling it.

The conundrum that makes the vortex that Sri Lanka is in even more complex and destabilising, is India, just 20 kilo meters away, and the US, with the threat to their strategic interests by the super power in waiting, China, an ardent enemy of both.

Sri Lankans may be poor and they are not perfect like the rest of the world. It’s possible that some human rights issues may have occurred in the heat of the final battle against the LTTE. However, Sri Lankans are not fools. They can see through this mirage of human rights violations advanced continuously by the US and its allies. Sri Lankans know that they have weaknesses and they know these have to be addressed by themselves and not by others whose own record on human rights is appalling to say the least. 

It would have been interesting if a resolution was moved to investigate human rights violations in the US based on the revelations documented in the latest Human Rights Watch report. Unfortunately, no country would do that as its allies, in self-preservation, will not do it.

Tamara Kunanayakam, a well-respected Sri Lankan diplomat and former Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office at Geneva and who has an in depth knowledge of the inner workings of the UN system in the back of her hand states that quote the countries in the Non Aligned Movement and in the Global South have a principled position against targeting a country, or naming and shaming”, which is a weapon in the arsenal of the US and its allies, when they want to achieve their strategic objectives elsewhere. She says further that to fulfil the Charter responsibility to promote and encourage respect for human rights in all countries, the UNHRC has a mechanism called the universal periodic review (UPR) where all countries are duty bound to submit a report on promotion and protection of human rights in their own countries and where questions can be raised by others and a list of recommendations made by all parties. The State under review then has the opportunity to select the recommendations that it can implement and makes a voluntary commitment to do so. It is a cooperative not confrontational mechanism within which all states are treated equally, in conformity with the inalienable Charter principle of sovereign equality.  It is in the interest of the NAM/Global South that that principle is respected. It is the US and its allies that sees it as THE major obstacle to its global hegemony. The UN Charter based on multilateral order is founded on the principle of sovereign equality of States, big or small, rich or poor, powerful or weak. It is the guarantor of our sovereignty.  It is that order that the US wants to dismantle as an obstacle to its own ambition to a world order under its hegemony”. 

Sri Lankans of all hues. Tamils, Muslims, Sinhalese and others should echo Ms Kunanayakam’ s assertion that it is our responsibility to strengthen the United Nations not weaken it, and actively join with the Non Aligned Movement and the Global South to prevent it from being instrumentalised by the US and its allies. It is common sense that India cannot be trusted to side with Sri Lanka on this issue. If the government thinks they could be trusted, and if they do support Sri Lanka, it would be very important for all Sri Lankans to know the price that would have had to be paid to elicit India’s support.

No doubt it would be hefty price. It would be far better tactically and strategically for Sri Lanka to follow the path so well-articulated by Tamara Kunanayakam.

The US and India should know that the action of the Core Group and their supporters will only draw Sri Lanka even closer to China, and if they thought they were Sri Lanka’s friends who were only concerned in helping the country, Sri Lanka may well ask why it needs enemies when they have friends” like the US and its allies.

The disturbing development that might be in the offing is that the Sri Lankan Government is ready to compromise with the US-UK led sponsors and accept a consensus resolution. As Ms Kunanayakam clearly explains, the compromise will be Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, because the resolution will be based on the Bachelet Report and resolution 30/1, both of which were rejected by the same Government, as threatening Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and national security. The report is based on the R2P (Right to Protect populations) doctrine that allows armed intervention, rejected by the General Assembly in 2009, as incompatible with the UN Charter and international law. If Sri Lanka goes ahead with negotiations for a compromise, they will be playing a two faced Jekyll and Hyde act and endangering alliances like NAM and Global South. Countries in these alliances will not trust Sri Lanka thereafter and we will be dictated to by a US led alliance.

A consensus resolution, once arrived at, will be a compromise agreed with the very countries who are out to break Sri Lanka’s alliances with the NAM and Global South, and it will be a precedent-setting resolution legitimising R2P. The implications for Sri Lanka will be worse than in 2015, because, unlike 2015, it will be argued there was a national consensus with no internal opposition to the resolution from a moribund Opposition, plus the 2/3 majority.

Since the US agenda is to bring SL within the ambit of QUAD (a group of countries comprising Japan, India, Australia and the United States) and away from China as well as friendly nations in NAM and the Global South, it is likely that a consensus resolution will be followed by imposition of the outstanding US defence agreements – SOFA and MCC by another name, completing the US defence triptych with ACSA.

Sri Lankans have short memories and they seem to have forgotten what consensus resolutions result in. In 1987, not even 3 months after Sri Lanka agreed to a consensus resolution in Geneva, ndian Air Force planes and fighter jets violated the country’s airspace with food drops to the Jaffna peninsula, and 2 months afterwards the Indo-Lanka accord was imposed on us, along with the 13th Amendment. Similarly, ACSA and the Disappearance Act allowing for extradition of Sri Lankan citizens for trial in foreign courts were imposed post 2015 consensus, along with intervention in key ministries and PM’s office, etc. MCC was not signed because of resistance from several quarters although the Cabinet at the time approved its signing.

As Ms Kunanayakam says Sri Lanka has to work with countries in the NAM and Global South who are in the UNHRC, in order to defeat this latest resolution and ensure that the UNHRC complies in Ms Kunanayakam’ s words, with the principle of a cooperative, and not confrontational mechanism within which all states are treated equally, in conformity with the inalienable Charter principle of sovereign equality”. In order to defeat the resolution, and for Sri Lanka not to compromise its sovereignty, it has to ask a friendly Member of the Council to call for a vote when the resolution is tabled. Compromising with countries hostile to Sri Lanka will be like walking into a den of hungry Wolves.

Once tabled, the passage of this resolution will be a precedent to subjugate other nations who do not have the strength or the wealth to stand against duplicitous nations like the US and its allies whose own human rights violations record is worse than that of countries they support actively without any regard to violations in those countries. This resolution therefore has to be defeated by those countries in the NAM and the Global South who are vulnerable to the machinations of these mighty powers, if not to support Sri Lanka, but at least for their own sake.  

Sri Lanka and other countries in the NAM and Global South need the assistance of all countries including China, to improve the lot of their people. They need investments without strings, and not handouts. These countries should extend their hand of friendship with true concern for improving life in these countries, and not extend a hand with a hidden instrument that will injure the hand extended in return.

An American Journal (1851) highlights massacres of the Sinhalese and horrors perpetrated in 1848 under the administration of Lord Torrington

February 26th, 2021

  The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (May 1851)  

In 1851, An American Journal  (The United States Magazine and Democratic Review), at a time (1851) when they I.e. USA, did not have imperial ambitions that dovetailed with that of British imperialism, highlighted and exposed the genocidal crimes committed on the Sinhalese people in British occupied Ceylon, under the administration of the then Governor Lord Torrington.

In the concluding phase of the Journal article having the caption ‘ The English in Ceylon” ( May 1851) , the author of the article says as follows:

” The history of Lord Torringtons administration in Ceylon affords an epitome of English rule, wherever throughout the world, by force, or fraud, or violence, she has succeeded in planting her guilty flag. The horrors perpetrated during 1848 in the island-gem of the East, are the counterpart of those of which, from time to time, during a period of seven centuries, the green isle of the West has been the victim.

We have reproduced this Ceylon tragedy, because it contains a moral upon which it behooves the Democracy of America, at the present moment, seriously to reflect. The flag which sanctioned the massacres of the Cingalese, and has witnessed the devastation of Celtic Ireland; the flag which, usurping every advantageous commercial and political position throughout the globe, has been the harbinger everywhere of desolation and death this flag, which in two wars, our fathers levelled in the dust, now flaunts us in the face on the southern portion of this our continent ; out-spreads its crimson folds over republican soil, insulting our manhood, blighting our commercial prospects, and dimming the lustre of the stars and stripes. Shall Central America share the fate of Ceylon ? Shall our sister Republics on this continent, whose independence, hy every principle of honor, of interest, and of duty, we are bound to protect, be consigned to the tender mercies of a Torrington ? Shall the island of Ruatan become the Ceylon of the Western Hemisphere, and the Isthmus of Central America be made, on a smaller scale, a second Hindostan ? We submit these questions, in all earnestness, to the consideration of the Democracy of America, confident that they will be answered in a manner worthy of those, whose pride it is, that they inherit the principles of a Jefferson, a Madison, a Monroe, a Jackson and a Polk”.

  The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (May 1851)  

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Full Article below

The English in Ceylon.

May 1851.

http://books.lakdiva.org/moa/cornell/1851_english_in_ceylon.html

BRITISH policy, or that system which the British Government has for ages systematically pursued, and by which it has acquired its vast colonial empire, is hut very imperfectly understood by the mass of the American people. Deriving our knowledge of English affairs, for the most part, from English sources, we are too apt to he dazzled by the contemplation of an empire upon which the sun never sets, and to ascribe to Divine destiny, that which, in reality, is the result of a system, more fiendish, and more detestable, because more extending and more extended in its operation, than that of Machiavelli. The conquests of old Rome were attended, at least, with glory; and, in modern times, those of our own country were laden with fruits, not alone of glory and renown to the conquerors, but better far, of freedom, of happiness, and of civilization to the conquered. England alone, of all the nations, ancient or modern, is the only one whose sword, while entwined with wreaths of cypress for the vanquished, has failed to reap one pure laurel to deck the victor’s brow. Survey her colonial empire ; glance your eye athwart those boundless plains made fruitful by the young embraces of the god of day and point, if you can, to one rood of territory, whose acquisition was not conceived in selfishness and iniquity, and consummated in treachery, in perfidy and fraud. As the subject, however, of England’s colonial empire is one which could not properly be treated within the limits of a review article, we shall confine ourselves, for the present, to a condensed expose of certain occurrences of which the island of Ceylon has recently been the theatre and which have startled the propriety even of that most fastidious assembly, the British House of Commons.

Placed at the western entrance of the Bay of Bengal, Ceylon is separated by a narrow strait from the mainland of Hindostan. In size, it is nearly as large as Ireland; and it possesses a population of about a million and a half of souls, made up of various tribes of native Cingalese, Malabars, Mahometans, Coolies, Dutch and English, and their mongrel descendants. Once the abode of civilization, as is evidenced by the ruins of ancient cities, canals, bridges, aqueducts, &c., in which the interior of the island abounds, its geographical position, and natural advantages of soil and climate, should make of Ceylon, in our day, the chief mart of Eastern commerce. That it does not occupy this position, can only be attributed to that system, as short-sighted as vicious, by which the island has, for half a century, been governed, for the immediate profit of the mother country. In 1796, Ceylon was taken possession of by the English, and the Dutch expelled from its shores. From that period, down to so late as 1819, the native chiefs boldly resisted the usurped authority of the invaders, and were finally reduced to subjection only after a desperate struggle, and by such agencies as England alone is skilled to employ for the accomplishment of her darling objects. Since 1819, the government of the colony has been administered by a Governor, appointed by the Colonial Secretary, for the time being, at home, assisted by a council composed entirely of European civil and military servants, who are described by MeCulloch as being, from their tenure of office, totally subservient to the will of the Governor. The religion of the island is that of Buddha, as established by the following clause of the treaty of the 2nd of March, 1815, between the British government and the native chiefs The religion of Buddha, professed by the chiefs and inhabitants of these provinces, is declared inviolable; and its rites, ministers and places of worship, are to be maintained and protected. The period embraced between the years 1819 and 1846, was not remarkable for any extraordinary occurrences in Ceylon; suffice it to say, that the history of the island during this interval, is made up of patient suffering and distress on the part of the natives, and of heartless tyranny and exaction on the part of their foreign rulers.

In 1846. Lord Torrington was appointed by Earl Grey, Whig Colonial Secretary,to the lucrative office of Governor of Ceylon. Arrived at the seat of government, his lordship is surprised to find the financial affairs of the colony in an embarrassed condition; and, accordingly, in virtue of the wide discretionary powers vested in him, proceeds to meet the difficulty off-hand by the imposition of severe new taxes of his own invention. These taxes, though decidedly original in their way, were yet of that character, that any one at all acquainted with the colony might have foreseen that they could never by any possibility be collected. The most obnoxious of them were, a road-tax, a shop-tax, a gun-tax, and a dog-tax. The first ordained, that every male resident in the island, between the ages of fifteen and fifty-five, should either labor for six days in each year on the public roads, or pay three shillings sterling, in lieu of such personal service. The second enacted, that every occupant of a shop, the rental of which amounted to £ 5, should take out a yearly license on a £ 1 stamp. The third directed, that on a certain day in each year, the Cingalese should repair to the chief towns, armed, and apply for licenses for their fire-arms, at a cost of 2s. 6d. for each gun. The fourth, imposed a tax of ir. on every dog kept in the island, and sentenced to death all puppies above three months old whose proprietors could not produce the protecting shilling. Now, it is necessary to understand that in Ceylon, as in all countries subject to the British flag, the bulk of the population are extremely poor; hence, the payment of these taxes was to them an impossibility. Those, moreover, upon dogs and guns, were imposed upon what were to them absolute necessaries of life. Besides, the road-tax was a direct outrage upon that religion which, as we have shown above, the English had bound themselves by treaty to protect, since the native priests are restricted by it, both from labor and from touching money. The promulgation of the decree announcing these new taxes naturally created great excitement throughout the island. Petitions, memorials, remonstrances, from all classes of the inhabitants, were laid before the Governor. They were disregarded. By any means, Lord Torrington was resolved to carry out his object. The assembling of the people in large masses was encouraged by the government agents, in the hopes that a collision between them and the British troops would occur. It did occur. A British soldier is slightly wounded, whether by any of the native inhabitants or not, does not appear from the evidence taken before the Parliamentary Committee, which is the only authority which we shall quote. But the collision, so anxiously sought for by Lord Torrington, had taken place; and martial law is at once proclaimed. Proclamations are issued, confiscating the lands and properties of all those who, terrified at the atrocities they had before seen committed under martial law, had fled into the jungles. Courts martial, composed of subaltern officers, ignorant of the language of the country, tried, convicted, sentenced, and put to instant death, hundreds of the innocent inhabitants; and this, not only in violation of all law, human and divine, but in utter contempt of the 7th article of the treaty, to which we have already referred, which stipulates that No sentence of death can be carried into execution against any inhabitant, except by the written warrant of the British Governor or Lieutenant Governor for the time being. But what cares Lord Torrington for treaties, or for the laws of humanity ? Must he not govern ? And what means government in the vocabulary of a British aristocrat, but confiscation and murder ?

Much has been said of the magnanimity of the British soldier. Let the following letters, addressed by the commandant of Kandy, to the presiding officer of one of the courts martial, hounding him on in his bloody career, serve as a specimen

My dear Watson:
You are getting on swimmingly. Impress on the court that there is no necessity for taking down the evidence in detail; so they are satisfied with the guilt or innocence of the individual, that is sufficient for them to find and sentence. This is the law and the mode.
Yours, T. A. DROUGHT, Col. Commanding.
August 16, 1848.

Well were these magnanimous instructions obeyed. For a period of nigh three months, confiscations, burnings, massacres, were the order of the day in Ceylon: and this, be it remembered, notwithstanding that subsequent to the imposition of martial law, not a single offense was pretended ever to have been committed by the inhabitants. Amongst those who suffered during this period, was one whose execution is thus mentioned by Lord Torrington in a dispatch to Earl Gray___” An influential priest who was convicted of administering treasonable oaths, was shot at Kandy in full robes. This priests trial took place at Kandy, and he was arraigned–

First, For having directly or indirectly held correspondence with rebels, and Cur not giving all the information in his power which might lead to the apprehension of a proclaimed rebel, Kaddapolla Unanse, professing to know his place of concealment on or about 17th August, 1848. Second, For administering, or conniving at the administration (!) of a treasonable oath to one Kerr Bande, on or about the 17th August, 1848.

On these absurd and unintelligible charges the poor Buddhist priest was dragged before a military tribunal; tried by military judges, not one of whom understood the language in which the evidence against him was given; convicted and shot! Several attorneys who were present at the trial; and who did understand the language, felt satisfied that the witnesses for the prosecution had perjured themselves for the purpose of currying favor with the Governor, and that the priest was innocent. Under this impression they besought the Governor to postpone the execution. In vain Lord Torringtons answer was By G, sir, if all the lawyers in Ceylon said that the priest was innocent, he should be shot tomorrow morning. And shot he was. More, Earl Grey, in answer to Lord Torringtons dispatch announcing the execution, pronounced the death of the Buddhist priest to be highly satisfactory! Again, in a subsequent dispatch, Earl Grey, in the name of the Queen, complimented Lord Torrington, and declared his complete approval of his decision, promptitude, and judgment. Thus sustained by the Home Government, and having triumphed over the refractory inhabitants of Ceylon, surely Lord Torrington must feel proud and happy! But no: after all the massacres, pillages, burnings and confiscations after he had made a desert, and called it peace.

Lord Torrington discovered that his severe taxes were inapplicable to the island, and could not be collected. They were accordingly every one repealed!

These proceedings had now begun to attract popular attention in England, and in the session of 1849, a parliamentary committee was appointed to investigate then-i. Upon the evidence taken before that committee, we have based our statements. Their authenticity, therefore, cannot be impeached. And this is England. England of the World’s Fair, and the Peace Congress ; England of George Thompson, and the Abolition Societies! What matters it, that a few men, Cobden and Bright, and their associates, should denounce these atrocities, and that the London Quarterly Review should stigmatise them as a disgrace to the English name they have been sanctioned by the British government, and are the consequences of the policy by which, in its foreign and colonial relations, that government has invariably been directed. The history of Lord Torringtons administration in Ceylon affords an epitome of English rule, wherever throughout the world, by force, or fraud, or violence, she has succeeded in planting her guilty flag. The horrors perpetrated during 1848 in the island-gem of the East, are the counterpart of those of which, from time to time, during a period of seven centuries, the green isle of the West has been the victim.

We have reproduced this Ceylon tragedy, because it contains a moral upon which it behooves the Democracy of America, at the present moment, seriously to reflect. The flag which sanctioned the massacres of the Cingalese, and has witnessed the devastation of Celtic Ireland; the flag which, usurping every advantageous commercial and political position throughout the globe, has been the harbinger everywhere of desolation and death this flag, which in two wars, our fathers levelled in the dust, now flaunts us in the face on the southern portion of this our continent ; out-spreads its crimson folds over republican soil, insulting our manhood, blighting our commercial prospects, and dimming the lustre of the stars and stripes. Shall Central America share the fate of Ceylon ? Shall our sister Republics on this continent, whose independence, hy every principle of honor, of interest, and of duty, we are bound to protect, be consigned to the tender mercies of a Torrington ? Shall the island of Ruatan become the Ceylon of the Western Hemisphere, and the Isthmus of Central America be made, on a smaller scale, a second Hindostan ? We submit these questions, in all earnestness, to the consideration of the Democracy of America, confident that they will be answered in a manner worthy of those, xv hose pride it is, that they inherit the principles of a Jefferson, a Madison, a Monroe, a Jackson and a Polk.

  Courtesy: The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (1851)  


Original text courtesy of the
Cornell University proto-type Digital Library Collections – Making of America
Formatted Text in HTML put Online at Lakdiva.net with their Permission.

Title: The English in Ceylon
Author:
Journal: The United States Magazine and Democratic Review.
Print: Vol. XXVIII, No. CLV, – 1851 May, p. 409 p. 410 p. 411 p. 412
Publisher: J.& H.G. Langley, New York.

Editor’s Note: Text Proof read by Kavan Ratnatunga but many OCR and formatting errors, probably still remain.

Please also see notes on other interesting articles like this that have been put online in the Digital Library Collections of MoA.

UNHRC Resolution: why Sri Lanka must seek Rejection & Closure

February 25th, 2021

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister has expressed what the Sri Lankan public wish to hear. We want the Government to take a firm stand and strategize on how to put to rest this unfair, biased witch hunt against Sri Lanka. A conflict that lasted 3 decades was ended not by UN or UNHRC but by Sri Lanka. UN or UNHRC did not stop LTTE, could not stop LTTE and did not save a single child from being turned into child soldier killers. Not only that the UN or UNHRC could not stop war crimes against ANIMALS by LTTE. It is laughable how countries with blood stained hands are writing resolutions against Sri Lanka and demanding accountability while they refuse to be accountable for their sins both colonial and modern. The Sri Lankan public must understand the dangers at hand and why we must pressurize the GoSL through its foreign ministry to either seek a vote or lobby members to force the core group to withdraw their resolution.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=442803713814303

UNHRC is interfering into the domestic affairs of Sri Lanka with each resolution.

This will politically socially and economically impact Sri Lanka as it will impede our sovereignty.

Why Sri Lanka must go for a vote? 

In simply sitting silent while the Core Group reads out its bogus charges and not asking countries whether they agree or not,  Sri Lanka is silently accepting every lie and trumped up charges.

In not raising objection, Sri Lanka will be allowing UNHRC to continue with more detrimental demands that will interfere into the legal mechanisms of Sri Lanka, leaving no room for the national laws to prevail.

In simply surrendering, we will be allowing foreign intervention via R2P  (armed humanitarian intervention) and eventually end up remote controlled by Geneva. It’s a modern version of Colonial Governor in the form of Bachelet ruling Sri Lanka.

In not raising objection, Sri Lanka is watching UNHRC flout the UN Charter and the spirit of the UN Charter and international laws. We cannot allow this to happen to Sri Lanka, for eventually it will be repeated on other countries as well.

All that UNHRC will say is – ‘we did in Sri Lanka, your country is next’.

Countries that nitpick on Sri Lanka for human rights, claiming we cannot look after our own are cannot even look after their covid patients and are holding world records for covid deaths1

If Sri Lanka doesn’t go for a vote, Bachelet will invoke individual unilateral sanctions because she cannot use her office to impose sanctions.  Only UNSC can impose sanctions and that too if a nation poses an international threat to peace. UNSC has never sanctions countries for human rights!

If Sri Lanka doesn’t go for a vote, it’s as good as admitting to the lies being told by even the UNHRC head. For her to read out a report and says ‘more than 250,000 people were detained for months in military-run closed camps’ is unacceptable and the GoSL must demand she retract &  apologize for this. This is going overboard with lies.

We have been repeatedly saying that if there were individual excesses committed by soldiers not adhering to command or not following rules of war, then bring these individual instances with evidence and separately charge them if found guilty beyond doubt. But the brush stroke allegations of the nature that the UNHRC head is putting into her report is going overboard with bias. It is because of these lies that we must defend our troops and our nation.

If Sri Lanka, remains silent and allows the UNHRC heads’ biased report to go without admonition then we are again walking into another external intervention of what took place in 1987 with India threatening Sri Lanka, dropping parippu over Sri Lanka and forcing the signing of the Indo-Lanka Accord and landing Indian Peace Keepers that killed Sinhalese, Muslims and Tamils and even raped 3000 Tamil women. Do we want a repeat of this? NO

But what is important to realize is that India intervened unilaterally, today we are facing QUAD nations & their allies who wish to use Sri Lanka’s airports and ports as military installations and use our land for international trade and holiday hub for their staff and families – look at the number of foreign resorts, foreign apartments emerging across Sri Lanka and the manner they are creating no-go zones securing the area for themselves!

Therefore, the 2015 co-sponsorship of 30/1 resolution paved the way for much damage. The best way to get rid of the defenders of the nation is to put them in jail on trumped up charges, this is what the UNHRC is tasked to do via the international tribunal with international judges and international lawyers to find our war heroes guilty and put them out of the way, while they descend and rule Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka must now be alert, as the UNHRC has come to the last leg of its outsourced plan by the QUAD and allies. Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans must unite to save its sovereignty and its nation.

Shenali D Waduge

‘Political move’: Sri Lanka urges rejection of UNHRC resolution

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Aljazeera

Sri Lanka subjected to ‘unprecedented propaganda campaign’, the foreign minister says in video address to the UN Human Rights Council.

Sri Lanka has urged the United Nations Human Rights Council to reject a forthcoming resolution voicing serious concern” over the deteriorating” rights situation in the country.

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena told the council it would have to decide whether time should be spent raking over Sri Lanka or if the resolution was politically motivated.KEEP READINGSri Lanka to allow COVID burials for Muslims after outcryUK Muslims complain to UN over Sri Lanka’s cremation policySri Lanka war memorial to be rebuilt after Tamils protestThousands in Sri Lanka drink ‘miracle’ COVID potion, minister ill

Sri Lanka had been subjected to an unprecedented propaganda campaign”, he said on Tuesday in a video address to the UN rights body, which is meeting virtually.

It is regrettable that … elements working against Sri Lanka intend to table another country-specific resolution.”

Members should choose whether Sri Lanka warrants the urgent attention of this council – or if this campaign is essentially a political move that contravenes the very values and principles on which this council has been established”, he added.

Last month, UN rights chief Michelle Bachelet called for an International Criminal Court investigation into Sri Lanka’s Tamil separatist conflict and sanctions against top generals and others accused of war crimes.

Bachelet accused Sri Lanka of reneging on promises to ensure justice for thousands of civilians killed in the final stages of the 37-year separatist war that ended in 2009.

The United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Malawi, Montenegro and North Macedonia submitted a draft resolution for consideration by the 47-member Human Rights Council next month.

It is the only one tabled so far during the 46th regular session of the council, which opened on Monday and is due to run until March 23.

It expresses serious concern over emerging trends over the past year, which represent clear early warning signs of a deteriorating human rights situation in Sri Lanka”.

They include the accelerating militarisation of civilian government functions, erosion of the independence of the judiciary … ongoing impunity and political obstruction of accountability for crimes … surveillance and intimidation of civil society and shrinking democratic space, arbitrary detentions, allegations of torture”.

It also voices concern that the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has hurt freedom of religion.

It urges Colombo to ensure a thorough and impartial investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of all allegations of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

Gunawardena said the resolution, if passed, would only result in a significant loss of morale in countries fighting terrorism”.

The council must hold the scales even – not going by hearsay,” he said.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 3

February 25th, 2021

By Rohan Gunaratna Courtesy Adaderana

The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) the real reincarnation of the LTTE – Rohan Gunaratna

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=8115

The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) led by the Norway-based Nediyavan is the real reincarnation of the LTTE, and not the US-based outfit led by Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, which is trying to establish a Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE), says Prof.Rohan Gunaratna, the Singapore-based expert on terrorism.

Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism at Nanyang University in Singapore, told Express that Rudrakumaran has a better understanding of politics and is therefore more likely to negotiate a settlement with the Sri Lankan government than Nediyavan, who is a hardcore LTTE man.

Nediyavan, who had studied in Moscow, ended up being deputy to Castro, the LTTE’s chief fund manager.

In due course Rudrakumaran will realise that a Transnational Government is a pipedream like an independent Tamil Eelam and will start talks with the Sri Lankan government,” Gunaratna predicted.

He pointed out that all those Tamils who had voted in the recent TGTE elections are citizens of countries other than Sri Lanka, and that 90 percent of these will not come back to their ancestral homeland. 

The expert characterised Rudrakumaran, a US-based attorney and son of a former Mayor of Jaffna, as a cautious person” who keeps within the law, unlike Nediyavan’s followers.

BTF MORE DANGEROUS THAN TGTE

According to Gunaratna, the British Tamil Forum (BTF) is a handmaiden of the GTF and Fr.Immanuel, who heads the BTF, is a puppet” of Nediyavan. Fr.Immanuel preaches ethnic hatred not reconciliation,” Gunaratna said.

Yet, the former British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and several MPs had addressed the GTF on February 25 in London.The BTF is therefore more dangerous for Sri Lankathan the TGTE.

DOOR OPEN FOR ARMS SMUGGLER ANANDARAJAH TOO  

As for the Sri Lankan government, it is ever ready for talks with anyone giving up violence and opting for negotiations, Gunaratna says.

Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa is a man with a mission who knows when to use military means and when to talk peace. If it is necessary to bring about lasting peace, the Secretary of Defence will negotiate even with those LTTE leaders who had committed heinous crimes. After all they too are Sri Lankans, though misguided,” he said.

Doors for talks are open even for a man like Ponnaiah Anandarajah, the LTTE’s top arms procurer, who had smuggled more than 10,000 tonnes of armaments between 1996 and 2009, Gunaratna said.

AMNESTY FOR LTTE CADRE

The expert regretted that Western governments are turning a blind eye to the fact that Sri Lanka has given amnesty” to over 10, 000 hardcore LTTE cadre who had surrendered.

These LTTE cadre are in the process of being rehabilitated and absorbed into society, and that is like getting amnesty,” he explained.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 2

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy https://ltteuk.wordpress.com/

WHAT EXACTLY IS THE UK DOING? A TERRORIST SAFE HAVEN!

UK politicians should have some respect for its security services!

http://www.globalpolitician.com/default.asp?22235-britain-terror

LTTE Tamil Tigers” and its UK-wide network

Dominic Whiteman – 10/18/2006

LTTE was banned in the UK February 28th 2001. The annual publication of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) London ‘Military Balance 2005/2006′ referred to emerging links between the LTTE and the Al-Qaeda movement. It was later revealed confidentially by the editors to diplomatic sources that these links were in terms of commercial transactions including trafficking for financial gain and acquisition of technology rather than any ideological linkage. Experts are studying with interest links between the LTTE and Al-Qaeda in its financial, commercial and arms dealings. It is also believed that such links also exist in maritime transactions.

The LTTE, better known as the Tamil Tigers, which is engaged in an armed confrontation with the Sri Lankan Government, was the first terrorist organisation to use suicide bombers against civilian and military targets. It has in the last 23 years assassinated the political leadership in Sri Lanka, killed a former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and been involved in the loss of nearly 60,000 lives of mostly innocent civilians.

On August 21, 2006 a British NHS GP at Forest Primary Care Centre, Hertford Road in Edmonton, Dr Murugesu Vineyagamoorthy and his wife Dr Pushpam were arrested in New York by the FBI for attempting to bribe a US Justice Dept official with $1 million to try to get the LTTE off the list of banned terrorist organisations in the USA. He was further charged with facilitating the purchase of American made missiles and British submarine technology for the LTTE. This arrest according to many observers was an eye-opener to the huge volume of money that is raised through extortion and intimidation from the Tamil diaspora in the UK that is either smuggled into Sri Lanka through human carriers or in the form of weapons purchased in third countries.

Fundraising in UK: method case studies

i) Extortion The US based organisation Human Rights Watch earlier this year published a study entitled Funding the final war – LTTE intimidation and extortion in the Tamil diaspora (a case study of UK and Canada)”. According to this study many individual families and businesses have been approached to pay sums of money ranging from ё2000 to ё100,000. The LTTE’s de-facto headquarters in London masquerading under the name ‘British Tamil Association’ has even arranged direct debit arrangements to its account at the Natwest Bank. They have now progressed to getting members of the Tamil community to fill out a questionnaire detailing family address, income, details of family in Sri Lanka etc. Any refusal to meet with payments would result in one of the following steps.

1. Next of kin living in Sri Lanka would be abducted and later killed

2. The person refusing to pay, himself would be killed

This can be illustrated as follows.

On January 5, 2006 Mr Subramaniam Sivakumar, a Tamil businessman who operated a grocery shop called Apna Bazaar on Willesden Lane in North West London was killed in mysterious circumstances. Police later found in his journals that he had been making regular payments of ё10 – ё20,000 to LTTE boys”. Family members believe his failure to make one of these ‘regular payments’ sealed his fate. Police investigations are continuing.

ii) Open Public Events In Spite of Ban Each year the LTTE holds 2 (regularly annual) events in London. On 27 November 2005, notwithstanding the fact that the LTTE is banned both in the UK and the European Union, nearly 5000 Sri Lankan Tamils gathered at the Wembley Arena to commemorate the 50th birthday of the LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran who incidentally is wanted by Interpol after having been charged by the Supreme court of India for assassinating their Prime Minister. The event took the form of drama and dances performed in his honour and candles were lit to honour the name of the notorious black tigers” (LTTE suicide bombers). Entrance to the event cost ё35 per head which entitled attendees to a 2006 calendar with colour illustrations of Prabhakaran’s military prowess. Incidentally the principal speaker at this event was Mr Anton Balasingham, the LTTE’s theoretician and chief negotiator at all the LTTE’s talks with the Sri Lanka Government. Mr Balasingham is a British citizen who lives comfortably in Greenford, London from where he proclaims the LTTE ideology to the western world. His operations in the UK have been ignored by the authorities citing various reasons.

On 25 July 2006 the LTTE organised the black July rally at Hyde Park with a 20 ft cut-out of the LTTE leader on the stage. The event was supposedly held to commemorate an incident which had occurred 30 years ago where some tamil civilians had been killed by a Sinhalese mob. The event was organised by a LTTE front calling themselves Tamil Youth Organisation (TYO, UK). The event had the likes of Labour party Harrow Councillor Thaya Idaikaddar delivering a homily extolling the virtues of the LTTE leader. Incidentally permission to hold the rally was obtained from the Royal Parks’ Police by 2 other Labour councillors √ one from Harrow Ms Sashikala and the other Ms Eliza Packiadevi Mann from Southwark. These councillors have now formed another LTTE front called British Tamil Councillors and Associates. Although they are supposedly elected to represent the people of Harrow, Southwark, East Ham etc they claim that they have been elected to safeguard the well-being of the Tamil people. Seem to be unable to integrate into British society and are contributing their might to strengthen the Tamil ghettos” in North & East London (Ealing Road, Wembley, East Ham, Croydon, Walthamstow, Tooting etc). Mr Idaikaddar is closely associated with DFID Minister Gareth Thomas who usually is an active participant in these events in his electorate. Mr Robert Evans – another Labour member who is a member of the European Parliament (PSE group) – is another active supporter.

iii) Hindu Temples The Human Rights Watch report has also thrown light on the role of British Hindu temples which have come under the control of the LTTE and have become a source of huge revenue to the LTTE’s war chest. The report refers to the detention of 2 British nationals of Sri Lankan Tamil origin in the north of Sri Lanka (whilst they were visiting relatives) – Mr Rajasingham Jayadevan and Mr Arumugam Kandiah Vivekanandan, proprietors of a private Hindu temple located on Ealing road in Wembley by the LTTE. They were detained for several weeks in February 2005 until they agreed to hand over control of the temple to a group aligned with the LTTE. Mr Jayadevan subsequently initiated an application to the UK High court and on April 7, 2005 the High court ruled that the transfer of the temple was not valid and returned control of the temple to its original trustees. However the group aligned to the LTTE continues to operate the Sivayogam Hindu temple in Tooting. The UK Charity Commission has continued to drag its feet on this investigation for several years citing the usual bureaucratic delays. This is despite evidence available of how during the tsunami disaster in December 2004 the Sivayogam Trust sent a container load of ‘tsunami relief goods’ which contained among other things aluminium kitchen pots inside which were cleverly concealed ball bearings and other items required for assembling explosives. The Sivayogam also sponsored the construction of a boat yard in Sampoor in the East of Sri Lanka purportedly for fishermen affected by the tsunami but which later turned out to be a boat yard for the LTTE’s sea tiger suicide squad.

iv) Charities Another LTTE front organisation White Pigeon currently under investigation by the UK Charity Commission for its links with the LTTE in 2005 transferred approx. ё500,000 (SL Rs 98.64 million) from its account at the National Westminster Bank, Sutton branch. This organisation also regularly transmits funds to the Bumiputhra Commerce Bank in Kuala Lumpur which is the bank account of the World Tamil Relief Fund for procurement of military hardware for the LTTE.

Note that in August 2005 the UK Charity Commission de-listed the charity Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (UK) from its list of charities for its links with the LTTE. At the time of its being de-listed it had ё1.3 million but the trustees made a mockery of British legislation by in September 2005 registering the same organisation under the name International Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (ITRO)” as a company with Companies House UK. It was recently uncovered that TRO (UK) had collected a staggering sum of SL Rs 56.3 million for tsunami work in the north of Sri Lanka which was supposedly to construct 639 housing units in the north & east of Sri Lanka. The entire sum of money has been drawn by the LTTE but only approx 100 housing units have been completed.

Synopsis

The banning of the LTTE in the UK in 2001 resulted in only one change in their course of action. They changed the name of their secretariat and fronts – and now continue to operate business as usual”.

Today they are at the centre of everything from credit card frauds to money laundering, drug trafficking and the international narcotics trade and they operate a commercially viable shipping network. The LTTE continues to destabilise Sri Lanka with funds mainly collected from the UK and Canada. Annual remittances from the UK alone both from extortion and their business activities is in the range of ё10 million.

According to the Counter Terrorism Command of the UK Metropolitan Police they are aware of these activities but are faced with staffing constraints, as they are preoccupied with handling Islamic terrorism”. It is regrettable that terrorist groups that the UK, EU, USA, Canada, India, Australia and many other countries have chosen to ban continues to operate at large in the UK due to this differentiation” between Islamic terror groups posing a threat to the UK domestic security and other terrorist groups” which pose a threat to the domestic and regional security of other regions in the world, in this instance South Asia.

British tolerance feeding terrorism

Tamil gang violence continues unabated throughout London and its suburbs. On 16 February 2006 a Sri Lankan was stabbed to death at McDonalds in Tooting, London. The attack was carried out apparently in revenge for a sword attack against another Sri Lankan man which took place outside the Tooting police station 4 days earlier. According to police grudges based on the 23 year rebellion by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka have spilled into Britain and led to some horrific attacks. In 2005 alone, 16 killings have taken place involving the Sri Lankan Tamil community in the UK. The Specialist Crime Unit of the UK Metropolitan Police launched 2 operations (Operation Enver and Operation Quadrant) but sadly these operations which led to the arrest of hundreds of LTTE gangsters in the suburbs of London has been abandoned due to lack of funds – apparently the priority is Islamic terrorism”.

It is interesting to note that Mr Charles Anthony, son of the internationally hunted criminal Velupillai Prabhakaran is now a student at the University of Belfast. His entry was secured with the help of the IRA’s Martin McGuinness as a confidence building measure” to contribute towards bringing peace to Sri Lanka!

Worse still

Since 1995, three LTTE British charities and the Tamil Housing Association has raised over 8 million pounds. Most of the funds have been attracted as grants from local and central government because of the legitimacy these organisations have derived from being registered charities and a Housing Association in the UK. The Tamil Refugee Action Group has even got a British National Lottery grant of ё78,450 pounds awarded on 2nd December 1998. Tamil Refugee Education and Training Centre where the LTTE official spokesman Anton Rajah works, has also attracted a British National Lottery grant of ё155,484 pounds, awarded on 4th March 1999. It is a grant covering a period of 3 years.

The TRO has declared to the British authorities that since 1995 approximately 2.5 million pounds have gone from Britain to LTTE control, tax free, via the charity under the guise of rehabilitation work”. Although TRO has raised approximately 3 million pounds since 1995 and have no staff costs, most of those who canvass for the TRO are working for the other two charities and the Housing Association and are receiving salaries courtesy of the British tax payer. The total salary costs since 1995 of the Housing Association and the two charities (excluding TRO which has no salary costs) is approximately 1.5 million pounds.

By raising over ё3 million pounds in the UK, without paying Value Added Tax on turnover and transferring over ё2.5 million pounds out of Britain since 1995, exploiting the charity status” it has gained by deception to avoid the payment of corporation tax, the LTTE may have defrauded the British Treasury, Her Majesty’s Inland Revenue and Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise of over a million pounds.

There is no doubt that these groups are doing some degree of charity work and no doubt that the TRO does carry out refugee relief work in the Vanni jungles, but in the words of Charles Somasundram, the LTTE activist who wrote in Hot Spring” magazine, these charities are the brainchild of the LTTE leader Prabakaran. The charity work they carry out in the Vanni jungles is minuscule, (a fraction of the ё 2.5 million pounds that has been sent from Britain) compared to the other organisations such as UNHCR, ICRC, OXFAM etc. who are active in the conflict areas and refuse to have anything to do with the TRO, as they are all aware of TRO’s LTTE connections. In its propaganda the TRO claims that it works with” organisations such as CARE, MSF, UNHCR and UNICEF in order to gain credibility and legitimacy.

The charity work of the Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation is a facade to cover up its primary purpose, which is to raise funds to purchase weapons as commented by Don Gracey, security specialist to the Canadian Senate Committee on Security and Intelligence. The little work the TRO does in the Vanni jungles is given massive publicity in the LTTE controlled media in order to create a distorted perception among expatriate Tamils, that they are the largest NGO operating in the Vanni jungles, so as to emotionally target them and raise more funds to finance terrorism.

While UNHCR, ICRC, OXFAM and other international organisations move about freely all over Sri Lanka, the Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (British charity number 1010029), only operates in terrorist held areas of Sri Lanka, because as a terrorist outfit, it has no legitimacy in parts of Sri Lanka where democracy prevails.

General

Recurring themes of banned terrorist entities in UK

a) There are always 20 or so individuals (mover/shakers) who run groups, who – if taken out of the picture – would paralyse a group’s activities overnight.

b) When a group knows it is probably going to be banned, it steps up its level of activities (and rhetoric) until the day it is banned, preparing for banning.

c) Fundraising for groups comes from ongoing assets like property and state benefits, which are not going to disappear even if a group’s funds are seized or re-distributed.

d) Fundraising for groups most often includes some use of a British registered charity.

e) Websites are often cached or duplicated.

f) Web presence will continue using a general term (Followers of Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaa, for example, which is a group term also used by non-radicals)

g) Propaganda material (audio and video) is often moved to an online storage site, such as Sendspace, and its destination promoted privately.

h) Clear IP address / bank account detail / written / audio / video / other prosecutable evidence exists on individuals within groups likely to be banned.

In light of these themes, VIGIL is currently lobbying the UK parliament for a change in banning legislation. This would take the form of the following:

The VIGIL banning mechanism

VIGIL has devised a simple method by which groups can get themselves banned √ not a code making it easier for the government to ban groups, but a code allowing effective banning of groups by the government. It is similar to the threat security code but simpler. It is a three level code as follows:

GREEN First, whether by a UK authority, foreign government or other body, the UK Home Secretary receives a report of a group or hydra. This green level results in rapid private investigations of the group.

AMBER Second, investigations (or the strength of the original report) result in a public warning to the group. An official letter goes out to the recognised leaders of the group informing them of a likely imminent ban unless there is an immediate change in their conduct and activities (the 20 mover/shakers mentioned above). The letter clarifies that they will be held personally responsible (just like a company director for his company’s activities) for future infringements and that these infringements could lead to large fines, deportation and / or a jail sentence (standard Dutch sentence 12 months, for example). These individuals have one week to convey this message to the group’s followers and to present to the police / Home Office any group members they feel will put their positions in jeopardy. Finally, these individuals will be warned that they are as of now subject to an open ended review. A group/hydra – once it has reached amber – can never return to green.

RED Third, comes the ban. This is a seizure of assets, a cutting of ongoing funds (benefits, direct debit contributions etc) and the arrest of the liable individuals. Standard banning legislation is also used √ websites forced offline and propaganda material seized. Banks used in the fundraising process for these groups should be publicly chastised where guilty and fined if possible.

In conclusion

Banning groups is a great opportunity for the British government to inflict lasting damage on terrorist networks. There are few opportunities as good as the banning opportunity to wound terrorists before they strike. There is no cure in terrorism – just prevention – and banning is an opportunity too good to miss.

There has been much talk of how the 7/7 bombers needed very little money to cause so much devastation. Yet the groups who provided them with support and succour use lots of money daily to spread their vile ideologies and win similar recruits – they openly raise these funds, especially in Britain.

This LTTE case study – just touching the surface of evidence collected by VIGIL over three months’ infiltration – is a shocking example of how banning can go so wrong. It should not be allowed to repeat itself. While the effect on Britons of the LTTE’s comfortable existence in the UK is minimal, the effect on Britons of the Al Mujahiroun Hydra’s continued comfortable (benefit supported) existence in the UK will be paid for in blood. Not that this makes effectively banning the Al Mujahiroun Hydra more important than the effective banning of the LTTE √ which causes daily mayhem in Sri Lanka and beyond, and whose infrastructure (so advanced it has its own shipping fleet) it is alleged Al Qaeda uses.

The key point here is liability. These supporters of terrorism are liable for what their proteges and martyrs” go and do. The leaders of such groups – publicity seekers all of them – will not step aside from their responsibility of being seen as the leaders of their groups, or they will lose the leadership of their groups by default anyway. It is far easier talking the terror game than being an actual terrorist – it is time the British government stood up to the plate and swapped the comfy armchairs of the leaders of these supporters of terrorism for prison cells.

To the camp that says, these groups will go underground – don’t frighten them off” the British Home Secretary should say rubbish – they need the publicity so much they cannot afford to go underground.” (And from VIGIL’s experience they are groups which are easy to infiltrate – easy to glean amber level evidence on – even when they think they are out of the public glare).

One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half.”

– Sir Winston Churchill.

Dominic Whiteman is spokesperson for the London-based VIGIL anti-terrorist organization – an international network of terror trackers, including former intelligence officers, military personnel and experts ranging from linguistic to banking experts. He’s currently the Editor of Westminster Journal.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 1

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Terrorists Exposed

LTTE ACTIVITIES IN THE UK

UK LTTE / May 24, 2014

The organisation of support for the Tamils of Sri Lanka goes back toNovember 1978 when Tamil Co-ordinating Committee or TCC was formed at the instance of Amirthalingam for the purpose of Co-ordinating the UK based political and militant front organisations. Its President S K Vaikunthavasan has been the initiator of many efforts to bring the government of Sri Lanka into disrepute as oppressors of the Tamil minority – This theme is yet been followed and it is in UK that the vicious anti-government propaganda is strongest. Vaikunthavasan is also remembered for the incident where on 5 Nov 1978 he walked up to the rostrum of the United Nations before the Sri Lanka Foreign Affairs Minister who was billed to speak could reach it and held forth for about a minute on the Tamil cause before he could be removed.

The centre of LTTE activities for the area has now shifted to Paris and the LTTE activities in UK are now co-ordinated by LTTE International Secretariat at No 211 Katherine Road, London E6 IBU , United Kingdom, Fax No 0181-4708593 The following are the pro-LTTE organisations in the UK

ආසියාවේ නපුංෂකයා

February 25th, 2021

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

අපේ මාතෘ භූමියට එරෙහිව නැවත වරක් මානව හිමිකම් කැඩීමේ යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත්ව තිබේ. එය අප අපේක්ෂා කල සිදුවීමකි. මෙම යෝජනාව මුල්වරට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබුවේ ලෝකයේ බලවත්ම රාජ්‍ය ලෙස හදුන්වා ගන්නා ඇමරිකා එකසත් ජනපදයයි. ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයම මෙම යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම තුලින් පෙන්වන්නේ, අප රාජ්‍ය කොතරම් ප්‍රබල රාජ්‍යක් ලෙස ඇමරිකාවම සලකනවාද යන්නයි. මෙවර වෙනත් කබ්බෝ රාශියක් එම යෝජනාවම හොදට මැදලා යලි ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත. මෙම සිදුවීම දෙස බලනවිට අපට පැහැදිලිවම දර්ශණය වන්නේ, කිසිවෙකුත් අපේක්ෂා නොකල මහා ජයග්‍රහණයක් ශ්‍රී ලං.කාව විසින් අත්පත් කරගෙන ඇති බවයි. අප රාජ්‍යය විසින් ලෝකයා ඉදිරියේ ලද මේ මහා ජයග්‍රහණය,, අප විසින් මනාව අවබෝධ කර ගෙන රැකගත යුතුය.

May be an image of one or more people and outdoors

ත්‍රස්තවාදය යනු බටහිර විසින් නිශ්පාදය කර ලෝකය මත ආරෝපනය කර මනාව පවත්වා ගෙන ආ වෙළද භාණ්ඩයකි. මෙය විවිධ වෙළද නාමයන්ගෙන් ලොවපුරා ප්‍රචලිතව පවත්වා ගෙන යන අතර, අල්කයිඩා, දෙමළ කොටි සංවිධානය යන ආදී නම් වලින් ආසියාවේද, වෙනත් නාමයන්ගෙන් අප්‍රිකාවේද, තවත් නාමයන් රාශියකින් ලතින් ඇමරිකාවේද ව්‍යාප්තව පවතී. කුමන නාමයන් ගෙන් හැදින් වුවද මේ සියළුම ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධාන වල නිශ්පාදකයා එකම එක ආයතනයකි.තවද ඉතා පැහැදිලිවම මෙම ත්‍රස්තවාදී සියළුම ව්‍යාපාරයන් පවත්වා ගෙන යන්නේ, ඒවාට මුදල් ආධාර සපයන්නේද නඩත්තු කරන්නේද, ඒවා ආරක්ෂා කරන්නේද මේ ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය නම්වූ මහා රාජ්‍යයයි. එමනිසා  මේ දිනවල ජිනීවා නුවර සිදුවෙන සිදුවීම සම්බන්ධව කථා කරන විට අපට ස්විස්ටරලන්තය සම්බන්ධව කථා කිරීමෙන් බැහැර වී කිසිම දෙයක් සම්බන්ධව අවබෝධයක් ලබා ගත නොහැක. ඒ නිසා අප ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය නම්වූ ඒ ත්‍රස්තවාදීලන්තයේ සැබෑ තතු ස්වල්පයක් කථා කොට අපේ කථිකාවතට පිවිසෙමු.

අපේ කථාන්තරයේ ආරම්භය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයයි. මේ සංවිධානය ආරම්භ කරන ලද්දේ දෙවන ලෝක මහා යුද්ධයේ ප්‍රතිපලත් සමගය. මේ සංවිධානය පිහිටුවීමේදී ප්‍රකාශිත අරමුණ, ලෝකය පුරා සාමය පවත්වා ගෙන යාමයි. ලෝකය පුරා සාමය පවත්වා ගැනීමේ අරමුණින් පිහිටුවා ගත් මේ සංවිධානය ලෝකය ලෙස දුටුවේ කුමක්ද? මානවයින් ලෙස දුටුවේ කාවද? සාමය ලෙස දුටුවේ කවරක්ද? යන්න ඉතාම වැදගත්ය.

1936දී ජාතීන්ගේ මන්දිරය  වශයෙන් නම් ලද මහා මන්දිරය, 1946දී ජිනිවා නුවර පිහිටි එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මණ්ඩලයේ මූලස්ථානය බවට පත්විය. අද වන විටත් එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට අයත් දෙවෙනි විශාල මූලස්ථාන ගොඩනැගිල්ල වන්නේ ජීනිවා නුවර පිහිටි මේ ගොඩනැගිල්ලයි. ඉතා වැදගත් කරුණු වන්නේ,

1. මෙම මූලස්ථාන ගොඩනැගිල්ල ජීනිවා නුවර ස්ථාපිත කලද, ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය එවකට එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජිකයකුද නොවීමය.

2. සිය සාමාජිකයකු නොවන රටක මේසා විශාල මූලස්ථානයක් පිහිටවූයේ ඇයි?

3.එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය ඉතා වැදගත් සංවිධානයක් ලෙස ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය සැලකුවේ නම් මේ මූලස්ථාන එරටෙහි පිහිටුවා, අවුරුදු 46ක් පුරා මේ සංවිධානයටට නොබැදුනේ ඇයි?

4.අවසානයේදී වර්ෂ2002දී එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට බැදීමට තීරණය කලේ ඇයි?

මේ ප්‍රශ්න කන්දරාව ඇතුලේ විශාල කථාන්දරයක් ගලා යන අතර, මේ කථාන්දරයේ විවිධ අවස්ථාවන්වලදී, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය යනු ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තයේ පදයට නටන සංවිධානයක්ද යන කරුණද ඉස්මතුවේ. කුමන පදනමකින් වුවද එක්සත් ජාතීනගේ සංවිධානයේ උපතේ කලලය තුල ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තයේ ජාන ඇතිබව අපට කීමට සිදුව ඇත.

.මේ වනවිට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහි වූ මානව හිමිකම් කඩකිරීමේ චෝදනා පත්‍රය ඉදිරිපත් කර ඒ සම්බන්ධව සාකච්චා වෙමින් පවතී. මෙය එදා ඇමරිකාව ඉදිරිපත් කල යෝජනාවම ඉදිරියට ගෙන යාමකි. සැබෑ ලෙසම ඇමරිකාව අපේ සතුරාය. අපේ පමණක් නොවේ ඉන්දියාවේත් සතුරාය, පකිස්තානයේත් සතුරාය, ඉතාමත් කෙටියෙන් පවසතොත් මුළු ආසියාවේම සතුරා වන්නේ මේ ඇමරිකාව නම්වූ අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී මූලස්ථානයයි. එපමණක් නොවේ. අප්‍රිකාවට එරෙහිව කටයුතු කරන අතිභයානකම  සතුරා වන්නේද,ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයයි. ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදය අවට අසල්වාසි රජ්‍යෙ පද්ධතිය වන ලතින් ඇමෙරිකානු රාජ්‍යයන් පෙලෙහි අංක එකේ සතුරාද වන්නේය. ඇමරිකාව යුරෝපයේ හිත මිත්‍රයා පමණක් නොව ඤාතිවරයාද වන ඇමරිකාව ලෝකයේ සාමය අපේක්ෂා කරන එකම කලාපය වන්නේ උතුරු ඇමරිකා කලාපය හා යුරෝපා රජ්‍ය කලාපය තුල පමණි.

අපට එරෙහි චෝදනා පත්‍රය ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම ඇමරිකාවේ තනි අභිමතයට සිදුවූවක්ද නොවේ. එය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය, යුරෝපා සංගමය, ඇමෙරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදය යන ත්‍රිත්වය විසින් මනාව සකස් කර, පෙරමුණ ගෙන ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද චෝදනා පත්‍රයකි. එසේ  වූවද, මෙම චෝදනා පත්‍රයට හේතුව වන්නේ, ඇමරිකාවේ සැලසුමට අනුව ඉන්දියාව කැබලි කිරීමේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හමුදාව විසින් විනාශ කර දැමීමයි.

ඇයි ඇමරිකාවට ඉන්දියාව රාජ්‍යන් ගණනාවකට කැඩීමට අවශ්‍ය? ඊට හේතුව වන්නේ නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය බිහි කිරීමට ඉන්දියාව විශාල කාර්යභාරයක් ඉටුකළ රටක් බැවිනි. නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය බිහිකිරීමට දායක වූ සාම රටක්ම විනාශ කොට රටවල් ගණනාවක් නිර්මාණය කල බටහිර ජාතීන්ට එසේ කඩා විනාශ කල නොහැකි රාජ්‍ය වුයේ ඉන්දියාව පමණි. ඉන්දියාව බිදීමේ අරමුණින් නිර්මාණය කල කොටි සංවිධානය ශ්‍රී ලංකාව වැනි කුඩා රාජ්‍යක් විනාශ කර දැමීම මේ ලෝක බලවතුන් ඉවසා වදාරන්නේ කෙසේද? ඒ වෛරය පිරිමහ ගැනීමේ ක්‍රියාවලිය සිදුකරන්නේ මේ මානව හිමිකම් සුරැකීමේ සංවිධානය තුලිනි. මේ වරත් ඒ බටහිර සැලසුම් කල නාඩගමට මුහුණදීමට අපට සිදුව තිබේ.

  මිට කලෙකට පෙර එනම් වර්ෂ 1960- 1961 වකවානුවේදී, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය යනු  ජාත්‍යන්තර කුමන්ත්‍රණ ගුහාවක් බව මනාව අවබෝධ කරගත් බුද්ධිමත් රජ්‍ය නායක පෙලක් ලොවට උරුම විය. මේ නායකයින් එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය සෘජුවම ආසියාතිකයින් ඝාතනය කිරීම සදහා කොරියාවට හමුදාව යවා මිලියන ඝනනාවක් කොරියන් ජාතියකයින්ව ඝාතනය කල බව අවබෝධ කරගත්හ. එමෙන්ම නිදහස් කොන්ගෝවේ පලමු අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාව එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ හමුදා මැදිහත්ව ඝාතනය කල බව වටහා ගත්හ. එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය නිහඩව බලා සිටියදී, ඒ වන විට වියට්නාමය, ලාවොසය, කාම්බෝජයේ සිවිල් ජනතාව  ඇමෙරිනානු ඝාතන යාන්ත්‍රණය දෛනික සිය දහස් ගනනින් මරා දමන බවද මනාව දුටුවහ. සැබෑ සතුරාගෙන් බේරීම යනු එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයෙන් බේරීම බව මේ නායකත්වය වටහා ගත්හ. තවද ඒ සදහා නව ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධානයක අවශ්‍යතාවය හදුනා ගත්හ. එම රාජ්‍ය නායකයින් බිහිකල රාජ්‍යයන් නම්, ඉන්දියාව, යුගෝස්ලෝවියාව, ඊජිප්තුව,ඝානාව, හා ඉන්දුනීසියාව නම්වූ රාජ්‍යයන්ය. මේ ගෞරවණීය අභීත නායකයින් වූවේ, එවකට ඉන්දීය අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ජවහර්ලාල් නේරු, යුගෝස්ලාවියානු ජනාධිපති ජොසිප් බ්‍රෝෂ් ටිටෝ, ඊජිප්තු ජනාධිපති ගමෙල් අබ්දෙල් නසෙර්, ඉන්දුනීසියානු ජනාධිපති සුකර්නෝ හා ඝානා ජනාධිපති ක්වාමේ කෲමා යන මහත්වරුන් පෙලයි.

 ඔවුන් ගොඩනැංවූ මහා සංවිධානය, නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය  නම් විය. මෙය මහා බලවත් මෙන්ම ප්‍රතාපවත් සංවිධානයක් බවට ක්‍රම ක්‍රමයෙන් පත්වෙනමින් පැවතිණි..ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක් තුලදී නොබැදි ජාතික නායකත්වයේ බලය ඉස්මතුව නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයද මෙලොව ප්‍රබල සංවිධානයක ස්වරූපය උසුලන්නට විය. තම ප්‍රථම රැස්වීම යුගෝලාවියාවේ බෙල්ග්‍රෙඩ් නුවර පැවත්වූයේ එහි ආරම්භයේ ප්‍රබලත්වය ලොවට හඩගා කියමිණී.

 සැබෑ ලෙසම මේ සංවිධානය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට ප්‍රබල තර්ජනයක් බවට පත්වෙමින් තිබිණ. ඒ අතර මෙම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ නායකයකුව සිටි ඉන්දුනීසියානු ජනාධිපතිතුමාට චීනයේ සහභාගිත්වයෙන් නව ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධානයක් ගොඩනැංවීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවයක්ද තිබිණ. ඒ චීනයට එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ හිමි අසුන ඇමෙරිකාව ප්‍රමුඛ බටහිර ප්‍රජාව විසින් සිය නිශේධ බලය පාවිච්චි කරමින් අහිමිකර තිබීමයි. මේ සියළු තත්වයන් යටතේදීම, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලයට ගෙවැදීමට රජ්‍යයන් පොරකන වකවානුවකදී, එම ඉල්ලුමට විශාල පහරක් එල්ල කරමින් ඉන්දුනීසියාව එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලයෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්විය.

මෙම ක්‍රියාවලයත් සමගම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට එරෙහිව මහා විනාශකාරී ක්‍රියාවලියක් ආරම්භ කරන ලදී. ඒ අනුව යුගෝස්ලාවියාව කැබලිකරණය කිරීමත් ඉන්දියාව කුඩා රාජ්‍යයන් ගනනාවකට බෙදීම ඇතුලුව, සියළුම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය තුල සිටින ප්‍රබල රාජයයන් විනාශ කිරීමේ සැලැස්ම ආරම්භ කරන ලදී.  පලමුව, එය ඉන්දුනීසියාවෙන්ම ඇරඹීණ. මේ වනවිට මේ කාර්යය ආරම්භ කර වසර පනහක් ගතවී හමාරය. මෙම වසර 50 තුලදී ඉතාමත් පහත් ආකාරයට විනාශ කරනු ලැබූ රාජ්‍ය වූයේ යුගෝස්ලාවියාවයි.  නමුත් ඉන්දියාව කඩා බිද දැමීමේ කාර්යය සාර්ථකව ඉටුකර ගැනීමට මෙම ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධාන ජාලයට නොහැකිවිය. අද වන විට ඔවුනගේ එදා සැලසුමට අනුව ඉතිරිව ඇත්තේ ඉන්දියාව කැබලි ගනනාවකට කඩා වෙන් කිරීමේ කර්තව්‍යය පමණකි.

ඉන්දියාව කැබලි කරණය කිරීමේ එක් අවියක් වූයේ කොටි සංවිධානය වූ අතර, ඒ හරහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාව කැබලි තුනකට කැඩීම අරමුණ විය. ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජාතිය විවිධ බාධක මධ්‍යයේ සටන් කලේ අපේ රටේ බෙදුම් වාදයට එරෙහිව වුවද, ඒ සටන තුල අපි නොදැනුවතවම ඉන්දීය දේශය බෙදුම්වාදයෙන් රැක ගැනීමේ අරගලයද අන්තර්ගතව පැවතිණ. ඉන්දියාව කල යුතු මහා යුදමය කාර්යයක් අප විසින් ඉටුකරම්න් සිටින  විට අපට එරෙහිව ඉන්දියාව මෙහෙය වීමට බටහිර සතුරාට අවස්ථා කීපයකදීම හැකියාව ලැබිණ. මේ කරුණ වඩාත් විග්‍රහාත්මකව බලන විට ඉන්දියාව විසින් ඉන්දියාව කඩා බිද දැමීමේ ව්‍යාපාරය වෙනුවෙන් විශාල මෙහෙයක් ඉටු කර ඇත. වදමාරච්චි සටනේදී ඉන්දියාව ඉදිරිපත්ව බේරාගත් ප්‍රභාකරන් ලවාම ඉන්දියාවේ පතාක යෝධයක් ලෙස සිටි රජිව් ගාන්ධිව විනාශ කිරීම තුලින් ඉන්දියාව රාජ්‍යයක් වශයෙන්ද දුබල කිරීමේ ව්‍යාපාරය අසාර්ථක වුවද, ඉන්දියාව මේ වනවිටත් ඉන්දියාව කැබලිකරණය කිරීමේ බටහිර ව්‍යාපාරයට සෘජුවම දායකත්වය සපයයි. බටහිර බලවේගයන් මුළු කලාපයම තමන්ට ඕනෑ ආකාරයට පාලනය කර ගැනීමට වෙර දැරුවේ කොටි සංවිධානය පෙරට දමාය.

මේ වනවිට කොටි සංවිධානය මෙරට ජනාධිපති ධූරයට පත් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ නායකත්වයෙන් යුත් රජය විසින් මේ මාතෘ භූමියෙන් උදුරා දමා ඇත. වසර තිහක කාලයක් පුරා මුළු බටහිරම එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලය ඇතුළුව සකස් කල කොටි නාටකය නිමා කිරීම හරහා බටහිර බලවේගයන් මෙහෙය වන හාම්පුතුන්ට ඩොලර් බිලියන ගනනක් අහිමි වී ඇත. මේ හාම් පුතුන් ඉදිරියේදී මේ හාම් පුතුන් ගේ යටහත් පහත් සේවකයින් වන බන් කී මුන්ලා, එරික් සෝල්හයිම්ලා, රොබෙටෝ බ්ලේක්ලාට උරුමව  ඇත්තේ ප්‍රබලව ගලා එන කුණු හරුප වර්ෂාවකට මුහුණ දීමටය. මේ කුණු හරුප වර්ෂාවෙන් බේරීම සදහා ඔවුන් දියත් කල අළුත්ම අවිය වූයේ එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සලය හමුවේ අපට එරෙහිව මානව හිමකම් කඩකිරීම සම්බන්ධව යෝජනාවක් ගෙන ඒමයි.

මේ අවස්ථාවේදී මේ මානව හිමිකම් යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත්තේ, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජික රටකට එරෙහිව, සාමාජිකයකු නොවන ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙනි. විශේෂිතය වන්නේ, ඇමරිකාව මේ යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ තම රටේ තහනම් කර ඇති සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් වීමයි. ඇමරිකාවේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, යුරෝපයේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, ඉන්දියාවේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ නාමිකව සාමාජිකයකුද නොවන ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් සාමාජික රටකට එරෙහිව යොජනාවක් සම්මත කරගන්නා විට, මේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජිකයාට උරුම තත්වය කුමක්ද යන පැනය ඉදිරියට පනී. සාමාජිකයාටත් වඩා ප්‍රබල උරුමයක් ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයකට මේ සංවිධානය තුල උරුම වීමට නම් මේ ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානය නිශ්පාදනය කර ඇත්තේ එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය විසින්ම විය යුතුය, සත්‍යයද එයයි,

අපේ කථාන්තරයේ ප්‍රධානියා ඉන්දියාවයි. ඉන්දියාව යනු අවුරුදු දශ දහස් ගනනක් පුරා ඈත ඉතිහාසයක උරුමකම් කියන ශිෂ්ඨාචාරයේ අගතැන්පත් රාජ්‍යයකි. ඉන්දියාව ලෝකයට ශිල්ප සාස්ත්‍රය බෙදන්නෙක් මිස අනිකුත් ලෝක ප්‍රජාවගෙන් ශිල්පය ලබන්නෙක් නොවීය. ඉන්දියාව යනු ලෝකය පුරාම සාමය ප්‍රචලිත කරන රාජ්‍යයක් මිස ත්‍රස්තවාදය ප්‍රචලිත කරන මධ්‍යස්ථානයක්ද නොවීය. තම නිදහස් සටනේදී පවා අප තවමත් අනුමත නොකරන ආකාරයේ අවිහිංසාවාදී නිදහස් සටන් ව්‍යාපාරයක්ද ලොවට හදුන්වා දුන් මහා රාජ්‍යයකි. මෙවන් වූ පරිපූර්ණත්වයෙකින් අනූන වූ ඉන්දීය දේශය නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ, ආරම්බක යෝධයන්ගෙන් ඉතිරිව සිටි එකම පතාක යෝධයායි. සාක් කලාපීයය රාජ්‍ය පදධතියේ සිටින පතාකම යෝධයාද වූයේ ඉන්දියාවයි. ඉන්දීයාව මැදිකරගත් සාක් කලාපීය රාජ්‍යයන්ට ඉන්දීය සුව සෙවනක අවශ්‍යතාවය හා මනා ආරක්ෂාවක් අපද අපේක්ෂා කලෙමු. මේ සියළු කථාන්තරයන්ගෙන් අප පවසන්නේ ඉන්දියාව මත ඇති වගකීම් සමුදාය සම්බන්ධවයි.

 අප රාජ්‍යයට  අහසින් විත් බෝම්බ හෙලූ එකම රාජ්‍ය ජපානය විය. නමුත් අප ජපානය මතට පරමානු හෙලන විට ඊට එරෙහිව ප්‍රබලව නැගී සිටිය ජාතියක් වෙමු. ලෝකයේ විශාලම ජන ගහණයක් සිටින ආසියාවට කුමණ රාජ්‍යයක් කුමන ආකාරයේ තර්ජනය කලද අප එය අනුමත නොකල ජාතියක් වෙමු. ඉන්දියාව හා චීනය මහා යුධ ගැටුමක යෙදෙන විට මේ ගැටෙන්නේ ලෝකයේම විශාල ජනගහණයන් සිටින රාජ්‍ය දෙකයි. මෙයින් විනාශවන්නේ ආසියාවයි මෙය වහාම නතර කල යුතුයි යන මතය අප දැරුවෙමු. අප ඉදිරියට පැන්නේ ලෝක සාම භූමිකාව රගන එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය ගින්නට පිදුරු දමමින් බලා සිටින අවස්ථා වකදීය. අප ඒ යුද්ධය නවතාලීමට මහා දායකත්වයක් දුන්නෙමු. ඒ අප රටේ කාන්තා රාජ්‍ය නායකත්වයක් තිබියදී. සැබෑ මිත්‍රත්වය ඇත්තේ එතනයි. ඉන්දියාව හෝ චීනය ගරා වටුනොත් අපට උරුම වන්නේත් ගරාවැටුන ආසියාවක් බැවින් අප හැම විටම ආසියාතිකයින් වශයෙන්ම කටයුතු කලෙමු. එපමනක්ද නොවේ අප රුසියාව පරමානු බෝම්බය නිපදවනවිට සතුටු වූවෙමු. චීනය පරමාණු බෝම්බය නිපදවනවිටද ඒ සතුටම ලද්දෙමු ඉන්දියාව හා පකිස්තානය පරමාණූ බෝම්බය නිපවන විටද සතුටු වූවෙමු. උතුරු කොරියාව එම පරමාණුවම නිපදවන විට වඩාත් සතුටු වන්නෝද වෙමු. ඒ මේ බෝම්බ වලින් ආරක්ෂා කරන්නේ ආසියාව බව යන විශ්වාසයෙනි. ඒ ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයින්ගේ ස්වරෑපයයි.

ඉන්දියාව කාලාන්තරයක් මුළුල්ලේ කොටි සංවිධානය පෝෂණය කලේය.තමන් මේ පෝෂණය කරන්නේ තමන්ව විනාශ කිරීම අරබයා ගොඩනංවන ලද සංවිධානයක් බව ඉන්දියාව නොදැන සිටියාද?  එසේ නැත්නම් ලංකාවේ හිටපු රාජ්‍ය නායක නායිකාවන් මෙන්ම සැබෑ තත්වය දැන දැනම මුදල් උදෙසා කොටි සංවිධානය පෝෂණය කලාද? මෙය ඉන්දීය ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ ඇති ප්‍රබල ප්‍රශ්නයකි. තමන් පෝෂණය කර යුධ පුහුණුව ලබාදුන් කොටි සංවිධානය ඉන්දීය අගමැති රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව මරා දැමුවේ ඇයි? මේ පැනයට පිලිතුරු කුමක්දැයි ඉන්දියාව දන්නේම නැද්ද? සැබෑ ලෙසම දනී. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාව මරා දැමීම, ඒ බෝම්බ බඩ බැදගෙන පැමිණි කාන්තාව මත පමණක් ලඝු කොට ආ ඒ එක්කම එයාත් ඉවරයි කියා ප්‍රශ්නය නිමාකල නොහැක. තවද එටට අනුබල දුන් අනිකුත් පුද්ගලයින්ට ලොකු දඩුවමක් දී ආ අපි සාධාරණය ඉටුකලායයි සිතන්නට ඉන්දීය ජන මනස සකස් කරනවා නම් එයත් විශාල වරදකි. ඒ සමගම එම සංවිධානය ඉන්දියාව තුල තහනම් කර, සතුටුවෙන මනසක් ගොඩනංවනවා නම් එයත් වරදකි. ඉහත දක්වන ලද කිසිම පිලිතුරක් රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාගේ මරණයට සාධාරණයක් ඉටුකලේ නැත. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාගේ මරණයට සැබෑ සාධාරණය ඉටුකලේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය කොටි සංවිධානය සතු බලතල බිදලා, රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව ඝාතනය කිරීමට අණ දුන් ප්‍රභාකරන්ව ඝාතනය කිරීම හරහාය. එයට තවත් සාධාරණයක් එකතු කිරීමට නම් රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව ඝාතනය කිරීමට ප්‍රභාකරන්ට කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව දුන් පුද්ගලයින්ව, රාජ්‍යයන්ව හා සංවිධානයන්ව විනාශ කිරීම ඉන්දියාව විසින් කල යුතු වුවද,ඉන්දියාව විසින් සිදු කරන ලද්දේ මේ කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව දුන් පුද්ගලයින්ථ, රාජ්‍යයන් හා සංවිධාන සමග එකතුව, ප්‍රභාකරන්ව විනාශ කල ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව නැගී සිටිමයි. වරද කොතනද ඇත්තේ? වරද ඇති තැන අපි මනාව දනිමු. නමුත් එය ප්‍රකාශ කිරීම අපට අයත් කාර්යයක් නොවේ. කොටි  සංවිධානය පොඩිපට්ටම් කිරීම හා ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනය කිරීම, මානව හිමිකම් කඩ කිරීමක් නම්, ඉන්දියාව එම සංවිධානය  තහනම් කිරීමද, මානව හිමි කම් බිද දැමීමක් බව ඉන්දියාව පිලිගත යුතුය. තහනම් සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් කථා කිරීමත් තහනම් ක්‍රියාවකි. ඉන්දියානු රාජය නායකත්වය මේ කාර්යයන් දෙකම කර ඇත. කොටි සංවිධානය ඉන්දියාව විසින් තහනම් කලේ ඇයි. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාව බල්ලෙක් සේ මහ මග මරා දැමු බැවිණී. තම රාජ්‍ය නායකයාව ඝාතනය කල ඝාතකයාලේ හා ඝාතකයාගේ සංවිධානයේ මානව හිමිකම් සම්බන්ධව කථා කල ඉතිහාසයේ එකම රාජ්‍යය ඉන්දියාව පමණක්ම වි හැකිය. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා එදා බටහිර අධිරාජ්‍යවාදීන් සමග අත්වැල් බැදගෙන ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ ජීවිතය බේරා ගැනීම සදහා මේ භූමියට පැමිණී වේලේ රයිෆල් මිටි පහරකින් පහරදී පලවා හැරිය ජාතියක්ම, ඒ මහතාව මරාදැමූ ඝෘතකයාව නැවත සොයා මරා දැමීම ඉන්දියාව අගේ කල යුතුව ඇත. සිය ස්වාමි පුරුෂයාගේ සැබෑ ඝාතකයාව විනාශ කිරීම සම්බන්ධ සතුටු වන බිරියක මිස, ඒ ඝාතකයාගේ මානව හිමිකම් වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටින කාන්තාවක් ඉන්දියාවට අවශ්‍ය නොවේ, අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ බටහිරටය නැත් නම් ඉතාලියටය.

ප්‍රභාකරන් නම් වූ ඝාතකයා මරා දැමූවේ ඉන්දියාවේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා පමණක් නම් නොවේ. එදා රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා ප්‍රභාකරන්ව ගලවා ගැනීම සදහා මෙරට ආක්‍රමණය කිරීම සදහා යෙදවූ ඉන්දීය සොල්දාදුවන්ගේ 2000 කට ආසන්න පිරිසකගේ මරණයන්ට වරද කරුවන්නේද කොටි නායකයා යයි හදුන්වන ප්‍රභාකරන් බවද ඉන්දියාව අමතක නොකල යුතුව තිබිණ.

පසුගිය වර මෙන් නොව මේ ලබා ඇත්තේද ඉන්දියාවට ඉතා වැදගත් යුගයකි..ඉන්දියාව ඒ ගාම්භීර ගොඩනැගිල්ලට ඇතුළු වන විට ඉන්දීය නියෝජිතයාට ඇති වගකීම සම්භාරය වන්නේ,

1. තමන් මේ ගොඩනැගිල්ලට ඇතුළු වන්නේ නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ, ආරම්භක පතාක යෝධයන් ගෙන් ඉතිරිව සිටින පතාකම යෝධයා වශයෙන් ඇති වගකීම් සමුදායත් සමගය.

2.තමන් මේ ස්ථානයේ වැජබෙන්නේ, සාක් සංවිධානයේ සිටින පතාකම යෝධයා වශයෙණී.

3. ආසියානු මහද්වීපයේ සිටින බලවත්ම රාජ්‍යයක් වශයෙනි.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව, ඉන්දියාව පසුගිය වතාවලදී මෙන්ම මෙවරද ක්‍රියාකරන බව අපේ විශ්වාසයයි.නිවටයින් රාජ්‍ය නායකත්වය දරන සාම රටක්ම නපුංසක රංගනයන්හි යෙදෙන ආකාරය අප දැක ඇත. මෙවරත් ඉන්දියාව මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සලයේදී ආසියාවේ නපුන්සකයා ලෙස කටයුතු කරනු ඇත. එය අප ලබන ගෞරවයක් මිස පරාජයක් නොවේ.




අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ 85වැනි පාලක මණ්ඩලය රැස්වෙයි

February 25th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ 85වැනි පාලක මණ්ඩල රැස්වීම ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් අද 2021.02.25 දින පස්වරුවේ අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ දී පැවැත්විණි.

බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ ලේකම් රුචිර විතාන මහතා පසුගිය රැස්වීම් වාර්තාව ඉදිරිපත් කළේය. ඒ සඳහා පාලක මණ්ඩල අනුමැතිය ලැබිණි.

බුද්ධශාසන අරමුදලේ සාමාජික සද්ධර්ම කීර්ති ශ්‍රී ත්‍රිපිටකාචාර්ය ආචාර්ය පූජ්‍ය දිවියාගහ යසස්සි නාහිමියෝ ඉදිරියේ දී දිස්ත්‍රික් මට්ටමෙන් සාමණේර ආයතන පිහිටුවීම ගැන පැහැදිළි කළහ.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට විපක්ෂ නායක සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස,ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මහාභාරකාර තැන නීතිඥ ගනේශ් ධර්මවර්ධන, බුද්ධශාසන ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් දේශබන්ධු මහාචාර්ය කපිල ගුණවර්ධන, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය අතිරේක ලේකම් චමින්ද කුලරත්න, මහාභාණ්ඩාගාර නියෝජිත ආර්. වී. එල්. උදයකුමාර, බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ ලේකම් රුචිර විතාන මහත්වරු ඇතුළු බුද්ධශාසන අරමුදලේ සාමාජික සාමාජිකාවන් පිරිසක් එක්වූහ.

නැනො මාස්ක් නව නිපැයුම අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාට පිළිගන්වයි

February 25th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

පේරාදෙණිය විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ මහාචාර්ය ගාමිණී රාජපක්ෂ, විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය චමින්ද හේරත් මහත්වරු ඇතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් නිර්මාණය කළ නැනො තාක්ෂණික වයිරස් නාශක මුව ආවරණය ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ඉදිරියේ එළිදැක්වීම අද 2021.02.25 දින පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කමිටු ශාලා 01හි දී පැවැත්විණි.

මෙම නැනො වයිරස් නාශක තාක්ෂණික මුව ආවරණය ඒ මත වැටෙන ඕනෑම විෂබීජයක් විනාශවන ආකාරයට නිර්මාණය කර තිබීම විශේෂත්වයකි. ලොව ප්‍රථම වයිරස් නාෂක සහ නැනො අංශු පෙරණ මුව ආවරණය මෙය වේ.

නොබෝදිනකින් මෙම විශේෂිත මුව ආවරණය දේශීය හා විදේශීය වෙළඳ පොලට නිකුත් කිරීමට පර්යේෂක කණ්ඩායම සැළසුම් කර තිබේ.

ඊට අවශ්‍ය රාජ්‍ය මැදිහත්වීම ඉටු කිරීමට සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍යතුමියට දැනුම් දෙන බව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මෙහිදී සඳහන් කළේය.

මෙම නව නිපැයුම සඳහා රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිනි සීතා අරඹේපොළ මහත්මියගේ සහය ලැබී තිබේ.

අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන, ගාමිණි ලොකුගේ, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන රොෂාන් රණසිංහ, සුදර්ශනී ප්‍රනාන්දුපුල්ලේ, සුසිල් ප්‍රේමජයන්ත, ලසන්ත අලගියවන්න, ඩී.වී චානක මහත්වරු සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ගයන්ත කරුණාතිලක මහතා ඇතුළු මහජන නියෝජිතයින් පිරිසක් මෙම අවස්ථාවට එක්ව සිටියහ.

III වන ශ්‍රේණියේ තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරී තනතුරට පත් කර ගැනීමට අදාළ සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට කරමින් ඇති යෝජනාව සම්බන්ධවයි.

February 25th, 2021

ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය.

ගරු ඇමතිතුමා,
ජනමාධ්‍ය අමාත්‍යංශය,
කොළඹ 05.

III වන ශ්‍රේණියේ තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරී තනතුරට පත් කර ගැනීමට අදාළ සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට කරමින් ඇති යෝජනාව සම්බන්ධවයි.

2021.02.17 වන දින නියෝජ්‍ය පොස්ට් මාස්ටර් ජනරාල් පාලන තුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් පවත්වන ලද තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරි බඳවා ගැනීමේ පටිපාටියේ සංශෝදන සම්බන්ධව වෘත්තීය සමිති සමඟ කරන ලද සාකච්චාවේදී තැපැල් විෂය භාර ගරු ඇමතිතුමා විසින් III වන පෙලට නිලධාරි බඳවා ගැනීමේදී පවත්වන සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති බව තැපැල් පරිපාලනය දැනුම් දෙන ලදි. එහිදී එම යෝජනාවට ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය ලෙස අපද අනෙකුත් වෘත්තීය සමිති ද ඒ සඳහා අකමැත්ත හා විරෝධය පල කර සිටින ලදි.

විවෘත තරඟ විභාගයෙන් වැඩිම ලකුණු ලබා ගන්නා අපේක්ෂකයින් මෙම සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයට කැදවන ලද අතර, එම අයට නැවත ලකුණු ලබා දීම යනු මෙම තරඟ විභාගයට තිබෙන අගය වටිනාකම පහතට ඇද දැමිමක් සේම තරඟ විභාගයෙන් වැඩි ලකුණු ලබා ගන්නා සුදුස්සන් හට බලවත් අසාධාරණයක් වනු ඇත. කසිදු බලපෑමකින් තොරව ස්වාධීනව තැපැල් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව හරහා රාජ්‍ය සේවයට එක් වීමට ඇති අවස්ථාවද අහිමි වනු ඇත. මෙහි තිබෙන ස්වාධීන බව නැති කරමින් දේශපාලන අතපෙවීමකට ඉඩ විවර කර ගැනීමක් මින් සිදුවේ. ඒ අනුව මෙම යෝජනාවට අපගේ දැඩි විරෝධය පල කර සිටින අතර, මෙම විවෘත තරඟ විභාගය තවදුරටත් ප්‍රමාද නොකර තැපැල් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ පවතින නිලධාරි පුරප්පාඩු පියවා ගැනීමට විභාගය පැවැත්වීමට අදාළ කටයුතු සඳහා අවශ්‍ය ඉඩ ලබා දෙන මෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නෙමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
ජගත් මහින්ද
සභාපති  
ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress