Testifying before PCoI: Ranil slams Mattala Airport

October 23rd, 2019

By Mirudhula Thambiah Courtesy Ceylon Today

Rejecting allegations that the Government had damaged the reputation of the Mattala Rajapaksa International Airport by storing paddy in some of its storage buildings in 2015, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe said  the Mattala Airport was a white elephant.

He was testifying before the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) to investigate into alleged corruption of the current administration yesterday (23).
The Premier said, “What reputation? It has no prestige. It is known as  the world’s emptiest Airport. The unnecessary construction of the Airport is a massive misuse of public funds.”


Premier Wickremesinghe went on to say that inquiries by the Auditor General’s Department and the Committee on Public Enterprises had proved that the decision to build an Airport in Mattala was a disaster. “A PCoI on the SriLankan Airlines also made similar observations in its report,” he said.


He noted that moreover in 2014, the then Government under President Mahinda Rajapaksa had forced the SriLankan Airlines and other airlines to use the Mattala Airport.


“Thus, there were over 2,900 flights to the Airport in that year but once the Government stopped forcing airlines, they stopped using the Airport altogether. SriLankan Airlines incurred a loss of Rs 740 million during the use of the Mattala Airport. We are not preventing people from using the Airport. In fact, we have been trying to encourage people to use it,” he said. He added that the Mattala Airport was built at a cost of USD 209 million and that the Government pays around Rs 2.95 billion per year as loan payments. “This is a big loss and if this was not carried out, the Bandaranaike International Airport in Katunayake could have been well developed.”


Denying any personal involvement in the storing of paddy, he said that a committee comprising of Ministry Secretaries in 2015 was appointed to deal with a high paddy yield from the Yala season.


“These committees are appointed at times when such incidents occur because even in the past, Sri Lankan Governments have tried to protect the farmers by preventing a drop in prices,” he added.


Meanwhile, State Counsel representing the Attorney General’s Department questioned Premier Wickremesinghe whether he was aware that two of his senior Advisors, Charitha Ratwatte and R. Paskaralingam, had participated in some of the meetings of the said committee.


Wickremesinghe replied: “I’m unaware. The committee might have asked them to come in and help. They don’t need my authorisation to take part in Government meetings.”


At an earlier occasion, former Chairman of the SriLankan Airlines, Ajith Dias told the PCoI that Ratwatte had called him and requested permission to store paddy at the Mattala Airport. However, Premier Wickremesinghe noted that he was not aware of this, adding that Ratwatte probably was acting on behalf of the said committee.


“I went through the reports and there were damages of Rs 600,000 to the equipment, and Rs 500,000 was spent on cleaning and another Rs 20,000 was spent on an air compressor.


It had cost Rs 60,000 to transport this compressor. The Paddy Marketing Board (PMB) had informed officials at the Mattala Airport to remove any valuable items from the storage units.  If they now claim that there was valuable equipment, they should have told the PMB that they won’t allow the storage of paddy,” he said.


 Wickremesinghe also said: “This shows the way they do things there. A whole bunch of people responsible for the construction of this vanity project and running the Mattala Airport down, are now trying to blame us.


Please get these people back so that my lawyers too can cross examine them.”
Accordingly, over 4,000 metric tons of rice was stored at the Mattala Airport in 2015 by the PMB.


Recently, former Head of the PMB, Bandara Dissanayake stressed that Premier Wickremesinghe personally instructed him to store paddy at the Mattala Airport.

සජිත්ගේ රැළියකදී චම්පිකට විරෝධය පෑ තරුණයෙකුට ප්‍රහාරයක්

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

නව ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂක අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස සහභාගිවූ ජන රැළියකදී අමාත්‍ය පාඨලී චම්පික රණවක, එම රැළිය අමතන අවස්ථාවේ එහි සිටි තරුණයෙකු නැගී සිට යම් ප්‍රකාශයක් කිරීමත් සමඟ පාක්ෂිකයින් ඔහුට පහරදී තිබෙනවා.

මෙය සිදුව ඇත්තේ ඊයේ මාළඹේ නගරයේදි පැවති ජන හමුවකදියි. එහිදී තරුණයෙකු නැගී සිට යම් කිසි ප්‍රකාශයක් සිදුකිරීමත් සමඟ එහි සිටි පාක්ෂිකයින් ඔහුට පහරදී ඇති අතර, එහිදී උණුසුම් තත්ත්වයක් ද හටගත් බවයි හිරු වාර්තාකරු කියා සිටියේ.

තවත් ආබාධිත සෙබලෙකුට ප්‍රහාරයක්

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

යතුරුපැදිවලින් පැමිණි පුද්ගලයින් දෙදෙනෙකු කළ පහරදීමකින් පො‍ළොන්නරුව – ගිරිතලේ ප්‍රදේශයේ ආබාධිත රණවිරුවෙකු තුවාල ලබා රෝහල් ගතකර තිබෙනවා.

ආබාධිත හා විශ්‍රාමික රණවිරු සංවිධානය අද ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවමින් සඳහන් කළේ රණවිරුවන්ට දිගින් දිගටම සිදුකරන මෙම පහරදීම් රාජ්‍ය දැනුවත් වීමෙන් සිදුකරන ඒවා බවයි.

පොළොන්නරුව ගිරිතලේ නිල් මානෙල් මල්විල ප්‍රදේශයේදී මෙම පහරදීම සිදුකර ඇත්තේ ඊයේ පස්වරු 6.30ට පමණයි.

යතුරුපැදි දෙකකින් පැමිණි පුද්ගලයන් දෙදෙනෙකු මාර්ගය හරස්කර මෙම ආබාධිත රණවිරුවාට පහරදී පලාගොස් තිබෙනවා.

පහරකෑමෙන් තුවාල ලැබූ දෙදරු පියෙක් වන එම්ගජීගඒග ජයවර්ධන මහතා 42 හැවිරිදි වියේ පසුවන ආබාධිත රණවිරුවෙක්.

පසුව ප්‍රදේශවාසීන් තුවාලකරු දියබෙදුම රෝහලට ඇතුලත් කර ඇති අතර, පසුව පොළොන්නරුව මහ රෝහල වෙත වැඩිදුර ප්‍රතිකාර සඳහා යොමුකර තිබෙනවා.

මෙම පහරදීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ශ්‍රී ලංකා ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදා, පොලිස් දිවිපිදු ආබාධිත හා විශ්‍රාමික රණවිරුවෝ සංවිධානය අද පෙරවරුවේ මාතරදී ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවා තිබුණා.

මේ අතර, හිටපු හමුදා සෙබළුන්ගේ බිරින්දෑවරුන්ගේ සහ රණවිරු සෙබළියන්ගේ සංවිධානය අද කොළඹදී ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවා තිබුණා.

ඇමති හකීම්ට නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ යුතු බවට පාර්ශව රැසක් කියයි

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාස්කු ඉරිදා ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරයට ශ්‍රී ලංකා මුස්ලිම් කොංග්‍රසයේ නායක අමාත්‍ය රවුෆ් හකීම් මහතා සෘජුවම වගකිව යුතු හෙයින් ඔහුට එරෙහිව නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කළ යුතු බවට විවිධ පාර්ශ්ව චෝදනා එල්ල කරනවා.

16ට පෙර විසඳුමක් දෙන්න – ETI තැන්පත්කරුවන් ඉල්ලයි

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ඊ.ටී.අයි. තැන්පත්කරුවන්ගේ ගැටලුව සම්බන්ධයෙන් එළැඹෙන 16 වැනිදාට පෙර විසඳුමක් ලබා නොදුනහොත් ජනාධිපති අපේකෂක ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට ඡන්දය ලබා දෙන බව ඊ.ටී.අයි. තැන්පත්කරුවන් සුරැකීමේ ස්වාධීන සංවිධානය පවසනවා.

එහි සාමාජිකයින් මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදහස් පළ කළේ කොළඹ පැවති ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවකදී

යළි රට සංවර්ධනය කළ හැක්කේ තම රජයකට පමණයි – ගෝඨාභය

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

රට තුළ යළි ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු කර සංවර්ධන කටයුතු සිදුකළ හැක්කේ තම රජයක් යටතේ පමණක් බව ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂක ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ පවසනවා.

ගම්පොල ප්‍රදේශයේ අද පැවති ජන හමුවකට එක්වෙමිනුයි ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේ.

එම ජන හමුවට එක්වෙමින් අදහස් දැක්වූ ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණේ නායක පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී විමල් වීරවංශ ඇතුලු පිරිසක් විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ද එක්ව සිටියා.

මත්තල වී ගබඩා කිරීම ගැන දූෂණ වංචා සොයන ජනපති කොමිසම අගමැතිගෙන් ප්‍රශ්ණ කරයි

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව සමයේ රාජ්‍ය ආයතන වල සිදුවු දුෂන සහ වංචා සෙවීමට පත්කළ ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභාව හමුවේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අද දෙවන දිනටත් පෙනී සිටියා.

ඒ මත්තල ජාත්‍යන්තර ගුවන්තොටුපළේ වී ගබඩා කිරීමෙන් රජයට පාඩු සිදුවු බවට වූ පැමිණිල්ලකට අදාළව ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභාව හමුවේ සාක්ෂි ලබාදිම සදහායි.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අද පෙගව 10.30ට පමණ ජනාධිපති කොමිසම වෙත පැමිණියා.

එහිදී මත්තල, ජාත්‍යන්තර ගුවන්තොටුපලේ වී ගබඩා කිරීමේ සිද්ධිය තුළින් රජයට පාඩු සිදුවුයේ යැයි සැලකෙන පැමිණිල්ලට අදාළව නියෝජ්‍ය සොලිසිටර් ජනරාල් යුරේෂා ද සිල්වා මහත්මිය සහ ජනාධිපති කොමිසමේ සමාජිකයින් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගෙන් ප්‍රශ්න කර තිබෙනවා.

මෙහිදි අග්‍රාමාතයවරයා ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශ කර ඇත්තේ මත්තල ජත්‍යාන්තර ගුවන් තොටුපලේ වී ගබඩා කිරිමට අදාළ තීරණය ගනු ලැබුවේ ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් පත්කළ කැබිනට් අනුකමිටුවක් විසින් බවයි.

එබැවින් එම තීරණය සම්බන්දයෙන් තමන්ගේ කිසිදු සම්බන්ධයක් නොමැති බවද අග්‍රාමාතයවරයා ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ සඳහන් කර තිබෙනවා.

හදිස්සි අවස්ථාවකදි භාණ්ඩ ගබඩා කිරීම සඳහා ගුවන්තොටුපලවල්හි පහසුකම් සලසා ඇති බව සඳහන් කළ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා කොමිසම හමුවේ පෙන්වා දුන්නේ සුනාමි අවස්ථාවේදි කටුනායක ගුවන් තොටුපලේද භාණ්ඩ ගබඩා කර තිබු බවයි.

එසේම මෙම වී ගබඩා කිරීමේ කටයුතු සිදුකර ඇත්තේ ගුවන්තොටුපළ අධිකාරිය සහ වී අලෙවි මණ්ඩලය යන රාජ්‍ය ආයතන දෙකෙහිම මැදිහත්වීමෙන් බව පෙන්වා දුන් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා වැඩිදුරටත් සදහන් කළේ වී ගබඩා කිරීම තුළින් යම් පාඩුවක් සිදුවී ඇත්නම් එය ගුවන්තොටුපළ අධිකාරියට වී අලෙවි මණ්ඩලයෙන් අයකරගත හැකි බවයි.

පැයකට අධික කාලයක් ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබාදිමෙන් පසු අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා මධ්‍යන 12ට පමණ ජනාධිපති කොමිසමෙන් පිටව ගියා.

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ පෙනීසිටි දෙවන අවස්ථාව මෙය වන අතර කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍යංශය බත්තරමුල්ල ඩීගපී ජයසිංහ ගොඩනැගිල්ලට රැගෙන ගොස් මාසිකව රුපියල් මිලියන 24.6ක කුලියක් ගෙවීම තුළ රජයට පාඩුවක් සිදුවුයේ යැයි ගොනුකර තිබු පැමිණිල්ලක අදාළවද අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ඉකුත් සැප්තැම්බර් මස 16 වන දින ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ සක්ෂි ලබාදුන්නා.

මන්ත්‍රී ඩලස්ගෙන් හිටපු ජනපතිනි චන්ද්‍රිකාට චෝදනාවක්

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

හිටපු ජනාධිපතිනි චන්ද්‍රිකා බණ්ඩාරනායක කුමාරණතුංග ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂය සහ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂය එක් කිරීමේ උත්සහයක නිරතවන බව පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ඩලස් අලහප්පෙරුම පවසනවා. 

ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේ කොළඹ අද පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකට එක්වෙමින්.

එම මාධ්‍ය හමුවට ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ මාධ්‍ය ප්‍රකාශක පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී වීරකුමාර දිසානායක ද එක්ව සිටියා.

මේ අතර නව ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති ධුර අපේක්ෂක සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතාගේ මැතිවරණ ව්‍යාපාරය සම්පූර්ණ අසත්‍ය ප්‍රචාරවලින් සමන්විත වන බවට ද පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ඩලස් අලහප්පෙරුම මහතා චෝදනා කළා.

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරය ගැන – සාක්ෂි ඇත්නම් අධිචෝදනා ගොනු කරන්නැයි තේරීම් කාරක සභා අවසන් වාර්තාවෙන් නිර්දේශ

October 23rd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාස්කු ඉරිදා එල්ල වූ ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරයේදී ඇතැම් පුද්ගලයින් ප්‍රහාරය වැළැක්වීම සඳහා වන, සිය වගකීම් ඉටු කිරීමට අසමත් වී ඇති බව පාස්කු ඉරිදා එල්ල වූ ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සොයාබැලීමට පත් කළ පාර්ලිමේන්තු විශේෂ කාරක සභාවේ අවසන් වාර්තාව මගින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත්කර තිබෙනවා.

ඒ අනුව වරදක් සිදුකිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ප්‍රමාණවත් සාක්ෂි රැස්කර ගැනීමට හැකිවන අවස්ථාවලදී අධිචෝදනා ගොනුකිරීම සහ නඩු පැවරීම සිදුකළ යුතු බවටයි විශේෂ කාරක සභා වාර්තාව මගින් නිර්දේශ කර ඇත්තේ.

අප්‍රේල් 21 වැනිදා එල්ල වූ ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සොයාබැලීමට පත්කරන ලද පාර්ලිමේන්තු විශේෂ කාරක සභාවේ අවසන් වාර්තාව අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබුවේ කමිටු සාමාජික පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ආචාර්ය ජයම්පති වික්‍රමරත්නයි.

කෙසේ වෙතත් තේරීම් කාරක සභාවේ අවසන් වාර්තාව ඉදිරිපත් කිරිමට ප්‍රථම ඊට විපක්ෂයෙන් විරෝධතා එල්ල වුණා.

ඔවුන් කියා සිටියේ ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරයට සම්බන්ධ සහරාන් හෂීම් සමග අමාත්‍ය රවුෆ් හකීම් සාකච්ජා පවත්වා ඇති බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වී ඇති බැවින් ඔහු සමාජිකත්වය දරන විශේෂ කාරක සභාවේ වාර්තාව පිළිගත නොහැකි බවයි.

පාස්කු ඉරු දින පල්ලි 03 ක සහ හෝටල් 03 ක සිදුවූ මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරවලින් පුද්ගලයින් 277 දෙනෙකු මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බකරුවන්ද ඇතුළුව ජීවිතක්ෂයට පත්ව ඇති අතර, 400 කට වැඩි පිරිසක් තුවාල ලබා ඇති බව විශේෂ කාරක සභාව පවසනවා.

මරණයට පත්වූවන් අතර අවම වශයෙන් විදේශිකයින් 40 ක් සහ ළමයින් 45 ක් සිටි බව වාර්තා වූ බවයි කාරක සභා වාර්තාවේ දැක්වෙන්නේ.

පාර්ලිමේන්තු විශේෂ කාරක සභාව 24 වතාවක් රැස්වී පුද්ගලයින් 55 දෙනෙකුගෙන් සාක්ෂි සටහන් කරගෙන තිබෙනවා.

පිටු 242 කින් සමන්විත විශේෂ කාරක සභා වාර්තාවෙන් දක්වා ඇත්තේ බුද්ධි අංශ යාන්ත්‍රණය තුළ රාජ්‍ය බුද්ධි අංශයේ අධ්‍යක්ෂවරයාගේ අති විශේෂ භූමිකාව සලකා බැලීමේදී ඔහුට බරපතල වගකීමක් පැවරී ඇති බව අවධානයට ලක්වූ බවයි.

අප්‍රේල් මස 04 වැනිදා ප්‍රහාරය පිළිබඳව බුද්ධි තොරතුරු පළමුව ලැබුණු පුද්ගලයා වූ රාජ්‍ය බුද්ධි අංශයේ අධ්‍යක්ෂවරයා ඇතිවිය හැකි තර්ජන අවම කිරීමට සහ වැළැක්වීමටත් සියළු පියවර ගත යුතුව තිබූ බව වාර්තාව මගින් සඳහන් කර ඇති අතර, එම සියළු අංශවලින් ඔහු අසාර්ථක වී ඇති බව එහි දක්වා තිබෙනවා.

එසේම ජාතික ආරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ රැස්වීම් පිලිවෙලකට පැවැත්වීම ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයා විසින් වගබලා ගත යුතු බව සඳහන් කරන, විශේෂ කාරක සභාව රැස්වීම් කැඳවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරයා මත රැඳී නොසිටිය යුතු බව පවසනවා.

මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරුන් වන කපිල වෛද්‍යරත්න සහ හේමසිරි ප්‍රනාන්දු යන දෙපලම වරදක් සිදුකර ඇති බව පාර්ලිමේන්තු විශේෂ කාරක සභාව ප්‍රකාශ කර තිබෙනවා.

පාස්කු ඉරිදා ප්‍රහාරය පිළිබඳව ලද බුද්ධි තොරතුරු දේශපාලන නායකත්වය සහ ආරක්ෂක හමුදා දැනුවත් කිරීමට හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් හේමසිරි ප්‍රනාන්දු අවශ්‍ය පියවර නොගැනීම බරපතල අඩුපාඩුවක් බවයි එහි දැක්වෙන්නේ.

පොලිස්පතිවරයා විසින් සිදුකර ඇති අඩුපාඩු කිහිපයක්ම පාස්කු ඉරුදින ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සොයා බැලීමට පත්කළ විශේෂ කාරක සභාවේ වාර්තාව මගින් සඳහන් කර තිබීම විශේෂත්වයක්.

ඒ අනුව කාත්තන්කුඩි ප්‍රදේශයේ සිදුවූ පිපිරීම සහ ලැබුණු බුද්ධි තොරතුරු තිබියදීත් නැගෙනහිර පළාත භාර නියෝජ්‍ය පොලිස්පතිවරයා දැනුවත් කිරීමට අපොහොසත් වීම, දේශපාලන නායකත්වය දැනුවත් නොකිරීම සහ ලැබුණු තොරතුරු සම්බන්ධයෙන් බිම් මට්ටමේදී ගත යුතු පියවර පිළිබඳව ප්‍රමාණවත් උපදෙස් යටත් නිලධාරීන්ට ලබාදී නොතිබීමද ඒ අතර වනවා.

පොලිස්පතිවරයා විසින් ක්ෂණික සහ ශක්තිමත් පියවර ගෙන බිම් මට්ටමේ සූදානම් වීම් සඳහා පැහැදිලි උපදෙස් ලබාදී තිබුණේ නම් ප්‍රහාරය වළක්වා ගැනීමට හෝ එහි තීව්‍රතාවය අවම කර ගැනීමට බොහෝ දෑ කළ හැකිව තිබූ බව විශේෂ කාරක සභාවේ අදහසයි.

ප්‍රධාන වශයෙන් වහා අවධානය යොමුවිය යුතු නිර්දේශ කිහිපයක් විශේෂ කාරක සභාව මගින් ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබෙනවා.

ඒවා අතර, ආරක්ෂක සහ බුද්ධි අංශයේ අත්‍යවශ්‍ය ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ, ආගමික අන්තවාදයේ නැගීම පාලනය කිරීමේ සහ අධීක්ෂණය කිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවය, වහබ්වාදය සහ ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ක්‍රියාමාර්ග ගැනීමේ අවශ්‍යතාව යන කරුණු දක්නට ලැබීම විශේෂත්වයක්.

Tamil leadership re-igniting anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism for political gain

October 22nd, 2019

H. L. D. Mahindapala

Any lawyer who has made it to the peak of his profession carries with him the authoritative air of having achieved the highest intellectual capacity to build up a case on hard evidence and presenting it cogently, logically, rationally to persuade his audience, court, forum, etc., of the unshakeable truth on which the case is based. But there are, of course, exceptions to this rule. C. V. Wigneswaran,(CVW)  former Supreme Court Judge and later Chief Minister of Jaffna, is one of them.

After he left the bench and joined the Northern political class obsessed with Tamil extremism allied to Prabhakaran he has played a mean and vicious role of denigrating the Sinhala-Buddhist at every turn. Like most other Tamil politicians he is playing the anti-Sinhala-Buddhist card to the hilt for survival in Jaffna which has consistently and unreservedly rejected pluralism, diversity, peaceful inter-ethnic coexistence with the Sinhala majority, or even the Muslim minority. They have never considered the construction of an enlightened path for reconciliation, overriding the narrow and partisan interpretations of history for separatism. They have never sat down and revisited the failure of their post-independent politics that led them all the way to Nandikadal. As seen in the 13-point demands put to the leading presidential candidates they are going back only to revive the policies that dragged their hapless people into death, destruction and despair.

The only ideology that  was allowed to reign supreme in Jaffna by the Vellalar ruling class – they were in the majority– is anti-Sinhala-Buddhism. This  ideology has come down from the early decades of the twentieth century. It was honed, weaponised and unleashed as a deadly force against the Sinhala-Buddhists by G. G. Ponnambalam in the 1930s. Ever since then demonising  the Sinhala-Buddhists has  been the primary platform that dominated Jaffna politics. No  politician competing  for electoral votes could  survive without scapegoating the Sinhala-Buddhists. Following this  line, CVW is now performing to beat his  rivals in this game of demonising the Sinhala-Buddhists. After the defeat at Nandikadal CVW has stepped into the Northern political stage to revive and activate the failed bid by his predecessors to perpetuate the anti-nation building politics of the Jaffna political class.

The latest exhibition of this campaign surfaced in Colombo Telegraph of October 14, 2019. Consider, for instance, the following story taken out of a long list of complaints made against the Sinhala-Buddhist recently.( See Colombo Telegraph, — 14/10/2019).  In it CVW . spins his stories accusing the Sinhala-Buddhists and the state of victimising the Tamils and then says: .How far this is true I do not know. But we are told many families…….”  have been victimised. (In the last phrase I am summarising his numerous charges).

Imagine him presenting this case to a judge in a court of law and then concluding by saying: ” How far this is true I do not know. But we are told manyfamilies … etc., etc. Which judge is going to take him seriously? Will not his case be thrown out of court summarily without any further hearing? He goes to court without knowing whether there is any truth at all in his stories of Tamil claims of victimisation but he wants the whole world to believe that the victimisation of the Tamils is true.

If this is the best that a Tamil judge of the supreme court can produce how much truth can there be in most of the wild accusations made by the Tamils against other sources? This penchant for repeating second and third hand stories has been one of the main reasons that had warped the public discourse on the ethnic issue. Had they checked their facts and stuck to the stark realities the ethnic issue would not have gone so far as Nandikadal.  At the core of the ethnic issue is that deep craze to believe that the Tamils are the victims of the Sinhala-Buddhist state and any story is good enough to turbo -charge their imagined or rumoured stories of victimhood. For instance, in the dying days of the Vadukoddai War (aka Eelam war) a Tamil Christian priest in a church in Melbourne (where I live) was swearing that the Sinhala-Buddhist soldiers were throwing up Tamil babies up in the air and pinning them with bayonets as they come down!

Adding fuel to the fires of anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism has been the standard practice of the Tamil leadership. Just last month CVW led another anti-Sinhala-Buddhist rally in Jaffna, along with Suresh Premachandran and Jaffna University students and lecturers. The main objective of this Ezhuga Thamil rally was to turn back the Jaffna clock to the history concocted in the Batakotte (Tamilised as Vadukoddai) Resolution. That version of Tamil history ended in Nandikadal. Reports reveal that CVW’s Ezhuga Thamil rally was a flop. Considering all the failures of the Tamil leadership since independence the time has come for the Tamil people to seriously question the misleading and the disastrous role played on their behalf by the so-called brilliant Tamils. It is time for the Tamil people to rise up and ask CVW and his gang of University students and lecturers : Are you going to lead us down the path of Batakotte Resolution to Nandikadal again?

CVW’s swing to radical Tamilness is reflected, somewhat garishly, in his face which is plastered with Saivite strips of ritualistic ash in technicolour. These strips seem to be more symbolic of his anti-Sinhala-Buddhist hatred than any expression of his spiritual purity. What is objectionable is the aggressive political statement he makes through his face make-up. It is like the Sinhala-Buddhist politicians displaying their pirith noolas, sometimes thick as ropes strong enough to hang them up in the nearest tree. Which reminds me also of the cynic who told a Christian congregation that if Jesus was shot with a pistol then Christian devotees would be wearing canons round their necks now! Not surprisingly, kovils, churches, mosques and temples have become powerful centres of politics more than religion.

The political activity of CVW indicate that he is eager to ride on the back of Tamil youth into power like his predecessors in ITAK (example: S. J. V. Chelvanayakam) who urged the Tamil youth to take up arms against the nation. CVW has also jumped into the bandwagon of Tamil extremism with an eye to claim Tamil leadership in the North. Claiming to be the sole representatives of the Tamils” is an obsession with Tamil politicians. He is hoping to cash in on the prestige of his judicial background (thanks to the Sinhala-Buddhist state which he condemns) to be the only Tamil worthy of being a respected and hero-worshipped leader, now that Prabhakaran is no longer with them to be their  thalaivar”. As the head of the newly established Tamil Makkal Kootani (Tamil Peoples’ Congress) he is making a desperate bid to revive and retain Tamil politics at the same virulent and intransigent level defined and pursued by his predecessors, starting from G. G. Ponnambalam in the 1930s’ to Velupillai Prabhakaran.

In one sense he is, like all other Tamil politicians, a prisoner of the anti-Sinhala-Buddhist ideology. Jaffna never had a history of embracing any other ideology. The political fathers of Jaffna and their followers were, from birth to death, bound by two main ideologies : 1. Saivite casteism as defined by the Vellalar guru, Arumuka Navalar and 2. anti-Sinhala-Buddhist politics which demonised the Sinhala-Buddhists in the dying days of the British raj as their main enemy. They never took to socialism, liberalism, pluralism, humanism or any other ism” unlike the South which embraced all the ideologies that were sweeping the world, from Marxism, Maoism, Castroism to neo-liberalism.

However, for a brief period in the late twenties the Tamil youth embraced Gandhism and peaceful co-existence with the rest of the nation. But that was snuffed out swiftly by Ponnambalam’s anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism which became the ruling ideology that gripped the North. Ever since then Jaffna has been the permanent home of virulent Tamil racism, excluding all others as non-Tamil outsiders. Tamil ideologues tried to give it a shine by labelling Tamil racism as sub-nationalism, or Tamil nationalism. But historical events prove that it was a latter-day development that began with Ponnambalam raising Tamil racism in the  thirties to protect and  preserve the disproportionate Tamil power, privileges and  perks  in the British colonial regime. Tamil supremacist arrogance closed the minds of the Jaffnaites  to any other alternative. Tamil casteist arrogance went as far as dismissing its own low-caste people as pariahs who should not be allowed to walk in God-given sunlight. For instance, the Turumbas, the lowest of the low-castes, were allowed to walk only in the night to protect the purity of the eyes of the ruling Vellalars who might bump into them in day time. In this tight environment, dominated by Tamil casteism/racism, there was no space for CVW, particularly as a new comer to the political arena, to compete with any other rival ideology that would tend to be conciliatory and moving towards peaceful co-existence with the other communities.

Today he is facing similar (not identical) forces that confronted the young G. G. Ponnambalam when he arrived from UK, qualified as a lawyer. To make his name he had to compete with the established and elderly aristocracy consisting of Ramanathans, Arunachalams  and Mahavdevas. He had no constructive program to beat the turbaned aristocrats” (Jane Russell) entrenched in the colonial system. The only card he could play to stand out from the pack was anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism. So to cut his teeth in politics and to make a name for himself he embraced anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism in the colonial period. 

The racism he unleashed in the 1930s remained as the permanent norm for peninsular politics. He defined and propagated the aggressive and the intransigent political culture of Jaffna that ran all the way to Nandikadal – and beyond to Wigneswaran. He ruptured the inter-ethnic relations that had lasted for centuries. The most marketable slogan for competing and winning votes in peninsular politics was based on bashing Sinhala-Buddhists. This Tamil tactic was not labelled as racism. It was labelled as minority rights. But when the Sinhala-Buddhist reacted to it and defended their right to preserve and maintain their historical legacies they were called racists.

Ever since Ponnambalam unleashed anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism as the norm for peninsular politics his successors never deviated from it. It was suicidal for any Tamil to champion any other brand of politics that moved towards reconciliation, or peaceful co-existence.  Those deviating from this norm were condemned as collaborationists” or traitors to the Tamils, as seen in the time that Prabhakaran ruled Jaffna. Tamil extremism blocked all attempts at nation-building. Even the best deals offered with international guarantees were rejected by the Tamil leadership.  If the Jaffna electorate did not eliminate them with their votes then the guns of Tamil militants liquidated them. Examples: Lakshman Kadirgamar, Neelan Tiruchelvam, Appapillai Amirthalingam etc. Arrogant and relentless Tamil violence didn’t stop at that. Tamil violence went as far as assassinating Rajiv Gandhi who attempted to keep Sri Lanka united for his own self-interests, with powers devolved to the periphery to appease the Tamil separatists.

Clearly, there was no escape route for any new entrant to deviate from the entrenched political culture of Jaffna. In varying degrees of antagonism Tamil politicians had to conform to its anti-Sinhala-Buddhist ideology. The Jaffnaites were prisoners trapped tightly inside the anti-Sinhala-Buddhist straight jacket. They could move only within the perennial parameters   drawn by the cadjan curtains of Saivite casteism which morphed into virulent anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism. Whether CVW likes it or not he had to fall in line with the racism initiated by Ponnambalam and finally consolidated by Prabhakaran. For him to survive in the competitive electoral politics of Jaffa CVW is compelled to dance to the beat of nagasalam choreographed by Ponnambalam and Prabhakaran.

His ambition now is to grab the leadership of the Tamils to be the sole representative of the Tamils. To achieve this he has to kick out of his way the TNA ladder on which he climbed to seats of power in Jaffna. Having done that, he is now aiming to take over the Jaffna leadership by beating the TNA with his aggressive anti-Sinhala-Buddhist programmes, politics and pronouncements. As Chief Minister he did his damnedest to denigrate the Sinhala-Buddhists and paint them as the sworn enemies of the Tamils. He passed the notorious resolution in which he condemned all Sinhala leaders, from the time of independence, as killers of the Tamils. He was so obsessed with anti-Sinhala-Buddhist racism that he could not provide even a toilet at the Jaffna bus stand. Like most of the Tamil leaders he was obsessed with anti-Sinhala-Buddhist politics and not with the well-being of the Tamil people.

His latest gimmickry is to take up the 13-point demands put up by the Tamil University students in the North and the East universities. As M. Sumanthiram states, there is nothing new in it. It is the same old, same old – all 13 demands pointing to separatism. Clearly, we are back to square one. We are back to the time when S. J. V. Chelvanayakam and his band of fake Gandhians were ganging up to the draw the belligerent Batakotte (Tamilised as Vadukoddai ) Resolution.

It was a time when the Tamil leadership had pushed Tamil extremism to the bitter end and had nowhere to go except to declare war on the rest of the nation. It was time when the Gandhian Chelvanayakam was delighted with the placing on his forehead a red pottu, consisting of blood drawn from the vein of a Tamil militant. It was a time when the ageing Vellalar Tamil leadership was ready to sit back in their arm chairs and sacrifice the low-caste Tamil youth, hoping that they would win Eelam for them to take over as their permanent lords and  masters of the feudal days gone by. The educated Vellalars went overseas to enjoy the greener pastures, with two cars, one to take their children to universities and the other to take their wives shopping.

The sequence of events that happened tell the story of the utter failure of Tamil politics. The precise date was May 14, 1976. The place was Batakotte. The entire Tamil leadership collectively declared war on the rest of the nation and urged the Tamil youth to take up arms and never stop until they had achieved Eelam. They, of course, never expected to land in Nandikadal. That, in short, the failed history of Tamils.

The 13-point demands put up by the Northern and Eastern Universities seems to heading the way of the Batakotte Resolution. History seems to be getting ready to repeat itself, this time as a greater tragedy than before. The oldies are taking cover under the 13-points presented by the Tamil youth in the universities. The oldies are happy that the Tamil youth had taken up their demands, once again. The oldies, of course, have nothing to worry. If the worst comes to the worse, the Sampanthans, Sumanthirams, and the Wigneswarans would come rushing down to the South (which they hate) and take refuge with the Sinhala-Buddhist state providing police protection..The oldies expect the  Tamil youth to fight for the tall tales told in Tamil fiction. In relating these tales they will demonise the Sinhala-Buddhists and never mention a word about the miserable failure of the Tamil leadership to serve or save the Tamil people whom they oppressed throughout their history.

The more  I look into  Tamil politics the more  I am convinced of the value of the words of Prof. Kumar David which described the Tamil leadership as a bunch of congenital idiots”.

More of Tamil politics in the next article.

Genetically modified foods safer and better; Another view to ‘Engineered vegetables’.

October 22nd, 2019

By Bodhi Dhanapala, Quebec, Canada

[Full version of the article that appeared in the Island, 22nd October, 2019]

A reader named “Vegetarian” (The Island 15th Oct.) had written asking if ‘outsized vegetables are some type of “engineered” vegetables’? Jayantha Samarasinghe (JS) has replied (21st October), alluding to a science fiction story by Arthur Clarke to argue that it is best to NOT eat such “engineered vegetables”.

 JS advises that “this story demonstrates how a subtle difference can trigger a serious problem”. Clarke’s story is not based on a subtle difference, but a huge difference, as big as the left foot not fitting into the right shoe. SJ says, “…there was a plan to set up a lab in Sri Lanka to detect genetically engineered food imports… scuttled by people who benefit in selling such food”.

SJ’s advise that we must avoid engineered food and eat “natural food”, is as fictional as the Arthur Clarke story. SJ is also equally wrong when he implies that genetically modified (GM) food has been produced by people (scientists) who benefit by selling such food, and that it is worse in every sense (including nutritionally, i.e. compared to “natural food”.

 Certainly, if SJ can do it, eating his home grown food is an excellent idea. However, it is not practicable to feed the 22 million population in Sri Lanka, or the seven billion globally. SJ may have a choice of foods, but many can only sleep hungry as they don’t have food, leave aside the  choices that people like SJ have.

 If we use the “traditional” varieties of rice used decades ago, grown according to traditional methods (e.g. “organic farming”), it yields 1.1-1.5 metric tonnes of paddy/hectare, and giving two harvests (Yala and Maha). Modern hybrids, developed by scientists at Batalagoda, Kundasale and other research stations, produce yields like 6 to 10 metric tonnes per hectare. That is how Sri Lanaka has managed to feed its population that grew exponentially since world war I.  But those unsung scientists get no benefit in selling such food., or any recognition. In fact, they are often blamed unreasonably as being in the pockets of multi-national companies.

 Modern varieties use less water and yield harvests in shorter time – e.g. in three months. So, to produce one kilo of rice takes less water, less land, less tilling and less erosion. If modern pesticides are used, no tilling is needed, cutting down erosion to a minimum and boosting harvests.

If old “goma and geri-katu” agriculture is used, together with the admonition to not to use pesticides, the harvests are open to attack from epidemics of pests. In Sri Lanka, the attack of the senaa (“army”) caterpillar recently  is a notable example. Venerable Ratana,  who champions the “Toxin-free agriculture”  claimed that he can kill them all using  “organic pesticides” if he were given the responsibility  of combating the army caterpillar.  Leave aside the ethics of  a Buddhist monk taking over such a task, such technical matters should be  the concern of  agricultural scientists. Furthermore, such pesticides, often based on Neem (“Kohomba”) have been used from time immemorial and so plants and  pests have developed resistance to them. Pests develop resistance even modern pesticides and they need to be constantly modified as organisms evolve.

 The claim that there are harmful amounts of pesticide residues on vegetables is a canard spread by the Organic Food lobby. Sensitive chemical analyzes show, say, 10-100 parts per billion of Roundup or some such pesticide on cabbage. This is potentially harmful if you eat about 200 kilos of cabbage daily. If SJ were to test the vegetables grown in his garden, he will find much larger amounts (parts per thousands) of noxious chemicals in his vegetables, coming from the motor vehicular traffic on the busy roads in “Mahanuwara”, and from the dust laden acid rain that falls on his vegetables, even if he lives far away from any traffic!

There is a phenomenon known as “bio-accumulation” of toxins in plants. Plants  take up toxins from the ground and concentrate them hundreds of times. So, if the same plant material is composted again and again, higher and higher levels of toxins accumulate in the soil. In the old days, people moved to a different “chena” and continued their cultivation. But today people don’t have the luxury of moving from the “Parana-hena” to the “Aluth-hena” periodically, to grow one’s crops.  So a partial solution to the problem is crop rotation, or leaving the land fallow for a few years.

Grasses and straw accumulate toxins from the soil, and so cow-dung is richer in toxins than the soil. The soil naturally contains small amounts of cadmium, lead, arsenic and other noxious elements. These come to the soil from naturally occurring minerals, from urban waste like discarded batteries, electronic parts, paints, vehicle exhaust, burning of plastic, car-repair garages etc.

 Most of the soya bean safely eaten all over the world is GM soya invented decades ago by scientists and commercialized. Canola oil produced by Canadian scientists has been, and is used safely all over the world for decades. Genetic engineering is simply plant breeding equipped with the information about the genetic code available from DNA analysis of the plant genome. In the old days, before DNA, people used hit and run hybridization, and so it took long years by farmers to develop useful varieties. Even the traditional varieties such as “heenati”, “nilnaadu” etc., are NOT natural varieties. The natural varieties are grass-like wild rices, which are the actual ancestors of traditional rices. The same story goes for fruits and vegetables.

 The larger-sized vegetables that I have seen in markets are simply cultivars of standard varieties,  grown with adequate application of mineral fertilizers, instead of relying on the old “cow dung and geri-katu” agriculture which often does  not provide enough nutrients to crops.  Traditional  agriculture takes up a lot of land, water, digging-tilling causing erosion.  Organic farmers do not usually analyze their soils for N, P, K etc. or toxins. Essential minerals may be lacking in their soil. The scientifically farmed vegetables are more fully grown and can be large if they are from “larger-size” cultivars.

 There are self-styled “patriots” and “heroes” who agitate against “multinationals” claiming that agri-businesses seek profits. Companies need profits to survive. These activists claim to “save the environment” by agitating against the “pollution” coming from agrochemicals. The overuse of agro-chemicals is simply a consequence of the uncontrolled “free-market” introduced by politicians, and not intrinsic to agrochemicals, which are as necessary as the vitamins and drugs that most people need. Most soils get depleted of their N, P and other minerals on repeated farming, and hence adding the right amount of fertilizer, organic or mineral, is essential to good farming practice. A ton of organic fertilizer may be necessary for what is done with just one kilo of mineral fertilizer.

 The self-styled “green heroes” agitating against GM foods have caused enormous harm and retarded progress. They are mostly driven by unreasoned and unsubstantiated fear. They fear that GM is toxic, and that GM-product companies will control the farmers by controlling GM seed supplies. That surely is a matter of legislation and not science. Do we stop the imports of cars or pharmaceuticals, saying that car companies or big-pharma can control our destinies?

Household compost pits and urban garbage dumps emit methane, a green-house gas much worse than CO2,  adding to the environmental burden coming from organic farming.
 
An excellent example of a false prophet causing much damage to South Asians is “Shiva Vandana”. She campaigned against golden rice in India.   Most early-blindness cases in Asia are due to lack of Vitamin A in the diet. Carrots contain carotene – a source of Vitamin A. Most Asians eat rice, but little of carotene containing foods. So, a simple solution is to hybridize rice with carrots. This cannot be done by plant hybridization. But it is very simple to take the relevant carrot gene and add it to the rice DNA, giving a new golden coloured, known now as “golden rice”. Although golden rice was produced by scientists decades ago, opposition to GM foods by the likes of Shiva Vandana has prevented its release in India. Health officials estimate that millions of people could have been spared of blindness if this rice had been licensed. The anti-GM protesters have spread fear among the public and lobbied politicians (who are equally ignorant of genetics). People fear what they do not understand, and especially when it is claimed that GM is a tool of subjugation of poor nations by global conglomerates.  However, the most recent news is that the Indian government is – after decades of delay – set to approve the sale of golden rice.  

 The bottom line is, please cultivate your garden if you can, but avoid using urban waste and even household waste, unless you are sure that it is free of contaminants, road-side pollution etc. Avoid excessive composting,  and instead use a mixture of mineral fertilizers and humus if needed. But be informed that genetically modified foods are as safe and often better for you (and the environment) than traditional varieties.

[The author worked as the head of the science department of a Quebec technical college, and retired recently.]

නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යය: මහේස්ත්‍රාත්ලා කපුරුහාමිලාද?

October 22nd, 2019

චන්ද්‍රසිරි විජයවික්‍රම, LL.B.Ph.D

මුලතිව් ගුරුකන්ද විහාරයේ හාමුදුරුවන් විහාර ඉඩමේ අදාහනය කිරීම තහනම් කිරීමට වැඩබලන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් දුන් තීරණය මතක් කරන්නේ නමින් කපුරුහාමි, නමුත් කට ගඳයි යන ආප්තෝපදේශයය.  බොදු බල සේනාවේ ඥානසාර හාමුදුරුවන්  නැවතත් කොටු කිරීම සඳහා මෙවර ඉදිරිපත්‌ව සිටින්නේ විග්නේශ්වරන් ප්‍රමුඛ උතුරේ ඊලම්කාරයින් පිරිසකි. ඒ සඳහා ඔවුන් ගේන්නේ නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යය නොහොත් උසාවියට අපහාසකල යන පරණ බයිලාවමය. හෝමාගම මහේස්ත්‍රාත් හරහා නීතිපති දෙපාර්‌තමේන්තුව හා ජේවීපී නීතීඥ කුමාරප්පෙරුමලා ගැසූ කලින් බයිලාව කෙතරම් අසාධාරණද යන්න ඉංග්‍රීසි හා සිංහල ලිපි කීපයකින්ම මීට පෙර පෙන්වා දෙන ලදී. ඒවා ඇපැල් උසාවියද ඇතුළු ආයතනවලට ඊමේල් මඟින් යවන ලදී.

උසාවියට අපහාසකලා යන සංකල්පය අයුතුලෙස යොදවා ගැනීම වැලැක්‌වීමට නීතියක් පාස්කර ගන්නා තෙක්, එය කැලෑ නීතියක් බවට පෙරලීම නතර කිරීම ඇපැල් උසාවියේ වගකීමක් බව මෙම ගුරුකන්ද විහාර පෙත්සමට අදාල කාරණා විමසන විට සක්සුදක්සේ පැහැදිලි වන්නේය. වැඩබලන මහේස්ත්‍රාත්‌වරයා ඊලම් විග්නේශ්වරන්ගේ ගෝලයෙක් වීම මෙහිදී වැදගත් නැත. නමුත් ඕනෑම නඩුකාරයෙක් විසින් ගන්නා තීරණයක් හිතුවක්කාර (උන්ෆෛර්, අර්බිට්‍රර්ය්) විය නොහැකිය. පුද්ගලික නඩුවකදීත්, පොදු නඩුවකදීත් මෙය එකසේ භාරදූර වගකීමකි.

අපවත්‌වූ හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ දේහය නරක්‌වී දුගධ ගසනතුරු තබාගත නොහැකිය. අනික එය වලලන එක හා ගිනිතබන එක අතර වෙනසක් ඇත. මිනියක් වැලලූවිට එය දිගටම ඒ ඉඩමේ තැන්පත්‌ව තිබේ. එහෙත් සොහොනෙන් අළු ඉවත් කල පසු එහි කිල්ලට අසුවීමට දෙයක් ඉතිරි නොවේ. බෞද්ධයින් අතර මෙවැනි විශ්වාසයක්ද නැත. හින්දු කෝවිල්වල සතුන්ගේ බෙලි කපා ඒ ලේ කටේ ගා ගැනීමද සිදුවේ. වැඩබලන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් දෙමළ හින්දු හෝ ක්‍රිස්තියානි අයෙක් නම් ඔහුට මේවා ගැන තේරුමක්, දැනුමක් නොතිබිය හැකිය.

එහෙත් ඔහුට තිබූ සීමිත කාලය තුලදී මෙම විහාර-කෝවිල් අර්බුදය නිරාකරණය කර ගැනීමට සධාරණලෙස (රෙසොනබ්ලෙ) හා ප්‍රඥාවන්තලෙස (wඉසෙල්‍ය්) ක්‍රියාකිරීමට අවකාශ තිබුණේය. ඔහු විසින් ඉතිහාසය අමතකකර ඇත. අක්කර 90 කට වැඩි භූමියක් පැරණි විහාර නටබුන් ලෙස 1930 ස් ගණන්වලදී සිට හඳුනාගෙන ඇත. ඓතිහාසිකව දළදා සමිදුන් වැඩමකරගෙන ආවේ මේ පන්සලටය. දෙමළ ත්‍රස්තවාදීකාලයේ මෙම අපවත්‌වූ හිමියන් මෙහි පන්සලක් ස්ථාපිතකර, අසල තිබූ දේව පිලිමයක් ඒ අසල තබා එය පන්සල ආශ්‍රිත දේවාලයක් ලෙස පවත්‌වාගෙන යන ලදී. අවට ජීවත්‌වූ දුප්පත් හින්දු මිනිසුන් පන්සලේ හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ උපකාරද ලබමින් ජීවත්‌විය.

මේ සියල්ල වෙනස්‌වූයේ උතුරු පලාත් සභා වන්දයක් පවත්‌වා සිංහල ලේලිලා දෙන්නෙක්ම ඉන්නා විග්නේශ්වරන්ට එය ලබාදීමෙන් පසුවය. මේ කොළඹ ජීවත්‌වන ඊනියා දෙමළ මධ්‍යස්ථ මතධාරියා යයි සැලකූ පුද්ගලයා, සිංහල ආණ්ඩු නිදහසේ සිටම දෙමළ ජනසංහාරයක් කරනවා, උතුරේ පන්සල් හා බුදුපිලිම එපා යන ව්‍යාපාරයක් ආරම්භ කලදා සිට උතුරු-නැගෙනහිර පුරාණ බෞද්ධ නටබුන් ආක්‍රමණය කිරීමේ කැත, දුෂ්ට ජාතිවාදී විෂ අහිංසක හින්දු ජනයාට පෙවීම, කොළඹ යහපාලන ඇමතිලාගේ අනුග්‍රහය යටතේ ක්‍රියාත්මක විය. මේ අනුව පන්සලේ තිබූ දේවාලය, කෝවිලකට පෙරලී කෝවිල් කමිටුවක්ද බිහිවිය. කලින් හාමුදුරුවන්ගෙන් පාසැල් පොත්, ආහාරපාන යනාදිය සතුටින් ලබාගත් හින්දූන්ට ඒවා ආපසු පන්සලට දෙන ලෙස අණකරන තත්‌වයකට ටිිෙන්‌ඕකාරයින් කෲරවිය.

මෙවැනි පසුබිමක් යටතේ පන්සල් ඉඩමේ අපවත්‌වූ හාමුදුරුවරුන්ගේ මෘතදේහ ආදාහනය කිරීමේ බෞද්ධ සම්ප්‍රදාය නතර කිරීමේ බලයක් මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්ට නැත.  13 වන සංශොධනය යටතේ මෙවැනි බලයක් උතුරු පලාතට නැත. පන්සලේ දායක සභාව විසින් ගත් තීරණයට පන්සලේ දායක සභාවට මිස, ඥානසාර හාමුදුරුවන් පස්සේ හඹaaේමට  විග්නේශ්වරන් ඇතුළු උතුරේ ඊලම්කාරයින් හා මන්ත්‍රීලා ගන්නා උත්සාහය නීතියේ අධිපත්‍යය ගනිකාවක් සේ සැලකීමකි. 

දකුණේ සිංහල දේශපාලකයින් මේ අවස්ථාවේදීත්, මුහුදු මහා විහාර ආක්‍රමණයෙදීත්, ත්‍රිකුණාමල කින්නියා උණුදිය උල්පත් විහාරභූමි ප්‍රශ්ණයේදීත් හොරගල් අහුලන්නේ දෙමළ චන්දවලට ඇති පෙරේතකම නිසා මිස යුක්තිය හා සත්‍යය නොදන්නා මිස නොවේ. ගෝඨාභය පුරවැසිකම පිළිඹඳ පෙත්සමේදී මෙන් මෙහිදීද පෙනීයන්නේ සද්භාවයෙන් තොරව මේ ඊලම්කාරයින් විසින්, උසාවිය, කොස් ඇට බා ගැනීම සඳහා බළල් අතක් කරගන්නට හදන බවය. මොවුන් උසාවියට එන්නේ අත්‌වල තැවරුණු දේශපාලන ඊලම් ලේ ඇතිවය.

මනා දැණුමක් හෝ නිසි ප්‍රඥාවක් නැතිව යම් මහේස්ත්‍රාත් කෙනෙක් යම් හිතුවක්කාර තීරණයක් ගත්තොත් එය නීතියට පටහැනි වන නිසා, එය නොසලකා හැරීම උසාවියට අපහාස කිරීමක් නොවේ. මහේස්ත්‍රාත්ගේ තීරණයට විරුද්ධව ඉහල උසාවියකට යාමට ගියොත් මළමිනිය කුණුවන්නේය. මහේස්ත්‍රාත්ගේ තීරණය අවලංගු කලේ දායක සභාව මිස ඥානසාර හිමියන් නොවේ. රටේ ජනතා නායකයෙකු වශයෙන් උන්වහන්සේට මෙම ආදාහනයට සහභාගී නොවී සිටීමට නොහැකිය. මෙම සිද්ධිය ජාතික ප්‍රශ්ණයක්‌වීම වැලකුණේද ඒ නිසාය.

THE LAND OF TRIALS AND TRIBULATIONS-KASHMIR

October 22nd, 2019

ALI SUKHANVER

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan was in China a few days back with Pakistan’s Chief of the Army Staff Gen. Qamar Bajwa; experts say that this visit was simply another effort of pulling the people of Kashmir out of an inferno of trials and tribulations. On their first day of the visit The Gulf News published a very detailed report which said, While Imran Khan and his delegates will meet businessmen and Chinese officials, Pakistan’s army chief General Bajwa is meeting the top military officials to discuss the security situation in the region and the tension between India and Pakistan over Kashmir issue.

A top diplomat told Gulf News that both Prime Minister Imran and General Bajwa are trying to convince China to stand by Pakistan on the Kashmir issue.” Pakistan’s concerns over Kashmir are very genuine and legitimate as the situation there is getting horrible day by day. The helpless Kashmiris are hopelessly waiting for someone who could save them from the tyranny and brutality of the Indian security forces.

A very true picture of the present-day Indian-Held Kashmir was portrayed by the Aljazeera in a report a few days back, In more than 50 interviews, residents in a dozen villages in Kashmir told The Associated Press that the military had raided their homes since India’s government imposed a security crackdown in the region on August 5. They said the soldiers inflicted beatings and electric shocks, forced them to eat dirt or drink filthy water, poisoned their food supplies or killed livestock, and threatened to take away and marry their female relatives. Thousands of young men have been arrested.” But on the other hand, Mr Modi is still harping on the same string that the cancellation of Article 370 and 35A would bring a new flood of peace and prosperity in the Indian Held Kashmir. It is difficult to understand what type of peace and prosperity this region is going to be blessed within such a horrible situation where even the honour of Kashmiri women is not safe. If this is Modi’s desired shape of peace and prosperity, let the Kashmiris live in the hell of anarchy and distressful poverty instead of Modi’s paradise of peace and prosperity.

 A painfully agonizing fact is that whosoever tries to raise voice in favour of the wretched Kashmiris, the Modi government starts a very well organized type of hostile propaganda move against it. Pakistan is also one of such victims to this propaganda move; it has to face a lot of hindrances and hurdles, sometimes in shape of blames and allegations and sometimes in form of conspiracies; the objective is simply to malign Pakistan’s support to the Kashmiris. But positive is the fact that in spite of this childish and notorious behaviour of the Indian government, Pakistan has neither changed its policy nor its philosophy regarding its efforts for the world peace specifically for peace in the Indian-Held Kashmir. It is also a notable fact that Pakistan has never supported, favoured or encouraged any type of militancy based action against the cruelties of the Indian security force in the Indian Held Kashmir. A few days before going to USGA, the Prime Minister of Pakistan had said talking to media that anyone wanting to go and fight in occupied Kashmir would do a great injustice to the Kashmiris by undermining their legitimate cause. He had further said, Such an act would be an act of animosity towards the Kashmiris.” This statement of Mr Khan was warmly appreciated and admired even by the US authorities. Acting Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asia Alice G. Wells said commenting upon Mr Khan’s statement, Pakistan’s sustained commitment to counter all terrorist groups is critical to regional stability.” Whatever Imran Khan said in his statement is a very clear message to the world that Pakistan wants a peaceful solution to the Kashmir issue without any bloodshed without any massacre. Unfortunately, the Modi sarkar is taking Pakistan’s desire for peace as a weakness of Pakistan. Just to make things clear for the Modi sarkar, Imran Khan, in his speech at UNGA, had to warn the world that India’s actions in Kashmir could cause a bloodbath” in the region and provoke a war between the two nuclear-armed countries.

On the other hand, Mr Modi also did his best to misguide the world regarding the ever worst situation of human rights violations in Kashmir by presenting a very calm and peaceful picture of the valley but all his efforts surely received a very serious setback when the honourable participants of the General Assembly came to know of a petition filed in the Houston Court by a victim Kashmir-American family for grave human rights violations in Kashmir. The Court had summoned Mr Modi, Amit Shah and the commander of the Indian army in Kashmir. It seems that Mr Modi could not remember that Court ‘invitation’ in his heat and haste. Hopefully, he would again receive an ‘invitation’ for the same purpose.

No internet, no mobile phones, no media, no communication; for the last many weeks, the situation in Kashmir is getting worse and worse. incidents of rape are on a rise; Indian security forces are brutally butchering the protesters; use of pellet guns on Kashmiri youth has become a routine practice; people are not allowed even to go to the mosques. In short, on one hand, the Modi government is claiming that Kashmir is ‘Atoot Ang’ of India but at the same time the people of Kashmir are being treated as if they belong to some hostile land; as if they are aliens. The atrocities and cruelties inflicted upon the people of Kashmir by the Indian security forces are a proof that inwardly Modi sarkar has accepted the reality that Kashmiris, in no way, want to be a part of India. The hostility of the Indian government against the Kashmiri people shows that India wants Kashmir without the people of Kashmir. To the Modi government, the people of Kashmir are not of any value and importance; important and valuable is the land of Kashmir.

Scientific energy saving technique can save nearly 60% energy wastage

October 22nd, 2019

Dr Hector Perera         London

There are far too many cooking programmes in many British TV channels. When I watched them to see any energy saving cooking, I must say I didn’t observe that much energy saving in cooking. Cooking has to be done using energy but that has to be controlled depending on the situation. Many chefs cook so many different types of food and they are far too many to be mentioned here.
One of the common things to be cooked is rice then comes a curry or two. This is quite common in a country like Sri Lanka or among Sri Lankans or Asians. Some of these Asians eat rice and curries as their main meal when compared to British people who eat fish and chips or chicken and chips than rice and curries. Don’t forget they also eat pasta, spaghetti and many different pies as well. There is no strict method of cooking them. They bake them in ovens after a certain stage then mix with so many things then eat. Before they eat the food they add so many varieties of flavours and sources to make the food palatable. Most of the times these flavours are found in bottles or in packets and they just add them to the food as they eat. If someone eats fish and chips then the person would add some sources from bottles or from packets as they eat. Some tomatoes sources are sweet and as well. Not only tomatoes sources but other sources such as mustard, vinegar and salt are also eaten to get the food flavour. The more they eat, more salt and far too much sources are eaten without their knowledge. Who would recommend too much salt to eat?

Judges in cooking competitions

When the judges, judge the individual cooking of each competitor they also go by these food flavours than anything else. Most of the times these food flavours are added to the plates so the judges are forced to taste the food flavours along with the food. The judges watch how the food are cooked then they make so many facial expressions and say so many things while these cooking competitions are taking place. I have my doubt if they cared about energy wastage while cooking. The fire goes out of the cooking pans and most of the times they even let the food catch fire. When food flavours and vapours catch fire, there are so much misty, cloudy vapours surround the cooking vessels but the chefs do not care and even the so called judges just keep on looking at them but never mention if that kind of work is right or wrong. Most of the times there are two judges watching the cooking of a few contestants but they never say anything right or wrong of that kind of cooking.

Any mistakes are ignored while cooking, why?

Strictly speaking these kinds of cooking should give an example to the public as they are broadcasted on the spot. Within an hour and half they finish cooking a few dishes, may be three or four but not anymore. Judges keep on walking and watching how these cooking are taking place and they always see how the food cooked.  They often see how mistakes are done but seem to ignore.

Usually there are about four cooking sessions and at the end of every session, one competitor is eliminated. The rest of the few contestants have to face similar risks. They make so many mistakes while cooking, waste far too much energy, and often get showered with cooking aroma. I think the judges are not taking those mistakes into the competition, as long as the food are palatable. Sometimes even beef not properly cooked. When they are sliced one can easily see that they are virtually raw meat.

I am certain that this kind of cooking cannot be called energy saving cooking but they are send to viewers in their inbox with a name such as energy saving cooking. I had the chance to demonstrate to the public in four different TVs in Sri Lanka how scientific energy saving cooking is done. Also I demonstrated this scientific energy saving cooking for the approval of The Sustainable Energy Authority then The Invention Commission added my work to their official web site. All these work can be viewed even right now at The Google search under my name. I am certain if my work is good enough to be broadcasted by four different TVs in Sri Lanka then my work should be good enough to be shown in any British TV but so far none of the British TVs have contacted me about my work.

I still claim to save about 60% of the energy used in cooking by applying science. When I explained the scientific energy saving cooking in Sri Lanka TVs, I had to use both English and Sinhalese in my explanation because I was not aware of the proper Sinhalese terms only but if I had to demonstrate my work in any British TV then I would stick to English only in my scientific energy saving cooking. I am capable of cooking so many things where majority of people use on daily basis. Please let me repeat if my work is good enough to be shown in four different TVs in Sri Lanka then it should be good enough to be shown in British TVs as well. Your comments are welcomed perera6@hotmail.co.uk

Freedom to question politicians

October 22nd, 2019

Editorial Courtesy The Island

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has said the people are free to question politicians, without fearing reprisal, unlike in the past. True, there have been instances where people even booed and hissed some ruling party politicians at public rallies, without being harmed. If such incidents had occurred in the past, hecklers would have been taken away in white vans and each one of them made to regret the day he was born.

A wag says that under the previous regime, too, the people, especially journalists, were free to say anything, but the problem was that others were free to kill them for saying that!

Yahapalana leaders would have the public believe that they have restored democracy and the freedom of expression. They pride themselves on the fact that there are no white van abductions and no attacks on dissenters. True, the situation has improved in comparison to what we experienced under the repressive regimes of Presidents J. R. Jayewardene, Ranasinghe Premadasa, Chandrika Kumaratunga and Mahinda Rajapaksa. But this improvement is not due to the present-day leaders’ commitment to democratic governance or their aversion to repression.

It is said that when governments fear the people there is liberty and when the people fear governments there is tyranny. People feared the last regime, which went so far as to order a military crackdown on a group of protesters demanding clean water as a factory had contaminated the groundwater in the area. There were also numerous attacks on the UNP-led Opposition and the media. Some journalists had to flee the country, fearing for their lives.

The incumbent government is weak and fears the people so much so that, unable to face them, it has even resorted to postponing elections. What has made the present-day leaders act with restraint without baring their true faces is the instability of their government. We saw some of them in action during the JRJ regime and the second JVP uprising, in the late 1980s. They had private armies led by notorious criminals and suppressed their rivals in every conceivable manner. It is they who introduced the white-van method to tackle troublemakers.

The present government was at war with itself for more than three years, with the UNP and the SLFP trying to destroy each other, while sharing power. It has been staggering along since the collapse of the so-called national unity government. Political cripples cannot take on others, can they? This is why the people have been able to exercise some of their democratic freedoms.

As for the freedom of expression, the people and the Opposition are free to ask questions, and the government politicians are free to refuse to answer them. The question time in Parliament is a case in point. UPFA MP Udaya Gammanpila has been asking the government, for about two years, how many foreign trips President Maithripala Sirisena has made; his question has gone unanswered.

The Speaker takes pride in having introduced the right to information laws, but the Opposition’s right to information is denied under his nose. When JVP MP Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa, last month, asked how many times the PM had travelled overseas and how much his foreign trips had cost the taxpayer, the government asked for six more months to respond! The question was first raised, on March 08, and the government asked for three months to answer it. When it was repeated, on June 18, MP Jayastissa was asked to wait three more months to receive an answer.

The Opposition has also asked, in Parliament, how many vehicles are being used by government ministers. That question, too, has gone unanswered. The Finance Minister claims to have found the exact amount of funds the former rulers have stashed away in offshore accounts. He says they have USD 18.5 bn in foreign banks. (If so, the question is why that money is not brought back to pay back foreign loans and develop vital sectors.) But the government says it cannot figure out the number of vehicles at the disposal of ministers!

The people can ask politicians questions, but they won’t get answers.

Addressing accountability ‘properly’

October 22nd, 2019

by Neville Ladduwahetty Courtesy The Island

article_image

A report in The Island of October 18, 2019 titled “SL would be subjected to ‘Universal jurisdiction’ unless allegations were probed”, cites Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera as having “warned of dire consequences unless accountability allegations leveled against Lankan military were properly investigated”.

The issue is what is meant by the statement: properly investigating accountability allegations. If Minister Samaraweera means that a proper investigation of the accountability allegations could only be achieved by a judicial mechanism as provided for in Paragraph 6 of the UNHRC Resolution 30/1cited below, it must follow that when the Minister co-sponsored the Resolution, he was either not aware of the Constitutional impediments associated with stipulations in Paragraph 6, or that despite being aware, he knowingly committed Sri Lanka to undertakings beyond its capacity to fulfill. In either case, the fact that no attempt was made to seek approval of Parliament not only for Paragraph 6 but also for the entire Resolution, amounts to a violation of the principles of separation of power on which are founded the Constitution of Sri Lanka. The consequence of this unilateral action on the part of the Executive is to violate the sovereignty of the People.

PARAGRAPH 6 of the UNHRC RESOLUTION

Paragraph 6 states:

“Welcomes the recognition by the Government of Sri Lanka that accountability is essential to uphold the rule of law and to build confidence in the people of all communities of Sri Lanka in the justice system, notes with appreciation the proposal of the Government of Sri Lanka to establish a judicial mechanism with a special counsel to investigate allegations of violations and abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law, as applicable; affirms that a credible justice process should include independent judicial and prosecutorial institutions led by individuals known for their integrity and impartiality; and also affirms in this regard the importance of participation in a Sri Lankan judicial mechanism, including the special counsel’s office, of Commonwealth and other foreign judges, defence lawyers and authorized prosecutors and investigators”.

The statement made by Foreign Minister Tilak Marapana at the 37th Session of the Human Rights Council states:

“We would like to stress with sincerity and conviction that we will not be deterred by anyone in fulfilling the undertakings given by us to our people, which will lead to building a peaceful, stable, reconciled and prosperous Sri Lanka for all our “citizens.”

“Sri Lanka’s judiciary and law enforcement mechanisms are fully capable and committed to the processes of advancing justice to all concerned. It has a long history of integrity and professionalism and since January 2015, steps have been taken to further strengthen its independence. And may I add, Mr. President, that all reconciliation mechanisms will be implemented in accordance with our Constitution.”

The statement made by Foreign Minister Tilak Marapana at the 40th Session of the Human Rights Council states:

“In referring to para 68 (C) of the OHCHR Report (A/HRC/40/23), which pertains to the Recommendations to GOSL, to ‘to adopt legislation establishing a hybrid court to investigate allegation of violating and abuses of international law and violations of international humanitarian law’, I wish to make it clear that our position on this matter is as follows”,

“The Government of Sri Lanka at the highest political levels, has both publicly and in discussions with the present and former High Commissioner for Human Rights and other interlocutors, explained the constitutional and legal challenges that preclude it from including non-citizens in its judicial processes. It has been explained that if non-citizen judges are to be appointed in such a process, it will not be possible without an amendment to the Constitution by 2/3 of members of the Parliament voting in favour and also the approval of the people at a referendum”.

In summary, the Sri Lankan Government informed the UNHRC that it had the capacity and the capability to address issues of accountability and furthermore, that if it was to be undertaken by a foreign judicial mechanism it would involve serious Constitutional amendments.

Although it was only in 2018 and 2019 that the Government brought to the attention of the UNHRC the constraints associated with the accountability process, the stark fact is that they were addressed prominently by the public from day One. Notwithstanding such warnings, the fact remains that the government did not take the initiative to demonstrate in good faith its inability to secure the needed 2/3 majority in Parliament together with a referendum to address accountability within the framework stipulated in the Resolution. Furthermore, having failed to act responsibly the Government did nothing to renegotiate more pragmatic mechanisms to address accountability. By doing nothing the Government has left it to a future Government to pull the proverbial chestnuts out of the fire.

By co-sponsoring the Resolution the Government became co-owners responsible for implementing the provisions in the Resolution. Therefore, the former Foreign Minister Samaraweera has to take full responsibility for committing the Sri Lankan State to undertakings without the requisite formations in Parliament to amend the Constitution without which the issue of accountability could not be addressed; a fact admitted by Minister Tilak Marapana in Geneva. The same fate is likely to befall a future government because there is no guarantee that a future Government would have the needed majorities and success at a referendum to fulfill the UNHRC Resolution in its current form. Therefore, the only option open to a new administration is to reject the Resolution in its current form and work with the UNHRC to develop an arrangement that allows alleged violations to be addressed by Sri Lanka in the context of an armed conflict wherein International Humanitarian Law applies as it should be. In such a context, the threat of Sri Lanka being “subjected to ‘universal jurisdiction’ unless allegations are probed” has to be treated as a threat to divert attention from the present Government’s dismal failure to address Accountability to which it committed itself in 2015.

UNIVERSAL JURISDICTION

Quoting Minister Samaraweera, The Island report states: “Should we let allegations remain without investigations and make our security forces personnel vulnerable to be subjected to universal jurisdiction”? The question as to whether “we let allegations remain” is not by intent but a matter of circumstance, since it is entirely a product of Resolution 30/1 co-sponsored by the Minister containing provisions relating to accountability that require Constitutional amendments of a nature that is not achievable due to existing dispensations in Parliament.

It is too late in the day for Minister Samaraweera to feel guilty about making the security forces vulnerable because it was none other than the Minister himself who took the initiative to co-sponsor the Resolution. By doing so, the Minister trapped the Sri Lankan State into Constitutional constraints that his Government is not in a position to overcome. Furthermore, these same Constitutional constraints would prevent a future Government from addressing allegations either, unless that future formation in Parliament is such that at least a 2/3 majority to amend the Constitution is a realistic proportion. Thus, the options are either for the security forces to remain vulnerable forever, or for a new Government to amend Resolution 30/1 to make it implementable.

CONCLUSION

The UNHRC Resolution 30/1 on Sri Lanka was co-sponsored by Minister Mangala Samaraweera without reference to Parliament. It was finally tabled in Parliament after it was co-sponsored due to demands from the then Opposition. However, by then it was too late to propose any amendments. This left the Sri Lankan State being compelled to undertake commitments that it was in no position to fulfill due to lack of the needed majorities in Parliament to comply with the provisions in the Resolution. These commitments are inconsistent with the Constitution.

The procedures adopted by the Executive at the behest of Minister Samaraweera as (the then) Foreign Minister, was for one organ of Government, i.e., in this case, the Executive, to make commitments without reference to another organ of Government – the Parliament, and commit Parliament to undertake commitments that the Executive has no control over, despite Articles 33A and 42 (2) calling for the President and the Cabinet of Ministers to be collectively responsible and answerable to Parliament. This is a violation of the sovereignty of the People. Even if the act of co-sponsoring was undertaken in the flawed belief that it would correct the international isolation that Sri Lanka found itself in, due to the “irresponsible responses” of the former government as stated by the Minister, the country has to now face the dilemma of how to extricate itself from the trap it is in, with the minimum of damage to its international image. This is the daunting challenge for any future government.

Tamil Muslim National Alliance pledges support to Gotabaya

October 22nd, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Tamil Muslim National Alliance has confirmed that it would support Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna’s candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the forthcoming Presidential Election.

Holding a media briefing yesterday (21), the chairman of the Alliance, Attorney-at-Law Abdul Raheem stated that Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa promised to ensure the safety of Tamil and Muslim communities in the country.

He said concerns existed with regard to the security of Muslims on the occasion that Gotabaya Rajapaksa wins the Presidential Election, however, the discussion held with the former President had put the concerns to rest.

Responding to a question raised by a media person on removing military forces from the North and the East and merging the two provinces, Mr. Raheem said they are against the idea of merging, adding that the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna has promised to develop the North and the East.

Addressing the media briefing, Moulvi Rizwan Saudi said, they helped ‘Yahapalana’ government to come to power with the hopes that the security of the Muslims would be ensured. However, the government has failed to do that, he said, adding that behind Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe are India and the US forces. The political policy of Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa is to develop the country, he said further.

Meanwhile, nine independent members of Kalmunai Municipal Council have met with Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa to confirm their support for SLPP’s presidential candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Only a Rajapaksa era can reaffirm security of the country – Gotabaya

October 22nd, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) presidential candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa says the security of the country can only be reaffirmed in a Rajapaksa era which has a security system with well-guided and planned intelligence units.

The former Defense Secretary stated this addressing a public meeting held in Middeniya yesterday (21).

There was no concern for national security and priority for national security since the current government came to power, states Rajapaksa.

He says that they humiliated and broke mindsets of the war heroes in the tri-forces and the police.

Rajapaksa also pointed out that they have signed international agreements and taken the war heroes before international courts.

He said: Back during our time, we had established a special unit to investigate extremist terrorists with specially trained agents. But when this government came into power they transferred those officials to other departments. The units were disbanded.

The government failed to prevent the Easter Sunday attacks despite receiving intelligence on the time, date and method of attacks, the names, addresses and phone numbers of the individuals behind the attacks.

The main reason for this is them not caring for national security. The security of a country with such a cabinet cannot be ensured.”

Gotabaya meets folks at Neluwa (English)

October 22nd, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

ජනාධිපතිවරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් විවිධ අදහස්

October 22nd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ඉදිරි ජනාධිපතිවරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් පක්ෂ විපක්ෂ දේශපාලනඥයින් මෙලෙස අදහස් පළ කළා

පාර්ලිමේන්තු තේරීම් කාරක සභාව ගැන ගැටලුවක් – පූජ්‍ය මැදගොඩ අභයතිස්ස

October 22nd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන්  සොයා බැලීමට පත්කළ පාර්ලිමේන්තු තේරීම් කාරක සභාවේ නියෝජිතයෙකු ලෙස අමාත්‍ය රාවුෆ් හකීම් මහතා කටයුතු කිරීම හේතුවෙන් එහි සුජාතභාවය සම්බන්ධයෙන් පැහැදිලි ගැටලුවක් පැන නගින බව මහාචාර්ය පූජ්‍ය මැදගොඩ අභයතිස්ස හිමියන් පවසනවා.

උන්වහන්සේ මේ බව සදහන් කළේ කැලණිය මානෙල්වත්ත ශ්‍රි නාගානන්ද ජාත්‍යන්තර බෞද්ධ මධ්‍යස්ථානයේ පැවති වැඩසටහනකට එක්වෙමින්.

යුගයේ අවශ්‍යතාව සහ භික්ෂු සමාජයේ කාර්යභාරය පැහැදිලි කිරිම සඳහා සමස්ත ලංකා ශාසනබල මණ්ඩල සභාපති හිමිවරුන් සහ ලේඛකාධිකාරී හිමිවරුන් සහභාගී වූ මෙම විශේෂ සමුළුව පැවැත්වුණේ කැලණිය මානෙල්වත්ත ශ්‍රී නාගානන්ද ජාත්‍යන්තර බෞද්ධ මධ්‍යස්ථානයේදීයි.

මන්ත්‍රී බන්දුල කැලණිය රජමහා විහාරාධිපති හමුවෙයි

October 22nd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ඉදිරි ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ අපේක්ෂකයින්ට දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති යෝජනා සම්බන්ධයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ආචාර්ය බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන මහතා කැලණිය රජමහා විහාරාධිපති පූජ්‍ය කොල්ලුපිටියේ මහින්ද සංඝරක්ඛිත හිමියන්ට කරුණු පැහැදිලි කළා.

මහාචාර්ය පූජ්‍ය කොල්ලුපිටියේ මහින්ද සංඝරක්ඛිත හිමි – විහාරාධිපති

විපක්ෂ නායකවරයාගෙන් චෝදනාවක්

October 22nd, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවෙන් හිමිව ඇති කැමති ආගමක් ඇදහීමේ අයිතිය මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව විසින් මෙරට ජනතාවට අහිමි කර ඇතැයි  ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ නායක විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා පවසනවා.

ඔහු මේ බව සඳහන් කළේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ ජනාධිපති ධුර අපේක්ෂක ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ ජය තහවුරු කිරීම සඳහා මිද්දෙනිය ප්‍රදේශයේ පැවැති ජන රැලියකට එක්වෙමින්.

සාර්ථක දැක්මක් වැඩකරන රටක් තේමාව යටතේ, ජනාධිපතිවරණය ඉලක්ක කරගෙන ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ ප්‍රමුඛ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂය සංවිධාන කරන ජනරැලි මාලාවේ තවත් එක් රැලියක් මිද්දෙණිය සති පොළ භූමියේදි ඊයේ පස්වරුවේ පැවැත්වුණා.

Global liberal Mafiosi mobilises against the Rajapaksas

October 21st, 2019

By C. A. Chandraprema Courtesy The Island

article_image

The global liberal mafia has already begun mobilizing against the Rajapaksas in anticipation of their return to power. Last Friday, Brahma Chellaney of the American funded New Delhi based NGO Centre for Policy Research wrote an article to the international web page Project Syndicate on the possible return of the Rajapaksas to power with the apocalyptic sounding title “The End of Sri Lankan Democracy?” Chellaney is an interesting character. He is the spin doctor credited with having invented the ‘Chinese debt trap’ theory, which was applied to Sri Lanka as well in relation to the Hambantota port. The theory that captured the imagination of the Western dominated international media was that the Sri Lankan government had been forced to lease the Hambantota port to the Chinese because they were unable to service the loan of 1.26 million USD taken to build the Hambantota port.

This is not borne out by the facts at all. The amounts borrowed for the various projects initiated by the Rajapaksas is minuscule in comparison with the commercial borrowings of the yahapalana government in the past five years. For the yahapalana government especially, 1.26 million USD is peanuts – just one afternoon’s borrowings. The total amount that had to be paid by 2036 in relation to the loan taken to build the Hambantota port is USD 1,266 million capital + USD 495 million in interest – a total of USD 1,761 million. By the end of 2016, nearly USD 500 million of this total amount had already been repaid. Thus Sri Lanka had no difficulty at all in repaying this loan. Be that as it may, we are told by the foreign liberal media that Sri Lanka was forced to sell the 1.26 billion USD port because we could not pay back the money taken to build it and nothing that we say will convince them otherwise!

The man responsible for this spin on things is supposed to be Chellaney. Some think he is a RAW operative, but it is highly unlikely that RAW would allow one of its operatives to work for an American funded NGO. It seems only too clear that Chellaney is an American agent operating from New Delhi. With the yahapalana government leasing the Hambantota port to the Chinese, the latter ended up getting a port in Sri Lanka which they would never have got if the Rajapaksa government had been in power. The Rajapaksa government was going to run the port itself. In fact, at the time the government changed, documents had already been signed to lease the container terminal in the port to the two Chinese companies that became the bidders to lease out the entire free port including its 2,000 hectare industrial park. The Chinese company that now manages the port was originally a joint lessee of the container terminal in the port.

The media reported recently that Japan’s NYK, the largest vehicle shipping company in the world had come to an agreement with the Hambantota port to use it as a transhipment hub. This too was a deal that was originally struck between SL and NYK when the Rajapaksas were in power. Had the Rajapaksas remained in power, Sri Lanka would have had a port in Hambantota, and not the Chinese. The fact that China now has a port in Sri Lanka is entirely due to the change of government in 2015, which the Obama administration was largely responsible for engineering. The US Ambassador in Sri Lanka at the time, Michelle Shison was up to her eyeballs in the regime change project in Sri Lanka. She was instrumental in not allowing Ranil Wickremesinghe to contest as the presidential candidate that year and insisting that the UNP agree to a common candidate.

The former US Secretary of State John Kerry had himself revealed that in 2015, the US had spent USD 585 million ‘to promote democracy’ in Sri Lanka, Myanmar and Nigeria in 2015 alone. So what happened in 2015 was that the USA spent money to bring into power the government, which provided the Chinese with a free port in Sri Lanka! This is one of the biggest foreign policy fiascos in modern world history. It would have come as a delightful surprise to the Chinese when they were offered the Hambantota port on a platter by the Obama administration’s puppet regime. The Chinese had never once asked the Rajapaksas for the port. Initially, the yahapalana government was so anti-Chinese that they stopped all Chinese funded projects as soon as they came into power.

A fig leaf to cover a free port

One of the things that motivated the yahapalana government to finally give up its infantile opposition to China was because the flood of aid and investment that it was expecting from their Western backers never materialised. Another reason why Wickremesinghe gave the Hambantota port to China could be as an act of vengeance as the US had deprived him of the chance to contest the 2015 presidential election. At the provincial council elections held in 2014, it was only too obvious that the trend was going in favour of the UNP. But RW had to forego the candidacy due to American pressure. Chellaney is the American sponsored Indian spin doctor who provided the explanatory fig leaf to conceal the Obama administration’s embarrassment when the Sri Lankan government brought into power by them, handed over a valuable strategic asset in the Indian Ocean to the Chinese. One would be hard put to think of another fiasco of this magnitude in the history of maritime politics.

True to form in this latest article on Sri Lanka Chellaney states apocalyptically that “… the Rajapaksa family’s potential return to power is welcome news for Chinese President Xi Jinping. But it is bad news for practically everyone else.” He paints the possibility of the Rajapaksas returning to power in the darkest colours possible. He says, “One of Asia’s oldest democracies may be in jeopardy. Sri Lanka’s presidential election next month, is expected to bring to power another member of the Rajapaksa family, whose affinity for authoritarianism, violence, and corruption is well known While Sri Lanka’s democracy survived the last test – an attempted constitutional coup by outgoing President Maithripala Sirisena a year ago – it may not survive a Gotabaya Rajapaksa presidency”.

The entire article that he has written is nothing but a repetition of all the accusations hurled at the Rajapaksas over the past several years.

“Mahinda’s decade-long tenure, which ended in 2015, was characterised by brazen nepotism, with the four Rajapaksa brothers controlling many government ministries and about 80% of total public spending.”

“By steadily expanding presidential powers, Mahinda created a quasi-dictatorship known for human-rights abuses and accused of war crimes.”

“Mahinda’s pro-China foreign policy allowed for the swift expansion of Chinese influence in Sri Lanka – and rapid growth in Sri Lankan debt to China. It was the debt incurred during the last Rajapaksa presidency that forced Sirisena in 2017 to sign away to China the Indian Ocean’s most strategic port, Hambantota, along with 6,070 hectares (15,000 acres) of nearby land, on a 99-year lease.”

“There is little reason to doubt that Gotabaya would revive his brother’s corrosive legacy. Simply by becoming president, he could gain immunity from two lawsuits pending in US federal court over war crimes allegedly committed while he was Sri Lanka’s defence chief.”

“During the war’s final years, thousands of people – from aid workers and Tamil civilians to the Rajapaksa family’s political opponents – disappeared or were tortured. And the final military offensive against the Tamil Tiger rebels was, according to the United Nations, a “grave assault on the entire regime of international law,” with as many as 40,000 civilians killed.”

“According to the wartime military commander, Sarath Fonseka, Gotabaya ordered the summary execution of rebel leaders as they surrendered.”

International political Mafiosi

The spin that Brahma Chellaney has put on the presidential elections in Sri Lanka is the clarion call of the international liberal mafia. Even though there has been regime change in the USA and Britain as well, the effects of regime change in the USA and Britain have not been felt in Sri Lanka largely due to the liberal deep state in the USA and Britain and also to the fact that the government we still have in Sri Lanka is a creation of the ousted liberal regimes in the USA and Britain. The defeated global liberal Mafiosi are fighting back everywhere and Chellaney is the adavance party working on Sri Lanka. He is trying to organize opposition to a possible return of the Rajapaksas to power by saying things like the following:

“The Rajapaksas have already used the Islamist bombings (on Easter Sunday that killed 253 people) to fan the flame of Sinhalese nationalism. And Gotabaya has promised his supporters that, if elected, he will strengthen the intelligence services and reintroduce surveillance of citizens, in order to crush Islamist extremism. The prospect of an alleged war criminal still wedded to extrajudicial methods becoming president rightly terrifies minority groups, the media, and civil-liberties advocates.”

“Gotabaya’s camp has also confirmed that, as president, he plans to “restore relations” with China. Given Sri Lanka’s strategic location near the world’s busiest sea-lanes, the implications of this pledge extend well beyond the island. Indeed, Sri Lanka could play a pivotal role in the struggle for maritime primacy between China and Indo-Pacific democratic powers (India, the United States, Japan, and Australia). China’s “string of pearls” strategy has been encircling India by securing strategic military and commercial facilities along major Indian Ocean shipping lanes.

“… the Rajapaksa family’s potential return to power in Sri Lanka is welcome news for China, which hopes to turn the country into a military outpost … A Gotabaya presidency would… help China gain strategic supremacy in the Indo-Pacific.”

Chellaney has sought to organize India, the USA and Japan against the Rajapaksas by saying that a Rajapaksa restoration would turn Sri Lanka into a Chinese military outpost and that China would gain ‘supremacy’ in the Indo-Pacific. This kind of idea had much resonance in 2014-2015, but it is very unlikely that India especially, would fall for such propaganda this time around. Before 2015, there was no Chinese-run port in Hambantota. After the regime change in 2015 now there is one. India knows better than anybody else that if this government continues for another five years, there is no telling what else they will see coming to Sri Lanka as the yahapalana government sells parts of the country off to the highest bidder.

India knows through experience that what they need on their southern border is an independent country with a strong government that can run the economy properly and does not have a policy of selling off strategic assets to foreign parties. The government in Sri Lanka also should have a leadership strong enough to be able to give India the guarantees that it needs that Sri Lankan territory will not be used to the detriment of India. If the Rajapaksas do not win this election, India is going to be in deeper ordure than it is in already.

Easter Sunday PSC urged to question its member, Hakeem on discussion with Zahran

October 21st, 2019

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

Attorney-at-law Maj. (retd) Ajith Prasanna, yesterday, urged the Chairman of the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) which probed the Easter Sunday carnage, Deputy Speaker Ananda Kumarasiri, MP, not to release his report until SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem appeared before the PSC.

Addressing the media, at Dr. N. M. Perera Centre, the former UPFA Southern Provincial Council member pointed out that Minister Hakeem, as a member of Kumarasiri’s PSC, owed the outfit as well as the public an explanation as to the revelation that he met Easter Sunday bombing mastermind Zahran Hashim in Kattankudy, in 2015, to discuss allocation of some National List seats.  The allegation was made by a Moulavi, who complained to Police Headquarters about Hakeem’s links to Zaharan.

Ajith Prasanna addressed the media in his capacity as the convenor of the Mawbima Wenuven Ranaviruwo (War Heroes for Motherland) – one of the groups backing wartime Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s candidature at the Nov. 2019 presidential election.

Ajith Prasanna said that the PSC shouldn’t release its report without an explanation from Minister Hakeem.

Pointing out that the PSC had gone to the extent of recording a statement from President Maithripala Sirisena on the issue, Maj. Ajith Prasanna insisted Minister Hakeem be similarly summoned. “The report can be delayed by a few days to accommodate Minister Hakeem’s statement,” the lawyer said.

Referring to a statement made by Minister Hakeem at a rally held in support of New Democratic Front (DNF) presidential candidate over the weekend, Ajith Prasanna emphasised the urgent need to ascertain why the SLMC leader had met Zahran Hashim. Although Minister Hakeem said his meeting Zahran Hashim had been videoed soon after the last parliamentary election, the PSC should inquire into the possibility of subsequent meetings.

Ajith Prasanna, formerly of the Sixth Battalion of the Sri Lanka Sinha Regiment (6 SLSR) had to give up front-line duties after being injured in fighting at Atchuveli in the Jaffna peninsula on October 1, 1995.

Lawyer Ajith Prasanna said that Zahran Hashim hadplayed a significant role in Kattankudy politics at the last presidential and parliamentary polls in 2015. Referring to a media conference given by the NFGG (National Front for Good Governance) leader Abdul Rahuman in late May 2019, Maj. Ajith Prasanna said that Rahuman had admitted that political parties contesting the Batticaloa district at the 2015 parliamentary poll met Zahran Hashim at the latter’s Kattankudy office. “Wouldn’t it be necessary to identify who met Zahran Hashim on behalf of the SLMC?” Maj. Ajith Prasanna asked.

Rahuman held the media briefing at the Mandarina Hotel on Galle road.

Maj. Ajith Prasanna said that a comprehensive inquiry was required to ascertain the links between Zahran Hashim and registered political parties as well as other political outfits.

Rahuman contested the Batticaloa district on the SLMC ticket in keeping with a tripartite agreement among the UNP, SLMC and the NFGG.

Responding to another query, Maj. Ajith Prasanna pointed out that though the media reported that the then Eastern Province Governor M.L.A.M. Hizbullah had had a clandestine meeting with a group of Saudi nationals in the immediate aftermath of the Easter Sunday carnage, the PSC never bothered to question him on that issue.

The PSC consisted of Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka (UNP National List), Ravi Karunanayake (UNP), Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne (UNP National List), Ashu Marasinghe (UNP National List), Dr. Rajitha Senaratne (UNP), M.A. Sumanthiran (TNA) and Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa (JVP).

Dr. Senaratne was brought in after UNP MP Dr. Kavinda Jayawardena declined to participate in the PSC process.

Attorney-at-law Ajith Prasanna said that the ongoing police investigations into the Easter Sunday carnage had taken a new turn with the revelation of the SLMC leader’s powpow with Zahran. The former PC member pointed out that President Sirisena had, on 21 Sep., appointed a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate Easter Sunday attacks.

The Gazette Extraordinary notification issued on Sept 20, 2019 said that the five-member Commission, chaired by Court of Appeal Justice Janak de Silva, would comprise CA Judge Nissanka Bandula Karunarathna, CA Judge (retd) Nihal Sunil Rajapaksa, High Court Judge (retd) Atapattu Liyanage Bandula Kumara Atapattu, and W. M. M. Adikari Retired Ministry Secretary.

Maj. Ajith Prasanna said that the bottomline was that the PSC had lost its credibility due to the father of two of Zahran’s accomplice had been the JVP’s National List at the last parliamentary polls.

The Confession

October 21st, 2019

Laksiri Warnakula

Rev. MP (I opted for the initials to keep anonymity) was feared by even the tough fisherfolk. He was short and stocky with a complexion, which was quite fair by any standard and made his roundish chubby face turn red when he was angry. My uncles said that he was a Monsignor and was probably left in charge of a medium-sized church in a small parish by the bishop of the Diocese, knowing his reputation of being a no-nonsense cleric with no small temperament. 

Now on my way to the ‘Confessional’, where Rev. MP sat, waiting to hear his parishioners’ confessions and then absolve them of their sins, which he could do as he became a temporal representative of God after his ordination as a priest.


With a pounding heart and a giddying head, I finally make it to face Rev. MP. He sat inside the ‘Confessional’ with his head bent as if he was in prayer.  He blesses me as I kneel down on the pedestal that ran along on the side of the ’Confessional’. His face was only inches away from mine with a partition in between that had an intricate design of lattice work. I could see his face, only as a collection of pale patches separated by wooden strips on the lattice with little gaps in between and I am sure he could see mine too as a vague little roundish shape speckled with alternating little shades of dark brown and light brown.


I launch into the feared recital cautiously starting off with minor sins or ‘sulu pau’ (in my opinion, of course) such as hitting Frank that robust for his age troublemaker in my class across his face stopping him straight away as he menacingly advanced towards me with clenched fists. Or pinching Didi so hard that it must have hurt him so much that he couldn’t even scream and instead made him empty his bladder right in the middle of the church floor as our flock of little boys squatted and listened to the sermon. The news finally reached the principal or ‘Loku iskola mahaththaya’ and the reward for hurting Didi came in the form of caning by him as I stood on the little stage facing a crowd of my school mates, who seemed very amused and thrilled by the whole spectacle. By the way I must give it to Didi that he didn’t report it to any one and it was only few others, who witnessed the scuffle and reported it to the teachers with no malicious intent though, I am sure.

Now moving further away from ‘sulu pau’ and towards not so ‘sulu pau’ (in my opinion, once again) such as picking few coins that my grandfather left on his table and then forgot all about them, thanks to his failing memory. And, I, on the other hand, couldn’t forget the sight of those oil cakes (konda kewum) that were tantalisingly sitting in a glass cupboard at Peter ayiyas’ little boutique and my grandfathers’ forgotten little change was indeed very helpful to me in securing a couple of those sweet delights. 


Around fifteen or twenty minutes later, including few minutes of a probing- interrogation as to why I skipped that particular Sunday mass,  I am back kneeling down in front of the altar saying the prayers, usually ten ‘Hail Marys’ and five ‘Our Fathers’ or so as penance for my sins. Rev. MP probably thought that it was good enough as penance this time, for this lot of sins of a child, whom he knew was still lying to him even when he was in the middle of the ‘Confession’, for fear of admonition and now was stammering rather excitedly as he tried to explain why he couldn’t attend that Sunday mass.

I am sure he took the above fact into consideration too, when he ordered the number of prayers to say in penance. You couldn’t fool Rev. MP. He could recognise a lie from miles away, even when it was still in infancy, a tiny nucleus of an idea in your mind just beginning to take shape. And when the liar was a ten year old child, well, you can guess! Finally, it’s over and having finished my prayers and I run back to the playground to join my friends.  

Lastly I must make myself absolutely clear here as far as the objective of this article is concerned. It is written with a slightly amusing slant and a modicum of humour and is only a reflection on those long-gone years of my childhood.

All my folks have been Catholics for a few generations and as someone, who has been brought up amongst them, I know that the ‘Confession’ is a sacred religious rite (Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation) and is one of the seven sacraments of the Catholic Church. So to all, who might see this in a different light, please accept my sincerest apologies. Poking fun at this religious rite sacred to all Catholics was the furthest thing from my mind, when I wrote this.

The incidents and the people mentioned here are not fictional but were very real once upon a time, which was many years ago. And some of them are certainly not amongst the living now. Though they all come and visit me now and then, regardless: vague shapes emerging from a misty past that keep losing clarity and contour as years go by.

Laksiri Warnakula

GOTA PHOBIA – Part V D (A Presidential Commission to probe Easter Sunder Carnage promised)

October 21st, 2019

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

The National and common presidential candidate had a series of successful and highly attended meetings in the areas coming under the landscape popularly referred to as ‘the Catholic Belt’ – kiribathgoda, Katana, Ragama, Negombo etc., – in which Catholic MPs Nimal Lansa, Arundika Fernando and several others made emotional speeches about the Easter Sundage carnage and the government’s deliberate negligence to prevent the bomb blasts even at the last moment and pointed out that government Ministers and MPs did not attend Easter Sunday services in their neighbourhood churches on that day because they were well aware what was going to happen on that melancholic day.  It was also pointed out that Minister Harin Fernando had told the media that he did not attend church on that day because his father told him that there will be bomb blasts in churches on that day.

 They said not a single government Minister or MP despite their awareness of the looming carnage did not take any action at least to keep the priests of the churches informed.  All the MPs emphasized that all Ministers and MPs in the government should be held responsible for the unfortunate deaths of over 250 people and nearly 500 people injured and colossal damages done to the churches. They also stated that some of the injured people are still hospitalised and some have become disabled.

Addressing the meeting held in Negombo, which is considered as Sri Lanka’s Vatican, on October 19th Saturdat, Mr. Gotabhaya Rajapaksa promised to fulfil His Eminence Cardinal’s request.

He asserted that under his administration, he would appoint the presidential commission that His Eminence Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith had been requesting for, to uncover the persons responsible for the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

Mr. Rajapaksa also vowed to restore the disrupted security measures and to make the country a safe haven again.

Attending a public meeting held in Ragama, Mr. Rajapaksa claimed that the incumbent government failed to prevent the Easter Sunday attacks despite receiving all the necessary information on the date and the venues where the attacks would take place.

Toda, October 21st in the date this article was written it is exactly 6 months from the Easter Sunday carnage.  Up to now the government has not apologized for the havoc.  The ignoramus UNP candidate Sajith Premadasa keeps on shrieking and thumping on the chest at his meetings uttering nonsense but so far bot a single word of apology has been made on behalf of the unfortunate victims of this butchery.  Killing people is not a matter to be regretted for this man who proudly calls himself as the son of his father Ranasinghe Premadasa and the one who is possessing the genes of Premadasa who was responsible for the death of over 60,000 southern youth.  

His Eminence Cardinal Dr. Malcolm Ranjith who became very annoyed and saddened over this carnage urged that all officials who received prior information about the bombings but did not take any action to prevent them should be removed along with the country’s leadership, The  Archbishop made these commands at a  Sunday mass held at St. Lucia’s Cathedral in Kotahena to commemorate those killed in the Easter Sunday attacks and invoke blessings on the injured.

The prelate said that the Easter Sunday bombings had come as a shock to him and he was still grief-stricken like millions of others. He emphasized that not only the officials who had not acted on an intelligence warning of terror attacks but also the rulers were responsible for the tragic incidents.

The cardinal added that a large number of people had been killed and injured in the attack not because of God’s will but because of the evil of men and those who were incapable of taking responsibility must be removed from their positions and from the leadership of the country.

He said some terrorists were still at large and they thought they could escape punishment and if they were not punished by courts, there would be divine justice. Those who failed to punish those involved in acts of terror would be punished by God .

The cardinal added that those who were trying to use the tragedy to get their personal gains and political agendas fulfilled would also be punished by God.

A large number of relatives of the victims of the bombings attended the mass.

Addressing a seminar held at Bolawalana, the Archbishop while blaming the government  for its deliberate negligence to prevent the suicide bombings, said that  they are not bothered about whether an election is held or not but what they want is to know the truth about the background to this carnage and the innocent people, men, women and children were massacred in this manner?

Many religious, social and political analysts have pointed out that Sri Lanka is fortunate to have a person in the stature of His Eminence Cardinal Dr. Malcolm Ranjith as the Archbishop of the country at the time of the Easter Sunday carnage and if there was a myopic person in his place there could  have been a horrendous bloodbath in the country and religious riots.  They said that all Sri Lankans should be immensely thankful for Cardinal Dr. Malcolm Ranjith for preventing such a calamity and ensuring peace and harmony in the country. 

In a special appeal to the Muslims in Sri Lanka the Archbishop called on all Muslims in the country to personally minimise and shed their cultural differences and integrate with the rest of society and the common culture, as one people and citizens of the country. He said that Muslim politicians, should be authentic in their faith and the core values of Islam instead of using religion as a label or for selfish purposes.

The Cardinal along with several Buddhist religious leaders, also claimed that regional level leadership of various political parties and politically aligned groups and agents at the base and grassroots level were the lynch mobs who fuelled and motivated by the provision and consumption of alcohol behind the spate of tense and riotous situations and violent attacks, in the past couple of days, targeting Muslim properties, including shops and mosques, in certain areas which led to the imposition of curfew and arrests. They thus called on all leaders of political parties to rein in and control their Party members and henchmen.

Advocating on behalf of the private nature of religion and worship, and the separation of religion from politics and vice versa, the religious leaders also reiterated their call to ban all national level political parties which contained references to race, ethnicity or religion in the names of their Parties as it only served to cause further divisions. They emphasised that, political candidates representing minorities should be able to contest from national level Parties for even the Presidency and Premiership, and should respect diversity.

It was also the view of the Cardinal and other religious leaders that all affairs pertaining to religion should be brought under the purview of one Government Ministry as was previously the case as opposed to having separate Ministries per religion.        

These views were expressed by Archbishop Ranjith and Chief Prelate of the Kotte Chapter of the Siam Sect, Ven. Ittepane Dhammalankara Thera at a Media conference convened at the Archbishop’s house in Colombo to make a special appeal for the public to refrain from giving vent to their emotions and causing chaos, taking the law into their own hands owing to a misguided sense of faux heroism and thereby disturbing the peace and unity, and instead act intelligently and patriotically, keeping emotions in check, maintaining calm, exercising compassion, love and patience, respecting dignity and individual liberty and freedom, and allow and assist the law enforcement authorities to carry out their duties, including search operations and obey their orders as that would constitute the highest tribute to be paid to those whose lives were sacrificed in the 21 April Easter Sunday suicide bomb attacks on churches, hotels and elsewhere.

Archbishop Ranjith urged all to allow for Buddhists and Muslims to celebrate their forthcoming festivals, Vesak and Ramadan, respectively. 

When questioned as to Tamil National Alliance MP, President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran’s recent statement that the Easter Sunday carnage was partially the result of the grievances of the minorities not being addressed by the Government, Archbishop Ranjith whilst acknowledging that minorities had legitimate problems which should be separately discussed and resolved. He pointed out that there was no evidence to indicate a direct link between the Easter Sunday attacks and unaddressed issues facing the minorities, and that therefore Sumanthiran’s claim was a case of overreach.

The Archbishop also took the security forces personnel to task over the recent incidents which revealed that areas and places previously searched and swept by law enforcement during search ops had revealed more weapons. We told them to do a thorough search area by area, house by house, irrespective of religion, yet this went unheeded, he noted. The searches have not been done properly, he further added.

He also bemoaned that their call to appoint a commission to probe the assets of politicians had fallen on deaf ears.

On Minister Mangala Samaraweera’s recent claim that Sri Lanka is not a Buddhist country, and not a Sinhalese country the two religious leaders said that such a view was one bereft of even the most rudimentary understanding of the country, its history and culture. The Archbishop also cited examples of how well Christians and Catholics were treated in Sri Lanka when compared to the treatment afforded them in other Christian and Catholic countries (example – separate seats for clergy in public transportation).

D6espite these conciliatory and pacifying moves by these two religious leaders and many other religious leaders and erudite scholars the vicious elements similar to Sumanthiran, some Sumanthirams in the Sinhala community also attempted to espouse hatred and communalism among the Sinhalese as well.  They were only blood thirsty and were not concerned at all about that could cause to this country.  A person calling himself as Ratanapala” without giving his full name or proper identification writing an article to Lankaweb news-site under the title Easter Sunday bombings – Islamic terror and R2P – clash of the Barbarians”.  Exract from the opening paragraph of his article and writer’s comments are given below:

On 21 April 2019 Easter Sunday – on the holiest day in the Christian Calendar, suicide bombers simultaneously attacked three Catholic Churches and three 5 – Star Hotels in Sri Lanka killing over 250 including nearly 40 foreigners visiting the island. The reason for attacking the Catholics and White Foreigners can be adduced to ISIS losing territory in the Middle-east to Christchurch massacre of Muslims by a white nationalist in New Zealand.

It seems that the so-called Ratanapala unfortunately does not know who the ISIS are, who invented this terror group and for what purpose it was invented?  ISIS was a strategic terrorist group invented by the United States when they found Russian influence is increasing in Iraq and Syria extensive and these two countries would become appendages of Russia and it is necessary to install American puppet regimes in these two countries.  American aspirations have not succeeded and the ISIS has suffered heavy casualties recently.  At the same time, America is also very much worried about increasing Chinese influence in South Asia and was looking forward to destabilise these countries and establish a base in lieu of the Diego Garcia island in order to arrest and contain the Chinese influence..  Accordingly they have chosen Sri Lanka as the ideal location and the Easter Sunday carnage was a part of their plan to foment Muslim-Catholic clashes in the country thus paving the way for them to assume the role of peace keepers and establish a command base and maintain a puppet government in the country.  Do you think that it was because they like you and me and other Sri6 Lankans they proposed t0 grant U.S.$ 480 Million grant under a project named MCC. 

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe was to sign the SOFA agreement even without cabinet approval under which comes the MCC project on 27th October, 2019 and President Maithreepala Sirisena forced to dodge it by appointing Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa on the previous day of the Ranil-American D-Day and launching Sri Lanka’s October Revolution. After getting re-instated with the help of the TNA Ranil attempted to get cabinet approval twice for the SOFA agreement but it was stalled by the President.  

President’s Counsel Ali Sabry commenting on the Easter Sunday carnage said that the number of members in terrorist leader Zahran Hashim’s group grew significantly following the ethnic clashes in March last year and that this goes to show extremism feeds extremism.

He said Zahran’s terrorist group had only 20-25 members in the past, but after last year’s unfo6rtunate clashes in Digana a large number of youths had joined them and this has been confirmed through intelligence reports.

It is also pertinent to present here a comprehensive investigative report on the Easter Sunday carnage posted by the Colombo correspondent of the Indian daily The Hindu” Meena Srinivasan.

Meera says that at first, they were nameless. Nine suicide bombers,” is all authorities would reveal. In a little over a week, the police identified each of them and their stories began coming out. A month after a messy web of disgruntled radicals emerged, throwing up troubling hints of how readily rage can court terror.

She says that Zahran Hashim, 33, was a radical preacher and was the alleged ringleader, who f6ound little acceptance in his hometown Kattankudy, in eastern Batticaloa. Mosques in the predom6inantly Muslim town rejected him outright and their members even complained to authorities, before he went absconding in 2017 after a clash with a fellow priest who challenged his interpretation of Islam.

But soon, a team of young Muslim men — and one woman — from other, mostly Sinhala-majority, areas eagerly joined him on his Easter mission to carry out a suicide attack on churches and high-end hotels in and around Colombo and Batticaloa. All nine bombers were in their 20s and 30s.

Ms. Srinicasan states that they were radicalised at different times, for different reasons, and in varying measures and they encountered Hashim on social media or in person. She adds that in him they saw a mentor who could give their lives purpose and direction. With time and interaction, their shared cause acquired considerable weight — enough for them to pledge their lives for it.

She states that the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and Terrorist Investigation Division (TID), w6ho conducted the probe, have traced all nine to two jihadist organisations — National Tawheed Jamaath (NTJ), led by Hashim, and Jamathei Millathu Ibrahim (JMI), a less formal group of youth who had met on social media.

Marred by internal power struggles,Meera says that the two organisations gradually became less relevant for Hashim’s team as its focus shifted to a new mission in the last six months. They were bound by ideology and connected by technology.

And on April 21, the nine bombers killed over 250 people, including 45 children, drawing attention to the underground terror network they had built quietly and efficiently, even as the rest of Sri Lanka was enjoying a relative post-civil war calm.

Ishana Exports is a nearly three decade-old spice export company. Its founder Y.M. Ibrahim is widely known as 6a millionaire with modest beginnings, and an ever-ready philanthropist. He has friends of all political hues, and they all respect him. In natural course, his sons would have inherited his business, fortune, and possibly all that goodwill. Instead, they chose to become suicide bombers. The CID has detained their father for questioning.

An extremely mild-mannered and polite young man.” That is how a senior staff member at Ishana Exports remembers his boss’s son Inshaf Ahmed Mohamed Ibrahim. Even as a child he was not mischievous. He was a lovely child,” said a family member.

Inshaf, 33, went to D.S. Senanayake College, he didn’t go to university but learned the tricks of the spice trade.

Of nine siblings, only Inshaf and Ilham — the second and third sons — were directly involved in the business. Both were on the board of directors. Inshaf was more actively engaged, said company sources. Th6e two often travelled on work, including to India.

Though he [Inshaf] was technically our boss, he never gave orders. He would say ‘can you please do this’, as if he were asking a favour,” said an employee, who asked not to be named. Ilham, 31, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to have evoked a similar warmth. Ilham was a loner, he rarely showed up at family events or spoke to people. He was very introverted. We hardly even know him,” said a family member.

It was not until a year ago that employees and family noticed a change in the two brothers.

Inshaf often objected to his father’s practice of taking short-term loans on interest for rotating cash. He said our 6religion does not permit borrowing money on interest and we must stop it,” a senior employee rec6alled. It’s something Muslims often hear their preachers say, but their father — with a practical business sense — did not consider it an offence.

  • At least two arrests made after the attacks suggest that young IT professionals were among those associated with JMI.
  • Investigators say they suspect Aadhil Ameez, 24, a software engineer who might have provided technical and logistical support to the bombers, to have been a link between different jihadist units.
  • A Reuters report reveals that Ameez — who calls himself Aadhil Ax — has been under Indian surveillance from 2016, when he was found to be in touch with two suspects linked to a plot targeting Ahmedabad and with three Indians promoting the IS.
  • Ameez was from Dharga Town, near Aluthgama on the southern coast, where Muslims faced large-scale, targeted violence in 2012. As in Digana in 2018, the attacks seemed part of a pattern. It was repeated6 last week in parts of Kurunegala and Gampaha, when mobs torched Muslim-owned shops and homes.
  • Ameez is believed to have interned with IT company Virtusa in 2013, where one employee was recently arrested for suspected links with the Easter attacks. We don’t know if he played a role, but there are indications that this employee met Hashim on April 6,” said a senior investigating officer.

Inshaf continued to run a copper factory that he had set up some five years earlier, in Wellampitiya, 5 km from the family’s plush villa in the Colombo suburb, Dematagoda. Ilham managed a part of the spice sourcing for his father’s company.

Inshaf continued to visit the office, dealing with employees as cordially as before. A company source said there was no drastic change in Inshaf’s appearance. He only sported a slightly longer beard, I noticed. But ma6ny people do that.” He wore formals or the usual jeans and T-shirt.

He came last on April 18.” That was four days before he blew himself up at Colombo’s Cinnamon Grand Hotel, just as Ilham and mastermind Hashim did at the nearby Shangri-La hotel.

The same day, Ilham’s pregnant wife Fathima blasted explosives strapped to her body as the police surrounded the Dematagoda house, where Ilham’s family lived on the top floor. Their three children as well as three policemen died on the spot.

Investigators believe the brothers came in contact with Hashim via Facebook and private chat rooms. The bond seems to have grown over time, with Ilham becoming a key funder of the Easter plot, according to a top officer.

The CCTV footage from Taj Samudra that Sri Lankan television played, showed a restless Abdul Latheef Jameel M666ohamed seated at a restaurant, fiddling with his backpack. Minutes later, he walked out after a botched suicide attack. Without a clue of the terror he was carrying on his shoulders, staff helped him wheel out his bigger bags to the porch. Five hours later, he blew himself up in a small hotel in a southern suburb of Dehiwala, killing at least two other guests.

As a teenager, Jameel was a motivated student. He pursued aerospace engineering at Kingston University in southwest London from 2006 to 2007, and later went to Melbourne for postgraduation. Australian immigration records show that he left Australia in 2013.

Jameel’s sister Samsul Hidaya told Daily Mail that he was normal” when he went to study in Britain. But after Australia, he returned to Sri Lanka a different man,” she was quoted as saying. The Australian reported that the police had marked Jameel for his apparent terrorist leanings, based on evidence linking him 6to IS recruiter Neil Prakash, one of Australia’s most wanted jihadists.

Others, however, believe Jameel was radicalised earlier, in the U.K., where he met notorious British Islamist Anjem Choud66ary. Jameel’s friends also told media that the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 had deeply affected him when he was in his early 20s.

According to investigators, Jameel returned t0 Sri Lanka in 2014, after a failed attempt to travel to Syria. He could go only up to Turkey,” an officer said. Back home, he lived with his wife and four children in Wellampitiya, the Colombo suburb where Inshaf’s copper factory is located.

Jameel and the Ibrahim brothers knew each other well,” said a senior investigator. Initially, it was Ilham who linked up with Jameel online. Later, they were all part of JMI.”

Like Jameel, Alawdeen Ahmed Muath too was a motivated student. He graduated in law from a college in Colombo and was registered to practise. Following his wedding a year ago, Muath mostly lived in Sainthamaruthu, his wife’s hometown in the Eastern Province. The town, less than an hour’s drive from Kattankudy, where Hashim was based, came into focus when troops found 15 bodies inside a house on April 27. After an overnight gun battle between security forces and suspects, three suicide bombers triggered explosions, killing themselves, six children and three women inside.

Among the dead were Hashim’s father and two brothers, including Rilwan Hashim, later identified by investigators as an explosives expert”. The jihadists were tenants on the first floor of a small house in a crammed tsunami resettlement colony. Muath, officers say, likely met the Hashims in Sainthamaruthu.

Muath would visit us now and then. He last came [home] on April 14 to see his sister’s newborn. His wife was pregnant, their baby was also due soon. Muath bought baby clothes and left for Sainthamaruthu,” his father said in court.

On Easter morning, Muath’s wife called the family to ask if they knew where he was. Then came news of the blast. On M6ay 5, Muath’s baby was born, a fortnight after the father took his life and that of many others, at St. Anthony’s church in Colombo.

Hashim’s network was not restricted to the nine Easter bombers. Over the years, he had found allies and fans in different cities. For instance, the Abdul-Haq brothers in Mawanella, some 25 km from Kandy, who were on the run from December 2018. That’s when Buddha statues in Mawanella, which is home to a sizeable Sinhala-Buddhist population, were vandalised. At least six people were arrested, but Mohammad Sadik Abdul-Haq and Mohammad Shaheed Abdul-Haq went into hiding. They were caught days after the Easter terror attacks.

Military intelligence sources said they have not found any evidence of the duo’s role in the Easter bombings, but other investigators indicated that Sadik likely trained some of the bombers.

of their role, their backstory gives a peek into how some crucial links in Sri Lanka’s Islamist radical m6atrix go back years. Their story also reveals how raging anger can swiftly morph into a thirst for revenge, making an indoctrinator’s job easy.

Hashim visited a mosque near Mawanella over eight years ago and, typically, made more enemies than friends before being barred from preaching there. Hashim would frequently argue that our preachers were wrong in their practice of Islam. After a point, they realised he was a trouble-maker and asked him not to come,” said an official at the Mawanella masjid.

The brothers grew up in Mawanella in a pious family. Their father Ibrahim Moulavi was a well-respected preacher and a member of the local Jamaat-e-Islami, an influential socio-religious organisation. Sadik failed his A Levels but was known for his karate skills. He was very athletic,” the source said. Sadik and Sha6heed met Hashim once or twice” at that time, said a source close to the family.

Investigators can’t confirm these earlier meetings, but believe the brothers gravitated towards Hashim later, in 2017, enticed by his doctrinal videos. From our investigation, it appears they got close in 2018, months before getting the statue vandalising assignment from Hashim,” a senior officer said.

Meanwhile, friends of the brothers were aware of their growing radicalism. In fact, the Jamaat-e-Islami and its youth wing, Sri Lanka Islamic Students’ Movement, expelled them four years ago. Sadik went to Turkey on a scholarship and promised to return in three months but stayed on for over four months. We heard he went to Syria from there,” said one member.

On his return, Sadik tried usurping leadership of the organisation, and was expelled. He grew a long beard, his wife began to wea6r the face veil, not very common among Muslims in Mawanella. Shaheed too changed his attire. Their father tried bringing them back on track. Instead, they tactfully drew Moulavi to their radical line,” said a relative. The father had to be expelled from Jamaat-e-Islami less than a year ago. He challenged our constitution,” said a member.

Then, the defacing of the Buddha statues put them back in the spotlight. Friends and family members of the duo point to two likely triggers for the brothers’ growing slant towards radicalism.

Mawanella experienced a spate of violent anti-Muslim attacks in 2001 that shook the town. Fearing more losses to business and property, Muslims did not retaliate. Sadik and Shaheed were in their late teens at the time.

In 2018, Digana, located 40 km east of Mawanella, witnessed one of the worst targeted attacks on Muslims in years. Following a ro6ad rage incident, at least one Muslim youth died, and Muslim-owned property worth millions was burnt down. Many saw the incident as a crude expression of a resurgent Sinhala-Buddhist extremism.

It must have impacted Sadik very much. Why Sadik, it affected all of us. I was very disturbed that these hardline groups were getting away with such deplorable actions,” says a young professional, in his early 30s, who knew the brothers from childhood. We all felt the same rage. The only difference was in how we chose to express it — emotionally or rationally. Sadik was always emotional and aggressive, the kind whose hands would speak first even when someone violated traffic rules.”

A few others in Mawanella, Kattankudy and Colombo echoed similar sentiments. As much as they vehemently condemned the terror attacks, they seemed to appreciate why their friends or relatives had turned radical. They say radicalism and terrorism have many roots. The feeling of injustice must surely be one,” said the young p6rofessional.

He recalled Hashim’s Facebook cover picture from late 2018. I remember it said in Arabic ‘we are going to conspire against your statues’. It must have spoken directly to Sadik and Shaheed’s anger.” As it turned out, Hashim — who staunchly opposed idol worship — chose the brothers for the statue vandalism that investigators, in retrospect, see as an important precursor to the Easter attacks.

The many hazy links Hashim had with radical youth appear to have firmed up into an informal alliance in 2016, at a wedding. Investigators said: It was at a wedding in Kattankudy. Many JMI members went for it. We think Ilham and Jameel were also there.” Beginning then, most in the group stayed in touch largely through WhatsApp and Telegram, even after Hashim went into hiding in 2017.

But the real close circle,” investigators said, was formed mid-2018, with no specific mission but probably as some sort of preparation” for a future attack. Investigators point to the clue they saw in the huge cache of explosives unearthed in January in Wanathawilluwa town, near Wilpattu national park.

The Easter plot itself seems to have come to shape much later. From our interrogation of suspects, it is evident that Hashim spoke of attacking churches,” said a senior officer. He thinks the plot was provoked by the Christchurch killings in New Zealand in which over 50 Muslims, kneeling in prayer, were shot dead.

Others are less certain. The Christchurch attack was mid-March. A well-coordinated, sophisticated attack of this nature will need meticulous planning and longer preparation time,” said a senior officer. There is little evidence to support that theory.”

In fact, one of the main questions that remains is whether the suspects had a direct channel to the IS leaders6hip,” he said. Evidence shows that some suspects, including Jameel and Hashim’s brother Rilwan, were in touch with two of the five main Sri Lankan IS fighters who went to Syria some years ago. But none of the bombers had direct links with the IS leadership.

One of the Sri Lankan jihadists that Rilwan had been speaking to died in 2017; and another, whom Jameel knew, is in custody, reportedly in Turkey. They were two of the first five fighters who left from 2015 to Turkey and Syria. They left with their entire families. That is how politicians came up with that number,” he said, referring to the over 30 Sri Lankan youth” who, politicians say, joined the IS.

It is unclear if Hashim was independently in touch with the IS leadership. He often claimed to have received instructions from Sham,” referring to Syria, in his videos and conversations with recruits.

Investigators are also grappling with another contradiction — the target. Why did the Islamist radicals choose to attack a fellow minority community with whom they had no enmity?

In the raid in Sainthamaruthu, troops not only found explosives, but also white dresses that Buddhist women usually wear for temple visits or prayers. This has sparked doubts of whether the attacks were planned for the Buddhist festival of Vesak — May 18-19 — or for the July Kandy Perahara, known for its procession of traditional dancers and parades of elephants. Every year, tens of thousands of people are on Kandy’s streets to witness this spectacle.

Some investigators wondered if an initial plot, planned against Sinhala-Buddhists, had been hijacked by an external element” at a later stage. In other words, did an individual or group abroad use an already activated local radical group to put out its own message to the Western world? There are no clear answers yet.

It also looks as if JMI members initially hoped to join the IS in Syria. But after the ‘fall’ of the Caliphate in Iraq and Syria, they had to put off the plan, an official source said. Ever since, Ilham was desperate to execute an attack in Sri Lanka. He found his answer in the Easter plot.”

His brother Inshaf appears to have been roped in at the last stage. He had flight tickets booked for himself and his family for Mecca this May.

It was only weeks before the Easter weekend that they have evolved into a proper team, with their specific roles charted out. In the final weeks, they communicated using ‘Threema’, an encrypted messenger service considered highly secure, according to an officer.

Now, after extensive searches and key arrests, officers are confident of having virtually eliminated the threat. However, investigators continue to connect the dots — old and new — to deconstruct the deadly operation. Gaps remain,” a senior officer admitted.

Further probes will reveal if the plot was accelerated after Christchurch or if the target shifted at some point, but what is clear is that the suicide bombers had harboured enough rage in recent years to willingly embrace terror and execute a ruthless act. After that, the date, venue and target were merely details.(END)

Who won the war?

October 21st, 2019

Editorial Courtesy The Island

October 21, 2019, 8:58 pm

 It is said that victory has a thousand fathers and defeat is an orphan. Everybody now wants to take the credit for defeating terrorism. Those who opposed the war tooth and nail and condemned the military, during the height of the Vanni conflict, are now using former war-winning army commander Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka to score political points.

Fonseka has sought to settle old scores with SLPP presidential candidate and war-time Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa by claiming that the latter was not involved in planning military operations, which were prepared and executed by service commanders, according to him. Earlier, he claimed that the Navy had made no contribution whatsoever to the war victory, and it was only operating a fleet of ‘fishing boats.’ He seems to have changed his attitude towards the Navy, which was led by his bete noire Vice Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda during the war.

Who really won the war? Was it Fonseka or the Rajapaksas or Karannagoda or the war-time Air Force Commander Roshan Goonathilake? We believe that it was the right combination that worked. Fonseka, no doubt, played a pivotal role in defeating the LTTE. So did other service commanders and their officers and men. The credit for that feat should also go to the police, who foiled many a terrorist bid to blast nerve centres in the city, and the Civil Defence Force personnel, the unsung heroes.

The war would never have been over but for the bold political leadership. Several army commanders before Fonseka failed to defeat the LTTE because governments under which they served lacked the courage to fight the war to a finish. Fighting was still on when Fonseka reached the retirement age and the then President Rajapaska gave him an extension in service at the instance of the then Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa. That proves that the then government leaders had recognised Fonseka’s outstanding contribution to the war and wanted him to continue as the army commander. One can also argue that but for that extension, Fonseka would not have been the war winning army chief.

If the Navy, under Vice Admiral Karannagoda’s command, had not destroyed the LTTE’s naval wing, Prabhakran would have taken delivery of many more consignments of sophisticated weapons to match the army’s fire power, and the supplies to the North would have been crippled. It was the naval intelligence that revealed in early Noughties that under the UNP-led UNF government, the LTTE was using a fragile ceasefire to move its big guns to the East and North so as to have the Trincomalee harbour and the Palali airstrip within their range; it was preparing to mount simultaneous attacks on those facilities to cripple the supplies to the North. Had that plan worked, the troops would have been trapped in the North. When the LTTE pulled out of the ceasefire, it successfully targeted the Trinco harbour and the Palali airstrip but precautions had been taken to meet the threat.

The manner in which the Navy with the help of its meagre assets accomplished extremely difficult tasks such as destroying the LTTE’s floating armouries on the high seas may have made the commanders of the blue water navies turn green with envy. The Air Force neutralised the LTTE positions for the ground troops to advance. The STF kept the LTTE at bay, especially in the East.

Nobody would have been able to brag about the war victory if the political leadership had buckled under international pressure in 2009. The then British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and his French counterpart Bernard Kouchner rushed here in a bid to stop the war, days before its conclusion. The army would have had to stop its advance if President Rajapaksa had given in to them.

Ironically, Field Marshal Fonseka has undertaken to protect national security as a member of a team that went all out to scuttle the country’s war effort and ridiculed him as a person unfit to lead even the Salvation Army. Those who praised him as the best army commander in the entire world now claim that they would have been able to win the war without him!

Fonseka’s contention that the political leadership and the Defence Secretary had no role to play in preparing the strategy to defeat terror is counterproductive. He aspires to be the Defence Minister in case of NDF presidential candidate Sajith Premadasa’s victory. Going by his aforesaid argument, he as the Defence Minister would have no role to play in preparing military plans in case of terrorism raising its ugly head again; that task would have to be left to the future military commanders, according to Fonseka’s own logic. In other words, in the event of Premadasa winning, to ensure national security, his government would need good military commanders and not a former army commander as the Defence Minister.

Fonseka should be asked whether he, as the Defence Minister of a future government, led by a group of opponents of war advocating appeasement, would be able to fight a war in case of terrorism re-emerging. The Rajapaksas need to be asked whether they would be equal to the task of countering terrorism again without military commanders of Fonseka’s calibre.

Certain macro factors need to be managed carefully -Cabraal

October 21st, 2019

Moderated by Rishini Weeraratne Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Former Central Bank Governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal responded to a few questions posed to him by viewers during a live interview conducted on Facebook. Here, he spoke about the growth of the economy during his tenure, where it has gone wrong, allegations on bond issues and the future of certain political factions.
Excerpts : 

Live interview on DM online​

Q The economy grew from USD 24 billion to USD 79 billion during your period as the Governor. What would you say was the main reason for this?


We were prepared for the challenge of taking the economy forward. We didn’t come during early 2006 and say we must find what to do. We were ready with the plans and focused areas we were going to work on and started on each of those areas together. Sometimes we cannot wade through one to the other, but have to do several things together. That was our key thrust. Then we started on the development, dealing with the war and that helped us to give confidence to the rest of the country and stakeholders and their were results. Each year there was an incremental way in which it was going forward and it gave more confidence to people. 


Q  Recently you presented a 12-point revival plan and said that the rupee should be 150 per USD. Don’t you think that’s a little too ambitious?


What happened was at the beginning of 2018 the rupee was at 150 and then just a year later it was 183. If the rupee could have depreciated in one year why can’t the opposite happen? Why are we thinking that we cannot do it? I’m sure we can with the right conditions put in place. I think what we need is to have confidence restored back into the economy. Once that happens and investments come back and other macro-fundamentals start moving in the right direction. 


Q Hoteliers have been agitated for years. Municipality and Local Government licence fees based on up to 1% tax on turnover based on the hotel industry. They feel this is an unfair tax where they are singled out in comparison to other sectors such as banking, insurance etc where they only take Rs. 5000. What are your comments?


Many industries have told us that they have been taxed unfairly. These include the banking sector, hotels, small and medium enterprise sector, professionals and various traders who have been taxed unfairly. I think hoteliers have a very good reason to be agitated because they have been made to pay many taxes. I believe we need to rationalise all these quickly. That’s why the first part of the plan that I have presented suggests that we should cut taxes at least by 20%. Some of these obnoxious taxes such as those on apartment sales and remittances need to be scrapped because they are inhibiting growth. Tourism is a sector that we want to support, which will touch people and filter down fast. It’s much better to forego some taxes and ensure that the people have jobs and their energy to do additional activities and that’s the philosophy that will drive the economic policy in future.  If they are energized they will take Sri Lanka to a five million tourism product. Even a three-wheel taxi driver will have more hires. 


Q Could you clarify the fraudulent bond issues during your time? Greek bonds, hedging, humping and dumping using EPF money to buy shares of nearly bankrupt companies etc.?


When I left Central Bank, the portfolio of the Employers Provident Fund (EPF) had had an unrealised gain of Rs. 20 billion. That wouldn’t have been the case had there been pumping and dumping. The Greek bond case was a situation where it was challenged in the Supreme Court by Sujeewa Senasinghe, who wrote a book on the alleged Bond Scam. Details of the case is in the website of the Supreme Court. They specifically say ‘considering the totality of the circumstances, it is neither possible nor desirable to hold that the members of the monetary board in taking a  decision to invest in Greek bonds have acted arbitrarily, unreasonably and in a fraudulent manner. In view of the conclusion reached, the Court is not inclined to express any opinion on the objections raised’. 


I recommend all these people who ask this question regularly to go read it through. If anybody has any doubts, please refer to this case.  Hedging is not a fraudulent activity. It is an activity that people use in order to deal with some risk. It’s like an insurance and was proposed by the Central Bank. But something went wrong with that as a result of certain factors. But no one alleged. That was not done by the Central Bank, but the Petroleum Corporation. It was only an idea that was generated by the Central Bank’s economic research team. It was never alleged that there was anything fraudulent in that. There was a loss that occurred, but that was certainly less than what this Government paid as compensation for the Port City stoppage of work as well as the cancellation of the SriLankan Airbus. Coming back to the Greek bonds, although they say that there was a loss of USD 6.6 million what they said is that during the particular year, the Central Bank made its highest ever profit which was USD 430 million against a USD 50 million profit made last year and a USD 100 million the previous year. You can see that despite taking this loss into consideration, the Central Bank made its highest ever profit and it was a landmark year; although this loss was suffered. 

Sometimes we need to hold the hand of certain state institutions to ensure that those also grow. I think we must do what is right for the country at the stage that it is in. Don’t embrace certain theories and principles, merely because they have been applied in other countries


Q What is your stance with regard to the perpetrators and masterminds behind the bond issue? Would we ever see those responsible being behind bars and their gains brought back to the Government? 


This alleged bond scam was twofold ; it happened in February 2015 and again in March 2016. You could see the number of people involved in it. 


The main way in which this alleged bond scam took place was that the system of issuing bonds didn’t allow any bonds to be issued in a fraudulent manner.


 That is why I told that anyone who was making allegations about my period of issuing to please go and ask anyone to do any check whatsoever. I’m not afraid and I don’t think anyone in Central Bank is afraid to face any inquiry. We know that it wasn’t possible to initiate any bond scam with that system in place. But on February 27, 2015 that system was changed arbitrarily on the insistence of PM Ranil Wickremesinghe. They changed the system which allowed this kind of thing to take place. If the system wasn’t changed, even Mahendran couldn’t have done that. Now we need to get to the bottom of that. During the past five years there have been one cover-up after another. I’m writing a book on the cover-ups because people should know the extent of them. Those people have to account for their actions and the loss that we have suffered, not only the direct loss we suffered on the day of the alleged scam. 
There were losses that were suffered for thirty years as a result of what is being issued at higher rates of interests. Because of bad publicity, the confidence in the economy was lost and interest rates have still not come down. The Average Weighted Prime Lending Rate (AWPLR) was only 6.2% at the time I left the Central Bank. Today it is nearly 12%. This means that every single person who is paying interest has to account for an additional 6% premium that has been added to all transactions. The Commission that was appointed didn’t do its job properly. 


Q  But your sister was on the Perpetual Board. Your comments?


That was again being said by many people. I’m glad that you asked this question. My sister was invited to the board of Perpetual Holdings and she was there for one year. She hadn’t attended a single meeting and she had never had any dealings with Perpetual Treasuries. People pretend as if they don’t know this. Even the Commission didn’t write about any involvement regarding her during that period. During the time I was Governor, Perpetual Treasuries had bid for about Rs. 2.7 billion worth of bonds at the auctions. They had only received Rs. 26 million. Billions bid but Rs. 26 million received. That was all they had got which was at normal rates. That was  what  all others had got. It was only after I left that the entire incident had taken place. My sister and I have never run away. They are all here. My sister has said that she would come and give evidence any time. I even told the first COPE Commission that I would come. I would have been one of the first people to have said to invite me to the COPE and I’ll gave evidence.Try to find the man after me and catch him and see if you can ask a single question. 


Q According to the President, the bond reports states that there was a loss of Rs. One trillion from 2008-2016. Between 2015 and 2016 the loss was Rs. 11 billion. Doesn’t the rest fall under you?


Our President Sirisena has been making all sorts of comments of that nature. We all know that. But nobody takes him seriously. These are just statements he has made. Whatever he says, let the records speak for themselves. It is not true. It complete nonsense. Even if it is the President who has said it, nonsense is nonsense. 


Q  State enterprises are a drain on taxpayers. Government-owned monopolies such as CEB and CPC have made huge losses which have required tax money to prop up these unproductive organisations. Every Government has promised to reform them, even when the previous regime had a 2/3rd majority in Parliament, they still failed. Economics show us that competition and private enterprise lead to cheaper and better services. The privatization of Sri Lanka Telecom and the opening of the telecom market are excellent examples of how privatisation and de-regulation help. Will you support opening up the electricity and petroleum markets to more competition besides CEB and CPC?


There is one area which may need a little clarification. You have mentioned that it’s cheaper, but it’s not so. Those days the prices you would have paid for telecom would have been much cheaper. Of course the service is terrible. 

That is what we need to accept as the difference. When you have a private entity they will charge the right price or a higher price to make a profit and ensure that the customer gets a proper deal. Take the Petroleum Corporation – tomorrow the CPC can increase the price and make a profit because it’s a monopoly. If it is handed over to the private sector, the first thing they would do is to bring in a price that would make money. But what does it do to the customer? Are we prepared to do that? If yes, that’s perfectly fine. At the time that the oil price went to USD 145 per barrel, we still gave petrol at a much lower rate. 


That loss was accepted by the Government. The Government subsidised that. During that period of time although it was a tough call, the Government took a political as well as economic decision that we want to ensure that the country’s economic activities don’t get stalled by this high price that it had to pay. So we took an economic and a political call and that was a deliberate action by the Government. 


It had nothing to do with the efficiency of the Petroleum Corporation. Even if the CPC becomes inefficient the bulk of its expenditure is  not on salaries or any other factor, but on the fuel price. 


If the fuel price is high the price will have to be high. Here what has happened is that there are certain times you have to offer support to the consumers in order to bring that economic activity up to a certain level of robustness. 


At the same time we need to ensure that these are companies which are not in any way a burden on the government taxpayer as well as the people of the country. So it’s a balance. Economics is always about a balance. Sometimes the most optimum solution is not found in that particular organization alone. It can be found elsewhere. 


The SriLankan Airlines is going to be restructured, but we should view tourism as a product. Who would support tourism during a downturn? We mustn’t get completely carried away by this privatisation thought and think that everything would be perfect with privatisation. Right now we are at USD 4000 per capita income and our economy isn’t robust enough to charge interests of that nature. Sometimes we need to hold the hand of certain state institutions to ensure that those also grow. I think we must do what is right for the country at the stage that it is in. Don’t embrace certain theories and principles, merely because they have been applied in other countries. So let’s give it some time and I would support the companies you just mentioned, to make them better managed companies. 


Q So you don’t support Sri Lankan consumers to have more choices as to whom they buy their power and energy from?


 I wouldn’t say that. But for everything there’s a timing. We need to ensure that people have it at the right time. If we were to bring in so many other oil companies to Sri Lanka I don’t think we would be doing justice to consumers. We may only have a steep increase in the pricing alone. There’s a lot more focus on electricity as well, but what has happened? During the past five years not a single unit has been added to the National Grid. So how do we tackle that? The Government is contemplating adding 500 MW of emergency power. The worse thing that you can do is have emergency power. The answer to that is not that you do a tender for emergency power, but have a longterm generation plan. This way you would ensure that each year there would be new amounts of units added to the national grid. Then we would be in a position to have better pricing and better relief to the consumers. In 2014 the electricity prices actually reduced after the 300 MW Norochcholai Power plant was commissioned. That was a promise that was given in the manifesto of President Mahinda Rajapaksa and it was followed because we were in a position to do that. 

Many industries have told us that they have been taxed unfairly. These include the banking sector, hotels, small and medium enterprise sector, professionals and various traders who have been taxed unfairly. I think hoteliers have a very good reason to be agitated because they have been made to pay many taxes


Q What is Sri Lanka’s way out of this issue with the fiscal deficits because state finances are in dire straits and brought down further by SOE burdens?


The SOE burdens are minimal compared to what can happen in the case of the total public sector management of the economy. Last year the Central Bank report showed that due to the depreciation of the currency, Sri Lanka’s debt burden grows by Rs. 1063 billion. The Colombo-Katunayake expressway cost us only Rs. 37 billion. We could have done about 35 such expressways through the amount the rupee depreciation added on to our debt. That is the critical part of public sector management. All debts put together of SriLankan Airlines etc., won’t come anywhere close to it. So we need to manage our economy properly. If we don’t manage it we get into serious trouble. So we need to get our interest rates, rupee and the SOEs right.  Why we are here in this situation, where people are wondering whether we could survive is because we have actually gotten into trouble in the mega areas of our economic management. We have done badly in terms of interest rates, rupee, fiscal deficit and foreign direct investments coming in and those need to be fixed very quickly. 


Q  Do you think the SLPP is a Democratic Party? Can any other candidate other than a member of the Rajapaksa family be party leader some day?


It is a young party. It has been in existence only for about three years and there’s lot more time for leadership changes. If you take the SLFP, it had the leadership of S.W.R.D Bandaranaike and then from him to Sirimavo and Chandrika, but then it changed. If you take the UNP from D.S Senanayake it went to Dudley Senanayake and then it changed. So there were times where you would have seen certain initial stages of the Party being dominated by a certain group or a certain family. But over a period of time as other leaders emerged and they come forward there will be changes taking place. So I’m confident that even here there would be a certain transition.  I think people accept the undisputed leadership of Mahinda Rajapaksa and there has been consensus that the person who should contest the Presidency is Gotabaya Rajapaksa. 


Transcribed by Kamanthi Wickramasinghe 

Withdrawing from UNHRC Resolution: Petition filed in Supreme Court

October 21st, 2019

By Sugeeswara Senadhira Courtesy Ceylon Today

A petition has been filed in Supreme Court, seeking issuance of a directive to the Government, to take measures to withdraw from the UNHRC Resolution it co-sponsored in September 2015, titled ‘Promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human Rights in Sri Lanka.’ The petitioner claimed that his fundamental rights were violated due to the Government co-sponsoring the Resolution. The respondents included former Foreign Minister, Mangala Samaraweera and Foreign Secretary, Ravinatha Aryasinha.

The Petitioner, Truth Seekers Movement (Sathya Gaveshakayo) Convener, Attorney-at-Law Premnath C. Dolawatta, states his fundamental rights, protected by Article 12(1), 12(2), 13(1) of the Constitution are continuously being violated or caused to be violated by the Government co-sponsoring this Resolution.
The Resolution was moved in September 2015 and the petition to challenge it has been moved four years later.

However, there is a precedent. In 1988, after the Provincial Councils were set up under the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, President J.R. Jayewardene issued a proclamation to temporarily amalgamate the Northern and Eastern Provinces. This was challenged in Supreme Court 17 years later, by the JVP.

A five-Judge bench, headed by then Chief Justice, Sarath N. Silva, ruled the temporary merger of the Northern Province with the Eastern Province is “unconstitutional, illegal and invalid.” The ruling was delivered on 16 October 2005. The three JVP petitioners, being residents of the Trincomalee and Digamadulla Districts, within the Eastern Province, the alleged infringement of their fundamental rights to the equal protection of the law, guaranteed by Article 12(1) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict to allow the applications and grant to the petitioners the relief prayed for in the respective petitions.

The executive action impugned as denying to the petitioners equal protection of the law relates to the proclamation declaring that the provisions of Section 37(1) of the Provincial Councils Act No. 42 of 1987 shall apply to the Northern and Eastern Provinces, which resulted in these two provinces forming one administrative unit, a process commonly described as the merger of the two provinces. The case for the petitioners, articulated by H.L. de Silva, is that the proclamation (P2) resulting in the merger is “fatally flawed” due to the non-observance of the mandatory conditions as contained in the Constitution.

Political destiny of people

The petitioners said there was a strong likelihood of crucial decisions affecting the political destiny of the people of the Eastern Province being taken, on the basis of an unconstitutional order to merge the two provinces in September 1988.

Although, it was stated that a referendum will be held to decide on permanent merger or de-merger of the two provinces. But the referendum was never held. The then President, on 12 July 1990, made an Emergency Regulation, under Section 5 of the Public Security Ordinance, which stated the notice published by the Commissioner of Elections fixing the date and time of nominations “shall be deemed for all purposes to be of no effect.” The electoral process stopped there, and has remained ever since. As it were frozen, up to date. There has been no election for either the North East Provincial Council or separately for the Northern Provincial Council or the Eastern Provincial Council. Whereas, in respect of the councils for the other seven provinces in the country, elections have been held on the due dates in 1988, 1993, 1998 and 2004, the petitioners pointed out.

After a lengthy hearing, the Supreme Court ruled the merger of North and East was a violation of the Constitution, and ordered a de-merger.
The Petition calling for a declaration that co-sponsoring Geneva Resolution null and void, points out that by cosponsoring the resolution, the 1st and/or 2nd respondents and other delegates representing the Government of Sri Lanka at the UNHRC have given an undertaking and/or forwarded proposals to engage in several activities that are inconsistent with the Constitution.

The most serious among these undertakings relates to the establishment of a judicial mechanism with powers to investigate human rights violations and abuses and violation of international humanitarian law. The petitioner states, adding that as long as this remains in force, the petitioner and every citizen of Sri Lanka would be subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign judicial mechanism.

Sri Lankan Constitution

The Sri Lankan Constitution declares it a “free, sovereign, independent and democratic” republic, and the UNHRC Resolution infringes on the sovereignty of the people, especially subjecting the people and the country to foreign sovereignties and jurisdictions which would be amounting to unlawful alienation of sovereignty, which amounts to violation of Article 3 of the Constitution.
The petitioner states personnel who served in the armed forces and State officials who served in the State machinery and engaged in activities in State security would continuously be subjected to foreign jurisdiction.

Last year, President Maithripala Sirisena too publicly stated that he did not recognise the UNHRC Resolution. He said that this resolution, which was co-sponsored by Sri Lanka for a second time, had been worked out without his knowledge and that of the Foreign Ministry. Yet, a joint UNF-SLFP delegation sent by President Sirisena that was in Geneva did not oppose it and the resolution was carried unanimously.

President Sirisena said he had not given his consent for co-sponsoring either the 2015 Resolution (30/1) or the one passed the following year. The latest resolution, moved by a core group including the United Kingdom, Canada, North Macedonia and Montenegro, was co-sponsored by Sri Lanka without his approval, he said. It pledged to implement remaining provisions of Resolution 30/1, including the setting up of Hybrid Courts to try alleged war crimes by troops and LTTE terrorists.

Mano Tittawala

The President told a public meeting that it was Mano Tittawala, Secretary General of the Secretariat for Coordinating Reconciliation Mechanisms (SCRM), and Advisor to the Finance Ministry, who had written to Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative at the UN in Geneva to co-sponsor the second resolution. It had been on the grounds that Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had agreed to it. President Sirisena bitterly criticised those responsible for the co-sponsorship, saying it was done behind his back. “I would wish we can withdraw from it. Discussions are now on over this matter,” President Sirisena told the Media.

The move would be a dramatic shift in Sri Lanka’s official position since 20 September 2015. The pros and cons of the withdrawal, a Foreign Ministry source said, were now being studied, in consultation with President Sirisena.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court petition was filed seeking withdrawal from co-sponsorship of the UNHRC Resolution.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress