19ට ජනපති උසාවියට!

July 6th, 2019

දේශපාලන වාර්තාකරු උපුටා ගැන්ම දේශය

තීරණාත්මක දේශපාලන ප්‍රශ්න ගණනාවක් ගැන ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ මත විමසුමක් සිදු කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයා තීන්දු කර ඇතැයි ඉහළ පෙළේ විශ්වාස කටයුතු ආරංචි මාර්ග සඳහන් කරයි. මේ සඳහා වන සුබ දිනයක් පවා පසුගිය සතියේ මෙරට ප්‍රධාන පෙළේ දෛවඥයන් ගණනාවකගෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරයා විමසා තිබිණි.

දේශයට වාර්තා වන ආකාරයට ජනාධිපතිවරයා ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ මතය විමසීමට සැරසෙන්නේ 19 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සම්මත කිරීමේදී ජනමත විචාරණයක් මගින් සම්මත කරගත යුතු යැයි අධිකරණය නියම කළ සමහර වගන්ති සාමාන්‍ය 2/3 බහුතරයකින් සම්මත කර ඇති නිසා ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 19 වැනි සංශෝධනය තවදුරටත් වලංගුද යන්නයි.

යම් හෙයකින් 19 වැනි සංශෝධනය මේ හේතුව නිසා බල රහිත බව ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය ප්‍රකාශ කළහොත් නැවතත් 18 වැනි සංශෝධනය ක්‍රියාත්මක වන අතර ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ නිල කාලය වසර 6ක් දක්වා දිගුවෙයි. ඒ සමඟ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට ජනාධිපතිවරණයට තරග කිරීමට තිබූ බාධකයද අවසන් වෙයි.

මේ හැර පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය ආණ්ඩුව විවිධ තාක්ෂණික හේතු නිර්මාණය කොට ප්‍රමාද කර ඇති නිසාත්, මැතිවරණ කොමසාරිස්වරයා ඒ ගැන ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයෙන් මතය විමසන ලෙස ජනාධිපතිවරයාගෙන් ඉල්ලා ඇති නිසාත් පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය පැරැණි ක්‍රමයට හෝ පැවැත්වීමට නීතිමය අවකාශයක් තිබේද යන්තත් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයෙන් විමසනු ඇතැයිද සඳහන් වේ.

මෙම මත විමසීම් ගැන දින 14ක් තුළ තමන්ට තීරණය ලබා දෙන්නැයි අධිකරණයෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටීමටත් අපේක්ෂිත බව වැඩිදුරටත් කියැවේ. මෙම මත විමසුමේ තීන්දුව ලද පසු කිසියම් හදිසි මැතිවරණයක් කරා යොමුවීමේ වාසි අවාසි ගැනද ජනාධිපතිවරයා සිය සමීපතම උපදේශකයන් සමග සාකච්ඡා කර ඇත. එම මත විමසුම් දෙකට අදාළ ලිපි ලේඛන ලබන සතියේ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට යොමුකරනු ඇති බව ජනාධිපති කාර්යාල ආරංචි මාර්ග කියයි.

ජීව විද්‍යාවෙන් පැහැදිය නොහැකි විඥ්ඥාණය

July 6th, 2019

Tissa Jananayake

[1] කලලයට විඥ්ඥාණය බැස ගන්නේ කෙසේද? [2] දරුවන්ට දෙමව්පියන්ගේ ගතිගුණ නොපිහටන්නේ ඇයි? [3] සර්වසම නිවුන් දරුවන්ගේ දෛවය දෙයාකාර වන්නේ ඇයි?

https://youtu.be/Zr_SgfpXIxw

Why Sri Lanka named its first-ever satellite after Ravana

July 6th, 2019

Courtesy Scroll.in

For some Sinhala-Buddhists, the mythological king is a symbol who challenges Indian cultural hegemony.

Why Sri Lanka named its first-ever satellite after Ravana

A sculpture of Ravana at the Koneswaram temple in Sri Lanka. | Gane Kumaraswamy/ Wikipedia

On June 19, Sri Lanka successfully put its first satellite into orbit. This was a landmark moment for the small island country that spent nearly four decades focused on a civil war between the Sri Lankan state and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

But the satellite embodied not just the fulfillment of a technological aspiration – its name revealed a cultural ambition.

Sri Lanka chose to call the satellite Raavana 1 after the mythical king Ravana of the Ramayana. Most Indians are used to the mainstream reading of the Sanskrit epic, which paints Ravana as the evil king of Sri Lanka who was killed in battle with divine incarnate Ram. But as scholars like AK Ramanujan have pointed out, there are hundreds of versions of the Ramayana within India, some substantially different from the Sanskrit version attributed to Valmiki.

The number of Ramayanas and the range of their influence in South and Southeast Asia over the past 2,500 years or more is astonishing,” Ramanujan said, citing at least 22 languages, including Sinhala, in which the epic has been retold.

Despite this, conservative Sinhala-Buddhists, who form the majority in Sri Lanka, have for long been uncomfortable with Ravana’s portrayal in the epic. Given the conflation of modern-day Sri Lanka with the theatre of war represented in the Ramayana, a section of the community, which has tried to create a glorious past of valour for itself, would rather recast Ravana as a Sinhalese king of great ideals and values. In this account, Ravana was defeated only because his scheming brother Vibhishana helped the Indian king Ram.

These attempts to remould Ravana as a national hero gained momentum with the landing of the Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka in the 1980s, which was seen by some as interference by India in the country’s internal strife. Now, with Sri Lanka naming its first satellite after Ravana, the mythical king’s transformation into a political symbol is complete.

Tharindu Dayaratne and Dulani Chamika Withanage played a key role in developing Raavana 1. Credit:Astronomical and Space News in Sri Lanka.

Sinhala-Buddhists and Ravana

For centuries, the Mahavamsa, a Pali language epic written by Buddhist monks in Anuradhapura in the 5th Century, remained the undisputed cultural foundation of Sri Lanka. The historical epic tells the story of Prince Vijaya arriving from Kalinga in India and establishing his rule on the island, followed by many generations of kings.

This epic dominated the cultural narrative of the Sinhalese people until a split emerged in the 20th century. A section of the community opposed the Indian origin story of the Sinhalese people and located their beginnings within Sri Lanka.

Such an imagination became even more critical after the Sinhalese-Tamil ethnic conflict intensified in the 1940s, with the Sinhalese wanting to establish themselves as the original inhabitants of the island.

It is with the emergence of such nativity narratives that historians feel the character of Ravana came to the centrestage of Sinhala popular discourses.

One of the leaders of this so-called cultural renaissance movement was Kumaratunga Munidasa, who formed the literary organisation Hela Havula in 1941. The goal of the organisation was to purify Sinhala language of external influences. This organisation would play a pivotal role in the reimagination of the Ravana myth through members like Arisen Ahubudu, who in the 1980s leveraged works such as Ravanavaliya to locate Ravana as a Sinhala hero.

According to Nirmal Ranjith Dewasiri, a senior lecturer of history at the University of Colombo, there has always been an anti-Indian strain within a section of Sinhala-Buddhists. The reconstruction of the Ravana myth fits into this framework of antagonism towards India and its perceived cultural hegemony.

This anti-India feeling strengthened with the Indian involvement in the Sri Lankan Tamils problem and its measures to find a settlement to the strife. The tipping point came when the Indian Peace Keeping Force landed in Sri Lanka in 1987, which was seen by certain Sinhala-Buddhists as a continuation of the ancient Indian urge to violate Sinhalese territory. One of Mahavamsa’s famous stories is the battle of Vijithapura, in which the Sri Lankan king Dutthagamani defeated the South Indian king Ellalan.

‘Monkey Army’

When the Indian Peace Keeping Force operated in Sri Lanka, the Janata Vimukthi Peramuna stuck posters calling them monkey army,” Dewasiri said. The Janata Vimukthi Peramuna is an ultra-Left party that orchestrated an insurgency in 1987 using the Sinhalese sentiments against the IPKF. Its reference to the monkey army was a throwback to the Ramayana – in the epic, Ram had defeated Ravana with the help of a monkey army led by Sugriva.

But Nandaka Maduranga Kalugampitiya, lecturer at the University of Peradeniya, questioned this glorification of Ravana as a Sinhalese icon in an essay in 2015.

The association of Rāvanā with Sinhala Buddhism is problematic for the simple reason that Rāvanā predates both Buddhism and the Sinhala ethnicity as we know them today,” he wrote. Prince Vijaya who arrived in what is today known as Sri Lanka with a group of companions in the sixth century BC is widely seen as the founder of the Sinhala ethnic identity.”

The consecration Of Prince Vijaya, detail from mural in Ajanta cave No 17. Credit: Dharma from Sadao, Thailand [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)]

Kalugampitiya continued: Although this particular understanding of the origin of the Sinhala ethnic identity has been challenged and attempts have been made to place this point of origin centuries, if not millennia, back in time, in a context where the authority of the Mahāvamsa largely remains unchallenged, especially in the eyes of the mainstream elements of the Sinhala community, the argument that Vijaya was the founder of the Sinhala identity continues to remain valid.”

In post-war Sri Lanka, after the LTTE was defeated in 2009, the triumphalism has added to the Ravana myth. Deborah De Koning of the Tilburg University called this Ravanisation”, a form of cultural revitalisation, which portrays him as the most famous king, not just of Lanka, but of an ancient and indigenous civilisation.

The imagination of a glorious past and, more specifically, the revitalisation of Ravana finds its expression in multiple ways among Sinhalese Buddhists such as the publication of popular books and articles, the production of TV and radio programs, songs and Ravana statues, and the promotion of Angampora,” she wrote in an essay. The Angampora is a traditional Sri Lankan martial art.

Dewasiri said that the figure of Ravana has gained more prominence in popular Sinhalese culture rather than in academic circles and among historians for the simple reason that much of the claims made in the Ramayana have hardly any real backing in empirical evidence. There is a fundamental dispute among historians on whether the Lanka of Ramayana is indeed the Sri Lanka of today.”

Despite such doubts, many locations in Sri Lanka are popularly identified, even by the government, as those mentioned in the Ramayana.

Sinhala, Ravana and India

Perhaps the biggest irony is that Ravana has held the same appeal for two political forces which are otherwise opposed to each other: the Dravidian movement of Tamil Nadu and the Sinhala-Buddhists of Sri Lanka.

In Tamil Nadu, stalwarts like former Tamil Nadu chief minister CN Annadurai portrayed Ravana as a Dravidian king wronged at the hands of his Aryan counterpart. It was effectively used to build the discourse of the Aryan invasion theory in the state.ADVERTISEMENT

It is here that the Sinhala-Buddhists and the Dravidian movement of Tamil Nadu, now separated by the sea and politics, meet, in that both see Ram as a force of cultural hegemony. There are many positive references to Ravana in the Sri Lankan Tamils literature as well.

Dewasiri argues that the lack of historical evidence for the Ramayana means that it is open to varied interpretation under different contexts. Sections of Tamils and Sinhala-Buddhists laying claim over the same symbol points to the very nature of a myth as amenable to different readings.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/indi/4292507865
A representation of Ravana at Colombo’s Sri Ponnambalam Vanesar Kovil. Credit: Indi Samarajiva/Flickr

Could the naming of a satellite after Ravana be considered an attempt to antagonise India?

For many Hindus, and particularly the Bharatiya Janata Party, which leads the government of India, Ram is a revered divine figure. It is around the icon of Ram that Hindutva as an ideology transformed into a formidable political force, culminating in the destruction of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992. Ram has been at the foundation of the BJP’s rise to power in India and the party has in the past reacted sharply to attempts at delegitimising Ram in any manner.

However, India and Sri Lanka have a deep cultural, economic and geographical connection that has gone beyond ideologies of political parties. Governments in both countries have, barring a few incidents, tried to keep political differences away when it comes to diplomacy. Ravana is unlikely shake this relationship.

Dewasiri said that there was indeed a symbolic value to the naming of the satellite given how Ravana has emerged as a significant figure in the Sri Lankan popular imagination. But there could be other benign reasons as well. The reign of Ravana, with elements like Pushpaka Vimana, is imagined to be a technologically advanced era,” he said. It is this context that may have led Sri Lanka to name its satellite after the mythical king.

Confusion worse confounded

July 6th, 2019

Editorial Courtesy The Island

July 6, 2019, 8:12 pm 

The country is where it is thanks to partisan party politics which takes precedence over everything else. The economy is struggling to remain afloat and the tourism sector is still lying supine following the Easter Sunday carnage. Another National Thowheed Jamaath cadre wanted in connection with the terror strikes in April has been arrested. This is proof that the situation is not so rosy as the government has made it out to be. The suspect in custody cannot be the only terrorist left. But, both the government and the Opposition carry on regardless. They are busy with their presidential election campaigns.

The UNP is doing a Santa, giving pay hikes to the public sector and handouts to the needy in a desperate bid to make up lost ground. Its election-oriented programmes such as the expansion of the Samurdhi Scheme to include 600,000 more people are bound to deal a crippling blow to the state coffers. The state-owned banks are experiencing difficulties due to the political loans they are made to grant without collateral. Not to be outdone, the SLFP is also doing its damnedest to shore up its crumbling image. President Maithripala Sirisena is on a spending spree. He seems to think that the best way to win future elections is to hang convicted drug dealers. The SLPP is berating both the UNP and the SLFP. Instead of concentrating on main issues that the government has failed to tackle and offering solutions thereto, it is behaving like a bull in a china shop. It has stopped ratcheting up pressure on the government to conduct the much-delayed Provincial Council (PC) polls. Its bark is worse than its bite.

Interestingly, none of these three parties has been able to announce its presidential candidate yet. It is widely thought that the SLPP will field former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who is already acting like a presidential candidate. But the SLPP lacks confidence to announce his candidacy, and whether he will be able to clear obstacles in his path remains to be seen. The SLFP is all at sea. Its General Secretary Dayasiri Jayasekera says President Maithripala Sirisena will seek a second term, but the latter, true to form, is blowing hot and cold on the issue. The SLFP is also having talks with the SLPP to form an electoral alliance and field a common candidate so that there will not be a split in the anti-UNP vote. Their endeavour is not likely to reach fruition because Sirisena is not likely to opt out of the presidential contest. If he ever does so, all those who threw in their lot with him will be reduced to political orphans overnight, and some of them may even join the UNP.

The UNP seems to have two presidential hopefuls —its leader Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and its Deputy Leader Sajith Premadasa, who has got more assertive unlike in the past. Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera is busy politicking while the economy is screaming. He has publicly announced that Premadasa is the ideal presidential candidate. The same view has been expressed by some other UNP MPs as well. The UNP’s problem is to reconcile these two groups in time for the presidential election. This is an uphill task in that one faction is bound to be frustrated in case of its failure to have its favourite fielded. A divided UNP will not be able to make the most of the problems in the Opposition.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe has gone on record as saying that the much-delayed PC elections cannot be held in September, and the party leaders have not even discussed the issue yet. Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa has chosen to remain silent. This statement runs counter to Chairman of the National Election Commission Mahinda Deshapriya’s position. Deshapriya has publicly declared that he will resign from his post if the PC polls do not precede the next presidential election. Chances are that he will have step down before the presidential election, and the image of the government will suffer further damage in such an eventuality.

The signs are that while the main political parties are struggling, unable to name their presidential candidates, the NEC will have to look for a new head.

USA’s Lankan quagmire over ACSA and SOFA

July 6th, 2019

by C.A.Chandraprema Courtesy The Island

July 6, 2019, 8:14 pm 

article_image

Last week, the debate on the proposed Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between Sri Lanka and the US took centre stage. The proposed SOFA is not something specific to this country but a generic agreement signed by the US with many other states. Many of the provisions would be the same in SOFA’s throughout the world. However, the very idea of entering into a Status of Forces Agreement with the US ran into a storm of protest in Sri Lanka with even outfits like the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce (CCC) and the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) taking up the issue.

The CCC, the oldest trade chamber in the country issued a statement requesting the government of Sri Lanka to provide a greater level of transparency with respect to these agreements and their potential consequences and also to clarify the exact position with regard to the current status of the negotiations and/or execution of these agreements. The President of BASL Kalinga Indatissa, PC held discussions with Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajapaksa with regard to the proposed SOFA, the already operational Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the proposed Millennium Challenge Corporation agreement that are to be signed with the US. Indatissa warned that if the SOFA was signed, Sri Lanka would become a target of anti-American terrorists.

Indatissa further pointed out that even if US personnel in Sri Lanka committed offences of any sort, Sri Lankan law could not be enforced on them, under the provisions of the proposed SOFA. In the meantime, the State Minister of Defence issued a tepid and unconvincing denial stating that the government of Sri Lanka did not intend signing any such agreements. It was even said that the planned visit of the US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to Sri Lanka had been called off at the last moment because the US government had failed to get the proposed SOFA approved by the Sri Lankan government in time for his visit.  The blame for this mess falls squarely on the US. From the very beginning, the US had adopted the wrong approach towards entering into agreements with Sri Lanka. When the US signed the Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA) with former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa in 2007, it was the US that wanted it to be done secretly.

Robert Blake’s original sin

A cable sent to the State Department by the then US Ambassador in Colombo Robert Blake, on 31 January 2007, (several weeks before the ACSA was signed) and released to the public by Wikileaks shows how things went wrong from the very beginning. The extracts from that cable reproduced here are self explanatory. The following is what Blake wrote:

“On December 7, 2006, Ambassador and Office of Defense Cooperation (ODC) Chief met with Sri Lankan Defense Secretary Gothabaya Rajapaksa to provide background information on a Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and a the draft ACSA proposed for signature. On January 25, 2007, Secretary Rajapaksa provided concurrence to ODC Chief on the proposed agreement. Secretary Rajapaksa stated that he was ready to sign the SIPDIS agreement at anytime convenient to the U.S …”

 “The US Government faces some risk that the Government of Sri Lanka might seek to exploit the signing to convey the US Government’s support for possible ongoing offensive military operations. The Embassy therefore recommends the Ambassador sign the agreement in a low-key ceremony with Secretary Rajapaksa in late February. The Sri Lankan military is presently engaged in mop-up operations against the LTTE in eastern Sri Lanka. However, the Defense Secretary and other military leaders have hinted they are considering further offensive military operations in northern Sri Lanka. The US Government has informed the GSL that we oppose large scale offensive military operations because we believe the Government should focus on developing a power-sharing proposal that can form the basis for peace negotiations with the LTTE.”  

“We recommend holding off on the signing ceremony until late February when we will have a clearer idea of the Sri Lankan military’s intentions. We also do not wish to detract attention from the Sri Lankan Commission of Inquiry (on human rights) and the work of the International Independent Group of Expert Persons who will arrive in Sri Lanka the second week of February to observe the work of the Commission. Since the ACSA benefits U.S. forces transiting through the region, and since the GSL might leak news of the signing, the Embassy proposes to have the Ambassador sign the ACSA with the Defense Secretary with a select number of photographers and no statements. The Embassy will then issue a press release following the ceremony explaining the purpose of the ACSA.”

 There was nothing in the 2007 ACSA that warranted all this secrecy except for the US Ambassador’s fear that the Sri Lankan government would use it as a propaganda tool gain an advantage over the LTTE. That was an era when the conservative political parties in the West had all succumbed to the propaganda of the liberals and, in fact, become clones of the liberal political parties. Thus, to some extent the Republicans tended to mouth the same platitudes as the democrats. Even though the Republican Party administration in the US in 2007 was carrying on a worldwide campaign against terrorism (meaning terrorism directed against the US), with regard to other countries, they continued the democratic party line of advocating negotiations instead of military action.

 As far as the US was concerned only it could exercise the option of fighting terrorists instead of negotiating with them. All other countries were required to negotiate with terrorists. The Republican Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice was even preaching the virtues of negotiating with the Chechen terrorists to Russia! It was this mind set that led Ambassador Blake to insist on secrecy when signing the ACSA with Sri Lanka. The fact that the Sri Lankan government had by then commenced dealing with the LTTE militarily was an embarrassment to them. If not for this, there was nothing in the ACSA of 2007 that warranted the secrecy in which it was signed.

 In any event, it must be said that despite the Bush administration’s lack of a backbone in the face of liberal propaganda, they were helpful to Sri Lanka in the struggle against terrorism in other ways, such as canvassing the EU to get the LTTE named as a terrorist organization, and providing for a mutual exchange of naval intelligence which was vital for Sri Lanka. The previous Republican administration may have thought that it was too exhausting to fight the liberals on all fronts so they just fought the liberals only with regard to domestic policy and when the interests of the US were directly involved and tended to fall in line with the liberals when it came to policy towards countries like Sri Lanka.   

Gota’s ACSA  

Be that as it may, despite Blake’s misplaced qualms the previous Republican administration was helpful to Sri Lanka and Gota was right to give them some quid pro quo by signing the ACSA in 2007. There was absolutely nothing special about the Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA), which Gota signed. It was like so many other ACSA’s that the US had signed with other countries. That ACSA was designed to facilitate reciprocal logistic support between the signatories to be used primarily during combined exercises, training, deployments, operations, or other cooperative efforts, and for unforeseen circumstances or exigencies, in which one of the parties may have a need of logistic support, supplies, and services. Specifically excluded from its coverage were weapon systems such as guided missiles, naval mines and torpedoes, nuclear ammunition and items such as warheads, warhead sections, cartridge and air crew escape propulsion system components, chaff and chaff dispensers, guidance kits for bombs or other ammunition, chemical ammunition (other than riot-control agents), any other materials, subject to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

Only non-lethal items of military equipment which are not designated as significant military equipment on the US Munitions List were covered by the 2007 ACSA between Sri Lanka and the USA. Under that agreement logistic support meant supplies and services such as food, water, billeting, transportation (including airlift), petroleum, oils, lubricants, clothing, communication services, medical services ammunition, base operations support (and construction incident to base operations support), storage services, use of facilities, training services, spare parts and components, repair and maintenance services, calibration services, and port services, use of general purpose vehicles and other non lethal terns of military equipment. Payment was to be made for the logistic support, supplies, and services provided to the USA under this agreement.

These are all generic features of all ACSAs that the US has signed with various countries. For example, the above mentioned provisions of the Sri Lankan ACSA of 2007 are almost identical to those found in the ACSA signed between the US and Australia in April 2010. The difference being that in Australia, the ACSA is a public document whereas in Sri Lanka it is a top secret document. When the ACSA with Sri Lanka was renewed in 2017, it was once again shrouded in secrecy. The renewed document too has not been made public. An issue has been raised about the annexures that were added to the 2017 agreement. We know that annexures were added to the 2017 ACSA because American records indicate that there were annexures to the 2017 agreement.

What were these annexures? As a separate SOFA has been proposed for Sri Lanka we know that the usual SOFA provisions have not been included in the annexures to the 2017 ACSA, which is just as well because Status of Forces Agreements can appear in various formats. In fact, according to the text of the proposed draft SOFA agreement between Sri Lanka and the USA, it was to be entered into not as a formal agreement but simply as an understanding arrived at on the basis of an exchange of letters. Since there are many ways in which a SOFA can be entered into, there is justifiable anxiety about the annexures of the 2017 ACSA agreement.  

The annexures accompanying other ACSA agreements entered into by the USA, largely refer to the details pertaining to the implementation of the agreement such as the manner in which goods and services are to be ordered from the host country, the forms that are to be used to place orders, the data that have to be provided, the manner in which the forms have to be filled, the Points of Contact for both contracting parties, details as to who will be responsible for the orders placed, the manner in which the payment will be made etc. Such annexures typically tend to go into fifty to sixty pages. When the ACSA between Sri Lanka and USA was renewed in 2017, what were the annexures that were added to it? Were they the innocuous annexures dealing with the minutiae of implementation that we see in other ACSA agreements or were they something more sinister? We have no way of knowing because everything is shrouded in secrecy.

SOFAs as generic documents

Even though the Status of Forces Agreement that has been proposed with Sri Lanka is shrouded in secrecy, as far as other countries are concerned, SOFA agreements are open documents. The provisions of the proposed Status of Forces Agreement between Sri Lanka and the US are almost identical for example to the USA’s SOFA with Poland. The provisions in these agreements are largely generic and can be cut and pasted from one agreement to another with minimal changes. SOFA agreements apply to US military and civilian personnel working for the US Department of Defense, and to US contractors under contract to the US Department of Defence. The agreement applies to the presence of US personnel in the host country in relation to ship visits, training, exercises, humanitarian activities, and other activities mutually agreed.

Such US personnel are to be accorded the privileges, exemptions and immunities accorded to the staff of a diplomatic mission. US personnel may enter and exit the host country with US identification. The host country accepts as valid all professional licences including driving licences issued by United States. US personnel will be authorised to wear uniform while performing official duties and to carry arms. The government of the United States will continue to exercise criminal jurisdiction over US personnel while in the host country. US personnel shall not be liable to pay any tax in the host country. Importation, exportation, and use shall be exempt from any inspection, license, other restrictions, customs duties, taxes or any other charges.

Vessels and vehicles operated by the US Department of Defense may enter, exit, and move freely within the territory of the host country.  US vessels and aircraft shall not be subject to the payment of landing fees or port fees, pilotage charges, overflight, terminal or similar charges etc. Aircraft and vessels of the US government shall be free from boarding and inspection. According to the US Congressional Research Service the United States is currently party to more than 100 agreements that may be considered SOFAs. A SOFA is an agreement that establishes the framework under which US armed forces operate within a foreign country. The agreement provides for rights and privileges of covered individuals while in the foreign jurisdiction, addressing how the domestic laws of the foreign jurisdiction shall be applied to U.S. personnel while in that country.

The Department of State and the Department of Defense, working together, identify the need for a SOFA with a particular country and negotiate the terms of the agreement. SOFAs may be as short as one page or in excess of 200 pages as is the case with the SOFA between the US and Germany. The question that the US government should ponder is why there is so much resistance in Sri Lanka to signing a SOFA agreement with the US. The first reason is that Sri Lankans in general do not see the USA as an ally or even a friend. For the most part, the US is seen as an adversary that has worked against Sri Lanka in the international arena especially during the Obama administration. There is the general awareness that Sri Lanka got on fairly well with the previous George Bush Republican administration despite the hang-ups that the Americans had about Sri Lanka. Even though the Republican Party has been restored to power, under the former US Ambassador Atul Keshap the Democratic deep state was fully operational in Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans felt no difference even after Trump defeated the Democrats.

What looms large in the minds of most Sri Lankans are the UN Human Rights Council resolutions that were brought against Sri Lanka by the Obama administration and the agenda it had to literally dismember Sri Lanka by striking down the armed forces and intelligence services and introducing new laws and Constitutions that would have broken Sri Lanka into eight or nine semi independent states. The vast majority of the general public sees no reason to give the armed forces of a hostile power privileges in Sri Lanka. When one looks at other countries such as Afghanistan, Japan, South Korea, Philippines and Iraq with which the US has SOFAs all those countries are accepted as allies by the US and the people in those countries (at least the pro-government types in Afghanistan and Iraq) would see the US as an ally and not as an enemy. Most importantly, other countries with which the US has SOFAs such as the ones mentioned earlier get billions of US Dollars in grants and other military aid whereas we get nothing.

The few hundred million dollars that the US seems to be willing to throw in Sri Lanka’s direction is just chicken feed and the people know it. What Sri Lanka has been getting from the US since 2009 are only criticisms and lectures on how to run our country. The US does not want to even acknowledge us as partners. In such circumstances, who in his right mind will be happy at a proposal that will give US troops a free run of this country? The presence of US troops in this country will on the one hand seriously compromise the non-aligned tradition which has become an article of faith in this country. Then there is the very real danger that the presence of US troops on Sri Lankan soil may spark off rivalry between super powers. Then there is the danger that the presence of US troops in our country may fuel Islamic terrorism as well.

Sri Lanka will have to go through all that for nothing in return from the US– not even a kind word let alone the kind of goodies that other countries get for doing the US similar favours.

SIRISENA AND DUTERTE Lost in Translation?

July 6th, 2019

Dr Nihal Jayawickrama Courtesy The Island

July 6, 2019, 8:13 pm 

article_image

President Duterte and President Sirisena in the Philippines

When President Sirisena announced his intention to hang the convicted drug offenders lingering in the death cells of the Welikada prison, he was congratulated by President Duterte of the Philippines.When he returned from a recent visit to the Philippines, President Sirisena publicly expressed his admiration of the manner in which President Duterte was dealing with drug offenders in that country. Sirisena and Duterte appear to have misunderstood each other. The death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 1987, and Duterte’s method of dealing with the drug problem has been to order the police to kill suspected drug dealers and drug users.Thousands are reported to have been murdered in their homes and on the streets.Duterte once claimed with pride that he himself had killed one or two. Sirisena does not appear to be aware of the pariah status that Duterte has earned for himself within the international community.

President Sirisena has reportedly signed four death warrants requiring the prison authorities to kill one woman and three menby hanging them by their necks until they are dead. It is not known how these four persons were singled out, and by whom. It was earlier reported that the President had identified 19 prisoners from among those convicted and sentenced to death as those who had been indulging in the drug trade from within the prison premises.That, of course, cannot be the basis for signing a death warrant. None of them have yet been indicted or convicted of the offence of drug trafficking from within prison premises. A prisoner has first to be charged with that offence, convicted and sentenced to death by a court, had his appeal dismissed, and then been recommended for execution by the Minister of Justice before the President can sign his or her death warrant. Any other course of action will constitute extra-judicial murder.

The legislative history

The death penalty was suspended in 1956 by Act of Parliament on the initiative of Senator M.W.H. de Silva, K.C., Minister of Justice in S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike’s government. In an emotion-driven decision, it was hurriedly restored througha flawed Emergency regulation following the assassination of Bandaranaike in 1959. In 1976, when I was Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Justice, a policy decision was reached to suspend judicial executions. Consequently, on 22 May 1977, the fifth anniversary of the Republic, President Gopallawa commuted the sentences of everyone on death row: 144 men and 3 women. Thereafter, President Jayewardene and his successors in office, Presidents Premadasa, Wijetunge, Kumaratunge and Rajapaksa, commuted every sentence of death.

The constitutional obligation

Then, as now, the Constitution prescribed the procedure to be followed when an accused person was sentenced to death by a trial court. Article 34 of our present Constitution states that, following the imposition of such sentence, the President shall cause a report to be made to him by the trial Judge. He shall forward such report to the Attorney General for his advice. Thereafter, the President shall send both reports to the Minister of Justice who will make the final recommendation whether the sentence should be carried out or whether it should be commuted to life imprisonment. When the President acts on that advice, and makes the appropriate order, the case is closed. The death sentence cannot be reinstated.

The procedure followed when Mr Felix Dias Bandaranaike was Minister of Justice was prescribed in a ministry standing order. If either the trial Judge or the Attorney General had recommended that the sentence should not be carried out, the Minister advised that the sentence be commuted to one of life imprisonment. If the trial Judge and the Attorney General had both recommended that the sentence be carried out, a senior assistant secretary examined the case record and the investigation notes for one of three elements: (i) evidence of premeditation (ii) excessive cruelty in the commission of the murder (iii) any other material that “shocks the conscience”. If one of these elements was present, the Minister advised the President to let the law take its course.

The Prime Minister has declared that his political party is opposed to the death penalty. Therefore, if the Minister of Justice had, in performing her constitutional duty, followed the policy adopted by her predecessors for 43 years and advised that every death sentence be commuted to life imprisonment, there would be no prisoners today under sentence of death. They would be serving life sentences. A prisoner serving a life sentence cannot now be hanged. On the other hand, if there are prisoners still lingering in death row, it means that the reporting procedure in respect of them, as required by the Constitution, has not yet been performed, and they cannot therefore be hanged. It is, of course, possible that the Minister of Justice had, in defiance of her party policy, and in order to accommodate the President’s publicly declared wishtohave at least a few human beings hanged before his term of office ends this year, recommended execution. If that be the case, the Minister’s recommendation will surely be challenged in court as having been influenced by irrelevant considerations. The Minister would not have brought to bear her own independent judgment as required by the Constitution but would instead have been influenced by the President’s publicly declared desire.

Empirical evidence

There is now an international commitment to abolish the death penalty. This is not only because of the desire to respect the dignity of the human being and the sanctity of human life, but also because the global empirical evidence demonstrates beyond any shadow of doubt that the death penalty does not serve as a deterrent. The most effective deterrent to crime is the certainty of detection. Competent policing, efficient prosecution, and expeditious trial– none of which are evident in Sri Lanka today – should be the primary objective of the government. If, in the absence of such deterrent, an individual proceeds to a life of crime, the progress that humanity has made through the centuries now demands that that individual be afforded an opportunity for rehabilitation, for reform, for repentance, for hope, for spiritualty, so that one day he or she may be able to enjoy those fundamental rights and freedoms which others outside the prison walls enjoy, but which are only possible if his or her right to life is not extinguished.

The international consensus

The Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights requires that no one shall be executed and that each State shall take all necessary measures to abolish the death penalty within its jurisdiction. In 1983, the Council of Europe abolished the death penalty in peacetime, and in 2002 abolished the death penalty in all circumstances, including wartime. Similar instruments have been adopted by the states parties to the American Convention on Human Rights. In 2014, the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights developed a protocol on the abolition of the death penalty. More than 160 of the 193 member-states of the United Nations have abolished the death penalty or introduced a moratorium, either in law or in practice. They include all the countries of Europe including Russia, nearly all the countries of Africa, and all the countries of South and Central America and Canada, as well as Australia, New Zealand and much of the Pacific and the Caribbean.

Violation of a fundamental right

Article 11 of the Constitution states that “No person shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. There is now a considerable body of international jurisprudence on the interpretation of thisArticle. For example, the Constitutional Court of South Africa has held that the death penalty is a “cruel punishment”. The Court of Appeal of Tanzania has held the death sentence to be both “cruel and degrading punishment”. In Canada, three Judges of the Supreme Court expressed the view that capital punishment per se constituted “cruel and unusual punishment”: “The death penalty not only deprives the prisoner of all vestiges of human dignity. It is the ultimate desecration of the individual as a human being.” The Judicial Committee of the Privy Councilis among several courts which have held thatthe mandatory sentence of death, based solely upon the category of crime (e.g. drug related offences in Sri Lanka), without regard to the offender’s personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence, constitutes”cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”.

Breaking the 43-year moratorium

If Sri Lanka now breaks its 43-year moratorium on executions, it is inevitable that economic concessions granted by the European Union including GSP+ will be withdrawn. Assistance from abroad in the investigation of crime will not be forthcoming. Requests by Sri Lanka for the extradition of persons awaiting trial or already tried and convicted will probably be refused by other States because of the unpredictability of the sentencing policy of the Government.

It was only a few months ago that President Sirisena, in elaborate island-wide ceremonies, proclaimed the Tripitaka as a national heritage, and called upon the international community to inscribe it on the UNESCO Memory of the World Register. Many beyond our shores who truly and faithfully adhere to the philosophy of life based upon tolerance and compassion as expounded by the Buddha will now stand aghast as the President of the only country in the world whose Constitution requires the State “to protect and foster the Buddha Sasana” addresses four human beings confined in a prison cell and tells each of them: “You are beyond the pale of humanity. You are not fit to live among humankind. You are not entitled to life. You are not entitled to dignity. You are not human. I will therefore annihilate your life”.

A concluding vision

Despite his apparent uncontrollable desire toexercise his power to have a woman and three men killed, it is unlikely that President Sirisena will be present to witness each of them being hanged by his or her neck until he or she is dead. Therefore, for his benefit, I would entreat him, at sunrise on each of the four mornings, to read to himself the execution of the death penalty as described by Professor Chris Barnard:

“The man’s spinal cord will rupture at the point where it enters the skull, electro-chemical discharges will send his limbs flailing in a grotesque dance, eyes and tongue will start from the facial apertures under the assault of the rope and his bowels and bladder may simultaneously void themselves to soil the legs and drip on the floor”.

19 හෙවත් රට විනාශ කළ යහපාලන පිළිකාව

July 6th, 2019

චතුර පමුණුව උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

yahapa

ජාතික නිවාස සංවර්ධන අධිකාරියට වසර 40 ක් සපිරීම වෙනුවෙන් කොළඹ බණ්ඩාරනායක අනුස්මරණ ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මන්ත‍්‍රණ ශාලාවේදී පසුගිය ඉරිදා පැවති සැමරුම් උත්සවයේදී ජනාධිපති මෛති‍්‍රපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ප‍්‍රකාශ කළ කරුණු ගැන සැමදෙනාගේ අවධානය යොමු වී තිබේ. ඊනියා යහපාලනය නිසා රටට අත්වූ ඉරණම ගැන කියැවෙන පාපොච්චාරණයක් බඳු ඒ කතාවෙන් කොටසක් මෙලෙස දක්වමි. ‘පශ්චාත් මරණ පරීක්ෂණය දැන් තියන්න වේලාව ඇවිල්ලා තියෙනවා. අපි මේවා කතා කරන්න ඕන. අවුරුදු හතරහමාරක කාලය තුළ ආණ්ඩුව රටේ නරක් වුණා නම් නරක් වුණේ ප‍්‍රධානම හේතුව තමයි 19 වන සංශෝධනය. 19 වන සංශෝධනය ආවේ නැත්නම් මේ ආණ්ඩුව ඉතාම හොඳ ආණ්ඩුවක්. මේ රටේ ජනතාව අතරේ චෝදනාවක් තිබෙනවා අගමැතිතුමායි මායි දෙපැත්තට අදිනවයි කියලා. ඒ දෙපැත්තට අදින තත්ත්වය ඇතිවුණේ 19 වන සංශෝධනයෙන්. එනිසා 19 වන සංශෝධනය නිසා දේශපාලන අස්ථාවරත්වයක් ඇති වුණා. එක නායකයෙක් නැතුව ගියා. 19 වන සංශෝධනයෙන් ජනාධිපතිත් අගමැතිත් දෙපැත්තට අදින ක‍්‍රමයක් හැදුණා. ඒකෙන් රටටත් විශාල අලාභයක් සිදුවුණා. ආණ්ඩුවටත් විශාල අලාභයක් සිද්ධ වුණා. 18 වන සංශෝධනයත්, 19 වන සංශෝධනයත් දෙකම අවලංගු කෙරුවොත් තමා මේ රටට යහපතක් වෙන්නේ. 18 ඒකාධිපති 19 අස්ථාවරත්වය. රට අරාජිකයි කියලා මිනිස්සු අපිට කියන්නේ 19 වන සංශෝධනයෙන් ඇති වෙච්ච තත්ත්වය.’
 
 මහා පුරසාරම් මැද 2015 අපේ‍්‍රල් 28 වැනිදා 19 වන සංශෝධනය පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රීවරු 215 දෙනෙකුගේ ඡුන්දයෙන් සම්මත විය. එයට විරුද්ධ වූයේ සරත් වීරසේකර මන්ත‍්‍රීවරයා පමණි. මේ විපත දැක්කේ ඔහු පමණකි. සැබවින්ම 19 වන සංශෝධනය යනු රටත් යහපාලනයත් විනාශ කළ පිළිකාව යැයි කිවහොත් නිවැරදිය. එය පමාවී හෝ ජනපතිවරයාට අවබෝධව ඇති සෙයකි. සාධාරණ සමාජයට අවශ්‍ය ලෙස විධායක බලතල කප්පාදු කිරීමටත් රාජපක්ෂවරුන්ගේ තටු සිඳීමටත් ගෙන එනු ලැබූ මේ ඊනියා ව්‍යවස්ථා මර උගුල නිසා රටම අරාජිකත්වයට ඇද දැමූ අතර අවසානයේ සහරාන්ලාට මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බ පුපුරවා සිය ගණනක් මරා දැමීම හැකි වන අන්දමට රටද අනාරක්ෂිත විය. මේ නම් කවර විපතක් ද? යහපාලනය වෙනුවෙන් කෑ ගැසූ මහාචාර්යවරුන්ගේ කේවට්ට උපදෙස් මත විධායක ජනපති ක‍්‍රමයද අහෝසි කර දැමුවා නම් කවරක් වන්නේද? ශ‍්‍රී ලංකා රාජ්‍යයත් විනාශවී යනු සිකුරුය. මේ ඊනියා සමාජ ක‍්‍රියාකාරිකයින් අද හැංගී සිටිති. මාදුළුවාවේ සෝභිත හිමියන් මේ අවුල දකින්නට අද නැත. එහෙත් උන්වහන්සේද මේවාට වගකිව යුතුය. මේ අරාජිකත්වයට පාර කැපුවේ උන්වහන්සේගේ නායකත්වය යටතේය. ඒ සිවුර පිටුපස බෞද්ධ විරෝධියෝ සැඟවී සිටියහ. එහෙත් මේ විපත වටහා ගන්නට උන්වහන්සේට නොහැකි වූයේ කොළ පාට අන්ධකාරය නිසාද ?
 
 ජනපතිවරයාගේ අදහසට එකහෙළා විරුද්ධ වන පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රී ආචාර්ය ජයම්පති වික‍්‍රමරත්න පවසන්නේ කුමක් ද ? සෝභිත හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ සිහිනයක් තිබුණා, මේ අත්තනෝමතික බලතල ඉවත් කරන්න. ඒ වගේ ම, ආචාර්ය ඇන්. ඇම්. පෙරේරා අනාගතය ඇස් දෙකෙන් දැකල වගේ කිව්වා විධායක ජනාධිපති ක‍්‍රමයේ ප‍්‍රතිවිපාක. පහුගිය ඔක්තෝබර් 26 වෙනි දා අපි ඒක හොඳට ම තේරුම් ගත්තා. සෝභිත හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ අවමංගල උත්සවය දවසේ ජනාධිපති තුමා පොරොන්දුවක් දුන්නා උන් වහන්සේගේ සිහිනය සැබෑ කරනවා කියලා. අපි ඒක ඉටු කළ යුතුයි. 
 
 එහෙත් අප කිසි විටක සෝභිත සිහින වලට ඉඩ දිය යුතු නැත. ඒ සිහිනය බියකරුය. රට අනාරක්ෂිත කරන අතරම ජාතියේ අනාගතයද නැතිකර දමයි. ආචාර්ය ජයම්පති වික‍්‍රමරත්න පමණක් ඒ සිහිනය දැක්කාට අපට කම් නැත. සෝභිත හිමියන් අද ජීවත්ව සිටියානම් මේ කළ වැරදි ගැන කම්පාවනු ඇත.
 
 ජනපතිවරයාත් කලින් කලට තමාගේ ප‍්‍රකාශයද ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිද වෙනස් කර ගනී. එනිසාම ඔහුගේ කතාවලට ලැබෙන පිළිගැනීමද බෙහෙවින් හීනවී ගොස් ඇති බව පැහැදිලිවම පැවසිය යුතුය. මීට වසර තුනකට පෙර ඉන්දියාවේ ‘ද හින්දු‘ පුවත්පතේ මීරා සිරිනිවාසන් සමග සාකච්ඡුාවකට එක්වෙමින් ජනපතිවරයා ප‍්‍රකාශ කර තිබුණේ 19 වන සංශෝධනය හරහා ජනාධිපති බලතල අඩු කිරීමට තමන් යෝජනා කළ බවය. එදා අන්ධව 19 වන සංශෝධනය පසුපස ගොස් ජනපතිවරයාම විශාල උගුලකට හසු විය. හේන මුවන් කා ගියා පසු ගෙදර ඇති මුව හමට තලා වැඩක් නැති බවද ජනපතිවරයා අවබෝධ කරගත යුතුය.
 
 රටට අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ කෙළින් වැඩ කළ හැකි නායකයෙකි. තද තීරණ ගත යුතුය. එසේම නායකයන් දෙදෙනකු සිටින රටකට ඉදිරියට යා නොහැකිය. එනිසා ජනපතිවරයාගේ බලතල කප්පාදුව රටේ ඉදිරි ගමනට කරන බාධාවකි. එනිසාම ජනපති බලතල කප්පාදු කරන සියලූම සංශෝධන අහෝසි කර දැමීම වැදගත්ය. විධායක ජනපති ක‍්‍රමය අහෝසි කිරීම කිසිලෙසකින්වත් සිදු කළ යුතු නැත. ඒකීය රාජ්‍යය සුරැකෙන්නේ විධායක ජනපති ධුරය නිසාය. පළාත් සභාවලට උපරිම බලය බෙදා විධායක ජනපති ක‍්‍රමය අහෝසි කළහොත් සිදුවන්නේ කුමක්ද? සිදුවන්නේ ස්ථාවර රට අස්ථාවර වීම පමණි. 1977 ජුලි මාසයේදී හයෙන් පහක බලයක් ලබාගෙන ජේ. ආර්. ජයවර්ධන මහතා 1978 පෙබරවාරි 04 වැනිදා මෙරට ප‍්‍රථම විධායක ජනපති ලෙස දිවුරුම් දුන්නේය. එදා බොහෝ දෙනකුට විධායක ජනපති ක‍්‍රමය වහකදුරු මෙන් විය. නමුත් අද අප විධායක ජනපති ක‍්‍රමය සුරැකීම වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි ජේ. ආර්. ගේ විධායකය සුරැකිය යුත්තේ මවුබිම වෙනුවෙනි.

මීට මාස කිහිපයකට පෙර පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පැවති විවාදයකට එක් වෙමින් මුදල් ඇමැති මංගල සමරවීර මහතා ප‍්‍රකාශ කර සිටියේ නව ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව සම්මත කිරීමෙන් පසු ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාව නව දිසාවකින් ඉදිරියට යනු ඇති බවයි. රට ඉදිරියට ගිය හැටි අපි දනිමු. එය පාස්කු ඉරිදා ලේ වලින් ලියැවී ඇත. වාසනාවකට මේ ඊනියා ව්‍යවස්ථාව සම්මත වූයේ නැත. සකස්වූයේ මූලික ලියවිල්ලක් පමණි. සුමන්දිරන්ගේ ඊළාම් උගුලෙන් රට බේරිණි. නව ව්‍යවස්ථාව වෙනුවෙන් පණ දීගෙන සිටි පුරවැසි බලයේ ඊනියා නියෝජිතයන් කිසිම විටක ඒකීය රාජ්‍ය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි අය නොවෙති. ඔවුහු සැමවිටම ෆෙඩරල් මෙන්ම සහසන්ධීය රාජ්‍යය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි අය වෙති. ඒ අනුව අලූත් ආණ්ඩුක‍්‍රමය අවශ්‍ය වූයේ බෙදුම්වාදීන්ට මිස දේශපේ‍්‍රමීන්ට නම් නොවේ. අස්ථාවර රට ස්ථාවර කළ හැකි එකම තැනැත්තා විධායක ජනපතිවරයාය. එනිසාම යහපාලන ව්‍යවස්ථාව සංශෝධන සැබවින්ම පිළිකා බව සඳහන් කරමි.

වඳ දොස්තර (තවත් කොටසකි)

July 6th, 2019

කතු වැකිය උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

wada

කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ නේවාසික වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි සහාබ්දීන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපරාධ පරීක්‍ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව උසාවියට ඉදිරිපත් කළ වාර්තාව යළි විමර්ශනය කළ යුතු බව පූජ්‍ය අතුරලියේ රතන හිමියන් විසින් සඳහන් කරනු ලැබ ඇත. දැනට කොළඹ සී. අයි. ඞී. බිල්ඩිමේ හතරවන තට්ටුවේ නැවතී සිටින (රඳවාගෙන සිටින) අති ධනවත් වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි සහබ්දීන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් කුරුණෑගල උසාවියේ පැවැති විභාගයකදී අපරාධ පරීක්‍ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කෙරෙනු ප‍්‍රකාශ කිහිපයක් සලකා බැලීමෙන් පසු උන්වහන්සේ ඉහත සඳහන් යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කළහ. වරකට සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් දෙක බැගින් දෑතින් කිරීමට තරම් දක්‍ෂකම් ඇති අසහාය වෛද්‍යවරයකු වූද, කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේ සේවය කරන අතරම ඡුන්දය ඉල්ලා පැරදී සියලූ සම්ප‍්‍රදායයන් බිඳ දමමින් කැබිනට් පත‍්‍රිකාවක් හරහා ආපසු එම රෝහලටම පැමිණියා වුද, දොස්තර ෂාෆි වෛද්‍ය වෘත්තිය පටන් ගත් කාලයේ සිට සී. අයි. ඞී. යේ තාවකාලික පදිංචියට පැමිණි කාලය දක්වා ගත වූ කාල අන්තරය තුළ සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් 8000 ක් කළ බව හෝ සැත්කම් 8000 ක් කිරීමට සහාය වූ බව කියනු ලැබේ. ඒ ගණන් හිලව්වලට අනුව නම් ෂාෆි ජාතියේ පිනට පහළ වූ දොස්තර කෙනකු බව හැඟී යතත් ඔහු සිංහල මවුවරුන්ගේ පැලෝපීය නාළය මිරිකා ඔවුන් වඳ කර ඇති බවට ආරංචි වීමත් සමඟම සියලූ ජනයා තුළ මහත් සංවේගයක් හට ගත්තේය.

එතැන් සිට සිදු වූ සියලූ දේ මුළු රටම දනී. කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේදී දොස්තර ෂාෆි වෙතින් සැත්කම්වලට භාජනය කෙරුණ දහස් ගණන් මවුවරු තමන්ට දෙවනවර දරු පිළිසිඳ ගැනීම් නැති බව කියමින් එම රෝහලට එන්නට පටන් ගත්හ. එවිට අපරාධ පරීක්‍ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව සිද්ධිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ‘දිවයිනෙන්’ ප‍්‍රශ්න කරන්නට පටන් ගත්තේය. සී.අයි.ඞී.ය යනු අති දක්‍ෂ නිලධාරීන්ගෙන් සමන්විත ආයතනයකි. වසර 2015 මැයි 13 වනදා යාපනයේදී දූෂණය කර මරන ලද සිවලෝගනාදන් විiා නමැති සිසුවියගේ මිනීමරුවන් අල්ලන ලද්දේ ද මෙම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවය. පාස්කු බෝම්බය පුපුරා පැය හතරක් ඇතුළත සිද්ධියට සම්බන්ධ සැකකරුවන් අල්ලන ලද්දේ මෙම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවය. එසේ නම් දොස්තර ෂාෆි සම්බන්ධයෙන් එම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව ඉදිරිපත් කළ වාර්තාව නැවත විමර්ශනය කළ යුතු බව පූජ්‍ය අතුරලියේ රතන හාමුදුරුවන් වහන්සේ කියන්නේ ඇයි? අපගේ වැටහීමට අනුව එයට ප‍්‍රධාන හේතුවක් තිබේ. ෂාෆිගේ සිද්ධිය හෙළිදරව් කිරීමෙන් පසු මේ රටේ ඇති පිටපත් දෙතුන්දහස බැගින් විකිණෙන ඇතැම් (වි)ජාතික පුවත්පත් ‘දිවයින’ට පහර දෙන්නට පටන් ගත්තේය. එම පුවත්පත්වලට හඬක් නැතත් එම පහරදීම්වලින් වැඩිහරිය හඬක් නැති ඇතැම් අධෝවාත මෙන් මහත් සේ ගන්ධස්කාරයෙන් පිරී තිබිණ. ඒ අතර ෂාෆිගේ පුද්ගලික අන්තේවාසිකයෝ ද, ඔහුගෙන් අලූතෙන් යැපෙන්නට පටන් ගත් අය ද ‘දිවයින’ට එරෙහිව මතවාදයන් පැතිරවීමට පටන් ගත්හ. එහිදී මේ රටේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ ජනතාවට සහ ඔවුනගේ මතවාදය නියෝජනය කරන ‘දිවයින’ වෙනුවෙන් පාර්ශ්ව කිහිපයක් නැගී සිටියහ. පළමු පාර්ශ්වය දේශපේ‍්‍රමී සාමාන්‍ය ජනයා ය. ඊළඟ පාර්ශ්වය රට ජාතියට සහ ආගමට ලැදි දේශපාලනඥයන් ස්වල්ප දෙනෙක් ය. තුන්වන පිරිස බෞද්ධ භික්‍ෂූහු ය. ඉනුත් අතුරලියේ රතන හිමි ප‍්‍රමුඛය. 

 
 ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥානසාර හිමියන් ගැන ආරංචියක්වත් නැත්තේ උන්වහන්සේ බන්ධනාගාරයේ වැඩ සිටින නිසා විය යුතුය. (සමාවෙන්න, උන්වහන්සේ බන්ධනාගාරයෙන් නිදහස් වූ බව මේ දැන් අපට මතක් විය.) එමතුද නොව මහාචාර්ය මැදගොඩ අභයතිස්ස හිමි ද දිවයින වෙනුවෙන් කතා කළහ. කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේ වෛද්‍ය අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය සරත් වීරබණ්ඩාර සහ නියෝජ්‍ය අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ වෛද්‍ය චන්දන නැදුන්ගමුව සිංහල ජාතියේ පැවැත්ම උදෙසා ඉදිරිපත් වෙමින් අධිකරණය ඉදිරිපිට කරුණු ගොනු කළහ.
 
 මේ අතර වැඬේ අල විය. ඒ, අපරාධ පරීක්‍ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරියකු ගරු අධිකරණය ඉදිරියේ කරුණු දක්වමින් කියූ කතාවක් හේතුවෙනි. ‘වඳ දොස්තර’ ගැන ‘දිවයින’ ඉදිරිපත් කළ පුවත වැනි ව්‍යාජ පුවත් නිසා කම්පාවට පත් වී ඇස්වලට කඳුළු නගාගත් වෛද්‍යවරයකු ගැන එම නිලධාරියා අධිකරණයට කීවේය. මෙම කාරණය ගරු අධිකරණයේදී විභාග වූ සිද්ධියට කොතරම් දුරට බලපාන්නේ ද යන්න ගැන අපි නොදනිමු. එය පක්‍ෂග‍්‍රාහී ප‍්‍රකාශයක් බව පමණක් කෙනෙක් කියනු ඇත. අප පොලිස්පතිතුමාගෙන් සහ ජනාධිපතිතුමාගෙන් විමසන්නේ රජයේ නිලධාරියකු මේ ආකාරයෙන් බොළඳ ප‍්‍රකාශ කර අවමානයට සහ සැකයට ලක්විය යුතු ද යන්නය. අප මේ ලියන ටික පවා ඉතා බරපතළ ලෙස අපේ අවාසියට හේතු විය හැකි බව අපි දනිමු. එහෙත් ජනාධිපතිතුමා මේ කාරණය ගැන ඇත්ත දැන ගත යුතු බව පමණක් අවසන් වශයෙන් ලියමු.

පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ඇමරිකාවට විකිණුනේ රු.බිලියන 1.92 ගිවිසුමෙන්ද?

July 6th, 2019

ෂමින්ද්‍ර ෆර්ඩිනැන්ඩෝ උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

paliment

මෑතකදී කථානායක කරු ජයසූරිය 2019 ජනාධිපතිවරණයට ඉදිරිපත් වීමට තමාගේ සූදානම පිළිබඳව ප‍්‍රකාශයක් කළේය. එම ප‍්‍රකාශයත් සමග ගම්පහ දිස්ති‍්‍රක්කයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඇතුළු වූ ජයසූරිය ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයේ ප‍්‍රධානතම ඉලක්කයක් බවට පත්විය. ජුනි 19 දින පාර්ලිමේන්තුව රැස් වූ අවස්ථාවේ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු කණ්ඩායමේ නායක දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන කථානායකවරයා ඇමරිකානු සංවිධානයකින් වැටුප් ලබන ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ හිටපු විදේශ ලේකම් ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් තමාගේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කටයුතු පිළිබඳව උපදේශකයා ලෙස පත්කර ගැනීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් බරපතළ චෝදනාවක් නැඟීය. ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයේ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ ද කථානායකවරයාගේ තීරණය අභියෝග කළේය. කාරියවසම් දරුණු මාධ්‍ය ප‍්‍රහාරයකට ලක් විය. හිටපු විදේශ ලේකම්වරයා ඇමරිකානු ඒජන්තවරයකු ලෙස කි‍්‍රයා කරන බව යම් කණ්ඩායමක් පවසයි. 
 
 ඇමරිකාව කාරියවසම් හරහා කථානායකවරයාව තමන්හට අවශ්‍ය ආකාරයට යොදා ගන්නා බවට ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය බිය පළ කරයි.
 
 කථානායකවරයාට සහ හිටපු විදේශ ලේකම්වරයාට එල්ලවන චෝදනා පිළිබඳව විමසීමක් කළ යුතුව ඇත්තේ ඇමරිකාව ප‍්‍රමුඛ එම කඳවුරේ සාමාජික රටවල් ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් 2014/2015 සිට කටයුතු කරන ආකාරය සැලකිල්ලට ගනිමිනි.
 
 විශ‍්‍රාම ගිය ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම්ගේ කිසිදු මැදිහත්වීමක් නොමැතිව ඇමරිකාවට අවශ්‍ය තත්ත්වය පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ සහ ඉන් පිටත ඇති කර ගැනීමේ අවස්ථාව වොෂින්ටනයට ඇත.
 
 ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් 2017 දෙසැම්බර් මස පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ උපදේශකයකු ලෙස පත්වීමට පෙර ඇමරිකාව අප පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තම ග‍්‍රහණයට ගත් බව අද බොහෝ දෙනකුට අමතකවී ඇත. ඇත්ත වශයෙන් ම ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ඇමරිකාව සමග කළ ගනුදෙනු නොදැක්කා ලෙස සිිටියේය. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් උපදේශකයකු ලෙස පත්වීමට වසරකට පෙර පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ඇමරිකාව සමග ගිවිසුම්ගත විය. එම කටයුත්ත රහසේ සිදු නොවීය. ගිවිසුම්ගත වීම පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ සිදු වූයේ කථානායකවරයාගේ ද සහභාගීත්වයෙනි. ඇමරිකානු නියෝජිතයෝද එම අවස්ථාවට සහභාගි විය.
 
 ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව යහපත්, නීතිගරුක දේශයක් කිරීමට තුන් වසරක ගිවිසුමකට දෙපාර්ශ්වය අත්සන් තැබීය. ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කරනු ලබන වැඩසටහනේ මුළු වියදම ඇමරිකානු බදු ගෙවන ජනතාව දැරීය. වටිනාකම රුපියල් බිලියන 1.92 කි. 
 
 (ඇ. ඩො. මිලියන 13) 2016 සැප්තැම්බර් වොෂින්ටනයේ මෙම ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කරන අවස්ථාවේ ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකාවේ සිටි ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ තානාපතිවරයාය. කථානායක කරු ජයසූරිය, ජාතික හෙළ උරුමයේ කරුණාරත්න පරණවිතාන, එජාපයේ අජිත් පී. පෙරේරා, එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සංධානයේ වෛද්‍ය සුදර්ශනී ප‍්‍රනාන්දුපුල්ලේ සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ මහා ලේකම් දම්මික දිසානායක කණ්ඩායමේ සාමාජික සාමාජිකාවෝ වූහ. එම ගිවිසුම 2016 නොවැම්බරයේදී පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත් කෙරිණි.
 
 ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් කථානයාකවරයාගේ ජාත්‍යන්තර කටයුතු පිළිබඳ උපදේශකයා ලෙස හඳුන්වා දීම නිවැරැදි කළ යුතුය. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකාව ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදී ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ, ආංශික අධීක්‍ෂණ කොමිටි පිහිටුවීම ඇතුළු වඩාත් යහපත් පාලනයක් ඇති කිරීමට යැයි කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කරනු ලබන වැඩසටහන, නිසියාකාරව සිදුවේදැයි නිරීක්‍ෂණය කිරීම ඔහුගේ වගකීමයි.
 
 ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් තම රාජකාරිය නිසියාකාරයෙන් කළා දැයි විමසා බැලිය යුතුය.
 
 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව බදු ගෙවන ජනතාවට වගකිව යුතුය. 2015 සහ 2016 සිදු කළ මහා බැංකු ‘කොල්ල කෑම. සම්බන්ධයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අදටත් කටයුතු කරන ආකාරයෙන් පෙනී යන්නේ මැති සබය කිසිදු වෙනසකට භාජන වී නැති බවයි.
 
 ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය ඇමරිකාව සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අතර ඇති කර ගත් ගිවිසුම පිළිබඳව කිසිදු සොයා බැලීමක් කළේ නැත. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකානු රජයෙන් පඩි ලබන්නකු ලෙස පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ උපදේශකයකු ලෙස කටයුතු කිරීම මෑතකදී ප‍්‍රශ්න කළ බව සැබෑය. නමුත් ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් එම තනතුරට පත්වීමට හේතුවූ පසුබිම පිළිබඳව ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය අදටත් කිසිදු විමසීමක් කර නැත. ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය තම වගකීම නිසියාකාරව සිදු කළා නම් ඇමරිකානු ව්‍යාපෘතිය පිළිබඳව හෙළිදරව්වක් මීට පෙර කළ හැකිව තිබිණි. අවාසනාවකට මාධ්‍ය මගින් හෙළි කළ කරුණු කාරණා පිළිබඳව විමසා බැලීමටවත් ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය උනන්දු නොවීය. සතියකට මාධ්‍ය හමු කිහිපයක් පවත්වමින් රජයට විරුද්ධව මෙහෙයුමක යෙදෙන ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයට බටහිර බලවේග කි‍්‍රයාත්මක වන ආකාරය පිළිබඳව නිසියාකාර අධ්‍යයනයක් අදටත් කර නැත.
 
 2016 නොවැම්බර් මස පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදීම කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළ ජනමාධ්‍ය වාර්තා කළ ඇමරිකානු ගිවිසුම පිළිබඳව ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය කටයුතු කළ ආකාරය පුදුම සහගතය.
 
 එම ඇමරිකානු ගිවිසුමට අමතරව ජර්මනිය, එංගලන්තය සහ වෙනත් ඇමරිකානු ආයතන දෙකක් සමග ඇති කර ගත් ගිවිසුම් මගින් අප පාර්ලිමේන්තුව වඩාත් යහපත් වූවාදැයි විමසිය යුතුය. විදේශීය මුදල්වලින් කි‍්‍රයාත්මක වන ව්‍යාපෘති මගින් ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය, පාර්ලිමේන්තු ප‍්‍රතිසංස්කරණ කෙසේ වෙතත්, අප ජනතා නියෝජිතයන්ට විදෙස් සංචාරවල නිරත වීමේ භාග්‍යය උදාවී ඇත. තමන් නියෝජනය කරන පක්‍ෂය කුමක් වුවත් එම පක්‍ෂවල ජනතා නියෝජිතයෝ විදෙස් සංචාර ප‍්‍රතික්‍ෂේප කරන්නේ නැත. පාර්ලිමේන්තුව සහ රාජ්‍ය අංශය වඩා යහපත් තත්ත්වයකට පත්කිරීමට කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කර ඇති ව්‍යාපෘතිය සාර්ථක කර ගැනීමට අප මහජන නියෝජිතයන් ඉන්දියාවේ, චීනයේ, ඇමරිකාවේ, එංගලන්තයේ, ජර්මනියේ, නෝර්වේ, යුරෝපීය සංගමය, ඉරානය, කැනඩාව, ඕමානයේ සහ ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තයේ අධ්‍යාපන චාරිකාවල නිරත වූ බව පාර්ලිමේන්තු වාර්තාවල සඳහන් වේ.
 
 පාර්ලිමේන්තු කාර්යමණ්ඩලයට සහ මැතිසබය වාර්තා කරන ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන්ට ද විදේශ සංචාර ලබාදී ඇත්තේ ඔවුන්ගේ ද දැනුම වර්ධනය කර ගැනීමට බව එම වාර්තා සඳහන් කරයි. සභා නායක ලක්‍ෂ්මන් කිරිඇල්ල පෙන්වා දී ඇත්තේ මෙම විදේශ සංචාරවල වියදම පාර්ලිමේන්තුව දරන්නේ නොමැති බවයි. ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම උත්තරීතර පාර්ලිමේන්තුව රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධානය තත්ත්වයට පත් කර ඇත. විදේශීය රජයන් සහ සංවිධානවලින් සීමාවකින් තොරව අප පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැති ඇමැතිවරුන් නොයෙකුත් සැප පහසුකම් ලබාගනී. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකානු ආයතනයකින් මාස් පතා පඩි ලබා ගැනීම, පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ස්වාධීනත්වයට බරපතළ තර්ජනයක් ලෙස ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂය සලකනවා නම්, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරනු ලබන මන්තී‍්‍රවරු 225 කටයුතු කරන ආකාරය ද විමසා බැලිය යුතුය. කථානායකවරයාගේ කි‍්‍රයා කලාපය ද විමසා බැලිය යුතුමය.
 
 ඊට පෙර ඇමරිකානු මෙහෙයුමේ ආරම්භය විමසා බලමු. ඇමරිකානු මැදිහත්වීම ප‍්‍රබල ලෙස මතු වන්නේ මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ රජය කොටි සංවිධානය 2009 මැයි සටන් බිමේදී පරාජය කර දැමීමෙන් පසුවයි. හතරවැනි ඊළාම් යුද්ධය අතරමඟදී නතර කිරීමට ඇමරිකාව ඇතුළු බටහිර බලවත්තු ප‍්‍රබල උත්සාහයක් කළ බව රහසක් නොවේ. මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ ජනාධිපතිවරයා බටහිර බලපෑම්වලට යටත් නොවීය. වේලූපිල්ලේ ප‍්‍රභාකරන් මරා දමන තුරුම මෙහෙයුම කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළේය. යුද ජයග‍්‍රහණයත් සමගම මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ චීනය සමග දිගු ගමනක් යෑමට කටයුතු කරන බව ඇමරිකාව සහ චීනය චෝදනා කළේය. 2010 ජනපතිවරණයේදී රාජපක්‍ෂ කණ්ඩායමේ ප‍්‍රබලයකු වූ සරත් ෆොන්සේකා එජාප – ජවිපේ – ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතික සංධානය- මුස්ලිම් කොන්ග‍්‍රසය වෙනුවෙන් තරගයට ඉදිරිපත් විය. ඇමරිකාව පූර්ණ සහාය පළ කළේය. නමුත් ෆොන්සේකා ඡන්ද මිලියන 1.8 කින් පරාද විය. 
 
 2010 වැරදුණ කුරුමානම 2015 සාර්ථක කර ගැනීමට එම කණ්ඩායම සමත් විය. එම කණ්ඩායමට අලූතින් එක්වූ මෛති‍්‍රපාල සිරිසේන ජනාධිපති විය. ඇමරිකානු මෙහෙයුම් තීව‍්‍ර වූයේ 2014 අගය. ඒ වනවිට ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකාවේ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා තානාපතිවරයාය. 2014 ජුලි මස ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් දේශපාලන පත්වීමක් ලැබ සිටි එවකට ජනපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂගේ නෑයෙකු වූ ජාලිය වික‍්‍රමසූරිය දැරූ තනතුර ලබා ගත්තේය. ජාලිය වික‍්‍රමසූරිය 2008 සිට එම තානාපති ධුරය හෙබවීය. ප‍්‍රධානතම තානාපති කාර්යාලයේ වසර 7 තානාපති ධුරය දැරීමට ජාලිය වික‍්‍රමසූරියට අවස්ථාව ලැබීම අදහාගත නොහැක. එම පත්වීම කළ පාර්ලිමේන්තු කොමිටිය චමල් රාජපක්‍ෂ යටතේ කි‍්‍රයාත්මක විය. මහජන නියෝජිතයන් මහත් ආඩම්බරයෙන් සඳහන් කරන අප පාර්ලිමේන්තු ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදයේ මැති සබය ජනතාවට වගකියන්නේ නැත. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකාවේ තානාපති ධුරය හොබවන කාලයේ ඇමරිකාව ගෙනා ජිනීවා යෝජනාව යහපාලන රජය අත්දෙකම උස්සා අනුමත කළේය. 2015 සැප්තැම්බර් අග එම යෝජනාව ප‍්‍රතික්‍ෂේප කළ එවකට ජිනීවා සිටි ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා නිත්‍ය නියෝජිත රවිනාත් ආරියසිංහ රජයේ නියෝගය අනුව අප රට වෙනුවෙන් එම යෝජනාවලියට අත්සන් තැබීය. විදේශ සේවයේ නියුතු නිලධාරීන්හට ස්වාධීනව කටයුතු කිරීමේ අවස්ථාවක් නොමැත. ජිනීවා යෝජනාවලිය ප‍්‍රතික්‍ෂේප කළ ආරියසිංහට 2015 ඔක්තෝබර් 01 දින එය පිළිගැනීමට සිදුවිය. ඇමරිකාවේ මැදිහත් වීම මත එම ගිවිසුමට ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව එකඟ විය. ආරියසිංහ 30/1 යෝජනාවට අත්සන් කළ ආකාරයටම ඔහුගේ අනුප‍්‍රාප්තිකයා ඒ. එල්. ඒ. අසීස් 40/1 යෝජනාවට අත්සන් කළේය. අසීස් ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව වෙනුවෙන් පොරොන්දු වූයේ 30/1 යෝජනාවලියට අදාළ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව ඉටුකළ යුතු පොරොන්දු 2020 මාර්තු වනවිට ඉටු කරන බවයි.
 
 ඇමරිකාවේ තානාපති ධුරය 2017 අගෝස්තු මස හිස් විය. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් 2017 අගෝස්තු මස විදේශ ලේකම් ලෙස පත්වීම ලැබීය. තිලක් මාරපන විදේශ ඇමැති විය. ආන්දෝලනාත්මක ඇවන්ගාඞ් ආයතනය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටියා යැයි කියනු ලබන චෝදනාව මත ජනාධිපති නීතිඥ තිලක් මාරපන 2015 නොවැම්බර් මස නීතිය හා සාමය ඇමැති ධුරයෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්විය. නමුත් එතුමා එජාප ජාතික ලැයිස්තු මන්තී‍්‍රවරයකු ලෙස පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ රැඳී සිටියේය. රවි කරුණානායකට මහ බැංකු වංචා විමර්ශනය කිරීමට පත් කළ ජනාධිපති කොමිසමේ කරුණානායක පවුල සම්බන්ධයෙන් කළ හෙළිදරව්ව හේතුවෙන් විදේශ ඇමැති ධුරය අහිමි විය. එම පුරප්පාඩුවට තිලක් මාරපන පත් කෙරිණි. මාරපන – කාරියවසම් දෙපල ජිනීවා කි‍්‍රයාවලියට කැප වූ බව රහසක් නොවේ.
 
 තිලක් මාරපන ඇමැති ධුරයේ වැඩ භාරගත් දිනයේ ජිනීවා යෝජනාවලිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ යාපනය දිස්ති‍්‍රක්ක පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්තී‍්‍ර එම්. ඒ. සුමන්තිරන් වොෂින්ටනයේ කර තිබූ ප‍්‍රකාශයක් පිළිබඳව විමසීමට මෙම ලියුම්කරුට අවස්ථාවක් ලැබිණ. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් තිලක් මාරපන පසෙකින් සිටගෙන සිටියේය. 
 
 ප‍්‍රශ්නය – විදේශ ලේකම් ඇමරිකාවේ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා තානාපතිවරයා ලෙස 2016 කටයුතු කරන අවස්ථාවේ සුමන්තිරන් පවසා තිබුණා විදේශීය විනිසුරුවන් ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ අධිකරණ පද්ධතියට සම්බන්ධ කිරීමට පවතින ව්‍යවස්ථාව කිසිදු බාධාවක් නොවන බව 2015 ජිනීවා ගිවිසුමට පෙර මෙම අධිකරණ කි‍්‍රයාවලිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඇමරිකාව – ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතික සන්ධානය එකඟතාවකට පැමිණි බවද ඔහු පැවසීය. විදේශ ඇමැතිවරයා ලෙස ඔබ එම තත්ත්වය දකින්නේ කෙසේද?
 
 පිළිතුර – ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව විදේශ විනිසුරුවන්හට කිසිදු ආකාරයකට එම කි‍්‍රයාවලියට සම්බන්ධ විය නොහැක. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් නිශ්ශබ්දව සිටියේය.
 
 හිටපු නීතිපතිවරයකු වන මාරපන එසේ පැවසුවත්, අදටත් ජිනීවා යෝජනාවලියේ විදේශීය විනිසුරුවරුන් ලංකාව පිළිගත යුතු බවට සඳහන් වැකිය එලෙසම ඇත. මංගල සමරවීර විදේශ ඇමැතිවරයා ලෙස කටයුතු කළ කාලයේ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව අත්සන් කළ ජිනීවා යෝජනාවලිය ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම අප රට හිරකර ඇති ඇමරිකානු උගුලකි. කිසිදු ආකාරයක වග විභාගයකින් තොරව ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවට එරෙහිව නැඟූ චෝදනා බටහිර රාජ්‍යයන් පිළිගත් අතර 2015 ඔක්තෝබර් ජිනීවා යෝජනාවලිය සම්මත කරගන්නා ලදි. ජිනීවා මානව හිමිකම් අසූචි වළක් ලෙස හැඳින්වූ ඇමරිකාව 2018 ජුනි මස එම එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ ආයතනයෙන් ඉවත් විය. නමුත් ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ යහපාලන නායකයන්ට එම අසූචි වළ තවමත් සුරපුරක් ලෙස පෙනෙන බව කිව යුතුය. ඇමරිකාව ලංකාව ජිනීවා උගුලේ හිර කර ඇත. ජිනීවා උගුල දඬු කඳකි. 
 
 2017 ඔක්තෝබර් මස බි‍්‍රතාන්‍යයේ සාමි මණ්ඩලයේ නේස්බි සාමිවරයා ජිනීවා උගුලෙන් ගැලවීමට අවශ්‍ය බි‍්‍රතාන්‍යයේ රහස් වාර්තා ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවට ලබාදුනි. යහපාලන රජය අදටත් එම වාර්තා නිල වශයෙන් ජිනීවා මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සිලයට ඉදිරිපත් කළේ නැත. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් ඇමරිකානු ඒජන්තවරයකු ලෙස හඳුන්වන කණ්ඩායම අදටත් ඇමරිකානු මෙහෙයුම කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කිරීමට අවශ්‍ය සියලූම පහසුකම් සපයමින් සිටී. විශ‍්‍රාම ගිය ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම්ට කළ හැකි ‘මඟුලක්. නැත. ඇමරිකාවේ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා තානාපති (2014-2017) සහ විදේශ ලේකම් (2017 – දෙසැම්බර් 2017) ලෙස ජිනීවා මෙහෙයුමට අවශ්‍ය පහසුකම් සැලසීම ඔහු කර ඇත. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් 2017 අගෝස්තු මස වොෂින්ටනයේ සිට නැවත කොළඹට පැමිණියේය. පසුගිය සතිය වනතුරුම ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් කොළඹට පැමිණීමෙන් ඇති වූ පුරප්පාඩුව පිරවීමට රජය කටයුතු කළේ නැත. විදේශ සේවයේ පළපුරුදු නිලධාරියකු වන රොඞ්නි පෙරේරා මෑතකදී කාරියවසම්ගේ හිස්තැන මීට දින කිහිපයකට පෙර පිරවීය.
 
 ඇමරිකාව කටයුතු කරන ආකාරයට ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවට වොෂින්ටනයේ තානාපතිවරයකු අවශ්‍ය නැත. පසුගිය වසර දෙකකට ආසන්න කාලයක් තානාපතිවරයකු නොමැතිව ඇමරිකානු ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා සම්බන්ධතා ඉහළ තත්ත්වයට පත් වී ඇත. රොඞ්නි පෙරේරාටද සිදු වන්නේ ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් කළ කටයුතු ඒ ආකාරයෙන්ම ඉදිරියට ගෙන යෑමටය.
 
 2015 ආණ්ඩු පෙරළිය ඇති කිරීමට ඇමරිකාව කළ කාර්යය පිළිබඳව ප‍්‍රකාශයක් 2016 දී එවකට රාජ්‍ය ලේකම් ජෝන් කෙරී කළේය. මියන්මාරයේ, නයිජීරියාවේ සහ ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය ඇති කිරීමට ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 585 වියදම් කළ බව හෙළිදරව් කළේය. මෙම මුදලින් කොපමණ ප‍්‍රමාණයක් ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවේ මෙහෙයුමට වියදම් කළාද? එම මුදල් ලැබුණ දේශපාලන පක්ෂ, රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධාන හෝ ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන්ට ලැබුණාද? ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාවට ලබාදුන් මුදල් ප‍්‍රවාහය සම්බන්ධයෙන් මෙම ලියුම්කරු කොළඹ පිහිටි ඇමරිකානු තානාපති කාර්යාලයෙන් කළ විමසීමට පිළිතුරක් ලැබුණේ නැත.
 
 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව, අධිකරණ පද්ධතිය ආරක්ෂක අංශ ඇතුළු සියලූම ක්ෂේත‍්‍රවලට ඇමරිකාව බලපෑම් කරමින් සිටී. අධිකරණ පද්ධතියට කළ බලපෑම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් මෑතකදී පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී සහ ඉන් පිටතදී ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂය විරෝධය පළ කළේය. ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් විශ‍්‍රාම යෑමෙන් පසු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ උපදේශක තනතුරක් ලබා ගැනීමට එහා ගිය ප‍්‍රශ්නයක් රටේ ඇත. අවාසනාවකට පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරනු ලබන සියලූම පක්ෂ සාමූහිකව අසමත් වීම තුළ ඇමරිකානු මෙහෙයුම සාර්ථකව කි‍්‍රයාත්මක වේ. ඇමරිකාව සමග පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ගිවිසුම් ගත වීම පිළිබඳව පූර්ණ විමර්ශනයක් කළ යුතුව ඇත. ආංශික අධීක්ෂණ කොමිටි පිහිටු වීම ඇමරිකාව කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කළ මෙහෙයුම අනුව සිදු කළ බව රහසක් නොවේ. පාර්ලිමේන්තුව වඩාත් යහපත් සහ කාර්යක්ෂම තත්ත්වයකට පත් කිරීමට ඇති කළ ආංශික අධීක්ෂණ කොමිටි පිහිටුවන මුවාවෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍යාංශය සමඟ එකතු වී මහා වංචාවක් කළේය. හිටපු නිළියක් වන සබීතා පෙරේරාගේ ස්වාමි පුරුෂයාට අයත් ඞී. පී. ජයසිංහ සමාගමට අයත් ගොඩනැඟිල්ලක් වසර 5 කට ලබා ගන්නේ මසකට ලක්ෂ 210 කුලියකටය.එමව ගොඩනැඟිල්ලට කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍යාංශය ගෙන යෑම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අවශ්‍යතාව විය. එයට හේතුව කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍යාංශය පිහිටුවා තිබූ ‘ගොවිජන සේවා. මන්දිරය ආංශික අධීක්ෂණ කොමිටිවලට වෙන් කර දීමය. මෙම ගිවිසුම විගණකාධිපති දුන් උපදෙස් නොතකා අත්සන් කළ බව දැනට කි‍්‍රයාත්මක වන ජනාධිපති කොමිසමේදී හෙළි වී ඇත. මසකට රුපියල් ලක්ෂ 210 මහජන මුදල් ගෙවා කුලියට ගත් ගොඩනැඟිල්ල අමාත්‍යාංශයක් පිහිටු වීමට සුදුසු නැති බව හෙළි වී ඇත. එවකට කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් බී. විජයරත්න මෙම ඒක පාර්ශ්විය ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමට කටයුතු කළ ආකාරය සහ විරෝධතා නොසලකා ඞී. පී. ජයසිංහ ආයතනයට වාසිදායක ලෙස කටයුතු කිරීම කොමිසමේදී හෙළි විය. ඇමරිකාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුව හරහා කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කරන වැඩපිළිවෙළ තවත් ‘මෙගා. වංචාවක් කිරීමට යොදා ගත් බව පැහැදිලිය. ශී‍්‍ර ලංකාව පාවා දුන් බවට ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් චෝදනාවට ලක් වන්නේ ඔහු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කරනු ලබන රාජකාරියට ඇමරිකාවෙන් මාසික වැටුපක් ලැබෙන බැවිනි. පසුගිය වසර 4 තුළ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව පිරිහී ඇති තරම විමසා බැලූ විට රුපියල් බිලියන 1.92 ක ඇමරිකානු වැඩපිළිවෙළ සම්පූර්ණයෙන් අසාර්ථක බව පැහැදිලිය. විදේශීය රාජ්‍යයකින් ප‍්‍රසාද් කාරියවසම් මාසික වැටුප ලැබීමට පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරන ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂය විරුද්ධ නම් පහත සඳහන් කරුණු කාරණා සම්බන්ධයෙන් ද එම කණ්ඩායමට නිහඬව සිටිය නොහැක. (1) 2016 ඇමරිකාව – පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අතර රුපියල් බිලියන 1.92 ගිවිසුම, (2) කථානායකවරයා චීනයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්තී‍්‍රවරුන්ට චීන සංචාර සඳහා අවස්ථාවක් ඉල්ලීම. මේ අනුව 110 ට අධික මන්තී‍්‍රවරු චීනයේ සංචාර කළ බව සඳහන් කළ යුතුය. (3) කථානායකවරයා චීනයෙන් මන්තී‍්‍රවරු 225 ටම මේසය මත තබන පරිගණක ලබා ගැනීම (4) යහපාලන නිර්මාතෘ මාදුළුවාවේ සෝභිත හිමියන් සිහිවීමට සියලූ පහසුකම් සහිත ගමක් අනුරාධපුරයේ සෑදීමට ඉන්දියාවෙන් රුපියල් මිලියන 300 ලබා ගැනීම සහ (5) පාර්ලිමේන්තුව අනෙකුත් විදේශීය ආයතන සමග ඇති කර ගත් ගිිවිසුම්.
 
 පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කරන සියලූම පක්ෂ මැති සබයේ ‘හැසිරීම. පිළිබඳව පසු විපරමක් කළ යුතුය.

First Stirrings of a Sinhala Buddhist Spring – II

July 5th, 2019

By  Rohana R. Wasala

The polity consisting of the majority community (Sinhalese) cannot behave like this. In any country, it is normal for the majority community to be unconsciously undermined by a false sense of security vis-a-vis the minorities, whereas the latter feel a bit too paranoid with or without reason. The Sinhalese voting public are always divided into rival parties, and at parliamentary elections, under the existing electoral system, it is extremely rare that a major party is able to  form a viable government without the assistance of one or more minority parties, a situation where the latter become kingmakers despite the insignificance of their numerical strength. The slightest movement towards redressing the balance in favour of the disadvantaged majority Sinhalese in any anomalous situation would invariably earn the label racist or extremist or chauvinist for the individual Sinhalese or the group behind that initiative. So, the Sinhalese (Buddhists, particularly) get criticised and condemned as racists, tribalists, etc., while in reality being victims of the racism, fanaticism, and extremism of others. This applies to Ven. Gnanasara as well in the performance of the duty that has historically devolved on him as a Buddhist monk.  

Ven. Gnanasara Thera approached the Ven. Mahanayakes in Kandy and pleaded with them beseechingly, not once, but several times, and explained to them this problem with video evidence of outrageous Buddhism-bashing speeches of Wahhabist fanatics, to no avail. Once the monk led a large procession of well behaved young activists (more than 2000 strong) from Getambe to the Sri Dalada Maligawa, and then they proceeded to the Malwatu Vihara, the monastery of the Ven. Mahanayake of the Malwatte Chapter. The Mahanayake, at first, very unfairly, refused him an audience. Later, having found that they were not ready to leave without seeing him, he allowed Ven. Gnanasara and a few of his companions to come before him. Nothing resulted from that meeting.  

The BBS leader wants the Maha Sangha to play their historic role as Buddhist monks without stooping to politics, and is determined to resolve the Islamic extremist problem through rational dialogue with the participation of the clergy of other religious groups (which is what he always wanted to do from 2013 onwards, because even groups of traditional Muslims, he claims with evidence, approached him and pleaded with him to rescue them from Wahhabist and Salabist extremism). Unlike him  the UNP national list MP Ven. Athuraliye Ratana Thera is engaged in a one man political show (an ostensible crusade against Islamist extremists, though it is). Unless he is decent enough to call it off in time, and join with the mainstream Sangha who are being galvanized into action in response to the watershed of April 21 Easter Sunday terrorist bombings, Ven. Ratana’s maverick intervention is bound to undermine the emerging unity among the clergy of different religions in the face of ISIS terror.  The activism of Buddhist organizations including the Ven. Gnanasara Thera’s BBS facilitated this awakening among the Buddhist clergy and now it can help form a united Sanga community that speaks with one voice on matters that come within their purview. But Hon MP Ven. Ratana, most probably, wants to edge out the leaders of that movement and assume control of it, with a view to playing an important role in the corresponding political power structure that will evolve. 

Thus, Ven. Ratana seems to be trying to play a two-in-one function combining both those roles. However, the role traditionally assigned to the Maha Sangha has been above that of the king or, in modern times, the government. The ruler assigns a higher seat to the monk and pays him obeisance. The monks didn’t dabble in policy making or in governing, but advised the ruler on how to rule in the righteous way according to the Dasa Raja Dharma or the Ten Duties of the King. The question of a problematic religion state relationship did not arise. Buddhism is not a political religion. The only politics it advocates is democracy. The Maha Sangha or the Community (of Monks) is a perfectly democratic social entity. In the modern world it is considered essential to keep religion and state separate from each other in order to ensure secular democratic rule. So every secular democracy should be regarded as consistent with Buddhist principles. 

(The principle of secularism in governance is not a bad thing, and Buddhism is quite comfortable with it. Secularism in government simply means keeping religion and state separate from each other so that the former does not dictate government policies; yet it does not prevent religious institutions from offering ethical guidance to the rulers and the citizens at large. The Sinhala translation of the term ‘secular’ as ‘anaagamika’ is bound to be misleading because of its inherent ambiguity, for ‘anaagamika’ can mean ‘irreligious’, ‘areligious’ { i.e., without religion} or even ‘of a different religion’. Probably, most ordinary citizens remain unaware of the real meaning of ‘secular’ in this context, which is ‘areligious’ as suggested above, not anti-religion, or irreligious in the sense of immoral. Honoring the practical conventional definition of Buddhism as a religion (in essence it is not), we might say that it is a religion that is most compatible with secular democracy, like Hinduism in India, definitely more so than Christianity. If America and Britain with their white Christian majorities are recognized as exemplary secular democracies, while being priding themselves on being Christian nations, why can’t Sri Lanka with its conspicuous Sinhalese Buddhist cultural identity be allowed to enjoy similar recognition as a Buddhist nation    

Ven. Ratana cannot provide the political leadership that the country needs, nor can he provide any spiritual leadership either, because of his attempted dabbling in statecraft and priestcraft simultaneously. Common to both is ‘craft’, but what one can achieve by craft doesn’t endure. A Buddhist monk is not likely to make a good president or prime minister. The impression among political analysts is that  Ven. Ratana is a typical politician and a pragmatic political strategist (Pragmatism is amoral, or rather immoral, but it is part and parcel of realpolitik.) That he is clever at dissembling was evident to the less gullible onlookers during his fake ‘fast unto death’ before the Sri Dalada Maligawa (He took care not to die by drinking water, as the Catholic priest who joined the fast probably inadvertently revealed). It is obvious that he was not alone in staging the show. The Ven. Mahanayake Theras severely criticised him after the event. He had approached them beforehand and told them about his intention, but cunningly he did not reveal the venue to them. Had they been told that he was going to have his fast in the hallowed precincts of the Maligawa, they would not have permitted him to do so; that would have been a serious setback for him. It is doubtful whether his later exploit of forcibly entering the alleged Sharia University campus currently under construction in Baticaloa for inspection as an MP will serve a useful purpose. His actions will only serve to unnecessarily politicize this deadly issue. 

Because of Ven. Gnanasara’s exertions, unprecedented prospects of different religious communities standing up to the common enemy of murderous religious extremism are brightening. It is only now that we are witnessing the first stirrings of a spring in the Sangha Sasana, that is potentially freed from abominable Nikaya divisions, which are based on caste in stark contradiction of the compassionate Buddha’s teaching. Ven. Gnanasara has made the largest contribution to this most positive development.

The monks do not relish the idea of establishing a Buddhist theocracy, which is, in any case,  inconceivable, considering the spirit of absolute democracy that characterizes the Maha Sangha. Buddha praised the system of government followed by the Licchavis of Vesali of his time, who were his relations, being of a martial race like himself: it was a form of republican system of government by common consent, an ancient version of what we call democracy today. However, the monks’ staying above mundane politics doesn’t mean that they don’t have anything to do with secular politics (or how the country is run). Buddhist monks in the majority Buddhist Sri Lanka have been the custodians of the country’s Buddhist cultural heritage for two thousand two hundred and fifty-five years according to written records. By the way, which other country in the world can boast of such a long unbroken singular religious tradition? Shouldn’t the United Nations Organization make special recognition of this fact in the name of human civilization, which is currently being threatened with annihilation by murderous religious extremism? 

By the influence of its humane spiritual values, Buddhism ensures, not only the peaceful coexistence of the various communities who live there, but also the unhindered enjoyment and protection of their freedom of belief, including especially their religious beliefs and observances, except the alleged divine right of believers of any religion to kill or persecute those who don’t share their beliefs, or to discriminate against them. What Ven. Gnansara proposes to the Maha Sangha is that they unite and provide the necessary moral guidance for the rulers to rule the country righteously, whatever political ideologies they subscribe to. This does not involve any violation of secular democracy in governance. He says that the Sri Lankan society to day is sick in every way. To heal the society, the Maha Sangha must unite. He quotes the Buddha’s teaching: ‘sukho sanghassa samaggi’ ‘Happy is harmony among the Sangha’.

Ven. Gnanasara Thera predicts that when the Maha Sangha are united, the politicians and the people will fall in line, and a suitable lay political leadership will emerge. Ven. Ratana’s intervention in his capacity as an MP monk will produce some limited positive results in the immediate context, but in the long run, it will be counterproductive. He is only doing more of what he did in the past. And we all know what he did has led to. His involvement will be an obstacle to the emergence of a lay political leader that the whole country approves of as being capable of fixing not only the problem of Wahhabist incursion, but also the infinitely greater issue of external interference in the country’s domestic affairs that, in the first place, as the media reveal, inflicted it on our  nation under the Yahapalanaya. It is good to note that Ven. Ratana is still not contrite enough about the pioneering role he played in calling down that visitation on a resurgent Sri Lanka at the end of 2014.  

The D-Day for epoch-making Sangha unity to usher in a new spring will be July 7, 2019 in Kandy in the vicinity of the Sri Dalada Maligawa, where a massive rally of Buddhist monks and lay Buddhists will be held that day for the proclamation of a Dasa Panatha or Ten Commandments of righteous governance based on Buddhist principles drawn by erudite monks in consultation with experts in other fields.        

EASTER SUNDAY BOMB BLAST IN SRI LANKA Part 10

July 5th, 2019

KAMALIKA PIERIS

The Easter Sunday attacks are considered, worldwide, as one of the most sophisticated attacks in recent years. The bombs were all highly impactful and were detonated at precise locations with impeccable timing, ensuring maximum impact and maximum casualties.

These attacks in Sri Lanka are said to be the biggest single terrorist attack targeting civilians ever to take place in South Asia. So many people did not lose their lives even in the Mumbai attacks of 2008, said analysts. Even during that 30 year war, no single attack carried out by the terrorists targeting civilians ever resulted in as much carnage as the Easter Sunday attacks. The LTTE also carried out co-ordinated simultaneous attacks on multiple targets but even they were not able to wreak the same amount of destruction.

 Communist Party issued a statement on the event. From all evidence hitherto revealed, it was a wall-designed, clearly calculated, cleverly organized terrorist attack showing an international pattern of terrorism, said the statement.  Though it is too early to form conclusions, it is abundantly clear that the intention of the perpetrators was to destabilize the society, dismantle the economy, create fear and suspicion amongst religious and ethnic minorities and promote backlash. The hands of extremist groups associated with drug barons cannot be ruled out. The gradual shift of terrorism from Middle East to the South Asia, judging from the pattern of events, is a matter of grave concern, concluded the statement.

The bombers had used “Mother of Satan” explosives favored by the Islamic State group. That is a new sign of foreign involvement said analysts. This attack on Christians and targeting foreigners and the claim by ISIL will give an international dimension to this event. Sri Lanka will come alongside Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria and this will lead to the possibility of foreign intervention.  Both the prime minister and the president are with one voice saying that Sri Lanka ‘needs the help of foreign intelligence agencies.’ This is global terrorism so we need the expertise of other countries they said. In his April 26 special statement the PM, no less than six times, mentioned the need for foreign assistance.

Detectives said the back-pack bombs used in the April 21 attacks on three churches and three hotels contained the explosive as Triacetone Triperoxide, or TATP, an unstable but easily made mixture favored by Islamic State militants who call it “Mother of Satan”.”It looks like they used a cocktail of TATP and gelignite and some chemicals in the Easter attacks. Investigators had initially believed that C4 explosives — a favored weapon of Tamil Tiger rebels — were used, but forensic tests found TATP which causes more burning than C4. .Police have also confirmed that 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of explosives found in January in the islands northwest was TATP.

The explosives were manufactured by local jihadists with Islamic State expertise. “The group had easy access to chemicals and fertilizer to get the raw materials to make TATP,” an official involved in the investigation said. “The group had easy access to chemicals and fertiliser to get the raw materials to make TATP,” an official involved in the investigation said. Sri Lankan and international investigators are anxious to know just how much outside help went into the attacks.

Sri Lankan detectives say the National Thowheeth Jama’ath (NTJ), local militants blamed for the attacks, must have had foreign help to assemble the bombs. “They would have had a face-to-face meeting to transfer this technology. This is not something you can do by watching a YouTube video,” said the official,

Prof.  Rohan Gunaratne commented on the shocking security failure”. He said the April 21 attacks had revealed the collective failure of the political leadership. Sri Lanka had experienced the Easter Sunday suicide bombings due to politicians playing politics with national security. Having come to power in January 2015, the new administration had done away with check points. That should never have happened. The government also confined the military to barracks. That was a huge mistake. Western powers and smaller political parties including the TNA wanted to restrict the military. Another critic observed that this would not have happened if Mahinda Rajapaksa has been allowed to continue as Prime Minister  after  his appointment in October 2018.

Sri Lanka should have monitored links between Zahran Hasim’s group and the ISIS. A senior Muslim officer responsible for monitoring the activities of Zahran had been moved overseas, said Gunaratne. In addition to that about 500 intelligence officers had been either arrested or exposed, Prof. Gunaratne said.

The public are furious about the bomb blasts. The reaction of the public indicates that Sri Lanka is not an insipid ‘soft state’ , a ‘failed state’,  or a ‘rogue state’ . It is now a very, very Angry State, determined to settle issues.

A father who lost his two children in a bomb blast at St. Anthony’s Church on April 21, 2019 filed a Supreme Court petition on the matter. The petitioner has cited as respondents the IGP and the Secretary Defence. He wants the court to direct the Attorney General to order the prosecution of the respondents for criminal negligence. The petitioner has alleged that the respondents had prior information about the terror attacks but did not care to conduct investigations or provide security. The victim’s children were in their teens. Two other petitions have also  been filed by aggrieved family members (Island 21. 5.19. P 1).

Five attorneys representing the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) filed a Fundamental Rights petition in May 2019 in the Supreme Court against Easter Sunday attack probe operations. They are seeking a declaration that any person found interfering with or attempting to interfere with the anti-terrorism operations of the Police and the Armed Forces should be forthwith arrested and arraigned before the law or otherwise dealt with swiftly in terms of the law. This petition had been filed by BASL President Kalinga N. Indatissa PC, BASL Deputy President Shavindra Fernando PC, BASL Secretary Kaushalya Nawaratne, BASL Treasurer Nalin Chandika De Silva and BASL Assistant Secretary Vishwa De Livera Tennekoon naming Defence Secretary Gen. S.H.S. Kottegoda (Retd), former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando, IGP Pujith Jayasundera and the cabinet of ministers as respondents.

A criminal investigation is under way to find out why former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando and Police Chief Pujith Jayasundera failed to act on intelligence warnings about the Easter Sunday massacre announced the media In May.

In April, President Sirisena appointed a committee headed by serving Supreme Court Judge Vijith Malalgoda, PC and two others, N.K. Illangakoon and Padmasiri Jayamanne, a former Secretary to a number of ministries, to study and report on the bomb blasts. As directed, the Committee handed in its interim report within two weeks. Thereafter, it sought an extension of its term until May 31 to complete the final report. The final report was handed on June 10th. The contents were not made public. But the media said it had learned that the committee had made strong strictures on the two top officials.

 The report was seen by Attorney General Dappula de Livera. After studying the report, the Attorney General ordered a probe.  The team was headed by Superintendent of Police J.T.D. Jayasinghe of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). The CID submitted its report, on June 26.

On the basis of these two reports, Attorney General ordered the acting IGP, on June 27, to produce former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando and IGP Pujith Jayasundara, who is currently on compulsory leave, in courts over their failure to prevent the Easter Sunday attacks. The AG had decided that Fernando and Jayasundera had neglected their duties and not prevented the terrorist attacks,

When the order for their arrest on charges of criminal negligence and the failure to prevent or minimize the Easter Sunday terrorist attacks,  was made, Hemasiri Fernando  , was admitted  to National Hospital with a heart attack and IGP Pujith Jayasundara was  admitted to the Police Hospital. Colombo Chief Magistrate Lanka Jayaratne   went to the Police Hospital personally and then ordered the arrest of the two persons. They presently remain in hospital, under arrest.  They were further remanded till July 9.

The magisterial inquiry into the incident was taken up before the Court on July  3rd. Deputy Solicitor General Thusitha Mudalige appearing on behalf of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) yesterday informed the Court that former Defense Secretary Hemasiri Fernando and IGP Pujitha Jayasundara had received several intelligence information briefs regarding the attack. But they had not taken any action regarding the Easter Sunday attacks. The State Intelligence Service  had sent letters on April 09, 18 and 20 to the IGP and Secretary of Defense.DSG.

Thusitha Mudalige informed the court that IGP Jayasundara had received details regarding the Easter Sunday attack on April 09. DSG Mudalige further told the Court that the then IGP Jayasundara had sent that letter to Western Province Senior Deputy Inspector General of Police, Senior Deputy Inspector General of Special Task Force, Senior Deputy Inspector General (Special Protection Division) and Senior Deputy Inspector General of Terrorism Investigation Division.When the National Security Council met on April 9, Secretary of Defense Hemasiri Fernando had not mentioned anything regarding that matter before the Council. A blast took place in Kattankudy area on April 17.  They identified it as a prior signal for the next blast but had not taken any action against the terror attack” the DSG said.

The issue of who is responsible for the Easter bomb blasts and what punishment should be meted out to them, is now  developing nicely, and will be decided eventually, But this will be the last essay in this series. (Concluded)

The Twisted Tales of two alleged genocides – and Canada’s claimed support for conflict prevention in Sri Lanka.

July 5th, 2019

by Chandre Dharmawardana.

David McKinnon, Canada’s High Commissioner to Sri Lanka  has stated, on Canada’s National Day  that  Canada would continue to support conflict prevention efforts in Sri Lanka, where  it has been seen how hate speech and media can entrench communal divisions”.  Meanwhile back in Canada, successive Canadian governments have failed to understand how this very hate speech” is being entrenched in Canadian municipal discourse and even in parliamentary proceedings by militant diaspora groups. They wish to replay the old ethnic animosities of their homeland   in Canada too.

This has been possible because of electorates where minority groups determine the swing vote”. Canadian politicians usually know  little about Sri Lanka,  and prefer to  parrot what gets them the votes even when they find out the facts. Many candidates running for office in Canada believe or assume that  all Sri Lankan immigrants in Canada are Tamil ethnics. They readily  accept that a genocide” of Tamils had occurred, and that most  Sri Lankan immigrants are  refugees from that genocide”. This is surely very convenient for would be refugees.

The now defunct Northern Provincial Council (NPC) of Sri Lanka led by Mr. Wigneswaran had declared in 2015 that all Sri Lankan governments since independence in 1948 had practiced genocide” against Sri Lankan Tamils (see: Island, Feb 2015,  http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=119757).  Sri Lankan political historians and jurists have largely ignored this,  conveniently treating it as  mere political rhetoric of extremists who even discourage  inter-ethnic  marriage and strive to create mono-ethnic communities subservient to them. But the Canadian Tamil Diaspora has taken up the drum beat of a Tamil genocide” back in Canada.

Canada’s federal inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls released its final report with a verdict of genocide”,  indicting Canada’s policies since the times of Sir John A MacDonald.  Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accepted the findings of the report, while informally endorsing the claim of genocide”.  The leader of the opposition, Andre Sheer contends  that Genocide” isn’t the right word to describe what was done to the Indigenous people. But was it right for what happened in Sri Lanka?

Canada is a signatory to the  1948 UN Convention on the  Crime of Genocide.  Following the federal  inquiry report, the Secretary General of the Organization of American States wants an international panel to investigate the claim and activate justice indicting Canada.

According to the University of Wisconsin scholar William Denevan and collaborators, the population of native people in the early 16th century in North America may have been as high as 110 million. Of this, an  estimated native population  in Canada during Jacques Cartier’s times could have been as  high as  10 million. It dwindled to record lows in the late 19th century, and recovered partially. It  now stands at  nearly  a million, or about 1.5 million on including  Métiis and  Inuits  as well. That is, the native population has dropped by a factor of at least 10  in  five  centuries, while  European numbers  have  increased exponentially. The record  lows in the Native population of the late 19th and early 20th century resulted from deliberate Colonial policies. Sir John A. MacDonald’s  policy of starving First Nations to death to make  room for  European settlers, willful denial of  health needs,  residential schools, negation of treaties etc., took their toll.  It was a time when a Good Injun was a dead Injun”. More recently, during WWII, refugee Jewish ships were turned way with no qualms.

However, Canada turned a page with the quiet revolution in Quebec, and with leaders like Tommy Douglas and Lester Pearson making a difference, and Canada became a country with a conscience.

And yet, in spite of all these well-known facts, Canadian legislators have been very cautious since a  proclamation of a Genocide” when Canada is at the receiving end is not in the plan. Casting stones at others is much easier, especially if there is political capital to be made.

Three Canadian municipalities, namely Toronto, Pickering and Brampton  have rushed  to cast stones and declare  May 18 as the Sri Lankan Tamil Genocide commemoration day”. Furthermore, Mr.  Vijay Thanigasalam (a provincial legislator)  has tabled the  Bill 104: Tamil Genocide Education Week in Ontario”. Clearly,  inter-ethnic battles of their homeland  are  being imported to Canada by  militant diaspora groups who work hand in hand with Canadian legislators  who know very little about Sri Lanka.

Demographics   indicate a  robust growth, rather than  a genocide of Sri Lankan Tamils, a 12% minority. The Tamil population  of 734,000  in 1946 (i.e., just before independence)  increased  to 2.3 million at the 2011 census,  after the fall of  the Tamil Tigers”  in May 2009.   In addition,   some 0.9 million Tamils have emigrated, with most coming  to Canada. So the Tamil population has increased by  a factor of 4.4., strongly exceeding the 3.5 factor of  growth of the Sinhalese (the 72% majority) during the same period.

The majority of Tamil speakers  live in the Sinhalese areas. According to  CIA fact sheets,  at most 5% of the population were under  the Tigers.  The RCMP and the news media in Canada (e.g., Stewart Bell, National Post,  http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/01/21/documents-courts-seize-assets-from-the-world-tamil-movement/“),  as well as in Sri Lanka  (e.g., see  Shamindra Ferdinando’s  series entitled War on Terror”, Island) have reported how  Canadian Tamil organizations  funded  the Tigers who are proscribed as Terrorists in most countries even today. The columns of the veteran Tamil Journalist J. B. S. Jayaraj claim that the Tigers killed more Tamils  than  attributable to state terror. This view seems to be echoed by  the late Sebastian Rasalingam (e.g., see , http://federalidea.com/focus/archives/201) a writer who is believed be a rare voice of  the depressed” castes..  Even  Mr. Chandrahasan, the son of the iconic Tamil leader S. J. V. Chelvanayagam seems to have echoed similar views.

 S. J. V. Chelvanayagam  founded the Ilanaki Tamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) in 1949 claiming a part of Ceylon as the exclusive homeland of the Tamils.”. The idea of ethnic communities living apart – apartheid – was a respectable political philosophy in 1949.  However, the majority community has never accepted the concept of an exclusive Tamil homeland. The Moors living in the Eastern province have strongly opposed the amalgamation of the East and the North to form an Eelam”.  Consequently  the ITAK was never trusted by the majority community or by the Moors. The ITAK in its turn did little to win such trust, printing Eelam stamps even in the 1950s, while its chief ideologue of the times, Mr. Navaratnam, wrote a text emphasizing the irreconcilability of the Sinhalese and the Tamils. The Sinhalese were themselves concerned with preserving their Identity derived from a Sinhala-Buddhist heritage, with “politcal monks” behaving with scant regard to the very teachings of the Buddha. The ITAK  gradually morphed into a  full-blown separatist party that pledged military action in 1976 at Vaddukkoddai. As an irony of history, this was an ancient garrison-fortification town known as “Batakotte”, designated to protect the country against South Indian invasions.  The ITAK, having roused the militancy of its boys”, and  having  failed in its attempts to reach  a negotiated settlement with the state, actually found itself at the mercy of its own extremists.  The northern peninsula, cleansed of Sinhalese and Mulsims by the Tigers, and with Northern Tamils a mere 5% of the population, was now pitted against the military might of the state backed by the Sinhalese and the Moors. This  launched a set of  armed conflicts supported by by unprecedented types of terrorist action, use of suicide cadre and child soldiers,  now known as the Eelam wars.  They lasted for three decades, mainly because the tigers were supplied with weapons and funds from the Diaspora living in the West. The Western politicians  pushed for  peace negotiations but took no action to control the flow of such funding of terrorism from within their  shores.

Deaths during the Eelam wars struck all  Lankan ethnic groups equally hard. The claim of genocide” focusing only on Tamil deaths of  a claimed 40,000 during the last days of the  Eelam wars is currently under review by the UN Human Rights Commission (UNHRC).  The Organization of American States probably wants a similar review against Canada in regard to its treatment of native people. It should be noted that Canada is  a main sponsor of the indictment against Sri Lanka, now that the USA has left the UNHRC.

 The indictment before the UNHRC is  contested by  knowledgeable authorities including Lord Neseby’s  British House of Lords investigation.  Their estimates of  casualties come to some 7000, of which 5000 are Tamil-Tiger  fighters.  Scholarly studies of wiki-leaks of diplomatic dispatches, studies by the American Physical Society of satellite images of shelling,  the report of the Paranagama commission etc., indicate similar  lower figures of casualties.

However,  the municipalities of Toronto, Brampton and Pickering  rushed to judgment to please ethnic pressure groups. The Canadian Parliament itself sponsored  a sham hearing hosted by Mr. Garry Anandasangaree where the event was announced with short  notice.  Admissions were controlled and cut to a short time window to just voice the genocide story.  

If a genocide of 40,000 occurred in the last weeks of  Eelam IV,  mass graves of  40,000 killed  have to be somewhere. But even the  NPC under Mr. Wigneswaran who claimed a Tamil genocide has NOT  succeeded in demonstrating any mass graves. The Mannar mass grave, which was excavated with great expectations of providing some support to the NCP genocide claim fell completely flat.  Radio-carbon data indicated that the skeletons were from a massacre during Portuguese times by a Hindu-Tamil chieftain who exterminated fellow Tamil converts  to Catholicism.  Furthermore, if 40,000 were killed by shell fire and bombings, some 160,000 injured are expected as collateral”, but  very few  injured were found among the 300,000 held in the war zone when freed in May 2009.

 A grave injustice is being committed  by the Canadian municipalities in their rush to judgment about a Tamil genocide”. This contrasts strongly with  the cautious approach  of  the House of Commons regarding  the alleged  genocide of aboriginal peoples. The good intentions contained in the  Canadian High Commissioner’s statement is unfortunately not being played out in Canada itself.   

[The author is a Canadian and Sri -Lankan academic living in Canada and attached to the Université de Montreal, and may be contacted at chandre.dharma@yahoo.ca]

Wahhabism confronted: Sri Lanka curbs Saudi influence after bombings

July 5th, 2019

KATTANKUDY, Sri Lanka (Reuters) – Sri Lanka is moving to curtail Saudi Arabian influence, after some politicians and Buddhist monks blamed the spread of the kingdom’s ultra-conservative Wahhabi school of Islam for planting the seeds of militancy that culminated in deadly Easter bomb attacks.

On April 21, nine Sri Lankans blew themselves up in churches and luxury hotels, killing more than 250 people and shocking the country a decade after its civil war ended.

Sri Lanka has since arrested a Wahhabi scholar and is poised to take over a Saudi-funded school. The government also says it will monitor previously unchecked money flows from donors including prominent Saudi families to mosques on the Indian Ocean island.

Nobody will be able to just make donations now,” said Muslim cabinet minister Kabir Hashim, who has urged Muslim communities to look at how radical ideas could have spread. He said the Department of Muslim Religious and Cultural Affairs would oversee donations.

The outcry in Sri Lanka is the latest sign that Wahhabism, which critics deem a root cause of the jihadist threat, is under pressure internationally.

Jihadist organizations, including Islamic State – which claimed responsibility for the Easter bombings – follow an extreme interpretation of Islam’s Salafi branch, of which Wahhabism was the original strain.

Saudi Arabia rejects the idea that Wahhabism is problematic and defends its record by pointing to the detention of thousands of suspected militants. Riyadh in June sent back five Sri Lankans allegedly linked to the Easter attacks.

Saudi diplomats in Colombo have expressed displeasure” over being targeted during a recent meeting with President Maithripala Sirisena, a Sri Lankan official told Reuters.

Sirisena’s office, as well as Saudi Arabia’s Colombo embassy and the kingdom’s communications office in Riyadh, did not respond to requests for comment on the backlash against Saudi influence.

MONKS’ INFLUENCE

That backlash has focused on one man in particular – Muhammad Hizbullah, a businessman and politician who was the governor of Sri Lanka’s Eastern Province until he resigned in June following protests by hardline Buddhist monks.

    The monks, who are influential on the island where 70 percent of the population are Buddhists, and some members of parliament say Hizbullah’s links to Riyadh contributed to the spread of militancy in his native Kattankudy, a Muslim-majority town.

Hizbullah’s family helped build Saudi-financed mosques and a Saudi-funded higher education institute, Batticaloa Campus, which has not opened yet, in the Eastern Province.

The mosque and school projects were led by the Hira Foundation, a non-profit owned by Hizbullah and his son Hiras.

Its financial statements show income of some $31,000 between 2014 and 2018, though Hizbullah told parliament Hira had received $2 million from foreign donors. He did not respond to a request from Reuters for further financial details.

In an interview with Reuters at his home in the capital, Colombo, Hizbullah, 56, said most funds come from the Juffalis, a leading Saudi merchant family. Reuters also found two wires from other Saudis but was not able to trace them. Hizbullah said they were pooled contributions from smaller donors.

The Sheikh Ali Abdullah Al Juffali Foundation Charity wired some $24.5 million to Batticaloa Campus between 2016 and 2017, bank statements and loan agreements seen by Reuters show.

Hizbullah warned the experience of the Juffalis, who he said have received hate mail, was spooking Saudi investors. He did not identify any investors.

Ongoing investigations have not shown that any Saudi money flowed to the plotters. And critics attribute moves against Saudi influence to burgeoning Islamophobia, including mob attacks on Muslim properties in May.

Not a single Saudi institution, charity or individual gave even one rupee to terrorists,” Hizbullah said.

The charity did not respond to calls or messages seeking comment, and Reuters was unable to find alternative contact details for the Juffalis. The charity’s website lists the founders as Ali al-Juffali, a businessman and former member of the kingdom’s consultative assembly who died in 2015, and his four sons. The charity says its objectives include supporting orphans and activities that promote religious tolerance.

The Juffalis, who promised a total of $100 million to Batticaloa Campus, have halted loans over the school’s uncertain future, Hizbullah said. Construction of the sprawling campus, designed in Islamic architectural style, has been paused, he added.

Hira also connects mosques with donors.

The modest Siharam Mosque, for example, was rebuilt in 2015 thanks to some $56,000 from the Juffalis, according to a mosque plaque and its ex-president M.Y. Adam, who said Hira received a 10% commission. Hizbullah did not respond to questions about mosque funding.

SCAPEGOAT?

In the Reuters interview, Hizbullah also denied allegations made by some monks that he had links to the attacks, and no evidence has surfaced to support that claim.

His critics, however, point to a 2015 photograph that shows Mohamed Hashim Mohamed Zahran, who authorities say led the April suicide bombings and blew himself up at a Colombo hotel, grinning under his beard as he shakes Hizbullah’s hand.

Hizbullah said he was seeking support from Zahran, also a Kattankudy native, for a parliamentary election. Back then, Hizbullah stressed, Zahran was just a charismatic preacher who could deliver some 2,000 votes in the devout town of roughly 50,000.

His supporters – and even some opponents – say Hizbullah is a scapegoat. Ameer Ali Shihabdeen, an Eastern Province member of parliament from a rival party, said Hizbullah was being targeted despite a lack of evidence linking him to the attacks.

Wahhabism spread to Sri Lanka’s Eastern Province three decades ago, when the area was convulsed by conflict between mostly Hindu Tamil separatists and the Buddhist-dominated government, according to local religious leaders and politicians.

Muslim scholars received scholarships to study in Saudi Arabia, while impoverished farmers escaped clashes by becoming drivers or maids in the Middle East – often returning home with stricter Islamic practices, the sources said.Slideshow (10 Images)

Saudi-funded mosques mushroomed. Women ditched their saris for all-enveloping black abayas. Some Sri Lankan Sufis, who follow a mystical form of Islam that Wahhabis consider heretical, said they began to be persecuted.

Hizbullah’s political career, which included stints in parliament, blossomed during this time. In Kattankudy, his name adorns schools, a public hall and roads.

Batticaloa Campus, the college funded by the Juffalis, initially planned to teach sharia, which some critics say limits women’s rights. Hizbullah said sharia only meant the academic subject of Islamic Studies, and that the discipline had been dropped from curriculum plans.

Students would pay half standard tuition fees, which Hizbullah said was partly why this long-neglected area welcomes Arab donors’ deep pockets.

A parliamentary committee last month called for authorities to take over Batticaloa Campus and compensate investors, citing incomplete documentation, possible violations of foreign exchange rules, and national security concerns.

No decision has been announced yet, but a presidential spokesman told Reuters that Sirisena, a Hizbullah ally who is on the back foot ahead of presidential elections this year, also favours a takeover.

WAHHABI SCHOLAR BEHIND BARS

Some Kattankudy Sufis link the advent of Wahhabism to the 1990 opening of the Saudi-financed Center for Islamic Guidance, which boasts a mosque, school, and library. Reuters was unable to trace Saudi donors, who had names common in the Middle East, thanked on a plaque at the centre.

The centre brainwashed” youth and distributed flyers denouncing Sufism, according to H. M. Ameer, a community spokesman who said his house was destroyed during anti-Sufi unrest in 2004. Persecution intensified with the rise of Zahran, the suspected Easter bombings ringleader, whose followers attacked Sufis with swords in 2017, Ameer added.

Representatives of the centre did not respond to requests for comment about the Sufis’ allegations. They previously told Reuters the centre practiced moderate Islam”.

The centre’s Riyadh-educated founder, Mohamed Aliyar, was arrested in May for allegedly funding Zahran.

The charge sheet, reviewed by Reuters, details his bank accounts but does not provide evidence of wrongdoing. A police spokesman did not respond to requests for details.

Aliyar’s lawyer Abdul Uwais said he was a victim of paranoia over Wahhabism.

Two sources from Kattankudy’s Muslim leadership said Zahran voraciously read Wahhabi texts from Aliyar’s centre, but that the men were not known to be close.

World Bank classifies Sri Lanka as upper middle income country

July 5th, 2019

COLOMBO, July 4 (Xinhua) — The World Bank has changed Sri Lanka’s classification from a lower-middle income country to an upper-middle income country under its latest country income classifications for the 2020 fiscal year, local media reports said here Thursday.

The World Bank in a statement said it had classified the world’s economies into four income groups, high, upper-middle, lower-middle, and low and upgraded economies on Gross National Income (GNI) per capita.

The classification is updated each year on July 1.

Accordingly, Sri Lanka inched into the upper-middle income category along with 4,060 U.S. dollars per capita income for 2019 along with Kosovo and Georgia.

The World Bank, this year has predicted Sri Lanka’s economic growth to 3.5 percent.

SOFA not for Sri Lanka

July 5th, 2019

By Lakshman I.Keerthisinghe Courtesy Ceylon Today

Once we agree on the future, the present will be much easier. A captain who does not know where he wants to sail, there is no wind on Earth that will bring him there. We have first to decide where we want to go, where we want to sail”
– Ami Ayalon –Israeli Politician

 It was reported in the Media that President Maithripala Sirisena told heads of Media institutions, at a meeting held on 26 June that he is strictly against the proposed signing of the Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the United States of America. 

Although, it was reported that ACSA has already been approved by the Foreign Ministry, influenced by a former diplomat, SOFA is yet to be signed.


Critics say that if the SOFA were to be signed, by Sri Lanka, it can be noted that since Independence, 71 years ago, this would be the first time foreign troops, in uniform, carrying weapons and communication equipment, would be free to roam the country. Regarding foreign troops permitted free access to Sri Lanka in the past, the only forces were the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) but they were confined entirely to the war-torn North and East during the separatist war. 

They were sent back by late President Ranasinghe Premadasa. The other was the presence of foreign troops during the December 2005 Tsunami but they were not allowed to carry weapons and given specific areas to undertake relief work.


 It must be recalled that the US was the sponsor of a resolution against Sri Lankan troops for the purported violation of human rights, international humanitarian law and alleged war crimes. Unfortunately due to the intervention of the then Foreign Minister, Mangala Samaraweera, Sri Lanka became a co-sponsor of that resolution. It is rather strange that the very country that accused the Sri Lankan troops and placed them under scrutiny before the UNHRC and blacklisted many military officers now desires joint military ties.

 Meanwhile, the Chief Prelate of the Malwatte Chapter Most Venerable Thibbatuwawe Sri Sumangala Thera expressed the following views when the US Ambassador to Sri Lanka called on the Venerable Thera recently. The Mahanayaka Thera said that there are allegations against America as well and that these agreements should be publicised so that the people are aware of the contents. The Venerable Thera emphasised that the majority of the clergy consider entering in to these agreements as dangerous and added that he too feels the same, about the issue.


 If SOFA is signed, unavoidable presence of American troops on the ground, which Sri Lanka will be powerless to prevent, the country would undoubtedly jeopardise its sovereignty and territorial integrity, over the whole Island. The real cost of the civil war is coming to light only now and with the most startling and disastrous consequences.


It is to be noted that history reveals that during the British colonial period, the British East India Company was able to conquer the whole of India, because of disunity amongst Indian rulers, princes and chiefs. Similarly, a communally disunited Sri Lanka may succumb to the same fate due to a new strategic power game played by the US in the Indian Ocean region.  The root cause of the nation’s misfortune appears to be its ethnic and religious disharmony with the background of disunity between our present leaders.


Engineered chaos


It is in this context that one is prompted to ask the question whether the Easter massacre was just the joint handy-work of home grown jihadists and ISIS only, or chaos engineered and executed by even more powerful and sinister game players. Because, ISIS is no more an arch enemy of US as once thought to be, but a friend of convenience in the fight against Assad. ISIS lost its territory and caliphate not because of US bombing but because of Russian and Syrian joint attacks.


The timing of SOFA/ VFA deal is also significant. Sri Lanka is about to face Presidential as well as Parliamentary elections, soon. Having envisaged the increasing prospect of Chinese influence escalating with a new regime not so amenable to them, US would prefer to conclude the deal while the pro-US UNP regime is still in power. The fact that Pompeo excluded Sri Lanka from his recent Asian tour may have been due to the US displaying its displeasure for not signing SOFA thus giving a veiled threat to Sri Lanka.  US seem to attach a great importance in gaining a foothold in Sri Lanka. But sooner or later, the presence of US troops in Sri Lanka presents a worrying scenario.


In conclusion, the decision of President Sirisena not to sign the SOFA is very astute, which will safeguard the sovereignty of our motherland.

(The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with LLB, LLM, MPhil.(Colombo)-keerthisinghel@yahoo.co.uk)

SC issues interim order against carrying out death penalty

July 5th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Supreme Court has delivered an interim order preventing the implementation of the death penalty until the 30th of October.

The order was delivered by a three-judge bench consisting of Supreme Court Justices Buwaneka Aluwihare, Prasanna Jayawardene and Gamini Amarasekara.

Twelve petitions filed with the Supreme Court against the implementation of the death penalty were taken up for consideration before the judge bench today (05).

President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, appearing on behalf of the Fundamental Rights (FR) petition filed by Attorney-at-Law K.H. Geeganage, pointed out that imposing the death sentence on four selected death row inmates is a violation of Article 12 (1) of the Constitution which ensures that all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to the equal protection of the law. 

PC Sumanthiran accordingly sought the Supreme Court to deliver an interim order preventing the implementation of the death penalty as it is a violation of fundamental rights ensured by the Constitution.

Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle, presenting submissions on behalf of the Attorney General, told the court that the death penalty is a punishment compliant with the Sri Lankan law.

Accordingly, the Deputy Solicitor General pointed out that implementing the death penalty does not violate any fundamental rights ensured by the Constitution.

Considering the submissions, the Supreme Court ordered that the FR petitions filed against the death penalty would be taken up again on October 29th.

The Supreme Court then delivered an interim order preventing the implementation of the death penalty until the 30th of October.

SOFA allows US forces entry to Sri Lanka at anytime – Kalinga Indatissa

July 5th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

Signing the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) allows the forces of the United States to enter into Sri Lanka at anytime, says the President of Bar Association of Sri Lanka and President’s Counsel Kalinga Indatissa.

The BASL president stated this during a discussion held with the Leader of the Opposition with regard to the SOFA, Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) and Millennium Challenge Corporation agreement that are to be signed with the government of the United States.

The discussion was held at the office of the Opposition Leader with a group of members of the BASL yesterday (04).

If the SOFA is signed terrorists are given the opportunity to act freely in the country, the BASL president commented further.

Furthermore, even if the US forces engage in offences of any sort, Sri Lankan law cannot be enforced on them, he added.

Meanwhile, the State Minister of Defence, issuing a statement, said that the government of Sri Lanka does not have any intention of signing such agreements.

AG orders immediate arrest of Avant-Garde chairman & 7 others

July 5th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Attorney General has informed the Acting Inspector General of Police to immediately arrest the Chairman of Avant-Garde Maritime Services (Pvt) Ltd Nissanka Senadhipathi and 7 others, the Attorney General’s Department said.

However, the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) has informed the Attorney General’s Department that Mr Nissanka Senadhipathi has left the country, according to the Coordinating Officer to the Attorney General, State Counsel Nishara Jayaratne. He has reportedly traveled to Singapore.

The following suspects are to be arrested:

  1. Major General (Rtd.) Waduge Palitha Piyasiri Fernando 
  2. Major General (Rtd.) Karunaratna Banda Adhikari Egodawele
  3. Yapa Hetti Pathirannehelage Nissanka Yapa Senadhipathi – Avant-Garde, Chairman
  4. Rtd. Commodore Vishvajith Nandana Diyabalanage
  5. Dissanayake Mudiyanselage Saman Dissanayake – Secretary, National Police Commission/Former Senior Additional Secretary, Ministry of Defence
  6. Rtd. Air Vice Marshall P.B. Premachandra
  7. D.M.S. Damayanthi Jayaratne – Former Senior Additional Secretary, Ministry of Defence
  8. Victor Samaraweera – Chairman, Rakna Lanka

In his letter to the Acting IGP, the Attorney General states that the Supreme Court yesterday (4) rejected the Fundamental Rights petitions filed by five of the suspects against their arrest.

However, before the Supreme Court announced its decision on the petitions yesterday the CID had informed the AG that Nissanka Senadhipathi and Vishvajith Nandana Diyabalanage have left the country.

Accordingly the AG informed the Acting IGP that there is no legal obstacle to immediately arrest the aforementioned suspects and produce them before court.

The AG also instructs to name P.B. Premachandra, Damayanthi Jayaratne and Victor Samaraweera as suspects, proceed according to the provisions of the Penal Code Ordinance, record their statements and produce them before court as suspects without delay.

The AG also instructs to report the progress with regard to this before July 08, 2019.

SLPP denies any agreement with SLFP on possible alliance

July 5th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) today denied that the party has reached an agreement with the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) on the name of the new alliance if both parties decide to contest an upcoming election together.

UPFA General Secretary Mahinda Amaraweera yesterday announced that the possible new alliance between the two parties would be named the ‘Sri Lanka Nidahas Podujana Peramuna’ and that they would contest under this name if the two parties contest together.

However, SLPP member MP Shehan Semasinghe says that no such agreement has been reached.

Speaking at a press briefing today (5), the parliamentarian said that he even spoke to MP Dullas Alahapperuma earlier in the day and inquired whether any such decision was taken.

Clearly the Sri Lanka Freedom Party and the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna have so far not agreed on forming an alliance and contesting elections or to contest as the ‘Sri Lanka Nidahas Podujana Peramuna’,” he said.

The MP said that the UPFA General Secretary may have talked about the alliance he expects as Amaraweera truly wants to unite the two groups.

Semasinghe said that so far the two parties have discussed regarding 25 points and as to how the agreements must happen, but no such final decision has been reached.

EASTER SUNDAY BOMB BLAST IN SRI LANKA Part 9

July 4th, 2019

KAMALIKA PIERIS

This essay deals with two aspects of the bomb blast which do not get much attention. The bomb blasts sent many people to hospitals with grave injuries. This brought pressure on the hospitals concerned.  Sunday Times did an interview on this.

The major hospitals worked with clinical precision, at very short notice, in the wake of the Easter Sunday suicide bombings that shook the country, said Sunday Times. The call to the National Hospital Sri Lanka (NHSL) came just after 8.45 a.m. on April 21, about the Kochchikade Church and three five-star hotel blasts and into action they went, with all the key” people of the Disaster Management Committee being informed immediately.

 As soon as the operator informed me that the telephone exchange had got the alert, I put our plan into action,” says the Deputy Director-General (NHSL), Dr. Kumara Wickremasinghe of this 3,500-bed facility.

He was informed of multiple blasts” and to expect a large number of casualties” and so the emergency wheels began turning, with him at the helm as the casualties were brought in a rush to the NHSL’s Accident & Orthopaedic Service which is considered the Level 1 Trauma Centre in the country.

More operating theatres were opened up, additional Intensive Care Units (ICUs) made ready and the neuro-trauma teams brought in,” he says, adding that resources such as sterile linen were reallocated from other parts of the NHSL. Later many outside donations flowed in

.Initially dispatching its own ambulances, he called for support from the Colombo South (Kalubowila), Colombo North (Ragama), Castle Street and Lady Ridgeway Hospitals in transferring the dead and injured from the blast site . 20-25 ambulances plying back and forth with sirens screaming and red lights flashing. This was while casualties were also being brought in private vehicles.

Pointing out that within a short time of about one hour, they received 267 people, Dr. Wickremasinghe explains that three weeks before, the NHSL had rehearsed the contingency plan as they usually do quite often. He explains how they dealt with this mass of casualties systematically – as soon as a casualty arrived, he/she was tagged with a number, which number would later be on the Bed-Head Ticket (BHT). Thereafter, ‘triaging’ took place to rush the severely injured to a resuscitation room, with the less severely injured (second level) being taken to a different area and those with minor injuries elsewhere.

It was a similar scenario at the Negombo District General Hospital. When the telephone operator informed Director Dr. Chandraguptha Ranasinghe, he had immediately contacted the Police to verify the bomb attack and get an insight into the number and type of casualties. The reply had been mass casualties”. Quickly invoking the Disaster Management Plan, the relevant personnel had got into position quickly. Having six ambulances, Dr. Ranasinghe had requested institutions close by for support, mustering the services of 24 ambulances.

By the time the casualties came in soon after 9 a.m., the ‘Triage Area’ with a Consultant and his team had been in place, assessing them and transferring them to the Primary Care Unit, OT, ICU or wards.

All the bodies were checked to confirm that there were no life-signs and sent to the temporary mortuary outside the OPD premises and kept for identification,” says Dr. Ranasinghe, explaining that Consultant Judicial Medical Officers (JMOs) were rushed to the blast site to carry out analysis and secure evidence.

He also alerted all nearby institutions such as the Chilaw, Marawila, Gampaha and Ragama Hospitals and the JMO offices of Mannar and Kurunegala as he realized that if there was a large influx of bodies, there could be a delay in their release if there was a shortfall of JMOs.

I asked the JMOs to come with their teams, dissecting crews and equipment,” says Dr. Ranasinghe who quickly got his staff to set up temporary dissecting rooms in four garages and also a temporary police post as well as a temporary magisterial post.

The postmortems started around 3 p.m. on Sunday, as they had to await the holding of the magisterial inquiry at the blast site. With 11 JMO stations working from 3 p.m. on Sunday to 1 a.m. Monday, 84 bodies had been released.

As a back-up plan, Dr. Ranasinghe had got in touch with the Defence Ministry and the Health Ministry’s Disaster Management Centre to secure two mobile coolers (40-foot and 20-foot respectively) to store the bodies and prevent decomposition in case there was a delay. However, the JMOs had worked throughout and by 11 a.m. on Monday, the day after the bombing, more bodies had been released.

The Negombo Hospital Director appreciates the great help” extended by many including the respective Medical Superintendents (MSs) and Directors of the hospitals such as Chilaw, Marawila, Gampaha, Ragama and NHSL; Health Ministry officials including Dr. Champika Wickramasinghe and Deputy Director-General (Planning) Dr. Sridharan Sathasivam; regional and provincial health officials and Gampaha District Secretary Sunil Jayalath. Donations of dry rations, clothes, water, medical equipment and consumables had flowed in from non-governmental organizations and private organizations. Post-disaster, the Negombo Hospital has held an in-depth debriefing to focus on any deviations from the recommendations and why and what the way forward should be, both immediate and long-term. ( Sunday Times 28.4.19 p 8)

The bomb blasts killed the wage earners of families and orphaned several children. The Yahapalana government felt obliged to do something about it.

On the instructions of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe who is also the Minister of National Policies, Economic Affairs, Resettlement, Rehabilitation, Northern Province Development and Youth Affairs, compensation cheques for deaths and injuries caused by the Easter Sunday suicide bomb attacks on St. Sebastian’s Church at Katuwapitiya, were distributed in May 2019. .Secretary to the Ministry of National Policies, V. Sivagnanasothy said that compensation was paid for 89 deaths and 130 injuries .The payment was made on 16.05.2019 at Cardinal Cooray Church.

Sivagnanasothy said that the Prime Minister presented a Cabinet Paper and obtained approval of the Cabinet of Ministers for the payment of compensation of Rs. 1 million per death and a maximum of Rs. 500,000 for injuries based on the degree of disability/impaired.

“With regard to Property damages, a maximum of Rs.5 million based on the Chief Valuer’s report has also been approved for payment. The costs of rehabilitation/reconstruction of the damaged Churches are to be met by the Ministry of National Policies, Economic Affairs, Resettlement & Rehabilitation, Northern Province Development and Youth Affairs and work to be undertaken by the Sri Lanka Army and Sri Lanka Navy.

 Accordingly, already Rs. 10 million has been paid as an advance to St. Sebastian’s Church, Rs. 10 million for Kochchikade Church and Rs. 5 million for St. Zion Church in Batticaloa, on the directive of the Prime Minister.

“”Office for Reparations of the Ministry of National Policies, Economic Affairs, Resettlement, Rehabilitation, Northern Province Development and Youth Affairs is entrusted with the implementation of the compensation package payment for the attack that took place at the St. Sebastian’s Church at Katuwapitiya. For St. Sebastian’s Church at Katuwapitiya, a sum of Rs. 81.7 million has been already paid for 89 deaths, while Rs.13.1 million has been paid for the 137 injuries reported.

 Similarly, for St. Anthony’s Church at Kochchikade and other places in Colombo where the attacks took place, a sum of Rs. 18.4 million has been paid for 27 deaths and Rs. 1.3 million for four injuries has been paid. Further, Rs.21.2 million has been paid for 27 deaths, while Rs. 3.7 million for 35 injuries has been already paid for the suicide bomb attack which took place in St. Zion Church at Batticaloa. A total compensation of Rs. 121 million for 143 deaths and Rs. 18.1 million for 176 injuries has been paid. Further, the balance payments for the victims will be paid on submission of necessary supporting documents The compensation packages are expected to be fully completed within 10 days covering all the affected parties as instructed by the Prime Minister”, Sivagnanasothy said.[1] (continued)


[1] Island 22.5.19 3 modern used no 23

DEATH PENALTY MUST BE MANDATORY IN SRI LANKA

July 4th, 2019

By M D P DISSANAYAKE

There is an argument that the legislature cannot deprive the right to live, under any circumstances.  This is the view held by some Western Nations. The last death sentence in Australia was in 1967.  The debate started again in 2002 after Bali bombing where 202 Aussies were killed.  Similarly Sri Lanka lost nearly 300 after 21/4 bombing.  The extent to which terrorism operates now, these events might not have been averted even if capital punishment was in place.  

Murder rate in Sri Lanka ( according to last published statistics) was 3.4 per 100,000 inhabitants.  In our region, our murder rate is higher than Malaysia   ( 31 million) and Bangladesh ( 165 million) population.

If someone with the criminal intent cause the end of life for another, then the criminal need to be aware of his destiny if caught and found guilty.

We need not get mixed up with Buddhism and Punishment for Crime.  Apart from deaths caused by terrorists attacks, today Sri Lanka is not a safe place to live at all.  People are always in angry mood.  Whilst walking if you accidentally bump into some one unknown  on the street,  are you blind” is the spontaneous question?  They are ready for a fight anytime with anyone for anything. 

In addition, corruption and contract killings are rampant in Sri Lanka.  Those who became rich recently consider themselves most powerful.  Politicians are in the front line in this parade.

Felons must be treated equally the same way the Felons treated the innocent victims.  Judiciary is neither a Temple nor Church.  Dhamma is not part of Criminal Law.

Death Penalty must be made  mandatory in Sri Lanka.

Ten Years After The US-Backed Coup in Honduras

July 4th, 2019

Free Speech TV

GUEST: Matt Ginsberg-Jaeckle, member of the Honduras Solidarity Network.

BACKGROUND: June 28th marks the tenth anniversary of the US-backed coup in Honduras that ousted democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya and unleashed a new chapter of violence in the Central American nation. 

The coup was backed by the Obama Administration and especially by then State-Secretary Hillary Clinton. Now, a decade later, Hondurans join waves of Central American refugees in fleeing the drug and gang violence that is plaguing their nation. 

Despite the incessant discussion of immigration in the US, few are connecting the dots between the US support of a devastating coup and how its aftermath has generated an exodus northward.

https://freespeech.org/stories/ten-years-after-the-us-backed-coup-in-honduras/

කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේ වාර්තාවෙන් සාෆිගේ කෙරුවාව හෙළිවේ – අනුමැතියකින් තොරව සිංහල මව්වරු 11 කට එල්ආර්ටී කරලා

July 4th, 2019

සිරිමන්ත රත්නසේකර උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

diva main

සිංහල මව්වරුන් වඳභාවයට පත් කළා යැයි කියන වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි සාබ්දීන් සම්මත ක‍්‍රමවේදයෙන් බැහැරව පමණක් නොව සම්මත ක‍්‍රමවේදයන් අනුවද සිංහල මව්වරුන් වඳ භාවයට පත්කර ඇතැයි මහාචාර්ය චන්න ජයසුමන මහතා ඊයේ (03 වැනිදා* විශේෂ හෙළිදරව්වක් කරමින් අනාවරණය කළේය.

ඒ මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා මවුවරුන්ගේ අවසරයකින් තොරව වඳ භාවයට පත් කරන ඛඍඔ සැත්කම් එකොළහක් සිංහල මව්වරුන් සඳහා කර ඇතැයි සබ්දීන් වෛද්‍යවරයා පිළිබඳව කුරුණෑගල මහ රෝහල මගින් සිදු කර ඇති විමර්ශන වාර්තාවේ සඳහන් බවද හෙතෙම පැවසීය.

රජයේ රෝහල් සඳහා ඇතුළත් වන මවුවරුන්ට ඔවුන්ගේ අනුදැනුමකින් තොරව මෙවැනි ඛඍඔ සැත්කම් කිරීම මෙරට සෞඛ්‍ය ක්ෂේත‍්‍රයේ බරපතළ ප‍්‍රශ්නයක් පෙන්නුම් කරන්නක් බවත් සාෆි වෛද්‍යවරයා ලියාපදිංචිය අවලංගු කිරීමට වෛද්‍ය සභාවට ප‍්‍රමාණවත් කරුණු මෙම වාර්තාවේ ඇති බවත් මහාචාර්යවරයා සඳහන් කළේය.

එසේම මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා කලබලයෙන් සහ වේගයෙන් සිදුකරන ක‍්‍රියාවලිය තුළ ඇතිවන සංකූලතා නිසා කාන්තාවන් සරුභාවය නොවීමට හේතු වී ඇති බවත් එම වාර්තාවේ සඳහන් යැයිද හෙතෙම කීවේය.

මෙම වාර්තාව වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාත්මක කරුණු පිළිබඳ දැනුමක් නැති පැලෝපීය නාලය හෝ ගර්භාෂය දැකලා නැති අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සමූහ මංකොල්ල විමර්ශන අංශය කුරුණෑගල අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබෙන වාර්තාව සේ නොව සෞඛ්‍ය ක්ෂේත‍්‍රයේ විශේෂඥ දැනුමක් ඇති වෛද්‍යවරුන් සැකසූ වාර්තාවක් බවත් මහාචාර්ය චන්න ජයසුමන මහතා මෙහිදී වැඩිදුරටත් සඳහන් කළේය.

මහාචාර්ය චන්න ජයසුමන මහතා ඊයේ (03 වැනිදා* එම අදහස් පළ කළේ රාජගිරියේ පිහිටි ශ‍්‍රී සදහම් සෙවණ පරිශ‍්‍රයේ පැවති විශේෂ මාධ්‍ය හමුවකට එක්වෙමිනි.

මෙහිදී අදහස් දැක්වූ මහාචාර්ය චන්න ජයසුමන මහතා මෙසේද පැවසීය.

වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි සාබ්දීන් පිළිබඳව අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව කුරුණෑගල අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති වාර්තාව අනුව මුද්‍රිත හා සමාජ මාධ්‍ය එම වෛද්‍යවරයා නිවැරදිකරු කරමින් පුළුල් වැඩපිළිවෙළක් මේ වන විට ගෙන යමින් තිබෙනවා.

ඉස්ලාම් අන්තවාදී කණ්ඩායම්, නිරාගමික කණ්ඩායම්, විවිධ මාක්ස්වාදී කණ්ඩායම් සහ එම වෛද්‍යවරයා දරන දේශපාලන මතවාදය නියෝජනය කරන කණ්ඩායම් මේ වෛද්‍යවරයා හොඳ මිනිසෙකු කරමින් පුළුල් මතවාදයක් ගෙන යමින් පවතිනවා. එම කණ්ඩායම මහා සංඝ රත්නය, වෛද්‍යවරුන්, උගතුන් අපහාසයට ලක් කරමින් ඔවුන්ට එරෙහිව අධිකරණ ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග ගත යුතුයි කියන තත්ත්වයට මෙම සිද්ධිය දැන් යොමු කර තිබෙනවා. මෙයට මූලික හේතුව වී තිබෙන්නේ අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව කුරුණෑගල අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති කරුණුයි.

වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාත්මක කරුණු පිළිබඳ දැනුමක් නැති පැලෝපීය නාලය හෝ ගර්භාෂය දැකලා නැති අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සමූහ මංකොල්ල විමර්ශන අංශය ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබෙන වාර්තාව තමයි දැන් සමාජගතව තිබෙන්නේ.

සබ්දීන් වෛද්‍යවරයා පිළිබඳව කුරුණෑගල මහ රෝහල මගින් සිදුකර ඇති විමර්ශනයේ සඳහන් වන කරුණු මේ වන විට ගරු අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබෙනවා. රටට ආදරේ කරන සියලූදෙනාම මෙම වාර්තාව පිළිබඳ අවධානය යොමු කර දැන් සිදුවෙමින් ඇත්තේ කුමක්ද යන්න තේරුම් ගන්නා ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.

මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා කුරුණෑගල ශික්ෂණ රෝහලේ පමණක් සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් 4372 ක් සිදුකර ඇති අතර දඹුල්ල මහ රෝහලේද සැත්කම් දහසකට අධික ප‍්‍රමාණයක් සිදුකර ඇති බවට දැනගන්නට තිබෙනවා.
මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා විසින් කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේදී සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් සිදුකරන ලද මව්වරුන් අතරින් 850 දෙනෙකු ජුනි 22 දිනට පෙර ඔහුට විරුද්ධව රෝහලට පැමිණිලි කර තිබෙනවා. එම පැමිණිලි සම්බන්ධයෙන් රෝහල මගින් සිදුකරන ලද පරීක්ෂණවලදී ඒ පිළිබඳ බොහෝ හෙළිදරව් වී ඇති බව රෝහල් කාර්ය මණ්ඩලයේ නිලධාරීන් විසින් දන්වා තිබෙනවා. එහෙත් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව වෙනුවෙන් අධිකරණයේ පෙනී සිටි නිලධාරීන් මෙම පැමිණිල්ල ඉතා සැහැල්ලූවට ගනිමින් කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කරනු දක්නට ලැබුණු අතර මෙම පැමිණිල්ලට අදාළව රෝහල් පරීක්ෂණයේ දැනට ප‍්‍රගතිය නිසි පරිදි ඉදිරිපත් නොකර වෛද්‍යවරයා නිදහස් කළ යුතු බවටද අදහස් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම පුදුමය දන්වන්නක්.

වෛද්‍ය සෙයිගු ෂිහාබ්දීන් මොහොමඞ් ෂාෆි මහතාට එරෙහිව ජුනි 22 වනවිට කුරුණෑගල රෝහලේදී සිදුකරන ලද සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් වලින් පසු මඳසරුභාවය සම්බන්ධයෙන් පැමිණිලි 767 ක් ලැබී තිබෙනවා. එයින්, 766 ක් සිංහල මව්වරුන් වන අතර එක් අයෙකු ස්වාමිපුරුෂයා සිංහල වන මුස්ලිම් මවක්. සිසේරියන් නොවන වෙනත් ශල්‍යකර්මවලින් පසු මඳසරුභාවයට පත්වීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් පැමිණිලි 29 ක් ලැබී තිබෙනවා. ඒ වගේම නීත්‍යානුකූල නොවන LRTවඳ සැත්කම් සම්බන්ධ පැමිණිලි 11 ක් වාර්තා වෙනවා.එසේම ගර්භාෂය ඉවත් කිරීමේ ශෙල්‍යකර්මයේදී අභ්‍යන්තර ඉන්ද්‍රියන්ට හානිවීම සම්බන්ධ පැමිණිලි 02 ක් තිබෙනවා. සිසේරියන් සැත්කම්වලින් පසු ඇතිවූ සංකූලතා සම්බන්ධ පැමිණිලි 43 මේ අතර වෙනවා.

ස්වාමිපුරුෂයා සිංහල වන එක් මුස්ලිම් මවකගෙන් හැර වෙනත් කිසිම මුස්ලිම් මවකගෙන් මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයාට එරෙහිව පැමිණිලි ලැබී නැහැ. මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා විසින් සිදුකළ සිසේරියන් සැත්කම්වලින් පසු සිංහල මව්වරුන්ට ඇති වූ සංකූලතා කිසිම මුස්ලිම් මවකට ඇතිවී තිබේද යන්න අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව මගින් තොරතුරු රැුස්කිරීමක් සිදුකර නැහැ. රෝහල වෙත ලැබී ඇති පැමිණිලි 850 අතරින් 11 ක් සෟජුවම නීත්‍යානුකූල නොවන LRTවඳ සැත්කම් සම්බන්ධයෙන්. මවගේ කැමැත්තකින් තොරව එසේ කිරීම ඉතා බරපතළ වරදක්. මේ පිළිබඳව අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් අවධානය යොමුකර නොමැති බව නිරීක්ෂණය වෙනවා.

මොහමෙඞ් ෂාෆි වෛද්‍යවරයා සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් සිදුකිරීමේදී සිංහල හා දෙමළ මව්වරුන් සදහා ඉතා අඩු කාලයක් වැය කරන බවටත් මුස්ලිම් මවුවරුන් සඳහා වැඩි වේලාවක් ගතකරන බවටත් රෝහලේ තොරතුරු මගින් සනාථ වී තිබෙනවා. මේ පිළිබඳ අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් අවධානය යොමුකර නැහැ.

මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා විසින් සිදුකරන සිසේරියන් සැත්කම්වලදී මැහුම් දැමීමේදී සිංහල හා දෙමළ මව්වරුන් සඳහා එක් මැස්මකුත්, මුස්ලිම් මව්වරුන් සඳහා මැහුම් දෙකකුත් යොදමින් දෙයාකාරයකින් කටයුතු කරන බවට තොරතුරු ඉදිරිපත්වී තිබෙනවා. මැහුම් දැමීමේදී අනුගමනය කරන ක‍්‍රියාපටිපාටියද මඳසරුභාවය ඇතිවීමට බලපෑ හැකි බවට වෛද්‍යවරුන් පවසා සිටිනවා.

ඉහත තොරතුරු අනුව මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා විසින් සිදුකළ සැත්කම්වලින් මව්වරුන්ගේ ගර්භාෂයට හානිවීම් සිදුකර ඇති බවට විද්‍යාත්මක සාධක ලැබී ඇතත් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් ඒ පිළිබඳව වැඩි අවධානයක් යොමුකර නැති බව නිරීක්ෂණය වෙන බව කියන්න ඕනෑ.

ෂාෆි වෛද්‍යවරයාට එරෙහි පැමිණිල්ලට අදාළව මූලික පරීක්ෂණ පවා අවසන් නොමැති තත්ත්වයකදී අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව විසින් මෙම තොරතුරු හෙළි කළ මාධ්‍යවේදී හේමන්ත රන්දුණු මහතා සහ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ පොලිස් අධිකාරීවරයා වැරදිකරුවන් කරන ආකාරයේ නිරීක්ෂණ ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබීම පුදුමයක්.

මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා කුරුණෑගල සහ දඹුල්ල රෝහල් දෙකේදී සිසේරියන් සැත්කම් 5000 කට අධික ප‍්‍රමාණයක් සිදුකර ඇති අතර දැනට ලැබී ඇති පැමිණිලි මත පමණක් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අවසන් නිගමනයකට එළබෙන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න ගැටලූවක්. මෙම පැමිණිල්ල විභාග කිරීමේදී වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාත්මක කරුණු පිළිබඳව විශේෂ අවධානයක් යොමුකළ යුතු බැවින් මොහොමඞ් ෂාෆි වෛද්‍යවරයාට එරෙහිව ලැබී ඇති පැමිණිලි සම්බන්ධයෙන් කුරුණෑගල ශික්ෂණ රෝහල මගින් සිදුකරන ලද පරීක්ෂණවල වාර්තා අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම සහ එම වාර්තා හා නිර්දේශ සැලකිල්ලට ගැනීම ඉතා වැදගත් බව සඳහන් කළ යුතුමයි.

පූජ්‍ය අතුරලියේ රතන හිමි

ඉස්ලාම් ආගමෙන් ඇස් අන්ධකර ගත් ජන සංහාරකයකු කර ඇති සංහාර කුමක්ද යන්න මේ වන විට ඔප්පු වී හමාර බවත් ඔහු රැුකගැනීමට මහජන මුදලින් නඩත්තු වන පොලිස් දෙපාර්තුමේන්තුව කටයුතු කරන්නේ මන්ද යන්න බරපතළ ප‍්‍රශ්නයක්.

වෛද්‍ය ෂාෆි සහබ්දීන් සිංහල ජන වර්ගය සංහාරය කිරීම සඳහා ගෙන ඇති සියලූ කූට උත්සාහයන් කුරුණෑගල මූලික රෝහල විසින් කර ඇති විමර්ශනයේ වාර්තාව මගින් ඔප්පු වී ඇතැයි උන්වහන්සේ කීහ.
වෛද්‍ය සාබ්දීන්ගේ හෙළිදරව්ව ‘දිවයින’ පුවත්පත කළ පසු එය සිදුවිය හැකිද යන්න අපිත් පළමුව පුදුම වූවා. ඒ නිසා අපි ඒ ගැන පළමුව ඔයා බැලීමක් කරන්න කටයුතු කළා. එම සොයා බැලීම් අනුව රෝහල් අධ්‍යක්ෂවරයාගෙන්, වෛද්‍යවරුන්ගෙන් හෙද හෙදියන්ගෙන්, සුළු කාර්ය මණ්ඩල වලින් අපි විමසීම් කළා. ඒ විමසීම් අනුව මෙහි යම් සිදුවීමක් සිදුව ඇති බව අපට නිරීක්ෂණය වුණා.
ඉන්පසුව කළ විශේෂ විමර්ශනය අනුව මෙහි සහසික අපරාධයක් හා සැකයට ලක් වන කරුණු රැුසක් ඇති බව අපට නිරීක්ෂණය වුණා. එහිදී යම් අපරාධයක් වී ඇති බව කරුණු රාශියක් සහිතව අපට පෙනෙන්නට තිබුණා.

මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා සතු දේපළ සහ වත්කම් පිළිබඳ කළ විමර්ශනයක් අනුව ඔහුව අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනීමට කුරුණෑගල දිසාව භාර නියෝජ්‍ය පොලිස්පතිවරයා කටයුතු කර තිබුණා. ඒ අනුව කුරුණෑගල අධිකරණයට සිදු කළ කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම සිදුකළේ පොලිස් අධිකාරී තිසේරා මහත්මයායි. ඒ මහත්තයා මුලින්ම කළේ පුවත්පත් වාර්තා ඉදිරිපත් කරමින් අධිකරණයට කරුණු වාර්තා කිරීමයි. මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා පිළිබඳ ‘දිවයින’ පුවත්පතට වාර්තාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කළ හේමන්ත රන්දුණු මාධ්‍යවේදියා එම පුවත පළ කර ඇත්තේ කිසිදු තොරතුරක් නොමැතිව බව ඔහු අධිකරණයට කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කළා.

ඇත්තටම මෙම කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම විහිළු සහගතයි. මෙම මාධ්‍යවේදියා අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට ගෙනැවිත් පැය හත අට ප‍්‍රශ්න කිරීම් සිදු කළා. නමුත් මේ පිළිබඳව වාර්තාවක් සම්පාදනය කළ රෝහල් අධ්‍යක්ෂවරයාව ගෙනත් ඔවුන් ප‍්‍රශ්න කළේ නැහැ. ඒ වගේම මාධ්‍යවේදියාගෙන් ප‍්‍රශ්න කිරීම් සිදුකරන විට ෂාෆි වෛද්‍යවරයා ඊට ආසන්නයේ ඇසෙන දුරක සිටි බවත් කරුණු වාර්තා වෙනවා. මේ සිදුවීම් සිදුවන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න අපට ලොකු සැකයක් තිබෙනවා.

ශ‍්‍රී ලංකා පොලිස් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව නඩත්තු වන්නේ මහජන මුදලින්. ඒ නිසා ඔවුන් මහජනතාවගේ ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු කළ යුතු වෙනවා. නමුත් ජනතාවගේ බදු මුදලින් නඩත්තු වන පොලිස් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අපරාධයක විත්තිකරුවන් වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටිනවා නම් එය ප‍්‍රශ්නයක්. ඇත්තටම කුරුණෑගල අධිකරණයට කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කළ පොලිස් අධිකාරිවරයා අයුක්ති සහගත ලෙස කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කළ බව සඳහන් කළ යුතුයි.
මෙම පොලිස් අධිකාරීවරයා අදාළ වෛද්‍යවරයාගේ දේපළ වත්කම් පිළිබඳ ඉදිරිපත් කළ වාර්තා සැකයට තුඩු දෙන්නක්. ඒ පිළිබඳව නැවත සොයා බලන ලෙස පොලිස්පතිවරයාගෙන් සහ නීතිපතිවරයාගෙන් අපි ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා. ඔහුගේ වත්කම් ආදායම් ඉපයීම සහ ජන සංහාරය අතර සෘජු සම්බන්ධතාවයක් ඇති ද යන්න අපට ප‍්‍රශ්නයක් තිබෙනවා.

මෙම පොලිස් අධිකාරීවරයා තෙවැනිව අධිකරණයට කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කළේ මදසරුභාවය පිළිබඳවයි. නමුත් ඔහු කුරුණෑගල රෝහලෙන් ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබූ වාර්තාව සැලකිල්ලට ගත්තේ නැහැ. ගවයා ගැන කතා කරන්න කී පසු ඔහු බැඳ සිටින ගස සහ ලණුව ගැන කතා කිරීමක් වැනි දෙයක් තමයි පොලිස් අධිකාරීවරයා අධිකරණයේදී සිදු කළේ. ඔහුගේ නිරන්තර උත්සාහය වුණේ මෙම වෛද්‍යවරයා නිදහස් කිරීමයි.

අප මෙම හෙළිකිරීම් කරන්නේ මුස්ලිම් සමාජයට එරෙහි වීමක් ලෙස නොවේ. ඉස්ලාම් ආගමෙන් ඇස් අන්ධකරගත් ජන සංහාරකයකුට එරෙහි වීමක් තමයි අප මේ කරන්නේ.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා මෙම ප‍්‍රශ්නය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සිදුකරන මැදිහත් වීම ඉතාම අල්ප බව අපගේ හැඟීමයි. තමන්ගේ රටේ මවුවරුන් දහස් ගණනකගේ පැමිණිල්ලක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරයා කටයුතු කරන ආකාරය පිළිබඳ අපට සෑහීමකට පත්වෙන්න බැහැ. මේ පිළිබඳව ජනාධිපති කොමිසමක් පත් කර පරීක්ෂණ කටයුතු මෙහෙවන ලෙස අපි ජනාධිපතිවරයාගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.

India stays lower-middle-income nation while Sri Lanka gets richer: Report

July 4th, 2019

Courtesy Business Standard

Maldives ($9,310 or Rs 6,36,432) and Sri Lanka ($4,060 or Rs 2,77,542) are the only two countries in South Asia in the upper-middle-income group

Mumbai: India continues to be a lower-middle-income country along with 46 others, while Sri Lanka has climbed to the upper-middle-income group for the fiscal year (FY) 2020, according to the World Bank’s classification of countries by income levels, releasedon July 1, 2019.

Sri Lanka entered the lower-middle-income group in FY 1999, from the low-income category and continued for over two decades, before moving to the upper-middle-income group this year, the data show. India became a lower-middle-income nation from low-income in FY 2009.

The World Bank classifies economies based on gross national income (GNI) per capita (current US$) calculated using what is called the Atlas method. The Bank uses four income groups: low ($1,025 or less; Rs 70,069 or less), lower-middle ($1,026 to $3,995; Rs 70,137 to Rs 2,73,098), upper-middle ($3,996 to $12,375; Rs 2,73,167 to Rs 8,45,955) and high ($12,376 or more; Rs 8,46,023 or more).

Of 218 economies, 80 are in the high-income group, 60 in the upper-middle, 47 in the lower-middle and 31 in the low-income group. The classification is updated on the first day of July every year. The GNI per capita used for this year’s classification is based on 2018 data.

Besides Sri Lanka, in 2019 six other countries–Argentina, Comoros, Georgia, Kosovo, Senegal and Zimbabwe–have seen classification changes based on income levels. Argentina is the only country that slipped from the high-income to upper-middle-income group. The rest moved up.

Source: World Bank, 2019

Here is how classifications are determined:

  • A country’s GNI per capita, which can change with economic growth, inflation, exchange rates, and population. Revisions to national accounts methods and data can also influence GNI per capita.
  • Classification thresholds, which are adjusted for inflation annually using the Special Drawing Rights (SDR) deflator.

There is an increase in thresholds from last year due to SDR inflation. The new thresholds, as of July 1, 2019, are:

Source: World Bank, 2019

The high-income threshold is also a deciding factor for lending rates since 2018-19, before which income classifications did not influence lending terms. Surcharges are applied for lending rates of countries which have been categorized as high income for two consecutive years,” a World Bank release said.

India, its neighbours and BRICS

Maldives ($9,310 or Rs 6,36,432) and Sri Lanka ($4,060 or Rs 2,77,542) are the only two countries in South Asia in the upper-middle-income group.

India ($2,020 or Rs 1,38,087) along with Bangladesh ($1,750 or Rs 1,19,630), Bhutan ($3,080 or Rs 2,10,549) and Pakistan ($1,580 or Rs 1,08,009) fall in the lower-middle-income group, while Afghanistan ($550 or Rs 37,598) and Nepal ($960 or Rs 65,626) are among the low income group economies.

Source: World Bank, 2019

Among fellow developing economies—BRICS—India is the only country in the lower-middle-income group. The others–Brazil ($9,140 or Rs 6,24,810), Russia ($10,230 or Rs 6,99,323), China ($9,470 or Rs 6,47,369) and South Africa ($5,720 or Rs 3,91,019)–are in the upper-middle-income group.

Source: World Bank


(Mallapur is a senior policy analyst at IndiaSpend.)

Republished with permission from IndiaSpend. You can read the original article here

Sri Lanka is a paradise for Israelis – Israel Envoy

July 4th, 2019

Ananth Palakidnar Courtesy Ceylon Today

Sri Lanka is a paradise for Israelis according to Israeli Ambassador to India and Sri Lanka, Dr. Ron Malka who was on a three day visit to the Island.

Speaking to Ceylon Today on Israel – Sri Lanka relations, Dr. Malka said that several countries had alerted their citizens over travelling to Sri Lanka after the Easter Sunday attacks, but Israelis didn’t stop coming to Sri Lanka as they considered Sri Lanka a paradise. We Israelis are used to those types of attacks and nothing prevented our people from travelling to Sri Lanka.”

Commenting further on tourism, he said that tourists from Israel to Sri Lanka were on the increase and mentioned that he even saw a significant number of Israelis holidaying in Sri Lanka.

Elaborating on areas Israel was focusing on developing in Sri Lanka, Dr. Malka mentioned there was USD 200 million worth of trade between the countries each year. Israel imports seafood, tea as well as gems from Sri Lanka.

Agriculture and water management are prime areas Israel is focusing on in Sri Lanka. We are sharing our expertise with Sri Lanka on developing agriculture in the dry zone with the drip water irrigation system and are even helping set up greenhouses for advanced agricultural activities. Israeli expertise is also available on crops and seeds as well as fertilizer,” Dr. Malka said.

He pointed out that Israeli farmers have been assisted by drones and satellites with regard to climatic conditions, crops, soil and irrigation to farmlands.

The Ambassador also said that in the future, Israel could even focus on water desalination in developing the dry zones in the country.

Dr. Malka also said that Sri Lankans serving in Israel as caregivers were very popular with Israeli families and they were recognized for their commitment and dedication for the people they take care of.

He also added that Sri Lankans were recognised for their efficiency in the farmlands of Israel.

As terrorism remains a global phenomenon, all countries should come together to wipe out terrorism and Israel has its potential in a cyber security system and it could even share the expertise with other countries, Dr. Malka said.

First Stirrings of a Sinhala Buddhist Spring – I

July 3rd, 2019

By Rohana R. Wasala

Five hundred years of European colonial occupation could not destroy the dominant Sinhalese Buddhist cultural identity of Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese have a distinct language called Sinhala that evolved entirely out of indigenous roots over thousands of years. It is one of the few still extant oldest languages in the world. It got enriched in contact with other languages of the world. They have what is accepted as the purest form of Buddhism, the Theravada Buddhism, which, according to the prevalent tradition, they got from North India about 2255 years ago.  ‘Tripitaka’ in Pali (the Buddhist scriptures contained in ‘Three Baskets’) which had been passed down through oral tradition was committed to writing at Aluvihara, Matale during the reign of King Valagamba in the first century BCE. Commissioned by King Dhatusena (455-473 CE), the Mahavamsa was composed in the 5th century CE. Both these monumental literary tasks were done by Buddhist monks at times like the present when the island state and its head and heart the Buddhasasana were facing or had just overcome alien threats (military and doctrinal/ideological, respectively) to their survival. All the ancient place names throughout the country are in Sinhala. Those in the North and East  still survive in the form of Tamilized versions. This shows that the Sinhalese inhabited the whole of the island. The feeling of proprietorship over the island is in the Sinhalese DNA as it were. Of course, all communities need to think of themselves as Sri Lankans, but it is doubtful whether non-Sinhalese feel that way – the way the Sinhalese do – towards Sri Lanka, the geographical territory, the land.  

The statement of an unalterable historical fact like this should not be interpreted as an assertion of so-called Sinhalese supremacism. What is supremacism? The www.google.com definition of ‘supremacism’ is that it is ‘an ideology which holds that a certain class of people is superior to others, and that they should dominate, control, and subjugate others, or are entitled to do so’.The same source defines the adjective ‘supremacist’ as ‘relating to or advocating the supremacy of a particular group’. The majority Sinhalese do not want to ‘dominate, control, and subjugate others’, and do not believe that they have a right to do so. Considering the beleaguered state of  the Sinhalese )esp. Sinhalese Buddhists), both internally and externally, it looks as if they are obliged to show cause for their survival as a distinct race, or as if they ought to apologise for being what they are.

The Sinhalese are the oldest inhabitants of the island, no doubt coeval with the veddas, though the latter are identified as a separate aboriginal race by European anthropologists who used to faithfully copied by their local clones parroting their Eurocentric ideas until recently. The Sinhalese have been the majority in the country for countless millennia. No wonder the country used to be named after them. It is actually embarrassing for them to be talking so much about their racial identity and their special relationship with the land, and their Buddhist culture that evolved over the last 2255 year phase of their dateless history. But they are obliged to do so because of the racist discrimination  against them by a handful of minority politicians who fear the legitimate self-assertion of the Sinhalese as a threat to them. The more accommodating the Sinhalese are towards others, the less recognition of the fact seems to be forthcoming from the latter. 

The Sinhalese Buddhist majority are not racist, neither are they fanatical Buddhists. There’s no need to prove that something is not there. It is up to those who say that the Sinhalese Buddhists are this and that to produce evidence, it looks like they don’t have any. The term ‘fanatical Buddhist’ is self-contradictory. Fanaticism is possible only  with faith-based religions. Buddhism says ‘ehi passiko’ ‘come and see’, if you don’t agree, go your way in peace. It is not a political religion unlike Christianity and Islam. The system of government that is most compatible with the Buddhist philosophy is democracy. Democracy has a chance of flourishing in a Buddhist country. Buddhism cannot have any issue with secularism, and vice versa. 

At least 70% of the population in Sri Lanka are Buddhist. Since Buddhism’s tolerant attitude dominates in the country, the minorities are able to practice their  religions in perfect freedom. The same sort of religious freedom can probably be found in some Chritian countries like America and Britain. But, do the Christian and Buddhist minorities in  Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh respectively enjoy the same freedom? Fundamentalist forms of Christianity and Islam (each of these religions monopolizes ‘God’ and claims to be the only true religion) threaten the very foundation of human civilization. A ‘non-religious’ spiritual moral philosophy like Buddhism is little tolerated by fundamentalists. That is why the few Buddhist majority countries there are – Thailand, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka, for example – have begun to have problems with their Muslim minorities. Sri Lanka had no religious problem because of its entrenched Sinhalese Buddhist cultural infrastructure. But the curse of Wahhabism has gradually been visited on Sri Lanka over the past decade or so. 

Fundamentalist activity increased in the past three or four decades behind the smokescreen of the civil war. Its progress was facilitated largely by the passivity of the divided Sangha and the Sinhala politicians’ reluctance to take action against fundamentalists for fear that they’d fail to get the minority vote. So they play it safe, by taking refuge in the dishonest policy of political correctness. Patriotic individuals and groups who urged the Mahanayakes and the successive governments to address this issue by making use of the available legal mechanisms were often condemned as racists, tribalists and extremists and they turned a blind eye to the cases of  physical destruction of archaeological sites by treasure hunters and political vandals, and a deaf ear to the pleas of the peaceful activists to intervene. Ven. Galaboda-aththe Gnanasara who has been a fierce anti-fundamentalist for many years, and who, for that reason,fell foul both of the authorities and fundamentalist sympathisers, is just coming in out of the cold.

Ven. Gnanasara never raised his voice to create communal unrest or foment violence targeting any community. He raised his voice only to awaken the political authorities and the Ven. Mahanayake Theras who were indifferent to his early warnings  and pleas about the worsening danger of murderous religious extremism for their own selfish reasons. It is only the satanic propaganda that turned him into a hate figure, particularly in the biased media eyes. It can be seriously suspected that money plays a central role in it. Otherwise, how could the true situation in this regard be misrepresented in the press in the distorted manner it usually is?

The fear that the release of Ven. Gnanasara Thera from prison would cause a conflagration of racial or religious conflict because of the alleged devilry on his part is entirely misplaced. Contrary to such fears, it can be argued, Ven. Gnanasara, set free, has become a symbol of hope for a nation unexpectedly betrayed barely five years after its return to normalcy at the end of three decades of devastating civil war in May 2009. He adopted a roughneck-like manner when demonstrating his ‘righteous anger’ at the failure of politicians successively in power and the leading Buddhist clergy to address the chronic problem of Christian and Islamic fundamentalist religious onslaught on Sri Lanka’s Buddhist cultural space. (The idea of righteous anger is alien to the Buddhist teaching; but even Ven. Gnanasara is a patujjana, an ordinary human, a worldling). That strategic posturing must now be consigned to the past. He said his prison experience was a kind of postgraduate education for him. 

This fundamentalist infringement on the ancient Buddhist cultural heritage of Sri Lanka  is sometimes done by brazenly crude methods (e.g., forced conversion of, particularly, helpless impoverished Buddhists and Hindus in remote rural areas through blandishments, or by getting them to desecrate their religious symbols as a rite of passage, such as trampling on Buddha statuettes, and home visits by fanatical preachers on morality as taught in their religions, sometimes accompanied by gullible or simply mercenary uneducated Buddhist monks or monk imposters. There has been authentic video). Religious subversion is sometimes done in more sophisticated ways in urban areas, something difficult to criticize or condemn without arousing opposition both among the proselytizers and the potential proselytes. For example, there is the case of a Christian or Catholic Brother who preaches well on ethical matters that are superficially identical between Christianity and Buddhism. He, having mesmerized a mixed crowd by the manner of his preaching, suddenly exclaims ‘Jesus is the SupremeTruth’!

Now, no two religions agree totally in terms of their metaphysics, nor in terms of their ethical principles. The differences between Theravada Buddhism preached/practiced in Sri Lanka and Catholicism professed by the majority of Sri Lanka’s Christians are unbridgeable, as the first is based on the idea of Causality, and the second on Creationism. To ignore these differences is hypocrisy. The audiences in these programs consist not only of Christians, but Buddhists, Hindus, and probably others as well. Even Buddhist monks are sometimes present on the stage with this Catholic Father. If the Buddhists in the audience and the monks on the stage have an iota of brains, they should realize that what the preacher is implying is that Buddhists and others who are not Christians are spiritually deluded, and that his intolerant, totalitarian assertion is not consonant with his purported desire to generate goodwill among diverse religious communities. No Buddhists will quarrel with Catholics or Muslims about their beliefs; nor will they oppose conversion through conviction. But, they will object to them trying to convert Buddhists by unethical means including force or deception. (If a courageous monk or layperson, hearing the proselytizing Father’s assertion of his personal religious belief or conviction, had raised objections, they’d have been roundly condemned on all sides. Of course, what is ‘unethical’ in a multicultural context is problematic. So, it is best to avoid such situations in the interest of religious harmony among the people.)

Ven. Gnanasara Thera’s is an unimaginably worse predicament than that hypothetical monk’s or lay Buddhist’s. What he exposed and challenged were infinitely greater and much more public and even violent instances of fundamentalist aggression. He endeavoured to do this in the calm and composed way characteristic of a Buddhist monk, without expecting any reward (‘nissaranadyashayen’  as he puts it); he has no political or other materialistic ambitions. For many years he tried to alert the lay Buddhist leaders (politicians in power and those out of power) to the danger. In a few instances clashes between Buddhists and Muslims occurred for which only the former were blamed; Muslims were portrayed as the sole victims. The true situation was otherwise. Buddhists never initiate any violent incident. Unruly elements from the Muslim side started the trouble. For example, videos are still available in the social media that show how Muslim youths threw stones from a mosque at a peaceful Buddhist procession at Aluthgama and how this led to violence in 2014, which quickly spread to a number of other towns (including Panadura, Beruwala, Welipenna, etc) in south-western Sri Lanka. On that occasion, thousands of innocent Muslims and and similarly innocent Buddhists were affected and their shops, houses, and places of worship were attacked. Though the then government did its best to stop the violence and restore normalcy, the incidents were not adequately investigated, and not enough was done to clear the name of the BBS which was solely blamed for all that happened. The leaders of both the present and previous governments didn’t take Ven. Gnanasara seriously enough, while pretending to do so, because they thought that if they took any decisive action against the handful of powerful communalists among minority politicians allegedly responsible for questionable acts such as anti-Buddhist subversion, illegal felling of trees in the state forest reserve in Wilpattuwa, settling foreign illicit Muslim immigrants  there, encroaching on and even vandalizing historic Buddhist places of worship in the North and East, and so on, they would lose the support of the mainstream Christian and Muslim communities, which being minorities, naturally tend to form themselves into ‘block vote’ bastions at the instance of opportunistic politicians. (But I believe that this is a misplaced fear on the part of Sinhalese politicians. The majority of ordinary Muslims do not want to support racist politicians, but they are often in the thrall of those politicians, because of the latter’s ability to ‘deliver’ whichever major party or alliance happens to be in power.)

CAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT JUSTIFY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY? PART 1

July 3rd, 2019

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

Narcotic has become a serious problem in the modern world as they are badly affected to the human body as the adherent substance in the one hand and the consumers and dealers of the illicit drug do massive harm to the young generation and to the society in other hands. Many countries have passed legal provisions against the use of illicit drugs considering harmfulness to the human body as well as they have become a burden to society.  The example of Sri Lanka and many other countries demonstrate that consuming and dealing with narcotics would support creating a lawless society.  It seems that Sri Lanka has become a centre of distribution of various narcotics to other countries and international narcotics dealers have turned Sri Lanka to promote illicit drug business and crimes against the democratic rights of people.  Many countries have criminalized all activities associated with narcotic substances, some responsible members of Sri Lanka’s parliament (Mr. Rajitha Senaratne) launched a campaign to decriminalize narcotics in the country without knowing the harmfulness of them not only to Sri Lanka but also to other countries in the world.

The dealing with all kind of narcotic substances such as consuming and using as a business device have been banned by the world and some countries wherein an uncontrollable illicit drug problem has imposed capital punishment for consuming as well as association with the distribution. Middle Eastern and Asian countries have severe punishments for consuming and dealing with narcotics.   The president of Philippines insisted capital punishment to people associated with illicit drugs in absence of a trial and as a result of this decision, it has recorded that more than 3000 people who associated with illicit drugs were subject to capital punishment or on the spot death.  It is a topic that internationally debating, we can express views on the decision of the president of Philippines, but have no ability to revert the decision of the president as it specifically related to a serious problem of the country. I spoke to several citizens of Philippines in different countries, they agree with the decision of the president as the narcotic is an austere problem affecting to day to day life of ordinary people in the Philippines.

Australian Institute of Criminology has published an excellent paper, Polas and, Walker (1987), Capital Punishment: Trends and Issues, Crime and Criminal Justice No 3, Canberra (www.aic.gov.au) and the paper described that the term capital punishment is derived from caput, meaning head.  It originally referred to death by decapitation, but now applies generally to state-sanctioned execution. Recently, the President of Sri Lanka has publicly stated that he will sanction the execution of drug dealers who were punished by the court of justice after a fair trial. The intention of the president of Sri Lanka cannot be compared to the public execution of drug offenders by the president of Philippines because the statement of Sri Lanka’s president is a punishment within the legal framework. Therefore, the intention of the president of Sri Lanka and the practice of the president of Philippines has a vast difference and the practice of the Philippines cannot be implemented in Sri Lanka, which is a Buddhist country, and all religions in Sri Lanka cogitate killing a person for any reason is a sin, and there might be a convincing opposition to killing drug dealers on roads or public.

However, the statement of the president of Sri Lanka to sanction state execution for drug dealers has composed a sharp debate from a different point of views and some religious leaders have expressed their opinion, but such opinion may not be an authentic decision of the religious organizations. Why the president of Sri Lanka openly expresses his intention to introduce capital punishment, to attract popularity or any other purpose is a question to the public, and it might be a dubious decision or an intention. Another vital point is that did the president consult his own cabinet or the parliament before taking the decision and what was the response of them.  The president is a democratic institution, and before making decisions he should consult or get approval from the relevant institutions, and it is the good governance.  His predecessor, Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa consulted the cabinet and other relevant authorities and neighbouring countries before making decisions in many instances.  Why the current president has departed from the practice of the previous president?  In a moralize society, making a statement on sanctioning state execution should not be the behaviour of a leader, is my opinion.  It is not a cause for attracting personal popularity.      

In terms of criminal law, the purpose of punishment is to prevent a person from further engage in wrongdoing.  A punishment may achieve or may not be achieved the purpose. According to the common experience, it has seen that many wrongdoers were given punishments but after the period of punishment they reengage in committing crimes, many feel that punishments have not prevented wrongdoings. Practically in Sri Lanka, illicit drug offenders were punished by the court, nevertheless, these criminals recommenced criminal behaviour while staying in jail using a secret network. How and why they are happening if there are an efficient and effective jail administration in the country. For this situation, administrators including the president of Sri Lanka are responsible. 

The deterrence theory further aims at punishing to drug offenders with jail sentence to off the opportunity to commit crimes.  According to the theory of deterrence in criminal law, people generally believe that when drug offenders deter, drug business will stop but the reality in Sri Lanka is that after the punishment, drug criminals reiterate wrongdoing same as the way or more vigorously killing the judge or personnel in law enforcement authority.  It is a real concerned experience in Sri Lanka compared to other countries. The minister responsible for jail administration has publicly expressed that officers in jail, as well as personnel in law enforcement authority, are associated with the narcotic business dealers. The president of Sri Lanka also made a statement that the barbaric attacks on churches and tourist hotels in the Easter Sunday has a relationship with international drug dealers.  These statements prove that Sri Lanka has a weak law enforcement authority and jail administration, which are not supported to control illicit drugs in the country.

The illicit drug problem in Sri Lanka is a management related problem in the country, which needs effective controls and management methods.  Many expressed views that government politicians, henchmen of them, the top brass of the government and civil society activists sophisticatedly linked to drug business and obviously, it seems that current weakness in political administration is responsible for the problem.  In order to get out of owned weakness for formulating right strategies to control drug problem, president talks on imposing capital punishment, which is rejected by the democratic world, is not a competent administration and the behaviour of responsible president elected by the votes of people. (Continuing)

CAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT JUSTIFY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY? PART 2

July 3rd, 2019

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

In Sri Lanka a widespread talking point or a gossip was, that originally abolished capital punishment was re-established after the assassination of Prime Minister S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, and the capital punishment was given to the assassinator, Rev. Talduwe Somarama was not the real assassinator, but some other person did it, and the exterminator disguised with the support of the law enforcement authority. This means that it is a quite difficult task to detect the real criminals to give capital punishment and the best option is to consider another method of punishment for drug criminals.  It does not mean that the system of justice should ignore the offense, but to use an alternative strategy.

Many countries have controlled illicit drug problems using effective strategies and techniques.  The Local drug problem in Sri Lanka is basically related to consuming or use of the drug, which can be controlled by using multiple methods such as educating about drugs and harmful effects of drugs to individuals and the society.  Sri Lanka has a history of the small-scale drug business in villages. Opium and cannabis business had been operated in Sri Lanka since the beginning of human being in the country. Opium business had been operated in villages by small scale Indian businessmen, who illegally migrated to Sri Lanka and used opium as a business device to quickly achieving enrichment.  Sri Lanka is not growing the plants which use to produce opium (Popi plant) or cocaine (Koki Plant).  Sri Lanka Politics and education in the country did not focus to control such business in the past.  Therefore, Sri Lanka has an ideal environment for illicit drug and alcohol business and consumption.     In many countries, drug education is a part of the school curriculum and lots of resources are diverted to this purpose.  Sri Lanka needs a vigorous campaign on drug education not only in schools but also to the young generation who are out of schools. The government needs funding for advertisements against drug in newspapers, radio, and TVs.

Another vital aspect of narcotics and illicit alcohol in Sri Lanka is that traditional people treated cannabis as a medicinal plant and many Ayurveda doctors use cannabis and opium to produce medicines in various forms. History recorded that illicit alcohol used in the war between King Dutugemunu and Elara. Many traditional employees such as toddy tappers, coconut husk removers, coconut pickers, and many hard-labour workers had been used opium as a pain killer and sleeping chemical or a nerve agent. In the recent past, many Ayurveda doctors got caught using cannabis and opium for making medicines for Asma and another common deceases.  In villages, women use cannabis to soften the village rooster’s meat. Religions did not address the issue.  Catholic priests appreciated with illicit alcohol producers and dealers who contributed funds for church festivals.  Cannabis dealers associated with Buddhist temples, many Muslim clergy associated with heroine dealers and religious leaders reluctant to openly talk about narcotic and alcohol business, the stand of religion now has radically changed and openly talk against illicit drugs and all religions in the country have commenced drug education programs.

People should be vigilant on drug traffickers.  During the LTTE war people were highly concerned with explosive and similar way, people need concern on drug traffickers and inform about the suspicious people to the law enforcement authority.   

Capital punishment from the point of views of religion may not be justified due to various points. According to Christianity humans are the creation of God and human have no right to make a judgment to destroy a creature of God.  This is a complex argument because human makes decisions to destroy animal, plants, which are also creatures of God.  Because some people do wrong things, it doesn’t warrant to kill them.  For example, Adam and Eva believed to be the first human were created by God and when they committed the original sin, God could have given a punishment to kill them and end human being in this world, but God never has done it. Instead of destroying creation, God sent own son (Jesus Christ) to this world to save human being sacrificing his life and to educate people to get away from bad habits and sins. Therefore, Christianity doesn’t agree with capital punishment for drug or any other kind of offenders.

Buddhism also does not agree with capital punishment as a killing of a person regards as a Karma, which is sorrow in metempsychosis transmigrating one life to others and Buddhism would not agree with the capital punishment. In Hinduism, it is a controversy, in terms of Bagawarh Geetha, if God has not sanctioned, a killing a person is regarded as Karma. Islam also against killing people despite the fabricated Islam of new manipulators.  In this religious background, capital punishment is not approved by religions in Sri Lanka and the president’s decision for capital punishment for drug offenders would not be justified by any religion operating in Sri Lanka. Other religions in the world, which are not mentioned here don’t agree with giving capital punishment to offenders.  All religions in the world aim to redeem offenders from the way of reforming them. 

I had an opportunity to develop a program for correctional service officers to reform offenders in jails. I was financially supported by Australia and Canada.  It was highly successful.  In the jail environment, many prisoners openly talked with me the causes to commit crimes and I found that various factors contributed to committing crimes and came across that giving competency-based training to correctional service officers could successfully redeem offenders and remove the elements of wrongdoing from their minds.

I observed that many countries have various programs with a view to reforming offenders and in the modern society programs aim at reforming drug offenders. Developed countries donate a considerable amount of money for programs reforming drug offenders. To be successful such programs, while strict role-playing to detect drug dealers by the law enforcement authority and arm forces, the government needs taking responsibility to provide continuously helping and monitoring different types of offenders who reformed and living in the free society.  I found that the main weakness of the reforming programs was neglecting reformed offenders after the correctional service. Mainly many reformed personnel haven’t had the opportunity to find employment with a decent pay packet for living with the family.  There is no doubt that the government cannot economically help reformed people for their entire life and they need to adapt to reality.  The second important point is that reformed people should be treated equally like other citizens and they should be helped to gain employment consistent with their qualifications, experience, and skills or give the opportunity to gain education and training to find employment like other citizens.

The role after the reforming offenders especially drug offenders seems to be very weak and much-reformed personnel vulnerable to reengage in drug consuming and dealing as they are not gained a status of social civility or decorum in the new environment.  

සිසුන් ලක්‍ෂ 45ක සුරක්‍ෂා රක්‍ෂණයෙන් 20%ක් ඇමති අකිල විරාජ් කොමිස් ගහලා..- විජේදාස රාජපක්‍ෂ සාක්‍ෂි දෙයි..

July 3rd, 2019

lanka C news

සිසුන් ලක්‍ෂ 45ක සුරක්‍ෂා රක්‍ෂණයෙන් 20%ක් ඇමති අකිල විරාජ් කොමිස් ගහලා..- විජේදාස රාජපක්‍ෂ සාක්‍ෂි දෙයි..

පාසැල් සිසු දරුවන් වෙනුවෙන් හඳුන්වා දෙන ලද සුරක්ෂා රක්ෂණාවරණය ව්‍යාපෘතිය මගින් අධ්‍යාපන ඇමති අකිල විරාජ් කාරියවසම් මහතා ඇතුළු කිහිපදෙනෙක් කොමිස් මුදල් ලබාගෙන ඇති බවට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ආචාර්ය විජයදාස රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සඳහන් කරයි.

ජනාධිපති විශේෂ පරීක්ෂණ කොමිසම ඉදිරියේ සාක්ෂි දෙමින් ඔහු කියා සිටියේ සුරක්ෂා රක්ෂණය ප්‍රතිරක්ෂණය කිරීමේදී එම රක්ෂණ සමාගමේ 20%ක කොමිස් මුදලක් ඇමතිවරයා ඇතුළු පිරිසක් විසින් බෙදා හදාගෙන ඇති බවයි.

මෙරට පාසැල් ළමුන් ලක්ෂ 45ක් සිටින බවත් ප්‍රතිරක්ෂණය කරමින් රක්ෂණ ආවරණ ලබාදීමට එම සිසු සිසුවියන් එකවර රෝගාබාධ හෝ අසනීප වලට ලක් නොවන බවද පවසන මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ප‍්‍රතිරක්‍ෂණය කිරීමෙන් සිදු කරන්නේ වංචනිකව මුදල් උපයා ගැනීමට මාර්ග සකස් කරගැනීම බවද කියා සිටියේය.

සුරක්ෂා රක්ෂණාවරණ ව්‍යාපෘතියේදී සිදුව ඇති බව කියන වංචා දූෂණ ගැන විමර්ශනය කරන ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ සාක්ෂි දෙමින් මන්ත්‍රීවරයා මේ බව පැවසීය.

සිරාට, රනිල්ට, සෝෆාට හා ඇමරිකානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයට කෙලවන්න වහා වහා සුදානම් වෙයල්ලා!

July 3rd, 2019

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

අලුත්ම කතාව සෝෆා බවට පත්ව ඇත. සෝෆාගේ හොද නරක නිතර දෙවේලේ සියලුම නාලිකා වලින් විදාරණය වෙමින් පවතී. ඇම්බට්ටයෝ, චීනය විසින් ගොඩනගන පොර්ට් සිටි එකත් බෙල්ට් ඇන්ඩ් රෝඩ් ව්‍යාපෘතියත් සෝෆාට සමාන බව පළකරමින් තමන්ගේ මන්ද බුද්ධික බාවය ලොවටමැ පෙන්වමින් සිටි. මේ වනවිට සෝෆා හා ඊට සම්බන්ධ ගිවිසුම් හේතුවෙන් ඇමරිකාව ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ නිරුවත්ව සිටි. මේ ඇමරිකන් නිරුවත දෙස බලනවාද නැත්නම් ලජ්ජාවෙන් ඉවත බලාගන්නවාදැයි යන කුකුස ජනතාව තුල ඇත. ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජාතියේ “මරු සිරාගේ” යහපාලනයේ අවසාන රංගනයේ, මේ නිරුවත ප්‍රදර්ශනය කරන අතරවාරයේදී, මෙරට ඇමරිකානු තානාපතිවරියද ඉදිරියටම පැන සිදුකරන ප්‍රකාශ අසන ජනතාව, ඇය මේ කරන අශික්කිත කාර්යය එතුමිය ලද විශාල ජයග්‍රහණයක් ලෙස සිතන්නාක් සේ දකී.

ජනපති මහින්දට, මැතිවරණ කොමසාරිස්, මහින්ද ලවා පහරදී  එළවා දමා, සීරාව බලයට පත්කර, ඒ තුලින් තම එකම ඒජන්තයාවූ රනිල් බලාත්මක කොට රටේ සියලු ධනය කොල්ලකා ගත් ඇමරිකානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදය, මේ වනවිට තම බලය කලාපය තුල ස්ථානගත කරගැනීම සදහා නිවට පාලකයින්ගෙන් සමන්විත මේ රජය පාවිච්චි කරගෙන ඇත. මේ ඇමරිකානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයේ, අවසාන කඩයිම  බවට පත්කිරීමේ පුර්ණ වගකීම ඉතිහාසය විසින් මෙරටවාසි ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජනතාව වෙත පවරා ඇති අතර මේ විමුක්ති අරගලයේදී, ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජනතාවගේ සහයට මුළුමහත් ලෝකවාසී ජනතාවම පෙළ ගැසෙමින් සිටින තත්වයක් අපි දකිමු. පසුගිය සතියේ, ආසියාවේ ප්‍රභලම ආර්ථිකයන් හසුරවන චීනය, ඉන්දියාව හා රුසියාව  එක්ව ආසියාව මේ මතුවෙන බටහිර තර්ජනයන්ගෙන් මුදවා ගැනීමේ කාර්යන් සදහා මුලික අඩිතාලම සම්බන්ධව සාකච්චා වටයක නිරත විය. දේශප්‍රේමී ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් මෙවර තනි වී නැති අතර, ඔවුනට තනිවීමට ලෝකවාසී බලවේගයන්ද ඉඩ තබන්නේ නැත. මුළුමහත් ලෝකයම වෙනස් කරන චීනයේ ආර්ථික වැඩ පිළිවෙල ඉදිරියටම ගලා යන අතර, එයට හොදම උදාහරණය වන්නේ ජනාධිපති ටරම්ප්  විසින් පනවන ලද හුවාවේ තහනම, ඔහු විසින්ම ඉවත්කර ගැනීමයි. ඇමරිකාව, වර්තමාන නිවට ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය පාලකයින් උපයෝගී කරගෙන නවතාලන්නට වලිකන පොර්ට් සිටිය, බෙල්ට් ඇන්ඩ් රෝඩ් ව්‍යාපෘතිය නවතාලන්නට කිසිදා නොහැකි වන අතර ඒ හරහා ඇමරිකානු උපාංග වන ISIS තරස්තවාදය හා ඇමරිකානු අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයද මුළුමනින්ම බිදවැටීමට නියමිතය. එහි අවසානය ශ්‍රී ලංකාව මත හා ඒ අවට සාගර කලාපය තුල මහා සටනකින් නිමවීමට නියමිතය. ඒ සදහා ලහි ලහියේ, ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය දේශප්‍රේමී ජනතාවට සුදානම් වීමට සිදුව තිබේ. එබැවින් ආදරණිය ජනතාවනි, සැරසෙන්න අවසන් සටනට, සිරාට, රනිල්ට, සෝෆාට හා ඇමරිකන් අධිරාජ්‍යවාදයට කෙලවන්න.

“අධ්රාජ්‍යවාදයට විනාශය- ජනතාවට විමුක්තිය”


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress