රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට එරෙහිව ඇතැම් දේශපාලනඥයින් සිදුකරන මැර තර්ජන, ගර්ජන, බලපෑම්

January 30th, 2017

සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ උපාධිධාරීන්

ගරු ජනාධිපති,
 මෛතී‍්‍රපාල සිරිසේන මැතිතුමා,
ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලය,
කොළඹ 01.

2017.01.30.

ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමනි,

රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට එරෙහිව ඇතැම් දේශපාලනඥයින් සිදුකරන මැර තර්ජන, ගර්ජන, බලපෑම් වැළැක්වීමට නිසිපියවරක් ගන්න.

            පසුගිය සතියේ දිනක වත්මන් යහපාලන රජයේ ගම්පහ දිස්ති‍්‍රක්කය නියෝ්ජනය කරන නියෝජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරයෙකු ජනතාවද සම්බන්ධ කරගනිමින් මාධ්‍යද පිරිවරා ප‍්‍රසිද්ධියේ දිවුලපිටිය ප‍්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරියට සිදුකරන ලද තර්ජන, ගර්ජන, බලපෑම් සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ උපාධිධාරීන් ලෙස අපි දැඩි පිළිකුලෙන් යුතුව හෙලාදකිමු. එමෙන්ම සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ටම නිදහසේ ස්වාධීනව සිය රාජකාරිය හෘද සාක්‍ෂියට එකඟව සිදුකරගෙන යාමට අවශ්‍ය නිදහස් හා සාමකාමී පරිසරයක් නිර්මාණය කිරීමට ද කඩිනමින් පියවර ගන්නා මෙන්ද අප සංගමය ඔබතුමාගෙන් වගකීමෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමු. 

            පසුගිය රජය යටතේත්, වත්මන් රජය යටතේත් බලයට පත්වන හා පත්වුනු ඇතැම් දේශපාලනඥයින්ගෙන් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ට එල්ල වන තර්ජන, ගර්ජන, බලපෑම් වල අඩුවක් හා වෙනසක් නැතැයි අපි ඔබතුමාගේ අවධානයට යොමුකරවමු. 

            දිවුලපිටිය ප‍්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරියට ප‍්‍රසිද්ධියේ සිය රාජකාරිවලට බාධා කරමින් සිදුකරනු ලැබූ බලපෑම ශිෂ්ඨ සම්පන්න සමාජයක සම්මත ක‍්‍රමවේදය නොවන අතර නැවත සමාජය ම්ලේච්ඡත්වයට ගමන් කරනවාද යන්න මතුවන ගැටළුවකි.

            2015 වර්ෂයේදී සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවයෙන් සාතිශය බහුතරයක් පැවති පාලනය තුළ විඳින ලද පීඩාවන්ට හා නිදහසේ රාජකාරි කිරීමට අදාළව එල්ලවී තිබූ බලපෑම්වලට එරෙහිව එම රජය වෙනස් කිරිමට පියවර ගත්තද වත්මන් රජයද එම නොහික්මුණුකම් ඉතා කෙටිකාලයකින්ම අවස්ථා කිහිපයකදීම ප‍්‍රදර්ශනය කිරීමට කටයුතු කර ඇත. 

            පැවති රජය යටතේත් කුරුණෑගල දිස්ති‍්‍රක්කය නියෝජනය කළ අමාත්‍යවරයෙකු නිකවැරටිය ප‍්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරයාට එරෙහිව ඉතාම දැඩි බලපෑමක් හා තර්ජනය කිරීමක් කරමින් සිය දේශපාලන ගජමිතුරන්ට අවශ්‍ය වන පරිදි වැඩකටයුතු කිරීමට පරිසරයක් ගොඩනගා ගැනීමට දැරූ උත්සාහයත්, එම දිස්ති‍්‍රක්කයේම මන්තී‍්‍රවරයෙකු, ග‍්‍රාමනිලධාරීවරයෙකුගේ රාජකාරියට බාධා කරමින් පහරදීම් පවා සිදුකළ අවස්ථා එම රජය යටතේත් දක්නට ලැබුණි.

            රාජ්‍ය සේවයේ සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන්ට ද එවැනිම අත්දැකීම් රාශියකට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවූ අවස්ථා ඇත. එවකට රුවන්වැල්ල ප‍්‍රාදේශීය සභා සභාපති සංවර්ධන නිලධාරියෙකුට රාජකාරියේ යෙදී සිටියදීම පහරදීම එමෙන්ම වත්මන් රජය නියෝජනය කරන මතුගම ආසනයේ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂයට අයත් පළාත් සභා මන්ති‍්‍රවරයෙකු සංවර්ධන ව්‍යාපෘතියක රාජකාරිවල නියැලෙමින් සිටි ගර්භනී අවස්ථාවේ පසුවූ නිලධාරිනියකට බැණ තර්ජනය කරමින් රාජකාරියට බාධාකළ අවස්ථා ඇතුළු සිදුවීම් විශාල ප‍්‍රමාණයකට සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන්ට ද මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවී ඇත.

            මේ කිසිදු සිදුවීමකදී අදාළ මන්තී‍්‍රවරයාට හෝ අමාත්‍යවරයාට එරෙහිව ඔවුන්ට අදාළ පක්‍ෂ වලින් කිසිදු විනය කි‍්‍රයාමාර්ගයකදු නොගෙන එම මැරකම්, නොහික්මුණුකම්, චන්ඩිකම් බවට පත්විමට ඉඩහැර සමාජගතවීමට කටයුතු කර ඇත. එවැනි අමන කි‍්‍රයාකාරකම්, වීරකි‍්‍රයා බවට පත්වීමට ඉඩහැර ඇත. 

ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමනි,

            දිවුලපිටිය ප‍්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරියගේ රාජකාරිවලට බාධා කරමින් කාන්තාවන්ගේ අයිතිවාසිකම් ගැන පවා කතා කරන රජයේ නියෝජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරයෙකුගේ මෙම නොහික්මුනු කි‍්‍රයාමාර්ගයට එරෙහිව පියවරක් ගන්නා මෙන් සමස්ත රාජ්‍ය සේවා උපාධිධාරීන් වෙනුවෙන් අපි ඉල්ලා සිටිමු. එමෙන්ම තවදුරටත් මෙවැනි පහත් කි‍්‍රයා අනුමත් නොකරන, මෙවැනි කි‍්‍රයා වළක්වමින් රාජ්‍ය සේවකයින්ගේ සිය රාජකාරි පරිසරය ආරාක්‍ෂා වන ආකාරයට මෙන්ම එවැනි සිදුවීම් වලදී ඔවුන්ට ද රැුකවරණයක් ලැබෙන පරිදි විධිමත් වැඩපිළිවෙලක් දියත් කරන මෙන් අප සංගමය නැවතත් ඔබතුමාගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමු. 

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
චන්දන සූරියආරච්චි
ප‍්‍රධාන ලේකකම්,

පිටපත් :-      

  1. ගරු අග‍්‍රාමාත්‍ය – රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමා. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  2. ගරු  ස්වදේශ කටයුතු අමාත්‍යතුමා (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  3.         ගරු රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන අමාත්‍යතුමා. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  4. ගරු කබීර් හෂීම් අමාත්‍යතුමා – ලේකම් එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂය. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  5. ගරු ජනාධිපති ලේකම්තුමා. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  6. ලේකම් – ස්වදේශ කටයුතු අමාත්‍යාංශය. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  7. ලේකම් – රාජ්‍ය පරිපාලන අමාත්‍යාංශය. (අ.ක.ස/දැ.ගැ.පි.)
  8. සියලූ දිස්ති‍්‍රක් හා ප‍්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරුන්. (දැ.ගැ.පි.)

Mass exodus of professionals…….. Right to reply.

January 30th, 2017

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

I read the opinion today written by a retired professional about mass exodus of professionals from Sri Lanka…

I received free school education from a leading school, and proceeded to Soviet Union on a scholarship to obtain a degree in Petroleum Engineering, expecting to come back and contribute to the country. During third year in the State University ,teaching Petroleum Exploration Techniques ,I made a visit to Sri Lanka and visited CPC to get access to the Mannar Oil Exploration Project executed under Russian Aid ,in order  to get an insight of the exploration work .I went on my own by bus to Mannar after getting permission from CPC and visited  the camp where Russians were doing the drilling .They were very happy to see a local student who studies in Russia in the same field  treated me well ( including Vodka!)

During the conversation they mentioned about a Minister of Industries at that time influenced someone to pour some oil into the drilled well ,and gave a wide publicity that Sri Lanka found Oil ! That was a failed election stunt by them PM and Russians were not very happy about it.

Even lately I heard another short sighted politician calming that every family can get a barrel of oil as dowry to give their daughters away. These are the type of politicians we have today who are supposed to guide the professionals to serve the country.

I went back, and finished the degree and met another Minister in the Embassy who implied that I will not get a job in Sri Lanka and that I should try to find greener pastures elsewhere.

So I bolted to the West ,where they embraced me to their industry and  served in Norway and UK for many years .I do not regret that I ran away and  I was not feeling guilty because I had my education thanks to Lenin!!

I learnt engineering, management, planning and how to take responsibilities in the area of my field and, I was ready to take any job afterwards.

I returned to Sri Lanka and ran after ministers, big bosses and asked for a job in the Petroleum Industry and I was ignored Finally due to my sheer luck the President at that time looking for someone without any political affiliation to run a corporation with nothing to do with Petroleum, put me in charge I have leant how to deliver in the corporation and subsequent job in Sri Lanka, I did even better and today I am serving in this country to develop Marine Industry.

What I am trying to emphasize is let the raw graduate go learn how to manage and return back with better knowledge to serve the country.

First of all Politicians should be examples of good citizens, to make the professional feel same way so that they give everything what they can.Imposing rules to retain them will not work ,leaders should cut waste and stop self-serving the national wealth which makes professional disgusted .

Like in India we have to foster the sense of being the true owners if the country .Then they will at least return back and serve.

Give them better salaries and create conditions, recognize them who drive the engine of growth, then they will give something to the country.

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

”කොරාන්  ”   යය්  කියා පොතේ තිබුනත් මේවා නම් ”නො – කොරාන් ”’ මිනිසුනේ .

January 30th, 2017

ධර්මසිරි සෙනෙවිරත්න 

   ”’ අන්‍ය ලබ්ධිකයන් අපේ ආගමට බලෙන් හරි හරවනු . බැරි නම් මරාදමනු .එසේ ආගම වෙනුවෙන් මිනී මරන්නෝ මියගිය විගසම සුරලොව ඉපදෙ දෙවගණන් 72ක් සමග කම්සපවින්දිමින් කල්ගේවන්නට ඔවුන්ට  වාසනාව පෑ දේ.    –ඔබේ ගැහැණු ඔබේ දෙපලය් කැමති පරිදි පරිහරණය කරන්න සුරා .2. 223 —..-සැමියාට අවශ්‍ය විට කාම සේවනයට මැලිකම් දක්වන බිරිඳට දඩුවම් කිරීමේ අයිතිය සැමියාට දී ඇති දිව්‍යමය අයිතියකි ,,,,සුරා 4..34 ..

                                                              ඉස්ලාම් ආගමේ නිර්මාතෘ සොල්දාදුවෙක් මිස දාර්ශනිකයෙක් නොවේ .නගර ගම්  නියම්  ගම්  රටවල් ආක්‍රමණය කරමින් මිනිසුන් ලක්ෂ ගණන් මරාදමමින් දේපල කොල්ල කමින්  සිය ආධි පත්‍යය පතුරවා ලන්නට හා තහවුරු ගන්නට සැකසු නීති පද්ධතියක් හා එහා සමග බඳුන සිරිත් විරිත් පද්ධතියක් ඔහු යොදා ගත්තේ  මංකොල්ල කාරී හේවායන් ගේ සතුට සඳහාය .මේ නීති පද්ධතිය එම හේවායෝ බලහත් කාරයෙන් යටත් වුවන් පිට පට වන ලදී ..යටත් වුවන්ට තෝරාගැනීමට තිබුනේ මරණය හෝ ඉස්ලාමය අතරින් එකකි ..  .මේ ආගමික කර්තෘ වරයා  සිය හදාගත් දරුවාගේ බිරිඳත්  සිය බිරියන්ගෙන් එකියක් බවට පත් කළේය .මිනිසුන් රැවටීම සඳහා දෙවියන් වහන්සේ එසේ කරන ලෙස තමන්ට කියූ බව .ඔහු පැවසුවේය .. වයස 9 ක් වූ කෙල්ලක් බිරිඳ කර ගත ඔහු    අනු ගමනය කල අතවැසි ආගමිකයෝ සියලු ගැහැණු  නිවාස අඩස්සියේ තබමින්  ඔවුන්ගේ සියලු මානුෂික අයිවාසිකම් නැති කල   . ලොව  අ නේ කුත් රටවල කාන්තාවන් භුක්ති විඳින වරප්‍රසාද හා නිදහස  දකින විට ඉස්ලාමික කාන්තාවන් ඔවුන්ගේ ආගමික සිරගෙවල් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරතිය් බියෙන් දැන් මේ ආගමේ පුජකයෝ  පාසල් යන ගැහැණු දරුවන් වෙඩි තබා මරති .. සියලු මානුෂික අයිතීන් උල්ලංඝනය කරමින්   අතපය කැපීම ගල්ගසා මැරීම වැනි අමානුෂික නීති මගින්  මුළු ලෝකයම ගඳ ගස්වති  භය බිරාන්ත කරති . කිතුනු ආගමේ ය මුලදී  ආගම ප්‍රචාරය සඳහා  නොයෙක් කෘර ක්‍රියා සිදු කර ඇතත්  පසුව  එසියල්ලනවතා  දමා දැන් සෑහෙන කාලයකි .එහෙත් ඉස්ලාමිකයෝ දිනෙන් දින තම සැහැසිකම් මගින් මුළු ලෝකයම  අසහනයට පත් කරමින් සිටිති .ඉස්ලාම් පුජකයෝ  සාමාන්‍ය මිනිසුන් රවටා ගෙන අදහම දහමක්  ලෙස පෙන් වමින්  මෙසේ වියරු වැටුනවුන් ලෙස ක්‍රියාකරන්නේ තමන්ගේ සුඛ විහරණය සඳහා ඇති  මේ ආගම  මිනිසුන්ට එපාවුවහොත් තමන්ට යන එන මන්  නැතිවන නිසාය .දැන් දැන්  ඉස්ලාමීය ගැහැනුද  මේ පුජකයන්ට එරෙහිව නගීසිටිමින් ඇත .මුස්ලිම් ලේඛකයෝ  ඉස්ලාමයේ දුෂණ වංචා  හා භීෂණ  හෙළිකරති . .ඉස්ලාමය වෙනුවට  සමහර ඉස්ලාමිකයෝ  අලුත්  ආගමක් ද බිහිකර ඇති බවක් වාර්තා විය

                                                                මේ ඉස්ලාමික රටවල් වලට  මෙතෙක් නොයෙක් අයුරින් ආධාර දුන් බටහිර රටවල් අතරින්  ඇමරිකාව  දැන්  කරුණු තේරුම් ගෙන සිටීම සැනසිල්ලට කරුණකි  . . මේ ඉස්ලාමීය භීෂණය  ලොව විනාශ කරන්නට පෙර සෙසු සාමකාමී ලෝකයයා කිසියම් පියවරක් ගත යුතුව ඇත .ඇමරිකාව මේ සඳහා මුලිකවී සිටීම  සතුටට කරුණකි . නිදහස් කාමී  ලජ්ජා බිය ඇති  මුස්ලිම් ප්‍රජාව  මේ අමානුෂික ඉස්ලාමික පුජකයන්ගේ  ප්රෝඩා වලට හසු නොවී   සෙසු ලෝකයාගේ  අවඥාවෙන්  බේරී ජීවත් වන්නට හිතන්නේ නම්   තමන් යටකරගෙන  මර්දනය කරගෙන ඇති  මේ පුජක ප්‍රලාප  වලට එරෙහිව විවිධ අයුරින් සටන් කර උන්ගේ ග්‍රහණයෙන් මිදිය යුතුය . වර්තමාන යෙදී ඉස්ලාමිකයෙක්  යය කියුවිට බොහෝ අ ය ඔවුන්ගන හිතන්නේ අන්ධ භක්තියෙන් මුසපත්වූ  නවීන ලෝකයට නොහොබිනා අර්ධ වනචාරී  මිනිසුන් කොටසක් ලෙසය ..

                             එනිසා පුජකයෝ ””කොරාන් ” යය කීවත් හිතන්න පුළුවන් මිනිසුනේ ඒවා  ”’නො – කොරාන් ”’ 

Corruption continues: President must reverse the trend

January 30th, 2017

Courtesy the Sunday Times

  • Bellanwila prelate bluntly tells Sirisena the people feel let down because of continuing fraud and other misdeeds
  • Sirisena responds strongly, assures that all bond issues will be probed and those found guilty punished
  • Cabinet reshuffle likely soon; four UNP ministers may face change of portfolios
  • Rajapaksa rejects plea by CMs to support SLFP at polls, says Nugegoda rally proof of where the people are

By Our Political Editor
The many challenges for President Maithripala Sirisena, now in the early days of his third year in office, seem unprecedented if not too burdensome.

Since assuming the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) leadership in 2015, his highest priority has been to reunify the party. That turned out to be a futile exercise. Thus, he urged SLFP Ministers who were summoned on January 3 to be told of his plans for 2017 to publicly expose” the misdeeds” of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and members of his family. He began to offer plum jobs to incompetent Rajapaksa loyalists saying they should be separated from the former President before dealing a hard blow at him.” He offered diplomatic postings to those who were close to Rajapaksa. The reality that every such appointment angered hundreds of his own supporters, and his countrymen, to say the least, was lost on him.

Just 18 days after that meeting, it did not deter Sirisena from making another vain attempt for peace with the Rajapaksas. It came in the form of giving the green light to seven Provincial Chief Ministers to meet Rajapaksa last Sunday. Their main objective was to forge a united alliance of the two SLFP factions, one backing Sirisena and the other Rajapaksa, to contest the Provincial Council (PC) elections as one. Polls for the Eastern, Wayamba (North Central) and Sabaragamuwa Provincial Councils are due this year.

Local Council polls not yet
Interesting enough, those at the highest levels of the Government want to hold these elections first. As for the long overdue local council elections, they opine that there are more time-consuming procedural issues to overcome. In reality it was not so. Senior SLFPers backing Sirisena confess privately that such polls would end in certain defeat. If an alliance was forged, that would have paved the way for victory, said one of them. Another reason, they point out, is a decision first on the system of voting at the local council polls. As for the PCs, the existing proportional representation system is to be followed. Some Chief Ministers have been complaining to President Sirisena that the majorities in their respective councils were fragile. Those close to Sirisena felt that an accord of some sort with Rajapaksa would not only unify the party but would pave the way even for a future SLFP Government. For them, this patching up operation was a necessity, particularly in the light of irreconcilable issues that have cropped up with their United National Party (UNP) partner in the National Unity Government.

SLFP policies have been sold”
It was an odd combination that paved the way for the Chief Minister’s dialogue. Sabaragamuwa Chief Minister Maheepala Herath’s son Kanaka Herath, an SLFP parliamentarian who supports Rajapaksa, was the conduit. The former President, who agreed to the meeting, ensured some of his strongmen who were not in the best of terms with the Chief Ministers were present. Former Western Province Chief Minister Prasanna Ranatunga is opposed to his successor Isuru Devapriya. Former Minister Johnston Fernando is opposed to Maheepala Herath (CM Sabaragamuwa). Other CMs present were Sarath Ekanayake (Central Province), Shan Wijayalal de Silva (Southern Province), Dharmasiri Dassanayake (North Western) and Chamara Sampath Dassanayake (Uva). Other Rajapaksa invitees were Gamini Lokuge, Mahinda Yapa Abeywardene and Bandula Gunawardena. Dullas Allahapperuma who was due to attend was indisposed.

The Chief Ministers declared that they came at the request of President Sirisena to appeal to Rajapaksa not to break the SLFP. Rajapaksa first let his own invitees to speak but joined in later.

You can meet me anytime. However, you all have joined our party’s enemy, the United National Party (UNP). As long as this arrangement continues, I cannot discuss anything,” declared Rajapaksa. He disclosed for the first time that he had been receiving offers that investigations against him and members of his family would be dropped if he chose to retire from politics. He said he was willing to discuss the demands of the Chief Ministers only if President Sirisena removes the UNP from his Government. He charged that the SLFP policies had been sold” outright to the UNP. How we can work with you all under these circumstances?” he asked.

Rajapaksa said he had retired on January 9, 2015. They attacked me and my family. I thought it would be for two or six months. I can understand that, for it happens in politics. Even after two years they are doing it. They are chasing behind political opponents. They took into custody Wimal Weerawansa,” he pointed out. Weerawansa’s party convention was a greater success since he was kept in prison.” Rajapaksa said adding; They want my support to win the elections. Once they win, who knows, they may ask me to retire.”

Once the meeting ended, Rajapaksa invited those present for breakfast. When one of them saw hoppers on the table, he remarked that there would now be media reports that they had come to eat hoppers. Kamak Nehe. Aappa kaala giya ekkana ekka ney ogollo inney, or it does not matter, you are with the one who left after eating hoppers,” replied Rajapaksa alluding to the widely publicised instance when Sirisena partook of hoppers for dinner with the former President the night before he quit his government to contest him.

Although the Chief Ministers and Rajapaksa meeting ended on a sour note, there was still a ‘silver lining.’ That was certainly comforting news for Sirisena. There was heavy pressure on Rajapaksa this week to support Sirisena and his SLFP faction. That is even if they did not wish to forge unity for the time being. Last Tuesday, three of Weerawansa’s staunch backers — Ven. Elle Gunawansa Thera, Gunadasa Amerasekera and Nalin de Silva — met Rajapaksa. They urged him to support Sirisena particularly with regard to constitutional matters and electoral reforms. However, Rajapaksa holds the view that the Executive Presidency should be abolished.

Nugegoda rally: No speaker hit out at Sirisena
The mood of the SLFP was reflected in the crowded ‘Joint Opposition’ rally in Nugegoda on Friday. Although crowds chanted derogatory anti-Sirisena slogans calling him an Aappa Hora” (hopper thief), speakers directed their venomous criticism only against Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and the UNP. There was no pointed criticism on Sirisena or any personal attacks on him from the platform speakers. Mahinda Rajapaksa was to only repeat what he told Chief Ministers at last Sunday’s meeting – that Sirisena had driven him back to politics though he had chosen to retire. He also criticised the Central Bank bond scam. It is now becoming clear that the strategy of the pro-Rajapaksa SLFP group is to drive a wedge between the UNP and the Sirisena faction of the SLFP. The Central Bank bond scam and the controversial conduct of some UNP ministers, who are facing serious allegations of bribery and corruption, have come as grist to the mill for them.

President Sirisena having a friendly discussion with the Ven. Muruthhetuwe Ananda Thera during an Abhayarama Temple ceremony on Wednesday. At this ceremony, the President and Ven. Bellanwila Wimalaratne Thera exchanged strong views regarding corruption allegations.

Cabinet reshuffle discussed
Sirisena had another formidable task on hand — conveying to Prime Minister – Wickremesinghe some important decisions he had made during the latter’s absence. Hardly a few hours after the Prime Minister’s return from Davos (Switzerland) where he attended the World Economic Forum, the duo met last Sunday night. Also present was Malik Samarawickrema, Minister of Development Strategies and International Trade.

Sirisena declared that he would appoint a Commission of Inquiry to probe the Central Bank bond scam. He also said that he proposed to effect a re-shuffle of his Cabinet of Ministers. Sources close to the Presidency said Wickremesinghe, who had earlier resisted moves for a reshuffle, wanted a month’s time. However, Sirisena is learnt to have noted that a month’s time would be too long. The same sources said that Sirisena proposed to change the portfolios of at least four UNP ministers who have become the objects of severe criticism. However, new faces to fill such positions would also have to come from the UNP. Allegations against the ministers’ range from corruption, secret deals with Opposition personalities to fixing projects for financial considerations.

Commission of inquiry
On Friday evening, Sirisena signed a proclamation appointing the Presidential Commission of Inquiry. It is headed by serving Supreme Court Justice K.T. Chitrasiri and includes Justice Prasanna Jayawardena and retired Deputy Auditor General Kandasamy Velupillai. The terms of reference, still being formulated, are to be gazetted next week. On January 22, Sirisena tweeted that he would appoint a Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry. However, he had changed his mind after legal advisors told him it would have to be a Commission of Inquiry.

The Joint Opposition” leader Dinesh Gunawardena welcomed the appointment f a Commission of Inquiry to probe the Central Bank bond scam. Hel told the Sunday Times The very fact that such a probe is being conducted is an acknowledgement that there have been serious irregularities and a colossal amount of public funds have been defrauded.”
The fact that Sirisena has chosen a Commission of Inquiry as against also a proposal before the Cabinet of Ministers to appoint Criminal Justice Commissions (CJCs) is significant. In doing so, he has also, in fact, accepted the recommendations made by a ten-member SLFP Committee headed by Transport Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva. The reports’ contents were revealed exclusively in the Sunday Times of December 11 last year.

The SLFP Committee recommended that a Presidential Commission of Inquiry comprising a sitting Justice of the Supreme Court, an expert in the field of finance and a professional expert in the field of audit should be set up. The Committee said that they do not believe” that forwarding the report of the parliamentary Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE), after it is debated and approved in Parliament, is the only process through which the situation could be corrected.

The Committee noted that considering the COPE report, on the face of it, there are large financial irregularities and as a result the Government suffered a large financial loss.” It added; Perpetual Treasuries gained a large profit in a short period and it is unusual in normal commercial transactions. Particularly the close relationship between the (former) Central Bank Governor and Arjun Aloysius of Perpetual Treasuries creates serious doubts. The actions of the former Governor of the Central Bank and officials of the Bank of Ceylon also creates serious suspicion.”

The CBSL bond issue was the subject of a nine-hour debate in Parliament last Tuesday. Extracts of comments made by key speakers appear elsewhere in this newspaper. The next day, President Sirisena was at a ceremony where a 54-foot replica of the Avukhana Buddha was unveiled at the Abhayaramaya Temple in Narahenpita.

A strong speech made by Ven. Bellanwila Wimalaratana Thera was to prompt Sirisena to make an equally strong response. Here are edited highlights of Ven. Wimalaratna Thera’s speech. The prelate is the Anu Nayaka of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Dharmasri Maha Sangha Sabhawa and Chanceller of the Sri Jayawardenapura University.

At a religious event I do not wish to speak politics. However, I thought of saying something since the President also is here. The people in this country, ushered in a major political change two years ago. The people, therefore, expected a justifiable change in the level of governance. It is true that there has been some development activity, but people expected a change on issues like corruption and frauds. It is sad to say we have to question whether the expected change has taken place. I will come out with one example.

I am a monk who has no political links or bias. I am not a person who takes sides or praises one side and criticises the other. I don’t need to do that, because I do not want any favours from the Government. I do not have the need to topple the Government. I am speaking about a colossal fraud in the country. Everyone is aware of. Even a small child will tell you this. This is a robbery, this is a fraud. Why is a Commission being appointed? Is it to cover up? It is being debated in Parliament and then there is also a case being filed — these are all jokes. The people are being taken for a ride. Don’t the politicians have some shame to allow some persons favoured by them to carry out this fraud? We know that you (President) are an honest person and you are trying to do something for the country. As Ananda Thera mentioned, use your powers. The people voted for you so that corruption and frauds are brought to an end.

It is a difficult task. In history the two main parties have not got together to rule the country. This is like walking a tight rope. It is not easy. Sri Lanka is a blessed country. Instead of depending on foreigners coming to develop the country, the locals should be empowered to develop it, irrespective of the foreign contribution. The President’s thinking is pure and clear. I feel that the President is caught in between. The country does not need a new Constitution. If there are any shortcomings they should be corrected. The Presidential powers could be adjusted and we can proceed.

There is nothing to be discussed about the position for Buddhism. Already Buddhism has been given priority. There are various proposals coming. One of them was to give legitimacy to homosexuality. It is a joke, because some things in foreign countries cannot be applied to us. The GSP Plus or whatever should be given to us should come in a manner that we can preserve our identity. Our culture need not be betrayed.

I spoke on these because the President is here. I want to covey the pain we go through. We should give the strength to the President, who comes from a Buddhist, farming, rural family to understand the powers he enjoys and resolve these issues.”

President’s response
President Sirisena responded. Here are edited excerpts of his speech. The full speech can be heard on our website www.sundaytimes.lk.

Yesterday, there was a Parliamentary debate on the Bond issue. Both sides hurled accusations at each other. Those on the Government side spoke about what those no longer in Government did while they were in power. Those in Opposition spoke about what those in the Government were now doing. In village terms, I would say ‘degollama naawa’. (Meaning both ‘bathed’ and subjected the other to disrepute). That is how I see it. When someone accuses another of being a thief, the correct response is not to speak about a theft that came before it. Theft is wrong, whoever does it. What is wrong is wrong. Everyone should understand how to carry out one’s duties. This is consistent with one’s integrity.

Ven. Bellanvila Thera, you said that Commissions were a lie (or a cover up). You must forgive me for replying to this charge. I appointed this Commission after consulting some of the senior-most legal experts in the country. An investigation outside a Commission may take two to three years.

That’s the reality. The usual procedure is for the COPE report to be forwarded to the Attorney General. The Speaker spoke to me today. He told me that Parliament’s decision would be conveyed to the AG in the next few days. Once the report reaches the AG, there are two options available to him. As lawyers have informed me, one of these is to forward the report to the IGP to conduct an inquiry by the CID based on information contained in the COPE report, and to file charges against the accused.

According to advice given to me, this is a very lengthy process. It will take years. It has also come to my attention that the report has been forwarded to the AG’s Department and then to the IGP for observation before the report was approved by Parliament. I inquired into this. According to investigations already conducted, they have ruled that the probe should be conducted not as a criminal case but as a civil one. I disagree with that. I want this to be done right. I have to emphasise this to the country.

There are two types of Commissions in this country. One is the Special Presidential Commission and the other is the Commission of Inquiry. The best one to probe this incident is a Commission of Inquiry. We are also planning to impose a time frame on this Commission through a gazette notification. I am of the view that it should be three months. While that time may change according to the views of the justices who will be appointed to the Commission, I will not agree to this dragging for a very long time. I appointed the Commission of Inquiry as this probe must be genuine and if there is any wrongdoing, then charges must be filed and the law allowed to take its course.

Some politicians say that the Commission was appointed to suppress the issue. I have no reason to suppress the issue. I withdrew from a Government which was plagued with frauds and corruption. I did not get out from such a Government to carry out a similar rule. I am clear on that. If they are rouges they are rouges. It does not matter who they are. I am doing my job in a proper manner. It does not matter whether they were former persons (former regime) or the current persons (present regime).

When I continue to do a proper job, the people will rely on me. To all those in Parliament, whether they are in the Opposition or the Government it does not matter, I appeal to them to support me to take action against those who are at fault.
The Bond issue came up only in the past two years, but it is clear that the issue has been going on for seven or eight years. After the investigations are completed on the issues in the past two years, I wish to say that we will appoint another Commission to investigate as to what had happened during the past seven or eight years.

I want to make this country a better place for the future generation. I accept your advice with deep respect. I am not prepared to run the country according to the wishes of other countries. I have mentioned this earlier.

There was mention about the proposal of legalising homosexuality. When the issue was brought up at the Cabinet it was I who rejected it. There was even a proposal to legalise prostitution. It was I who rejected it. I could go on listing out many other things adverse to the country and rejected by me.

It was I who removed Arjuna Mahendran. It was I who appointed Dr. Indrajit Coomaraswamy who is accepted worldwide. The country accepts that the current Auditor General is an efficient officer. The entire country accepts that the current Central Bank Governor is an efficient and clever officer. I appointed him. I am doing my job properly. I am prepared to correct the shortcomings. But if anyone is doing any misdeed, whether they are in the Government or the opposition, I will not protect them. I will take whatever decision is needed for that purpose.

We need to think of the country. We need to think of the composition in Parliament. We need to see how we need to run the country with this composition. According to the Constitution, Parliament cannot be dissolved for four and half years. We need to run the country with the present composition in a manner that the governance is not affected. I believe that the collective governance carried out by the two main political parties gives us a very optimistic situation.

Usually, under whatever government and whatever economic plans, if there is good rain the economic growth rate is more than four per cent. I am willing to accept criticism and I accept advice from the Maha Sangha. I do what is required by the people. I will not bow down to anybody’s wishes, but will work in accordance with the wishes of the people. I will only bow down to the peoples’ wishes.

The issues we face today are not those which have cropped up during the past two years. The former President called for elections, with two more years to go due to these problems. That is the true story. He went for another election due to the adverse economic situation and the (resolution before the) UN Human Rights Council. We took over the government and we faced these problems. I was able to get over the issue of the international war crimes tribunal and the issue about appointing foreign judges. I am not prepared to accept foreign judges.

We now have the international support. We are building up as a nation. With the economic issues it is the responsibility of politicians, officials and others to perform their duties for the country without corruption, fraud and waste. Therefore, I am not prepared to protect those who do misdeeds, but I will punish such persons for their offences. I will take action against any person who commits offences.”

People veering away from Yahapalana Govt.
At the Nugegoda rally on Friday, some speakers also spoke of misdeeds in the present Government. Former President Rajapaksa was to note that the corruption index on Sri Lanka by Transparency International was now much higher than what it was during his administration.

That apart, the large turnout in Nugegoda laid bare an important political reality. The people, most of whom voted for a Yahapalanaya Government, were veering away from it. Though some in the Government may claim crowds were paid for and bussed, a charge from which they are not altogether free, the fact remains that the Government has forced most people to veer away from it.

President Sirisena, has in his Abhayarama Temple speech conceded that the country is plagued with frauds and corruption.” Both at the presidential and parliamentary elections, pledges were made to bring to book those who are corrupt and were responsible for other serious misdeeds. Two years after those pledges were made, the fact that no tangible action has been taken against any person is one thing. It is another when the people complain that such activity is higher now than during the Rajapaksa administration is another. It is still not too late to reverse this deteriorating trend.

Bondgate the political roller coaster

January 30th, 2017

By Ruwan Laknath Jayakody Courtesy The Nation

The Joint Opposition said that the next course of action they were considering taking with regard to the Central Bank Treasury bonds issue was to file a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeal.

The issue reportedly involves former Governor of the Central Bank, Arjuna Mahendran and his son-in-law Arjun Aloysius who is involved with primary dealer Perpetual Treasuries.

Member of Parliament Vasudeva Nanayakkara reiterated that he had filed complaints with the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption, the Inspector General of Police and the relevant crime detection departments while anticipating that investigations would unfold in the course of time.

tableHe added that as long as Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, remained in his current position nothing would take place in this regard.

The issue with filing a writ seeking to get a particular directive with regard to urging investigations to be forge ahead, is that respondents to the case (the Commission and the Police) would inform the Court that investigations were ongoing and that they required time in which case the Court might be prompted to ask those who filed the writ to bide the time for a while.

Therefore, in order to obtain an order making it mandatory for the Commission and the Police to act would require concrete information regarding how the investigations were being conducted.

Perpetual Treasuries has not been struck off the list of primary dealers despite having engaged in insider dealing. They are currently trading. The money they make does not stay stuck in one place as the amounts get larger and larger. The financial capital moves (even overseas) and therefore becomes impossible to trace.

Thus, action taken in this regard is already late. The Central Bank can take certain limited action without waiting for a Court pronouncement by halting trade of, Perpetual Treasuries.

Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) MP Sunil Handunnetti earlier said that they probed the Central Bank Bond transactions for the years 2015 and 2016, and in the process it was evident that Mahendran, had an influence with regard to the Treasury Bond issue of February 27, 2015 which was rigged to benefit Perpetual Treasuries.

This was expressed by him on October 28, 2015 when the report was tabled in Parliament. He went on to say that the committee had recommended that the officials accountable for these transactions should be brought before the law and punished. He also said that COPE recommended for the establishment of a proper mechanism that would ensure credibility and transparency in transactions of this nature.  In this regard, COPE recommended amendments to the existing laws dealing with the said matter.

Minister of Public Enterprise Development, Eran Wickremaratne, last week following the parliamentary debate on the bond scam said that the matter has been directed to the Attorney General.

However, President Maithripala Sirisena claimed that the report was sent to the AG’s Department without seeking Parliamentary approval.

Subsequently the Prime Minister’s Office had said, the AG had recommended that legal action could be instituted against Mahendran and Perpetual Treasuries as criminal as well as civil cases related to the CB Bond scam.

Meanwhile, on Thursday it was reported that the Central Bank had placed controls on distributing assets of Perpetual Treasuries. It was also reported that the government was prepared to enact new laws enabling the confiscation of any ill-gotten gains if the court finds Perpetual Treasuries guilty for any allegations levelled against them.

Meanwhile, Central Bank had decided to restrict transactions made from bank accounts belonging to Perpetual Treasuries Limited.

In addition, the President had instructed the TRC to disallow the transfer of ownership of radio and television channels without him being notified.

This comes in light of media reports that monetary gains from the Bond issue may be invested in certain media organization.

Despite government assurances to the contrary, the civil society anti corruption organizations provided documentary evidence attesting to Mahendran’s continued involvement as an advisor to the Ministry of Finance.

Why indecent hurry over LGBT rights

January 30th, 2017

AG should expose truth behind bond scam: SLPP

January 30th, 2017

 Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The Attorney General (AG) should expose the individuals responsible for the Central Bank bond scam, the lawyers’ body affiliated to the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) said today.

The AG has a legal obligation to expose those responsible and take steps to punish those found guilty,” SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam told a news conference.

On June 1, 2015 Crime Investigation Division (CID) Director B.R.S.R. Nagahamulla informed the Attorney General’s Department of a possible financial fraud that had taken place involving a company called Perpetual Treasuries (pvt) Ltd. and the Central Bank (CB). Thereafter the AG’s Department was said to have opened a file to investigate the matter,” he said.

He said the report had been sent to the Criminal and Civil Deputy Solicitor Generals by the AG, who in turn recommended that immediate action be taken against the parties involved.

Both Deputy Solicitor Generals were of the opinion that the bond issue should be investigated further. However, their recommendations were ignored and no investigation followed. The AG should not stay silent any longer and should order a thorough investigation into the matter,” Kariyawasam said.

Meanwhile, he said that the people of the country need to know the truth about the bond issue and under the Right To Information (RTI) Act the AG is duty bound to reveal to the people what really took place.(Thilanka Kanakarathna)

– See more at: http://www.dailymirror.lk/article/AG-should-expose-truth-behind-bond-scam-SLPP-122912.html#sthash.uDJo9zvL.dpuf

Mahinda at Abeyaramaya 26 01 2017

January 30th, 2017

Mahinda at Abeyaramaya 26 01 2017

President keeps fake anti-UNP policy – NFF

January 30th, 2017

ජනාධිපති ව්‍යාජ රනිල් විරෝධයක් පෙන්නවා

JO slams govt. over attempts to sell country’s resources

January 30th, 2017

FCI යේ මේ ආයෝජකයට විශාල චෝදනා තියෙනවා

JO slams govt. over attempts to sell country’s resources

I never agreed for harmful terms – Mahinda Rajapakse

January 30th, 2017

ආධාර ගන්න අහිතකර කොන්දේසි වලට මම එකඟ වෙන්නෑ

විදේශ ආයෝජන 54%කින් වැටිලා.. ආයෝජකයින් ගෙන්වගන්න අලූත් නීති හදන්න ඕනෑ..

January 30th, 2017

ලංකා සී නිවුස්

2016 සැප්තැම්බර් මාසය වන විට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට ගලා ආ සෘජු විදෙස් ආයෝජන ප්‍රමාණය ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් මිලියන 450 ක් බවත් එය පූර්ව වර්ෂයේ අදාළ කාලපරිච්ඡේදය හා සැසඳීමේ දී 54%ක පහළ යාමක් බවත් ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළෙඳ අමාත්‍ය මලික් සමරවික්‍රම මහතා කියා සිටී.

විදේශ ආයෝජන 54%කින් වැටිලා.. ආයෝජකයින් ගෙන්වගන්න අලූත් නීති හදන්න  ඕනෑ..

පසුගිය දා කරන ලද කරුණු දැක්වීමක දී අමාත්‍යවරයා මේ බව සඳහන් කළ අතර 2015 මුල් මාස 09 තුළ ඩොලර් මිලියන 970 ක සෘජු විදෙස් ආයෝජන මෙරටට ගලා ආ බවත් එය ඩොලර් මිලියන 450 ක් දක්වා මෙම වසරේ සැප්තැම්බර් 30 වන විට අඩු වී ඇති බවත් අමාත්‍යවරයා වැඩිදුරටත් මෙහිදී කියා සිටියේය.

මෙහිදී තවදුරටත් අදහස් දක්වමින් අමාත්‍යවරයා කියා සිටියේ, ආයෝජන මණ්ඩලය විසින් ප්‍රවර්ධන කටයුතු ඉහළ නැංවිය යුතු බවත්, විදෙස් ආයෝජකයින් මෙරටට ගන්වා ගැනීමේ දී, දැනට පවතින නීතිරීති ඒ සඳහා යෝග්‍ය නොවන බවත්ය.

– biz.adaderana.lk

2014 විදෙස් ආයෝජන ඩොලර් මි. 1635යි.. ලෝකෙම යාළු යහපාලන යුගයේ ඩොලර් මිලියන 450යි..

January 30th, 2017

ලංකා සී නිවුස්

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ පාලන යුගයේ අවසන් වසර වූ 2014 දී ඩොලර් මිලියන 1635ක් වූ මෙරට සෘජු විදේශ ආයෝජන ප‍්‍රමාණය 2016 වසරේදී (Jan-Sep) ඩොලර් මිලියන 450ක් තෙක් ඇද වැටී තිබේ.

මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් DailyFT පුවත්පත පල කර තිබූ වාර්තාව මෙතනින්

Sri Lanka’s foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2016 dips 54% to $ 450 m as policy inconsistency weighs

January 30th, 2017

Courtesy Daily FT

Reuters: Sri Lanka’s foreign direct investment (FDI) slumped 54% to reach an ‘extremely low by any standard’ level last year, the Government said on Friday as inconsistent tax and economic policies weighed on offshore investments.

The FDI dived 54% to $ 450 million in 2016 year-on-year, compared with $ 970 million in the previous year, which International Trade Minister Malik Samarawickreme stated was, Extremely low by any standard”.

He said the State-run Board of Investment (BOI) should promote investment, and if necessary, regulations and rules need to be changed to attract investments As the current regulations have failed to bring in investors”.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe-led centre-right United National Party (UNP), which is in a coalition with President Maithripala Sirisena’s centre-left Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) promised to revive the economy with major FDIs.

Last year, the Government faced a debt and balance-of-payments’ crisis, and it also had to change its tax policies announced in the 2016 budget due to protests.

Foreign Direct Investment Inflows

It is a lot to do with policy inconsistency on some of the key criteria like taxes and land ownership,” Shiran Fernando, an analyst at Colombo-based Frontier Research.

Still we see some uncertainty, in particular in the financial sector, due to the proposals outlined in the budget for 2017 in November.”

The Government also faced legal battles in raising the value added tax (VAT) by 4% to 15%, resulting in a loss of Rs. 100 billion due to a six-month delay in the implementation of the new tax.

The Government agreed for an economic reform agenda with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a $ 1.5 billion loan in June last year. That includes reducing budget deficit, allowing rupee flexibility, and reviving loss-making State-owned enterprises.

The IMF in November said Sri Lanka’s macro-economic and financial conditions have begun to stabilise and that the island nation’s performance under its $ 1.5-billion loan program was satisfactory.

http://www.ft.lk/article/594657/FDI-in-2016-dips-54–to—450-m-as-policy-inconsistency-weighs

CIA assessed Rajiv Gandhi assassination before he was killed: Report

January 30th, 2017

Adaderana

Five years before Rajiv Gandhi was killed in 1991, the US Central Intelligence Agency had prepared a very detailed and thorough brief” on what would happen if he is assassinated or makes an abrupt departure” from the Indian political scene.

A 23-page report, titled India After Rajiv …” was put out as early as in March 1986 for comments from other senior CIA officials. The sanitised” report was declassified recently by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The report, whose complete title is not entirely available as it is part deleted, was prepared on the basis of inputs available to the CIA till January 1986. The very first sentence of the report’s available (undeleted) page reads: Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faces at least an even chance of assassination before his tenure in office ends in 1989.”

It, however, later clearly said that assassination is the major near-term threat” to him. Over five years later, Gandhi was assassinated at Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu on May 21, 1991.

The first section titled Key Judgments” analyses and deliberates upon what likely scenario would emerge in the domestic and international political situation if there is a sudden change in leadership minus Rajiv Gandhi and the likely impact on India’s relations with the US, the then USSR and the region.

It also dealt with the threats posed to Gandhi’s life by various extremist groups at that time and the likely fallout of his murder.

If Gandhi fell to a Sikh or Kashmiri Muslim assassin, widespread communal violence probably would erupt even if strong preventive security measures – including deployment of Army and paramilitary troops across northern India – were taken by the Indian President ……(deleted),” it said.

Interestingly, it also names P V Narasimha Rao and V P Singh, who could be the interim successor” and likely candidates” in case of sudden exit by Rajiv. Rao took over as the Prime Minister in 1991. In a section, titled ‘The Threat of Assassination: Stability in Jeopardy’, the report says In our view, there is at least an even chance in the next several years of an assassination, most likely by extremist Sikhs or disgruntled Kashmiri Muslims who have targeted Rajiv,” besides a fanatical Hindu”.

Since a significant portion of this section is deleted, it is not clear whether Sri Lankan Tamil extremists were also dealt with in the analysis. However, another section deals in-depth with Rajiv’s mediation efforts to resolve the conflict between militant Sri Lankan Tamils and the Sinhalese-dominated government in Colombo…”

-PTI (Indian Express) -Agencies – See more at: http://www.adaderana.lk/news/38868/cia-assessed-rajiv-gandhi-assassination-before-he-was-killed-report#sthash.ztjZecdA.dpuf

Case against Gammanpila: summons issued on Australian couple

January 30th, 2017

Adaderana

The Attorney General has informed the Colombo High Court that summons have been issued to the Australian couple to appear in Courts with respect of the case against MP Udaya Gammanpila, Ada Derana reporter said.

The Senior State Counsel apprised the court this when the case against Gammanpila was taken up for hearing on Monday.

High Court Judge R. Gurusinghe has also requested a progress report in connection with the case on 13 March, reporter added.

UPFA MP Gammanpila has been charged with the sale of shares valued at Rs.110 million which belonged to Australian businessman Brian Shaddick by fraudulent means.

The Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) leader was arrested by the by the Police Special Investigations Unit (SIU) at his office in Pagoda Road, Nugegoda on June 18, 2016 over the incident and later enlarged on bail.

 – See more at: http://www.adaderana.lk/news/38871/case-against-gammanpila-summons-issued-on-australian-couple#sthash.xobj1HRE.dpuf

Get these mega dens of thieves called the Provincial Councils

January 29th, 2017

Sudath Gunasekara writes

Get these mega dens of thieves called the Provincial Councils which have already laid the foundation for  a Federal State and made this country an Augean mess of Governance and turn the country to a no return situation with the EELAM in sight, scrapped at least now

Six key Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) Chief Ministers left for London on Thursday, informed sources said. –News item  2017-01-28 By P. Samarasekera

“Six Provincial Council Chief Ministers have left for London to participate in a training programme on provincial Council system”Those who left the country were Western Province CM Isura Devapriya, Central Province CM Sarath Ekanayake, Sabaragamuwa CM Maheepala Herath, Southern Province CM Shan Wijeyalal de Silva, Wayamba CM Dharmasiri Dasanayake and Uva CM Chamara Sampath Dasanayake. Sources said the CMs are in London to attend a workshop for Provincial Councilors sounding like as if it is a meeting of the ‘Provincial Councilors of the World’ These CMs are stated to return home on 2 February

I was thoroughly amused as I read this news as to why the people of this country don’t chase out these jokers at least now and get this Huniyama called Provincial Councils scrapped forthwith, which have tormented and robbed the nation for thirty long years making the whole country an Augean mess in the field of Governance and consolidating the map for the Future EELAM .

As far as I know there are no Provincial Councils in UK or any other country in this world. As such UK has no experience on that system to teach another, though British were the ancestors of these councils in this country since they were the people who first created Provinces in 1833 in order to divide the natives of Sinhale on ethnic grounds with the ulterior motive of dividing it in to Sinhala and Tamil areas. That way Britishes were the real fathers of present day EELAM. The Indians played only a secondary role of step father here by imposing Provincial Councils along with the so-called Traditional Homeland of Tamils concept in the North and Eastern Provinces. I am not surprised even if British send these six parasite betrayers back by return plane from the airport itself as the two EELAM CMs, the two main actors of this tragic drama are not in their team.

Even if the British know the subject, how and what can they teach these idiots who don’t know even the functioning of a village Committee in their own country. This must be a hosanna come from heaven for these parasites who so far enjoyed only the luxuries of five star hotels in Sri Lanka on their annual get together and numerous Con- ferences in Pasikuda and Bentota and other places .It is a pity that the poor PinGovernors were also not sent on this joy ride. Probably They can’t collect votes and funds for the party and that may be why they were not sent.

I only hope the former British Civil Servant like J.F.Dixon, who was GA CP in 1872 in then Ceylon who described the  Village Council system in Ceylon  prior to 1815 as a remarkable  system of self government strikingly developed in the Village Communities in the East” and another Civil Servant Elliot (1911) who observed that the  ‘Village Communities Ordinance enacted by them’ based on earlier Sri Lankan experience which they had once abolished as the ‘Magna Carta of the  paddy cultivator of Ceylon”   might ask these jokers to come back to Ceylon and ask a Goviya in amude/ a saruwale in a rustic village like Meemure, my own village,  who knows about it as to how villages in Sri Lanka should be developed rather than wasting their time and also wasting the poor man’s money on such training in London by British who have never cultivated a paddy plant.

British politicians might tell them that these CMM are the present day beneficiaries of the legacy the British have left behind where they play pandu now at the expense of the poor tax payers of this country.  They also might ask them to oppose any move by any government to scrap the Provincial Councils as political rejects like this will never have a chance to rob public money if they are gone as the Parliament at the centre is meant only for bigger sharks.

This is the latest entertainment provided to the country by the President who came to power by promising Yahapaalanaya.  He has to tell the country now as to why he sent these Six Chief Ministers who failed to hook,  Mahinda Rajapaksa on a reconciliatory mission to ask him not to contest Local Government elections separately. I can understand it if they had at least succeed their mission. When you read the conversations transpired at the meeting of ‘Cheap’ Ministers with MR one can see how dishonest, how unreliable these people are. What they wanted to do is once again trap MR for Sirisena’s nominees to win the local Government elections so that  they could continue in their posts with Sirisenas blessings. Almost all these CMM have no personal political following in their districts All what they got last time were votes for MR. The crabs now no water is boiling that is why they came to see MR. So you can see how selfish they are. Had Mahhinda scrapped the 13th A as most of us advised him just after the war in 2009 when he had the 2/3 in Parliament this problem would not have been there today. Unfortunately he could not understand our good counseling at that time.

I wonder whether this trip is a gift bestowed to these six fellows who obeyed his cunning request on the one hand and a punishment to the CM, NCP on the other who did not obey his order. The Uva CM and the SP CM both who expressed their allegiance to MR and played a hide and seek game are lucky in any case as they too have got the chance of the London trip at public expense.  It is surprising he has not included the two rubble rousers in the NP and EP at least to tame them

This is how the Yahapalanaya politicians plunder the public without impunity. It is not President Sirisena’s money that is wasted. It is citizen Perera and citizen Banda who has to pay for all the follies of our politicians. Of cause tomorrow the President might say this strip was funded by the British Government to train them in reconciliation his craving to pay the debt to his Tamil and Muslim friends. He might even say no! it is by the Buckingham palace or Queen Elizabeth who shook hands with him last time without gloves, when he visited them. Even then one should not get surprised, going by what he says off and on.

The country must ask those who authorized this joy trip, whether be it the president or an officer to pay back the money spent on this trip. Also the voters should ask all these six fellows to resign immediately on their return, to put an end this type of daylight robbery. Also people start a national campaign to get this Huniyama and death trap called Provincial councils scraped as they have already put the foundation for the Sri Lanka Federal State, before this Government gives land and police powers also to the PCC and complete the right royal betrayal of the 2500 years old Sinhala Country and the Sinhala Nation.

Get these mega dens of thieves called the Provincial Councils which have already laid the foundation for  a Federal State and made this country an Augean mess of Governance and turn the country to a no return situation with the EELAM in sight, scrapped at least now

International laws in armed conflict Part II

January 29th, 2017

By Neville Ladduwahetty Courtesy The Island

POST-CONFLICT APPLICATION of IHRL and IHL

The position originally adopted by some participating in the e-mail exchange was that IHRL and IHL concurrently apply in Armed Conflict. Since then they have conceded that the Law applicable to Armed Conflict of a non-International nature is IHL and furthermore that it is applicable up to the cessation of hostilities in Sri Lanka in May 2009. Their original position that IHRL and IHL concurrently applied was influenced by a misguided notion that such a position would strengthen Sri Lanka’s hand to address issues of accountability and also defend the interests of the security forces better. However, what is evident from the foregoing is that the concurrent application of IHRL and IHL is in fact detrimental to Sri Lanka’s interests.

article_image

Since it has been conceded that only IHL applies up to the cessation of hostilities i.e. May 2009, it means that their original position would have jeopardized the interests of not only Sri Lanka but also those of the security forces. Acknowledging this reversal is a manifestation of integrity that is rare and therefore noteworthy. What is even more heartening is that since IHL is more restrictive in its application and offers greater latitude when engaging in an Armed Conflict, Sri Lanka would be in a better position to meet the charges leveled against it since most of these occurred prior to May 2009 than under their previous position that IHRL and IHL operated concurrently.

Notwithstanding these clarifications it is important to note that the ruling by the ICTY was that IHL continues to apply “beyond the cessation of hostilities until a general conclusion of peace is reached; or in the case of internal conflicts, a peaceful settlement is achieved”. Furthermore, although there was no formal peace settlement, the rationale behind using this ICTY ruling to advantage is that if IHL is applicable ONLY up to May 2009, IHRL cannot be enlarged beyond “hard core human rights” until conflict related issues are resolved. Considering the realities that prevailed post May 2009 such as the situation in Manik Farm and other detention camps, the presence of land mines in undisclosed locations, security related issues from potential acts of terrorism, and identifying former LTTE combatants from bona-fide civilians as well as the challenges associated with providing humanitarian assistance to over 300,000 displaced that included combatants, it would be unrealistic to expect IHRL to operate fully beyond May 2009 without first addressing issues relating to human safety. .

The need to restrict personal liberties until conflict related issues are resolved is addressed in Article 2 Section 2 of the Additional Protocol II. This states: “At the end of an armed conflict, all persons who have been deprived of their liberty or whose liberty has been restricted for reasons relating to such conflict, as well as those deprived of their liberty or whose liberty is restricted after the conflict for the same reasons, shall enjoy the protection of Articles 5 and 6 until the end of such deprivation or restriction of liberty”. These are all provisions of IHL.

A more compelling reason not to apply IHRL and IHL concurrently immediately after hostilities cease is that the starting point to relax IHRL is the “hard core human rights”. Therefore, the transition process must necessarily be gradual. How gradual is a subjective call that needs to be handled with caution if unintended complexities are to be prevented. Under the circumstances stated above and strengthened by the rulings of ICTY and ICRC the applicable Law beyond the cessation of hostilities should be IHL.

CONCLUSION

This article is the result of a debate between two divergent views as to which International Laws govern non-International Armed Conflicts such as in Sri Lanka. Although Sri Lanka’s conflict had been categorized as one that defeated Terrorism or as a Humanitarian Operation, it has now come to be accepted as a non-International Armed Conflict. Despite this categorization of Sri Lanka’s conflict as an Armed Conflict, which particular International Laws are relevant to issues of accountability have not been explored.

The position advocated by me since 2008 was based on the ruling by the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) appointed by the Security Council. My position was that the conflict in Sri Lanka was an Armed Conflict and as such the International Law that should govern the conflict was International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Furthermore, that IHL should apply to the whole territory up to the cessation of hostilities and beyond. The position advocated by others was that International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law should apply concurrently. It is heartening to note that the latter group has now revisited their position and acknowledged that IHL applies up the end of hostilities which in the case of Sri Lanka was May 2009.

The UN official publication cited above titled “”INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMED CONFLICT” by the United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, New York and Geneva, 2011 states: “Two arguments have specifically been raised against their concurrent application. Firstly, it has been argued that international human rights law and international humanitarian law are regimes that apply in separate contexts – namely the former in peace time only and the latter in armed conflict – and that concurrent or complementary application is therefore, irrelevant. Second, it has also been argued that if both bodies of law are applicable in situations of armed conflict, then the question is whether one body of law would have pre-eminence over the other as a matter of lex specialis” (p.54).

The fact that there are two equally valid positions depends on one body of law being pre-eminent over the other. However, the pre-eminent law is IHL because the provisions of IHRL are derogated to the point that only the “hard core human rights” prevail during an Armed Conflict. Therefore, the task is not to condemn one and extol the other but to find which position would best serve the interests of the security forces and Sri Lanka.

All of the above is academic to many readers. However, its impact on Sri Lanka and in particular the fate of the security forces could be significant. Therefore, it is of extreme importance that a clear and unambiguous determination is made as to the International Laws that should regulate investigations relating to accountability – should it be IHL throughout the conflict and thereafter until conflict related issues are resolved, or IHL up to May 2009 with IHRL and IHL applied concurrently thereafter.

Such a determination should factor in the following statements in the Preamble to the Additional Protocol II of 1977 on which IHL is based. The relevant statements are: “Recalling furthermore that international instruments relating to human rights offer a BASIC (emphasis added) protection to the human person” and “Emphasizing the need to ensure a BETTER (emphasis added) protection for the victims of armed conflicts”. This underscores the pre-eminence of IHL in Armed Conflicts.

Unless and until these issues are resolved there would not be a clear remit to the judicial process particularly because the UNHRC of 2015 Resolution, A/HRC/30/L.29 states that the judicial mechanism should “investigate allegations of violations and abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law, as applicable”. Since the words “as applicable” are vital there is a need to identify which International Laws are applicable to accountability related issues.

Hoodwinking the People and Supressing Democracy

January 29th, 2017

Dr Dasarath Jayasuriya, President SPUR Australia

Treating the people with disrespect and disdain is fast becoming the trademark of the Yahapalana government. However, history reminds us that they are not the first. There are other examples but what sticks in my mind from the past is the SLFP taking citizens to be mugs in the 1960’s promising rice from the moon before an election. But the Yahapalan leadership including the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister has made this into an art form. Important public discourse is often trivialised with verbal diarrhoea coloured with tasteless and inappropriate jokes evidenced by the PMs recent ‘ Buddang Saranag Gachchami’ news cut after meeting the  Asgiriya and Malwaththa nayaka  theros.

The Yahapalana team which came to power parading a ‘cleaner than Cleanex’ image has been compromised with an unending list of corruption accusations. Leading amongst them are the billion rupee Central Bank Bond fiasco and the mega million coal procurement annulled by a Supreme Court determination.  Many attempts at supressing the ‘truth’ related to the Central Bank Bond fiasco have been made including dissolving the parliament in 2015 as well as giving stepmotherly treatment   to the Hadunhetti chaired Committee of Public Enterprise (COPE)  report on the Bond scam. After a long wait and many attempts by the Yahapalana bigwigs to scuttle the process, the COPE report was scheduled on 24 January to be discussed in Parliament.  The good citizens of the nation were looking forward not only to the details of how this scam was planned and orchestrated but also to the detailed defence (if any) provided by the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister of their mate, the former Central Bank governor Arjuna Mahendra.  Alas! a spanner has been thrown in the last minute to thwart exposure and debate.

It was reported  widely over the weekend that a Buddhist monk appointed by the Finance Ministry to the Lanka Hospital Board of Directors had filed a fundamental rights (FR) application challenging the COPE report claiming inconsistencies, contradictions and misrepresentations. Although a majority of parliamentarians would welcome tomorrow’s debate on the Central Bank Bond scam, there could be attempts made to scuttle the debate by sighting the monk’s FR case is yet to be heard by the Supreme Court.  One wonders firstly, what the monk’s interest is on the Bond scam and secondly, why he left until the last moment before the Parliamentary debate to lodge he FR case?  Further questions amongst others include:

  • A monk’s ability to forensically examine a finance centric COPE report;
  • The source of financial resources to commission Paul Rathnayake Associates, a leading law firm in Sri Lanka; and
  • The overall outcome sought by the monk that the auction process reigns supreme over the direct or private placement process.

After berating the Rajapaksa government and accusing them of nepotism and favouritism, ditching  its pre-election norms, a not so Yahapalana government appointed a Buddhist monk to the Board of the Lanka Hospital. Putting aside the lack of professional expertise required to be a member of a Board governing a large hospital, what I found most interesting is the total lack of any previous record of this particular monk showing interest or providing public discourse on the Central Bank Bond scam. The obvious question is whether the monk is being the La Fontaine fable ‘cat’s paw’ of the Yahapalana masters.  All evidence at least associated with the Central Bank Bond  fiasco seems to point in that direction.

“BEAT COST OF LIVING BY INTRODUCING THE MAXIUM PRIZE OF SIX CONSUMER ITEMS?”

January 29th, 2017

Sarath Wijesinghe – former Chairman Consumer Affairs Authority, former Ambassador UAE and Israel

Cost of Living

Cost of living goes up in any country and in any jurisdiction with different paces and speeds. In some economies the increase is minimal based on the proper management of the economy. In the west the rise is slow and controlled due to competition, proper management of economy and fierce consumer activism and the organized and powerful consumer society network which is lacking in Sri Lanka. In Sri Lanka cost of living cannot be controlled as the state economy is out of control as in many underdeveloped jurisdictions. In Sri Lank the cost of living is sky rocketing and the Governance is finding ways and means of controlling it desperately and unsuccessfully. Most of the food and consumer items in Sri Lanka are imported in the fast changing economic culture and floating dollar – a threat to cost of consumer items. Local production of food and consumer items is minimal as we depend on imported items to arrive for the next food consignment most probably with increased prices. International business and imports are in the hands of private sector- mostly non-nationals or business giants obtained citizenship for trade and business in Sri Lanka with close business links with India and Pakistan. Black money is freely moving in the society due to bribery and corruption rampant as air; with a part of the society lavishly take part in spending sprees, catalysing the increase of consumer prices of most items. Credit card culture is encouraging the middle class on unlimited and uncontrolled spending habits until next month or the ultimate demand from the bank or the lending institution. Credit card culture suited to the rich west with excellent social security system and modern society of extreme rich capitalism looking after the downtrodden by social benefits.

Village life with nature

Village and the villagers are the most affected due to the newly introduced Credit Card, online, and modern way of life with modern equipment freely available on easy payment terms, consumer items at door steps even at remote villages, and availability Mobile/FB and modern way of life eradicating the village way of life living with nature with self-sufficiency in food, vegetables, fruits and consumer items. Today young villager could easily purchase a three wheel on easy terms resulting over one million of young on street junctions for business to pay the bank loans and finance payments, leaving the village fields empty for the

remaining the elderly to continue the local food production which is lucrative and the need of the hour. 25% private land is household gardens ideal for the growth of vegetables which is not expensive and short supplies which in unutilised.

Maximum retail prize

Maximum retail price of Dhal is made 159 per kg, Mysore Dhal 159 per kg, Dried Sprat from Thailand 490.00, Dubai sprat 405.00, Potato imported 115 and white sugar Rs. 93 respectively. While attempting to maintain the prices of listed items countrywide with the handful of staff, it is difficult to fathem how the cost of living is reduced considering the increase of prices of all food and other items tremendously which the consumer is feeling every minute.

Legal Basis of the process under S 18 of the CAA

According to Act No 2003 where the Minister is of opinion that any goods or any service is essential to the life of the community or part thereof, the Minister in consultation with the Authority may by Order published in the Gazette prescribe such goods or such services as specified goods or specified services as the case may be; no manufacturer or trader shall increase the retail or wholesale price of any goods or any service specified under subsection (1), except with the prior written approval of the Authority; a manufacturer or trader who seeks to obtain the approval of the Authority under subsection (2), shall make an application in that behalf to the Authority, and the Authority shall, after holding such inquiry as it may consider appropriate: a) Approve such increase where it is satisfied that the increase is reasonable or b) Approve any other increase as the Authority may consider reasonable and inform the manufacturer or trader of its decision within thirty days of the receipt of such application and where the Authority fails to give a decision within thirty days of the receipt of an application as required under subsection (3), the manufacturer or trader who made the application shall be entitled to, notwithstanding provision of subsection (I), increase the price: provided however, where the delay in giving its decision within the stipulated period was due to the failure of the manufacturer or trader to give any assistance required by the Authority in carrying out its inquiry into the application, the Authority shall have the power to make an interim order preventing the said manufacturer or trader from increasing the

Powers of the Consumer Affairs Authority as the Main Regulator

It is established in place of Fair Trading Consumer Act no 1 of 1987 and price control act 1 of 1987 for promotion of effective competition and protection of the consumer with a blend of UK, Australian and West modelled concepts creating a main regulator to regulate trade under s 9 of the act, which has power to undertake studies, issue directions, restrict selling above market price, determining standards, inquire complaints, enter into agreements, deal with offences such as refusal to sell, hoarding goods, investigations publication, prevent misleading , deceptive conduct and many more powers and expectations. Due to the abolition of the price control under the price control act, the new concept of price making was introduces where every trade is expected to exhibit the price mark and maintain standards of the items. (S29) It is left to the consumer to judge the effectiveness of the enforcement mechanism in maintaining the price and the standards of the consumer items. Is the CAA competent to beat the cost of living or it is teeth less organization is a matter the citizen will be deciding based on the performances of the organization.

Beat Cost of Living

Cost of living is a relative term depends on the conditions, environments, and jurisdictions. Rarely the prices of consumer articles are reduced, but the salary and income increases slowly from time to time. Price of rice or bread is not static, but consumer is ready to adopt the price fluctuations. In the west a major portion of the salary or income is utilized for accommodation when the food items are generally affordable, which is not the case in Sri Lanka. In the UK one could have a comfortable living with the minimum wages and in addition government subsidiary where necessary. In Sri Lanka though salary and income is less for many – traditional food items such as Jak, leaves, and village grown items (available in Polas” – street markets in towns too) assist consumer to make ends meet comfortably. If the consumer is sharp and careful it is easy to beat cost of living provided the cost of mobile phone, tuition and extravagance is restricted. In short one should know (a) when to buy (b) where to buy, (c) how to buy and (c) what to buy. In England the apple at Selfridges- the most expensive food chain could be purchased at the street market near the store for a lesser price. In Sri Lanka street markets are plenty and food can be carefully purchased and s stored to be used later. Consumers make the biggest blunder by eating out in food chains with unhealthy oily food and Colas inviting long term diseases. Consumer should be trained for healthy food at identified outlets. It is an exercise one should practice. Consumer is any actual or potential user of any goods or services made available for a consideration by any trader or manufacturer. (s75 of the consumer affairs Authority Act) This shows that every citizen is a consumer and need protection from the state to protect the consumer against unfair trade, hazardous to life and property of consumers, adequate access to gods, and seek redress against unfair trade practices (s 7 of the Act no of 2003).

Is Consumer the King – and Powerful?

In practice it may not be so, especially in Sri Lanka where the consumer is not organized as in other parts of the world. Consumer day falls on 15th March and the world Consumer Federation has started the agitation throughout the world claiming the legitimate share for the consumer as Kennedy’s statement in 1983 that – the consumer includes us all – the largest economic group affecting and affected by almost all public and private economic decision yet they are the only important group whose views are often not heard”. In other parts of the world consumer is restricted from becoming unfair by the government as well as strong lobbing of the powerful organizations in maintaining the quality, standards, price and consumer rights of return goods, and maintain standards by the trade, manufacturer and the trader. Sri Lanka is full of adulterated and poisonous food and other consumer goods, unhealthy food chains and goods adulterated and downgraded with no restrictive conditions. Unhealthy food chains are thriving and there is no proper control of the quality and price of the consumer items expected to be monitored by the main regulate Consumer Affairs Authority.

Complains to public bodies and to be organized is your civic duty

Ideally CAA is expected to entertain complaints on the phone, via net and all over the country. This extends to all consumer items and to services as well. In other parts of the world the consumer is so well organized that the Trader is under pressure and control of the consumer. Media plays a vital role in this matter. In the UK when Cola company used the water from Thames river it is the media that came forward as in the Bopal case in India to teach unfair trade practices of multinational companies. In Sri Lanka CAA is expected to

organize a consumer federation to assist the consumer. it is the duty of the NGOs to take the mantel forward without wasting time for Human rights situations in Sri Lanka which maintains highest sander ands. It is time for the citizen to organize themselves to beat the cost of living and to organize the life leading a careful systemic planned organized life with other fellow citizens The quality of life has greatly improved and the expectations of the community are frequently increasing.

Way Forward

Modern technology, modern way of life, crave for education and globalisation have led the consumer to unexpected and unachievable expectations. The mobile culture has embraced the community though it is costly now every other person has a mobile and the telephone has become a part of day-today life. It is the right of the citizen and duty of the state to ensure the consumer is able purchase quality items at a reasonable price, and it is his/her duty to look for healthy food in the interest of the citizen. United Nations too have recognized the right to satisfaction and ensure on basic needs, safety, and information, chance to be heard, redress, consumer education and healthy environment as a right and a requirement to be facilitated for the consumer/citizen by the state. It is the duty and a statutory requirement of the main regulator CAA to organize consumer organizations and to work on a joint project with the consumer, state, trader, manufacturer and the citizen for a fair and reasonable system of trade and business for a better life for the consumer. Consumer should be vigilant and smart, the trader should be fair and reasonable and the state should be efficient for a better day for the consumer/citizen. Citizen must be modern and fast in embracing modern technologies and way of life. But it has to be done with caution and thinking of the future generation, health and the environment. NGOs and Consumer organisations have a vital role to play in this regard as WHICH in UK stands guarding the consumer warning and directing in consumerism. State invention and regulation is essential to direct all the players in balancing their civic duties to the citizen in promoting fair deal to all parties concerned in the society.

Writer could be reached on Sarath dw28@gmail.com

කරගන්න බැරිව නාගෙන දගලන රට කරවන හැටි මහින්ද තේරෙන සිංහලෙන් කියයි..

January 29th, 2017

ඒකාබද්ද විපක්‍ෂය විසින් නුගේගොඩදී පැවැත්වූ ජනහමුව අමතමින් හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා මෙසේ අදහස් පල කලේය.

මහින්ද යුගයේ බැදුම්කර වංචා සිදුව නෑ.. – මුදල් ඇමතිට ඩබල් මල පැන්න විගණකාධිපතිගෙන් රහසේ ඉල්ලූ වාර්තාව මෙන්න..

January 29th, 2017

| lanka C news | ලංකා සී නිවුස්

රජයේ විගණකාධිපතිගේ විගණන වාර්තාව සම්බන්ධව මුදල් අමාත්‍යවරයාගේ නොහොබිනා හැසිරිම සම්බන්ධව ප්‍රකාශ කරමින් රජයේ විගණකාධිපති ගාමිණී විජේසිංහ මහතා කල ප්‍රකාශයක් සන්ඩේ ටෛම්ස් පුවත් පතේ සඳහන් වේ.

එතුමා පවසන පරිදි මම වෛද්‍යවයෙක් වගේ, මට පශ්චාත් මරණ පරික්ෂණය සිදු කොට වාර්තාවක් ලබාදෙන ලෙස නියෝග කරනවා. මම වාර්තාව ලබාදීමට කටයුතු කිරිමෙන් පසු එහි අඩංගු කරුණු සම්බන්ධව ඔහුන් සතුටු නොවන අතර ඒ හරහා මගේ වෘත්තීමය ගරුත්වය විනාශ කිරීමට කටයුතු කරනවා යයි පැවසිය.

රජයේ ඉල්ලිම මත මහා බැංකුවේ 2005 සිට 2015 දක්වා සිදු වූ භාණ්ඩාගාර බැදුම්කර පිලිබඳ විගණන වාර්තාවක් ලබාදීමට රජයේ විගණකාධිපතිතුමා විසින් කටයුතු කරන ලදි. එහිදි මුදල් අමාත්‍යවරයා විසින් භාණ්ඩාගාර බැදුම්කර පිලිබඳ විශේෂිත වූ කරුණු 10 ක් සම්බන්ධව කරුණු පරීක්ෂා කොට වාර්තාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලෙස දන්වා තිබු අතර ඒ සඳහා සියලු ලිපිගොනු පරික්ෂාවට ලක් කොට විගණන වාර්තාව පිලියෙල කිරීමට රජයේ විගණන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව කටයුතු කරන ලදි.

ඒ අතර මුදල් අමාත්‍යවරයා විසින් රජයේ විගණකාධිපතිවරයා අපහසුවට පත් කරමින් අවස්ථාවන් ගනනකදීම සිහි කැදවීම කොට එම කාර්යය නිසියාකාරව කිරිමට ඇති ඉඩකඩ අහුරා ඇති බව එම විගණන වාර්තාවේ පිටු අංක 18 හි 3.6 ඡේදයේ මෙසේ සඳහන් වේ:-
2008 වර්ෂයේ සිට 2016 දක්වා අවස්ථා 2136 කදි කර තිබු බැදුම්කර නිකුත් කිරිම් වලට අදාළව ප්‍රශ්න දහයට පිලිතුරු සැපයීම සඳහා 1997 වර්ෂයේ සිට ආරම්භ කර තිබු බැදුම්කර නිකුත් කිරිම් ක්‍රියාවලිය පිලිබඳව ගැබුරින් පරීක්ෂා කල යුතු වුවද, මුදල් අමාත්‍යවරයාගේ නොඉවසිලිමත් සහ අචාරශිලිත්වයෙන් තොර සිහි කැදවීම් හේතුවෙන් එවැනි ගැබුරු පරීක්ෂාවන් සඳහා ප්‍රමාණවත් කාලයක් මෙම කාර්‍ය සඳහා යෙදවිය නොහැකි වීම”.

තවද පසුගිය රජය සමයේ නිසි අනුමැතියන් තොරව මෙසේ බැදුම්කර අලෙවි කොට ඇත් ද යන මුදල් අමාත්‍යවරයාගේ පැනයට පිලිතුරු දෙමින් රජයේ විගණකාධිපති නීරික්ෂන ඉදිරිපත් කරමින් සඳහන් කොට ඇත්තේ. වාර්තාවේ පිටු අංක 19 හි 4.1 යටතේ
VII.හී
2005 වර්ෂයේ අප්‍රෙල් මස සිට හෝ එයට පෙර කාලයක් සිට 2015 වර්ෂය දක්වාම සaජු ක්‍රමයට බැදුම්කර නිකුත්කර තිබිම සහ එය අවිධිමත් ක්‍රියාවක් බවට අනාවරනය වූ බව සාක්ෂි නොවිම. ඒ අනුව මහා බැංකුව විසින් විධිමත් මුදල් මණ්ඩල අනුමැතියකින් තොරව සaජු ක්‍රමයට බැදුම්කර නිකුත්කර ඇති බව විශ්වාස කිරීමට හේතුවන ප්‍රමාණවත් කරුණු මාගේ අවධානයට ලක් නොවීය.” යන්නයි.

2005 සිට 2015 දක්වා සිදු වූ භාණ්ඩාගාර බැදුම්කර පිලිබඳ විගණන වාර්තාව මෙතනින්

http://www.auditorgeneral.gov.lk/web/images/special_report/Bond_report/direct_placement/Bond-Report-on-direct-placement-ceylon-bank-of-srilanka.pdf

බෙදිම්වාදී රාවය කාරයා කුපිත වූ , රට බෙදන ව්‍යවස්ථාවට එරෙහි අස්ගිරි විහාරයේ මැදිහත්වීම

January 29th, 2017

සටහන : යටියන ප්‍රදීප් කුමාර යුතුකම  

 ඉඩම් බලතල , පොලිස් බලතල පළාත් සභාවලට දෙමින් වෙනම රටක් ඇති කිරීමේ යෝජිත ෆෙඩරල් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේලා වශයෙන් තමන් වහන්සේලා එරෙහි වෙද්දී බෙදුම්වාදී ගැත්තන් කලබලවී භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේලාට එරෙහිව අවලාද නගමින් සිටින බට අස්ගිරි මහ විහාර පාර්ශවයේ ගරු ලේඛකාධිකාරී ආචාර්ය පූජ්‍ය මැදගම ධම්මානන්ද නාහිමියෝ පෙවා දෙති.
විසේෂයෙන් පසුගියදා මල්වතු – අස්ගිරි විහාරවලට පැමිණි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාට යෝජිත ව්‍යවස්ථාවෙන් රටට සිදුවන විපත පිළිබඳ සඳහන් කරමින් බාරදුන් සංදෙශය පිළිබඳව බෙදුම්වාදයට කත් අදින රාවය පුවත්පත කලබලයට පත්ව තමන් වහන්සේ ඇතුළු භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේලාට එරෙහිව පුවත්පත හරහා අවලාද ගසමින් සිටින බව උන් වහන්සේ සඳහන් කරති.

ඒ කුමනාකාර අවලාද නැගුවත් රට දැය සමය පිළිබඳ භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේල්කා වෙත පැවරුණු වගකීම ඉටු කිරීමට කිසි සේත් පසුබට නොවන බව උන් වහන්සේ අවධාරණය කරති.

ඒ පිළිබඳ අදහස් පළකළ මැදගම ධමානන්ද නාහිමියෝ ” ඔය රාවය කාරයා පුවත්පතේ බහුතරයක් පළකරන්නේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ විරෝධී දේවල් පමණයි.පසුගිය සතියේ දාලා තිබුණේ “අස්ගිරි නාහිමියන් නොමග යවන්නේ කවුද?” යනුවෙන් ලිපියක්.අපි සංඝ සභාවක් හැටියට අපට අයිතියක් තිබෙනවා අපේ මහ නායක හාමුදුරුවන් සමග සාකච්චා කරල උපදෙස් දෙන්න.මේකට ඔවුන් කියනවා මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ඒකීය රාජ්‍ය ගැන කතා කරනවා .ඒ හඬ තමයි මේ අස්ගිරියෙන් නැගෙන්නේ කියලා.
මොවුන් ඉතිහාසය පුරාම කටයුතු කරල තිබෙන්නේ බෙදුම්වාදී උවමනාවටයි.”

එහිදී මනෝහර ද සිල්වා මහතාගේ ‘ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධන’ ග්‍රන්ථය ගැන අදහස් පළකළ ධම්මානන්ද නාහිමියෝ “මෙම අගනා ග්‍රන්ථය සම්පාදනය කරමින් කාලීන අවශ්‍යතාවය ඉෂ්ඨ කර\මින් මෙලෙස ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනවලට අදාල කරුණු ඉතා හොඳින් විග්‍රහ කරමින් මනෝහරද සිල්වා මහතා සිදුකළ කාර්‍ය අප සියළු දෙනාගේ පැසසුමට ලක් විය යුතුයි.
රට වෙනුවෙන් ,සිංහල ජාතිය වෙනුවෙන් ක්‍රියාකළ නීතීඥ ගාමිණී ඊරියගොල්ල ,අධිනීතීඥ එස් එල් ගුණසේකර මැතිතුමා , ආර් එස් වනසුන්දර මැතිතුමා ආදීන් ක්‍රියාකළ අභීත ආකාරය ඊලඟ පරපුරට ගෙනයන වියතෙකු ලෙස මනෝහර ද සිල්වා මහතාට මහා සංඝරත්නයේ ප්‍රසාදය පළ කරන්න කැමතියි.

රට විනාශ කරමින් , රට බෙදමින් අනාගත ව්‍යසනයකට,ඛේදවාචකයකට රට ඇද දමමින් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට යන මේ ෆෙඩරල් ව්‍යවස්ථාව වලක්වා ගැනීමට අවශ්‍ය ජනතා දැනුවත් කිරීමට මහෝපකාරි වෙන මේ ග්‍රන්ථය රටට දැයට ආදරය සියළු දෙනාම කියවිය යුතුයි.” යනුවෙන් පැවසූහ.

මැදගම ධම්මානන්ද හිමියන් පැවැත්වූ සම්පූර්ණ දේශනය පහත සබැඳියෙන්

සටහන : යටියන ප්‍රදීප් කුමාර
යුතුකම සංවාද කවය
www.yuthukama.com

රේගු වෙන්දේසියට තබා ඇති Rose Wood දැව තොගය අඩු මිලට ලබාගැනීම

January 29th, 2017

සමස්ත ලංකා රේගු සේවා සංගමය. 

ගරු ජනාධිපති තුමා                                                                                             
ජනාධිපති ලේකම්කාර්යාලය
කොළඹ 01.

මැතිතුමනි.

රේගු වෙන්දේසියට තබා ඇති Rose Wood දැව තොගය අඩු මිලට ලබාගැනීම සදහා දරන උත්සාහය වලක්වන ලෙස ඉල්ලීම.

නීති විරෝධී ලෙස ශ‍්‍රිලංකාව හරහා ප‍්‍රවාහනය කරමින් තිබියදී අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන රාජ සන්තක කරන ලද රු කෝටි 100 කටත් වඩා වටිනා ඍදිැ උදදා දැව මෙට්ට්‍රික් ටොන් 415ක් පසුගිය මාසයේ රේගු වෙන්දේසියට තබන ලදි.

එහෙත් රේගුව අපේක්‍ෂා කල මිල ගණන් ඉදිරිපත් නොවූ බැවින් එම දැව තොගය යලිත් වරක් 2017.01.28 වන දින වෙන්දේසියට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම සදහා කටයුතු කරමින් සිටින විට රේගු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජෙනරාල් වරයා එම දැව තොගය වෙන්දේසියට නොතබන ලෙස නිලධාරීන්ට දැනුම් දී තිබේ. 

පසුව කරන ලද සොයා බැලීම් වලදී හෙළිදරව් වූයේ ධැව තොගය සදහා ඉල්ලූම් කරන්නන් විසින් තැබිය යුතු රු. මිලියන 12ක ආපසුව ගෙවන තැන්පතුවට අමතරව රු මිලියන 10ක ආපසු නොගෙවන තැන්පතුවක් තැබිය යුතු බවට වන කොන්දේසියක් ටෙන්ඩර් පත‍්‍රිකාවට ඇතුල් කිරීම සදහා රේගු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල් වරයා විසින් මහා භාණ්ඩාගාරයෙන් අනුමැතිය ඉල්ලා ඇති අතර එකී අනුමැතිය ලැබෙන තෙක් දැව තොගය වෙන්දේසියෙන් ඉවත්කර ඇති බවයි.

රේගු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල් වරයාගේ මෙම උත්සාහය සාර්ථක වුවහොත් Rose Wood දැව තොගයට කිසිවෙකු මිල ගණන් ඉදිරිපත් නොකරනු ඇත. එවිට මෙම ක‍්‍රියාවලිය පිටුපස සිටින පුද්ගලයා කවුරුන්හෝ ඉතා අඩු මිලක් ඉදිරිපත් කර මෙම දැව තොගය මිලදී ගනු ඇත. අපගේ අවබෝධයේ හැටියට රේගු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂක ජනරාල් වරයාට මෙවැනි බලපෑමක් කළ හැක්කේ මුදල් ඇමතිවරයාට පමණි.

එබැවින් මේ රටේ  ඕනෑම පුරවැසියෙකුට මෙම දැව තොගය සදහා මිල ගණන් ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට අයිතිය ආරක්‍ෂා කර දෙන ලෙසත් ඒ මගින් මහා භාණ්ඩාගාරයට බැරවිය යුතු අති විශාල මුදලක් ජාවාරම් කරුවන් අතට පත්වීම වැලැක්වීම සදහාත් අවශ්‍ය පියවර ගන්නා මෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.

ස්තූතියි,

මෙයට විශ්වාසී,
ජේ. ඒ ගුණතිලක
ලේකම් 
සමස්ත ලංකා රේගු සේවා සංගමය. 

සම්බන්ධීකරනය – ජේ.ඒ. ගුණතිලක – 071-8246948

ජාතික විගණන පනත ක්‍රියාත්මක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලෙස කැෆේ සංවිධානය ගරු ජනාධිපතුමන් වෙතින් සිදු කරන විවෘත ආයාචනයයි.

January 29th, 2017

පුවත්පත් නිවේදනය කැෆේ සංවිධානය

ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමනි,

ජාතික විගණන පනතට 2016 සැප්තෑම්බර් මස නීතිපතිවරයාගේ අනුමත කරනු ලැබීය. පනත සම්බන්ධයෙන් කටයුතු කරනු ලබන කැබිනට් අනු කමිටුට විසින් පනත සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලබාදුන් නිර්දේශ සියල්ලම අවසන් අනුමැතිය ලැබූ පනත් කෙටුම්පතට ඇතුලත් කරනු ලැබ ඇත. 

මේ වන විට විගණකාධිපතිවරයා ද, අනෙකුත් උනන්දුවක් දක්වන පාර්ශව සියල්ල ද ‘ජාතික විගණන පනත’ සම්බන්ධයෙන් සිය එකගතාව ලබා දී ඇත.  ජාතික විගණන පනත සම්බන්ධයෙන් තවදුරටත් ඉතිරිව ඇත්තේ එය ගැසට් මගින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කිරීම සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ විවාදය සදහා ගැනීම පමණී. 

ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමන් අප සංවිධානය පැවැත්වූ සාකච්ඡාවක දී ප්‍රකාශ කර සිටියේ 2017 ජනවාරි මස ජාතික විගණන පනත ගැසට් මගින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරන බවයි.  නීනිඥ ජේ.සී.වැලිඅමුණ මහතා ප්‍රමුඛ කණ්ඩායමක් මේ පිළිබද ගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමන් සමග පැවැත්වූ සාකච්ඡාවේ දී ජනාධිපති ලේකම් පී.බී.අබේකෝන් මහතා වෙත මෙම පනත ගැසට් කිරීමේ වගකීම පවරනු ලැබීය.  ඉහත තත්වයන් යටතේ, 2017 ජනවාරි 8 දින පනත ජාතික විගණන පනත ගැසට් මගින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරනු ඇතැයි අප ඒ අනුව බලාපොරොත්තු තබා සිටියෙමු.

ජාතික විගණන පනත යථාර්ථයක් බවට පත් කිරීමට දැඩි වෙහෙසක් ගත් වත්මන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ගරු කථානායක කරු ජයසූරිය මහතා ද 2017 වසරේ ජනවාරි මස මෙම පනත පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත්වනු ඇතැයි අවස්ථා ගණනාවක බලාපොරොත්තු පළ කළේය.

දුෂණ වැලැක්වීම සදහා දැවැන්ත සමාජ කතිකාවතක් ඇරඹී ඇති මෙම අවස්ථාවේ දී ජාතික විගණන පනත නීතියක් බවට පත් කොට එය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම අතිශයින් එලදායී වනු ඇත්තේය.  එබැවින්,  ජාතික විගණන පනත හැකි ඉක්මනින් ගැසට් මගින් ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කිරීම සදහා ජනාධිපති ලේකම්වරයාට උපදෙස් ලබා දෙන මෙන් කැෆේ සංවිධානය ගරු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ගෙන් ඉතා කාරුණිකව ඉල්ලා සිටී.

කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන්

විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ/කැෆේ සංවිධානය

2017 ජනවාරි මස 29 වැනිදා

 

Thousands throng Brahmaputra Literary Festival

January 29th, 2017

 By NJ Thakuria

Guwahati: Creative writers, journalists, filmmakers, vivid appreciators, enthusiast observers from various parts of the globe now gather at Brahmaputra Literary Festival in the far eastern part of India. First of its kinds in the alienated region of the country, the festival witnessed the gala opening on Saturday precluding all serious panel discussions on literature and related other creative activities.

Eminent authors including Randy Taguchi from Japan, Neal Hall from USA, Carlo Pizaati, Giampaolo Simi & Alessandra Bertini from Italy, Francois Gautier & Nicolos Idier from France, Carlos Penalver from Spain, Subramani from Fiji,  Dhunpal Raj Heeraman & Ramdeo Dhorundhur from Mauritius, Selina Hussain & Shaheen Akhtar from Bangladesh, Rajiva Wijesinha from Sri Lanka, Raj Heeramun, Ramdev Dhoorandhar & Niranjan Kunwar from Nepal, Yugyen Tshering from Bhutan have already graced Srimanta Sankardev Kalakshetra, the venue of the festival.

UNION MINISTER OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT SHRI PRAKASH JAVADEKAR LIGHTING THE LAMP TO INAUGURATE THE BRAHMAPUTRA LITERARY FESTIVAL AT GUWAHATI ON 28TH JANUARY 2017 ( PIB PHOTO BY S K DARJEE )

Many prominent Indian writers and cultural personalities like Asha Parekh, Shatrughan Sinha, Rakyesh Omprakash Mehra Damodar Mauzo, Subhash Kashyap, Makarand Paranjpe, Narendra Kohli, Khalid Mohammed, Dipa Choudhuri are scheduled to participate in various sessions of the festival including open interaction with the audience.

Some famed north-eastern creative personalities and journalists including  Sanjoy Hazarika, Arup Kumar Dutta, Jahnavi Barua, Mamang Dai, Pradip Phanjoubam, Monalisa Chankija, Dhruba Hazarika, Yeshe Dorjee  Thongchi, Leena Sarma, Jnan Pujari, Phanindra Kumar Debachoudhury, Kula Saikia, Rami Chhabra, Vimala Morthala, Aniz Uz Zaman, Monikuntala Bhattacharjya, Dileep Chandan along with Utpal Borpujari, Nilim Kumar, Suparna Lahiri Baruah, Mirza Ali Baig, Prasanta Rajguru, Mrinal Talukdar, Arindam Barkataki, Samrat Chowdhury, Nanigopal Mahanta,  Imran Hussain, Ratna Barali Talukdar, Atanu Bhattachrya, Geetali Borah etc arrived at the venue for cohesive participation.

With this three-day fiesta, jointly organised by the National Book Trust India (under HRD ministry) and Publication Board Assam (under Assam’s education ministry), the city has emerged as an important venue of literary festivals in the country. With brain storming  panel discussions, book releases & readings, cultural events including screenings of films based on literary pieces etc, the festival is expected to enrich the literary prospect of the region to many extend.

Inaugurating the festival, the Union human resources development minister Prakash Javadekar appealed to the litterateur and authors to contribute for the mission to build a culturally sound society through their literary pieces reflecting the truth. Once a journalist, Javadekar also assured the government’s support in ensuring the freedom of thought & expressions.

Assam chief minister Sarbananda Sonowal, State education minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, celebrated authors  Randy Taguchi, Mamang Dai and Damodar Mauzo, NBT chairman Baldeo Bhai Sharma & director Rita Choudhury also addressed the gathering under the winter sky. Earlier a spectacular literary carnival led the participants to the festival venue in the southern part of the pre-historic city.

චෝදනා සහිත පුද්ගලයෙකු අධිකරණ සේවයට බදවා ගැනීම පෙර විමර්ශනයක් පවත්වන්න – මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රයෙන් අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාවට ඉල්ලීමක්

January 29th, 2017

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය පුවත්පත් නිවේදනය

ශ්‍රී ලංකා අධිකරණයේ මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරයෙකු ලෙස පත්වීම් ලැබූ ඩී.එම්.ඒ.අයි.දිසානායක මහතා සම්බන්ධයෙන් අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව වෙත නිවැරදි නොවන කරුණු ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම ඇතුළු කරුණු ගණනාවක් යටතේ විමර්ශන පවත්වන ලෙස ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය හා කැෆේ පැමිණිල්ලක් ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබීය.

අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව විසින් 2016 ඔක්තෝබර් මස 14 දින දිණමින පුවත්පතේ අධිකරණ සේවය සදහා අලුතින් බදවා ගනු ලැබූ පුද්ගයින් පිළිබද ලේඛණයක් මුල් වරට ප්‍රසිද්ධ කරනු ලැබීය.  අධිකරණ සේවය සදහා බදවා ගැනීමේ දී පෙර චෝදනා සහිත පුද්ගලයින් සම්බන්ධයෙන් තොරතුරු සොයා බැලීම සදහා වන අවස්ථාවක් ලබාදීම සදහා මෙම පියවර ගෙන තිබුණි. අධිකරණ සේවාව සදහා බදවාගැනීමේ ක්‍රියාවලියේ විනිවිද භාවයක් ඇති කිරීම සදහා සිදුකල දිගුකාලීන අරගලයේ ප්‍රතිඑලයක් ලෙස ලද මෙම අවස්ථාව යොදාගනිමින් නුසුදුසු පුද්ගලයින් එම තනතුර සදහා පත්වීම වලක්වා ගැනීම අප විසින් සිදුකල පැමිණිල්ලේ අරමුණ විය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය වෙත ලැබුණු  තොරතුරු සියල්ල අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව වෙත ඉදිරිපත් කර උක්ත පත්වීම සිදු කිරීමට පෙර නැවත ඔහු පිළිබදව සොයා බැලීමක් සිදු කරන ලෙස සහ සුදුසු වෙනත් විමර්ශන ක්‍රියාවලියක් අප විසින් ඉල්ලා සිටින ලදී.

අධිකරණයේ ස්වාධීනත්වය සදහා දීර්ඝ වුත්, දුෂ්කර වූත් මාවතක අප පැමිණ සිටින්නෙමු.  කුමන ආකාරයකින් හෝ නුසුදුසු පුද්ගලයින් අධිකරණ කේෂත්‍රයට ඇතුලත්වීම වලක්වා ගැනීමේ වැදගත්කම ලෙනින් රත්නායක සිදුවීම හරහා ද තවත් එවන් ප්‍රසිද්ධියට පත් නොවූ සිදුවීම් හරහා ද අප අත් දැක ඇත්තෙමු. 

කෙසේ නමුත්, පැමිණිල්ල ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට පෙර නීති කේෂ්ත්‍රයේ විවිධ පාර්ශව සමග මේ පිළිබද අදහස් විමසීමක් ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය විසින් සිදු කරනු ලැබීය.  මෙම පුද්ගලයා සම්බන්ධයෙන් ශ්‍රී ලංකා නීතිඥ සංගමය වෙත ද පැමිණිලි ඉදිරිපත් වී තිබූ අතර ඔවුන් ද එය අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව වෙත වාචිකව යොමු කර ඇත.  අධිකරණ සේවයට බදවා ගැනීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් මෙවර සිදුකළ එකම ලිඛිත පැමිණිල්ල ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රයේ සහ කැෆේ සංවිධානයේ විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ කීර්ති තෙන්නකෝන් මහතා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබුණි.

අධිකරණ කේෂ්ත්‍රයේ ප්‍රතිසංවිධාන සදහා බලපෑම් කණ්ඩායමක් ලෙස කටයුතු කරන ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය සහ කැෆේ සංවිධානය මෙරට සිවිල් සංවිධාන හා පුරවැසියන්ගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ අධිකරණ විනිසුරුවරුන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් පැමිණිලි කිරීමේ ක්‍රමවේදයක් අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව විසින් ආරම්භ කොට ඇති බැවින් එම අවස්ථාවෙන් ප්‍රයෝජන ගැනීමට කටයුතු කරල ලෙසයි.

 

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය

කැෆේ සංවිධානය

2017 ජනවාරි මස 28 වැනිදා

 

Rajith Keerthi Tennakoon
Executive Director/CaFFE
Executive Director/CHR-Sri Lanka
100/19 A, Welikadawatta Road,
Rajagiriya,Sri Lanka.

Contradictions galore!

January 29th, 2017

Editorial Courtesy The Island

The government tries to promote itself as a good governance coalition. But, it is, in fact, a coalition of contradictions in that its constituents and leaders keep contradicting one another ad nauseam. What we hear from its top guns on crucial national issues has all the trappings of a babble of voices in a toddy bar; nay, it is more incomprehensible than shebeen gabble.

Cabinet Spokesman Dr. Rajitha Senaratne, last Wednesday, tried to defend Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, who attended a recent ceremony where a factory was launched by a frontman of the Rajapaksa family, had come to know about the background of that investor only a few hours before the event. But, Minister Malik Samarawickrama contradicted Senaratne immediately afterwards; he said both the PM and President Maithripala Srisena had been quite au fait with the background of the entrepreneur concerned. Now, it is clear that the government is honeymooning with the persons it once condemned as crooked cronies of the former ruling clan!

In the run-up to the last presidential election the UNP and the Maithripala faction of the SLFP promised to abolish the executive presidency, which, they insisted, was the mother of all evils in Sri Lankan politics. President Sirisena declared, upon being inaugurated, that he would never seek a second term. But, now the SLFP has suddenly woken up to the need for retaining the executive presidency and is preparing the ground for fielding President Sirisena as the SLFP’s next presidential candidate much to the consternation of the UNP.

The UNP insists that former Central Bank Governor Arjuna Mahendran has not been on the wrong side of the law as regards the bond scams which have caused the state coffers and the Employee’s Provident Fund to haemorrhage colossal amounts of money. But, President Sirisena has faulted Mahendran, denied him a second term as the Central Bank Governor and ordered a presidential probe into the bond scams.

Government pundits have maintained during the last two years that LTTE threat is a thing of the past. Anyone who warns of a possible LTTE comeback is promptly branded a racist. LTTE cadres are being released and high security zones dismantled at a rate. When a former Tiger was arrested in March last year with a suicide jacket, claymore mines and ammunition, some government ministers claimed there was no threat to national security and the media were blowing the issue out of proportion. But, The Hindu newspaper has recently reported that the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government has warned TNA MP M. A. Sumanthiran of a serious threat to his life. The MP is quoted as saying that the government has shared some specific information about the threat and four persons have been arrested in that connection. So much for the government’s claim that the LTTE threat has long ceased to exist!

President Sirisena keeps saying there has been no agreement to hand over land in Hambantota to foreigners. But, UNP members of his Cabinet say 15,000 acres in areas adjacent to the Hambantota Port will be leased out to some Chinese investors for 99 years. Who is telling us the truth?

President Sirisena has gone on record as saying that his predecessor opted for a snap presidential election because the latter had been at its wits’ end, unable to figure out how to face an impending economic crisis. He has given the impression that Mahinda Rajapaksa ran away, not knowing how to steer the ship of the state to safety. But, the incumbent government claims Rajapaksa was planning a coup to stay in power despite his defeat at the Jan. 2015 presidential election! If he had sought to run away from trouble on the economic front, he could have refrained from seeking a third term or he would not have tried to retain power forcibly!

The UNP pretends to be on a mission to restore the supremacy of Parliament. But, last week, its heavyweights argued in the House in favour of a judicial intervention as regards the COPE (Committee on Public Enterprises) report on the bond scams. They took on JVP MP Bimal Ratnayake, who pointed out the absurdity of MPs being summoned by a court for carrying out their duties and functions as members of a parliamentary watchdog committee. The Constitution does not provide for post enactment judicial review. Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe tore into the judiciary some moons ago for allegedly trying to usurp the powers of the legislature anent the Singarasa case. The UNP has also taken pride in the late Speaker Anura Bandaranaike’s historic ruling (2001), which rejected a Supreme Court interim order seeking to prevent him from dealing with a parliamentary resolution to probe the then Chief Justice until the apex court had heard and determined a fundamental rights application before it. As they say in this country a water monitor becomes a land monitor when one feels like eating it.

It is not only the members of the yahapalana coalition who keep contradicting themselves; their foreign allies also do. The present dispensation has received plaudits from the US and the EU for ‘meaningful steps’ it is said to have taken to battle corruption. But, Sri Lanka has, under the yahapalana watch, slipped 12 points on the 2016 Corruption Perception Index (CPI) released by the Transparency International, which ranks countries according to the perceived level of public sector corruption. Sri Lanka was ranked 85th on the CPI in 2014 under the previous government. How would the defenders of the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe administration explain this mismatch between its claim to have contained corruption and the CPI rankings?

Who is helping business tycoon Nandana Lokuwithana?

January 29th, 2017

BY Cassendra Doole Courtesy Ceylon Today

On 5 January 2017, the foundation stone for what was then said to be the largest tyre-manufacturing factory in the country was laid under the auspices of Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. An investment of Rs 11.25 billion was made for the factory which is based in the Wagawatthe Board of Investment Industrial Zone in Horana. However, information later revealed that the tyre-factory is owned by business tycoon Nandana Lokuwithana, a very close ally of the Rajapaksa family.

Rajitha claims PM
was unaware

Co-Cabinet spokesperson Rajitha Senaratne said Prime Minister Wickremesinghe was not aware that the businessman behind the tyre factory in Horana was Lokuwithana until the morning of the opening ceremony.

Responding to a question on why the Prime Minister attended the opening of the tyre factory, which is owned by a pro-Rajapaksa businessman with a controversial past, Senaratne said, “The Prime Minister did not know who owned the factory until the morning of the opening ceremony. He decided to go, after long deliberation, because the announcement that he would be there had already been made.”

Senaratne said he blames certain ministers for misleading the Prime Minister and added that the tyre factory cannot be built until the agreement is renegotiated.

“He [Lokuwithana] has got 100 acres of land, in the Wagawatte Industrial Zone (WIZ), on a 99-year lease for an annual rent of just Rs 100 an acre. That is not done, there are regulations regarding how sale and lease of land can take place in the country.

No one can violate them, not even the President. The BOI usually charges US $ 40,000 (Rs. 6 million) an acre for a 50-year lease of WIZ land. That is the rate Lokuwithana has to pay,” he said.

Reasons

Senaratne said one of the reasons for such incidents is the fact that the Cabinet Committee on Economic Management (CCEM) has been allowed to go above the line minister. “The President has now stated that everything has to come from the line minister, who now has the power to override the Cabinet Committee on Economic Management (CCEM).

Lokuwithana was awarded a 100-acre block of land at the Wagawatte Industrial Zone on a 99-year lease, at an annual rent of just Rs 100 an acre, to build Rigid Tyre Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. The foundation stone was laid on 5 January. The annual rent for an acre of WIZ land is US$ 3,850. At Rs 100, Lokuwithana gets a discount of 99.98 per cent on each acre.

Maliks
contradiction

Rejecting claims made by Minister Rajitha Senaratne with regard to the Horana Tyre factory, Development Strategies and International Trade Minister Malik Samarawickrama said he had informed both the President and the Prime Minister about the investor of the factory well in advance.

The statement made by Rajitha Senaratne on the issue is also incorrect, he said.

“It is necessary to emphasize the fact that, both the President and the Prime Minister were aware of the investor since I, myself informed them well in advance.

“Furthermore, two Cabinet papers i.e. initially one proposing the land and then giving details of the incentives and other terms were submitted on the project and in addition, the project was discussed and endorsed at several meetings of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Management.

Incorrect
statement

The statement that the land was given for Rs 100 per acre is incorrect. In fact, the government Chief Valuer had valued the land at Rs 170, 825, 000 and the investor has agreed to pay the total amount upfront. The Chief Valuer has also indicated that a further

Rs 10, 000 be charged as an annual nominal fee.

Further details pertaining to the project are given below:

The 100-acre land at Horana, Wagawaththa Industrial Zone is a bare undeveloped land undulating in most areas. Based on the technical investigations done by Central Engineering and Consultancy Bureau (CECB), it is noted that the investor has to incur a sum of about Rs 300 to 400 million as per the estimate to bring the land to a usable state. The investor claims that around 3 million layer of weak soil has to be removed throughout 25 acres of the land.

BOI is not providing any infrastructure facilities like in other zones- e.g. even the waste disposal treatment plant will be constructed by the investor. Similarly, all internal roads will have to be constructed by the investor.

Based on the valuation of land by the government Chief Valuer an upfront payment of Rs 170 million is to be paid by the investor. Since the project requires a large extent of land, the investor requested the land be leased to him based on the valuation determined by the Chief Valuer on the basis that infrastructure will be provided by him. The request by the investor was accommodated by us in view of the high value of the investment of the project and the significant contribution expected to the economy particularly linked with the rubber industry.

Promoting
investment

BOI should promote investment and if necessary, regulations and rules need to be changed to attract investments as the current regulations have failed to bring in investors. The (Foreign Direct investments) FDIs in 2015 was USD 970 million and in 2016 it will be around USD 450 million, which is extremely low by any standard.

The total investment of the project is USD 75 million

(Rs 11.25 billion). The project will employ around 3, 000 workers. It will add value to the rubber produced in Sri Lanka and convert raw rubber to radial and solid tyres. The annual export earnings will be above USD 125 million.

There will also be an inward transfer of technology as the Italian company Marangoni is expected to provide the technical know-how to produce tyres and other rubber based products.

There are similar BOI projects, on BOI owned properties, which have been given on long-term lease with an upfront payment and an annual fee is not charged from such projects – e.g. MAS Group was given 47 acres on a 50-year lease and upfront payment is to be received and no annual fee is charged. This was a well-developed property with buildings and other infrastructure, although major repairs/renovations will have to be undertaken by the investor (former Kabool Lace property).

Furthermore, a land vested in BOI in Kuliyapitiya was given on a freehold basis to Western Automobile Assembly for a proposed vehicle assembly plant. The BOI has also granted 357 acres in the same area on a 99-year lease for 1 USD per acre per annum to Merbok, in settlement of a dispute arising from a contract signed in 2000.

All expenses in developing the land, including constructing a treatment plant, internal roadways and obtaining transformers will be done by the investor. Therefore, the project should be considered on the same basis as the MAS project. The investor applied to set up the plant in March 2016 when they were eligible for the tax concessions under BOI.

Initially, BOI took steps to acquire a private land in Horana, but as the owners of the land were unwilling to sell the property, BOI was instructed not to acquire that land as per the President’s observation on Cabinet paper No MODSIT/3/CAB/16/8 dated 2 June 2016.

We believe the investor should not be penalized for the delay on the part of BOI to make the land available. Accordingly a Cabinet memorandum was submitted on 3 October 2016 identifying the BOI owned land at Wagawaththa and explaining the position.

Accordingly approval and tax concessions were granted by the Cabinet on the rates prevailing at the time of the application. In different countries promoting investment projects, various mechanisms exist for lease of land and providing infrastructure on case by case basis, based on evaluation of salient features of the project, level of infrastructure required, and extent of land. In India, in certain State land is given for one Indian rupee per acre per year to attract investors.

When proposals for investments are received, we do not look at the political affiliations of the investor, and projects are evaluated and approved on the basis of economic and social benefits to the country.”

UNP cannot manage country properly -Minister of Science and Technology Susil Premajayantha

January 29th, 2017

By Charminda Rodrigo Courtesy Ceylon Today

Minister of Science and Technology Susil Premajayantha questions how many of the targets set by the budget presented in 2016 have been achieved so far? “If they are out to create a ‘powerful Sri Lanka’ they need to set the targets for GDP, power and energy creation, agriculture production and various other sectors”.

Excerpts:

?: What do you think about the present political developments in the country?

A: Well, present political developments are escalating into a critical state for the government unless we identify them and address them immediately.

?: What do you really mean when you say a critical state for the government?

A: There are many critical issues. Amongst them one is the heap of debt this government had inherited at the inception. Now most of the loans are reaching the end of their grace period so they have begun repayments. We have a trade deficit of nearly US$ 9 billion. Our debt will increased another US$ 4 billion in the coming years when the real repayments of such loans begin. We do not earn much export revenue. Therefore, we have a large trade deficit and a huge national debt. We need to think of some creative ways out of the box to remedy these situations.

?: Did the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa call the presidential election early after foreseeing the issues you describe?

A: I do not have much knowledge regarding his intentions. Despite the debts, he might have had a feeling of being internationally pressured due to the Geneva problem. In electing him, the people put their trust in him, therefore, they cannot blame him now.

?: The former President at the rally in Nugegoda on 27 Friday, said Why did they take over the government if they knew that the country is in debt?. What do you think about this statement?

A: I’m also asking the same question. People who manage the finances in this government had asked for the power to show to others how they could efficiently manage the country. We have to introduce a better mechanism for the country. What really happens is that the government is merely trying to survive on the taxes imposed on the people. Just have a look at lending rates today, and how they have sky rocketed. It was 9% in 2015 but now it has escalated to 15%. How can one finance a venture with a bank loan under these lending rates? We cannot expect the savings to increase due to the fact that people would be left with no excess money to invest in banks. These figures should be managed properly to take the country forward.

?: You mean to say the UNP is not competent enough to manage the countrys finances since they basically control all the institutions directly related to the finances of the country?

A: Yes, I do not agree with their principles in financial management. UNP and SLFP policies clearly are very different.

Their model ‘New liberal economy’ is not at all practical. Country’s which followed these principles have taken a turn for the worse. Take a look at the United States. They are walking out of these principles under the new President. This system has failed all over the world. What the government today thinks is that global conditions during former President J.R. Jayewardene still prevail in the world. The dynamics have changed.

?: Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa had also been following more less the same principles to date. So, what made the difference?

A: It is like this. Mahinda Rajapaksa’s administration had not been able to attract investments until the war had come to an end. Even after the war they were not able to do it. So they walked through some real tough problems.

The trade deficit of the country is nearly US$9 billion. The government has to make this money using various means. Whatever the government does it will have a direct effect on inflation and the value of the rupee in the money markets. We need a constructive approach by limiting imports, by introducing alternative substitutes for the people. Tourists who visited the country during the war amounted to about 400,000 per annum. Now it has exceeded 2,000,000 per annum. We need to introduce some new ways to enable people to come up with new value additions in tourism. We need to benchmark the current standards and introduce new strategic initiatives to make these tourists spend more. This is a sector of greater economic potential. Another sector is the service sector.

It’s been so long but we were not able to line up these priorities right. Mahinda’s government was more inclined towards encouraging long-term investments such as the Mattala airport, Hambantota harbour etc. We need some projects in the country, which generate short-term revenues. All these activities should be directed at easing the burdens of the people.

?: Do you see any other measures to achieve the objective?

A: We need to plan all these steps properly. We can begin discussions with other countries for better terms for our imports such as crude oil. If we can discuss more flexible terms through inter-governmental dialogue, we could have an impact on the forex outflow. There are many commodities we heavily import annually. We have to identify them and formulate a plan to tackle the alternatives.

I have done this in my ministry. We have successfully concluded discussions with many countries for technology dissemination and transfer.

?: UNP recently introduced their economic master plan under the tagline of A powerful Sri Lanka. This document carries many economic initiatives. What do you think about it?,

A: A government should have a vision. Take a look at this document. I cannot see a mission statement or a policy statement in it. There are some pictures tangled up with some fairy tales. Look at what they have showcased in Kuliyapitiya. It has turned out to be a total disaster. See what happened in Horana, when they set out to establish a tyre factory. The whole investment has turned into a greater debacle. UNP does not have a direction. Look at the number of budget proposals rejected during the Appropriation Bill debate stage. How many of the targets set by the budget presented in 2016 have been achieved so far? If they are out to create a ‘powerful Sri Lanka’ they need to set the targets for GDP, power and energy creation, agriculture production and various other sectors. The UNP cannot manage the country properly. To manage the country right, they need to get the institutions that steer these policies in line. The once powerful Finance Ministry itself has been brought under the purview of three ministers. The institutions are working in isolation without any proper understanding of how the others function. Iran today has become No. 6 in the world in the use of Nano technology. However, it is not in our school curriculum. The world is moving far ahead of us. We need to get there within the shortest possible time.

?: Dont you think what we see today is the fruit of the past administration?

A: Well, I see it like this. Have we ever done a proper strength, weakness, opportunity and threat analysis for the Mattala Airport? Same goes for the Hambantota harbour. We intended having a second international airport. But have we been able to market it right to convert it to a profit making entity? There are thousands of ships passing southern Sri Lanka. Those ships are not going to dock in for services just because we have constructed a port in Hambantota. We need to have discussions with the shipping companies and relevant governments to bring at least some of the ships. We couldn’t manage it right.

?: What do you see as the way forward?

A: Well, I’m against selling off these public properties to individuals or countries. We need to have a solid plan. We should appoint right professionals to run public enterprises. That is how Singapore emerged as a wealthy nation. We have over 200 public enterprises. Consider the people appointed to spearhead these institutions. Why can’t we appoint top professionals to run these institutions? They know the art of management. There are top professionals in the private sector. Get them to manage these public enterprises provided that they are vested with the respective authority and compensation. Look at those appointed to SriLankan Airlines. The previous government appointed a planter and there is no difference about these appointments under the present government. These important positions are being filled to please political associates and friends.

 

?: If the government is to change what are the constitutional provisions available for the opposition to use?

A: The President plays a decisive role in changing the government. He can only be removed by an impeachment motion. He has the discretion to appoint the Prime Minister. There are 82 parliamentarians representing the SLFP. Out of this 41 support the President and the rest are with the joint opposition. In order to form an SLFP government, these 82 members should be united.

The President too should trust some member out of the 82 parliamentarians. A top level discussion should be held instead of the lower level discussions that we see today. The government should be directed in the right way at least now. Otherwise, the government will have to go through some tough times if someday all anti-government forces unite against the government. We can see the actions of some ministers already driving the government down that lane.

?: The United Peoples Freedom Alliance won 95 seats out of which 82 seats were won by the SLFP. But surprisingly you were removed from the position of General Secretary of the UPFA. Is there any untold story behind this?

A: This is a senseless decision taken by those who orchestrated it. At least they should have called Minister AnuraYapa and myself to ask us to show cause relating to our decisions. If they wanted to prevent Mahinda Rajapaksa becoming the Prime Minister, open your eyes and look at the state of affairs today and you will see where it has all ended. If it wasn’t for the events which transpired during the last few days, we could have easily obtained nearly 6 seats more than the UNP. Research conducted into this has borne this out.

?: Dont you see any possibility of a possible amalgamation between the two factions of the SLFP?

A: I have never been able to actively participate in any of these dialogues. I was never invited to participate. I was able to bring all the fragments of the party to one table within a very short period of one week. There was no unity between the members of the SLFP when the general election was declared in 2015. My efforts to bring the SLFP together have greatly enabled efforts to prevent a total UINP domination of government after the election. The SLFP today strongly positioned to challenge the UNP where it matters, within the unity government. That’s all a result of my efforts. People do not talk about it. There is no body to take charge and negotiate to bring the party together. There is no high level discussion going on in this regard to my knowledge.

?: Who is responsible for bringing these forces together?

A: The responsibility to bring these factions together lies with President Maithripala Sirisena and former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress