ආණ්ඩුව ගුරුවරුන්ට ගෙවිය යුතු විභාග රාජකාරි දීමනා ගෙවලා නෑ. මේ විදිහට ගියොත් ඉදිරියෙදි රාජ්‍ය සේවකයින්ගේ වැටුපත් නොගෙවා ඉන්න බැරි නෑ.

April 10th, 2019

ඒකාබද්ධ ගුරු සේවා සංගමය

අපොස උ/පෙළ, සා/පෙළ විභාග රාජකාරි සඳහා ගුරුවරුන් සඳහා ගෙවිය යුතු දීමනා ආණ්ඩුව මේවනතාක් ගෙවීමට කටයුතු කර නැත. එහිදී 2018 සා/පෙළ විභාගයට අදාළව ගුරුවරුන් සඳහා ලැබිය යුතු විභාග ශාලා නිරීක්ෂක, උත්තර පත‍්‍ර ඇගයීම් හා ප‍්‍රායෝගික පරීක්ෂණ නිරීක්ෂක යන රාජකාරී සඳහා ගෙවිය යුතු දීමනාද, 2018 උසස්පෙළ විභාගයට අදාල ප‍්‍රායෝගික පරීක්ෂණ සඳහා ගෙවිය යුතු දීමනාද ගෙවීම් ප‍්‍රමාද කර ඇත.

වෙනත් වසරවලදී මේ සියලූ විභාග රාජකාරී සඳහා ගෙවීම් මාර්තු මාසය වන විට ගෙවා අවසන් කරන නමුත් මේ වසරට අදාලව තවමත් මෙම ගෙවීම් ප‍්‍රමාදවීමෙන් ගුරුවරු විශාල අපහසුතාවයකට මුහුණ දී සිටිති. ගුරුවරුන් සඳහා ජීවත්වීමට ප‍්‍රමාණවත් වැටුපක් ලබාදීමට බලධාරීන් කටයුතු කර නොමැති අතර ඒ නිසා වැටුප් වැඩිකරගැනීම සඳහා මේවන විටත් ගුරුවරු හා විදුහල්පතිවරු ඒකාබද්ධ අරගලයකට ප‍්‍රවේශවී සිටිති. එවන් තත්ත්වයක් යටතේ ඔවුන්ට ලැබිය යුතු දීමනාවන් පවා නොගෙවා සිටීමෙන් සිදුවන්නේ ඔවුන් තව තවත් ආර්ථික වශයෙන් පීඩාවට පත්වීමයි.

ඒ නිසා මෙම ගෙවීම් තවත් ප‍්‍රමාද නොකර වහාම ලබාදෙන ලෙස අප බලධාරීන්ට බල කර සිටිමු. එසේ නොවන්නේ නම් ගුරු සංගමයක් විදිහට අනෙකුත් ගුරු සංගම්ද සමඟ ඒකාබද්ධව වෘත්තීය ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ගවලට යාමට සිදුවනු ඇති බවද අවධාරණය කර සිටිමු. මෙම ගෙවීම් ප‍්‍රමාදවීම පිළිබඳ විමසීමේදී බළධාරීන්ගේ පිළිතුර වී ඇත්තේ ඒ සඳහා මුදල් නොමැතයි බවයි. ඒ අනුව ආණ්ඩුව ආර්ථික වශයෙන් වැටී ඇති බංකොළොත්භාවය ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත්වේ. නමුත් ගැටලූව වන්නේ විභාග දීමනාවත් ගෙවාගන්නට බැරි බංකොළොත් ආණ්ඩුව තඹ සතයකින් වුව සිය නාස්තිකාර වියදම් හෝ මර්දනය සඳහා කරනු ලබන වියදම් අඩුකිරීමට සූදානම් නොවීමයි.

අධ්‍යාපන ක්‍ෂේත‍්‍රය තුළ මේ ප‍්‍රශ්නය දිගින් දිටම පවතින අතර පසුගිය කාලයේදී ඌව පළාත් සභාව තුළ ගුරුවරුන් සඳහා ගෙවිය යුතු උත්සව අත්තිකාරම් දීමනා නොගෙවීම, ගුරු හිඟ වැටුප් වසර ගණනාවත් තිස්සේ නොගෙවා සිටීම ආදිය නිදසුන් කිහිපයක් පමණි. ඒ සඳහා දිගින් දිගටම සිදුවන අධ්‍යාපන ප‍්‍රතිපාදන කප්පාදුව ප‍්‍රධාන හේතුවක් වී ඇති අතර මෙම තත්ත්වය දිගටම පැවතිය හොත් ඉදිරියේදී ගුරුවරුන්ගේ වැටුපත් නොගෙවා සිටින තැනටම ආණ්ඩුව පත්විය හැකිය.

එය ගුරුවරුන් විෂයෙහි පමණක් නොව අනෙකුත් සියලූ සේවාවන්ටද පොදුවේ බලපෑ හැකි තත්ත්වයකි. ආණ්ඩුව ආර්ථික වශයෙන් බංකොළොත්වී ඇත්නම් ඒ ආණ්ඩුවේම වරදක් මිස රටේ ජනතාවගේ වරදක් නොවේ. ඔවුන් ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කළ වැරදි ආර්ථික ප‍්‍රතිපත්තිවල ප‍්‍රතිවිපාකවලට ජනතාව වගකිව යුතු නැත. ඒ නිසා උදාවෙමින් ඇති අනතුර හඳුනාගනිමින් සියලූ රාජ්‍ය සේවකයින් ලෙස සිය අයිතීන් වෙනුවෙන් අපි සියලූදෙනා එක්ව නැගී සිට සටන් කළ යුතු තත්ත්වයක් රට තුළ නිර්මාණය වෙමින් ඇති බව අපි අවධාරණය කර සිටිමු.

මේ පිළිබඳව අවධානය යොමුකර ලෙස බලකරමින් විභාග කොමසාරිස්වරයා වෙත අප විසින් ලිපියක් යොමු කර ලද අතර ඔබගේ අවධානය පිනිස එම ලිපියද මේ සමඟ යොමු කරමු.
සංජීව බණ්ඩාර
ලේකම්
ඒකාබද්ධ ගුරු සේවා සංගමය

Sri Lanka builds fastest railway line first time after independence with China’s assistance

April 10th, 2019

Courtesy Business Today

The project was financed by the Export-Import Bank of China (China Exim Bank) and the contract was awarded to the China National Machinery Import and Export Corporation

The Sri Lankan government on Monday inaugurated its fastest railway line, which has been built with the assistance of the Chinese government. Sri Lanka finished the construction of first 26.75-km Matara-Beliatta railway extension first time after the island nation got independent in 1948. The new railway line was inaugurated by Arjuna Ranatunga, Sri Lanka’s Transport and Civil Aviation Minister, Finance Minister Mangala Samaraweera, and other parliamentarians.

Sri Lanka builds fastest railway line first time after independence with China's assistance

Sri Lanka finished the construction of first 26.75-km Matara-Beliatta railway extension first time after the island nation got independent in 1948.

The project was financed by the Export-Import Bank of China (China Exim Bank) and the contract was awarded to the China National Machinery Import and Export Corporation. A major portion of the construction was carried out by the China Railway Group 5 (CR5) and Sri Lanka’s Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau (CECB). According to Sri Lankan media reports, the cost of the rail project was $278 million.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said, “The railway line is the first railway project contracted by the Chinese company in Sri Lanka under the BRI and it is indeed the first railway built after country’s independence.” The project will make regional transportation more convenient and facilitate  local economic and social development, said Lu Kang.

The construction of the rail track from Matara to Kataragama was started in 1991 by former president Ranasinghe Premadasa, reported Sri Lankan news portal. The Matara-Beliatta railway extension includes the longest and second longest railway bridges of 1.5 km and 1.04 km, respectively. The railway line also includes one of the tallest railway bridges, the longest railway tunnel and the most modern railway station buildings in the country.

China is Sri Lanka’s biggest lender. The country has made an investment of $8 billion in the island nation. Moreover,  Beijing already has a 99-year lease of Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port, as Colombo failed to repay Chinese debts.

Canadians to help Sri Lanka build 100-MW floating solar park

April 10th, 2019

Courtesy Renewables Now

April 10 (Renewables Now) – The governments of Sri Lanka and Canada have signed a cooperation agreement for the construction of a 100-MW floating solar park in Sri Lanka’s Maduru Oya Reservoir.

The pact between Sir Lanka’s Ministry of Power and Energy and Business Development and the Canadian Commercial Corporation (CCC), a federal Crown corporation dealing with international trade issues, comes less than a month after Sri Lanka gave the go-ahead to the project in the Mahaweli Economic Zone. The scheme will be implemented by a joint venture of the Sri Lanka Mahewali Authority, state-run Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB), the Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority and the Canadian Solar Institute.

The new floating solar array in South East London. Courtesy: WolfeWare Limited.

The floating solar park will be coupled with battery storage capacity and will use less than 4% of the Maduru Oya Reservoir’s surface area. The first 10 MW of it will be become operational by the end November, while the whole complex is expected to switched on by end-September 2020.

The 100-MW project is part of a larger proposal calling for the construction of several such facilities across Sri Lanka.

Case against Gotabaya filed at US Courts?

April 10th, 2019

ගෝඨාභයට අමෙරිකානු අධිකරණයක නඩුවක්?

Pause-3:30Additional Visual SettingsEnter Watch And ScrollClick to enlargeUnmute

Buying Power from Multinationals

April 9th, 2019

By Garvin Karunaratne

Power Cuts to the extent of 2 to 3 hours has been the order of the day and the news is just out that we are about to buy 500MW of Power from three Multinationals Agrico, V Power included, our estimated excess requirements for the next 5 years..

What is also important is to note that we are due to buy power at 28 to 30 rupees a kv/hr, when our current rate is in the area of 24 rupees. 

Compare this price with the rate at which the USA produces power- at 5 cents (US) a kw/hr, which is around Rs. 8.5.

Why have we got into this plight of non having sufficient power. The immediate cause is that we have stopped the Sampur Coal Power Plant and all the sources we currently have cannot meet the demand.

I have been an ardent advocate of wind power ever since the day I gazed at the thousands of wind turbines at Altamont Pass, California turning out power. I stopped my Nissan 300ZX  by the roadside and gazed for over fifteen minutes, because I could not believe my eyes. I was wondering why we did not tap our mountain resource of wind power. At Altamont Pass the power of the wind was nothing like at Madugoda or Ohia, or Ramboda- many vantage points came to my mind- all places where I had  been almost blown off on my eternal  circuits.

I wrote, first to the LMD and the editor was kind enough to publish my Paper:” Candle in the Wind”. That was long ago.

I wrote again and again and questioned why Sri Lanka was always building the wind turbines on the coast and not on the mountains, when every country to which I have happened to travel- to Scotland, to England, to France, to Spain, to Portugal to the USA, to Canada- everywhere the authorities are building the wind turbines in the mountains and never at the coast

Finally my cry reached the ears of Kananga, the engineer who put up the wind turbines at Hambantota. He says that in Sri Lanka the environmentalists have declared that no wind turbines should be put up in the mountains. Instead they have to be on the coast.

I continued my crusade, supported by  the editor of the Sunday Observer and by Noor Nizam,  and finally I have written a book- a compendium of my writings which is due to be published shortly- WIND POWER FOR SRI LANKA’S POWER REQUIREMENTS..

I enclose a few sections of my conclusion and hope that this Paper will reach the higher portals for scrutiny.

10.Conclusion

I am pleased to submit the Papers I have so far written on Wind Power as a source of Energy, in a booklet in the sheer hope that someday this will be read by one of our leaders who will be convinced that Wind Power is the form of energy that Sri Lanka is blessed with in abundance and will get going all out.”

I have  summarized the case for concentrating on wind turbines to produce power

Firstly, the country will not depend on the supply of coal and oil for power plants and the country can save all the millions and billions  being spent today to import oil and coal.

Secondly it will provide employment for thousands in erecting the turbine towers, in establishing the wind turbines and in the manufacture of the turbine mechanism itself at the later stages. In my travels in France, Spain and Portugal I have seen workers making  the towers, blades, transporting them in long trucks, erecting the towers and maintaining them. That is no difficult task for our engineers and workers.

 One of my readers happened to be an engineer, Mr Kanaga. who was involved with establishing the five wind turbines at Hambantota, the first to be built in Sri lanka. What is most interesting in his comment which I have totally enclosed in this book, is that the  environmental lobby had decided that the turbines should only be erected on the coasts and not in the mountains where there is ample wind force.

Kanaga, that engineer supports my recommendation that  we should use the wind in our mountain area to provide the energy we need.

To my mind it is a crime not to use the wind power available and to spend millions and billions to purchase oil and coal.”

Many opine that wind is undependable.  To them my answer is that the wind is an utterly dependable source of energy. Spain has gone all out to build wind turbines and even sells power to France.

A reader of my Papers, Susantha Wijeytileke has even commented that once at Madugoda he saw a cyclist being blown off the road by the power of the wind.

I must mention that I am not alone in advocating the siting of wind turbines in the mountainous areas of Sri Lanka.

In Windfair, on line  editorial journalist  Trevor Sievert  quotes Lakshman Guruswamy, Sri Lanka has the potential to generate 24,000 MW electricity from wind.” (http://w3.windfair.net/wind-energy/news/1q543-sri-lanka-high-wind-energy-potential) Professor Guruswamy further states that studies have shown that nearly 5000 square KM of windy areas are available for potential wind power generation in Sri  Lanka.” (Dated 12/04/2018.)

In  www.windpower.lk, it is stated that in wind power the potential for Sri Lanka  is 20,740MW”

Wind Power in Sri Lanka,a publication by The Asia Business Office (//www.asiabiomass.jp/English/topics/1601_04.html) states that the wind potential in Sri Lanka is 20,740 MW. In  its words there is strong potential for wind power in the North Western coastal regions of Northern Province, the highland areas of the Central Province, Sabaragamuwa and Uva.”

This Study  states that the windy land   can provide 50,000 MW.”.

My thanks are also due to the Editor of the Sunday Observer.lk who in Let there be Light” (Sunday Observer:06/09/2009) commented that my suggestions are very valuable. Referring tro my suggestion that the wind power in the Central Highlands should be harnessed says, This is a timely and valid proposal and the authorities should take  appropriate action to locate wind turbines in  areas which will enable them to reach their maximum potential.”

I am also thankful for Noor Nizam for his Wind Energy Electricity generation is a reality” (Sri Lanka Guardian:27/08/2009)  In his words, Garvin should be commended for his boldness to take to task the lethargic and selfish bureaucrats on this issue of renewal energy development of electricity energy in Sri Lanka…. His message should be well taken  by others too handling  national planning and development strategies  to assist the little island of 21 million to come out of the rut of poverty, misery, the destruction of the civil war and the dependence on foreign powers.”  He adds in the affirmative, As Garvin Karunaratne  wishes Wind Energy Electricity Generation  will be a reality in Sri Lanka for the next generation”.  It is my fervent hope that this will be realized.

The contents of this book convinces any sane thinking person that wind power can be harnessed. We have to learn from mistakes, not make the mistakes rule us. As a country we have to find ways and means of forging ahead,  heedless.

This study proves  beyond all doubt that there is ample wind capacity in Sri Lanka for self sufficiency in our power requirements through harnessing the wind.. There is no question about this..

I am dead certain that Sri Lanka can become self sufficient in all its power requirements not for its present stage but also for its future development through using wind power. The wind power in the Central and Sabaragamuwa Hills is vast. Methods and systems have to be found to harness this energy. However as long as we build wind turbines on the coastal areas and ignore the areas where there is real wind power and satisfy ourselves with studies of the difficulties and constraints,  our attempt will be like  that of a squirrel trying to empty the water in the ocean , carrying a bit of water on its tail,  endless.”

Let us try to look at our situation today. We are short of around 500 MW and we are purchasing it from Power Suply Multinationals and that at a staggering high cost of Rs 28 to Rs 30 per kw/hr. In short we are unable to avoid the power cuts totally.

I am of the firm opinion that Sri Lanka can become self sufficient in all its requirements of power through erecting a few hundred wind turbines in our hill country. Working in the Administrative Service my home was in the hills at Nuwara Eliya, at Kandy, at Kegalla, at Ratnapura, at Matara(including Sinharaja) and for the full eighteen years I worked my traveling claim on circuits equalled or at times surpassed my salary. 

I am aware that some foreign experts have ruled that the coastal areas in Puttlam are ideal. The foreigners would have seen Puttlam. I am dead certain. Why were they not housed in the Forest Circuit Bungalow at Ohia. My take is these days even the prestigious IMF clandestinely made President Jayawardena and Minister Ronnie de Mel accept the neoliberal development model of Milton Friedman and we all fell a prey resulting in Sri Lanka becoming indebted. Anyone doubting can read my book: How the IMF Sabotaged Third World Developmenmt(Godages/Kindle).

Even if our leaders decide to go ahead with Sampoor, it will easily take four years and a massive loan, which we have to pay back.

Instead, let me recommend that our leaders decide to put up a few hundred wind turbines in our hills, instead of building them on the coast trying to fool our leaders that wind pohey have actually become steamrollerwer does not work.

Let me make a suggestion. On my recent visit to worship the Avukana Buddha statue I saw thin tall concrete pillars made by our State Engineering Corporation holding the canopy.  Let us find the engineers who designed it and the unit that made it and ask them to design and make the wind turbines. I am certain that they can do that task. Import the turbine mechanism and get them installed.  Let our Administrators who have got blown off on circuit decide the sites. We have had administrators who knew no lunch intervals and no hours when they get activated. They become steamrollers, urging ahead, unstoppable even facing the wrath of local Ministers who at best can get them an immediate transfer. They would pack their bags and move on to another assignment, yet moving as steamrollers. Our leaders have to find them  and get them going.

If only our President will dare to get into the shoes of our great leader D.S. and get going in the manner DS directed the colonies and Gal Oya, and allow a few of us administrators to tackle this task it can be done. In my days we did  similar tasks. We can be self sufficient in all our Power requirements in a single year. I am dead certain about that. The foreign exchange needed to import the power sets can easily be re couped within six months. The rest of the expenses is in local Rupees- printed money. We will create employment for thousands and save foreign exchange in millions of dollars. We do not require any foreign exchange or foreign loans. Just buy the power sets with the dollars being used to buy coal and oil. That was how I secured an allocation of dollars to buy dyes for the Crayon Factory at Deniyaya in 1972. It was from the funds separated to import crayons. Minister Illangaratne and Controller Harry Guneratne  saved foreign exchange by reducing the imports of crayons.

These words come from a son of Sri Lanka who as the Commonwealth Fund Advisor on Youth to the Ministry of Manpower in Bangaladesh did design and establish the Youth Self Employment Programme of Bangladesh in two years- resulting in an ongoing programme which has guided over two million youths(upto 2011) to become self employed. An entire Ministry of Youth spend 95% of itstime to find drop out children, train and motivate them to become entrepreneurs- 160,000 a year>  It is easily the premier employment creation programme in the world today. That was a task which the ILO had failed to do in Bangladesh in the earlier three years.

It is a far  easier task to get a few hundred wind turbines erected than to motivate and guide youths to become entrepreneurs.

Garvin Karunaratne

Ph.D. Michigan State University.

10 th April 2019

The vicious cycle of increasing election related govt. expenditure, increasing govt. debt and increasing taxation

April 9th, 2019

Mahinda Rajapaksa Leader of the Opposition

According to the provisions in the Budget for 2019, all government servants are to be given a special allowance of Rs. 2,500. Pensions are to be increased. Samurdhi benefits are to be extended to an additional 600,000 families. Existing Samurdhi beneficiaries are to be allowed to withdraw up to Rs. 30,000 in two instalments this year from their accumulated funds in the Samurdhi Banks as spending money for the New Year and Christmas. The newly set up Office of Missing Persons is to pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 6,000 each for the families of all missing persons until the Office of Reparations is established and a larger sum paid. The fact that this is an election year, will naturally lead many people to suspect that all these provisions are election related.

The government seeks to justify extending Samurdhi benefits to an additional 600,000 families on the grounds that ‘deserving families’ had been kept out of the scheme for political reasons. It appears that the government suddenly became aware of that alleged long standing injustice only after ruling the country for over four years. The rhetoric of the government makes it obvious that the additional 600,000 Samurdhi recipients will be selected on political criteria for reasons more to do with elections than with poverty alleviation. There is an inherent contradiction in the government claiming on the one hand that poverty has been reduced and then increasing the number of Samurdhi recipients by over 40%. Furthermore, spending money for the New Year and Christmas is being released from the compulsory savings of Samurdhi recipients in 2019 when such a thing never happened in previous years. After releasing Rs. 30,000 in a single year, it is obvious that there will no money to be released in that manner in the coming years.

The purpose of having compulsory savings for Samurdhi recipients is to encourage the savings habit and to enable them to utilize that money for self-employment and other livelihood related activities. We have not heard of the compulsory savings of Samurdhi recipients being released as spending money for festivals. Except for this Rs. 30,000 coming out of the compulsory savings of the Samurdhi recipients, all the other measures mentioned above will result in an increase in government expenditure. Through their first Budget in 2015, the yahapalana government gave a special allowance of Rs. 10,000 to all government servants, reduced the price of fuel and gas and certain foodstuffs so as to win the Parliamentary election on August 2015. Thereafter, the taxes collected from the people were increased from Rs. 1,050 billion in 2014 to Rs. 1,355 billion in 2015 – an increase of Rs. 305 billion in a single year.

Such an increase would have been spread out over at least three years under my government. As a matter of policy, we kept the year-on-year increase in taxes within the range of Rs. 50 to 100 billion a year so as not to oppress the public. Under my presidency, the economy grew at an average annual rate of 6% from 2006 to 2009 despite a raging war and at 7.4% in the five post war years from 2010 to 2014. No government in post-independence history has achieved an average growth rate of 6% leave alone 7.4%. Because of that growth, the economy was able to absorb the relatively modest annual increases in taxation under my government. In 2019, the government hopes to collect Rs. 2,077 billion as taxes – twice the amount that was collected 2014. All that money is to be wrung out of the public in a context where the annual growth rate has declined to 5% in 2015, 4.5% in 2016, 3.1% in 2017 and it is expected to be around 3% in 2018.

The total outstanding government debt increased from Rs.7,391 billion in 2014 to more than Rs. 11,859 billion by the end of 2018 – an increase of 62%. This increase in debt has been incurred for no other purpose than paying for the cost of inducing people to vote for the yahapalana government. These enormous borrowings were not spent on any development work. When government salaries are increased, and various other concessions given, it may give the recipient the feeling that he has got something. But very soon, he finds that whatever is given by this government with one hand is taken away by the other. Due mainly to excessive taxation and currency depreciation, any salary increase given by this government disappears almost immediately.

The Rupee depreciated from Rs. 131 to the Dollar at the end of 2014 to reach around Rs.180 under yahapalana rule, driving up the prices of all imports. Under my government, taxes were much lower, and the exchange rate was controlled to prevent increases in the prices of imports. So whatever was given by my government as salary increases actually stayed in the hands of the recipients. The yahapalana finance minister who became popular by increasing government salaries by Rs. 10,000 and reducing the prices of fuel and foodstuffs was forced out of the finance ministry and assigned the foreign ministry within a couple of years after he became unpopular for increasing taxes to pay for those concessions. That gives an indication of the turnaround time between doling out concessions to win votes and having to pay for them under the yahapalana government.

Sri Lanka is now caught up in a vicious cycle of increasing government spending for the electioneering needs of the incumbent government, heavy borrowing to finance that expenditure and increased taxation of the public to service those loans.

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Leader of the Opposition

ඡන්ද පෙරදැරි කරගෙන ආණ්ඩුවේ වියදම් වැඩිකිරීම, එම වියදම් පියවීමට මහා පරිමාණයෙන් ණය ගැනීම, හා එම ණය ගෙවීමට මහා පරිමාණයෙන් බදු ගැසීමේ විෂම චක්‍රය

April 9th, 2019

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ විපක්‍ෂ නායක

2019 අයවැයට අනුව සියලුම රජයේ සේවකයින්ට රුපියල් 2,500ක විශේෂ මාසික දීමනාවක් දීමට නියමිතය. විශ්‍රාම වැටුප් ඉහළ දැමීමට නියමිතය. පවුල් 600,000ක් අලුතින් සමෘද්ධි ලාභීන් හැටියට බඳවා ගැනීමට නියමිතය. දැනට සිටින සමෘද්ධි ලාභීන්ට මෙම වසරේ තමන්ගේ අනිවාර්ය ඉතිරි කිරීම්වලින් අලුත් අවුරුද්දට හා නත්තලට වියදම් කිරීමට කොටස් දෙකකින් රුපියල් 30,000ක් මුදා හැරීමට නියමිතය. අලුතින් පිහිටුවන ලද අතුරුදහන්වුවන්ගේ කාර්යාලය විසින් සියලුම අතුරුදහන් වු පුද්ගලයින්ගේ පවුල්වලට රුපියල් 6,000ක මාසික දීමනාවක් ගෙවීමටත්, එම දීමනාව වන්දි කාර්යාලය පිහිටුවා වන්දි මුදල් ගෙවනතුරු පවත්වාගෙන යෑමටත් නියමිතය. මෙය මැතිවරණ වසරක් වන නිසා මේ සියල්ල මැතිවරණයට සම්බන්ධයක් තිබෙන බවට බොහෝ අය සැක කරනු ඇත.

ආණ්ඩුව තවත් පවුල් 600,000කට සමෘද්ධි ප්‍රතිලාභ ලබා දීම සාධාරණීකරණය කරන්නේ දේශපාලන හේතුන් මත සමෘද්ධිලාභීන් විය යුතු පවුල් විශාල ගණනකට එම ප්‍රතිලාභ අහිමි කර තිබු බව කියමිනි. මේ ආකාරයට දිගුකාලයක් තිස්සේ පැවතුනා යැයි කියන අසාධාරණයක් ආණ්ඩුවේ අවධානයට යොමු වී ඇත්තේ අවුරුදු හතරකට වඩා කාලයක් රට පාලනය කිරීමෙන් පසුව වීම මවිතයට හේතුවකි. ආණ්ඩුව මේ ගැන කරන ප්‍රකාශ වලින් පැහැදිලි වන්නේ අලුතින් බඳවා ගන්නා සමෘද්ධිලාභින් 600,000ය දේශපාලන නිර්ණායක මත තෝරා ගන්නා බවය. මෙවැන්නක් ඔවුන් කරන්නේ දුගීභාවය තුරන් කිරීම පෙරදැරි කරගෙන නොව ඡන්දය පෙරදැරි කරගෙන බව පැහැදිලිය. රටේ දුගීභාවය අඩු කළ බව කියන අතරම සමෘද්ධි ලාභීන්ගේ ගණන  42% කින් වැඩිකිරීම තුළ නෛසර්ගික පරස්පරතාවයක්ද ඇත. එමෙන්ම සමෘද්ධිලාභීන්ගේ අනිවාර්ය ඉතුරුම්වලින් අලුත් අවුරුද්ද හා නත්තල වෙනුවෙන් වියදම් කිරීමට මුදල් ලබා දීම වෙනත් වසරවලදී සිදු කර නැත. එක් අවුරුද්දක් තුල රු.30,000ක් මුදා හැරීමෙන් පසු ඉදිරි අවුරුදු වලදී එවැනි දීමනා ලබා දීමට මුදල් නැතිවන බවද පැහැදිලිය.

සමෘද්ධි ලාභින් සඳහා අනිවාර්ය ඉතුරුම් පවත්වාගෙන යන්නේ ඔවුන් තුළ ඉතිරි කිරීමේ පුරුද්ද ඇතිකිරීමටත්, ස්වයං රැකියා හා ජීවනෝපාය පවත්වාගෙන යෑම වැනි කටයුතුවලට යෙදවීම සඳහාය. උත්සවවලට වියදම් කිරීම සඳහා සමෘද්ධිලාභින්ගේ අනිවාර්ය ඉතිරි කිරීම් මුදා හැරීමක් ගැන මීට පෙර අපි අසා නැත. සමෘද්ධිලාභින්ගේ ඉතිරිකිරීම් වලින්  මුදාහැරීමට නියමිත මේ රුපියල් 30,000 හැරුණු විට ඉහත සඳහන් කරන ලද සියලුම සහන හේතුවෙන් ආණ්ඩුවේ වියදම් විශාල වශයෙන් වැඩි වනු ඇත. 2015 යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ පළමු අයවැයෙන් සියලු රජයේ සේවකයින්ට රුපියල් 10,000ක විශේෂ දීමනාවක් දීම, ඉන්ධන හා ගෑස් මිල මෙන්ම ඇතැම් ආහාර ද්‍රව්‍ය වල මිල පහත දැමීමද සිදුවිය. මෙයින් ඔවුන් බලාපොරොත්තු වුයේ 2015 අගෝස්තු මහ මැතිවරණය ජය ගැනීමය. ඉන්පසුව ඔවුන් කලේ 2014 දී රුපියල් බිලියන 1,050ක්  වු ආණ්ඩුවේ සමස්ථ බදු ආදායම 2015 අවුරුද්ද ඇතුළතම රුපියල් බිලියන 1,355ක් දක්වා වැඩි කර ගැනීමයි. මෙය එක් අවුරුද්දක් තුළ රුපියල් බිලියන 305 ක වැඩිවීමකි.  

රුපියල් බිලියන 305 ක් යනු අපේ ආණ්ඩුව යටතේ නම් අවම වශයෙන් අවුරුදු තුනක් පමණ මුළුල්ලේ සිදු කළ බදු වැඩි කිරීමකට සමාන මුදලකි. මහජනතාවට පීඩාවක් ගෙන නොදීම සඳහා අපි ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් හැටියට වසරකට සමස්ථ බදු ආදායම වැඩි කිරීම රුපියල් බිලියන 50 සිට බිලියන 100 දක්වා සාධාරණ පරාසයක් තුළ පවත්වාගෙන ගියෙමු. අපේ පාලන සමය තුළ 2006 සිට 2009 දක්වා දරුණු යුද්ධයක් තිබියදී වුවත් ආර්ථිකයේ සාමාන්‍ය වර්ධන වේගය වසරකට 6% ක් විය. යුද්ධය අවසන් වු පසු 2010 සිට 2014 දක්වා වූ වසර පහේදී  සාමාන්‍ය ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය 7.4% දක්වා වැඩි විය. නිදහස ලැබුණ දා සිට කිසිම ආණ්ඩුවක් 7.4%ක තබා 6%ක සාමාන්‍ය  වර්ධන වේගයක්වත් පවත්වාගෙන ගොස් නැත. අපේ පාලන සමය තුළ ආර්ථිකය ඒ ආකාරයට වර්ධනය වු නිසා ඒ කාලයේ පනවන ලද සාධාරණ බදු ආර්ථිකයට ඉතා පහසුවෙන් අවශෝෂණය කර ගැනීමට හැකි විය.  

2019 වසරේදී වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව රුපියල් බිලියන 2,077ක සමස්ථ බදු ආදායමක් මහජනතාවගෙන් එකතුකර ගැනීමට බලාපොරොත්තු වේ. එය 2014 දී එකතු කළ බදු ආදායම මෙන් දෙගුණයකි. ඒ ආකාරයට මහජනතාවගෙන් මොවුන් මුදල් ලබා ගැනීමට බලාපොරොත්තු වන්නේ ආර්ථිකයේ වර්ධන වේගය 2015 දී 5% දක්වාත්, 2016 දී 4.5% දක්වාත්, 2017 දී 3.1% දක්වාත්, අඩුවී තිබෙන තත්වයක් තුළය. 2018 වර්ධන වේගයද 3% ක් පමණ නොඉක්මවන බවට ගනන් බලා ඇත. මේ අඩු වර්ධන වේගය නිසා රටේ ජනතාවට වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුවෙන්  පනවන ආකාරයේ බදු බරක් දැරීමට ශක්තියක් නැත.

රජයේ සමස්ථ ණය බර 2014 අවසානයේදී රුපියල් බිලියන 7,391ක් වු අතර, 2018 අවසන් වන විට එය රුපියල් බිලියන 11,859ක් ඉක්මවා 62% කින්  වැඩි වී තිබුණි. මේ ආකාරයට ආණ්ඩුවේ ණය බර වැඩි වුයේ යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවට ඡන්දය දැමීමට මිනිසුන් පොළඹවා ගැනීමට ගිය වියදම් පියවා ගැනීමට මහා පරිමාණයෙන් ණය ගැනීම නිසාය. මේ දැවැන්ත ණය කන්දරාවෙන් පසුගිය අවුරුදු හතර මුළුල්ලේ කිසිදු සංවර්ධන වැඩක් සිදු වී නැත. ආණ්ඩුවෙන් වැටුප් වැඩි කරන විට නැතිනම් වෙනත් සහනයක් ලබා දෙන විට ඒ සහන ලැබූ අය තමන්ට යමක් ලැබුණා යැයි සිතා සතුටු වේ. නමුත් වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව එක් අතකින් දෙන දෙය අනෙක් අතින් ඉතා ඉක්මනින් ඩැහැ ගනී. වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව යටතේ සිදුවන කෙළවරක් නැති බදු ගැසීම  හා රුපියලේ අගය කඩා වැටීම නිසා ලැබෙන වැටුප් වැඩිවීම් ඉතා ඉක්මනින් අතුරුදහන් වේ.

2014 දී ඇමරිකානු  ඩොලරයට රු.131ක් වු විනිමය අනුපාතය යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව යටතේ  රුපියල් 180 දක්වා වැඩි වීම හේතුවෙන් සියලුම ආනයනික භාණ්ඩවල මිල ඉහළ ගොස් ඇත. අපේ  ආණ්ඩුව පැවති සමයේදී මහජනතාවට දැරීමට සිදු වු බදු බර අදට වඩා බෙහෙවින්ම අඩු වු අතර ආනයනික භාණ්ඩවල මිල වැඩිවීම වැලැක්වීම සඳහා විනිමය අනුපාතයද අපි පාලනයකට යටත් කොට පවත්වාගෙන ගියෙමු. එම නිසා අපේ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් ලබාදුන් වැටුප් වැඩිවීම වැනි සහන සත්‍ය වශයෙන්ම ජනතාවගේ අතේ රැදිණි. රජයේ සේවකයින්ට රුපියල් 10,000ක විශේෂ දීමනාවක් ලබා දී ඉන්ධන හා ඇතැම් ආහාර ද්‍රව්‍ය වල මිල අඩු කළ පළමු යහපාලන මුදල් ඇමතිවරයා අවුරුදු දෙකක් වැනි කෙටි කාලයක් තුළ බදු වැඩි කිරීම හේතුවෙන් ජනප්‍රියතාවයෙන් පිරිහුණු නිසා ඔහුව මුදල් අමාත්‍යංශයෙන් ඉවත් කොට විදේශ අමාත්‍යංශයට  යවනු ලැබුවේය. යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව විසින් සහන ලබාදිම, හා ඒ හේතුව නිසාම වැඩියෙන් බදු ගෙවීමට පටන් ගැනීමට සිදුවන කාල පරාසය පිළිබඳව යම් අදහසක් ඒ සිදුවීමෙන් අපට ලබාගත හැක.

පවතින ආණ්ඩුවේ මැතිවරණ අවශ්‍යතා සඳහා ආණ්ඩුවේ වියදම් වැඩි කිරීම, එම වියදම් පියවීම සඳහා  මහා පරිමාණයෙන් ණය ගැනීම, හා එසේ ලබා ගත් ණය ගෙවීමට මහජනතාව මත මහා පරිමාණයෙන් බදු බර පැටවීම යන විෂම චක්‍රයට ශ්‍රී ලංකාව අද  හසුවී සිටී.

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

විපක්‍ෂ නායක

Neoliberal economic invasion of SL led by U.S.

April 9th, 2019

By Prof. Tissa Vitarana Courtesy Ceylon Today

BMost people in Sri Lanka are unhappy (Sri Lanka has dropped from the 116th place to the 130th place in the United Nations global ‘Happiness Index,’ out of 156 countries, this year), deeply concerned and bewildered by what is going on in our country. They keep asking what is happening, what is going to happen?”. The Ranil Wickremesinghe (RW) Administration is breaking down, and instead of the promised good governance there is a failure of governance, featured by open corruption from the very top, waste, disregard for the law of the land including the Constitution, nepotism, partisan abuse of State resources and lack of clear and consistent policy decisions, leading to a collapse of most utility services. 

The level to which the RW-led Government has sunk is clear from one example: The day light robbery at the Central Bank which is covered up and not taken up by the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID), set up to take speedy action against financial fraud. The FCID has failed to get the evidence even to back up the serious allegations made against the previous regime, and is being used mainly to harass and take revenge from RW’s political opponents. There is a growth of the underworld and an increase in the drug trade with a breakdown of societal values. 

Administration and society itself is in a State of virtual chaos.


The economy too is in deep crisis bordering on bankruptcy. Prices are soaring, incomes are falling, personal debt is widespread, poverty, malnutrition and suicides are on the rise. The average economic growth rate has dropped from 7 per cent, during the Mahinda Rajapaksa (MR) regime, to 3 per cent with the RW regime. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are closing down. Foreign debt has soared, reaching a debt repayment level of US$ 6 billion for this year, and similar levels for the next five years. The wrong tax policy, where 87 per cent of Government income comes from the people (99 per cent) and only 13 per cent is from the rich (1 per cent) is a major factor causing the adverse foreign trade balance, where the cost of imports is double the export earnings. The increased demand for US dollars (USD) has led to more and more foreign borrowing by the RW Government, and also opened the door for the sale of our assets to multinational corporations (MNCs), which had been banned earlier.


Superficially, these appear to be an outcome of mere incompetence and the clash of policies and personalities at the top. But they are part of, and hide, a well thought out and meticulously executed plan that commenced with the foreign plot led by the USA that toppled the MR regime in 2015, and installed a UNP/SLFP Unity Government, really led by RW. It is a part of the USA global pattern of regime change to install puppet regimes to implement neoliberal change.


Neoliberalism


Neoliberalism originated at a meeting of leading capitalist economists held in France in 1947, led by Prof. Milton Friedman, Head of the USA’s Chicago School of Economics, among others. These ideas were aimed at finding a means of sustainably emerging from the deepening global crisis of capitalism which was affecting the USA and Europe worst. The basic concept was that State regulation of the economy should be taken over by market forces. There should be maximal privatisation of the State sector. 

The development of the individual and private companies, maximising their profit, should be supported by the State, and not impeded in any way. Any action of the State for the common good that interferes with the advancement of the individual or private company is considered to be against human and fundamental rights. In fact, these ideas are included in the USA’s company law. The welfare State must be dismantled and handed to the private sector. With globalisation, the barriers of the nation State, acting in the interest of its people and national economy must be removed, to enable the free flow of money, goods, and services across countries. 

This enables private capital and giant multinational corporations from the USA and Europe to freely exploit our resources, like in the colonial period, without the need to physically occupy our territory. What is required is to have a puppet regime in power, which will facilitate the implementation of the neoliberal agenda. To ensure that this would be done globally the Washington Consensus was signed in the 1970s between the Government of the USA, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank (WB).

Role of USA/IMF/World Bank

To compel our countries to fall in line with this neoliberal agenda, the internal policies should make us fall into a position of increased foreign debt. For this, our USD outflows should exceed inflows, by making Sri Lanka give up its self-sufficiency policy and become import-dependent. By minimising the tax burden on the rich (24 per cent upper slab), they can increase the import of luxuries (vehicles and similar items). 

The Government is thus forced to take more and more foreign loans and get deeper into debt. The IMF/WB then step in to help with concessionary loans (around 6 per cent interest), provided we conform with their conditions. This includes the complete dismantling of the welfare State and its sale to local and foreign private capital. Along with this the ban on the sale of land, and our national assets to foreigners, should be removed. The restriction of land holdings to 50 acres must go. The door must be opened for the free outflow of profits. The UNP Government has agreed with the IMF so that foreign MNCs can take over our economy.


One would expect RW as Premier not to allow such a thing to happen. But he is also Chairman of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of Conservatives International (headed by the Republican Party of the USA) and it this role that he fulfils. Agreements enable the USA military to make full use of our bases, including Trincomalee, and US troops while here are not bound by Sri Lankan law, but that of the USA. 

The UNP has surrendered our independence and sovereignty. In addition, the proposed Labour legislation, (12-hour working day, Saturday half a day with no salary increase) will help foreigners to further exploit our workers. The draconian Counter Terrorism Act (CTA) will enable the ruling Party to establish a Police State, and stay on in power without elections.

Court told “Madush to be deported”

April 9th, 2019

HANSI NANAYAKKARA Courtesy Ceylon Today

Deputy Solicitor General (DSG) Dileepa Peiris informed Colombo Fort Chief Magistrate Ranga Dissanayaka today (9) that underworld kingpin Makandure Madush, who is currently detained by the Bur Dubai Police, is to be deported to Colombo during the course of this week.

He was representing the Attorney General when the case against imprisoned former Deputy Inspector General of Police Nalaka de Silva was taken up for hearing at the Colombo Fort Chief Magistrate’s Court today.

Nalaka de Silva is a suspect in the alleged plot to assassinate the President and former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Magistrate Dissanayaka ordered the Criminal Investigation Department to submit the evidence related to the case when it is next taken up for hearing on 23 April.

The Court also announced that at the next hearing it will be decided on whether to enlarge the suspect de Silva on bail or not.

Magistrate Dissanayaka also ordered the CID to provide security to the Operations Director of Anti-Corruption Force, Namal Kumara, who spilled the beans regarding the alleged assassination plot, under the provisions of the Assistance to and Protection of Witnesses and Victims of Crime Act

Gota committed to giving up US citizenship: SLPP

April 9th, 2019

Kelum Bandara Courtesy The Daily News

Amid reports of lawsuits being filed against former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa in the US, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) said he had made an irrevocable decision to renounce his US citizenship despite it being the best source of protection against allegations of war crimes.

At a news conference SLPP chairman G.L. Peiris referred to the remarks made by Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo on Friday that international officials trying to prosecute American military personnel will not be allowed to enter the US.

We are determined to protect the American, allied, and civilian personnel from living in fear of unjust prosecutions for actions taken to defend our great nation,” Mr. Pompeo told reporters at the State Department.

Commenting on these remarks Prof. Peiris said Mr. Rajapaksa as a US citizen had the best protection from war crimes allegations but however he would say goodbye to all these facilities by renouncing his US citizenship.

He said he wondered how frivolous attempts by some elements could thwart the renunciation of his US citizenship. Prof. Peiris said the attempt by Sunday Leader Editor Lasantha Wickramatunga’s daughter Ahimsa was in connection with an incident that took place more than ten years ago. He said there was another action being pursued against Mr. Rajapaksa in connection with an incident that took place in 2007.

Prof. Peiris said Mr. Rajapaksa had visited the US every year, but no case had been filed. However, he said the action which had been initiated so suddenly could be connected to the presidential election.  (

Namal Kumara to be given witness protection

April 9th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

The Colombo Fort Magistrate’s Court today instructed the police to provide necessary security to anti-corruption activist and police informant Namal Kumara, under the victims and witness protection act.

The attorneys representing Namal Kumara had requested from the court that police security be provided for their client, who is a main witness in the case pertaining to the alleged VIP assassination plot, under the aforementioned act.

When the case was taken up for hearing today (9), the magistrate allowed the request and instructed the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) to proceed with the request and make the necessary arraignments. 

Meanwhile former DIG Nalaka de Silva, who was arrested by the CID over the suspected plot to assassinate President Maithripala Sirisena and former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, was further remanded until April 23.

In September last year, the self-styled Director (Operations) of Anti-Corruption Movement, Namal Kumara had revealed information of the conspiracy and the alleged conversations that he has had with former DIG Nalaka de Silva regarding the assassination plot.

The CID subsequently commenced investigations regarding the alleged conspiracy and has recorded statements from both Namal Kumara and the former DIG on multiple occasions.

Nalaka de Silva, the former Director of the Terrorism Investigation Division (TID) was arrested by the CID on October 25, 2018.

Get divorced in just 6 months, England to amend archaic matrimonial laws

April 9th, 2019

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Written by Staff Writer    09 Apr, 2019 | 11:02 AM

Colombo (News1st) : England and Wales have begun the process overhauling their divorce laws which are nearly 50 years old.The new amendments to the legislation are expected to allow couples to split faster and with less acrimony. The new rules will set a timeline of 6 months for the entire process (from petition to decree absolute), following the 6 month period the applicants will be required to confirm whether they wish to proceed with the divorce.

Amendments have been suggested to the existing laws following a 12-week public consultation which had shown widespread support for no-fault divorce.According to foreign media reports British Justice Secretary David Gauke has described the new changes as and elimination of the current blame game.” The existing matrimonial causes act of 1973 requires an applicant to prove that their partner is at fault for adultery, desertion or unreasonable behaviour for a divorce to be settled, else both parties can agree they could be allowed to part after two years.

The changes are also expected to put an end to dispute where one partner refuses to grant a divorce, an issue which came into the spotlight when Supreme Court of the UK ruled that a 68-year-old Worcestershire woman must remain married to her husband of 40 years till 2020. The petitioner had filed for divorce stating that she was unhappy, but the husband rejected the divorce request which eventually led to the SC rejecting her appeal.

Recently I was listening to a sermon of a young monk who has travelled a lot .He was talking about the lack of marale values among Sri Lankan youngsters .Among Muslims prophet has advised that simple statement in front of a priest is good enough to divorce one’s wife .But among other religions it is not that easy.Judges in Sri Lanka try to uphold moral values and try to discourage divorces .The monk was telling the almost 60 % of newly weds tend to get divorced !One new items quoted that there ae 400 divorces per day in Sri Lanka !

We need to amend our laws like in some Equropean countries that the couple should live together for at least 2 years before seeking a divorce only on following grounds

  • communication problems
  • loss of connection
  • infidelity/trust issues
  • physical or emotional abuse
  • alcohol and drug addiction
  • financial problems
  • work/time pressures
  • family interference
  • physical health or mental health issues

After two years of a marriage the couple should be allowed to divorce OR the public should turn blind eye to the concept of living together for some time to check their compatibility .

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

ඝෝෂාකාරී නළා භාවිතා කරන රියදුරන්ට ජූලි පළමුදා සිට දැඩි නීති-(ඉන්දිකා රාමනායක දිවයින)

April 9th, 2019

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

රථවාහන නීති උල්ලංඝණය කරමින් විවිධ නාදරටා සහිත ඝෝෂාකාරී  ශබ්ද සිහිත නළා පරිහරනය කරන සහ පීඩාකාරී ලෙස අලෝක රටා භාවිතා කරන  බස් රථ ඇතුළු වාහන වල රියදුරන්ට ජූලි මස 1 වැනිදා සිට දැඩිව නීතිය කි‍්‍රයාත්මක කරන බව රථවාහන භාර නියෝජ්‍ය පොලිස්පති  අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා පැවසීය.

වාහනවල සවිකර ඇති මෙම නළා සහ ආලෝක රටා  ඉවත් කර කිරීම සඳහා  සියලූ වාහන වලට සහ මාස තුනක සහන කාලයක් ලබා දී ඇති බවද අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා කියා සිටියේය.

අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා මේ බව කියා සිටියේ පොලිස් මුලස්ථානයේ දී අද (8)  පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදීය. මෙම මාධ්‍ය සාකච්ඡාවට පොලිස් මාධ්‍ය ප‍්‍රකාශක පොලිස් අධිකාරි රුවන් ගුණසේකර මහතාද සහභාගී විය.

මහජනයාට ඝෝශාකාරී  නළා සහිත බස් රථ, මෝටර් රථ,  වෑන් රථ  ති‍්‍රරෝද රථය,  යතුරු පැදි ඇතුළු වාහන පදවන  රියදුරන්ට විරුද්ධව නඩු පැවරීමෙන් පසු රුපියල් 3000 සිට 5000 නොඅඩු  දඩයක්  නියම කර ඇති බවත් හෙතෙම කීය.

කර්කෂ ඝෝෂාකාරී  ද්විත්ව ස්වර නළා නාද කරමින් වාහන ධාවන කිරීම නිසා  මාර්ගය පරිහරණය කරන සහ වාහනයේ ගමන් ගන්නා මහජනයා  අපහසුතාවට පත්කරමින්, භිය උපදවන,  කරදරයක් වන අයුරින්, රථ ධාවන කරන රියදුරන්ට  රුපියල් 10,000 සිට 20,000 ට නොඅඩු  දඩයකට යටත් කළ හැකි බවද අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා සඳහන් කළේය.

ඉහත වරද යටතේ ගැනෙන  නළා ශබ්ද කරමින් රථ ධාවන කිරීම නිසා  යම් පුද්ගලයකුට තුවාල සිදුවන අවස්ථාවක  එම රියදුරුට රුපියල් 10,000 සිට 20,000 ක නොවැඩි  දඩයක් සහ මාස 2 ට නොවැඩි කාලයක  සිරදඩුවම් සහ   රියදුරු බලපත‍්‍රය අත්හිටුවීමට අධිකරණයට බලයක් ඇති බවද ඒ මහතා කියා සිටියේය.

ඉහත වැරදි යටතේ  යම් කිසි පුද්ගලයකුට බරපතල තුවාල සිදු වුවහොත්  රියදුරුට අමතරව  රථයේ ලියා පදිංචි හිමිකරුට ද රුපියල් 25,000 සිට 35,000 නොවැඩි දඩයකට හා මාස 6 ක නොවැඩි සිරදඩුවමක් හා  රියදුරු බලපත‍්‍ර අත්හිටුවීමටද අධිකරණයට හැකියාවක් ඇති බවද නියෝජ්‍ය පොලිස්පති අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා කියා සිටියේය.

ඉහත වරද යටතේ නලා ශබ්ද කරමින් ගමන් කර පුද්ගලයකුට මරණය    සිදුකරන අවස්ථාවක  වාහන පදවන රියදුරාට  හා  ලියාපදිංචි අයිතිකරුට   රුපියල් 50,000 සිට 75,000 ට නොවැඩි   දඩයක් හා   වසරකට නොවැඩි   සිරදඩුවමක්,  රියදුරු බලපත‍්‍රය   අත්හිටුවීමට අධිකරණයට බලය ඇති බවද  අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා පැවසීය.

මෝටර් වාහන පනතේ අනුව යම් නලාවක  තිබිය යුත්තේ තනි ස්වරයක් පමණක් බවද කීය.

තනි ස්වරය නලාවක් වුවත් එය ඉදිරිපස සිට මීටර් දෙකක් ඇතුළත ශබ්දය පරික්ෂා කිරීමේ දී එය ඩෙසිබල් 93ට  නොඅඩු විය යුතු බවත් වාහනයේ ඉදිරිපස සිට  මීටර්  07 ක්  ඇතුළත ශබ්දය ප‍්‍රමාණය ඩෙසිබල් 105 නොඅඩු බවද අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා කියා සිටියේය.

ආරක්ෂක අමාත්‍යාශය  මේ සඳහා ශබ්දය මැනීමේ උපකරණ 200 ක් පොලිස් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව වෙත ප‍්‍රධානය කර ඇති බවද පැවසේ.

තවද මෝටර්  වාහන වල ආලෝක සංඥා  නිමි නිමී දැල්වෙන  රටාවලින්  යුත් ආලෝක  සංඥා   පාවිච්චි කළ හැක්කේ මෝටර් රථයේ   ඉදිරිපස හා  පිටුපස  ඇති  සිග්නල් ලයිට් දෙක  සඳහා පමණක් බවත් අජිත් රෝහණ මහතා   සඳහන් කළේය.

මෙම කරුණු වලට  පටහැනිව  කටයුතු කරන රියදුරන්ට රුපියල් 2500 සිට රුපියල් 25000  දක්වා  දඩ නියම කළ හැකි බවද ඒ මහතා කියා සිටියේය.

I have suggested to include some more violators in the prohibition list who break  environmental  rule such as early moring and noon prayers emanating from loud speakers disturbing  the people and  school children  .

Many writers have complained about ” Paan Choon ” -tuk tuk traders making the annoying noise by playing loud music to show their presence .

Some poor little ricj kids play loud Regae music or other tyoe  rapper music in their flashy cars and disturb neughbourhood 

Rule should be that any sound level going beyound 50 to 60 Decibells at the dictance of 10 meters should be prohibited . ( 93 decibells at 2 meters is too loud ) 

We are a nation depending on tourism ,We need to shos our visistors that we are discilined 

ps

Recently i woke up ealry morning and switched on to one of the TV channels and listended to Piriteh chanting .Ever polular “Atanatiya” pirith was on full sound which is meant to be heard by Devils ( Kunbandayo)  etc so that they are chased  away .

I suggested to my wife that this chanting should be played every day by Ditwanna Lake at about 150 Decibells so that all the Kumdbayas’ in the house of commons are driven away !

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Sri Lanka- Rajiv Gandhi gave his bullet-proof vest to Prabakaran

April 9th, 2019

Courtesy MENAFN

img

Date4/1/2019 10:30:09 AM 

(MENAFN – Colombo Gazette) The then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi gave his bullet-proof jacket to LTTE leader Velupillai Prabakaran in Delhi, besides Rs 50 lakh as first instalment of Rs 5 crore aid to LTTE, and wanted the LTTE to allow implementation of the Indo-Lanka accord, AIADMK leader Panruti S Ramachandran said in an exclusive interview to News Today TV.

The accord was signed in my presence as the then Chief Minister of Tamilnadu, MGR, had deputed me as his emissary to Colombo to be at hand for the agreement over the pact, Panruti said.

He is virtually the sole survivor of the accord as the other principal parties, including Rajiv Gandhi, Jayawardene, Premadasa, Prabakaran and MGR are no more.

Recounting the parleys held by Rajiv Gandhi with MGR and himself, and also with Prabakaran and other leaders of Sri Lankan Tamils, Panruti said Rajiv had sent Indian ambassador Dixit to meet MGR and secure his approval for the Indo-Lankan accord.

‘I was also present at the meeting. The accord contained several features which included elections to a single provincial council of Sri Lanka’s north and east which for the first time indirectly conceded the Tamil homeland concept to the island’s Tamils. The accord provided for rule by the LTTE and others through a council in the Tamil areas. The Indian government was the guarantor of the accord which was unusual in the world where another country was asked to guarantee the pact.’

‘MGR had a dilemma as though he was in favour of the accord and wanted its implementation as requested by Rajiv Gandhi, he held discussions with Prabakaran but could not convince him to accept it. MGR was upset that he tried and failed to convince Prabakaran who was adamant that he could not accept anything less than Tamil Eelam country,’ recalled Panruti.

Later, the Union government invited MGR to Delhi for the final round of talks before Rajiv’s departure to Colombo. ‘MGR brought me along to Delhi. After discussions with Rajiv Gandhi when he urged us to secure Prabakaran’s approval, MGR and I again held talks with Prabakaran at Tamil Nadu House in Delhi. Prabakaran was assisted by Balasingham. Prabakaran expressed his inability to support the accord as the LTTE stood for Tamil Eelam,’ said Ramachandran.

When Prabakaran met Rajiv Gandhi, the PM said India would not ask the LTTE to sign the accord. It merely wanted the LTTE to allow the peaceful implementation of the pact and not stand in its way. Rajiv also told Prabakaran that the LTTE need not lay down arms.

Prabakaran was told that the LTTE could bury their arms at a safe place in Tamilnadu from where it could retrieve them at a later date, if needed. India also offered LTTE the chief ministership of the Tamil province of north and east, and administration through a council which could also include other Tamil leaders.

Rajiv gave his bullet-proof jacket to Prabakaran and also Rs 50 lakh as first instalment of Rs 5 crore aid to the LTTE, Panruti said.

‘MGR deputed me to attend the signing of the accord in Colombo on his behalf. I found that the entire capital was under curfew and there was scarcely any movement outside. The accord was signed by Rajiv Gandhi and Jayawardene in my presence. However, it was clear that the Buddhist clergy and the Sinhalese leaders were against the accord as they felt it gave too many rights to the island’s Tamils. Rajiv Gandhi was also attacked with a rifle by a Sri Lankan navy sailor but was saved in time,’ said Panruti.

Subsequently, at a public function on the Marina in Chennai to celebrate the signing of the accord, Rajiv Gandhi publicly thanked MGR for his support to the accord, Panruti said.

MGR had great respect for Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, and held Jawaharlal Nehru and his family in high esteem, Panruti added. He was also in the Congress earlier, attracted by Nehru’s ideology and speeches. He often would break into tears on seeing the photo of Indira Gandhi next to his bed in Chennai, as she had visited Apollo Hospital where he was hospitalised and she had made arrangements for his plane journey to the US for treatment but was later assassinated, Panruti recalled.

Asked whether he thought the LTTE should have accepted a political solution in the form of the accord and the post of chief ministership, as subsequently they got isolated and were defeated in the war with the Lankan defence forces, Panruti said the LTTE should have considered the fact that the global situation had changed and that world over no country wanted to support terror or terrorist organisations. The LTTE was labelled as a terrorist organisation in the world. There was no way countries would support or recognise Tamil Eelam. The LTTE should have realised that Tamil Eelam was not feasible.’

Late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, in the early eighties, had ordered training for Sri Lankan Tamil militants in India in the use of fire arms which, in fact, was questioned by some countries, as it amounted to supporting militancy. Later, after the assassination of Indira Gandhi, the Indian government under Rajiv Gandhi took the decision not to support terrorism, and consequently, the Sri Lankan groups were also told to accept a political solution granting powers to the Tamil area equivalent to a State in India, Panruti said.

Unfortunately, the LTTE could not change its stand in accordance with reality. Prabakaran himself said he did not need India’s support for the Tamil Eelam struggle and merely wanted it to recognise Eelam. When India itself said it would not support the cause of Eelam, LTTE should have realised that it was a futile exercise and not feasible. However, the LTTE stand led to ultimate defeat in the war with Lankan forces.

Not only Rajiv Gandhi, subsequent prime ministers V P Singh, Narasimha Rao and Vajpayee declared that they could not support a Tamil Eelam and that the Lankan Tamil groups should accept a political solution in accordance with the accord, Panruti said.

Particularly after the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, all governments in India including that of Narendra Modi said they would not support Tamil Eelam and wanted the island Tamils to accept a political solution, Panruti pointed out.

On the role of the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) in Sri Lanka, he said it was strange that the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government led by President Premadasa got together and asked the IPKF to leave Sri Lanka.

He said he was involved in an election campaign in May 1991 when he heard of the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi at Sriperumbudur and said he was shocked.

After the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, all governments in the world, including India, and Indian PMs like Narasimha Rao, Deve Gowda, Gujral, Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh and Modi decided on a hands-off policy towards Sri Lanka, Panruti said, adding that India, thereafter, refused to intervene in Sri Lankan affairs. (Colombo Gazette)

Video story on Sino-Lankan Colombo International Container Terminal

April 9th, 2019

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, April 9: The Colombo International Container Terminals (CICT) in which the China Merchants Port Holdings Company Limited is a partner, has reported handling 2.65 million teus for the 12 months ending 31st December 2018, recording a 13 percent increase in its annual throughput and contributing 38 percent of the Port of Colombo’s volumes in the year just concluded.

A significant factor in the achievement of 7 million teus by the Port of Colombo, CICT’s performance helped the port increase its total throughput by 14 percent in 2018, a noteworthy accomplishment in the region.

Announcing the year’s final volume, CICT said ULCCs (Ultra Large Container Carriers) of a size that only CICT is capable of handling, had contributed 70 percent to the volumes the Terminal achieved for the year.

CICT handles mega container vessels from all three major shipping line alliances. With the geographical coverage of these services and the high frequency of mainline liner service connections, CICT has helped the Port of Colombo to move up the Drewry’s Port Connectivity Index to be ranked the 11th best-connected port in the world.

The concluded year has been a prolific one for CICT: besides being adjudged the Best Container Terminal in Asia in the Under 4 million teus at the Asian Freight, Logistics and Supply Chain (AFLAS) Awards for the second consecutive year, CICT also handled MV.

Ever Golden, the first 20,000+ teu vessel of Evergreen to call on Colombo, as well as the 14,000 teu ‘One Columba’ – the first magenta colour vessel to call on Colombo.

The company was also responsible for salvaging the storm-ravaged ‘MV Theseus’ earlier in the year.

In its engagements with the community in 2018, CICT continued to be the principal sponsor of the SLTA’s wheelchair tennis programme, was the strategic partner of the National Chamber of Exports initiative to develop local exporters, and won the softball cricket tournament organised by the Chamber of Commerce.

CICT recently also announced the addition of two new mega Quay Gantry Cranes (QGCs), six new Rubber-tyred Gantry Cranes (RTGs) and 12 Prime Movers to enable the handling of 22,000+ teu vessels and further develop the deepwater capacity of the Port of Colombo. This enhancement is planned for completion by March 2019.

Besides its significant contributions to the growth of the Port of Colombo in volume terms, CICT is also responsible for several firsts in service innovation and eco-friendly operations.

In early 2016, the company launched a US$ 10 million programme to convert its fleet of diesel operated rubber-tyred-gantry cranes to electricity driven rubber-tyred gantry cranes (E-RTGs) which have zero carbon emissions.

CICT is the first and currently the only deep-water terminal in South Asia equipped with facilities to handle the largest vessels afloat.

Since its inception in 2014, the terminal has incrementally grown the volume it has handled; from 686,639 teus in 2014, to 1,561,931 teus in 2015, 2,002,580 teus in 2016, and 2,388,506 teus in 2017.

In its last four full years of operation, CICT has brought some of the largest vessels plying the Asia-Europe routes to Colombo.

Of these, Milan Maersk (20,568 TEU), MSC Maya (19,224 TEU), Mogens Maersk (18,300 TEU), MSC New York (16,652 TEU), CMA CGM Marco Polo (16,020 TEU), Edith Maersk and EMC Thalassa Hellas (each 14,000 plus TEUs) and their sister vessels are now regular callers at CICT.

CAN UN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION GO AGAINST UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS?

April 9th, 2019

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

UN Human Rights Commission has established with specific purposes and the commission has no right to go against the human rights of people based on the recommendation of its bureaucrats, who are not above the human rights declaration of the United Nations. I read an article in the Sunday Observer on 07.04.2019 written by Dr S.W. premaratne on Involvement of the United Nations in the Reconciliation Process.  I was really surprised to read that the United Nations has taken into consideration the present state of political instability in Sri Lanka and the possibility of a change of government that would reverse the progress of already made after the co-sponsoring resolution 30/1.” Further article stated that the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in a report warned that the political crisis at the end of 2018 further obstructed the progress owing not only to temporally paralysis investigation but also it generated fear that another government might not embrace the reconciliation agenda”.

I have not read the report mentioned in the article of the Sunday Observer, if it is an accurate statement, there would be serious implications regarding operations of the Human Rights Commission. Many people in Sri Lanka showed the concern on the resolution 30/1 and 31/1 which were not legally binding to Sri Lanka.  If so, why some people in Sri Lanka are too much talking and writing about the resolution, which is non-binding to the country.  Think about Israel and Cuba, many resolutions were passed regarding human rights of those countries but people of those countries did not so concern about such resolutions.  The best thing to do is forget about non-binding resolutions and do own work.  However, there are some points need to be discussed as such points have emerged after this report.

When I read the statement, I had a reasonable doubt that did the United Nations passed a resolution without proper contents to cover any government of Sri Lanka to be elected in the future to honour the resolution?   The general understanding of people in Sri Lanka is that the United Nations and its agencies do commonly acceptable work to any government of a country with a proper consultation of every parties involved in an issue. If the UN Human Rights Commission has doubt about future governments in Sri Lanka that they might not embrace the reconciliation agenda, it means that that the UN Human Rights Commission has not prepared the reconciliation agenda with a proper consultation with binding contents cover all future governments.   The implied democracy of the United Nations is it is common to all human in this world without considering political or racial differences. During the cold war time UN respected the views of US as well as the views of Soviet Union and why didn’t the UN agency of the Human Rights Commission follow the popular democracy in the world, when it was passing 30/1 resolution for Sri Lanka. Why didn’t consult opposition in Sri Lanka passing the resolution. Can the United Nations agency pass such a non-unbidding resolution and push a country to follow the conditions of a resolution?  This is a question that experts in international matters to be answered.

Regarding the reconciliation process and the resolutions passed, the following points also need to consider.

  • Some journalists in Sri Lanka appear to be writing too much on this issue as they have nothing to write attracting readers in the country, so they want to write something repeatedly to scare people and secure the job in the workplace.
  • UN bureaucrats and Sri Lankan foreign service people and people who are expecting to involve in this matter concern on their posts and if the matter is over the jobs of them will be ended.  In this environment, they need to continue the issue like a beggar’s wound.  Therefore, it seems that many attempts launching a scare mongering campaign in favour of the job but it is not the United Nations’ official statement.
  • Sri Lanka and India had a doubt about Norway led reconciliation process in Sri Lanka and India is still observing it. If any attempt to create problem in India especially for the unity of India it would not allow to pass any resolution.
  • Sri Lanka had a mediation for a reconciliation under Lord Buddha and never had a controversy like this.  Sri Lanka used to obtain outside support to reconciliation if it is going proper manner.
  • No country can pass a legally binding resolution against Sri Lanka in unreasonable manner as the country has a veto support from China and Russia. UK and other countries supported countries for the resolution 30/1 are fully aware of the situation.
  • United Nations’ human rights agency cannot go against the fundamental rights of people in voting of a democratic election, which is a human right or expressing public will and the UN will not go against free and fair election result of a country and cast doubt about the will of people.  United Nations is the highest democratic organization in the world.
  • Finally, the UN Human Rights Commission cannot directly or indirectly influence to an election in a country.  If it happens it would be violation of its charter.

Importing exotic cows which performed poorly under local conditions

April 9th, 2019

By Ananda Wickramasinghe

View(s):

In 2017, over 5000 young pregnant cows (heifers) imported from Australia and New Zealand, were sold to some farmers. They were assured that a cow would yield 20 litres/day. Within a few months, the farmers’ expectations started to shatter when the cows failed to produce the promised milk yields. Currently, farmers are facing financial ruin as a consequence of several grave issues with the cows they purchased: Poor milk yields, very low conception rate, abortions, stillbirths, high mortality rates, and unrecognised diseas

Some of the imported cows.

This article is an attempt to examine the reasons for the poor performance of imported cows under local conditions.

The dairy cow is a biological milk-producing plant which converts nutrients, derived from a variety of dietary constituents, into a nutritious product. The quantity and quality of milk governed by factors such as cow’s genetic makeup, quality of feed, management practices and surrounding environmental conditions.

The imported cows were a cross-bred between Holston Friesian (HF) and Jersey. The high milk producing capability of HF and Jersey’s ability to tolerate high-temperature conditions could be the reasons the authorities selected such a cross-breed. Since past information of the animals was not divulged, it is not possible to state much about the history of these heifers.

Assuming that the heifers have the required genetic potential to produce higher milk quantities, let’s examine whether factors such as poor quality of feed, bad management practices or unfavourable environmental conditions caused these disturbing issues.

Quality of feed

Some authorities have alleged that farmers fed cows with a poor quality feed which triggered the issues with the animals. According to the farmers, at the start animals were fed with a recommended feed mixture. However, once they noticed the cows were not economical some started to feed them with locally available fodder.

The digestibility rate of high fibrous grass such as matured ‘Gini’ is quite low and it can generate a high level of body heat during the digestion process. Such a situation can adversely affect the milk production capabilities of a cow.

If the poor quality feed is the cause, one has to query how government-owned National Livestock Board (NLDB) farms failed to obtain expected milk yields from imported cows. Those farms are managed by experienced managers and veterinary surgeons.

According to the Auditor General’s 2018 report, the average milk yield per cow in 2016, at three upcountry NLDB farms were around 11-15 litres/day. At Ridiyagama NLDB farm this was about 11 litres/per cow/day.

Impact of local environmental condition on imported heifers

Globally, many studies have been conducted on environmental stress on cattle. Although Sri Lanka has collected climatic data for over a century it is rather unfortunate that no attempt was made to use this information in animal sciences.

Climatic factors such as ambient temperature, relative humidity (R/H), wind, rainfall, and radiant temperature can negatively affect the cows’ performances. The influence of environmental impact on animals is complex and it is not possible to isolate a single factor to explain the stress on an animal. We have to recognise what cow senses is a combination of all surrounding environmental factors.

Environmental stresses in cattle could result in loss of appetite, cessation of feeding, lethargy, increase respiration and heart rates, immobility, aimless wandering, staggering, flow of saliva outside the mouth, open mouth breath, and the collapse of the animal, non-responsiveness, and seizures. Further, these conditions can cause reduction of milk yield, reduce weight gain, shorter gestations, abortions, calves with reduced body weight, reduction of the quality of colostrum (mother’s first milk after the calf is born), development of unproductive udders, sick and weak calves, higher mortalities among calves and drop in conception rate.

Our farmers too noticed such symptoms among their animals. Let’s examine whether these issues initiated due to unfavourable environmental conditions.

Comfort (Thermo Neutral) zone

During the milk-producing process, higher amounts of internal heat are generated, especially among high yielding cows. When environmental conditions are favourable, the animal has the ability to dissipate this heat without using her stored energy. The temperature range that the animal doesn’t have to expend stored energy to maintain normal body temperature is called its comfort zone or thermo neutral zone. For healthy cattle, this temperature is between -15 and 22 degrees Celsius.

When the cow is exposed to conditions beyond the comfort zone, it starts to utilize stored energy to dissipate its own internal body heat. At this stage, the cow reduces its feed intake followed by a reduction in milk yield.

Prone to diseases

Due to environmental stress, the animals’ immune system can also be weakened and become very susceptible to various bacterial, viral and physiological diseases.

Impact on the
development of udders

During pregnancy, the cow utilises her stored energy to form the mammary glands. When environmental conditions are not favourable, the stored energy is utilised to overcome the stresses. Eventually, this will negatively affect the morphology of her mammary glands. In such situations, udders can become dried, underdeveloped and unproductive.

Reproduction issues

Under an environmental stress situation, cow’s expression of heat (estrus) signs and also the duration and intensity of estrus expression can be dramatically weakened. Without such signs, farmers are unable to detect estrus signs. This will cause a sharp drop in the success rate of artificial insemination.

Embryo death and effect
on the fetus

Embryos of the cows are highly vulnerable for heat stresses during the first 17 days of conception. At this phase, a protein that resists heat stress is not formed. This situation can be fatal to the embryos.

Development of follicles can also be retarded due to heat stress. This could result in weakening of signals to indicate that she is pregnant. In the absence of such signals from the embryo, a cow can stop secreting the needed hormones to maintain the pregnancy. Finally, this can cause the death of embryos.

Calves born under heat stress

Due to environmental stresses, placental development of the cow can be negatively regulated. The placenta is an organ that develops in the cow’s uterus during pregnancy aiming to provide oxygen and nutrients to the growing fetus.

Environmentally stressed cows normally have a shorter gestation length and give birth to lighter calves by about 5 kg. Calves of such cows will have a reduced efficiency to absorb antibodies (immunoglobulin) from colostrum (first milk) and could be easily infected with diseases. Malformation, growth retardation and higher mortality rates can also be observed among those calves.

Stresses due to transportation

Imported cattle were transported from ports in poorly ventilated lorries that were not designed to carry the live animal. Cattle transport produces physical and psychological stresses among animals. Stress may result in altered metabolism, immune competence, and behaviour, as well as failure in reproduction. Further, it can reduce milk production.

Comparison of Australian
and local climatic conditions

The average R/H and temperature of Victoria province of Australia (the source of heifers) was compared with a few locations in Sri Lanka such as Nuwara Eliya, Hambantota, Badulla, Kurunegala, and Vavuniya. It was revealed that R/H in Victoria is around 60 per cent while in Sri Lanka locations R/H is around 80 per cent. The temperature in Victoria was higher than that in Nuwara Eliya from November to March.

The heifers that rose under the Australian low humid environment during their first 3-4 years were later exposed to high humid tropical Sri Lankan conditions. Has the impact of environmental changes together with the transportation stress caused the above-mentioned issues to the imported cows?

Impact of Relative Humidity
on milk yield

It is interesting to observe how cows with European blood perform under various humid conditions. Daily average milk yield per cow in a farm which this writer visited at the Californian desert town called Barstow, US is 30 litres/day. Within a year R/H varies from 14-66 per cent and it rains only about 24 days. The milk yields drop on rainy days due to rising humidity.

An Israel cow produces the highest quantity of milk in the world. In 2017 the average milk yield of a cow was more than 33 litres/day. The humidity in this zone from March-December is around 45-60 per cent. During summer months the temperature could go above 300 C.

There are many countries where cows with European blood have been successfully raised in low humid high-temperature regions. We do not have such low humid zones in Sri Lanka.

After visiting a farm in Israel or Australia one could easily come to the conclusion that cows with European blood can be raised in high-temperature zones. Was this a reason the authorities selected Ridiyagama at Hambantota district to raise exotic cows without considering the existing high R/H conditions?

Misting animals as a measure to relieve heat stress has been done at Ridiyagama. This operation tends to increase the surrounding R/H in humid areas. Direct wetting of the animal’s body should be practiced in such zones.

The distribution of imported heifers directly to the farmers was a grave mistake. These heifers should have been raised in government farms and only distributed the offspring. Studies found that the calves born under unfavourable climatic conditions have the ability to better cope with acute environmental stresses in the future.

The existence of different climatic zones in Sri Lanka has been completely ignored when imported cows were distributed.

Sri Lanka should introduce a long-term feasible strategy to become self-sufficient in dairy milk. Improving the genetic potential is just a single measure that should be implemented with several other essential factors. In order to achieve this, we should concurrently implement tasks such as reintroducing higher import tax for powdered milk, improve the local powdered milk industry, infrastructural developments, assistance to dairy farmers (loans, grants), development of farmer organizations (cooperatives, etc), farmer training and research, selection of breeds based on climatic zones, production of extra professionals such as veterinarian/agriculturists, grassland development and feed management, dairy marketing, processing and quality control, and dairy waste management.

(The writer is a former research officer at the Department of Agriculture, Sri Lanka. Detail report of this article with references and other resources can be found in his blog: https://outofboxag.wordpress.com/. He can be reached at
anawicks@gmail.com
 

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ හා ශ්‍රීලනිපය අතර සාකච්ඡෘ මැදදි කඩා දැමීමට අපි පියවර ගන්නේ නැහැ.-මහාචාර්ය ජි. එල්. පීරිස් මහතා

April 9th, 2019

අද (08) දින පැවැත්වූ ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුනේ මාධ්‍ය හමුව

අද (08) දින පැවැත්වූ මාධ්‍ය හමුවට සහභාගි වූ නියෝජිතයින්

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුනේ සභාපති, මහාචාර්ය ජි. එල්. පීරිස් මහතා

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන මහතා

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුනේ සභාපති, මහාචාර්ය ජි. එල්. පීරිස් මහතා

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ හා ශ්‍රීලනිපය අතර සාකච්ඡෘවල අනාගතය මේ වෙද්දි කාගෙත් කුතුහලයට ලක්වෙලා තියෙන්නේ. පාක්ෂිකයින්ගෙන් අපිට දුකතන ඇමැතුම් රැසක් එනවා. අපි මෙතෙක් සාකච්ඡා වට දෙකක් පැවත්වුවා. තුන්වන සාකච්ඡාවට අප්‍රියෙල් 10 වැනිදා දින නියම වෙලා තියෙනවා. අපි ප්‍රශ්නයකින් පැනලා යන්නේ නැහැ. සාකච්ඡා මැදදි කඩා දැමීමට අපි පියවර ගන්නේ නැහැ. දිගටම සාකච්ඡා පවත්වනවා. බැරෑරුම් ප්‍රශෟනයක් තිබෙන බව කාටත් පැහැදිලියි. ප්‍ස්බරා වගේ වැලි ගොඩක ඔලුව හංගාගෙන යථාර්ථයට මුහුණ නොදීම අපේ පක්ෂයේ ප්‍ර්‍රතිපත්තියක් නෙවෙයි. ශ්‍රීලනීපයේ අයත් එක්ක ප්‍රශ්නයට පිළීතුරක් සෙවීම තමයි ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුනේ කුමවේදය. අප්‍රියෙල් 10 වැනිදා පවත්වන සාකච්ඡාව ඒ සදහා අවස්ථාවක් කර ගන්න පුලුවන්.

අයවැය ලේඛණය අප්‍රියෙල් පස් වෙනිදා තුන්වැනි වර කියනව අවස්ථාවේ එජාප විරෝධී ජනතාව තුල බලාපොරොත්තුවක් තිබුණා. තීරණාත්මක යමක් වෙයි කියලා හිතුවට දැන් ඒ විශ්වාසය කැඩිලා. ඒ විදියට විශ්විසයක් ගොඩනැගෙන්න හේතු තිබුණා.මේක තමයි මේ රජයේ අවසාන අයවැය. ජනාධීපති මැතිවරණයක් මේ වසෙර් පැවැත්වෙනවා. ශක්තිමත් ජනාධිපතිවරයෙකු යටතෙයි මිළග අයවැයක් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට එන්නේ. අයවැයක් පරාද නම් ආන්ඩුවේ කාලය අවසන්. විපක්ෂයේ අය මේ සදහා එක් වෙයි කියලා හිතුවත් ජනතාවගේ හිත් කඩා වැටිමක් වුනා. විරුද්ධ පක්ෂ්‍ය එක ස්ථාවරයක සිටින අවස්ථාවක සුලු පක්ෂවලට ධෛර්යක් ලැබෙනවා. එවැනි විශ්වාසයක්නිර්මාණය වෙමින් පැවතුනත් මේ කණ්ඩායමේ තීරණයත් එක්ක ඔවුන් අධෛර්යමත් වුනා.

දෙවැනි වර කියැවීමේදී අපි අතින් සිදුවුනු අතපාසුව නිවැදි කරන්න අපි අවංක උත්සාහයක් ගන්න බවත් ශ්‍රීලනිප සමහරෙක් කියලා තිබුණා. ඒකට තුන්වැනිවර ඡන්ද කියැවීමේදි අවස්ථාව ලැබුණත් එයින් ප්‍රයෝජන නොගෙන චේතනාන්විතව මග හැරියා. ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ කියන්නේ කිසියම් සංස්කෘතියක් විශ්වාස මාලාවක් යටතේ ගොඩනැගුණු දෙයක්. පක්ෂයේ තීරණ උඩින් අරන් ඒ තීරණ පාක්ෂිකයා පිට පටවන පක්ෂයක් නෙවෙයි. බිම් මට්ටමෙන් අවශ්‍ය දේ සොයා බලා තීරණගන්න පක්ෂයක්.

අයවැය ලේඛණයට ඡන්දය නොදී පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට නොපැමිණ සිටිම සාධාරණිකරණයකරන්නේ කොහොමද. ආන්ඩුවට තියෙන ආර්ථක දර්ශනයේ මූලික සිද්ධීන්ත මොනවාද. ඒවා රට පිළීගන්නවාද කියලා මෙයින් පේනවා. පිළීගත් දේශපාලන පක්ෂයක් මොන පනතක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඡන්දය නොදි සිටියත් අයවැය සම්බන්ධයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව පැත්ත පළාතට එන්නේ නැහැ කියන්නේ සුවිශේෂි තත්ත්වයක්. ජනතාවට වගකියන පක්ෂයක් එවැනි දේ කරන්නේ නැහැ. අප්‍රියෙල් පස් වෙනිදා පාර්ලාමේන්තුවේ නොසිටි ප්‍රබල චරිත විවාදය අවස්ථාවේ අයවැය ලේඛණය පතුරු ගහන පුකාශ නම් කළා. කායත් මේ ගැන වැද විවාද කරන්න බැහැ. කරපු කතා හා තිරණාත්මක අවස්ථාවේ ක්‍රියාමාර්ගය අතර මූලික පරස්පරතාවයක් තිබෙන බව පැහැදිලියි. කතාව කෙරුවාව කරන්න තියෙන අවස්ථවයි ඡන්දය. වාචිකව ප්‍රහාර එල්ල කරලා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට නොපැමිණ සිටියාම ඒ වචනවල අගය මොකක්ද.මේ අය සමගයි අපි සාකච්ඡා පවත්වන්නේ. ඒ නිසා ප්‍රශ්නය මග ඇරලා ප්‍රශ්නයක් නැහැ කියන තැන ඉදන් සාකස්ෂ ාකරන්න සූදානම් නැහැ. ප්‍රශ්නයෙන් මග හැරිමට අපිට කිසිම වුවමනාවක් නැහැ. මේ ක්‍රියාමාර්ගය ගත්තේ මොන හේතුව නිසාද. මෙයින් උද්ගත වන දේට අපි කොහෙමද මුහුණ දෙන්නේ කියලා සාකද්ධා කළ යුතුයි. එදි ගත් ක්‍රියාමාර්ලයෙන්පස්සේ මේ රජයේ සියලු දේට ශ්‍රීලනිපය සම අනුග්‍රාහයකයින්. වගකීම බෙදා ගන්නවා.එජාපයට තමන්ගේ හානිකර අයවැය ලේඛණය සම්මත කරගැනීමට මාර්ගය සකසා දිමයි කලේ. මේ රජයේ විනාශ කාරී වැඩපිළීවෙලට ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයට චෝදනා එල්ල වෙනවා. අපි සමග එකග වෙන සියලු මන්ත්‍රීවරු අයවැය ලේඛණයට එරෙහිව ඡන්දයප්‍රකාශ කළා. මේක ආරම්භය පමණයි. අඛණඩව කරගෙන යන වැඩපිළිවෙලක් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ උපදේශකත්වෙයන් බැසිල් රාජපක්ස මහතා සකස් කර තියෙනවා. අයවැයට එරෙහිව ඡන්දය දීලයි මේ වැඩපිළීවෙල පටන්ගන්නේ. අයවැයට විරුද්ධව කතා කළා වගේම අයවැයට විරුද්ධ වෙලා ඊළගට කරන්නේ මොනවාද. දිවයිනේ සැම ප්‍රදේශයකම මහජන නියෝජිතයින් අපි මුණ ගැසුණා. ගම්මාන 25000ක් ආවරණය වෙන විදියට ගම සමග පිළිසදරක් වැඩපිළීවෙල අපි කරගෙන යනවා. ඒ සමගම දිප ව්‍යාප්තව තරුණ, කාන්තා සම්මේලන පවත්වමින් තිබෙනවා. ඊට පස්සේ පොදුජන පෙරමුනේ සම්මේලනය පවත්වනවා. අද සාකච්ඡා කරලා නිගමනයකට එන්න බැරිව හෙටට කල්දාල ඒ විදියට දිගින් දිගටම විසදන්න අමාරු වාද විවාද විශ්ලේෂණ අවශ්‍ය කරුණක් විදියට අපි මේක සැලකුවේ නැහැ. අපි ක්ෂණිකව මෙයට විරුද්ධ වුනා. අපේ මන්ත්‍රීවරු අතර ප්‍රතිවිරැද්ධ මතයක් ඇතිවුනේ නැහැ.

මේ ප්‍රශ්නයට පිළිතුරක් දිම එතරම් ලේසි වුනේ ඇයි. මේ රජයට සහාය දෙන්න හේතුව මොකක්ද. රජයක මූලික වගකීම ජනතාවට විදුලි බලය හා ජලය සපයා දීමටවත් නොහැකි බෙලහින රජයක් මොකටද. එවැනි පිඩනයක් ජනතාවට ලබා දෙන රජයක්, ඒ පිඩනය තුළින්වුවත් කොමිෂ ගහන රජයක්. කොමිස් ගහන අවස්ථාව හිතාමතා සපයා ගත්ත රජයක්. මේ සියල්ල නිසා ජනතාව තුල නැගීගෙන පිළීකුළ හොදින්ම පැහැදිලියි. මැතිවරණ නැති රජයක්. ජනතාව කෙළින්ම ගෙදර යවන්න තිරණය කරලා තියෙන බව හොදින්ම දන්නවා. චේතනාන්විතව මැතිවරණ නොපවත්වන වාතාවරණයක, දරා ගන්න බැරි පීඩනයට ජනතාව පාරට බහින අවස්ථාවේ පොලිස් සපත්තුවෙන් අමානුෂිකව ශීෂ්‍යයින්ට පහර දෙන රජයකට අපි පක්ෂ වෙන්න අවශ්‍යයද. මේ අත්තනොමතික බලතල තවත් වර්ධනය කර ගන්න පොලිස් රාජ්‍ය සදහා ජනතාව මර්ධනය කිරීමේ එවැනි පනතක් ලෝකයේ කොහෝවත් නැහැ. එවැනි රජයක් ගැන අපි දෙගිඩියාවකින් පස්වෙන්නේ.

ජාත්‍යන්තර අපරාධ අධිකරණයේ නිලධාරින්ට ඇමරිකාවට පය තියන්න දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියනවා. ඇමරිකාව ස්වකීය හමුදාවන් දිවි හිමියෙන් ආරක්ෂා කරද්දි අපේ රජය දොරටු විවර කරනවා ඇවිත් ජාත්‍යන්තර අධිකරණ හදන්න කියන රජයකට පක්ෂ වෙනවාද විපක්ෂ වෙනවාද ගෙදර ඉන්නවාද කියලා හිතන්න දෙයක් අපිට නැහැ. හම්බන්තොට තෙල් පිරිපහදුවට තව වසරක් යනතුරු ආයෝජනයක් කරන්න බැහැ කියනවා. අපේ රටේ ජනතාවට දැන් එක් දෙයක් සක්සුදක් සේ පැහැදිලියි. එජාප රජය ගෙදර යවන්න නායකත්වයක් දෙන්න හැකියාව තියෙන්නේ ශ්‍රි ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණට පමණයි කියලා දැන් ජනතාව තේරුම් අරන් ඉන්නවා. කතාවට පමණක් සීමා නොවී ක්‍රියාවෙන්ද කටයතු කරන්නේ ශ්‍රීලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ කියලා දැන් ජනතාව පිළිගන්නවා.

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන මහතා

මේ දිනවල  නියමිත වේලාවට කළින් නැගිටලා නා ගන්න වෙනවා. වේලාසන ඇදුම අයන් කරලා තියාගන්න වෙනවා. විදුලිය කපන බව කියලා තියෙන වෙලාවට නෙවෙයි විදුලිය කපන්නේ. පැය තුනක් කපනවා කියන නිසා පැය තුනකින්  පස්සේ විදුලිය එයි කියලා බලන් හිටියත් විදුලිය එන්නේ නැහැ. නමුත් රවි කරුණානයක ඇමැතිවරයා කියනවා 10 වැනිදායින් පස්සේ ජිවිතේට විදුලිය කපන්නේ නැහැලු. සිංහල අලුත් අවුරුද්දට පවත්වන  අවුරුදු උත්සවයකට ගිහින් හොදම බොරුව තරගයට ඉදිරිපත් වෙලා කියන්න තිබුණ බොරුව ඇමැතිවරයා වේලාසනම කිව්වා. 10 වැනිදා වෙද්දි ජිවිතේට විදුලිය කපන්නේ නැහැ කියන්නේ ජිවත් වෙන්න කිසිම ප්‍රශ්නයක් නැහැ කියන එකනේ. මේ ඇමැතිවරයා ප්‍රායෝගිකව දන්නේ නැහැ 10 වෙනිදා වෙනකල් විදුලිය කැපුවම කරගෙන ආපු ස්වයං රැකියාවක්වත් කරගන්න බැරිව මිනිස්සු නන්නත්තාර වෙලා හොම්බෙන් යනවා කියලා. සිංහල අවුරුද්දට ඇදුම් මහන කෙනාට විදුලිය නැතිව මැෂිම කරකවා ගන්න බැහැ. ගෙදරට වතුර නැහැ. ගමේ කඩවල ශීතකරණයේ තියෙන දේවල් දියවෙලා මස්මාලු කුණූ වෙනවා. එහෙම වුනාම සිංහල අලුත් අවුරුද්දක් ගැන ජනතාවට හිතන්නවත් බැහැ. මේ ආන්ඩුව 10 වෙනිදා ඉදන් විදුලිය දෙන්නේ කොහොමද. තුර්කි පාවෙ දැවිතෙල් බලාගාරයෙන් විදුලිය ලබා ගන්න සුදානම් කියලා අද මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා පළවෙලා තියෙනවා. දැන් මේ කැබිනට් පේපර් එක දාන්නයි සූදානම. කැබිනට් පේපර් එක තවම දාලා නැතිවුනාට තුර්කියෙන් නැව ඇවිත්. තුර්කියෙන් නැව එන්න නම් තුර්කිය ලංකාව ගැන මොනතරම් අවධානයෙන් ඉදලාද බලන්න. තුර්කිය ලංකාව ගැන මොනතරම් හිතනවාද බලන්න. කැබිනට් පේපර් එකෙන් තුර්කියෙන්ම  විදුලිය මිලදි ගන්න කියන්න ඉඩක්නැති වුනත් තුර්කියෙන් නැව ඇවිත්. තුර්කියට ලංකාවේ මිනිස්සු ගැන හිත වුනුවෙලා. නැව ආවාට පස්සේ කැබිනට් පේපර් එක දානවා. විදුලිය කැපිම අස්සේ මේ දේවල් මොනතරම් සංවිධානාත්මක විදියට වෙනවාද බලන්න. රුපියල් 15ට ගන්න පුලුවන් විදුලි ඒකකය රුපියල් 32ට ගන්නවා. අවුරුදු 4ක් තිස්සේ බලයේ හිටියට මේ ආණ්ඩුවට වගකිමක් තිබුනේ නැද්ද විදුලි ප්‍රශ්නයක් ඇති වුනොත් කරන්නේ මොකක්ද කියලා. රටට වෙනසක් කරන්න ආපු මේ යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවට දැක්මක් තිබුනේ නැද්ද. දැක්ම තිබුනේ මෙහෙ ලයිට් නිවෙන කොට තුර්කි නැවට අඩගහන්න තමයි. තුර්කි නැව ඇවිත් කැලනිතිස්ස බලාගාරය හරහා ලංකාවට විදුලිය දෙන කොට ලයිට් පත්තුවෙනවා වගේම මේකේ ඉන්න උන්නැහේලාට කොමිස් කුට්ටි කුට්ටි ලැබෙනවා. මේ අයට නත්තල් කන්න පුලුවන් වෙනවා. අපි බලමු 10 වෙනිදා වෙද්දි ලයිට් දෙන්නේ කොහොමද කියලා.

අද විදුලි බල ඇමැතිවරයා මුලින් මුදල් ඇමැති. අද මුදල් ඇමැතිවරයා හිටපු මුදල් ඇමැතිවරයාට චෝදනා එල්ල කළා.ඒ නිසා විදුලිබල ඇමැතිවරයා කල්පනා කරන්න ඇති මම මොකටද මුදල් ඇමැතිවරයාට දෙවැනි වෙන්නේ කියලා. අපේ මුලු රට වටේම මුහුද. දෙවියන්ගේ පිහිටෙන් අපි රටට දියලුණු ටික වෙනත් රටවලින් ගෙන්වනවා. රට වටේට මුහුද තිබුණත් අපේ මුදල් ඇමැති මාලු ටික ගෙන්වනවා. සියඹලා ගස් යට වැටිලා වැටුනු ඒවායින් අලුතෙන් පැලත් එනවා. එහෙව් රටේ සියඹලාත් 2018 වර්ෂයේ මෙරටට ගෙන්වලා. රටේ හැමදේම ආනයනය කරන කොට විදුලි බල ඇමැතිවරයා හිතන්න ඇති මම මොකටද දෙවැනි වෙන්නේ කියලා විදුලිබලයත් ආනයනය කරන්නේ. රටට අවශ්‍ය විදුලියත් ආනයනය කරන රටක් බවට පත් වෙලා. මිනිස්සුන්ට එදිනෙදා ජිවිතය ගත කරගන්න බැරි තත්ත්වයකට රට පත් කරලා ඉවරයි.

අයවැය යෝජනාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරන අවස්ථාවේ ශ්‍රීලනිපමන්ත්‍රීවරු කිහිපදෙනෙක් අයවැයට විරුද්ධව ඡන්දය භාවිතා කිරිම ගැන අපේ ස්තූතිය පළ කරනවා. රට ගැන හිතලා මේ ආන්ඩුවට විරුද්ධ වෙන්න තියෙන හැම මොහෙතෙකම විරුද්ධ වෙනවා නම් මහජනතාව ඔවුන් දිහා සැලකිල්ලෙන් බලනවා. මේ ආනෟඩුව ජනතා ද්‍රෝහි, ජනතාවට එපා වුනු ආණ්ඩුවක්. ගෙදරක දානයක් තිබුණම එකී නොකී ආපු නාපු සියලු දෙනාට පින් දෙනවා වගේ මේ ආන්ඩුවට විරුද්ධ වෙනව හැමෝටම පිනක් ලැබෙනවා. ඒ තරමට මේ ආන්ඩුව දේශද්‍රෝහීයි. ශ්‍රිලනීප මන්ත්‍රීවරු බහුතරයක් ඡන්දය නොදි හිටියා කියන්නේ ජනතාවට ද්‍රෝහීකම් කරන ආන්ඩුවට පක්ෂ බවයි.

පහුගිය මැතිවරණයේදී ජාතික ලයිස්තුවෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ආපු ජනතාවගෙන් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප වුනු මන්ත්‍රීවරු අයවැයට පක්ෂව ඡන්දය දුන්නා. ඒ අය පරදින බව දන්නවා. ගියපාරත් පැරදුනු අයනේ. මිනිස්සු මේ සියලු දෙනා නැවත ගමට එනකල් බලන් ඉන්නවා. ගම තමයි තින්දුව ගන්නේ. අපි දැක්කා ශ්‍රීලනිප මහලේකම් දයාසිරි ජයසේඛර කිව්වා අයවැය පරාජය කරන්න විපක්ෂයට වැඩපිළීවෙලක් තිබුනේ නැති බව. මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ආන්ඩුව විසුරුවා හුරියේ මේ ආන්ඩුව තව දුරටත් තිබුනොත් රට විනාශ වෙන බවයි. ඒ නිසා මේ ආන්ඩුව ගෙදර යවන්න පියවර ගැනීමයි. ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ ප්‍රමුණ විපක්ෂයේ අපි ලද සැනින් මේ ආණ්ඩුව ගෙදර යවන්න සුදානම්.

අයවැය ගැන වෙලෙද දැන්වීම් පත්තරවල පිටු පිරෙන්න දැම්මා. මේවා කියවලා ගම්වල මිනිස්සු කියන දේ බලාගන්න පුලුවන් ගමට ගියානම්. පිපාසය නිවාගන්න වතුර බවුසරය එනකල් ඉන්න වෙන්නේ  නැහැ කියලා වෙලද දැන්වීමක් දාන්නේලයිට් කපලා තියෙන වෙලාවේ. ලයිට් කපන්න කලින් ජල සම්පාදනයේ අයට ජෙනරේටර් ඔන් කරගන්න බැරිවුනාම වතුර බටෙන් වතුර එන්නේ නැහැ. ඒ වගේ වෙලාවට මෙහෙම දැන්විම් දාන විගඩම් ආණ්ඩුවක් තියෙන්නේ.රජයේ රෝහල්වලට ගිහින් ජෙනරේටර් තියෙන රෝහල් ගාන බලන්න. සියයට 90ට ජෙනරේටර් නැහැ. ඒ රෝගීන් වතුර විදුලිය නැතිව ඉන්නේ. ගමේ පාසලේ දූපතුන්ට පෝෂණීය කිරි විදුරුවක් කියලාත් දැන්විමක් දානවා. අමාත්‍යංශයකියනවා ආනයනය කරන කිරිවල රෝගකාරක 24ක් තියෙනවා කියලා.මේ කිරි වීදුරුව 2018 අයවැයෙත් මේ විදියටම තිබුණා.

රණවිරුවන්ගේ අභිමානය සුරකින්න කැපවුනු අයවැයක් තියලාත් වෙලද දැන්වීමක් තිබුණා. මේ ආන්ඩුව තරම් රණවිරුවන්ට සලකපු ආන්ඩුවක් ඉතිහාසයේ නැහැ. රට බේරාගත්ත රණ විරුවෝ ‌බෙල්ලෙන් අල්ලන් ගිහින් වැලිකඩ දැම්මා. .තමන්ගේ විශ්‍රාම වැටුප ඉල්ල ගෙන ආපු ආබාධිත රණවිරුවන්ට එලවා එලවා ගහලා රණ විරුවන්ගේ අභිමානය සුරකින්න කැපවුනු අයවැයක් කියලා දැන්විම් දානවා. රණවිරුවන්ට එරෙහිව යුද අපරාධ චෝදනා එල්ල කරමින් තමයි මේ අභීමානය දීලා තියෙන්නේ.

අපේ දරුවන්ට ඔක්ස්පර්ඩ්, ක්‍රේම්බිජ් වගේ විශ්ව විද්‍යාල වරම් කියලාත් දැන්වීමක් තිබ්බා. දැන්වීම දාපු දවසේම දරුවන්ට එලවා එලවා ගැහුවා.විශ්ව විද්‍යාල දරුවන්ට වැඩුපුරම ගැහුවේ මේ ආණ්ඩුවයි. සිසුවියන් 14ක් යවන්න දැන්වීමක් දාලා අපේ රටේ විශ්ව විද්‍යාල දරුවෝ අයිතිවාසිකම් ඉල්ලපුවාම සලකන හැටි අපි දැක්කා. මුලින්ම නාවනවා. කන්න දෙනවා. පස්සේ රෝහලටත් ගෙනිහින් දානවා. මේ ආණ්ඩුව ගැන කතාකරන්න දෙයක් ඇත්තෙම නැහැ.

මැතිවරණ කොමසාරිස්වරයා පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ මතය විමසන්න තිරණය කරලා තියෙනවා කියලා ජනාධිපතිවරයාට ලිපියක් යවලා තියෙනවා. ඒක හොදයි. මේ ආන්ඩුව ජනතා මැතිවරණවලට බයයි. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඇතුලේ ඔලුගෙඩි ඡන්දයකට විතරයි මේ ආණ්ඩුව බය නැත්තේ. වරදාන පූජාවට්ටි හරියට දෙන ආන්ඩුවක්නේ. අපේ අයවැය තියෙන්නේ පස්වෙනිදා කියලා වරදාන පූජාවට්ටි දීලා වැඩේ කරගන්න පුලුවන්. අද පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය තියාගන්න ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාදිකරණයට යන්න වෙලා. ඒවුනාට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයාගේ කාලේනම් වෙලාවටත් කළින් මැතිවරඛ තිබ්බා.

මැතිවරණ කොමිෂමේ කෙනෙක් හිටියා. එතුමා අධීකරණයට ගියානේ පහුගිය ආන්ඩුව අවස්ථාවේ. මම මේ එතුමා හොයනවා. ඒ වුනාට හොයාගන්න නැහැ. එදා ඒ විදියට අධිකරණයට ගියා නම් අදත් පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය වෙනුවෙන් එතුමාට අධීකරණයට යන්න වෙනවානේ. දැන් අයවැයේ ප්‍රතිඵල ලැබෙමින් තියෙනවා. අද දවස වෙද්දි රෝහල් වැඩ වර්ජනය. රාත්‍රියේ දුම්රිය වැඩ වර්ජනය. රටපුරා ඉන්න ඉංජිනේරුවරයොත් කොළඹට එන්න ඉන්නේ ඔවුන්ගේ වැටුප් ප්‍රශ්නයකට. 10 වැනිදාට රවී විදුලිය දීලා උච්ච වෙන්න හදනවා. වැටුප් නැහැ කියලා විදුලි ඉංජිනේරුවෝ මොනවා හරි කලොත් මේ රවි නීච වෙනවා.

මාතර සිට බෙලිඅත්තට අභිනව දුම්රිය මාර්ගය විවෘත කරමින් ආන්ඩුව අලුත් ගමනක කියලා දැන්වීමක් දාලා.

මේ ආණෟඩුවේ ලැජ්ජා නහරයයි හිරිකිත නහරයයි දෙකම කපලා. දකුණට දුම්රිය මාර්ගයක් ගෙන ගියේ කවුද. කොට්ටාව අන්තර් හුවමාරුව ගෙනාවේ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ජනාධිපතිතුමා. ඒවුනාට අගමැතිතුමා ගිහන් අම්මා තාත්තාගේ භූදලේ වගේ විවෘත කරනවා. මේ ආන්ඪුව තමන් මුල්ගල තියලා තමන් හදලා ජනතා අයිතයට පත්කරපු එක වැඩක් තියෙනවාද. තව ටික කාලකෙින් මංගල සමරවීරගේ වැසිකිලි ටික නම් පෙන්වන්න පුලුවන්.

අපි විපක්ෂයේ ඉදන් කරන අන්තිම මැයි රැලිය මෙවර කරනවා. අති දැවන්ත ජන සහභාගීත්වයකින් කරන මේ රැළීයට ආන්ඩුවෙන් බැට කන ජනතාවගෙන් පීරෙනවා. අපි ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ ප්‍රමුඛ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ සියලු පක්ෂ හා වෘත්තීය සමිති මේ අවස්ථාව සාර්ථක කරගන්න එකතු වෙලා ඉන්නවා.

මාධ්‍ය – ඇමරිකානු අධීකරණයෙන් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට එන්තර වාසියක් දුන්න බවක් සමාජ මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා කරනවා. ලසන්ත වික්‍රමතුංග මහතාගේ දියණිය විසින් ගොනුකර නඩුවක් සම්බන්ධයෙන්.

රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන – අනාගතයේ රට ගැන හිතලා තීන්දුවක්ගන්න යන වෙලාවක ඔය වැගේ අරළු බුළු එනවා. නමුත් රටේ ජනතාව ඔහු එනතෙක් බලාගෙන ඉන්නවා.

ජී. එල්. පිරිස්- පුරවැසිභාවය අත හරින්න හදන විට බලහත්කාරයෙන් තියාගන්නේ මොන රටද. ඔහු පුරවැසිභාවය අස්තකර ගන්න තිරණය කරනවා නම් බලකරලා පුරවැසිභාවයේ තියාගන්නේ මොන රටද . ඒක මානව හිමිකම්වලට ජාත්‍යන්තර නීතියට ගැලපෙනවා

මාධ්‍ය – ඒ නඩු කටයුත්ත අවසන් වෙනතුරු පුරවැසිභාවය අහෝසි නොකර ඉන්න පුලුවන් නේද

ජී. එල්. පීරිස් – කොයි විදියේ නඩුවක්ද, ඒකට හරයක් තියෙනවාද.මොන චේතනාවෙන්ද  නඩු පවරන්නේ කියලා බලන්න වෙනවා. නඩුවක් දාපු පමණින් පුරවැසිභාවය ඉවත් කිරීමේ ඉල්ලීම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කිරීමේ සම්ප්‍රධායක් ලෝකේ නැහැ. මේක පළිගැනිමක්

රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන – ආණ්ඩුව පෙරලීමෙන් පසුව ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා කිහිප වරක් ඇමරිකාවට ගිහින් ආවා. අද ලංකාදිප පුවත්පත වාර්තා කරනවා ද්විත්ව පුරවැසිභාවය අහෝසිකරගෙන ඔහු නැවත 10 වැනිදා ලංකාවට එනවා කියනවා. එතුමා මිට කළින් ඇමරිකාවට යන අවස්ථාවල ඔය කියන දේ කරන්න තිබුණා. මේ සියල්ල පිටුපස ඉන්නේ යහපාලන ආන්ඩුව

ජි. එල්. පීරිසි – සිතාසියක් නිකුත් කරද්දි මොන සිද්ධියක් සම්බන්ධයෙන්ද සිතාසියක් ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ කියලා හිතනවා. අද ඊයේ සිදුවුන දෙයක් නම් එහෙම සිතාසියක් නිකුත් කරන්න පුලුවන්. අවුරුදු 10ට පමණ පෙර වුනු දෙයක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් මේ විදියට වෙන්නේ ඇයි. අධිකරණය කූඨ අරමුණ ඉටු කරගන්න ඉඩ සලසන්නේ නැහැ.

මාධ්‍ය – ලංකාවේ වුනු දෙයක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඇමරිකාවේ නඩු දාන්න පුලුවන්ද.

ජි. එල්. පීරිස් – නැහැ. ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආන්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවසථාවට අනුව අධීකරණ බලය කිුයාත්මක කරන්නේ ශ්‍රි ලංකාවේ අධීකරණයයි.

මාධ්‍ය – නමුත් ඔහුට ද්විත්ව පුරවැසිභාවය තියෙනවානේ

රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන – ලංකාවේත් ඔය සම්බන්ධයෙන් පරීක්ෂණ කලානේ. මේ රජය ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට පක්ෂපාත රජයක්ද. අවුරුදු හතරයි මාස තුනක් එවැනි දෙයක් තිබුණා නම් හොයා ගන්න තිබුණා නේ.

ජි. එල්. පිරිස් – අධීකරණ පද්ධතිය වැරදි අරමුණට යොදා ගනී නම් ඒ නඩුව පැවරීමේ ක්‍රියාවත් සාපරාධි ක්‍රියාවක්. මේ කරන පුද්ගලයින්ට විරුද්ධව යම් යම් නිතිමය ක්‍රියාමාර්ග ගන්න ඉඩ තියෙනවා.

මාර්ග – අයවැය පරාජයෙ කරන්න ඡන්දය නොදි සාකච්ඡා පවත්වලා තේරැමක් තියෙනවාද

රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන -ජනාධිපතිවරණයකදි ජනතාව ඉන්නේ කදවුරු දෙකකයි. මේ කදවුරු දෙකේදි රටට ආදරයට කරන කදවුරේ අපි හිටගන්නවා. රට විකුණන් කන අය එජාපයත් එක්ක හිට ගන්නවා.ගමේ මනුස්සයා හිටගන්නෙත් රටට ආදරේ කරන කදවුරත් එක්කයි.

Diaspora terrorists threaten Mayor of Harrow

April 9th, 2019

By ;A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

The first Muslim female Mayor of England, Kareema Marikar who functions as Mayor of Harrow since 2010 hails from a political family in Sri Lanka.  Reports said that one thing you notice in Kareema Marikar’s personality is her bubbly nature, infectious smile and down-to-earth simplicity. It said that despite creating history as the first female Muslim mayor in England, she is not yet ready to rest on her laurels, judging by an interview she gave to the BBC recently.

I am a Marakkala woman from Sri Lanka,” Marikar told Saroj Pathirana of the Sinhala Service of the BBC in the interview conducted in a quaint, leafy British park on a bright Spring day, clad in a white ‘osari’, a traditional sari originated among the nobility in her native area of Kandy about a century ago.

Marikar, who was elected on the Labour Party ticket in north London’s Harrow city in May, hails from a well-known political family in Sri Lanka. She is closely related to the former Minister of Posts, Broadcasting and Information, Mr. C. A. S. Marikar, who served in the Bandaranaike government and was popularly known as Sinhala Marikar,

Kareema Marikar – Mayor of Harrow

I was educated at Kandy High School in Sinhala medium,” said Marikar, who has five brothers and two sisters. One of her elder sisters lives in Canada.

Marikar was born at a time when Sri Lanka knew perfect ethnic harmony, before racial-minded politicians with narrow  agendas led the country to the brink of disaster with a terrible war.

Though a Muslim, my uncle, my father’s elder brother, who was Minister of Posts, Broadcasting and Information, created history by organising the first ever all-night Buddhist ‘pirith’ chanting ceremony over Radio Ceylon in the 60s,” said Marikar.

Like Kandy, Harrow is ethnically-mixed. Out of 248,000 inhabitants, 20,000 are Gujaratis, more than 8000 are Tamils, in addition to many other nationalities, including a large number of Sinhalese. Ethnic diversity is our strength, and everybody lives in perfect harmony. This is the 21st century, and today it is difficult to live according to old ways. The world is fast-changing and we also have to adapt to changes fas t. We have 80 places of worship of various religions in Harrow, and I also serve in the Inter-Faith Council,” says Marikar, who is a trained mental health nurse in Oxfordshire Alsbury. She studied hotel management in Sri Lanka before coming to England, and worked briefly at Queen’s Hotel, Kandy.

She still keeps in touch with her relatives, classmates, teachers, and other friends, who have helped her to lay the foundation to create history in a foreign country. She became emotional when speaking about her late parents, commenting, How can I forget the country where my parents are buried?”

During the recent floods in Sri Lanka, she launched a fundraising drive in Harrow to help the victims. A firm believer in women’s greater participation in politics, Marikar says though Sri Lanka has ambitious plans to increase women’s share in the Government up to 25%, still the target falls well below expectations.

In response to a question as to what she thinks is the secret of her success, Marikar, who played hockey as a goal keeper for her school and the Sri Lankan national team, says she thinks it is her smile, patience, and love for racial and ethnic harmony that has helped her to become the city’s mayor. I manage to smile often,  and take care not to react when people are critical of me. On such occasions I lie low, go home and reflect, trying to analyse what makes someone critical of me. That way, I am able to keep minor heartaches at bay, and correct myself.”

A frequent visitor to her native country, she attended a local Government association in the Eastern city of Batticaloa, chaired by chief executive Hemanthi Goonesekara, whom Marikar describes as one of her good contacts in the island. The main discussion at the conference revolved around increasing female representation in the local Government and Parliament, which hovers around 4% today.

Her deep attachment to the culture of her native land was evident when she walked into the Harrow council chamber to take oaths on her first day in office as Mayor, accompanied by Sri Lankan traditional dancers, drummers and conch shell blowers, while the council members and the public watched in rapt attention as history was being made.

According to her Facebook page, she is a regular at all the cultural and religious events in her council area. Several posts show her being welcomed at Buddhist events at numerous temples, and Islamic functions held to mark important religious events like Eid. In one post, she is seen dancing with a South African group opposite late freedom fighter Nelson Mandela’s Soweto home while she was visiting the country.

She has also taken causes close to her heart to national prominence. Marikar is urging Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May, who made cut backs to police services as the Interior Minister, to increase funds and manpower to improve the deteriorating law and order situation in the country.

Judging by her enthusiasm and popularity, the present political office does not look like Mayor Marikar’s last frontier.

Despite her enormous service to Harrow, for Britain, for her native country Sri Lanka and in the Global Arena, the racist Tamils (the diaspora terrorists) have demanded her to resign fromher post.

A petition with signatures of diaspora elejments in Harrow have been handed to Harrow Council in February calling  her to step down from her role and threatening her after she was pictured with senior military figures during a visit to Sri Lanka, Harrow based newspaper, Local London reported.

The newspaper added that the Tamil community in Harrow ‘are upset’ that she met Commander of the Sri Lankan Army, Mahesh Senanayake, and Brigadier Priyanka Fernando during a trip to Sri Lanka last year.

The petition has read: “Most Tamil residents in Harrow escaped the war and came to the UK as refugees, (economic refugees, otherwise they can return now as the war was over 10 years ago) and they still carry the scars of that war which killed many of their kith and kin in their former home country.

“It was extremely upsetting to learn that Ms Marikar, who represents a large number of Tamils in Harrow and claims to have a detailed knowledge of Sri Lanka, chose to publish photographs with these senior military officials.”

In a report published on 7th August 2019 datelined from Kandy said that  the Kandy born Sri Lankan Mayoress of the City Council of Harrow, England Kareema Marikar was felicitated by the Kandy Mayor Kesara D. Senanayake and the Municipal Council on the previous  day.  It said that  Kareema Marikar is a member of the famous Marikar family in Kandy and gave her family detail and said that she younger sister of Kandy Municipal Council member Asmin (Mathali) Marikar The report said that Kareema, after receiving her education at Kandy Girls’ High School, left for England, where she received higher education and took to Labour Party politics, Addressing the meeting held to felicitate her Kareena has said that she was where she was due to hard work and service to the public.

නාගානන්දගේ වැලලී ගිය අතීතය

April 8th, 2019

FB

මේ පත්තර වාර්තා වලින් දැක්වෙන්නේ නාගානන්ද කොඩිතුවක්කු රේගුවේ වැඩ කරන සමයේ අල්ලස් ගැනීමේ චෝදනාවට ලක්වී රිමාන්ඩ් බන්ධනාගාරගත වීමේ පුවතයි.

වැදගත් වන්නේ මෙපමණයි. නෙලුම් මලක් මෙන් සුපිරිසිදු, සුචරිතවත් ගැලවුම්කරුවාණන්ගේ චරිතයට පණ පෙවීමට මෙවර ජනාධිපතිවරණයට ඉදිරිපත් වීමට නියමිත මෙවැන්නන් ඔබට මවා පෙන්වන සුරංගනා ලෝක සැබවින්ම ඔවුන්ගේ භාවිතය සමග ගැලපෙන්නේද යන්න ඔබ බුද්ධිමත්ව සිතා බැලිය යුතුය යන්නයි. විශේෂයෙන්ම, දිදුලන පොරොන්දු රොත්තක් දී ජනවාරි 8 බලයට ආ හංස සන්ධානය අවසානයේ ඔබේ තිබ්බ පිච්චියටත් කෙලවා දමා දැන් මුලු රටම අඳුරේ ගිල්වා දමා ඇති පිම්බුණු පාත්තයන් රෑනක් පමණක් බව ඔබේ දෑස් ඉදිරිපිටම ඔප්පු වී ඇති පසුබිමක තවත් එවැනිම වූ කයිවාරු කරුවන්ට රැවටීමට තරම් ඔබ මුග්ධද යන්න මැනෙන පසුබිමකය.

පුංචි දාසලා, උස මහ කලු සිංහලයෝ, එක් දින ණය සර්විස් පල්ලෙවත්තලා වැනි නානාවිධ කයිවාරුකාරයන් තවත් එනු ඇත….නොරැවටෙන්න….. මේ ඔබේත් රටේත් අවසාන අවස්ථාව විය හැක. වැඩක් කර ඇති වැඩක් කල හැකි අය වෙනුවෙන් බුද්ධිමත්ව කතිරය භාවිතා කරන්න.

PATHFINDER FOUNDATION AND CHINA’S CICIR CONTINUE BILATERAL COOPERATION DIALOGUE

April 8th, 2019

Press Release  PATHFINDER FOUNDATION

A senior delegation from the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR) led by Dr Fu Mengzi, Vice President, visited the Pathfinder Foundation Office at Riverpoint” yesterday (08 April, 2019) to continue the bilateral cooperation dialogue between the two institutions.  The CICIR is a leading policy research institute in China and consists of 11 institutes and two research divisions employing over 400 staff including 150 Professors.   The visit took place as a part of the framework set out in the Memorandum of Understanding that was signed between the two organizations in April 2016.The delegation met with Pathfinder Foundation Founder Milinda Moragoda and other senior officials to discuss the future work program that will seek to build on the success of the Pathfinder / CICIR joint publication. The Island of the Lion and the Land of the Dragon” that was published last year to commemorate 60 years of diplomatic relations between China and Sri Lanka.

In addition, the two sides discussed the possibility of setting up a joint China – Sri Lanka Study Group to identify critical success factors that would have to be put into place to take the economic, investment and trade relationship between the two countries to the next level.

The CICIR delegation consisted of: Dr. Fu Mengzi, (Vice President and Research Professor and Doctoral Advisor – CICIR), Dr. Hu Shisheng (Director of the Institute for South Asian Studies), Mr. Xu Xiaotian, (Director of the Institute for Maritime Security Studies) Dr. Guo Chunmei, (Associate Research Professor) Mr. Zhang Xinbo, (Assistant Professor) Mr. Wang Se, (Assistant Professor)

The Pathfinder Foundation delegation consisted of:  Mr. Bernard Goonetilleke – Chairman; Lalith Weeratunga, (Senior Fellow) Admiral Dr. Jayanath Colombage, (Director of the Center for Indo-Lanka relations of the PF) Mr. Luxman Siriwardena (Executive Director PF and Director, China Sri Lanka Cooperation Studies Centre.)

Sri Lanka rolls out free visa on arrival for UK tourists

April 8th, 2019

Courtesy  travelmole.com

Sri Lanka is to offer free visas on arrival to tourists from the UK and 30 other countries from next month.

The country’s tourist office is hoping to build on a good performance for March, when visitor numbers increased by 5%.

The free visa period will operate for six months from May 1.

Free visa entry will be granted to nationals of the UK, the EU, the US, Australia, South Korea, Canada, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and New Zealand.

Tourism development minister John Amaratunga said: “We will start granting a six-month free visa period from 1 May for selected countries during our lean period to boost tourist arrivals,” said tourism development minister.

“As the next step of this programme, we are planning on setting up a permanent system at the Bandaranaike International Airport (BIA) to issue visa on-arrival, like in many other countries.

“We believe this would be a major breakthrough in attracting more visitors,” the minister added.

The free-visa system may be expanded to include major market China and could be extended permanently depending on its success over the six-month period.

Sri Lankan Presidential Hopeful Sued in Federal Court for Human Rights Violations

April 8th, 2019

by  Courtesy  justsecurity.org

Human rights lawyers have sued Sri Lankan presidential hopeful Gotabaya Rajapaksa in federal court in the Central District of California. Rajapaksa, who is a joint Sri Lankan-U.S. citizen, was served with process in the parking lot of a Trader Joes, of all places.

Plaintiff Roy Samthanam, who is a Canadian citizen, alleges that he was detained and tortured from 2007-2010 by the Terrorism Investigation Division of the Sri Lanka police. He tells his harrowing story of physical and mental torture here. He is represented by the International Truth & Justice Project, under the leadership of the indomitable Yasmin Sooka, and a private law firm. The U.N. Human Rights Committee, which evaluates states’ compliance with the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights, has already ordered Sri Lanka to pay him compensation. A separate case was apparently filed on behalf of the family of assassinated journalist Lasantha Wickrematunga. Rajapaksa is known to own property in California, which could be attached for the purpose of any civil judgment against him.

Just Security has extensively covered the aftermath of the war in Sri Lanka, which is characterized by an entrenched impunity. In particular, we have offered a number of proposals for how the Department of Justice could prosecute Rajapaksa under the U.S. War Crimes Act, which has never been activated to date. That statute grants jurisdiction over war crimes committed by, or against, U.S. citizens. (See Ryan Goodman’s coverage hereherehereherehere, and here).

There has been some discussion that Rajapaksa has given up his U.S. citizenship in order to run for higher office in Sri Lanka. This does not affect the viability of these civil cases because he was served with process while in the United States, and was—in any case—a U.S. citizen at the time he allegedly acted. The Torture Victim Protection Act (28 U.S.C. § 1350 note) is expressly extraterritorial, so does not raise the extraterritorial issues presented by the Alien Tort Claims Act.

Over 240,000 tourists arrive in Sri Lanka in March

April 8th, 2019

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, April 8 (newsin.asia) – Over 240,000 tourists arrived in Sri Lanka in March, growing 4.6 percent compared to the same period last year, statistics from the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority showed here Monday.India, United Kingdom, China, Germany and France were Sri Lanka’s top five international touristgenerating markets in the month of March this year.

India was the largest source of tourist traffic to Sri
Lanka with 14% of the total traffic received in March 2019. UK accounted for 12% of the total traffic;
while China, Germany and France accounted for 10%, 7% and 6% respectively.

To date, this year, the total number of tourist arrivals this year has been 740,600.Tourism Development, Wildlife and Christian Religious Affairs Minister, John Amaratunga said the government was on target to reach its total aim of 3 million tourists by the end of this year.

Sri Lanka Tourism has emerged as one of the leading markets following the end of the country’s civil war in May 2009.This year the government said it is expecting a revenue of at least 5 billion dollars from its tourism industry.

History of Tibetan influence on Chinese politics

April 8th, 2019

By P.K.Balachandran/Ceylon Today Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Relations between Tibet and the rest of China to back to ancient times. Tibetans and Tibetan Buddhism had influenced the beliefs, political systems and art forms of several Chinese dynasties.

Karl Debreczeny, author of Faith and Empire: Art and Politics in Tibetan Buddhism (The University of Washington Press) says that from the 7 th., to early 20 th., century, Tibetan Buddhism had offered to Chinese and other East Asian dynasties, a divine means to power and legitimacy to rule.

And through tantric rituals, which are a part of Tibetan Buddhism, the ability to seize and retain power was attained.

Debreczeny, who is Curator at Rubin Museum in New York, says in an interview to James Blake Wiener of the Ancient History Encyclopaedia (AHE) that between the 7 th.,and the 9 th., centuries AD, Tibet had dramatically” established an empire, which became one of the great military powers of Asia. The Tibetan Empire’s principal rival was the Tang Dynasty of China (618 AD to 907 AD).

The Tibetan empire included the Hexi area of present-day Gansu province in North Western China, including Dunhuang, which at that time, was an important centre of international Buddhism and a trading hub at the eastern end of the Silk Route.

However, the culture of the Tibetan Empire was not purely Tibetan but hybrid. It’s writing was based on Sanskrit derived from India; it got it’s Buddhism from the monks of Khotan in Central Asia and scholars from India; its Greek medicine came via Persia; it got it’s record-keeping system from Tang China; and it’s silver-working techniques from Persia, Debreczeny points out.

Interestingly, when the Tibetan Empire took control of Dunhuang, the centre of Buddhist activity in 781 AD, Tibetan Buddhism and Tibetan art were themselves in their formative stages. The first Tibetan monastery, Samyé, had been founded only two years earlier in 779 AD, coinciding with the adoption of Buddhism as Tibet’s state religion.

Thus, the scriptural translation and artistic activities at Dunhuang had a significant impact on what was to become Tibetan Buddhism”, the art historian says.

However, generations of the Tibetan Empire’s largely Chinese inhabitants, learned to speak and write Tibetan and were subject to Tibetan laws and overseen by Tibetan officials, Debreczeny says.

The Tibetans’ impact on Dunhuang was deep and long-standing, culturally, linguistically, and ideologically. The impact outlived the Tibetan occupation, which ended in 848 AD. Tibetan influence could be seen in the administrative, diplomatic, scriptural, and artistic areas. Tibetan language was in widespread use till well into the 10th century AD, he stresses.

Kublai Khan being initiated into Buddhism

Emergence of Tantrics

After the collapse of the Tibetan Empire in 848 AD, there was chaos. However, order was brought about by local tantric masters” who exercised authority between the 9th and 12th centuries AD.

Tantric master, Lama Zhang (1123-1193 AD) directly involved himself in political and military affairs, ruled territory, and enforced secular law. He even sent his own students into battle to work siege engines as part of their religious practice. Equipped not only with conventional weapons, Lama Zhang also employed a ritualized warfare of magic spells, purportedly aided by powerful protector deities such as Shri Devi and Mahakala,” Debreczeny says.

Lama Zhang’s tutelage led to the Tangut Empire of Xi Xia (1038-1227 AD) adopting the cult of the wrathful protector deity, Mahakala. The Mahakala cult was used as an instrument for power.

The Tangut were a Sino-Tibetan tribal people who inhabited North Western China. The Tangut Empire was a small but powerful multi-ethnic kingdom along the Silk Road. It adopted many of the court rituals of Tibetan Buddhism and aspects of Tibetan art.

Imperial Preceptors

Tibetan Buddhists, known for their expertise in ritual magic, served the Tangut court as Imperial Preceptors.” A cleric who was tied to the Tangut imperial line, Tsami Lotsawa, is linked to a work entitled: The Instructions of Shri Mahakala: The Usurpation of Government, which dwelt on ways to overthrow a government by invoking Mahakala.

When Genghis Khan, the Mongol marauder, laid siege to the Tangut capital in 1210 AD, the Tangut’s last Tibetan Buddhist Imperial Preceptor, Tishri Repa (1164-1236 AD), invoked Mahakala to break dams and drown the invading Mongols. This impressed the Mongols who wanted to know more about Mahakala.

In 1270 CE, Kublai Khan, the Mongol, appointed the Tibetan cleric, Phakpa as his Imperial Preceptor, the highest religious authority in the land, just prior to the founding of the Yuan dynasty(1271-1368 AD). The Yuan emperors also followed the practice of appointing Tibetans as Imperial Preceptors.

While the title ‘Imperial Preceptor’ was never revived after the fall of the Yuan dynasty, the practice of appointing Tibetan monks as advisors and using the wrathful deity of Mahakala in politics and war, lasted for centuries. In the 13th century, Mahakala became a Mongol State protector. Mahakala was credited with intervening in several key battles, and temples dedicated to this deity were built throughout the empire, Debreczeny points out.

Most famously, during the campaign to conquer Southern China, Kublai asked Phakpa for Mahakala to intervene against the Chinese Southern Song. In 1275 CE, Kublai’s Nepalese court artist Anige (1244-1306 CE) constructed a temple with its statue facing south, Phakpa performed the rituals, and soon after the Song capital fell, he adds.

Panjaranatha Mahakala

The Song dynasty ruled China from 960 AD to 1279 AD

Debreczeny further says: This sculpture (made by Kublai Khan’s Nepalese sculptor) became a potent symbol of both Kublai’s rule and the Yuan imperial lineage. This association was so strong that four centuries later the Manchus, lacking the proper bloodlines, traced their own spiritual ancestry to Kublai Khan as the rightful inheritors of his Yuan legacy.”

The Yongle Emperor (1402-1424 CE) was the first Ming emperor to establish significant ties with Tibetan patriarchs. The Mings ruled from 1368 AD to 1644 AD.

Yongle had seized the throne, thus a cloud hung over his legitimacy. As part of his strategy to bolster his right to rule, Yongle invited the Tibetan hierarch, the Fifth Karmapa (1384-1415 CE), to the early Ming capital of Nanjing. After the Karmapa’s visit, Yongle styled himself a universal sacral ruler (Chakravartin).”

The Manchus, like the Mongols, were a people from north of the Great Wall who conquered China and assumed Tibetan Buddhism as a means of political legitimacy in ruling a vast multi-ethnic empire. Under the Manchus the focus was on the cult of the Bodhisattva of Wisdom Manjushri” Debreczeny says.

The Manchu emperors (1644 AD to 1912 AD), lacking the proper bloodlines to the Mongol ruling house, traced their own spiritual ancestry to Kublai Khan through the Tibetan succession mechanism of reincarnation. By promoting themselves as emanations of Manjushri, they declared themselves Kublai Khan reborn and the rightful inheritors of his Yuan legacy, the historian says.

It was the Qianlong emperor (1736-1795 CE) more than any other Manchu ruler who realized the potential of patronizing Tibetan Buddhism, as is evidenced by the incredible volume of Tibetan Buddhist images produced by the imperial workshops.

Debreczeny however makes it a point to clarify that the various Chinese empires’ engagement with Buddhism did not necessarily signify that the leaders ruled on Buddhistic principles.

Their employment of religious rhetoric was part of their claim to legitimacy, and their deployment of religious ritual was one of the means by which they sought to take and maintain power,” he says.

The Manchus, like the Mongols, were a people from north of the Great Wall who conquered China and assumed Tibetan Buddhism as a means of political legitimacy in ruling a vast multi-ethnic empire. Under the Manchus the focus was on the cult of the Bodhisattva of Wisdom Manjushri” Debreczeny says.

The Manchu emperors (1644 AD to 1912 AD), lacking the proper bloodlines to the Mongol ruling house, traced their own spiritual ancestry to Kublai Khan through the Tibetan succession mechanism of reincarnation. By promoting themselves as emanations of Manjushri, they declared themselves Kublai Khan reborn and the rightful inheritors of his Yuan legacy, the historian says.

It was the Qianlong emperor (1736-1795 CE) more than any other Manchu ruler who realized the potential of patronizing Tibetan Buddhism, as is evidenced by the incredible volume of Tibetan Buddhist images produced by the imperial workshops.

Debreczeny however makes it a point to clarify that the various Chinese empires’ engagement with Buddhism did not necessarily signify that the leaders ruled on Buddhistic principles.

Their employment of religious rhetoric was part of their claim to legitimacy, and their deployment of religious ritual was one of the means by which they sought to take and maintain power,” he says.

(The featured image at the top shows Lama Zhang)

Scrapping Presidency will solve everybody’s problems

April 8th, 2019

N.A.DE S. AMARATUNGA Courtesy The Island

article_image

Presidential system is a burden on the country and its people, and when it is like the present arrangement where the president and the parliament do not see eye to eye, it could be disastrous as being proved now. During the last four and a half years, nothing was done to develop the country as consensus was not possible on any issue, and investors sensing the discord would not take a chance with their money. At present the president is trying to enhance his image and the prime minister his, in view of the elections that hover in the horizon. The two have conflicting interests, and nothing gets done except heaps and heaps of promises. Therefore, the people would be better off without an executive presidency, and the burden of maintaining a more or less useless institution. The recent budget allocation for the president shows the magnitude of this issue. Further, a presidential election would cost about Rs. 500 Million, which this almost bankrupt country can ill afford. Moreover, the parliament is also proving to be ineffective in solving the country’s problems as it depends on minority ethnic parties for its existence, and has to dance to their tune forgetting the people’s woes. We need a stable government instead of a weak president and a tottering parliament.

There is no guarantee that future elections would bring in a better arrangement. Future elections too could result in a situation such as the present, with the president and prime minister belonging to two rival political parties with opposing national policies. It has happened in the past and may happen in the future. Consequently there will be two heads vying for supremacy and they will be eternally at loggerheads, and the country would slowly decay. This weakness will be exploited by corrupt politicians to make money, minority political parties to demand the moon, separatists to plot for a separate state, and foreign powers to pursue their geopolitical agenda, with the president and the prime minister tripping each other to please these devils.

The argument in support of an executive presidency is that the central control it has on the provincial council system is essential, without which the tendency for secession could be high. We must remember that the presidency came before the provincial councils, and neither made the other compulsory. One problem cannot be solved by another problem as clearly seen. We realize this after a long haul and great expense. Provincial councils are worse than the presidency, both in terms of cost and benefit. Our small economy cannot carry this dead wood any longer. However, an attempt to get rid of both at the same time might jeopardize the whole project and end up in total failure. Until Tamils realize that PCs are an “Anna round the neck” our poor people may have to carry the Tamils’ burden as well.

Another argument is that the war would not have been won if not for the presidency. On the contrary, a strong government and a determined prime minister would have done the job equally well. We have had presidents before, but none had the determination and the courage to fight to a finish. The preservation of the unitary nature of the state is said to be dependent on an executive president elected by the entire country. On the contrary, a strong parliament with a good majority, and with crossing over of MPs prevented by law, would be able to achieve whatever that an executive president could achieve.

Scrapping the presidency would solve the problems that the present political leaders face. All of them seem to be in a quandary and weighed down by their personal vendettas and ambitions, and unable to take a decision that is good for the country. If none of them take a step backward and all of them enter the fray, a chaotic and uncertain situation could result and the country could get into anarchy. To avoid such a situation all of them could get together and pool their resources to get rid of the inimical presidency, revise the electoral system according to the recommendations of the Dinesh Gunawardena Committee, bring the PCs under the control of the parliament, in the same way that the president has control over them at present, and enact necessary laws to prevent cross-overs by MPs.

Such an action plan would solve the problem of the incumbent president and also those who are vying to get presidential nomination and their supporters, who are waging a battle within their parties to the consternation of all concerned. These battles, if they continue in their present intensity and venom, have the potential to divide these composite parties irreparably, which in effect would be a tremendous loss to the country at large. Abolition of the presidency would also pave the way for an easier merging of fractions of like minded parties and forge stronger alliances to face the common foe. Also, a stronger common front against separatism and foreign interference could be coalesced if the intra-party bone of contention is removed. These parties must realize that their personal differences had not only cleaved their parties, but it had created an opportunity for separatists and foreign powers to exploit the political weakness thus created. And at present the country is in such peril due to the personal weaknesses of our leaders. To pursue with a presidential system, with all its immediate destructive possibilities and its long term cost to the people is to court disaster.

Small political parties may want the presidential system to continue for they fear that an abolition of the presidency would have concomitant electoral reforms, with a change in the present PR system which they think would be disadvantageous to their parties. This is a selfish attitude. If these leaders of small parties cannot win on their own, but has a role to play in the country’s politics and governance, the best for them would be to be absorbed into their respective patron parties; instead of holding those parties to ransom and forcing them to follow a policy inimical to the country. After all it is the votes of the patron party that carry them through, their inability to win on their own prove the point.

Abolition of the presidency, changing the electoral system, and enactment of other laws mentioned above would entail a constitutional reform. Time may not be enough to do all that before the declaration of the next presidential election. Yet, it may be possible to postpone the presidential election by a few months to find the time to do what is good for the country and all the present leaders. Let the leaders get together and do themselves a favour.

N.A.DE S. AMARATUNGA

‘War was not an ethnic issue, it was a conflict between terrorism and democracy’ Ammaipillai Yogamoorthy

April 8th, 2019

Courtesy The Island

April 8, 2019, 8:06 pm 

article_image

At the risk of sounding cliché, he started showing artistic talent at an early age, like most cartoonists featured in Pen Pricks. Although his childhood ambition was to become a doctor, his first comics were published in Veerakesari and the Indian newspaper, Swadesamitran when he was in year 9 at school.

He had his primary education in Sithivinayagar Vidyalayam, Point Pedro and secondary education at Puloly Boys’ School, Jaffna. He had an uncanny knack for cartoonizing his teachers and school mates, which was encouraged by his teachers. He learned Sinhala under Sumanananda Thera at Jaffna Naga Vihara. “My main source of income is translations and my Sinhala lessons at Naga Vihara was influential,” said the veteran.

Thinakkural political cartoonist Ammaipillai Yogamoorthy, Moorthy for short, is one of the longest standing political cartoonists of the country. He joined Thinakkural in 1997 and has done some 5,000 daily political cartoons to date. He won gold medals from Sri Lanka Asian Media Foundation in 2008 and 2010; Tamil Media Alliance, Best Cartoonist award in 2004 and runner-up in Tamil medium Best Cartoonist of the Year award in 2004, conferred by the Sri Lanka Press Institute and The Editors’ Guild of Sri Lanka. Moorthy was a member of the London Political cartoon society from 2004 to 2010.

He tried his hand at professional cartoons when he joined the fortnightly Tamil satirical magazine, Siritharan, back in the 60’s. The magazine’s founding Editor, R. Sundaralingam became Moorthy’s mentor, influential in him later deciding to follow in Sundar’s footsteps. “Sundar insisted I continue to cartoon even after he dies,” said Moorthy, reminiscing his mentors words.

Moorthy joined the government clerical service in 1966, stationed in Chavakachcheri, Jaffna. In 1984, he started his own agribusiness, while freelancing for Tamil papers. After his business collapsed he joined Thinakkural in 1997 and has never looked back since. He pioneered Tamil political cartoons, a medium not featured in Tamil newspapers until then. He still works at Thinakkural as a political cartoonist and translator.

However, he by no means restricts himself to political cartoons. “Rural Tamil community believes that retired clerks get around a lot, therefore are erudite,” Moorthy explained the basis of Clerk Kandasami, his social criticism cartoon. Clerk Kandasami, is a social reformer, who discusses social phenomena that have an immediate impact on Tamil culture. “For example most Tamils work abroad and send money to their parents in Sri Lankan. The parents waste their children’s hard earned money to maintain their bad habits such as alcoholism.”

His common man, unlike Camillus’ Silibibiris, Thalangama Jayasinghe’s A-Thuma, Hapuwalana’s Suwaris or Saradam and Wijesoma’s Punchi Sinno or Citizen Silva, is nameless.

Moorthy has an inherent Tamil cartoon style, that is unique in that it is flat and two dimensional. His characters are crude, yet readily identifiable and the facial expressions vivid. Although his earlier cartoons were rife with text he has reduced it to a minimum, keeping in step with the times.

When asked how the industry climate has changed in the two decades, Moorthy said that unlike the old days, cartoons and graphics can be computer generated. “But what’s important is not the method of drawing, but the message, specifically the political message a cartoon attempts to convey.” Moorthy observed that most of today’s cartoons are superficial. “They have substituted cheap humour for serious political message.”

When asked about the level of political influence exercised today as compared to the 90’s, Moorthy said that he is hardly intimidated by political influence and only reacts to the existing political situation in the country, in his cartoons. Moorthy plays no favourites but has a soft spot for Mahinda Rajapaksa, who he says had a good rapport with artists. Moorthy has drawn over 1,000 cartoons of MR.

“Cartoons are illustrated comments,” said Moorthy, when asked why cartoons are important. He pointed out that the significance of cartoons is never more evident than in the daily cartoon readings of newspaper reading TV shows. “Irrespective of social stature or cast, everybody’s interested in politics and the public, in general, is well-informed. And the message in any cartoon can be easily grasped at a glance by even the least educated person.”

He reiterated that a cartoonist must not be politically influenced or driven. “A cartoon must reflect the country’s real political situation. A cartoonist must mediate political issues in a neutral manner.”

When asked whether there is there freedom of expression, specially for a Tamil cartoonist, in Sri Lanka, Moorthy pointed out that Cartoons in itself is a result of freedom of expression. “Not even my Editor interferes with my cartoons.”

When asked how he deals with racism and religion, being a Tamil cartoonist, Moorthy said, “For any conflict, ethnic or otherwise, the spiritual approach is more effective than the political.” Moorthy considers himself a spiritual man than a political animal. Extremist ideals have no place in his cartoons.

When asked whether Sinhala and Tamil cartoons differ, Moorthy said, “Not much. They deal with the same politics. Cartoons differ according to the cartoonist’s political ideologies rather than his race or religion.” He pointed out that even war has been blown out of proportion. “It’s not an ethnic problem, it’s not even a political problem. The war was a conflict between terrorism and democracy.” He pointed out that the exact nature of the conflict has been ignored by Sri Lankan cartoons, giving it a satirical spin.

Present power crisis – The Chinese factor

April 8th, 2019

By Dr. Janaka Ratnasiri Courtesy The Island

article_image

In response to the writer’s previous articles on the present power crisis published in the Island of March 28th and April 05th, he has received from an investor some new information which would shed light on the real party behind the present power crisis. This investor claims that he has submitted a proposal in response to a call for proposals published in the press by the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) for setting up business ventures at Hambantota Port.

The information to be revealed hereunder could be considered confidential as they refer to Cabinet discussions. Since much misinformation about the present power crisis is being circulated by people in authority including politicians (which includes the President himself), ministry officials, professionals in the field and the media, to put the record straight, the writer feels that this information should be revealed in the public interest.

Proposal to build 1200 MW LNG power plant at Hambantota

A press notice calling for proposals says the investor is required to design, build, finance, manage and operate the business venture to be set up at the Hambantota Port, where 17 m deep jetty and a 610 m long berth for oil and gas projects are available. The closing date for receiving proposals was 24. 08. 2012. In response, the investor has submitted a proposal to build an LNG receiving terminal at the Hambantota Port along with a 1200 MW natural gas fired power plant in the Port premises, which has been accepted by the SLPA.

After evaluating the proposals and short-listing them, which took about one and a half years, the said proposal was recommended to the Cabinet by the then Minister of Ports and Shipping in March 2014 and was taken up at the Cabinet meeting on 03. 04. 2014. The Cabinet memorandum has recommended the construction of a 1200 MW of LNG power plants phased out over a period of eight years, subject to the investor entering into a Joint Venture Company (JVC) with the CEB and BOI and 10% shares issued to the Treasury. The power purchase agreement was to be entered by CEB with the JVC.

Subsequent to the recommendations made at this cabinet meeting, Secretary to the Treasury summoned a meeting of representatives of the Ministry of Ports & Shipping, Ministry of Power & Energy, Ministry of Investment Promotion and other relevant officials. According to a report, dated 09. 10. 2014 circulated as a follow-up to this meeting by the Secretary of Ministry of Ports & Shipping among all the stakeholders, the following observations were made at the meeting:

Need for a power plant at Hambantota

About 10 industrial/commercial projects were approved during 2011 and 2013, but work on any of them did not commence mainly because no assurance could be given of an uninterruptible power supply. Hence, building the proposed power plants would be a prerequisite for the development of the industrial zone associated with the Hambantota Port. It has also been reported that the existing industries are very enthusiastic about having an LNG power plant at Hambantota as it will not cause pollution including coal ash.

The investor present at the meeting gave the assurance that he could supply uninterrupted power as required and build an LNG terminal hub, which meant the re-exporting of LNG as well as extending its use in other sectors locally in transport. The Investor agreed to form a JVC as suggested and the SLPA agreed to lease out the necessary extent of land within the Port premises to set up the LNG storage tanks and the power plant.

Cheapest offer for power generation

One critical factor referred to at this meeting was that only the energy cost would be charged at not more than UScts 7 per kWh of electricity, and that no capacity charges or other hidden costs would be levied. This is very important because capacity charges are payable whether the plant runs or not. It was reported in media that the CEB had been paying billions of rupees as capacity charges for the controversial diesel power plant in Jaffna even during the period when it remained shut down.

The outcome of the above meeting, along with the observations of the Ministry of Finance was again submitted to the Cabinet for consideration at its meeting held on 30. 10. 2014. Subsequent to receiving the concurrence of the Cabinet, the Secretary ofthe Ministry of Ports & Shipping wrote to the Chairman of SLPA on 02.12.2014 directing him to implement the project. This was followed up by the SLPA writing to the Investor on 20. 04. 2015, releasing 30 ha of land within the Port premises requesting him to take necessary follow up action.

Cancellation of the project by CCEM

The Investor subsequently commenced preliminaries such as getting the environment impact assessment report prepared. Then to his surprise, he received a copy of a letter dated 21. 06. 2016 from the Chairman of SLPA, addressed to the Secretary to the President, informing him that the project had been disallowed by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Management (CCEM) on a decision taken at a meeting on 25. 05. 2016. The reason given was that the CCEM had decided to put on hold all the projects planned under the RFPs because the government had decided to hand over the Hambantota Port to the Chinese!

Would a similar thing happen anywhere else in the world? The government invites proposals from investors to set up business ventures at their own expense and approves a project from an investor who has submitted a proposal to generate clean power at a rate cheaper than what the government spends currently and gives the green light for him to proceed after releasing land also. Then China comes in and demands ownership of the Port in exchange for the debt the government owes China. The government meekly agrees to cancel all commitments it has made to investors. Isn’t this a shameful act done with no self-respect? The government could have handed over the Port but without cancelling the projects it had already agreed to. This is after the BOI collecting over LKR 9 million from the investor as application processing fee. What signals would this action send to new investors?

One-stop centre for BOI projects at Hambantota – a farce?

It was reported in the media recently that the BOI has opened on March 23, 2019, a one-stop service centre for the benefit of businessmen who wish to invest in projects at the Hambantota Port. The new centre was reported to be a joint venture between the BOI and the new Port Authority, to provide all information about Sri Lanka’s investment policies to those interested in investing in Hambantota. The Hambantota Port was targeting port-related investments within the 3.5 square km area allocated for the Hambantota Port’s development. However, when the potential investors come to know of the government’s decision to cancel projects which had already been granted approval, under pressure from a foreign government, won’t any sane party think twice before deciding whether to come to Hambantota?

Had the project not been aborted by the government, it would have commenced in mid-2016 after completing the EIA within one year. With the fuel being natural gas, there would not have been any pollution unlike in the case of a coal-fired power plant, and the location has already been set up, EIA approval would not have taken much time. With the construction of the plant to be undertaken by the investor, there would not have been any ministry tender procedures which could have delayed the process. The time span could have been further reduced if the proposal had not been referred to the Cabinet twice.

Loss due to cancellation of project

Consequently, the first phase of simple cycle operation generating 200 MW of power could have been completed by the end of 2017 and the balance work generating additional 100 MW of power generation by the end of 2018, generating a total of 300 MW of clean power in 2019 at a cost of LKR 12.25 a unit (@ LKR 175 per USD). CEB’s Statistical Digest for 2017 has reported that the average fuel cost alone for operating the CEB’s thermal power plants to be LKR 12.22 a unit in 2017.

With overheads and cost of operation and maintenance added, the cost of generation would likely to exceed LKR 20 a unit. The other important factor is that there wouldn’t be any external costs as there is no pollution caused by natural gas. Under such circumstances, wouldn’t the proposed LNG-operated power plant, expected to generate about 2000 GWh annually, been a wind-fall to the CEB, helping it save around LKR 15 Billion annually? This is the loss to the country by cancelling the proposed LNG project.

Parties responsible for cancelling the project

Now, who is responsible for killing this clean power project when it was about to take off the ground with no financial burden on the government? Was it the President or the Prime Minister or the line Minister or the Cabinet or the CCEM? Somebody should take the responsibility. Apparently, this matter has been questioned even in the Parliament, recently. They cannot get away by trying to put the blame on the PUCSL for not approving the CEB plan promptly, which has no relevance to the present crisis.

A lot of people talk about the President killing the Sampur project but even if it had been allowed to proceed it wouldn’t have solved today’s crisis as explained in the earlier articles by this writer. But the general public does not seem aware that the government killed the LNG project, which could have generated clean and cheap power by now if it had been allowed to proceed. It is sad that the government did so, disregarding the national priorities just to make the Chinese happy.

In his previous article written on April 5th, the writer said that Sri Lanka didn’t have the courage to say ‘no to India when it offered to build a coal’-fired power plant at Sampur with conditions when the CEB had already called for proposals for setting up power plants with no financial commitment. All these proposals were set aside in favour of the Indian offer and that was the first mistake Sri Lanka made.

Second instance of yielding to pressure

from a foreign country

Now, this is the second mistake made by the government when it cancelled the LNG project, which was about to commence. In so doing, Sri Lanka demonstrated to the world that it had no backbone to tell China that the country had to give priority to its national needs. Why is the country so subservient to foreign powers? Why do our leaders allow these foreign powers to bully Sri Lanka in this manner? This has resulted in everyone being troubled by power interruptions which affect the day-to-day activities as well as the economy of the country?

Instead of owning up to their own mistakes responsible for killing the power projects planned earlier or trying to find out what has happened in the past, the country’s leaders seem happy to bash officials referring to their conflicts which have no relevance to the current power crisis. If the leaders are not capable of logical thinking, how can they run a country?

Conclusion

It appears that several factors have contributed to the present power crisis.

=Firstly, the undue long delay in selecting an investor to build the 300 MW combined cycle power plant at Kerawalapitiya, for which proposals were invited in November 2016. The CEB’s procurement division is totally responsible for this as described in a previous article.

=Secondly, the undue long delay of over 10 years for finalizing the plans to build the coal power plant at Sampur, for which CEB and NTPC delegates who took part in the negotiations are responsible.

=Thirdly, the cancellation of the BOO project inviting proposals in November 2006 to build 4×300 MW coal power plants on the Southern coast during 2012 – 2020, for which the line ministry and CEB are collectively responsible.

=Fourthly, the cancellation of the BOO project to build a 1200 MW LNG power plant at Hambantota, initially with 300 MW capacity, when it was about to commence work in 2015, for which the Government including CCEM was responsible.

In summary, it can be said that politicians, government policymakers, economic advisers, CEB engineering professionals and the government procurement committees are equally responsible for the present power crisis.

Mangala Samaraweera gets nothing out of licking Bachelet’s boots.

April 7th, 2019

H. L. D. Mahindapala

Mangala Samaraweera’s speech apologising to UNHRC High Commissioner, Michelle Bachelet was rather difficult to read on my PC because my screen was blurred with his crocodile tears shed for human rights. Simultaneously, his tears were interspersed with scorn and anger against the Sri Lankan delegates who dared to challenge the questionable and unworkable foundations of his Resolution 30/1. He had also pitched his speech at a high spiritual and moral level to make it sound as if he was the New Messiah standing on Mt. Sinai, announcing the New Commandments, in addition to the existing Ten Commandments, for universal human conduct. But beneath the pretentious piety was his humiliating and unwarranted political objective: to prostrate before Bachelet and let her know that he has not abandoned (1) her, (2) Samantha Power, his patron saint in US, and (3) his Resolution 30/1 selling the nation down the river. It is apparent that the speech was written more to appease his masters/mistresses abroad than to find solutions for the victims referred to in Resolution 30/1 at home.

Taking up cudgels on behalf of those in the UNHRC cesspool”, already abandoned with utter contempt by Samantha Power, he says: As the person who held the portfolio of Foreign Affairs when resolution 30/1 of 01 October 2015 was adopted, I feel that it is my duty to respond to some of the malicious arguments being made and misrepresentation of facts.” Here the knight in shining armour from Matara was announcing his battle cry in defence of the damsel in distress at the UNHRC. With that pronouncement he engages in a lengthy exercise to paint himself as an obedient abith-thaya, bending in two, to please Ms. Bachelet. He says:” I offer an apology to High Commissioner Michelle Bachelet, a true friend of Sri Lanka’s people, a champion of the Global South, and herself a survivor of the horrors of torture. (” Really! A true friend of Sri Lanka?). Why should we apologise to Bachelet for exercising the right to challenge the myths, inaccuracies and fictitious numbers which she is touting to push her anti-Sri Lankan offensive?

And then – hold your breath! — he adds: High Commissioner Bachelet, you did not deserve the misrepresentation of your statements.”  OMG! This friend of Sri Lanka” accuses and indicts the Sri Lankan forces as murderers of 40,000 Tamils – a fabricated figure challenged and disproved by Lord Naseby who has established on British documentary evidence that those killed in the last stages of the war were around 5,000 – 7,000. So who is misrepresenting” the facts and figures? Since Ms.Bachelet refuses to accept the most reliable figures documented in the unimpeachable British secret files I personally would like to tell her: High Commissioner Bachelet, like everyone else, you deserve every bit of the consequences of your refusal to accept the facts / truth staring in your face!.”

One of the consequences of her intransigent refusal to accept the verifiable facts and figures is to place the future of UNHRC in jeopardy. Already America, one of the sponsors of the Resolution 30/1 has left UNHRC condemning it as a cesspool”. Ms. Bachelet is facing an uphill task in restoring the UNHRC as a moral agency capable of living up to the expected  standards of decency and morality  – i.e., defend and protect human rights with facts and truth. She cannot win the confidence of the international community with lies. The first step she should take to maintain the dignity, integrity and the credibility of her office is to get her facts and figures right.

By now she should have enough incontrovertible evidence on her table to know that she cannot defend, promote or protect human rights in Sri Lanka on unchecked figures packaged by Darusman whose sources have not been made transparent for the accused parties to check and accept his secret documents as the legal basis to pursue a case against Sri Lanka. That medieval system of accusing and punishing the accused on anonymous and secret sources went out with the Star Chamber and the Inquisition. That pernicious and unfair practice of convicting accused people violates all basic principles of human rights.

Besides, the fact that the figure of 40,000 mentioned in a UN report doesn’t make it true or reliable. UN reports, particularly those that are secret, are not the final repositories of the truth / facts necessary to formulate constructive policies, or to initiate legal action for violating human rights. She must be aware that the biggest crime against humanity committed by the UN was when it accepted the lies of Colin Powell accusing Iraq of being in possession of WMDs. It was also on a UN-sponsored resolution that a naval cordon was thrown round Iraq to block the supply of medical and other essentials – a criminal act that killed 600,000 children of that ill-fated nation.

Lies are vital for Big Powers and institutions like UNHRC manipulated by Big Powers, to bully small nations. For instance,  Ms. Bachelet who is so worked up about Sri Lanka is not likely to work with the same urgency and perseverance  to take action Israel’s war crimes in Palestine or India’s violations of human right in oppressing the people of Kashmir. Nor will she open up a file to investigate the brutal massacre of unarmed doctors, nurses, and helpless patients in the Jaffna hospital by the Indian army – an incident well documented. Her bravado will be directed only at a small like Sri Lanka. Besides, Ms. Bachelet, who has brilliant academic record, should know by now that she could never leave behind a legacy of being a defender of human right if she pursues a partisan agenda that ignore the facts and truths. She should know that the UN charter was set up to achieve its noble objective only through scientific and verifiable truths and not on voodoo lies.

 In fairness to her it must be mentioned that she has been a progressive leader of Chile. She was a popular leader who was elected twice as President by the Chileans. There was, of course, the case of her romantic relationship with Alex Vijokovic Trier of Manuel Rodriguez Patriotic Front, an armed group which was engaged in violence against the military dictator, Gen.Pinochet. When she was accused of being an activist in this Front she denied engaging in violence. And when she was President her son was accused of getting a bank loan of $10 million dollars to finance a land investment of his wife. Once again she denied knowing anything about it. But her popularity plummeted to a new low.

She was also at the receiving end of Gen. Pinochet’s brutal violence. So she should be equipped with ample knowledge not only to receive violence but also to give it back. She also knows how to dispense politicised justice like the way she goes after the Sri Lankan soldiers on fake figures. But all this is acceptable to Samaraweera. because he thinks she is a friend of Sri Lanka”. Backing her, he says, quite blithely:: The Human Rights Council is not a court of law. That is not the place to argue and debate over the number of dead or missing. All these including the information obtained by Lord Naseby are matters for Sri Lankan processes including the Sri Lankan justice system.”

There are two arguments here: 1. UNHRC is not the place to argue and debate the numbers dead or missing (Where in the UNHRC is this written?) and  2.Lord Naseby’s figures are matters for Sri Lankan processes and not for discussion in international fora. . (Really!)

 Re.1: He is craftily attempting to remove, or downplay the impact of numbers from the international debate now that  Lord Naseby had exposed the fact that the Sri Lankan forces had not killed 40,000 Tamils in the last days of the longest running war in Asia. Resolution 30/1, which he co-sponsored, would gain credibility only if the figures are inflated to prove that the Sri Lanka forces have been brutal killers of Tamils on a mass scale – somewhere in the region of tens of thousands. Anything less than ten thousand doesn’t carry weight to convince the public that there has been a genocidal massacre” – the line plugged by the Tamil lobby to gain political mileage. In fact, Resolution 30/1 gained international attention on the fictitious figure of 40,000.Even the international community will sit up and take notice only if the dead are in the region of tens of thousands and not below 10,000.

The INGOs ignored the thousands killed throughout the 34-year-old war and focused only on the last three months because the Tamil lobby and their allied NGOs, who attempted to save Prabhakaran from humiliating defeat, raised the bogus cry of a mass massacre in the final assault. And when the end came the NGOs had nothing to fall on except to run berserk with their own cooked up figure of 40,000 dead. A typical example is the UN Representative in Colombo, Gordon Weiss, who estimated the dead to be 7,000 when he was in Colombo and jacked it up to 40,000 when he returned to his home in Australia to market his book, The Cage. Later, when questioned, he reduced the figure to 10,000. I e-mailed him and requested an interview. He agreed at first and then backed out like all pro-Tamil propagandists. Even M. Sumanthiram and C. V. Wigneswaran who distort history, politics, and facts and figures backed off when they were pressed for a debate or an interview.

It is Lord Naseby’s figures dug out from the British secret files that nailed the Tamil propagandist and Resolution 30/1. His figures punctured the hot air balloon floated by the Tamil propagandists. His figures do not fit into their fiction of a genocidal war”, or anti-Sri Lankan resolution at the UNHRC.  The political agenda of Samaraweera too demands a figure of 40,000 or more. Now that he does not have the figures to prove the Tamil claim of a genocidal massacre” he says figures are not valid for debates at the UNHRC.

If the UNHRC is not the place to debate the numbers dead or missing in the armed conflict in Sri Lanka then why did Samaraweera go all out to sponsor the UNHRC Resolution 30/1 which, among other things, is aimed at setting up judicial mechanism with foreign judges to take punitive action against Sri Lankan soldiers accused by him, his friend” Bachelet, and also his friends in the Tamil Diaspora, of violating human rights? He didn’t agree to hybrid courts to judge a cricket match between the warring parties, did he? His Resolution refers to investigation of serious crimes involving human rights violations, or violations of international humanitarian laws”?  These charges cannot be prosecuted or tried without counting the dead and the missing.

That is also the central issue in the Resolution raised and pushed hard by the anti-Sri Lankan Tamil and Western lobbies. Samaraweera too was quick to pick the fictitious figures of the dead and missing to justify the sponsoring of his Resolution. Embarrassed by Lord Naseby’s revelations he is now on his back foot struggling to save his face. He is now singing a different tune. He is saying UNHRC is not the place to argue and debate the numbers dead or missing. Ha! Ha!

It is the fictitious figure of 40,000 cooked up by Darusman, a man with a grouse against Sri Lanka, that clinched the argument for the anti-Sri Lankan lobby to vote against us. The case against Sri Lanka would not have got off the ground if the figures of Lord Naseby figures were available in 2015 when Resolution 30 /1 was passed by UNHRC. Lord Naseby’s figures have been an embarrassment to Ranil-Mangala move to tie the hands of Sri Lanka and parade the nation as genocidal killers who must tried in hybrid courts. In fact, the Ranil-Samaraweera government refused to revise or, reject Resolution 30/1 based on the hard evidence of  Lord Naseby’s figures invalidating the rationale on which they co-sponsored the Resolution in 2015. Besides, it is the fake numbers accepted by Samaraweera which makes him and his Resolution 30/1 a total betrayal of Sri Lanka’s national interests. If he thinks he can build peace, reconciliation and stability on fake figures then he got another think coming!

Re.2: In the same breath, he says that figures are matters for Sri Lankan processes and not the UNHRC. According to him the local Truth Commission is going to be a Sri Lankan made instrument for Sri Lankans to confess their crimes.  If and when it begins it is likely to question him on the various causes and events  the war, including the last stages which has become the critical focus of human rights activists. Will not the dead and the missing feature prominently in that process? And when that issues is raised whose figure will he present? Darunu-man’s or Lord Knows-be’s? The Tamil lobby is having a field day, nationally and internationally, gaining maximum political mileage by vilifying and denigrating the nation with the fictitious figure of 40,000. And what does he do? Sweet llaregub!. (This neologism was created by one of my favourite poet’s, Dylan Thomas, to be read backwards).

One has to go way back in time to Don Juan Dharmapala, to find stooges of the West like the Ranil-Mangala combo. They are two masochistic maniacs who are prostrating at the feet of the Western masters and mistresses pleading with them to whip them more and more. Their appetite to receive humiliating whippings from the West is insatiable. The history of post-Independent foreign policy, however, runs contrary to the cringing roles of this duo.

Let’s begin with the role of Sir. John Kotelawela at the famous Bandung  Non-aligned meeting. When Pandit Nehru asked Sir. John Kotelawela why he didn’t show his pro-American speech before it was delivered he retorted: You didn’t show me yours. Why should I show you mine if you didn’t show me yours!” (This is only a paraphrasing!).

Now that’s how he asserted his status as the leader of a proud nation, though small. Tarzie Vittachi, who was my first editor in The Observer, won the plaudits of even the Marxist Left when he threw out the American embassy press attaché from his office when the Yankee walked into to dictate the editorial policy. President Ranasinghe Premadasa taught India a lesson in foreign policy when it decided to boycott the SAARC meeting hosted by him because the Indians were plotting for a regime change. Instead of going begging to India he got on the phone and persuaded all other regional nations to attend. When they agreed to follow President Premadasa’s lead India had no option but to join, though humiliated by his courageous counter-move. He is also the first leader of the nation who dared to kick Britain in the butt by declaring David Gladstone, the British High Commissioner who was a descendant of the famous British Prime Minister, William Gladstone, persona non grata, for attempting to interfere in the domestic elections. Lakshman Kadirgamar also threw out two diplomats for overstepping their mark.

But Ranil-Mangala duo are behaving like two political ponies who take great delight in giving their backs for the West to ride on. What is worse, they seem to enjoy every minute of giving the White men a free ride on their backs!. The people are entitled to ask one straightforward question: Are they political leaders, or are they political poltroons ever willing to sell the country to foreigners?

In his speech Samaraweera makes a farcical attempt to impress that he is a man of high moral values with a scholarly background. Though his speech is sprinkled with reference to Buddha, Jesus, Mohammed and Mani, the founder of Manichean doctrine, there is a touch of starchy artificiality in the laboured attempts to impress his greatness and nobility. He fails because the facts facing him debunk his own fictions. One can see through the pompous attempts of Samaraweera to pose as an intellectual when he quotes Mani, the founder of Manichean doctrine. But those who know Samaraweera will agree that no light has come out of the black hole in his head.

Though in his speech he invokes the values of the highest moral and spiritual authorities it can never erase the hypocrisy of a man who stood on the floor of the House and abused Sri Lanka’s first female Olympian in humiliating filth. Sprinter Susanthika Jayasinghe, the Olympian bronze medallist, was ridiculed in abusive language for not yielding to one of his Cabinet colleagues’ sexual appetites. He treats a Sri Lankan heroine with utter contempt, but he crawls on his fours to lick the boots of anti-Sri Lankan apparatchik at UNHRC who has no compunction in whipping Sri Lankans

He piously preaches human rights to create feel good sounds in the ears of Samantha Power and Bachelet. In the same breath he has no reservations about condemning his mate Mahinda Rajapakse, accusing him of operating a white van culture”. However, he slyly omits the role played by Sudath Chandrasekera, who described himself as Ranil’s rathu thol pook kolla (red-lipped ass boy). Chandrasekera has confessed in his letter of resignation how he thrashed with kurundu polu” (cinnamon poles) the opposition activists marching through Samaraweera’s electorate in Matara. Did Samaraweera utter one word in sympathy with the victims of his leader’s thugs going on the rampage, attacking political activists protesting against his leader and his corrupt government? He allows his leader’s thugs to beat the day lights out of their political opponents in his own backyard and expects us to believe that he is a compassionate disciple of Lord Buddha. Does he expect us to believe his  hypocrisy as one of the four noble truths?

With all this boru-shoke” doesn’t Samaraweera’s ali-keli fit neatly into the old Sinhala adage: Lo-keta pera-kashay; gedetta mara-gar-thay”?

UN Torture Prevention Body visits HRCSL

April 7th, 2019

Dr Sudath Gunasekara

April 6, 2019   11:53 pm

The delegation of the United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (SPT) has visited the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka.

The SPT Delegation met with Dr. Deepika Udagama, Chairperson of the Commission and Commissioners Ms. Ramani Muttetuwegama and Ms. Ambika Satkunanathan and discussed issues of mutual concern and interest on 04 April.

The delegation is composed of Victor Zaharia, Head of Delegation (Republic of Moldova), Satyabhooshun Gupt Domah (Mauritius), Petros Michaelides (Cyprus), and June Lopez (Philippines).

The UN’s torture prevention body is visiting Sri Lanka from 2 to 12 April to examine the treatment of people deprived of their liberty and the safeguards in place for their protection against torture and ill-treatment.

In addition to meeting with the Human Rights Commission and civil society organizations, the four-member delegation will also meet government officials and hold discussions with relevant ministries.

Their talks in Colombo will focus on advising and assisting the Sri Lankan authorities regarding the measures they must take to be in compliance with the obligations contained in the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture.

The Subcommittee will be visiting places of deprivation of liberty and will hold discussions on Sri Lanka establishing an independent National Preventive Mechanism.

The Optional Protocol, which Sri Lanka ratified in 2017, requires such a mechanism to be established with the authority and capacity to undertake preventive visits to any place where persons may be deprived of their liberty.

During our visit we will be exploring the steps Sri Lanka needs to take to effectively prevent torture and ill-treatment of people deprived of their liberty,” said Victor Zaharia

Comments by Dr Sudath Gunasekara.

I suspect this to be another attempt to interfere with the internal affairs of this country where the Western groups with vested interests in collaboration with Tamil Diaspora is trying to collect cooked up data against the Government of this country.

Why does the Government allow this type of biased delegations to visit this country to create more headache in addition to damages done by such groups visited in the recent past. Their itinerary and the list of people they intend to meet clearly shows their hidden motives.

Why cant the Government ask them to go home without interfering in our internal matters.

Why do these people come only now to find faults with the government?. Why didn’t they come when the LTTE was murdering and torturing thousands for 30 long years. Where were they then.

 These are serious issues the Government takes immediately, if there is one in this country.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress