100 Megawatt wind farm project stuck in the Cabinet

September 9th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

How  Sri Lankan Industry can benefit

By Sandun Jayawardena

A Danish wind turbine manufacturer has won a tender to build the 100 MegaWatt wind farm in Mannar but the project is held up by delays at Cabinet level.
The Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) has now urged Cabinet to speed up approval of the US$ 140 million (Rs 22,68 billion) project which Vestas Asia Pacific A/S, Denmark, secured, following evaluation of international competitive bids. The venture is expected to be completed by May 2020.Approval of the Standing Cabinet Appointed Procurement Committee (SCAPC) and the Asian Development Bank, which is providing funds under a concessionary loan, has already been approved, but Cabinet approval is still pending. Electricity from this project can be generated at less than US 5 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh). This is just below Rs 8 per kWh at prevailing exchange rates, CEBEU Committee Member Athula Wanniarachchi said.

Construction of Wind Farm would be greatly influenced by climate conditions in Mannar, Mr Wanniarachchi warned. Therefore, timely awarding of the contract is crucial, to complete the project by the May 2020 deadline, as wind turbines need to be hoisted prior to the onset of the South-West monsoon. If there is a considerable delay in commencing project activities, they may end up having to hoist up the turbines during strong monsoonal winds, which may not be feasible,” he observed.In such a scenario, the CEB estimates that, completion of the project may have to be pushed back to the first quarter of 2021. This would mean the plant would lose out on generating 280 million kWh of electricity, from a South-West monsoonal season. The CEBEU has urged the Cabinet to approve the project, so that, the contract can be awarded by next month.

UK government moots infrastructure projects are mooted not because state has an overflowing coffers but to generate employment, jobs for Consultants, and project manager’s .Such mega projects creates indirect income to the local population and small time entrepreneurs to start businesses in project areas.

Project like Cross Rail construction is carried out by many UK companies with assistance from other foreign companies.

Construction of the Elizabeth line is now in its final stages. Testing of new trains and infrastructure is underway and continues alongside the remaining fit-out of the station

https://www.kingscross.co.uk/media/Construction-Newsletter-Summer_2013_150.pdf

TEN NEW STATIONS IN CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST LONDON

The Crossrail project is delivering new stations at Paddington, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Farringdon, Liverpool Street, Whitechapel, Canary Wharf, Custom House, Woolwich and Abbey Wood.

Each of the ten new stations will have its own, distinct character, conceived by different architects, which reflect the environment and heritage of the local area. However, at platform level, common design components such as seating, signage and full-height platform screen doors will create a consistent and familiar feel to the rest of the TfL network.

In Sri Lanka most of the mega projects are taken by either Korean or Chinese Companies or in the case of Wind Farm Project, Danish Company may fabricate the units and install themselves without even requesting local companies to quote.

When I was in Project Management Team of construction of 125000 Barrel second space of Reliance Petroleum project ,Indian owners have insisted that most of the equipment should be purchased in India and construction contracts should be given to local companies .Large Korean Companies got involved only when such expertise is not available in the country .

In Sri Lanka certain mega projects like ,Arruwakkaru Garbage  Project,Colombo Storm Water Tunnel Project ,Mono Rail project are given to Chinese and Korean Companies where contribution by local companies are min minimum ,

State agencies who prepare tender documents include such clauses so that local companies cannot be qualified .Argument put forward by the Consultants is that under ADB or World Bank funding they cannot change tender conditions !

Even upcoming small and medium time contractors are disqualified in taking part due to stringent requirement that they should have CIDA (ICTAD) higher level registration

It is high time that Government imposes conditions to all state agencies that certain percentage of the mega contracts should be given to Local Contractors or Consortiums.

In the case of Wind Farm Project, Steel or Concrete columns can be build be Local companies, Local Consultants should be integrated into the project management Team.

CEB Engineering Union dominated by only electrical engineers do not give and chance to Mechanical Engineers in the organization. Various failures and defects of Norrochcholai Power Plant have been surfaced because CEB did not get services of Mechanical Engineers and Marine Engineers.

CEB permitted Chinese to supply two 5000 ton Dump Barges with Two independent tugs to transport coal powder from large bulk carrier to shore .These units were used few time as CEB found that they cannot be used due to difficulty in Manoeuvring .If Marine Engineers were consulted, the location of the unloading pier would have been built in Deeper part of the sea with a break water, and barges could have been self-propelled.

Promotions in CEB for mechanical engineers is held up because CEB Electrical Engineers Mafia blocks them.

Minister in charge of Power being a highly educated person should ensure that CEB deploys local consultants and companies to provide technical advice or execute part of the Wind Farm Project to benefit Sri Lankan Economy

 

 

 

කසළ රඳවන ව්‍යාපෘතියට අදාළ පළවන මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා අසත්‍යයි – බස්නාහිර සංවර්ධන අමාත්‍යාංශය

September 9th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

පුත්තලම, අරුවක්කාලු සනීපාරක්ෂක කසළ රඳවනය ඉදිකිරීමේ ව්‍යාපෘතියට අදාළ අපද්‍රව්‍ය මුදාහැරීම සඳහා කලපු ප්‍රදේශයට කාණුවක් කපා ඇති බවට පළවන මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා සම්පූර්ණයෙන් අසත්‍ය බවට මහා නගර හා බස්නාහිර සංවර්ධන අමාත්‍යාංශය අවධාරණය කරයි.

When such megaprojects and planned authorities should ensure to hold multiple meetings in the project area with stake holder participation to explain the Engineering and Environment aspects of the project .SLLRDC which is playing a major role in execution of these projects should know better. During the planning stages of 4 billion Rs Canal Rehabilitation Project and the Muthurajawela Reclamation Project, many meeting were held to explain details of the project with participation of MPs of the government of opposition .members of local authorities NGO representatives etc. ,

Many arguments were placed in these forums and answers were given to pacify the people who had various negative views.

During the execution of the projects there were hardly any protest.

Megaplolis Ministry should have requested counterpart funds to perform such operation and social impact specialist, environment specialist should work hand in hand and conduct these workshops regularly

Can anyone tell whether the purpose of digging a gutter/canal towards the lagoon was evert discussed with the people in the area so that any doubts created among them eliminated beforehand?

Next step of the Garbage Project will be to build a collecting and dispatching station on Peliyagoda where garbage will be loaded to be transported to Aruwakkalu

I will not be surprised if the people in the area including the Dutugamunu of Kelaniya and the Field Marshal start creating problems unless Megapolis holds many meetings to explain and give maximum publicity about the positive aspects of the project .

 

ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවත් විස්සත් එන්නේ එකම තැනකින්:

September 9th, 2018

හිටපු අගවිනිසුරු සරත් එන්. සිල්වා

ජනතා මුදල් සොරා කෑ පුද්ගලයන් අල්ලා පර සක්වල ගසන බවට වහසි බස් දොඩමින් බලයට පත් ආණ්ඩුව වසර තුනකින් පසුව හදිසියේම ත්‍රිපුද්ගල විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ ස්ථාපිත කොට දූෂණ, වංචා පිළිබඳ නඩු විභාග පැවැත්වීමට සූදානම් වේ. එම විශේෂ අධිකරණය පළමුවරට මේ මස 24 දින රැස්වීමට නියමිතය. බැලු බැල්මට මෙය ජනතා හිතවාදී, නීතියට අදාළ නෛතික ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් සේ පෙනී ගිය ද, මෙය ද ඡන්ද විමසීම් ඉලක්ක කොට සිදු කිරීමට යන තවත් එක් දේශපාලන පලිගැනීමක් බව පැහැදිලිය. එහි ඇති පලිගැනීමේ ස්වභාවය යටපත් කිරීම සඳහා මෙය විධිමත් නෛතික ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් සේ පෙන්වීමට උත්සාහ කළ ද ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම මෙම විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ පිහිටුවීම ද මෙම ආණ්ඩුව පත්වූ දා සිට අනුගමනය කරන නීති විරෝධී ක්‍රියාදාමයේ තවත් පියවරක් පමණකි.

චෝදනාවක් විභාග කිරීමේ සාමාන්‍ය ක්‍රමය වන්නේ පොලිස් ස්ථානයක් වෙත කරනු ලැබූ පැමිණිල්ලක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් පහළ උසාවියකින් කරනු ලබන මූලික විභාගයක් පැවැත්වීමය. ඉහළ උසාවියකට අදාළ පරීක‍ෂණය යොමු කෙරෙන්නේ ඉන් පසුවය. එය අපගේ අපරාධ නඩු විධාන සංග්‍රහයේ පැහැදිලිව දක්වා ඇති අතර මෙම ක්‍රමය ජාත්‍යන්තරව පිළිගත් නියමයන්ට අනුව සකස් කොට ඇත්තේ චූදිතයන්ගේ මූලික අයිතීන් ආරක‍ෂා වන පරිද්දෙනි.

කෙසේ වෙතත් චෝදනාවේ බරපතළකම අනුව ත්‍රිපුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් යටතේ විභාගයක් පැවැත්වීමට නෛතික ප්‍රතිපාදන අපගේ පවත්නා නීතියේ තිබේ. ඒ සඳහා විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ පත් කිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවක් නැත. පවත්නා නීතිය යටතේ එලෙස ති්‍රපුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් යටතේ විභාග වූ නඩු ලෙස ක්‍රිෂාන්ති කුමාරස්වාමි ඝාතන නඩුව, රීටා ජෝන් නඩුව සඳහන් කළ හැකිය. අවසන් වතාවට මෑතක දී පැවැති එවන් නඩු විභාගයක් වන්නේ භාරත ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍ර ඝාතන නඩුවයි.

මෙහිදී සිදුවන්නේ අදාළ නඩු විභාගය සඳහා ත්‍රිපුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් පත් කරන ලෙස නීතිපතිවරයා, අගවිනිසුරුගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටීමෙන් පසු අගවිනිසුරු විසින් ඒ සඳහා අවශ්‍ය පියවර ගැනීමය. එලෙස ත්‍රිපුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් නඩු විභාගයකින් පසු දෙන තීන්දුවට එරෙහිව හිමි වන්නේ එක් අභියාචනා අවස්ථාවක් වන අතර එය විභාග කෙරෙන්නේ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ පංච පුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් ඉදිරියේය.

සුවිශේෂී හෝ ඉක්මණින් විභාග කොට අවසන් කළ යුතු නඩු විභාග සම්බන්ධයෙන් අපගේ නීතියේ එවන් ප්‍රතිපාදන තිබිය දී විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ පිහිටුවීමට ආණ්ඩුව තීරණය කරන්නේ දේශපාලන පලිගැනීමේ හා වාසි ලබා ගැනීමේ අරමුණෙන් බව පැහැදිලිය.
මේ විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ මඟින් නඩු විසඳීමට යන්නේ මේ පිළිගත් නීත්‍යානුකූල ක්‍රමයට නොව ඊට පිටින් නීත්‍යානුකූල නොවෙන ක්‍රමයකටය. මෙම විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ සඳහා නඩු යොමු කෙරෙන්නේ පොලිස් මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය නම් නීති විරෝධී පොලිස් ඒකකය විසින් සිදු වු කළ පරීක‍ෂණ පදනම් කර ගෙනය.

මෙම පොලිස් මුල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය නීති්‍යානුකූල නොවෙන ආයතනයක් බව මම මීට පෙරද ස`දහන් කොට ඇත්තෙමි.
පොලිස්පතිවරයා එය පිහිටුවා ඇත්තේ පොලිස් ආඥා පනතේ 55 වැනි වගන්තිය යටතේය. පොලිස් ආඥා පනතේ 55 වැනි වගන්තිය යනු පොලිස් නිවාස ශ්‍රේණිගත කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඇති වගන්තියයි. නීතිපතිවරයා විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ හමුවේ චූදිතයන්ට අධි චෝදනා ගොනු කරන්නේ මෙම නීති විරෝධී පොලිස් ඒකකයේ පරීක‍ෂණ මත පදනම්වය. මෙම විශේෂ මහාධිකරණවල විභාග කළ යුතු නඩු මොනවා දැයි යන්න තීරණය කරන්නේ ද දේශපාලන වාසි ලබා ගත හැකි අනුපිළිවෙළට බව පෙනේ.

එහෙත් අගවිනිසුරුවරයා අනුමත කොට ඇත්තේ විශේෂ මහාධිකරණයෙන් විභාග කිරීමට අපේක‍ෂා කරන නඩු කිහිපයක් යොමු කළ විට අගවිනිසුරු විසින් ඉන් විභාග කළ යුතු නඩුව තීරණය කිරීමේ ක්‍රමයකි. නමුත් එලෙස නඩු කිහිපයක් යොමු කිරීමක් සිදුව නොමැති අතර ඔවුන් විසින් තෝරාගත් නඩුවක් විභාග කිරීමට දින නියම කොට තිබේ.

මේ සියල්ල සිදුවන්නේ අගමැති රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහගේ සූක‍ෂම වැඩපිළිවෙළකට අනුවය. ඔහු මුලින්ම පොලිස් මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය ඇති කළේය. එයට පැමිණිලි ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ ඔහුගේ අනුග්‍රහය යටතේ ඇති කමිටුවකිනි. නමුත් ඒ කමිටුව කිසිදිනෙක රැස්වී නැත. ඒ අනුව පැහැදිලි වන්නේ මෙතෙක් එෆ්සීඅයිඩී යට පැමිණිලි ඉදිරිපත්ව ඇත්තේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගේ අවශ්‍යතාවට බවය. එකී පැමිණිලි සම්බන්ධයෙන් මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය නීති විරෝධී විමර්ශනයක් සිදු කිරීමෙන් පසු එකී විමර්ශන වාර්තා නීතිපතිවරයාට යොමු කෙරේ. නීතිපතිවරයා ඒවා විශේෂ මහාධිකරණයට යොමු කරනු ලබයි. අගමැතිවරයාගේ නීති්‍යානුකූල නොවන සූක‍ෂම වැඩපිළිවෙළ සිදුවන්නේ මේ අන්දමටය. මේ කරුණු අනුව පෙනී යන්නේ මේ විශේෂ මහාධිකරණ අහම්බයක්, හදිසියේ ඇති කෙරුණු එකක්වත් නොව ඔවුන්ගේ සැලසුමේම කොටසක් බවය. ඒ සැලසුම පටන් ගත්තේ පොලිස් මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාස පිහිටුවමිනි.

මේ ආකාරයට නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය කෙලෙසූ ආණ්ඩුවක් බි්‍රතාන්‍ය පාලනය යටතේවත් තිබී නැත. නමුත් මේ අය බලයට පත් වූයේ නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය ඇති කරන බවත්, ආරක‍ෂා කරන බවත් පවසමිනි. ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම, මේ ආණ්ඩුව පත් වෙන විට නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යට හානියක් වී තිබුණේ නැත. බලයට පැමිණි දවසේ සිටම නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය විනාශ කරමින් සිටින්නේ මේ ආණ්ඩුව විසිනි.

නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යයේ මූලික ගුණාංගයක් වන්නේ බලය ඛෙදීමය. එනම් විධායකය, ව්‍යවස්ථාදායකය හා අධිකරණය අතර බලතල ඛෙදීමය. ජනතා පරමාධිපත්‍ය පවතින්නේ ඒ මතය. පාලකයන් කරනු ලබන්නේ ජනතාව වෙනුවෙන් ජනතා පරමාධිපත්‍ය ක්‍රියාවට නැංවීමය.

යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව පත් වන විට අප රටේ මෙම පදනමට කිසිදු හානියක් සිදුවී තිබුණේ නැත. මහින්ද රාජපක‍ෂ මහතාගේ පාලනයේ මුල් වසර 05 තුළ මම මෙරට අගවිනිසුරු ලෙස කටයුතු කළෙමි. ඒ කාලයේ මවිසින් දුන් තීන්දු තීරණ සම්බන්ධයෙන් මට කිසිදු බලපෑමක් එල්ල වී නැත.

යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව පත්වූ දා සිටම නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍ය කෙලෙසු ආකාරය මා මීට පෙර ද විස්තර කර ඇත. මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ජනාධිපති ලෙස පත් වූ වහාම එවකට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය තිබූ අගමැතිවරයා ඉවත් කිරීමක් හෝ නොකර සුළුතරයක් තිබූ රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අගමැති ලෙස පත් කළේය.

ඉන් පසු රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාට බහුතරය ලබා දුන්නේද ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසිනි. එය ජනාධිපතිවරයකු නොකළ යුතු කාර්යයකි.
මහින්ද රාජපක‍ෂ ආණ්ඩුව අගවිනිසුරු ශිරාණි බණ්ඩාරනායක ඉවත් කරනු ලැබුවේ ඒ සඳහා වූ පිළිගත් ක්‍රමවේදයට අනුවය. ඇය ඉවත් කිරීම සඳහා මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී ඡන්දය ලබා දුන්නේය. ශිරාණි බණ්ඩාරනායක ඉවත් කිරීම විවේචනය කරන වත්මන් පාලකයන් අගවිනිසුරු මොහාන් පීරිස් මහතා ඉවත් කළේ කෙසේද?

තමන් අග විනිසුරු ධුරයෙන් ඉවත් කර ඇති බව මොහාන් පීරිස් මහතා පළමුවෙන් දැන ගත්තේ රූපවාහිනි ප්‍රවෘත්ති මඟිනි. ඔහු ඉවත් කිරීමට කිසිදු පරීක‍ෂණයක්, දෝෂාභියෝගයක් පැවතියේ නැත. ඔහුව ඉවත් කර ඇත්තේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා යැවූ ලිපියක් මඟිනි. මොහාන් පීරිස් මහතාගේ පත් කිරීම බලශ=න්‍ය (භමකක ්බා ඪදසා) යනුවෙන් එහි දක්වා තිබිණි. මෙම ලිපිය ද නීති විරෝධීය. බලශ=න්‍ය යන ප්‍රකාශය කළ හැක්කේ අධිකරණයට පමණි. එය අධිකරණ බලයකි.

වර්තමානයේ කටයුතු සිදු වන ආකාරය ගත් විට උසාවියේ ක්‍රියාකලාපය ගැනත් විශාල ප්‍රශ්නයක් තිබේ. පොලිස් මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසයට එරෙහිව පූජ්‍ය ඇල්ලේ ගුණවංශ හිමියනුත්, මහාචාර්ය කාලෝ ෆොන්සේකාත් අභියාචනාධිකරණය හමුවේ නඩු පවරා ඇතත් තවමත් තීන්දුවක් ප්‍රකාශ කොට නැත.

එෆ්.සී.අයි.ඩී. එක සුපුරුදු විදියට තම කාර්යයන් කර ගෙන යමින් සිටී. පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය වසර දෙකක් කල් දැමීමට එරෙහිව පැවරූ නඩුවල තීන්දු ද මෙතෙක් ලබා දී නැත. ජන බලය නිසා ආණ්ඩුවට පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය තැබීමට සිදු වූ නමුත් නඩුවල තීන්දු දී නැත.
මේ වන විට ආණ්ඩුව පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය ද කල් දමමින් සිටී. ඒ සඳහා ක්‍රම පාදා ගත්තේ කෙසේ ද යන්න හැමදෙනාම දන්නා කාරණයකි. පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය කල් දැමීමට අවශ්‍ය නිසා සියලු පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද එක දිනයක පවත්වන්නට ආණAඩුව මුලින්ම යෝජනා කළේය. නමුත් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ තීරණය වුයේ එසේ කිරීමට ජනමත විචාරණයක් පැවැත් විය යුතු බවය. ඉන් පසු කාන්තා නියෝජනයට මුවා වී කාරක සභා අවස්ථාවේ පිටු 20ක පනතක් ගෙන ඒමට ආණ්ඩුව පියවර ගත්තේය. ජනමත විචාරණයකින් කර ගත යුතු ඡන්ද කල් දමා ගැනීම ඒ හරහා ඉටු කරගෙන තිබේ.

මේ නීති විරෝධී තත්ත්වයට එරෙහිව මම අධිකරණය හමුවට ගියෙමි. දින දෙකක් තර්ක කොට දින තුනක් පිටු 20ක ලිඛිත දේශන ඉදිරිපත් කළෙමි. අවසානයේ මාස 07කට පස්සේ පසුගිය ජුනි මාසයේ මගේ අයැදුම්පත ප්‍රතිෙක‍ෂ්ප කෙරුණේ කිසිදු හේතු දැක්වීමකින් තොරවය. නඩුව පවත්වා ගෙන යන්නට අවසර දීමට කිසිම පදනමක් දක්නට නැත යන්න අධිකරණයේ අදහස වී තිබුණි. ඒ බව කියන්නේ ද මාස 07කට පසුවය. අගවිනිසුරු මේ තීන්දුවට විරුද්ධව තීරණයක පසුවිය. ඛෙදුණු තීන්දුවක් වුවත්, දෙපැත්තෙන් එක පැත්තකින්වත් භේතු ඉදිරිපත් කොට නැත.

මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන ජනාධිපතිවරයා දැන් සූදානම් වෙන්නේ යළිත් වරක් ජනාධිපතිවරණයට තරග කිරීමටය. ඔහු පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය කල් දැමීම සිදුවන්නේ ඒ සැලසුමට අනුවය. සම්පන්දන් මහතාව තවදුරටත් විපක‍ෂනායක ධුරයේ රඳවා ගැනීම අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ ද එනිසාය. ජනාධිපතිවරණයට අගමැති තෝරන්නට පුළුවන් වුවද විපක‍ෂනායක තේරීමට නොහැක. මෙතැනදීත් ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ගණිතය ගැන දෝෂය පැහැදිලි වේ. 70 සහ 16 අතරින් වැඩි අගය කුමක් ද යන්න තෝරා ගැනීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාට හැකියාවක් නැත. ඔහු 2015 දී අගමැතිවරයා පත් කළේ ද මේ අන්දමටය.

20 වැනි සංශෝධනයත් නව ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයත් කියන දෙකම එකම තැනකින් ආරම්භ වී ඇති බව පැහැදිලිය. සුළු වෙනස්කම් ඇතත් වගන්ති සංසන්දනය කළ විට ඒ බව පැහැදිලිවේ. නමුත් මේ අවස්ථාවේ නව ආණ්ඩු ක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවක් ගෙන ඒමට ආණ්ඩුව කටයුතු නොකරන බව ස්ථීරය. එවැන්නක් ගෙන එන බව කියන්නේ දෙමළ ජනතාව රැවටීමට පමණකි. කිසිදු ආණ්ඩුවක් තමන්ගේ පාලනයේ අවසන් භාගයේ ව්‍යවස්ථා ගෙනැවිත් නැත. එවැන්නක් සාර්ථක වන්නේ ද නැත.

සිරිමාවෝ මැතිනිය 1970දී ව්‍යවස්ථාව ගෙන ආවේ ද ෙජ්.ආර්. 1978දී ව්‍යවස්ථාව ගෙන ආවේ ද බලයට පැමිණි ගමන්ය. චන්ද්‍රිකා සිය පළමු පාලන සමයේ අවසන් භාගයේ ගෙන ආ නව ව්‍යවස්ථාව සාර්ථක වූයේ නැත. එක්සත් ජාතික පක‍ෂය පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළදීම එයට ගිනි තැබුවේය.

සියලු තත්ත්වයන් සලකා බැලුවිට පෙනී යන්නේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා ඉක්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරණයකට සූදානම් වන බවය. නමුත් ආණ්ඩුවට තරගයක් දෙන්නට සිටින රාජපක‍ෂ කඳවුර තවමත් එවැන්නකට සූදානම් බවක් පෙනෙන්නට නැත. එම කඳවුරේ ජනාධිපති අපේක‍ෂකයා විය හැකි යැයි කියන ගෝඨාභය රාජපක‍ෂ මහතා තවමත් ජනාධිපතිවරණයට තරග කිරීමට තමන්ගේ ඇති නුසුදුසුකම් ඉවත්කරගෙන නැත. ඒ තවමත් ඔහු අපේක‍ෂකයා ලෙස නම් කර නැති නිසා විය හැකිය. මහින්ද රාජපක‍ෂ මහතා කළ යුතු වන්නේ තමන්ගේ පිලේ අපේක‍ෂකයා නම් කර ඔහු ජනාධිපතිවරණයට සූදානම් කරවීමය. එය ප්‍රමාද වන තරමට වාසිය ආණ්ඩුව පැත්තට බැර වන බව අවසන් වශයෙන් කිව යුතුය.

 

Let the search begin!

September 9th, 2018

Editorial Monday 10th September, 2018 Courtesy The Island


President Maithripala Sirisena has come to terms with reality. He has gone on record as saying that the head of the next government will be the Prime Minister, according to the 19th Amendment to the Constitution. Speaking at a public event in Nivitigala, on Saturday, he said the onus was on the people to elect a clean person as the next Prime Minister.

The President has got it right at last, but stopped short of referring to his own position vis-à-vis that of the Prime Minister. He has apparently sought not to attract public attention to his predicament as a lame duck President with reduced powers. In reality, the position of the Prime Minister is already much stronger than the President’s.

The 19th Amendment having taken full effect, the President’s statement is tantamount to an admission that he is only playing second fiddle to the PM. An argument was once peddled, in some quarters, that some provisions of the 19th Amendment did not apply to the incumbent President. But, it was proved wrong by the Supreme Court opinion on the length of his term.

The President is at the mercy of the UNP, which keeps undermining his position in the government without clashing with him openly. The UNP is comporting itself with a great deal of restraint as it wants the present government to continue till the next national level election. There is absolutely nothing the President can do if the UNP refuses to co-operate with him. He is dependent on the goodwill of the UNP and the PM to prevent himself from being treated as a figurehead. This fact became evident when he intervened to stop a fuel price increase and grant railway workers a pay hike. Having failed to have his directives implemented, he fell in line to avoid a confrontation with the UNP-controlled Finance Ministry. He also failed to save his loyalists who sought to oust the PM and lost their ministerial posts.

When the Joint Opposition made quite a stir, the other day, by claiming that the 19th Amendment did not debar former President Mahinda Rajapaksa from seeking a third term, we questioned its wisdom of trying to make him President again. We argued, quoting constitutional experts, that the executive presidency was no better than a titular post and anyone desirous of savouring powers should try to secure the post of the Prime Minister.

What’s up the President’s sleeve? The SLFP says Sirisena will be its presidential candidate. Is it that he is now willing to settle for the ‘titular’ presidency and help someone else secure premiership in return for the latter’s support for him at the next presidential election. In 2015, he got elected, promising to abolish the executive presidency. Now, the presidency is without most of the executive powers or, in other words, as good as abolished. He can claim that his promise has been fulfilled! Those who are lambasting him for having reneged on his pledge to the late Ven. Maduluwawe Sobitha Thera and demand that the presidency be done away with should ask themselves whether the game is worth the candle. The President’s statement at issue has come in the wake of the tabling of the 20th Amendment by the JVP, in Parliament. One may ask what powers the JVP wants removed from the presidency and vested in the post of Prime Minister, which is already the stronger of the two.

The wisdom of those who are striving to make former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa the next President also stands questioned. Do they want Gotabaya to be under the next Prime Minister whoever it may be?

As for President Sirisena’s call for the country to elect as the next PM a person who is above board, people will have to start walking the streets, in daylight, holding lighted lamps and searching for an honest politician.

Rupee and Debt burden now at a critical stage

September 9th, 2018

Governor of the Central Bank Dr. Indrajith Coomaraswamy has, recently, stated that the Central Bank is to soon raise USD 250 million through the issuance of Panda Bonds. Such funds would be in addition to the Syndicated Loan of USD 1,000 million that it has already raised recently through the China Development Bank.

Sri Lanka’s public debt was at a value of LKR 7,391 billion as at end 2014. Of it, the loans from China amounted to approximately LKR 585 billion (USD 4.5 billion), or 8% of the total. At the same time, the Debt to GDP was at a manageable 71%, (down from 91% in 2005) and the interest cost in 2014 was LKR 443 billion or 4.2% of GDP.

article_image

Sri Lanka’s debt related relevant data, as at the end of 2014, would confirm that there was no truth whatsoever in the suggestion that Sri Lanka was in any ‘Debt Trap’ at that time:

* Debt to GDP ratio: 71% (down from 91% in 2005)

* Total Debt – LKR 7,391 billion; of which, External Debt – LKR 3,113 billion: Domestic Debt – LKR 4,278 billion

* External Debt to GDP: 30.0% (down from 39.0% in 2005)

* Domestic Debt to GDP: 41.3% (down from 51.6% in 2005)

* Average time to Maturity of Domestic Public Debt: 5 years and 8 months (up sharply from 2 years 5 months years in 2005)

* Total Chinese Debt, mainly Project-related: USD 4.5 billion

* Percentage of Chinese Debt out of Total Debt: 8%

* Total International Sovereign Bonds outstanding: USD 5.5 billion

* Percentage of ISBs, mainly held by US and Western Investors out of Total Debt: 10%

However, by end July 2018, Sri Lanka’s Public Debt had zoomed to around LKR 11,971 billion (Please see Computation 1); a staggering increase of 59% in just three and half years, while the interest cost for 2018 is estimated at LKR 820 billion, or nearly double that of the 2014 interest cost. The Debt to GDP ratio as at 31st July 2018 has also reached an alarming level of 87.0%. (Please see Computation 2).

Further, according to the publicly available information, the government’s total external debt had also since increased by a massive 33%: from USD 23.7 billion at end 2014 to at least USD 35.4 billion by July 2018, of which, International Sovereign Bonds which are mainly held by US and Western investors, now account for about USD 11.6 billion.

This debt escalation has taken place in an economy that has recorded a serious declining GDP growth rate; from a healthy average of 6.4% from 2010 to 2014 to a dismal 3.1% in 2017. The GDP growth rate for the first half of 2018 has also not shown any signs of recovery, and key sectors such as construction have experienced significant negative growth. Accordingly, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka has reduced its 2018 GDP growth projections to under 4% though most analysts now expect it to be considerably less than 3%.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the meantime, the country’s external trade deficit has ballooned substantially from USD 8,287 million in 2014 to USD million 9,619 in 2017. The Central Bank’s press release on 27th August 2018 reported that the trade deficit for the first half of 2018 had widened to USD 5,709 million as against USD 4,751 million in the first half of 2017, reflecting the continued worsening of the trade deficit owing to sluggish growth in exports and double digit increase in imports. On that basis, the trade deficit is likely to reach a massive USD 11,000 million this year. Workers’ remittances too, which has been a major source of financing the current account deficit of the balance of payments has recorded only a sluggish increase of 0.9 percent.

In financing the current account deficit in 2018, the government is reported to have so far raised a sizeable USD 3,838 million, of which USD 2,500 million has been from International Sovereign Bonds, USD 1,000 million has been from a China Development Bank Syndicated Loan, and further Forex loans of USD 338 million. But, sadly there has been no noticeable foreign direct investment this year, other than the final tranche of the one-off sales proceeds relating to the alienation of the Hambantota Port to China. Incidentally, the debt incurred by Sri Lanka for the construction of the Hambantota Port was USD 1,322 million (or about LKR 158 billion), and such Debt was only about 2.1% of the Total Debt of Sri Lanka as at the end of 2014. Hence, by no stretch of imagination could it also be claimed that the Sri Lankan government was in a “Debt Trap” due to the Hambantota Port loan.

The level of gross official reserve assets of the country has also declined to USD 8.4 billion at end July 2018 from USD 9.3 billion by end June 2018. At the same time, the short term net drain on foreign currency assets between September and December, are also expected to be as high as USD 7.7 billion. In fact, considering the erosion in the balance of payments surplus in the first half of 2018 and the likely strain on the trade deficit and lower remittances inflows, the external reserve assets are likely to erode even further.

Reflecting these weaknesses, the LKR has rapidly depreciated by more than 5% this year to 163.00 per US Dollar, from a value of around 131.00 at the end of 2014: an unprecedented depreciation of about Rs.32 per USD in just three and half years.

Adding to these woes, the exchange rate is likely to face even more pressure in the background of the crisis in Iran and Turkey, the fall in Sri Lanka’s debt-financed reserve assets, the Government Securities market mass-scale foreign investor exodus, and the wide-spread Equity sales by foreigners in the Colombo Stock Exchange. Further, the massive depreciation of the currency is now placing a very heavy burden on the national budget due to the sharply rising debt servicing cost and is likely to well exceed the budgeted interest cost of Rs.820 billion, by a considerable margin.

As a result of these looming financial uncertainties, Moody’s have already warned of the acute financial risks in Sri Lanka, including the growing risks in the country’s banking and financial system, which is suffering from a high level of non-performing loans. Bloomberg too has ranked Sri Lanka among the highest risk countries for investors in early January 2018.

It is now clearly evident there has been a serious deterioration of the Debt Dynamics of Sri Lanka over the past 3 ½ years. It is also clear that such outcome is primarily due to the present Government’s unsound economic management, reckless borrowing, imposition of unbearable taxes and severe discouragement of investors. Consequently, the Sri Lankan Government’s debt situation has now reached a precarious and dangerous level.

Against that background, if the government were to borrow further by issuing more Forex debt in the form of Panda Bonds, it would lead to more reckless spending by the government and precipitate a possible debt default. Accordingly, as a former Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka for nearly 9 years, when the Sri Lanka Economy grew from USD 24 billion to USD 79 billion. I urge the government not to increase its Forex borrowing any further, as that would expose Sri Lanka to Debt levels beyond the current Debt to GDP level of nearly 87.0% (Please see Computation 2), and pave the way for Sri Lanka to be firmly entrenched in the category of Highly Indebted Countries.

Rajapaksa’s Delhi visit hints at thaw

September 9th, 2018

 Courtesy The  Hindu

Former Sri Lankan President seems to be warming to India.

In an indication of warming of ties, former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa will visit New Delhi this week and hold important discussions.

Mr. Rajapaksa, who is credited with ending the reign of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam with the military operations from 2006 to 2009, will deliver a public lecture on India-Sri Lanka relation: the way ahead” organised by the Virat Hindustan Sangam, led by BJP MP Subramanian Swamy. He is likely to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi. The External Affairs Ministry has not spoken about the meetings so far. A source said the visit was being planned by private parties”.

Sri Lanka’s former President Mahinda Rajapaksa speaks to his supporters during an anti-government protest in Colombo on September 5, 2018.

Sri Lanka’s former President Mahinda Rajapaksa speaks to his supporters during an anti-government protest in Colombo on September 5, 2018.   | Photo Credit: REUTERS

Mr. Rajapaksa attended the swearing-in of Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May 2014. He lost his President’s post to Maithripala Sirisena in 2015. While he accused India of contributing to the regime change, he met Mr. Modi when the Prime Minister visited Sri Lanka in May 2017. The late-night meeting, apparently unscheduled, was organised at Mr. Rajapaksa’s request. After the war, New Delhi was disturbed by Mr. Rajapaksa’s apparent tilt towards China, which brought in massive investments to Sri Lanka. He was also criticised for the alleged human rights violations committed by the Sri Lankan military during the war.

The visit comes less than a week after thousands of demonstrators, led by Mr. Rajapaksa, protested in Colombo against the government’s economic policies and the delay in holding provincial elections.

The Rajapaksa camp is yet to name its candidate for the presidential election likely at the end of 2019. A 2015 constitutional amendment has placed a two-term limit on the presidency, thus barring the former President from contesting again, but Mr. Rajapaksa’s supporters have sought the Supreme Court’s clarification. There is an opinion that I can contest again. We need to find out if I am eligible,” he told presspersons recently.

Political sources in Colombo point to the efforts to groom his son and Hambantota MP, Namal Rajapaksa, who is accompanying his father on the India trip. He played a role in mobilising supporters for last week’s rally.

Though out of power for more than three years, Mr. Rajapaksa, who represents Kurunegala district in Parliament, remains a formidable political actor in Sri Lankan politics, often challenging the fractured coalition in power.

Tamil Nadu cabinet recommends to Governor the release of convicts in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case

September 9th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Chennai, September 9 (PTI/newsin.asia): Following the Indian Supreme Court’s suggestion, the All India Anna Dravida Kazhagam government in  Tamil Nadu  on Sunday decided to recommend to the State Governor Banwarilal Purohit the release of all seven life convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

A resolution to this effect was adopted at the State Cabinet which met in Chennai under Chief Minister K. Palaniswami’s leadership, Fisheries Minister D. Jayakumar told reporters.

Tamil Nadu cabinet recommends to Governor the release of convicts in Rajiv Gandhi assassination case

It decided to recommend to  Purohit, the release of Murugan, Santhan, A.G. Perarivalan, Jayakumar, Ravichandran, Robert Payas and Nalini Sriharan, who are now serving life imprisonment.

The move comes days after the Supreme Court asked the Tamil Nadu Governor to consider the mercy petition of Perarivalan seeking remission or pardon under Article 161 of the Constitution and disposed of the Centre’s petition opposing Tamil Nadu government’s earlier proposal for the release of the convicts.

Though the apex court had asked the Governor to consider the plea of Perarivalan only, the government decided to recommend setting free all others as they too had petitioned seeking premature release, he said.

The Cabinet resolution will be sent to the Governor immediately,” Jayakumar said.

Former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated on May 21, 1991 at Sriperumbudur near here by an LTTE woman suicide bomber, Dhanu, at an election rally. Fourteen others, including Dhanu herself, were also killed.

The plea of the Central government is that the killing of a former Prime Minister was a heinous crime. But the plea of the convicts is  that they have been in jail for 27 years since 1991. Also they were not the killers of Rajiv Gandhi they were only accomplices in varying degrees.

The killer was Dhanu the suicide bomber and her handlers were Sivarasan and his female  accomplice who had killed themselves when surrounded by police.

There is also an opinion in Tamil Nadu that Rajiv Gandhi was killed as he had sent the Indian Peace Keeping Force which had killed a number of Tamil civilians in the war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam between July 1987 July and March 1990. The killing of Rajiv was part of a war.

The release of the convicts had become an issue of  Tamil nationalism with all Tamil regional parties and  also the communists supporting it.

Even the Congress, of which Rajiv Gandhi was President, is likely to support the release if only tacitly,  because Rahul Gandhi, its current President and son of Rajiv Gandhi, has said that the killing of his father was the result of an atmosphere of violence. He has also said that he was sorry when Prabhakaran’s 12 year old son Balachandran was killed in the fighting,

(The featured image at the top shows the seven convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi asassination case: Top row:  Murugan, Perarivalan, Santhan. Bottom row: Nalini, Ravichandran, Robert Payas and Jayakumar)

Sri Lanka’s Port of Colombo ranks world’s leading container growth port

September 9th, 2018
According to the rating, the Port of Colombo has recorded a 15.6 percent growth in container handling for the first half of 2018, over same period last year.
It is a very significant achievement as it is the first time in history the Port of Colombo has reached the top of a global maritime ranking. With this growth, Port of Colombo has leaped ahead many other Asian Ports, Major European Ports and Dubai as well,” the statement said.
According to Alphaliner Singapore ranked second in the highest container growth port, Guangzhou third, Antwerp (Belgium) fourth and Port of Xiamen in China ranked fifth.
Sri Lanka’s Port of Colombo ranks world’s leading container growth port
The Port of Colombo consists of the Jaya Container Terminal of the state-run Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA), South Asia Gateway Terminal of the John Keells Holdings and Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) of China’s CM Ports.
Ports Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe said recently that the three terminals had inked a deal to jointly promote the port and under this deal, waiting time for all container vessels arriving at the Port of Colombo will be minimized by allowing vessels to be accommodated at the earliest available terminal.
In 2017, the Colombo Port moved up two places to become the 25th busiest container port.

 

Revisiting JVP’s 20th Amendment

September 8th, 2018

By UDAYA P GAMMANPILA Courtesy Ceylon Today

MP Vijitha Herath of the JVP presented the Bill, titled ‘20th Amendment to the Constitution (20A) in Parliament on 5 September. I filed a petition in the Supreme Court, seeking a determination that the Bill requires the approval of the people at a referendum, since it violates entrenched Articles 3, 4 and 30(2) of the Constitution. This is the ideal time to revisit the 20A to justify our vehement protest against it. We oppose the 20A for three reasons.

Firstly, it opens a window for the disastrous federal constitution. The Government is fully aware of the fact that if the federal constitution is placed before the people at a referendum, it will face a humiliating defeat. Hence, they have found a new strategy to avoid the referendum. It was tested at the committee stage of the Provincial Council Election Amendment Act No 17 of 2017 in September 2017.

The Bill published in the Gazette contained provisions for guaranteeing minimum female representation. When the Bill was at the committee stage, 40 pages were added to a three-page Bill which contained provisions for introduction of electorate-based election method for provincial councils (PCs). It had no relevance to the original Bill at all. It was a gross violation of the procedure set for approving Bills in the Constitution and Standing Orders.

Unfortunately, the Speaker endorsed and facilitated this undemocratic process. When it was challenged before the Supreme Court, it held that it has no authority to intervene in the legislative process. Hence, the Government has unfettered authority to import foreign material into Bills at the committee stage. When the Government follows this process, the public lose the opportunity of challenging it before the Supreme Court or expressing their views about the provisions. If the new federal constitution is published through a Gazette, it should definitely be placed before the people at a referendum.

Even if federal provisions are published in the Gazette as an amendment to the existing Constitution, the people can seek the Supreme Court determination for referring to a referendum. When such provisions are introduced during the committee stage people will lose the opportunity of challenging it before the Supreme Court. In the light of the above, the Government has the opportunity of introducing federal features to the Constitution avoiding the mandatory referendum.

Secondly, the 20A is a part of the Government’s grand strategy of ruling the nation until 2025 as repeatedly announced by government politicians.

Postponing the elections

The present Government attempts to rule the country not by winning elections but by postponing the elections. They postponed local authority elections for nearly three years quoting the process of delimitation of wards as the excuse. They have now postponed provincial council elections indefinitely by introducing electorate-based election method for the PCs just three days before the dissolution of three PCs. Nobody knows when elections can be held after finalizing the delimitation of electorates.

The Government can postpone the parliamentary elections in the same manner by introducing the electorate-based method for the parliamentary elections and appointing a Delimitation Commission just before the dissolution of the Parliament. If there are no elections, the Government can continue even beyond 2025. The only obstacle for this plan is the presidential elections. The entire country is considered as one electorate at presidential elections. Hence, there is no need of delimitation of electorates for the presidential elections. As a result, it cannot be postponed quoting delimitation of electorates as the excuse. That is why the Government has contracted the JVP to present the 20A to abolish the Executive Presidency.

Thirdly and most importantly, the Executive Presidency is not only the best but also most modern and most popular system of governance in the world. That is why nobody campaigns for abolishing the Executive Presidency in any other country. If the Executive Presidency was oppressive, the citizens of the US are the people who have suffered the most, since the US has been under the Executive Presidency for 229 years. Hence, the strongest campaign against the Executive Presidency should be found in the US. However, nobody campaigns against it, since nobody finds it not suitable for the US. In fact, it is ideal for ethnically divided, politically vulnerable developing nations such as Sri Lanka.

Worst political challenge

The JVP anyway hates the presidential elections, since it is the worst political challenge faced by the JVP periodically. After the introduction of the Executive Presidency, the JVP decided to contest the first election in 1982.

Although it expected at least one million votes, it received only 273,428. Because of the disappointment, it boycotted the election held in 1988. The JVP contested again in 1999 and received only 344,173 or 4%. It was the highest percentage obtained by the JVP at a presidential election.
The JVP performs decently at local government elections. Thereafter, they increase their vote bank at the PC elections. They impatiently wait for parliamentary elections to secure a higher number of votes and to become the king maker in Parliament.

Unfortunately, the presidential election comes in between. If the JVP fields a candidate at this ‘bipolar’ contest, its earned vote base will be slashed by half. Therefore, the JVP supports candidates from other parties at the presidential elections held in 1994, 2005, 2010 and 2015. The JVP later realized that after offering its votes to a stronger political party at the presidential election, it is difficult to attract voters back to the JVP at the parliamentary election which arrives soon thereafter.

Exhausted options

The JVP has now exhausted with options to exercise at the Presidential Elections. It has unsuccessfully tried out fielding candidates, supporting candidates of other parties and boycotting the election. The only option available for the JVP is to agitate for the abolition of the Executive Presidency. Hence, it is crystal clear that the JVP and the UNP have joined hands to abolish the Executive Presidency for ulterior motives!

Fifth September in Retrospect

September 8th, 2018

By Tissa Vitarana Courtesy Ceylon Today

The ‘Jana Balaya Colambata’ (People Power to Colombo) procession, organized by the Joint Opposition on the 5 September, certainly shook the UNP-led Government, and was a success despite the need to alter the programme at the last moment, due to their disruptive actions.

Given the cost of travel and all the obstacles placed by the Government to impede the event, the turn out (estimated by some at close to 100,000) and the enthusiasm and militancy were significant features. It has helped to sustain, if not increase, the momentum generated by the victory at the Local Government Elections of 10 February, this year.

I travelled in my vehicle and observed most of the processions, which included both political, trade union and other non-political groups.  Noteworthy features were the virtual absence of any incidents, the orderliness without disturbing pedestrians or vehicles, and the voicing of relevant political slogans in addition to kawdha raja, Mahinda Raja”.

Politically, the presence in the procession of a large number of Muslims from the East and Tamils from  North and Hill country, as well as youth and professionals – specially lawyers, some doctors and engineers, was a significant feature.

The performance of a peaceful quiet (as no loudspeakers were permitted) sathyakriya” in front of Lake House, where people sat for hours  patiently, though packed together like sardines in a tin, was also a good sign for the future and an indication of their commitment to the success of the event. These crowds extended close to the Hilton on the West and to the Cinnamon Lake Hotel on the South and for about 300 metres to the East on Wijewardena Mawatha, and the road to Pettah on the North.

A novel feature was the night vigil by candlelight which went on till about 11.30 p.m. when the crowd dispersed. The organizers provided food parcels, but they were not really adequate.

A stage was set up on the road to the Hilton Hotel and various cultural programmes with political messages were performed for about an hour. The Police acted humanely and there were no confrontations. We have a long way to go to reach the level of the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protest in New York where people camped for several days and had meetings and discussions on important themes:

socio-economic destructive role of Neo-liberalism and how to counter it” and so forth. Now that Neo-liberalism, devised by the USAs oligarchy with the IMF and World Bank, is being fully implemented in Sri Lanka by their puppet UNP-led Government headed by the PM, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and is the root cause of the problems facing Sri Lanka, the next Sathyakriya should help people to understand the de-humanizing effect of the Neo-liberal mindset.

It is based on individual greed, that is really paving the way for the giant Multi-national Corporations (MNCs), based in rich countries, to take control of our national economy and to flourish by exploiting our people and assets, replacing the government elected by the people for the people. MNCs prosper, the people suffer.

Impeding complete success

But the tactic, or was it really pressing of the panic button, by the UNP to withdraw at the last moment, without any valid reason, the permission granted to use five public parks/playgrounds impeded the complete success of the whole exercise. The finale with the candle lit parades, and the attack on the UNP and its policies using the richness of our culture at five locations had to be modified.

Many who were used to fiery speeches, at meetings after the traditional May Day procession, felt a little let down.

Some other reactions of the UNP need some comment. While those of several ministers, like the ludicrous statement by the Secretary of the UNP, Akila Viraj Kariyawasam, that the whole purpose of the procession was to divert attention from the Court cases against members of the previous Government and exert pressure, are not worthy of comment.

But there is a very serious allegation without any factual basis that needs to be corrected as it may lead to the repetition of an unpleasant past chapter in Sri Lanka’s history. This appeared on Wednesday, 5 September in the Daily Mirror, the Island and the Ceylon Today. I give extracts from the latter paper. This was the result of the Cinnamon Gardens Police informing the Colombo Chief Magistrate that they have received information to the effect that during the protest Namal Rajapaksa and 10 others, were planning to enter the President’s official residence and stage an anti-Government riot.”

Magistrate Dissanayake, accordingly ordered the Cinnamon Gardens Police to arrest the 11 members of the JO named below, if the information received by the Police about their plan was true, as they had been named as respondents in the request by the Police.

The 11 persons include MPs Namal Rajapaksa, Rohitha Abeygunawardene, Dilum Amunugama, Wimal Weerawansa, Udaya Gammanpila, Vasudeva Nanayakkara, Prasanna Ranatunga and Dinesh Gunawardene, and also Tissa Vitarana, D.E.W.Gunasekera and Asanka Navaratne. The Magistrate then told the Police if the protesters were planning to topple the Government unlawfully then, as they would be committing an offence under Sections 114 and 115 of the Penal Code the Police have the authority to apprehend and produce them in Court.”

The Chief Magistrate told the Police that evidence had to be produced in Court that the investigations by the Police have revealed that the protesters were planning to topple the Government. If there was evidence the … suspects could be arrested by the Police… without passing the buck to the Court. He then rejected the request for an interim injunction against the JO protest to be held today.”

Dangerous naming

This type of false charge was made against several Opposition leaders like Vijaya Kumaratunga and Vasudeva Nanayakkara, and they were labelled as Naxalites plotting to overthrow the UNP Government led by President J. R. Jayewardene. They were charged and jailed in 1983.

I hope that this UNP-led Government is not contemplating a similar course of action to weaken the Opposition and remain in power. Every effort is being made to delay the Provincial Council Elections. The Government has any chance of winning in the Presidential Election, which it likes to hold first. But even then, by making false charges, it is trying to weaken the Opposition as much as possible.

Temple Trees wedding tamasha

September 8th, 2018


Those who have had the opportunity of visiting the luxury reception/banquet hall built at ‘Temple Trees,’ the prime minister’s official residence during the Mahinda Rajapaksa regime are well aware that it is an extravagance that a country in our economic situation could ill-afford. The building of the opulent carpeted and chandeliered air-conditioned facility is without doubt an act of utmost profligacy of a governing elite that thought nothing of expending billions of tax rupees for their own benefit and glorification. Soon after he became prime minister in 2015, Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe took pleasure in showing guests around the place so that they could see for themselves how public funds had been lavishly expended on ego trips of the then rulers.

The facility came into the news recently when a ruling party MP, Chathura Senaratne, the son of Health Minister Rajitha Senaratne who is both highly visible (and audible) in his role of a government spokesman, hired it for his wedding. The JVP raised the matter in parliament and Senaratne Jr. quickly responded by saying that he had paid over Rs. 2.1 million for the wedding and provided a photo copy of the banker’s cheque favouring the Secretary to the Prime Minister. There was no break-up of how much the venue itself had cost and what was paid for connected services like food, drink and décor although one report said the hall charge was Rs. 450,000.

The prime minister’s office was at pains to assert that the wedding had not been held at ‘Temple Trees’ itself but at an adjoining building on the same compound, no doubt to counter the allegation that was being widely bruited around that the prime minister’s official residence was being converted to a Magul Maduwa by the yahapalana rulers. The whole business had apparently been discussed at a meeting of the UNP parliamentary group and following what had been said there, which has not been revealed to the public, it was decided that the hall will not in future be rented out for weddings. If there was nothing wrong in the first place of hiring it for Chathura Senaratne’s lavish wedding (the social media has been replete with details including the opaque glass invitation, the fruit and flower table décor and what not), then why is the practice being done away with for the future?

The groom’s minister-father has been quoted saying that this venue was obtained because it was not possible to get a booking at one of the big hotels. It is well known that wedding bookings are tight at the luxury hotels particularly on auspicious days with such booking being made months ahead. If the demand exists, and the venue can be successfully marketed at a price, what is the harm in letting it out and some of the big taxpayer bucks spent in building it recovered? The prime minister’s office justified the original renting of the venue for the Senaratne wedding. It must now justify why it should not be rented out for such purposes in the future. The public deserves to be edified on the reasons for not letting it out and realizing its commercial potential. There have been other social events including shows there and official state receptions have been hosted there too. We do not think the Senaratne wedding was the first at the venue and there have been others as well. Quite apart from these events being held at the hall, there have been weddings held in the official residence proper with small receptions hosted at such events, most probably with taxpayer funds.

We live in a country where the social mores and culture of the well-to-do and the well connected is such that they like to have VIPs including presidents and prime ministers as attesting witnesses at the weddings of their offspring. It would be convenient for the dignitaries to sign at their official residences rather than go elsewhere to do the honours and such conveniences have been availed of in the past. There have been reports that the former president asks couple who want him to attest at their weddings to come to his official residence in Colombo and have the marriages duly registered there. Nobody would or should object to that. In fact some couples who found that President Sirisena often does his morning constitutional walking in the Independence Square area, beautified by the brother of the man he ousted from the presidency, go there to have themselves photographed with the president who is happy to oblige.

Now that there has been a controversy about the Senaratne wedding it would be useful if somebody in authority let the people know how much it cost to build the luxury reception facility next to ‘Temple Trees’, what was the past practice in letting it our commercially if that was in fact was done, what would it cost somebody to avail of the facilities and other details. Given that the people paid to build the place, they are entitled to the information which we presume would anyway be available by way of a Right to Information inquiry which the present rulers, whatever their shortcomings, have made available to the people.

අබලක සූත්‍රය

September 8th, 2018

අබලක

අප මහ බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ පිරිනිවී වසර දෙදහස් පන්සිය හැට දෙකක් ගෙවුණු ඒ වෙසක් පුර පසළොස්වක දිනෙන් පොහෝ දෙකක් ගතවුනු තැන උදාවුනු පොසොන් මස පුර පසළොස්වක් දිනයේ මිහින්තලාව වන්දනාවට ගිය මම; එහි කලුබුද්ධරක්ඛිත මහරහතන්වහන්සේ කාලකාරාම සූත්‍රයෙන් බණ කිව් කළුදිය පොකුණ අසබඩ වූ කළුවර ගස තිබුණු තැනට වී විඩාහරිමින් සිටියෙමි. එ කල්හි, අමුතු ලෙස ම දෙස බලමින් එකිනෙකා පසුපස හඹා යන ලෙහෙණුන් පස් දෙනෙක් දැක ඒ කෙරෙහි ඇති වූ කුහුල නිසා උන් පසුපස ගියෙමි. වැඩි කල් නොයා ඒ අසළ වූ ලෙනකට වැදුණු උන් අතුරුදන් වූ හෙයින් වික්‍ෂිප්ත වූ මම ද ඒ ලෙනට වැද එහි හිඳ විවේක ගන්නට වීමි.

එ සේ විවේක ගනිමින් සිටිනා අතර වාරයෙහි හාත්පස බැලූ මා හට ඒ අසළ ම වැටී තිබුණු තල්පත් තුනක් දක්නට ලැබිණි. ඒවා අසුළාගත් මම තල්පත් තුබූ පිළිවෙළින් ගෙන එකින් එක කියවන්නට වීමි. ඒවායෙහි මෙ සේ ලියා තිබිණි.

නමෝ තස්ස භගවතො අරහතො සම්මා සම්බුද්ධස්ස! මා විසින් මෙ සේ අසන ලදී෴ සියලු ලෝ වැස්සන්ට වැඩ කොට පරම ශාන්තිකාලයට සපැමිණ පිරිනිවන් මඤ්චකයෙහි සැතැපුනා වූ අප මහා ගෞතම බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ තමන් වන්දනයට පැමිණි දේව සමාගමයෙහි මුල් තැන් ගෙන සිටි ශක්‍ර දේවේන්ද්‍රයාණන් අමතා; තම ශාසනය ලක්දිව්හි පිහිටන හෙයින් එය සුරකින මිනිසුන් ද රට ද ආරක්‍ෂා කරන මෙන් උන් හට දන්වා සිටි සේක෴ තථාගතයන්වහන්සේ ගේ බස ගෞරවයෙන් ගත් ශක්‍ර දේවේන්ද්‍ර තෙමේ ලක්දිව සුරැකීමේ කාර්යය උත්පලවන්න නම් දිව්‍යරාජයා හට භාර කළේ ය෴ අප මහා බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ පිරිනිවුණු ඒ දිනයේ දී ලක්දිව් ගොඩබට විජය කුමාරාදී සත්සියයක් පිරිසට පිරිත් පැන් ඉස පිරිත් හූ බැඳ ආරක්‍ෂාව සැලසූ උත්පලවන්න දෙව්රජ තෙමේ එවක් පටන් මේ දක්වා ම ලක්දිවත් ධර්මය සුරකින ලක්දිව් වාසී මිනිසුනුත් ආරක්‍ෂාකරනු ලබන්නේ ය෴”

ඒ අමෘත වූ සද්ධර්මය රැගෙන අනුබුදු මහින්ද මහ රහතුන්වහන්සේ මෙහි වැඩම කළ තැන් පටන් බුද්ධ ශාසනයා ගේ චිරස්ථිතිය උදෙසා මහා සංඝයා කරණ කොට ප්‍රත්‍යවේක්‌ෂා වශයෙන් සැලකෙන චීවර, පිණ්ඩපාත, සේනාසන, ගිලානප්‍රත්‍යාදී සිව්පසය පුදමින්, අටුවා සහිත වූ ත්‍රිපිටක සද්ධර්මය සුරක්‍ෂා කරමින්, හතුරු උවදුරින් ලක්දිව් මඩනා කල්හි තම දිවි පවා පුදමින් කටයුතු කළෝ ද ආකාසට්ඨ ටූ ද භූමාටු වූ ද අනේක වූ දේව මණ්ඩලවල ඉපැදී මේ ලක්දිව් ආරක්‍ෂා කරනු වස් උපුල්වන් දිව්‍යරාජයාණන් හට තම උපකාරය ලබාදෙන්නෝය෴”

බුදුන්පිරිනිවීමෙන් හවුරුදු දෙදහස් පන්සිය හැට දෙකක් පිරුණු වෙසක් මස පුර පසළොස්වක දිනයෙහි අනුරාධපුරය ඉහළ අහසේ වැඩසිට ලක්දිව බුදුසසුන්හි තත් විචාරණ උපුල්වන් දෙව් රජ තොමෝ තම පරිවාර දෙවිවරුනගෙන් කරුණු විමසා සිටියේ ය෴ එ කල්හි උන්වහන්සේ ඇමැතූ එක් දෙවි කෙනෙකුන් පවසා සිටියේ ලක්දිව අබලක නමින් අමුතු ම නිකායක් බිහි වී එහි සරණ ගියෝ බුදු බණ නමින් විප්‍රකාර බණක් දෙසමින් සිටින බවයි෴ මේ අසා කම්පා වූ සිත් ඇති උපුල්වන් දෙව්රජාණෝ අබලක නිකාය යැයි කියන්නේ මන්දැයි කියා ඒ පිළිබඳ විස්තර විමසා සිටි සේක෴”

එ තෙකින් ඒ තල්පත් තුන අවසන් වී තිබුණු බැවින් ඒවා පසෙක තැබූ මම පෙර තල්පත් තිබූ දෙස නැවතත් බැලීමි. පුදුමයෙකි. එහි තවත් තල්පතෙකි. එහි සඳහන් වැ තිබුණේ පෙර තල්පත් තුනෙහි සටහන් ක‍ොට තිබුණු විස්තරය හා බැදුණු ම විස්තරයෙකි. ඒ මෙ සේ ය.

අබලක නිකායට මුල් වූ අභය, අභය යැයි නම් තබාගත් චීවරධාරීන් දෙදෙනකු ද ලංකාර, ලංකාර යැයි නම් තබාගත් චීවරධාරීන් දෙදෙනකු ද වෙයි෴ මේ නිකාය ඇටවීමට මුල් වූ බුඩ්ඪ පබ්බජිතයා අභයරතනාලංකාර ය෴ ඌහු ගුරු තනතුරෙහි ලා ඒ පසුපස ගිය බුඩ්ඪ පබ්බජිතයා සිරිධම්මාලංකාර ය෴ ඒ දෙදෙනාට ම ලංකාර නාමය වෙයි෴ ඒ හැරුණු විට තවත් එකෙකු ද අභය නාමය ගෙන සිටියි෴ මේ පොදු නාම මාත්‍ර සැළකිල්ලට ගත් කල්හි නව නිකාය අභය සහ අලංකාර යන දෙවදනින් නම් තැබීම යුක්තියුක්ත ය෴ තව ද මෙහි සරණ ගියෝ හට සිතු සිතු දේ බිණීමේ විලිබිය ද නැත෴ සිතට එන්නේ යමෙක් ද ඔවුහු එය ම අලංකාර කොට කියති෴ විලිබිය නො මැති ව අලංකාරවාදයෙන් මිනිසුන්ට කරුණු දෙසන බැවින් ද ඔවුහු අභය හා අලංකාර දෙවදනින් නම්කිරීම යුක්තියුක්ත ය෴ අභය හා අලංකාර යන දෙවදන එක් ව අභයාලංකාර යන නම ද එහි විකෘතියෙන් අබලකර යන නම ද එය ලඝුවීමෙන් අබලක යන නම ද සැකැසී ඇත්තේ ය෴”

ඒ තල්පත ද එ තැනින් අවසන් ය. මම එය ද පෙර තල්පත් මත්තෙහි ම තැබුවෙමි. පුදුමයෙකි. පෙර තල්පත් සතර මතු වූ තැන තවත් තල්පතෙකි. පුනරුක්තිය අඩු කරනු වස් මෙහි ඉදිරියට ඇති විස්තර ද එ ලෙසින් නැවත නැවතත් හමු වූ තල්පත්වල සටහන් ව තිබූ දෑ බැව් දත යුතුයි.

අබ සරණය, අබ සරණය ලෙසින් කියැවෙන අලුත් ව්‍යවහාරයක් ලක්දිව්වාසීන් අතර ප්‍රචලිත වී ඇත්තේ ය෴ එයින් කියැවෙන්නේ යමක් කම්මුතු වී යන බව ය෴ ඉදින් අබලක නිකාය නිසා බුද්ධ ශාසනයට ද අබ සරණයි කියා කියන්නෝ සිටිති යි කියා ඒ දේවතාවා සැළකර සිටියේ ය෴ එහි අර්ථය වනුයේ බුද්ධ ශාසනයට අනතුරක් උදා වී තිබෙන බැව් දැයි කියා උපුල්වන් දෙවිරජු නැවතත් කරුණු විමසා සිටියේය෴ එ සේ ය. අබලක නිකායෙහි එවුන් පෙනීසිටින්නේ රහතුන් ලෙසිනි෴ එයට මුල් වූ අබේරත්න නම් තැනැත්තා දැනටත් පරලොව ගොසිනි෴ ඌහු පිරිනිවන් පෑ බැව් අබලකයෝ කියති෴ ඒ අබේරත්නයාගේ මළකඳින් ගත් ඇට කැබැලි සුවඳ පැනින් නහවන අබලකයෝ ඒවාට ධාතුන්වහන්සේලා කියා වන්දනාමාන කරත්෴

සිරිසේන නම් ගිහි නම දැරූ එකෙකු දැන් සිරිධම්මාලංකාර නමින් පෙනී සිටියි෴ ඌහු මුලින් කී අබේරත්නගේ මිතුරෙකි෴ අබේරත්න සිවුරක් හැඳගත්තේ වයස්ගත වී විශ්‍රාම ගත් කල්හි ය෴ ඌහු එයට පෙර නොයෙක් වූ රැකියා ද කට්ටඩිකම් ද කර දිවි රැකගත්තෙකි෴ තමන් සිවුරු පොරවාගන්නා කල්හි අබේරත්න තම බිරිඳ වන චන්ද්‍රලතාට ද පුත්‍රයා වන කපිලට ද දියණිය වන ප්‍රියදර්ශනීට ද සිවුරු පෙරෙව්වේ ය෴ එ ලෙසින් සිවුරු පොරවාගත් ඔවුහු එක ම ගෙදරක එකට ලැග සිටියෝ ය෴ පෙර පරිද්දෙන් ම ගැහුණුන් දෙන්නා පිරිමින් දෙන්නාට බත් තම්බා දුන්නෝ ය෴ පෙර ලෙසින් ම එක් වැ කා බී තුටු වූ ඔවුහු පවුල ම පන්සලක් කරගත්හ෴ මේ විප්‍රකාර මැද අබේරත්න අලුතින් ශාසනයක් පටන්ගැනීමේ වැඩට යුහුසුළු වී සිටියේ ය෴ සිවුරු පොරොවාගත් අබේරත්න තම නම වෙනස් කරගෙන සිටියේ අභයරතනාලංකාර යනුවෙනි෴”

අබේරත්න තෙමේ අලංකාර ලෙසින් පෙර බවය ගැන කියන්නට ද පටන්ගත්තේ ය෴ දීපංකර පා මූලයේ දී අප මහ බෝසතාණන්වහන්සේ නියත විවරණ ලබන කල්හි තමන් සිරිසේන සමඟ ඒ අසළ ම සිටි බැව් අබේරත්න කියන්නේ ය෴ අපේ බුදුන් පිරිනිවී හවුරුදු දෙදහස් පන්සියයක් ගිය තැන අබලක බණ කීමට තමන් අධිෂ්ඨාන කරගත්තේ දීපංකර පාද මූලයේ අප මහ බෝසතාණන් නියත විවරණ ලබන කල්හි බැව් ද අබේරත්න කියන්නේ ය෴”

අප මහ බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ වැඩ සිටි කල්හි අබේරත්න ගවයෙක් ව සිටි බැව් සිරිසේන අලංකාර ලෙස කියා සිටියේ ය෴ ඒ බැව් අබේරත්න ද පිළිගත්තේ ය෴ එ ලෙස ගවයකුව සිටි හෙයින් අප මහ බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ ජීවමාන කාලයේ දී අබේරත්නට ධර්මය වටහාගත නොහැකි වූ බව සිරිසේන කියන්නේ ය෴ අහෝ, ආශ්චර්යයෙකි!෴එ කල ධර්මය වටහාගත හැකි භවයක උපත ලබා සිටියාය කියන්නා වූ ඒ ගව පට්ටයේ හිමිකරුවා වූ සිරිසේන මෙ කල අබේරත්නගෙන් අබලක ධර්මය උගත්තේ ය෴”

සිරිසේන අබලක බණට කියන්නේ සිරිසද්ධම්මය කියා ය෴ ඌහු සං-දේශනාව කියා නම් කළ අභූත ධර්මයක් උගන්වති෴ මේ තමන් ගේ ම ස්වයංභූ ඥාණයෙන් දැනගත් දහමක් බව ද සිරිසේන කියන්නේ ය෴ සං යනු එකතුකිරීම හා වැඩිකිරීම බවත් එහෙයින් සං අඩුකොට, බෙදා ශූන්‍යතාව අවබෝධ කරගත යුතු බවත් ඌහු පවසති෴ තමන් කිසි දිනෙක ත්‍රිපිටකය කියවා නැති බැව් ද ඌහු කියති෴ එ නමුදු, තමනට ඕනෑ ම සූත්‍රයකට අර්ථ පැවැසිය හැකි බැව් ද ඌහු පවසති෴ ඉදින් මේ සිරිසේනයා කියන්නේ සම්මා යනු සං මා කිරීම කියායි෴ ඌහු එය පැහැදිළිකරන්නේ එකතුකිරීම අඩුකිරීම කියායි෴”

අබලක ධර්මයට අනුව අනිච්ච යනු අනිත්‍ය නො වේ෴ ඉච්ඡා යන්නෙහි නැත අර්ථය අනිච්ච බව ඔවුහු කියති෴ පාලි භාෂාවේ අල්පප්‍රාණ, මහප්‍රාණ වෙනසක් නැති බව ද ඔවුහු කියති෴ එහෙත් අල්පප්‍රාණ බයන්නක් තිබුණු අබේරත්න සිවුරු හැඳගත් පසු මහප්‍රාණ භයන්නක් යොදා අභයරතනාලංකාර යන නම් ගත්තේ ය෴ අල්පප්‍රාණ අකුරුවලින් ම හැදුණු නමක් තිබුණු සිරිසේන සිවුරු හැඳගත් පසු සිරිධම්මාලංකාර කියා මහප්‍රාණ ධයන්නක් ඇති නමක් ගත්තේ ය෴ ඒ එ සේ වුව ද අනිච්ච, ඉච්ඡා පදවල අල්පප්‍රාණ සහ මහප්‍රාණ නොසළකන්නැයි ඌහු උපදෙස් දෙති෴”

මේ විප්‍රකාර අදහස් පතුරුවන තවත් අය ද සිටිති෴ අභය යනුවෙන් ම තව එකෙකි෴ නිවාතාප කියා ද එකෙකි෴ විමුක්තිරතන කියා ද එකෙකි෴ සිවුරු දැරුවෝ මෙන් ම සිවුරු නො දැරුවෝ ද සිටිති෴ චිත්‍රා නමින් එකියකි෴ ධම්මවිමුක්තා නමින් එකියකි෴ ගාමිනි අභය නමින් එකෙකි෴ මේ හැම කෙනෙක් ම තම තමන්වත් ඔවුනොවුන්වත් රහතුන්වහන්සේලා නමින් හඳුන්වාගනිති෴ ඉතා ඉක්මනින් ම මගඵල ලබාගන්නා ආකාරය ඔවුහු තම අනුගාමිකයන්ට කියා දෙති෴ දුරකථනය ඔස්සේ ද මගඵල ලබාදෙති෴ අබලක ධර්මය ඇසීමෙන් පසු ඉතාමත් පහසුවෙන් සැනෙකින් සත්‍යය අවබෝධ කරගත් බව ඔවුන ගේ අනුගාමිකයෝ ද පවසති෴”

ශීලය අනවශ්‍ය බව ද මොවුහු දෙසති෴ ශීලය වතක් කියා බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ දේශනා කොට ඇති බවත් මොවුහු පවසති෴ මොවුහු මේ කරුණු සනාථ කරනු වස් ත්‍රිපිටකාගත ධර්මපාඨවලින් උද්ධෘත පෙන්වමින් ද තවත් දේ වසමින් ද කරුණු කියති෴ වැසූ දේ නොදකින්නෝ ඒ කියන දේ අසා නොමග යති෴ ශීලය වතක් බව පවසමින් එය පිළිකෙව් කරන්නට තම අනුගාමිකයන් පුරුදු පුහුණු කරන ඔවුහු දානය යනු ණය ගෙවීමක් බව ද පවසති෴ අබලක ධර්මයට අනුව දානයෙන් ලැබිය හැකි අනාගත ඵලයක් නැත෴ ඒ, එය හුදෙක් ම අතීත ණය ගෙවීමක් වන බැවිනි෴”

දානයත් ශීලයත් හළ විට ඉතිරිවන්නේ භාවනාව යි෴ අබලකවාදීහු භාවනාව ගැන ද අපූරු කතා කියති෴ අභය නමින් පෙනී සිටින අබලකවාදියාට අනුව භාවනාව කරන විට බඩ බුරුල් ව අශූචි පහවෙයි෴ වමනය ඇතිවෙයි෴ දහඩිය ගලයි෴ සෙම සොටු ගලයි෴ කඳුළු වැගිරෙයි෴ මේ සියල්ල සිදු වූ විට ශරීරය ශුද්ධ වන බව ද ඔහු පවසයි෴ නිරුත්තර සම්‍යක් සම්බෝධිය අධිගම කළ අවස්ථාවේ ද, අනුපාදිශේෂ නිර්වාණ ධාතුවෙන් පිරිනිවන් පෑ අවස්ථාවේ ද බඩ බුරුලට අශූචි පහ වී, වමනය ඇති වී, දහඩිය දමා, සෙම සොටු පිට වී, කඳුළු වැගිරී අප මහ බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ ගේ ශරීරය පිරිසිදු වුනු බව මේ අබලකවාදියා පවසයි෴”

පුක්කුස මල්ල පුත්‍රයා විසින් පූජා කළ මට සිළිටි රන්වන් සිවුරු දෙකින් එකක් ආනන්ද හිමියන් විසින් තථාගතයන්වහන්සේ ගේ සිරුරට පැළැඳැවීමත් සමඟ උන්වහන්සේ ගේ සිරු‍ර ප්‍රභාස්වර වූ බව කියන සඳහන උපුටා දක්වමිනුයි මොහු මෙ සේ කියන්නේ෴ තථාගතයන්වහන්සේ ගේ සිරුර ප්‍රභාස්වර වූයේ ඇයි දැ යි ආනන්ද හිමියන් ඇසූ බව මොහු නො කියයි෴ පහවූ සිළු ඇති, ගිනි අඟුරු රැසක් මෙන් අප මහා බුදුරජාණන්වහන්සේ ගේ සිරුර දිලෙන්නේ ඇයි දැ යි ආනන්ද හිමියන් ඇසූ බව මොහු නො කියයි෴ බඩ බුරුලට අශූචි පහ වී, වමනය ඇති වී, දහඩිය දමා, සෙම සොටු පිට වී, කඳුළු වැගිරුණේ ඇයි කියා ආනන්ද හිමියන් විමසා නැත්තේ ය෴ එ සේ නමුදු, මේ අබලකවාදියා නැත්තක් ම ඇත්තක් සේ කියයි෴”

 බුදුදහම අනෙකුත් ආගම්වලින් වෙනස් නො වන බැව් නිවාතාප යන නම් ගත් අබලකවාදියා පවසයි෴ යේසුස්වහන්සේ යනු බෝධිසත්වයන්වහන්සේ නමක් බව ඌහු පවසති෴ බෞද්ධයන් මසකට වතාවක් පන්සල් යද්දී ක්‍රිස්තියානි භක්තිකයන් සතියකට වතාවක් පල්ලි යන බැව් පවසන ඔහු ඒ අතින් බෞද්ධයන්ට වඩා ක්‍රිස්තියානි භක්තියන් උතුම් බැව් පවසයි෴ තව ද ලක්දිව්වාසීහු බෞද්ධයන් වී ඇත්තේ නාමික ව බවත් සුනඛයන් පවා නාමික ව බෞද්ධයන් බවට පත් කළ හැකි බවත් ඔහු පවසයි෴ මේ අනුව ඔහු කියන්නේ ක්‍රිස්තියානි භක්තියන් උතුම් බවත් බෞද්ධයන් සුනඛයන් හා සමාන බවත් ය෴”

 සිවුරු දරාගත් සිරිසේන නමැත්තා සිරිධම්මාලංකාර ලෙසින් පෙනී සිටිමින් කියා ඇවිදින්නේ බුදුන් උපන් තැන, බුදු වූ තැන, ධම්මචක්කපවත්තන දේශනාව පැවැත්වූ තැන, පිරිනිවන් පෑ තැන ඇතුළු බුද්ධ ජීවිතයට සම්බන්ධ සියලු ස්ථාන මේ ලක්දිව් පිහිටා ඇති බවකි෴ ඒ බැව් පවසමින් ඔහු අතීත රජදරුවන්ට ද ශාසනික වීරයන්ට ද නින්දා කරන්නේ ය෴”

බහ තෝරන දරුවෝ අලුතින් වචනයක් දැනගත් කල්හි එහි අකුරු පෙරළමින් විනෝදවන්නාක් මෙන් අබලකවාදීහුද වචනවලට සිතු සිතු පරිද්දෙන් අර්ථ දෙති෴ මෝහ කරන අය මාලු වී උපදින බව ද හුරු කර අල්ලාගත් අය හුරුල්ලන් වී උපදින බව ද සහායට ආලය කරන්න ගිය අය සාලයෝ වී උපදින බව ද බලය පෙන්නපු අය බලයෝ වී උපදින බව ද තල තලා ගොඩ ලොකු කරගත් අය තල්මහ වී උපදින බව ද ණය නොගෙවා මුවා වී යන අය මූවන් වී උපදින බව ද තිතට දෙන්නම් කියා මුවා වී ගිය අය තිත් මුවන් වී උපදින බව ද වේලි වේලි සිට ගිය අය වැලි මුවා වී උපදින බව ද අබලකවාදීහු කියති෴”

 මෙ ලෙස පුටුවක් පෙන්වමින් අල පුතුව, අල පුතුව යැයි කියන නොදරුවන් තොදොල් වන්නා ලෙසින් භාෂාවේ එදිනෙදා ව්‍යවහාර කරන වචනවලට විප්‍රකාර නිරුක්ති ලබාදෙන අබලකවාදීහු ධර්මයට ද සිතු සිතූ පරිද්දෙන් නිරුක්ති ලබාදෙති෴ ඔවුනට අනුව දානය යනු ණය දා යන්න පෙරැලී හැදුණු වචනයකි෴ කාලෙන යනු කෙලෙස් නැතිකිරීම යැයි මූහු කියති෴ බණ යන්නෙහි අරුත බව නසන යන්න යැයි මූහු කියති෴ පටිච්චසමුප්පාදය යනු කැමැත්තෙන් බැඳීම නිසා සං උප්පාදවීම යැයි මූහු කියති෴ මාගධී යනු අධිගමයට ඇති මග යැයි මූහු කියති෴ සෝතාපන්න යනු ශ්‍රවණයෙන් මාර්ගයට පැමිණියේ යන්න යැයි මූහු කියති෴ සංඝ යනු සං ගසා දමනු ලැබූ අය යැයි මොවුහු කියති෴ මෙ ලෙසින් සිතු පරිද්දෙන් නිරුක්ති දී ඇති වචන ගණනින් අපමණ ය෴”

 අබලක නිකායේ අනුගාමිකයන් වශයෙන් කටුයුතුකරන්නෝ අතර විවිධ ශාස්ත්‍ර සඳහා සහතිකපත්‍ර ලබාගත්තෝ ද වෙති෴ වෛද්‍ය ශාස්ත්‍ර, ඉංජිනේරු ශාස්ත්‍රාදිය ඉගෙනගෙන ඒ ශිල්ප ඇසුරුකරමින් රැකියාකරන්නෝ ද ඒ අතර වෙති෴ මෙ කල ලක්දිව් සමාජයෙහි ඉහළින් අගය කෙරෙන්නේ වෛද්‍යවරුන් සහ ඉංජිනේරුවරුන් ය෴ ඌහු සිංහල නොදන්නා බව කියති෴ ඉංගිරිසි බස ම දන්නා බව කියති ෴ එවැනි ඉහළ සමාජ වරප්‍රසාද විඳින පිරිසක් තමන් ව අනුගමනය කරන හෙයින් තමන් හා එක්වන ලෙස අබලකවාදීහු අන් ජනයාට ද පවසති෴”

 දෙව්රජාණන්වහන්ස, මේ ආකාරයෙන් කටයුතුකිරීමට ඉඩදෙන්නේ නම් ලක්දිව් බුද්ධ ශාසනය වැඩිකල් නො රැකෙන්නේ ය෴ ඇත්ත නැත්ත කිමෙක්දැයි විමසා දැනගැනීමේ බුද්ධියක් දැන් කල මිනිසුන්ට නැත්තේ ය෴ උගත් යැයි සම්මත ජනයා පාලි, සංස්කෘත තබා සිංහලවත් නොදන්නහුය෴ තමන් සිංහල නොදන්නා බව ඌහු ආඩම්බරයෙන් කියති ෴ පාලි, සංස්කෘති තබා සිංහලවත් නොදන්නා උන්ට අලුත් අලුත් නිරුක්ති රිසි පරිද්දෙන් කියාදීම අපහසු කටයුත්තක් නොවේ ෴ ඉදින්, ශාසනය රක්‍ෂාකරන්න නම් දැන් කළයුත්තේ කිමෙක් දැයි කියා ඒ දෙව් පුත්තෙම උපුල්වන් දෙව් රජුගෙන් විමසා සිටියේය෴”

 එයට පිළිවදන් දුන් උපුල්වන් දෙව්රජු මෙ ලෙසින් පවසා සිටි සේක෴ ශාසනය රැකගත හැක්කේ සිංහලදේශයේ මිනිසුන් හට ය ෴ එය අපට කළ හැකි කාර්යයක් නොවන්නේ ය ෴ අපට කළ හැක්කේ ශාසනය රකින මිනිසුනුත් උන්ට එය කිරීමට ඉඩ සළසනු වස් මේ දේශයත් ආරක්‍ෂා කරදීම ය ෴ භාෂා ශාස්ත්‍රාදිය නොදන්නා නිසා මිනිසුන් ගේ සිත් විකල් වී සිටින බවක් පෙනෙයි ෴ භාෂා ශාස්ත්‍රාදිය උගන්වන පිරිවෙන් ආයතන නැති වී ගොසිනි ෴ ඉදින් අපට කළ හැක්කේ මේ පිරිවෙන් ආයතන නැවත ඇතිකිරීමට උත්සුක වන ජනයා හට උපකාරකිරීමයි ෴ උන් ව ආරක්‍ෂාකිරීමයි ෴ එය කළ හැකි දනන් ගැන සොයා බලව් ෴ එවන් දනන් හට ආරක්‍ෂා සලසා දී, අවැසි පිහිටාධාර ලබාදියව් ෴”

 මේ සැනෙන් දිව්‍ය සභා තොමෝ විසර ගියහ ෴ මතු පැමිණෙන සිංහල බස දන්නා අයවළුන් ගේ අවබෝධය පිණිස මම මෙය සිංහලෙන් ම ලියා තැබුවෙමි ෴”

එ් අවසන් තල්පතයි. එය ද අනෙක් තල්පත් මත තැබූ මම දෑස් පියාගතිමි. නො දැනුවත්ව ම මා හට නින්ද ගොසිනි. සිහිනයෙන් මා පිවිස සිටියේ නිදාගෙන සිටින මිනිසුන්ගෙන් පිරිණු සභාවකට ය. එම සභාවෙහි සිටි අප ඉදිරියෙහි ප්‍රාදූර්භූත වූ අනගාරික ධර්මපාලතුමන් මෙ සේ කියනු මා හට ශ්‍රවණය විය.

සිංහලයිනි අවදිවව්! නැවතත් පිරිවෙන් ඇතිකරව්!!

ලංකාවේ ක්‍ෂිතිමය පරම්පරාව නියෝජනය කල දොස්තර සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍ර ප්‍රනාන්දු

September 8th, 2018

 වෛද් රුවන් එම් ජයතුංග

ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේ හිටපු නායක රෝහණ විජේවීර මහතාගේ බිරිය වන චිත්‍රාංගනී විජේවීර  මහත්මියගේ සොහොයුරා වූ ‍දොස්තර සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍ර ප්‍රනාන්දු මහතා  වනවාසල තෙලඟපාත දුම්රිය හරස් මාර්ගයේදී කොළඹ කොටුවේ සිට මහනුවර බලා ධාවනය වන ශීඝ්‍රගාමී දුම්රියට පැන සියදිවි හානි කරගෙන ඇත.  

වෛද්‍ය සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍රා ප්‍රනාන්දු 71 කැරැල්ලේදී හා ඉන් පසුව දීර්ඝ වදබන්ධන වලට ලක් වූ වින්දිතයෙකි. 1971 වසරේ දිනක දිනක්‌ රාත්‍රියේදී පණ පිටින් පුළුස්‌සා මැරීම සඳහා ඔහුගේ සිරුරට පෙට්‍රල් වත් කරනු ලැබේ. එහෙත් රත්නපුර රෝහලේ ටෙනිස්‌ පිටියේදී ඔහු සමග ටෙනිස්‌ ගැසූ පැරණි මිතුරකු වූ සහකාර පොලිස්‌ අධිකාරි නීල් වීරසිංහ ඔහු හඳුනාගෙන ඔහුගේ සිරුරට ගිනි තැබීම වළක්‌වයි. 1989 දී   ගම්පහ රෝහලේ වෛද්‍යවරයකුට පහර දීම නිසා යළි පොලිස්‌ කූඩුවට දමනු ලැබේ. ඊට දින කිහිපයකට පසු ගම්පහ පිහිටි “වයිට්‌ හවුස්‌” නමැති ඔහුගේ නිවස ජ.වි.පෙ. සාමාජිකයෝ ගිනි තබති. මේ වන විට ඔහු හත් වතාවක්‌ හිරේ ගොස්‌ ඇත. සිය වතාවකට වඩා පොලිස්‌ අත්අඩංගුවට පත්ව ඇත. (කාලයෙන් කාලයට රට කළඹන  විජේවීරගේ දොස්‌තර මස්‌සිනා -අනුර සොලමන්ස්‌)  

ඔහුගේ ක්ලමථකාරී හැසිරීම් රටාව මාධ්‍ය විසින් වාර්ථා කල තිබුණි. වරක් අධිකරණය ඉදිරිපිටදී කැත්තක් රැගෙන කළහකාරි ලෙස හැසිරුණු  වෛද්‍ය සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍රා ප්‍රනාන්දු මහතා කෙසෙල්වත්ත පොලිසිය මගින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනුනි. ඉන්පසු   කොළඹ අළුත් කඩේ මහේස්ත්‍රාත් අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමෙන් අණතුරුව වෛද්‍ය සුභාෂ් පිළිබඳව මානසික තත්ව වාර්තාවක් ලබා දෙන ලෙස නියෝග කිරීමෙන් පසුව ඔහුව   අංගොඩ මානසික රෝහලට යොමු කරන ලදි.  

වධ බන්ධනයට ලක් වීමත් හිසට සිදු කරන ලද පහර දීම් නිසාත් දොස්‌තර සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍ර ප්‍රනාන්දු පශ්චාත් ව්‍යසන ක්ලමථ අක්‍රමථාවයෙන් මෙන්ම TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) තත්වය නිසා හටගත් පෞරුෂ වෙනස් වීම් වලින් ද පෙලෙන බවට අනුමාන කිරීමේ සාධක  තිබේ. මේ පිලිබඳව මම වරක් ලිපියක්ද ලියූවෙමි.   වෛද්‍ය  ‍ සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍ර ප්‍රනාන්දු මෙවැනි කුරිරු ලෙස තම ජීවිතය අවසන් කර ගැනීම සඳහා ඔහු ලද  ක්‍ෂිතිමය ජීවන අත්දැකීම්ද හේතු කාරකයන් වන්නට ඇත.   සියදිවි නසා ගැනීම අනුමත නොකරන මුත් දිවි නසා ගැනීම සඳහා ඔහුට තම වෛද්‍ය දැණුම උපයෝගී කර ගෙන මාරක නමුදු සෞම්‍ය ක්‍රමවේදයක් උපයෝගී කර ගැනීමේ හැකියාව තිබුන නමුදු ඔහු තෝරා ගත්තේ ඉතා සාහසික මෙන්ම දරුණු ක්‍රමවේදයකි. මෙයද ඔහු පෙළූ පශ්චාත් ව්‍යසන ක්ලමථ අක්‍රමථාව හේතු කාරකයක් වන්නට ඇත. දොස්‌තර සුභාෂ් චන්ද්‍ර ප්‍රනාන්දු යනු 1971 / 1988-89 යුග වල අන්තවාදී ප්‍රචණ්ඩ දේශපාලනයේ මෙන්ම රාජ හිංසනයේ  කොටස්කරුවෙකු මෙන්ම ගොදුරකි. ඔහු නියෝජනය කලේ ලංකාවේ ක්‍ෂිතිමය පරම්පරාවය.

Losing all sense of perspective

September 8th, 2018

By R.S. Karunaratne Courtesy Ceylon Today

During the past 50 years, life for most of us has been transformed beyond recognition. Sometimes we wonder at how such change, took place, in a span of half a century. Poets and philosophers have often reminded us of the ever-changing pattern of life. The celebrated Greek philosopher Heraclitus (c. 540-c. 480) said, You can’t step twice into the same water.”

P.B. Shelley wrote, ‘Naught may endure but mutability.’ Longfellow expressed a similar observation in these words: ‘All things must change / To something new, to something strange.’

Men may come and men may go and nothing remains static in this world. Similarly, life itself consists of energy, movement, rhythm, growth and transmutation. When the world itself is turning upon its axis and is circling in its own orbit human life cannot possibly remain static. The world has been created in such a way that nothing remains constant.

In most parts of the world, seasons change through spring, summer, autumn, winter and back to the same cycle. Even a tree grows, blooms, withers and dies, but another tree is born from the seeds. Some countries are extremely cold, others extremely hot. In the same way, light follows darkness in endless succession.

Human life follows the same pattern. A new-born baby begins to breathe, think and move. Eventually, a child grows up into a man or woman. Nobody can change this pattern. Nature does not allow anybody to idle. If you stand idle, you will grow rusty. Although change is essential to human life, all changes are not necessarily for the benefit of mankind. So long as man is his own creator, he alone is responsible for any change he makes.

If he makes a wise change, he will be rewarded. If he makes an unwise change, he will suffer. Thus his future depends upon the wisdom of his choice.

Political change

The people of Sri Lanka wanted a political change in 2015. The majority of them voted against the Rajapaksa regime and paved the way for a coalition of two rival political parties – Sri Lanka Freedom Party and United National Party – to form a Unity Government. After three years of Yahapalanaya, voters are wondering whether they made a wrong decision. This is one instance where we made a change which is politically immature and unwise.

Although there is nothing wrong in change, there is a craze for speed today. You can see motorcycles, three-wheelers, cars and private buses roaring along dusty roads. The people, their houses and trees are covered with dust thrown up by the vehicles. In wet weather pedestrians are sprayed with muddy water from the spinning wheels. Those who drive fast miss the simple pleasures and wonders of nature.

Apart from the craze for speed, the death toll from accidents is on the increase. We have to pay a heavy price for fast and reckless driving. Therefore, it is time we decided whether this modern craze for speed is a wise change.

Modern methods of manufacture and the total absorption of small businesses by multinational companies have created many problems. In a big company, individual workers have no personal interest in the business. They work for a negotiated salary. In the past, workers in small industrial units had a personal interest in the job. They had a close relationship with the employer. Today’s employees hardly meet their bosses who operate from air-conditioned rooms.

Machines

On the other hand, machines are replacing workers. In a local soft drink manufacturing company 200 workers were employed to process fruits before turning them into soft drinks and other by-products. However, the employer bought an expensive machine to process the fruits and the 200 employees lost their jobs. We cannot blame the manufacturer for introducing machines in his factory because his motive is to make a sizeable profit. However, such decisions invariably lead to severe unemployment among the youth.

We have unwittingly created a class of people who earn big money and enjoy too much of leisure. Most of them make money by selling drugs or engaging themselves in anti-social activities. Nobody knows how much they earn. Although they do not pay income tax, they take a keen interest in committing crimes and other misdemeanours. Most of them commit crimes through sheer boredom. This remains a major social problem.

The universities in Sri Lanka have become hotbeds of politics. Instead of following lectures and doing research, students can be seen on the street shouting slogans and disrupting the flow of traffic. They may be having valid grievances. But is this the right way to win their demands? The government too has adopted an intransigent attitude towards the protesting students. Very often we see how the demonstrators are dispersed by using water cannons and tear gas.  At this rate our universities will not be able to produce scholars in any field.

Upheavals

Some of the drastic changes taking place today are nothing but upheavals. People are clamouring for relief, but the authorities remain deaf and dumb to their demands. The cost of living is soaring, but the government wants the people to tighten their belts.

Instead of cushioning the blow the government is dishing out bigger allowances to Parliamentarians. This is not the change the people expected.

A recent survey found that most young voters have lost their faith in politicians. They are no longer interested in elections. They want opportunities for higher education and employment. When their demands are not met, they pose a serious threat to the government and society.

Amid the swirl of life’s many and varied changes, we are apt to be influenced by false estimates. We have lost our sense of true values. Today we feel the importance of perspective in measuring the frequent changes in life that cannot be overemphasized.

We should guard against false promises and blind prejudices. Both the rulers and the ruled should keep their balance, think constructively and logically. They should adapt themselves to new changes while clinging to ideals which have stood the test of time.
karunaratners@gmail.com

Showdown looms for IGP

September 8th, 2018

BY METHMALIE DISSANAYAKE Courtesy Ceylon Today

The Constitutional Council yesterday (7), gave the National Police Commission (NPC) and the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Pujith Jayasundara 14 days to solve all disputes between them.

The Council met with Speaker Karu Jayasuriya presiding at the Parliament Complex to discuss the reports submitted by the independent commissions and the administrative problems of the commissions.

One of the key issues taken up for the discussion was the ongoing dispute between the NPC and the IGP where the latter declined to follow some recommendations of the NPC about the promotion of Kilinochchi Senior Superintendent of Police Palitha Siriwardena, the promotions of 129 officers subjected to political victimization, the removal of Officer-In-Charge (OIC) Narammala from his post, investigations into the educational qualifications of Deputy Inspector General of Police Nalaka de Silva and the suspension of the OIC of the Statistics Division.

The NPC complained to the Council earlier that they could not compel the IGP to implement their recommendations. The NPC Chairman had complained that with the IGP refusing to implement their recommendations, the NPC is unable to take any further action to ensure the implementation of its proposals as it does not have the powers to do so.

In response, IGP Jayasundara informed the Council that he could not implement some recommendations on various grounds. One of the Police officers in the list of 129 directed by the NCP for promotions is known to have close connections with the previous Government although the list mentions that he was politically victimized by the same Government.
This has created serious doubts regarding the process used by the NPC to recommend promotions for these officers, the IGP said.

The Council then informed both parties to come to a conclusion on the matters within 14 days and to inform the Council of their progress.

Why do people hate the politicians chosen by them? – Gammanpila

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) leader Udaya Gammanpila says that an age had dawned where the people of the country are asking for a new political culture.

He made this observation while addressing the gathering during the launch of a booth authored by SLPP Colombo Municipal Council member Milinda Rajapaksha on Friday (8).

Gammanpila said that the country’s people are today facing a situation where they are cursing the very same politicians who were elected by them.

The people are today wishing for the Parliament to be flooded during rainy seasons. He questioned as to why people hate the public representatives chosen by them.

The UPFA MP also asked as to whether those criticize the way the country is governed are ready to take the country from the bad place to the good.

Gotabaya slams IGP’s ‘insulting’ behavior

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

Former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa says that the behavior of Sri Lanka’s Inspector General of Police (IGP) is completely unacceptable.

He made these comments while addressing another seminar in the ‘Eliya’ series held at Godakawela in Ratnapura on Saturday (8).

Rajapakksa said that the former President not only ended the country’s war, he also carried out development in the post-war period. That is the reason the country should be entrusted to a leader like that, he said.

He stated that today the entire government is discussing how they are going to get the Rajapaksas to where prison clothes. He also questioned as to how there can be any freedom in a country where drugs and the underworld is king.

The former Defence Secretary further said that the IGP has ‘insulted’ his position as the country’s police chief by engaging dancing while wearing uniform during the Kandy Esala Perahera.

No early Presidential Election – President

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

President Maithripala Sirisena says there is unnecessary concern in the country regarding the Presidential election and that even though some have made statements that the presidential election will be early, he will not in any way hold a presidential election before it is due.

President Sirisena also pointed out that he alone could decide on holding such an election.

He made these remarks addressing the SLFP Nivitigala Bala Mandala meeting held at the Nivitigala public fair premises, today (08).

Expressing his views, the President further said that if SLPP and UNP overestimate their political power, that is a mistake and said that whatever value given by themselves to their parties no one could form a government without the support of the SLFP.

Political parties which emerge centering on individuals are temporarily and the country needs political movements with clear vision, the President pointed out. He stated that the SLFP which has a proper vision for the motherland is now moving forward successfully while strengthening its organizational structures.

Expressing his views further, the President said that according to the 19th amendment to the Constitution after the next presidential election the powers of the President will be limited and the key position of the government will be the post of Prime Minister and the discussion among the all who are in the political field should be selecting a better Prime Minister for the country but not concern about the next presidential election.

 

‘Even though whatever allegations were leveled against me by the political opponents, I will continue to fulfill the duties toward the country, much more than anyone done in the past,” he said.

He also said that he created an environment where a common man could reach the highest level while strengthening the democracy and vesting the superior powers of the Executive Presidency in the Parliament and no other leader in the world did so.

President Sirisena said that the true Bandaranaike policy and the policy of the SLPF is that and always the country needs those policies.

The President said that even though the main allegation against the SLFP is that it is joined with the UNP, it did so to fulfill some tasks which could not be fulfilled by the previous government and the President recalled that today the government was able to win the support of the international community and those cooperation is now using for the benefit of the country.

The President said that he is scheduled to address the UN Assembly in 24 th of this month and he is expected to made a new statement before the Assembly to free the security forces from the allegations leveled against them.

Expressing his views regarding the development activities of the Rathnapura district the President said that he will instruct the relevant authorities and the Police to allow the people to engage in gem mining using kooda cane-sacs in rivers and canals in the area from this week.

The President felicitating 10 senior members of the Rathnapura district SLFP and presented awards for them for their long period of contribution for the development of the SLFP.

Ministers Nimal Siripala de Silva, Vijith  Wijayamuni   Zoysa, State Minister Weerakumara Disanayake, Deputy Minister Lasantha Alagiyawanna, Nivitigala SLFP organizer Miyuru Bhashitha Liyanage, Jagath Pushpakumara, Athula Kumara Rahubadda and many other SLFP activists participated on this occasion.

Source: PMD

මොරගහකන්ද හතර සැරයක් විවෘත කිරීම ගැන පරීක්ෂණයක් ඉල්ලයි

September 8th, 2018

සුජිත් හේවාජුලිගේ සහ ආරියරත්න රණබාහු උපුටාගැණීම ලංකාදීප

ජනාධිපතිවරයා මොරගහකන්ද ව්‍යාපෘතිය සිව් වතාවක් විවෘත කිරීම ගැන විගණන විමර්ශනයක් පවත්වන්නැයි විගණකාධිපතිවරයාගෙන් විශේෂ ඉල්ලීමක් කරන බව පත් කළ මන්ත්‍රී බිමල් රත්නායක මහතා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී අද (7) පැවැසීය.

රත්නායක මහතා මේ බව පැවැසුවේ විගණකාධිපති ගාමිණි විජේසිංහ මහතාගේ වැටුප් හා දීමනා වැඩි කිරීමේ යෝජනාව පිළිබඳ විවාදයේදීය.

බිමල් රත්නායක මහතා මෙසේද කීය.

   ‘‘ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ හා අගමැතිවරයාගේ උත්සව වලට ලොකු මුදලක් නාස්ති වෙනවා.රාජ්‍ය උත්සව වලට කරන අනවශ්‍ය වියදම් ගැන විගණකාධිපතිවරයා රටට ප්‍රකාශයක් කළ යුතුයි.

ඒ වගේම පාර්ලිමේන්තුව රැස්කරන්න දිනකට වැය කරන මුදල ගැනත් ඔහු ප්‍රකාශයක් කළ යුතුයි. ඒ ගැන තිබෙන සංඛ්‍යා ලේඛන පරස්පරයි.

මහා පරිමාණ ව්‍යාපෘති ආරම්භ කරන්න කලින් ඒ ව්‍යාපෘති ගැන විගණනයක් කළ යුතුයි.

විගණකාධිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවෙන් දූෂිත නිලධාරීන් ඉන්නවා.වයඹ පළාතේ දුෂණයක් ගැන මා පැමිණිල්ලක් කළා. ඒ පළාතේ විගණන ප්‍රධානීන් කිහිපදෙනෙකු කළේ දූෂිතයින් සෙවීම නොව පැමිණිල්ල කරපු අය පිටුපස පැන්නීමයි.‘‘

ජන ගඟ පිටුපස ඇත්තම ඇත්ත

September 8th, 2018

මාගම්පුත්‍ර උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

කොළඹ වටලා ආණ්ඩුවට දැනෙන හඬක් නැඟීමට තැත් කිරීමේ උත්සාහයට විවිධ අර්ථකථන තිබුණද එජාපයටවත්, ජවිපෙටවත් එක්රැස් කරගත නොහැකි ජන ගංගාවක් කොළඹට කැඳවන්නට ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණට හැකිවිය. හිස්ගෙඩිවලින් අසවල් ගණනක්ය කියා ගණන් බලන්නට ඕනෑ තරම් අය සිටියද ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහිව ජනතාවගේ විරෝධය පෑම බලවත්ය යන්න ඒකාබද්ධය ලෝකයටම කියා පෑවේය.

විදෙස් මාධ්‍ය කිහිපයක්ම මෙම උද්ඝෝෂණය පිළිබඳව වාර්තා කර තිබුණේය. එයින් කියැවුණේ ආණ්ඩුව 5000ක පමණ පොලිස් නිලධාරීන් සංඛ්‍යාවක් යොදවා ආරක්ෂාව තර කර තිබුණු බවය. කොළඹ ප්‍රදේශයේ බොහෝ රජයේ ආයතන හා පෞද්ගලික ආයතනවල සේවකයන්ගේ පැමිණීමේ යම් අඩු වීමක් තිබුණු බවත්, වාර්තා කර තිබුණු විදෙස් මාධ්‍ය කිහිපයකම දක්වා තිබුණේ රජය මෙම උද්ඝෝෂණය කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට උත්සාහයක යෙදෙන බවට තොරතුරු පළවූ ආකාරයක් විරෝධතාවට එක්වූ ප්‍රබලයන්ගෙන් උපුටා දක්වමිනි.

කෙසේ වෙතත් ආණ්ඩුව පැහැදිලි ලෙසම උද්ඝෝෂණයට පෙර සිටම තැතිගැන්මක පසු වූයේය. ආරක්ෂාව සඳහා පොලිස් බළඇණි වැඩි වශයෙන් කොළඹට කැඳවූ අතර, සිවිල් ඇඳුමින් සැරසුණු ඔත්තු සේවා නිලධාරීන් බුරුතු පිටින් තැන තැන රැඳවීය. රජයේ ප්‍රධාන මර්මස්ථානවලට විශේෂ ආරක්ෂාවක් යොදවමින් ආණ්ඩුව පෙන්වන්න උත්සාහ කළේ…
“ඒකාබද්ධයේ අය කොළඹට ඇවිත් මහජන දේපළවලට හානි කරාවි, පහර දේවි, ලොකු විනාශයක් කරාවි” කියලාය. ඒ නිසාවෙන්ම ඊට ගැළපෙන ආරක්ෂාවක් දිය යුතු බවය. අරලියගහ මන්දිරිය ඇතුළත ආරක්ෂාව කලින්ට වඩා විශේෂයෙන් තර කිරීමෙන් ආණ්ඩුවේ ප්‍රධානීන් ප්‍රකට කර වූයේ.

“අරලියගහ මන්දිරය වට කරලා, තාප්පෙන් පැනලා විරෝධතාකරුවන් පහර දෙන්නට පුළුවන්” යන්න විය යුතුය. ඒ මුවාවෙන් ජනාධිපති නිල නිවෙසටත් අරලියගහ මැඳුරටත් සුවිශේෂ ආරක්ෂක විධිවිධාන යොදවා තිබිණි. මතුපිටට නොපෙන්නුවාට ආණ්ඩුව හොඳටෝම බය වී ආරක්ෂාව වෙනුවෙන් කරන්නට තිබුණු හැමදේම කර තිබුණේය.
මේ වග වටහාගත් මෙම උද්ඝෝෂණයේ සංවිධායකයකු වූ නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ බීබීසී ගුවන් සේවයට පවසා තිබුණේ.

“අපේ විරෝධතාව සාමකාමී එකක්. මහජනතාවට අවම පීඩාවක් වෙන විදියටයි විරෝධතාව පැවැත්වෙන්නේ” කියලායි.

උද්ඝෝෂණයට සහභාගි වීම සඳහා ජනතාවට කොළඹට එන්නට පෙරම ආණ්ඩුවේ තැති ගැන්මේ තරම ප්‍රකට වී තිබිණි. හාලිඇළ බෝගහ මඩිත්තේදී උද්ඝෝෂකයන් පැමිණීමට තිබුණු බස් රථයකට අලුයම දීම ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල වුණේය. එය ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානාව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රයද තහවුරු කර තිබුණේය. අංක තහඩු වසාගත් කැබ්රියකින් පැමිණි බේස් බෝල් පිති වැනි දෙයකින් බස් රථයට පහරදී ඇති බවත්, එම පහර දුන් අය කිසියම් නිල ඇඳුමකට සමාන ඇඳුමක් ඇඳ සිටි බවත් ප්‍රකාශ විය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මානව හිමිකම් කේන්ද්‍රය ද ප්‍රකාශයක් කරමින් පැවැසුවේ සාමකාමී උද්ඝෝෂණ පැවැත්වීම පුරවැසියන්ගේ අයිතියක් බවත් එම අයිතියට ගරු කිරීම ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී සමාජයක වගකීමක් බවත්ය.

රාජ්‍ය මාධ්‍ය බෙහෙවින් තැති ගෙන තිබුණු බවක් දක්වමින් රජයේ වැඩකටයුතු අතිශයෝක්තියෙන් වර්ණනා කරමින් පුවත් මෙහෙයුමක වැඩසටහන් යුද්ධයක නිරත වී සිටියේය. ඔවුන් කියන්නට උත්සාහ කළේම ඒකාබද්ධය තුළ බෙදීම් ඇති බවත් සහෝදරයන්ම කුලල් කා ගන්නා බවකි. එහෙත් මෙම උද්ඝෝෂණයේදී එම තර්ක බිඳ දැමීමට ලක්කරමින් මහින්ද, ගෝඨා මෙන්ම ශ්‍රීලනිප මෛත්‍රි පිලෙන් ඉවත්වූ 16 කණ්ඩායමේ සාමාජිකයෝද එකට එක්වී සිටියහ. බැසිල් සහභාගි නොවුණේ ඔහු විදෙස් ගතව සිටි නිසා වුවත් මෙය භේද භින්නතා නිසා වූවක් බවට ඒත්තු ගන්වන්නට රාජ්‍ය මාධ්‍ය උත්සාහ කළේය.

වෙන කවරදාකවත් නැති ආකාරයෙන් උද්ඝෝෂණය ආවරණය සඳහා විශේෂ අවධානයක් රාජ්‍ය මාධ්‍ය යොමු කළ යුතු බවට ඉහළින් උපදෙස් ලැබී තිබිණි. ඒ අනුව උද්ඝෝෂණයේ සිදු වෙන අඩුපාඩුකම් හසුකරගන්නටත් ඒවා පුන පුනා ප්‍රචාරය කිරීමටත් උපදෙස් ලැබී තිබිණි. මෙයින්ම උද්ඝෝෂණය පිළිබඳව ආණ්ඩුවේ තැති ගැන්ම ප්‍රකට විය.

ඒකාබද්ධයේ නායකයන් සියලු දෙනාම උද්ඝෝෂණයට සහභාගි වන සියලු දෙනාටම කණ්ඩායම් නායකයන් හරහා පණිවිඩයක් යවමින් කියා තිබුණේ ජන ගංගාව අතරට එන බාහිර පුද්ගලයන් ගැන අවධානයෙන් සිටින ලෙසටය. කිසියම් වැරැද්දක් සිදු කරන්නේ නම්, එය යම් සැක සහිත බවක් ගනී නම් තමන් ළඟ ඇති ජංගම දුරකථනයෙන් රූපගත කරගෙන ඒ තොරතුරු කණ්ඩායම් නායකයන්ට ඉතා ඉක්මනින් දැනුම් දෙන ලෙසටය.

ඒ අනුව ජන ගංගාව තුළට ආණ්ඩුවේ බුද්ධි අංශ නිලධාරීන් ඇතුළු වුවද, වෙනත් කිසියම් අයකු ඇතුළු වුවද ඒ වෙනස දැනගත හැකි විය. ජන ගංගාව ගලද්දී ඊට බාහිරින් එකතු වන අයට කුඩා කණ්ඩායම් තුළ එම කණ්ඩායමේ නායකයන්ගෙන් ඉඩක් නොලැබුණේ ඒ නිසාය. එය කල්තියාම ඒකාබද්ධයේ නායකයන් සැලසුම් කර තිබුණු නිසාම ජන ගංගාවේ පිරිස් අතරින් කිසියම් හෝ වරදක් සිදු විනැයි වාර්තා කර ගන්නට නොහැකි විය. මෙය ආණ්ඩුවේ ඇතැම් මහමොළකාරයන්ට හිතට වද දෙන්නක් විය.

මීට පසුබිම්ගත හේතුව වූයේ ආණ්ඩුවේ මහ මොළකාරයන් සිතා සිටි දේවල්ය. “එන සෙනඟ අතරින් සමහරු අතට අහුවන දේවල්වලින් කඩ සාප්පුවලට ගහන්න පුළුවන්. රජයේ දේපළවලට හානි කරන්න පුළුවන්, අරලිය ගහ මන්දිරය වටලන්න පුළුවන්, ජනාධිපති නිල නිවෙස වටලලා කලබල කරන්න පුළුවන්. එතැනදී රාජ්‍ය විරෝධී කැරැල්ලක් වගේ මෙහෙයවන්න පුළුවන්. එහෙම කළොත් ඒ ටික හවස රූපවාහිනි මාධ්‍යයෙන් පෙන්වන්න අපට පුළුවන්. ඒකෙ අපකීර්තිය ඒකාබද්ධයට එල්ල කරන්න පුළුවන්.”

මේ ආකාරයට එක එක කතා කියමින් බලා සිටි ආණ්ඩුවේ මහමොළකාරයෝ බලාපොරොත්තු වූ කිසිදු ප්‍රචණ්ඩ ක්‍රියාවක් සිදු වුණේ නැත. ඉතාමත් සාමකාමී උද්ඝෝෂණයක් සිදු කරමින් උද්ඝෝෂකයෝ කොළඹට එක් රැස්වී රාත්‍රි වනතුරු රැඳී සිට ඒකාබද්ධයේ නායකයන් හා හඬ නඟා කීවේ.

“මේ පරගැති ආණ්ඩුව විසුරුවා දමලා අපට අලුත් ආණ්ඩුවක් දියව්” කියලාය. ලංකාවේ උද්ඝෝෂණයකදී එකම තැනකට වැඩිම පිරිසක් එක්රැස් කරවමින්, විලක්කු දල්වමින්, හඬ නඟමින් රැඳී සිටිමින් බලපෑම් කණ්ඩායමක් ලෙස උද්ඝෝෂණයක් රාත්‍රි වන තුරුම කෙරුණේ ප්‍රථම වතාවටය යන්න කාගේත් කතාබහට ලක්විය.

උද්ඝෝෂණයේ අරමුණ කඩාකප්පල්කාරී ක්‍රියා සිදුකොට එහි වැදගත්කම නැති කර ගන්නට නොව ආණ්ඩුවට කිව යුතු දේ කියා දැනවන්නට බව මහින්දගේ කතාවෙන් ප්‍රකට කළේය.
“වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුව ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී අයිතීන් අහෝසි කරමින් රට ඒකාධිපතිත්වයක් කරා ගෙන යනවා. අධික බදු බර, ජීවන වියදම ඉහළ යෑම නිසා ජනතාව පීඩාවට පත්වෙලා. මේ පීඩනය දරාගන්න බැරිව ජනතාව අද පාරට බැහැලා. ඒ අතරේදී ආණ්ඩුව මැතිවරණ කල් දමමින් ජනතාවගෙන් ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී අයිතීන් අහෝසි කරමින් රට ඒකාධිපති ගමනකට ගෙන යනවා.

මහින්ද කිව යුත්ත හා මෙහි අරමුණ කෙටියෙන් කීවේ ජනතාවගේ දැඩි ප්‍රතිචාර මැදය. මහින්ද මෙහිදී විදෙස් මාධ්‍යයටද දැනෙන්න. ලෝකයටම ඇසෙන්න කියූ වැදගත් දෙයක් විය. එය මෙසේය.

“අවුරුදු 20කට පස්සෙ උතුරු පළාතට මැතිවරණයක් තිබ්බෙ මමයි, යුද්ධය ඉවර කරලා ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය උදා කරපු හින්දා ජනාධිපතිත් අගමැතිත් උතුරට ගිහින් මට බනිනවා. අපි යුද්ධය ඉවර කරලා ජනතාවට නැවත ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය දිනා දුන්නා. ඒ නිසා උතුරේ ඒ මිනිස්සු අද නිදහසේ හුස්ම ගන්නවා. මම මැතිවරණ පැවැත්වූවා. ඒත් ආණ්ඩුව මැතිවරණ කල් දානවා.”

මෙහි ඇති වැදගත් කරුණ නම් තරුණ බලවේග රැසක එකමුතුවෙන් තාක්ෂණයද උපයෝගී කරගෙන ජාත්‍යන්තර අත්දැකීම්වලද ආදර්ශ ලබා ගනිමින් කළ අලුත් විදිහේ උද්ඝෝෂණයක් වීමය. ඉතා සුළු සුළු අඩුපාඩුකම් පෙන්වමින් ආණ්ඩුව බෙරිහන් දෙමින් මෙහි සාර්ථකත්වය යටපත් කරමින්, මොට කරමින් මඩ ප්‍රචාර ගෙන යන්නෙ ඒ නිසා යැයි ඒකාබද්ධයේ ප්‍රමුඛයන්ගේ අදහසය.

ජනතාවගේ දුක්ඛ දෝමනස්සයන් වීදි සටන් තුළට ගොනු කිරීම ලෝක ප්‍රවණතාවකි. එහි යහපත් ප්‍රතිඵල ලැබී ආණ්ඩු ඇද වැටුණු අවස්ථා ඕනෑ තරම්ය. මේ උද්ඝෝෂණයද එවන් ආණ්ඩු පෙරළියක එක් තියුණු අවස්ථාවකැයි ඒකාබද්ධයේ නායකයන් කියන්නේ ඒ නිසාය. ඒ නිසා ආණ්ඩුව සැහැල්ලුවෙන් හුස්ම ගෙන මේ හඬ නැඟීම නොතකා හරින්නේ නම් එය ආණ්ඩුවේ අවසානයක ආරම්භය බවට නැඟෙන මතවාද ප්‍රබලය. එබැවින් මේ ගත වන්නේ ඉතාමත් තීරණාත්මක කඩඉමක්ය.

නොවැම්බරයේදී ආණ්ඩුව පෙරළන්න කණ්ඩායම් 2ක් මෛත්‍රි-මහින්ද සමඟ රහස් කතා

September 8th, 2018

ඩබ්ලිව්.කේ. ප්‍රසාද් මංජු උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

නොවැම්බර් 08 වැනිදා ආරම්භ වන අය _ වැය විවාදයේදී ආණ්ඩුව වෙනස් කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සහ හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සමඟ කණ්ඩායම් දෙකක් වෙන වෙනම සාකච්ඡා ආරම්භ කර තිබෙන බව ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී වාමාංශික පෙරමුණේ නායක ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ රත්නපුර දිස්ත්‍රික් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රි වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මහතා ‘ඉරිදා මව්බිම’ට ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ ආර්ථික ප්‍රතිපත්ති සමඟ ඉදිරියටත් මෙම ආණ්ඩුව ගමන් කළහොත් ඉතා දරුණු ආර්ථික අගාධයකට රට ගමන් කරන බවත් ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලරයේ අගය ශීඝ්‍ර ලෙස ඉහළ යමින් රුපියල අවප්‍රමාණය වීම ඇතුළු ආර්ථික කරුණු රැසක් මෙම සාකච්ඡාවලදී අවධානයට ලක්වී ඇති බවත් වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මහතා පෙන්වා දෙයි.

‘ජනබලය – කොළඹට’ විරෝධතා ව්‍යාපාරයට විශාල පිරිසක් සහභාගි වී ඉතා කඩිනමින් මහා මැතිවරණයක් පවත්වන ලෙසට ආණ්ඩුවට බලකර සිටි බවත්, රටේ පොදු මහජනතාවගේ මෙම බලකිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන්ද ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සහ හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සමඟ සාකච්ඡා පවත්වන කණ්ඩායම්වල අවධානය යොමු වී තිබෙන බවත් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රි වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මහතා ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

අය _ වැය විවාදය නොවැම්බර් මාසයේදී ආරම්භ වන නිසාත් අය _ වැයේදී ආණ්ඩුව වෙනස් කිරීමට හොඳ අවස්ථාවක් ලැබී තිබෙන නිසාත් ඒ සඳහා ආණ්ඩුව නියෝජනය කරන අනෙකුත් දේශපාලන පක්ෂවලද සහාය ලබාගෙන ආණ්ඩුව වෙනස් කිරීමට අදාළ වන මෙම සාකච්ඡා දිගටම සිදු කිරීමට සැලසුම් කර තිබෙන බවත් නානායක්කාර මහතා ප්‍රකාශ කරයි. 15 දෙනාගේ කණ්ඩායමේ ජේ‍යෂ්ඨයන් කිහිපදෙනකු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සමඟ මෙම සාකච්ඡාව පවත්වන බවත් තමා ඇතුළු ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ පක්ෂ නායකයන්, හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සමඟද මෙම සාකච්ඡාව සිදුකරන බවත් නානායක්කාර මහතා ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

ආණ්ඩුව වෙනස් කිරීමට අවස්ථාවක් ලැබුණු විට අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරය භාරගන්නවාද කියා තමා හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගෙන් විමසූ බවත් එවැනි තත්ත්වයක් ඇති වුවහොත් රට හා පොදු ජනතාව වෙනුවෙන් එය මඟහරින්නේ නැති බවට මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගෙන් ප්‍රතිචාරයක් ලැබුණු බවත් වාසුදේව නානායක්කාර මන්ත්‍රිවරයා වැඩිදුරටත් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය.

මෙහෙම ගියොත් ඩොලරය 200ට නඟීවි

September 8th, 2018

උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

2005 ආරම්භ වන විට ඇමෙරිකානු ඩොලරයක් සඳහා ගෙවූ මිල රුපියල් 105කි. 2005 – 2014 කාලය තුළ ලෝක ඛනිජ තෙල් අර්බුදය, ලෝක ආහාර අර්බුදය, ලෝක මූල්‍ය අර්බුදය සහ එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ.යේ දරුණු යුද්ධය වැනි දැවැන්ත අභියෝග රාශියකට මුහුණ දෙමින් වුවද 2014 වන විට ඩොලරයට ගෙවූ මුදල රුපියල් 131කි. ඒ අනුව 2005-2014 දස වසර තුළ ඩොලරයට ගෙවූ මුදල වැඩිවූයේ රුපියල් 26කින් පමණි. මේ රජය බලයට පත්වන විට රුපියල් 131ට තිබූ ඩොලරයේ මිල වසර 4ක් ගතවන්නටත් පෙර ඩොලරයට ගෙවූ මිල රුපියල් 33කිනි. පසුගිය රජය සමයේ රුපියල වාර්ෂික සාමාන්‍ය අව ප්‍රමාණය සියයට 2කි.

දැන් රුපියලේ සාමාන්‍ය අව ප්‍රමාණය සියයට 5.5කි. එයින් ඔප්පු වන්නේ රටේ ආර්ථික ස්ථාවරය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම කඩාවැටුණු බවයි. සිංගප්පූරු ගිවිසුම වැනි විදේශ වෙළෙ¼දාම නිදහස්කරන තවදුරටත් සිදුවුවහොත් රටින් පිටට ගලා යන විදේශ විනිමය ප්‍රමාණය වැඩිවීමෙන් මේ වර්ෂය තුළදී ඩොලරයක මිල රුපියල් 200 දක්වා වැඩි වනු ඇතැයි උපකල්පනය කර ඇත. රට ඇතුළට ගලා එන රට සල්ලි ප්‍රමාණයට වඩා රටින් පිටට ගලායන විදේශ විනිමය ප්‍රමාණය ඉහළ යෑමෙන් ලංකාවේ ගෙවුම් ශේෂය මත දැවැන්ත පීඩනයක් ඇතිවී තිබේ. රුපියල දිනෙන් දිනම කඩා වැටීම වැළැක්වීම සඳහා ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව විසින් මීට අති විශාල ඩොලර් ධනස්කන්ධයක් වෙළෙඳපොළට සපයා තිබේ. තවත් දිගින් දිගටම ජාත්‍යන්තර මූල්‍ය අරමුදල මහ බැංකුවට අනතුරු අඟවා තිබේ. ඒ නිසයි හිටපු මුදල් ඇමැති රවි කරුණානායක මහතා විසින් තුන් වසරකට අස්සන් තැබූ ගිවිසුම ප්‍රකාරව පමණ ඉක්මවා විදේශ විනිමය වෙළෙඳපොළට මහ බැංකුව මැදිහත්විය නොහැකි තත්ත්වය තුළ ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම තුළදී තවදුරටත් රුපියල මස්තබාල්දු විය හැකි බව ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයේ ආර්ථික පර්යේෂණ ඒකකයේ නායක ආචාර්ය බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන ‘මව්බිම’ට විශේෂයෙන් ප්‍රකාශයක් කරමින් සඳහන් කෙළේය.

A long & hard battle of a Sri Lankan activist for gay rights

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy The Economic Times

It has been a long and arduous road for the LGBT community in India, as it has been for practically all of us who have lived under the yoke of colonial-era laws that have criminalised and marginalised us for over a century

Waking up on the morning of September 6, I thought I was facing yet another humdrum day in Colombo. Good news is always so few and far between when it comes to gay rights in our part of the world. Then came the news from India, the blaring headlines, the joy in activists’ voices — this was a moment to cherish, and also a moment to reflect. In scrapping Section 377, India has done at last what should have been done many, many years ago. Better late than never, however. I can’t applaud LGBT activi ..

Gay-parade-india-bccl

Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/65736301.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 

India to supply 160 railway passenger coaches worth US$ 82.64 million to Sri Lanka

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, September 8 (DDNews): An agreement to supply160 railway passenger coaches custom-made in India, was signed between RITES Limited of India and Sri Lankan government in Colombo on September 7.

The US 82.64 million contract is part of a line of credit agreement for procurement of railway rolling stock and upgrading of rail tracks worth US$ 318 million which was signed between EXIM Bank of India and Government of Sri Lanka in June 2017.

India to supply 160 railway passenger coaches worth US$ 82.64 million to Sri Lanka

Procurement of rolling stock from India which are underway also include 6 DMUs, 10 locomotives, 20 container carrier wagons and 30 fuel tank wagons.

RITES Ltd. will be supplying the DMUs and locomotives, whereas Texmaco Rail & Engineering Ltd. will be supplying the wagons.

India has already completed projects close to US$ 1 billion under concessional financing in the railway sector in Sri Lanka including railway lines to Jaffna and Thalaimannar.

This project is in continuation of India’s efforts to partner with Sri Lanka in people-oriented connectivity projects in Sri Lanka.

Chinese enters Lankan market as a language of communication

September 8th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, September 8 (newsin.asia): Is Chinese beginning to replace Tamil in promoting products or serving customers in the Sri Lankan market? Looking at the Anchor butter packet being sold in the Sri Lankan market one might begin to think so.

Packets of Anchor butter, imported from Fonterra Brands in New Zealand, now carry  information in English, Sinhala and Chinese but not Tamil, though the latter is one of the official languages of Sri Lanka. And Chinese is given precedence over Sinhala which is the language of more than 75% of Sri Lanka’ population.

This is leading people using the social media to ask if Chinese is in the process of replacing the local languages.

Given the increasing number of Chinese in the urban areas,  thanks to the many high-end infrastructure projects being implemented by Chinese companies with loans given to the Sri Lankan government by China, this could very well be so in the not too distant future people say, though only jokingly.

Chinese enters Lankan market as a language of communication

However what is bothering the Minister of National Integration, Reconciliation, and Official Languages, Mano Ganeshan, is not the inclusion of Chinese on the packet but the absence of Tamil.

He has told the media that he has instructed the Commissioner of Official Languages to look into the lapse, though Anchor is a private enterprise and not a public sector company.

Ganeshan said that having information on a product in English and Sinhalese and not Tamil is a violation of the National Language Policy.

But he was quick to clarify that he has no issue with information being printed in Chinese (given the expanding Chinese population with no knowledge of English or any other Lankan language). But it should not replace local languages he added.

Ganeshan said that if the company importing and selling Anchor in Sri Lanka does not rectify the flaw he will personally take action. He refrained from specifying the nature of the action.

New Zealand’s Anchor and Ratthi brands control 60 per cent of Sri Lanka’s milk powder consumption market which is estimated at 85,000 metric tonnes (MT) annually, industry sources said.

The balance comes from Lakspray (12 per cent) and Nespray (8 per cent) which is also sourced from New Zealand, the sources said.

The Fonterra group which sends the milk to Sri Lanka was in deep trouble in Sri Lanka in 2013 when it was rumored that its milk was contaminated. The New Zealand government had to intervene to settle the issue.

Sri Lanka is heavily dependent on imported milk and milk products. The island produces just 10,000 MT of the country’s total milk powder requirement.

Separatist political battles fought in  the fields of  history

September 7th, 2018

H. L. D. Mahindapala

One of the imperatives that drives the Tamil separatist lobby is the yearning to be on the side of history that makes them look and  sound great. They need this appearance of greatness most of all to sustain their claim for a separate state — their modern political  agenda.  Without this feeling of greatness they feel inadequate because they are overwhelmed by the monumental history of the Sinhala-Buddhists who were the makers of history as revealed in  recorded art, architecture, language, hydraulic engineering, culture and civilisation. In the absence of comparable historical achievements the Tamil ideologues labour indefatigably to fill the vacuum with either scraps picked up from here and there, or imaginative creations of their  own.

Challenging or denigrating the present and the past of the Sinhalese has been a part  of  the Tamil separatist strategy to claim a greatness superior to that of the Sinhalese and the  other communities, including the Tamils of Batticoloa and the Indian Tamils in the estates whom they deride as coolies. Underlying their demand for a separate state is their belief that they are a cut above the rest of  the nation. This is a noted characteristic of the Saivite Jaffna Vellalas (SJVs) who despise their own peninsular Tamils categorised as the pariahs, the outcasts.  Ever since the Dutch officially enthroned the SJVs on the top of the caste hierarchy, by legalising  the higher status of the SJVs in the Thesawalamai (1707), they had taken the upper hand to pursue arrogant and intransigent politics in the peninsula. Their demand for a separate state too is based on the political arrogance of the English-speaking.SJVs who were  anointed in the 19th century as God’s chosen people by their revered Saivite guru, Arumuka Navalar, a caste fanatic. The SJVs are also aware that they cannot claim greatness in  the present to claim a separate state without an impressive greatness attained in the past. So creating a past that makes them look great, at least in  their own eyes, is an indispensible necessity. Consequently, one of the biggest  industries of the Tamil ideologues has been to rush into the past to dig up any skeleton on which they can put  some  lipstick to make it look attractive and great. In other  words, their mission has been to politicise history to serve their present agenda. But they can’t go far into the past because history belongs to those who make it and not  to  those who claim it noisily without any substantial evidence.

Besides, history does not come out of thin air. History consists of the material conditions created by the labour of the pioneers who transformed the virgin land for habitation. Clearly, anyone claiming a superior right to own territory must prove that they were the pioneers who created the material conditions for the making of history in Sri Lanka. So what does the available evidence reveal about the original makers of history – the founding fathers who sowed the seeds for a brand new civilisation that was comparable to any other great civilisation of ancient or medieval times? What is relevant to  this discourse is the unbroken flow of mainstream  history that informed, influenced and determined the identity and the destiny of the nation as it evolved from the dim distant origins to this day. As far as it is known, there is only  one mainstream that maintained an  unbroken continuity determining the overall shape and form of  the  nation and that is the history of the Sinhala-Buddhists. Others were minor tributaries that flowed into  the mainstream.

The Indo-Aryan settlers of the pre-Christian era (Mahavamsa says they were the ”Sihalas” – VII:42)) were the only known pioneers who tamed the virgin land and prepared the ground for the rise and growth of one of the unique civilisations of the ancient and medieval worlds. With their advanced technology and their creative political skills they gave the world a new language, new culture and a new civilisation.  This achievement reduces the other competing cultures of minorities, however great  they may believe theirs to be, to a lower tier in the grand sc ales of history. The legacy they left behind makes them the founding fathers of a new nation with a distinct identity. All other migrants were mere imitators who were quite content to live in the comfort zones of the cultures they brought with them. They were basking in the glories of their imported feathers. Their imitative contributions were no match to the creative genius of the Indo-Aryans who came to be known as the Sinhalese.

From the time the Indo-Aryans stepped ashore they established an affinity with the land. They were drawn to the land instinctively as the land in which they would write their destiny. They knew that that the boats they came will be tied permanently to the  shores of new land and never be used to take them back — not even for a brief visit. They had no yearnings, nor ambitions of going back to the womb from which they came. They were permanent settlers determined to make their stay memorable and worthwhile by making their brand of history that would add to their glory in the annals of time. And as they made history in their ingenious and creative ways, history in turn would make them the supreme custodians of the land.

No one had a better right to ownership of the land as the creative custodians of the land who made history. Their commitment to  the  land as protective custodians is written in blood by defending the land against those who came to destroy their history. They embraced those who came to  join hands with them in their endeavours to make history jointly. They were equally ruthless with those who came  to destroy the history they were making. The over-determining forces  of creative history, intertwining with the people who were minting a new history, came together as inseparable and symbiotic twins feeding each other.

Nobody has a better claim to the land than those who made history in it.  After all the greatest achievement of man is in making history and though history belongs to all mankind – the Tamils, Muslims, Burghers, Malays etc — those who made history in Sri Lanka as the founders, namely, the Sinhala-Buddhists, have a special right to claim what they made, protected and preserved as their heritage. No other community has the unique record of  protecting  the national values and its  history as the Sinhala-Buddhists. They remained as the prime guardians of the nation by protecting it  against the destructive forces of the external and  internal enemies.

Since the Indo-Aryans have been the makers of history for others to come and share, co-existing peacefully in the  historical/political space of their unique civilisation, they have the right, like all the other makers of history in other nations, to call it their exclusive and foremost homeland. They own the foremost right because they were the first to pave the path for others to follow. The others” grew in the shadow of the pioneers. As the creative custodians who laid the foundations for the birth, rise and growth of the nation they have the right to be the owners of the territory because others have not been in the forefront consistently to protect or guarantee the legacy/history  they have inherited from their founding fathers. The legatees have the  right of the first call because the others cannot match their  contributions  with that of the  pioneering makers of history.

This, however, does not confer an exclusive right to exclude the other”. In owning the foremost right the makers of history must necessarily give the other”, who came later into history, their due rights as minorities. It should be noted that one of the hallmarks of the Sinhala-Buddhist civilisation throughout known history has been the protection and space given to the minorities to live and  breathe freely with dignity. The Catholics persecuted by the Protestant Dutch were given protection in Wahakotte in Matale by the Kandyan kings. The Muslims persecuted by the Dutch and Prabhakaran were also given safe havens by the Sinhala-Buddhists. Despite the sporadic infirmities and insanities that threatened the minorities, it is not possible to deny that the Tamils ever experienced, in their entire history, including the 33- year-rule of the North under Velupillai  Prabhakaran, equality and liberty and dignity as known to them in the 70 years of Independence, which they describe as the reign of Sinhala governments”.

In the absence of a credible history to back their claims for a separate state the Tamil ideologues have laboured tirelessly to (1) demonise and denigrate the recorded Sinhala-Buddhists history, and, simultaneously (2) engage in elevating the Tamil history by inventing a new reality that never existed in the known  past, as seen in the Vadukoddai Resolution – the Bible of the Tamil separatists. The separatist lobby was desperately in need of a past  that glorified Tamil history. Their political agenda was, primarily,, to acquire power and territory and they needed a history that confirmed their claim of being equal with the Sinhala-Buddhists from the dawn of time”. They were desperately seeking to convince themselves and the others that they had shared power with the Sinhalese from the dawn of time” – a line they threw into the Vadukoddai Resolution to justify their claim for a separate state. This claim  is not confirmed by the Tamil historians who agree that the Tamils settled down as permanent settlers in the  Northern  strip only in the 12th-13th centuries. But the separatist ideologues did not  want to spoil their fiction with the historical truths. Consequently, their political strategy has been to denigrate the monumental records of Sinhala-Buddhist history and glorify a Tamil past  that exists only in their imagination.

This aspect needs to be explored at length in another chapter. However, looking back, it is clear that the Tamils of Jaffna have nothing comparable to that of the unique Sinhala-Buddhist civilisation and culture. Their claim to a statehood in an island that was tamed, cultured and developed by the Indo-Aryan settlers (Sihalas”) lacks the substance and the essence of a valid history to be equal  with  the  pioneers who made history. The Indo-Aryans dominated the classical period exclusively when they defeated and drove  out the Tamil invaders. Their supremacy was imprinted indelibly in stone, sand and sea. Chinese records state that the Sinhala kings built the tallest ships of the time to export elephants. For  all intents and purposes, the history,  the legacy, the legitimacy derived from the history and the glory belongs  to those who made history – i.e,, the Sinhala-Buddhists.

There are many teams that play in the  fields of history. Problems arise mainly when the B team and C team decide to challenge  the A team and dethrone them from their primary role of being the  original source which nurtured historical growth to be shared as a common good for all.

The overall pattern is clear : Nandikadal confirmed that new Dutugemunus will rise to repeat Vijithapura all over again. Nandikadal is also the latest instance that proves history has always been on the side of the Sinhalese at critical times. History has posed serious challenges to the makers of history from time to time but in the end it has always come round to rescue the Sinhalese. The tragedy of contemporary politics has been in the futile attempt to reverse this history. After Nandikadal the next deceitful attempt to rewrite and reverse history is visible clearly in the draft of the new Constitution-makers. Among other things, it  is an  insidious attempt to deny the legatees of the pioneering makers of  history their legacy, their territory and sometimes even their  memory. The ill-conceived educational policies of the UF government (1970 -1977),” wrote Prof. S. Pathmanathan, eliminated, almost entirely, the study of history at schools.” (p. xi – Facets of Sri Lankan History and Culture, Kumaran Book House, 2015). Dangers lurk in every nook and corner.

So will the Constitution-makers succeed in dismantling the entire historical edifice, built over millennia, and replace it with narrow compartments,  dividing the territory with  powers to separate the goats from  the sheep?

THE JVP HAS TABLED THE 20A:  THE ‘FINAL BATTLE’ FOR THE FUTURE OF SRI LANKA HAS BEGUN

September 7th, 2018

DHARSHAN WEERASEKERA

It has happened as was to have been foreseen.  A morally, intellectually and financially bankrupt Government has played its last hand to try and stay in power beyond 2020.  I have argued in previous articles that, the JVP with 4 members in Parliament will not even dream of bringing a constitutional amendment if they didn’t have the backing of the UNP for it, and that means Ranil is ultimately behind the present venture.

I am annexing to this article a previous article of mine titled, ‘An Open Letter to Mr. Mahinda Rakapaksa re the JVP’s 20A,’ written in May 2018 and published on lankaweb.com on the eve of the JVP’s first attempt at tabling the 20A.  It contains my arguments on what I consider to be the real reasons behind the 20A, what Ranil is ultimately trying to gain with this amendment, and how I think the Government will try to get MR and the JO to back it.  So, I will not repeat those arguments here.

In this article, I will simply list what I think are the strengths and weaknesses of the Sinhalayo on the one hand who have to somehow or other defeat the 20A, and on the other the Sirisena-Wickremasinghe combine (i.e. the ‘Government’ and its assorted allies including especially India, the U.S., and the Tamil Diaspora) who will do their utmost to get the amendment passed, and make a few recommendations as to what the Sinhalayo can do to try and win this fight.

THE SINHALAYO

STRENGTHS

  1. The Sinhalayo are exhausted, battered and bruised after three years of ‘yahapalanaya,’ but they are still standing, i.e. nothing irrevocable has happened yet.  For instance a new Constitution generated by the ‘Constitutional Assembly’ set up under the Framework Resolution of March 2016 has not been passed.  It should be noted that, around August – October last year there was a very real possibility that such a thing might happen.
  2. The Sinhalayo have the support of overwhelming majority of the Buddhist clergy or Maha Sangha.  This is a tremendous moral as well as political asset.
  3. The Sinhalayo have good leaders.  By this I don’t mean the politicians, but rather the group of men who led the war against the LTTE, leaders whose loyalty, commitment and love for the country are beyond question, and therefore have the personal credibility to command the respect and allegiance of the Sinhalayo.
  4. The Sinhalayo still have an ‘Old Guard’ of intellectuals who have been writing, lecturing and in general agitating on behalf of the Sinhalayo for decades. They know their ‘enemy’ very well, including most if not all his tricks, and can advise the Sinhalayo accordingly.
  5. The Sinhalayo have China

WEAKNESSES

  1. The Sinhalayo are divided.  The grave danger is that in the coming days and weeks the discussion over the 20A will degenerate into a debate over the pros and cons of abolishing the Executive Presidency.  The reality is that, in order to abolish the Presidency, a referendum is needed, and I’m no longer of the view that the Government is prepared to risk a referendum.  So, abolishing the Presidency is not the real game here.

In my view, what the Government will do is have the Supreme Court rule that a referendum is needed, then either delete or amend the clauses that [court says] trigger the referendum, and pass the remainder with a 2/3 majority.  Then, at the Committee Stage, following the tactic that was used in the Provincial Councils Elections Amendment Act, the Government will bring in an entirely different text, or a substantially different one from the one that was originally gazetted, one that perhaps even makes Sri Lanka  into an ‘orumiththa nadu,’ and adopt it.

The Sinhalayo must understand very clearly why they must resist the 20A.  The Sinhalayo must resist the 20A because it is a tactic being used by a corrupt and unaccountable government to bring in changes to the Constitution that will cause the interests of the Sinhalayo irrevocable harm.  It has nothing to do with whether or not one likes the Executive Presidency.  If the Executive Presidency is a problem, then it can be made a campaign issue at the next elections.

  1. The Sinhalayo are poor compared to the Government and its foreign backers.  So, in general the Sinhalayo cannot spend as much time and energy campaigning against the 20A, as their opponents will do in promoting it.
  2. The Sinhalayo don’t have the organizational capacity to mobilize for a referendum if one is needed.  (As I mentioned earlier, I don’t think the Government will risk going for a referendum, but if they decide to roll the dice and go for one, the Sinhalayo are in real trouble.)
  3. The JO, which supposedly represents the Sinhalayo has proved itself thoroughly inefficient and incompetent in carrying out that trust, as for example shown by the JO’s inability to capitalize on the results of the 10th February Local Government elections.
  4. The Sinhalayo do not have an alternative to the 20A.  One of the main challenges that the advocates of the 20A will throw at the Sinhalayo is that they (Sinhalayo) can only protest against things but cannot present anything positive or substantive of their own in respect of constitutional reform.  At present, the Sinhaloyo have no reply to this challenge.

THE GOVERNMENT

STRENGTHS

  1. The Government has a 2/3 majority in Parliament.
  2. The Government has the support of India and the United States, who want to prevent China from gaining a foothold in the island.
  3. The Government has money to spend on political campaigns.
  4. The Government has a well-oiled propaganda machine including NGO’s capable of shaping public opinion.
  5. The Government controls the media and so will control much of the public discourse on the 20A in the coming days and weeks.  This, along with the matter in point ‘4’ above will help the government shape public opinion in respect of the 20A in the coming days and weeks.

WEAKNESSES

  1. Corruption, dishonesty, venality and incompetence of most if not all of the members of the government, which no amount of propaganda and other such things can gloss over.
  2.  Lack of a coherent vision or policy for the country other than slogans,
  3. The fundamental lack of appeal to the Sinhalayo
  4. The country is in a bad way.  The economy is in shambles.
  5. Fundamental illegitimacy of the ‘National Government.’

The gravest danger at the moment is that, according to rumor, Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa has been enticed into supporting the 20A in exchange for being made the Prime Minister at some time in the near future.  I repeat, this is only rumor, but nevertheless something that the Sinhalayo must take seriously.

I hardly think MR will be so shortsighted as to fall for a ‘deal’ such as the above.  For instance, who would be appointing him PM?  Clearly, it would be Sirisena.  Recall that, as recently as May 2018 if I’m not mistaken, Mr. Sirisena was bemoaning the fact that MR had been given a helicopter on the morning of 9th January 2009 in order to fly to Tangalle after his defeat at the Presidential elections.  And this is the same Sirisena who is now supposedly going to present MR with nothing less that the Premiership on a platter!

I need not mention that, Sirisena lured MNR with the ‘bait’ of the Premiership in the run-up to the 2015 general elections also, until he yanked it away at the last moment.

I won’t waste time arguing about this matter anymore.  Suffice it to say that, in my view, Sirisena is not interested in giving MR anything.  Sirisena wants to bury MR once for all, and the sooner MR realizes it the better for everybody, especially the Sinhalayo.  The Sinhalayo, and no one else, will make MR Prime Minster in 2020.  He does not need Sirisena or Ranil, and far less the Indians, to become PM.

RECOMMEDATIONS

Just to be on the safe side, it is time the Sinhalayo registered another political party, to be kept in reserve in the event that they have to field their own candidate.  The 10th February LG polls demonstrated that the Sinhalayo are no longer going to stick with parties and even individuals just for the sake of doing so, or simply because they may have traditionally or habitually done so.  What is important is that the parties and individuals in question protect the interests of the Sinhalayo, and do it with actions rather than mere words.  So, if the JO and the SLPP know that the Sinhalayo will not stand for any nonsense, I am quite sure they will think twice before cutting ‘deals’ on the 20A.

ANNEX

[Authors note:  The following article was published on www.lankaweb.com on 29th May 2018]

AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. MAHINDA RAJAPAKSA, FORMER PRESIDENT OF SRI LANKA RE THE JVP’S 20A AND ALSO CONTINUING ATTEMPTS BY THE GOVERNMENT TO BRING A NEW CONSTITUTION

DHARSHAN WEERASEKERA, Attorney-at-Law

Dear Mr. President:  The newspapers report that the JVP has filed the 20A with the Speaker.  Independently of this, there are reports that the Constitutional Steering Committee has requested its ‘experts’ to prepare a Final Report and Constitutional Proposal.[1]  The Steering Committee filed its Interim Report in September 2017, and at least as far as is known to the public, debate on the said Report in Parliament was put off indefinitely in January 2018.

The point is this.  Having studied the tactics of Sirisena and Ranil (‘Siri-Wiki’) for nearly three years now, I am confident these latest attempts at amending the Constitution are their last ditch effort to postpone elections in 2020, and either stay in power till 2025 or beyond, or at any rate ensure that the ‘Yahapalayana’ agenda, so devastating to the interests of the Sinhalas as well as the country as a whole, continues beyond 2020.

You are the undisputed Leader of the Sinhalas.  I am convinced that, what is now shaping up is the ‘Final Battle’ between Siri-Wiki and those backing them on the one hand, and the Sinhalas on the other.  Your conduct will be the decisive factor in who ultimately wins this battle.  The question is whether you take a rock-solid stance against these attempts to change the Constitution, or waver, hedge and equivocate?  I would like to take a few moments to bring the following five matters to your attention:

  1. The Peril that the Sinhalas are facing
  2. Siri-Wiki’s options at the moment
  3. Siri-Wiki’s Plan
  4. The tactic they have used to trap you during these past three years, and what I think will be done this time also
  5. My appeal to you
  • The Peril of the Sinhalas

I’ll confine myself to just the 20A because it is not yet clear how the Steering Committee will play its hand.  The fact that the JVP with four seats in Parliament has even dreamt of bringing a constitutional amendment means that Ranil is behind this attempt.

If Ranil is behind it, then the UNP will back it.  Also, if Ranil is behind it, it is a safe bet that Sirisena is behind it as well, or at any rate will provide his 45 SLFP’ers – I have called them ‘sleazebags’ in a previous article and that judgment still stands[2] – to help Ranil get a 2/3 majority and push the amendment/s through Parliament.

To digress a moment, at the 10th February 2018 LG polls, SLFP voters gave Sirisena a terrific body-blow, making it absolutely clear that he had no right to use his 45 ‘sleazebags’ to carry on a ‘National Government’ with the UNP.  However, Sirisena has managed to survive this setback because of the Joint Opposition’s (JO’s) debacle with the Vote of No Confidence against the PM.  He has cleverly divided his forces, keeping about 10 with him, ‘releasing’ about 20 to the UNP, and sending 16 to you.

It is my considered opinion that, Sirisena still has as firm a grip over the ‘45’ as he ever did, and will use them to his advantage as and when he chooses.  That leaves your 50 JO’ers.  Of this, I think about 10 – 15 are shaky, i.e. they might back Sirisena under the right circumstances.  That means you (along with the Sinhalas) are left with roughly 35 MP’s on whom to rely in a crunch.

In short, if the 20A or any other constitutional amendment that Siri-Wiki table in Parliament goes to the wire, it will pass.  That’s the reality.  I hope I am wrong in this, but it is better for the Sinhalas to mentally prepare for this nightmare scenario.  It means that, the only safeguard left for the Sinhalas is the Referendum.  Unfortunately, there’s a huge problem with this as well, to which I will turn in a moment.  But first, let’s look at Siri-Wiki’s options.

  • Siri-Wiki’s Options

I take as a premise that, at the 2020 Parliamentary Elections, Siri-Wiki will suffer a crushing defeat.  If Siri-Wiki lose in this fashion, a) they will have nothing to look forward to in their respective retirements but endless trips to courtrooms and/or jails in order to account for their actions during the past few years, and b) the Sinhalas will finally get a chance to put the country on the right track by inter alia bringing fundamental constitutional changes including the repeal of the 13A.

Needless to say, Siri-Wiki can’t afford to let the above happen.  More important, the Foreign Powers – the U. S., India and the U.K. along with the Tamil Diaspora, that, each for their own reasons helped bring Siri-Wiki to power – cannot afford to let it happen.  They will therefore put their full weight behind Siri-Wiki to ensure that the latter continue in power beyond 2020, or at any rate the main thrust of the ‘Yahapalanaya’ agenda continues, albeit even with a change of faces at the top.

There are only two ways to prevent the aforesaid crushing defeat of 2020:  a)  to somehow or other postpone the 2020 Elections, or b) have those Elections held earlier than 2020, that is, when the Sinhalas have not yet fully mobilized, and also when they have not yet fully formulated their post-elections plans including constitutional changes.  Siri-Wiki can achieve either of these goals by pursuing a constitutional amendment such as the 20A followed by a Referendum.  In my view, they have three options, as follows:

  1. Go for a referendum and win.

Siri-Wiki have a good chance of winning a referendum if they can marshal the same coalition that got Sirisena elected, plus, rig the referendum just to be on the same side.  If they win the referendum, they can claim that the people have renewed the ‘January 8th Mandate’ or some other such excuse and postpone the 2020 Elections, for instance by way of another referendum, the tactic J.R. used in 1980.

2.Go for a referendum and lose, and hold early elections.

If Siri-Wiki lose the referendum, they’ll have to dissolve Parliament and go for elections.  But, this is not such a bad idea at the moment, if one looks at it from their point of view.  The simple fact is that, your Party the SLPP is not in a position to win a national election at the moment.  One would have thought they were, but the No Confidence Vote fiasco proved otherwise.

If the UNP fields a strong team, and also has the support of the minorities, it will probably come out on top.  This is especially so if Sirisena’s ‘sleazebags’ contest under the SLPP banner.  The simple fact is that, most voters simply can’t stand the sight of these ‘sleazebags.’  I can’t speak for others, but I for one will not vote for the SLPP if a single ‘sleazebag’ of Sirisena’s contests under the Party’s list.  At the very least, they should sit out a term as penance for their ‘sins.’

The point is that, if the elections were held today, the SLPP will not crush Siri-Wiki, which is what the Sinhalas need, and what Siri-Wiki want to avoid at any cost.

3. Cut a deal with the JO that if they support the 20A there will be early elections.

This is the deal that was dangled in front of the JO a few weeks ago, and if I’m not mistaken a JO’er had even said they might be interested in it.  That was before you shut it down.  Anyway, this option leads to the same results as point ‘b’ above.  I will now turn to the trap that I think they will lay for you in order to get you to take one of the above routes, preferably ‘A’ because that is the best one from their point of view.

  • Siri-Wiki’s Plan

The trick for Siri-Wiki is to get you to support the 20A (or whatever other amendment they bring) or at any rate to be lukewarm in your opposition to it, so that  it sails through Parliament with a 2/3 majority and even a number of JO’ers will vote for it.  This will set up the referendum, which is where Siri-Wiki plan to bury you.

Siri-Wiki hope to confuse, divide and demoralize the Sinhalas in the run-up to the referendum, while they (i.e. Siri-Wiki) along with the minorities and the NGO’s with their unlimited funds from foreign backers mount a focused campaign.  For the Sinhalas, imagine the following scenario at any given JO rally in the run-up to the referendum:

On the same stage, the 16 ‘rebels,’ many of whom were rejected by the voters in 2015, (as I said earlier many voters can’t even stand the sight of these ‘sleazebags’), a good number of JO stalwarts, who made complete asses of themselves in the No Confidence Vote against the PM, and finally, the Left ‘intellectuals’ all braying at the top of their lungs against the 20A, or whatever other amendments Siri-Wiki put on the table.  Who will believe this lot?  It’ll be a complete circus.  This is exactly what Siri Wiki want.

On the other hand, if you fight the amendment in Parliament, it’ll give the Sinhalas time to mobilize, and also, more important, set out from the very start the main points on which the amendments in question must be rejected.  That way the arguments that will be made in the course of the campaign are clear from the very start.   The line that divides the ‘For’ camp from the ‘Against’ camp is absolutely clear from the very start.  Siri-Wiki can’t afford to let this happen.  This is where the trap comes in.

  • The Trap

In order to understand the trap, I must briefly review the tactic that they have used to trap you on at least 3 key occasions in the past three years, to wit:  a) get you to contest the 2015 General Elections under the UPFA banner with Sirisena’s blessing, b)  to get the JO to sign on to the Framework Resolution that established the ‘Constitutional Assembly’ on 9th March 2016 so that the resolution could be adopted unanimously, and c) get the JO to file a No Confidenec Motion against the PM.

I have discussed the tactic used in ‘a’ and ‘b’ above in an article titled, ‘The Constitutional Deathtrap,’ published on lankaweb.com on 23rd August 2016, and refer you to that for more details, but in brief, the tactic has 6 steps, as follows:

  1. By way of an interview or an article, a mole (usually an ‘intellectual’) working in cahoots with Siri-Wiki puts out the desired goal: for instance, that the best thing for MR to do is to contest under the UPFA, that [the aftermath of the 10th February 2018 LG Pools] is the perfect chance to get rid of Ranil, etc.
  2. Then, a faction within the JO also takes up the aforesaid position.
  • Then, a group of Sirisena’s men make a pretense of quarrelling with him over the matter in ‘ii’ above. They subsequently leave Sirisena and go over to the JO, to pursue ‘ii’.

3.Many rounds of ‘discussions’ between the ‘rebels’ and the JO follow, until finally the ‘rebels’ also embrace the JO’s position in ‘ii,’ with a few minor changes.

4. The JO adopts the position in ‘ii’ and acts on it, the result being that Siri-Wiki get exactly what they wanted all along.

5. After a few days, the ‘rebels’ go back to Sirisena.

I invite you to consider how the JO came to file a Vote of No Confidence on the PM.  First, recall that SLPP voters – who were in effect UPFA and SLFP voters of 2015 – never called for Ranil’s head either going into the LG polls or immediately afterwards.  I was a Pohottuwa voter, and I couldn’t care less if Ranil continued as PM.  My concern was that Sirisena had no right to continue with the ‘National Government’ because his 45 ‘sleazebags’ did not have a mandate from their voters to engage in such action.

So, the idea that Ranil should be got rid of, rather than the ‘National Government,’ was put to the people:  it was planted in a very clever way.   Next, a number of JO stalwarts began to make a hullabaloo calling for Ranil’s head.  It seemed as if, all of a sudden, these JO’ers couldn’t live a single second if Ranil remained PM.

Then, predictably, a number of Sirisena’s men also started calling for Ranil’s head.  To make a long story short, the JO’ers filed the No Confidence Motion thinking that Sirisena’s men were firmly behind them, which they were not.  No doubt the JO’ers were also assured (by Sirisena’s men) that a significant number of UNP’ers would join the plot at the right moment.  And so the JO filed the motion.  Sirisena’s men left them holding the bag.  The promised UNP defections didn’t happen.  And it was a disaster.

The result:  Sirisena lived to fight another day.  I won’t belabor the point.  Now, Sirisena has moved his men into place gain, and is poised to strike again.

I predict the following.  In the coming days and weeks, there will be a steady barrage of articles and interviews by various pundits suggesting that the 20A is the perfect chance to get rid of the Government.  All that needs to be done is to go for a referendum that [we will be told] the Government will surely lose.

Next, there will be a group of JO stalwarts who start saying the same thing.  And then, Sirisen’as ‘16’ will join the chorus as well.  Then, the JO stalwarts and Sirisena’s 16 will start having ‘discussions.’  And so, the farce will go…until the 20A or whatever other amendment Siri-Wiki want sails through Parliament with the JO’s tacit backing!

  • My Appeal

My appeal to you is, ‘Please do not fall into the aforesaid trap!’   Instead take an unequivocal stance against the 20A or whatever other constitutional amendment Siri-Wiki or their agents put on the table.  This will:

  1. Keep the ‘shaky’ JO’ers within your ranks.
  2. Perhaps get Sirisena’s ‘Sleazebags’ to vote against the amendment/s in Parliament, which will deprive Siri-Wiki of a 2/3 majority for once, and end the amendment/s in Parliament itself. This is the optimal result for the Sinhalas.
  3. Most important, give the Sinhalas time to mobilize.

Some people might say, But, isn’t it a good idea to at least discuss the pros and cons of abolishing the Executive presidency, devolving more power to the Provinces, etc.?’  I reply, ‘Certainly, but not at the moment.’ The Sinhalas can discuss all those questions and more when they have a Government of their own.

The only question right now is whether it is in the interests of the Sinhalas to trust a Government as corrupt, dishonest and scheming as the present one to meddle with the Constitution.  As far as I’m concerned any person who thinks the aforesaid is a good idea is either an idiot, a glutton for punishment, or in on it with Siri-Wiki.

Those then are some of my thoughts on the related issues, Mr. President.  I apologize for asking so much of your time.  I trust this finds you well.

[1] I am relying for this on an article in the Daily Mirror of 26th May 2018, titled, ‘Constitution-making Experts’ Committee Asked to Submit Paper Within Two Weeks.’

[2] An article in the Daily Mirror of 26th May 2018 titled, ‘Yes, I Received 1M Cash Cheque,’ details how a prominent member of this group of ‘16’ has now admitted that he received a million rupee ‘donation’ from disgraced bond scammer Arjun Aloysius’ Company.  From what I understand, the position of the aforesaid member is in essence, ‘Yes, I took the money, but I was not the only one.  Other people took even more.’  In short, ‘Everyone is a crook, so no one is a crook!’  I repeat, my judgment as to the ‘sleazebags’ remains.

TOUGH TIME FOR THE MAOISTS

September 7th, 2018

ALI SUKHANVER

When we talk of the present political change in Pakistan, it is not only the change of faces; it is the change of system, change of philosophy and change of traditions leading to an overall change in behaviour and attitude of the whole nation. Astonishingly this revolutionary transformation of the society is so strong that one can feel its impacts even across the borders also.

Recently the Prime Minister of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina Wajid also expressed her liking for the new democratic set-up in Pakistan by writing down a letter of congratulations to the newly elected Prime Minister of Pakistan in which she expressed her hopes for friendly relations between the two countries. She said in her letter addressing Mr. Imran Khan, I would like to convey our best wishes for your good health. We wish that the benefits of economic progress and development under your leadership permeate all the strata of society and touch the everyday lives of the people of Pakistan. We always remain ready to work together with the countries in the region to usher in an era of continued peace, progress and prosperity and ensuring collective welfare of its people.”

It is a day-light fact that Sheik Hasina has always been very hostile to Pakistan. Experts say that the hostility expressed by Sheikh Hasina against Pakistan in the past was always based on her personal grudges against Pakistan and that hostility had nothing to do with the people of Bangladesh and Pakistan. Her letter of congratulation shows that she has realized, though late, the need and importance of peace and the insignificance of hostility as well but any step heading to a positive direction is never too late.

Experts are of the opinion that in spite of all her past hostility against Pakistan, Sheikh Hasina has tried to step into a new arena of cordial relationship with Pakistan. Fact of the matter is that any threat to the world-peace is a direct threat to human lives. Since the very beginning of life, we find no philosophy, political, social or religious encouraging bloodshed and massacre of human beings. Be it of a Muslim, of a Hindu or of a Christian or of someone from the Sikh or the Buddhist community, every human life is precious.

People in the present day world are so caring that they don’t support even killing of animals and birds in the name of hunting. Things are really changing fast; brutality and cruelty against any living being is no where appreciated and admired but still in some societies things are still going otherwise. Indian society which is in total control of Hindu extremists is also one of such societies where human life is losing all its value and importance day by day.

The Aljazeera published an analytical article of Pavan Malreddy & Ashok Kumbamu recently on 30th August 2018 with the title ‘Why are the Indian authorities afraid of a ‘half-Maoist?’ This article refers to the arrest and life imprisonment of a wheelchair-bound professor, GN Saibaba who was pushed behind the bars by the brutally blind courts of India just because at the time of his arrest some material in favour of the Maoist movement was recovered from his home in form of a few hard disks, CDs, DVDs and pen drives.

This recovery ‘proved’ professor’s connections with Maoist revolutionaries, said the investigators. How ironical is the fact that a person who is so helpless that he could not even move his body freely became a threat to the existence of the shining India ; a country well-known for its advocacy of freedom and liberty of expression.

Atrocities of the Indian government against the Maoists and other protesting groups are reaching a horrible climax. According to a report, only in June 2018, five Dalit rights activists were arrested under the draconian Unlawful Activities Prevention Act commonly known as UAPA. It is an irony that they were blamed of inciting violence against their own Dalit community which they are fighting for. UAPA is simply a merciless law which enables the prosecution of Indian citizens merely on the basis of their thoughts and ideology, not necessarily for any actual crimes they might have committed.

The report says that every month dozens of Muslims and Dalits have to face live burnings and public lynching by the so-called cow-protection vigilant groups, most notably in the BJP-ruled states of Maharashtra, Haryana and Gujarat. The Maoists are being treated as terrorists though legally they all are Indian nationals. It seems that the BJP government has issued orders of ‘see and shoot’ every Maoist. Time and again fake encounters are staged and innocent Maoists are mercilessly murdered.

Last April Indian Security Forces staged a fake-encounter of the same type in district Gadchiroli in which 39 Maoists were killed brutally. It has become almost impossible for the BJP government to crush this communist movement and the only option it is left with is a large-scale genocide of the Maoists or Naxalites. The BJP government is applying the same method there in the Occupied Jammu and Kashmir also. International peace-keepers must pay attention to this painful situation.

 

President dreams of Death Row Delight

September 7th, 2018

Courtesy The Island

Capital punishment is the most premeditated of murders. – Albert Camus

There is a new interest in the Death Penalty. It comes from President Sirisena himself. Speaking at the parliament premises this week, he said the Death Penalty should be the punishment to those who misused public funds and properties. He was obviously upset that his call for the Death Penalty on those convicted of drug-related crimes, who continue such crimes from the prisons, was not implemented…despite those volunteer hangmen and hangwomen.

Such thoughts are not strange to those elected to serve the people, but have wholly failed in the task given to them. He knows how big the Central Bank Bond Scam was, but the one who proposed the Madu Valige and the Sword against such crimes, did not demand the Death Penalty for them. Isn’t this some dilly-dallying over capital punishment?

article_image

This is some new thinking, possibly following the Janathava Kolombata protest, which had much to do with the corruption of this government. Of course, we know that this Janatha Ralla in Colombo was mainly to put an end to the cases coming up against the corruption of the recent past. However, it must be giving cause for worry to those in government today, including its leaders, to prevent any possible future punishments to them. With tomorrow’s Jana Rali against today’s corruption.

So, his call for the Death Penalty for those misusing public funds and properties.

We are talking about misusing public funds and properties. What has he done to stop it – let us put the Bond Scam aside – what about today his ministries? Is the money spent on renting out that luxury and costly apartment for the Ministry of Agriculture, by none other than his own Minister of Agriculture and Secretary of the SLFP, a gross misuse of public funds? Does the President think such a supporter of the SLFP led by him should be hanged? Or, does the President have a rate of misuse of such funds to earn the gallows?

Not a bad idea. Misuse ten million of public funds and get ten public whacks on one’s knuckles. If it is a hundred million, it can be a tougher caning on the bum. The Death Penalty will come only to those who have misused so much of public funds that they have begun to own the Hanging Tree or the Gallows.

The President’s Office will soon have to work out such a punishment system leading up to the Death Penalty, and make it the new operative system of punishment for corruption in Sri Lanka. The Corruption Punishment rates adopted by parliament. That will not be tough to those working out that hugely wasteful, propaganda expenditure for Polonnaruwa alone.

President Sirisena will certainly be able to get good support for this calculated progress to the Death Penalty from his coalition partner, the UNP and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. The level of corruption within its ranks is so high it will also support a graduated progress to the Death Penalty, with it never reaching Arjuna Mahendran, and only public knuckle whacks to Ravi Karunanayake and the forgetful likes.

In fact, the President did think of this when he suggested that all the party leaders should consider his proposal and make necessary measures to draft laws in this regard. What a great idea. Democratic agreement and Collective Political Responsibility on the Death Penalty for the Corrupt!

I am sure the President knows there can be ready agreement on some aspects of this killing proposal. It is the family connection – the Pavul Balaya exception. Surely, what political party or political leader in this Thrice Blessed country wants to punish any corrupt member of a political family, especially if it is a family of corrupt leadership?

Just think of those families – Blue, Green and Purple – the power players and handlers in this country, with so many members ready to, and always carrying out corruption against the State. Not just misusing public funds and property, but grabbing and playing out such funds and property. We must be topping the South Asian list of such crooked political families, and will top the Third World list very soon – even with the Death Penalty on Corruption.

I leave it to the readers to carry out some home calculations and work out how many corrupt families we have in political leadership. Work out the lists of brothers and sisters, husbands and wives, sons and daughters. This can be quite an interesting Home Play situation, with wonderfully crooked answers and hugely crooked people.

One certainty is that the crooked in our politics will certainly climb over the hangman’s rope, with the certain support of political leaders, whatever dreams the President may have.

The Joint Opposition’s show of force

September 7th, 2018

On Wednesday, as I left my house at around 2.30 pm to see how the Joint Opposition’s protest was working out, the streets of Colombo had about the same amount of traffic as one would see on holidays. Yet Wednesday was a normal working day with workplaces and schools all functioning. The mere announcement that the JO was planning a protest was enough to shut down the entire city. Workplaces in Colombo’s central business district, Fort, Union Place, Nawam Mawatha etc. had closed by lunchtime and sent their staff home. The government made a futile attempt to get three Magistrate’s Courts to issue orders banning the protest to no avail. This despite the experience they had earlier during the 2017 march from Kandy to Colombo of unsuccessfully trying to get four Magatrate’s Courts along the route from Kandy to Colombo to ban the march on the grounds that it was obstructing traffic on that most important highways. From that experience it should have been obvious to the police that no Magistrate will block a public protest by the main opposition.

article_image

When the march from Kandy to Colombo took place, the Joint Opposition was just a group in Parliament with a demonstrated capacity to mobilise large numbers of people. They had no legal standing as the main opposition. But today after the local government election, the JO has amply demonstrated that they are not only the main opposition party but also by far the largest political party in Sri Lanka and it was highly unlikely that any Magistrate would look upon a protest organized by such a group as they would a student demonstration. Despite this, for the police to make an attempt to get the demonstration banned by Courts shows how desperate they were. In terms of the sheer number of protests that have taken place since this government came into power, this government by now should be totally inured to the effects of any demonstration. For the past three years we have been seeing protests almost on a daily basis.

Lotus Road in Colombo is kept almost permanently closed as protestors tend to come down that road literally on a daily basis. This writer has been saying regularly that under this government protests had become so numerous that even the media has completely lost track of who protested against what! Since no one remembers who came and asked for what, the government takes no notice of any demonstration. In such circumstances, simply making this government even acknowledge that a demonstration was to take place was no small victory for the JO. When the JO said that they were going to hold a demonstration, the government certainly took notice. Thousands of special police contingents were brought to Colombo despite past experience as during the Galle Face show last year, that it was not really necessary.

Speaking of the rally itself, as I left my house on Wednesday and made my way towards the venue that had been announced by that time, the first thing I noticed was that the buses carrying demonstrators to the protest were all jam packed which was an early indication that there would be a large crowd. In contrast to this, in 2016 when I observed the UNP May Day rally, the buses coming for that were half empty. I parked my car some distance away, I approached the venue in a trishaw on the agreement that the driver would take me as far as he could. Even though the TV Channel drones mostly captured the scenes in Pettah near the Bo tree as former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and former Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa were to join the demonstration from there, most of crowd came along D.R.Wijewardene Mawatha. As they came along D.R.Wijewardene Mawatha and congregated at the Lake House round about, the crowd got pushed down Sir Chittampalama A.Gardiner Mawatha. I reached the Lake House roundabout at around 3.30 pm but even at that time, it was not possible to walk past the Lotus Road junction to see what was happening on the Pettah side. So what I saw of the procession that came from Pettah was only from the drone footage in the evening news bulletins.

*D.R.Wijewardene Mawatha

* At its peak between around 5.00 to 5.30 pm, the Lake House round about, D.R.Wijewardene Mawatha, Sir Chittampalam A.Gardiner Mawatha, the Lotus Road roundabout and the extension of Lotus Road going towards Pettah was one sea of heads as far as the eye could see. The JO’s target of having assembled the largest crowd ever, for a demonstration was met. The crowd present was perhaps the same as that which came for the Joint Opposition’s 2016 Kirullapone rally. The threat to stay overnight was obviously meant just to frighten the government. Nobody that I met at the demonstration had come prepared to stay the night even though they had been told that they were retuning late. All the buses had obviously been booked on that understanding.

When the demonstration ended at midnight the buses were on hand to take them away, and the cleaning parties were on standby to clean up after them. This was supposed to be a protest, a demonstration against certain issues. The biggest weakness in the organization was that nobody was shouting slogans on the issues that were to be highlighted. They were supposed to be demonstrating against the proposed new constitution, against the Singapore-SL FTA, the high cost of living, the increasing tax burden, and many such issues. The whole purpose of a demonstration is to display banners and placards highlighting the issues and to shout slogans. Given the media coverage received, all the issues would have received a great deal of publicity. But as it turns out, even the slogans that were shouted out were lost in the crowd, the placards and banners were rendered ineffective. Having been at the venue, this writer can’t remember a single slogan written on the placards or banners.

This is one of the weaknesses as well as the strengths of the JO. It is a weakness because all the public events of the JO become demonstrations of strength and public participation. It is a weakness because no issue that matters to the public ever gets highlighted at these shows of strength. The Joint Opposition is completely dependent on their press conferences to highlight public issues. The JVP however has mastered the art of having small demonstrations of manageable proportions where people hold banners and placards which are picked up by the media and where one or two people give ‘voice cuts’ to the TV crews that also receive wide publicity over the media so that the issue at hand is highlighted. In contrast to this, what the JO organizes are mainly shows of strength and Wednesday’s one was no different. When he was a young opposition MP in the 1980s and early 1990s Mahinda earned a name for himself by organizing demonstrations against the then UNP government. Those days, just one percent or less of the crowd at Wednesday’s demo would be considered an excellent showing.

Today, once again as an opposition MP demonstrating against a largely UNP government, Mahinda is still in his element. As I made my way around the Transworks House project to get to Pettah after 6.00 pm because Lotus Road was impassable, I noticed that just the crowd in front of the Hilton Hotel would have sufficed for a very well attended public meeting by any political party including the JO. Another major shortcoming was that nobody had thought of hiring a mobile stage so that the crowd could be addressed as was done after the march from Kandy to Colombo ended at Town Hall in 2016. Later in the night a makeshift public address system appears to have been set up but by that time most of the crowd had gone back. This show of force by the Joint Opposition had been announced some time ago. The UNP also knew that they would be marking their 72nd anniversary the very next day. In this political competition, one would have expected the UNP to organize a massive show of strength for their 72nd anniversary celebrations to counter that of the JO. In other countries, when one side puts up a show of strength, the other side customarily responds – otherwise you lose face.

However the UNP’s tame 72nd anniversary celebrations held at party headquarters which cannot accommodate even the crowd that JO parliamentarian Pavithra Wanniarachchi brought down D.R.Wijewardene Mawatha just by herself last Wednesday, seems to indicate that they have given up trying to compete.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress