Hoping for a dawn in Indian healthcare

May 12th, 2024

Nava Thakuria

An ancient Indian saying ‘Swasthya Param Sampad (Health is wealth) emerges as most relevant for the entire human race in the post-corona era. Over eight billion human beings on the planet understood the real face of life & death during the horrible Covid-19 days, where almost everyone was locked inside and counted the number of casualties from here and there. The most powerful, intelligent and articulate community on Earth turned out to be a victim of circumstances, where a small virus showed the homo-sapiens a mirror to understand- it makes sense only when you are alive (Assamese wisdom says-Deha Thakilehe Beha).

Various scientific surveys reveal that over one billion people lack access to healthcare facilities around the world. It needs a multi-dimensional effort empowering different sections in the society and continuous advocacy along with societal collaboration to create a healthier population. International organisations, local governments, healthcare initiators, etc can make a real difference here, when each and every individual can be provided an affordable, accessible and quality healthcare service. Understanding the responsibility on ground, an innovative healthcare model named Affordable Health Mission (AHM) was launched five years back in North-east India by GNRC Hospitals under the leadership of Dr Nomal Chandra Borah.

Providing value-added healthcare facilities to everyone with a reasonable expenditure can create a magical world, where the prevention of epidemics, reduction of the burden from non-communicable diseases and improvement of healthcare management for the women, children and elderly individuals will be easier. When the lack of affordable healthcare pushes millions of Indian families to below the poverty line every year and thus jeopardizes the government’s mission to uplift the economy of poor families, the initiative like AHM can show a light at the end of the tunnel. It may be termed as a dawn of hope for those economically downtrodden families in a populous country like Bharat.

A brief biography of Dr NC Borah, who was born in a marginal farmer’s family of eastern Assam to become one of the best known neurologists across the south Asian nation with unbelievable hard works during his childhood and persuasion of a missionary zeal in professional life, depicts a dream to be realized with an affordable health mission for benefit of millions of rural poor families in the alienated region. The biography, titled ‘Hope dawns in the East’ and co-authored by Mumbai-based communication professionals Arnab Mukherjee and Sushmita Sarkar, guides the readers with a stunning line by Nobel laureate Nelson Mandela saying, ‘It always seems impossible until it is done’ and appreciating words from Mother Teresa and Bill Gates.

Published by Chennai-based Notion Press, the tiny book highlights the promise of ‘Health for all, smiles for all’. It includes many photographs ranging from Dr Borah’s early life to present days along with the portraits of his father Karneswar Borah and mother Kanaklata Borah. His close association with legendary musician Bharat Ratna Dr Bhupen Hazarika and Jnanpith awardee author Dr Indira (Mamoni Raisom) Goswami is also reflected in the selected photographs. Former President Pranab Mukherjee, former State chief ministers Tarun Gogoi and Sarbananda Sonowal and many other luminaries are also seen with Dr Borah along with his adorable family comprising wife Dr Jayshree Borah, two daughters Priyanka & Satabdee and son Madhurjya.

The book comprises a few articles, penned by Dr Borah as CMD of GNRC Hospitals, on various pertinent issues like improving medical education system, dealing with the shortage of specialist doctors, highlighting the patient’s right to have a second medical opinion, troubles created by many doctor’s illegible handwriting in prescriptions, if healthcare is a science of medicines or an art of healing, etc. Dr Borah has passionately argued in his pieces that health is a fundamental human right and it’s critical for human dignity. A healthy population is essential for socio-economic growth as it determines the average life expectancy, number of persons in the productive age bracket, employment, productivity & capacity building, contribution to social welfare, etc.

For records, GNRC (formerly known as Guwahati Neurological Research Centre) group of hospitals was established in 1987 at Dispur and it was the first super specialty healthcare centre in the region to cater the needs of nearly 60 million people. A pass-out from Gauhati Medical College and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (New Delhi), Dr Borah later expanded its network of hospitals with a unit at Sixmile (Guwahati), another at Dispur, one more at Barasat (West Bengal) and a unique one in North Guwahati (named as GNRC Institute of Medical Sciences). Today, all five hospitals comprising a cumulative 750 beds take care of over 2,50,000 out-patients and 25,000 in-patients annually. Besides North-eastern residents, GNRC Hospitals cater to the needs of many patients from neighbouring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Myanmar.

The energetic entrepreneur also added the Asian Institute of Nursing Education to his healthcare empire. An unusual concept of pharmacy cum grocery shops (titled GNRC Medishops) was also materialized in Guwahati. With an aim to spread awareness about preventive healthcare and early intervention in the community Dr Borah also launched Swasthya Yatra (March towards health) and a monthly health magazine (GNRC Swasthya) in Assamese language. The visionary professional started GNRC’s community outreach program titled Medireach, under which a mobile hospital unit was developed to travel among the deprived families to raise healthcare awareness including timely and curative care. The mobile vehicle has the arrangements for conducting ECGs, X-Ray, Ultrasonography and other laboratory tests. A qualified and trained medical team accompanies the unit to collect, store and transport blood and urine samples for various tests. By now, Medireach has touched over 15 million people in Assam providing affordable and reliable  diagnostic services to the people.

Later he created a pool of community health workers named   Swasthya Mitra, who relentlessly work for preventive and promotive care  in rural and semi-urban localities. Swasthya Mitras remain the frontline health friends/workers, who understand the  community and serve as a bridge between healthcare professionals  and the people. GNRC has trained over 20,000 community health workers and nearly 6000 Swasthya Mitras are working on the ground. With a rare facility of free medical care to all accident & emergency patients for the first 24 hours, the North Guwahati campus also  provides free bus service for the patients along with their attendants regularly coming from even 400 kilometres away.

GNRC Hospitals also supports the people under Ayushman Bharat (PM Jan Arogya Yojana) and Atal Amrit Abhiyan, sponsored by the Union government in New Delhi and State government in Dispur. GNRC’s affordable health mission supplements the government mission to offer quality healthcare facilities to the citizens at an affordable cost through different initiatives and it has reached 1.7 million people till date. Similarly, its Telehealth helps the patients in distant places to consult with GNRC specialists as and when needed. At GNRC hospitals, the management encourages generic medicines and India-made medical supplies at a cheaper price. Moreover, the use of high-end diagnostics for multiple deserving patients helps reduce  spending  of the patients.

The soft spoken gentleman asserts that a large volume of patients suffer because of preventable diseases and many can avoid hospitalizations if offered timely medical care to them. Most of the patients arrive at hospitals after the diseases become complicated due to delayed care. It’s always essential to keep them healthy rather than treating in hospitals which often become so expensive. Health is a fundamental human right and it’s critical for human dignity and GNRC tries to unite the science of medicine with the art of healing while offering the treatment with trust. A healthy population is essential for socio-economic growth which finally determines average life expectancy, productivity, capacity building, employment, etc for an individual member, stated Dr Borah, adding that good health of each person emerges as a priority for peace, happiness and prosperity of a nation.

Debt restructuring as Rocket Science: The IMF, Green, Blue and Pink-washing BlackRock?

May 12th, 2024

Darini Rajasingham-Senanayake

Calls for divestment from BlackRock and other International Sovereign Bonds (ISB), have echoed across Columbia, Yale and many non-Ivy League universities in the United States recently. BlackRock is heavily invested in weapons companies fueling a genocidal war in Palestine. However, the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF), debt restructuring operations in the Global South appear designed to ensure BlackRock’s enhanced profitability.

BlackRock the world’s biggest investment fund manager and Sri Lanka’s largest private creditor, has over $ 10 trillion in investments around the world. An estimated 55 countries in Africa, Asia and South America, like Sri Lanka, are in ISB Eurobond debt traps, in or near Default at this time. From Argentina to Zambia, Global South countries have been subject to IMF ‘debt sustainability treatment’ after their currency depreciated against the exorbitantly privileged US dollar’ instantly impoverishing citizens. This, despite US government debt being $34 trillion and counting, with questions raised about America’s debt sustainability also given the Rise of the BRICS and ongoing de-dollarization in what has been termed ‘the Asian 21st Century. Estimates are that one billion is added every100 days to the US government debt.

BlackRock got huge US government Covid-19 ‘bailout funds under the CARES Act to asset strip the world during the World Health Organization’s panicdemic lockdowns and global economic meltdown in 2020-21.

Hit by a series of exogenous economic shocks to Make the economy scream”, including mysterious Islamic State (ISIS), claimed terror attacks on luxury hotels in 2019, and burning ships spilling oil and plastic pellets along the coast, not to mention Covid-19 policy debacle, geostrategic Sri Lanka staged its first ever Sovereign Default in April 2022, amid distracting Aragalaya protests and a regime change operation. The Lanka Rupee crashed– just when the new Cold War between ‘America first’ and China Rising ramped up in the Indo-Pacific!

Blue and Green Washing BlackRock and Partner Adani

BlackRock, is heavily invested in weapons manufacturing and fossil fuels. Facing criticism, the company has been trying to green, blue and pink-wash itself by marketing Environment, Social and Governance bonds (ESG), or Debt for Nature Swaps (DFNS), a.k.a. green and blue bonds, as well as, by funding UNWOMEN programs.

BlackRock’s South Asia partner is India’s richest man Adani, who appears to have achieved a lucrative settlement ex-ante any collective agreement with the bondholders given geopolitical headwinds and high levels of corruption. Sri Lanka sits on major Indian Ocean energy trade and Submarine Data Cable routes.

Adani closely allied with the Modi government in Delhi, has secured the environmentally and geopolitically sensitive Mannar and Pooneryn basins in the northwestern seas of Sri Lanka, purportedly for ‘green energy’ wind farms with unsolicited bids to the Ranil Rajapakse government whose bond scams at the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL), led to the staging of the country’s first ever sovereign default in 2022.

There have been protests by local fishermen and fisheries cooperatives in Mannar as well as, environmental organizations due to depleting fish catch and the environmental impacts of some wind mills already installed in Mannar.

In a nutshell, ESG, DFNS or Green and Blue bonds as part of ISB debt restructuring would see the financialization of Mother Nature based on a questionable carbon credit calculations and ‘Anthropocene’ science-fiction, ‘climate catastrophe’ narratives, while depriving local fishers and farmers of access to their traditional fishing and forest areas, impacting their livelihoods– in the name of ‘environment protection’.

Meanwhile, last year, women’s organisations and activists around the world signed a petition that accused the United Nations agency responsible for promoting gender equality of ‘pink-washing BlackRock”!

 They argued that UNWOMEN’s collaboration with BlackRock gave the company ‘a veneer of feminist approval it clearly does not merit’. UN Women was compelled to terminate its contract with BlackRock over its record of prioritising profits over human rights or environmental integrity”.[i]

An IMF Firesale in Geostrategic Sri Lanka: CBSL prioritizes bond Holders

Now as Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring drags into a third year amid a flurry of meetings with bond holders and the IMF in London, Paris and Washington DC., the priority appears to be securing private lender’s profit margins and interests, regardless of the fact that they lend at predatory interest rates citing risks in lending to Global South countries, and the fact that many had already made profit.

There has been little effort to ensure transparency given that the names of the bond holders who own 40 percent of Sri Lanka’s debt stock are secret, or to ensure Odious Debt cancellation given the IMF’s principle of the ‘parity of treatment’ of lenders, regardless of whether they lend at predatory or concessionary rates. Nor has there been a serious attempt at poverty and debt reduction, aside from handouts via the Asswessuma program given persistent high levels of corruption at the newly reformed CBSL.

Ironically, the IMF-EFF debt restructuring operation appears designed to force a more borrow from the same predatory private lenders (ISBs), responsible for the country’s Odious Debt and Default in the first instance — in order to pay them back with a minimal haircut!

The result would be Sri Lanka’s ISB debt trap is being deepened and extended, also given IMF mission and mandate creep and new proposals for Macro-economy linked Bonds (MLB). Previously, Environment, Social and Governance Bonds (ESG), has been proposed supplemented by an IMF Firesale of strategic assets and State Owned Enterprises. These include prime coastal and hill country lands, energy, telecom, and transport infrastructure, with the latest being a Bill in Parliament to fragment and privatize the national electricity system. The latter has elicited powerful protest from the Unions of the Ceylon Electricity Board who also argue that it threatens national energy security. There are 12 cases ongoing against this bill in the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka at this time!

Last week there was a furor at Colombo’s BIA Airport over the US-backed Ranil Rajapakse regime outsourcing immigration and emigration services, including visas issue, to a foreign Company staffed by Indians, whose parent company is BlackStone.

 Just like the deal with BlackRock’s South Asia front partner, Adani ex-ante any debt restructuring agreement.  Meanwhile, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has set up an office within President Ranil Rajapakse’s office – purportedly to collect and game national data! The national milk production company, Highlands, meanwhile was sold off to India’s other Oligarch- Ambani of Amul.

Sri Lanka Telecom and Sri Lanka Insurance, both highly profitable SOEs are also on the IMF privatization list.

Triple Jeopardy? IMF Mission Creep and Firesale

At this time, Sri Lanka subject to an IMF Firesale of national assets and SOEs regardless of their profitability as part of required reforms for its IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF), bailout of a mere $ 3.9 billion over 4 years, seems to face not double, but triple and quadruple jeopardy given IMF mission mandate creep into Domestic Debt Restructuring (DDR), with partner in crime the newly privatized and independent” CBSL.

IMF ‘s mission and mandate creep into DDR has enabled conflating local rupee denominated domestic debt with external USD denominated debt and inflating Sri Lanka’s debt numbers, while upending the country’s economic sovereignty and policy autonomy. DDR along with MLBs would effectively enable ISBs to link and access the country’s Employment Provident Funds (EPF).

The CBSL manages the biggest pension fund in Sri Lanka, the EPF, which is assessed now at Rupees. 3.4 trillion. As agreement with private lenders remained elusive, the newly privatized and IMF-reformed CBSL, appears to have prioritized the interests of Eurobond holders, and facilitated the IMF’s mission and mandate creep into DDR, and the EPF. This would enable wealth transfers from the working people’s retirement saving to the Eurobond holders a.k.a. the global one percent.

IMF mission creep into DDR has enabled private creditors like BlackRock to link debt restructuring to the country’s biggest pension fund – the Employment Provident Fund (EPF) — jeopardizing the savings of millions of working people.

Debt restructuring morphs into Rocket Science

Civil society groups have called for a 10-year moratorium and ban on government borrowing from Eurobond markets, and debt restructure ONLY of multilateral and bilateral loans leveraged at concessionary rates. Almost 50 percent of Sri Lanka’s interest payments are to ISBs that charge predatory rates, rather than multilateral or bilateral creditors

The MLB and ESG, (also called Green and Blue Bonds or DFNS), proposals for Sri Lanka’s $26 billion external debt restructuring have been made by the French accounting firm Lazard and Clifford and Chance that represent the colonial Club de Paris group of private creditors and ISB holders.

The proposed MLBs and ESG bonds willy-nilly, seem to link everything and all national assets including the EPF funds to Debt and its restructuring via convoluted numbers games. They also include financializing Mother Nature with un-scientific carbon credit calculation in the form of Debt for Nature Swaps (DFNS), and belie basic science, logical analysis, and monitoring and evaluation criteria.

Under the aegis of IMF-EFF, debt restructuring appears to have morphed into ‘rocket science’ with jargon-filled numbers games, alongside IMF mission and mandate creep. This begs the question: Are Principles of Scientific thought such as simplicity, logical rigour in abeyance in an era of AI enhanced virtual reality, big data algorithms, and fudged figures in the absence of accurate data and baselines?  The obtuse and convoluted linking of debt restructuring to unachievable and arguably incalculable macro-indicators and outcomes, also violate basic principles of development program Monitoring and Evaluation. After all it is an M & E truism that indicators must be SMART— that is, Specific, measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time bound.

MLBs have been also extensively critiqued by Gihan Pathirana and other economists from the Institute for Political Economy who argue that they would ‘fleece’ the country.[ii] Future generations would be forced to pay down debt with a depreciating local currency given manipulated exchange and interest rates.

Whether by design or accident, the dragging negotiations with Eurobond holders under the IMF-EFF (although China is routinely blamed for debt traps and delays in the global corporate media), masks the ongoing privatization of State owned Enterprises and asset stripping of the strategic Indian Ocean island nation under the rubric of ‘economic reforms’ needed for the IMF-EFF disbursements.

Under IMF-Extended Fund Facility (EFF), negotiations among partners-in-crime, the CBSL and BlackRock and its South Asia partner Adani and other bond holders, the IMF has literally extended itself all over the strategic Indian Ocean island, making deep inroads into Sri Lanka’s economic Sovereignty and policy autonomy to conduct a Firesale and privatization of strategic assets – with land, energy, telecom, transport sector infrastructure being targeted as they were under a previous US Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), project.

Triple Jeopardy? Economic Sovereignty and Natural Justice

‘Too many cooks may spoil the debt restructuring soup’! Both un-transparent (the bond holders’ names are secret) and unnecessarily complex, the current’ IMF-EFF debt treatment’ process seems designed to give the upper hand and power balance to private creditors. The process itself seems riven with logical errors, fudged figures, data inconsistencies, and solely lacking in transparency and accountability to vulnerable people.

Simultaneously, MLBs and ESGs seem designed to mask the fact that the current process of IMF-EFF debt restructuring would deepen and extend the strategic island’s debt trap for decades, with future generations having to pay down the USD debt, further eroding Sri Lankan citizen’s economic sovereignty and policy autonomy.

It is increasingly clear that the IMF’s debt restructuring operations are part of Sri Lanka’s Odious debt problem, rather than the solution. The IMF seems to be more than ever in need of reform given the erosion of Sovereignty and principles of Natural Justice in its practice, as was pointed out in a statement signed by 184 internatoinal economists and development experts in January 2023, including Professors Jayathi Ghosh, Thomas Piketty, Dani Rodik, Yanis Varoufakis and others:

Private creditors own almost 40% of Sri Lanka’s external debt stock, mostly in the form of International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs), but higher interest rates mean that they receive over 50% of external debt payments. Such lenders charged a premium to lend to Sri Lanka to cover their risks, which accrued them massive profits and contributed to Sri Lanka’s first ever default in April 2022. Lenders who benefited from higher returns because of the risk premium” must be willing to take the consequences of that risk. Indeed, ISBs are now trading at significantly lower prices in the secondary market. In this context, giving private bondholders an upper hand relative to sovereign debtors in the Paris Club and the IMF’s required debt negotiations violates the basic principles of natural justice.[iii]


[i] https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/aug/10/campaigners-call-on-un-women-to-pull-out-of-blackrock-partnership

[ii] https://island.lk/sri-lanka-being-fleeced-through-debt-restructuring-says-economic-analyst/

[iii] https://debtjustice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sri-Lanka-debt-statement.pdf

Why Sri Lanka & Sri Lankans are in a stalemate!

May 12th, 2024

Shenali D Waduge

We may have a literacy rate of over 90% but majority of the citizens in particular those holding key positions in both private & public sector are clueless of geopolitics & historical linkages to modern governance or careless to even learn. This is why we are in a stalemate situation where politicians are clueless & care less, businesspeople share same sentiments, public sector & private sector are too busy with their personal problems, organizations are happy to keep to there area of focus instead of desiring to bring scope of every organization into a national agenda & the enemies who are well aware of what Sri Lankans suffer are happy to keep all divided & walk away with the booty. Having said that, it is a surprise that Sri Lanka is able to maintain its sovereignty despite the treacheries and lack of nationalism that worsens with every year while schools & university systems are not producing a younger generation to take up the stewardship and steer Sri Lanka. We don’t need youth protestors. We need youth leaders dedicated to turning Sri Lanka into a powerful nation while maintaining its historical blueprint. Our ancestors who built this civilization, produced man-made marvels that stands testament to our glorious past. They, must surely be rolling in their graves.

Every nation has its ups & down but they rise because not only the political leaders but the general citizens are bound by a common desire to take their nation & their people to the next level. It is a common call beyond fulfilling personal or selfish desires. This is how China uplifted 400million people from poverty & has become an international force today. Development has not erased their desire to foster, protect & preserve their heritage. Some Sri Lankans believe that we can develop ONLY AFTER erasing the Sinhala Buddhist civilizational history.

What is lacking amongst majority in Sri Lanka is that pride in their nation, the civilization that was built, the ancient marvels that continue to be tourist & archaeological attractions. Most are happy to make money showing off our ancient sites but with cosmetic pride shown only for the tourist! People must actually feel that pride not pretend for personal advantage.

Development in Sri Lanka is presented as having to first erase the historical past of the Sinhala Buddhist civilization. Lobbies & pressure groups in particular the media channels that influence the general public in Sri Lanka are all anti-national, anti-Sinhalese, anti-Buddhist and they are drilling this notion into the minds of the masses. So long as these influencers continue to influence people, Sri Lanka cannot develop. Confounding the situation is the use of technology & social media eternally keeping the majority & minorities apart while further dividing the majority & even the minorities. The lack of the true history of the nation, believing the historical lies that have been fed, successive governments that has failed to put history in its proper perspective to the people enables citizens to be swayed by the anti-Sri Lanka lobbies and prone to be manipulated enabling internal frictions that pave the path for the manipulators to get an upper hand.

People in positions whether in public or private sector roles are either voluntarily or involuntarily manipulated because they are unable to connect the dots, think for themselves & analyse situations & political events.

How many have questioned or thought about – the fall by D S Senanayake was accidental or not:, the assassination of SWRD Bandaranaike was really by the person who was accused, the real players behind the Catholic Action to assassinate & oust Mrs. Bandaranaike, the sudden emergence of the JVP a movement, its re-emergence in 1980s well-timed with the LTTE? Who has wondered how a 19 year old Prabakaran suddenly formed Tamil New Tigers in 1972 the same day that the Republican Constitution was released or the connection between the May 1976 Vaddukoddai Resolution calling for a separate armed struggle & Prabakaran rechristening LTTE that same month & year.

Who has looked at the extension of the Catholic Action into the inner circles of the JVP & LTTE & questioned if their targets were Sinhala Buddhists. The domino effect was that eventually it was the brainwashed but talented Sinhala Buddhist youth in the JVP who got massacred while the Sinhala Buddhist brainwashed youth were used to massacre Sinhala Buddhist soldiers. The ultimate outcome was that promising Sinhala Buddhist youth were eliminated by brainwashing them into joining various groups & killing each other. The US/West is using the same tactic via Islamic terrorism These terror groups are only killing fellow Muslims!

In all this we have failed to identify the role of India and pretend it is our historical friend. India trained, armed & funded LTTE from 1970s. India provided safe haven and logistics support to LTTE & other armed militants. India prevented action against LTTE going to far as to violate our territorial space & forced the signing of an agreement that is legally invalid due to India not fulfilling its commitments. India has economically, politically weakened Sri Lanka with every passing year. India used LTTE terror to build its power over Sri Lanka. Even the diplomats & foreign ministry did not realize the extent of India’s intervention or how to diplomatically deal with it or were themselves manipulated by India. We are now told that even the Easter Sunday has an Indian hand in it.

It is unfortunate that Mahinda Rajapakse who had the will to declare war on the LTTE failed to be streetsmart enough to comprehend the dangers of the external enemies after Sri Lanka became internally free of terror. In eliminating the LTTE, Sri Lanka had exposed itself badly. There was no post-LTTE plan/strategy and the Rajapakse’s were cunningly swayed to bolster themselves personally which was craftily used to build a campaign against them as part of the revenge for ending an investment project that lasted over 30 years. It is the fault of the Rajapakses for not reading the writings on the wall or becoming compromised from within. They had the golden opportunity to turn Sri Lanka onto the right path if strategic decisions had been taken instead of building their own personal portfolios and in so doing embracing all sorts of enemies to their fold who were planted to destroy them from within. They failed to realize the formidable forces that were building up against them & ensure they had a plan to overcome them.

The culmination of this came at the end of 2014 & the hero Sirisena emerging as common candidate. It was another India-US operation. The same US-Allies-India that mooted resolutions at the UNHRC & used their powers over Member states to press Sri Lanka against the wall & force administrative/legal & political changes advantageous to them to manipulate Sri Lanka further. The Sirisena-Wickremasinghe government was hailed by both US & India who were QUAD partners each with their own geopolitical goals to gain supremacy in the region and each with an angst against China.

What Sri Lankans failed to understand is that US & India were using our own people to fight against our own while they were walking away with the bounty. It is an open secret that the Church is a key ally of the Western agenda, the Church is used to say Catholic/Christian voters & its NGOs are placed across the provinces engaged in various social themes that enables them to get closer to target audiences & manipulate their thinking. It explains why NGOs were thriving during the LTTE in the North & East & seemed to have no issues to be among terrorists while most LTTE orphanages were run by Church fathers! Look closer at the influence of the Church lobbies within the LTTE. With the many evangelical & Born Again groups in full swing, they hide their true new affinities. All of the elements that have been highlighted above converged in 2022 to oust an elected leader behaving like hooligans and embarrassing the nation. History will be rewriting this narrative not as a aadara aragalaya” but one that brutally killed 8, vandalized state property, torched homes, looted and plundered and displayed venom, vengeance and hatred.

The very groups that converged are today uncharacteristically & not surprisingly silent. If they belonged to the anti-Sinhala/anti-Buddhist lobby (partnered by Sinhala Buddhists who only displayed their own lack of understanding geopolitics and political dynamics) & easily swayed by giving vent to their emotions and personal benefits, these individuals and groups are silent primarily because of their arrogance to admit they erred but committed to the emotional blackmail that they suffer as a result of their inability to assess and analyse ground realities.

So long as people who matter are weak & vulnerable in their analytical skills especially to identify the enemy & the tools used by the enemies, Sri Lanka cannot peddle forward. There will be plenty of public performances, beautiful speeches about my nation” blah blah blah but all these will only be for the ears and provide laughing matter for the enemies who are happy to think Sri Lankans are enjoying post-aragala dividends while sitting on a volcano ready to erupt any time!

Shenali D Waduge

The sale of national assets and state owned enterprises

May 12th, 2024

Mahinda Rajapaksa Leader Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna

The government’s plans to sell off certain national assets and state owned enterprises have given rise to discontent among trade unions, political parties and the general public. The present divestiture drive is ostensibly aimed at minimizing govt. expenditure on loss-making state owned enterprises and meeting certain IMF conditions in that regard. I ruled the country for more than nine years from November 2005 to January 2015 without ever selling a single state owned enterprise. In fact, my government actually re-acquired some state owned enterprises such as the Insurance Corporation, and Lanka Hospitals that had been sold off by previous governments and these enterprises continue to make profits for the state to date.

My government had a pragmatic approach towards state owned assets and enterprises. If a state owned enterprise was making profits and providing a good service to the public, we saw no reason to privatize it. At times, a government may take a strategic decision to manage the prices of certain goods or services produced by state owned enterprises for the overall benefit of the economy or to help low-income earners. The energy sector is a good example of this. There is no government in the world that does not subsidise certain earmarked economic activities.

During my tenure as President, even if some state owned enterprises made losses due to a government decision to manage prices, our management of the economy resulted in an unbroken nine year economic boom. We had no difficulty in paying off our debts or meeting the costs of the subsidies we maintained and nobody even spoke of privatization when I was President. Since the divestiture of certain sectors can have far reaching consequences for the country especially when foreign parties are involved, this is an issue that has to be approached with caution. As was resolved at the SLPP May Day rally, any restructuring of state owned enterprises should take place with maximum transparency, according to a national plan, in a manner consistent with national security and in consultation with the employees.

Having said that, I wish to stress that the trade union sector for its part, should take a more nuanced approach towards private sector participation in state owned enterprises. Going by the dictionary definition of privatization, any involvement of the private sector in the ownership structure or the control of a state owned asset or enterprise can be characterized as privatization. However, trade unions should not oppose every attempt to obtain foreign or private sector investment in a government owned enterprise. A pragmatic and non-dogmatic approach to such matters is required.

If there are unutilized government properties or underperforming government enterprises, it makes sense to obtain private sector participation to turn such enterprises around. If a profitable state owned enterprise needs further investment to add a new feature which cannot be financed by the government, it makes sense to award a share of that enterprise to a private investor in exchange for the investment. If an investor is willing to build a new enterprise from scratch, it makes sense to award shares in that enterprise to the investor so that a new state asset comes into being.

Some political parties have an ideology driven, dogmatic approach to privatization and seeks to privatize anything and everything that can be privatized. Many trade unions also have a similarly dogmatic attitude and tend to oppose any involvement of the private sector in state owned enterprises. Both these extremes are harmful to the country. Trade unions should regard proposals to obtain private or foreign participation in a state owned enterprise on a case by case basis and look at the overall benefit of such collaboration to the country. The only real way national assets and strategically important state owned enterprises can be safeguarded is by having a government that takes a pragmatic and non-dogmatic approach to such matters. This is why it is important to take note of the fact that when I ruled the country for more than nine years, the economy flourished and there was not even a discussion on the subject of privatization.

The present government is an interim arrangement formed to run the country for the remainder of former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s term. Even the pro-privatisation lobby should realize that the hasty divestiture of state owned assets at a time like this will not produce the best outcome for the country. Furthermore, the next Presidential election is only a few months away. Hence, as a measure to ease the widespread discontent over the government’s divestiture drive, I wish to propose that all moves to sell off state owned assets or enterprises be postponed until a new government is formed after the next Presidential election. The new government will then be able to deal with state owned properties and enterprises in accordance with the mandate they obtain at the election.

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Leader

Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna

Blue Economy –Need of the Hour

May 12th, 2024

Deewara saha Sagara Sampath Sanwardane Udawa

The current and future prosperity of Sri Lanka is intrinsically linked to its marine and coastal assets, with fisheries and tourism being the two main pillars of its economy, gross domestic product (GDP) and source of employment   

Implementation of the Blue Economy, hitherto to be named as” Fisheries and Ocean Development Movement

 ( Deewara saha Sagara Sampath Sanwardane Udawa)       

Related Agencies for implementation of above

NAQDA ,CCD .MEPA CFHC.CFC.SLPA .TDA ( Tourism),Ministry of Ports and Shipping DMS ( Merchant Shipping ) ,Ceynor ,DWL ( Wild life) ,Navy ,Coast  Guard .Sri Lanka Customs ,Fishery Ministry ,EDB ,MODSIT ,BOI ,Ministry of Trade PDRS ( Petroleum Exploration ) .Ministry of Agriculture and Private Boat Builders and Yacht/Leisure boat Operators   

v     Blue Economy –Area to be developed

 

  • Fishery Sector Needs rapid revolutionary Accelerated Development
    • Private sector to be allowed to deploy several Mother Vessels around the island to help fishermen to store their catch in cold rooms and also assist with First Aid ,Fuel ,Water etc during the week they stay in med sea catching fish
    • Provide Speed Boat  Ambulance Service dedicated for fishermen
    • Develop Cold room services in every fishery harbour with facilities to store fish for Japanese Market ( -60 Degrees for export
    • Training Schools for fishing folks and  provide land plots to build new large multiday fishing vessels with Seawater Ice generating equipment
    • Comprehensive Annual Inspection Service to be managed by Private Boat Building Repair Yards in Colombo .Negombo.Pandura ,Galle ,Mirrissa,Kudawalla  etc and in Oluvil,Trinco  ,Point Pedro and Karainagar etc
    • Establish dedicated Insurance Scheme based on Annual Fitness Check of boats  for Fishermen to cover their families and Boats
    • Establish satellite monitoring system to control boat movement from neighborhood countries
    • Promote more and more Deep Sea Fish Cultivation Farms for export
    • Development of offshore Fish Processing and Canning factories for export and to make Poultry Feed
    • Enhance involvement of Ocean University in Fishery Sector education and boat building with ongoing South Korean Financing
    • Enhance Cold Chain logistics to transport fish into hinterland for local use at affordable prices
    • Establish laboratories to perdiodically check fish quality and monitor harvest of fish
    • Development of Organic Vegetable growing technology using the principle of Aquaponics, a hybrid between aquaculture and hydroponics, uses organic fish waste to fertilise vegetables growth. Aquaponics works on a circular system where water from fish tanks is filtered by the growing medium and the plants as they grow. The water is then returned to the fish tank cleaner than when it left. As a result, aquaponics uses only a small amount of water compared to traditional soil based farming and zero artificial fertilisers or pesticides.
  • Nautical Tourism –Development using the 20 numbers Fishery Harbours and other protected lagoons around Sri Lanka by promoting mini Marinas
    • Speedy Implementation of Harbour Village Concept where lands around fishery harbours and other lagoons to be developed for Tourism Related services and real estates and Coastal Urban Development by encouraging real estate development near marinas
    • Grow Boat spearheaded by Export development Board need accelerated development ( Individuals to own their own boats with facility to anchor in the mini marinas right around the island
    • Promote local Yacht /pleasure boat building by taking away VAT /NBT etc
    • Expedite issuance of local boat building rules and regulations to help boat the builders
  • Expediting Exploration of Oil and Gas in Manar and Covery Basin and Eastern Province
  • Accelerated Development of Marine Renewable Energy Development of power generation of offshore wind farms and wave energy
  • Development of Ship  repair /Underwater Hull cleaning in Deep ocean during voyage of super tankers from Middle east to Far East

Over 10 MPs with dual citizenship still in parliament; step down before elections: Ven. Sobitha Thera

May 12th, 2024

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, May 11 (Daily Mirror) – Venerable Omalpe Sobitha Thera told the Daily Mirror today that there are over 10 members currently serving in Parliament who hold dual citizenship and said that those MPs should be removed from their posts before the elections.

“In light of the Supreme Court ruling, I would like to kindly request all party leaders to disclose any members within their parties who hold dual citizenships,” he said.

MPs holding dual citizenship should step down before the upcoming elections; otherwise, the respective party leaders should bear the responsibility, he added.

“These MPs have no loyalty to the country; they simply occupy parliamentary positions for personal gain. We have the capability to disclose their identities, but they should be granted an opportunity to reveal themselves before the upcoming elections,” he said.

“If they fail to come forward, we’ll have to pursue legal action against them. However, resorting to litigation over these issues is both time-consuming and costly,” Ven. Sobhitha Thero said.

“Therefore, I urge these MPs to respectfully resign from their positions and I also remind party leaders to choose their representatives carefully,” the Thera said.

Ven. Sobhitha Thero said that pursuing legal action over these issues is pointless and a waste of time and resources. Therefore, he urged those MPs to resign from their positions gracefully.

කටුනායක වීසා දෙන සමාගම කප්පම් ගැනීම් හා දත්ත විකිණීමට දඬුවම් ලැබූ එකක්…

May 12th, 2024

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

කටුනායක ගුවන්තොටුපළේ වීසා බලපත්‍ර නිකුත් කිරීම භාරදී ඇති විදේශ සමාගම එම ක්ෂේත්‍රයට අදාළව කළු පැල්ලම් සහිත කුප්‍රකට සමාගමක් බව  ශ්‍රී ලංකා කොමියුනිස්ට් පක්ෂය සඳහන් කරයි.

මේ බව පවසමින් එම පක්ෂයේ ප්‍රධාන ලේකම් වෛද්‍ය ජී. වීරසිංහ මහතා විසින් නිකුත් කර ඇති මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයක් මෙසේය.

විසා ලබාදීමේ බලය දුන් මෙම සමාගම ස්විට්සර්ලන්තයට අයත් Kuoni සංචාරක සමාගම, VFS Global ඉන්දියානු අනුබද්ධිත ආයතනයක් ලෙස පිහිට වූ අතර, එහි මූලස්ථානය ඩුබායි සහ ස්විට්සර්ලන්තයේ සූරිච් හි පිහිටා ඇත. එහි බහුතර කොටස් බ්ලැක්ස්ටෝන් සමුහයට අයත් වන අතර ඉතිරිය කුඕනි සහ කුඕනිගේ හිමිකරුවන් වන ඊකියුටී (EQT) සතුය.

බ්ලැක්ස්ටෝන් සමූහය යනු වත්කම් කළමනාකරණය කරන එක්සත් ජනපද ආයෝජන කළමනා කරණ සමාගමකි. එය ළමා ශ්‍රමිකයන් යොදා ගැනීම සහ. නිවර්තන වනාන්තර විනාශයට සම්බන්ධ බවට චෝදනා ලබා ඇත.

2007-2008 ගෝලීය මූල්‍ය අර්බුදයෙන් පසු බංකොලොත් හිමිකරුවන්ගෙන් නිවාස ලබා ගැනීමේ සදාචාර 2019 දී, බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය ස්වදේශ කටයුතු කාර්යාලය VFS Global හරහා වීසා ලබා ගන්නාපසුගිය දශක දෙක තුළ, VFS Global රජයන්, ගවේෂණාත්මක මාධ්‍යවේදීන්ගේ සහ එහි ගනුදෙනුකරුවන්ගෙන් සැලකිය යුතු විවේචන වලට ලක්ව ඇත.

බොහෝ විට අනවශ්‍ය සහ ඔවුන්ගේ මූල්‍යමය හැකියාවෙන් ඔබ්බට යන සේවා මිලදී ගැනීමට සමාගම වීසා අයදුම්කරුවන්ට බලපෑම් කර ඇති බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වී තිබේ.

විරෝධී ව්‍යාපාරික භාවිතයන් සම්බන්ධයෙන් විවේචනයට ලක්ව ඇත. සැලකිය යුතු තවත් කරුණක් වන්නේ අවසරයකින් තොරව පුද්ගලික තොරතුරු හුවමාරු කර ගැනීම නිසා වන්දි ගෙවීමට ද සිදුව තිබීමයි.

පුද්ගලයන්ගේ රාශියකට පැමිණිලි මුහුණ දුන් අතර, ඔවුන්ගෙන් බොහෝ දෙනෙක්, මූල්‍ය වාසි සඳහා අයදුම්කරුවන් සූරාකන බවට සමාගමට චෝදනා කළහ.

මෙම සමාගම නයිජිරියාව වැනි සංවර්ධනය වෙමින් පවතින රටවල වීසා ලැබීම අපැහැදිලි අවස්ථාවන්හිදී අයදුම්කරුවන්ගෙන් ” කප්පම් ” ගැනීම මෙන්ම ඔවුන්ට ” අයුක්ති සහගත ලෙස සැලකීම්” කළ බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වී ඇත.

විදේශ ගමන් බලපත්‍ර නිකුත් කිරීමේ සේවා කළමනාකරණය කරන VFS Global, එම ක්ශේත්‍රය තුළ ඒකාධිකාරි ආයතනයක් ලෙස ක්‍රියාත්මක වන බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වී ඇත.

මෙම චෝදනා මගින් විසා ඉල්ලුම් පත්‍ර වල ඉහළ මිල ගණන් පිළිබඳ කනස්සල්ල මතු කර ඇති අතර මධ්‍යගත ලේඛන හැසිරවීම සහ අදාළ දත්තවල ආරක්ෂාව පලුදු වීම් පිළිබඳ ප්‍රශ්න ද මතු කර ඇත. මෙම පලුදු වීම් හරහා සංවේදී පුද්ගලික තොරතුරු කාන්දු වන්නට ඇත.

ආගමන හා විගමන සේවා VFS Global වෙත පැවරීමෙන්, වඩාත් අවදානමට ලක්විය හැකි පුරවැසියන් සුරාකෑමේ සහ ඒකාධිකාරි භාවිතයන්ට නිරාවරණය වීමේ අනතුරක් පවතී.

මෙය මැයි 1 වැනිදා රාත්‍රියේ එම සමාගමේ සේවකයන්ගේ කාර්ය සාධනය මගින් ඉස්මතු කරන ලද අකාර්යක්ෂමතාවන්ට අමතරව. රාජ්‍ය ආදායමක් අහිමි වීමක්ද වනු ඇත.

US nominee to Sri Lanka prioritizes fair access to ports for all ships

May 12th, 2024

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, May  (Daily Mirror)- Amid concerns over the presence of Chinese research vessels conducting surveys in the Indian Ocean, the US nominee to Sri Lanka Elizabeth K. Horst assured the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee to work with Sri Lanka to ensure a moratorium on these vessels remains in place.

The Senate committee raised questions about the potential national security threat posed by the vessels, which are believed to have links to the China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and display suspicious behavior. Horst emphasized the importance of collaboration with Sri Lanka to enhance their capabilities in patrolling their waters and defending sovereignty. The issue of the moratorium on Chinese vessels in Sri Lankan ports is at the forefront of discussions surrounding regional security concerns.

We are working to make sure there is fair access to ports for all ships,” she said adding that We have huge concerns and we have asked for that moratorium. We think it is Sri Lanka’s best interest.”

She also said “…cooperation with Sri Lanka is a key part of our security assistance. It is important for the Sri Lankans to have the capability and technology to patrol their own waters and defend their sovereignty. If I am confirmed, we will work with them to build their own capabilities.”


She also noted that the US government’s investment in Sri Lanka demonstrated a transparent and different model of investment, giving Sri Lankans a choice in their economic partnerships. Horst also committed to finding ways to further support and strengthen US activities in the region if confirmed.

Commenting on the economic situation in Sri Lanka, she said that the IMF is working closely with partners in the Sri Lankan government to make sure they can get back on better economic footing. We are making sure any debt negotiations treat partners fairly. There is an element of the IMF program that looks at governments to make sure that any programs also take care to the most vulnerable and are spread fairly. If I’m confirmed, I will look to follow in the steps of the ambassador Chung or to make sure we continue to work with the IMF to help Sri Lanka,” she said.

Sri Lanka is a vital partner to the United States in the Indo-Pacific region, and it has been for over 76 years. If confirmed, I would focus on three main pillars of the U.S.-Sri Lanka relationship: broadening our economic cooperation, bolstering our security interests, and deepening our ties with Sri Lanka’s diverse and vibrant population,” she said.

She further said that if confirmed she will support members of marginalized populations in Sri Lanka, accountability, truth and reconciliation, and transparency and justice.

In response to a question about the human rights situation in Sri Lanka, she said, “If I’m confirmed, you have my commitment to work with your committee and with Congress to ensure we are holding everyone accountable to the international standards we want them to adhere to.”

State officials can become monks in Thailand

May 12th, 2024

By CHATURANGA PRADEEP SAMARAWICKRAMA  Courtesy The Daily Mirror


The government has decided to implement a referral programme for state officials to become monks in Thailand, the Buddhist Religious and Cultural Affairs Ministry said.

Accordingly, the Thailand Government has planned to implement a special temporary monastic programme for the Sri Lankan community to improve the local religious and cultural relations between the two countries in view of the birthday of the King of Thailand.

The Buddhist Religious and Cultural Affairs Ministry says that the programme will be held in Thailand for 15 days.

The announcement is as follows:


ඉරනපලෙයි සටනේ වීරයා කමාන්ඩෝ ෆිල්ටා පැවැදි වෙයි | දම්ම හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ බිහිසුණු මතකය | WANESA TV

May 12th, 2024

An everlasting solution to all physical, environmental, socio-political, employment,  economic and ethnic  problems in the Central Hill Country. The HADABIMA of Sri Lanka.

May 10th, 2024

Dr Sudath Gunasekara Ex secretary to Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranayaka

 10.05.2024.

  1. To protect the physical stability of the central Hill Country

2 To guarantee the perennial flow of all 103 rivers that start on the hills

.3. to arrest soil erosion and degradation on the central hills.

4, to solve landlessness among Kandyan peasants

5.To put an end to the pestering Indian labour problem

6 To bring about balanced development in the mid-country

7 To increase M-id country tea production and upgrade the living conditions

8 To Increase annual Minor Export crop production may be by 5 fold the minimum,

9. Increase annual hydroelectricity production

10 restoring ecological balance in the Hill Country

11. Bring about socio-cultural integration in the region.

12. The 1000-3500  belt going round the Central hill country will provide the labour for the plantations between 3500-5000

මේ          රටේ       මධ්‍යම  කඳුකරය               ආරක්ෂාකොට     ගැනීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙල

ශ්‍රී ලංකා වේ මධ්‍යම කඳුකරය ( ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ භූගෝලීය හදබිම )වශයෙන් මම නම් කරමි), mem apradheishya අපේ හදවත  මෙන් රැකගත යුතුය. මක්නිසාදයත්,මිනිසෙකුට හදවතින් කෙරෙන ක්‍රියාදාමය මධ්‍යම කඳු කරයෙන් ශ්‍රී ළන්කාවට සිදුකෙරෙන නිසාසාය. යම්සේ හදවත නතරවූදාට මිනිසා හෝ වෙනත් ඔනෑම සතෙක් මිය යන්නාසේම මධ්‍යම කඳුරයේ බහුතික ස්ථාවරත්වය නැතිවූදාට ශ්‍රී ලංකාව නැමති සත්වයාද මිය යනු ඒකාන්තය. එබැවින් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මධ්‍යම කඳුකරය අපේ හදවත රැකගන්න සේම රැකගතයුතුය.

ඒ සඳහා පහත සඳහන් වැඩපිළිවෙල යෝජනාකරමි.

1. මධ්‍යම කඳුකරයේ මු. ම. අඩි 5000 ඉහල සෑම ප්‍රදේශයක්ම. අධිරක්ශිත ප්‍රදේශ වශයෙන් ප්‍රකාශකිරීම. කිසිම වගාවක් හෝ ජනාවාශයක් මේ තුල සපුරා තහනම් කළ යුතුය.

11. අඩි 3500-5000 අතර විශාල තේ වතු තිබුණද ඒ තුළද සෑම වර්ගයකම ජනාවාශ තහනම් කළයුතුය.

111.කඳුකරයේ සියළුම ජනාවාශ අඩි 3500 යේ සීමාවෙන් පහල ප්‍රදේශ වලට සීමා කළයුතුය.

1Vකඳුකරයේ   1000-3500 අතර ප්‍රදේශය ශ්‍රී ලංකා හදබිම අධිකාරියේ නිර්දේශිත ගම්මිරිස්,කරාඹු,කෝපි,එනසල්, පලතුරු වැනි මිශ්‍ර භෝග සහ, ගෘහස්ථ සත්ව පාලනය (ගව, එළු.කුකුල් සහ මීමැසි ) සහිත කුඩා ගොවිපල ව්‍යාපාර සඳහා වෙන්කළ යුතුය.මධයම කඳුකරය වටේ දිවෙන මෙම තීරුවේ උඩරට ඉඩම් නැති ගොවියන් සහ උඩරට තේ වතු වලින් ඉවත් කෙරෙන ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ පුරවැසියන් වන දෙමල කම්කරුවන්ද මිශ්‍ර ගම්මාන වශයෙන් පදින්චි කළයුතුය. එසේ පදින්චි කිරිමට අපේක්ෂිත ගොවි පවුල් ගණන 2,50,000 කි. මෙසේ කිරීමෙන් උඩරට දෙමළ ප්‍රශ්නයද, උඩරට ඉන්දියාණුකරණයද සදහටම අවසන්වණු ඇත.

විෂේශ කරුණක්

ශ්‍රී ලන්කාවේ තේ වගාකරන භූමියේ උස අනුව 2017 නිශ්පාදනය කි. ග්‍රෑ. දස/ලක්ෂ

ඉහල මු. ම. අ. අඩි  4000 ඉහල                                                       64.64

මැද                       2000-4000                                                      45.65

3පහල                   0-2000                                                           197.42

මුළු ප්‍රමාණය                                                                                  307.72

මේ රටේ සමස්ථ ජීවී පද්ධතියේ සහ ශිෂ්ඨාචාරයේ පැවැත්ම සඳහා මු.ම. අ. 5000 න් ඉහල බෞතික ස්ථාවරත්වය අරක්ෂාකිරීමේ ඇති වැදගත්කම සලකා බලන විට 5000 න් ඉහල ප්‍රදේශ දැඩි ආරක්ෂිත ප්‍රදේශ වෂයෙන් පවත්වා ගැනීමේ ඇති වැදගත් කම අනුව අඩි 5000 ඉහල තේ වගාව තහනම් කිරීමෙන් නිශ්පාධනයට සැලකියයුතු පාඩුවක් නොවණු ඇත. තවද මැද සහ පහල මට්ටම්වල නිෂ්පාදනය වැඩිකිරීමෙන් ඉන් ඇතිවන ඌනතාව මඟහැරගත හැකි වේයයිද සිතමි. සිංහල රජ කාලයේ 3500 න් ඉහල සෑම බින් අඟලක්ම දැඩි රක්ෂිතය

The story of Katakirilla in Tripitaka! ත්‍රිපිටකයේ එන කැටකිරිල්ල ගේ කතාව !

May 10th, 2024

The Power of Story for you Life-Dr Dhammika

Suddenly a hawk jumped down and caught a quail. As it was led away, it cried, ‘I have received this punishment for wandering out of my territory and into the domain of others. I am very unfortunate, unfortunate. Had I wandered today in my own motherland, in the domain of my fathers, this hawk would not have fought with me and won.” He started shouting.

What is the domain of your fathers?” asked the hawk as he carried it.

‘It is a plowed field covered with clods,’ said the quail.

The hawk, who was crazy about his strength, released quail and gave her an open challenge. No matter where you are, you will not escape from me. If possible, hide now and save your life”!

The quail that fell on the ground immediately ran to an empty field that had been sown. He stood there on a fairly large lump of earth, and said to the hawk: ‘Take me, sir.’

Confident in his strength, the hawk took courage and instantly leaped onto the pebbles with lightning speed. Knowing that the hawk was near, the quail immediately slipped under the clod. Unable to control the speed, the hawk hit the ground and died on the spot.

That’s what happens when you step out of your territory and wander into other people’s domains.

(Sanyuktha Nikaya)

No matter where you are in the world, there is no other place in the world that will protect you as much as your motherland. Your native land is the only place where you can successfully face any risk, any challenge. So love your motherland dearly. Keep the motherland safe like you safeguard your life.

(Nalaka Thero)

The Power of Story for you Life-Dr Dhammika

Video by Palitha Ariyarathna : Link Video : Guardians of the Homeland | Cherishing and Safeguarding Our Motherland | The Quail’s Wisdom:

(බෙංගමුවේ නාලක හිමි)

එකපාරටම උකුස්සෙක් බිමට පැනලා කැටකිරිල්ලක්ව අල්ලගත්තා. ඌ ඉවතට රැගෙන යන විට ඌ කෑගැසුවේ, ‘මගේ භූමියෙන් පිටව අනුන්ගේ වසමක සැරිසැරීම හේතුවෙන් මට මේ දඬුවම ලැබුණු බව. මම ඉතා අවාසනාවන්තයි, අවාසනාවන්තයි. අද මම මගේම මාතෘ භූමියේ, මගේ තාත්තලාගේ වසමේ සැරිසැරුවා නම්, මේ උකුස්සාට මා සමඟ සටන් කර ජයගැනීමට ලැබෙන්නේ නැහැ.” යනුවෙන් ඌ කෑගසන්නට වුනා.

උඹේ පියවරුන්ගේ වසම කුමක්ද” උකුස්සා ඌ රැගෙන යන ගමන් ඇසුවා.

‘එය පස් කැටවලින් වැසී ගිය සීසාන කෙතක්.’ කැටකිරිල්ල කියුවා.

තමාගේ ශක්තිය ගැන දැඩි උන්මාදයෙන් සිටි උකුස්සා කැටකිරිල්ල නිදහස් කොට ඇයට විවෘත අභියෝගයක් කළා. උඹ කොහේ හිටියත් මගෙන් නම් උඹ ගැලවෙන්නෙ නෑ. පුලුවන්නම් දැන් සැඟවී ජීවිතය බේරා ගනිං”!

බිම වැටුණු කැටකිරිල්ල වහා සී සෑම කර තිබු හිස් කුඹුරකට දිව ගියා. එහි තිබු තරමක් විශාල වූ පස් කැටයක් මත නැඟ ගත් ඌ එහි සිටගෙන, උකුස්සාට මෙසේ කීවා: ‘වරෙන්,  මාව ගනිං’

තම ශක්තිය ගැන දැඩි විශ්වාසයෙන් සිටි උකුස්සා ධෛර්යවත් වී ක්ෂණිකව කැටකිරිල්ල මතට විදුලි වේගයෙන් පැන්නා. උකුස්සා ළඟ ළඟ බව දැනගත් කැටකිරිල්ල වහා එම පස්කැටය යටට ලිස්සා ගියා. වේගය පාලනය කරගත නොහැකි වූ උකුස්සා පොලවේ හැපී ඒතැනම මිය ගියා.

ඔබ ඔබේ ප්‍රදේශයෙන් පිට වී අනුන්ගේ වසම් තුළ සැරිසරන විට සිදු වන්නේ එයයි.

(සංයුක්ත නිකාය)

ඔබ ලොව කොහේ සිටියත් ඔබේ මව්බිම තරම් ඔබට රැකවරණය දෙන වෙන තැනක් ලොව කොහෙවත් නැහැ. ඕනෑම වූ අවදානමකට, ඕනෑම අභියෝගයකට සාර්ථකව මුහුණ දිය හැකි එකම තැනයි ඔබ උපන් මව්බිම. ඒ නිසා මව්බිමට පණ මෙන් ආදරය කරන්න. මව්බිම පණ මෙන් රකින්න.

(බෙංගමුවේ නාලක හිමි)

Norman Solomon, When Students Are a Shock to the System

May 10th, 2024

TomDispatch.com

May 9, 2024

Once upon a time, in another era, maybe even another universe, the head of a university refused to call on the police, the National Guard, or even federal troops in the face of student and other protests. Instead, he opened the doors of his school to the demonstrators.

I’m thinking of Kingman Brewster, who was the president of Yale University on May 1, 1970, as peaceful protests over racial justice and against the Vietnam War were taking place in New Haven, Connecticut. It was just days before, thanks to the killing of four demonstrators by the Ohio National Guard at Kent State University, anti-Vietnam War protests would — rather like the present Gaza ones — spread across hundreds of college campuses nationwide. Yale avoided the worst of it, when Brewster, among other things, said: “I am skeptical of the ability of Black revolutionaries to receive a fair trial anywhere in the United States. In large part, the atmosphere has been created by police actions and prosecutions against Panthers in many parts of the country. It is also one more inheritance from centuries of racial oppression.” I’m sure you won’t be surprised to learn that Republican Vice President Spiro Agnew promptly and publicly called for Brewster’s ouster, while the students united behind him.

No such luck these days, of course. The police are being called onto ever more campuses, starting with Columbia University where the Gaza demonstrations were first launched. Had its president, under pressure from the Spiro Agnews of this day, not called in the police to arrest students, there might be no nationwide Gaza protest movement today. Instead, as I’m writing this, more than 2,000 students have been arrested across the country, including — yes! — 44 for “trespassing” at Yale. Rare indeed has been Brown University, where “only” 61 were arrested after two sit-ins and a hunger strike before its president finally agreed to let its governing body vote this fall “on a proposal to divest the school’s $6.6 billion endowment from companies affiliated with Israel” and the Gaza Solidarity Encampment there ended peacefully. With that in mind, let TomDispatch regular Norman Solomon, author of War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, fill you in on the ways in which American students have bravely risked their college careers and their futures to reject what he calls an all-American death culture amid a horrifying war in Gaza to which this country continues to supply the most devastating of weaponry. Tom

War Culture Hates the Ethical Passion of the Young

In the Thrall of a Dominant Death Culture

BY NORMAN SOLOMON

Persisting in his support for an unpopular war, the Democrat in the White House has helped spark a rebellion close to home. Young people — least inclined to deference, most inclined to moral outrage — are leading public opposition to the ongoing slaughter in Gaza. The campus upheaval is a clash between accepting and resisting, while elites insist on doing maintenance work for the war machine.

I wrote the above words recently, but I could have written very similar ones in the spring of 1968. (In fact, I did.) Joe Biden hasn’t sent U.S. troops to kill in Gaza, as President Lyndon Johnson did in Vietnam, but the current president has done all he can to provide massive quantities of weapons and ammunition to Israel — literally making the carnage in Gaza possible.

A familiar saying — the more things change, the more they stay the same” — is both false and true. During the last several decades, the consolidation of corporate power and the rise of digital tech have brought about huge changes in politics and communications. Yet humans are still humans and certain crucial dynamics remain. Militarism demands conformity — and sometimes fails to get it.

When Columbia University and many other colleges erupted in antiwar protests during the late 1960s, the moral awakening was a human connection with people suffering horrifically in Vietnam. During recent weeks, the same has been true with people in Gaza. Both eras saw crackdowns by college administrators and the police — as well as much negativity toward protesters in the mainstream media — all reflecting key biases in this country’s power structure.

What is needed is a realization that power without love is reckless and abusive, and that love without power is sentimental and anemic,” Martin Luther King, Jr., said in 1967. Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice, and justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.”

Disrupting a Culture of Death

This spring, as students have risked arrest and jeopardized their college careers under banners like Ceasefire Now,” Free Palestine,” and Divest from Israel,” they’ve rejected some key unwritten rules of a death culture. From Congress to the White House, war (and the military-industrial complex that goes with it) is crucial for the political business model. Meanwhile, college trustees and alumni megadonors often have investment ties to Wall Street and Silicon Valley, where war is a multibillion-dollar enterprise. Along the way, weapons sales to Israel and many other countries bring in gigantic profits.

The new campus uprisings are a shock to the war system. Managers of that system, constantly oiling its machinery, have no column for moral revulsion on their balance sheets. And the refusal of appreciable numbers of students to go along to get along doesn’t compute. For the economic and political establishment, it’s a control issue, potentially writ large.

As the killing, maiming, devastation, and increasing starvation in Gaza have continued, month after month, the U.S. role has become incomprehensible — without, at least, attributing to the president and the vast majority of Congressional representatives a level of immorality that had previously seemed unimaginable to most college students. Like many others in the United States, protesting students are now struggling with the realization that the people in control of the executive and legislative branches are directly supporting mass murder and genocide.

In late April, when overwhelming bipartisan votes in Congress approved — and President Biden eagerly signed — a bill sending $17 billion in military aid to Israel, the only way to miss the utter depravity of those atop the government was to not really look, or to remain in the thrall of a dominant death culture.

Buy the Book

During his final years in office, with the Vietnam War going full tilt, President Lyndon Johnson was greeted with the chant: Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” Such a chant could be directed at President Biden now. The number of Palestinian children killed so far by the U.S.-armed Israeli military is estimated to be almost 15,000, not counting the unknown number still buried in the rubble of Gaza. No wonder high-ranking Biden administration officials now risk being loudly denounced whenever they speak in venues open to the public.

Mirroring the Vietnam War era in another way, members of Congress continue to rubberstamp huge amounts of funding for mass killing. On April 20th, only 17% of House Democrats and only 9% of House Republicans voted against the new military aid package for Israel.

Higher learning is supposed to connect the theoretical with the actual, striving to understand our world as it truly is. However, a death culture — promoting college tranquility as well as mass murder in Gaza — thrives on disconnects. All the platitudes and pretenses of academia can divert attention from where U.S. weapons actually go and what they do.

Sadly, precepts readily cited as vital ideals prove all too easy to kick to the curb lest they squeeze big toes uncomfortably. So, when students take the humanities seriously enough to set up a protest encampment on campus and then billionaire donors demand that a college president put a stop to such disruption, a police raid is likely to follow.

A World of Doublethink and Tone Deafness

George Orwell’s explanation of doublethink” in his famed novel 1984 is a good fit when it comes to the purported logic of so many commentators deploring the student protesters as they demand an end to complicity in the slaughter still underway in Gaza: To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it.”

Laying claim to morality, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has, for instance, been busy firing media salvos at the student protesters. That organization’s CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, is on record flatly declaring that anti-Zionism is antisemitism” — no matter how many Jews declare themselves to be anti-Zionist.” Four months ago, ADL issued a report categorizing pro-Palestinian rallies with anti-Zionist chants and slogans” as antisemitic events. In late April, ADL used the antisemitic” label to condemn protests by students at Columbia and elsewhere.

We have a major, major, major generational problem,” Greenblatt warned in a leaked ADL strategy phone call last November. He added: The issue in the United States’ support for Israel is not left and right; it is young and old… We really have a TikTok problem, a Gen-Z problem… The real game is the next generation.”

Along with thinly veiled condescension toward students, a frequent approach is to treat the mass killing of Palestinians as of minimal importance. And so, when New York Times columnist Ross Douthat wrote in late April about students protesting at Columbia, he merely described the Israeli government’s actions as failings.” Perhaps if a government was bombing and killing Douthat’s loved ones, he would have used a different word.

A similar mentality, as I well remember, infused media coverage of the Vietnam War. For mainline news outlets, what was happening to Vietnamese people ranked far below so many other concerns, often to the point of invisibility. As media accounts gradually began bemoaning the quagmire” of that war, the focus was on how the U.S. government’s leadership had gotten itself so stuck. Acknowledging that the American war effort amounted to a massive crime against humanity was rare. Then, as now, the moral bankruptcies of the political and media establishments fueled each other.

As a barometer of the prevailing political climate among elites, the editorial stances of daily newspapers indicate priorities in times of war. In early 1968, the Boston Globe conducted a survey of 39 major U.S. newspapers and found that not a single one had editorialized in favor of an American withdrawal from Vietnam. By then, tens of millions of Americans were in favor of such a pullout.

This spring, when the New York Times editorial board finally called for making U.S. arms shipments to Israel conditional — six months after the carnage began in Gaza — the editorial was tepid and displayed a deep ethnocentric bias. It declared that the Hamas attack of October 7 was an atrocity,” but no word coming anywhere near atrocity” was applied to the Israeli attacks occurring ever since.

The Times editorial lamented that Mr. Netanyahu and the hard-liners in his government” had broken a bond of trust” between the United States and Israel, adding that the Israeli prime minister has been deaf to repeated demands from Mr. Biden and his national security team to do more to protect civilians in Gaza from being harmed by [American] armaments.” The Times editorial board was remarkably prone to understatement, as if someone overseeing the mass killing of civilians every day for six months was merely not doing enough to protect civilians.”

Learning by Doing

The thousands of student protesters encountering the edicts of college administrations and the violence of the police have gotten a real education in the true priorities of American power structures. Of course, the authorities (on and off campuses) have wanted a return to the usual peaceful campus atmosphere. As military strategist Carl von Clausewitz long ago commented with irony, A conqueror is always a lover of peace.”

Supporters of Israel are fed up with the campus protests. The Washington Post recently featured an essay by Paul Berman that deplored what has become of his alma mater, Columbia. After a brief mention of Israel’s killing of Gazan civilians and the imposition of famine, Berman declared that ultimately the central issue in the war is Hamas and its goal… the eradication of the Israeli state.” The central issue. Consider it a way of saying that, while unfortunate, the ongoing slaughter of tens of thousands of children and other Palestinian civilians doesn’t matter nearly as much as the fear that nuclear-armed Israel, with one of the most powerful air forces in the world, is in danger of eradication.”

Pieces similar to Douthat’s and Berman’s have proliferated in the media. But they don’t come to grips with what Senator Bernie Sanders recently made clear in a public message to the Israeli prime minister: Mr. Netanyahu, antisemitism is a vile and disgusting form of bigotry that has done unspeakable harm to millions. Do not insult the intelligence of the American people by attempting to distract us from the immoral and illegal war policies of your extremist and racist government.”

College protesters have shown that they will not be distracted. They continue to insist — not flawlessly, but wonderfully — that all people’s lives matter. For decades, and since October in a particularly deadly fashion, the U.S.-Israel alliance has proceeded to treat Palestinian lives as expendable. And that is exactly what the protests are opposing.

Of course, protests can flicker and die out. Hundreds of U.S. campuses shut down in the spring of 1970 amid protests against the Vietnam War and the American invasion of Cambodia, only to become largely quiescent by the fall term. But for countless individuals, the sparks lit a fire for social justice that would never be quenched.

One of them, Michael Albert, a cofounder of the groundbreaking Z Magazine, has continued with activist work since the mid-1960s. A lot of people are comparing now to 1968,” he wrote in April. That year was tumultuous. We were inspired. We were hot. But here comes this year and it is moving faster, no less. That year the left that I and so many others lived and breathed was mighty. We were courageous, but we also had too little understanding of how to win. Don’t emulate us. Transcend us.”

He then added:

The emerging mass uprisings must persist and diversify and broaden in focus and reach. And hey, on your campuses, again do better than us. Fight to divest but also fight to structurally change them so their decision makers — which should be you — never again invest in genocide, war, and indeed suppression and oppression of any kind. Tomorrow is the first day of a long, long potentially incredibly liberating future. But one day is but one day. Persist.”

Persistence will be truly essential. The gears of pro-Israel forces are fully meshed with the U.S. war machinery. The movement to stop Israel’s murderous oppression of Palestinians is up against the entire military-industrial-congressional complex.

The United States spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined (and most of them are allies), while maintaining 750 military bases overseas, vastly more than all of its official adversaries put together. The U.S. continues to lead the nuclear arms race toward oblivion. And the economic costs are stunning. The Institute for Policy Studies reported last year that 62% of the federal discretionary budget went to militarized programs” of one sort or another.

In 1967, Martin Luther King, Jr., described this country’s spending for war as a demonic, destructive suction tube,” siphoning tremendous resources away from human needs.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.

With transcendent wisdom, this spring’s student uprising has rejected conformity as a lethal anesthetic while the horrors continue in Gaza. Leaders of the most powerful American institutions want to continue as usual, as if official participation in genocide were no particular cause for alarm.

Instead, young people have dared to lead the way, insisting that such a culture of death is repugnant and completely unacceptable.

Copyright 2024 Norman Solomon

Featured image: Students protest to support Gaza outside the Israeli consulate in New York City by Joe Catron is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / Flickr

Follow TomDispatch on Twitter and join us on Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Books, John Feffer’s new dystopian novel, Songlands (the final one in his Splinterlands series), Beverly Gologorsky’s novel Every Body Has a Story, and Tom Engelhardt’s A Nation Unmade by War, as well as Alfred McCoy’s In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and Decline of U.S. Global Power, John Dower’s The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World War IIand Ann Jones’s They Were Soldiers: How the Wounded Return from America’s Wars: The Untold Story.

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include War Made EasyMade LoveGot War, and most recently War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine (The New Press). He lives in the San Francisco area.

හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී අභාවප්‍රාප්ත ගරු අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මහතා

May 10th, 2024

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

“හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී අභාවප්‍රාප්ත ගරු අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මැතිතුමා 1937.09.27 දින රත්නපුර ඇලපාත ප්‍රදේශයේ උපත ලැබූ අතර ඔහුගේ ආදරණීය දෙමාපියන් වූයේ දම්මෙආරංචිලාය බේබිනෝනා මැතිනිය සහ දෙල්ලබඩ බටවලගේ රත්තරන් හාමි මැතිතුමා යන අයයි. රත්නපුර ඇලපාත මහා විද්‍යාලයේ ඉගෙනුම ලබන සමයේ 1954දී එතුමා ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ පාඨශාලා සහතික පත්‍ර විභාගය සමත් වූයේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ පළමුවැනියා වෙමින්. 1956දී, ගුරු අභ්‍යාස විද්‍යාල ප්‍රවේශ විභාගයෙන් සමත් වූ අතර අනතුරුව එතුමා අවසාන ගුරු විභාගය ද සමත් වුණා. ඔහුගේ ආදරණීය බිරිඳ වූයේ එවකට රත්නපුර මහ රෝහලේ මාණ්ඩලික හෙද නිලධාරීනියක වූ අභාවප්‍රාප්ත ලියෝනී ජයවර්ධන මැතිනියයි.

කොළඹ වෛද්‍ය පීඨයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ කථිකාචාර්ය විශේෂ වෛද්‍ය ඉන්දු අසංක ජයවර්ධන සහ  හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික් මහා රෝහලේ අධ්‍යක්ෂිකා වෛද්‍ය අයන්ති සාරංගා ජයවර්ධන එතුමාගේ ආදරණීය දරුවන් දෙදෙනායි.

කීර්තිමත් රාජ්‍ය සේවකයෙකු වූ අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මැතිතුමා, රෙජිස්ටාර් ජෙනරාල් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ පරිපාලන සේවයට එක්ව 1994 වනතුරු කටයුතු කළා. අතිරේක ඉඩම් රෙජිස්ටාර්, දිස්ත්‍රික් ඉඩම් රෙජිස්ටාර්, අතිරේක දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම්, සහකාර රෙජිස්ටාර් ජෙනරාල් ලෙස එතුමා රාජ්‍ය සේවයට මහඟු සේවයක් ඉටු කළා. 2004දී ජාතික මැණික් හා ස්වර්ණාභරණ අධිකාරියේ සභාපතිවරයා වූ අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මැතිතුමා මැණික් හා ස්වර්ණාභරණ පර්යේෂණ සහ පුහුණු අභ්‍යාස ආයතතනයේද සභාපති ධූරය ඉසිලුවා.

රාජ්‍ය සේවයෙන් විශ්‍රාම ගැනීමෙන් අනතුරුව, 1994 දී එතුමා ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයෙන් ක්‍රියාකාරී දේශපාලනයට පිවිසි අතර, 1997 දී රත්නපුර මහා නගර සභාවේ නගරාධිපතිතුමා බවට තේරී පත්වුනා. පසුව සබරගමුව පළාත් සභාවේ පළාත් පාලන, ක්‍රීඩා, යෞවන කටයුතු, පරිසර හා සංචාරය අමාත්‍ය ධුරය දැරූ අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මැතිතුමා, සබරගමුවේ ප්‍රධාන අමාත්‍ය ධුරයද ඉසිලුවා. පොදුජන එක්සත් පෙරමුණෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට 2002 වර්ෂයේදී පැමිණි අතර, නැවත පළාත් සභාවට පත්වී සබරගමුව පළාත් සභාවේ සභානායකවරයා ලෙසද කටයුතු කළා.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා-සෝවියට් මිත්‍ර සංගමයේ ක්‍රියාකාරිව කටයුතු කළ එතුමා, ශ්‍රී ලංකා-කියුබා පාර්ලිමේන්තු සහයෝගිතා සංගමයේ ලේකම්වරයා ලෙසද කටයුතු කළා. ශ්‍රී ලංකා-වියට්නාම සහයෝගිතා සංගමයේ සභාපතිවරයා ලෙසද එතුමා ක්‍රියා කළා. එතුමා කළ සේවය නිසාම වියට්නාම ජාතික ගොවි සංවිධාන මගින් විශිෂ්ඨ පුරවැසියා සම්මානයද එතුමා වෙත පිරිනැමුණා. ක්‍රීඩාව පැත්තෙන් ගත් කල, රත්නපුර දිස්ත්‍රික් රගර් සංගමයේ අනුශාසකවරයා ලෙසත්, ශ්‍රී ලංකා වොලිබෝල් සංගමයේ උප සභාපතිවරයා ලෙසත් කටයුතු කළා. එමෙන්ම රත්නපුර දිස්ත්‍රික් ක්‍රිකට් සංගමයේ අනුශාසකවරයා ලෙසත් එතුමා ක්‍රියාකර තිබෙනවා. විටක, රත්නපුර දිස්ත්‍රික් ස්වභාවික විපත් අවම කිරීමේ කමිටුවේ සභාපතිවරයා ලෙසත්, දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පරිසර ආරක්ෂණ කමිටුවේ සභාපතිවරයා ලෙසත්, දීප ව්‍යාප්ත රෙජිස්ටාර් සංගමයේ යාවජීව අනුශාසකවරයා ලෙසත්, එතුමා මහඟු සේවයක් ඉටුකර තිබෙනවා.

එතුමා, තායිලන්තයේ, ජාතික විපත් කළමනාකරණ පාඨමාලාව හැදෑරීමද මෙහිදී සිහිපත් කළ යුතුයි. ඉන්දියාවේ පැවති නගරාධිපතිවරුන්ගේ සම්මේලනයටද 1998දී එතුමා එක්වුණා. සිංගප්පූරුව, ජපානය, සෞදි අරාබිය, ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය, මැලේසියාව, චීනය, ඉතාලිය වියට්නාමය ආදී රටවලද එතුමා සංචාරය කර තිබෙනවා.

2024 පෙබරවාරි 01 දින අප අතරින් සමුගත් ගරු අශෝක ජයවර්ධන මැතිතුමාට නිවන් සුව ප්‍රර්ථනා කරන අතර එතුමාගේ ආදරණිය දූ දරුවන් ඇතුළු පවුලේ සියලු  ඥාතින් වෙත මේ උත්තරීතර සභාවේ ශෝකය දන්වා යවන ලෙසද ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.”

හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී අභාවප්‍රාප්ත ගරු යූ.එල්.එම්.ෆාරුක් මහතා

May 10th, 2024

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

“හිටපු අමාත්‍ය යූ.එල්.එම්.ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමා 1941 ජුනි 20 වැනිදා කෑගල්ල, රුවන්වැල්ල කන්නන්තොට මුස්ලිම් ගම්මානයේ පාරම්පරික වාමාංශික දේශපාලන පවුලක උපත ලැබූ අතර, ෆලීලා උම්මා මැතිනිය සහ යුනුස් ලෙබ්බේ මැතිතුමා, එතුමාගේ ආදරණීය දෙමව්පියන්. එතුමා කන්නන්තොට සුලෙයිමානියා මහා විද්‍යාලයේ මූලික අධ්‍යාපනය ලැබූ අතර, රුවන්වැල්ල මූදුගමුව සිංහල මහා විද්‍යාලයෙන් උසස් අධ්‍යාපනය ලැබුවා.

රුවන්වැල්ල මැතිවරණ කොට්ඨාශයෙන් එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂය නියෝජනය කර හිටපු ජනාධිපති ආර්. ප්‍රේමදාස මහතා තරඟ කළ 1956 දී, අවුරුදු 15ක වයසේ සිටි ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමා, ප්‍රේමදාස මහතාට සහයෝගය දැක්වු බව අප අසා තිබෙනවා. 1964 දී, ගම්සභා මැතිවරණයෙන් ක්‍රියාකාරී දේශපාලනයට පිවිසි එතුමා රුවන්වැල්ලේ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ බල මණ්ඩලයේ සභාපතිවරයා ද වුණා.

එමෙන්ම, කෑගල්ල දිසා සංවර්ධන සභාවේ සාමාජිකයෙක් වූ ඔහු සමස්ථ ලංකා මුස්ලිම් ලීගයේ තරුණ පෙරමුණේ උප සභාපති ධූරය ද, කෑගල්ල දිසා මුස්ලිම් අධ්‍යාපන සංවර්ධන පදනමේ සභාපතිවරයා ද වුණා. තුන් කෝරලයේ පුරවැසි එතකුමුතුවේ සභාපතිවරයා ලෙස ද එතුමා කටයුතු කළා.

කොත්මලේ තේ කම්හලක කළමනාකරු ලෙස ද විටෙක ඔහු කටයුතු කළා. 1965 – 70 සමයේ හිටපු ආහාර හා කෘෂිකර්ම අමාත්‍ය පී.සී. ඉඹුලාන මැතිතුමාගේ පෞද්ගලික ලේකම්වරයා ලෙස කටයුතු කළේ ද ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමායි.

හවිවා උම්මා මැතිනිය සමඟ 1965 දී විවාහ වූ එතුමා දරුවන් 09 දෙනෙකුගේ පියෙක්.

1988 සිට 1991 දක්වා එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු වූ ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමා, කෑගල්ල දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පළමු මුස්ලිම් ජාතික පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ලෙස වාර්තාවක් ද තබා තිබෙනවා. ආර්. ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ රජය යටතේ ප්‍රවාහන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරයා වූයේද එතුමායි. එම අවස්ථාවේදී කිහිප වරක්ම වැඩ බලන ප්‍රවාහන හා මහාමාර්ග ඇමතිවරයා ලෙස ද, ඔහු කටයුතු කළා. 1994 දී එතුමා යළි පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට පිවිසියා. 2001 වසරේ දී ශ්‍රී ලංකා ගමනාගමන මණ්ඩලයේ සභාපති ධූරය දැරුවේද යූ.එල්.එම්.ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමායි.

කොටි තර්ජන නිසා සේවයට වාර්තා නොකිරීමෙන් සේවය අහිමි වූ ලංගම හා දුම්රිය දෙපාර්තමේන්තු සේවකයින් සිය ගණනකට නැවත ෆාරුක් මැතිතුමා විසින් රැකියා ලබාදීමට කටයුතු කිරීම,  ගොඩනැගිලි පහසුකම් නැති මුස්ලිම් පාසල් 19කට එවකට සබරගමුව පළාත් මහ ඇමතිවරයාගේ ආශිර්වාදයෙන් මුදල් වෙන් කර දීම ඇතුළු කෑගල්ලේ මුස්ලිම් දරුවන්ගේ අධ්‍යාපනය දියුණු කිරිමට එතුමා විශේෂයෙන් කටයුතු කළා.

වසර 80ක් ජීවත් වූ එතුමා 2021 අගොස්තු 06 වනදා මෙලොවින් සමුගත්තා. ඊට පෙර ඔහුගේ දේශපාලනය පිළිබඳ යුග පෙරළියක තුන් කෝරළයේ අභිමානය” යන ග්‍රන්ථය 2014 වර්ෂයේදි එළි දැක්වූවා.

අප අතරින් සමුගත් එතුමාට ඔහුගේ ආගම අනුව ස්වර්ගය ලැබේවායි ප්‍රාර්ථනා කරන අතර, එතුමාගේ බිරිඳ, දරුවන් ඇතුළු ඥාතීන් වෙත මෙම උත්තරීතර සභාවේ ශෝකය දන්වා යවන ලෙස ද ඉල්ලා සිටිනවා.”

ආර්ථික අර්බූදයට මහ බැංකුව නිර්දේශ කරන විසඳුමේ සාර්ථකත්වය ගැන විවාදයකට එන්න – නන්දලාල්ට ගම්මන්පිලගෙන් අභියෝගයක්

May 10th, 2024

උපුටා ගැන්ම  ලංකා ලීඩර්

විදේශ විනිමය මෙරටට අහිමි කරමින්, අධික විදුලි බිල හේතුවෙන් කර්මාන්ත ශාලා වැසී යන තත්වයක් නිර්මාණය කර විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලය ලබන ලාභයෙන් ඇති ප්‍රයෝජනය කුමක්දැයි පිවිතුරු හෙළ උරුමයේ නායක නීතිඥ උදය ගම්මන්පිල මහතා ප්‍රශ්න කරයි.

පිරිවැය නිරූපිත මිල ක්‍රමයකට විදුලිය ලබාදීම විය යුතු වුවද  අතීත විදුලි පාරිභෝගිකයාගේ පිරිවැය ද වත්මන් විදුලි පාරිභෝගිකයාගෙන් අය කර ගැනී සිදු නොකල යුතු බව පිවිතුරු හෙළ උරුමය නායකයා ප්‍රකාශ කරයි.

නීතිඥ උදය ගම්මන්පිල මහතා මේ බව සදහන් කර සිටියේ  පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ පැවති ඛණිජතෙල් නිෂ්පාදන (විධිවිධාන) පනත් කෙටුම්පත පිළිබද විවිාදයට එක් වෙමිනි. පිවිතුරු හෙළ උරුමයේ නායකයා වැඩිදුරටත් එහිදී මෙසේ අදහස් දැක්වීය.

දූෂිත දේශපාලකයා පමණද?

ඛණිජතෙල් නිෂ්පාදන (විධිවිධාන) පනත යටතේ සැකසූ නියෝග පිළිබඳ විවාදයකට සහභාගි වීමට ලැබීම සතුටක්.  අපි 2021 දී ඛනිජතෙල් සම්පත් සංවර්ධන පනතක් ඉදිරිපත් කළා. මේ පනත සම්මත කිරීමට අමතරව අධිකාරියක් බිහි කළා.  ගවේශන සිතියමක් සැකසුවා.  නිලධාරින් බඳවා ගත්තා.  ගුවන් යානා සහ නැව් භාවිතා කරලා ගවේශන කටයුතු ඇරඹුවා.  නමුත් ලංකාවේ තෙල් සහ ගෑස් ගවේශනය පිළිබඳ මෑතක දී නම් නැවුම් ප්‍රවෘත්තියක් අපට අහන්න ලැබුණේ නෑ.  අද ලෝකය පාරිසරික හේතු මත සීඝ්‍රයෙන් ඛනිජතෙල් භාවිතයෙන් ඈත් වෙනවා.  අපේ ඛනිජතෙල් වලට වඩා තිබෙන්නේ ස්වභාවික ගෑස්.  තවත් කලක් ගියාම ස්වභාවික ගෑස් භාවිතයත් අවසන් වේවි.  වත්මන් ආර්ථික අර්බූදයට වඩාත් නිශ්චිත විසඳුම තමයි  හැකි ඉක්මනින් අපේ තෙල් සහ ගෑස් සම්පත ගොඩ ගන්න එක.  ඒක හැකි ඉක්මනින්ම සිදු කිරීමට හැකි වේවා කියා මම ප්‍රාර්ථනා කරනවා.

විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය ප්‍රතිව්‍යුහකරණය පිළිබඳ ඊයේ ඇමතිවරයා සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවා තිබුණා.  විදුලිබල මණ්ඩලය ප්‍රතිව්‍යුහකරණය කළ යුතුයි. නැවුම් නීතියක් ගෙන ආ යුතුයි.  තරගකාරි පසුබිමක කාර්යක්ෂමතාවය ඉහළ නැංවිය යුතුයි කියන ස්ථාවරයේ අපි ඉන්නවා.  බිහි කරන  නැවුම් සමාගම්වල වගේම උපදේශක සභාවේත් පත්වීම් කරන්නේ ඇමතිවරයා නිසා ඇමති සතු බලතල ඉවත් කරන්න එතැන දී සමහරු යෝජනා කළා.  මේ අදහසට අපි විරුද්ධයි.  ඇමතිවරයා හරහා තමයි රාජ්‍ය ආයතන මහජනතාව සමග ගැට ගැහෙන්නේ.  අපි ආයතන ස්වාධීන කරනවා කියලා මොකක්ද කරන්නේ?  නිලධාරි පාලනයකට නතු කරන එක කරන්නේ.  දේශපාලකයින් දූෂිතයි.  ඇත්ත.  සමහර දේශපාලකයින් දූෂිතයි.  එතකොට නිලධාරින්?  අර වගේම සමහර නිලධාරින් දූෂිතයි.  ඒක තමයි තිත්ත ඇත්ත.

දේශපාලකයා වසර පහකට වරක් ජනතාව ඉදිරියට එන නිසා ජනතාවට බයයි. සමහරු එහෙමහ ඇවිත් සමත් වෙනවා. සමහරු අසමත් වෙනවා. ඒ නිසාම දේශපාලකයා නිලධාරියාට වඩා ජනතාවට බයෙන් තමයි වැඩ  කරන්නේ.  නිලධාරින් කවදාවත් ජනතාව ඉදිරියට එන්නේ නැති නිසා එහෙම බයක් නෑ.  දේශපාලකයාට වරදින තුරු බලා ගෙන ඉන්න විපක්ෂයක් ඉන්නවා.  නිලධාරින්ට එහෙම එකක් නෑ.  අපි බලයට පත් වුණාමත් වැඩ කරන්න වෙන්නේ මේ නිලධාරින් සමග නේද කියලා හිතමින් විපක්ෂය නිලධාරින් පිළිබඳ කටයුතු කරන්නේ ප්‍රවේශමෙන්.

2002 දී සිහළ උරුමයේ ක්‍රියාකාරකමකට පරිත්‍යාගයක් ඉල්ලන්න මමත් චම්පික රණවක මන්ත්‍රිවරයාත් ව්‍යාපාරිකයෙක් හමු වුණා.  ඒ පරිත්‍යාගය නම් ලැබුණේ නෑ.  නමුත් මසුරන් කතාවක් කිව්වා.  දේශපාලකයෙකුට ආයෝජනය කලොත් ප්‍රතිලාභ තිබෙන්නේ අවුරුදු පහයි.  නිලධාරියෙකුට ආයෝජනය කලොත් ප්‍රතිලාභ අවුරුදු 30ක් 35ක් ලබා ගන්න පුළුවන්.  ඒ නිසා දේහපාලනීකරනයට බියෙන් ස්වාදීන කරන්න කතාකරන එක ඊට වඩා භයානකයි.

ස්වාධීන වූ මහ බැංකුව සිදු කලේ කුමක්ද?

පසුගිය අවුරුද්දේ ආණ්ඩුව මහ බැංකුව ස්වාධීන කළ යුතුයි කියලා පනතක් ගෙනාවා.  මහ බැංකුව මහජනතාවට වෙනුවට ජාත්‍යන්තරයට වග කියන ආයතනයක් වෙන බව අපි දැක්ක නිසා අපි ඒකට විරුද්ධ වුණා.  නමුත් විපක්ෂයේ බහුතරය ඒකට හුරේ දැම්මා.  මේක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බේරා ගන්න බැරි බව තේරුණු නිසා අපි අධිකරණයට ගිහිල්ලා සංශෝධන 72ක් නිර්දේශ කර ගත්තා.  ඒ සංශෝධනත් කර ගත්තේ නැතිනම් මහ බැංකුව නූල කැඩුණු සරුංගලයක් වෙන්න තිබුණා.  හැමෝම මහ උජාරුවට කතා කරන ස්වාධීනත්වය ලබා දුන්නාම ඒ අය මොකද කලේ? ලංකාවේ කිසිම ආයතනයක නොකළ ආකාරයකට ලක්ෂ ගණනින් වැටුප් වැඩි කර ගත්තා.

විවාදයකට එන්න –  මහබැංකු අධිපතිට අභියෝගයක්

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුව දිගින් දිගටම පාඩු ලබන අතරේ තමයි ලක්ෂ ගණනින් වැටුප් වැඩි කර ගත්තේ කියන එක මම පසුගිය 6දා මාධ්‍ය හමුවක් තියලා රටට දැනුම් දුන්නා.  2023 මහ බැංකු වාර්තාවට අනුව  ශ්‍රී ලංකා මහ බැංකුවේ 2023 වසරේ ශුද්ධ අලාභය රුපියල් බිලියන 114ක්.  2022 වසරේ ශුද්ධ අලාභය බිලියන 374ක්.  මහ බැංකුව ලංකා ඉතිහාසයේ ලොකුම වැටුප් වැඩි වීම ලබා දෙන්නේ ආයතනය අඛණ්ඩව වසර ගණනාවක් බිලියන ගණනින් පාඩු ලබන අවස්ථාවකයි.  ඊයේ මහ බැංකු අධිපතිතුමා මාධ්‍ය හමුවක මට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වමින් කිව්වා මහ බැංකුව තිබෙන්නේ ලාභ ලබන්න නොවේ ආර්ථික ස්ථාවරත්වය හදන්න.  ලාභ පාඩු මත මහ බැංකුව සාර්ථක ද අසාර්ථක ද කියලා තීරණය කරන්නේ අවබෝධයක් නැති අය කියලා.  මහ බැංකු අධිපතිවරයා ඉතාම නින්දිත අයුරින් දේශපාලකයෙකුවත් නොකරන අයුරින් මගේ ප්‍රකාශය තමන්ට වාසි වන අයුරින් වෙනස් කරගෙන තමන් හදා ගත්තු ප්‍රකාශයට පිලිතුරු දීලා මම ඇත්තටම මතු කළ කාරණයට පිලිතුරු දීම මග හරිනවා.

මම එතුමාට ආරාධනා කරනවා මගේ කතාව සාවධානව ඇහුම්කන් දෙන්න කියලා.  පාඩු ලැබීම නිසා මහ බැංකුව ආයතනයක් විධියට අසාර්ථකයි කියලා මම කොතැනවත් කියලා නෑ.  මහ බැංකුව තිබෙන්නේ ලාභ උපයන්න නොවේ. ඒ ගැන විවාදයක් නෑ.  නමුත් ලක්ෂ ගණනින් වැටුප් වැඩි කර ගෙන ඉතිහාසයේ ලොකුම වැටුප් වැඩි කිරීම කර ගත්තේ දිගින් දිගටම පාඩු ලබන වාතාවරණයකයි කියලායි මම කිව්වේ.   මහ බැංකුව පිළිබඳ මට අවබෝධයක් තිබෙනවා ද කියා එතුමාට බලා ගන්න අවශ්‍ය නම් මහ බැංකුවේ වැටුප් වැඩි කර ගැනීම හෝ වත්මන් ආර්ථික අර්බූදයට මහ බැංකුව නිර්දේශ කරන විසඳුමේ සාර්ථකත්වය පිලිබඳ මා සමග විවාදයකට එන්න කියා මම එතුමාට අභියෝග කරනවා.

අපනයන කුඩු – මණ්ඩල ලාභ ලබයි

අපේ රට මුහුණ දී තිබෙන විදේශ විනිමය අර්බූදය නැතිනම් ඩොලර් අර්බූදය විසඳා ගැනීමට තිබෙන හොඳම මාර්ගය තමයි පිටරටට බඩු විකුණලා අපනයන ආදායම වැඩි කර ගැනීම.  නමුත් ආණ්ඩුව කර ගැනීමට අසමත් වෙලා තිබෙන්නෙත් ඒකමයි.  2018න් පසු අඩුම අපනයන ආදායම වාර්තා වෙන්නේ 2023 දී.  විදුලිය පැය 12ක් කපපු දින ගණන් ඉන්ධන පෝලිම් ගෑස් පෝලිම් තිබුණු මාස තුනක් රට අකර්මන්‍ය කළ අරගලයක් තිබුණු 2022ට වඩා ඩොලර් මිලියන 1,200කින් අපනයන ආදායම අඩු වෙලා.  මේකට ප්‍රධානම හේතුව විදුලි බිල දරා ගන්න බැරිව කර්මාන්ත ශාලා වසා දැමීමයි කියලා අපට කියන්නේ මහ බැංකු වාර්තාවමයි.  වාර්තාවට අනුව ඒක පුද්ගල විදුලි පරිභෝජනය රට කළුවරේ තිබුණු 2022 දී ඒකක 655යි.  නමුත් විදුලි කප්පාදුවක් නොතිබුණු 2023 දී 642 දක්වා පහත වැටිලා.  හැබැයි විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලය නම් රුපියල් බිලියන 60ක් ලාභ ලබලා.  කර්මාන්ත වසා දමලා රස්සාවල් නැති කරලා අපනයන කුඩු පට්ටම් කරලා ලබන ලාභය කුමැටැ කියලයි අපට විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලයෙන් අහන්න වෙන්නේ.

දැන් විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලය විදුලි බිල අඩු කරන්න සූදානම්ලු.  කර්මාන්ත වැහිලා ගිහින් අපනයන ආදායම වැටිලා රැකියාවල් නැති වුණාට පස්සෙ විදුලි බිල අඩු කරනවා කියන්නේ හරියට අශ්වයා පැනලා ගියාට පස්සේ ඉස්තාලය වහනවා වගේ වැඩක්.  අපි විදුලි බිලේ අසාධාරණය පෙන්වන්න සම්මන්ත්‍රණ දෙකක් පැවැත්තුවා. මාධ්‍ය හමු ගණනාවක් පැවැත්තුවා.  අනවශ්‍ය ලෙස විදුලි බිල වැඩි කිරීමේ ආදිනව කිව්වත් ඒ ගැන ආණ්ඩුව අවධානය යොමු කලේ නෑ.  ඇත්තෙන්ම ආණ්ඩුව උත්සාහ කලේ වත්මන් විදුලි බිල දැවැන්ත ලෙස වැඩි කරලා ඉතිහාසය පුරා විදුලි බල මණ්ඩලය ලැබූ පාඩුව අය කර ගන්නයි.

පිරිවැය නිරූපිත මිල ක්‍රමයක් වෙනුවෙන් අපි හැමදාමත් පෙනී හිටියා.  විදුලි නිෂ්පාදනයේ පිරිවැය විදුලි පාරිභෝගිකයාගෙන් මිස වෙන කාගෙන්වත් අය කිරීම සාධාරණ නෑ.  නමුත් මෙතැන වුණේ අතීත විදුලි පාරිභෝගිකයාගේ පිරිවැය වත්මන් විදුලි පාරිභෝගිකයාගෙන් අය කර ගැනීමයි.  ඒක කරන්න ගිහිල්ලා තමයි අපේ නිෂ්පාදන පිරිවැය ඉහල ගිහිල්ලා අපට ලෝක වෙළඳපොලේ තරග කරන්න බැරි වෙලා අපේ අපනයන ඇදගෙන වැටුණේ.

අවම පිරිවැයෙන් විදුලිය ජනනය කිරීම

අපි නැවතත් යෝජිත විදුලිබල පනතට යමු. අපේ ජනන සැලැස්මක් හදන කොට අපේ පදනම් ප්‍රතිපත්තිය වුණේ අවම පිරිවැයෙන් විදුලිය ජනනය කිරීම.  මොකද පවතින විදුලි බල පනතේ ඒක සඳහන් වෙනවා.  එහෙම නීතිමය විධිවිධානයක් තියාගෙන තමයි රු31ට විකුණන විදුලි ඒකකයක් ඩීසල් විදුලි බලාගාර වලින් රු 140/-ට මිල දී ගත්තේ.  අවම පිරිවැයෙන් විදුලි ජනන ප්‍රතිපත්තිය මේ පනතේ අරමුණක් ලෙස සඳහන් වෙලා නෑ.  එතකොට විවිධ සාධාරණීකරණයන් ඉදිරිපත් කරමින් ඩීසල් විදුලි බලාගාර වගේ වැඩි මිල විකල්ප වලට වුණත් යන්න මේ පනතෙන් සිදුරක් නිර්මාණය කරලා තිබෙනවා.

ඒ විතරක් නොවේ.  අපේ බලවත් විරෝධය මැද 2022 දී විදුලි බලය සැපයීමට තිබුණු තරගකාරි ප්‍රසම්පාදන ක්‍රියාවලිය අවලංගු කලා.  ඒ නිසාම අවම පිරිවැය ප්‍රතිපත්තිය මේ පනතේ සඳහන් වීම අත්‍යාවශ්‍යයි.  එහෙම නොකලොත් නව පනත හරහා බලාපොරොත්තු වෙන විදුලි බිල අඩු කිරීමේ අරමුණ ඉටු කර ගන්න බැරි වෙනවා.

විදුලි උත්තපාදන ක්‍රියාවලියේ විදේශ සහභාගිත්වය ජාතික ආරක්ෂාවට තර්ජනයක් නොවෙන්න ඕනි.  ඒ නිසා විදේශ සහභාගිත්වය සමස්ත නිෂ්පාදනයෙන් උපරිම සීමාවක් මේ පනතට හඳුන්වා දිය යුතුයි කියා යෝජනා කරනවා. ඒ උපරිම සීමාව පනතේම සදහන් කරලා තිබුනොත්, ඒ විධිවිධාන වලින් පිට ගිහිල්ලා විදුලි නිෂ්පාදනයට යම් සමාගමක් ගෙනාවොත් ඒ පිලිබදව අධිකරණ ක්‍රියාමාර්ග ගන්න පුළුවන් වෙනවා.

ජාතික පද්ධති ක්‍රියාකරු වැදගත් ඇයි ?

නව පනතේ පිහිටුවන ආයතන වලින් වැදගත්ම ආයතනය විධියට අපි දකින්නේ ජාතික පද්ධති ක්‍රියාකරු කියන සමාගම.  මේ සමාගම තමයි කුමන සමාගම් වලින් කුමන මිලකට කොපමණ ප්‍රමාණයක් විදුලිය මිල දී ගන්නවා ද කියන එක තීරණය වන්නේ.  ඒක 100%ක්ම රජයට අයිති සමාගමක්.  ඔතැන තමයි වැඩිම දූෂණයට ඉඩ තිබෙන තැන.  එක් එක් සමාගමෙන් වැඩි ඒකක ප්‍රමාණයක් මිල දී ගන්න අත යට ගනුදෙනු සිදු වෙන බවට චෝදනා එල්ල වෙන්නේ ඔය සමාගමට.  ඒ නිසා මේ සමාගම විනිවිද භාවයෙන් කටයුතු කිරීම ඉතා වැදගත්.  සමාගමේ විගණනය කරපු ගිණුම් ප්‍රසිද්ධ වෙන්නේ ගනුදෙනුව වෙලා වසර එකහාමාරකට පස්සේ.  එතකොට කෝච්චිය ගිහිල්ලා ඉවරයි.  ඒ නිසා සෑම දිනකම කුමන සමාගමෙන් කුමන මිලට කොපමණ විදුලි ඒකක ප්‍රමාණයක් මිල දී ගත්තා ද කියන එක දිනපතා තමන්ගේ වෙබ් අඩවියේ දාන්න ඕනි.  ඒක පනතට සිදුවිය යුතු අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය සංශෝධනයක් විධියට අපි දකිනවා.

විදුලි පාරිභෝගියන්ට කර්මාන්ත කරුවන්ට තියෙන ලොකුම ප්‍රශ්නය වන අවම පිරිවැයෙන් විදුලිය ලබාගැනීමේ අයිතිය මේ පනත තුලින්වත් ඉටුකරගන්න හැකිවේවා කියලා අපි ප්‍රර්ථනා කරනවා.

UN/UNHRC/US & Allies hypocrisy – comparison of Sri Lanka & the Gaza Conflict

May 9th, 2024

Shenali D Waduge

This is not to present a notion that Israel is right or wrong, or that Sri Lanka is right or wrong but to question UN’s treatment of Member states & the applicability of the UN Charter & the principles of equality & non-discrimination to Member states. UNGA has condemned Israel over 120 times. UNHRC has condemned Israel over 40 times. US has vetoed over 40 Resolutions against Israel but is spearheading resolutions against Sri Lanka in connivance with the UN. How fair is this to Sri Lanka?

Hamas was founded in 1987 an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. US & EU designate it as a terrorist organization. Its 1988 charter called for the murder of Jews & destruction of Israel both calls were changed in 2017. Hamas first suicide bombing was on April 1993. It has a political wing & a military wing & won elections in 2006.

All Palestinians do not support Hamas just as all Tamils do not support LTTE. Yet Hamas & LTTE claim to be representing their people.

On 7 October 2023 Hamas is alleged to have attacked military bases & towns in southern Israel as a result of which 1200 people were killed, 845 were civilians & took some 240 Israeli & nationals of other countries as hostage. UN claimed reasonable grounds to believe’ some Hamas members committed sexual violence against hostages on 7 October.

On 26 July 2006, LTTE terrorists blocked the sluice gates, committing a genocide by denying water to some 40,000 farmers & thereafter began attacking villages.

Following the 7 October 2003 attack by Hamas, Israel launched a counter attack on Gaza (a strip of land only 140sq.miles) & home to 2.3million people.

Regarding denying water as a war crime, the Sri Lankan Government ordered its troops to re-open the sluice gates & when doing so faced onslaught of LTTE resulting in troops returning fire.

The case of Israel-Palestine & Sri Lanka-Tamils is somewhat different, however the comparison is being made to show the double-standards & hypocrisies within the halls of the UN that delivers lavish speeches preaching fair-play & equity to all UN Member States.

Since Israel’s bombing on Gaza UNOCHA has been releasing reports on Gazans killed, injured & missing. WHO declared that in the 1st month at least 160 Gazan children died. Of the 2.3million Gazans 1.7million, that it 85% are IDPs. Israeli siege has resulted in electricity blackouts, blockade of fuel, food, water & medicines. UN has called it a crisis of humanity”.

We are all preached about the 1949 Geneva Conventions on international humanitarian law (not human rights) as well as universal rules on warfare that prohibit punitive sieges, collective punishment, hostage-taking, torture, cruel & inhuman treatment, targeting civilians, civilian infrastructure, forcible displacement of civilian populations. ICC defines this as an act of genocide. All parties including terrorists have to abide by the laws though they are not recognized as lawful combatants”. All parties must avoid disproportionate harm. This means that in a hostile situation there is likely to be harm but it cannot be in excess.

If Hamas’s October 7 attacks on Israel is said to have caused greater harm to civilians than military as well as taking hostages – why were these same standards not applied to Sri Lanka when LTTE closed the sluice gates denying water to 40,000 civilians and thereafter took some 300,000 hostages to be kept as human shields and even killed those that attempted to flee LTTE?

Israel’s bombardment on Gaza schools that housed civilians causing thousands of casualties as well as destruction to homes & flats in Gaza which has killed only a small number of Hamas but a larger number of civilians is claimed as disproportionate” but UNSG has not appointed a panel like the 3 member Darusman Palen appointed for Sri Lanka & US-UK& EU has not spearheaded any resolutions or UN investigations against Israel like they did & do against Sri Lanka, while there are no Sir John Holmes to visit Gaza & claim the UN has failed” as he did to Sri Lanka.

If the UN & international community are powerless in Gaza – from where did they get all their teeth against Sri Lanka? Is it because Sri Lanka is a small powerless nation unlike Israel?

The hypocrisy in handling Israel & Sri Lanka undoubtedly illustrates the administrative, structural & policy failures of the UN, in the UN & by the UN. UN’s attempt at reforms produced UNHRC which has turned to be more biased than all. If R2P was promoted for Sri Lanka, why is it not being applied to Israel-Gaza?

Why is the US inactive against Israel but active against Sri Lanka? All of the successive resolutions against Sri Lanka were drafted & canvassed inside the UN by US. How come the same allegations used against Sri Lanka by US & Allies do not apply to Israel. Ironically, the Allies that stand against Sri Lanka, stand with Israel. Hysterical is that the statements on the allegations issued by US & Allies against Sri Lanka are the direct opposite when used to side with Israel. Something is definitely amiss!

In fact US & Allies that demanded a ceasefire in Sri Lanka going so far as to even despatch the foreign ministers of UK & France to Sri Lanka in 2009, have voted to prevent a ceasefire. On October 27, 2023 when UNSG invoked a rarely-used Article 99 calling for a ceasefire alongside 120 UN member states, US vetoed it.  The US has used its veto powers 30 times to protect Israel. US has also protected Israel from ICC prosecution even sanctioning ICC staff!

The US that went to town about denial of humanitarian aid in Sri Lanka abstained from voting on 22 December when UNSC approved a resolution calling for more humanitarian aid to Gaza.

The UNSC did not get involved in Sri Lanka but we know how sheepishly the UNSG’s private 3 member panel ended up leaking their report instead of tabling it at the UNGA or UNSC & that has been the basis of the resolutions & UN investigations against Sri Lanka which we continue to question the legality.

The Genocide Convention is an equal farce – with parties and groups lavishly using the term genocide” without any foundational basis except technology-used social media PR stunts & campaigns to do Goebbels propaganda on genocide without any facts or evidence. When such gets accepted by the UN apparatus itself, their hypocrisy is further highlighted. The fundamental question of where are the dead bodies, the skeletons, the names of the alleged dead never make it to any reports. But what gets media mileage is heavily funded trained documentaries that hire people to cry & read out well-rehearsed stories of genocide” and these are given witness protection” while their stories are gagged as confidential” and purposely not released for 20-40 years enabling the truth to be sealed from public domain.

Why is UNSG not commissioning a 3member panel on Israel’s siege like he did to Sri Lanka – if legality of this appointment is what is preventing such an appointment against Sri Lanka, why is the legality of the Resolutions & OISL against Sri Lanka not investigated?

If UN calls for action against Hamas, why did it not do so when LTTE committed acts of suicide, assassinations, bombings across 30 years in Sri Lanka?

If Israel is being accused of denying food, fuel medicines etc what has the UN done – when Sri Lanka was falsely accused of same, what did UN do?

When UN & UNHRC failed Sri Lanka while LTTE bombed across 30 years, why did the UN/UNHRC suddenly go into action after the fall of the LTTE popping out all the law books against Sri Lanka but doing sweet nothing as LTTE amassed funds  & procured arms globally, ran campaigns from western capitals and unleashed brutal crimes across 30 years? What did UN/UNHRC do to stop LTTE recruiting children into child soldiers inspite of appointing a Sri Lankan as a rapporteur? What did UN do to stop LTTE from training children to even commit suicide biting the cyanide capsule? How many children would have died because UN did nothing.

Then months after LTTE ground force was militarily defeated along with the LTTE leader, from nowhere came allegations of dead” manipulating the legally questionable Darusman panel’s report statement may have been killed”. Yet, there were no dead bodies, no mass graves and certainly no skeletons or even names of supposed 40,000 or more dead. More importantly, those who claim to have footage of people being killed cannot show any mass graves that were dug during hostilities to stuff 40,000 dead bodies. The UNSG toured the areas that the conflict took place by helicopter with media. They should have been able to see newly dug graves but none existed. David Gray of Reuters even toured the battlefield in April 2009 & reported Sri Lankan soldiers sharing their own food rations with civilians. However, fast forward to Gaza there are actual footage of people in Gaza who have died being dumped into makeshift graves & this is what should alarm UNHRC into action. The question is why are they not making the same noise as they did to Sri Lanka? Just count the statements issued by successive UNHRC heads since 2006 to come to terms with the bias inside the UN by its officials. With so much of lies a bogus Truth & Reconciliation is also being forced down on Sri Lanka as part of aid package by western governments. There are even calls for Tribunals without even being able to present any dead bodies or skeletons. We know the outcome of the Yugoslavia tribunal which took 23 years spending $2billion & omitted NATO crimes from investigations, eventually the Serbian leader was exonerated after he died mysteriously in prison – the allegations of 40,000 dead in Serbia that was used to call for a Tribunal ended up with only 2788 dead & that buried the mass genocide” drama. So most of us right thinking people in Sri Lanka know where all these biased calls are going & we can well sense the objective which has nothing to do with justice or truth.

Other than issuing lavish speeches against Israel/Hamas– is UN/UNHRC following the same procedures applied against Sri Lanka, ironically US & Allies are supporting Israel while they were on a witch hunt against Sri Lanka.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6A6hT1XjMY

 (this is in a hospital)

Shenali D Waduge

An open letter to Sinha Ratnatunga Editor of the Sunday Times

May 9th, 2024

By C.A.Chandraprema

Dear Sinha,
The 57th session of the Human Rights Council is to be held from 9 September 2024 to 9 October 2024. Under the provisions of resolution 51/1 which was passed against Sri Lanka in October 2022, the UN Human Rights Commissioner is due to present a written update on the situation of human rights in Sri Lanka and a comprehensive report ‘that includes further options for advancing accountability’ and both are to be discussed in an interactive dialogue at the 57th session of the UNHRC. The 57th session will coincide with the Presidential election which under the provisions of Article 31(3) of Sri Lanka’s Constitution, has to be held between the 17th September and 17th October 2024. Hence we are faced with a situation where the President and the government in power in Sri Lanka when the 57th session of the UNHRC begins, may no longer be in power by the time the session end
Since Sri Lanka should not be facing a process in the UNHRC in the midst of a crucial election, the correct thing for the government to do would be to arrange for a postponement in taking up Sri Lanka in the UNHRC as was done in 2015 after the yahapalana government came into power. In that instance, the Sri Lankan issue was put off from the March session in 2015 to the September/October session the same year. The government should perhaps make arrangements to have this matter taken up at the organizational meeting which will be held before the 57th session of the UNHRC later this year. After the presidential and parliamentary polls which are likely to be held in quick succession later this year and early next year, the next big issue for Sri Lanka will be the process in the UNHRC.
In 2021 and 2022, I made note of certain reports and opinions expressed by your political editor on matters relating to the UN Human Rights Council which I wish to bring to your attention because the English language print media in particular has a special responsibility to be accurate in reporting and to refrain from confusing or misleading the public. The issues I highlight will be of relevance to upcoming the 57th session of the UNHRC as well. The 12 June 2022 column written by the Sunday Times political editor had the following paragraph:
In February 2020 Sri Lanka withdrew from the co-sponsorship of US-backed resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council on Sri Lanka Resolution 40/1. In March, the same year, the Council adopted a resolution successfully with wording that Sri Lanka could not control or negotiate on the matter. Since then, approaches to UNHRC sessions have been ad hoc and have led to a litany of blunders. A retired foreign service career officer said the attempt to withdraw from the resolution was a ‘grave mistake.’ That saw the birth of resolution (41/6) which, he claimed was intrusive, damaging to the country and even the military.” This included provisions for countries to use universal jurisdiction to deal with human rights violators. Otherwise, he argued, there was still room to negotiate on the words in Resolution 40/6.”
Before going on to weightier matters, I should point out that that there are some errors in the numeronyms of the resolutions and the dates mentioned in this paragraph. As your political editor states, Sri Lanka did indeed withdraw from co-sponsorship of resolution 40/1 in February 2020 during the tenure of Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardene. (The substantive resolution that Sri Lanka withdrew from was actually resolution 30/1 of 2015. Resolutions 34/1 of 2017 and 40/1 of 2019 were only resolutions brought to extend resolution 30/1.) To say that Sri Lanka withdrew from resolution 40/1 in February 2020 and that the UNHRC adopted another resolution in March ‘the same year’ is not accurate. The next resolution against Sri Lanka (resolution 46/1) was adopted only in March 2021 after resolution 40/1 of 2019 had run its course.
In the final sentences of the paragraph from the 12 June 2022 article quoted above, your political editor refers to a resolution 41/6 when he should have been referring to resolution 46/1. The former is a resolution on eliminating discrimination against women and girls passed in July 2019 and the latter is the resolution passed against Sri Lanka in March 2021. At the end of the paragraph he refers to a resolution 40/6 which is a resolution on cultural diversity passed in March 2019 whereas what he may have been referring to was resolution 40/1. (If one speaks of negotiating the wording of the resolution, what matters is the substantive resolution 30/1 and not resolutions 34/1 and 40/1 which only extended the application of resolution 30/1.)
This is not ‘trivia’ pertaining to Geneva. One has to be very familiar with what is what before writing about these matters, because you could easily end up confusing the public who rely on the print media to obtain information and to form their own opinions. Due to his own obvious lack of familiarity with the subject, your political editor has ended up misinforming the public on much more substantive matters. In the paragraph quoted above, he opines that Sri Lanka’s withdrawal from resolution 30/1 led to the adoption of another resolution the wording of which Sri Lanka could not control or negotiate on. On what grounds can anyone assume that Sri Lanka could ‘control’ or ‘negotiate’ on the wording of resolution 30/1 of 2015? The yahapalana government co-sponsored resolution 30/1 in 2015 and it was extended in 2017 and 2019 but during that entire period there were no negotiations on the wording of resolution 30/1.
If there was even a remote possibility of negotiating on the wording of resolution 30/1, the yahapalana government would have done that behind the scenes and those changes would have been incorporated in resolution 34/1 or resolution 40/1 which were passed in 2017 and 2019 respectively. The yahapalana government was taking a beating domestically on account of having co-sponsored resolution 30/1 and they had every incentive to re-negotiate its wording if that was possible. When the last yahapalana foreign minister Tilak Marapana addressed the UNHRC in Geneva in March 2019, he highlighted among many other things, why it is legally impossible to establish special courts to try war crimes with the participation of foreign judges and prosecutors etc. – a provision that was central to resolution 30/1.
The reason why the last yahapalana foreign minister had to go to Geneva and speak at cross-purposes with resolution 30/1 which his own government had co-sponsored a few years earlier, was because no such room for negotiation existed. Once a resolution is passed with the co-sponsorship of the country concerned, that places a logical block on further negotiation. The wording in resolutions have to be negotiated on before it is passed, not afterwards. The tenor of
Foreign Minister Tilak Marapana’s speech of March 2019 differs very little in substance from those made by his successors up to now. Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardene’s withdrawal from resolution 30/1 in February 2020 was a natural follow up to the speech made by his predecessor Minister Marapana in March 2019.
According to the paragraph quoted above, an unnamed ‘retired foreign service career officer’ is supposed to have told your political editor that withdrawing from resolution 30/1 was a ‘grave mistake’ and that such withdrawal led to the birth of resolution (46/1) which was ‘intrusive, damaging to the country and even the military’ and that resolution 46/1 included provisions for countries to use universal jurisdiction to deal with human rights violators. Your political editor has been able to write such nonsense and get away with it because only a very few people in Sri Lanka are really familiar with what is going on in the UNHRC. Fewer still have actually read the resolutions and related documents.
Undoubtedly, resolution 46/1 which was passed in March 2021 replacing resolution 30/1, was intrusive, damaging to the country and the military which is why Sri Lanka refused to accept it. However resolution 30/1 was far more intrusive, and far more damaging to the country and the military than resolution 46/1. I cannot go into the demerits of resolution 30/1 here because that would require another article of this length. However for the time being, suffice it to say that it was not resolution 46/1 that introduced provisions for countries to use universal jurisdiction to deal with alleged human rights violations in Sri Lanka as your political editor misleadingly states in the paragraph quoted above.
That universal jurisdiction be used against alleged violators of human rights in Sri Lanka was one of the recommendations in the report of the UN Human Rights High Commissioner (the OISL Report) of 26 September 2015. The yahapalana government accepted the OISL report when they co-sponsored resolution 30/1 through operative paragraph 1 of that resolution. Thus you will see that your political editor has been conveying misinformation to the public.
I also wish to draw your attention to the political column in the Sunday Times on 7 March 2021 under the banner headline UNHRC sessions: Govt.’s diplomatic blunders galore without proper strategy”. It also had a subheading stating Ambassador Chandraprema involved in procedural errors; thrice overruled by core-group envoys”. The passages in that article regarding the procedural errors I am supposed to have made were as follows:
…Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative at the United Nations in Geneva. Not quite well versed in the intricacies of diplomatic conduct, including in seeking the negotiations of the current text, he did cause some procedural errors…
When general observations and comments ended, with remarks for and against Sri Lanka, the United Kingdom’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva, Robert Last, declared that the session now reviews line by line the draft resolution. Envoy Chandraprema intervened and declared that the operative paragraphs (OP) 6 and 7 should be first taken up. Deputy Ambassador Last turned down the request pointing out that it is customary to review line by line in order of the paragraphs.
Of course, China’s delegate to the UN in Geneva stood up for Ambassador Chandraprema. He said the operative paragraphs 6 and 7 be considered by the chair first. Also joining in was the Pakistani delegate, who suggested that they move to Operative Paragraphs 6 and 7. It was of no avail.
At this stage of the informal discussion, Deputy Ambassador Last gave the chair to Rita French, the Human Rights Counsellor of the UK Permanent Mission in Geneva. She resumed the line-by-line discussion when Ambassador Chandraprema insisted once more in first dealing with OP 6 and 7. She said they would discuss the two paragraphs when it came to that part of the resolution. The Sri Lankan envoy’s pleas were rejected, twice by the Deputy Ambassador and once by the Human Rights Counsellor for the UK mission. Does this not reflect badly on Sri Lanka, a country which in the past has not been short of diplomatic skills?
Once again, your political editor has got basic facts mixed up. In the passages above, he refers to Rita French as the Human Rights Counsellor of the UK Permanent Mission in Geneva and to Robert Last as the United Kingdom’s Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva. Rita French was actually the UK’s Global Human Rights Ambassador and Deputy Permanent Representative in Geneva and Robert Last was the Human Rights Counsellor of the UK Permanent Mission in Geneva.
Be that as it may, according to what your political editor wrote on 7 March 2021 the ‘procedural error’ that the SL Ambassador is supposed to have made is in requesting that operative paragraphs 6 and 7 be considered first when the draft resolution against Sri Lanka was taken up for discussion at the informal meetings. Resolutions are put up for discussion by its penholders at informal meetings. These are as the name indicates, ‘informal meetings’ and not official sessions of the UNHRC. There is no ‘procedural error’ if the country concerned requests that certain paragraphs be taken up first. If I had made a ‘procedural error’ as your political editor alleges, that request would not have been fully supported by some of the most important players in the UNHRC as your columnist himself has indicated in the passages quoted above. Your political editor further states the following in his article of 7 March 2021:
In a statement to the Interactive Dialogue on UN Human Rights High Commissioner Michele Bachelet’s Report on Sri Lanka, Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena declared on February 24 (2020) that Sri Lanka rejects” her report. He said it had unjustifiably broadened its scope and mandate further, incorporating many issues of governance and matters that are essentially domestic for any self-respecting, sovereign country.” He called on the UN Human Rights Council to reject the new resolution which is based on this Report,” and the issue be brought to a close.
A rather strange participant at the informal dialogue on Monday over its contents was C.A. Chandraprema, Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative at the United Nations in Geneva…
…the important question that begs answer is why Ambassador Chandraprema had to participate, that too at such high level. The event was not for envoys but at a lower level. Was it a change of mind by the Government or did he believe his intervention would make a
difference? If that be the case, why did the Government tell the Sri Lankan people that both the Report and the Resolution had been rejected?
…If the intention was to pressure the Human Rights Council to back out from some provisions in the Resolution, why then should it have been rejected?..”
The Gotabaya Rajapaksa government rejected and withdrew from only from UNHRC resolution 30/1. They did not disengage completely from the processes in the UN Human Rights Council as that would have left the field open for detractors to say whatever they like and do whatever they like without the wider community of nations having the benefit of hearing Sri Lanka’s side of the story – which would be highly inimical to a small nation like Sri Lanka. As far as draft resolution 46/1 of March 2021 was concerned, the government policy was to remain engaged and negotiate until all avenues for negotiation were exhausted. Hence I, as the then Ambassador to the UN in Geneva, participated personally at all the informals on draft resolution 46/1 held on the 1st , 2nd, 8th and 10th March 2021.
In the passages quoted above, your political editor has expressed the opinion that Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to the UN should not have been present at the informals and that Sri Lanka should have been represented by a junior diplomat. Countries that are at the receiving end in the UNHRC react differently to the informals on resolutions brought against them. Some countries ignore the informals totally basically telling the penholders to do as they please and even telling friendly countries not to attend the informals or speak on their behalf. Other countries send junior diplomats to the informals and take a lukewarm attitude to the proceedings choosing to contest the resolution only during the vote. Some countries remain fully engaged, in the informals as Sri Lanka was in 2021 and 2022. Everything depends on the decision made by the respective government.
When Sri Lanka is faced with an issue of the magnitude of a UNHRC resolution, the negotiations in that regard should be carried out by the Ambassador himself instead of by a junior diplomat. Even though your political editor has criticized the Sri Lankan Ambassador’s participation at the informals on resolution 46/1 in March 2021, that engagement was received very well by many countries during the informals and also during ‘the explanation of the vote after the vote’ at the end of the 46th session of the UNHRC. Some of the comments made about Sri Lanka’s participation and engagement on the 1st March 2021 at the first informal were as follows (taken verbatim from the recording):
Uruguay – We welcome the presence of the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka in this informal consultation which is in itself is a very good sign and I look forward to hearing the comments of the country concerned”.
Ireland – It is very positive to see the Ambassador of Sri Lanka participating in today’s informal negotiations. We are looking forward to hearing from the country concerned and engaging in constructive dialogue”.
Finland – I would like to thank the Sri Lankan permanent representative for being with us today and engaging in the dialogue”.
New Zealand – We also welcome the participation of the permanent representative of Sri Lanka as the country concerned and Sri Lanka’s engagement with the core group”.
Brazil – We congratulate the Sri Lankan Ambassador for being here and conveying the points of view of the govt. which we have been taking note of”.
Indonesia – I very much appreciate the presence of the ambassador of Sri Lanka and his thoughts”.
Mexico – We welcome the participation of the mission of Sri Lanka at this meeting. It is much better to have their presence here and their own perspective than being absent and us not being able to hear from them, so I really appreciate that and it’s going to enrich our discussion”.
Sweden – We appreciate the participation of Sri Lanka in today’s informal and urge Sri Lanka to consider a consensual approach”.
International Commission of Jurists – I recognize the presence of the mission of Sri Lanka and their engagement in this dialogue”.
Over three weeks after the first informal meeting, on the final day of the 46th Session after resolution 46/1 on Sri Lanka was voted on, many countries mentioned Sri Lanka’s participation at the informals in a positive light even in the written explanation of their vote as follows:
United Kingdom – We regret that agreement could not be reached with Sri Lanka during the four informal meetings but we thank the distinguished Ambassador of Sri Lanka for his participation”.
Philippines – We note that Sri Lanka engaged in the informals in good faith even after the failure of the OHCHR to adhere to high standards of transparency, objectivity and fairness in reporting”.
Pakistan – We appreciate Sri Lanka’s constructive engagement throughout the informal consultations”.
Brazil – We commend the participation of the Sri Lankan Ambassador during the informal consultations as proof of goodwill which certainly contributed to a more open and balanced approach during the discussions”.
Indonesia – We appreciate the continued and active engagement of the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka during the informal negotiations. Such engagement shows the willingness and the determination of the government of Sri Lanka to provide comments explanations and amendments to the draft as well as advancing dialogue with the core group. Indonesia values such engagement”.
These comments indicate that the government’s decision to remain fully engaged in the process met its diplomatic objective. This active engagement with the wider community of nations was why only 20 of the 47 member states of the UNHRC voted in favour of the current resolution against Sri Lanka (resolution 51/1) which was passed in October 2022. This engagement was also the reason why 38 speakers representing 43 nations spoke in support of Sri Lanka at the
interactive dialogue on Sri Lanka held during the 51st session in September 2022. (Saudi Arabia spoke on behalf of all six nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council.)
Your political editor has queried in the paragraph above …If the intention was to pressure the Human Rights Council to back out from some provisions in the Resolution, why then should it have been rejected?..” Firstly, it is not the UN Human Rights Council itself that brings resolutions against countries but groups of penholders. It is the penholders who can include or drop provisions from draft resolutions. Most importantly, if the country concerned is not in agreement with the draft resolution, it has to indicate that disagreement at the informals and contest the resolution when it is taken up for voting in the Council. The country concerned cannot accept a resolution and subsequently seek to amend its wording after it is passed as your political editor seems to suggest.
I bring these matters to your attention well in advance of the 57th session of the UNHRC so that you can instruct your political editor to refrain from confusing or misleading the public with garbled facts and ill-informed opinions. Screenshots of the two articles by your political editor referred to in this letter are attached hereto.
Yours sincerely,
C.A.Chandraprema

ADVICE TO NATIONAL ECONOMIC COUNCIL ON BLUE ECONOMY

May 9th, 2024

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

President Maithripala Sirisena says he decided to establish the National Economic Council to strengthen the national economy by formalizing the economic management in the country.

He said that the objectives of NEC are to increase the export income and develop the local industry.

 He pointed out there is a need for a stronger program for the development of agriculture.  ( like Dudley??or for Dudley ?)

The National Economic Council aims at fulfilling the government’s responsibility for the development of industries”, he said.

He stated that the National Economic Council was established after discussions with the representatives of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, local and international economic specialists, and also Sri Lankan specialists, working abroad.

President Sirisena emphasized that the government will not sign any free trade agreement which will bring injustice or challenge to the local industries and entrepreneurs. ( ETCA ?)

He said some groups that are not related to the business sector are making the business community scared by giving them false information.

 The government is getting into the free trade agreements with foreign countries only by protecting local industries,” he said (humbug!)

.The President pointed out that the state patronage for the development of local industries was not sufficiently done in the past. He said the government will implement a new program within the next few months to encourage and guide small and medium-scale entrepreneurs.

Government is only talking about agriculture and livestock etc..It seems that the concept of BLUE ECONOMY based on harnessing vast resources in the ocean surrounding our country is neglected.

As an example emerging concept of the Blue Economy has been embraced by the Government of Seychelles as a mechanism to realise sustainable economic development based ,around an ocean-based economy.

  Seychelles’ intention is to implement the Blue Economy concept at the national level as a framework to foster an integrated approach to sustainable development programs. The critical gap, however, is the mechanism for its implementation at the national level. Limited, if any, practical information is currently available to countries, notably small states, wishing to implement these concepts.

This is predominately so, as information that does exist focuses primarily on land-based economic development or has a strong focus on conservation rather than on the sustainable use of the investment in an ocean-based economy for national benefit.

( Rice ,Live stock only ??? )

This roadmap will necessarily require the definition of short, medium and long-term actions across a broad range of sectors and will also require fundamental changes to the traditional institutional arrangements that exist to support the management of marine sectors and resources in Sri Lanka  

A coordinated, whole of Government approach will be a necessary condition for successful implementation of the Blue Economy.

Recent changes in the attitude of Sri Lankan Government should establish a dedicated agency to oversee completion and implementation for the Blue Economy Roadmap. 

However, while Sri Lanka  has existing capacity for some key sectors of the Blue Economy (e.g. fisheries) it lacks the overarching policy and strategic expertise required to make this transition effectively.

As such, the Government of Sri Lanka should seek the assistance of the Commonwealth Secretariat and the World Bank with the provision of a long-term in-country technical expert to assist the Government complete this transition effectively.In addition, up to two additional technical experts may be required on a short-term basis (6 months) to undertake specific technical activities that are expected to arise as the project progresses.

Goal

The project aims to assist the Government of Sri Lanka in developing and implementing a National Blue Economy Roadmap, the purpose being to establish the broad direction for future investment in and development of a sustainable ocean-based economy in our country.

The purpose of the specific request for long-term (and shorter-term) technical adviser(s), is to assist the Government of  Sri Lanka  to review, validate and implement the Roadmap and more importantly, to support Sri Lanka  in its transition to a more integrated ocean-based economy.  

Question is whether newly appointed Technocrats have any idea about the Blue Economy ?

As an example a recent visit by Japanese Delegation initiated by the Prime Ministry’s office consisting private companies have expressed willingness, to develop Fishery Industry.

Unfortunately some advisors in the PM’s office are only promoting implementation of   Ice making Plants on Land to conserve fish caught in the deep ocean.

What our so called experts have failed to understand is that 70% of the fish brought on shore is rotten because Sri Lanka has not developed a Mother Vessel Concept  to collect fish as soon as they are caught ,preserve them until they reach the shore .

Fishermen using Multiday fishing Vessels go to Ocean carrying few tons of Ice blocks to preserve fish .By the time they return after an almost three weeks, ice is melted and fish is not even good for making Dry Fish!

Almost all big fish you find in the market is not good for Human Consumption

When this delegation was taken to Dikovita Harbour (a grandiose western style harbour facility built with foreign funding) during wee hours of the day by my team, they were aghast and disgusted to note that the fish unloaded in the morning by fishermen is not suitable for Human Consumption!

One polite young Japanese Lady murmured to us and asked Is this fish for dogs or for making chicken feed?”

I took the liberty of calling PMs’ office and explained that installation of Hybrid Ice Making plants of Japanese Technology on land is not what we need.

We need MOTHER VESSELS to be anchored in the Ocean with Seawater Ice making Plants to collect them rather than waiting for three weeks

Mother vessels are Stationery Self sustained ISLANDS in the ocean which  can not only provide Ice, but Fuel  and .Emergency Assistance  to multy-day fishing vessels of 40 to 55 feet which hardly have Ice Making Plants on Board  ( They do not even have generators on board but use batteries for night lights !)

Impact

The successful and sustainable implementation of the Blue Economy Strategic Roadmap will ultimately deliver the following outcomes: 

  • Ocean ecosystems and biodiversity recovered and protected. 
  • Increased investment in existing ocean-based economic sectors.
  • New data and knowledge on Sri Lankan  ocean space available.
  • Marine-based aquaculture sector and marine biotechnology products and processes developed and implemented.
  • Protective measures and greater use of surveillance and enforcement tools provides greater protection for Seychelles.
  • Fisheries and aquaculture management improved through equitable, non-subsidized and sustainable practices.
  • Utilization of renewable energy from the ocean, ( i,e Harnessing Wave energy )
  • Surveillance of offshore waters strengthened through enhanced maritime domain awareness and law enforcement. The above is expected to contribute to the goals of the Government of Sri Lanka
  • Capacity built and new research/data sectors developed.
  • Streamlined implementation with an overarching system in place.

The main beneficiaries of the project will be the Ministry of Finance, Trade and The Blue Economy. In addition, a range of government agencies/ministries that have responsibility for the management of marine resources and sectors, including Marine resources, tourism, environment management, maritime transport, economic development and investment, maritime security and offshore petroleum will also benefit. In this context Ministry of Tourism may be amalgamated with Ministry in Charge of Fishery and Aquatic Resources?

A broad range of relevant stakeholders and citizens will ultimately benefit from this intervention, including existing marine industry sectors, marine user groups and local communities.

Outputs

 Implementation of accelerated blue economy program (like Mahaweli for Farmers)

  • Comprehensive and strategic advice provided to the Minister of Finance, Trade and the Blue Economy, Ministry Secretary and relevant stakeholders including private Sector responsible for the Blue Economy.
  • Relevant documentation e.g. policy papers, project management documents, project status and evaluation documents prepared and submitted.
  • Review of the current Roadmap ( if any)  including additional improvement/amendments in the content leading to the validation of the Road Map.
  • Stakeholder engagement and consultation facilitated as required, including the establishment of stakeholder bodies.
  • Strategies, focus areas and projects for implementation of the Blue Economy Roadmap identified, approved and implemented.
  • Resources (financial, human capacity and technical) necessary to execute projects for implementation of the Blue Economy Roadmap, identify, solicited and secured.
  • Strategic partnerships between Sri Lanka and our neighbours such as Maldives and Seychelles  and relevant partners including, but not limited to: development agencies, private sector organizations, and marine research institutes, established and maintained.
  • Consistent implementation of the Roadmap across government and its respective agencies, in particular, working closely with Sri Lankan Ministry of Fisheries ,  Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Energy  Ministry , , Ministry of Investment, Entrepreneurship Development and National Agency for Aquatic Resources etc.
  • Blue Economy roadmap and policy for Sri |Lanka should be promoted domestically, regionally and internationally.

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

The Russia–Iran–China search for a new global security order

May 9th, 2024

By Pepe Escobar Information Clearing House.

While the collective west is in the grips of an existential legitimacy crisis, the RIC is devising its own security order to protect the rest of the world from the ‘genocidals.’

The Hegemon has no idea what awaits the Exceptionalist mindset: China has started to decisively stir the civilizational cauldron without bothering about an inevitable array of sanctions coming by early 2025 and/or a possible collapse of the international financial system. 

Last week, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and his list of delusional US demands was welcomed in Beijing by Foreign Minister Wang Yi and President Xi Jinping as little more than an annoying gnat. Wang, on the record, stressed that Tehran was justified in defending itself against Israel’s shredding of the Vienna Convention when it attacked the Iranian consulate in Damascus. 

At the UN Security Council, China now openly questions not only the state terror attack on the Nord Streams but also the US–Israel combo’s blocking of Palestinian statehood. Moreover, Beijing, just like Moscow recently, hosts Palestine’s political factions together in a conference aiming to unify their positions.   

Next Tuesday, only two days before Moscow celebrates Victory Day, the end of the Great Patriotic War, Xi will land in Belgrade to remind the whole world about the 25th anniversary of the bombing of the Chinese embassy by the US, UK, and NATO. 

Russia, meanwhile, provided a platform for the UNRWA – the UN relief agency for Palestinian refugees, which Israel has sought to defund – to explain to high representatives of BRICS-10 the cataclysmic humanitarian situation in Gaza, as described by UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini. 

In short, serious political business is already being conducted outside of the corrupted UN system, as the United Nations disintegrates into a corporate shell with the US dictating all terms as the largest shareholder. 

Yet another key example of BRICS as the new UN: Russian Security Council chairman Nikolai Patrushev met in St. Petersburg with his Chinese counterpart Chen Wenqing on the sidelines of the 12th International Security Summit, congregating over 100 nations, including the security heads of BRICS-10 members Iran, India, Brazil, and South Africa, as well as Iraq. 

The SCO security show

But the key crossroads these past few days was the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) defense summit in Astana,

azakhstan. For the first time, the new Chinese Defense Minister, Dong Jun, met with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Shoigu, to emphasize their comprehensive strategic partnership. 

Dong, significantly, stressed the dynamic” nature of China–Russia military interaction, while Shoigu doubled down, saying it sets a model for interstate relations” based on mutual respect and shared strategic interests. 

Addressing the full SCO assembly, Shoigu emphatically refuted the massive western propaganda drive about a Russian threat” to NATO. 

Everybody was at the SCO defense ministers’ meeting – including, at the same table, India, Iran, Pakistan, and Belarus as an observer. Minsk is eager to join the SCO. 

The interlocking Russia–Iran–China strategic partnerships were totally in sync. Apart from Dong meeting Shoigu, he also met Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Ashtiani, who lavishly praised Beijing’s condemnation of the Israeli terror air strike in Damascus. 

What is happening now between Beijing and Tehran is a replay of what started last year between Moscow and Tehran, when a member of the Iranian delegation on a visit to Russia remarked that both parties had agreed on a mutual, high-level anything you need” relationship.  

In Astana, Dong’s support for Iran was unmistakable. Not only did he invite Ashtiani to a security conference in Beijing, mirroring the Iranian position, he also called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the delivery of humanitarian aid.   

Shoigu, meeting with Ashtiani, provided extra context when he recalled that the joint fight against international terrorism in Syria is a vivid example of our long-standing friendly relations.” The Russian defense minister then delivered his clincher: 

The current military-political situation and threats to our states oblige us … to common approaches to building a just world order based on equality for all participants in the international community.

A new global security order

Establishing a new global security order is right at the heart of BRICS-10 planning – on par with the de-dollarization debate. All of this is anathema to the collective west, which is incapable of understanding the multifaceted, intertwined Russia, Iran, and China partnerships.   

And the interaction goes on in person. Russian President Vladimir Putin will be visiting Beijing later this month. On Gaza, the Russia–Iran–China position is in complete sync: Israel is committing genocide. For the EU – and NATOstan as a whole – this is not genocide: the bloc supports Israel no matter what.

After Iran, on 13 April, changed the game in West Asia for good, without even using their finest hypersonic missiles, the key question for the Global Majority is stark: in the end, who will restrain the genocidals, and how? Diplomatic sources hint this will be discussed face-to-face by Putin and Xi. 

As one Chinese scholar, with unique aplomb, remarks: 

This time, the barbarians are facing a 5,000-year continuing written civilization, armed with Sun Tzu’s Art of War, Mao thought, Xi’s dual circulation strategy, Belt and Road, BRICS, renminbi digitalization, Russia and China unlimited, the world’s most powerful manufacturing industry, tech supremacy, economic powerhouse, and the backing of the Global South.

All that against a polarized Hegemon in turmoil, with its genocidal aircraft carrier in West Asia totally spinning out of control.

US threats of a clear choice” between ending several key strands of the Russia–China strategic partnership or facing a sanctions tsunami don’t cut it in Beijing. The same applies to Washington’s wishful attempts at preventing BRICS members from ditching the US dollar. 

this is definitely a non-agreement capable” Empire, as Lavrov has been emphasizing since late 2021.

Yaroslav Lisovolik, founder of BRICS+ Analytics, dismisses the Hegemon’s threats against BRICS as the road map toward an alternative payment system is still in its infancy. As for Russia–China trade, the non-dollar high-speed train has already left the station. 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has made it quite clear that Moscow and Beijing have nearly reached the point of abandoning the US dollar in bilateral trade. And the outright theft of Russian assets by the collective west is the ultimate red line for BRICS – and all other nations watching with horror – as a whole: this this is definitely a non-agreement capable” Empire, as Lavrov has been emphasizing since late 2021.

Yet the key question remains: how will Russia–Iran–China (RIC), as BRICS leaders, SCO members, and simultaneously top three existential threats” to the Hegemon, be able to start implementing a new global security architecture without staring down the genocidals. 

Views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.

Special unit established to gather information on Sri Lankan citizens being deployed in the Russia-Ukraine war

May 9th, 2024

Ministry of Defence  – Media Centre

The Ministry of Defence has announced the establishment of a special unit to gather information on the human trafficking of retired Sri Lankan military personnel to the Russia-Ukraine war through illegal channels.

Accordingly, the Defence Secretary requests the family members of the concerned to provide information about retired Sri Lankan military personnel who have joined the Russia-Ukraine war via various routes, including the dates of their departure, persons and institutions that had coordinated their passages, to the following dedicated no: 0112441146.

The Defence Secretary also requests the general public to provide information about individuals involved in human trafficking, those who support it and any relevant information related to the above phone number.

As this is done to safeguard the safety of Sri Lankan citizens, everyone is encouraged to pay special attention and provide information in this regard.

SRI LANKA COAST GUARD’S PROMPT ACTION RESTORES WATER SUPPLY TO VILLAGES FOLLOWING OIL SPILL RESPONSE AND MANAGEMENT EFFORT

May 9th, 2024

Ministry of Defence  – Media Centre

In a commendable display of swift action and strategic coordination, the Sri Lanka Coast Guard (SLCG) responded decisively to an oil spill incident reported late on the evening of May 5, 2024. The spill, originating from a fuel transferring bowser that had fallen into a waterway at the Laggala Divisional Secretariat. After receiving the news, immediate efforts taken by SLCG under the visionary leadership of the Director General of SLCG.

The Operations Directorate of SLCG quickly engaged with the Disaster Management Center to gather crucial details for effective planning and execution of the oil spill response and management operation. With meticulous arrangements in place, a team comprising three officers and ten Coast Guard personnel was deployed as the first responders early morning on May 6, 2024.

The incident, situated at the Laggala LC 1 tank and its connected canal within the Laggala DS division, posed a significant environmental threat, affecting not only the immediate area but also disrupting the water supply essential for daily use and agricultural activities of the villagers. Throughout the day, they were unable to access water and felt helpless. Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the SLCG Rapid Response Team worked tirelessly and managed to clear the tank within a day, with support from the Divisional secretariat and staff, Grama Niladari and staff, Mahaveli project team, Laggala Police and the local villagers.

Approximately 3500 liters of fuel oil were spilled, necessitating urgent action to contain and mitigate its impact. Through hardworking efforts, the team successfully recovered approximately 2000 liters of contaminated fuel oil. This rapid and effective response underscores the Sri Lanka Coast Guard’s unwavering commitment to community welfare across social, economic and human security aspects.

By swiftly addressing the mitigation of environmental hazards while prioritizing the well-being of local communities, the Sri Lanka Coast Guard has once again demonstrated its capacity to safeguard both natural resources and human livelihoods in times of crisis. Such proactive measures not only mitigate immediate risks but also contribute to the long-term resilience and sustainability of ecosystems and communities.

බේරුවල කසළ ප්‍රශ්නය විසඳීමට, අගමැතිවරයා මැදිහත් වෙයි….

May 9th, 2024

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

බේරුවල නගර සභා බල ප්‍රදේශය තුළ එකතු වන අපද්‍රව්‍ය, වත්තිමිරාජපුර ගම්මානයේ ඉඩමකට බැහැර කිරීමෙන්, මතුව ඇති බරපතළ සෞඛ්‍ය ගැටළුව  විසඳීම සඳහා, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් විශේෂ සාකච්ඡාවක් පාර්ලිමේන්තු සංකීර්ණයේදී 2024.05.09 දින පැවැත්විණි. පා.ම. ඉමිටියාස් බාකිර් මාකාර් මහතා අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාගෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී කළ ඉල්ලීමකට අනුව පැවති මෙම සාකච්ඡාවට, ධිවර රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය පියල් නිශාන්ත මහතාද, පළාත් පාලන අමාත්‍යංශයේ නිලධාරීහු, බේරුවල ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරයා, බේරුවල නගර සභාවේ නිලධාරීහු මෙන්ම නාගරික සංවර්ධන අධිකාරිය, පොලිසිය, ජාතික සෞඛ්‍ය විද්‍යායතනය, පළාත් සභා කසළ කළමනාකරණ අධිකාරිය, මධ්‍යම පරිසර අධිකාරිය, ආදී අදාළ සියලු ආයතනවල නියෝජිතයෝද කැඳවා තිබිණි.

ඒ අනුව, අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා වගකිව යුතු අංශවලට උපදෙස් දුන්නේ, එළඹෙන සතියේ අඟහරුවාදා(14) බේරුවල ප්‍රදේශයට ගොස් පරික්ෂා කර බලා, එකතු වී ඇති එම කසළ, වහාම ඊට සුදුසු ස්ථානයකට බැහැර කිරීම සඳහා කටයුතු කරන ලෙසත්, පසුව කසළ නිවැරදිව වර්ගීකරණය කර ඒවා නිසි ලෙස බැහැර කර ප්‍රදේශවාසීන්ගේ සෞඛ්‍ය ආරක්ෂා කිරීමට කටයුතු කරන ලෙසත්ය. දැනට කසළ බැහැර කරන ඉඩම යොදාගනිමින් ක්‍රමවත් කසළ ප්‍රතිචක්‍රීයකරන ව්‍යාපෘතියක් ආරම්භ කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන්ද ධිවර රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය පියල් නිශාන්ත මහතා මෙහිදී යෝජනා කළේය. සාකච්ඡාව ලබාදීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාට ස්තූති කළ පා.ම. ඉමිටියාස් බාකිර් මාකාර් මහතා, යොදාගත් දින වකවානු අනුව ක්‍රියාත්මක වන ලෙස නිලධාරීන්ගෙන් විශේෂ ඉල්ලීමක් කළේය.

Northeast Bharat completes final phase polling with 81.61 % turnout

May 9th, 2024

Nava Thakuria

While a declining voters’ turnout surfaced in various parts of India/Bharat during the last three phases of polling under general elections 2024, Assam as well as Northeast Bharat recorded an impressive voters’ response to elect 25 members to the 18th Lok Sabha. Assam voted peacefully in the third  (and final) phase polling on 7 May for four Parliamentary constituencies (namely Guwahati, Barpeta,  Dhubri and Kokrajhar) with over 80 percent polling, which is nearly 15% more than the other parts of Bharat in the last phase. Often termed as a land of separatists, where most of the residents are alleged to remain reluctant to participant in any national event, Northeast voters have shown their inherent commitment for the nation, while participating in the greatest electoral show on Earth with enthusiasm

Altogether, 93 Lok Sabha seats belonging to 11 States and union territories of India went to the polls in the last phase. The voters of Gujarat (25 seats), Karnataka (14 seats), Maharashtra (11 seats), Uttar Pradesh (10 seats), Madhya Pradesh (8 seats), Chhattisgarh (7 seats), Bihar (5 seats), West Bengal (4 seats), Goa (2 seats), Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu (2 seats), and Jammu & Kashmir (1 seat) have already given mandates to their representatives (out of  1,331 candidates) through the electronic voting machines for the lower house of Parliament. The counting of votes will take place on 4 June (after four more phases of polling scheduled for 13, 20, 25 May and 1 June) and the results are expected the same day.

According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), polling in the 3rd phase recorded 64.4% national voter turnout (updated at 11:40 pm on 7 May), where Assam recorded the highest response (81.61 %) followed by West Bengal (75.79%), Goa (75.20%), Chhattisgarh (71.06%), Karnataka (70.41%), Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu (69.87%), Madhya Pradesh (66.05%), Maharashtra  (61.44%), Gujarat (58.98%), Bihar (58.18%) and  Uttar Pradesh (57.34%). The 1st (19 April) and 2nd (26 April) phases covered 102 and 88 parliamentary constituencies respectively, where the ECI revealed the final voter turnout as 66.14 % and 66.71 % respectively. Compared to the national average, Assam recorded a better 78.25 and 77.35 polling percentages in the two phases.

Though the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) put candidates in all ten parliamentary seats of Assam in 1st and 2nd  phases, it fielded only one party nominee in the last phase.  The saffron party nominated a relatively unknown face (Bijuli Kalita Medhi) for the Guwahati  constituency and extended support to its alliance candidates, namely Phani Bhusan Choudhury (Asom Gana Parishad) from Barpeta, Zabed Islam (AGP) from Dhubri, and Jayanta Basumtary (United People’s Party Liberal) for the Kokrajhar seat. Former BJP leader Mira Borthakur Goswami (now in the Indian National Congress)  put an electoral challenge to the former Assam BJP women’s wing chief in Guwahati.

In Barpeta, the AGP legislator faces Deep Bayan (Congress), Manoranjan Talukdar (a CPM legislator), and others, whereas in Dhubri, the AGP nominee challenges sitting All India United Democratic Front MP Badruddin Ajmal and Congress legislator Rakibul Hussain in the westernmost constituency. As the nomination of sitting Kokrajhar MP Naba Kr Sarania was cancelled, the electoral fight in the Bodo-dominated constituency emerged as a triangular one, where the UPPL nominee  faces challenges from Garjan Mashhary (Congress) and Kampa Borgoyary (Bodoland People’s Front).

Besides Assam, Tripura and Meghalaya in the region also recorded impressive polling, ranging from 75 to over 80 per cent in both phases. Even Nagaland, where six districts, namely Mon, Longleng, Tuensang, Kiphire, Noklak, and Shamator, voted zero, recorded around 57 per cent polling. The voters of Arunachal Pradesh successfully exercised their franchise to elect two MPs and 50 legislators, with a turnout of around 67 per cent. Mentionable is that 10 BJP candidates, including state chief minister Pema Khandu and his deputy Chowna Mein, had already won the race with no opposition candidates. Sikkim electorates also voted for 32 legislators along with one MP, with more than 75 per cent voters’ responses. State CM Prem Singh Tamang, former CM Pawan Kumar Chamling, legendary footballer Bhaichung Bhutia, etc. are contesting from separate assembly constituencies.

Amidst relentless troubles for a year because of ethnic conflicts between Meiteis and Kukis, the polling in Manipur witnessed violence. In fact, it was the only north-eastern state to witness electoral violence till now. Many booths in and around Imphal went for re-polling, and the state’s final voter turnout reached over 75 per cent. Contrary to Manipur, Mizoram witnessed peaceful polling but recorded only over 55 percent turnout.  The BJP-led National Democratic Alliance is looking for 400+ seats in the Lok Sabha under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. But despite relentless awareness campaigns by the ECI, social organisations, media outlets, and political personalities, the voter turnout remains unsatisfactory in mainland India.

වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය විදේශීය පුද්ගලික සමාගමකට පැවරීමට හේතුවූ තොරතුරු මහජනයාට හෙළිදරව් කරන්න – දේශහිතෛෂි ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරයේ මහ ලේකම් වෛද්‍ය වසන්ත බණ්ඩාරගෙන් ආගමන විගමන පාලකවරයාට ලිපියක්

May 9th, 2024

උපුටා ගැන්ම  ලංකා ලීඩර්

විදේශිකයින් සඳහා ගුවන්තොටුපළට පැමිණීමේදී වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය විදේශීය පුද්ගලික සමාගමකට පැවරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් විරෝධය පළ කරමින් දේශහිතෛෂි ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරයේ මහ ලේකම් වෛද්‍ය වසන්ත බණ්ඩාර මහතාගේ අත්සනින් යුතුව ආගමන විගමන පාලකවරයා වෙත ලිපියක් යොමු කර ඇත.

රාජ්‍යය විසින් ඉටු කළ යුතු වගකීමක් විදේශීය පුද්ගලික අංශයකට පැවරීම මගින් ජාතික ආරක්ෂාව අනතුරට ලක් කිරීමට අමතරව ඒ මගින් සංචාරකයින් අධෛර්මත් කිරීමක් ද සිදුවන බවත් ඒ මහතා එම ලිපියෙන් පෙන්වා දී තිබේ. 

ආගමන විගමන පාලකවරයාට ලැබී ඇති බලතල අනුව ඔහු විසින් අනුමත කරනු ලැබූ අත්තනෝමතික තීන්දුව අත්හිටුවන ලෙස සහ ඔහුට එවැනි නීති විරෝධී තීන්දුවක් ගැනීමට සිදුවූයේ කුමන හේතුවක් නිසාද යන්න පිළිබඳව තොරතුරු මහජනයාට එළිදරව් කරන ලෙසත් එම ලිපිය මගින් ඉල්ලා තිබේ.

අදාල ලිපිය පහළින්…

ආගමන විගමන පාලක,
ආගමන විගමන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව,
බත්තරමුල්ල.

ගරු මැතිතුමනි,

නීති විරෝධී ආකාරයට විදේශිකයින් සඳහා ගුවන්තොටුපළට පැමිණීමේදී වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය පුද්ගලික ඉන්දියානු සමාගමකට පැවරීමේ වරද පිළිබඳව

පසුගිය මැයි 01 වැනිදා කටුනායක ගුවන් තොටුපළට පැමිණීමේදී වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ ක‍්‍රියාවලිය තුළ ඇති වූ ප‍්‍රමාදය නිසා පැන නැගුණු විරෝධය තුළින් ආගමික විගමන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව විසින් එසේ වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය පුද්ගලිකම ඉන්දියානු සමාගමකට පවරා ඇති බව රටට එළිදරව් විය. නමුත් ජාතික ආරක්ෂාවට පවා ප‍්‍රබල බලපෑමක් ඇති කරන එවැනි රාජ්‍ය වගකීමක් පුද්ගලීකරණය කෙරෙන බවට කිසිදු වගකිවයුත්තකු විසින් රටේ ජනතාව දැනුවත් කර තිබුණේ නැත.

ඊට පෙර 2012 සිට ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කරනු ලැබූ මාර්ගගත වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ ක‍්‍රමවේදය සහ පැමිණීමේදී වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ ක‍්‍රියාවලිය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම ඔබගේ අධීක්ෂණය යටතේ ආගමන විගමන දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් විසින් සිදුකරනු ලැබීය. එම නිලධාරීන් විසින් එම වගකීම මැනවින් ඉටුකළ බව සහ ඒ පිළිබඳව දේශීය හෝ විදේශීය කිසිදු පුද්ගලයෙකු විසින් විරෝධතා දැක්වීමක් සිදුකර නොමැති බව ඔබ ඉතා හොඳින් දන්නා කරුණකි.

ඒ ආකාරයට රාජ්‍යය විසින් ඉටු කළ යුතු වගකීමක් පුද්ගලික අංශයට පැවරීම මගින් ජාතික ආරක්ෂාව අනතුරට ලක් කිරීමට අමතරව ඒ මගින් සංචාරකයින් අධෛර්මත් කිරීමක් ද සිදුවන බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිය. එම ක‍්‍රියාවලිය තුළ වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ පටිපාටිය සංකීර්ණ වීම සහ අමතර ගාස්තුවක් ගෙවීමට සිදුවීම නිසාම එසේ සංචාරකයින් අධෛර්යමත් වීම සිදුවන බව ඔබට ඉතා හොඳින් තේරුම් ගත හැක. ඒ අනුව දළ වශයෙන් එක් වීසා බලපත‍්‍රයක් සඳහා ඇමරිකානු ඩොලර් 25කට අධික අමතර පිරිවැයක් දැරීමට සංචාරකයාට සිදුවන බව ඔබ පිළිගන්නවා ඇත. එම මුදල් රජයට නොලැබෙන අතර ආණ්ඩුවේ ඉලක්කවලට අනුව වාර්ෂිකව දළ වශයෙන් සංචාරකින් මිලියන 3ක් රටට පැමිණියහොත් එම සරල සේවාව සැපයීම මගින් අදාළ සමාගම උපයාගන්නා ආදායම ඩොලර් මිලියන 75ක් වනු ඇත. එවැනි තත්ත්වයක් තුළ එසේ ටෙන්ඩර් කැඳවීමකින් තොරව එනම් ප‍්‍රසම්පාදන පටිපාටියට විරුද්ධව එම පුද්ගලික සමාගමට අදාළ වගකීම පැවරීම මගින් අදාළ ක‍්‍රියාවලියට ආශිර්වාදය ලබා දුන් පිරිසකට අයුතු ප‍්‍රතිලාභයක් ලැබෙන බවට එල්ල වන චෝදනා සාධාරණීකරනය වන බවද ඔබ පිළිගන්නවා ඇත.

කෙසේ වෙතත් දැනට පවතින නීතිය යටතේ ප‍්‍රසම්පාදන ක‍්‍රියාවලියට යටත්ව හෝ ඒ ආකාරයට වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය පුද්ගලික සමාගමට පැවරීමට ඔබට බලයක් නැති බව ඉතා පැහැදිලිය. ඊට අමතරව මෙම ක‍්‍රියාවලියට අදාළව පත් කරනු ලැබූ කමිටුවක් මගින් පවතින නීතිය සංශෝධනය කිරීමකින් තොරව එවැනි පුද්ගලීකරණය කිරීමක් සිදුකළ නොහැකි බවට මතයක් ප‍්‍රකාශ කළ බව ජනමාධ්‍ය මගින් හෙළිදරව් විය. එසේ නම් ඔබ විසින් අනුමැතිය ලබා දුන් ක‍්‍රියාවලිය නීති විරෝධී බවට ඔබට ඉතා හොඳ අවබෝධයක් තිබිය යුතුය.

යම් රටවල් වීසා අයදුම් පත‍්‍ර සකස් කිරීමේ ක‍්‍රියාවලිය අදාළ ඉන්දියානු සම්භවයක් සහිත සමාගමට පවරා ඇතත් වීසා නිකුත් කිරීමේ බලය සහ ආගමන විගමන තොරතුරු පද්ධතියට ඇතුල්වීමේ බලය ලබාදී නොමැත. ඒ අනුව ඔබ විසින් අනුමැතිය ලබාදී ඇති ක‍්‍රියාවලිය කිසිසේත්ම සාධාරණිකරණය කිරීමට හැකියාවක් නැත. ඊට අමතරව මෙම තීන්දුව යම් බලපෑමක් මත කඩිනම් කිරීමට සිදුවූවාද යන්න පිළිබඳව සැකයක් මතුවේ. ඊට හේතුව ඔබගේ ආයතනයේ වෙබ් අඩවිය මගින් ප‍්‍රකාශයට පත් කර තිබූ ආකාරයට චීනය, ඉන්දියාව, රුසියාව, ජපානය ආදී රටවල් කිහිපයක සංචාරකයින්ට 2024 මැයි 31 දා දක්වා ගාස්තු අය කිරීමකින් තොරව වීසා නිකුත් කරන බව ප‍්‍රසිද්ධියට පත්කිරීමය.

අවසාන වශයෙන් අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසින් නීති විරෝධී තීන්දුවක් ඔබ මත පැටවීමට උත්සාහ කරන අවස්ථාවක අදාළ ක‍්‍රියාවලිය නීතියට අනුකූල නොවන බව පෙන්වාදීම ඔබගේ අවම යුතුකමක් බව ඔබ පිළිගන්නවා ඇත. ඒ අනුව ජාතික ආරක්ෂාව අනතුරට පත්වන තීන්දුවක් නීති විරෝධීව ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම සඳහා ආධාර අනුබල දීමේ චෝදනාවෙන් ඔබට ගැලවිය නොහැකි බව ඔබ පිළිගන්නවා ඇත. එසේම වගකිවයුතු රට වැසියන් ලෙස එවැනි ක‍්‍රියාවන් ඉවසා සිටීම බලවත් වරදක් බවද ඔබ පිළිගන්නවා ඇත. එම පිළිගැනීමට අනුව ඔබගේ නීති විරෝධී පරිපාලන තීන්දුවට එරෙහිව නීතිමය පියවර ගැනීමට අදාළව අප සංවිධානය විසින් නීති උපදෙස් ලබා ගනිමින් සිටින බවද ඔබතුමාට දැන්වීමට කැමැත්තෙමු.

පුද්ගලිකව ඔබට නීතිමය බැඳීමෙන් සහ හෘද සාක්ෂියේ පීඩාවෙන් ගැලවිය හැක්කේ මහජන යහපත සඳහා සද්භාවයෙන් යුතුව අදාළ තොරතුරු එළිදරව් කිරීමෙන් පමණක් බව අපගේ පිළිගැනීම වේ. බොහෝ රටවල එසේ මහජන යහපත පිණිස තොරතුරු එළිදරව් කරන සහ කණගාටුව ප‍්‍රකාශ කරන ඉහළ රාජ්‍යය නිලධාරීන්ට නීතිය මඟින් සමාව ලැබේ. අවසානයේදී අප රටේ එවැනි නීතියක් සම්මත කිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවය අවධාරණය කිරීමේ හැකියාව දැන් ඔබට ලැබී ඇත.

එම නිසා පනත් මගින් ඔබට ලැබී ඇති බලතල අනුව ඔබ විසින් අනුමත කරනු ලැබූ අත්තනෝමතික තීන්දුව අත්හිටුවන ලෙස සහ ඔබට එවැනි නීති විරෝධී තීන්දුවක් ගැනීමට සිදුවූයේ කුමන හේතුවක් නිසාද යන්න පිළිබඳව තොරතුරු මහජනයාට එළිදරව් කරන ලෙස අපි ඉතා කරුණාවෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.

වෛද්‍ය කේ.එම්. වසන්ත බණ්ඩාර
ප‍්‍රධාන ලේකම්,
දේශහිතෛෂි ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරය

2024-05-08

Presidential poll to be held between September 17, October 16

May 9th, 2024

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Colombo, May 9 (Daily Mirror) – The Election Commission formally announced that the 2024 Presidential election will be held on a day between September 17 and October 16.

Issuing a notice signed by its chairman R.M.A.L. Ratnayake, the Election Commission said it will call for nominations to hold the Presidential election within the specified timeframe in terms of the provisions of the Constitution of Sri Lanka and the Presidential Elections Act No. l5 of 1981, and that by virtue of the powers vested with the Election Commission to fix the date for the election, it will hold the Presidential election between 17 September 2024 and l6 October 2024.

Frederic Myers – Proof of Life After Death.

May 9th, 2024

Courtesy Trans4Mind

Excerpts about the life of Frederick Myers from the book by Ian Currie
“You Cannot Die: The Incredible Findings of a Century of Research on Death”
Edited by Peter Shepherd

Frederick Myers was a founder of the Society for Psychical Research. Within a few weeks of Myers’ death in 1901, he began to communicate through different direct writing mediums in England, the United States and India, sending information about what happens when we die. His scripts made no sense on their own but the mediums were told to forward them to a central location where they fitted together like a jigsaw. They were signed, “Myers.” More than three thousand scripts were transmitted over thirty years, some of them more than forty typed pages long. Read more about these “cross-correspondences” and Myers’ discoveries about the afterlife – plus read the full books, here online, written by Geraldine Cummins, one of Myers’ correspondents…

Personal development has, as one of its aims, to transcend the human condition. If consciousness is limited to one’s current lifetime, and if one’s only route to immortality is to reproduce one’s genes and to try to make one’s mark on the world for the benefit of future generations, then still these are worthwhile aims.

But if, instead, one’s consciousness survives death, then the motivation to transcend the human condition becomes far stronger. One’s personal development in this lifetime will affect one’s situation in the after-life, and it will determine one’s future – whether it be to reincarnate in this world (in a worse, similar or better condition than one is now) or to fulfill one’s potential by moving on to higher purposes and responsibilities.

Frederick Myers recognized this as a critical question for all intelligent people and worked relentlessly to provide us with a solid proof of life after death.

1. Frederic Myers

https://trans4mind.com/afterlife/myers1.html

System Change: Is Sri Lanka to become an Indian ‘Pradesh’?

May 8th, 2024

By Chandre Dharmawardana

The Aragalaya came and went. The claim that we need a system change in Sri Lanka” has become the main legacy of that upheaval that brought Sri Lanka to the cusp of a violent takeover by organised left-wing or right-wing groups. The call for a system change” is nothing new. I remember how Mahinda Wijesekera, a JVP leader of the 1970s (who became a UNP minister) justified militant actions at the Vidyodaya campus (now SJP university) saying Raamuva Venaskireema ––”a change of frame”––was the main lesson of the campus. President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa’s non-confrontational approach may have fortunately averted bloodshed, but it delivered the country squarely into the hands of international Shylocks and their local financial and political agents.

President Ranil Wickremsinghe (RW) emerged as the perfect fit for the occasion, with immense administrative experience as a Prime Minister and minister many times over. RW’s libertarianism is in sync” with the mindset of bankers in Washington and the dealers in Davos. RW may not be accountable to a public who had rejected him and his party unequivocally in 2020. By the same token, he can only be a caretaker President. However, the main demand of the public was that ALL 225” parliamentarians must be sent home. The politicians, labeled as crooks, do not enjoy the trust of the public. Instead, RW has symbiotically protected even crooks to sustain his government, claiming the need for stability to implement the recommendations of the IMF”.

However, a less publicised agenda for creating free trade zones familiar from the early days of Yahapalanaya seems to also exist.

The IMF’s position is simple – it will provide emergency money to Sri Lanka so that Sri Lanka can pay back its loans amounting to some fifty billion US dollars. The IMF’s priority is to protect the Shylocks while the borrower is brought down to pay up. Debt write-off is never on the table; in any case the outstanding lenders are NOT governments, be it China, Japan, India or even the USA. There is no Chinese debt trap or any other conspiracy trap except in the minds of some political spin doctors.

IMF loan or not, Sri Lankans have to cut down imports, live frugally, produce more, get rid of loss-making enterprises, and increase forex inflows. Given that most of Sri Lanka’s earnings are in the hands of a mere 1% of the population, the draconian impact of the IMF loan must also fall on this rich 1% via a wealth tax. New taxes have been levied heavily on local products, while sparing and encouraging imports that cost forex! Even issuing visas to incoming tourists is now done by a foreign company getting paid in forex. Local operators would have been paid in rupees.

Meanwhile, the raising of the wages of estate workers by decree, with little concern for the health of the estate sector, shows that RW would readily discard his avowed free-market ideology for short-term votes.

Nevertheless, everything on the table shows that the government, the Central Bank, and their economic advisors are following text-book free-market theories within the simplest of globalisation concepts that work for big nations with strong export economies. The proposition that a free flow of goods, services and talent, as well as the adhesion to a larger market leads to greater overall prosperity does hold in the long run. The free-trade agreements covering the European Union, or the USA, Canada and Mexico, and the failure of Brexit have shown this to be true. However, this prosperity benefits the bigger partners most, while the smaller partners have to accept the erosion of their own industries and start-ups in competing with those of the bigger partner, at least for a generation or two. Furthermore, a smaller country tying up with a behemoth may have to accept the waste products of the big brother, polluting industries and agree to provide cheap raw materials to profit from the trickle-down prosperity promised for the future. Canada and Mexico have played that subservient role for years in their free trade” with the USA, and faced trade barriers in spite of agreed-upon free trade”.

When Sri Lanka ties up with India, as seems to be the undeclared plan of the Ranil–Basil consensus, we can certainly expect and profit from the opening up of a much larger market for Sri Lankan goods. But has Lanka competitively priced goods to sell? We may expect a more stable supply of electricity and fuel when grid connectivity and pipeline connectivity with India are established. But then, as Germany found out with the dawn of the Ukraine war, its dependence on Russian oil exposed its vulnerability and lost sovereignty. Many of India’s neighbours, such as Sikkim and Nepal, found that they had become mere Indian dependencies through power lines and pipelines.

The change of the system” to that of a Lanka-pradesh integrated even loosely with India, as well as the disbursement of business to Indian and international conglomerates will provide much bakshee” to the politicians at the helm, while sacrificing a generation of indigenous entrepreneurs. This already happened under the first stint of the open-market under JRJ, but the wholesale takeover of business by Indian business could not happen then. However, given an overt or covert full free-trade agreement, Indian business will be able to bid at least on an equal footing, and in fact more clout than a local businessman. When a job is advertised, Indians can apply equally, and perhaps even find more favour with Indian companies.

A recent report of the Madras Courier states that some 93,000 candidates applied for 62 peon” posts in Uttar Pradesh police department (https://madrascourier.com/policy/indias-unemployment-crisis/) ,which required a minimum eligibility of grade 5; however, there were 3,700 Ph.D holders and 28,000 post-graduates and many graduates. Once the system changes, in Lanka Pradesh every Sri Lankan job opening can in principle profit from a vast pool of Indian candidates, with Sri Lankan applicants elbowed out.

The crushing youth unemployment in India belies the so-called economic miracle of Narendra Modi. The top 1% of Indian society now owns most of India’s wealth. The extreme rise in inequality in India under Modi is seen in the attached graph; the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer, while the middle class is getting eliminated. Indian Elites have spread this claim of a vibrant and rapidly growing India in all sorts of fora including at the Oxford Union debates, while the reality is seen in scholarly reports of Indian and international research. The seeming prosperity of Modi’s India at the moment is not unlike the facade of prosperity that Sri Lanka had, under the Rajapaksas just after the end of the Eelam war.

Local apparatchiks of the RW–Basil consensus will benefit handsomely from the largess of Indian business as the latter establishes itself in Sri Lanka. The high-flying Adani Group, associated with Narendra Modi, has already positioned itself in ‘Lanka Pradesh’. The methods they use were documented in Hindenburg Research.com, 23rd January 2023 under the title How the world’s third richest man is pulling the largest con in corporate history. The Mannar wind turbine deal commits Sri Lanka to buying electricity from Adani at higher prices for many decades to come. How was this outrageous sellout to Adani signed? Was there an environmental impact assessment?

The Mannar wind farm is not only an economic sellout but also an environmental disaster, as detailed by the renowned biologist Rohan Pethiyagoda (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm5w2vMXgjI ). The importance of preserving bird migration patterns for insect control, cloud seeding, crop pollination, biodiversity etc., are unfortunately not at all appreciated by Sri Lanka’s ruling class or Adani and Modi. Unfortunately, even good science-based ecology has earned a bad reputation in Sri Lanka due to pseudo-science based environmental groups. These environmental” NGOs, organic food vendors, Natha-Deyyo-arsenic cabals and others got Gotabhaya’s government to ban agrochemicals, created famine, triggered a farmer uprising, an aragalaya joined in, and made Gota Go Home

(https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2023/01/05/the_us_must_learn_from_sri_lankas_green_policy_mistakes_873852.html).

The Indian continent and Sri Lanka have been separate geographic entities since the time of the last Ice Age some 10 centuries BCE. A unique biodiversity in Sri Lanka distinct from that of the continent evolved in Lanka. The physical separation has protected Sri Lanka from epidemics and infections that rage in insalubrious India. A land bridge and such links connecting Sri Lanka with India will completely upset the existing bio-ecosystem and inflame ethnic-identity politics. I had written about this (Island newspaper: 19th July 2015 ) when the then Yahapalanaya government proposed a land bridge to India.

To give just one example, the early work of Philips (1935) on Lankan mammals has been handsomely updated by Asoka Yapa and Ratnavira in their monumental ‘The mammals of Sri Lanka’ (2013). The 50 km separation of India has given the Island 126 species of mammals, and no other island of comparable size is as diverse, with 1/5 of this diversity endemic to Lanka! Since local politicians (Vavullu”) cross easily from side to side, Sri Lanka even has over 15 species of bats. The diversity of plants specific to Sri Lanka can be discerned from the web pages dh-web.org/place.names/bot2sinhala.html.

What is true for biodiversity is also true for cultural diversity. The Hinduism of Jaffna relates to the early monistic form of the Saiva Siddhanatha” due to saint Thirumular. In contrast, Tamil-Nadu Saivism is pluralistic and follows Aghorasiva, who rejected the monism” of Thirumular. Given a land bridge, the more profitable northern Kovils will pass into Indian hands. The Saivism offered will become the Saiva Siddhanatha of Aghorasiva. While Sinhala and Tamil cultures co-existed within Lanka until the advent of Chelvanayagams exclusive Tamil homelands” doctrine, any free access to the tycoons of Tamil Nadu will erode the identity of Lankan-Tamil and Sinhalese Cultures as well. The latter, used to centuries of such interactions may survive the challenge of a land bridge, while Lankan Tamil culture will be stifled by the embrace of Tamil Nadu.

All this does not mean that a free-trade zone with India should not be an objective for Sri Lanka. However, this has to be done from a position of economic strength and not when fire-sale conditions of disaster capitalism exist in the country. The first objective must be to achieve energy and food self sufficiency – perfectly achievable, as outlined by me in previous articles (e.g., Island article 12th August 2021). Then only should the nation seek unbridled international free-trade links.

Kandy Man with long name who fought the Brits: Where are the Reperations  for Indentured Labour and other Colonial Crimes?

May 8th, 2024

By Gary Brecher

You see some pretty sick stuff when you do my job, but I just read something sicker than any Congo cannibal buffet.   It’s an article by a posh little Limey named Jeremy Brown condemning the Sri Lankan Government for being too messy in putting down the LTTE, and demanding that we stop buying the cheap textiles the poor Sinhalese make their living churning out.

What’s sick about this is that the British establishment destroyed the Sinhalese people completely.   Completely and purposely, sadistically; stole their land, humiliated and massacred their government and made it Imperial policy to erase every shred of self-respect the Sinhalese had left.   You can talk about the Nazis all day long, but for my money nothing they did was as gross as what you find out when you actually look into the history of British-Sinhalese relations.   If you can even call them relations” – I guess a murder-rape is a sort of relationship.

But nobody knows about it.   Weird, huh?   Nothing ‘weirds’ me out more than the total news blackout the Brits have managed to put on all the sick shit they did to brown and black people all over the world.   They had a system, and it worked. They’d grab some paradise island in the tropics, use the Royal Navy to wall it off from the rest of the world and crush the local tribe.   If the locals resisted, the Brits would starve them to death, shoot them down, infect them with smallpox or get them addicted to opium – whatever they had to do to gang-rape the locals so bad that they would lose the will to resist.

And to this day, they don’t catch even a little bit of Hell for it.   Everybody thinks the Brits are all cute and harmless.   You’re all a bunch of suckers for those suave accents, you suckers!   The truth is that compared to the Brits, the Nazis who people are always whining about, were a gang of eighth-grade stoners who ran around spray-painting swastikas on school property.   The Nazis lasted one decade; the Brits quietly ran their extermination programs for three hundred years and to this day they wouldn’t even think of feeling guilty about it – it wouldn’t cross their minds.

That’s what made me want to puke battery acid when I read Mister Jeremy Brown’s sermon on the naughty Sinhalese: this pig Brown has no clue about why Sri Lanka is so fucked up, no hint at all that it’s the result of British Imperial policy. Not mistakes” or a few bad apples” or regrettable excesses” but clear, cold, ruthless British policy.

One of the funniest bits in Brown’s little Anglican sermon to the Sinhalese is when he mentions Arthur C. Clarke, the Brit sci-fi writer who moved to Sri Lanka.   The

reason that’s funny is that a few years back, when he was too senile and drunk to watch his tongue, Clarke admitted in an interview that the whole reason he moved to Sri Lanka is for the boys.”   As in, he liked to rape little boys, and they were cheap and pretty in the dear old ex-colony.   The Brits wouldn’t stop raping the Sinhalese even after their troops were forced (sorry, withdrawn) from the island.

Jeremy Brown wouldn’t know that, of course.   To him, Clarke is a wonderful example of all the wonderful things British people have done for poor little Sri Lanka:

Britain has helped to rebuild Sri Lanka’s tourist industry: Britons accounted for 18.5 per cent of the foreigners who visited the former colony’s famous beaches, wildlife parks, tea plantations and Buddhist temples last year.   Only India sends more tourists.   Many Britons also own property there, especially around the southern city of Galle, not far from where Arthur C. Clarke, the British science fiction writer who settled in Sri Lanka, used to love to scuba dive. [ Is that what they’re calling it these days? ]

So the question facing British shoppers and holidaymakers is this: should they continue to support Sri Lanka’s garment and tourist industries?

Don’t you love that last sentence: Sadly, the answer must be no.”   Anybody who can write a sentence like that without blowing his brains out at the monitor is a hopeless twit anyway, but let’s help Jeremy out a little bit, folks, let’s go back in time and take a quick look at all the wonderful things the Brits did for these rotten, ungrateful Sinhalese.

The pattern you see in the colonizing of Sri Lanka is a real familiar one, if you study the European naval empires: the Portuguese, the greatest sailors and explorers, came to Sri Lanka long before the Brits, claimed the place, but couldn’t hold on to it.   The Portuguese lost the island to the Dutch, those up & coming Protestant go-getters, in the mid-1600s.   That’s another pattern you see everywhere, the old Papist powers losing out to the Protestants, who were just faster and smarter.

The next stage was also totally by the book: the Brits, the canopy tree if you know what I mean, come along and force the Dutch out.   There were times the Brits sort of liked the Dutch; they were Protestant, at least, and blonde/blue-eyed.   But business was business, and the Brits realized, by the end of the 1700s, that Ceylon was worth taking.   Of course they didn’t say that in public; the official reason was that they had to boot the Dutch to guard the island from the nasty radical Frenchies.

That way of stealing islands, making it sound like you had to take them for the greater good–that was classic Brit strategy.   They always made it look like they were forced, against their will, to grab this or that colony.   I don’t know if you all ever saw a movie called Erik the Viking”, but it has a great scene with John Cleese playing this insane bloodthirsty warlord who orders people tortured to death in this tired, disappointed upper-class voice, and then whines, It’s the stress that gets you” – all put upon and harassed ( the ‘White Man’s burden’ ).   That’s a perfect image for the way the Brits booted the Dutch out of Ceylon, tut-tutting while they stole every shed, cannon and bale of tea on the island.

With the Dutch trade rivals gone, the Brits had only one problem left: those damned natives, the Sinhala, or Kandyans” as they were called back then.   The name, Kandyans,” came from the fact that their main city was Kandy, up in the highlands in the south of the island, the fat part of the teardrop.   The Sinhala lived in the highlands for the simple reason that it was a little cooler, not as totally malarial, up there compared to the coastal marshes.

By all accounts, the Sinhala/Kandyans were harmless slackers, who didn’t need or want much from the outside world.   All they asked was for people to leave them alone up on their big rocky highlands to do their Buddhist thing.   Unfortunately that wasn’t British policy.   It irked the redcoats that Kandy still had a king, an army, all this impudent baggage that went with independence.   The British decided to break the Sinhalese completely and crush their whole society.

You have to remember that by this time, the early 1800s, the Brits had perfected their techniques in little experiments all over the world.   Those Clockwork Orange shrinks were amateurs compared to the Imperial Civil Service.   They had dozens of ways of undermining native kingdoms.

British administrators were trained to do a kind of rough, quick sociological sketch of the natives, get a sense of the fault lines and then figure out how to exploit them.   The Brits saw fast that the Kandyans were a sluggish bunch of people divided into rigid castes in the classic subcontinent pattern.   That made it easy: the Brits made two big castes their official pets and shunned the others, setting up a violent hate between different parts of Sinhalese society.   That guaranteed that if the diehard Sinhalese/Kandyan nationalists ever revolted, the teacher’s-pet castes would have a good selfish reason to help massacre them. ( It’s called ‘divide & rule ’)

Then there was the Kandyan king himself.   The Brits weren’t dumb in the way Paul Bremer was dumb, de-Baathifying” Iraq.   They loved corrupt local rulers. Much easier and cheaper to bribe one fat old degenerate on a throne than

negotiate with all the commoners.   So the Brits started playing with the nervous, Kandyan royals, scaring them with the threat of losing everything and then teasing them with the possibility of the safe, soft life of a Brit puppet.

This was the major league of colonialism.   To give you an idea of how important Ceylon/Sri Lanka was back then, try this on: in 1802, when French armies were kicking British and Prussian and Italian and Russians all over Europe (weird how nobody remembers that?), the Brits were so terrified they tried to give Napoleon all their colonies except Sri Lanka and Trinidad.   Those were the two they needed to keep.

THE KANDY MEN: No match for the British vampire lords

And this is where another standard Brit policy came into play – a real smart one that we ought to be imitating: use native auxiliaries, not homeland troops, as much as possible.   For all kinds of reasons, but here are the main ones:

1. If you bring in troops from some remote part of the Empire to do your dirty work, it’s those troops, those faces and accents, the locals will remember, and hate, for generations.   So you, the sly little pink Brit administrator, can stroll in later and commiserate with the locals as they show you around their burned huts, bayoneted kids, etc., and even say with a straight face, Oh my, those auxiliaries from wherever; what heathens?   Outrageous!   I shall certainly let Whitehall know about these abuses.”   Then, of course, you get in his sedan chair, close the curtains and chuckle all the way home to where his personal ‘native’bum-boy was waiting.

2. Nobody back in London counts casualties as long as it’s Malay mercenaries dying.   You can lose a lot of them–and a lot of Malays did die fighting the Sinhala, especially in the total rout of a malaria-sapped British/Malay force at the Mahaveli River in 1803 – but nobody is going to make a fuss in the Times of London (Mister Jeremy Brown’s paper, as you may recall).   If you’re lucky they’ll pop off before payday and you can keep their payroll for that estate in Shropshire.

3. Dropping hot-blooded feisty Malay Muslims with guns far from home and making them fight Sinhalese bleeds Malay society as well as Sinhalese.   Left in peace, Malays could be trouble – a proud, warlike people.   So by sending them to die in Ceylon, you’re diverting all that young, angry Malay blood away from SE Asia and using it to bleed Kandy.   Two birds with one blood-soaked stone.

You see why I get impatient with you gullible suckers yammering about the Nazis? The Nazis were retards, a white-trash tantrum, an eighth-grade chemistry-class

pipe bomb, a quick-fizzle flash in the pan, compared to the Brits, the scariest motherfuckers ever to butt-fuck the planet.

The mercenaries the Brits sent to crush the Kandyans were Malays, Muslims from SE Asia who didn’t need a lot of pep talks to slaughter South Asian Buddhists (and steal their chickens).   That was life for the Brits back then, at the top of their game: picking up pieces from one part of the world and dropping them where they’d do the most harm, half the world away.   Ah yes, let’s ferry some Malay mercenaries to Kandy, that should give the bloody idol-worshippers something to think about!”

Destroying Buddhism was a big part of Brit policy.   The Buddhist routine, the temples, begging monks, long boring prayers – it was the glue that kept Kandy together.   So the Brits decided to destroy it.   They even said so, in private memos to each other.   They weren’t shy in those days.   Here’s the Brit governor in 1807: Reliance on Buddhism must be destroyed. Make sure all [village] chiefs are Christian.”

Up to 1818, the Brits had a blast messing with doomed Sinhala rebellions; a good time was had by all, except the Sinhalese.   They had a very, very bad time, and it was about to get worse.

See, another constant you’ll find in British imperial policy is that although they’re very sly and patient, they have a very good sense of when to cut the crap and just wipe out a tribe that’s been annoying them for too long.   They were getting sick of the Sinhalese, with all their bickering and intrigue; the redcoats just weren’t enjoying the game the way they used to, so boom: the kill ’em all” era began.

But they did it smart, not like the idiot boastful Nazis you all love to obsess on.   I bet every one on the planet can name the Nazi death camps, but I’d be surprised if more than, say, a half dozen people outside Sri Lanka can name the policy the Brits used to destroy the Sinhala for good.   Anybody?   Didn’t think so!   See, here’s another little tip for up and coming genocidaires out there: always pick the most boring name possible.  Those Nazis, with their heavy-metal jewellery and stupid titles! Dopes! You want extermination programs with names that put everybody to sleep.

And that’s why in 1818 Britain brought the wasteland policy” to Kandy.   They could have called it what that Liberian whacko called his campaign: Operation No Living Thing.” – that’s what it meant: Brit-led troops draining the sea” the Sinhala irregulars swam in by burning every hut, every field, and killing every animal in every village they suspected of harbouring rebels.”

Now that’s another key Brit imperial technique: that word rebels.”   Blows me away: how can a Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, fighting for the country his people have owned for a hundred generations, be a rebel”?   And the pipsqueak redcoat officers hunting him down, were born and raised in Britain.   He was not the rebel,” he was the force of law and order, the rightful authority.   It’s quite a racket if you have the sheer, sociopathic nerve to say it with a straight face. (I’m talking to you, Mister Jeremy Brown!)

What does rebel” mean, anyway?   I’ve noticed that in English press it’s a bad word.   Here, in the US of A, it’s different, because we were the rebels in 1775 and proud of it.   But see, people who know the American Revolution think that the Brit policy against the Yankees, where (give or take a Banastre Tarlteton or two), the redcoats tried to avoid killing civvies, was normal Imperial policy.   Bullshit! The reason the Brits let us go and didn’t try scorched-earth on us, was that we WERE Brits, as far as they could tell: white protestant English-speaking humans.   If you weren’t all of the above, you weren’t human.   The only other war where English troops had the same restraint was – take a wild guess.   Right: the English Civil War.   In England, they fought clean.   But when Cromwell marched up to subdue the Scots, who were Protestant (good) but non-English (bad), a lot of POWs never made it back to the holding pens and a lot of crofts were torched, and a lot of girls were raped.   When he moved from Scotland to Ireland, where the filthy locals were filthy Papist as well as non-English, well, you don’t want to know what happened there.

So in places like Sri Lanka, full of brown heathens, Brit policy had nothing to do with fucking Yorktown – more like Dresden, only lower-tech.

The Wasteland Policy” was smart and mean at the same time–another sure mark of the Brit imperial touch.   It was designed to deny the rebels” support in the short term, but in the long term it was pure punishment, taking away the land, livestock and other assets of all the Sinhalese who were even suspected of being rebel”-lovers.

And it worked.   To this day, 200 years later, the Sinhalese castes that backed the rebels are dirt poor, and worse: they’re hated by everybody around them and they even hate themselves.   And nobody even remembers who did it to them, poor lab rats.   They think it’s their own fault, that there’s something wrong with them.

There’s more, and worse, but to tell the truth, this is making me sick.   I’ve tried to tell this story a dozen times and nobody wants to know.   You just end up vomiting battery acid all night, and pigs like Mister Jeremy Brown of the Times of London never lose one second of sleep over all those bodies and all those lies and sheer nastiness.   What’s the use?   I’ll just fast-forward through a couple of highlight

shots.   Take reprisals, you know, like those bad old Nazis used to do after a rebel” attack?   The Brits were there way before the Nazis.   They took revenge for a half-assed Kandyan revolt by killing one out of every hundred Sinhalese.   Like, at random. To keep it fair, you know, not play favourites.

And then the nastiest imperial weapon of all: the demographic bomb.   This was a Brit specialty all over the world (see Fiji for a weirdly similar case).   The Brits ran India, so they had total control over millions of obedient Tamil peasants who were starving, desperate, and ready to go anywhere, just pile into the hold of a ship and get out to cut cane or plant rice in some place that may as well have been on the moon for all they knew.

So along with the massacre/reprisals, the Brits came up with one of their classic two-birds-one-stone plans: to neutralise the Sinhalese, let’s import huge hordes of Tamils from India!   They’re cheap and docile and they’ll give the Sinhala something to keep them busy even after we have to leave the island – and meanwhile they’ll drive the price of labour down even further.  Brilliant, chaps, absolutely brilliant!

And they did it.   It worked so well it’s still working today.   And when they were done totally destroying the poor Sinhalese, the Brits did what they do best, better than any other murder gang on the planet, they took that amnesia zapper from Men in Black” and zapped everyone in Sri Lanka, then turned it on themselves and were suddenly so innocent, so damn virtuous and clean, that a pig like Mister Jeremy Brown can actually sit down at a computer and boast about all the wonderful times England has raped Sri Lanka, from olden times right down to Arthur C. Clarke buggering every little boy on the island.   One hell of a job, Brownie!   Satan himself must be shaking his head, muttering, Gotta give it to the fuckin’ Limeys, damn it, they’ve got no shame at all; ya gotta admire that.   Damn, even I wouldn’t have had the gall to talk like that.   Jeremy Brown. I’m putting him down for CEO of the Hell Propagandastaffel” the minute his liver packs up and he lands down here.”

—————————————————————————————–

Gary Brecher is the author of the War Nerd . Send your comments to brecher@exiledonline.com.

LankaPropertyWeb Redefines Real Estate Marketing Landscape with AI-Powered Innovations

May 8th, 2024

LankaPropertyWeb (LPW),

LankaPropertyWeb (LPW), the leading real estate portal in Sri Lanka, proudly announces groundbreaking enhancements set to revolutionise the real estate marketing industry. Demonstrating an unwavering commitment to innovation, LankaPropertyWeb introduces two cutting-edge features – the AI-powered social Media Promo Add-On Package and the ML Image Recognition Tool – designed to transform property listings and streamline marketing efforts.

A.M.Pl.I.F.I.E.R – AI-Powered Instant Social Media Promo Tool: Elevating Property Visibility

LankaPropertyWeb introduces the AI-powered social Media Promo Tool – A.M.Pl.I.F.I.E.R (Automated Multi-Platform Integration For Instant Extra Reach) which will allow advertisers on its site to promote their ads instantly on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. What’s more, using AI the tool will generate videos based on images uploaded, add a trending soundtrack to the videos, and generate personalised captions and hashtags for each platform using ChatGPT, within seconds.

This pioneering tool for a real estate portal aims to revolutionise advertising efficiency, offering advertisers a trifecta of key benefits. Firstly, streamline your marketing endeavours through state-of-the-art automated features, unlocking significant time and resource savings. This empowers your team to redirect efforts toward the strategic pillars driving your business forward. Secondly, elevate audience interaction and connection with OpenAI-generated content, infusing your posts with an irresistible appeal that captivates and resonates. Lastly, bid farewell to the laborious tasks of manual posting and editing, embracing a new era of effortless marketing that allows you to concentrate on the core strategic facets of your business. With these transformative advantages, our platform is poised to redefine your advertising approach, delivering unparalleled efficiency, engagement, and strategic focus for unrivalled business success.

Machine Learning (ML) Image Recognition Tool: Precision in Visual Content Management

In its relentless pursuit of innovation, LankaPropertyWeb introduces Machine Learning Image Recognition.

The tool introduces a range of benefits aimed at transforming the landscape of online listings. Firstly, its advanced image recognition capability empowers users by efficiently detecting and eliminating spam images, thereby elevating the overall quality of listings. Additionally, the tool ensures a personalised browsing experience through accurate image labelling, allowing users with specific interests to be presented with tailored ads of similar types, such as ‘bedroom’ or ‘garden.’ Furthermore, LPW enhances the visual appeal of listings by providing image optimisation features and addressing issues like dark or poorly lit images. Lastly, the tool incorporates state-of-the-art duplicate image recognition, eliminating redundancy and guaranteeing that listings remain unique and diverse.

These advancements represent a remarkable leap forward in real estate marketing, underscoring LankaPropertyWeb’s steadfast commitment to delivering cutting-edge solutions tailored to the ever-evolving needs of real estate professionals. Seizing the opportunity to embrace the power of precision in visual content, they can elevate their real estate marketing strategy with these innovative tools. Embarking on a journey to explore the future of property presentation through LankaPropertyWeb’s latest updates, they position themselves ahead of the curve in the competitive landscape. Staying at the forefront of industry progress, they redefine their approach to real estate marketing with progressive solutions that set new standards in the field.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress