Senaka Weeraratna
I wish to respond to the article
published on ‘ Lankaweb’ (April 06, 2021) under the caption
‘Was Portuguese
proselytization ruthless as portrayed?’ byP.K. Balachandran, as I find the contents inaccurate, misleading
and contrary to well established historical facts.
The
writer Balachandran relies on Sir James Emerson
Tennent, Colonial Secretary from 1841 to 1850, and his book Christianity
in Ceylon (John Murray, London, 1850), to make the assertion that
the Portuguese proselytization efforts were benign and harmless, and if there
had been any lapse or transgression somewhere that was due to a lapse of a
local official. Portuguese Captain – Generals extended favours, partiality and if
there was any state assistance to the converts to Christianity, that was
because it was their common religion.
Balachandran quoting Tennent says:
There is no proof that compulsion was resorted to by them for the extension of
their own faith or violence employed for the extinction of national
superstitions.” (By national superstitions” he meant the other faiths). The
probability is that the priests and missionaries of the Portuguese were content
to pursue in Ceylon the same line of policy and adopt the same expedients for
conversion which had already been found successful by their fellow laborers on
the opposite continent of India.”
Tennent
is further quoted as saying Both in India and Ceylon, the cultural tools used
by the Catholic missionaries had proved to be more effective than coercion and
violence. Another reason for the preference for cultural tools was that the
Portuguese missionaries in India and Ceylon could not count on the support of
the Portuguese State apparatus which was necessary to use coercive methods. The
amount of assistance from civil power, on which the Roman Catholic clergy could
rely, did not ordinarily extend beyond the personal influence of the
Captains-General at Colombo,” Tennant says and adds that if at all there was
State assistance these were favors and partiality exhibited by successive
Governors to all who were willing to conform to their religion.”
Comment
Balachandran
contradicts his observations based on Tennent in this article with
Balachandran’s own observations on Portugal’s reign of Terror in a previous
article where he had based himself on Prof.P.V.J.Jayasekera’s
book: Confrontations
with Colonialism Vol:1 1796-1920 (Vijitha Yapa, 2017).
See
How Lankan Buddhists won
the battle against proselytization” https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2020/11/23/how-lankan-buddhists-won-the-battle-against-proselytization/ ( Lankaweb – November 23rd, 2020)
Since
Tennent published his book ‘Christianity in Ceylon’ in 1850, there has been
extensive studies done both in Sri Lanka and overseas, and particularly in
India on the criminal methods that Portugal employed to conquer and convert
native populations to Christianity.
Balachandran should have double checked the points made by
Tennent by comparing them with the research of scholars like Queyroz, Fernao de, (The Temporal and Spiritual
Conquest of Ceylon), C.R. Boxer, Tennakoon Vimalananda, Tikiri Abeysinghe, (Portuguese
Rule in Ceylon 1594 – 1612), Paul
E. Peiris, G.P. Malalasekera, among others.
Portugal introduced the Catholic Inquisition, which began in
Spain and spread all over Europe, to the Portuguese colonies, including Ceylon,
in its Empire in Asia. The most notorious of all them is the ‘Goa Inquisition’.
In Europe, the Goa Inquisition became notorious for its
cruelty and use of torture. Voltaire wrote: Goa is sadly famous for its
inquisition, which is contrary to humanity as much as to commerce. The
Portuguese monks deluded us into believing that the Indian populace was
worshipping the Devil, while it is they who served him.”
European entry into Asia
The European entry into Asia, commencing with the Portuguese in
the 16th century, was driven by two principal factors, namely the aim of
colonising Asian countries for purpose of trade and exploitation of natural
resources, and converting the inhabitants of these lands to Christianity The
Portuguese had as one of its primary aims the propagation of the Christian
faith in the newly ‘discovered’ lands of Asia, including Sri Lanka (called ‘
Ceilao’ by the Portuguese) and the realisation of this aim was accompanied by
steps taken to suppress wherever possible all other religions extant in these
lands namely Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam.
Crown
Patronage of missionary activity in the East
The Portuguese authority to spread Christianity in the East was
derived from the Papal Bulls issued by the Popes namely Calixtus III, Nicholas
V, Alexander V1 and the Pope’s Treaty of Tordesillas (in 1492), which divided
the newly ‘ discovered’ lands between Spain and Portugal, and imposed on the
rulers of these countries the duty of propagating the Christian faith. The
Western part of the world was allocated to Spain and the Eastern part to
Portugal.
To the Portuguese the Christianisation of newly ‘ discovered ‘
lands was a State objective. The Portuguese Crown maintained the entire
ecclesiastical establishment in the East. The Doctrine of Padroado (jus
patrionatus established by the Papal Bulls of 1514) provided the authority for
missionary work to be in the hands of the Portuguese Crown in areas where
Portugal claimed political rights. The noted historian C. R. Boxer says ”
The conviction that Portugal was the missionary nation above all the others in
the Western World – Alferes da Fe, ‘ standard bearer of the faith’ as the poet
– playwright Gil Vicente boasted – was widespread and deeply rooted among all
classes”.
Further Royal dispatches addressed to Vice-roys, Governors and
Bishops began with these words (or words to that effect) in the opening
sentence ” Forasmuch as the first and principal obligation of the Kings of
Portugal is to forward the work of conversion by all means in their power
”
The Padroado has been loosely defined as a combination of the
rights, privileges and duties granted by the Papacy to the Crown of Portugal as
patron of the Roman Catholic missions and ecclesiastical establishments in the
regions of Africa, Asia and Brazil. The Padroado Real or Royal patronage of the
Church overseas was one of the most cherished prerogatives of the Portuguese
Crown. It was to become the cause of bitter disputes between Portuguese
missionaries and other Roman Catholic powers.
Diogo do Couto, the Portuguese Soldier cum Chronicler says in his
sixth book ‘ Decada’ (1612) that ” The Kings of Portugal always aimed in
this conquest of the East at so uniting the two powers, spiritual and temporal,
that the one should never be exercised without the other ” Father Paulo de
Trindade, the Franciscan Chronicler, writing in his ‘ Spiritual Conquest of the
East’ at Goa in 1638, says ‘ The two swords of the civil and the ecclesiastical
power were always so close together in the conquest of the East that we seldom
find one being used without the other: for the weapons only conquered through
the right that the preaching of the Gospel gave them, and the preaching was
only of some use when it was accompanied and protected by the
weapons”.
It is in the exercise of the Padroado Real that we see the close
collaboration between the Church and the State in the promotion of Christian
missionary activity in conquered lands. An important component of this
relationship was the doctrinal position of the Papacy, which was vigourously
upheld by the Church that ‘ temporal possessions were occupied unlawfully by
the infidels’ in conquered lands and that these ‘ should be allotted among the
faithful’. There was an inter-locking policy of temporal and spiritual
objectives where benefits flowed to both the Vatican and Portugal.
Verdict of Historians on Portuguese rule in Ceylon
Learned Historians and commentators now generally regard the
arrival of the Portuguese in the year 1505 as the beginning of the Dark Age in
the history of Sri Lanka. The Portuguese through a policy of cunning statecraft
and ruthless terror were able to govern the coastal areas of the island for
most of the next 150 years, until the Dutch replaced them in 1658.
. The Rajavaliya describes the entry of the Portuguese to Sri
Lanka thus:- “There is in our harbour of Colombo a race of people, fair of
skin and comely withal. They don jackets and hats of iron, rest not a minute in
one place but walk here and there. They eat hunks of stone and drink
blood.”
Several noted historians and commentators have expressed their
indignation over the methods employed by the Portuguese during their period of
dominance in the following words:
Sir James Emerson Tennent
Sir James Emerson Tennent refers to the Portuguese conduct in Sri
Lanka in these terms-
“There is no page in the story
of European colonisation more gloomy and repulsive than that which recounts the
proceedings of the Portuguese in Ceylon. Astonished at the magnitude of their
enterprises, and the glory of their discoveries and conquests in India, the
rapidity and success of which secured for Portugal an unprecedented renown, we
are ill-prepared to hear of the rapacity, bigotry and cruelty which
characterised every stage of their progress in the East. They appeared in the
Indian seas in the three-fold character of merchants, missionaries and pirates.
Their ostensible motto was amity, commerce and religion. Their expeditions
consisted of soldiers as well as adventurers, and included friars and chaplain
majors. Their instructions were to begin by preaching, but, that failing, to proceed
to the decision of the sword.”
Paul E. Peiris
The historian Paul E. Peiris observes: ” They found in Ceylon
a contented race, and a fairly prosperous country, and it is melancholy to
reflect that they succeeded in producing nothing but chaos. Out of a long list
of high – born Hidalgos whom Portugal sent to Ceylon, it is difficult to point
to one name as that of an enlightened statesman and high – principled
administrator. No stately fabric remains as compensating for that religious
fanaticism to which ample witness is borne by the devastated ruins of those
lovely structures which the piety of generations had strewn broadcast over the
country Their bequest to the Dutch was a colony of half -castes, a failing
agriculture, a depopulated country, and a miserable and ill – conditioned
people They had in Ceylon an opportunity almost unique in the experience of
European nations in the East, but their moral fibre had proved unequal to the
occasion”.
G.P. Malalasekera
G.P. Malalasekera in his Ph.D. dissertation which was later
published as a book under the title ‘ The Pali Literature of Ceylon’ makes the
following comment in lucid language on the high-handed methods employed by the
Portuguese in pursuit of their colonial objectives which included conversion of
the people of the country into Christianity and the concomitant repression of
Buddhism:
“Every stage of their progress
was marked by a rapacity, bigotry, cruelty and inhumanity unparalleled in the
annals of any other European colonial power. Their ferocity and their utter
indifference of all suffering increased with the success of their army; their
inhuman barbarities were accompanied by callousness which knew no distinction
between man, woman and child; no feeling of compassion was strong enough to
stay their savage hands in their fell work. To terrify their subjects and bring
home to them the might of the Portuguese Power, they committed atrocities which
had they not been found recorded in the decads of their friendly historians,
seems too revolting to be true. Babes were spitted on the soldier’s pikes and
held up that their parents might hear the young cocks crow. Sometimes they were
mashed to pulp between millstones, while their mothers were compelled to
witness the pitiful sight before they themselves were tortured to death. Men
were thrown over bridges for the amusement of the troops to feed the crocodiles
in the river, which eventually grew so tame that at whistle they would raise
their heads above the water in anticipation of the welcome feast.”
Methods employed for
conversion and suppression of non-Christian religions
The Portuguese used a number of methods in their pursuit to
convert people to Christianity and suppress non – Christian religions
prevailing in territories under their control. They can be distinguished as
follows:
(i)
Carrot and Stick Policy
The Portuguese used a carrot and stick policy in converting people
living in the immediate vicinity of Portuguese strongholds particularly along
the West Coast of India and in the lowlands of Sri Lanka.
ii)
Enactment of harsh and oppressive laws
The Portuguese lawmakers enacted a large number of harsh and
oppressive laws with the aim of putting a stop to the public practice of non –
Christian religions such as Buddhism, Hinduism and Islam in territories
controlled by the Portuguese. These laws were followed by a number of other
decrees designed to favour converts to Christianity with Portuguese patronage.
The Ecclesiastical Councils at Goa laid down rules for missionary work and
these rules had a significant bearing on the conduct of Christian missionary
work in Sri Lanka, particularly after 1567. The pioneer Ecclesiastical Council
of 1567 in adopting a series of decisions were guided by three main
considerations, namely:
a) All religions other than orthodox Roman Catholicism were
intrinsically wrong and harmful in themselves. b) The Crown of Portugal had a
fundamental duty to spread the Christian faith and the power of the State must
be utilized to support the work of the Catholic Church c) Conversion of
non-Christians into Christianity must not be made by force, for nobody comes to
Christ by faith unless he is drawn by the love of God.
The third consideration stated above on non -use of force was
negated by several other decisions of the Council which had the sanction of law
by virtue of promulgation of a Vice -regal decree at Goa in December 1567. This
decree enacted among other things the following decisions of the Ecclesiastical
Council:
- All heathen places
of worship in Portuguese controlled areas should be demolished.
- All non
-Christian clergy, teachers and holy men must be expelled.
- All
their sacred texts such as the Koran should be seized and destroyed where
ever found.
- Buddhists
and Hindus must be prohibited from visiting their respective temples in
the neighbouring provinces under the control of other rulers.
- The
transit passage of Asian pilgrims to these places of worship must be
prohibited.
- The
celebration of non – Christian weddings and religious processions must
strictly forbidden.
- Conversions
from either Islam to Buddhism to Hinduism, and vice – versa were not
allowed but the conversion to Christianity from other religions should be
permitted and encouraged.
- Every
married man should be required to practice monogamy irrespective of his
religion.
- Non –
Christian orphans should be required to be handed over to Christian
guardians or foster parents and then baptized by Catholic priests .
- Christians
should be forbidden to live together or lodge with non – Christians
2. In addition the Portuguese
authorities are held as responsible for the following repressive practices,
which if adopted today would, tantamount to explicit violation of human rights
and cultural genocide:
- In Goa
nominal rolls were made of Hindu families and they were forced in groups
of fifty to visit local churches and convents and listen to Christian
sermons on alternate Sundays.
- Fines
were imposed on a sharply escalating scale on those who made attempts to
keep away from complying with these obligations.
- There
was official and legal discrimination against non -Christians who were
denied public employment. On the other hand public offices and
remunerative posts were reserved for Christian converts only and where
there was no such reservation the latter group was favoured.
- Buddhist
Temples, Hindu Kovils and Muslim Mosques were systematically destroyed by
the Portuguese conquistadors and Roman Catholic churches were built on or
near the sites of such destruction.
- Income
drawn from the lands belonging to Buddhist Temples, Hindu Kovils etc. were
channeled to support and maintain Roman Catholic Churches and missionary
educational institutions.
The penal laws against the public practice of Buddhism, Hinduism
and Islam which, were enacted after 1540 in some of Portugal’s eastern
possessions were inspired by laws that had been adopted in European countries
against the practice of what the then European rulers considered as ‘heretical’
or ‘subversive’ forms of Christianity. For example, the treatment of the Roman
Catholics in England during the period of the Reformation, the exclusion of
Jews from public life in many parts of Europe, and the torture and burning at
the stake of ‘ witches’ were based on such penal laws enacted during the period
of the Christian Inquisition.
C.R. Boxer observes: ” It is obvious that these
discriminatory and coercive measures, if they did not actually force people to
become Christians at the point of the sword, made it very difficult for them to
do anything else. Deprived of their priests, teachers, holy men, sacred books
and public places of worship, not to mention the free exercise of their
respective cults, it was confidently expected by the legislators of 1567 that ‘
the false heathen and Moorish religions’ would wither and die on territory
controlled by the Portuguese Crown” .
However, it must be noted that the application of these laws in
Portuguese controlled territories varied significantly according to the time,
place and circumstances and more importantly according to the disposition of
the arch bishops, vice-roys and Captain – Generals (in Sri Lanka) whose decision-making
powers were immense.
It must be further stated that the great abuses that took place in
almost all of the Portuguese overseas mission – fields, including the use of
force and farcical baptism of ignorant converts, did not proceed unnoticed and
without a protest by some members of the Catholic Clergy living in Portugal.
C.R. Boxer refers to a petition to the Portuguese Crown drawn up at Lisbon in
February 1567 by the Bishops of Ceuta, Lisbon, Tangier, Angra, Portalegre,
Lamego and the Algarve protesting against the use of unsavoury methods by Portuguese
missionaries overseas. Boxer then adds
that it was unlikely that seven leading Portuguese prelates would have made
such grave allegations unless they were quite certain of their facts).
iii) Strategic conversions
The Portuguese missionaries were aware that some of the methods
employed to convert Buddhists and Hindus into Christianity were dubious and
indefensible. But nevertheless, they still persisted with rough and ready
methods of conversion in the knowledge that though the first generation of converts
were likely to be superficial Christians, their descendants would become devout
Christians in due course of time. The Bishop of Dume, the pioneer prelate of
Goa, was aware of these outcomes and he is reported to have said in 1561 that
those who remained inside Portuguese territory and accepted baptism rather than
be expelled for refusing to become Christians could hardly be expected to
become good Christians ‘ yet their children will become so ‘.
C.R. Boxer comments ‘ This is, in fact, exactly what happened ‘
and he compares this position to a similar situation that occurred in Europe
where the descendants of the Saxons, Teutons and Slavs, who in many instances
were forcibly converted to Christianity, later became ardent Christians.
iv) The
Ruler and the Ruled must be of the same faith
Both the Catholics and Protestants in Europe readily accepted the
principle that the Ruler and the Ruled should belong to the same faith, which
is expressed in Latin as follows: ‘ cujus regio illius religio ‘.
Conversion was no longer a question of faith. The conversion of
kings was sought because their subjects were expected to follow as a matter of
course. The Portuguese wrote to their King in Lisbon as follows: “If the
King became a Christian, that would be sufficient for all to become the same:
this your Lordship can take as certain, for such is the nature of this
people” (29)
The Portuguese missionaries in Sri Lanka launched a concerted
campaign to achieve this result when they forced the grandson (Dharmapala) of
King Bhuvenaka Bahu to renounce his Buddhist faith and adopt Roman Catholicism
as his religion.
The noted historian P. E. Pieris observes that ” The King’s
change of religion was a grave political blunder: the social organisation of
his people was based on Buddhism, and his defection could not fail to estrange
them from him, the more so when the revenues of their most venerated shrines
were being diverted towards Christian propaganda. It was not long before the
Portuguese priests guided his counsels, Portuguese officers controlled his
army, and Portuguese names were the fashion at Court. ”
v) Forcible conversion of orphans
The use of force was permitted in a series of royal and vice –
regal decrees in respect to the conversion of Hindu orphans in Goa and Bacalm in
India. Legislation enacted both at Lisbon and Goa specifically authorized the
use of force in removing orphans from the custody of their relatives,
guardians, or friends. They were then taken to the College of Sao Paulo of the
Company of Jesus in Goa and baptized, educated and catechized by the Fathers of
the College.
It is quite possible that similar measures were adopted in respect
to Buddhist and Hindu orphans living in Portuguese controlled territories of
Sri Lanka.
vi) Gun
Boat Policy
The Portuguese used force or the threat of the use of force as a
tool in their conversion policy. The writings of Jesuit priests who served in
Catholic missions in various parts of Portuguese controlled territories in Asia
substantiate the adoption of this practice.
Padre Alexandre Valignano, a well – known Jesuit priest who
organized the Jesuit mission in Asia, observes that some of the indigenous
people in the East were incapable and primitive in respect to matters
concerning God, and consequently reasoning would not make an impression as
force. He laments that it would be difficult to establish Christian communities
‘ among the Niggers’ and more difficult to preserve such communities except in
areas under Portuguese Rule, or in regions where the Portuguese power could be
extended such as the sea coast through the use of the Portuguese naval fleet
that can ‘ cruise up and down, dealing out favours and punishments according to
what the people there deserve’.
Padre Alexandre Valignano adds that the striking success of the
missionary work of Francis Xavier on the Fishery Coast was primarily due to the
deliberate mixture of threats and blandishments. The Portuguese fleet lying off
shore had the capacity to deprive people of their fishing and sea borne trade
and using this power Xavier influenced a large number of people living in
coastal areas to embrace Christianity.
C.R. Boxer observes that ‘ gun boat ‘ policy methods were widely
prevalent among the Portuguese missionaries in the East and adds that the term
‘ Christian militant’ was no figure of speech.
vii) Exploiting Buddhist injunctions against taking away of animal life
The Portuguese were well aware of the Buddhist reverence for all
forms of life and the strict injunctions against the taking away of any form of
life including animals whatever the need. Kill and eat is not a Buddhist tenet.
On the contrary Christianity takes the view that animals and plants were
created by God for the benefit of humans and therefore man is free to kill
animals and eat their flesh.
Christian missionaries in predominantly Buddhist and Hindu lands
achieved their most notable successes among the fisher castes and classes.
Those who engage in vocations involving the breeding of animals for slaughter
as well as destruction of animals, which are considered as Wrong Livelihoods,
attract deep – seated prejudice in conventional Buddhist and Hindu societies.
The Portuguese missionaries exploited this position and converted a large mass
of fisher folk, ‘who found acceptance and enhanced self – respect in
Christianity.
viii) Similarities in outward manifestation of the Roman Catholic Church
vis-a-vis Buddhism and Hinduism
The use of images, incense, rosaries, orders of monks and nuns,
colourful ceremonies and Churches etc. created a superficial similarity in the
outward manifestation of Roman Catholicism vis – a -vis Buddhism and Hinduism,
and in turn these similarities also contributed towards making the transition
from the indigenous religions to the Roman Catholic faith relatively more
convenient. In contrast the austere practices of the Protestant religions
failed to impress the mass of the common folk in territories under Dutch and
later British control.
Conclusion
Historian J.H. Elliot says: The
history of the Portuguese intrusion into the Indian Ocean is an epic of
ruthless savagery.” In the bloody annals of the European conquest of Asia,
Portuguese barbarity stands out. Indeed, it apparently was an essential
component of the Portuguese’s strategy to subdue the local populations. This
use of terror will bring great things to your obedience without the need to
conquer them,” Afonso de Albuquerque, chief strategic mastermind behind the
Portuguese expansion into Asia and intermittently known as the Terrible” or
the Great,” wrote to the King of Portugal in 1510 after the sacking of the
Indian city of Goa. I haven’t left a single grave stone or Islamic structure
standing,” he boldly claimed. In another letter to the king, he wrote: I tell
you, sire, the one thing that’s most essential in India: if you want to be
loved and feared here, you must take full revenge.”
Senaka Weeraratna
References
- Repression of Buddhism
in Sri Lanka by the Portuguese (1505 – 1658)
http://www.vgweb.org/unethicalconversion/port_rep.htm
- How Portugal
forged an Empire in Asia
https://thediplomat.com/2019/07/how-portugal-forged-an-empire-in-asia/
