Four police officers interdicted over assault on law student

February 26th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Four police officers – 03 Constables and one Inspector – have been interdicted for allegedly assaulting a law student at the Peliyagoda police station.

Several offices attached to Peliyagoda Police had reportedly assaulted a law student named Migara Gunaratne yesterday (February 25).

The victimized student was identified as the son of former Central Province Governor, President’s Counsel Maithri Gunaratne and the brother of Attorney-at-Law Charitha Gunaratne.

Reports revealed that 10 police officers had assaulted him when he arrived at Peliyagoda Police to visit a suspect detained at the station.

Minister of Public Security Dr. Sarath Weerasekera subsequently directed the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Chandana Wickramaratne to probe the incident and to suspend the officers involved in the assault.

Meanwhile, Police Headquarters, issuing a statement on the incident, said 08 suspects – 04 Nigerian males, 02 Belarussian females, one Sri Lankan male and one Sri Lankan female – were arrested on Tuesday (February 23) for possession of 25g 120mg of heroin, racketeering narcotics, defrauding more than Rs. 1.7 million, possession of 25 bundles of paper used for printing counterfeit currency as well as commercial sex work.

The arrest was made by several officers of Kelaniya Division’s crimes unit including Chief Inspector of Police Linton de Silva, the statement pointed out. Reports revealed the said officer is also accused of assaulting the victim.

According to the Police, the law student had arrived at the police station to visit the Sri Lankan female in custody at around 8.35 pm.

On the directives of IGP, two police teams are probing the incident further, the statement read further.

UNHRC Resolution; What is the real agenda?

February 26th, 2021

By Raj Gonsalkorale

US Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken today encouraged the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to support the resolution on Sri Lanka stating that the ‘lack of accountability for past atrocities in Sri Lanka – Daily Mirror Sri Lanka’

The US Secretary of State seems to give an indication as to what the real agenda behind his and his country’s support for this resolution. He speaks of lack of accountability for past atrocities”. This statement implies that atrocities were committed if there is to be accountability for them. This leads to the question, who committed such alleged atrocities? There were two players in the battle against the LTTE. The Sri Lankan Armed Forces and the LTTE. One or both may have committed atrocities. The Sri Lankan government exists to respond to any allegations on atrocities. The LTTE does not exist although the atrocities they committed were many and well documented.

It would have been useful if Mr Blinken amplified how this resolution will address the accountability issue as far as the LTTE is concerned as there is no one from the LTTE who could or would respond to lack of accountability on their part.

LTTE atrocities have been documented, and video footage shown on many world stages. While many very ordinary Tamils, Muslims and Sinhalese were killed by them, they also killed two Heads of State, several cabinet ministers and leading politicians in Sri Lanka, and of course Tamil politicians as well.

Is Mr Blinken saying that since there is no one from the LTTE today who would acknowledge their atrocities or could be held responsible, the UNHRC should concern itself only with the Sri Lankan government and pursue action against them? Mr Blinken should know that Sri Lankans would not stand for this and if the US or any other ally of it thinks they could subjugate the country by stealth and overlook the vile deeds of a ruthless terrorist organisation, they could think twice about it.

Prior to looking for answers to the rhetorical question what is the real agenda?”, it may be worthwhile to pose a counter rhetorical question and look for answers to that. This question is about the geographic location of Sri Lanka. If the country was not where it is now and thousands of kilo meters away and lost to the world in some corner of an ocean, without China having any interest in the country, would the UNHRC or the Core Group or the US have had any interest in Sri Lanka?

Would these concerned” core group countries or the country and its allies suspected openly by many as the driving force behind these resolutions, shown any interest in human rights in Sri Lanka?

Readers are left to ponder and find an answer to this question.

It is reported and believed by some to an extent that the Tamil Eelam lobby groups in the US and in the countries who have allied with the US in targeting Sri Lanka, that these countries are raising this issue at the UNHRC and other forums because of the pressure exerted by these lobby groups. The following extract of a communication sent to the writer by a leading Tamil activist who wished to remain unnamed at this stage, stated what might be the reality in regard to the power and influence of these lobby groups.

This source stated there was much disgust amongst many Tamils, both within and outside Sri Lanka and wishing that the writer would highlight this in an article. The message is quoted in full, quote the Tamil Eelam lobby have the misguided idea that they are a powerful lobby group. If not for China showing an interest in the country, and making the US and India angry, they would have gone down like a lead balloon. They would have then worked with the Sri Lanka government to address issues faced by Tamil people in a spirit of cooperation with all others in Sri Lanka. This lobby has been holding a candle for the most horrible terrorist organisation in the world and never once condemning their atrocities. So many Tamil people were killed by them, not only Sinhala and Muslim people.

They are funding the setting up of a separate state in Sri Lanka and providing funds to Tamils in Sri Lanka to keep separatism alive and preventing the Tamil people and Sinhala and Muslim people in the country to find solutions to outstanding issues. If the Tamil people in Sri Lanka are to find their real enemy, it is this Eelam lobby and their supporters in Sri Lanka, who are their real enemies and preventing reconciliation amongst the people in the country. Please let Sinhala people know that a majority of Tamils want to live in peace with them” unquote. 

So much for these lobby groups who obviously are profiting by preventing the Tamil people living in Sri Lanka working together with all other communities to address any lingering issues that have and are affecting them. Their agents in Sri Lanka seem to be carrying out the dictates of these well-funded lobby groups. Money does talk. One is reminded on an age old saying that a beggar never wishes his or her wounds to heal for fear of not being able to beg and earn money. Keeping the Tamil Eelam issue alive seems to fall into this category of activism as these lobby groups would have to wind up and give up their privileged life style if the issue is addressed and resolved by the people of Sri Lanka and their funding sources dry up.

Leaving aside these lobby group, Sri Lanka is indeed in a vortex, with its proximity to India, its close links to China and the machinations of the US twirling it.

The conundrum that makes the vortex that Sri Lanka is in even more complex and destabilising, is India, just 20 kilo meters away, and the US, with the threat to their strategic interests by the super power in waiting, China, an ardent enemy of both.

Sri Lankans may be poor and they are not perfect like the rest of the world. It’s possible that some human rights issues may have occurred in the heat of the final battle against the LTTE. However, Sri Lankans are not fools. They can see through this mirage of human rights violations advanced continuously by the US and its allies. Sri Lankans know that they have weaknesses and they know these have to be addressed by themselves and not by others whose own record on human rights is appalling to say the least. 

It would have been interesting if a resolution was moved to investigate human rights violations in the US based on the revelations documented in the latest Human Rights Watch report. Unfortunately, no country would do that as its allies, in self-preservation, will not do it.

Tamara Kunanayakam, a well-respected Sri Lankan diplomat and former Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations Office at Geneva and who has an in depth knowledge of the inner workings of the UN system in the back of her hand states that quote the countries in the Non Aligned Movement and in the Global South have a principled position against targeting a country, or naming and shaming”, which is a weapon in the arsenal of the US and its allies, when they want to achieve their strategic objectives elsewhere. She says further that to fulfil the Charter responsibility to promote and encourage respect for human rights in all countries, the UNHRC has a mechanism called the universal periodic review (UPR) where all countries are duty bound to submit a report on promotion and protection of human rights in their own countries and where questions can be raised by others and a list of recommendations made by all parties. The State under review then has the opportunity to select the recommendations that it can implement and makes a voluntary commitment to do so. It is a cooperative not confrontational mechanism within which all states are treated equally, in conformity with the inalienable Charter principle of sovereign equality.  It is in the interest of the NAM/Global South that that principle is respected. It is the US and its allies that sees it as THE major obstacle to its global hegemony. The UN Charter based on multilateral order is founded on the principle of sovereign equality of States, big or small, rich or poor, powerful or weak. It is the guarantor of our sovereignty.  It is that order that the US wants to dismantle as an obstacle to its own ambition to a world order under its hegemony”. 

Sri Lankans of all hues. Tamils, Muslims, Sinhalese and others should echo Ms Kunanayakam’ s assertion that it is our responsibility to strengthen the United Nations not weaken it, and actively join with the Non Aligned Movement and the Global South to prevent it from being instrumentalised by the US and its allies. It is common sense that India cannot be trusted to side with Sri Lanka on this issue. If the government thinks they could be trusted, and if they do support Sri Lanka, it would be very important for all Sri Lankans to know the price that would have had to be paid to elicit India’s support.

No doubt it would be hefty price. It would be far better tactically and strategically for Sri Lanka to follow the path so well-articulated by Tamara Kunanayakam.

The US and India should know that the action of the Core Group and their supporters will only draw Sri Lanka even closer to China, and if they thought they were Sri Lanka’s friends who were only concerned in helping the country, Sri Lanka may well ask why it needs enemies when they have friends” like the US and its allies.

The disturbing development that might be in the offing is that the Sri Lankan Government is ready to compromise with the US-UK led sponsors and accept a consensus resolution. As Ms Kunanayakam clearly explains, the compromise will be Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, because the resolution will be based on the Bachelet Report and resolution 30/1, both of which were rejected by the same Government, as threatening Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and national security. The report is based on the R2P (Right to Protect populations) doctrine that allows armed intervention, rejected by the General Assembly in 2009, as incompatible with the UN Charter and international law. If Sri Lanka goes ahead with negotiations for a compromise, they will be playing a two faced Jekyll and Hyde act and endangering alliances like NAM and Global South. Countries in these alliances will not trust Sri Lanka thereafter and we will be dictated to by a US led alliance.

A consensus resolution, once arrived at, will be a compromise agreed with the very countries who are out to break Sri Lanka’s alliances with the NAM and Global South, and it will be a precedent-setting resolution legitimising R2P. The implications for Sri Lanka will be worse than in 2015, because, unlike 2015, it will be argued there was a national consensus with no internal opposition to the resolution from a moribund Opposition, plus the 2/3 majority.

Since the US agenda is to bring SL within the ambit of QUAD (a group of countries comprising Japan, India, Australia and the United States) and away from China as well as friendly nations in NAM and the Global South, it is likely that a consensus resolution will be followed by imposition of the outstanding US defence agreements – SOFA and MCC by another name, completing the US defence triptych with ACSA.

Sri Lankans have short memories and they seem to have forgotten what consensus resolutions result in. In 1987, not even 3 months after Sri Lanka agreed to a consensus resolution in Geneva, ndian Air Force planes and fighter jets violated the country’s airspace with food drops to the Jaffna peninsula, and 2 months afterwards the Indo-Lanka accord was imposed on us, along with the 13th Amendment. Similarly, ACSA and the Disappearance Act allowing for extradition of Sri Lankan citizens for trial in foreign courts were imposed post 2015 consensus, along with intervention in key ministries and PM’s office, etc. MCC was not signed because of resistance from several quarters although the Cabinet at the time approved its signing.

As Ms Kunanayakam says Sri Lanka has to work with countries in the NAM and Global South who are in the UNHRC, in order to defeat this latest resolution and ensure that the UNHRC complies in Ms Kunanayakam’ s words, with the principle of a cooperative, and not confrontational mechanism within which all states are treated equally, in conformity with the inalienable Charter principle of sovereign equality”. In order to defeat the resolution, and for Sri Lanka not to compromise its sovereignty, it has to ask a friendly Member of the Council to call for a vote when the resolution is tabled. Compromising with countries hostile to Sri Lanka will be like walking into a den of hungry Wolves.

Once tabled, the passage of this resolution will be a precedent to subjugate other nations who do not have the strength or the wealth to stand against duplicitous nations like the US and its allies whose own human rights violations record is worse than that of countries they support actively without any regard to violations in those countries. This resolution therefore has to be defeated by those countries in the NAM and the Global South who are vulnerable to the machinations of these mighty powers, if not to support Sri Lanka, but at least for their own sake.  

Sri Lanka and other countries in the NAM and Global South need the assistance of all countries including China, to improve the lot of their people. They need investments without strings, and not handouts. These countries should extend their hand of friendship with true concern for improving life in these countries, and not extend a hand with a hidden instrument that will injure the hand extended in return.

An American Journal (1851) highlights massacres of the Sinhalese and horrors perpetrated in 1848 under the administration of Lord Torrington

February 26th, 2021

  The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (May 1851)  

In 1851, An American Journal  (The United States Magazine and Democratic Review), at a time (1851) when they I.e. USA, did not have imperial ambitions that dovetailed with that of British imperialism, highlighted and exposed the genocidal crimes committed on the Sinhalese people in British occupied Ceylon, under the administration of the then Governor Lord Torrington.

In the concluding phase of the Journal article having the caption ‘ The English in Ceylon” ( May 1851) , the author of the article says as follows:

” The history of Lord Torringtons administration in Ceylon affords an epitome of English rule, wherever throughout the world, by force, or fraud, or violence, she has succeeded in planting her guilty flag. The horrors perpetrated during 1848 in the island-gem of the East, are the counterpart of those of which, from time to time, during a period of seven centuries, the green isle of the West has been the victim.

We have reproduced this Ceylon tragedy, because it contains a moral upon which it behooves the Democracy of America, at the present moment, seriously to reflect. The flag which sanctioned the massacres of the Cingalese, and has witnessed the devastation of Celtic Ireland; the flag which, usurping every advantageous commercial and political position throughout the globe, has been the harbinger everywhere of desolation and death this flag, which in two wars, our fathers levelled in the dust, now flaunts us in the face on the southern portion of this our continent ; out-spreads its crimson folds over republican soil, insulting our manhood, blighting our commercial prospects, and dimming the lustre of the stars and stripes. Shall Central America share the fate of Ceylon ? Shall our sister Republics on this continent, whose independence, hy every principle of honor, of interest, and of duty, we are bound to protect, be consigned to the tender mercies of a Torrington ? Shall the island of Ruatan become the Ceylon of the Western Hemisphere, and the Isthmus of Central America be made, on a smaller scale, a second Hindostan ? We submit these questions, in all earnestness, to the consideration of the Democracy of America, confident that they will be answered in a manner worthy of those, whose pride it is, that they inherit the principles of a Jefferson, a Madison, a Monroe, a Jackson and a Polk”.

  The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (May 1851)  

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Full Article below

The English in Ceylon.

May 1851.

http://books.lakdiva.org/moa/cornell/1851_english_in_ceylon.html

BRITISH policy, or that system which the British Government has for ages systematically pursued, and by which it has acquired its vast colonial empire, is hut very imperfectly understood by the mass of the American people. Deriving our knowledge of English affairs, for the most part, from English sources, we are too apt to he dazzled by the contemplation of an empire upon which the sun never sets, and to ascribe to Divine destiny, that which, in reality, is the result of a system, more fiendish, and more detestable, because more extending and more extended in its operation, than that of Machiavelli. The conquests of old Rome were attended, at least, with glory; and, in modern times, those of our own country were laden with fruits, not alone of glory and renown to the conquerors, but better far, of freedom, of happiness, and of civilization to the conquered. England alone, of all the nations, ancient or modern, is the only one whose sword, while entwined with wreaths of cypress for the vanquished, has failed to reap one pure laurel to deck the victor’s brow. Survey her colonial empire ; glance your eye athwart those boundless plains made fruitful by the young embraces of the god of day and point, if you can, to one rood of territory, whose acquisition was not conceived in selfishness and iniquity, and consummated in treachery, in perfidy and fraud. As the subject, however, of England’s colonial empire is one which could not properly be treated within the limits of a review article, we shall confine ourselves, for the present, to a condensed expose of certain occurrences of which the island of Ceylon has recently been the theatre and which have startled the propriety even of that most fastidious assembly, the British House of Commons.

Placed at the western entrance of the Bay of Bengal, Ceylon is separated by a narrow strait from the mainland of Hindostan. In size, it is nearly as large as Ireland; and it possesses a population of about a million and a half of souls, made up of various tribes of native Cingalese, Malabars, Mahometans, Coolies, Dutch and English, and their mongrel descendants. Once the abode of civilization, as is evidenced by the ruins of ancient cities, canals, bridges, aqueducts, &c., in which the interior of the island abounds, its geographical position, and natural advantages of soil and climate, should make of Ceylon, in our day, the chief mart of Eastern commerce. That it does not occupy this position, can only be attributed to that system, as short-sighted as vicious, by which the island has, for half a century, been governed, for the immediate profit of the mother country. In 1796, Ceylon was taken possession of by the English, and the Dutch expelled from its shores. From that period, down to so late as 1819, the native chiefs boldly resisted the usurped authority of the invaders, and were finally reduced to subjection only after a desperate struggle, and by such agencies as England alone is skilled to employ for the accomplishment of her darling objects. Since 1819, the government of the colony has been administered by a Governor, appointed by the Colonial Secretary, for the time being, at home, assisted by a council composed entirely of European civil and military servants, who are described by MeCulloch as being, from their tenure of office, totally subservient to the will of the Governor. The religion of the island is that of Buddha, as established by the following clause of the treaty of the 2nd of March, 1815, between the British government and the native chiefs The religion of Buddha, professed by the chiefs and inhabitants of these provinces, is declared inviolable; and its rites, ministers and places of worship, are to be maintained and protected. The period embraced between the years 1819 and 1846, was not remarkable for any extraordinary occurrences in Ceylon; suffice it to say, that the history of the island during this interval, is made up of patient suffering and distress on the part of the natives, and of heartless tyranny and exaction on the part of their foreign rulers.

In 1846. Lord Torrington was appointed by Earl Grey, Whig Colonial Secretary,to the lucrative office of Governor of Ceylon. Arrived at the seat of government, his lordship is surprised to find the financial affairs of the colony in an embarrassed condition; and, accordingly, in virtue of the wide discretionary powers vested in him, proceeds to meet the difficulty off-hand by the imposition of severe new taxes of his own invention. These taxes, though decidedly original in their way, were yet of that character, that any one at all acquainted with the colony might have foreseen that they could never by any possibility be collected. The most obnoxious of them were, a road-tax, a shop-tax, a gun-tax, and a dog-tax. The first ordained, that every male resident in the island, between the ages of fifteen and fifty-five, should either labor for six days in each year on the public roads, or pay three shillings sterling, in lieu of such personal service. The second enacted, that every occupant of a shop, the rental of which amounted to £ 5, should take out a yearly license on a £ 1 stamp. The third directed, that on a certain day in each year, the Cingalese should repair to the chief towns, armed, and apply for licenses for their fire-arms, at a cost of 2s. 6d. for each gun. The fourth, imposed a tax of ir. on every dog kept in the island, and sentenced to death all puppies above three months old whose proprietors could not produce the protecting shilling. Now, it is necessary to understand that in Ceylon, as in all countries subject to the British flag, the bulk of the population are extremely poor; hence, the payment of these taxes was to them an impossibility. Those, moreover, upon dogs and guns, were imposed upon what were to them absolute necessaries of life. Besides, the road-tax was a direct outrage upon that religion which, as we have shown above, the English had bound themselves by treaty to protect, since the native priests are restricted by it, both from labor and from touching money. The promulgation of the decree announcing these new taxes naturally created great excitement throughout the island. Petitions, memorials, remonstrances, from all classes of the inhabitants, were laid before the Governor. They were disregarded. By any means, Lord Torrington was resolved to carry out his object. The assembling of the people in large masses was encouraged by the government agents, in the hopes that a collision between them and the British troops would occur. It did occur. A British soldier is slightly wounded, whether by any of the native inhabitants or not, does not appear from the evidence taken before the Parliamentary Committee, which is the only authority which we shall quote. But the collision, so anxiously sought for by Lord Torrington, had taken place; and martial law is at once proclaimed. Proclamations are issued, confiscating the lands and properties of all those who, terrified at the atrocities they had before seen committed under martial law, had fled into the jungles. Courts martial, composed of subaltern officers, ignorant of the language of the country, tried, convicted, sentenced, and put to instant death, hundreds of the innocent inhabitants; and this, not only in violation of all law, human and divine, but in utter contempt of the 7th article of the treaty, to which we have already referred, which stipulates that No sentence of death can be carried into execution against any inhabitant, except by the written warrant of the British Governor or Lieutenant Governor for the time being. But what cares Lord Torrington for treaties, or for the laws of humanity ? Must he not govern ? And what means government in the vocabulary of a British aristocrat, but confiscation and murder ?

Much has been said of the magnanimity of the British soldier. Let the following letters, addressed by the commandant of Kandy, to the presiding officer of one of the courts martial, hounding him on in his bloody career, serve as a specimen

My dear Watson:
You are getting on swimmingly. Impress on the court that there is no necessity for taking down the evidence in detail; so they are satisfied with the guilt or innocence of the individual, that is sufficient for them to find and sentence. This is the law and the mode.
Yours, T. A. DROUGHT, Col. Commanding.
August 16, 1848.

Well were these magnanimous instructions obeyed. For a period of nigh three months, confiscations, burnings, massacres, were the order of the day in Ceylon: and this, be it remembered, notwithstanding that subsequent to the imposition of martial law, not a single offense was pretended ever to have been committed by the inhabitants. Amongst those who suffered during this period, was one whose execution is thus mentioned by Lord Torrington in a dispatch to Earl Gray___” An influential priest who was convicted of administering treasonable oaths, was shot at Kandy in full robes. This priests trial took place at Kandy, and he was arraigned–

First, For having directly or indirectly held correspondence with rebels, and Cur not giving all the information in his power which might lead to the apprehension of a proclaimed rebel, Kaddapolla Unanse, professing to know his place of concealment on or about 17th August, 1848. Second, For administering, or conniving at the administration (!) of a treasonable oath to one Kerr Bande, on or about the 17th August, 1848.

On these absurd and unintelligible charges the poor Buddhist priest was dragged before a military tribunal; tried by military judges, not one of whom understood the language in which the evidence against him was given; convicted and shot! Several attorneys who were present at the trial; and who did understand the language, felt satisfied that the witnesses for the prosecution had perjured themselves for the purpose of currying favor with the Governor, and that the priest was innocent. Under this impression they besought the Governor to postpone the execution. In vain Lord Torringtons answer was By G, sir, if all the lawyers in Ceylon said that the priest was innocent, he should be shot tomorrow morning. And shot he was. More, Earl Grey, in answer to Lord Torringtons dispatch announcing the execution, pronounced the death of the Buddhist priest to be highly satisfactory! Again, in a subsequent dispatch, Earl Grey, in the name of the Queen, complimented Lord Torrington, and declared his complete approval of his decision, promptitude, and judgment. Thus sustained by the Home Government, and having triumphed over the refractory inhabitants of Ceylon, surely Lord Torrington must feel proud and happy! But no: after all the massacres, pillages, burnings and confiscations after he had made a desert, and called it peace.

Lord Torrington discovered that his severe taxes were inapplicable to the island, and could not be collected. They were accordingly every one repealed!

These proceedings had now begun to attract popular attention in England, and in the session of 1849, a parliamentary committee was appointed to investigate then-i. Upon the evidence taken before that committee, we have based our statements. Their authenticity, therefore, cannot be impeached. And this is England. England of the World’s Fair, and the Peace Congress ; England of George Thompson, and the Abolition Societies! What matters it, that a few men, Cobden and Bright, and their associates, should denounce these atrocities, and that the London Quarterly Review should stigmatise them as a disgrace to the English name they have been sanctioned by the British government, and are the consequences of the policy by which, in its foreign and colonial relations, that government has invariably been directed. The history of Lord Torringtons administration in Ceylon affords an epitome of English rule, wherever throughout the world, by force, or fraud, or violence, she has succeeded in planting her guilty flag. The horrors perpetrated during 1848 in the island-gem of the East, are the counterpart of those of which, from time to time, during a period of seven centuries, the green isle of the West has been the victim.

We have reproduced this Ceylon tragedy, because it contains a moral upon which it behooves the Democracy of America, at the present moment, seriously to reflect. The flag which sanctioned the massacres of the Cingalese, and has witnessed the devastation of Celtic Ireland; the flag which, usurping every advantageous commercial and political position throughout the globe, has been the harbinger everywhere of desolation and death this flag, which in two wars, our fathers levelled in the dust, now flaunts us in the face on the southern portion of this our continent ; out-spreads its crimson folds over republican soil, insulting our manhood, blighting our commercial prospects, and dimming the lustre of the stars and stripes. Shall Central America share the fate of Ceylon ? Shall our sister Republics on this continent, whose independence, hy every principle of honor, of interest, and of duty, we are bound to protect, be consigned to the tender mercies of a Torrington ? Shall the island of Ruatan become the Ceylon of the Western Hemisphere, and the Isthmus of Central America be made, on a smaller scale, a second Hindostan ? We submit these questions, in all earnestness, to the consideration of the Democracy of America, confident that they will be answered in a manner worthy of those, xv hose pride it is, that they inherit the principles of a Jefferson, a Madison, a Monroe, a Jackson and a Polk.

  Courtesy: The United States Magazine and Democratic Review (1851)  


Original text courtesy of the
Cornell University proto-type Digital Library Collections – Making of America
Formatted Text in HTML put Online at Lakdiva.net with their Permission.

Title: The English in Ceylon
Author:
Journal: The United States Magazine and Democratic Review.
Print: Vol. XXVIII, No. CLV, – 1851 May, p. 409 p. 410 p. 411 p. 412
Publisher: J.& H.G. Langley, New York.

Editor’s Note: Text Proof read by Kavan Ratnatunga but many OCR and formatting errors, probably still remain.

Please also see notes on other interesting articles like this that have been put online in the Digital Library Collections of MoA.

UNHRC Resolution: why Sri Lanka must seek Rejection & Closure

February 25th, 2021

Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister has expressed what the Sri Lankan public wish to hear. We want the Government to take a firm stand and strategize on how to put to rest this unfair, biased witch hunt against Sri Lanka. A conflict that lasted 3 decades was ended not by UN or UNHRC but by Sri Lanka. UN or UNHRC did not stop LTTE, could not stop LTTE and did not save a single child from being turned into child soldier killers. Not only that the UN or UNHRC could not stop war crimes against ANIMALS by LTTE. It is laughable how countries with blood stained hands are writing resolutions against Sri Lanka and demanding accountability while they refuse to be accountable for their sins both colonial and modern. The Sri Lankan public must understand the dangers at hand and why we must pressurize the GoSL through its foreign ministry to either seek a vote or lobby members to force the core group to withdraw their resolution.

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=442803713814303

UNHRC is interfering into the domestic affairs of Sri Lanka with each resolution.

This will politically socially and economically impact Sri Lanka as it will impede our sovereignty.

Why Sri Lanka must go for a vote? 

In simply sitting silent while the Core Group reads out its bogus charges and not asking countries whether they agree or not,  Sri Lanka is silently accepting every lie and trumped up charges.

In not raising objection, Sri Lanka will be allowing UNHRC to continue with more detrimental demands that will interfere into the legal mechanisms of Sri Lanka, leaving no room for the national laws to prevail.

In simply surrendering, we will be allowing foreign intervention via R2P  (armed humanitarian intervention) and eventually end up remote controlled by Geneva. It’s a modern version of Colonial Governor in the form of Bachelet ruling Sri Lanka.

In not raising objection, Sri Lanka is watching UNHRC flout the UN Charter and the spirit of the UN Charter and international laws. We cannot allow this to happen to Sri Lanka, for eventually it will be repeated on other countries as well.

All that UNHRC will say is – ‘we did in Sri Lanka, your country is next’.

Countries that nitpick on Sri Lanka for human rights, claiming we cannot look after our own are cannot even look after their covid patients and are holding world records for covid deaths1

If Sri Lanka doesn’t go for a vote, Bachelet will invoke individual unilateral sanctions because she cannot use her office to impose sanctions.  Only UNSC can impose sanctions and that too if a nation poses an international threat to peace. UNSC has never sanctions countries for human rights!

If Sri Lanka doesn’t go for a vote, it’s as good as admitting to the lies being told by even the UNHRC head. For her to read out a report and says ‘more than 250,000 people were detained for months in military-run closed camps’ is unacceptable and the GoSL must demand she retract &  apologize for this. This is going overboard with lies.

We have been repeatedly saying that if there were individual excesses committed by soldiers not adhering to command or not following rules of war, then bring these individual instances with evidence and separately charge them if found guilty beyond doubt. But the brush stroke allegations of the nature that the UNHRC head is putting into her report is going overboard with bias. It is because of these lies that we must defend our troops and our nation.

If Sri Lanka, remains silent and allows the UNHRC heads’ biased report to go without admonition then we are again walking into another external intervention of what took place in 1987 with India threatening Sri Lanka, dropping parippu over Sri Lanka and forcing the signing of the Indo-Lanka Accord and landing Indian Peace Keepers that killed Sinhalese, Muslims and Tamils and even raped 3000 Tamil women. Do we want a repeat of this? NO

But what is important to realize is that India intervened unilaterally, today we are facing QUAD nations & their allies who wish to use Sri Lanka’s airports and ports as military installations and use our land for international trade and holiday hub for their staff and families – look at the number of foreign resorts, foreign apartments emerging across Sri Lanka and the manner they are creating no-go zones securing the area for themselves!

Therefore, the 2015 co-sponsorship of 30/1 resolution paved the way for much damage. The best way to get rid of the defenders of the nation is to put them in jail on trumped up charges, this is what the UNHRC is tasked to do via the international tribunal with international judges and international lawyers to find our war heroes guilty and put them out of the way, while they descend and rule Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka must now be alert, as the UNHRC has come to the last leg of its outsourced plan by the QUAD and allies. Sri Lanka and Sri Lankans must unite to save its sovereignty and its nation.

Shenali D Waduge

‘Political move’: Sri Lanka urges rejection of UNHRC resolution

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Aljazeera

Sri Lanka subjected to ‘unprecedented propaganda campaign’, the foreign minister says in video address to the UN Human Rights Council.

Sri Lanka has urged the United Nations Human Rights Council to reject a forthcoming resolution voicing serious concern” over the deteriorating” rights situation in the country.

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena told the council it would have to decide whether time should be spent raking over Sri Lanka or if the resolution was politically motivated.KEEP READINGSri Lanka to allow COVID burials for Muslims after outcryUK Muslims complain to UN over Sri Lanka’s cremation policySri Lanka war memorial to be rebuilt after Tamils protestThousands in Sri Lanka drink ‘miracle’ COVID potion, minister ill

Sri Lanka had been subjected to an unprecedented propaganda campaign”, he said on Tuesday in a video address to the UN rights body, which is meeting virtually.

It is regrettable that … elements working against Sri Lanka intend to table another country-specific resolution.”

Members should choose whether Sri Lanka warrants the urgent attention of this council – or if this campaign is essentially a political move that contravenes the very values and principles on which this council has been established”, he added.

Last month, UN rights chief Michelle Bachelet called for an International Criminal Court investigation into Sri Lanka’s Tamil separatist conflict and sanctions against top generals and others accused of war crimes.

Bachelet accused Sri Lanka of reneging on promises to ensure justice for thousands of civilians killed in the final stages of the 37-year separatist war that ended in 2009.

The United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Malawi, Montenegro and North Macedonia submitted a draft resolution for consideration by the 47-member Human Rights Council next month.

It is the only one tabled so far during the 46th regular session of the council, which opened on Monday and is due to run until March 23.

It expresses serious concern over emerging trends over the past year, which represent clear early warning signs of a deteriorating human rights situation in Sri Lanka”.

They include the accelerating militarisation of civilian government functions, erosion of the independence of the judiciary … ongoing impunity and political obstruction of accountability for crimes … surveillance and intimidation of civil society and shrinking democratic space, arbitrary detentions, allegations of torture”.

It also voices concern that the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has hurt freedom of religion.

It urges Colombo to ensure a thorough and impartial investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of all allegations of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law”.

Gunawardena said the resolution, if passed, would only result in a significant loss of morale in countries fighting terrorism”.

The council must hold the scales even – not going by hearsay,” he said.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 3

February 25th, 2021

By Rohan Gunaratna Courtesy Adaderana

The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) the real reincarnation of the LTTE – Rohan Gunaratna

http://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=8115

The Global Tamil Forum (GTF) led by the Norway-based Nediyavan is the real reincarnation of the LTTE, and not the US-based outfit led by Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran, which is trying to establish a Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE), says Prof.Rohan Gunaratna, the Singapore-based expert on terrorism.

Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism at Nanyang University in Singapore, told Express that Rudrakumaran has a better understanding of politics and is therefore more likely to negotiate a settlement with the Sri Lankan government than Nediyavan, who is a hardcore LTTE man.

Nediyavan, who had studied in Moscow, ended up being deputy to Castro, the LTTE’s chief fund manager.

In due course Rudrakumaran will realise that a Transnational Government is a pipedream like an independent Tamil Eelam and will start talks with the Sri Lankan government,” Gunaratna predicted.

He pointed out that all those Tamils who had voted in the recent TGTE elections are citizens of countries other than Sri Lanka, and that 90 percent of these will not come back to their ancestral homeland. 

The expert characterised Rudrakumaran, a US-based attorney and son of a former Mayor of Jaffna, as a cautious person” who keeps within the law, unlike Nediyavan’s followers.

BTF MORE DANGEROUS THAN TGTE

According to Gunaratna, the British Tamil Forum (BTF) is a handmaiden of the GTF and Fr.Immanuel, who heads the BTF, is a puppet” of Nediyavan. Fr.Immanuel preaches ethnic hatred not reconciliation,” Gunaratna said.

Yet, the former British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and several MPs had addressed the GTF on February 25 in London.The BTF is therefore more dangerous for Sri Lankathan the TGTE.

DOOR OPEN FOR ARMS SMUGGLER ANANDARAJAH TOO  

As for the Sri Lankan government, it is ever ready for talks with anyone giving up violence and opting for negotiations, Gunaratna says.

Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa is a man with a mission who knows when to use military means and when to talk peace. If it is necessary to bring about lasting peace, the Secretary of Defence will negotiate even with those LTTE leaders who had committed heinous crimes. After all they too are Sri Lankans, though misguided,” he said.

Doors for talks are open even for a man like Ponnaiah Anandarajah, the LTTE’s top arms procurer, who had smuggled more than 10,000 tonnes of armaments between 1996 and 2009, Gunaratna said.

AMNESTY FOR LTTE CADRE

The expert regretted that Western governments are turning a blind eye to the fact that Sri Lanka has given amnesty” to over 10, 000 hardcore LTTE cadre who had surrendered.

These LTTE cadre are in the process of being rehabilitated and absorbed into society, and that is like getting amnesty,” he explained.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 2

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy https://ltteuk.wordpress.com/

WHAT EXACTLY IS THE UK DOING? A TERRORIST SAFE HAVEN!

UK politicians should have some respect for its security services!

http://www.globalpolitician.com/default.asp?22235-britain-terror

LTTE Tamil Tigers” and its UK-wide network

Dominic Whiteman – 10/18/2006

LTTE was banned in the UK February 28th 2001. The annual publication of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) London ‘Military Balance 2005/2006′ referred to emerging links between the LTTE and the Al-Qaeda movement. It was later revealed confidentially by the editors to diplomatic sources that these links were in terms of commercial transactions including trafficking for financial gain and acquisition of technology rather than any ideological linkage. Experts are studying with interest links between the LTTE and Al-Qaeda in its financial, commercial and arms dealings. It is also believed that such links also exist in maritime transactions.

The LTTE, better known as the Tamil Tigers, which is engaged in an armed confrontation with the Sri Lankan Government, was the first terrorist organisation to use suicide bombers against civilian and military targets. It has in the last 23 years assassinated the political leadership in Sri Lanka, killed a former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and been involved in the loss of nearly 60,000 lives of mostly innocent civilians.

On August 21, 2006 a British NHS GP at Forest Primary Care Centre, Hertford Road in Edmonton, Dr Murugesu Vineyagamoorthy and his wife Dr Pushpam were arrested in New York by the FBI for attempting to bribe a US Justice Dept official with $1 million to try to get the LTTE off the list of banned terrorist organisations in the USA. He was further charged with facilitating the purchase of American made missiles and British submarine technology for the LTTE. This arrest according to many observers was an eye-opener to the huge volume of money that is raised through extortion and intimidation from the Tamil diaspora in the UK that is either smuggled into Sri Lanka through human carriers or in the form of weapons purchased in third countries.

Fundraising in UK: method case studies

i) Extortion The US based organisation Human Rights Watch earlier this year published a study entitled Funding the final war – LTTE intimidation and extortion in the Tamil diaspora (a case study of UK and Canada)”. According to this study many individual families and businesses have been approached to pay sums of money ranging from ё2000 to ё100,000. The LTTE’s de-facto headquarters in London masquerading under the name ‘British Tamil Association’ has even arranged direct debit arrangements to its account at the Natwest Bank. They have now progressed to getting members of the Tamil community to fill out a questionnaire detailing family address, income, details of family in Sri Lanka etc. Any refusal to meet with payments would result in one of the following steps.

1. Next of kin living in Sri Lanka would be abducted and later killed

2. The person refusing to pay, himself would be killed

This can be illustrated as follows.

On January 5, 2006 Mr Subramaniam Sivakumar, a Tamil businessman who operated a grocery shop called Apna Bazaar on Willesden Lane in North West London was killed in mysterious circumstances. Police later found in his journals that he had been making regular payments of ё10 – ё20,000 to LTTE boys”. Family members believe his failure to make one of these ‘regular payments’ sealed his fate. Police investigations are continuing.

ii) Open Public Events In Spite of Ban Each year the LTTE holds 2 (regularly annual) events in London. On 27 November 2005, notwithstanding the fact that the LTTE is banned both in the UK and the European Union, nearly 5000 Sri Lankan Tamils gathered at the Wembley Arena to commemorate the 50th birthday of the LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran who incidentally is wanted by Interpol after having been charged by the Supreme court of India for assassinating their Prime Minister. The event took the form of drama and dances performed in his honour and candles were lit to honour the name of the notorious black tigers” (LTTE suicide bombers). Entrance to the event cost ё35 per head which entitled attendees to a 2006 calendar with colour illustrations of Prabhakaran’s military prowess. Incidentally the principal speaker at this event was Mr Anton Balasingham, the LTTE’s theoretician and chief negotiator at all the LTTE’s talks with the Sri Lanka Government. Mr Balasingham is a British citizen who lives comfortably in Greenford, London from where he proclaims the LTTE ideology to the western world. His operations in the UK have been ignored by the authorities citing various reasons.

On 25 July 2006 the LTTE organised the black July rally at Hyde Park with a 20 ft cut-out of the LTTE leader on the stage. The event was supposedly held to commemorate an incident which had occurred 30 years ago where some tamil civilians had been killed by a Sinhalese mob. The event was organised by a LTTE front calling themselves Tamil Youth Organisation (TYO, UK). The event had the likes of Labour party Harrow Councillor Thaya Idaikaddar delivering a homily extolling the virtues of the LTTE leader. Incidentally permission to hold the rally was obtained from the Royal Parks’ Police by 2 other Labour councillors √ one from Harrow Ms Sashikala and the other Ms Eliza Packiadevi Mann from Southwark. These councillors have now formed another LTTE front called British Tamil Councillors and Associates. Although they are supposedly elected to represent the people of Harrow, Southwark, East Ham etc they claim that they have been elected to safeguard the well-being of the Tamil people. Seem to be unable to integrate into British society and are contributing their might to strengthen the Tamil ghettos” in North & East London (Ealing Road, Wembley, East Ham, Croydon, Walthamstow, Tooting etc). Mr Idaikaddar is closely associated with DFID Minister Gareth Thomas who usually is an active participant in these events in his electorate. Mr Robert Evans – another Labour member who is a member of the European Parliament (PSE group) – is another active supporter.

iii) Hindu Temples The Human Rights Watch report has also thrown light on the role of British Hindu temples which have come under the control of the LTTE and have become a source of huge revenue to the LTTE’s war chest. The report refers to the detention of 2 British nationals of Sri Lankan Tamil origin in the north of Sri Lanka (whilst they were visiting relatives) – Mr Rajasingham Jayadevan and Mr Arumugam Kandiah Vivekanandan, proprietors of a private Hindu temple located on Ealing road in Wembley by the LTTE. They were detained for several weeks in February 2005 until they agreed to hand over control of the temple to a group aligned with the LTTE. Mr Jayadevan subsequently initiated an application to the UK High court and on April 7, 2005 the High court ruled that the transfer of the temple was not valid and returned control of the temple to its original trustees. However the group aligned to the LTTE continues to operate the Sivayogam Hindu temple in Tooting. The UK Charity Commission has continued to drag its feet on this investigation for several years citing the usual bureaucratic delays. This is despite evidence available of how during the tsunami disaster in December 2004 the Sivayogam Trust sent a container load of ‘tsunami relief goods’ which contained among other things aluminium kitchen pots inside which were cleverly concealed ball bearings and other items required for assembling explosives. The Sivayogam also sponsored the construction of a boat yard in Sampoor in the East of Sri Lanka purportedly for fishermen affected by the tsunami but which later turned out to be a boat yard for the LTTE’s sea tiger suicide squad.

iv) Charities Another LTTE front organisation White Pigeon currently under investigation by the UK Charity Commission for its links with the LTTE in 2005 transferred approx. ё500,000 (SL Rs 98.64 million) from its account at the National Westminster Bank, Sutton branch. This organisation also regularly transmits funds to the Bumiputhra Commerce Bank in Kuala Lumpur which is the bank account of the World Tamil Relief Fund for procurement of military hardware for the LTTE.

Note that in August 2005 the UK Charity Commission de-listed the charity Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (UK) from its list of charities for its links with the LTTE. At the time of its being de-listed it had ё1.3 million but the trustees made a mockery of British legislation by in September 2005 registering the same organisation under the name International Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (ITRO)” as a company with Companies House UK. It was recently uncovered that TRO (UK) had collected a staggering sum of SL Rs 56.3 million for tsunami work in the north of Sri Lanka which was supposedly to construct 639 housing units in the north & east of Sri Lanka. The entire sum of money has been drawn by the LTTE but only approx 100 housing units have been completed.

Synopsis

The banning of the LTTE in the UK in 2001 resulted in only one change in their course of action. They changed the name of their secretariat and fronts – and now continue to operate business as usual”.

Today they are at the centre of everything from credit card frauds to money laundering, drug trafficking and the international narcotics trade and they operate a commercially viable shipping network. The LTTE continues to destabilise Sri Lanka with funds mainly collected from the UK and Canada. Annual remittances from the UK alone both from extortion and their business activities is in the range of ё10 million.

According to the Counter Terrorism Command of the UK Metropolitan Police they are aware of these activities but are faced with staffing constraints, as they are preoccupied with handling Islamic terrorism”. It is regrettable that terrorist groups that the UK, EU, USA, Canada, India, Australia and many other countries have chosen to ban continues to operate at large in the UK due to this differentiation” between Islamic terror groups posing a threat to the UK domestic security and other terrorist groups” which pose a threat to the domestic and regional security of other regions in the world, in this instance South Asia.

British tolerance feeding terrorism

Tamil gang violence continues unabated throughout London and its suburbs. On 16 February 2006 a Sri Lankan was stabbed to death at McDonalds in Tooting, London. The attack was carried out apparently in revenge for a sword attack against another Sri Lankan man which took place outside the Tooting police station 4 days earlier. According to police grudges based on the 23 year rebellion by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka have spilled into Britain and led to some horrific attacks. In 2005 alone, 16 killings have taken place involving the Sri Lankan Tamil community in the UK. The Specialist Crime Unit of the UK Metropolitan Police launched 2 operations (Operation Enver and Operation Quadrant) but sadly these operations which led to the arrest of hundreds of LTTE gangsters in the suburbs of London has been abandoned due to lack of funds – apparently the priority is Islamic terrorism”.

It is interesting to note that Mr Charles Anthony, son of the internationally hunted criminal Velupillai Prabhakaran is now a student at the University of Belfast. His entry was secured with the help of the IRA’s Martin McGuinness as a confidence building measure” to contribute towards bringing peace to Sri Lanka!

Worse still

Since 1995, three LTTE British charities and the Tamil Housing Association has raised over 8 million pounds. Most of the funds have been attracted as grants from local and central government because of the legitimacy these organisations have derived from being registered charities and a Housing Association in the UK. The Tamil Refugee Action Group has even got a British National Lottery grant of ё78,450 pounds awarded on 2nd December 1998. Tamil Refugee Education and Training Centre where the LTTE official spokesman Anton Rajah works, has also attracted a British National Lottery grant of ё155,484 pounds, awarded on 4th March 1999. It is a grant covering a period of 3 years.

The TRO has declared to the British authorities that since 1995 approximately 2.5 million pounds have gone from Britain to LTTE control, tax free, via the charity under the guise of rehabilitation work”. Although TRO has raised approximately 3 million pounds since 1995 and have no staff costs, most of those who canvass for the TRO are working for the other two charities and the Housing Association and are receiving salaries courtesy of the British tax payer. The total salary costs since 1995 of the Housing Association and the two charities (excluding TRO which has no salary costs) is approximately 1.5 million pounds.

By raising over ё3 million pounds in the UK, without paying Value Added Tax on turnover and transferring over ё2.5 million pounds out of Britain since 1995, exploiting the charity status” it has gained by deception to avoid the payment of corporation tax, the LTTE may have defrauded the British Treasury, Her Majesty’s Inland Revenue and Her Majesty’s Customs and Excise of over a million pounds.

There is no doubt that these groups are doing some degree of charity work and no doubt that the TRO does carry out refugee relief work in the Vanni jungles, but in the words of Charles Somasundram, the LTTE activist who wrote in Hot Spring” magazine, these charities are the brainchild of the LTTE leader Prabakaran. The charity work they carry out in the Vanni jungles is minuscule, (a fraction of the ё 2.5 million pounds that has been sent from Britain) compared to the other organisations such as UNHCR, ICRC, OXFAM etc. who are active in the conflict areas and refuse to have anything to do with the TRO, as they are all aware of TRO’s LTTE connections. In its propaganda the TRO claims that it works with” organisations such as CARE, MSF, UNHCR and UNICEF in order to gain credibility and legitimacy.

The charity work of the Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation is a facade to cover up its primary purpose, which is to raise funds to purchase weapons as commented by Don Gracey, security specialist to the Canadian Senate Committee on Security and Intelligence. The little work the TRO does in the Vanni jungles is given massive publicity in the LTTE controlled media in order to create a distorted perception among expatriate Tamils, that they are the largest NGO operating in the Vanni jungles, so as to emotionally target them and raise more funds to finance terrorism.

While UNHCR, ICRC, OXFAM and other international organisations move about freely all over Sri Lanka, the Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (British charity number 1010029), only operates in terrorist held areas of Sri Lanka, because as a terrorist outfit, it has no legitimacy in parts of Sri Lanka where democracy prevails.

General

Recurring themes of banned terrorist entities in UK

a) There are always 20 or so individuals (mover/shakers) who run groups, who – if taken out of the picture – would paralyse a group’s activities overnight.

b) When a group knows it is probably going to be banned, it steps up its level of activities (and rhetoric) until the day it is banned, preparing for banning.

c) Fundraising for groups comes from ongoing assets like property and state benefits, which are not going to disappear even if a group’s funds are seized or re-distributed.

d) Fundraising for groups most often includes some use of a British registered charity.

e) Websites are often cached or duplicated.

f) Web presence will continue using a general term (Followers of Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaa, for example, which is a group term also used by non-radicals)

g) Propaganda material (audio and video) is often moved to an online storage site, such as Sendspace, and its destination promoted privately.

h) Clear IP address / bank account detail / written / audio / video / other prosecutable evidence exists on individuals within groups likely to be banned.

In light of these themes, VIGIL is currently lobbying the UK parliament for a change in banning legislation. This would take the form of the following:

The VIGIL banning mechanism

VIGIL has devised a simple method by which groups can get themselves banned √ not a code making it easier for the government to ban groups, but a code allowing effective banning of groups by the government. It is similar to the threat security code but simpler. It is a three level code as follows:

GREEN First, whether by a UK authority, foreign government or other body, the UK Home Secretary receives a report of a group or hydra. This green level results in rapid private investigations of the group.

AMBER Second, investigations (or the strength of the original report) result in a public warning to the group. An official letter goes out to the recognised leaders of the group informing them of a likely imminent ban unless there is an immediate change in their conduct and activities (the 20 mover/shakers mentioned above). The letter clarifies that they will be held personally responsible (just like a company director for his company’s activities) for future infringements and that these infringements could lead to large fines, deportation and / or a jail sentence (standard Dutch sentence 12 months, for example). These individuals have one week to convey this message to the group’s followers and to present to the police / Home Office any group members they feel will put their positions in jeopardy. Finally, these individuals will be warned that they are as of now subject to an open ended review. A group/hydra – once it has reached amber – can never return to green.

RED Third, comes the ban. This is a seizure of assets, a cutting of ongoing funds (benefits, direct debit contributions etc) and the arrest of the liable individuals. Standard banning legislation is also used √ websites forced offline and propaganda material seized. Banks used in the fundraising process for these groups should be publicly chastised where guilty and fined if possible.

In conclusion

Banning groups is a great opportunity for the British government to inflict lasting damage on terrorist networks. There are few opportunities as good as the banning opportunity to wound terrorists before they strike. There is no cure in terrorism – just prevention – and banning is an opportunity too good to miss.

There has been much talk of how the 7/7 bombers needed very little money to cause so much devastation. Yet the groups who provided them with support and succour use lots of money daily to spread their vile ideologies and win similar recruits – they openly raise these funds, especially in Britain.

This LTTE case study – just touching the surface of evidence collected by VIGIL over three months’ infiltration – is a shocking example of how banning can go so wrong. It should not be allowed to repeat itself. While the effect on Britons of the LTTE’s comfortable existence in the UK is minimal, the effect on Britons of the Al Mujahiroun Hydra’s continued comfortable (benefit supported) existence in the UK will be paid for in blood. Not that this makes effectively banning the Al Mujahiroun Hydra more important than the effective banning of the LTTE √ which causes daily mayhem in Sri Lanka and beyond, and whose infrastructure (so advanced it has its own shipping fleet) it is alleged Al Qaeda uses.

The key point here is liability. These supporters of terrorism are liable for what their proteges and martyrs” go and do. The leaders of such groups – publicity seekers all of them – will not step aside from their responsibility of being seen as the leaders of their groups, or they will lose the leadership of their groups by default anyway. It is far easier talking the terror game than being an actual terrorist – it is time the British government stood up to the plate and swapped the comfy armchairs of the leaders of these supporters of terrorism for prison cells.

To the camp that says, these groups will go underground – don’t frighten them off” the British Home Secretary should say rubbish – they need the publicity so much they cannot afford to go underground.” (And from VIGIL’s experience they are groups which are easy to infiltrate – easy to glean amber level evidence on – even when they think they are out of the public glare).

One ought never to turn one’s back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half.”

– Sir Winston Churchill.

Dominic Whiteman is spokesperson for the London-based VIGIL anti-terrorist organization – an international network of terror trackers, including former intelligence officers, military personnel and experts ranging from linguistic to banking experts. He’s currently the Editor of Westminster Journal.

How the United Kingdom helped LTTE Terrorists in Sri Lanka Part 1

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Terrorists Exposed

LTTE ACTIVITIES IN THE UK

UK LTTE / May 24, 2014

The organisation of support for the Tamils of Sri Lanka goes back toNovember 1978 when Tamil Co-ordinating Committee or TCC was formed at the instance of Amirthalingam for the purpose of Co-ordinating the UK based political and militant front organisations. Its President S K Vaikunthavasan has been the initiator of many efforts to bring the government of Sri Lanka into disrepute as oppressors of the Tamil minority – This theme is yet been followed and it is in UK that the vicious anti-government propaganda is strongest. Vaikunthavasan is also remembered for the incident where on 5 Nov 1978 he walked up to the rostrum of the United Nations before the Sri Lanka Foreign Affairs Minister who was billed to speak could reach it and held forth for about a minute on the Tamil cause before he could be removed.

The centre of LTTE activities for the area has now shifted to Paris and the LTTE activities in UK are now co-ordinated by LTTE International Secretariat at No 211 Katherine Road, London E6 IBU , United Kingdom, Fax No 0181-4708593 The following are the pro-LTTE organisations in the UK

ආසියාවේ නපුංෂකයා

February 25th, 2021

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

අපේ මාතෘ භූමියට එරෙහිව නැවත වරක් මානව හිමිකම් කැඩීමේ යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත්ව තිබේ. එය අප අපේක්ෂා කල සිදුවීමකි. මෙම යෝජනාව මුල්වරට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබුවේ ලෝකයේ බලවත්ම රාජ්‍ය ලෙස හදුන්වා ගන්නා ඇමරිකා එකසත් ජනපදයයි. ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයම මෙම යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම තුලින් පෙන්වන්නේ, අප රාජ්‍ය කොතරම් ප්‍රබල රාජ්‍යක් ලෙස ඇමරිකාවම සලකනවාද යන්නයි. මෙවර වෙනත් කබ්බෝ රාශියක් එම යෝජනාවම හොදට මැදලා යලි ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත. මෙම සිදුවීම දෙස බලනවිට අපට පැහැදිලිවම දර්ශණය වන්නේ, කිසිවෙකුත් අපේක්ෂා නොකල මහා ජයග්‍රහණයක් ශ්‍රී ලං.කාව විසින් අත්පත් කරගෙන ඇති බවයි. අප රාජ්‍යය විසින් ලෝකයා ඉදිරියේ ලද මේ මහා ජයග්‍රහණය,, අප විසින් මනාව අවබෝධ කර ගෙන රැකගත යුතුය.

May be an image of one or more people and outdoors

ත්‍රස්තවාදය යනු බටහිර විසින් නිශ්පාදය කර ලෝකය මත ආරෝපනය කර මනාව පවත්වා ගෙන ආ වෙළද භාණ්ඩයකි. මෙය විවිධ වෙළද නාමයන්ගෙන් ලොවපුරා ප්‍රචලිතව පවත්වා ගෙන යන අතර, අල්කයිඩා, දෙමළ කොටි සංවිධානය යන ආදී නම් වලින් ආසියාවේද, වෙනත් නාමයන්ගෙන් අප්‍රිකාවේද, තවත් නාමයන් රාශියකින් ලතින් ඇමරිකාවේද ව්‍යාප්තව පවතී. කුමන නාමයන් ගෙන් හැදින් වුවද මේ සියළුම ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධාන වල නිශ්පාදකයා එකම එක ආයතනයකි.තවද ඉතා පැහැදිලිවම මෙම ත්‍රස්තවාදී සියළුම ව්‍යාපාරයන් පවත්වා ගෙන යන්නේ, ඒවාට මුදල් ආධාර සපයන්නේද නඩත්තු කරන්නේද, ඒවා ආරක්ෂා කරන්නේද මේ ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය නම්වූ මහා රාජ්‍යයයි. එමනිසා  මේ දිනවල ජිනීවා නුවර සිදුවෙන සිදුවීම සම්බන්ධව කථා කරන විට අපට ස්විස්ටරලන්තය සම්බන්ධව කථා කිරීමෙන් බැහැර වී කිසිම දෙයක් සම්බන්ධව අවබෝධයක් ලබා ගත නොහැක. ඒ නිසා අප ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය නම්වූ ඒ ත්‍රස්තවාදීලන්තයේ සැබෑ තතු ස්වල්පයක් කථා කොට අපේ කථිකාවතට පිවිසෙමු.

අපේ කථාන්තරයේ ආරම්භය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයයි. මේ සංවිධානය ආරම්භ කරන ලද්දේ දෙවන ලෝක මහා යුද්ධයේ ප්‍රතිපලත් සමගය. මේ සංවිධානය පිහිටුවීමේදී ප්‍රකාශිත අරමුණ, ලෝකය පුරා සාමය පවත්වා ගෙන යාමයි. ලෝකය පුරා සාමය පවත්වා ගැනීමේ අරමුණින් පිහිටුවා ගත් මේ සංවිධානය ලෝකය ලෙස දුටුවේ කුමක්ද? මානවයින් ලෙස දුටුවේ කාවද? සාමය ලෙස දුටුවේ කවරක්ද? යන්න ඉතාම වැදගත්ය.

1936දී ජාතීන්ගේ මන්දිරය  වශයෙන් නම් ලද මහා මන්දිරය, 1946දී ජිනිවා නුවර පිහිටි එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මණ්ඩලයේ මූලස්ථානය බවට පත්විය. අද වන විටත් එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට අයත් දෙවෙනි විශාල මූලස්ථාන ගොඩනැගිල්ල වන්නේ ජීනිවා නුවර පිහිටි මේ ගොඩනැගිල්ලයි. ඉතා වැදගත් කරුණු වන්නේ,

1. මෙම මූලස්ථාන ගොඩනැගිල්ල ජීනිවා නුවර ස්ථාපිත කලද, ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය එවකට එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජිකයකුද නොවීමය.

2. සිය සාමාජිකයකු නොවන රටක මේසා විශාල මූලස්ථානයක් පිහිටවූයේ ඇයි?

3.එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය ඉතා වැදගත් සංවිධානයක් ලෙස ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තය සැලකුවේ නම් මේ මූලස්ථාන එරටෙහි පිහිටුවා, අවුරුදු 46ක් පුරා මේ සංවිධානයටට නොබැදුනේ ඇයි?

4.අවසානයේදී වර්ෂ2002දී එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට බැදීමට තීරණය කලේ ඇයි?

මේ ප්‍රශ්න කන්දරාව ඇතුලේ විශාල කථාන්දරයක් ගලා යන අතර, මේ කථාන්දරයේ විවිධ අවස්ථාවන්වලදී, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය යනු ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තයේ පදයට නටන සංවිධානයක්ද යන කරුණද ඉස්මතුවේ. කුමන පදනමකින් වුවද එක්සත් ජාතීනගේ සංවිධානයේ උපතේ කලලය තුල ස්විස්ටර්ලන්තයේ ජාන ඇතිබව අපට කීමට සිදුව ඇත.

.මේ වනවිට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහි වූ මානව හිමිකම් කඩකිරීමේ චෝදනා පත්‍රය ඉදිරිපත් කර ඒ සම්බන්ධව සාකච්චා වෙමින් පවතී. මෙය එදා ඇමරිකාව ඉදිරිපත් කල යෝජනාවම ඉදිරියට ගෙන යාමකි. සැබෑ ලෙසම ඇමරිකාව අපේ සතුරාය. අපේ පමණක් නොවේ ඉන්දියාවේත් සතුරාය, පකිස්තානයේත් සතුරාය, ඉතාමත් කෙටියෙන් පවසතොත් මුළු ආසියාවේම සතුරා වන්නේ මේ ඇමරිකාව නම්වූ අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී මූලස්ථානයයි. එපමණක් නොවේ. අප්‍රිකාවට එරෙහිව කටයුතු කරන අතිභයානකම  සතුරා වන්නේද,ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයයි. ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදය අවට අසල්වාසි රජ්‍යෙ පද්ධතිය වන ලතින් ඇමෙරිකානු රාජ්‍යයන් පෙලෙහි අංක එකේ සතුරාද වන්නේය. ඇමරිකාව යුරෝපයේ හිත මිත්‍රයා පමණක් නොව ඤාතිවරයාද වන ඇමරිකාව ලෝකයේ සාමය අපේක්ෂා කරන එකම කලාපය වන්නේ උතුරු ඇමරිකා කලාපය හා යුරෝපා රජ්‍ය කලාපය තුල පමණි.

අපට එරෙහි චෝදනා පත්‍රය ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම ඇමරිකාවේ තනි අභිමතයට සිදුවූවක්ද නොවේ. එය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය, යුරෝපා සංගමය, ඇමෙරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදය යන ත්‍රිත්වය විසින් මනාව සකස් කර, පෙරමුණ ගෙන ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද චෝදනා පත්‍රයකි. එසේ  වූවද, මෙම චෝදනා පත්‍රයට හේතුව වන්නේ, ඇමරිකාවේ සැලසුමට අනුව ඉන්දියාව කැබලි කිරීමේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හමුදාව විසින් විනාශ කර දැමීමයි.

ඇයි ඇමරිකාවට ඉන්දියාව රාජ්‍යන් ගණනාවකට කැඩීමට අවශ්‍ය? ඊට හේතුව වන්නේ නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය බිහි කිරීමට ඉන්දියාව විශාල කාර්යභාරයක් ඉටුකළ රටක් බැවිනි. නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය බිහිකිරීමට දායක වූ සාම රටක්ම විනාශ කොට රටවල් ගණනාවක් නිර්මාණය කල බටහිර ජාතීන්ට එසේ කඩා විනාශ කල නොහැකි රාජ්‍ය වුයේ ඉන්දියාව පමණි. ඉන්දියාව බිදීමේ අරමුණින් නිර්මාණය කල කොටි සංවිධානය ශ්‍රී ලංකාව වැනි කුඩා රාජ්‍යක් විනාශ කර දැමීම මේ ලෝක බලවතුන් ඉවසා වදාරන්නේ කෙසේද? ඒ වෛරය පිරිමහ ගැනීමේ ක්‍රියාවලිය සිදුකරන්නේ මේ මානව හිමිකම් සුරැකීමේ සංවිධානය තුලිනි. මේ වරත් ඒ බටහිර සැලසුම් කල නාඩගමට මුහුණදීමට අපට සිදුව තිබේ.

  මිට කලෙකට පෙර එනම් වර්ෂ 1960- 1961 වකවානුවේදී, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය යනු  ජාත්‍යන්තර කුමන්ත්‍රණ ගුහාවක් බව මනාව අවබෝධ කරගත් බුද්ධිමත් රජ්‍ය නායක පෙලක් ලොවට උරුම විය. මේ නායකයින් එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය සෘජුවම ආසියාතිකයින් ඝාතනය කිරීම සදහා කොරියාවට හමුදාව යවා මිලියන ඝනනාවක් කොරියන් ජාතියකයින්ව ඝාතනය කල බව අවබෝධ කරගත්හ. එමෙන්ම නිදහස් කොන්ගෝවේ පලමු අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාව එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ හමුදා මැදිහත්ව ඝාතනය කල බව වටහා ගත්හ. එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය නිහඩව බලා සිටියදී, ඒ වන විට වියට්නාමය, ලාවොසය, කාම්බෝජයේ සිවිල් ජනතාව  ඇමෙරිනානු ඝාතන යාන්ත්‍රණය දෛනික සිය දහස් ගනනින් මරා දමන බවද මනාව දුටුවහ. සැබෑ සතුරාගෙන් බේරීම යනු එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයෙන් බේරීම බව මේ නායකත්වය වටහා ගත්හ. තවද ඒ සදහා නව ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධානයක අවශ්‍යතාවය හදුනා ගත්හ. එම රාජ්‍ය නායකයින් බිහිකල රාජ්‍යයන් නම්, ඉන්දියාව, යුගෝස්ලෝවියාව, ඊජිප්තුව,ඝානාව, හා ඉන්දුනීසියාව නම්වූ රාජ්‍යයන්ය. මේ ගෞරවණීය අභීත නායකයින් වූවේ, එවකට ඉන්දීය අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ජවහර්ලාල් නේරු, යුගෝස්ලාවියානු ජනාධිපති ජොසිප් බ්‍රෝෂ් ටිටෝ, ඊජිප්තු ජනාධිපති ගමෙල් අබ්දෙල් නසෙර්, ඉන්දුනීසියානු ජනාධිපති සුකර්නෝ හා ඝානා ජනාධිපති ක්වාමේ කෲමා යන මහත්වරුන් පෙලයි.

 ඔවුන් ගොඩනැංවූ මහා සංවිධානය, නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය  නම් විය. මෙය මහා බලවත් මෙන්ම ප්‍රතාපවත් සංවිධානයක් බවට ක්‍රම ක්‍රමයෙන් පත්වෙනමින් පැවතිණි..ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක් තුලදී නොබැදි ජාතික නායකත්වයේ බලය ඉස්මතුව නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයද මෙලොව ප්‍රබල සංවිධානයක ස්වරූපය උසුලන්නට විය. තම ප්‍රථම රැස්වීම යුගෝලාවියාවේ බෙල්ග්‍රෙඩ් නුවර පැවත්වූයේ එහි ආරම්භයේ ප්‍රබලත්වය ලොවට හඩගා කියමිණී.

 සැබෑ ලෙසම මේ සංවිධානය එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට ප්‍රබල තර්ජනයක් බවට පත්වෙමින් තිබිණ. ඒ අතර මෙම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ නායකයකුව සිටි ඉන්දුනීසියානු ජනාධිපතිතුමාට චීනයේ සහභාගිත්වයෙන් නව ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධානයක් ගොඩනැංවීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවයක්ද තිබිණ. ඒ චීනයට එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ හිමි අසුන ඇමෙරිකාව ප්‍රමුඛ බටහිර ප්‍රජාව විසින් සිය නිශේධ බලය පාවිච්චි කරමින් අහිමිකර තිබීමයි. මේ සියළු තත්වයන් යටතේදීම, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලයට ගෙවැදීමට රජ්‍යයන් පොරකන වකවානුවකදී, එම ඉල්ලුමට විශාල පහරක් එල්ල කරමින් ඉන්දුනීසියාව එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලයෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්විය.

මෙම ක්‍රියාවලයත් සමගම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයට එරෙහිව මහා විනාශකාරී ක්‍රියාවලියක් ආරම්භ කරන ලදී. ඒ අනුව යුගෝස්ලාවියාව කැබලිකරණය කිරීමත් ඉන්දියාව කුඩා රාජ්‍යයන් ගනනාවකට බෙදීම ඇතුලුව, සියළුම නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය තුල සිටින ප්‍රබල රාජයයන් විනාශ කිරීමේ සැලැස්ම ආරම්භ කරන ලදී.  පලමුව, එය ඉන්දුනීසියාවෙන්ම ඇරඹීණ. මේ වනවිට මේ කාර්යය ආරම්භ කර වසර පනහක් ගතවී හමාරය. මෙම වසර 50 තුලදී ඉතාමත් පහත් ආකාරයට විනාශ කරනු ලැබූ රාජ්‍ය වූයේ යුගෝස්ලාවියාවයි.  නමුත් ඉන්දියාව කඩා බිද දැමීමේ කාර්යය සාර්ථකව ඉටුකර ගැනීමට මෙම ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධාන ජාලයට නොහැකිවිය. අද වන විට ඔවුනගේ එදා සැලසුමට අනුව ඉතිරිව ඇත්තේ ඉන්දියාව කැබලි ගනනාවකට කඩා වෙන් කිරීමේ කර්තව්‍යය පමණකි.

ඉන්දියාව කැබලි කරණය කිරීමේ එක් අවියක් වූයේ කොටි සංවිධානය වූ අතර, ඒ හරහා ශ්‍රී ලංකාව කැබලි තුනකට කැඩීම අරමුණ විය. ශ්‍රී ලාංකීය ජාතිය විවිධ බාධක මධ්‍යයේ සටන් කලේ අපේ රටේ බෙදුම් වාදයට එරෙහිව වුවද, ඒ සටන තුල අපි නොදැනුවතවම ඉන්දීය දේශය බෙදුම්වාදයෙන් රැක ගැනීමේ අරගලයද අන්තර්ගතව පැවතිණ. ඉන්දියාව කල යුතු මහා යුදමය කාර්යයක් අප විසින් ඉටුකරම්න් සිටින  විට අපට එරෙහිව ඉන්දියාව මෙහෙය වීමට බටහිර සතුරාට අවස්ථා කීපයකදීම හැකියාව ලැබිණ. මේ කරුණ වඩාත් විග්‍රහාත්මකව බලන විට ඉන්දියාව විසින් ඉන්දියාව කඩා බිද දැමීමේ ව්‍යාපාරය වෙනුවෙන් විශාල මෙහෙයක් ඉටු කර ඇත. වදමාරච්චි සටනේදී ඉන්දියාව ඉදිරිපත්ව බේරාගත් ප්‍රභාකරන් ලවාම ඉන්දියාවේ පතාක යෝධයක් ලෙස සිටි රජිව් ගාන්ධිව විනාශ කිරීම තුලින් ඉන්දියාව රාජ්‍යයක් වශයෙන්ද දුබල කිරීමේ ව්‍යාපාරය අසාර්ථක වුවද, ඉන්දියාව මේ වනවිටත් ඉන්දියාව කැබලිකරණය කිරීමේ බටහිර ව්‍යාපාරයට සෘජුවම දායකත්වය සපයයි. බටහිර බලවේගයන් මුළු කලාපයම තමන්ට ඕනෑ ආකාරයට පාලනය කර ගැනීමට වෙර දැරුවේ කොටි සංවිධානය පෙරට දමාය.

මේ වනවිට කොටි සංවිධානය මෙරට ජනාධිපති ධූරයට පත් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ නායකත්වයෙන් යුත් රජය විසින් මේ මාතෘ භූමියෙන් උදුරා දමා ඇත. වසර තිහක කාලයක් පුරා මුළු බටහිරම එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලය ඇතුළුව සකස් කල කොටි නාටකය නිමා කිරීම හරහා බටහිර බලවේගයන් මෙහෙය වන හාම්පුතුන්ට ඩොලර් බිලියන ගනනක් අහිමි වී ඇත. මේ හාම් පුතුන් ඉදිරියේදී මේ හාම් පුතුන් ගේ යටහත් පහත් සේවකයින් වන බන් කී මුන්ලා, එරික් සෝල්හයිම්ලා, රොබෙටෝ බ්ලේක්ලාට උරුමව  ඇත්තේ ප්‍රබලව ගලා එන කුණු හරුප වර්ෂාවකට මුහුණ දීමටය. මේ කුණු හරුප වර්ෂාවෙන් බේරීම සදහා ඔවුන් දියත් කල අළුත්ම අවිය වූයේ එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සලය හමුවේ අපට එරෙහිව මානව හිමකම් කඩකිරීම සම්බන්ධව යෝජනාවක් ගෙන ඒමයි.

මේ අවස්ථාවේදී මේ මානව හිමිකම් යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත්තේ, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජික රටකට එරෙහිව, සාමාජිකයකු නොවන ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙනි. විශේෂිතය වන්නේ, ඇමරිකාව මේ යෝජනාව ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ තම රටේ තහනම් කර ඇති සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් වීමයි. ඇමරිකාවේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, යුරෝපයේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, ඉන්දියාවේත් තහනම් කර ඇති, එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ නාමිකව සාමාජිකයකුද නොවන ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් සාමාජික රටකට එරෙහිව යොජනාවක් සම්මත කරගන්නා විට, මේ සංවිධානයේ සාමාජිකයාට උරුම තත්වය කුමක්ද යන පැනය ඉදිරියට පනී. සාමාජිකයාටත් වඩා ප්‍රබල උරුමයක් ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානයකට මේ සංවිධානය තුල උරුම වීමට නම් මේ ත්‍රස්තවාදී සංවිධානය නිශ්පාදනය කර ඇත්තේ එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය විසින්ම විය යුතුය, සත්‍යයද එයයි,

අපේ කථාන්තරයේ ප්‍රධානියා ඉන්දියාවයි. ඉන්දියාව යනු අවුරුදු දශ දහස් ගනනක් පුරා ඈත ඉතිහාසයක උරුමකම් කියන ශිෂ්ඨාචාරයේ අගතැන්පත් රාජ්‍යයකි. ඉන්දියාව ලෝකයට ශිල්ප සාස්ත්‍රය බෙදන්නෙක් මිස අනිකුත් ලෝක ප්‍රජාවගෙන් ශිල්පය ලබන්නෙක් නොවීය. ඉන්දියාව යනු ලෝකය පුරාම සාමය ප්‍රචලිත කරන රාජ්‍යයක් මිස ත්‍රස්තවාදය ප්‍රචලිත කරන මධ්‍යස්ථානයක්ද නොවීය. තම නිදහස් සටනේදී පවා අප තවමත් අනුමත නොකරන ආකාරයේ අවිහිංසාවාදී නිදහස් සටන් ව්‍යාපාරයක්ද ලොවට හදුන්වා දුන් මහා රාජ්‍යයකි. මෙවන් වූ පරිපූර්ණත්වයෙකින් අනූන වූ ඉන්දීය දේශය නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ, ආරම්බක යෝධයන්ගෙන් ඉතිරිව සිටි එකම පතාක යෝධයායි. සාක් කලාපීයය රාජ්‍ය පදධතියේ සිටින පතාකම යෝධයාද වූයේ ඉන්දියාවයි. ඉන්දීයාව මැදිකරගත් සාක් කලාපීය රාජ්‍යයන්ට ඉන්දීය සුව සෙවනක අවශ්‍යතාවය හා මනා ආරක්ෂාවක් අපද අපේක්ෂා කලෙමු. මේ සියළු කථාන්තරයන්ගෙන් අප පවසන්නේ ඉන්දියාව මත ඇති වගකීම් සමුදාය සම්බන්ධවයි.

 අප රාජ්‍යයට  අහසින් විත් බෝම්බ හෙලූ එකම රාජ්‍ය ජපානය විය. නමුත් අප ජපානය මතට පරමානු හෙලන විට ඊට එරෙහිව ප්‍රබලව නැගී සිටිය ජාතියක් වෙමු. ලෝකයේ විශාලම ජන ගහණයක් සිටින ආසියාවට කුමණ රාජ්‍යයක් කුමන ආකාරයේ තර්ජනය කලද අප එය අනුමත නොකල ජාතියක් වෙමු. ඉන්දියාව හා චීනය මහා යුධ ගැටුමක යෙදෙන විට මේ ගැටෙන්නේ ලෝකයේම විශාල ජනගහණයන් සිටින රාජ්‍ය දෙකයි. මෙයින් විනාශවන්නේ ආසියාවයි මෙය වහාම නතර කල යුතුයි යන මතය අප දැරුවෙමු. අප ඉදිරියට පැන්නේ ලෝක සාම භූමිකාව රගන එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය ගින්නට පිදුරු දමමින් බලා සිටින අවස්ථා වකදීය. අප ඒ යුද්ධය නවතාලීමට මහා දායකත්වයක් දුන්නෙමු. ඒ අප රටේ කාන්තා රාජ්‍ය නායකත්වයක් තිබියදී. සැබෑ මිත්‍රත්වය ඇත්තේ එතනයි. ඉන්දියාව හෝ චීනය ගරා වටුනොත් අපට උරුම වන්නේත් ගරාවැටුන ආසියාවක් බැවින් අප හැම විටම ආසියාතිකයින් වශයෙන්ම කටයුතු කලෙමු. එපමනක්ද නොවේ අප රුසියාව පරමානු බෝම්බය නිපදවනවිට සතුටු වූවෙමු. චීනය පරමාණු බෝම්බය නිපදවනවිටද ඒ සතුටම ලද්දෙමු ඉන්දියාව හා පකිස්තානය පරමාණූ බෝම්බය නිපවන විටද සතුටු වූවෙමු. උතුරු කොරියාව එම පරමාණුවම නිපදවන විට වඩාත් සතුටු වන්නෝද වෙමු. ඒ මේ බෝම්බ වලින් ආරක්ෂා කරන්නේ ආසියාව බව යන විශ්වාසයෙනි. ඒ ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයින්ගේ ස්වරෑපයයි.

ඉන්දියාව කාලාන්තරයක් මුළුල්ලේ කොටි සංවිධානය පෝෂණය කලේය.තමන් මේ පෝෂණය කරන්නේ තමන්ව විනාශ කිරීම අරබයා ගොඩනංවන ලද සංවිධානයක් බව ඉන්දියාව නොදැන සිටියාද?  එසේ නැත්නම් ලංකාවේ හිටපු රාජ්‍ය නායක නායිකාවන් මෙන්ම සැබෑ තත්වය දැන දැනම මුදල් උදෙසා කොටි සංවිධානය පෝෂණය කලාද? මෙය ඉන්දීය ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ ඇති ප්‍රබල ප්‍රශ්නයකි. තමන් පෝෂණය කර යුධ පුහුණුව ලබාදුන් කොටි සංවිධානය ඉන්දීය අගමැති රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව මරා දැමුවේ ඇයි? මේ පැනයට පිලිතුරු කුමක්දැයි ඉන්දියාව දන්නේම නැද්ද? සැබෑ ලෙසම දනී. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාව මරා දැමීම, ඒ බෝම්බ බඩ බැදගෙන පැමිණි කාන්තාව මත පමණක් ලඝු කොට ආ ඒ එක්කම එයාත් ඉවරයි කියා ප්‍රශ්නය නිමාකල නොහැක. තවද එටට අනුබල දුන් අනිකුත් පුද්ගලයින්ට ලොකු දඩුවමක් දී ආ අපි සාධාරණය ඉටුකලායයි සිතන්නට ඉන්දීය ජන මනස සකස් කරනවා නම් එයත් විශාල වරදකි. ඒ සමගම එම සංවිධානය ඉන්දියාව තුල තහනම් කර, සතුටුවෙන මනසක් ගොඩනංවනවා නම් එයත් වරදකි. ඉහත දක්වන ලද කිසිම පිලිතුරක් රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාගේ මරණයට සාධාරණයක් ඉටුකලේ නැත. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාගේ මරණයට සැබෑ සාධාරණය ඉටුකලේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය කොටි සංවිධානය සතු බලතල බිදලා, රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව ඝාතනය කිරීමට අණ දුන් ප්‍රභාකරන්ව ඝාතනය කිරීම හරහාය. එයට තවත් සාධාරණයක් එකතු කිරීමට නම් රජිව් ගාන්ධ මහතාව ඝාතනය කිරීමට ප්‍රභාකරන්ට කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව දුන් පුද්ගලයින්ව, රාජ්‍යයන්ව හා සංවිධානයන්ව විනාශ කිරීම ඉන්දියාව විසින් කල යුතු වුවද,ඉන්දියාව විසින් සිදු කරන ලද්දේ මේ කොන්ත්‍රාත්තුව දුන් පුද්ගලයින්ථ, රාජ්‍යයන් හා සංවිධාන සමග එකතුව, ප්‍රභාකරන්ව විනාශ කල ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව නැගී සිටිමයි. වරද කොතනද ඇත්තේ? වරද ඇති තැන අපි මනාව දනිමු. නමුත් එය ප්‍රකාශ කිරීම අපට අයත් කාර්යයක් නොවේ. කොටි  සංවිධානය පොඩිපට්ටම් කිරීම හා ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනය කිරීම, මානව හිමිකම් කඩ කිරීමක් නම්, ඉන්දියාව එම සංවිධානය  තහනම් කිරීමද, මානව හිමි කම් බිද දැමීමක් බව ඉන්දියාව පිලිගත යුතුය. තහනම් සංවිධානයක් වෙනුවෙන් කථා කිරීමත් තහනම් ක්‍රියාවකි. ඉන්දියානු රාජය නායකත්වය මේ කාර්යයන් දෙකම කර ඇත. කොටි සංවිධානය ඉන්දියාව විසින් තහනම් කලේ ඇයි. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතාව බල්ලෙක් සේ මහ මග මරා දැමු බැවිණී. තම රාජ්‍ය නායකයාව ඝාතනය කල ඝාතකයාලේ හා ඝාතකයාගේ සංවිධානයේ මානව හිමිකම් සම්බන්ධව කථා කල ඉතිහාසයේ එකම රාජ්‍යය ඉන්දියාව පමණක්ම වි හැකිය. රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා එදා බටහිර අධිරාජ්‍යවාදීන් සමග අත්වැල් බැදගෙන ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ ජීවිතය බේරා ගැනීම සදහා මේ භූමියට පැමිණී වේලේ රයිෆල් මිටි පහරකින් පහරදී පලවා හැරිය ජාතියක්ම, ඒ මහතාව මරාදැමූ ඝෘතකයාව නැවත සොයා මරා දැමීම ඉන්දියාව අගේ කල යුතුව ඇත. සිය ස්වාමි පුරුෂයාගේ සැබෑ ඝාතකයාව විනාශ කිරීම සම්බන්ධ සතුටු වන බිරියක මිස, ඒ ඝාතකයාගේ මානව හිමිකම් වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටින කාන්තාවක් ඉන්දියාවට අවශ්‍ය නොවේ, අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ බටහිරටය නැත් නම් ඉතාලියටය.

ප්‍රභාකරන් නම් වූ ඝාතකයා මරා දැමූවේ ඉන්දියාවේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා පමණක් නම් නොවේ. එදා රජිව් ගාන්ධි මහතා ප්‍රභාකරන්ව ගලවා ගැනීම සදහා මෙරට ආක්‍රමණය කිරීම සදහා යෙදවූ ඉන්දීය සොල්දාදුවන්ගේ 2000 කට ආසන්න පිරිසකගේ මරණයන්ට වරද කරුවන්නේද කොටි නායකයා යයි හදුන්වන ප්‍රභාකරන් බවද ඉන්දියාව අමතක නොකල යුතුව තිබිණ.

පසුගිය වර මෙන් නොව මේ ලබා ඇත්තේද ඉන්දියාවට ඉතා වැදගත් යුගයකි..ඉන්දියාව ඒ ගාම්භීර ගොඩනැගිල්ලට ඇතුළු වන විට ඉන්දීය නියෝජිතයාට ඇති වගකීම සම්භාරය වන්නේ,

1. තමන් මේ ගොඩනැගිල්ලට ඇතුළු වන්නේ නොබැදි ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ, ආරම්භක පතාක යෝධයන් ගෙන් ඉතිරිව සිටින පතාකම යෝධයා වශයෙන් ඇති වගකීම් සමුදායත් සමගය.

2.තමන් මේ ස්ථානයේ වැජබෙන්නේ, සාක් සංවිධානයේ සිටින පතාකම යෝධයා වශයෙණී.

3. ආසියානු මහද්වීපයේ සිටින බලවත්ම රාජ්‍යයක් වශයෙනි.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහිව, ඉන්දියාව පසුගිය වතාවලදී මෙන්ම මෙවරද ක්‍රියාකරන බව අපේ විශ්වාසයයි.නිවටයින් රාජ්‍ය නායකත්වය දරන සාම රටක්ම නපුංසක රංගනයන්හි යෙදෙන ආකාරය අප දැක ඇත. මෙවරත් ඉන්දියාව මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සලයේදී ආසියාවේ නපුන්සකයා ලෙස කටයුතු කරනු ඇත. එය අප ලබන ගෞරවයක් මිස පරාජයක් නොවේ.




අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ 85වැනි පාලක මණ්ඩලය රැස්වෙයි

February 25th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ 85වැනි පාලක මණ්ඩල රැස්වීම ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් අද 2021.02.25 දින පස්වරුවේ අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ දී පැවැත්විණි.

බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ ලේකම් රුචිර විතාන මහතා පසුගිය රැස්වීම් වාර්තාව ඉදිරිපත් කළේය. ඒ සඳහා පාලක මණ්ඩල අනුමැතිය ලැබිණි.

බුද්ධශාසන අරමුදලේ සාමාජික සද්ධර්ම කීර්ති ශ්‍රී ත්‍රිපිටකාචාර්ය ආචාර්ය පූජ්‍ය දිවියාගහ යසස්සි නාහිමියෝ ඉදිරියේ දී දිස්ත්‍රික් මට්ටමෙන් සාමණේර ආයතන පිහිටුවීම ගැන පැහැදිළි කළහ.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට විපක්ෂ නායක සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස,ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මහාභාරකාර තැන නීතිඥ ගනේශ් ධර්මවර්ධන, බුද්ධශාසන ආගමික හා සංස්කෘතික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ලේකම් දේශබන්ධු මහාචාර්ය කපිල ගුණවර්ධන, අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය අතිරේක ලේකම් චමින්ද කුලරත්න, මහාභාණ්ඩාගාර නියෝජිත ආර්. වී. එල්. උදයකුමාර, බුද්ධ ශාසන අරමුදලේ ලේකම් රුචිර විතාන මහත්වරු ඇතුළු බුද්ධශාසන අරමුදලේ සාමාජික සාමාජිකාවන් පිරිසක් එක්වූහ.

නැනො මාස්ක් නව නිපැයුම අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමාට පිළිගන්වයි

February 25th, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

පේරාදෙණිය විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ මහාචාර්ය ගාමිණී රාජපක්ෂ, විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය චමින්ද හේරත් මහත්වරු ඇතුළු කණ්ඩායමක් නිර්මාණය කළ නැනො තාක්ෂණික වයිරස් නාශක මුව ආවරණය ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ඉදිරියේ එළිදැක්වීම අද 2021.02.25 දින පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කමිටු ශාලා 01හි දී පැවැත්විණි.

මෙම නැනො වයිරස් නාශක තාක්ෂණික මුව ආවරණය ඒ මත වැටෙන ඕනෑම විෂබීජයක් විනාශවන ආකාරයට නිර්මාණය කර තිබීම විශේෂත්වයකි. ලොව ප්‍රථම වයිරස් නාෂක සහ නැනො අංශු පෙරණ මුව ආවරණය මෙය වේ.

නොබෝදිනකින් මෙම විශේෂිත මුව ආවරණය දේශීය හා විදේශීය වෙළඳ පොලට නිකුත් කිරීමට පර්යේෂක කණ්ඩායම සැළසුම් කර තිබේ.

ඊට අවශ්‍ය රාජ්‍ය මැදිහත්වීම ඉටු කිරීමට සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍යතුමියට දැනුම් දෙන බව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මෙහිදී සඳහන් කළේය.

මෙම නව නිපැයුම සඳහා රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිනි සීතා අරඹේපොළ මහත්මියගේ සහය ලැබී තිබේ.

අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන, ගාමිණි ලොකුගේ, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන්වන රොෂාන් රණසිංහ, සුදර්ශනී ප්‍රනාන්දුපුල්ලේ, සුසිල් ප්‍රේමජයන්ත, ලසන්ත අලගියවන්න, ඩී.වී චානක මහත්වරු සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ගයන්ත කරුණාතිලක මහතා ඇතුළු මහජන නියෝජිතයින් පිරිසක් මෙම අවස්ථාවට එක්ව සිටියහ.

III වන ශ්‍රේණියේ තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරී තනතුරට පත් කර ගැනීමට අදාළ සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට කරමින් ඇති යෝජනාව සම්බන්ධවයි.

February 25th, 2021

ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය.

ගරු ඇමතිතුමා,
ජනමාධ්‍ය අමාත්‍යංශය,
කොළඹ 05.

III වන ශ්‍රේණියේ තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරී තනතුරට පත් කර ගැනීමට අදාළ සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට කරමින් ඇති යෝජනාව සම්බන්ධවයි.

2021.02.17 වන දින නියෝජ්‍ය පොස්ට් මාස්ටර් ජනරාල් පාලන තුමාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් පවත්වන ලද තැපැල් සේවා නිලධාරි බඳවා ගැනීමේ පටිපාටියේ සංශෝදන සම්බන්ධව වෘත්තීය සමිති සමඟ කරන ලද සාකච්චාවේදී තැපැල් විෂය භාර ගරු ඇමතිතුමා විසින් III වන පෙලට නිලධාරි බඳවා ගැනීමේදී පවත්වන සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයේදී ලකුණු ලබා දීමට යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති බව තැපැල් පරිපාලනය දැනුම් දෙන ලදි. එහිදී එම යෝජනාවට ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය ලෙස අපද අනෙකුත් වෘත්තීය සමිති ද ඒ සඳහා අකමැත්ත හා විරෝධය පල කර සිටින ලදි.

විවෘත තරඟ විභාගයෙන් වැඩිම ලකුණු ලබා ගන්නා අපේක්ෂකයින් මෙම සම්මුඛ පරීක්‍ෂණයට කැදවන ලද අතර, එම අයට නැවත ලකුණු ලබා දීම යනු මෙම තරඟ විභාගයට තිබෙන අගය වටිනාකම පහතට ඇද දැමිමක් සේම තරඟ විභාගයෙන් වැඩි ලකුණු ලබා ගන්නා සුදුස්සන් හට බලවත් අසාධාරණයක් වනු ඇත. කසිදු බලපෑමකින් තොරව ස්වාධීනව තැපැල් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව හරහා රාජ්‍ය සේවයට එක් වීමට ඇති අවස්ථාවද අහිමි වනු ඇත. මෙහි තිබෙන ස්වාධීන බව නැති කරමින් දේශපාලන අතපෙවීමකට ඉඩ විවර කර ගැනීමක් මින් සිදුවේ. ඒ අනුව මෙම යෝජනාවට අපගේ දැඩි විරෝධය පල කර සිටින අතර, මෙම විවෘත තරඟ විභාගය තවදුරටත් ප්‍රමාද නොකර තැපැල් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ පවතින නිලධාරි පුරප්පාඩු පියවා ගැනීමට විභාගය පැවැත්වීමට අදාළ කටයුතු සඳහා අවශ්‍ය ඉඩ ලබා දෙන මෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නෙමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
ජගත් මහින්ද
සභාපති  
ලංකා තැපැල් සේවා සංගමය.

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena rejects the Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on Sri Lanka, says allegations and recommendations based on ill-founded premises

February 25th, 2021

Embassy of Sri Lanka

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena has regretted the disproportionate attention drawn to Sri Lanka in the Human Rights Council driven by political motivations, and said Sri Lanka rejects the High Commissioner’s Report which has unjustifiably broadened its scope and mandate further, incorporating many issues of governance and matters that are essentially domestic for any self-respecting, sovereign country”. Noting that the allegations contained in the report were based on ill-founded premises, the Minister said the trajectory that has emerged with regard to the recommendations and conclusions reflects the preconceived, politicized and prejudicial agenda which certain elements have relentlessly pursued against Sri Lanka”. He added that it is regrettable that the High Commissioner’s Office published its Report, accompanied by an unprecedented propaganda campaign on it, and refused to publish Sri Lanka’s Comments on the report as an addendum. This has deprived Sri Lanka and members of equal visibility of Sri Lanka’s views on the report”.

The Minister made these observations when he addressed an ‘Interactive Dialogue’ of the HRC in Geneva earlier today (24 February), which followed the presentation by the High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet of the OHCHR Report ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’.

Statement by Hon. Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka Agenda Item 2: Interactive Dialogue on the OHCHR Report ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’ (A/HRC/46/20) 24th February 2021

Madam President,
Madam High Commissioner, Excellencies, Ladies and gentlemen,

The OHCHR Report which is presented today, emanates from the Resolution 30/1 and 40/1, from which the Government of Sri Lanka announced its withdrawal of cosponsorship, at the 43rd Session of this Council last year. Sri Lanka rejects the High Commissioner’s Report which has unjustifiably broadened its scope and mandate further, incorporating many issues of governance and matters that are essentially domestic for any self-respecting, sovereign country. This is in complete violation of Article 2 (7) of the Charter of the UN that states: Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state…”

The trajectory that has emerged with regard to the recommendations and conclusions reflects the preconceived, politicized and prejudicial agenda which certain elements have relentlessly pursued against Sri Lanka. These recommendations are based on ill-founded allegations. Sri Lanka categorically rejects the conclusions and recommendations in the High Commissioner’s Report.

The call for asset freezes, travel bans, references to the ICC and the exercise of universal jurisdiction by individual States, based on evidence that up to date has been denied access to and retained by the High Commissioners Office with some of it unreleased for thirty years, particularly in relation to a country like Sri Lanka which has consistently and constructively engaged with the UN and its mechanisms, points to a distinct and eminent danger which the international community as a whole need to take note of. Such unilateral actions by certain countries are unacceptable and a violation of the principles of natural justice.

In addition to the progress made since last March, Sri Lanka has provided written comments on instances of erroneous information, misconceived and arbitrary assessments in the Report. It is regrettable that the High Commissioners Office Text Delivered 3 published its Report, accompanied by an unprecedented propaganda campaign on it and refused to publish our Comments on the report as an addendum.

This has deprived Sri Lanka and members of equal visibility of Sri Lanka’s views on the report. Sri Lanka refutes the allegations that have been reproduced in the High Commissioner’s report, from the highly contentious Report of the Panel of Experts (PoE) on Accountability and the Report of the High Commissioner’s Office Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL), which have been rejected by Sri Lanka for reasons explained to this Council before.

The contents of the Report which have been drawn from the said disputed reports are rife with factual inaccuracies that appear to equate atrocities committed by the LTTE, a terrorist organization proscribed internationally, with legitimate action taken by the government to safeguard the territorial integrity of the country and the right to life of our people.

Madam President, Insistence on ever-expanding externally driven prescriptions, notwithstanding our continuous cooperation and engagement with this Council and all UN bodies, can pose numerous challenges and such processes could set a dangerous precedent affecting all member states of the UN.

We regret the disproportionate attention drawn to Sri Lanka by this Council, driven by political motivations. Sri Lanka calls upon the members of this Council that any resolution which is based on this Report, be rejected by the Council and be brought to a closure. In conclusion,

We remain open to engaging constructively with the UN, including this Council, and the international community in mutually agreed areas, in conformity with the Constitution and in keeping with domestic priorities and policies.

Ayubowan

China to continue COVID-19 cooperation with Mongolia, Sri Lanka

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy CGTN

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Wednesday expressed willingness to continue its cooperation with Mongolia and Sri Lanka on COVID-19 during phone calls with his counterparts from the two countries. 

In the face of the unexpected COVID-19 pandemic, governments and peoples of China and Mongolia have shared the weal and woe, and reached out to each other with assistance and support, lifting the bilateral ties to a new level, Wang told the newly-appointed Mongolian Foreign Minister Batmunkh Battsetseg. 

Noting that the touching story of Mongolia donating 30,000 sheep to China is widely known in both countries and the vaccines sent by China have arrived recently in Mongolia, Wang said he expects the two sides can further strengthen anti-pandemic cooperation until the pandemic is completely defeated. 

For her part, Battsetseg thanked China for its selfless help to her country in fighting the pandemic, saying that the two countries have maintained the development momentum of bilateral ties and have continuously strengthened practical cooperation amid the pandemic, setting a good example of how countries support each other in response to adversities. 

During the phone conversation with Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, Wang said China is ready to enhance anti-pandemic cooperation with Sri Lanka, continue to provide vaccine assistance to the country and take concrete actions to help Sri Lanka defeat the pandemic at an early date. 

Wang called on the two sides to make solid progress in cooperation within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative, turning the Colombo Port City and the Hambantota Port into two major engines to boost Sri Lanka’s economic development, pushing for Sri Lanka’s industrialization, and enhancing the country’s capacity for independent development. 

Gunawardena, for his part, said Sri Lanka regards China as its closest friend and sincerely thanks China for its long-term, selfless help in Sri Lanka’s economic development, improvement of people’s livelihood, and coping with internal and external challenges. 

Sri Lanka appreciates China’s fair stance on human rights issues and is willing to join hands with China to safeguard fairness and justice in regional and international affairs, he added.   

(With inputs from Xinhua)

China can extend Hambantota port lease to 198 years, Sri Lankan minister says

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy The South China Morning Post

  • Beijing denies the deal is being renegotiated after reports that Colombo is revisiting the agreement
  • Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena said the previous government had agreed to a 99-year lease with the option of another 99 years
China signed a deal to lease the Hambantota port, located at the southern tip of Sri Lanka, in 2017. Photo: Xinhua

Sri Lanka’s foreign minister said the 99-year lease of the Hambantota port to China could be extended to 198 years, calling it a mistake” made by the previous government, after reports that Colombo was revisiting the agreement.The port deal – signed in 2017 by the previous Sri Lankan government to cover its debts to China – has been the subject of intense international scrutiny amid accusations Beijing is using debt trap diplomacy” for geopolitical clout.

Hambantota’s location at the southern tip of Sri Lanka, overlooking South Asia’s vital sea lanes, makes it a potential key maritime hub in the Indian Ocean.

Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, younger brother of two-time former president Mahinda Rajapaksa, said he wanted to renegotiate the deal with China soon after he took office in late 2019, but later denied he had such a plan.

Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa is said to be revisiting the port deal with China. Photo: Xinhua

Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa is said to be revisiting the port deal with China. Photo: Xinhua

However, on February 6 the chairman of the Sri Lanka Ports Authority told Ceylon Today that the president was revisiting the port deal. General Daya Ratnayake also said Sri Lanka had not gained much from the agreement and that it had relocated its naval base from the area controlled by China after many discussions with the Chinese officials”.

We are revisiting the proposal even now,” Ratnayake was quoted as saying. It was unfortunate and such a deal on Hambantota port shouldn’t have been done. But the review process is going on.”

Sri Lanka revives Colombo port deal with Japan, India over ‘geopolitical concerns’14 Jan 2021

Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena added to uncertainty over the deal on Saturday, telling the same newspaper that the previous government made a mistake on the Hambantota port deal when they cancelled the lease and gave it on a longer period of 99 years plus another 99 years once the first term ends”.

But he did not say whether the government intended to make changes to the agreement.

Beijing said the deal was not being renegotiated, and that the port had overcome the challenges of the pandemic and its operations were expanding. Photo: AFP

Beijing said the deal was not being renegotiated, and that the port had overcome the challenges of the pandemic and its operations were expanding. Photo: AFP

China on Wednesday denied the deal was being renegotiated, with foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin instead saying that the port’s operations were expanding.EVERY SATURDAYSCMP Global Impact NewsletterBy submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don’t want these, tick hereBy registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy

The relevant reports are inconsistent with facts,” Wang said at a regular press briefing in Beijing.

He said the deal was negotiated under an equal and voluntary basis” between the two countries, and that it was intended to transform the port into a logistics, transport and industrial hub in the Indian Ocean.

With mutual efforts from the Chinese and Sri Lankan sides, the Hambantota port has overcome the challenges of the pandemic and has maintained good momentum in expanding operations,” he said.The port deal, a key project in China’s controversial Belt and Road Initiative, has been closely watched, with critics saying it could add to Sri Lanka’s heavy debt burden, which could push Colombo to accept Beijing’s geopolitical demands.

Pang Zhongying, an international relations scholar with the Ocean University of China, said Beijing was likely to face more pressure over its activities in Sri Lanka given its growing rivalry with the United States and also India in the region.

Sri Lanka has long been in India’s backyard and it has a complicated relationship with India. And as the [Joe] Biden administration pushes to deepen [America’s] Indo-Pacific strategy, China is likely to face even more challenges in the region,” he said.

How to get cheaper food for population

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy The News

ISLAMABAD: Imran Khan has said he had an excellent meeting with President of Sri Lanka Gotabaya Rajapaksa and discussed with him a wide range of matters. In tweets, the prime minister said, We discussed our common passion about poverty alleviation especially in our rural areas. We also exchanged views on how to give farmers more for their produce & get cheaper food & fruits to the population by using technology to eliminate middlemen.”

He noted, We also discussed other dimensions of our extensive ties to strengthen political & trade ties for our mutual benefit.” The prime minister said he inaugurated Sri Lanka’s High Performance Sports Complex. It was great to meet the Sri Lankan cricket greats invited on the occasion, who had played against me,” he said.

Catholic bishops urge Sri Lankan government to release report on 2019 Easter bombings

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Catholic Herald

Colombo, Sri Lanka, Feb 24, 2021 / 01:26 pm MT (CNA).- The Sri Lankan government must release its report on the Easter 2019 terrorist attack on Christian churches and hotels, say Catholic leaders.

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith of Colombo reportedly will not meet with any Sri Lanka politicians due to the delay. He has postponed meetings with Catholic members of parliament in both the government and the opposition, the Sri Lanka newspaper The Island reported, citing sources in the cardinal’s office.

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith of Colombo in his cathedral city, Jan. 13, 2015

Other bishops have also spoken out about the failure to release the report from the presidential inquiry into the Easter Sunday attacks, which killed more than 260 people and injured more than 500.

We have a lot of doubts about this whole process, the whole thing is getting delayed,” Bishop Winston Fernando of Badulla, head of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Sri Lanka, told the Associated Press.

Nine suicide bombers attacked two Catholic churches, one evangelical Christian church, four hotels, and a housing complex April 21, 2019. The church attacks came in the middle of Easter Sunday services. Two Sri Lankan groups who pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group have been blamed in the attacks.

Critics of the government investigation fear corruption or negligence has prevented prosecution of collaborators in the attack.

Fernando said the Catholic Church in Sri Lanka was alarmed by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s decision to appoint a new six-member committee to study the report without sharing the report with the Church or with the attorney general to prosecute suspects.

If there are people involved, they want to protect them, I suppose, what else?” the bishop said.

The study committee is composed only of government ministers who are members of the ruling coalition.

Fernando criticized the makeup of the committee. It was not balanced, and its integrity can be questioned because some members have other court cases pending against them, he said.

Ahead of the attacks, foreign intelligence gave warnings to the government. However, a communication breakdown between the then-president and prime minister reportedly led to a failure to coordinate a security response.

Rajapaksa’s office has said the new committee has a mandate to identify what measures various agencies should take to implement the presidential commission’s recommendations, the Associated Press said.

Earlier in February, Cardinal Ranjith wrote to Rajapaksa to request a copy of the report. The cardinal has warned that he would seek help from international Church bodies if the government does not quickly act on the report.

In October 2020, five of seven suspects arrested in connection with the attacks were released by the government, on the stated grounds of lack of evidence.

At that time, Ranjith said security officials had confirmed to him that there was sufficient evidence against many of the suspects who had been arrested. The cardinal, along with friends and family of the victims, have said they fear the release of the suspects meant corruption, or a lack of a thorough investigation, on the part of the Sri Lankan Criminal Investigation Department.

Skeptics of the investigation were most dubious about the release of Riyaj Bathiudeen, brother of MP Rishad Bathiudeen, who is the leader of the All Ceylon Makkal Congress party in Sri Lanka. In September 2020 a police spokesman told journalists that Riyaj Bathiudeen had met with one of the suicide bombers before one of the attacks on a hotel, and he was accused of other acts of collaboration with the bombers.

Rajapaksa rejected any claims that a deal had been made with MP Bathiudeen in the release of his brother. Various reports speculated that a deal would have aided the president’s push for constitutional changes that would grant sweeping powers” to the president.

Sri Lanka is an island nation in the Indian Ocean, southwest of the Bay of Bengal. Its population is more than 21 million. More than 70% of Sri Lankans are Buddhists, roughly 13% are Hindus, almost 10% are Muslims, and fewer than 8% are Christians. There are 1.5 million Catholics in the country, constituting the overwhelming majority of Sri Lanka’s Christians.

The country has been plagued with periodic violence since its 26-year civil war concluded in 2009.

UNHRC Debate: Majority Of Countries Spoke In Favor Of Sri Lanka – OpEd

February 25th, 2021

By 

At the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) debate on Sri Lanka on Thursday, 21 countries spoke for Sri Lanka and 15 against, a Sri Lankan diplomatic source said.

The debate was on the Core Group’s resolution lambasting Sri Lanka for alleged rights violations and absence of accountability during the war and to date.   

China, Pakistan and Russia were among the countries which spoke unequivocally for Sri Lanka, the source said. Sri Lanka had wanted the council to reject the resolution in-toto.  India was neutral, the source said without giving details. Bangladesh was silent. But Australia made some constructive suggestions avoiding the harsh indictment which characterized the West-led Core Group’s contentions.  

The 15 countries which supported the resolution were all from the Western bloc, the source said.

This is a major achievement, from the Sri Lankan point of view. Sri Lanka has been making no bones about the fact that it has become a victim of the Big Powers’ arm twisting for achieving their geo-political objectives. Based on this understanding, the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Dinesh Gunawardena had twice asked the 47-member Council to reject the Core Group’s resolution.

He had dubbed the resolution a tissue of lies based on unsubstantiated material largely based on the testimony of shadowy, biased and motivated sources and mere surmises.  What Gunawardena found particularly galling was the equation of a legitimate State having a democratically elected government, with a terrorist group widely known to be the most ruthless one with assassinations and senseless bombings as its hallmarks.

Gunawardena had also warned that the West, led by the US, has been using human rights as a cover to destabilize States, a tendency that has to be halted if sovereign States have to survive. He also lambasted the US-led West’s tendency to meddle in the internal affairs and institutions of sovereign States going beyond the mandate of the council and violating the UN Secretary General’s instruction to maintain credibility by eschewing bias.

Here is the operative portion of the Zero Draft of February 19, on which the resolution is based:

The resolution notes the persistent lack of accountability through domestic mechanisms and regrets that the domestic Commission of Inquiry announced on 22 January 2021, lacks independence and does not include a mandate to pursue accountability for past gross violations of human rights, or for serious violations of international humanitarian law.

It recognizes the importance of preserving and analyzing evidence relating to violations and abuses of human rights in Sri Lanka with a view to advancing accountability and decides to strengthen the capacity of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to consolidate, analyze and preserve information and evidence and develop possible strategies for future accountability processes for gross violations of human rights or serious violations of international humanitarian law; to advocate for victims and survivors; and to support relevant judicial proceedings in Member States with competent jurisdiction.

It expresses serious concern over emerging trends over the past year, which represent clear early warning signs of a deteriorating human rights situation in Sri Lanka, including the accelerating militarization of civilian government functions, erosion of the independence of the judiciary and key institutions responsible for the promotion and protection of human rights, ongoing impunity and political obstruction of  accountability for crimes and human rights violations in emblematic cases” policies that adversely affect the right to freedom of religion or belief, surveillance and intimidation of civil society and shrinking democratic space, arbitrary detentions, allegations of torture and other cruel, inhuman degrading treatment or punishment and sexual and gender based violence, and that these trends threaten to reverse the limited but important gains made in recent years and risk the recurrence of policies and practices that gave rise to the grave violations of the past.

It expresses further concern that the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted on freedom of religion or belief and exacerbated the prevailing marginalization and discrimination suffered by the Muslim community, and that the Government of Sri Lanka’s decision to mandate cremations for all those deceased from COVID-19 has prevented Muslims and members of other religions from practicing their own burial religious rites, and has disproportionately affected religious minorities and exacerbated distress and tensions.

It calls upon the Government of Sri Lanka to ensure the prompt, thorough and impartial investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of all allegations of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, including for longstanding emblematic cases.

It also calls upon the Government of Sri Lanka: to ensure the effective and independent functioning of the National Human Rights Commission, the Office on Missing Persons and the Office for Reparations; to protect civil society actors, to investigate any attacks and ensure a safe and enabling environment in which civil society can operate free from hindrance, insecurity and reprisals.

It requests the Government of Sri Lanka review the Prevention of Terrorism Act, and ensure that any legislation to combat terrorism complies with its international human rights and humanitarian law obligations.

It urges the Government of Sri Lanka to foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to contribute openly and on an equal footing to society.

It encourages the Government of Sri Lanka to continue to cooperate with special procedures mandate holders, including responding formally to outstanding requests. It also encourages the Office of the High Commissioner and relevant Special Procedures mandate holders to provide, in consultation with and with the concurrence of the Government of Sri Lanka, advice and technical assistance on implementing the abovementioned steps.

It requests the Office of the High Commissioner to enhance its monitoring and reporting on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka, including progress on reconciliation and accountability, and to present a written update to the Human Rights Council at its forty-ninth session, and a comprehensive report including further options for advancing accountability at its fifty-first session, both to be discussed in interactive dialogues.

AG not bound by its recommendations, yet to receive report

February 25th, 2021

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

Attorney General Dappula de Livera, PC is not bound by recommendations made by the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (P CoI) into the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage, or presidential directives in that regard, according to authoritative sources.

They said that the AG couldn’t under any circumstances initiate legal proceedings until he had received the full PCoI report.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa received the PCoI report on Feb 1. The President’s Office delivered a set of PCoI reports to Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena on Feb 23, a day after the report was presented to the cabinet of ministers. The Island raised the matter with relevant authorities in the wake of a section of the media reporting the PCoI recommending punitive measures against former President Maithripala Sirisena, Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando, IGP Pujitha Jayasundera, Chief of State Intelligence Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena, Chief of National Intelligence retired DIG Sisira Mendis and All Ceylon Makkal Congress (ACMC) leader and Samagi Jana Balavegaya MP Rishad Bathiudeen et al over the Easter Sunday carnage.

Sources pointed out that due to the inordinate delay in sharing the PCoI report with the AG, the department hadn’t been able to take preliminary measures required to initiate the proceedings. Sources said that a team of officers would take at least six weeks or more to examine the report before tangible measures could be taken.

With the AG scheduled to retire on May 24, 2021, even if the AG Department received the P CoI it would be quite a tough task to initiate proceedings ahead of retirement, sources said. However, in terms of the 20th Amendment to the Constitution enacted in last October, both the AG and the IGP could receive extensions beyond 60 at the President’s discretion.

Dappula de Livera received an Acting appointment as the AG a week after the Easter Sunday carnage whereas his predecessor Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, was elevated to Chief Justice.

Responding to another query, sources said that the Attorney General two weeks ago requested Secretary to the President for a copy of the P CoI. However, the AG was yet to receive one, sources said. In spite of the AG not receiving a P CoI copy, the AG had instructed the IGP to obtain a copy of the report when he requested the police to complete investigations into the Easter Sunday carnage. The AG issued specific instructions after having examined police files pertaining to the investigations.

The IGP, too, hadn’t received a copy so far though some sections of the report were in the public domain.

Agriculture Minister Mahindananda Aluthgamage displayed at a live political programme on Derana a copy of the P CoI report he received at the cabinet meeting earlier in the day.

Sources said that the Attorney General’s Department couldn’t decide on a course of action in respect of the Easter carnage on the basis of a section of the report. In terms of the Commission of Inquiry Act (Section 24), the AG enjoyed significant powers/authority in respect of investigations; sources said adding that the Department urgently required both the P CoI report and police investigations report. The Attorney General’s Department has raised the delay in receiving a P CoI report amidst the Catholic Church attacking the government over the same issue.

Sources said that ministerial committee appointed to study the P CoI report couldn’t decide on how to proceed with the recommendations and the matter was entirely in the hands of the AG. Sources pointed out that the delay on the part of the government to release the report had received the attention of sections of the international media, including the New York Times. Public Security Minister retired Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera having met Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith at the Bishop’s House on Dec 8, 2020 said that the AG would get a copy of the P CoI report once the President received it. Minister Weerasekera said that the CID had handed over the relevant files after having completed investigations into eight blasts. Referring to the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) report on the Easter Sunday carnage, the former Navy Chief of Staff said that all such documents would have to be brought to one place and considered before initiating legal proceedings. Acknowledging that there could be delays, lawmaker Weerasekera said that on the instructions of the Attorney General a 12-member team of lawyers was working on the case. The minister vowed to expose the mastermind behind the Easter Sunday attacks. Investigations continued while some of those wanted were overseas, the minister said.

The minister acknowledged that the Attorney General couldn’t proceed without the P CoI report. Minister Weerasekera reiterated that once the President received the P CoI report, it would be sent to the Attorney General. The minister said that there were documents two to three feet high that needed scrutiny. The minister assured comprehensive investigation. The minister said that investigations pertaining to eight blasts had been completed and the reports handed over to the AG. However, the Attorney General had found shortcomings in those investigations.

Proposal made to Cabinet to impose burqa ban: Justice Minister

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Justice Minister Ali Sabry said a proposal has been made to the Cabinet to impose laws to ban wearing of the burqa in public places considering the security of the country.

He told a news conference that a Cabinet Paper has also been submitted to amend Muslim laws by November.

We have submitted a cabinet paper to amend Muslim laws by November. We have proposed to amend matters widely discussed in society such as minimum marriageable age as 18, allowing Muslim woman to sign when getting married and to ensure equal rights to women as men,” he said and added that in addition, we have proposed that burqa should not be worn in public places. This is not targeting a specific community, but considering the security of the country,” he said.

The Minister said the Buddhist Temporalities Ordinance will not be abolished or amended under his tenure as the Justice Minister.

I must say, as long as I am the Justice Minister, I will never abolish or even touch the Buddhist Temporalities Ordinance. I haven’t even dreamt of doing so,” he said.

21 countries speak for SL during Interactive Dialogue at UNHRC; 15 against

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The international lobbying spree by the government gathered momentum today with 21 countries speaking in favour of Sri Lanka and 15 against during an Interactive Dialogue at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Daily Mirror learns.

A core group of countries led by the United Kingdom has proposed to move a resolution on Sri Lanka calling for action on alleged human rights and accountability issues during wartime. Sri Lanka has sought to thwart the adoption of such a resolution.

The Interactive Dialogue took place amidst intense campaigning for support.

The representatives of the countries such as the United Kingdom, Norway, Canada, the United States Germany and the European Union spoke against the position of the Sri Lankan government.

However, India and Japan took neutral positions. Australia also spoke with a moderate tone despite it being an ally of the western world.    

Among the 21 countries that spoke in support of the Sri Lankan government’s position, ten are member states of the UNHRC. These countries are Russia, China, Pakistan, Iran, Vietnam, the Maldives, Cuba, Nicaragua, Eritrea, Nepal, Cambodia, Laos, Azerbaijan, Vietnam, Belarus, North Korea, Gabon, the Philippines, Syria and Egypt. (Kelum Bandara)

We do not need loans from IMF – Ajith Nivard Cabraal (English)

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

464 cases of Covid-19 reported so far today

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The Ministry of Health reports 242 new cases of COVID-19 increasing the total number of coronavirus cases reported so far today to 464.

All new cases reported today are close contacts of infected patients from the Peliyagoda Covid-19 cluster.

This brings the tally of positive cases from the Minuwangoda, Peliyagoda and prisons clusters to 77,827.

The total number of Covid-19 cases reported in Sri Lanka thus far has climbed to 81,933 while total recoveries stands at 76,961.

4,513 patients are currently under treatment for the virus while the death toll from the virus is 459.

Two more Covid-19 deaths reported in Sri Lanka

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The Director General of Health Services on Thursday confirmed two more Covid-19 related deaths, increasing Sri Lanka’s death toll due to the virus to 459.

One of the deceased is a 62-year-old woman from Kadawatha who had passed away on February 21 while being treated at the Colombo North Teaching Hospital. The Cause of death is mentioned as a heart disease and complicated diabetes with Covid-19 infection.

The other victim is an 83-year-old woman from Wattala. She had been disgnosed as Covid-19 positive at the Kiribathgoda Base Hospital and transferred to the Mulleriyawa Base Hospital, where she passed away on February 25. The cause of
death is reported as Covid-19 pneumonia and bacterial infection.

AG receives Volume 1 of Easter attacks commission report

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The Attorney General has received Volume 01 of the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) that investigated the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

The AG’s coordinating officer said that Volume 01 of the report was received today from the Secretary to the President.

However, the Attorney General has requested the President’s Secretary to submit all proceedings, documents and materials (Volumes 2-5) of the commission to the Attorney General’s Department, she said.

The President’s Media Division also confirmed that the report was officially handed over by the Director General, Legal Affairs of the Presidential Secretariat Hariguptha Rohanadheera at the Attorney General’s Department today (25).

Attorney General Dappula De Livera on February 12 requested for a copy of the final report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry from the Secretary to the President in order to consider forwarding charges against the suspects.

Meanwhile the final report, which was handed over to the Speaker of Parliament on Tuesday (23) was tabled in parliament by the Leader of the House, Foreign Affairs Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, this morning (25).
  
The Presidential Commission of Inquiry appointed to investigate the 2019 Easter Sunday terror attacks handed over its final report to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa on February 01.

Hearings and other procedures of the Presidential Commission officially came to a conclusion on January 27, 2021.

The Commission was appointed by former President Maithripala Sirisena on September 22nd, 2019 to investigate the series of attacks that took place on Easter Sunday same year and to recommend necessary actions.

The commission had recorded evidence from a total of 440 individuals during its term.

The commission was chaired by Court of Appeal Judge, Janak de Silva and included Court of Appeal Judge, Nishshanka Bandula Karunarathna, Retired High Court Judges Nihal Sunil Rajapaksa and A.L. Bandula Kumara Atapattu, former Secretary of the Ministry of Justice, W.M.M.R. Adikari.

I’m not stupid enough to change Viharagam and Dewalagam Ordinance – Ali Sabry

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

President’s Counsel Ali Sabri stated that he does not intend to repeal or amend the Viharagam and Dewalagam Ordinance during his tenure as the Minister of Justice.

He expressed these views speaking at a media briefing in Colombo, today (February 25).

He said, As long as I am the Minister of Justice, we have no hope of touching the Buddhist Viharagam and Dewalagam Ordinance. I haven’t even dreamt of it.

We all acknowledge that this is a country with a history of 2500 years, based on Buddhist civilization. Can I bring laws against the traditional rights of the Sinhala Buddhist people in this country? I’m not that stupid.”

The Justice Minister further stated that steps have already been taken to ban the wearing of the burqa and to amend the Muslim marriage law.

He says that the relevant amendments to the Muslim law have been submitted to the Cabinet for them to be implemented by November.

The factors that have created dialogues in the society, such as the minimum age of marriage being 18 years and requiring the female to sign the marriage certificate, and giving equal rights to the females, have been proposed through these amendments.”

The decision not to cover faces in public was not made with the mind of targeting a specific community. [It was taken] considering national security.”

Gazette issued allowing “Cremation or burial of the corpse”

February 25th, 2021

Courtesy Hiru News

he Extraordinary Gazette Notification (No. 2216/38 – THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2021) allowing the cremation or burial of COVID-19 dead bodies has been issued.

REGULATIONS made by the Minister of Health under Sections 2 and 3 of the Quarantine and Prevention of Diseases<br />Ordinance (Chapter 222).

Regulations relating to Storage of Grain and Regulations relating to Anchylostomiasis published in Gazette No.7481 of August 28, 1925, as amended from time to time, are hereby further amended in regulation 61A thereof as follows: –

(1) by the substitution for the words, Cremation of Corpse” of the words Cremation or burial of the corpse”;

(2) in sub regulation (1) thereof, by the substitution for the words shall be cremated-” of the words may be cremated or buried. In the case of cremation, the corpse of such person shall be cremated-” ;.

(3) by the insertion immediately after sub regulation (1) thereof, of the following new sub regulation:- (1a) In the case of burial, the corpse of such person shall be buried in accordance with the directions issued by the Director General of Health Services at a cemetery or place approved by the proper authority under the supervision of such authority.” 

(4) in sub regulation (2) thereof, by the substitution for the words, duties of cremation” of the words duties of cremation or burial” ; and

(5) in sub regulation (3) thereof, by the substitution for the words, by placing them with the coffin during cremation.” of the words by placing them with the coffin during cremation or in the case of burial, by taking such steps in accordance with the directions as may be issued by the Director General of Health Services.

No description available.
No description available.

Truth Behind Dare Documentary & QUESTIONS for US-UK-Canada-EU & UNHRC

February 24th, 2021

A 11minute youtube video has been released of LTTE well-timed and poses questions for the international entities and individuals holding candles to LTTE.

The footage shows LTTE children and adults in training – how many of them are alive today.

Can the government issue a notice for all those living to present themselves or the OMP office or Reconciliation Ministry must also request them to appear and register with them.

How many of these LTTE trainees including children are alive today?

How did they die?

How many died during LTTE training?

How many died being shot trying to flee LTTE?

How many died during hostilities with a national army?

The videos show the deplorable manner LTTE are shooting dead civilians.

Are these Sinhala villagers? Where did these shootings take place?

The manner these civilians are shot at close range is shocking and shows how gruesome LTTE is.

All those holding memorials for LTTE and the LTTE overseas brats appearing on videos calling for Tamil Eelam must look at the number of children LTTE had stolen from their parents to turn into gruesome murderers.

How many Tamil children did LTTE steal from Tamil parents?

Have the LTTE promoters including the White Nations of the world have no feeling for these children denied fundamental right to education, to freedom, to live with parents?

Are the Tamil parents not happy now that LTTE is no more they do not have to fear their children being kidnapped?

Just count the kids on this video

Just think about what these kids had to go through

Just think how devastating it would have been for kids to hold a gun instead of a pen

Just think how life had been for these children

Just think how kids were asked to make bombs banned by international law

With the defeat of LTTE in May 2009 – there are no more LTTE child soldiers

With the defeat of LTTE in May 2009 – there are no kids making bombs for LTTE

With the defeat of LTTE in May 2009 – there are no kids denied their right to live like a child

With the defeat of LTTE in May 2009 – there is no fear of kids garlanded with cyanide capsules

With the defeat of LTTE in May 2009 – the Tamil child is free from LTTE

Why are the rights activists for children silent on bringing criminal charges against Adele Balasingham?

Why are the rights activists silent on LTTE using children to make bombs?

The video shows another side of the LTTE – a side no one had earlier seen.

LTTE’s treatment of domestic animals is too shocking.

To have pet dogs also kidnapped from Tamil homes shows another ugly side of the LTTE.

Kidnapped dogs and goats were used for target practice

Kidnapped dogs and goats were used to test TNT explosive devices – this was too cruel to watch

Kidnapped dogs were used to check weight to detonate land mines!

Thousands and dogs and goats fell victim to the LTTE

Look at the manner LTTE used innocent animals with no voice for their vicious ends.

This is the LTTE that the UNHRC want to white-wash of crimes and crimes against humanity.

Where are the foreign animal activists – why are they silent?

Wwould like to know how many of these LTTE children remain alive today?

What are they doing now that LTTE is no more?

What is their story

We would also like to know about the parents in these video footage, what do they feel now that the LTTE is no more? How many of these parents lost their children to LTTE?

We would like to know how many of these LTTE trainers are around – have they changed their ways, have they run away to foreign climes?

How many are today living overseas under false names?

How many of these LTTE trainers were helped out of the country by western NGOs and western governments?

How many of these LTTE trainers are still nursing separatism and terrorist tendencies?

How many of these LTTE trainers are having their identity kept hidden by foreign governments?

How many of these LTTE trainers have been given asylum/refugee status by western countries?

The western governments who have been sponsoring resolutions against Sri Lanka conveniently ignore the fact that with the end of LTTE, the Tamil parents do not fear their children being kidnapped, there are no more child soldiers, thousands of pet dogs and goats have been saved from being killed – there is so much that the whole country can feel happy about, but the countries drafting resolutions at UNHRC want Sri Lanka to continue to live under LTTE terror, want LTTE to prevail and want Sri Lanka to be punished for eliminating LTTE.

From the video clip and the manner that western governments are behaving using the UNHRC, we can only say that they are no better than the LTTE and they are no friend of Sri Lanka.

In place of Mullaiwaikkal Memorials for LTTE dead there must be a Memorial for the LTTE Child Soldier to remind the world what the CHILD went through – the horrendous CHILD ABUSE by LTTE and the fact that these children are now SAVED from LTTE for good.

Shenali D Waduge

LTTE the world’s only terrorists to use DOGS & GOATS for target practice – where are the animal activists?

February 24th, 2021

We thought we knew the worst about the LTTE. It appears there’s much more to LTTE brutality. The FBI described LTTE as the ‘most dangerous & deadly extremists’ in the world. But we never thought LTTE would stoop to the level of using innocent voiceless animals as guinea pigs for their brutality.It appears LTTE’s brutality knows no bounds as thousands of pets and goats had been used for target practice and to test land mines.This despicable acts on innocent animals took place even as late as September 2008 where animals had been tied by LTTE combatants and used for their brutal terror practices. The footage of this live brutality, by LTTE on animals is shown in the video now released for the world to see in the Truth behind Dare documentary. It should put to shame the countries using the floor of the UN/UNHRC to target Sri Lanka via resolutions for ending terror in Sri Lanka.Too bad these LTTE supporters are angry about LTTE being defeated, but we are more than happy that since May 2009, no child has been kidnapped & turned into child soldiers and no pet dog or goat has ended up dead from LTTE target practice. Maybe Francis Harrison may like to come forward and count the dead dogs and goats by LTTE or Yasmin Sooka may like to add animal abuse to one of her reports!  We also invite the other 3rdand 4thparties claiming ‘dead civilians’ to provide statistics on how many dogs and goats LTTE killed maliciously!

Truth behind Dare documentary on LTTE using dogs

Just look at the fear in his eyes.

These LTTE diaspora kids living and studying and working in Western countries are coming on social media demanding Eelam

Why dont’ they fly over and create it themselves?

Why do they want to outsource what they want to innocent Tamil children?

If Rudrakumaran wants an eelam – fly down from US and wear a LTTE uniform! Same goes for these kids too

The world must scorn the use of ANIMALS by TERRORIST LTTE. We do not want other terrorist groups copying LTTE abuse of animals. Therefore action must be taken when action should be taken.

It would be good to have a statement from the world’s animal activists on the LTTE treatment of animals for their terrorism especially since LTTE supporters in the West are using UN/UNHRC to resurrect LTTE and recommence terror in Sri Lanka

Animal rights organisations and activists in Sri Lanka must also issue a strong statement regarding LTTE’s use of animals for terror

Shenali D Waduge

The Truth Behind The Dare? More Aptly Named

February 24th, 2021

Chula Rajapakse MNZM, Spokesperson, United Sri Lanka Assn,Wellington NZ

The SL government is to be congratulated on their latest video above, exposing another, less well-known yet no less Horrific dimension to Tamil Tiger Carnage. This has been widely circulated among the expatriate SL communities.

However where this should be circulated most for maximum effect would be, among every state and federal parliamentarian, senator and News outlet in the US, UK, Europe, Canada, Aus & NZ  under a more effective title as suggested above.

This is the audience that this should target most.

Just after the end of the war in May 2009 the Uk channel four put out a video called Sri Lanka -Killing Fields without a factual basis at all.

The SL govt produced a very good counter Lies-Agreed Upon” and circulated it among the SL expatriates but not among the Western politicians and media who had been fed the SL killing fields using many media channels.

I somehow managed to screen the movie in the NZ parliamentary theatre ( where they issue the mid-day Covid briefings from) and Managed to get a few MP’s to attend and circulated CD of it to most in NZ parliament and news outlets so that there was some counter to the SL killing fields garbage.

The UNHRC condemnations going on now is the result of not conveying these truths repeatedly and relentlessly while misinformation inimical to SL is being disseminated to these recipients relentlessly by a most efficient Tiger Diaspora led by GTF (uk) TGTE (US) and CTC ( Canada )

As I have asked before there should be a branch of the foreign service dedicated entirely to disseminating factual information about Sri Lanka pro actively co-opting the goodwill, dedication, and know-how of expatriate groups in achieving this relentlessly and repeatedly. Repeated delivery of the truth briefly, well headlined, with photographs so that the message is delivered in a 30-second glance and reinforced relentlessly, is the way to go.

The target should be that the default impression in Western minds Re SL should be HR violations did not and do not occur inSL, The allegations flying around are Tiger Diaspora constructs to among others to enable them to continue enjoying the comforts and protection of the west as refugees fleeing HR violations in SL and that Minorities in SL have all the rights and privileges of the majority and very often more.”

Unless this happens the truths about Sri Lanka would remain cloistered within the confines of a few officials, politicians, and expatriate organizations, reinforcing these to each other but not to the western politicians and media who are the ones who should receive these most. In the meanwhile, these groups will continue to be fed garbage inimical to Sri Lanka by the GTF, TGTE and CDC. With these going unchallenged, this would be the truth about Sri Lanka In the Western minds,  as happens now.

Sincerely,

Chula Rajapakse MNZM
Spokesperson
United Sri Lanka Assn
Wellington NZ


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress