MR not stripped of SLFP membership: PHU

December 18th, 2018

Sheain Fernandopulle Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa has not been stripped of his membership of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) though he obtained Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) membership recently, the Pivithuru Hela Urumaya (PHU) said yesterday.

Addressing a press briefing, PHU leader Udaya Gammanpila said there was speculation that Mr. Rajapaksa could not be given leadership in the opposition as he held SLPP membership.

According to sources, we got to know that Mr. Rajapaksa has received SLPP membership. However, it is MP Basil Rajapaksa who knows whether or not Mahinda Rajapaksa was given SLPP membership. MR has neither been expelled from the SLFP nor from the SLFP advisory post. Hence, he is eligible to hold the opposition leader’s post,” Gammanpila said. 

Cabinet of ministers to be restricted to 30

December 18th, 2018

Yohan Perera and Ajith Siriiwardana Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe has informed the UNF parliamentary group that the Cabinet will have to be limited to 30 ministers and that some will have to voluntarily give up aspirations of holding posts.

This was mentioned by MP Mano Ganesan on his twitter message. “Myself and Rishard Bathiudeen will stay out of the cabinet if Mr. Wickremesinghe so wished,” he said.

No impediment to MR being opposition leader: UPFA

December 18th, 2018

Yohan Perera and Ajith Siriwardana Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA) today countered the argument raised by the government and TNA that newly-appointed Opposition Leader Mahinda Rajappaksa and the others who had obtained SLPP membership, said Mr. Rajapaksa could hold the post because the group he belongs to is the second largest in the House.

UPFA MP Susil Premajayantha said the UPFA which is the largest group in the opposition is eligible to hold the opposition leader’s Post.

There are six parties in the House and UPFA which is one of them holds the most number of seats in the opposition. Therefore the Speaker is right to have named Mr. Rajapaksa as the Leader of the Opposition,” he said.

UPFA MP Dinesh Gunawardene said the Speaker cannot change the decision he had made now as he had conveyed his decision to the international community including the International Parliamentary Union (IPU).

He asked the Speaker whether General Secretaries of the UPFA and the SLFP had informed him about any decision to take action against these who had obtained SLPP membership.

No minister posts for those who crossover, President says

December 18th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

President Maithripala Sirisena has said that if anyone goes beyond the decision of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), they will not be given any ministerial posts, according to MP Shantha Bandara.

MP Bandara stated that the SLFP Central Committee also agreed with this.

He stated this following the SLFP Central Committee meeting held earlier today (18).

Bandara stated that the President took the decision considering the request of the majority of SLFP parliamentarians.

MINORITY POLITICS WITH MAJORITY CITIZENS IN SRI LANKA

December 17th, 2018

BY EDWARD THEOPHILUS

Current political crisis in Sri Lanka clearly indicates that although Sinhala community is the majority citizens in Sri Lanka, minority groups are playing politics with them in the parliament. Although the Sinhala community is the majority of Population (Nearly 80%), they cannot discriminate the minority, who have equal human rights. The operation of politics in Sri Lanka through a democratic parliament has not made justice to minority through a strong anti-discrimination legislation with a view to ensuring human rights of them like in other countries.  The purpose of Yahapalana government was to pass essential laws to eliminate discrimination to enable the minority to practice equal human rights, it was not happened during more than three and a half years of the yahapalana regime.

As soon as the Yahapalana government elected in 2015, they submitted a bill to the parliament to legislate anti-discrimination practice in the country, the bill was withdrawn by the government without explaining the reasons to public. Many academics told me that the withdrawal of anti-discrimination bill was happened as Tamil parties wanted to do it because they will have no opportunities to discriminate their own people using caste dictions with the operation of anti-discrimination legislation.  Why UNP the majority in the Yahapalan regime agreed with minority parties in the country when the universal human rights were going to legalise for minority practice? Could UNP Justify their behaviour?

If this was openly happening in the country, so-called democratic advisors of the country as well as outside forces remained silent. The civil society activists were silent on this matter.  It clearly seems that democratic advice and practice are cheating in the country than really respecting to the human rights.  All religions practice in Sri Lanka recognize the equality of human and the requirement of human rights in the country. Playing politics using minority and respecting human rights are different matters.  Lord Buddha clearly preached that nobody will be a noble person or lower caste person by birth, but actions of people would be the criterion determine to it.

The real experience in Sri Lanka clearly indicates that minority political parties in Sri Lanka want to play politics for individual survival, specially to obtain various benefits through parliament privileges, but not to ensure the hopes of elected people of them to the parliament.

The majority citizens or Sinhala community needs understanding that they cannot discriminate minority who have equal rights like them.  If this matter openly works in Sri Lanka there wouldn’t be an opportunity to outsiders to put hands on the matters of Sri Lanka and then it will be honest politics in the country based on economic issues and matters such as corruptions to be eliminated.

One of the serious matters I observed in minority politics was that they never openly talk on major corruptions such as Central Bank Bond scam and others as minority people also involved in serious wrong doing.  As human being majority as well, minority cannot do wrong things, it doesn’t mean that because of the wrong doer is a person belong to minority community, he or she should be free.  As a human being a person belong to a majority community or minority community the wrong doer is equally responsible for the criminal works.

According to my experience in Sri Lanka, I worked in a major government bank in managerial level and conducted audit work with the World Banking consulting group and found that minority people involved in serious corruption work, which led to nearly insolvent the bank and the government had to recapitalize the bank making a serious pressure to the government budget process. The people involved in this corrupt practice were same people involved in Central Bank bond scam.

රටේ ජනාධිපතිව ගඩාෆිව මරා දැමු ලෙස  මරා දමනවායයි කියා තර්ජනය කිරීම පිළිබඳව

December 17th, 2018

ගීතාංජන

ජනාධිපතිතුමා එජාප ප්‍රධානීන් අමතා  කල කතාව නැරඹුවෙමි. එවැනි ත්‍රිලක් මට ලබන්නට හැකි වුයේ හුඟ කලෙකිනි.

එම කතාව ඇසූ විට මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන ජනාධිපති තුමා කෙරෙහි මාතුල මෙතෙක් නොතිබූ ගරුත්වයක් ඇති විය. සැබවින්ම එය අතිශය  ධෛර්‍යය  සම්පන්න කතාවකි. රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා දිව විකාගෙන ඉතා අපහසුවෙන් මෙන්, Mr. Bean ගේ මූණ දාගෙන එම සම්පුර්ණ කතාව  අසා ගෙන සිටි බව පෙනිණි. මා පසුවූයේ රනිල් මහතා දැන් නැගිට එතනින්  යයිද, දැන් නැගිට යයිද කියා විමසිල්ලෙනි. එතැන සිටි අය  අතර පහසුවෙන් සිටිබවක් පෙනුනේ සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතා සහ නවීන් දිසානායක මහතා ය. අන් අය  ආපු එක මෝඩකමක් ලෙස සිතමින්දෝ එහෙට ඇඹරෙමින් මෙහෙට ඇඹරෙමින් කරකියාගත හැකි දෙයක් නොමැතිව කසාය බිව් ගොළුවන් සේ අසරණව සිටියහ.

මෙය ඓතිහාසික වශයෙන් වැදගත් කතාවක් වන්නේ, ජනමාද්‍යය ඉදිරිපිට මෙවන් දෘඪ විවේචනයක් වෙනත් කිසිම ජනාධිපති කෙනෙකු විසින් මීට පෙර කිසිදාක කර නැති නිසාවෙනි. රනිල්වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාද මෙවැනි විවේචනයක් කිසිදාක මෙවැනි ආකාරයෙන් විඳ දරාගෙන නැතුවාට කිසිදු සැකයක් නොමැත. එමෙන්ම, මෙයින් හෙළිවන අනෙක් කරුණ නම්, යලි පිහිටුවන ලද එජාප රජය මලගිය පරානයක්සේ කිසිවක් කරගත නොහැකි රජයක්වන බවට අනාවැකියක්ද මෙයින්ප්‍රකාශ වීමය. අනෙක්  කරුණ නම් ජධිපති සහ අගමැතිට එකට වැඩ කල නොහැකි බව ජනාධිපති විසින් නැවතත් ඉතා අවධාරණයෙන් පැහැදිලිව ප්‍රකාශ කිරීමය. ඔවුන්අතර ඇති බව ජනාධිපති ප්‍රකාශ කල විභේදනය තවමත් එසේම පවතින බවට ඔහු නැවතත් අවධාරණය කළේය.

මෙහිදී ජනාධිපති තුමා විසින් එලිදක්වන ලද එක කරුණක්වූ තමාට එල්ල කරන ලද මරණ තර්ජනය පිළිබඳව, එනම් ගඩාෆිව මෙන් මරාදමනවා යයි තර්ජනය කිරීම පිළිබඳව කිව යුත්තේ මෙයයි. වෙනත් රටකදී එවැනි ඝාතන තර්ජනයක් යම් පුද්ගලයෙ එම රටේ රාජ්‍ය නායකයා වෙතඑල්ල කළහොත් අදාළ ආයතන විසින් එවන් අය නීතිය ඉදිරියට පමුණුවා දඬුවම් දෙන බවය. ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේදී එවන් ප්‍රතිපල අත් නොවන්නේ මන්ද යන්න ප්‍රෙහෙලිකාවකි.

එම ඝාතන තර්ජනයට ප්‍රතිචාර වශයෙන් ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන මහතා කීවේ ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම අපට අදහා ගතනොහැකි, අප කිසිසේත්ම නොසිතූදෙයකි. ශ්‍රී ලංකාව මෙතෙක් පාලනය කල කිසිදු රාජ්‍ය නායකයෙකුට එල්ල  නොකළ මෙම තර්ජනය නොබියව NGO මැරයින් සහ UNP ආණ්ඩුව තුල සිටින මිනීමරුරැල විසින් ඔහුට එල්ල කලේ සැබවින්ම ඔවුනට තමාව මරා දැමීමට හැකි  කම තිබෙන නිසා යයි ඔහුකීවේය.

මෙයින් හෙළිවන කරුණ නම්, ඉතාම නීච සහ දෘඪ පන්තිභේදයකට නතුවී තිබෙන ශ්‍රී ලාංකික සමාජ දේශපාලන ක්‍රමය තුල, සිරිසේන මහතාට කොළඹ පාලක පන්තියයයි කියාගන්න පක්ෂයේ ආරක්ෂාවක් නොමැති බව ඔහු තේරුම්ගෙන තිබෙන බවය. එමෙන්ම සියලු දේශපාලන ඝාතන වලට අවශ්‍ය විශේෂඥභාවය තිබෙන්නේ, බණ්ඩාරනායක පවා ඝාතනය කල  කොළඹුන්ගේ මිනීමරු පන්තියට බවත්, අනෙක් විශේෂඥභාවය ඇති කණ්ඩායම් දෙකවන ජවිපෙ හා LTTE එකද අද කොළඹුන්ගේ මිනීමරු පන්තියේ, එනම් එජාපයේ ඔඩොක්කුවේ සිටින නිසා ඔහුට ඒ තර්ජනය තදින්ම ඇති බවත් ඔහු හොඳින් වටහාගෙන තිබෙන බවය. කෙසේවුවද ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන මහතා වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාගේ මුහුණටම තම විවේචනය එල්ල කරන්නේ මෙම යතාර්ථය දැන දැනය. එය ගරු කලයුතු ධෛර්‍යය සම්පන්නකතාවක් වන්නේ එනිසාය. ජනාධිපති තුමාගේ එම කතාවේ කිසියම්අධිෂ්ඨාන පුර්වක බවෙක පෙර නිමිත්තක් අපට පෙනිණි.

සිරිසේන මහතා පැමිණෙන්නේ ගැමි පදනමකිනි. ඔහු ඉතාම සාමාන්‍ය මිනිසෙකු බව කිහිප වතාවක්ම ඔහුගේ කතාවලින් ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. මෙවර ඔහුගේ කතාවෙන් ඔහු තමා පන්තිමය වශයෙන් අනාරික්ෂිත තත්වයක සිටින බව අවධාරණය කොට රටට  ප්‍රකාශකිරීම සැබවින්ම ජනතාවගේ හදවතට කල ප්‍රබල  ආමන්ත්‍රණයක් බව මට හැඟී  යැමට හේතු වුයේ, මෙතෙක් කල් සිරිසේන මහතාට පතුරු යනකල් බැණ බැණ සිටි මගේ බිරිඳ එක වරම මේකතාව අසා අනේ පව් නේද   කියා මගෙන් ඇසීමනිසාය.

අනතුරුව NGO සමාජයවිවේචනය කල ජනාධිපති තුමාරටේ සංස්කෘතියට විරුද්ධව ක්‍රියා කිරීම ගැන දැඩි සේ විවේචනය එල්ල කළේය. හමුදාවට සහ සංඝ සමාජයටකල හිරිහැර හෙලා දැක්කේය. මෙම සමස්ත කතාව දුටු මට සිතුනේ ඉදරි කාලයතුල හොඳ හොඳ දේවල් අපට බලාගත හැකි වන බවය.

M A Sumanthiran of TNA on the Interim of the New Constitution

December 17th, 2018

Shenali Waduge‎ to Saving Sri Lanka

Who are these jokers drafting a new constitution that is NOT FEDERAL BUT CONFEDERAL where the Centre is basically PERMANENTLY ceding powers to the provinces.

What kind of sick arrangement is this … all to satisfy some murderers who killed for 30 years & now putting their political wing to finally separate the country… just how dare the UNP even think of putting forward a constitution of this nature…

බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය නිසා මේ වනවිට භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බිල්පත් සහ බැඳුම්කර පොලී අනුපාත ඉහළ ගිය ප්‍රමානය – හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල්

December 17th, 2018

 ශ්‍යාම් නුවන් ගනේවත්ත

යහපාලන රජයේ බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය නිසා මේ වනවිට භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බිල්පත් සහ බැඳුම්කර පොලී අනුපාත විශාල ලෙස ඉහළ ගොස්‌ ඇතැයි හිටපු මහ බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා zදිවයිනZ ට කීවේය.
2015 පෙබරවාරි මාසයේදී උද්ධමනය අඩුවෙමින් තිබුණත් මේ බැඳුම්කර මගඩිය නිසා පොලී අනුපාත ඉහළ ගිය බව ද ඔහු කීවේය.
මේ අනුව රජයට දේශීය ණය තොගය සඳහා සියයට 3 ත් 4 ත් අතර ප්‍රමාණයක්‌ වැඩියෙන් පොලී ගෙවීමට සිදුව ඇති බව ද ඔහු කියයි.
මේ අනුව 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 31 දින වන විට පැවැති මාස තුනේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බිල්පත් පොලී අනුපාතය 2018.11.30 දින වනවිට සියයට 9.87 දක්‌වාද
මැයි මාසේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බිල්පත් පොලී අනුපාතය සියයට 5.86 සිට සියයට 10.37 දක්‌වා ද
එසේම මාස දොළහේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බිල්පත් පොලී අනුපාතය සියයට 6.04 සිට සියයට 11.11 දක්‌වාද ඉහළ ගොස්‌ ඇතැයි ඔහු සඳහන් කරයි.
එසේම වර්ෂ 2 සිට වර්ෂ 30 දක්‌වා නිකුත් කර ඇති සෑම භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලී අනුපාතයක්‌ම 2014.12.31 දින සිට පසුගිය 2018.11.31 දින වන විට සැලකිය යුතු ලෙස ඉහළ ගොස්‌ ඇත.
මේ අනුව එම කාලයේදී වර්ෂ දෙකේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 6.22 සිට සියයට 11.35 දක්‌වාද,
වර්ෂ පහේ බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 7.26 සිට සියයයට 11.75 දක්‌වා ද,
වර්ෂ හයේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොළිය 7.57 සිට සියයට 11.87 දක්‌වාද
වර්ෂ අටේ භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 7.91 සිට සියයට 11.98 දක්‌වාද
වර්ෂ 10 භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 7.99 සිට සියයට 12.13 දක්‌වාද
වර්ෂ 15 භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 8.58 සිට සියයට 12. 30 දක්‌වාද
වර්ෂ 20 භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 9.15 සිට සියයට 12.45 දක්‌වා සහ
වර්ෂ 30 භාණ්‌ඩාගාර බැඳුම්කර පොලිය සියයට 9.27 සිට සියයට 12.30 දක්‌වාද ඉහළ ගොස්‌ ඇතැයි හිටපු බැංකු අධිපති අජිත් නිවාඩ් කබ්රාල් මහතා තවදුරටත් පවසයි.

Jeremy Corbyn tables Theresa May no-confidence motion but ministers would not allow time for it to be debated

December 17th, 2018

Courtesy BBC

Jeremy Corbyn has tabled a motion of no confidence in Theresa May, after she said MPs would not vote on her Brexit deal until the week of 14 January.

The PM had delayed the vote from last week, admitting she was set to lose.

Labour leader Mr Corbyn said on Monday it was unacceptable for MPs to wait a month to vote, adding the PM had led the UK into a “national crisis”.

But No 10 sources told the BBC the government would not make time for the no-confidence vote.

Ministers would not “go along with silly political games”, they added.

Mr Corbyn tabled the motion calling on MPs to declare they have “no confidence in the prime minister due to her failure to allow the House of Commons to have a meaningful vote straight away” on the Brexit deal.

The motion focuses on Mrs May personally, rather than the government.

BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the motion could have been embarrassing for Mrs May, but as things stood, ministers would not allow time for it to be debated.

She said No 10 had effectively “batted the ball back to Labour to see if they have the guts” to call for a vote of no confidence in the government as a whole.

This is the right opposite of what has happened in Sri Lanka where speaker has taken a unilateral decision to debate it and take a vote on it within a period of few minutes.

Re-instated Lankan PM and Rajapaksa set to clash over Executive Presidency and devolution of power

December 17th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, December 17: The re-instated Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and the man he replaced, Mahinda Rajapaksa, are set to clash over two major issues facing Sri Lanka, namely, the continuation of the Executive Presidency and devolution of power to the Tamil-speaking Northern and Eastern provinces.

Soon after being sworn-in as Prime Minister on Sunday, Wickremesinghe said that he had initiated discussions with a number of political parties for abolishing the Executive Presidency. He had also initiated talks with the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) for bringing about a political solution in which all citizens can live in harmony in a unitary state.

Re-instated Lankan PM and Rajapaksa set to clash over Executive Presidency and devolution of power

But Mahinda Rajapaksa, who resigned from the Premiership following two adverse rulings from the Supreme Court on two actions of President Mahinda Rajapaksa, said that Wickremesinghe has a two-point agenda.

The first is to weaken Sri Lanka by abolishing the Executive Presidency which is necessary for the unity of the country and its rapid economic development.  And the second is to divide the country into nine semi-independent” federal units through an agreement with the TNA.

In another point of divergence from Rajapaksa, Wickremesinghe said that a fresh election, as demanded by Rajapaksa, could not wipe off the stigma of dissolving parliament prematurely and unconstitutionally and quoted the recent Supreme Court judgment to this effect.

Mahinda Rajapaksa, who was appointed Prime Minister suddenly on October 26, had argued that a fresh parliamentary election would be the ideal way of solving the political issue plaguing the conflict-ridden Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government.

Rajapaksa Still Pitching For Elections

While Wickremesinghe says that fresh elections were not a solution to the current crisis and the solution was in the restoration of the status quo ante, Rajapaksa is still saying that fresh elections are the panacea for Lanka’s ulls.

In a statement issued after he resigned from the Premiership, Rajapaksa said: We are now in direct confrontation with a group of political parties that have continuously engaged in various subterfuge to avoid facing elections. When this group of political parties tried to get the local government elections postponed indefinitely by petitioning courts over the delimitation of wards, we were able to hold the local government election only because the Chairman of the Elections Commission intervened and declared that he would hold elections at least in respect of the local government institutions that had no delimitation issues pending before courts. If not for that intervention, the people would not have got even the local government election.”

Elections to provincial councils have been delayed by more than one year and three months but no one has any inkling of when those long overdue elections will be held. The law has been manipulated in such a way that those elections will be put off indefinitely.”

In September 2017, when the Attorney General said that a two-thirds majority will be necessary to pass the law designed to postpone the provincial council elections, the then government kept Parliament going till night time and with great effort, mustered the necessary number of MPs to get the law passed. So desperate were they that when some smaller political parties said they would not vote for the law unless the proportional representation quota was increased from 40% to 50%, the government agreed to that demand in the corridors of Parliament so as to get the required number of votes.They had to perform demeaning contortions to get the provincial council elections postponed.”

The people have now been deprived of the general election that had already been declared. After the President dissolved Parliament on 9 November, the political parties opposed to the election petitioned courts and obtained a stay order on the dissolution and with the cooperation of the UNP Speaker, they engaged in various activities to demonstrate that they had a majority in Parliament.”

Abject Dependence on TNA

Speaking about Wickremesinghe’s abject dependence on the Tamil National Alliance (TNA),  Rajapaksa said: But it was only on 12 December when a resolution was passed expressing confidence in Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe and requesting that he be appointed Prime Minister that the people of the country were able to see the real state of things.”

A total of 117 MPs voted calling for Mr Ranil Wickremasinghe to be appointed as Prime Minister. Fourteen of those votes belong to the TNA. Even though the TNA also requested that Mr.Ranil Wickremasinghe be appointed Prime Minister, on the same day, TNA Parliamentarian Mavei Senathirajah made a special statement in Parliament on behalf of the TNA saying that though they voted for Mr. Wickremasinghe to become Prime Minister, they would not join the government and would remain in the opposition. So what has actually happened here is that the UNP which has a minority of 103 seats, has been taken hostage by the TNA. If they do not adhere to the diktat of the TNA, the UNP minority can lose their parliamentary majority at any moment. The TNA now holds the remote control in Parliament.”

Divisive New Constitution

Rajapaksa charged that given the shortage of numbers in parliament, Wickremesinghe had to agree to TNA’s demand for an ethnically divisive new Sri Lankan constitution.

On 12 December, even before the Supreme Court judgement was delivered, Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe spoke in Parliament about bringing in a new Constitution. This new Constitution has already been drafted and published in the newspapers as well. Under the provisions of that draft constitution, this country will be divided into nine semi-independent federal units.”

The new Constitution will also abolish the executive presidency which means that the presidential election that is due before 9 December 2019 will not have to be held.”

The new Constitution will also change the system of electing MPs to Parliament which means that the parliamentary election due in 2020 can also be postponed citing delimitation issues the same way that the provincial council elections have been put off indefinitely. That is what they are now preparing for.”

Debt Trap

Rajapaksa said that Wickremesinghe had led Sri Lanka into a debt trap with no plans to use the borrowed money for constructive purposes.

The United National Party (UNP) government borrowed US$ 20.7 billion in foreign currency loans alone within a period of three and a half years, and we have no idea as to how much more they will borrow in the coming months.”

The UNP brought our economy to the brink of collapse through such foreign currency borrowings. All that money was borrowed for consumption. Burt we borrowed money to develop the country and that development is visible. But the UNP borrowed money only for consumption.”

President Might Be Ignored

Rajapaksa warned that Wickremesinghe  might continue to ignore the Executive President Maitrhipala Sirisena and act unilaterally ,which could in turn fuel conflict.

Even though some have expressed the view that it will be possible to minimize the damage done by the UNP because the President is no longer with them, we must realize that there is much that the UNP-TNA coalition can do without informing the President.”

We should bear in mind that back in 2002, the then UNP government signed a ceasefire agreement with the LTTE without informing President Chandrika Kumaratunga,” Rajapaksa said.

(The featured image at the top shows Mahinda Rajapaksa and Ranil Wickremesinghe.Photo.Govt Information Department)

Sirisena says it’ll be very hard to go on a “collective journey with a corrupt UNP”

December 17th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, December 17 (newsin.asia): Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena has said that it will be very difficult to undertake a collective journey” with the United National Party (UNP) led by Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe because of the presence of corrupt MPs in parliament where Wickremesinghe has a majority.

Speaking to MPs of Wickremesinghe’s alliance after swearing him in as Prime Minister, Sirisena said: Some of your MPs over the phone or when they meet me, say that we must move forward together, but I can’t see what the guarantee for such a collective journey is.”

I don’t want to create conflicts. At every turn of this conflict, it is the country that will fall back. The prevailing corrupt situation is very strong. There are some extremely corrupt politicians in the Parliament. When we consider our Cabinet there are some corrupted individuals, the promise of good governance, which we gave to our people, has been completely violated. I clearly state that I am not the person who responsible for this calamity. I made all the sacrifices toward achieving good governance; however, all those sacrifices were destroyed,” he said.

Sirisena says it’ll be very hard to go on a “collective journey with a corrupt UNP”

Here is the speech in full:

The January 08, 2015 Presidential election was an extraordinary people’s victory achieved through a challenging election campaign. In that victory, the people of the country had many of their hopes and expectations. As of now, with the completion of almost four years, we have had several achievements as a government that have a significant place in history. At the same time, there were many disastrous acts, corruption and disturbing incidents as well.We are pleased that we fulfill some of the aspirations of the people during this period. At the same time we could not take the country to the level the people expected us to take. Now, I do not know how far we will be able to achieve those expectations.

From the date of the victory of 2015 election, the promises of our election manifesto have floundered since the date of the swearing-in of the Cabinet of Ministers. According to our Election Manifesto, ministries had to be allocated on a scientific basis. Not only that, a team of experts had been appointed for that responsibility and necessary document was prepared. But, I do not know, if that document was even looked at.

In the past, most of us have witnessed most unfortunate situations. When it comes to progressive results, I see the establishment of democracy in the country and the freedom of the people, the 19th amendment and the establishment of independent commissions. I see only those steps as progress in the country. On the other side, today I only see a huge political crisis. It is uncertain to me whether the appointment of independent commissions and selection of some persons to positions under the 19th Amendment to Constitution were done impartially. The Constitution Council has to appoint the Chief Justice, the Attorney General and the Inspector General Police. The main thing I noticed was when the names of senior most judges were submitted for the judiciary appointments, they were rejected.

There is an allegation among the judges in the judiciary service that I do not give appointments in accordance with seniority.I should clearly state that I have sent every single name of those who level those charges against me, but the Constitutional Council has rejected those names. In that situation, there has been injustice to those who hold seniority in the field of judiciary. Therefore, the question arises as to how impartial the Constitutional Council has been when appointing of Judges.

As a result of the previous government’s serious misdeeds President Mahinda Rajapaksa was defeated, which was the first time a President was defeated, and I was elected as the President by 6,250,000 people voting for me. What was opposed in the previous government was corruption and fraud. But the new people’s government that was elected by the people, plundered the Central Bank within three months.In the two cases reported in 2015, our fight against corruption was destroyed. So, yahapalaya (good governance) political concept has been destroyed. The citizen’s yahapalana (good governance) expectation has been destroyed.

I spoke to the Central Bank Governor this morning by telephone and asked him as to where was the Forensic Audit, which was a major recommendation made by the Presidential Commission. Until today nothing has been done.As such the total financial loss to the Central Bank robbery cannot be estimated. The Commission Report says this fraud has happened over several years.

Then, economic experts told me about this last week and told me that this massive robbery had been over Rs 1,000 billion for many years.And, in this issue, Prime Minister Hon. Ranil Wickremesinghe clearly knows that I was opposed to the appointment of Mr Arjuna Mahendren. But,I did not want any conflict with Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe and I appointed Mr Arjuna Mahendran because of his strongest demand. Therefore, I too came under the allegation that I should take the responsibility.The fraud that has taken place under Mr Arjuna Mahendran has ignited the country like a wildfire. Mr Arjun’s Mahendran is missing today. The plan for his arrest was not implemented proprly.The Criminal Investigations Department (CID) and other officials who assisted the Presidential Commission on Central Bank robbery were threatened. There were pressures and some of the officials came under various investigations.

On 26th October, I appointed Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Prime Minister. Four days before that an amendment to the Bribery and Corruption Commission Act was presented to Parliament in order to punish the suspects who plundered the Central Bank. This was recommended by the Attorney General’s Department but the proposed Amendment, which was first sent last year was in a cupboard for more than five months. I reminded about this to the Minister of Justice Thalatha Atukorale and Minister Kiriella several times. Finally, with great difficulty, I could get Minister Kiriella to submit it to Parliament. But eventually, the debate on its amendment was postponed indefinitely. Because of this delay, the Act could not be changed. Now it wil not happen and the Central Bank robbery that cost billions of rupees for over 15 or 20 years will not be investigated and the guilty are not being punished. Money cannot be recovered. This is a serious issue today.

The CCEM that was established with a decision of the Cabinet. However, the CCEM has led to the rise of many issues. In reality, I have been too grateful to the Prime Minister, that he actually enjoyed the powers of the President. I did not ask about his conduct. He acted in this same manner in dealings with international leaders and trade agreements. Mr Wickremasinghe sued powers that he had not been vested with by the 19th Amendment.  But I waited patiently as a man with gratitude. I appointed a Commission on the Singapore trade agreement. I received its recommendations last week. According to that, there are lot of weaknesses. I am not going to explain them in detail at this moment. Particularly, in one paragraph mentions how the agreement has been entered into without concurrence of relevant agencies such as trade, ports, industry and finance.Therefore, the Singapore trade agreement is a major problem today. I suppose is that it should be suspended temporarily by government .I am not sure if this agreements needs to be amended or completely revoked after seeking the opinion of experts.We must be correct in the future.

I am happy that political parties and leaders contributed to resolve this crisis. I thank Hon. Speaker, for discussing to resolve this issue. You all came to this office. Likewise, all of them, including Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party and the Podujana Peramuna, came together.

I must tell you another matter. Within the past four years, in matters of eradicating bribery and corruption, I told, and as I always said there are certain very strong and powerful forces related to religion, customs, language etc. Mostly, It is those cultural forces, than political forces, that make or break governments. I clearly pointed out in the recent past in the matter regarding filing cases against Bikkhus need to be done carefully. There were no elephants for the Perahara from temples or Dewala and that amounted to a huge socio-religious and cultural resistance over this. As such, I asked to study the legality and release the elephants. Over this issue, we lost the whole Bhikku community.

I must also clearly mention about imprisoning the members of the Tri forces. I asked not to imprison our soldiers who have fought in battles and defeated terrorism; but nobody listened to me.

Today, they ask us to punish our soldiers, from all over the world, yet there are punishments for the people of Prabhakaran who have destroyed our country. Event today, there are bigger hands of L.T.T.E. freely roaming around in the world. The same international forces point fingers at us, but they are the ones who committed all these wrongdoings. But they still demand conducting enquires against our forces. They accuse us of violating human rights and international laws. But ,they killed nearly one lakh members of our tri-forces, police, civil security forces as well as a President of this country. So where is a programme to find and bring to justice those who have committed all these gross violations and now hiding in various parts of the world? The international community is silent about it. Not even anyone in the country talks about it.  If the members of our security forces are to be punished, they should also be punished. If not, both sides should agree to remove those punishments. Here, I clearly hold a firm idea that the forces should be freed after discussing with the international community. There is a request that Tamil prisoners should be released. We held several discussions. If the Tamil prisoners are to be freed, then our solders should also be freed from different court cases that have been filed against them. That is justice.

During the recent incidents, your debaters said that I will be dragged and be murdered like Gadafi. Some of your MPs said,I will be also burned in my own house with my family. The NGO operatives who were holding press conferences also said so. Why do they say that? No state leader in this country had been called like this. There were severe issues in the country during the tenure of President J.R. Jayawardena who was considered as a very strict ruler. I was imprisoned since I spoke against J.R. Jayawardhana’s government.

Even J.R.Jayawardena was not addressed like this; President Premadasa was not called like this. How many misdeeds were committed against Chandrika Bandaranaike? Nobody talked to them like that. Nobody said Mahinda Rajapaksa will be dragged like Gadhafi. I was called like that since I am the only person who would silently watch upon such acts. If the former leaders including J.R. were called upon like that nobody will be able to save their lives. But they know that the house of a man like me could be burnt down and person like me could be dragged liked that.

Just as there are good people, there are criminals and underworld gangs. It was those evil forces that made those barbaric pronouncements. I did not see anyone of you make a statement about the conspiracy to assassinate me. The conspiracy has not yet been proven, but it has certain details that should be clearly addressed. Since the police are running under me these days, there is a big progress in these issues. Yet the biggest misery is that the murder conspiracy against the President of the country was taken up in the courts, there was no single person of the Criminal Investigations Department to be found in the premises.

When I issued some gazette notifications recently, I did so with the advice of expert lawyers and constitutional experts. All what I did was done with utmost good faith. I didn’t do any of those acts with any malefic thought or with an intention of violating the constitution. The country was in a huge political turmoil. The best solution to solve the problem was to enter in to an election. It was only 122 members of Parliament who signed this letter. But there are 155 lakhs of voters in this country. I know the power of all these 15.5 million voters is much stronger than 122 members of the Parliament. That is why I reached that decision. If I am to be punished for such pure intentions or if an impeachment is to be brought against me, then it is a different issue.

Nevertheless, the truth will be written in the history as words carved in stone. Even though the courts delivered such a judgment, my intention was to empower the 15.5 million people eligible to vote. I know the citizens of this country are stronger than the number of 122 Parliamentarians, who refused an election. Hence, I have no worry about giving any punishment to me. I am a person who has been nearly killed five to six times in my political career. First, I was almost killed in 71, when the Principal of my school gave my name to the authorities, even though I have no connection with JVP, they labeled me as Che Guevarafollower, and after beating me, they put me in the Batticaloa Prison. That was the first instance when God saved me.

As Buddha preached: Dhammo Have Rakkathi Dhammachari”, I believe one who lives with Dhamma will be protected by Dhamma. The LTTE attacked five times targeting me. That is why I said Dhammo Have Rakkathi Dhammachari”.The L.T.T.Ecardres came to attack me. Some of them committed suicide taking cyanide at different times. As you can recall, I have given amnesty as well as released a person, who came to assassinate me. The last attack against me occurred in Boralesgamuwa. In this incident four or five innocent people were killed, but they could not attack a single hair on my body.

The Prime Minister and all of you can remember, how we were attacked in the junction where late N.M.Perera’s statue has been erected in Rajagiriya, on our way after voting for emergency regulation. I was trapped in that place, those L.T.T.E carders escaped taking a government vehicle which was parked at a nearby house, it was a vehicle my wife and children had come in. Later, it was discovered abandoned in Malwana area. There are numerous incidents like this.

When all these started in 1971, I was only 19 years of age. At present my age is 67 years. Since the age of 19, I have been living with a bonus opportunity. It is God who has saved me five times.

Thus, persons who wish to assassinate me like Gaddafi can fulfill their wish. I have no objection to that. I will not take action to shoot them by deploying the Army and S.T.F. I will remain silent at any time if such an incident occurred. I will open the gate when I get to know that they are coming for me. I will order the Army and S.T.F to leave the place. I will clearly state all, including the NGO persons and all your MPs who threatened to kill me to come and kill me and set fire on me and my house.

Taking into consideration all of these incidents, we must seriously think how things will unfold in the future, and how this government will move forward. Some of your MPs over the phone or when they meet me, that we must move forward together, but I can’t see what the guarantee for such a collective journey is. I don’t want to create conflicts. At every turn of this conflict, it is the country that will fall back. The prevailing corrupt situation is very strong. There are some extremely corrupt politicians in the Parliament. When we consider our Cabinet there are some corrupted individuals, the promise of good governance, which we gave to our people, has been completely violated. I clearly state that I am not the person who responsible for this calamity. I made all the sacrifices toward achieving good governance; however, all those sacrifices were destroyed.

The majority of respectable members of the UNP who voted for me, do not know about this rotten and corrupted political system. If they did, I do not think they will get together in shouting, marching and in other activities.

We say that this is a blessed country. Yes, it is truly a blessed country. But, how many politicians are there to build this country, to free this land of corruption? We need the assembly of such politicians to build a better country, and achieve our development goals. We need them to establish an administration free of corruption and to establish good governance which has failed. The countries in the world have developed by respecting their core values and traditions in their respective societies as well as honoring their religious and cultural values. Therefore, there is a question before me as to where such individuals are to take up the responsibility to build this country. This is a task which cannot be done by one person or two, to achieve this target we need a group of leaders to provide leadership to the public.

People may tell that I said that I will not reappoint Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister even if he received  the consent of 225 parliamentarians. The social media will target on me in this regard. That is my political view. I made that statement based on my political view. In this situation all of you went to the Parliament and by signing 117 MPs showed me the majority of the House.  There is no any provision in the constitution that the Parliament could dictate or order the President that a particular person should be appointed as the Prime Minister, for my knowledge event the courts cannot make such an order. That power is clearly vested with the Executive President. Nevertheless, as a person who values the Parliamentary tradition, when 117 MPs requested to appoint Mr.Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Prime Minister, accordingly, I decided to appoint him. My personal and political view, that even the 225 MPs signed to request the appointment of Mr.RanilWickremesinghe as the Prime Minister, I will not appoint him, has not changed and it remains unchanged at present too. But, I respected the Parliamentary tradition and decided that the post of Prime Minister should be given to Mr. Wickremesinghe. I see this as a characteristic of a democratic society as well as a society that values ethics.

Interest on 61.5% of China’s loans to Lanka is far below market rate, says Chinese scholar

December 17th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, December 17 (newsin.asia): The interest on 61.5% of China’s loans to Sri Lanka is far below the international market rate, according to Prof. Huang Yunsong, Associate Dean at the China Center for South Asian Studies in Sichuan University.

Huang told the Colombo Shangri-La Colloquium 2018 held here on Sunday, that as of December 2017, Sri Lanka owed China US$ 5.5 billion which was about 10.6% of the island nation’s total foreign debt of US$ 51.8 billion.

Of the US$ 5.5 billion, US$ 3.8 billion (61.5 % of the total loan) was provided at a rate far below the international market rate.”

Thus, the major part of China’s loan was taken at a concessionary rate,” Huang emphasized.

More importantly, US$ 1 billion had been taken at a concessionary rate of 2% which means that the interest on the major part of the loan was not excessive at all,” he added.

Interest on 61.5% of China’s loans to Lanka is far below market rate, says Chinese scholar

On the issues of Sri Lanka’s taking US$ 307 million at the London Interbank Offered Rate plus 0.75% pushing up the interest rate to 6.3%, Huang said that the commercial loan interest rate was based on a mutual agreement between Sri Lanka and China as per established principles of the international market.”

Misinterpretation of 99 Year Lease

Referring to the description of China’s taking over the Sri Lankan port at Hambantota as neo-colonialism”, Huang said that if one were to Google port 99 year lease”, the first result one would get is a 99-year lease on the Port of Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory, a deal worth Australian Dollar 506 million with a Chinese company.

Besides, port terminals in New York and Long Beach are managed by Chinese companies. But people do not term Darwin and Long Beach as China’s colonies!” Huang remarked.

The China Merchant Holdings now holds a 70% stake in Hambantota port for 99 years, with the remaining shares in the hands of Sri Lanka. But the lease agreement provides for the purchase of shares held by China if Sri Lanka so decides at a future date, the Chinese scholar pointed out.

Huang described the charge that China is trying militarize Sri Lanka’s ports, as baseless speculation”.

He pointed out that between 2009 and May 2018, 422 warships had arrived in Lanka’s ports for operational, training and formal visits.  These ships belonged to 27 navies in the world.

Being a neighbor and having close ties with Sri Lanka, India tops the list with 83 visits . Japanese naval ships undertook 69 visits. China is at the distant third place with 33 visits followed by Bangladesh with 29 visits. Russia and Pakistan come next with 27 and 24 visits respectively. All these naval vessels have followed the same procedure of applying for logistic and operational requirements, which proves that China’s dual-use of ports for both military and economic purposes is baseless speculation,” the Chinese scholar said.

He pointed out that according to the latest paper of a prominent US think tank, it is unlikely that the Kyaukpyu port in Myanmar and the Hambantota port in Sri Lanka will become dual use ports. This is due to political and legal restrictions in Myanmar and Indian pressure on Sri Lanka, the think tank had said.

Furthermore, the agreement between China and Sri Lanka on Hambantota port contains a clause that strictly prohibits” the Chinese from using the port for military purposes.

It also states that the security of the port shall be with the Sri Lankan navy, Huang pointed out.

Reacting to a remark made by a former Indian National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon that ports might begin as commercial ventures but ultimately end up as military bases also, Huang said that he is certain that at least in the short and medium terms, China has no plan to put the ports it is building overseas to military use.

Prof. Swaran Singh, Senior Fellow at the Institute of National Security Studies Sri Lanka (INSSSL), said that while India and China have differences on many maters, their navies are cooperating at the operation level on the high seas.

Anti-piracy operations off the Somalia coast  have brought the Indian and Chinese navies together, Singh said narrating an incident in which an Indian naval helicopter escorted a Chinese naval ship to help its crew board a pirate vessel.

India and China discussed bilateral maritime security in September 2014 during Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to India, but US President Barack Obama’s visit to India in January 2015 and the development of an Indo-US strategic alliance put paid to the China-India maritime security dialogue, Singh said.

The Indian scholar said that India should recognize the asymmetry between India and China, and instead of stressing the negatives, build on the positives as in the case of combating piracy.

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera, Director General of the Institute of National Security Studies Sri Lanka (INSSSL) described Asia as a geo-political hotspot” with increasing militarization following the rise of China as an economic and naval power. He pointed out that China’s naval growth has outstripped that of all major powers. The arms build up in the region has been unprecedented in history, he added.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka’s Prime Minister in the 1960s and 1970s had foreseen the present scenario and had proposed that the Indian Ocean be declared a Zone of Peace.

The region is currently divided into the Chinese and the US camps. To complicate matters, there are new threats from terrorism, piracy, gun running, human smuggling and illegal fishing. Globalization is taking place at a time when there are transformational changes” taking place in the region, Abeyagoonasekera noted.

He wondered if in the midst of all these transformational changes, a new security architecture can be created. He quoted India’s former National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon to say that it would be illogical to impose stability in a changing environment.

Earlier, inaugurating the Colloquium , Sri Lanka’s Defense Secretary Hemasiri Fernando stressed the need for high quality independent research” into national, regional and international security issues.

Given the strategic geographical positioning of Sri Lanka, the island nation should play a pivotal role in ensuring the security of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) he said, and called for international cooperation.

Sri Lanka should maintain friendly relations and cooperate with all nations but without compromising its territorial integrity,” he said.

(Photo Credit: Tang Lu)

දෙස් විදෙස් ඇස් මවිත කරවූ එජාප ගෝල්ෆේස් රැළියේ විස්මිත ගුවන් පින්තූර වීඩියෝ මෙන්න..

December 17th, 2018

lanka C news

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂය විසින් අද දිනයේ කොලඹ ගාළු මුවදොරදී ‘යුක්තියේ ජයග‍්‍රහණය’ ජනරැළිය පවත්වන ලදී.

විශාල ජන සහභාගීත්වයකින් යුතුව පවත්වන ලද එම ජනරැළියේ ගුවන් ඡයාරූප හෝ වීඩියෝ දර්ශණ සොයා ගැනීම ඉතා අපහසු තත්වයේ පවතී.

මේ වන විට සමාජ ජලායන්හි පලව ඇති පින්තූර හා වීඩියෝ දර්ශණ පිහිලයක් මෙහි දැක්වෙයි.

එජාප කථිකයන් කියා සිටියේ අද දිනයේ ගාළු මුවදොරට ලක්‍ෂ ගණනක ජනකායක් පැමිණි බවය.

 
YouTube Video Preview

New Cabinet should be confined to 30 members – UNP

December 17th, 2018

Yohan Perera Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Most of the UNPers had insisted that the new Cabinet should be confined to 30 Ministers, UNP MP Eran Wickrmaratne said yesterday.

Mr Wickramaratne told journalists that many UNPers had insisted that new Cabinet should be confined only to 30 members to be in line with the wish of the people, that corruption and wastage of the Government should be stopped.

Referring to a document that is being circulated in social media claiming it to be a list of Cabinet Members, Mr Wickramaratne said many had prepared lists claiming them to be the new Cabinet.

A new Cabinet would be appointed within the next 48 hours,” he said yesterday.

Asked whether any SLFPers would be accommodated in the Cabinet, he said discussions were under way with some SLFPers but UNP had insisted that those who participated in the Constitutional coup should not be given Ministerial portfolios.

He said that talks were underway to bring in a Vote on Account (VoA) in a few days’ time so that economic stability would be restored.

Referring to a question as to how President Maithripala Sirisena appointed UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Prime Minister after stating that he would not appoint Mr Wickremesinghe even if all 225 members of Parliament told him to do so, the UNP MP said President Sirisena had later decided to abide with the country’s Constitution.

Mr Wickramaratne, who responded to a question as to whether it had been computed that country had lost Rs. 22 billion as a result of the political uncertainty, he said that losses were incurred as a result of the interest rate hike.

President urged us to sit in the opposition: MP Dayasiri Jayasekara

December 17th, 2018

Chaturanga Samarawickrama Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Former SLFP Minister Dayasiri Jayasekara today said the President had requested the 21 SLFP Parliamentarians to sit in the opposition bench when they attend the parliament session.

He said the President had made this request from all SLFP MPs during a meeting with the President last evening.

Meanwhile, Parliamentarian Nishantha Muthuhettigama said that they had decided to carry out the task of opposition MPs in Parliament without accepting any Ministerial posts.

“MPs have decided to not to extend their support to the present UNF  Government”, he said.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror MP Chandima Weerakkody said none of the SLFP MPs would join the UNF government whose prime aim is to destroy the country.

He said none of the MPs except MPs Piyasena Gamage, A. H. M. Fowzie and Manusha Nanayakkara would join the UNF.

No one would join the UNF government following the remarks made by the President during his address to the SLFP MPs, MP Weerakkody said.

Remembering the Uva Wellassa Rebellion

December 17th, 2018

By Lakshman I. Keerthisinghe Courtesy Ceylon Today

The thing worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion – Frederick Douglass -American Author

Around two centuries ago our ancestors launched a heroic struggle against the mighty British Empire in an uprising in order to gain freedom from British colonial rule. Reminiscences of that struggle still haunt the minds of patriotic Sri Lankans. As quoted by J.B. Muller in his dissertation ‘Anglophiles, Eurocentric Arrogance and Reality’ –The Island 5 November, 2010 Samuel P. Huntington had stated quite correctly: ‘The West won the world not by superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organised violence. Westerners often forget this fact, non-Westerners never do.’ The British who have now assumed the role of great human rights defender along with United States supported by the United Nations Human Rights Commission accusing Sri Lanka of alleged human rights abuses during last stages of ethnic conflict when the LTTE was vanquished by heroic Sri Lankan armed forces, conveniently forget, great human rights abuses committed by them in the colonies that they were administering.


Sometime ago there were media reports that British parliamentarians have called on their government to boycott that year’s Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Sri Lanka due to alleged human rights violations. To remind the British of their past actions in Sri Lanka consider what J.B. Muller states in the dissertation quoted at the outset referring to the General Order issued in 1818 during the British Colonial Rule in Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) to put down the rebellion in Uva-Vellassa as follows: Kill every man, woman and child including the babes suckling at their mother’s breast. Destroy all dwelling houses. Burn all crops. Cut down all fruit trees. Slaughter all cattle; take what meat is necessary to feed the troops and burn the rest. Destroy all reservoirs, canals and channels.

Poison the wells. Lay waste utterly the countryside denying any relief whatsoever to the rebels.” Muller further states: This order was carried out, laying waste Uva and Vellassa, a destruction from which it is yet to fully recover.” British writers commented that every tree from Ratnapura to Badulla was devastated; there were hung bodies of rotting human beings that gave off a revolting stench. The word ‘genocide’ was coined in the 1940’s meaning the wiping out of a people, but if this wasn’t genocide then, what is?” This is the manner in which the British who have now become human rights crusaders against Sri Lanka dealt with a rebellion by the Ceylonese people at that time.

The British should first establish a Committee of Inquiry to investigate their own vicious scorched earth policy they used to put down rebellions in the colonies in the British Commonwealth and human rights violations committed by the British troops under the General Order given in 1818 and historical evidence available on the devastation they caused in 1818 (200 years ago) in Uva Wellassa during the rebellion. Wellassa (Wellakshaya in Sinhala) was composed of hundred thousand paddy fields yielding a substantial crop, which has not yet recovered from the scorched earth policy of the British. If the proponents of the Channel 4 video were present at that time they could have recorded horrific scenes of babes suckling at their mother’s breast being snatched by British soldiers and their throats being slit in the presence of their wailing mothers, who were then shot.

Setting fire to acres and acres of golden paddy fields resplendent with crops resulting in the wanton destruction of the fruits of hard labour of the poor Sri Lankan farmers all of whom were killed then would have met the eyes of the Channel 4 team. The strategy of destroying the food supply of the civilian population in an area of conflict has been banned under Article 54 of Protocol I of the 1977 Geneva Conventions.  The British invaded this peaceful little island, known as the Pearl of the Indian Ocean and robbed it of all its wealth in the form of tea, rubber, coconuts and coffee. They improved the infrastructure in the form of roads, railways and so forth, not for the love of the local population but to improve the economy for their own benefit.

In conclusion, the Sri Lankan Government should establish a Commission of Inquiry into the human rights violations and economic devastation caused in Sri Lanka, then Ceylon, during British Colonial Rule and based upon findings of such an inquiry call upon the Government of the United Kingdom to pay suitable compensation for those atrocities committed by the British during their rule. The British, with their dubious history on protection of human rights should leave other Sovereign Nations in the World to find their own solutions to any human rights violations in their lands.

 (The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with LLB, LLM,  MPhil.(Colombo)keerthisinghel@yahoo.co.uk)

TNA, JVP duplicity in power game

December 17th, 2018

By Sugeeswara Senadhira Courtesy Ceylon Today

Last week’s political developments revealed the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde syndrome of two leading minor parties in the country, the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP). These two parties have mastered the art of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds.

After extending support to Ranil Wickremesinghe, to show that he commands majority in Parliament, the TNA has forfeited its claim to be a party in the Opposition. Thus, TNA Leader Rajavarothiam Sampanthan can no longer claim to hold the post of Opposition Leader. All the TNA MPs, barring Shivashakthi Anandan, who abstained, voted for Wickremesinghe, backing a UNP-sponsored Motion of Confidence.

After August 2015 General Elections, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya appointed Sampanthan as Opposition Leader, although the TNA only had 16 MPs in the House. The claim of a 50-strong Joint Opposition was ignored, because JO MPs were recognized as members of the United People’s Freedom Alliance (UPFA), and the remaining 45 MPs were with the Government.


When its membership increased to 70, with several other UPFA members crossing over to the JO, it had staked claims again to be the main opposition. The JO also argued that the TNA was purely a regional party, which only represented the Tamil community, and it could in no way be representative of the national electorate as a whole. These arguments were not taken into consideration, as the UPFA was considered to be a major partner in the Government, despite a vast majority of members sitting in the Opposition.

According to the Speaker’s logic, if the UPFA leaves the Government, there is no reason whatsoever not to recognize the UPFA as the largest party in the Opposition.

The TNA is using the current political developments to its advantage, with its dual principle of supporting Ranil Wickremesinghe and the UNF, while keeping the position of Opposition Leader within the party. The TNA is aware that there is no possibility for the party to be the main opposition, when there are almost two equally balanced national parties in the forefront. In 1977, Appapillai Amirthalingam became the first Tamil Opposition Leader, because the SLFP was wiped out in an election held under the first-past-the-post system. Now, with the proportional representation system, it is impossible to wipe out one of the national parties in an election.

JVP’s deviation

The JVP too has deviated from the position of anti-capitalist (read) anti-UNP, and became the most trusted supporter of Ranil Wickremesinghe.

While voting with the UNP in all the No-Confidence Motions against the Government, the JVP suddenly found that the party cadres, especially the young radicals were not happy about the pro-UNP stance of the Marxist party. As there is a good possibility of JVP cadres crossing over to the more radical Forward Party (Peratugami), the JVP now wants to attack the UNP too, at least in public.

JVP Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake decided to attack the UNP and Ranil Wickremesinghe in Parliament for the ills of the country. This came within days of extending fullest support to the UNP at Parliamentary No-Confidence Motions.

In a sudden change of heart, Dissanayake claimed that his party did not care who the Prime Minister was, but was troubled about the unconstitutional method used to get rid of Wickremesinghe and appoint Mahinda Rajapaksa. The Prime Minister post will be held by a person from either of the main camps, the UNP or the UPFA. Whoever that person would be, we are sure that person cannot do much for the betterment of this country,” the JVP Leader said.

Without giving a chance to explain the policies of the new Prime Minister, the JVP Leader jumped to the conclusion that this person will not be able to come up with a new plan to initiate a good political culture, or a good economic policy for this country. We do not have faith in any person from either side.”

The position of Opposition Leader is not the only issue to be solved. It is the duty of everybody to think of the country, and the people, and find an amicable settlement to the current political crisis. In this connection, the Organization of Professional Associations (OPA) has taken an initiative. It has appealed to the warring parties to bury the hatchet and spare a thought for the people. Issuing a statement, it has prevailed on all political parties and politicians, legislators, and the Executive the need to uphold the spirit of democracy. Pointing out the ongoing political impasse between the Legislature and the Executive, it urged all parties to the current crisis to resolve their differences through consensus, without resorting to violence.

The OPA views with deep concern, the effects this impasse has on the economy, and urges that the socio-economic fabric of society is not irreparably damaged.

Ending impasse

One of the main requirements to end this impasse is to hold an election, either Provincial Council elections or a national referendum, so that the people would indicate the general lines of electoral trends, as it is not easy to gauge the exact political balance of forces. It is not yet clear whether the electorate will opt for an overwhelming shift in favour of Rajapaksa. An election will indicate a clear political picture. Most preferable would be a general election, but the issue cannot be revived because of the Supreme Court verdict that the Parliament cannot be dissolved until completion of four and a half years, or if such a request is supported by two-thirds of MPs, which is highly unlikely. The democratic people of Sri Lanka hope that the UNP and JVP will not change their minds about supporting a parliamentary motion on dissolution of Parliament, and conducting general elections. Unless the MPs decide in favour of an election, the political crisis is likely to continue until the end of the five-year term in August/September 2020, or at least until completion of four and a half years in April 2020, when the President can dissolve Parliament and hold fresh elections.

කසාදෙදාම මගුල දෙදරයි.. අගමැති දිවුරුම් තැනම වාඩි කරවා ජනපතිගෙන් කුණු බැණුම්.. 225ම කැමති වුණත් අගමැති නොකරන බව යලිත් කියයි..

December 16th, 2018

ජනාධිපති මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය

රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අගමැති ලෙස දිවරුම් දීමෙන් පසු ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා ඔවුන් ඉදිරියේදී දැඩි විවේචනාත්මක අදහස් දැක්වීමක් සිදු කලේය.

පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ 225ම පක්‍ෂ වුවත් රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අගමැති නොකරන බවට තමන් විසින් කරන ලද මුල් ප‍්‍රකාශයේ තව දුරටත් සිටින බවත් එය තම පුද්ගලික අදහස වුවත් පාර්ලිමේන්තු සම්ප‍්‍රදායට හා ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදයට ගරු කරමින් රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා අගමැති ලෙස පත් කල බවද ජනාධිපතිවරයා එහිදී සදහන් කලේය.

මහ බැංකු බැදුම්කර වංචාව ගැනද දැඩි දොස් පැවරීමක් ජනාධීපතිවරයා විසින් සිදු කලේ නව අගමැතිවරයා ඇතුළු එජාප නියෝජිතයන් ඉදිරියේදීමය.

ජනාධිපති මෛත‍්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා විසින් සිදු කරන ලද සම්පූර්ණ අදහස් පල කිරීම මෙසේය.

2015 ජනවාරි 08 වනදා ජනාධිපතිවරණය, එම අභියෝගාත්මක මැතිවරණ ව්‍යාපාරය තුළ ලැබු විශිෂ්ට ජනතා ජයග්‍රහණය. ඒ ජයග්‍රහණය තුළ රටේ ජනතාව බලාපොරොත්තු වූ ඔවුන්ගේ අරමුණු හා ප්‍රාර්ථනාවන් සහ සිතුම් පැතුම් රාශියක් තිබුණා.

වසර හතරකට ආසන්න කාලයක් ඉක්ම යමින් තිබෙන මේ අවස්ථාවේ ප්‍රධාන වශයෙන්ම පසුගිය කාලය තුළ අපි රජයක් විදියට ලබාගත් ජයග්‍රහණ හා කරපු ඉතිහාසයට එක්වන හොද වැඩ කොටස් රාශියක් තිබෙනවා වගේම ඉතාමත් අවැඩදායක වූ, අසුභ වූත් අවිචාර වූත් සිදුවීම් රාශියක් සිද්ධ වුණා. මෙතනදී මූලික වශයෙන්ම ඒ ප්‍රාර්ථනාවන් ඉෂ්ට කිරීම පිළිබදව අපි සතුටුවෙනවා වගේම රටේ ජනතාව සමග අපිට එකතු වෙන්න වෙනවා අපි බලාපොරොත්තු වූ තැනට රට අපට ගෙනියන්න නොලැබීම පිලිබඳව. ඒ තත්ත්වය ඉදිරියට මම දන්නේ නැහැ කොතෙක් දුරට සාර්ථකව ඉෂ්ට කර ගන්න පුළුවන් වෙයි ද කියලා.

2015 ජයග්‍රහණයෙන් පස්සේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය තෝරන අවස්ථාවේ ඉදලම මම ඔබට ප්‍රකාශ කර ඇති පරිදි අපේ මැතිවරණ ප්‍රකාශයේ ප්‍රතිඥාවන් කඩවුණා. විද්‍යාත්මක පදනමෙන් අමාත්‍යාංශ වෙන්කළයුතුයි කියලා මැතිවරණ ප්‍රකාශයේ තිබුණා. විශේෂඥ කණ්ඩායමක් පත්කරලා ඒ කටයුතු කරගෙන ගිහින් තිබුණා. නමුත් මම දන්න විදියට ඒ ලිපි ගොනුවවත් බැලුව ද කියලා මම දන්නේ නැහැ.

එදා මෙදා කාලය තුළ සිදුවූ සිදුවීම්වදී ප්‍රධාන වශයෙන්ම අපි බලාපොරොත්තු නොවූ ඉතාමත් අයහපත් තත්ත්වයන් රාශියකුත් ගොඩනැගුණා. යහපත් දේවල් ගත්තහම රටේ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය ස්ථාපිත කිරීම, ජනතාවගේ නිදහස, 19 වන සංශෝධනය, ස්වාධීන කොමිෂන් සභා පිහිටුවීම, 19 වන සංශෝධනය මම දකින්නේ ස්වාධීන කොමිෂන් සභා පිහිටුවීම තුළ ඇති වූ ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ප්‍රගතියක් විදියට විතරයි. අනිත් පැත්ත මම අද දකින්නේ විශාල දේශපාලන ආරවුලක් විදියටයි. ඒ වගේම 19 වන සංශෝධනයෙන් ස්වාධීන කොමිෂන් සභා පත් කිරීමේදී වගේම රටේ අනිත් තනතුරුවලට පත් කිරීමේ දී ව්‍යවස්ථාසභාව කෙතෙක් දුරට අපක්ෂපාතී වුණා ද, සාධාරණ වුණා ද කියන කාරණය මටනම් ප්‍රශ්නයක්. අද අගවිනිසුරුගේ ඉදලා, නීතිපති, පොලිස්පති ස්වාධීන කොමිෂන් සභා මේ සියල්ල පත් කරන්නේ ව්‍යවස්ථාදායක සභාව. මම දැක්ක ප්‍රධාන දේ තමයි ව්‍යවස්දායකසභාව තුළ අධිකරණයට පත්කිරීම් කිරිමේ දී අධිකරණයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ විනිශ්චයකාරවරුන්ගේ නම් ඉදිරිපත් කළහම ඒවා ප්‍රතික්ෂේප වුණා.

අධිකරණ ක්ෂ්ත්‍රයේ විනිශ්චයකාවරු පිරිසක් අතරේ මට චෝදනාවක් තිබෙනවා මේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨත්වය අනුව ඒ අයට මම පත්වීම් ලබා දේන්නේ නැහැ කියලා. මම පැහැදිළිව කියන්න ඕන ඒ චෝදනාවට ලක්වී තිබෙන සෑම නමක්ම මම ව්‍යවස්ථා සභාවට යවලා තිබෙනවා. ව්‍යවස්ථා සභාව ඒවා ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරලා තියෙනවා. ඒ තුළ අධිකරණයේ ක්ෂේත්‍රයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ විනිශ්චයකාර ධූර දරන අයට අසාධාරණයක් සිද්ධ වෙලා තිබෙනවා. ඒ නිසා විනිශ්චයකාරවරු පත් කිරීමේ ව්‍යවස්ථා සභාව අනුගමනය කරන ක්‍රියා පිළිවෙත කොතෙක් දුරට අපක්ෂපාතිද, මධ්‍යස්ථ ද කියන ප්‍රශ්නය පැන නැගිලා තිබෙනවා.

අපි මුහුණ දුන් ඉතාම කටුක අත්දැකීම් ගත්තහම මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයාගේ ආණ්ඩුව පරාජය කරලා රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයෙක් පළමු වතාවට පරාජය කරලා හැට දෙලක්ෂ පනස්දහසක ජනතාව මාව ජනාධිපතිවරයා ලෙස පත්කර ගත්තේ විශේෂයෙන්ම එදා ඒ ආණ්ඩුවේ තිබුණ බරපතළ වැරදි නිසා. ඒ තුළ මූලිකම දේ තමයි දූෂණය සහ වංචාව, එතකොට දූෂණයට සහ වංචාවට විරුද්ධව ජනතාව ජනතාවාදී ආණ්ඩුවක් පත්කරගත්තහම තමන්ගේ ඡන්දයෙන් මාස තුනක් යන්න කළින් ඇති වූ මහ බැංකු මහා මංකොල්ලය, 2015 වසරේ අවස්ථා දෙකක දී වාර්තා වූ සිද්ධින් අනුව අපි දූෂණයට විරුද්ධව ගෙනගිය සටන සම්පුර්ණයෙන් දූෂිත කළා. එය සම්පූර්ණයෙන් ජනතාවගේ ප්‍රාර්ථනාවන් සහ අපේක්ෂාවන් සුණු විසුණු කරලා තිබෙනවා. යහපාලන දේශපාලන සංකල්පය විනාශ කරලා තිබෙනවා.

මම අද උදේත් දුරකථනයෙන් මහබැංකු අධිපතිවරයාට කතා කරලා ඇහුවා ජනාධිපති කොමිසම් සභාව විසින් නිර්දේශ කරන ලද නිර්දේශ තුළ ප්‍රධාන නිර්දේශයක් වූ වෝහාරික විගණනය අද වෙනකන් කරලා තියෙනව ද කියලා. අද වෙනකන් එය කෙරිලා නැහැ. ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභාව පැහැදිළිව කියනවා.

මහ බැංකු මංකොල්ලයේ ජනතාවගේ මුදල්වල මූල්‍ය වටිනාකම තවම මෙතකැයි කියා සීමාවක් කිව නොහැක. මෙය අවුරුදු ගණනාවක් සිදු වී ඇත. වාර්තාවේ තිබෙනවා.

එතකොට ආර්ථික විශේෂඥයන් මට පහුගිය සතියෙත් මේ පිළිබඳ සාකච්ඡාවක දී කිව්වා වසර ගණනාවක් පුරා සිදුව ඇති මේ මහා මංකොල්ලය බිලියන් දාහකට එහා කියලා කිව්වා. අද වෙනකන් කිසිම විගණනයකින් කොමිෂන් සභා වාර්තාව අනුව සොයාගෙන නැති මුදල් කන්දරාවක්. එතකොට මේ ප්‍රශ්නයේ දී පැහැදිළිව ගරු රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ අගමැතිතුමා දන්නවා,අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතා පත් කරන අවස්ථාවේ මම දැඩි ලෙස විරුද්ධ වුණා. නමුත් මාව ජනාධිපති විදියට පත්කරලා සතියක් වගේ කාලයක් තුළ මම කළගුණ දන්නා කෙනෙක් විදියට රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා සමග මට කිසිදු ගැටුමක් අවශ්‍ය නැති නිසා එතුමාගේ දැඩි ඉල්ලීමට මම අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් පත් කළා. ඒක මගේ පත්වීමක්. ඒ නිසා මටත් චෝදනාවක් ආවා එහි වගකීම මමත් භාරගත යුතුයි කියලා. එසේ වූ අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගේ ක්‍රියාකාරිත්වය තුළ මේ සිදුවීම් සිදුවෙලා රට තුළ මහා ගින්නක් වගේ ඇතිවුණා. විශාල උණුසුමක් වුණා. අර්ජුන් මහේන්ද්‍රන් මහතා අදත් නැහැ. ඔහු අල්ලා ගැනීම පිළිබඳව වැඩපිළිවෙළක් හරියට ක්‍රියාත්මක වුණේ නැහැ. මේ මංකොල්ලය පිළිබඳව ජනාධිපති කොමිෂන් සභාවට සහයෝගය දුන්න ද, අපරාධ පරික්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරින්ට සහ අනිත් නිලධාරින්ට තර්ජන ආවා, ඒ අයට බලපෑම් ඇති වුණා. ඒ අයට විරුද්ධව පරික්ෂණ පැවැත්වුවා.

මම මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයා අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ලෙස පත් කළේ ඔක්තෝබර් 26 වෙනිදා. ඊට දවස් හතරකට කළින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කළ මහබැංකු මංකොල්ලයේ වැරදිකරුවන්ට දඩුවම් පැමිණිම අවශ්‍යයි කියලා නීතිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව නිර්දේශ කළ අල්ලස් හා දුෂණ කොමිෂන් සභා සංශෝධන පනත වචන කිහිපයක් සංශෝධනය කරන්න පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට යවලා මාස 05 කට වැඩිය මේක කබඞ් ඇතුලේ තිබුණා. මම මේ ගැන අවස්ථා කිහියක් තළතා අතුකෝරළ ඇමතිණියට කිව්වා එතුමිය අධිකරණ ඇමතිණි නිසා. කිරිඅල්ල ඇමිතිතුමාට කිව්වා. කිරිඇල්ල ඇමතිතුමා කියලා බොහොම අමාරුවෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කළා. නමුත් අවසානයේ දින නියමයක් නැතිව එම සංශෝධනය කල් දැම්මා. දැන් ඒ කල්දැමීම තුළ ඒ පනත සංශෝධනය වෙන්නේ නැහැ. අවුරුදු 15 කට 20 කටවත් මේ බිලියන් දාහකට වැඩියි කියන මහ මංකොල්ලයේ පරික්ෂණය කෙරෙන්නේ නැහැ. වැරදිකරුවන්ට දඩුවම් ලැබෙන්නේ නැහැ. මුදල් අය කර ගැනීමට හැකි වන්නේ නැහැ. මේ ප්‍රශ්නය අදත් බරපතළයි.

ඒ වගේම අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ තීරණයක් අනුව ආරම්භ කළ සී.සී.එම් එක. ප්‍රශ්න රාශියක් ඇති වුණා. ඒ තුළ ගැටුම් රාශියක් ඇතිවුණා. ඇත්තටම කියනවනම් මම අගමැතිතුමාට කොච්චර කළගුණ සැළකුවා ද කියන්නේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ බලතළත් අගමැතිතුමා අරගෙන ක්‍රියාකළා. මම ඒවා ගැන ඇහුවේ නැහැ. රාජ්‍ය නායකයන් සමග ගනුදෙනුවලදී, ජාත්‍යන්තර ගිවිසුම්වල දී ඒ ආකාරයට එතුමා කටයුතු කළා. 19 වැනි සංශෝධනයෙන් අගමැතිවරයාට හිමි නැති බලතළ රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහත්තයා ක්‍රියාත්මක කළා. මම ඒත් නිහඩව හිටියා කළගුණ දන්න මිනිහෙක් විදියට. සිංගප්පුරු ගිවිසුම පිළිබඳව මම කොමිෂන් සභාවක් පත් කළා. එහි නිර්දේශ මට පසුගිය සතියේ ලැබුණා. එම නිර්දේශවල සදහන් වෙනවා මෙම ගිවිසුමේදී වැරදි රාශියක් සිදු වෙලා තිබෙන බව. මම ඒක දීර්ඝව පැහැදිළි කරන්නේ නැහැ මේ වෙලාවේ. විශේෂයෙන් එහි එක් ඡේදයක සඳහන් වෙනවා ඊට අදාළ නියෝජිත ආයතන, වෙලෙද, වරාය, කර්මාන්ත, මුදල් ඇතුළු අදාළ අමාත්‍යාංශ ඒ ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමට ඒ නිර්දේශ ගතයුතු ආයතන රාශියකින් ඒ නිර්දේශය ලබාගෙන නැතිකම කර තිබෙන බරපතළ වැරුද්දක් ලෙස මෙම වාර්තාවේ පෙන්වා දෙනවා. ඒ නිසා සිංගප්පුරු නිදහස් වෙළෙඳ ගිවිසුම බරපතළ ප්‍රශ්නයක් වෙලා තිබෙනවා. මගේ අදහස එය රජයේ මැදිහත්වීම තුළ තාවකාලිකව නැවතිය යුතුයි කියන එක. ඊට සංශෝධන කළයුතු වෙනවා. ඒ සංශෝධනවලදී මම දන්නේ නැහැ තවත් විශේෂඥයෝ යොදවලා සම්පූර්ණයෙන් මේ ගිවිසුම ඉවත් කරනව ද, සංශෝධන සහිතව කළහැකි ද කියන එක නීති විශාරදයන්ගේ සහ ආර්ථික විශේෂඥයන්ගේ උපදෙස් අනුව කළයුතු කාර්යයන් විදියටයි මම දකින්නේ. ඒ නිසා මේ තත්ත්වයන් වලදී ඉතා පැහැදිළිව සඳහන් කරන්නට ඕන මම මේ කියපු කරනු පිළිබඳ සැලකිල්ල යොමු කිරීමේදී අපි මේ අත්දැකිම් සමග ඉදිරියට වැඩකරන ක්‍රමය කොහොමද නිරවුල් කරගන්නේ කියන කාරණාව. මේ පිළිබද ඇතිවූ මතභේදවල දී ව්‍යවස්ථාදායකය සහ විධායකය මේ ගනුදෙනුව බේරගත්තනම් අපිට සති 07 ක කාලයක් යන්නේ නැහැ මේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසදගන්න.

ඒ මොකද මම සතුටු වෙනවා, මම ඔබතුමන්ලාට සියලු දේශපාලන පක්ෂ නායකයන්ට, ගරු කථානායකතුමාට, මම ස්තූතිවන්ත වෙනවා මෙම ගැටලුව නිරවුල් කර ගැනීමට කැදවූ සෑම සාකච්ඡාවකදීම තමුන්නාන්සේලා සහභාගී වුණා. මේ කාර්යාලයට ආවා. ඒ වගේම මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයා ඇතුළු ඒ කණ්ඩායම්, ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂය, පොදු ජන පෙරමුණ ඒ හැම කෙනෙක්ම ආවා.

ද්‍රවිඩ ජාතික සන්ධානය, එක්සත් ජාතික පෙරමුණේ සහෝදර පක්ෂ නායකයෝ ඒ සියලුදෙනා ඉතා විශිෂ්ට සහයෝගයක් දැක්වුවා. ඒක ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී රටක තිබෙන සුහදකාමී වාතාවරණයක ඉතාමත් වැදගත් ලක්ෂණයක් විදියට මම සළකන්නේ. වේදිකාවල මහපාරේ මොනව කියාගත්තත් මනුෂ්‍යකමක් ඇතිවුණා එකට වාඩිවෙලා ඒ ප්‍රශ්න විසදා ගැනීමේ. නමුත් අපි අසමත් වුණා විධායකය සහ ව්‍යවස්ථාදයකය අතර ඒ ප්‍රශ්නය බේරගන්න. ඒ නිසා අධිකරණයට ගියා. අධිකරණයේදී දුන්න තීන්දුවේ දී මහජනතාව මොනවද කියන්නේ, නීති විශාරදයින් මේ ගැන මොනවද කියන්නේ, මම කියන්න ඕන මේ ගැසට් නිවේදන සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඇතැම් අය කරන විග්‍රහ. පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැරීම, වාර අවසන් කිරීම, අගමැති පත් කිරීම, ඉවත් කිරීම මේවා පිළිබඳව මම පිළිබඳව කරන විවේචනවල දී ඉතාම ළදරු ස්වභාවයේ විවේචන තමයි කරන්නේ. ඒ මොකද මම නීතඥයෙක් නොවන බව රටම දන්නවා. මම ඒ ගැසට් නිවේදනය නිකුත් කළේ මගේ තනි කැමැත්තට නෙවේ. මීට සම්බන්ධවූණා ජනාධිපති නිතිඥවරු, මීට සම්බන්ධ වුණා රටේ ඉහළම නිති විශාරදයින්. ඒ අය සාකච්ඡා කරලා තමයි ඔය ගැසට් නිවේදන සියල්ල සකස් කළේ.

එහෙම නැතිව ළදරුවෝ කරපු වැඩක් නොවේ, මෙහිදී හොදම උදාහරණය තමයි අධිකරණයේ මේ නඩු විභාගවන අවස්ථාවේ මාගේ පාර්ශ්වය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි නීතිඥයින්, මම ඒ අයට ස්තූතිවන්ත වෙනවා. ඒ අය මේ රටේ ඉහළම පෙළේ නීති විශාරදයින්. මම ගැසට් නිවේදන නිකුත් කිරීමේ දී ඔය කියන විදියට ළදරු වැඩක් කරලා තිබුණනම්, බාල වැඩක් කරලා තිබුණානම් මගේ පැත්තෙන් පෙනී සිටි එම නීති විශාරදයින් ඊට ඉදිරිපත් වන්නේ නැහැ.

විශේෂයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසිරුවා හැරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඔබතුමන්ලා සටන් ව්‍යාපාරය ගෙන ගියේ ඡන්දයක් එපා කියලා, උසාවි ගියේ ඡන්දයක් එපා කියලා. නමුත් මේ අර්බුදයේදී මේ දූෂිත වී තිබෙන පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවලා අලුත් පිරිසිදු පාර්ලිමේන්තුවක් තෝරා පත් කරගන්න ජනතාවට අවශ්‍යයි කියලා ජනමතයක් ඇතිවුණා. ඒක එක්සත් ජාතික පාක්ෂිකයෝ තුළත් ඇතිවුණා මම දන්නවා. ඒ අයත් කිව්වා අපෙත් ඉන්නවා වැරදි කරන අය ඒ අය ගෙදර යවන්න මැතිවරණයක් තමයි ඕන කියලා.

අධිකරණ තීන්දුව තුළ ජනතාව කියන්නේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසදන්න හොදම මග මේ දූෂිත පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරලා අලුත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවක් පත් කරන්න අපට අවස්ථාව තිබුණා. ඒක නැතුවි ගියා අධිකරණ තීන්දුවෙන්. ජනතාවගේ ඡන්ද බලය නැතිවුණා අධිකරණ තින්දුවෙන් කියලා ජනතාව කියන්නේ, මම නෙවේ කියන්නේ, මම මේ සියලුදෙනාගෙන් අදහස් විමසනවා, ආගමික පූජකවරු, විද්වතුන් අහනවා. එතකොට බහුතර මතය අදත් අධිකරණ තීන්දුව කිසේ වෙතත් ඡන්දයක් දුන්නනම් හොදයි කියන එක තමයි ජනතාවගේ මතය. මන්ත්‍රීවරු 122 ක් අත්සන් කරලා අධිකරණයට දුන්නේ ඡන්දයක් එපා කියන ඉල්ලීමයි. ඉතින් මේ තත්ත්වයන් සැලකිල්ලට ගත්තහම මම මේ කරුණු පිළිබඳව කතා කළේ අපි මේ පසුබිම් සමග අතීතයේ අත්දැකීම් සමග අනාගතය කොහොමද හදාගන්නේ කියන ප්‍රශ්නය තුළයි.

ඒ සමගම මම තමුන්නාන්සේලාට තව දෙයක් කියන්න ඕන. පහුගිය අවුරුදු හතරකට ආසන්න කාලය තුළ මේ දූෂණය වංචාව නැති කිරීමේ දී කාරණාවලදී මම කිව්වා මම හැමදාම කියන දෙයක් තියෙනවා විවිධ සමාජ බලවේගයන් රටේ තිබෙනවා, ආගමික බලවේග භාෂාව පිලිබඳ බලවේග, ඒ සිරිත් විරිත්, සම්ප්‍රදායන්, සංස්කෘතින් මේ පිළිබඳව අපේ රටේ තිබෙන බලවේග ඉතා ශක්තිමත් සහ පුළුල්. බොහෝ වෙලාවට රටේ ආණ්ඩු හදන්නේ ආණ්ඩු පෙරළන්නේ දේශපාලන මතයට වඩා මේ සංස්කෘතික බලවේග. මම බොහොම පැහැදිලිව පහුගිය කාලවලදී කිව්වා භික්ෂුන් වහන්සේලාට නඩු පැවරීමේදී මේ අලි ඇතුන් පිළිබඳ ප්‍රශ්නයේ දී පෙරහැරවල්වලට අලි නැහැ කියලා අලි ඉන්න දේවාල විහාර විතරක් නෙවේ, ඒක පුළුල් සමාජබෞද්ධාගමික, සංස්කෘතික විරෝධයක් දැඩි ලෙස ආවා. එතකොට මම බොහොම පැහැදිළිව කිව්වා මේ අලි ඇතුන් නිදහස් කරමු. මේකේ නිත්‍යානුකූල තත්ත්වය බලමු. එක දිගට භික්ෂුන් වහන්සේලා සිරභාරයට ගන්න මේ වැඬේ කරන්න එපා. මේ අලි ප්‍රශ්නයට කියලා. ඒ තුළ මුළු භික්ෂු සමාජය අපට නැතිව ගියා.

ඒ වගේම තමයි මම පැහැදිළිව කියන්න ඕන. ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාව අත්අඩංගුවට ගැනීම, යුද්ධයක් කරපු රටක යුද ජයග්‍රහණය ලබාදීලා ම්ලේච්ඡ ත්‍රස්තවාදී ව්‍යාපාරයක් නැති කරපු අපේ රණිවිරුවෝ හිරේ දාන්න එපා කියන එක මම නිතරම කියපු දෙයක්. ඒත් ඇහුවේ නැහැ.

අද ජාත්‍යන්තරය කියන විදියට අපේ හමුදාවන්ට දඩුවම් කරන්න ඕන, හැබැයි අපේ හමුදාව විනාශ කරපු ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ මිනිස්සුන්ට දඩුවම් නැහැ, ඒ මිනිස්සු ලෝකයේ රටවල්වල ඉන්නවා. එල්.ටී.ටී.ඊ එකේ ප්‍රබලයෝ, විදේශ රටවල ඉන්නවා. එතකොට ඔය කියන ජාත්‍යන්තරය අපිට තමවි ඇගිල්ල දික් කරන්නේ ඔක්කේම කරන්නේ, හමුදාවට විරුද්ධව පරීක්ෂණ පවත්වන්න කියලා. මානව හිමිකම් කැඩුවා, ජාත්‍යන්තර යුද නීති කැඩුවා කියලා අපිට තමයි චෝදනා කරන්නේ. එතකොට අපේ ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාව, පොලිසිය, සිවිල් ආරක්ෂක රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ සිට සිවිල් ජනතාව ලක්ෂයක් විතර මැරුවා. එතකොට අද ජීවතුන් අතර ලෝකයේ රටවල්වල සැගවිලා ඉන්න මිනිස්සු ලංකාණ්ඩුවට සැගවිලා ඉන්න අය මේ රටට ගෙනල්ලා දඩුවම් දීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙළක් කොහෙද තියෙන්නේ, ජාත්‍යන්තරයෙන් එහෙම දෙයක් කතා කරන්නෙත් නැහැ, අපේ රටෙ ඇතුළෙන් කතා කරන්නෙත් නැහැ. හමුදාවට දඩුවම් දෙනවනම් ඒ අයටත් දඩුවම් දෙන්න ඕන. එහෙම නැත්නම් දෙගොල්ලන්ටම දඩුවම් අයින් කරගෙන එකඟතාවකට එන්න ඕන. මෙහිදී ඉතා පැහැදිලිව මම දරණ මතය තමයි එහෙම නැත්නම් ඔක්කොටම නඩු දාන්න ඕන, එහෙමත් නැත්නම් ජාත්‍යන්තරයත් එක්ක කතා කරලා හමුදාවල් නිදහස් කරගන්න ඕන. දැන් ද්‍රවිඩ සිරකාරයෝ නිදහස් කරන්න කියන ඉල්ලීම තිබෙනවා. අපි සාකච්චා කිහිපයක් පැවැත්වුවා. ද්‍රවිඩ සිරකරුවන් නිදහස් කරනවනම් අපේ හමුදාවන්වලට විරුද්ධව දැන් පහුගිය අවුරුදු ගානේ නොයෙකුත් නඩුවලින් සියලුදෙනා නිදහස් කරන්න ඕන. ඒක තමයි සාධාරණත්වය.

මේ ප්‍රශ්නයත් එක්ක අතිවූ කරුණු කාරණාවලදී තමුන්නාන්සේලාගේ කතිකයෝ කිව්වා මාව ගඩාෆි වගේ ඇදගෙන ගිහින් මරන්නේ කියලා, ඒ වගේම ඇතැම් මන්ත්‍රිවරු කිව්වා, මහගහ සේකර මාවතේ මගේ ගේ ගිනි තියලා, කුඩු කරලා මාවයි, දරුවොයි මරලා දානවා කිව්වා. තමුන්නාන්සේලා එක්ක ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡා තියපු එන්ජීඕ කාරයෝ එහෙම කිව්වා. ඇයි එහෙම කියන්නේ, මේ රටේ කිසිම රාජ්‍ය නායකයෙකුට එහෙම කියලා නැහැ. දැඩි පාලකයෙක් විදියට සමාජය කතාකරන ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධන මහත්තයාගේ කාලේ මේ රටේ ප්‍රශ්න ගණනාවක් වුණා. ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධන ආණ්ඩුවට විරුද්ධව කතා කරලා මම හිරේ ගිය කෙනෙක්.

ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධනට එහෙම කිව්වේ නැහැ. ප්‍රේමදාස මහත්තයට කිව්වේ නැහැ. චන්ද්‍රකා බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිණියට විරුද්ධව රටේ කොච්චර දේවල් සිද්ධ වුණාද, කවුරුත් එහෙම කිව්වේ නැහැ. මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහත්තයට කවුරුත් කිව්වේ නැහැ ගඩාෆි වගේ ඇදගෙන යනවා කියලා. මට එහෙම කිව්වේ එහෙම කළානම් මම නිශ්ශබ්දව බලාගෙන ඉන්න මිනිහෙක් නිසා. ජේ.ආර්. ජයවර්ධනගේ ඉදලා හිටපු නායකයන්ට එහෙම කිව්වනම් ඒ කිසිවෙක් ඉතිරිවෙන්නේ නැහැ. හැබැයි දන්නවා මම වගේ මිනිහෙක් ගේ ගිනි තියන්නත් පුළුවන්. ගඩාෆි වගේ මාව ඇදගෙන යන්නත් පුළුවන් කියලා දන්නවා.

ඒක මගේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය සහ දර්ශනය තුළ රටේ යහපත් සමාජයක මිනිස්සු හොද පැත්තට යනවා වගේම අපරාධකාරයෝ, පාතලයෝ, මිලේච්ඡ පිරිස ඒ ප්‍රකාශ කළේ ඒ නිසා. මාව ඝාතනය කිරීමේ කුමන්ත්‍රණය ගැන මම දැක්කේ නැහැ තමුන්නාන්සේලා කිසි තැනක මේ වගේ ප්‍රශ්නයක් තියෙනවා කියලා කියනවා. ඒක ඔප්පුවෙලා නෙවේ, නමුත් ඒකට කරුණු කාරණා රාශියක් තියෙනවා. දැන් මේ දිනවල මගේ භාරයේ පොලිසිය තිබුණු නිසා ඒ ප්‍රශ්නවල ලොකු ප්‍රගතියක් තියෙනවා. නමුත් අවාසනාව කියන්නේ රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරණයා ඝාතනය කිරීම පිළිබඳ කුමන්ත්‍රණය අධිකරණයේ විභාගවන වෙලාවේ පහුගිය නඩු දිනයේ අපරාධ පරික්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ එක්කෙනෙක්වත් නැහැ.

මේ ගැසට් නිවේදන ගැහුවේ නීති විශාරදයන්ගේ උපදෙස් අනුව ඉතාමත් සද් භාවයෙන් මම මේක කළේ. ඉතාමත් යහපත් චේතනාවෙන් කළේ. ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව උල්ලංඝනය කළයුතුයි කියන අපවිත්‍ර චේතනාවකින් කරලා නැහැ. රට තුළ බරපතළ දේශපාලන අර්බුදයක් ඇතිවුණා. ඒක විසදාගැනීමට හොදම ක්‍රමය ඡන්දයකට යාමයි. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ මේ ලියුම අත්සන් කළේ මන්ත්‍රිවරු 122 යි. මේ රටේ ලක්ෂ 155 ක ඡන්ද දායකයින් ඉන්නවා. මේ ලක්ෂ 155 ක් ඡන්ද දායකයින්ට බලය දෙන්න මම ගැසට් නිවේදනය ගැහුවේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඉන්න 122 කට වැඩිය මේ ලක්ෂ 155 ඡන්දය තමයි ජනතා පරමාධිපත්‍ය තීරණාත්මක සාධකය සාක්ෂිය සහ රට වගේම ලෝකය පිළිගත යුතු වෙන්නේ කියලා. ඒ නිසයි මම එතනට ගියේ. බොහොම පැහැදිළි පිරිසිදු චේතනාව තුළ මම කරපු දේවල්වලට මට දඩුවම් දෙනවානම්, මඩ දඩුවම් දෙනවනම් දෝෂාභියෝග ගෙනවනම් ඒක වෙනම කාරණයක්.

නමුත් සත්‍යය ගලේ කෙටුව අකුරක් ලෙස ඉතිහාසයේ ලියවෙයි. උසාවිය මෙහෙම තීන්දු දුන්නට මගේ චේතනාව කුමක්ද, ලක්ෂ 155 කට ජනවරම දීම, පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඡන්දය එපා කියපු 122 ට වඩා ශක්තිමත් කියා මම දන්නා නිසා.

ඒ නිසා මට ඕනම දඩුවක් දුන්නට ගැටලුවක් නැහැ මම මගේ දේශපාලන ජීවිතය තුළ මම පස් හය සැරයක් මැරණ මිනිහෙක්. මාව ඉස්සෙල්ලා මැරුවේ 71. මාව ජේවිපියට කිසිම සම්බන්ධයක් නැතුව මගේ පාසලේ විදුහල්පතිවරයා මගේ නම දීලා මාව චේගුවේරාකාරයා කියලා මට ගහලා මාව ගෙනිහිල්ලා මඩකලපුවේ හිර ගෙදර හිටියා. ඒ පළවෙනි දෙවියන් වහන්සේ මාව බේරා ගත්ත තැන.

ධම්මෝ හවො රක්ඛති ධම්ම චාරි” මම ධාර්මික ජීවිතයක් පෙර මම ආත්මීය වශයෙන් ධාර්මික ජීවිතයක් පෙර ආත්ම වලත් ගත කරලා ඇති කියලා මම විශ්වාස කරනවා. ඒ නිසා තමා මගේ ජීවිතය බේරිලා තියෙන්නේ කියලා. එල්ටීටී එකෙන් මට පස් සැරයක් ගැහුවා.

ධම්මෝ හවො රක්ඛති ධම්ම චාරි” කිවේ එකයි. මගේ මේ රෝම කූපයකට වත් දැනුනේ නැහැ. ඒ එක ප්‍රහාරයක්වත් මට ගහන්න එල්ටීටි කාරයෝ වරින් වර අවස්ථා පහේ දීම පොළොන්නරුවේ ඔවුන්ම සයනයිට් කාලා මරුණා. . ඔබට මතක ඇති ඒ මරන්න ආපු එක මිනිසෙක් හිර භාරයේ ඉන්නකොට මම සිරභාරයෙන් ඔහුව නිදහස් කෙරුවා. අවසාන ප්‍රහාරය මට බොරගැස්ගමුවේ දී. බොරලැස්ගමුවේ ප්‍රහාරයේ දී අහිංසක මිනිස්සු හතර පස් දෙනෙක් මැරුණා. මගේ ඇගේ රෝම කූපයකටවත් දැනුනේ නැහැ.

අගමැතිතුමාටත්, ඔබතුමාලාටත් මතක ඇති රාජගිරියේ ඇන්.එම් පෙරේරා ප්‍රතිමාව හන්දියේ දී අපිට ගහපු හැටි අපි හදිසි නීතියට ඡන්දේ දීලා එනකොට එල්ටීටී ඇවිත් පැනලා. මාව එතැනට කොටු වුණා. මගේ නෝනායි, දරුවෝයි ආපු වාහනය එතැන ගෙදරක තිබිලා එල්ටීටීකාරයෝ ඒ ආණ්ඩුවේ වාහනයක් අරගෙන පැනලා ගියේ. ඊට පහුවදා මල්වාන පැත්තේ දාලා ගිහින් තිබිලා අහුවුණා. එවැනි අවස්ථා ගණනාවක් තියෙනවා.

එක නිසා මම මේ සියල්ල ගත්තහම 1971 ඉඳලාම එතකොට මගේ වයස අවුරුදු 19 යි. දැන් මගේ වයස 67 ඉවරයි. අවුරුදු 19 ඉඳලාම මම බෝනස් ඉන්නේ. දෙවියන් වහන්සේ මාව අවස්ථා පහක දී බේරලා තියෙන්නේ.
ඒ නිසා මාව ගඩාෆි වගේ ඇදගෙන යන අයට ඇදලා ගෙනිහිල්ලා මරන්න පුළුවන්. ඒක ගැන මගේ කිසිම විරැද්ධත්වයක් නැහැ. ඒ අයට හමුදාව දාලා, එස්ටිඑෆ් දාලා වෙඩි තියන්නේ නැහැ. එහෙම ඕනැ වෙලාවක ඇවිත් වට කරපුවාහම මම නිශ්ශබ්දව ඉන්නවා. එනවයි කියලා දැන ගත්තහම ගෙට්ටුව අරිනවා. ඔය ඉන්න ආරක්ෂක හමුදා, එස්ටීඑෆ් එකටයි සියලු දෙනාට යන්න කියලා කියනවා. ඒ අයට ඇවිල්ලා ගෙදරයි මාවයි ගිනි තියලා මරලා දාලා යන්න කියලා සියලු දෙනාට කියනවා ඔය එන්ජීයෝ කාරයින්ටයි, තමුන්නාන්සේලාගේ ඔය කියපු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ටයි මම බොහොම පැහැදිලිව කියනවා.
ඒක නිසා මේ සියලු දේවල් එක්ක අපි කල්පනා කරන්න ඕනැ මේ අත්දැකිම් එක්ක අපි මොන විදියට දැන් ඉදිරිය පිළිබඳ කරුණු කාරණා සිද්ධ වෙන්නේ කියලා. ඉතින් මේවා එක්ක මේ විදියටම ද මේ ආණ්ඩුව යන්නේ. ඔබතුමලාගේ මේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් මට දුරකතනයෙන් කතා කරලා කියනවා, සමහර අය මට ඊයේ පෙරේදා හමුවෙලා කිව්වා අපි දැන් එකතු වෙලා අපි මෙහෙම ගමනක් යමු කියලා. මේ දේවල් එක්ක මේ ගමන යාම පිළිබඳව මම දකින්නේ නැහැ මොකක්ද සහතිකය කියලා. ඒ නිසාගැටුම් හදාගන්න මට උවමනාවක් නැහැ. මේ ගැටුම හැදෙන්න හැදෙන්න රට වැටෙනවා. මේ දූෂිත තත්ත්වයන් ඉතාමත්ම ප්‍රබලයි. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ඉතාමත් දූෂිත දේශපාලනඥයින් පිරිසක් ඉන්නවා. අපේ කැබ්නට් මණ්ඩලය ගත් විට දූෂිත පිරිසක් ඉන්නවා.අපි බලාපොරොත්තු වෙච්ච රටේ ජනතාවට දුන්න යහපාලන දේශපාලන සංකල්පය අමු අමුවේ දුෂණය කරලා තියෙනවා. මේකට වැරදිකාරයා මම නොවෙයි කියන එක මම පැහැදිලිව කියනවා. මම ඒ පරිත්‍යාගය කරලා, මගේ සියලු කැපවීම් කරලා තියෙනවා. ඒ සියලු දේවල් විනාශ කළා. ඒ සියලු දේ විනාශ වුණා.

මේ රටේ මට ඡන්දය පාවිච්චි කරපු අති බහුතරයක් නියෝජනය වන ඒ ගෞරවනීය එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂිකයෝ ඒ අය දන්නේ නැහැ මේ විදියට මේ විදියට කුණු වෙලා තියෙන, මේ දේශපාලන ඔද්දල් වෙච්ච, ඡාරා ජීර්ණ වෙච්ච මේ දේශපාලන ක්‍රමයේ අභ්‍යන්තර තත්ත්වය ඒ අය දන්නේ නැහැ. ඒ අය දන්නවානම් මම හිතන්නේ නැහැ ඔය විදියට කෑගහන්න, පෙළපාලි යන්න, වට කරන්න ඕවාට එකතු වෙයි කියලා.

ඒ නිසා මේ රට ගත් විට අපි කියනවා වාසනාවන්ත රටක් කියලා ඇත්තටම වාසනාවන්ත රටක් තමයි හැබැයි මේ රට ගොඩ ගන්න, හෙට දවස වෙනුවෙන් මේ රටේ දුෂණයෙන් තොර දේශපාලනඥයෝ කී දෙනෙක් ඉන්නවා ද ? දූෂණයෙන් තොර දේශපාලන ව්‍යාපාරයක් ගොඩනගන්න අවශ්‍ය පිරිසක් කවුද? අන්න ඒ අයගේ එකාරාශී විමක් තමයි අවශ්‍ය වෙන්නේ. ඒ තුළ හොඳ රටක් හදන්න, හොඳ සංවර්ධනයක් ගෙනයන්න. දුෂණයෙන් තොර පාලනයක් ගෙනයන්න අපි කතා කරන සම්පුර්ණයෙන් අසාර්ථක වූ යහපාලන දේශපාලන සංකල්පය ඉෂ්ට වෙන්න. මේ විදියට රටට ආදරය කරන, රට ගැන හිතන, රටේ සංස්කෘතික වටිනාකම් දන්න ආගමික ධර්මතාවයන් එක්ක සමාජ හර පද්ධතීන්වලට ගරු කරන ලෝකයේ රටවල් දියුණු වෙලා තියෙන්නේ එහෙමයි. ඒ නිසා මම ඉදිරියේ ප්‍රශ්නාර්ථයක් තියෙනවා එහෙම රට ගොඩ ගන්න පිරිසක් කෝ කියලා. මේක එක් කෙනෙකුට දෙන්නෙකුට කරන්න බැහැ. මේක හොඳ පිරිසක් ඕනැ. ජනතාවට ඒ නායකත්වය දෙන්න හොඳ පිරිසක් අවශ්‍යයයි.

ඒක නිසා රටේ ජනතාවට කියන්න තියෙන්නේ මේකයි. කෙනෙක් අහන්න පුළුවන් රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහත්තයාට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ 225 තිබුණත් අගමැතිකම දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියලා මම කිව්වා නේද කියලා දැන් අදින් පස්සේ අහයි. මට සමාජ ජාලා වල ගහයි නොයෙක් දේවල් කියයි නොයෙක් නොයෙක් අපහාස උපහාස කරයි. ඒක මගේ දේශපාලන මතය. මම ඒ මතයේ තිබෙන ප්‍රබලකම නිසා තමයි මම එහෙම කිව්වේ, 225 ම අත්සන් කලත් මම රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාට අගමැතිකම දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියලා. ඔබතුමාලා එතැන දී පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ගිහිල්ලා 117 ක් අත්සන් කරලා, පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය පෙන්නුවා. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට කිසිම තැනක ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ නැහැ ජනාධිපතිට යෝජනා කරන්න, නියෝග කරන්න කිසි තැනක මේන්න මෙයා අගමැති විදියට පත් කරන්න කියලා. අධිකරණයටත් බැහැ මම දන්න විදියට අහවල් පුද්ගලයා අගමැති විදියට පත් කරන්න කියලා අධිකරණයටත් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ කොහේවත් නීතියේ නැහැ. ඒක බොහෙම පැහැදිලිව තියෙන්නේ විධායක ජනාධිපතිවරයාට.

නමුත් මම සදාචාර සම්පන්නව පාර්ලිමේන්තු සම්ප්‍රදාය ගරු කරන කෙනෙක් විදියට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ 117 ක් කතානායකතුමාගේ ඡන්දය පෙන්වූ විට රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමාට දෙන්න කියලා ඒ අනුව මම තීන්දු කළා. මම මගේ පෞද්ගලික මතය දේශපාලන මතය 225 ම අත්සන් කලාත් දෙන්නේ නැහැ කියලා, ඒක එහෙමම තමා අදත්. නමුත් පාර්ලිමේන්තු සම්ප්‍රදාය තුළ මම ඒ පාර්ලිමේන්තු සම්ප්‍රදායට ගරු කරලා, මම තීන්දු කළා අගමැතිකම දිය යුතුයි කියලා. මම මේක දකින්නේ ප්‍රජාත්‍රන්ත්‍රවාදී සමාජයක, සදාචාර සම්පන්න සමාජයක ලක්ෂණයක් විදියට මම දකින්නේ.

 

What’s next after the Supreme Court decision?

December 16th, 2018

H.L. D. Mahindapala

Last Thursday, just before the courts closed for Christmas holidays, the Supreme Court, sticking strictly to a legalistic path, put an end to the controversial issue of defining the powers of President Maithripala Sirisena, leaving the nation to wrestle with the bigger problems still awaiting solutions to stabilise the nation.  In fact, the grim reality is that the decision of the Supreme has thrown the nation back to square one. If the President agrees to work with Ranil, the nation will be back to another stint of Ranil Wickremesinghe’s rule with all his catchers” returning to lap the cream.

In the meantime, he can now claim Temple Trees” as his legitimate political base. But that was a non-issue in any case, except for him. The nagging overarching question is more serious: what is he going to do with his powers to stay on, thanks to the Supreme Court, during the remaining period of his stewardship? He feels vindicated and strengthened by the Supreme Court decision. But, as things stand now, it is clear, that the more he consolidates his position the more he is likely to take the nation towards confrontation, tensions, uncertainties and instability.

Soon the issues of constitutionality will be forgotten and the usual blame game of party politics will take centre stage. UNP cabinet ministers will trek back to their seats claiming that democracy has being restored. NGOs and the Western embassies will be happy that their apparatchiks are back in the saddle. Paki Saravanamuttu and Prof. Ratnajeevan Hoole, two of the petitioners in the case, too will preen smugly broadcasting that their citizenship rights” have been restored. (More about them later.) In short, will the return of Ranil take us out of the mess or drag us deeper into the depths that began with his regime staging biggest bank heist in the history of the nation in 2015 ?

One can also expect the cockiness of the UNPers to rise to a new level. There is no doubt that the UNP’s arrogance and prime minister’s unilateral policy-making” (International Crisis Group  report –16/5/2017) will generate more problems than solving the issues that cropped up in the post-Yahapalanaya regime. Besides, the political passions surrounding court case have polarised the nation. Ranil will resume his authoritarian role with a vengeance, tolerating no dissent. As usual he will misread the new situation and act as if he has got a new mandate to do what he wants. This is where he will slip and fall. He did not get a mandate from the Supreme Court to override the President nor to bulldoze his way through. Nor is it a personal victory for him, or an endorsement of his leadership. The Supreme Court decision was a mere legal clarification of the Presidential powers within the Constitution which is expected to return the political conditions to the status that existed before Parliament was dissolved. The final judgement is yet to made by the people.  That will come when the election postponed by the Supreme Court will be held in 2020, or whenever.

In essence, what the Supreme Court did was to postpone the election that was gazetted to be held on January 5, 2019. In making its decision Supreme Court did what Ranil has done previously: postpone elections for another date. Postponing elections, under whatever pretext, does not make those evading elections ideal defenders or champions of democracy. His lap dogs in the NGOs, however, want us to believe that democracy is best served by postponing elections. Paki, for instance, asserts that his citizenship rights” have been restored by the Supreme Court postponing the election gazetted by the President. Their latest political theory is tantamount to saying that denying, or postponing, the right to vote is a positive sign of the triumph of democracy.  They argued in Court that holding an election before the scheduled time is a denial of their citizenship rights. You begin to wonder whether Paki is just letting off high-pressure hot air from his mouth, hissing like a leaking car tyre, or delirious that the vast majority has been denied their right to express their will through the exercise of universal franchise. He is bound to claim that the postponing elections by the Supreme Court is a great victory for democracy and for his NGO.. Example: Provincial Council elections have been postponed with no dated fixed for it. Has he gone to courts saying that his citizenship rights have been denied by Ranil Wickremesinghe not holding PC elections?

Of course, it is the duty of every citizen to safeguard the rights that come with citizenship. I am glad that two Tamils could go before an all-Sinhala judiciary and win their citizenship rights in the Sinhala Only” state. But what worries me is why these two Tamils, posing as defenders of human rights (Blah! Blah! Blah!)  didn’t fight for the citizenship of his fellow-Tamils in the high court of Velupillai Prabhakaran who ran his one-man state with all the legal paraphernalia of courts, police, lawyers, judges, etc. The TNA bigwigs, who are lawyers, also trooped into a Sinhala-Only Court, draped in their black gowns, demanding their rights as citizens of Sri Lanka. But when did the TNA lawyers ever step into one of Prabhakaran’s court challenging the Tamil Pol Pot’s fascist regime that denied the Tamil people their inalienable right to protect their children being forcibly abducted to kill more Tamils than all other forces put together, as stated by S. Chandrahasan, son of S. J. V. Chelvanayakam?

An incorrigible tendency of the Tamil leadership has been to fight for democratic rights in the Sinhala South and defend with their lives the fascist tyranny of Tamil Pol Pots in the North. Democracy in the South and Tamil tyranny in North could never co-exist. One or the other had to go. And all peace-loving democrats should pay homage on their knees to our heroic soldiers who restored democracy for the oppressed, war-ravaged Tamils to enjoy the blessings of peace and freedom once again.  The Tamils of the North are able to walk with dignity and respect because 29,000 Sinhala soldiers sacrificed their lives to liberate Jaffna from the Tamil Pol Pot.

I am digressing. Let’s get back Ranil in the post-Supreme Court decision period. Assuming that he has won a great personal  victory he will now parade as the new champion of democracy. Just the other day he portrayed himself as the great discoverer of the fact that the Sri Lankan parliament has been governed by the Westminster tradition since 1948. As everyone knows, one of the sacred tenets of the Westminster tradition is for a prime minister, minister, or an MP, caught red handed with corruption, deceit, lying to Parliament, or obstructing or misleading Parliament etc., to resign immediately without even an inquiry. When has Ranil ever followed that exemplary principle? A British Member of Parliament caught with the evidence revealed in the Bond Commission would have been hounded out of Parliament by the unbearable weight of public opinion alone. But his skin is more tough and leathery than that of a buffalo. He has sailed through the rough and tumble of politics by not talking through his mouth but through an aperture in his anatomy  which is somewhere below his belt, as stated by his childhood friend. Ms. Chandrika Kumaratunga.

Looming large in the days ahead will be his relationship with the President. He will front up as if he has got a legal warrant to extract as much power as he can from the President to push his anti-national agenda. Reconciliation between the two seems unlikely in the immediate future. Plagued by the strained relations both are likely to snipe at each other. Ranil will insist on having his way. At every opportunity his parliamentary manoeuvres will be to fortify and expand his powers. He will pose as a pious pupil of Parliamentary procedure enshrined in the Westminster tradition. His fake commitment to Westminster traditions is exhibited unashamedly in appointing the TNA leader as the Leader of the Opposition who has only 16 MPs in a House of 225. His attempt to get away with lies claiming to be devotee of the Westminster model is childish and stupid.

His main tactic will be to put the blame from now on to the President and Mahinda Rajapakse.  But Anura Kumara Dissanayake has nailed this canard in Parliament. In blunt terms he accused Ranil of being responsible for the recent kerfuffle. The newspaper report captures the full extent of Ranil’s responsibility in causing the crisis. It said: The JVP yesterday (12/ 12/ 2018), criticized UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, saying that it was he who created the platform for the political coup by President Maithripala Sirisena and Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Participating in the debate, on the confidence motion in support of Wickremesinghe as the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka, JVP Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake said that the current political turmoil was triggered as a result of Wickremesinghe and his Government shifting away from the mandate the public granted them in 2015.

When a new Government was formed in 2015, there was a specialty in it. Several factions contributed to it. But unfortunately, one faction and a group of persons and a single authority started to claim the power. It is the Governing party which holds the responsibility for doing the correct thing.

They are also responsible for not refraining from any wrong doing. But Wickremesinghe did not care about it. He allowed things, which were not supposed to take place, to happen.”

Dissanayake has also blamed the President and Mahinda Rajapakse. But Ranil will be disappointed that he has not being exempted from blame. Also, being the skilled master of cover-ups, he will not accept his share of responsibility. He will come out swinging to confront the President, the opposition and any dissident that would dare to cross his path.  He thinks he has risen from the ashes like Phoenix.

One drama of Ranil is over.

What’s the next one?

Will the Western dip-low-mutts be invited by the Speaker to clap for the enactment of Ranil’s next theatrical performance in Parliament?

A nation weeps and laments as one of the darkest and tragic  periods of history in this country is been unfolded

December 16th, 2018

Sudath Gunasekara

16.12.2018

It was only  20 days ago on Nov 26, 2018. the patriotic Sinhala Buddhist  masses who love their motherland had some relief when Majhinda Rajapaks was sworn in as Prime Minister on the 26th of November as their Messiah (modern Dutugamunu of the Sinhala nation) and they  were jubilant and overjoyed as they felt that now they have their   leader once again at the steering of the nation. The news of the dessolution of Parliament that followed  further overjoyed the people with new hopes and great expectations that they can total anarchy and treacherous misrule under a rogue government headed by a PM who has no love or any feeling for this country or its people but only for political power openly serving the interests of anti national forces both at Home and abroad completly, ignoring the people of this country who voted them in to power.

But now the Supreme Court  has  declared the desoolution of Parliament is unconstitutional and thrown the baby with the clay water pan, both the baby and the clay pan have perished there is no point in trying to recover both. Instead we have to seriously look for a new baby and a new pan nas well. Alass, with this rather curious verdict, the peopel’s joy was short lived and now completely disappeared from the faces of all the people with whom sovereignty is supposed to rest under the Constitution that is supposed to be sacrocent.Who is culpable of this disaster is a moot question. However it must be made very clear that this SC decision affects only the desolurion of Parliament and it does not impinge on the legality of the appointment of the PM or the Cabinet. This point is made very clear from the following decision of the SC on the pettions  seeking a Quo Warranto  order  on the appointment of the PM and the Cabinet.

“The Supreme Court has granted leave to hear the appeal by Mahinda Rajapaksa against the interim order given by the Court of Appeal at the request of 122 MPP purported to be   saviours of democracy in this country comprising  UNP 102. TNA 14 and JVP 6 and also has rejected  to issue a stay order on the interim order restraining Mahinda Rajapaksa from holding office of Prime Minister and his Cabinet from functioning. It has also unanimously ordered the Appeal Court not to hear the petition against Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Cabinet holding office, until the Supreme Court hearing is over. This clearly says that the Mahinda Rajapaksa Cabinet is still leagal and therefore valid and I have no doubt that this is a good  news at least for one month for all the patriotiic people of this country who  love him “

Under this situation I opine there is no reason for MR to resing leaving the Cabinet dissolved untill the SC court decision on the appeal is given. I think he should have not resinged at least untill the SC ruling is given on this matter as he could have carried on until elections to Parliament are held in case the SC gives a favourable verdict.

However now that he has resigned, there is no point in talking about this postulation or hanging on to it by ordinary mortals like us. Nevertheless, as aperson who knows the crafty and  vicious mind of Ranil and proven ability to  manure and  design underhand treacheries, I am compelled  to think that this decision on MR’s part is yet another irrevercible blunder of fareaching political consequences for thim as well as the ountry and the nation. I would compare this  with his decision to go for Presidential elections in 2014, two years before the due date and also his decition to hand over the Presidency of the Party to MS  in 2015. If I were MR, intead of handing over the leadership I would have sacked MS from the post of Secretary of the party immediately after he  decided to contest as the comon candiate under the UNP and retained the leadership of the JO and  thereby retained the solid political power of the SLFP as well as the JO. Had that been done MS would never have been able to sack the Secretaries of the SLFP as well as the JO, thereby making him a prisoner in the hands of the UNP making him a lame duck and he could have never been able to appoint  Ranil as the PM on Jan 8th 2015. Jn the alternative he would have been compelled to work with a Governemnt headed by Mahinda Rajapaksa as the PM

That would also have avoided the10 billion Feb 2015 Central Bank scam as Ranil would never have been in power to all designings and conspiracies what he did and more over all subsequent ations taken by Ranil’s Government, including the 40 billion second CB scam ib 2016 detrimental to the country would have been avoided. To that extent I hold the view that both MS and MR have to take full responsibility or at least share it equally with Ranil  for all damages done to the country by the so-called yahaplanaya Government during the 4 1/2 years  including the 2 CB robbery 2016 that destroyed the countrie’s economy with spillover effects for generations to come.

Reverting to MR’s decision to resign why did MR take this illconcieved and hasty decision to me is a big puzzel.  I attribute this to three major factors. Firstly it may be  that he is fed up with never ending legal harrassings by this Government. Secondly he may have wanted to show the country that he is not power hungry like Ranil and he regards the country first than temporary political power. Lastly he did not have proper advice on the serious  and  long term political implications of this decision or he did not listned to it, even if it was given, as usual. Nevertheless I apprecite his decision if he ha staken it in consideration of the inconvenience caused to the country and the peole, in keeping with the ageold tradion of our ancient Kings.

It is undoubtedly magnanimous on his part as a true national leader. But this latest  decision will tigger  off another long chain of another reactions and confusions of unimaginable proportion and unpredictable repercussions for the counhtry for the following reasons.

The purported decsion, if it is true,on the part of the Presdient to allow some SLFP MPP to again join hands with Ranil and form a second second mariage in the guise of  a nonnational and anti-national “national Government” will  again takes the country back to square no 1. However having listen to the President’s address to Ranil and the UNP hierarchy at the President’s Office  on the eve of Ranil’s appointment as today I have my doubts as to whether he will allow any SLFP  MP to join the UNP. If they do I suggest he sack them.

Nevertheless one has to bare in mind the following realities as well in the complexities  one has to face in the days to come

1The President will now have to again preside over a more hostile and uncorpeartive Cabinet that takes decisions and try do things even without his knowledge.

2 Ranil W has only 102 seats in his UNF including the UNP, Muslim, Estate Tamils and  highly undependable  peopel like Champika who have their own private agendas and he will  not have the majority  in Praliament to form a stable Government unless he gets the TNA and JVP to support him. Now that the TNA and JVP have already  publicly declared that they will not give their support to Ranil (again not a reliable statement that could change at any time) we shold not forget that   both Tamil an dMuslim politicinas are real shylocks who will never support any Government without  the exact pound of flesh  from the heart.

3The TNA will never give their support unless they get a written promis  from Ranil (which he will of cause give as he will never get TNA support without that). If that happens the TNA will lose the Leader of the Opposition Job. If the UNP acceed to their demands  of merging the North and the East etc the UNP will be committing political suicide. The Speaker will also have to change his UNP stance (that was there in his head for the past 4 years) and will be compelled to accept the SLPP+SLFP as the true opposition in Parliament.

4 If the President again decides to allow few monkeys from the SLFP  to support Ranil once again he will be going back to square no1 by doing which he will be again making the same blunder he did in 2015 by taking 44 JO MPP to support Ranil

I only hope the President will not fall in to the same pit that he voluntarily jumped in 2015.

What ever said and done the Presidents appointment of MR as PM on the 26th has saved the country from the divion of the country in to 9 ethnic divisions with 9 separate Governements   by stopping the enactment of a federal Constitution in addition to many more disatrous betrayal that were designed to  be effected by the RAail Government before next April.

Let the Guardian Gods of this Island nation  give wisdom to stupid politicians to desist from their treacherous moves to destroy this country and the sinhalanation and its 2500 year old pristine civilization.

Save the country from TNAs Treachery –  Part X

December 16th, 2018

By A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

Religion based political history of North and East indicate that although Sumanthiran belongs to the  protestant Christian minority  it is believed  that  he    would  receive the overwhelming support of the predominantly Hindu electorate of Jaffna. The most famous of Protestant Christian being elected include the co-founder  and leader of the Federal Party, S.J.V. Chelvanayagam  who won in Kankesanthurai repeatedly in 1947, 1956, 60, 65, 70 and 75. Rajan Selvanayagam in Batticaloa (1970) and Alfred Durayappah in Jaffna (1960) was also protestant Christians though Durayappah later transcended religion and became  a Theosophist worshipping at Hindu temples and Buddhist vihares. In recent times T. Kurukularajah a protestant Christian won from the Kilinochchi district at the Northern provincial council elections. Kurukularajah who was the provincial Minister for Education is the son of eminent clergyman Rev. A.C. Thambyrajah who set up the unorthodox Christian institution Navajeevanam”in Murasumottai near Paranthan.

Political analysts commented that the main reason for Christians being elected in Hindu majority areas is since Tamil politics in Sri Lanka has been of a secular nature. Homage is paid to the Thamizh Thaai” or Tamil mother who symbolises Tamil unity regardless of religious differences. The political struggle for Tamil equality in the island has been on ethno-linguist grounds and pro separatist Jeyarj says when mobs attacked Tamils in 1956, 58, 77, 81 and 83 the victims were targeted for being Tamils and not for being Hindus or Christians. Similarly, when bombs and shells rained down on Tamil populated areas they did not differentiate between Hindus and Christians altogether .

This phenomenon of Christians being political leaders in the Tamil community has been remarked upon and questioned. This was particularly so in the case of S.J.V. Chelvanayagam who led Tamil non –violent political resistance for two decades and was revered as Than Thai (Father) Chelva.  I t was said that former Prime Minister Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike once wrote to Chelvanayagam and asked him as to what right he  had as a Christian to speak for the predominantly Hindu Tamils of the North and East. Chelvanayagam is reported to have responded saying that It is to the credit of the Tamil people that they did not require their leaders to change their religion in order to lead them.”

The reference to changing religion” was a veiled barb at  Sinhala leaders like S.W.R.D.  Bandaranaike and J.R. Jayewardene who were born and baptized as Anglicans but later became Buddhists.

TNA overseas branches in Canada, UK and Australia are also firmly supportive of Sumanthiran’s candidacy. Thus, Sumanthiran’s political opponents and competitors anticipate his victory and are apprehensive.

It is said that under the nre Ranil Wickremasinnghe dispensatiomneither the TNA nor Sumanthiran were willing at this juncture to join a Govt. There is however the probability of the TNA joining a national Government in the near future or after fresh elections and accepting ministerial posts and would depend upon a number of factors and it may be premature to speculate in greater detail on this possibility at this point.

The important thing is to note that anxiety about the TNA establishing greater rapport with the new government and accepting Cabinet posts in the future has reported to have afflicted two components of Tamil society. The major component consists of Tamil extremists and hardliners who do not want any rapprochement or reconciliation.      They particularly abhor the prospect of the TNA sharing power at the centre as part of a government. The minor component comprises those who are personally opposed to Sumanthiran and to a lesser extent Sampanthan. Currently there is a convergence of interests between both components and a tactical alliance  is  reported  to  have been evolved

 

The demands for Bifurcation of t5he country were given to Ranil in Writing Says TNA MP Siddarthan Dharmalingam 

  The genocide of Tamils” resolution drafted and presented by the former Northern Provincial Council Chief Minister C.V. Wigneswaran was unanimously” passed by the Northern Provincial Council.        It is important to note that the genocide resolution has poisoned   the cordial climate that prevailed between the Govt and the TNA since the beginning of  this year. There were many dimensions to Wigneswaran’s agenda and one such aspect is that  of   the resolution being a pre-emptive strike to prevent greater co-operation between the  TNA and the Government

A further extension of these efforts to pre-empt a Govt-TNA nexus is the recent escalation of attacks on Sumanthiran. One does not know whether Sumanthiran himself is confident about winning an election, but those circles opposed to him seem to be sure that the bespectacled lawyer residing in Wellawatte will  win a seat in Jaffna and enter Parliament through the Mun Kathavu” or front door. It is further anticipated that he would be a Cabinet minister after the next elections. This has lent a sense of urgency to the Anti-Sumanthiran camp.

The objective behind the intensified attacks  seems to be to increase pressure on Sumanthiran  and dissuade him from continuing with politics. By increasing attacks on multiple fronts   these elements want to pressurise him into re-thinking his future and reviewing his options.   Why should a person with a lucrative legal practice living comfortably in Colombo  with his  family expose himself continuously  to the slings and arrows of outrageous fortunes” in the  form of acts like effigy burning attacks?  is the  crude logic governing the masterminds    behind the demonstrations. The motive behind the malignant attacks is to exert pressure and make Sumanthiran quit politics voluntarily” explains his portage Jryaraj.

 A key device in this strategy is the tartarisation” strategy. Sumanthiran is being vilified widely as a thurogi” or traitor. In the bad old days when Veluppillai Prabhakaran  and his lethal minions were ruling the Tamil roost the modus operandi  adopted was  to demonise someone as a traitor and then exterminate him. Mercifully this is no longer an option for the tigers and their fellow travellers  because of Mahinda Rajapaksa who bestowed a great gift upon the Tamils by destroying the LTTE militarily in Sri Lanka. ryaraj says in a post-Prabhakaran era the course of action available is not assassination but character assassination. The idea is to kill without killing” by portraying the targeted victim as a traitor. Unable to kill physically, the blood-thirsty fiends satisfy their lust by cremating” portraits and effigies.

Ryaraj asserts that  the  orchestrated protests against Sampanthan and Sumanthiran therefore  should be viewed in this light. Initially the grouse was about attending the  Independence Day event. Now it is about the delay” in releasing the UN report on Sri Lanka.    Don’t delay” is the demand. Ironically the very same elements who are criticising the TNA  for the delay are the same sections who protested the UN probe itself when it was  mooted. What a contradiction! Likewise, Wigneswaran says his genocide resolution is to  signal the UN not to delay releasing the report. Again, the question is would not investigation  into genocide protract  UN proceedings further? Faulty logic bordering on political  hypocrisy!

If the track record of Tamil politics is any indication, the campaign against Sampanthan and Sumanthiran would keep continuing for a while.    ryaraj   claims the next phase would be an influx by an assortment of  Tamil nationalist patriots”  to Geneva demanding  speedy justice for the Tamils. In the process more, portraits and effigies of Sampanthan and  Sumanthiran may be set on fire in Geneva.

Different aspects of TNA-LTTE treachery and UNP/JVP and Western/Indian cooperation will be continued in a different series. Thank you

MPs who joined Mahinda won’t return to UNP – Basil

December 16th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

The United National Party members who had joined with Mahinda Rajapaksa will not return to the UNP, says former Minister Basil Rajapaksa.

Addressing a public meeting held in Meegoda area, the former Minister said that he is making this comment as a respect to those members.

Furthermore, the rumours which claim that certain members of Sri Lanka Freedom Party would join the government are unwarranted and that most of the MPs have already informed the President and Mahinda Rajapaksa in this regard, Basil Rajapaksa noted.

Premiership given to Ranil while honouring democracy – President

December 16th, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

I have given Premiership to Ranil Wickremesinghe while honouring Parliamentary traditions and democracy,” President Maithripala Sirisena has stated.

He stated this addressing the members of United National Front (UPF) following the swearing-in ceremony of Ranil Wickremesinghe as the Prime Minister this morning (16).

The President stated that his statement on refusing to give premiership to Wickremesinghe even if all 225 in Parliament sign and request him to do so is his personal political opinion and persists to date.

However, he has decided to invite Ranil Wickremesinghe to be appointed the Prime Minister as a leader who honours the Parliament traditions and democracy, President Sirisena further stated.

Reminding that, in accordance with the Constitution, the Parliament or the judiciary do not have the authority to appoint the Premier, President Sirisena stated that he took this decision as the majority of 117 votes in the Parliament has sought Ranil Wickremesinghe to be appointed as the Prime Minister.

ATTITUDE OF ARM CHAIR PUNDITS AND BENEFITS DELIVERED BY PRIME MINISTER MAHINDA RAJAPAKSE IN A SHORT PERIOD

December 16th, 2018

BY M D P DISSANAYAKE

There are several arm chair political pundits indirectly expressing happiness on the departure of Mahinda Rajapakse  after a very short period in office.  These are the same people who advocated that Mahinda was greedy to grab power to escape legal actions against him and his family.    If that is the case, why Mahinda gracefully left office, exactly the same way he left office of the President even before the final results were released.  These CLAYTON MAHINDA SUPPORTERS are disgruntled JVP and UNP  supporters.

In contrast, these arm chair political pundits have not complained even once when Ranil refused to leave Temple Trees after he was sacked from Office.  We need to  be extremely cautious of these arm chair writers and pundits.

During this short period, Mahinda addressed most pressing question of the farming community by providing fertilizer at Rs 500.  The Farming community is jubilant, the result of the decision will increase the production volume in the primary industries and reduce the prices.  Similarly, Mahinda dismantled the ad-hoc fuel pricing formula  and reduced the fuel prices 3 times within a short period.

Apart from these, he was able to tell TNA that he will never come to terms with them where the ultimate result will be division of the country.   Ranil has reconfirmed his previous commitment to divide the country, as disclosed by the former General Secretary of the UNP Mr Tissa Attanayake.

Mahinda displayed that he is now much tougher than last time.

It is now time for the SLPP to continue with the grass root build up, as his most recent decisions had enhanced the value of Mahinda Rajapakse.

A massive campaign must be undertaken to expose any attempts to divide the country by Ranil  Wickremasinghe.  Ranil will decrease the cost of living to increase his popularity and simultaneously deceive the masses whilst bringing new laws to satisfy the extreme Tamils and Muslims for the division of the country.

AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL FOREIGN EMBASSIES IN SRI LANKA

December 16th, 2018

Daya Wijesinghe  Hony. General  Secretary De Dham Rakno

Our organization, De Dham Rakno, is a movement of the people of Sri Lanka, that is committed to preserving the sovereignty and the integrity of our country, and the right of all its people to live in peace, equality and harmony across the length and breadth of the island.  It is not aligned or affiliated to any political party either directly or indirectly.  It spurns foreign funds and is financed purely by the meager contributions of its members and well wishers.

This letter is to express our utmost displeasure over the continuing acts of interference in the internal affairs of our country, by the ambassadors of some Western NATO countries and their allies both in the East and West, riding rough shod over Sri Lanka’s sovereignty, with scant regard to the sensibilities of our people.  Some of these ambassadors act in the most despicable and shameless manner, as if Sri Lanka is a colony of the countries they represent.  They are not only violating all norms of diplomacy but are also flagrantly abusing our sovereignty.

In the aftermath of the recent ousting of Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe from power, which is purely an internal matter of our country, the role that these ambassadors played in holding discussions with the Hon. Speaker of the house, Mr. Karu Jayasuriya, and persuading the latter to change his earlier position recognizing the appointment of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as the new Prime Minister by His Excellency the President, in accordance with the powers vested in him by the constitution, amply supports our position stated above.  Their over eagerness to reinstall their ally Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe as Prime Minister, led them to demean themselves to the level of DPL jokers, when they applauded and rejoiced in the lobby of the parliament, over the declaration made by the Speaker that Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa has lost a no confidence motion, that was rushed through parliament without regard to proper procedures.  They no doubt consider the occasion as a victory for their joint effort (or conspiracy?) to restore Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe to power.

We could have dismissed their behaviour lightly as arising from a burst of unbridled  but crude expression of colonial mentality, if not for the fact that their governments, casting aside international law, jointly endeavour to have their puppets installed and maintained in high offices in countries across the globe.  In many a such country, these puppet regimes have readily allowed the wealth of their countries to be stolen by their masters, and further commit their people to serve in proxi wars to oust other legitimate governments that resist the demands of the Western NATO states.  But we Sri Lankans do not want such a fate to befall us.

While civil unrest, military power struggles and separatist wars have brought untold suffering to people of nations that have undergone the “regime changes” effected by the NATO states, the wealth of the latter has burgeoned by the sale of armaments to the warring factions.  The citizens of NATO states, basking in the comforts of sitting rooms furnished by such ill begotten wealth, are inclined to readily believe the reports churned out by the biased high profile Western media, without going through the trouble to ascertain the truth from alternative sources of information.  We believe that if this world is not only to be a safer place for all, but also one where all its inhabitants could satisfy at least their basic needs, the good hearted citizens of NATO states should pay greater attention to the operations let loosed by their leaders, especially in countries that cannot defend themselves.  Further, they should bring pressure on their leaders to allow people of other nations to solve their internal political issues of their own accord.

We also take this opportunity to call upon the Indian government, or rather, once again, its good hearted citizens, to examine their country’s foreign policy, especially vis-a-vis its small neighbouring states.  We believe that if India is to be the great world leader it has the potential to be, and we sincerely wish it to be so, it should stop playing second fiddle to USA, and seek its position in the world on its own merit.  A great country that has produced a Buddha, an Asoka, a Ghandhi and an Ambedkar, should be a beacon of righteousness to the world, rather than one that trains and arms terrorists, promote separatism and indulge in cloak and dagger operations to bully or end governments and leaders of neighbouring states.  It should stop its policy of arm twisting smaller neighbours, forcing them to accept trade agreements and investments, that they fear would lead to the economy of the smaller state being swallowed by India, finally leading to its complete annexation, as happened to Sikkim.  Such murky unethical stratagem may be in order for one time colonial powers that have killed, raped, enslaved and plundered country after country from the 15 hundreds, but it is certainly anathema to the enlightened, modern and powerful Bharatha we wish it to be as one that protects the smaller states around it from the political machinations of the West, instead of conniving with it.

Leaders and diplomats on the other side of the Palk Straits use hackneyed phrases such as “ancient cultural ties”, “brotherly relations”, “spiritual union”, etc. to assure us how highly they value the special status of relations between our two countries, and consequently, the good intentions of India in its dealings with us.  However the general public of Sri Lanka cannot be hoodwinked, for we can never forget, the steps leading to India’s invasion of Sri Lanka in the guise of sending a “peace keeping force”, purportedly to disarm the very same terrorists trained and armed by itself, with the “consent” of the then President of Sri Lanka, who was made to bow down to the Indian Ambassador.  We can neither forget how the 13th amendment was forced on the parliament and ratified at the point of a gun instituting provincial councils, that have become the bane of development and harmony among the different races, and hangs like the Sword of Damocles threatening to disintegrate Sri Lanka to nine independent warring states.  We can neither forget India’s attempt to establish a separate independent state in the North and East and its setting up of a Tamil National Army in support of it.

Even if we cannot forget India’s past aggression, we can forgive India, if only it is in turn prepared to mend its ways allowing us to solve our problems by ourselves, truly respect our sovereignty, integrity and independence.  If India wishes to go further and live up to the claim it makes about the special status it affords our relationship, it can stand by us in resisting the pressure brought on us by the NATO states to carry out their diktats.  However what both India and the West should realise are that when they act hand in glove to our detriment, neither can complain if we seek closer ties with other powerful countries in the world to protect our sovereignty.

 

Daya Wijesinghe                                                                             21st of November, 2018

Hony. General  Secretary

De Dham Rakno

Dead end: UK’s Theresa May has led her party & country into an impasse

December 16th, 2018

John Laughland, Courtesy RT

British Prime Minister Theresa May is a politician who holds on to power through defeats. Even though she survived a no-confidence vote held within her own Conservative Party this week, it was also a sort of defeat.

She achieved high office (Home Secretary) thanks to David Cameron, who failed to gain a majority in Parliament at the 2010 election, in spite of the fact that Labour had been in power since 1997 and that the outgoing prime minister, Gordon Brown, was deeply unpopular. Cameron had to govern in coalition with the Liberals.

Dead end: UK's Theresa May has led her party & country into an impasse

British Prime Minister Theresa May ©REUTERS/Piroschka Van De Wouw © Reuters

Theresa May then became Prime Minister in 2016, after Cameron resigned having been defeated, like her, in the referendum on Brexit.  She and her boss had campaigned for Remain.

ALSO ON RT.COM‘Not open for renegotiation’: EU stands by Brexit deal, offers few extra reassurances to MayShe then led her party into a catastrophic election in 2017, in which the Conservatives lost the 20-seat majority they had won in 2015 and ended up nine seats short of a majority. This was in spite of the fact that the Conservatives faced a Labour opposition in deep disarray, with a leader (Jeremy Corbyn) who many had thought was unelectable. Since last year, May has clung on to power only thanks to the support of the Ulster Unionists.  Without them, she could not govern.

Theresa May’s latest election, the one held on December 12 by her fellow Conservative Members of Parliament, was also a sort of defeat.  True, she won by two-thirds: 200 votes for her, 117 against.  But out of the 200 votes there are more than 150 MPs who belong to the government, either as ministers, deputy ministers or private parliamentary secretaries.   These people have to vote with the government or they lose their government job and any chance of future preferment.  In other words, over half of the Tory backbenchers voted against May.

Moreover, her re-election as leader has not answered any of the questions which led to the vote in the first place, in particular what to do given that there is no majority in the House of Commons for the deal she has agreed with the EU.  Indeed, there is no majority in the House of Commons for any option at all. She has led her party and her country into an impasse.

Her only tactic is to turn this weakness into a strength: like Madame de Pompadour, Theresa May says it is either her or chaos. Après moi, le déluge.  Unfortunately, the tactic of turning defeat into victory has –as was inevitable– ultimately created the conditions for defeat.

This is because the deal that she has negotiated with the EU creates precisely the conditions which guarantee that her objective of a free trade deal with the EU, first stated in January 2017 and repeated on many subsequent occasions, cannot be achieved. According to the terms of the agreement –which is in fact only an agreement to continue negotiating– Britain and the EU will seek to sign a free trade deal by the end of the transition period in 2020.  But the famous ‘Irish border backstop’ ensures that the EU has no interest in agreeing to anything.

ALSO ON RT.COMCorbyn plots no-confidence motion with DUP in May’s Tory govt before Christmas – reportsIf there is no free trade agreement by the end of 2020, according to the terms of the deal she negotiated in November, the whole of the United Kingdom will remain in the EU customs union. It will not be able to leave it until a new agreement is reached. Britain will therefore be in a uniquely weak position and the EU has every interest in getting it there.

London would have to accede to a long shopping list of individual demands from EU states –from the French on fishing, from the Spanish on Gibraltar, and so on– in order to break free from the backstop. It is more difficult to leave the backstop than it is to leave the EU, and May’s deal is therefore the longest suicide note in history.

The fact is that Britain and the EU have been negotiating for two years with radically different objectives. Theresa May does not seem to have realized this. London was trying to have the benefits of EU membership (a free trade agreement) without the costs; Brussels was determined to show that you cannot have the benefits without the costs. London wanted to prosper outside the EU, Brussels is determined to show that you cannot prosper outside the EU, for fear that other EU member states might start trying to follow Britain. Theresa May was determined to succeed whereas the EU’s priority has been to ensure that she fails.

The EU’s strategy has, therefore, been to create a situation in Britain which is untenable, with the openly admitted goal of getting the British, one way or another, to reverse Brexit.  This is but a variant of the tactic the EU has deployed many times in the past when it has lost other referendums – in Denmark in 1992, in Ireland in 2001 and 2008, in France and the Netherlands in 2005, and in the Netherlands again in 2016 (in a vote on the Association Agreement with Ukraine which was widely seen as being against the EU in general.)

ALSO ON RT.COMChancellor Hammond labels Rees-Mogg, Boris & co ‘extremists’ as Tory civil war gets uglyOn each occasion, the EU simply decided to ignore the vote; either it pressed ahead with ratification in other states so that the countries in question were forced to vote a second time (Denmark and Ireland) or the same legislation was passed by the political class in their respective national parliaments (France and the Netherlands) and against the people’s wishes. The same thing is now happening against Britain, and we are now witnessing, in real time, a sixth attempt to strangle democracy.

By running down the clock, Prime Minister May hopes that her deal will be accepted as the only way of preventing no deal or no Brexit. That is why it is essential for MPs to adopt the opposite logic from hers and vote for no deal.

Painful Memories that Bleeds Forever

December 16th, 2018

By Afshain Afzal

Pakistan was once recognized as a unique nation spread over two strategically located Eastern and Western parts, separated by a distance of 1000 kilometers. The binding force that cemented unity and harmony between these two predominantly Muslim nations was ideology of Pakistan. The story of this love between Bengal as Eastern part of Pakistan and Balochistan, North Western Frontier Province, Punjab and Sindh as well Jammu and Kashmir including Northern Areas as West part of Pakistan dates back to the ancient times even older than the times of Prophet of Islam Hazrat Mussa Alhe Salam (Prophet Mosses). The Muslims of these two parts struggled hard under the leadership of father of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah to create single sovereign independent Islamic state, which finally came into being on 15 August 1947.

The celebration of 15th August as ‘Independence Day’ faded its colours after the separation of Eastern part as an independent country ‘Bangladesh’ on 16 December 1971. Interestingly, 15th August continued to be celebrated as ‘Independence Day’ by the masses in Bangladesh but the enemies of Pakistan and Bangladesh could not digest it. In a tragic terrorist attack on 15 August 1975, the great Pakistani-Bengali leader Mujibur Rehman was killed along with 26 persons including his wife, brother, three sons, two daughters in law, near relatives and close associates, turning this joyful event as a sad day to recall. One of the surviving two daughters of Shaheed Sheikh Mujibur Rehman is Hasina Wajid, the present Prime Minister of Bangladesh.

There is no doubt that 16th of December 1971 was the darkest day in the history of Pakistan, which Pakistan observes every year as ‘Day of sorrow and determination to take revenge from our enemies’. On the day Pakistan lost its Eastern part in war with India.  For some, the day marks as a day of relief as East Pakistani got rid of some of their grievances but many West Pakistan view the day when they lost everything as their brothers and sisters changed their identities with a heavy heart. Our common enemies could not digest that despite bitter and hard feelings between the former Pakistani nation, Pakistanis still observe 16th December as ‘Day of sorrow and determination to take revenge from our enemies’.

On 16th of December 2014, the enemies of Pakistan and Bangladesh again played with the sentiments of people of both the countries, when they chose the day of 16th of December to carryout terrorist attack on Army Public School, Warsak Road, Peshawar, martyring over 157 and injuring scores of other. Ever since the terrorist attack, the general masses are trying to observe the day associated with terrorist attack on the school. There is no doubt, the terrorist attack in Bangladesh on 15 August 1975 on the ‘Independence Day of Pakistan’ and  terrorist attack in Pakistan on 16 December 2014 on the ‘Day of sorrow and determination to take revenge from our enemies’ have been carried out by the same enemies. Both the episodes are sad and those who lost their lives will always be remembered but Pakistani and Bangladeshi nation should never forget 15 August and 16 December as Day of Independence and Day of Sorrow.

කංසා සමාන්‍යකරණය කිරීමේ අයවැය යෝජනාවට පසුවදනක්

December 16th, 2018

තුසිත බාලසූරිය ප්‍රධාන ලේකම්, සමාජ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී පක්ෂය          

කංසා ශාකය නීතිගත කරන ලෙසට අප විසින් රාජ්‍යයෙන් ඉතා පැහැදිලි ඉල්ලීමක් කර ඇත. මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශය විසින් කරන ලද ඉල්ලීමකට අනුව අයවැය යෝජනාවක් ලෙස අප එම යෝජනාවලිය ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. එහි අරමුණ කංසා ජාතික ධනය උපයන ශාකයක් බවට පත්කිරීමයි. රටේ ණය ගෙවා දැමීමට ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකයෙක් යෝජනා කිරීම වෙනුවට රටට ධන උපායන මාර්ගයක් අප විසින් ගෙන එයි. එය රටට විශාල විදෙස් විනිමයක් උපයන මිල අධික යෝජනාවකි.

දකුණු ආසියාවේ කංසා නීතිගත කරන පළමු රට බවට පත්වීමට එමගින් ලංකාවට අවස්ථාව උදාවෙයි. මත්පැන් වෙළෙන්දන්, බටහිර ඖෂධ නිෂ්පාදකයින්, වික්ටෝරියානු සදාචාරවාදී වෘත්තිකයන් සමඟ එක්ව මාධ්‍ය මාෆියාව විසින් කංසාවලට විශාල සමාජ අපකීර්තියක් පටබැඳ ඇති නිසා කංසා පිළිබඳ ජනතා මතය ප්‍ර‍සිද්ධියේ ප්‍රකාශ නොවුනත් බහුතරයක් ශ්‍රී ලාංකික ජනතාව සිටින්නේ කංසා නීතිගත කිරීම අනුමත කරන ස්ථාවරයක බව නොඅනුමානය.

කංසාවලට අදාළ නීතිරීති වෙනස් කිරීමට පැවති රජයන් කිහිපයක් උත්සාහ ගත්තේ ය. නීතිය හා සාමය සුරකින පොලිසියද දැනටමත් ඊට යම් අනුමැතියක් ලබා දී තිබේ. නැත්නම් කංසා භාවිතය නිසා අත්අඩංගුවට පත්වන පිරිස මීට වඩා බොහෝ වැඩි වෙති. අධිකරණය වුවද කංසා ස්වල්පයක් ලග තබා ගැනීමේ වරදට නියම කරන්නෙ සුලු දඩ මුදලකි. ව්‍යවස්ථාපිත නීතිය අනුගමනය කිරීමට වඩා භාවිත නීතියේ තරමක සහනයක් ලබා දීමට පොලිසියේ සහ අධිකරණයේ නැඹුරුවක් ඇති බව එමගින් තහවුරු වෙයි.

කංසා නීති විරෝධී වුවත් මත් ජාවාරම්කරුවන් කංසා වෙළදාමේ නිරත වන බව නොරහසකි. ඉන්දියානු ධීවරයින් හරහා ලැබෙන කේරල ගංජා ලංකාවේ බහුතර ජනයා අතර ප්‍ර‍සිද්ධ ය. කංසා බීජ අභිජනනය අතින්ද ඉන්දියාව ඉදිරියට පැමිණ ඇති බව වාර්තා වෙයි. ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කංසා වගාව අනීතිකව පැවතීමෙන් වාසි අත්වන්නේ ඉන්දියාවට ය. ලංකාවේ මුහුදුබඩ ප්‍රදේශවල කංසා වෙළදාම සිදුකරන්නේ යුරෝපයේ සිට එන සංචාරකයින් ය. පසුගිය පස් වසරක් තිස්සේ අප රාජ්‍යයෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ කංසාවලින් රටට ලැබෙන ආර්ථික වාසි අත්හැර නොදමන ලෙසයි.

වගා බලපත්‍ර නිකුත් කිරීම මගින් පුද්ගලික අංශයද ඊට දායක කරගත හැකිය. නමුත් ඔවුන් සියල්ල රජයේ නියාමනයට හෝ හවුල්කාරිත්වයට යටත් විය යුතුය. ඊට අමතරව  රජයට අයත් කංසා බීජ පර්යේෂණ ආයතන, වගා බිම් හා කංසා ආශ්‍රිත කර්මාන්ත ආයතන පිහිටුවීමෙහි සිට රාජ්‍ය ඔසුසැල්වල කංසා අලෙවි කිරීම දක්වා රාජ්‍ය අංශයට ඊට සෘජුව දායක වියහැකි අවස්ථා අපගේ අයවැය යෝජනාවලියේ පැහැදිලිව අන්තර්ගත කර ඇත. ඉදිරියේ කංසා පිළිබඳ පුලුල් සංවාදයක් ඇති කිරීම අපගේ බලාපොරොත්තුවයි.

        

WILL NOT THE 72% TAKE CONTROL OF THE POLITICAL DEMOCRATIC PROCESS IN SRI LANKA. POLITICAL PARTIES BASED ON COMMUNITY, RELIGION AND COMMUNAL BASIS HAS TO BE BANNED IN SRI LANKA.

December 15th, 2018

By Noor Nizam, Peace and Political Activist, Political Communication Researcher, SLFP Stalwart and Convener – “The Muslim Voice”. – December 15th., 2018.

POLITICAL PARTIES BASED ON COMMUNITY, RELIGION AND COMMUNAL BASIS HAS TO BE BANNED IN SRI LANKA BY THE MAJORITY SINHALESE COMMUNITY AND NATIONALIST SINHALA FORCES IMMEDIATELY UNDER ANY NEW CONSTITUTION TO BE PRESENTED IN PARLIAMENT. FOR THIS –  ALL SINHALA FORCES, INCLUDING THE MAHA SANGHA, THE SLFP, UNP (those who love the maathruboomiya”), JVP AND OTHER PATRIOTIC POLITICAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE SLPP/JO SHOULD GIVE THEIR FULLEST SUPPORT TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN. SEVENTY TWO PERCENTAGE (72% ) SINHALA MP’s (voters) CAN EASILY DO THIS. MINORITY REPRESENTATION SHOULD ONLY BE IN THE NATIONAL PARTIES BY MEMBERSHIP AND BY BEING ELECTED FOR OFFICE IN THOSE PARTIES.

THIS IS THE ONLY WAY VOTE BANK CREATION BY MINORITY COMMUNITY POLITICAL LEADERS (THE MUSLIMS AND TAMILS) WHO TRADE THE VOTE BANK FOR SELFISH PERSONAL BENEFITS, FORGOING THE REAL BENEFITS FOR WHICH THE MINORITY GROUPS, ESPECIALLY THE MUSLIM VOTERS CAN BE SURE TO REAP THE TRUE BENEFITS OF THEIR POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS AND INSPIRATIONS, BE MADE POSSIBLE / A REALITY. A good example is the confession made by Rauf Hakeem when Rauf Hakeem admitted that he took money from Mahinda Rajapaksa, then President, to vote in favour of the 18th., Amendment Bill to the constitution on September 8th., 2010. One of the SLMC stalwarts, Segu Dawood exposed this incident and Rauf Hakeem admitted it in public. Browse this web link and learn how this political leader (MP. Rauf Hakeem) got money to vote for the 18th., Amendment in parliament on 8th., September 2010.

http://www.jaffnamuslim.com/2016/07/blog-post_144.html  (for Muslim tamil readers).

In 1994, when the SLMC found an opportunity, supported by R. Premadasa to reduce the cut-off point in proportional representation from 12.5 to 5 per cent, in return NOT to field a Muslim candidate as a Presidential candidate, to stop the Muslims voting Premadasa, the SLMC joined the UNP. That was the beginning of the DEMOCRATIC DOWNFALL” of the aspirations and inspiration of the Sri Lanka Muslim community, because the late M.H.M. Ashraf started to trade with the Muslim vote bank to gain  POLITICAL POWER IN THE CENTER” and get ministerial and deputy ministerial positions, high government statutory posts, diplomatic posts and many other perks for his stooges/henchaiyas. The SLMC splitting into the All Ceylon Muslim Congress, which became the All Ceylon MAKKAL Congress (Rishad Bathiudeen) and the National Muslim Congress which later became the National Congress (Atthaullah, regional Eastern province Muslim party), began to adopt THIS POLITICAL TRADING OF THE MUSLIM VOTES” and making DEALS” that was of NO BENEFIT, BUT DETRIMENTAL TO THE MUSLIM FACTOR” which were supported by the All Ceylon Jamiyathul Ulema and so-called Muslim Civil Society groups, whose leadership also were given a SHARE” of these SPOILS and BENEFITS”, became the NORM” of the SLMC, ACMC, NATIONAL CONGRES, ACJU, THE NATIONAL SHOORA COUNCIL and the MUSLIM COUNCIL OF SRI LANKA, in the equation of Minority politics in Sri Lanka since 1994/1980. As a result of these deceptions, the Muslims in Sri Lanka do NOT have a voice – a POLITICAL VOICE” for that purpose. The Muslims did not benefit to resolve their economical, employment, development, land education and fundamental rights issues by VOTING the SLMC, ACMC or THE NATIONAL CONGRESS. The Muslims became POLITICAL ORPHANS” in Sri Lanka at last. Today this has become a MENACE and a SICKNESS in the democratic political process of our country. Not only has it affected the Sri Lanka Muslims, but also PRALALYSED THE DEMOCRATICE RIGHT OF THE MAJORITY SINHALA COMMUNITY WHICH IS 72% OF THE NATION TO MAKE ANY DECECIVE POLITICAL CONCLUSSION BENEFICAL TO THEIR AND OUR MAATHRUBOOMIYA” OR TO AMEND / ADJUST THE CONSTITUTION TO THEIR NEEDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE NATION AND OUR MAATHRUBOOMIYA”. The present constitutional conflict in parliament is a reslt of this POLITICAL PLIGHT”, where Democracy is killing Constitutional Democracy”

With the media uncovering the corruption and deception of the Muslim political leaders in recent times and exposing these DECEPTIVE AND HOODWINKING” Muslim politicians and their operating beneficial gangs, the Muslim political culture has begun to change. Today this VOTE BANK TRADING BY MINORITY MUSLIM AND TAMIL POLITICAL PARTY LEADERS” has become a MENACE and a SICKNESS in the democratic political process of our country. THIS HAS TO STOP FORTHWITH FOR A HEALTHY POLITICAL PROCESS TO TAKE PLACE IN OUR COUNTRY and the RIGHT for the voters to decide what their communities should do and the majority who are SINHALA VOTERS to decide what is best for the country they should do.

As for the Muslim Minority Community, the fact remains NOW, the Muslim voters are acting on their ownand do NOT wish to be represented by these MUNAAFIKK and DECEPTIVE POLITICIANS”. THE SLMC AND ACMC MP’S SHOULD ALSO ACT ON THEIR OWN NOW, Insha Allah. We Muslims should set an example like our predecessors who TRUSTED” the majority community in the wake of the British trying to delay giving us independence in 1948. The role of Dr. T B Jayah becomes paramount at this moment to recollect, because had he, or the Muslim community, sided with the British at that time, granting of Independence to Ceylon would have been postponed. It is only because the minorities agreed that there was a United Front of Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims asking for Independence. But one man was against it. That was G G Ponnambalam who tried to extract his pound of flesh. He said I will sign on the dotted line only if you agree to Fifty Fifty”. That is 50% of the seats for the Sinhalese and 50% for the minorities. Only if you agree to that, he told D S Senanayake, will I support the call for independence. It was at this point that Jayah rejected the ‘fifty fifty’ formula. He said he preferred to work in trust, to work in faith and goodwill with the majority community.Thereby T.B.Jayah totally undercut G G Ponnambalam’s fifty fifty” cry. That was the death knell of Fifty Fifty”. If Jayah joined the fifty fifty” cry at that time, Independence would have been postponed. One has to remember that even the word Sinhala was erased from the political lexicon. S W R D Bandaranaike ditched the idea of the Sinhala Maha Saba and he first joined the UNP and later set up the Sri Lanka Freedom Party which too did not have racial connotations. Everybody felt that communal parties were counter-productive. It is time up that a NEW POLITICAL FORCE” that will be honest and sincere that will produce CLEAN” and diligent Muslim Politicians to stand up and defend the Muslim Community politically and otherwise, especially from among the YOUTH has to RISE”, and this NEW POLITICAL FORCE” has to support the new government of PM Mahinda Rajapaksa and the majority Sinhalese citizens notwithstanding the fact that the Tamils of the North and East and the Upcountry Tamils and all minorities should be equally respected, politically, for a better Sri Lanka, God willing, Insha Allah.

 Re: Tamil Heritage Month launch reflects pain of Sri Lanka’s war.

December 15th, 2018

Asoka Weerasinghe Kings Grove Crescent . Gloucester . Ontario . K1J 6G1 Canada 

15 December 2018

MIKE ADLER
TORONTO. COM

Dear Mike:

Re: Tamil Heritage Month launch reflects pain of Sri Lanka’s war.

With my ongoing interest in this 30 year long Tamil Eelam War in my Homeland,

Sri Lanka, which ended with the last bullet penetrating the forehead of the Tamil Tiger leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, on the sandy beach of the Nandikadal lagoon in Mullaitivu, at sundown on 19 May, 2009,, I was intrigued to read your take on it in your article -Tamil Heritage Month launch reflects pain of Sri Lanka’s  war.

You know what Mike.  After reading it, my stomach made somersaults laughing at it.

That article of yours confirmed one more time that what P.T.Barnum said –There is a Sucker born every minute.  That’s a pity.  Let me elaborate You (Mike Adler) said – The pain of the war that brought Tamils to Canada still, lingers, nearly 10 years after it ended.”

I (Asoka Weerasinghe) says – That is sad, isn’t it!  Makes me ooze crocodile tears for these Tamils. What pain of War”, may I ask you Mike?   

The riots that began at sundown on 24 July, 1983, in Colombo, when unfortunately, the Tamils got a heck of a hiding with their shops in flames, and some deaths, and the world’s floodgates were opened asunder to them saying by the bleeding-heart international saviours,  Come running to our safe arms”. And so they came in rickety iron-corroding fishing trawlers and planes with some legitimate  and others with illegitimate forged passports.  It was a million dollar business,   The market value for one of these forged passports with entry documents went for Cdn. $25,000 a piece.   Ask the Toronto Metro police and they will tell you.

Of the Tamil refugees who came over, the majority, I would classify as ‘Economic Refugees’. If they had wanted to immigrate through the legitimate point system,  they wouldn’t have had a snowball’s chance in hell to come into Canada. And that’s a FACT, and these Tamils know it.  Did I tell you earlier that a Sucker is born every minute!  Ummmmmm!!!!!  How true, Canada!

It intrigues me as to why these Tamils who landed in the West, like Canada, US, UK, France, Germany and Norway, etc., thumbed their noses at their legitimate Motherland, Tamil Nadu, in South India, where 80-million of their kith and  kin live, when flying over or sailing by it to the western lands in rickety Fishing Trawlers.   And,  of course, no sooner these Convention Refugees get their landed status/permanent residency and the Canadian Passport, they are on the first flight to Sri Lanka, from where they ran away from saying that they were persecuted and discriminated.  Go figure that one out, Mike! 

Even prior to getting their Canadian passports, these Convention Tamil refugees came to the Sri Lanka High Commission in Ottawa in their thousands every October, November and December, with telegrams in their hands from Sri lanka, saying: Father  dying of cancer, come home immediately. Or Mother dying of cancer, come home immediately.” 

Mike, How do you know” you may ask me.  That is a fair question.  I know it as I had a stint as a senior locally recruited officer, and had to deal with these Tamil refugees, when the First Secretary was not available.  I did tell these Tamil refugees, however, that I was amazed that every October , November and December there is a Cancer epidemic in Sri Lanka which afflicts only the Tamil parents and not a single Sinhalese, Muslim or Burgher parent.  That was how it was between 1989 and 1994 when I was employed at the Sri Lanka High Commision in Ottawa.   Whoopee do…what a fraudulent hoot!  Did I not tell you that  there seems to be a Sucker born every minute, and Canada was certainly prone to that notion.  What a hoot!

Mike you said, The pain of the war……..”  Do you know who had suffered the pain most?   Between 1971 and 1981, much earlier than when the riots happened, were my people, the Sinhalese, when 27,000 of them who had been living in the North for generations, were threatened, terrorised and kicked out by the separatist Tamils. A Classroom Textbook example of ‘Ethnic Cleansing’.  Did you know that?  Did these Tamils tell you you that?  Of course, not.  How could they in case they would be painted as a bunch of crafty liars who wanted to find greener pastures away from home, where the roads were paved with gold, and earn a welfare cheque in Canadian dollars which most of them would earn  more in Sri Lankan rupees a month  than what they earned in Sri Lanka.   Aren’t they a bunch of lucky people.  Luckier than the Tamils who stayed back, as they couldn’t afford a plane ticket or  pay the owner of a rickety corroding fishing trawler to be  sailed over to western shores. The June 1983 riots in Colombo were a God’s send for these refugee Tamils, 

These Tamils were ethnic cleansing maestros” which was the genesis of them creating a Powder Keg which was waiting to go off anytime.  It happened on 24 July 1983 with a bang, fire and smoke.

Here is a short menu of their ‘ethnic cleansing’  acts of the Sinhalese majority, but there are more items.

  1.  In August 1977, the separatist Tamils chased 400 Sinhalese undergraduates and lecturers from the Jaffna Campus, and the buses that carried them South were attacked with a hail of rocks and stones;
  2. ‘Ethnic cleansing’ of Sinhalese in the Vauniya District in 1984 – with 73 Sinhalese shot dead in their villages to create a fear psychosis and  make the Sinhalese leave on their own, 6000 Sinhalese refugees are still  waiting to return to their ancestral homes in Wanni;
  1. ‘Ethnic cleansing’ of Sinhalese in the Trincomalee District  in 1984 – over 150 Sinhalese throughout the District including Buddhist (I am a Buddhist) monks have been killed and 20,000 refugees remain; 
  1. ‘Ethnic  cleansing’ of Sinhalese in Ampara District in 1980s – attempts  to chase out Sinhalese by attacking villages and killing hundreds of  Sinhalese while sleeping in their adobe houses was with the sole intention of forcing the Sinhalese out of the areas of North and East to  claim that these were Tamil areas, and so forth.  There are scores more  of  such ‘ethnic  cleansing’ incidents of the Sinhalese by the Tamils.  And that gets my goat, Mike. 

Your article of the Tamil pain, does not tell your readers the truth.  And that is unfair on my people, the Sri Lankan-Sinhalese Canadians, and I am one of them.  And I resent it.

Mike you sid, The pain of War……..” And I ask you What pain of War?”  You have missed a  Fact about this War.   This war was fought by two conventional Armies.  One was the separatist Tamil Tiger terrorists who were fighting to create a mono-ethnic, separate Tamil racist state, Eelam, carved out of 33% of productive real estate in the North and East of the island bordered by 60% of the coastline for 12.6% of the Tamil population,  The other was the Sri Lanka army who had been trained to safeguard the sovereignty and territorial integrity of that democratic island nation, Sri Lanka, which also happened to be my Motherland.

You give the impression that the Tamils are in pain”, and not the Sinhalese whose soldiers and innocent civilians were killed in the thousands and that those who won the war, are still celebrating lighting the skies with fireworks  and partying eating strings of Tamil Nadu Masala Wade with a fried shrimp curled on the top, and drinking coconut shells filled with Jaffna toddy.  That is poppycock, Mike.    That is Bull.  Give me a break.  Every soldier and innocent Sinhalese killed too were God’s children and had a mother, father and siblings like those of the Tamils who got killed in this unnecessary war.  After 10 years of ending the Sinhalese are still grieving and in pain as those Tamils you have portrayed in your article.  These chest thumping Mothers are still crying.  And that is no Fairy Tale So let’s cut out this crap, Mike.  Let’s be honest and lets portray the true picture of what it is after 10 years of ending the war in both communities, the Tamils and the Sinhalese.  Anything else would be fraudulent journalism which is not worth two prairie straws waving in the summer wind.

I notice in your article, the photos of the second generation Tamil youngsters used as pawns by the adult Tamils reflecting their celebratory-pain.

I wish they would have the courage to tell their Amma” (Mother) and Appa (Father).   Listen, we know that you are angry with the Sinhalese in Sri Lanka, and your dream is to have your own separate, racist Tamil state, Eelam, but  keep us out of it.  We are here as Canadians, and some of us were born here, and we don’t want to get involved in your sxxt” and you can stew in it but don’t pull us into the pot.

 If not for the riots of July 1983, we wouldn’t  have been here, and so Thank You  God for that happening.

Amma, Appa so please let us live in Canada as Canadians and get on with our lives.  If you hate the Sinhale, so be it as it is not our problem, but don’t brainwash us to be hateful towards them, either.  Dinesh an Sriyani, both Sinhalese are in my Class, and they are good friends of mine.  And I want to continue being their friends, and they are good youngsters.

So please…please leave us alone.” 

Mike, there is a Sinhalese-Canadian community in Toronto.  Meet them and have a dialogue with them.  They are a decent and an honest community.  Give it a try and you will see the other side of the coin and how different it is as you have been preached by the separatist Tamil Eelamists in Toronto,  feeding you with their Kilinochchi-Fairy Tales.,  You won’t regret it. 

Sincerely,

Asoka Weerasinghe (Mr.)


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress