පොත සමාලෝචනය කිරිම : ලෝක අර්බුදය සහ සාමය සඳහා වූ මාර්ගය.

September 1st, 2018

අබ්දුල් අසීස් ප‍්‍රචාරක ලේඛම් අහ්මදිය්යා මුස්ලිම් ජමාත්

අහ්මදිය්යා මුස්ලිම් ජමාතයේ පස්වැනි කලීෆා නායකවරයාණන් විසින් ලෝක සාමය ස්ථාපිත කිරීම සඳහා ලෝක බලවතුන් සහ රාජ්‍ය තාන්ති‍්‍රකයින්ට දෙන ලද අගනා දේශනාවන් සහ ඔවුන්ට යැවු ලිපි ගොනුව මෙම ග‍්‍රන්ථයෙහි ඇතුලත් කර ඇත.

අද ලෝකය දැඩි අර්බුදකාරි යුගයක් පසු කරමින් සිටියි. ලෝක අර්බුදය දැඩි අවදානමකට පත්වෙමින් පවතින බව එහි නවතම වූත් බියකරු වූත් ස්වභාවය අපට දිනපතා මෙන්ම නිරතුරුවම පෙන්නුම් කරයි. වත්මන් සිදුවීම් මනාව පෙන්නුම් කරන්නේ අප නොසිතූ අති භයානක තුන් වැනි ලෝක යුද්ධය කරා අප පෙළගස්වමින් සිටින බවයි. මෙම කි‍්‍රයාවලිය ඉතා ඉක්මනින් පාලනය කළ නොහැකි බවට සම්පූර්ණ අවබෝධයක් ඇති වී තිබෙන මොහොතේ සාමය සඳහා වූ මාර්ගය වෙත මිනිස් වර්ගයා යොමු කොට ස්ථීර වූත් තිරසාර වූත් මගපෙන්වීමක් මගින් මිනිසාගේ සිත් සතන් තුල විශ්වාසනීයභාවය ප‍්‍රතිස්ථාපනය කළ හැකි නායකත්වයක් දැකීම මිනිසුන්ගේ පරම බලාපොරොත්තුව වී තිබේ. න්‍යෂ්ටික යුද්ධයක් නිසා සිදුවිය හැකි අති භයන්කාර විනාශය කොතරම් දැයි කිවතොත් එ් ගැන සිතීමට පවා නොහැකිය.

එ් ගැන එතුමා විසින් තමන්ගේ නිරන්තර උත්සාහය තුලින් ඉස්ලාමීය සැබෑ ඉගැන්වීම් විවිධ මාර්ගයන් හි විශේෂයෙන්ම ඇමරිකාවේ කැපිටල් හිල් සහ යුරෝපය, බි‍්‍රතාන්‍ය, අයර්ලන්තය, නවසීලන්තය, ඕලන්ද යනාදි රටවල්හි පාර්ලිමේන්තුවල නීතිරීති සකස් කරන්නන්හට දේශනා පවත්වමින්ද ලෝක නායකයින්හට ලිපි මගින් දැනුවත් කරමින්ද මුළු ලොවට ලබාදුන් අගනා මගපෙන්වීම් සම්භාරයක් මෙම පොතෙහි අන්තර්ගත වී ඇත.

මෙම පොත ඪගඡුගඡු තැපැල් ගාස්තුව හැර නොමිලේ ලබාගත හැක. ලබා ගත හැකි මධ්‍යස්ථානය නොග 619/4ල බේස්ලයින් පාර, දෙමටගොඩ, කොළඹ 9 යන ලිපිනයට යොමු වෙන්න. මෙම පොත කළින් වෙන්කර ගැනීම සඳහා දුරකථන අංක 011 2 687 568, 077 5353 675, 077 7753 440 වෙතට සම්බන්ධ වන්න.

අබ්දුල් අසීස්
ප‍්‍රචාරක ලේඛම්
අහ්මදිය්යා මුස්ලිම් ජමාත්

Aeroflot launches flights to new international destinations: Colombo, Gothenburg, Ljubljana

September 1st, 2018

Courtesy Russian Aviation

Aeroflot opens regular flights to Colombo, Gothenburg, Ljubljana. Flights will operate under the winter schedule effective 28 October 2018 through 30 March 2019. Tickets are available for purchase.

Colombo is the largest city of Sri Lanka and its financial and cultural centre. It is the main tourist hub from which travellers start their journeys across the country. Five weekly flights on Airbus A330 aircraft will operate on the following schedules:

Moscow-Colombo (all times local):

– flight SU 0286 will depart Sheremetyevo on Mondays, Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays at 22:05, and arrive in Colombo at 9:05.

– return flight SU 0287 will depart Colombo on Mondays, Tuesdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays at 10:45, and arrive at Sheremetyevo at 17:30.

Gothenburg is the second-largest city in Sweden and one of the cultural capitals of Scandinavia. Part of Gothenburg lies on the Southern Archipelago just off the coast and is connected to the mainland by public boat and ferry services.  Daily flights on Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft will operate on the following schedules:

Moscow-Gothenburg (all times local):

– flight SU 2180 will depart Sheremetyevo on Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays at 21:05 and arrive in Gothenburg (Landvetter airport) at 21:40. Flight SU2180 will depart SVO on Tuesdays at 21:25, arriving in Gothenburg at 22:00.

– return flight SU 2181 will depart Gothenburg (Landvetter airport) daily at 00:20 and arrive in Moscow at 04:45.

Ljubljana is the capital of Slovenia, its main political, financial and cultural centre. It is popular among tourists for its architecture and the medieval Ljubljana Castle complex standing on a hill above the city’s downtown. Daily flights on Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft will operate on the following schedules:

Moscow-Ljubljana (all times local):

– flight SU 2610 will depart Sheremetyevo at 9:05 and arrive in Ljubljana at 10:20.

– return flight SU 2611 will depart Ljubljana at 11:30 and arrive at Sheremetyevo at 16:40.

Further information can be obtained and tickets booked at Aeroflot’s 24-hour contact-centre on +7-495-223-5555 (Moscow), 8-800-444-5555 (free call within Russia), or global toll-free numbers, or at the airline’s sales offices, or on the company’s website.

 

DOES AEROFLOT STILL USE RUSSIAN PLANES?

September 1st, 2018

I have three problem airlines” at Award Expert, airlines that clients are very hesitant to fly.

The first is Turkish Airlines. I have made the case for why Turkish is safe and a slam-dunk choice, but the resistance continues. The second is EgyptAir. I went out of my way to fly EgyptAir recently, ready to either stop even proposing it to clients or start making a stronger case for it. It turned out that I had an excellent experience.

The third airlines is Aeroflot Russian Airlines. I get that the reputation of the airline in its Soviet days was rightfully poor. Nevertheless, the Aeroflot of today is nothing like the Aeroflot of the past. I flew Aeroflot a decade ago from Moscow to Hong Kong in business class and had a great experience. Lucky and Tiffany recently flew Aeroflot and also had a good experience. With lie-flat seats in business class, modern aircraft, tremendous food, and great service, there is no rational reason to avoid Aeroflot.

But that modern aircraft” concern continues to be a roadblock for many. Just last week, we received an Award Expert trip request from a client for a trip to Russia. The instructions were crystal clear: No Russian airlines because I don’t trust their airplanes”. After I explained that Aeroflot has modern Boeing and Airbus aircraft, the client was happy to book on Aeroflot and fly non-stop. But the client’s confusion is something I hear a lot. So let’s discuss it.

Does Aeroflot Still Use Russian Planes?

Yes, it does. BUT not for any long-haul flights and not for the shuttle between St. Petersburg and Moscow. Unless you are going deeper into Russia, you’ll find yourself on modern American or European planes. If you do go deeper into Russia, you’ll find yourself on brand-new, modern Russian jets.

Aeroflot Fleet

Aeroflot boasts that is has one of the youngest in the world”. As of March 1, 2017 Aeroflot includes 190 passenger aircraft, with an average age of 4.3 years.

The Aeroflot fleets consists of:

  • 15 Boeing 777
  • 21 Boeing 737
  • 22 Airbus A330
  • 33 Airbus A321
  • 69 Airbus A320
  • 30 Sukhoi SuperJet-100

Sukhoi SuperJet-100?

Yes, that is a brand new Russian aircraft. With the retirement of the Ilyushin-96 last year and the Tuplolev-154 many years earlier, the Soviet-era fleet is retired. The SSJ-100 carriers 12 passengers in business class and 75 in economy class. With a range of 4000KM, it can cover a fair distance but the Russians are pragmatic—they understand that people do not like flying Russian” planes and so keep this model off most European routes. Then again, you’ll find this airplane on CityJet, Brussels, and bmi regional as well.

Aeroflot Russian Planes
Sergey Kuzmishkin / Wikimedia Commons

CONCLUSION

Aeroflot has a stellar safety record, a great onboard product, and one of the youngest fleets in the world. With both great pricing and award availability, there is no rational reason to avoid flying Aeroflot.

Muslims are not as bad as we think

September 1st, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

My wife who works in a private hospital  has come across a 26 year Sinhala girl who had a renal ( kindney )failure failure .She used to come to the hospital for dialysis twice a week .As the family had spent all their money ,my wife with another doctor helped them financially .They have placed an advertisement in the daily papers asking for a kidney donor .Many Sinhalese  have contacted them and requested advance money before  they are even checked the suitability of the Kidney.

They were contacted by a Muslim mother who had a daughter of same age and offered her kidney free of charge .Operation of transplant was done in Maligakanda hospital and operation very successful. She is doing well.

The point I want to make is that the perception we Sinhalese have about Muslims, including the (Not so) venerable monk who jailed, is not correct . Muslims are not bad people .but Americans and Jews have created the problems for them to fight back.

My other question is why can’t all these venerable monks donate their organs to the people rather than going around the country creating a mayhem?

 

Decks cleared for arrest of top military chief

September 1st, 2018

ECONOMYNEXT –Courtesy The Island

Arrangements are in place for the long-awaited arrest of  Sri Lanka’s  senior-most military officer in connection with an extortion racket and the horrific murder of 11 young men, official sources said.

The Colombo Fort magistrate on Wednesday ordered the arrest of Admiral Ravindra Wijegunaratne after the CID said it had evidence of him shielding the main suspect, a navy intelligence officer.

Despite the unprecedented order seeking the arrest of a military officer equivalent to the rank of a four-star general in the army, Wijegunaratne continued to receive visiting foreign dignitaries.

Incidentally, Wijegunaratne was attending the funeral of one of his predecessors, General Rohan Daluwatte, when the court made the stunning pronouncement against him.

The order came at a time when President Maithripala Sirisena was out of the country, attending a regional summit in Nepal.

It is suspected that political pressure prevented his arrest in December 2016 in connection with a different case. Television footage caught Wijegunaratne, the then navy chief, punching a cameraman covering a trade union protest at the Hambantota port.President Sirisena granted Wijegunaratne an extension of service and made him the Chief of Defence staff, a largely ceremonial role, in August last year.

The 56-year-old  Royal College alumnus is likely to be arrested and produced before a magistrate this week .

The police Criminal Investigations Department has told the Colombo Fort Magistrate Lanka Jayaratne that Wijegunaratne is believed to have funded navy intelligence officer Hettiarachchi Mudiyanselage Chandana Prasad Hettiarachchi alias Navy Sampath to escape the police net.

The magistrate has ordered the Bank of Ceylon to release details of transactions of a navy account between March and May last year.  The admiral is alleged to have given 500,000 rupees from the navy to Hettiarachchi to escape arrest.

At the time of his arrest earlier this month, Hettiarachchi had in his possession several fake identity cards, including one which he is believed to have used to obtain a passport and travel abroad.

The CID has uncovered chilling details of how children and young men of wealthy families were abducted for ransom by a gang of navy officers, allegedly led by Hettiarachchi, and subsequently killed after holding them at naval facilities in Colombo and Trincomalee between 2008 and 2009.

The alarm was raised by the then navy commander, Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda, who complained to the CID during the former regime of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.  However, the case has dragged with powerful political interests protecting the suspects, police said.

Police said the current CDS and ex-navy chief was not implicated in the abductions or the murders, but he was accused of shielding the suspects and providing them cash and protection.

Several other navy intelligence officers, including former navy spokesman D. K. P. Dassanayake, who were arrested in connection with the murders have now been released on bail.

Interview: Inclusive infrastructure, social projects to boost Sri Lanka’s sustainable growth: ADB vice president

September 1st, 2018

By Jamila Najmuddin Source: Xinhua

COLOMBO, Sept. 1 (Xinhua) — Inclusive infrastructure and social projects in Sri Lanka will help boost the island country’s economic growth, while active participation in regional cooperation and integration (RCI) will enhance connectivity, trade and investment with other countries in the region and beyond, Wencai Zhang, vice president of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), told Xinhua in a recent interview.

At the conclusion of a three-day visit to Sri Lanka, Zhang said he was glad to see ADB-funded projects in the island country in general had been well prepared and implemented and would bring tangible benefits to the local population.

In the village of Handapanagala, Zhang spoke to residents who had benefited from an energy project. He also visited a technical college in Southern Province, which offers vocational training courses, and the site of a proposed Integrated Water Productivity Improvement Project.

When asked to comment about projects assisted by China and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in Sri Lanka, Zhang said “In Sri Lanka, BRI has been supporting the country to build major infrastructures, such as highways, ports, airports, and urban development. Inclusive design and quality implementation are key to extend the project benefits to the community and the people. Sri Lanka may take advantage of BRI and other RCI mechanisms such as South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) to unleash its economic potentials”.

The ADB vice president also noted that China’s investments in Sri Lanka’s social sector such as health, agriculture, irrigation, and education are increasing.

“The development of infrastructure together with social sector projects would jointly improve the livelihood of local people and boost employment and eliminate poverty.” Zhang added.

Noting that Sri Lanka faces a number of development challenges including the recent low economic growth compared to other countries in the region and the demand for more structural reforms, Zhang said the ADB is committed to supporting Sri Lanka’s continued development drive, with innovative and integration solutions, in line with ADB’s new long-term corporate blueprint, Strategy 2030.

Zhang also said in the future the ADB is willing to co-finance with any organization or government who aimed to carry out development projects in Sri Lanka, including China.

As of July 31, ADB’s active project portfolio in Sri Lanka stood at 35 projects with a net loan amount of 3.9 billion U.S. dollars.

Zhang said ADB expects to sign a total of 1 billion U.S. dollar in financing for nine projects in 2018. Over the next three years, commitments will total 3 billion U.S. dollars addressing ports, railways, roads, secondary and higher education, electricity transmission and distribution, fisheries, irrigation, wastewater management, drinking water, sanitation, and support for small and medium enterprises.

කොළඹට කැඳවන පොදු ජන සේනා

September 1st, 2018

මාගම්පුත්‍ර උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

“ලබන 5දා කොළඹට ගලන ජන ගඟ ආණ්ඩුව ගෙදර යැවීමේ පෙරනිමිත්තක්. ඒ නිසා මේ වැඩේ උපරිමයෙන් කෙරෙන්න ඕනෑ. අඩුවක් තියෙන්න බැහැ. හැම පැත්තෙන්ම එක් රැස්වන මහා ජන ගංගාවක් පෙන්වලා ආණ්ඩුව හෙල්ලෙන වැඩක් කරන්න ඕනෑ. ඒ නිසා හැම දෙයක්ම දෙතුන්වාරයක් හොයලා, විමසලා හරියටම සංවිධානය කර ගන්න ඕන.” ඒකාබද්ධයේ ප්‍රබලයන් මේ සටහන තබන මොහොත වන විට එසේ තම ක්‍රියාධරයන් උනන්දු කරවමින් උපරිම කැපවීමකය.

මහින්ද, බැසිල්, ගෝඨා සහ චමල්ද වෙන කවරදාකවත් නැති උනන්දුවකින් මේ සියල්ල අධ්‍යයනය කරමින් පෙරමුණේය. මෙය මෙහෙයුමක් පමණක් නොව ස්වකීය දේශපාලන අනාගතයේ තීරණත්මක හැරවුමක් ඇති කරන්නක් බව සියල්ලෝම හඳුනාගත් බවක්ද පෙනෙන්නට ඇත.

“අපට හිතවත් සියලුම මාධ්‍ය මේ මහජන ගංගාව, උද්ඝෝෂණය ගැන හරි තොරතුරු රටටම කියන්න කටයුතු කරාවි. ඒ අතරේ 5දාත් ඊට ඉස්සර 4දාත් ආණ්ඩුවේ මාධ්‍ය තමන්ගේ වසර තුන ඇතුළත කරපු දේත් වෙනදාට වඩා හොඳින් පෙන්වන්න සූදානමින් ඉන්නවා. ඒ නිසා ආණ්ඩුවෙ උත්සාහය මේ ජන ගංගාවේ කටයුතුවලට බාධා කිරීමයි. ඒ නිසා ගැටුමකට නොගිහින් ජන බලය පවුරක් වගේ මහින්ද වටා ඉන්නා බව පෙන්වන්නම ඕනෑ.” මේ මෙහෙයුමේ ප්‍රචාරක කටයුතු භාරගත් ප්‍රබලයන් සියලුදෙනා කටයුතු පැවැරූ ඒ ඒ සංවිධායකයන් දැනුවත් කරමින් මෙම මෙහෙයුමේ ප්‍රබල බව වැඩි කරන්නට දැඩි උත්සාහයකය.

බැසිල්ගේ ක්‍රියාන්විතය ඊටත් වඩා ගැඹුරින් ක්‍රියාත්මකය. ඔහු වැඩ පැවැරූ අය එම කටයුතු නිසි ලෙසින් ඉටුකර පෙන්වන තැනකය. මේ අතර මහින්ද වටා සිටින ඔහුට ඉතා හිතවත් උපදේශකයන්ගේ අදහස වී ඇත්තේ…

“පසුගිය කාලෙ ගෝඨා – බැසිල් – චමල් අල්ලලා එක එක කතා පැතිරෙව්වනේ. ඒ නිසා මේ ඒකාබද්ධ මෙහෙයුමේදී ඔය කියන කිසිම සහෝදරයෙක් කර අරින්නේ නෑ. ඒ ඵය මහින්ද මහත්තයා එක්ක එකාවන්ව හිටගෙන, සහෝදර බැම්මෙන් මේ දේශපාලන ව්‍යාපාරය මෙහෙයවනවා කියලා මේ වැඩෙන් අපි පෙන්වන්න ඕනෑ.” කියලාය.

තවත් සමහරුන්ගේ අදහස වී තිබෙන්නේ මෙම ජන උද්ඝෝෂණයේදී මාධ්‍ය වෙත අදහස් ප්‍රකාශ කිරීමේදී ඒ ඒ නියෝජිතයන් එම ව්‍යායාමයට හානියක් නොවන විදියට කතා කළ යුතු බවයි. පරස්පර කතා නොකිය යුතු බවයි.

“මේ ආණ්ඩුව පුංචි ඡන්දය වසර එකහමාරක් කල් දාලා බැරිම තැන තිබ්බා. පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණයත් කල් දාන්නේ දිනන්න බැරි නිසයි. ඒ නිසා ආණ්ඩුවක් විදියට මෛත්‍රිත් – රනිලුත් එක පැත්තක ඉඳලා එකට වැඩ කරන නිසා ජනතාවට මේ දෙන්නගෙ වැඩ බැරි කමත්, ඡන්දෙට තියෙන අකැමැත්ත ගැනත් කියන්න ඕනෑ. ඡන්දෙට බය වෙන්නේ ඒකාබද්ධයේ ජන බලය බලවත් නිසා බව ජනතාවට කියන්න ඕනෑ.”

කෙසේ වෙතත් මේ සංවිධාන ශක්තිය විවිධ ආකාරයෙන් ක්‍රියාත්මක වන ආකාරය පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු ආණ්ඩුවේ බුද්ධි අංශ හරහා මෙන්ම ඒකාබද්ධයත් ශ්‍රී ලනිපයත් අතර සිටිමින් දෝලනය වන සාමාජිකයන් හරහා එජාපයටද ගලායෑම නිසා එජාපය මේ විරෝධතාවට මුහුණදෙන හැටි දැනගන්න ජනාධිපතිවරයාව රහසිගතව හමුවුණේය.

මංගල, මලික් හා සජිත් රනිල් සමඟ ඊට සහභාගි වූයේ හීන් සීරුවේය.

“මේ ජන ගංගාව ගේන්නේ උපරිම ශක්තිය යොදවලයි. ඒකට අපි බය වෙලා බ්ලොක් කරන්න නරකයි. එන්න දෙන්න තියෙන්නේ. ඒ ඇවිත් හිරවෙලා කෑ ගහලා ගියාදෙන්. පොලිසිය දමලා බාධා කරලා ගැටුමක් ඇති කරවන්න ඉඩ දෙන්න නරකයි.”

එහෙත් ශ්‍රී ලනිප පාර්ශ්වයේ අදහස වූයේ මෙය ආණ්ඩුව වට්ටන කඩාකප්පල්කාරී ක්‍රියාවක් නිසා පොලිසිය යොදවන්න සමහර විට වේවිය කියලාය.

“කොයි පැත්තෙන් එනවද කියන්නෙත් නෑ. ඇවිත් රොක්වෙන තැන ඉඟි කරන්නෙත් නෑ. ඒ නිසා ඒ ගැන හිතන්න ඕන නෑ. ඔහේ ඇවිත් ගියදෙන්.”

එජාපයේ ස්ථාවරය යළිත් මතු කෙරුණේ එසේය. මෛත්‍රි හා රනිල් ආණ්ඩුවක් හැටියට එක්වී මීට මුහුණ දිය යුතු වන තැනට මතුපිටින් නොපෙන්වුවද තීන්දු කර හමාරය.
කෙසේ වෙතත් ජන ගංගාව ගලද්දී මහජනතාව අතරින් නැඟෙන සටන් පාඨ පවා ඒකාබද්ධයේ ප්‍රබලයන්ගේ උපදෙස් මත කිසියම් පිළිවෙළකට ඉදිරිපත් කරන්න වෙනදට වඩා සැලසුම් සහගත දෙයක් කෙරෙමින් පවතින්නේය. රටේ සම්පත් විකිණීම, ජාතික ධනය හොරකම් කිරීම, මැතිවරණ කල් දැමීම වැනි මාතෘකා කිව හැකි මුත් ඊටත් වඩා ජනතාවට දැනෙන, බඩට දැනෙන, හිතට වදින මාතෘකාව තෝරා ගත යුතුයි. ඇතැමෙක් අදහස් පළ කළහ.

කෙසේ හෝ වැඩිම බස්රථ සංඛ්‍යාවක්, වාහන සංඛ්‍යාවක් කොළඹට පැමිණෙද්දී සිදුවන තදබදය හා අපහසුතාව වළක්වන්නට බැරි නිසා මෙය ලෝකයටම පුවත් මවන, විරෝධතාවක් විදියට පෙන්වන්නට මහින්ද සූදානම්ය. මේ පෙළගැස්මත් තමන් හා තම පිලේ ප්‍රබලයන් ආණ්ඩුව කොටු කරගන්නට හදන රහසිගත උත්සාහයත් හොඳින් දැන සිටින මහින්ද මේ උද්ඝෝෂණය මඟින් එහි බරපතළකම රටට දන්වන්නට සූදානමින්ය. ඔහු පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය පෙරට ගන්නට සූදානම් වන්නේ, බල කරන්නට හදන්නේ ඉන් ජන බලය පෙන්වා ජයග්‍රාහී මානසිකත්වයෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරණයකට යන්නටය. ජනාධිපතිවරණය පසෙකට දමා පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දයට බලමුළු කැඳවීමක්, ජන ජය තහවුරු කර ගැනීමක් මහින්ද මෙයින් අපේක්‍ෂා කරන්නේය.

අන් කවරකුටත් වඩා හොඳින් ආණ්ඩුවේ නාඩි අල්ලන මහින්ද තමන් වටා සිටින සියලු උපදේශකයන්ටත් වඩා හොඳින් කළ යුතුම දේ දැන සිටින්නේය. ඒ බව දනවමින් මහින්ද කියූවක් මෙසේය.

“අද ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් නැති දර්ශනයක් නැති පිරිසක් තමයි ආණ්ඩු කරන්නේ. අපි නොවෙයි හොරු කිව්වේ. දෙන්නට දෙන්නා චෝදනා ඉදිරිපත් කරනවා. අලුත් අධිකරණ හදන විට අපි දැනගත්තා දේශපාලන මර්දනයටයි කියලා. ආණ්ඩුව රටේ නීතිය වෙනස් කළා. නඩු පහළොස් දහසක්, විසිදහසක් විතර තියෙනවා. නමුත් අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන නඩු තෝරන්නේ ඇමැතිවරුයි. නීතිපති ගෙන්නල කියනවා මේ නඩුටික දාන්න කියලා. මේක තමයි මර්දනය කිරීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙළ. තමන්ගේ දේශපාලන වුවමනාකම්වලට නඩු අහන්න කලින් කියනව අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්නවා කියලා. රිමාන්ඩ් කරන මාස ගණන කියනවා.”
මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ (2018/08/11 ගාල්ලේදී)

මහින්ද සමඟ නැඟෙන බලවේගය මොට කරන්න නම් මහින්ද ඇතුළු ප්‍රබලයන් මෙල්ල කළ යුතුය. ඒ මෙල්ල කිරීම ආණ්ඩුව කරන්නේ කොහොම දැයි ගාල්ලේදී මහින්ද සහසුද්දෙන්ම කියා දුන්නේ එහෙමය. ගාල්ල කියන්නේ මහින්දට වඩාත් වැදගත් ජනපදනමක් ඇති දිස්ත්‍රික්කයකි. ගාල්ලේ මිනිසුන් මේ කතාව අහලා හිතට අරන් තව තවත් මහින්ද වටා ළං වෙනවා ඇරෙන්න ඔවුන් ශ්‍රී ලනිපය දෙසට හැරී ආණ්ඩුවට එකතු වන්නේ නැත.

එසේනම් මහින්ද මර්දනයට එරෙහිව මුහුණ දිය යුතුය. ඒ තම ජනබලය පෙන්වා ආණ්ඩුවට දැනෙන යමක් කරමින්ය. 5දාට පාරට බස්සන්නේ එම ජන බලවේගය නිසා එය මහින්දටත් ඔහු වටා සිටින බලවේගයටත් තීරණාත්මකය. ඒ නිසාම ඉතා තදබල විදියට මේ ජනගඟ සංවිධානය කළ යුතුය. පෙළ ගැස්විය යුතුය.

එබැවින් පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය කලින් පැවැත්විය යුතුවන තැනට ආණ්ඩුව හිරකළ යුතුය. වැට්ට විය යුතුය. දණගැස්විය යුතුය. එය ලෙහෙසිය, පහසුය කියලා සිතිය යුතු නැති වග මහින්ද කාටත් වඩා හොඳින් දන්නේය.

“මහින්දට ආයෙත් පාරක් ඉල්ලන්න පුළුවන්”ය කියන කතාවට ඒ හැටි ප්‍රතිචාර නොදැක්වූ මහින්ද “ඒක එහෙම තිබිච්චාවේ. ඊට වඩා වැඩේ තමයි පළාත් සභා ඡන්දෙ ගන්න එක”ය කියලා වැඩට බැසිය යුතු වග කියන්නේය.

පළාත් සභාව පවත්වන තැනට ආණ්ඩුව පත්වුණේ නැති නම් එහි අපවාදයද ආණ්ඩුවටය. පැවැත් වුවහොත් එය ජය ගන්නා බව දන්නා මහින්ද ඒ බව පෙන්වන්නට හැකි හැම දෙයක්ම කරන්න සූදානමින්ය. ඒ බව වටහාගෙන මහින්දගේ සැලසුමට අනුව න්‍යාය පත්‍රය අනුව සියල්ලෝම පෙළ ගැසෙන, වැඩ කරන තරමට අනුව ප්‍රතිඵලය හොඳ වනු ඇත.

ජපන් ආරක්ෂක ඇමැතිගේ හදිසි සංචාරයේ මොකක්දෝ අමුත්තක් තියෙනවා

September 1st, 2018

සංවාදය-උදේනි සමන් කුමාර උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

ගෝලීය භූ දේශපාලන තලයේ සිදුවන විවිධාකාර පෙළ ගැසීම් ලංකාවට සුවිශේෂී බලපෑම් එල්ල කරන බව රහසක් නොවේ. ලෝක දේශපාලන බල අරගලයේ ඉත්තකු වීමෙන් ඉතිහාසය පුරා අප සිදු කරගත් හානි බොහෝය. ජපානයේ ඉන්දියාවේ වගකිවයුතු නායකයෝ මේ දිනවල නිතර මෙහි පැමිණෙති. සිදු වෙමින් පවතින්නේ කුමක්ද යන්න පිළිබඳ අප හිටපු ඇමැති ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ කොමියුනිස්ට් පක්‍ෂයේ නායක ඩිව් ගුණසේකර මහතා සමඟ සාකච්ඡා කළෙමු.

 ජපානයේ ආරක්‍ෂක ඇමැතිවරයකු පසුගියදා ලංකාවේ නිල සංචාරයක නිරත වූවා. දෙවැනි ලෝක යුද්ධයෙන් පසු ජපානය මෙවැනි මැදිහත් වීමක් සිදුකළ ප්‍රථම අවස්ථාව හැටියට මෙය සලකන්න පුළුවන්. ඒ සමඟම ජපන් විදේශ ඇමැති වරයාද මේ සතියේ ලංකාවට පැමිණියා කුමක්ද මේ සිදුවන්නේ?

ජපානය අපේ මිත්‍ර රටක් බව ඇත්ත. ඔවුන් අපේ රටට සුවිශේෂී ආධාර ලබාදී තිබෙනවා. එහෙත් ඔබ සඳහන් කරන ජපාන ආරක්‍ෂක සහ විදේශ ඇමැතිවරුන්ගේ හදිසි සංචාර වෙනත් පසුබිමක් තුළ ඇතිවන වර්ධනයක් ලෙසයි මා දකින්නේ.

 කුමක්ද ඒ පසුබිම?

කෙටියෙන් සඳහන් කරනවා නම් ලෝක රටාවේ සහ ලෝක බල තුලනයේ ප්‍රබල වෙනසක් සිදුවෙමින් පවතිනවා. 21 වැනි සියවසේ ආරම්භයත් සමඟ ලෝක රටාව ඒකද්‍රව ලෝක රටාවක සිට බහුද්‍රව ලෝක රටාවකට පරිවර්තනය වෙමින් පවතිනවා. අපි දන්නවා දෙවැනි ලෝක යුද්ධයෙන් පසු ඇමෙරිකාව තමයි ලෝකයේ සුපිරි බලවතා වෙන්නේ. දේශපාලන ආර්ථික, මිලිටරි, හා තාක්‍ෂණ අතින් ඇමෙරිකාවේ ප්‍රබලත්වය නිසාම ඒකද්‍රව ලෝකයක් නිර්මාණය වුණා. ප්‍රධාන ප්‍රාග්ධන මධ්‍යස්ථානය වුණේ ඇමෙරිකාවයි. නමුත් වර්තමානයේ ප්‍රාග්ධන මධ්‍යස්ථාන ගණනාවක් මතුවී තිබෙනවා. ඕඅධ්ඛ්ඉ, ඒඉඡ්ඒව්, ඒ.උ. (ඒටපඪජචද භදඪධද) ඹ්ඡ්ඹ්ඒම්, ඹ්චබඪද ඒථඥපඪජචද) ඡ්භපධ -ඒඵඪච ආදී වශයෙනි. මෙහිදී ආසියානු ආර්ථිකයේ නැඟීම සහ චීනය ලෝකයේ දෙවැනි ආර්ථික බලවතා වශයෙන් මතුවීම තීරණාත්මක සාධකයක්. එහි ප්‍රතිඵලයක් වශයෙන් සංවර්ධිත රටවල් අතර සහ තුළ ප්‍රතිවිරෝධීතාවන් මතුවී තිබෙනවා. එංගලන්තය යුරෝපා සංගමයෙන් (ඡ්උ) වෙන්වීමත් ප්‍රබල සාධකයක්
මේ සියලු සාධකයන්හි පෙළ ගැසීම නිසා ලෝක ආර්ථික බලතුලනයෙහි වෙනසක් ඇතිවී තිබෙනවා. ට්7 කණ්ඩායම (සුපිරි කණ්ඩායම) ක්‍රියා විරහිතයි. ඒ වෙනුවට ට් 20 මතුවී තිබෙනවා. දෙවැනි ලෝක යුද්ධයෙන් පසු ලෝකයේ එකම න්‍යෂ්ටික බලවතා වන්නේ ඇමෙරිකාව. දැන් න්‍යෂ්ටික බලවතුන් 10කට වඩා සිටිනවා. ලෝක යුද්ධයක් පැනනැඟීමේ අනතුර පහව ගොස් තිබෙන්නේ ඒ නිසයි. මෙන්න මේ සියලු සාධක නිසා එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය තුළ බලතුලනය වෙනස්වී තිබෙනවා. ඒ අනුව ගෝලීය උපාය මාර්ගවල සහ භූ දේශපාලනික උපාය මාර්ගවල වෙනස්වීම් රැසක් සිදුවෙමින් පවතිනවා.

 මේ තත්ත්වය තුළ ආසියානු මහාද්වීපය ගැන කතා කරනවා නම්.

ආසියානු ආර්ථිකය වසර 500කට පසු ලෝක ආර්ථිකයේ පෙරගමන්කරු වී තිබෙනවා. මෙයට හේතුව පුළුල්ව ගත්කල ආසියාවේ සියලු කලාපයන් උතුරු, නැඟෙනහිර අග්නිදිග, දකුණු ආසියා කලාප වේගයෙන් වෙනස්වී තිබෙනවා. චීන ආර්ථිකයේ දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදනය ඩොලර් ටි්‍රලියන 14ක් ඇමෙරිකාවේ දළ දේශීය නිෂ්පාදනය පවතින්නේ ඩොලර් ටි්‍රලියන 19-20 අතර

 චීන ආර්ථිකයේ සිදු වෙමින් පවතින ප්‍රබලත්වය ගැන කතා කරනවා නම්

චීනය ලෝකයේ විශාලම ජනගහනය සිටින රට. මා දකින එහි ප්‍රබලත්වය නම් මිලියන 900 මහා ශ්‍රම බළකායයි. අධ්‍යාපනය, නිපුණත්වය, සහ තාක්‍ෂණය අතින් පරිපූර්ණ ශ්‍රම බළකායක් චීනය සතුයි. ඒ නිසාම එය ලෝකයේ විශාලම වෙළෙඳපොළ බවට පත්ව තිබෙනවා. ජනතාවගේ ක්‍රය ශක්තිය ඉහළ යමින් තිබෙනවා. මිලියන 600ක ජනයා දරිද්‍රතාවයෙන් මුදාගෙන තිබෙනවා. 2020දී දරිද්‍රතාවයෙන් තොර චීනයක් බිහි වෙනවා. මිලියන 300ක මධ්‍යම පන්තියක්. මිනිස් සම්පත ලොකුම සම්පත බවට පත්වෙලා.

දෙවැනුව ලොව විශාලතම ආනයනකරුවා මෙන්ම අපනයනකරුවා වන්නේද චීනයයි. තුන්වැනුව ලෝකයේ විශාලතම විදේශ විනිමය සංචිතය හිමි රට වන්නේද චීනයයි. ඩොලර් ටි්‍රලියන 14ක පමණ සංචිතයක් චීනය සතුයි. සතර වෙනුව ලොව විශාලතම ජාතික ඉතිරි කිරීම් ඇති රට 50%ක ඉතිරි කිරීම් ප්‍රතිශතයක් (ශ්‍රී ලංකාව 22%යි
පස් වෙනුව චීනය කාර්මික නිෂ්පාදන අතින් ප්‍රමුඛ රට.

 චීනයට වසර 40ක් තුළ මෙවැනි යෝධ ආර්ථික පිම්මක් පැනීමට හැකි වූයේ කෙසේද?

එහි රහස චීනයේ නව ආර්ථික උපාය මාර්ගයයි. 1978ට පෙර තිබුණේ ක්‍රම සම්පාදනය මත ගොඩනැඟුණු සංවෘත ආර්ථිකයක්. ඩෙන් ෂියා වෝ පෙන් යටතේ ක්‍රම සම්පාදනයට ඉඩහැරියා වෙළෙඳපොළට සමාන්තරව ක්‍රියාත්මක වෙන්න. ඒ සඳහා ලෝකයට විවෘත වූ ආර්ථික ප්‍රතිසංස්කරණ සිදු කළා. අද චීනය ක්‍රම සම්පාදනය – වෙළෙඳපොළ – රාජ්‍ය මැදිහත්වීම යන කාරණා තුනම සමාන්තරව ක්‍රියාත්මක වන උපාය මාර්ගයක් අනුගමනය කරනවා.

සමාජවාදී රාජ්‍ය පද්ධතිය බිඳවැටෙන්නට පෙර චීනය මේ නව උපාය මාර්ගයට ප්‍රවේශ වුණා. චීනය දැක තිබුණා සෝවියට් ආර්ථිකය මූලික වශයෙන් ගමන් කළ සංවෘත ආර්ථිකයක් වීම නිසා ඊට ලෝකයට පිවිසීමට නොහැකි වූ බව. දැන් චීන උපාය මාර්ගය සමාජ වෙළෙඳපොළ, සමාජ වෙළෙඳපොළ කියා නව හැඳින්වීමක් ලබාදී තිබෙනවා. ලෝකයට කොපමණ විවෘත වුවද ක්‍රම සම්පාදනයට රාජ්‍ය මැදිහත්වීම තුළින් පැනනැඟුණු ආර්ථික අර්බුද මඟහැර යෑමට සමත්ව තිබෙනවා. මේ වන විට ඇමෙරිකාව චීනයට වඩා ඉදිරියෙන් ඉන්නේ තාක්‍ෂණය අතින් පමණයි. චීනය ඉදිරියේ තාක්‍ෂණික අතින්ද ඇමෙරිකාව පසුකර යන බව ස්ථිරයි.

 මේ වර්ධනයන් ලෝක දේශපාලනයට බලපාන්නේ කෙසේද?

තුන්වැනි ලෝකයට නැත්නම් සංවර්ධනය වන්නා වූ රටවලට ආර්ථික සහයෝගිතාව ලබාදිය හැක්කේ චීනයට පමණයි. නිදසුනක් ගනිමු. අප්‍රිකානු මහාද්වීපය නිදහස් වී දැනට වසර 50කට ආසන්නයි. සෝවියට්දේශය හැරුණු විට කිසිදු රාජ්‍යයක් අත දුන්නේ නැහැ. සෝවියට්දේශය බිඳ වැටුණාම ගතවූ වසර 25 තුළ අප්‍රිකාව අනාථ වුණා. චීනය වර්තමානයේ රටවල් 25ක් සමඟ සබඳතා ගොඩනඟාගෙන තිබෙනවා. ප්‍රධාන වශයෙන් යටිතල පහසුකම් සහ ගමනාගමනය අතින් මේ දිනවල බීජිං නුවර අප්‍රිකානු නායකයන් සියලුදෙනා සහ චීන නායකයන් අතර ඉහළ පෙළේ සමුළුවක් පැවැත්වෙනවා.

 අපේ කලාපය අයත් වන දකුණු ආසියාව ගතහොත්,

ආසියාවෙන් ඉතා පසුගාමීව සිටින්නේ දකුණු ආසියානු රටවල්. ප්‍රධාන ගැටලුව ප්‍රාග්ධනය. ත්‍රස්තවාදය අපේ කලාපය පස්සට තල්ලු කළා. ජනවාර්ගික හා ආගමික අන්තවාදය තවත් නිශේධනාත්මක සාධකයක්. දකුණු ආසියාවේ සියලුම රටවලට මේ අභියෝගයට මුහුණදීමට සිදු වුණා. දැන් මේ කලාපයත් සාපේක්ෂව ඉදිරියට එමින් සිටිනවා. ඉන්දියාවේ ආර්ථික වේගය 70%ක්. බංගලාදේශය අන් සියලු රටවලට වඩා ඉදිරියෙන් සිටිනවා. චීන ආධාර මත පාකිස්තානයේ සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ යටිතල පහසුකම් සංවර්ධනය වෙමින් තිබෙනවා.

 සේද මාවත ආර්ථික ව්‍යාපෘතිය නමින් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති වැඩපිළිවෙළ කුමක්ද?

චීනය දෙවැනි ලෝක ආර්ථික බලවතා වූවාට පසු 2013දී චීනය මෙම නව සේද මාවත ආර්ථික ව්‍යාපෘතිය ඉදිරිපත් කළා. දැනට රටවල් හා ජාත්‍යන්තර සංවිධාන 100කට වඩා ඊට එක්ව සිටිනවා. ආසියාව+අප්‍රිකාව+යුරෝපය සම්බන්ධ කෙරෙන මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය ගෝලීයකරණය තුළ තාක්ෂණයේ සහ විද්‍යාවේ ව්‍යාප්තිය සමඟම වේගයෙන් ව්‍යාප්ත වෙනවා.

චීන ආර්ථිකය ර¼දා පවතින්නේ ලෝකයේ සෙසු රටවල් සංවර්ධනය වුණොත් පමණයි. නිෂ්පාදනය කෙරෙන භාණ්ඩ අලෙවි කරන්නේ කාටද? සංවර්ධනය වන රටවල ජනතාවගේ ‘ක්‍රය ශක්තිය’ ලබාගත යුතුයි. ‘නව සේද මාවත’ අරමුණ අනේ‍යාන්‍ය ප්‍රතිලාභ ලබා ගැනීමයි. මේක දෙපැත්තටම වාසියි. රැකියා වැඩි වෙනවා. එවිට ක්‍රය ශක්තිය වැඩි වෙනවා. ඒ තුළ භාණ්ඩ මිලදී ගැනීම් ඉහළ යනවා.

අධිරාජ්‍යවාදී රටවල් කළේ භාණ්ඩ නිෂ්පාදනය සඳහා සංවර්ධනය වන රටවලට අමුද්‍රව්‍ය ලබාදීම පමණයි. ඒ රටවල් තුන්වැනි ලෝකයට අයත් වුණේ ඒ නිසයි. ගෝලීයකරණයේදී ඒ රටවල් ප්‍රපාතයට ඇදවැටුණා. චීනය විකල්ප ආර්ථික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් ඉදිරිපත් කළේ මේ තත්ත්වය අනුවයි. මේ වන විට රටවල් 70ක් පමණ ඊට එක්ව තිබෙනවා. මූල්‍ය සම්පත් සඳහා වෙනමම බැංකු දෙකක් පිහිටුවා තිබෙනවා. එහි ප්‍රතිඵල වශයෙන් ජාත්‍යන්තර මූල්‍ය අරමුදලේ සහ ලෝක බැංකුවේ වැදගත්කම අඩු වෙලා. ඔවුන්ගේ කොන්දේසි පවා ලිහිල්ව තිබෙනවා.

 කුමක්ද මේ ඉන්දියානු සාගර ප්‍රශ්නය?

මා ඉහත දැක්වූ කරුණු මත ආසියාවේ වැදගත්කමත් ඉන්දීය සාගර කලාපයේ වැදගත්කමත් මතුවෙලා.

 මේ මොහොතේ ජපානය ඉටු කරන භූමිකාව කුමක්ද?

ජපානය ඇමෙරිකාව සමඟ ඉතා සමීපම රට. එසේ වූයේ දෙවැනි ලෝක යුද්ධයේදී න්‍යෂ්ටික බලය යොදා ජපානය යටත් කිරීමෙන් පසුවයි. ජපානය ජාත්‍යන්තර ක්ෂේත්‍රයේ උදේ‍යා්ගිමත් රට වූයේ නැහැ. සෙසු රටවල් සමඟ මිත්‍රත්වය ගොඩනඟමින් සිටියා. එහෙත් හැම ප්‍රශ්නයකදීම ඔවුන් සිටියේ ඇමෙරිකාවේ විදේශ සහ ආරක්ෂක ප්‍රතිපත්තිය සමඟ. ආසියාවේ නව තත්ත්වය උඩ ඇමෙරිකාවේත් ජපානයේත් බලපෑම අඩු වුණා. බැරක් ඔබාමා ඒෂියා පැසිපික් සංකල්පය ගෙනාවේ චීනය කොන් කිරීමටයි.

චීනය එම සංවිධානයට ඇතුළු වීම ඇමෙරිකාව මඟහැරියා. සෙසු ආසියානු රටවල් අෑ¼දා ගැනීමට ඔවුන් උත්සාහ කළා. ඩොනල්ඩ් ට්‍රම්ප් බලයට පැමිණීමෙන් පසු ආසියා-පැසිපික් අත්හැර ඉන්දු-පැසිපික් සංකල්පය ගෙනාවා. එහි අරමුණ ඉන්දියාව ඇතුළු කර ගැනීම. චීන භීතිකාව පෙන්වා චීන-ඉන්දියා ප්‍රති විරෝධතා ඒ සඳහා යොදා ගත්තා. දැන් ඇමෙරිකාව, ඉන්දියාව, ජපානය සහ ඕස්ට්‍රේලියාව වශයෙන් පෙළගැස්මක් හදන්නේ චීනය කොන් කිරීමටයි.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ 2015 ඇති වූ වෙනස තුළ මෙම සංකල්පය ශක්තිමත් කිරීමට ලංකාව යොදා ගැනීම ප්‍රමාද වුණේ චීන ආර්ථික සහයෝගය නිසයි.

 මේ වන විට ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආණ්ඩුවේ ප්‍රතිචාරය කුමක්ද?

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආර්ථික අර්බුදය උග්‍ර වූ නිසා චීනය එකවරටම අතහරින්න යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුවට බැරි වුණා. ණය උගුලේ හිරවීම ඊට බාධාවක් වුණා. ජපානය මේ දක්වන උදේ‍යා්ගය පිටුපස තිබෙන්නේ ඩොනල්ඩ් ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ උපාය මාර්ගයයි.

 ඔවුන් අපේ වරායවල් ගැන මෙතරම් උනන්දු වන්නේ ඇයි?

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ පිහිටීම නිසාම ලෝක ආර්ථිකයේ වැදගත් ස්ථානයක් හිමි වෙනවා. අපි හම්බන්තොට ගැන මුලින් කතා කළේ ආර්ථික කෝණයෙන්. නමුත් දැන් ඇමෙරිකාව ඉන්දියාව, ජපානය උනන්දු වන්නේ භූ දේශපාලනික හා යුද්ධ උපාය මාර්ගික කෝණයෙන්. හම්බන්තොට ගැන කතා කළාට ඇස යොමුව තිබෙන්නේ ත්‍රිකුණාමලයටයි. බෙංගාල බොක්ක ආරක්ෂා කිරීමට වැදගත්ම කේන්ද්‍රය වරාය. එය ගැඹුරු ස්වභාවික වරායක්. පෘතුගීසි, ඕලන්ද, ප්‍රංශ, බි්‍රතාන්‍ය අධිරාජ්‍යවාදීන් ඉන්දීය සාගරයේ වැදගත් වරාය ලෙස ත්‍රිකුණාමලය හඳුනාගත්තා. දෙවැනි රාජසිංහ රජු කොට්ටියාරම් බොක්ක රහසින් ප්‍රංශයේ නැපෝලියන්ට පැවරූ බව ඉතිහාසයේ සඳහන්. ඉන්දියාව කැමැතියි ජපානය ඉදිරියට දමා ඉන්දු-පැසිපික් සංකල්පය ශක්තිමත් කරන්න.

 මේ තත්ත්වය තුළ ලංකාව ජාත්‍යන්තර දේශපාලන ගැටුමකට ඉබේම තල්ලු වී යෑමට ඉඩ තිබෙනවා නේද?

ආණ්ඩුවවත්, විපක්ෂයවත්, ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයවත් තවම මේක වටහාගෙන නැහැ. මේ ප්‍රශ්නය ඉදිරි ජනපතිවරණයට හා මහ මැතිවරණයට ගැටගැහෙන්න පුළුවන්. එවිට අපේ මැතිවරණවලට ඉන්දියාව, ජපානය පිටුපස සිට ඇමෙරිකාව පෙළගැහෙන්න පුළුවන්.

 ඉන්දියාවේ භාරතීය ජනතා පක්ෂයේ සුබ්‍රමනියම් ස්වාමි හිටපු ජනාධිපති හමුවීමත් මෙයට සම්බන්ධයක් තිබිය හැකිද?

ඒ ගැන නිගමනයකට එන්න කල් වැඩියි. සුබ්‍රමනියම් ස්වාමි, මෝඩි අගමැතිගේ පිල්ලියක් බව අපි දන්නවා. මා හිතනවා මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා කල්පනාකාරීව ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වයි කියා. අප තේරුම්ගත යුතුයි ඇමෙරිකාව මේ කලාපයට ඩොලර් මිලියන 585ක් වෙන් කර තිබෙනවා. ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය වෙනුවෙන් ඉන් කොටසක් ලංකාවට එම සැලසුම තමයි ජාත්‍යන්තර දේශපාලන තලයේ දැන් ක්‍රියාත්මක වෙන්නේ.

සංවාදය-උදේනි සමන් කුමාර

මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ධුරයෙන් පුද ලද ඇස් ඉස් මස් ලේ දන්දී රට දැය සුරැකි විරුවෝ

September 1st, 2018

පුබුදු වික්‍රමතිලක උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

කුරිරු ත්‍රස්තවාදය වෙනුවෙන් තම තරුණ ජීවිතය කැපකළ විරුවන් අපමණය. ජීවිතය පුදා හෝ තම මවුබිම කුරිරු ත්‍රස්තවාදීන්ගෙන් බේරා ගැනීම ඔවුන්ගේ එකම අදිටන විය. රටේ සතර දිග් භාගයෙන් යුද හමුදාවට එක්වූ සියලු රණවිරුවන්ගේ එකම අදිටන වූයේත් ඒකීය රටක් වෙනුවෙන් දිවි පරදුවට තබා සටන් වැදීමය.

ඒ වෙනුවෙන් තම ඇස්, ඉස්, මස්, ලේ පිදූ රණවිරුවන් අපේ කාලයේ විරුවන් ලෙස ඉතිහාසගත වූයේය. යුද්ධයෙන් ආබාධිත තත්ත්වයට පත්වූ තරුණ නිලධාරීන් හා සෙබළුන්ද ඒ අතරේ වූයේය. අද රටට මෙන්ම රට කරවන්නන්ටද ඔවුන් කළ මෙහෙවර අමතක වෙමින් තිබෙන්නේය. අප සියලු දෙනාට ජීවත් වන්නට රටක් උරුම කරදී දිවිදුන් හා ආබාධිත තත්ත්වයට පත් එකී විරුවන්ට කළගුණ සලකන්නට දකුණේ සියලු දෙනාට අමතක වෙමින් ඇත්තේය.

එසේ සියලු දෙනාට අමතක වෙමින් තිබූ අපේ කාලයේ රණවිරුවන් කළ මෙහෙවර වෙනුවට ඔවුන්ව ඉහළට ඔසවා තබන්නට වත්මන් යුද හමුදාපති ලුතිනන් ජෙනරාල් මහේෂ් සේනානායක මහතා පසුගිය සතියේ තීන්දුවක් ගත්තේය. ඒ මෙතෙක් කිසිදු හමුදාපතිවරයකු නොකළ දෙයකි. යුද්ධයේදී තම තරුණ දිවිය කැපකොට යුද පෙරමුණේදී තුවාල ලැබ ආබාධිත තත්ත්වයට පත් එයින් නොසැලී තම ජීවිතය දිනාගත් නිලධාරීන් සිවුදෙනකු මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ධුරයට උසස් කිරීමට යුද හමුදාපතිවරයා ගත් තීරණයෙන් යුද හමුදාවට නව බලාපොරොත්තුවක් ඇතිකර දුන්නේය. යුද්ධයෙන් ආබාධිත තත්ත්වයට පත්ව සිටින අභීත රණවිරුවන්ට මෙය තම අනාගතය වෙනුවෙන් පාර කපා දුන් තීරණයක්ද විය.

2018-09-02

යුද හමුදාවට නව බලාපොරොත්තුවක් ඇති කරමින් මේජර් ජෙනරාල්වරුන්ගේ ලැයිස්තුවට අලුතින්ම එක්වූ මේ සිවුදෙනාම පාබළ නිලධාරීහු වූහ. යුද බිමේදී පස් පාගාවත් නොමැති, යුද්ධයේදී සටන් බිම සෙබළුන් අතැර දමා පැමිණිය නිලධාරිනුත් මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ධුරයට උසස් වූ කාලයක්ද තිබුණේය. එවන් වටපිටාවක යුද හමුදා ඉතිහාසයේ පළමු වරට මේජර් ජෙනරාල් තනතුර දක්වා උසස්වීම් ලද යුද්ධයේදී තම දිවි පරදුවට තැබූ මෙම අපේ කාලේ වීරයන් අතරට එක්වූයේ ගැමුණු රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ඩබ්ලිව්.එස්. මනතුංග, පාබළ රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ජේ.ආර්. අම්පෙමොහොට්ටි, ගජබා රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ මේජර් ජෙනරාල් පෙරමුණගමගේ හා සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ආර්. වික්‍රමසිංහ යන නිලධාරීන්ය.

මොවුන්ගේ විශේෂත්වය වූයේ සටන් පෙරමුණේ සිටි පාබළ රෙජිමේන්තු නියෝජනය කළ කනිෂ්ඨ නිලධාරීන් සමයේම සටන් බිමේ තුවාල ලද නිලධාරීන් වීමය.

මේජර් ජෙනරාල් පෙරමුණගමගේ මෙම නිලධාරීන් සිවුදෙනා අතරින් රණබිමේදී තුවාල ලද පළමු නිලධාරියා විය. 1984 මැයි 05දා පාඨමාලා අංක 19 යටතේ යුද හමුදාවට එක්වූ මොහු තුන්වැනි ගජබා රෙජිමේන්තුවට එක්වී සටන් බිමට ගිය නිලධාරියකු වූයේය. වරෙක ඔහුගේ අණදෙන නිලධාරියා වූයේ ලුතිනන් කර්නල් කමල් ගුණරත්නය. ඓතිහාසික වඩමාරච්චි මෙහෙයුමට එක්වූ පාබළ බළඇණියක් වූ මෙම බලඇණිය නියෝජනය කළ කාණ්ඩ භාර නිලධාරියකු ලෙස එවකට ලුතිනන්වරයකු වූ පෙරමුණගමගේ සටන් පෙරමුණේම සිටියේය. කොටි නායක ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ උපන් භූමිය පිහිටි වඩමාරච්චි ප්‍රදේශය අත්පත් කරගන්නට කළ වඩමාරච්චි මෙහෙයුමේදී මෙම බළඇණියට පැවැරුණේ තොණ්ඩමනාරු පසුකර ගොස් වඩමාරච්චිවලට ඇතුළුවීමය. මෙම වඩමාරච්චි මෙහෙයුම අරඹමින් ජෙනරාල් ඩෙන්සිල් කොබ්බෑකඩුවගේ නායකත්වය යටතේ අභීත භට පිරිස් ඉදිරියට ඇදෙද්දී තුන්වැනි ගජබා රෙජිමේන්තුව තොණ්ඩමනාරු පසුකරමින් සිටියහ.

සතුරු ප්‍රහාර නොතකා ඉදිරියට ඇදුණු ලුතිනන් පෙරමුණගමගේ යටතේ වූ අනුඛණ්ඩයට එක්වරම එල්ල වූ සතුරු වෙඩි ප්‍රහාර මාලාවකින් එම කණ්ඩායමේ සෙබළුන් දෙදෙනකු දිවි පුදා තිදෙනෙක් තුවාල ලදහ. තුවාල ලද තිදෙනා අතර ලුතිනන් පෙරමුණගමගේද සිටියේය.

උකුලු ඇටය පසාරු කරගෙන ගිය වෙඩි උණ්ඩයකින් තුවාල ලද ලුතිනන් පෙරමුණගමගේ සටන් බිමෙන් ඉවත් කර ගුවනින් කොළඹට රැගෙන එන්නේ ඉක්මන් ප්‍රතිකාර දෙන්නටය. ජයවර්ධනපුර රෝහලේ වසරක් එක තැන ප්‍රතිකාර ලද ලුතිනන් පෙරමුණගමගේ එතැන් පටන් යළි ජීවිතයට නව බලාපොරොත්තු දල්වාගෙන සෙමින් සෙමින් පැමිණෙන්නට වූයේය.

තමන් ආබාධිත නිලධාරියකු යැයි නොසිතූ ඔහු තමාගේ සිත දැඩි කරගෙන යළිත් නැඟිටින්නට වූයේ යුද්ධයේදී ආබාධිත වූ අනෙක් නිලධාරීන්ටත් ආදර්ශයක් දෙමිනි. එතැන් පටන් මෙතෙක් ගතකළ තිස්පස් වසරක සේවා කාලය තුළ බි්‍රගේඩියර් නිලය දක්වා උසස්වීම් ලබන්නේ මෙහෙයුම් කලාපවල පවා යළි රාජකාරි කරමිනි. ඔහු කොළඹ තර්ස්ටන් විදුහලෙන් සිප්සතර හදාරා එම පාසල් මාතාවගේ නාමය රටේ බබළවන්නට ක්‍රියාකළ නිලධාරියකු වූයේය.

මුලතිව් මුදාගන්නට ඇරඹි අකුණු පහර මෙහෙයුමේදී පළමුවන සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ දක්ෂ නිලධාරියකු වූ එවකට කපිතාන් ආර්. වික්‍රමසිංහ සටන් බිමේ තුවාල ලබන්නේ 1991දීය. පාඨමාලා අංක 21 යටතේ 1985 ජුනි 6දා හමුදාවේ සිංහ රෙජිමේන්තු නිලධාරියකු ලෙස සටන් බිමට ප්‍රවිෂ්ට වූ මෙකී රණවිරුවා වඩමාරච්චි, බලවේගය ඇතුළු ජෙනරාල් කොබ්බෑකඩුව යටතේ ඇරඹි මෙහෙයුම්වල සටන් පෙරමුණේ ගිය නිලධාරියකු වූයේය. යාපනය කොටුව මුදාගන්නට මෙන්ම බලවේගය මෙහෙයුමෙන් අලිමංකඩ මුදාගන්නට යද්දීත් සටන් පෙරමුණේ ගිය ඛණ්ඩ භාර නිලධාරියකු ලෙස වික්‍රමසිංහ එවකට ප්‍රසිද්ධ විය.

අකුණු පහර මෙහෙයුමේදී බළකායේ ඇජුටන් ලෙසින් සෙබළ කණ්ඩායම් සමඟ ඉදිරියට ඇදෙන මේ විරුවා ත්‍රස්තයන් ඇටවූ ජොනි බට්ටකුට අසුවී තුවාල ලබන්නේ සටන් පෙරමුණේදී තුවාල ලද තවත් භටයකු ප්‍රතිකාර සඳහා යොමුකරන්නට පසුපසට ගෙනිද්දීය. සටන් බිමේදී ජොනි බට්ටෙකුව පෑගී පාදයක් අහිමි වූ තම සහෝදර සෙබළා ඉක්මනින් ප්‍රතිකාර සඳහා යොමුවන්නට කරමතින් ගෙනයද්දි කපිතාන් වික්‍රමසිංහ ජොනි බට්ටකුට ගොදුරු විය. 1991 අගෝස්තු 29දා ත්‍රස්තවාදීන්ගේ බෝම්බයෙන් පාදය කැබලි වී මස්වැදලි එල්ලෙද්දීත් මෙකී විරුවා තම සෙබළුන්ට ධෛර්ය දෙමින් සටන් බිමෙන් ඉවත් විය. ගුවන් මගින් අනුරාධපුර රෝහලට ගෙනගිය කපිතාන් රජීව් වික්‍රමසිංහ හමුදා නිලධාරියකු ලෙසින් ඉදිරියට එන සටන අතැරියේ නැත. තම පාදය අහිමි වී දින විසිනවයක් රෝහලේ ඇ¼දමත සිටියත් ඔහු එතැන් පටන් පාදය අහිමිවීම පසෙකලා ජීවිතය යළි ජයගන්නට වෙර දැරුවේය.

යකඩ කකුලෙන් ඇවිදින්නට පුරුදු පුහුණු වෙමින් 1991 සටන් කොට රණවිරු සෙබළුන් යුද බිමේදී තම තරුණ ජවය පෙන්වා රට වෙනුවෙන් අත්පා දන්දුන් අනෙක් සෙබළුන්ට චිත්ත ධෛර්ය වැඩෙන්නට කපිතාන් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහඟු ආදර්ශයක් විය. රාගම රණවිරු සෙවණේ ක්‍රීඩා හා වෘත්තීය පුහුණු භාර ඛණ්ඩභාර නිලධාරියා ලෙස තමාගෙන් රටට ඉටුවිය යුතු සේවාව ඔහු ඉටුකර දුන්නේය. පිහිනුම් ශූරයකු වූ ජුලියන් බෝලිං රාගම රණවිරු සෙවණේදී වැඩමුළුවක් පවත්වා දුනු ඊතල ලබාදී දුනු විදීමේ ක්‍රීඩාවට මෙම රණවිරුවන් යොමු කළේය.

එයින් ප්‍රයෝජනගත් නිලධාරීන් අතරේ කපිතාන් වික්‍රමසිංහ පෙරමුණේම සිටියේය. යුද්ධයේදී තම තරුණ කාලයේ සිටම කළ මෙහෙවර හා සමාන මෙහෙවරක් ක්‍රීඩාව වෙනුවෙන් කැප කරන්නට ඔහු අදිටන් කරගත්තේය.

දුනු විදීමේ දක්ෂයකු බවට පත්වූ හෙතෙම එම ඉසව්වෙන් ජාත්‍යන්තරයටද ගොස් රටට කීර්තියක් අත්කර දෙන්නේය. රණවිරු සෙවණේ වසර නවයක් සේවය කර යුද හමුදාවේ ඉහළම තනතුරු රැසක් හොබවන්නට ඔහුට හැකි වන්නේද බි්‍රගේඩියර් තනතුර දක්වා උසස්වීම් ලබා පැමිණෙද්දීය.

බණ්ඩාරවෙල ශාන්ත තෝමස් හා ධර්මශෝක විද්‍යාලයෙන් ඉගෙනුම ලද ඔහු රණබිමේදී මෙන්ම ජාත්‍යන්තරයේද නමක් දිනාගත් නිලධාරියකු වූයේය. යුද්ධයේදී පාදයක් අහිමි වූ ජේ‍යෂ්ඨතම නිලධාරියාද වූයේ මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ධුරයට උසස්වූ ආර්. වික්‍රමසිංහය. 2004දී දුනු විදීමේ ජාතික ශූරයා බවටද ඔහු පත්වන්නේ ආබාධිත නොවූ ක්‍රීඩකයන් සමඟ උරෙනුර ගැටෙමිනි. භූතානයේ තරග ඉසව් සඳහාද ආබාධිත හා ආබාධිත නොවන තරග ශූරයකු ලෙස ඉදිරිපත් වීමට අවස්ථාව හිමිවූයේද ඔහුට පමණකි. පැරා ඔලිම්පික් තරගය සඳහා රටට කීර්තියක් අත්කර දුන් නිලධාරියා වූයේද මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ආර්. වික්‍රමසිංහය.

මෙම නිලධාරීන් අතරින් උසස්වීම් ලද මීළඟ නිලධාරියා වූයේ ගැමුණු රෙජිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ මේජර් ජනරාල් එස්. මනතුංගය. ඔහු 1985 ඔක්තෝබර් පළමුවැනිදා යුද හමුදාවට එක්වී ගැමුණු රෙජිමේන්තුවට එක්වූ කුරුණෑගල මලියදේව විද්‍යාලයේ කීර්තිමත් ආදි සිසුවෙකි. මුහුදු සුළං ක්‍රියාන්විතය මඟින් වාලච්චේන නාගවන්තිව් දූපතේ රැදී සිටිමින් කප්පම් ගන්නා කොටි කඳවුරක් වනසන මෙහෙයුම් 1993 මැයි මාසයේ ආරම්භ වන්නේය.
එවකට දක්ෂ බුද්ධි නිලධාරියකු වූ කපිතාන් ධුරයේ සිටි මනතුංග සතුරු කඳවුරකට පහරදෙන සටනේදී තුවාල ලබන්නේ සතුරු උණ්ඩයක් හිස පසාරු කරගෙන යාම නිසායි.

බෝට්ටු මඟින් සතුරා අබිමුවට ගොස් සටන් කරමින් සිටියදී වෙඩි උණ්ඩය හිස් කබල හරහා පිටතට එන්නේ දෛවයේ සරදමක් ලෙසිනි. ගුවන් මඟින් කොළඹට රැගෙන එන ඔහු යළි ජීවත්වන්නේ සියලු දෙනා ජීවත් කරවන්නට ධෛර්යය දෙමිනි. වසර තුනහමාරක් රෝද පුටුවේ සිටිමින් යළි නැඟී සිටින්නට වෙරදරන ඔහු ක්‍රම ක්‍රමයෙන් ඉහළ තනතුරුවලට උසස් වෙද්දී අනෙක් ආබාධිත නිලධාරීන්ටද ධෛර්යයක් දෙමින් දෙපයින් ඇවිදින්නට කටයුතු කළේය. මුලදී වම් කකුල හා දකුණු අත පණ නැතිව ගියද මෙම අභීත රණවිරුවා ධෛර්යයෙන්ම නැඟී සිටියේය. යළිත් යුද හමුදාවට සේවය කරන්නට විවිධ නිලවල සිටිද්දී ඔහු තමන් කළ විශේෂ මෙහෙවර වෙනුවෙන් මේජර් ජෙනරාල් ධුරයට උසස් වීම් ලැබුවේය.

පාඨමාලා අංක 21 යටතේ යුද හමුදාවට එක්වූ ආර්. අම්පෙමොහොට්ටි මීළඟට උසස්වීම් ලද අනෙක් රණකාමියාය. පාබල රෙජිමේන්තු නිලධාරියකු ලෙසින් සටන් පෙරමුණේ ගිය අම්පෙමොහොට්ටි ජයශක්ති මෙහෙයුමේදී පලාලි කඳවුර පුළුල් කරන මෙහෙයුමේදී පෙරමුණේම සිටි නිලධාරියා සතුරා අබිමුවට කඩාවැදී වාසවිලාන් හන්දියේ කළ දැවැන්ත සටනකදී සතුරු වෙඩි ප්‍රහාරයක් පපුවට වැදී හිස් කබල හරහා පිටතට එන්නේ සුෂුම්නාවටද හානි කරමින්ය.

සතුරා හමුවේ අභීතව සටන් කළ මෙකී විරුවා ඉක්මන් ප්‍රතිකාර සඳහා කොළඹට රැගෙන එන්නේ අසාධ්‍ය තත්ත්වයෙනි. වෛද්‍යවරුන් පවා ඔහුව ජීවත් කිරීමට අසීරු බව සිතුවද ඔහු යළි ජීවිතය පටන් ගන්නේ සියලු දෙනාටම ජීවත්වීමේ අශාව ඇති කරමින්ය. මාසයක් පමණ රෝහලේ ප්‍රතිකාර ලද ඔහු ක්‍රම ක්‍රමයෙන් රාගම රණවිරු සෙවණේදී යළි නැඟී සිටින්නට වූයේ ඒ වනවිට රණවිරු සෙවණට පැමිණ තුවාල ලබා පැමිණි තමා සමඟ එකට පාඨමාලාව හැදෑරූ වික්‍රමසිංහ සමඟය.

එතැන් පටන් ජීවිතය ජයගෙන ඉදිරියට පැමිණි ඔහු අදටත් රෝද පුටුවේ වාරුවෙන් සිටියද ඔහුගේම විස්මිත ධෛර්යය නිසා තවත් යුද්ධයෙන් ආබාධිත රණවිරුවන් රැසක් පුනරුත්ථාපන ක්‍රියාවලිය හරහා සමාජ ගත කරවන්නට හැකි වූයේය.

රාගම රණවිරු සෙවෙණේ රණවිරුවෝ නමින් සංගීත කණ්ඩායමක් පවා අරඹමින් රටට යුද හමුදාවේ රණවිරුවන්ගේ අභිමානය හා ශක්තිය කියා පාන්නට සුවිසල් කාර්ය භාරයක් ඉටුකළ නිලධාරියකු ලෙස මේජර් ජෙනරාල් අම්පෙමොහොට්ටි ප්‍රසිද්ධය.

 

එකතු වෙන්න! ගෝඨා විද්වතුන්ගෙන් ඉල්ලයි

September 1st, 2018

දෙනගම ධම්මික රණවීර උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

දේශප්‍රේමී බලවේග එක්ව සංවිධාන කරන ‘ජනබලය කොළඹට’ නම් වූ ආණ්ඩු විරෝධී රැලියට සහභාගි වන ලෙස හිටපු
ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා වෘත්තිකයන් ඇතුළු බුද්ධිමතුන්ට
ආයාචනයක් කරයි.

සිය අස්සනින් පෙරේදා (31දා) ප්‍රවෘත්ති නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ඔහු එම ආයාචනය කරයි. ප්‍රධාන ධාරාවේ දේශපාලන කටයුතුවලට එක්වීමෙන් වැළකී සිටි ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා මෙවැනි දේශපාලන ව්‍යාපාරයක් සඳහා මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ආයාචනයක් කරන පළමු අවස්ථාව මෙය වේ. ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ජාතියක් ලෙස ඓතිහාසිකව සමාජයීය, දේශපාලනික හා ආර්ථික වශයෙන් මෙතරම් පහළට වැටුණු අවධියක් නොවූ බවද එය නිවැරැදි කිරීමට පසුගිය කාලයේ සංවිධානගත වීමට උත්සාහ දැරූ බවද එම නිවේදනයේ සඳහන් කරයි.

ප්‍රධාන දේශපාලන ධාරාවේ දේශපාලන කටයුතුවලට එක්වීමෙන් වැළකී සිටීමේ ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් අනුගමනය කළ බවද සඳහන් කරන ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා එම සංකල්පයෙන් ඔබ්බට ගොස් රට තුළ සිදුවෙමින් පවතින නැවත නිවැරැදි කළ නොහැකි සහ දරාගත නොහැකි විනාශය අබිමුව සියලු දෙනා පෙරට පැමිණිය යුතු දිනය උදා වී ඇතැයිද ඔහු පවසයි. විරුද්ධ දේශපාලන මතයක් දැරීමට ඇති ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී අයිතිය රාජ්‍ය යාන්ත්‍රණය භාවිත කරමින් අසාධාරණ සහ අත්තනෝමතික ලෙස දරුණු දේශපාලන මර්දනයකට යටත් කර තිබෙන බව තම නිවේදනය මඟින් සඳහන් කරන හෙතෙම ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී මූලධර්ම සියල්ලම බිඳ දැමීමට රජය කටයුතු කරමින් ඇතැයිද කියයි. ජාත්‍යන්තර ගිවිසුම්, ඔස්සේ නැවත රට විනාශය කරා ගෙනයන ආකාරයද සඳහන් කරන හෙතෙම ජාතික, ආර්ථික මර්මස්ථාන විදේශිකයන්ට විකුණමින් ඇතැයිද පවසයි. ජාත්‍යන්තරව පිළිගත් සියලුම ආර්ථික දර්ශක ඉතිහාසයේ පෙර නොවූ විරූ ලෙස පහත වැටී ඇති බවද සඳහන් කරන ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා පෞද්ගලික හා දේශපාලනික ප්‍රයෝජන පිණිස සාමය හා සංහිඳියාව විනාශ කරමින් ඇතැයිද චෝදනා කරයි. රණවිරුවන් දඩයම් කිරීම ඇතුළු ආණ්ඩුවේ සමස්ත ක්‍රියාදාමයම ජනතා උදහසට ලක් වී ඇතැයිද ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා එම නිවේදනය මඟින් වැඩිදුරටත් අවධාරණය කරයි.

බෙංගමුවේ නාලක-ඉත්තෑකන්දේ සද්ධාතිස්ස-මාගල්කන්දේ සුදත්ත හිමිවරුන් වහාම අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්න නියෝග

September 1st, 2018

අමිල අබේරත්න උපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

ජාතික භික්ෂු පෙරමුණේ ලේකම් පූජ්‍ය බෙංගමුවේ නාලක, සිහළ රාවය සංවිධානයේ මහලේකම් මාගල්කන්දේ සුදත්ත, රාවණා බලය සංවිධානයේ මහ ලේකම් ඉත්තෑකන්දේ සද්ධාතිස්ස යන හිමිවරුන් වහාම අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලෙස කොළඹ කොටුව මහෙස්ත්‍රාත් සහ අතිරේක දිසා විනිසුරු ලංකා ජයරත්න මෙනෙවිය නියෝග කළාය.

මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය එලෙස නියෝග කරනු ලැබුවේ එම හිමිවරුන් ඇතුළු රාවණා බලය සංවිධානය විසින් ආබාධිත රණවිරුවන් පෙරටු කරගෙන කොළඹ සෙරමික් හන්දිය අසල 2016 වසරේ පැවැත්වූ උද්ඝෝෂණයකදී ගිනි නිවන රථයකට ඇතුළු රජයේ පොදු දේපළවලට හානි කළායැයි කියන සිද්ධියක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් පොලිසිය පවරා ඇති නඩුවකට අධිකරණයේ පෙනී නොසිටීම සම්බන්ධයෙනි.

සිද්ධිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් චෝදනා ලැබ සිටින ජීවනී ප්‍රියංගිකා නමැති ගිහි කාන්තාවක් අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලෙස මහෙස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය නියෝග නිකුත් කළ අතර සිද්ධිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් චෝදනා ලැබ සිටින ඇය පෙරේදා (31) දින අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් වී සිටී.

අඟුලුගල්ලේ සිරි ජිනානන්ද නමැති හිමිනමකට ඉකුත් දිනයකදී අධිකරණයේ පෙනී නොසිටීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් නිකුත් කර තිබූ වරෙන්තුවක් ආපසු කැඳවනු ලැබිණි.

සිද්ධිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් චෝදනා ලැබ සිටින තවත් ගිහි කාන්තාවක වන කංකානම්ලාගේ ශ්‍රියානි නමැත්තියක්ද පෙරේදා (31දා) නඩුවට අදාළව අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටියාය.
නඩුවට අදාළව කිසිදු දිනයක පූජ්‍ය බෙංගමුවේ නාලක, පූජ්‍ය මාගල්කන්දේ සුදත්ත, පූජ්‍ය ඉත්තෑකන්දේ සද්ධාතිස්ස යන හිමිවරුන් අධිකරණයේ පෙනී නොසිට ඇති අතර පොලිසියද ඔවුන්ව අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කර නොතිබිණි.

සිද්ධියට අදාළව එම හිමිවරුන් සියලු දෙනා සැකකරුවන් ලෙස පොලිසිය විසින් නම්කර ඇත.

උද්ඝෝෂණය අතරතුරදී සිදුකර ඇති පහරදීම් මඟින් ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලය අසල නවතා තිබූ ගිනි නිවන රථයකට ඇතුළු රජයේ දේපළවලට හානි සිදුවී ඇති අතර ඒ අනුව පොලිසිය මඟින් ඔවුන්ට එරෙහිව පොදු දේපළ පනත යටතේ නඩු පවරා ඇත. අසූදාහක පමණ හානියක් සිදුවී ඇති බවට පොලිසිය ගණන් බලා ඇත. කොටුව පොලිසිය මඟින් එම හිමිවරුන් ඇතුළු සෙසු පිරිසට එරෙහිව නඩු පවරා තිබිණි. නඩුව දෙසැම්බර් 7 වැනිදා යළි කැඳවීමට නියමිතය.

Unequal partners in trade agreements

September 1st, 2018

by Lakshman I. Keerthisinghe Courtesy Ceylon Today

Not only must we fight to end disastrous unfettered free trade agreements with China, Mexico, and other low wage countries, we must fight to fundamentally rewrite our trade agreements so that American products, not jobs, are our number one export.

-Bernie Sandersp (American Politician)

There has been much criticism in both political and civil society circles that Singapore Free Trade Agreement is detrimental to Sri Lanka’s national interests. A Fundamental Rights petition filed by the Government Medical Officers Association (GMOA) along with two other petitions was taken up before the Supreme Court recently regarding the said agreement.

Petitioners state that purported Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Sri Lanka had entered into with Singapore, is inimical to the interests of Sri Lanka. The said Agreement is totally incompatible with Sri Lankan interests and granted totally unfair and uneven asymmetric advantages and benefits to Singapore’s interests at the expense of Sri Lanka’s interests.

Petition

Petitioners cited Minister of Development Strategies and International Trade, Director General of Customs, Members of the Cabinet of Ministers, the Attorney General and others as respondents.

They challenge the action and/or the decision of the Minister to enter into the purported FTA between Sri Lanka and Singapore; executed on 23 January 2018. No approval of the Cabinet of Ministers has been obtained prior to the Agreement being entered into by the Minister. If any purported approval has been granted by the Cabinet of Ministers, the petitioner state that is illegal and bad in law.

For the purpose of entering into any agreement between the Sri Lankan Government and any other foreign State, its nationals or of corporations, companies and other associations incorporated or constituted under its law for investments in Sri Lanka, the approval of Parliament is necessary, by resolution passed by not less than two-thirds of the whole number of MPs (including those not present) voting in its favour.

Insufficient legislation has been introduced in Sri Lanka to ensure equal status competition and to eliminate disparities and inequalities in trading and supplying services in Singapore. In a Clause of the Free Trade Agreement (SlSFTA), the term national” is defined to mean ‘citizens of Singapore’ and ‘permanent residents of Singapore’, however, in the context of Sri Lanka, same term means ‘citizen of Sri Lanka’ only.

The term the national person of a party” is defined as a ‘natural person who is a national of a party’. Such an apparent and patent disparity may facilitate a person of a ‘third party’ country, who is qualified to apply and obtain the status of a permanent resident of Singapore, to have the benefit of accessing the domestic market, through this purported SLSFTA.

In 2016, Sri Lanka recorded a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of $ 3,759.20 whereas GDP of Singapore is $ 52,600.60 and assert that hence in an objective perspective, a citizen of Singapore, would not in all probability, be induced into or be attracted to invest his time and resources in Sri Lanka, in view of such a vast disparity of GDP and bipolarity of the economic affluence of the two countries. They express apprehension that the said Clause has been included to provide a gateway or an opportunity for totally unknown third party nationals to have access to the Sri Lankan market, merely on the basis of satisfying the requirement of permanent residency of Singapore.

Clauses

Certain purported Clauses of SLSFTA relating to ‘reduction and/or elimination of customs duties’ place Sri Lanka under obligation to reduce or eliminate the existing Customs duties and taxes with additional obligation to further eliminate them in the future petitioners caution. Most of the goods referred to in the Tariff schedule of Singapore are already exempted from Customs duties irrespective of the purported SLSFTA.

The exploitation by foreign nationals, without an effective regulatory framework in Sri Lanka to safeguard the interests of domestic service sectors, may lead to detrimental competition, placing Sri Lankan citizens in a highly-disadvantageous position, depriving competition on an equal status.

The legislation and regulatory framework in Singapore has already established effective protective measures to safeguard the interest and welfare of their domestic service providers. It is alleged that there is a notorious lack of parity which taints the entire transaction process, which seriously impacts Sri Lankan citizens.

The Ministry in a detailed response to prevalent criticisms said the aim is to achieve a diversification of exports and export markets; to create linkages to global production and value chains; integrate Sri Lanka to the global economy; and by virtue of nexus between trade and investment, attract Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) into the country.

In conclusion, it must be stated that Sri Lanka should concentrate on enhancing the export of local products to the world markets in order to enhance the national economy.

(The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with LLB, LLM, MPhil.(Colombo)
keerthisinghel@yahoo.co.uk

එක සිංහල පවුලක් හරි මුලතිව් පදිංචි කළහොත් මැරෙනතුරු උපවාස කරනවා;

September 1st, 2018

Courtesy Lanka Lead News

මේ වන විට මුලතිව් දිස්ත්‍රික්කයට අයත් නොවන සිංහල පවුල් 7000ක් මුලතිව් දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පදිංචි කොට සිටින නිසා මීට වඩා එක් පවුලක් හෝ බලහත්කාරයෙන් පදිංචි කළහොත් එයට එරෙහිව මාරාන්තික උපවාසයක් ආරම්භ කරන බව රවිහරන් මන්ත්‍රිවරයා ප්‍රකාශ කරයි.

උතුරු පළාත් සභාවේ දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ මන්ත්‍රි ටී. රවිහරන් (29දා) මුලතිව් පළාතට පැමිණි අවස්ථාවේදී මාධ්‍යවේදීන් විසින් නඟන ලද ප්‍රශ්නවලට පිළිතුරු දෙමින් මේ බව පැවැසීය.

රවිහරන් මන්ත්‍රිවරයා කියන්නේ රජයට අවශ්‍යව ඇත්තේ උතුරේ සිංහල ඡන්ද දායකයන් සංඛ්‍යාව වැඩි කොට සිංහල පුද්ගලයන්ට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට යවා උතුරේ දෙමළ දේශපාලන බලය යටපත් කිරීමට බවයි.

මේ අවශ්‍යතාව ඉටු කර ගැනීම සඳහා මහවැලි යෝජනා ක්‍රමය ඉත්තකු වශයෙන් රජය භාවිත කරන බව ප්‍රකාශ කරන රවිහරන් මන්ත්‍රිවරයා, ජනාධිපතිවරයා පසුගියදා යාපනයේදී මොරගහකන්ද ජලාශයේ ජලය උතුරට ලබාදෙන බව කියා සිටියේද සිංහල ජනාවාස ඇති කිරීමේ එක් පියවරක් වශයෙන් බවද පැවැසීය.

රජයේ මහවැලි වතුර සමඟ උතුරට කල්ලතෝනි සිංහල වැසියන් පැමිණෙන බව උතුරු පළාත් ප්‍රධාන අමාත්‍යවරයා මීට වසර තුනකට පමණ ඉහතදී පළාත් සභාවේ සැසි වාරයකදී කියා සිටි අවස්ථාවේදී සියලු දෙනාම සිනාසුණත් මේ වන විට සිදුවෙමින් පවතින්නේ ඒ දේම බව කී රවිහරන් මන්ත්‍රිවරයා ඊට අවස්ථාවක් දීමට දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය කිසිසේත්ම සූදානම් නැති බවද කියා සිටියේය.

Sri Lankan student charged with terror offences in Sydney

August 31st, 2018

By Sally Rawsthorne Courtesy Brisbane Times

Star Sri Lankan student Mohamed Kamer Nilan Nizamdeen allegedly planned to attack a hit list of “symbolic” individuals and landmarks across Sydney in an ISIS-inspired lone-wolf terror attack that was foiled on Thursday when a co-worker stumbled across the list and alerted police.

Mr Nizamdeen, 25, was arrested by police in dramatic raids on his office high above the University of New South Wales on Thursday, after a colleague in the university’s IT business team found a notebook allegedly containing details of an “ISIS-affiliated” terrorist plot planned for the Harbour City in the next few months.

Kamer Nilar Nizamdeen appears in a 2016 promotional video for a project by the NSW Government body Study Sydney and an education startup. He was charged with terror offences on 31 August 2018. 
Kamer Nilar Nizamdeen appears in a 2016 promotional video for a project by the NSW Government body Study Sydney and an education startup. He was charged with terror offences on 31 August 2018.

Photo: NSW Government

It is understood the targets of the allegedly graphic threats included former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, ex-foreign minister Julie Bishop and their Liberal Party colleague Bronwyn Bishop. The iconic landmarks included the Sydney Opera House as well as police and railway stations.

Fairfax Media understands that police are now tracking his financial transactions from the past few years to see if they went beyond sending money back to Sri Lanka.

Those who know the Sri Lankan postgraduate student were in shock after the arrest, with multiple friends and neighbours saying they couldn’t believe what Mr Nizamdeen is accused of doing.

“Everyone says it, but he’s such a normal guy. I never would have expected it.”

PhD student charged with terror offences in Sydney

Playing in 4 .

A Sri Lankan national is alleged to have had a notebook containing Islamic State-inspired ideology, and was allegedly planning a terrorist attack involving iconic landmarks.

The IT business analyst was not previously known to police in Australia and has no criminal record.

It is understood that he has no family in Australia and lives with a roommate.

He had worked with NSW Police in 2016 to develop an app to help adapt to life in Australia, which was presented at Parliament House.

He was also selected as UNSW Hero of the Week last year, telling an interviewer that material things are unimportant to him.

“Success for me, being happy, doesn’t always have to be about money, it’s not about the high-ranking job. Success is if you’re comfortable with where you are,” he said.

Sri Lankan national Mohamed Kamer Nilar Nizamdeen who has been charged with terrorism offences.
Sri Lankan national Mohamed Kamer Nilar Nizamdeen who has been charged with terrorism offences.

Photo: Supplied

Everyone says it, but he’s such a normal guy. I never would have expected it.

Friend of the accused

Mr Nizamdeen’s colleagues who witnessed the police raids on the office on Thursday said they were still reeling following the discovery of the notebook, and the subsequent arrest.

“It’s very dramatic. We are all very shaken,” said one colleague.

“It’s scary, thinking we were sitting next to someone plotting something horrible.”

After the arrest on Thursday, plain-clothed detectives also raided the Zetland apartment where he had lived for four years and seized computers and mobile phones from the unit.

Investigators from the multi-agency Joint Counter Terrorism Team say that the notebook found by a co-worker contained details of Sydney identities and landmarks that Mr Nissandeep was allegedly plotting to attack in the following months, NSW joint counter terrorism team commander Detective Acting Superintendent Mick Sheehy said.

It's understood police are now tracking his financial transactions to see if they went beyond sending money back to Sri Lanka.
It’s understood police are now tracking his financial transactions to see if they went beyond sending money back to Sri Lanka.

Photo: Supplied

“There is a number of locations and individuals named in that document who are potential targets,” he told reporters on Friday morning.

Police do not anticipate making any further arrests, he said.

While police say the IT student “would affiliate with ISIS”, he has not been charged with being a member of a terror group.

“At this stage it appears that this is an individual operating on his own. There is certainly some further investigation that is required but again it is a matter that is before the courts,” said Acting Superintendent Sheehy.

He has returned to his native Sri Lanka and has travelled to a number of other overseas destinations, which police on Friday refused to detail.

Mr Nizamdeen briefly faced Waverley Local Court on Friday morning charged with one count of making a document connected with the preparation of a terrorist act.

He did not apply for bail, which was formally refused. He will next appear in Central Local Court on October 24.

Police say that Mr Nizamdeen is on a student visa that expires in September, and was in the process of applying for a new one.

Instead, the AFP have applied for a Criminal Justice Stay visa so they can prosecute him.

“We will allege that this person was in possession of a document that was used in the preparation of air terrorism offence,” said the Australian Federal Police’s Detective Superintendent Michael Mick Tiernan.

“The charge laid against this person are serious and significant and should not be underestimated.”

Police are now working to investigate how Mr Nizamdeen allegedly became radicalised.

Govt engaged in rampant violation of fundamental democratic norms – Gotabaya

August 31st, 2018

Courtesy Adaderana

Former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa says it is abundantly clear that the state apparatus is being abused to unjustly and arbitrarily violate the fundamental democratic right of espousing dissenting political views.

The government is engaged in the rampant violation of fundamental democratic norms in ways that threaten the very foundations of a functioning republic,” he said, in a letter to professionals and intellectuals in Sri Lanka.

He claimed that even the basic right of expressing political preference has been flagrantly violated through the arbitrary and illegal” postponement of elections.

Rajapaksa also charged that the government has pursued a policy of ceding control over key sectors of the economy to foreign interests despite strong opposition from stakeholders, professionals and the general public.

He said that the government has entered into agreements in the most unprofessional and unethical manner, with scant regard for technical concerns.

Most alarmingly, many of these agreements do not include clauses for renegotiation or annulment. Moreover, these have been drafted and signed without ever being subjected to the review or consideration of Parliament.”

The economic doldrums we find ourselves in today are evidenced by the gloomy numbers pertaining to inflation, debt ratio, balance of payments, the value of the rupee against the dollar and foreign investment,” he added.

See Full Letter Below:

My Dear Friends,

Sri Lanka has never, in its long history, fallen to the political, social and economic depths that the nation has witnessed in recent times. Having recognised the dangerous trends across all sectors, we have engaged in various processes and readied ourselves to take up the challenge of rectifying the status quo in a systematic manner. A large number of professionals and intellectuals from all walks of life, irrespective of their religious and ethnic identities, have rallied around us for this purpose.

It is no secret that I have so far desisted from participating in activities of the mainstream political forces. I am aware that you, as professionals and intellectuals who consider it imprudent to dabble with larger discredited political entities, have silently endorsed my position.

The scale of the serious calamities unfolding before us at this very moment however, necessitates an impactful response. Therefore I now believe we are at a juncture where everyone must set aside such concerns to step up and be counted in the larger struggle to save our nation as we know it.

It is abundantly clear that the state apparatus is being abused to unjustly and arbitrarily violate the fundamental democratic right of espousing dissenting political views. The government is engaged in the rampant violation of fundamental democratic norms in ways that threaten the very foundations of a functioning republic. Even the basic right of expressing political preference has been flagrantly violated through the arbitrary and illegal postponement of elections.

The government has pursued a policy of ceding control over key sectors of the economy to foreign interests despite strong opposition from stakeholders, professionals and the general public. It has entered into agreements in the most unprofessional and unethical manner, with scant regard for technical concerns. Most alarmingly, many of these agreements do not include clauses for renegotiation or annulment. Moreover, these have been drafted and signed without ever being subjected to the review or consideration of Parliament.

The economic doldrums we find ourselves in today are evidenced by the gloomy numbers pertaining to inflation, debt ratio, balance of payments, the value of the rupee against the dollar and foreign investment.

There are also dangerous, and concerted, efforts to compromise peace and reconciliation in the pursuit of personal political interests; this is evident in the ongoing constitutional reform initiatives as well as the witch-hunts on military personnel who have made untold sacrifices to rid the country of terrorism. All true Sri Lankans will observe these developments with great dismay.

The political situation borders on anarchy and our nation hurtles towards disaster; at this moment, professionals and intellectuals can no longer look away. It is often said that evil will triumph easily where the good remains silent. We must choose not to stay silent.

In this context, I urge all professionals and intellectuals to support the patriotic forces who have organized the rally ‘Janabalaya Kolambata’ on the 5th of September.

-Gotabaya Rajapaksa

 

Gota says he will join JO protest

August 31st, 2018

Lahiru Pothmulla Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who kept away from mainstream politics so far, said today that would not remain silent when the country was heading towards disaster and would join Wednesday’s ‘Jana Balaya’ protest organised by the joint opposition (JO).

He said Sri Lanka has never before fallen into the political, social and economic depths such as that seen in recent times and added that the unfolding calamity calls for a meaningful response.

The political environment borders on anarchy with our nation hurtling towards disaster. Professionals and intellectuals can no longer look away. We have heard it said that evil will triumph when the good remain silent. We must no longer remain silent and I urge all professionals and intellectuals to support the patriotic forces who have organised the rally ‘Janabalaya Kolambata’ on September 5,” Mr. Rajapaksa said.

He said the government was engaged in violating the fundamental democratic rights in ways that threaten the very foundations of a functioning republic.

Even the basic right of expressing a political preference has been flagrantly violated through the arbitrary and illegal postponement of elections,” Mr. Rajapaksa said.

He said that the government has pursuing a policy of ceding control over key economic sectors to foreign interests despite strong opposition from stakeholders, professionals and the people.

It signed agreements in the most unprofessional and unethical manner. Many of these agreements do not include clauses for re-negotiation or annulment. Moreover, these have been drafted and signed without ever being subjected to the review or consideration of Parliament,” he said.

Mr. Rajapaksa said there were dangerous and concerted efforts to compromise peace and reconciliation in the pursuit of personal political interests.

This is evident in the ongoing constitutional reform initiatives as well as the witch-hunts on military personnel who have made untold sacrifices to rid the country of terrorism,” he said.

Ecological reasons for moving away from meat and livestock.

August 31st, 2018

Chandre Dharmawardana, Canada.

The reasons for the production and consumption of more vegetables, cereals and fruits are  not just  those based on religious considerations, but they are  also over-whelmingly scientific and ecological. Livestock farming requires a huge amount of water and land as pasture. The amount of  agrochemicals  and veterinary chemicals needed also are high, especially with factory farming. The amounts of water etc., needed depend on the climate and other factors. The consumption of insects as protein sources may not face the same ecological objections are for the consumption of meat.

Hence the push to expand diary farming and meat production in countries like Sri Lanka and
BanglaDesh in the face of global warming etc., is not very sensible. The production of buffalo milk takes up much less water as the water is put to double use (paddy growing and preventing weeds in paddy plots). The effect of global warming on a tropical island like Sri Lanka, and what it may take to save it from the dire consequences of sea-level rise are discussed in: https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php

It is also very sobering to note that more than 1/3  of the food produced by  conventional agriculture gets wasted in distribution and production. Meanwhile, 40% of the world lives under famine conditions. large amounts of grain are lost to weevils, bugs and fungus in storage, while this can be safely and very inexpensively eliminated by low level irradiation. This is weaker in intensity than even the cosmic radiation falling daily on our planet, but effective because the right frequency can be chosen to eliminate the fungus and bugs. But “green” zealots who have the support of some politicians  have prevented such simple measures from being adopted. Their propaganda have fanned fear into the mind of the public.

In organic food production (where no preservatives are used in storing grain, fruits, vegetables  etc) the wastage is much more and estimated to be over 60-70 %. However, less than 2% of the world’s food needs are currently produced by organic methods. Hence they make no impact on world hunger, except for their negative impact in their capacity to muster extremely high levels of propaganda and political influence against scientific  agriculture.  There by they  create havoc in the conventional agricultural sector by banning essential agricultural practices, having been misled by misinformation and fake news put out by internet gurus” like Dr. Mercola who wish to sell books, videos, and alternative food supplements and cures through their websites.

“Organic food” is popular among wealthy elite circles who are also the type of people who eat chocolate and want their steak to be organic!  There are extreme ecological difficulties in pushing organic food  to feed even half the world population. See:
http://dh-web.org/green/CD-Mueller-OrganicL.pdf

Here are some sobering facts regarding how much water is used in various types food production.

Chocolate                 1 kg    16,000-18,000  litres of water
Beef                          1 kg    15000-20000
lamb Meat                1 kg    10,000-15,000
Pork                          1 kg     5000-8000
Milk                          1 kg      800-1200
Wheat                       1 kg      500-3000
Rice-traditional seeds       1 kg     3000-5000
Rice-new hybrids              1 kg    1000-2000
Tobacco                      1 kg           2000-5000
Sugar                          1 kg            1000-2000
Potatoes                     1 kg             200-400
Tomatoes                    1 kg            200-300
Cabbage                     1 kg             200-300

Rice needs more water than potatoes, but 1/4 the input of agrochemicals. See my research publication:
Environ Geochem Health, published June 23, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-018-0140-x

The greenhouse gas emissions from meat and diary production are also correspondingly high, adding extensively to global warming. Organizations like the IME claims that water requirements to meet food demand in 2050 could reach triple the current amount used annually by humans. The only way to handle this is to remove meat from our diet, and create new varieties of grain and crops that need 1/3 less water, using biotechnology.

Meat production requires a much higher amount of water than vegetables. IME state that to produce 1kg of meat requires between 5,000 and 20,000 litres of water whereas to produce 1kg of wheat requires between 500 and 4,000 litres of water.

So eat meat only very sparingly if at all.

There are also many reasons from a human health point of view to reduce the intake of red meat which has been declared to be a class-I carcinogen by the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC). The IARC classification indicated a health hazard but not a health risk unless significant amounts are eaten. It is interesting to note that Red meat is  considered to be a factor of at least a hundred more dangerous than glyphosate (herbicide) which has been classified as a class-II carcinogen (i.e., it is not established to be a carcinogen, but there is a probability that it may prove to be a carcinogen on further research).

Similarly noxious fumes form burning fossil fuels like coal, petroleum etc are also proven carcinogens, but no one is fighting to ban them. The very minsters who talk of a toxin-free world also push to open coal-fired power plants. They also produce particulate dust which provide free a ride to many toxins. Dense vehicular traffic does the same thing.

Cigarette smoking is  proven to be carcinogenic, but the CEOs of the cigarette companies, be it Philip Morris or Ceylon Tobacco, have not been jailed but  they are feted, feasted  and honoured; they brush shoulders with the highest in the land!

Balalobhi Arthmarthakami  Dessapaluwan visin 70 vasarakadii  vinasakala ratak. බලලොභි ආත්මාර්තකාමි  දේශපාලුවන් විසින් 70 වසරකදී  විනාසකල රටක්.

August 31st, 2018

Sudath Gunasekara

30.8.2018

Once upon a time

This country had been known as Sinhaladveepa as well as Lanka from ancient times. Ramayanaya was the first to use the word Lanka. The word Simhala was found in Bhagawath Purana

Pearl of the Indian Ocean

Granary of the East

Dharma dveepa

Paradise on earth

Glittering Island (Lankadeepa)

Asia’s Golden Island (Danis Clerk)

Ratnadeepa

Famous for

Best Gems in the world (that is why it was called Ratna Deepa)

Where Kings were one with the people and religion

Where kings declared the subjects as their children

Where only a Buddhist who take an oath that he will protect the Buddha Sasana could become the King

Where the king declared that his body with blood and flesh, he bears, for the welfare of his subjects (Sirisangabo) Iman saraththan pisitan sareeran Dharemi Lokassa Hitassa meva”

Even in recent history it was known as

The Paradise on earth

The land of the most hospitable people in the world

And famous for

Best Tea in the world

Best Cinnamon in the world

Best Gems in the world (that is why it was called Ratna Deepa

And  Now

The tear drop of India both literally and metaphorically as India is always crying to acquire it

The hell on earth

The begging bowl of Asia

The garbage ground of Asia

The drug hub of the Indian Ocean

The main source of cheap home maids for Arabian countries

The garage of South East Asia

Additionally

It holds the world record

For the country with the largest Cabinet in the world

For the only country where there are two leaders and also where one does not know what the other is doing

That has the highest number of politicians per person in the world approximately 1 for 2225 and the highest number of public servants per person 1 for 16

Of being the only country where appointments like the Prime Minster, Leader of the opposition, Chief Whip of the opposition and even the removal of the Chief justice are done against the provisions of the Constitution with impunity where the opposition keeps mum

Where the minority rules the majority and in fact where the tyranny of the minority reigns

As the only country in the world that has denied a party with 72 members the legitimate Leadership of the opposition and a man with 16 seats in the house is appointed as the Leader of the opposition

As the only country where the speaker speaks only for the Prime Minister and on behalf of his former party. And ceased to be the Speaker of the House

As the only country where the Prime mister robs the Nation’s Central Bank and keeps the man who did it, the second accused in safe hiding with impunity.

As the only country where the President takes orders from the Prime minister and the Prime Minister acts on his own without caring a damn just to maintain the majority in Parliament

Where both the President and Prime Minister have made the highest number of foreign trips within the shortest time.

Where the President does not know what his Prime minister is doing

Both the President and Prime Minister talk only no work done (NATO leaders0

Where Ministers enter in to agreements with foreign Governments even without the knowledge of the Cabinet Eg. FTA with Singapore

As the country where more than 50% of the electorates on ground do not have representatives in Parliament under the District MPP system since 2004

Where it is not the people of a given electorate who select and elect their candidates but the Party leader who sometimes name a person from the other side of the world after which voters just cast their vote to the man or woman put forward by the Party

It is also well known

As the country with the most parasitic, self-centered politicians

As the country where modern Democracy has become the biggest joke on earth where political office is only a ladder for politicians to climb to the heaven alive

As the only country with more than one nation

Has the largest number of political parties for any country in the world

A 75 % majority without a single patriotic political leader and where politicians betray their own nation for sake of political gains( The best example is the 80 odd pack of MPP supposed to represent the Kandyan areas keep deaf, dumb and blind while the Prime Minister Ranil and Leader of the house Kiriella freely distribute the native land to Indian Tamil laboures on the hills making the way for a mono Tamilnadu right at the heart of the traditional Home Land of the Sinhalese for 2500 years.

A country that has no national policies on any matter

The country with the highest number of public holidays in the word sometimes running in to 130 a year including holidays declared for 6%12%Islam and Hindu minorities are imposed on the 70% Sinhala majority without w whimper.

A set of people that don’t know its own country, its history, and value of their own people

Pack of politicians who don’t love their country, history, and values

As the say goes it has become a country where pigs are flying and cows summersaulting

And finally where politics is done by the politicians, for the politicians and the personal aggrandizement of the politician only but where the people continue line up and vote like a herd of cattle periodically, for their party nominees whom they see only during elections time one in 5 or 10 years.

In short the famous 16 dreams of the King Kosol appear to be performing on the Sri Lankan stage at full swing accompanied to the death drums beaten by the politicians

I am sure the readers can add many more. These are only few things that came to my mind as I was thinking of the sad flight of my motherland.

Our politicians call it five star Democracy, a replication of the Westminster model?

MMDA and Wali : “To be, or not to be, that is the question”

August 31st, 2018

Dr. Mareena Thaha Reffai, Dehiwela

The famous line that begins Prince Hamlet’s soliloquy in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “To be, or not to be, that is the question” is probably the most cited statement in all classical drama. … “To be or not to be” is in fact, not the question. It is a wrong question.” So says  Google !

Yes, regarding the wali too, it is the wrong question. It should be ”What should the wali do?”

We can excuse Justice saleem Marsoof, a life time dear family friend of ours, a he has no daughters.  But would  all the other members in the panel agree to their daughters – if they have one – to go get married at 18 without the consent of the parents to any Tom, Dick or Harry?   Or even to any Mohamed, Ahamed or Seyyed? I doubt it. I certainly will not.

We must understand the concept of wali in Islam. It is not a matter of a monstrous father handing over his infant daughter with no consent whatsoever   to a horrible doddering old man!   Islam lays down cohesive, comprehensive  rules for a Girl’s marriage giving her independence, dignity, love and acceptance while also assuring the groom that the  protection of the parents and her family continuously even after the marriage. That’s what wali is about.

The bride’s consent is a must in Islam. And the girl being given in marriage by the wali  doesn’t mean it is an authoritarian usurping of the right of the bride, rather the responsible consent of the family – not necessarily the father alone – and the wali represents this fact at the solemn function of the wedding. This also indicates to the groom – and his family, the wali is still responsible for the bride throughout her life. The decision to give her in marriage to a certain person  is most  of the time not decided by the father alone rather by the whole family –often even with consultation with extended family, and father or the wali  represents the family.

The notion that Imam Abu Hanifa  allowed marriage without wali is a misconception. People must know the strongest version is that the marriage is not valid without a wali.

Now again, just like the matter of marriageable age, this proposal to allow marriage of girls without wali came about based on wrong perception. How many marriages have taken place where the father surreptitiously or forcefully gave the daughter in marriage to a total stranger?   Let’s find out and if it is true, then let’s take measures to stop it, rather than opening the flood gates for every girl to go get married to anyone who gives her a missed call, or send a love letter or  smiled at her on the road. Who in their proper sense will think that every girl at  18 years of age  is fit enough to know all the facts about the boy she wants to get married to, and will make a proper decision? Come on.

If anyone is in touch with reality and have seen the girls who eloped with boys and are suffering, often abandoned by her husband and her family, often with two or three children, they will shudder at the thought of allowing girls to get married without wali.

What we need to do is to educate the girls on their rights and more so educate the fathers of the travails of unhappy marriages. Pre marital counselling, both to the bride and groom,  is a sorely neglected need of our society.

Just giving the ass’s freedom for the girls to marry without a wali is not going to solve the problem- it will only confound it.

Sent by:

Dr. Mareena Thaha Reffai,

Dehiwela

Kofi Annan turned UN into a puppet of imperialists

August 30th, 2018
As the customary outpouring of sympathies flow across the continents for the former UN Secretary General, there are some hard truths no one can ignore.
Kofi Annan served as UN Secretary General for 2 terms (10 years) from 1997 to 2007. He was the first official to rise through the UN bureaucracy to become a UNSG. Prior to becoming the UNSG he served as head of the UN Peace Keeping department (1992-2006). Kofi Annan must therefore account for the UN peace keeping failures in Rwanda, Darfur Somalia & Srebrenica, Bosnia. He had ignored a cable by his peace keeping commander in Kigali, Gen Romeo Dallaire in January 1994 alerting the UN about a civil war being provoked. Dallaire had even sought permission to take action to stop an impending genocide but Annan’s office gave orders not to take action. Everything that Dallaire described in his cable to Annan occurred. All that Annan said years later was ‘we did not do more to prevent it’. What good are crocodile tears when a million Tutsi’s had been exterminated? Kofi Annan was just another puppet for the French government in 1994.
UN peacekeepers in a range of countries, including Liberia, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of Congo, were found to be sexually exploiting those they were charged to protect
Philip Gourevitch regular contributor to New York Times says Annan has a habit taking credit when there’s praise to be had & blaming member states for the organization’s failures.
Immediately after taking office as UNSG Kofi Annan announced plans for reform. How linked were these to overall imperial goals & agendas. Kofi Annan in reality facilitated the neoliberal agenda utilizing the UN to penetrate into countries which combined various initiatives into a package that countries had little choice not to refuse or reject. Some of his proposals including reducing powers of the General Assembly & Security Council.
Though UN is supposed to derive its powers from the sovereign powers of its member states, Kofi Annan was responsible for paving the way to transfer sovereignty of nations into the hands of the UN. He was responsible for helping steer UN Security Council approval to legitimize an illegal invasion against Iraq.
After allowing the US to whisk away the 12,000 page Iraqi weapons report, Kofi Annan had the audacity to say the UN was not a US puppet.
His son was implicated in the infamously corrupt food-for-oil programme while he was forced to launch an investigation it concluded that he had failed to refer the case to the UN’s independence watchdog agency.
The manner in which he protected the former head of UN refugee agency accused of sexual harassment adds to the lists of Kofi Annan failures having chosen to side with the perpetrator & penalize the victim & use the UN’s legal immunity to avoid responding when she sought justice. This is not what any women sexual victim would have expected a UNSG to do. Ruud Lubbers, was accused of sexual harassment and Annan cleared him. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/16/world/annan-clears-refugee-chief-of-harassment-accusations.html
In 2001 the Nobel Peace prize was awarded to Kofi Annan & the UN. If Barak Obama did not know why he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the same feeling would have been inherent in the conscience of Kofi Annan. Against a string of major failures (Congo, Rwanda, Liberia, Bosnia, Serbia, Kosovo, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone ) what achievement deserves an international award for peace? What a comedy of errors this award has become.
Many of the UN’s goals like the Millennium Development & Sustainable Development are shrouded in controversy & allegations of using fancy terminology to deceptively push Agenda 21 to depopulate the world forcing sovereign UN member states to adapt & meet goals dictated by UN agencies. These allegations are brushed aside claiming them to be ‘conspiracy theories’ but there is no fire without smoke. http://finalwakeupcall.info/en/2015/10/21/agenda-21-converted-into-2030/
Even when the ICC was hounding African leaders completely ignoring the crimes being committed by West, Kofi Annan sided with the ICC. I remind the Africans that it’s wrong for them to say that only African leaders are put into the dock,” He mentions Milosevic has been tried for war crimes but what is rarely mentioned is that Milosevic was exonerated of war crimes but unfortunately he mysteriously died or was killed in prison! https://thisisafrica.me/stand-icc-kofi-annan-says/ why cannot Annan speak in the same tone against Western crimes as well?
Statistics reveal the hypocrisy behind the hyped UN tribunals. ICC spent $900m over 10 years to complete just 1 trial. The Tribunal for former Yugoslavia took 23 years spending $2b but only 161 indictments but ignored atrocities of NATO & West. The hype about mass graves in Srebrenica ended up just 2788 dead. In the tribunal against Rwanda too international involvement was excluded from investigation & after 20 years of trial only 2 were declared guilty! Cambodia’s hybrid tribunal spent $200m to indict 5 and convict 1. The Tribunal for Sierra Leone spent $23 million on every defendant but only 22 have been indicted. Not one of the UN tribunal has served justice to the victims. These have been nothing but a waste of money, time & have peddled bigger agendas by those funding it.
R2P & humanitarian intervention now plugged into the UN system during Kofi Annan’s tenure as UNSG was in reality a means to dilute the Westphalian principle of international relations to respect national sovereignty & embodied in the UN Charter. Both R2P & HI were a legal means of applying aggression through the UN & at times even ignoring the UN as was in the case of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya & Syria.
Do the bigwigs in the UN not realize the hypocrisy behind the great powers that deem themselves ‘benevolent’ to invade nations & bomb them claiming to prevent other countries bombing these invaded countries! NATO’s bombing campaign of Serbia is a perfect example of how NATO countries organized the Tribunal against former Yugoslavia & the ICJ which NATO countries funded & ensured none of NATO crimes went to the dock! ICC prosecutor Moreno-Ocamp even declined to prosecute NATO officials for attacking Iraq in 2003. How can any doctrine exist if it omits & exempts the main violators who are also the promoters of the very doctrine they violate?
We can all recall former US Secretary of State Madeline Albright who in 1996 said that the deaths of over 500,000 Iraqi children from sanctions was ‘worth it’. Why was there no calls for R2P or HI intervention on behalf of the Iraqi’s when US & UK invaded Iraq in 2003 killing thousands of Iraqis for no reason. The Canadian-sponsored International Coalition for R2P justified Iraq as a R2P invasion necessity. Gareth Evans a key architect of the R2P doctrine was foreign minister of Australia when Indonesia occupied East Timor & Evans shared the stolen oil of Timor (John Pilger) This is the biased personality behind the doctrine of R2P which Kofi Annan blessed. By the very application of the doctrine why are those advocators ignoring the injustices suffered by those invading these nations using the doctrine of R2P – isn’t Kofi Annan himself guilty of sitting silent & watching innocent people suffer from a doctrine he endorsed?
How can the US be benevolent & champion R2P or HI when it has overthrown at least 35 governments (William Blum) R2P & HI have become convenient alternate options for regime change & national asset take overs.
So should we have been surprised when Kofi Annan became the ‘outstanding choice’ to broker peace in Syria. We can well guess who made the outstanding choice. Isn’t it a coincidence that the same UN heads are given to hold international roles which are funded by the very imperialists these UN heads served. Kofi Annan became a convenient peace envoy to buy time till the West was ready to penetrate Syria. What did Annan do when in 17,000 Syrians had been killed after he took over as peace envoy earning $5.7m as envoy fees?
After departing the UN as Secretary General Kofi Annan joined the Elders & he has his own Kofi Annan Foundation which is not surprisingly supported by the usual entities that have been funding depopulation & regime change across the world – Belinda & Bill Gates Foundation, George Soros Open Society, USAID. Annan was a member of Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) a lobby group funded by the Bill Gates Foundation & Rockefeller Foundations promoting GMOs.
Annan was also a member of JP Morgan’s International Council making him automatically aligned to western interests. According to Andrew Gavin Marshall an independent researcher, this international council is chaired by Tony Blair! Annan also sat on the boards of the UN Foundation, World Economic Forum, Global Board of Advisors of the CFR, a Trustee of the International Crisis Group which directly links him to George Soros & the neocon agenda. He was also a member of the Club of Madrid comprising 89 former presidents & PMs from 58 countries. He was also Board of Director of Global Centre for Pluralism. Thierry Meyssan writing to Global Research in 2012 claims Annan to be a handpicked choice of Ford Foundation (unofficial US foreign policy advocate) & CIA initially head hunted by Ford Foundation under the ‘young leaders program’ where Ford even funded his Harvard studies where he went on to marry Nane Lagergren the niece of Raol Wallenberg & connected to Rothschild banksters. Annan’s initiatives like Global Compact, Agenda 21 were all in line with the greater objectives of the corporate family to which he by marriage belonged.
Of all his awards was the 2008 Peace of Westphalia prize when Annan by promoting R2P & HI actually weakening Westphalian sovereign states.
Today, the UN is nothing but a puppet serving the interests of Western neocon agenda. Every UN entity is being used to promote & advance the weakening of sovereign states, the diluting of its internal systems, laws & is even poking their noses into the cultures, heritage & traditions of countries in a well-orchestrated, well-funded & manipulative mechanism that taps into local traitors who can be bought over & aligned to various NGOs & other programs that will help them in their overall objectives.
This is the legacy that Kofi Annan helped create & departed with many wrongly thinking him to be a hero.
You become great by your actions & in deciphering the outcome of one’s role, that greatness becomes diminished by the wrong decisions & actions taken. They depart not knowing, not bothered about the damage done – nations destroyed, people devastated & the unlikelihood of ever recovering from the chaos & abyss their actions helped create.
Shenali D Waduge

ගාළු වරායේ ටකරන් මඩුවක මහ වංචාවක්.. සෞදි සමාගමක්ද පැටලේ..

August 30th, 2018

රංජිත් විතානගේ සභාපති පාරිභෝගික අයිතීන් සුරකීමේ ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරයේ lanka C news

පාරිභෝගික අයිතීන් සුරැුකීමේ ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරය විසින් නිකුත් කර ඇති මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයක් මෙහි දැක්වෙයි.

ගාලුවරායේ ඉදි නොවුනු නාවික යාත්‍රාඅලුත්වැඩිය කරන අංගනයේ ඇතුලු පැත්ත.

2013 මැයි මස 6 වන දින ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරිය හා සීගල්ෆ් ෂිප්යාඩ් (පුද්ගලික) සමාගම අතර ගාලු වරායේ නාවික යාත්‍රා අලුත්වැඩියා කරන අංගනයක් ස්ථාපිත කිරීම සදහා වන ගිවිසුමක් ඇති කරගන්නා ලදී. මෙම ගිවිසුමට ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරිය පාර්ශවයෙන් අත්සන් කරනු ලබන්නේ එහි හිටපු සභාපති  ප්‍රියත් බී වික්‍රම වන අතර ඊට සාක්ෂිකරු ලෙස අත්සන් කරනුයේ වර්තමානයේ වරාය අධිකාරියේ අධ්‍යක්ෂක සැළසුම් ලෙස කටයුතු කරන ඉන්ජිනේරු සුසන්ත අබේසිරිවර්ධනය. වසර 2014  පෙබරවාරි 20 වන දින පෙරවරු 10.41 ට යෙදෙන සුභ මොහොතින් අදාල නාවික යාත්‍රා අලුත්වැඩිය කරන අංගනය සදහා වන සමරු ඵලකය විවෘත කරන ලද්දේ එවකට අමාත්‍යධූර දෑරෑ රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන හා නිර්මල කොතලාවල යන අමාත්‍යවරු විසින්ය. සීගල්ෆ් ෂිප්යාඩ් (පුද්ගලික) සමාගම සවුදි අරාබියට සම්බන්ධකම් කියනු ලබන සමාගමකි. එම සමාගම විසින් 2018/08/28 වන දින වන තෙක්ම ගාලුවරායෙන් එම සමාගමට ලබා දුන් ස්ථානයේ ඉදිකර ඇත්තේ ටකරන් මඩුවක් පමණි.

ගිවිසුම ප්‍රldරව අදාල සමාගම සෑම මසකම කුලී මුදලක් ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරියවෙත ගෙවිය යුතු වුවද මේ වන විට අප වෙත දැන ගැනීමට ඇති ආකාරයට සීගල්ෆ් ෂිප්යාඩ් (පුද්ගලික) සමාගම ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරියවෙත ගෙවීමට ඇති මුදල ඇමරිකානු ‌ෙඩාලර් මිලියන 75 කි.

ගාළු වරායේ ටකරන් මඩුවක මහ වංචාවක්.. සෞදි සමාගමක්ද පැටලේ..

එම මුදල ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරියවෙත ලබා ගැනීම සදහා වන කිසිදු ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරියගෙන ඇති බවට තවම වාර්තා වී නැත. ගිවිසුමේ කොන්දේසි අනුව ගිවිසුමේ කොන්දේසි කඩකිරීමක් සම්බන්ධව 1995 අංක 11 දරණ බේරුම් කිරීමේ මධ්‍යස්ථානය වෙත යායුතු වුවද එසේ බේරුම් කිරීමේ මධ්‍යස්ථානය වෙත තවමත් ගොස් නැත.

මෙම ගිවිසුම පිටුපස සිටින්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා වරාය අධිකාරියේ ඉහළ තනතුරක් දeරෑ පුද්ගලයෙකු වන අචාර්යය සරත් ඔබේසේකර බවට පැහැදිලි සාක්ෂි අප වෙත ලැබී ඇත.ඔහු වර්තමානයේ වෝකර්ස් කලම්බු ඩොක්යාඩ් සමාගමේ කළමනාකාර අධ්‍යක්ෂක වරයා වන අතර ඔහු විසින් තවත් පුද්ගලයෙකු සමග ගාලු වරායට ආසන්නයේ විශාල ඉඩමක් මිලදී ගෙන ඇත. සීගල්ෆ් ෂිප්යාඩ් (පුද්ගලික) සමාගමේ කළමණාකාර අධ්‍යක්ෂකවරයා වන්නේද සරත් ඔබේසේකර වන අතර ඔහුගේ සමීපතම මිතුරා වන්නේ වර්තමානයේ වරාය අධිකාරියේ අධ්‍යක්ෂක සැළසුම් ලෙස කටයුතු කරන ඉන්ජිනේරු සුසන්ත අබේසිරිවර්ධනය.

සුසන්ත අබේසිරිවර්ධන ගාලුවරායේ නාවික නිවාඩු නිකේතනයක් සෑදීම සදහාද සැළසුම් සාදන පුද්ගලයාද වේ. අචාර්යය සරත් ඔබේසේකර ගාලුවරායේ නාවික නිවාඩු නිකේතනය සෑදීමට වන ටෙන්ඩරය පිළිබදව මාධ්‍යයට ලිපි සපයන පුද්ගලයෙක් වන අතර ඔහු පවසන්නේ ස්විස් චැලේන්ජ් ක්‍රමය යටතේ අදාල ටෙන්ඩරය කැදවා ඇති බවය. එය අමූලික බොරුවක් වන අතර ලංකාවේ වලංගු නීතියට අනුව ස්විස් චැලේන්ජ් ක්‍රමය ලංකාවේ වර්තමානයේ ක්‍රියාත්මක නොවේ.

ජනතාවගේ බෙල්ල මිරිකා බදු ලබා ගන්නා රටක රජයට අයවිය යුතු මුදල් නොසලකා කටයුතු කිරීමට එරෙහිව ජනතාව නැගී සිටිය යුතුය. ඒ වෙනුවෙන් නැගී සිටීමට අප ඉදිරිපත් වන  අතර ඉදිරියේදී මේ පිළිබදව අල්ලස් හෝ දූෂණ විමර්ශණ කොමිසම වෙත පැමිණිලි කිරීමටද අප කටයුතු සූදානම් කර ඇත.

රංජිත් විතානගේ
සභාපති
පාරිභෝගික අයිතීන් සුරකීමේ ජාතික ව්‍යාපාරයේ

2 Comments to ගාළු වරායේ ටකරන් මඩුවක මහ වංචාවක්.. සෞදි සමාගමක්ද පැටලේ..”

  1. Sarath obeyseketa says:

    All lies

  2. Sampath Perera says:

    This man Sarath Obesekera has a number of very valuable properties in UK. He had bought them using the he had made through various malpractices when he was the Chief at Ports Authority during the period of President Premadasa. He is corrupt to the core.

සීමා නිර්ණ වාර්තාව අගමැතිගේ පීල්ලට ඒකාබද්ධය පීලි පනියි

August 30th, 2018

මතුගම සෙනෙවිරුවන්

        2017 වර්ෂයේ අග භාගයේදී පැවැත්වීමට තිබූ පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය  කල් තබා කොට්ඨාශ ක්‍රමයට පැවැත්විය යුතු යැයි යටි කූට්ටු පණතක් සම්මත කරගත් යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව කොට්ඨාශ සීමා නිර්ණය සඳහා දහනව වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය ප්‍රකාරව සීමා නිර්ණ කොමිසමක් පත් කළහ. දැන් එම කොමිසමේ වාර්තාව පළාත් සභා අමාත්‍යවරයාට භාර දී පාර්ලිමේන්තු ගත කර තිබේ. මෙම වාර්තාව පසුගිය මාර්තු 22  දින පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ විවාදයට ගෙන සම්මත කර ගැනීමට තිබුණද එසේ සිදු නොවීය.2018 අගෝස්තු මාසයේ 24 වන දින පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට මෙම වාර්තාව ඉදිරපත් කරන තෙක්ම  මෙම වාර්තාව ගැන තොරතුරු ලබා ගැනීමට එය අන්තර්ජාලයේ පළ නොකළ බව සඳහන් කළ යුතුය.. මෙම වාර්තාව සකස් කිරීම පිණිස මහජන අදහස් ලබා ගැනීමට යැයි සාකච්ඡා වට මාලාවක් ලංකාව පුරා පැවැත්වුවද ඒවාට ලක්ෂ 212 ක් වැනි මුදලක් වියදම් කළද මහජන නියෝජිතයන් බහුතරයකට එයට අදහස් පළ කිරීමට හැකියාවක් නොලැබුණි.එම සාකච්ඡා වටය කලුතර දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ පැවැත්වූ දිනයේදී ඒ බැව් කිසිම පළාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රී වරයෙකු දැන නොසිටි අතර එදින බස්නාහිර පළාත් සභාවේ අය වැය විවාදය පැවැත්වූ දිනයද වීම මතක් කළ යුතු කාරණයකි.අහම්බෙන් මෙම අවස්ථාව ගැන දැන ගැනීමට ලැබී එහි පැමිණ අදහස් පළ කළද මාගේ සාක්ෂිය ද එම වාර්තාවේ සඳහන් කර නොමැත.

          මේ සීමා නිර්ණ වාර්තාව මගින්  මා නියෝජනය කරන කලුතර දිස්ත්‍රික්කය එක් අතකින් ජාතිවාදීවද තවත් අතකින් සමාජ විකෘතියක් ඇතිවන ලෙසටද  සකස් කර ඇත. උදාහරණයක් ලෙසට මෙතෙක් බහු ආසනයක් ලෙසට තිබූ බේරුවල ආසනය තුළ සිටි සිංහල ජන සංඛ්‍යාව දෙඩන්ගොඩ නමින් යුක්ත ආසනයකට අනුයුක්ත කිරීම දැක්විය හැකිය. එවිට බේරුවල ආසනය තනි මුස්ලිම් ආසනයක් බවට පත් වේ. සමානුපාතක නියෝජනය මත සිංහල නියෝජිතයෙකු හට පත් විය හැකි නමුදු එය ජයග්‍රාහකයාගේම පක්ෂයෙන් ලැබෙන පත්වීමක් බවට පත් වේ.පළාත් පාලන මැතිවරණයේදී වැලිපැන්න කොට්ඨාශය තුළ එවැනි අවස්ථාවක් ඇති විය.

        මෙම සීමා නිර්ණ වාර්තාව අනුව පැරණි අගලවත්ත ආසනය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම අහෝසි වන අතර අලුතෙන් වාද්දුව නම් ආසනයක් නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. එසේම මෙතෙක් දොඩන්ගොඩ ආසනයට තිබූ තෙබුවන ග්‍රාමයද මතුගම ආසනයට කඩා දක්වා තිබේ.කලුතර දිස්ත්‍රික්කය මෙන්ම ලංකාවේ විවිධ දිස්ත්‍රික්කයන් තූළ කර ඇති විකෘති කිරීම්ද අධ්‍යනය කිරීම යෝග්‍ය වේ. මා විසින් මෙම කොමිසම වෙත ඉදිරපත් කළ යෝජනා අතර පසුගිය පළාත් පාලන සීමා නිර්ණ වලදී සිදුවූ වැරදී බෙදීම්ද ඇතුලත් විය. නිදර්ශනයක් වශයෙන් මන්නාරම මුසලි ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාව සඳහා ආසන 07 ක් ඇති කිරීමේ දී  සිදු කළ වැරදි එසේ පෙන්වා දුනිමි. රිෂාඩ් බද්යුදීන් විසින් කපා දමන ලද කල්ලාරු වනයට පවා එක් මන්ත්‍රී අසනයක් වෙන් කර තිබූ ආකාරය පෙන්වා දුනිමි.උතුරේ අවතැන් වූ සිංහලයන් වෙනුවෙන් වෙන් කළ වවුනියා දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ බෝගස් වැව ප්‍රදේශය පළාත් පාලන සීමා නිර්ණයේදී දිස්ත්‍රික්ක දෙදකටද ප්‍රා දේශීය සභා තුනකටද කඩා වෙන් කර තිබුණි. මේ තුළින් සීමා නිර්ණ කරුවන් බලාපොරොත්තු වූයේ වවුනියා දිස්ත්‍රික්කයට සිංහල මන්ත්‍රී නියෝජනය ශූන්‍ය කිරීමටයි. විශේෂයෙන්ම ඉදිරි පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයකදී මෙන්ම පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණයකදී. සිංහල ජනතාව එක පොකුරුට සංවිධානය වීම මෙයින් වැලකේ.මේවා නිවැරදි කරන ලෙසට කොමිසමෙන් ඉල්ලීම් කළද ඒවා තමන්ට අයත් කාර්යයන් නොවේ යන්න ඔවුන් ගේ පිළිතුර විය.

        මෙවැනි ජාතිවාදී සමාජ විකෘතිවාදී බෙදීම් ඇති මෙම වාර්තාව සකස් කර තිබෙන්නේ කොටි ත්‍රස්තවාදීන් සඳහා අනුග්‍රහය දැක්වූ හිටුපු මිනුම්දෝරු අධිකාරිවරයෙකු වූ කේ.තවලිංගම් මහතාගේ සභාපතිත්වයෙනි. එසේම කොටි කාන්තාවන් වෙනුවෙන් ලිපි සම්පාදනය කල එන්.ජී.ඕ. ක්‍රියාකාරිණියක වූ ආචාර්ය අනිලා ඩයස් බණ්ඩාරනායකද රිෂාඩ් බද්යුදීන් ගේ උපදේශකයෙකු ව සිටි මහාචාර්ය හිස්බුල්ලා ද(ඔහු පසුගියදා මියගියේය) අනෙක් සාමාජිකයන් වෙති.ඔවුහු තමන්ගේ ස්වාමි වරුන් ගේ අරමුණ වෙනුවෙන් මෙම වාර්තාව සැකසූහ.පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත්කර න තෙක්ම මහජනයාට මෙම වාර්තාව නිකුත් නොකරන ලද්දේ මෙම ජාතිවාදී සීම නිර්ණ සහ විකෘතිතා හෙළිදරව් වන නිසාය

        පළාත් පාලන සීමා නිර්ණයෙන් පසු පැවැත්වූ මැතිවරණයේ දී ප්‍රා දේශීය සභාවල ඇතිවූ විකෘතිතා දැන් කවුරුත් අවබෝධ කරගනෙ සිටිති. පරාජිත පක්ෂ වල නියෝජිතයන් බුරුතු පිටින් මන්ත්‍රී වරුන් බවට පත්වූ යේ  ජ.වි.පෙ. මුස්ලිම් කොන්ග්‍රසය හෙළ උරුමය සහ එ.ජා.ප.ය විසින් බලපෑම්කර සම්මත කර ගත්  සියයට හැත්තෑව සහ සියයට හතළිහේ මැතිවරණ ක්‍රමයෙනි.දැන් ඔවුන්ගේම මැදිහත් වීමෙන් සකස් කළ සියයට පණහක කේවල ක්‍රමයත් සියයට පණහක සමානුපාතික ක්‍රමයත් මගින් පළාත් සභාවන් ස්ථාපිත වුවහොත් පළාත් පාලන ආයතන වල දැනට ඇතිවී තිබෙන අර්බුදයන්ට වඩා එහා ගිය අර්බුද රැසක් නිර්මාණය වනු ඇත. එජා.ප යට දැන් තිබෙන එකම හිසරදය නම් ඉදිරි පළාත් සභා චන්දයට මුහුණ දෙන අන්දමයි.නිසැක පරාජය ඔවුන් අභිමුවේ තිබේ.එසේම දෙමළ ජාතිවාදීන් සහ මුස්ලිම් අන්තවාදීන් සතුටු කිරීමට කළ හැකි තවත් දේද ඉතිරිව තිබේ. එම තත්ත්වය තුළ රජය විසින් සිය අනුග්‍රහයෙන්ම සකස් කළ සීමා නිර්ණ වාර්තාවට විරෝධතාවයක් ගොනු කරනු ලබන්නේ මාස පහකට ආසන්න කාලයක සිටයි.කොට්ඨාශ ක්‍රමය වෙනුවට පෙර පැවති සමානුපාතික ක්‍රමයට මෙම මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම හොඳයයි සමාජමය මතයක් ඇති කිරීම එයින් එකකි. එසේම චන්දය කල් දමමින් ජනතා විරෝධය යටපත් කරමින් එකම දිනක පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට අවශ්‍ය කල් මැරීමද මෙහි තිබේ.මෙම උගුලට ඒකාබද්ද විපක්ෂය පැහැදිලිවම අසුවී ඇත. ඔවුහු රජය සමග එකතුව සිමා නිර්ණ වාර්තවට විරුද්ධව චන්දය ලබා දුන්හ. නමුත් මාස පහක් ගත වීත් මෙම වාර්තාව විශ්ලේෂණය කොට කල එකදු මාධ්‍ය සකච්ඡාවක් හෝ රැස්වීමක්ද නොවීය. එයින් පැහැදිලි වන්නේ ඔවුහු සියල්ල අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා උගුලකට අසුවී ඇති බවය. මන්ද අමාත්‍ය මහින්ද සමරසිංහ මහතාද මැතිවරණ කොමසාරිස් මහින්ද දේශප්‍රිය අතින්ද මේ ගැන ඉඟියක් පළවූ බැවිනි. එනම් අගමැති ගේ මූලිකත්වයෙන් පත්කරන ලද කමිටුවකින් මෙම වාර්තාව නැවත සමාලෝචනය කොට සම්මත කළ හැති බවයි.අගෝස්තු 28 වන දින කතානායක වරයා විසින් එම කමිටුව පත් කොට අවසන් කර තිබේ. එහි සාමාජිකයන් ලෙසට අගමැතිවරයා අර්.එම්.ඒ.එල්. රත්නායක පෙරියසාමි මුතුලිංගම් මහාචාර්ය බාලසුන්දරම් පිල්ලේ සහ ආචාර්ය ඒ.එස්.එම්. නවුෆල් යන මහත්වරුන් පත් කර ඇත. ඒ අතර මුස්ලිම් කොන්ග්‍රසයේ නායක රවුෆ් හකීම් සීමා නිර්ණය තුළ තම ප්‍ර දේශ වලට බහු ආසන ගණනාවක් අවශ්‍ය බව පසුගියදා ප්‍රකාශ කලේය. දැන් බළලා මල්ලනේ එළියට පැමිණ ඇත.නව කමිටුවට ඇතුලත් වන බහුතරය සිංහලයන් නොව දෙමළ හා මුස්ලිම් පුද්ගලයන්ය. එවිට ඉදිරියේදී සිදු වන්නේ මෙම වාර්තාව අගමැතිට අවශ්‍ය වන ආකාරයට ජාතිවාදීන් ගේ ඉල්ලීම අනුව සංශෝධනය කොට සම්මත කර ගැනීමයි. ඒකාබද්ධය පීලි පනින විට අගමැතිවරයා සිය ඉලක්කයන් අනුව ඊනියා යහපාලන කෝච්චිය ඉදිරියට ගෙනයමින් තිබේ.ජනතාව මේ කෝච්චිය ට බෙල්ල තබනවාද නැතිනම් පෙරලනවාද යන්න ඉතා ඉක්මනින් තීරණය කළ යුතුය.

මතුගම සෙනෙවිරුවන්

MMDA need to be implemented with or without ACJU – A REJOINDER

August 30th, 2018

Dr.Reffai Sri Lankan Association of Muslim Women & Girls

Assalamu alaikum.

I am shocked by this scathing attack on one of the oldest leading organisation of the community – namely ACJU. This article  has nothing to do with MMDA rather a vitriolic run down on ACJU.

Before responding to the accusations, though I am not a member of ACJU, I would like to ask the erudite writer where in the world  did he get this notion that “MMDA  ….. is misused/misapplied  by ulemas  to make girls victims as they are given in ‘marriage’ easily to fun-seeking  foreign ( mostly from the Gulf) men mulch older and, in some cases  married to many others back in their  countries.”  – as  much as I am familiar with the grass root level girls and  women, I have not come across a single case where any  ulema did anything of the sort. I would expect the writer to give  actual details of such cases if there are any.  Or else he is committing a grave slander against the ulemas of this country.

That being said, yes it is true ACJU is far from a perfect organisation of theologians but  it is unfair to expect it to be, since we are in a country which has various  aqeeda and anyone passing out from any madrasa, not only from  Srilanka but from  any country,  can become a member of ACJU – so it is anything but homogeneous – as it will consist of ulemas with a variety of views on any matter and usually the view of the head of the ACJU prevails or is presented.

However, the Srilankan Muslim community has no proper leadership. Politicians have miserably failed to give leadership and even organisations such as MCSL and NSC are sorely lacking in leadership due to various reasons mainly due to a lackadaisical attitude and lack of perseverance in any matter. Obviously knee jerk reactions, that too, very delayed at times, only when some problems crop up and then going into slumber back again, is not a sign of leadership.

In this back drop the only semblance of leadership we have is from the ACJU. It does have many strengths,  and is performing many meritorious acts, which I suggest Mr. Latheef to inquire from the head of ACJU and find out.  Meanwhile on matters which need absolute thorough knowledge of theology – a he calls it – which means really a knowledge of Quran and Sunna – when it comes to the MMDA,  if we are to call on every Jill, Jane and Mary to come forward to give verdicts (sic. fathwas), we certainly will be doomed.

MMDA matters are not simple matters like road traffic rules to change as and when we fancy. These will have long lasting impact on the society specially the female sector. They have to be changed, if at all,  having studied the problems properly and knowing the reality in today’s context and having the Quran and sunna as the back drop. I spoke to one of the spokes –  person in the ladies group which had a press conference regarding this matter and when asked how many  children she knows who are married younger than 18, she said  very  few but when asked how many she knows who were married at an older age and are miserable, she said many many. She did accept the fact that we have no records of any figures of the number of child marriages or how they are fairing.

Pray, I’D LIKE TO KNOW, what  the writer implies by ” If Muslim women’s views are not respected and required changes to MMDA are not made they (Women) too are likely to show their displeasure at the next polls and, as the trend goes they cannot be dictated even by their husbands about how they will vote.” – What in the world has the voting   to do with change to MMDA? WHEN DID THE HUSBANDS DICTATE  THE WIVES HOW TO VOTE? And if they did, is it a good thing we should preserve? Confusing.

What we need  is really not a total change just because some feel so. We must remember the maxim ” It is important to change when it is important to change and it is important not to change, when it is important not to change.”

First of all, what we need to do is a proper study on the situation at present; number of child marriages actually  taking place, and how they have fared in the past, what is the number of divorces among Muslims relating to marriage ages, the despicable situation of the qazis, the number of polygamy taking place and why etc. etc. With these hard facts in hand we can decide whether we do need a change or not.

More than anything, what we need to do most is to continuously educate the public specially the men, who will be the fathers and husbands of the girls, on the importance of  giving the rights of the women in their families,  as well as fulfilling their obligations according to shariah laws in order to please Allah. This can be done only  through ACJU – just castigating them and shunning them will only aggravate the situation.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Latheef Farook <almfarook19@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr.Reffai 

Almuslimaath

Sri Lankan Association of Muslim Women & Girls

YAHAPALANA AS A WAKE UP CALL Part 3B

August 30th, 2018

KAMALIKA PIERIS

The phosphate deposit at Eppawala  was discovered  in 1971 during a survey conducted by the Department of Geological Survey. It was given to a DDC for its exploration in 1974, and was later taken over by Lanka Phosphate Ltd,  (LPL) a company fully owned by the GOSL. Eppawala contains 60,000,000 metric tons of phosphates within 4 square kilometres..

In 1992 it was decided to call for proposals for the manufacture of phosphate fertilizer using Eppawala. In view of the chemical composition of this rock, such as high chlorides and high oxides of iron and aluminum causing serious corrosion of plant and equipment, as well as a reduction in filtration rate, foreign collaboration had to be sought to get over the these technological difficulties and  use this deposit for the manufacture of fertilizer for export,” said Industrial Development Minister C.V. Gooneratne.

Six proposals were received by the government in 1994 but only one, Freeport MacMoran was selected.   Reason give was that only Freeport McMoran had the required technology to process the Eppawala apatite deposit. They are also one of the leading phosphate fertilizer firms in the world

Initial discussions on the proposed project were held with Freeport MacMoran Resource Partners of USA and their agents here between 1994 and 1996. The first round of negotiations was in March 1994 under the UNP government. The second was in March 1995 and the third in December 1996.

On the conclusion of negotiations Freeport MacMoran made representations to the President saying they could not agree with some of the conditions and also ‘the language used.’ These included the Income Tax Act and the Environmental Acts. President Chandrika Kumaratunga  had then directed officials to conduct a “final round of negotiations and clear all outstanding issues along with the tests of the agreement” following a request made by McMoran.

Even the Attorney General has pointed out that this type of intervention could seriously obstruct a fair negotiating process, and is an indirect way of binding the Negotiating Team to agree to the final terms and conditions laid down by foreign companies, however disadvantageous and unfavorable they are to the people of Sri Lanka, observed Batty Weerakoon, in 2000.

A committee comprising, B. C. Perera, Secretary to the Treasury, Sarath N. Silva, attorney general, K. Austin Perera, Secretary Ministry of Industrial Development, Thilan Wijesinghe, Chairman/Director-General BOI, and Vincent Panditha, Senior Advisor, BOI and Consultant Ministry of Industrial Development  was appointed to conduct a final round of negotiations. That round of negotiations was conducted between July and August 1997, and thereafter the Agreement was initiated by the  Secretary/Ministry of Industrial Development and representatives of Freeport MacMoran.

The B.C.Perera Committee’s final round of negotiations in furtherance of the Tender ended in August 1997. The Report tendered after this round  is titled, “Report of the Negotiating Committee on the Joint-Venture Agreement with M/s Freeport McMoRan Resource Partners of USA for the manufacture of rock phosphate fertilizer for export utilizing the rock phosphate deposit at Eppawala.” The Report says that in this final round of the Negotiating Committee the drafts of the Mineral Investment Agreement and the subsidiary Agreements were agreed upon and initialled by S/Ministry of Industrial Development and representatives from Freeport McMoRan Resource Partners and IMC Agrico.

However,  Freeport McMoran is not the joint-partner in the Eppawala project, noted Batty Weerakoon, it is IMC-Agrico. Free-Port McMoran Resource Partners Ltd., had transferred all their phosphate fertilizer businesses, including the mining and sale of phosphate chemicals, to IMC-Agrico, in 1993. IMC Agrico , though a company in its own right, is no more than a front for the operations of McMoran, said Weerakoon. This meant that the successful tenderer. McMoran, had substituted another as the joint venture partner. McMoran makes the Agreement but a dummy signs it.

Sri Lanka had agreed to a 30 year deal worth $425mn  ,the Eppawala phosphate mining and Trincomalee fertiliser production joint venture” for exporting Di-Ammonium Phosphate manufactured in Sri Lanka using Eppawala rock phosphate,  a Mineral Investment Agreement was signed with    IMC Agrico and Tomen Corporation  , signing for Freeport MacMoran. Under the deal, IMC and Tomen will respectively control 65 and 25 percent of equity in the joint venture, with the balance, ten percent, going  to state-run Lanka Phosphate Ltd. Tomen is a Japanese construction company.

IMC and Tomen would  will be allowed to mine and export up to 3.6 mn metric tons of phosphate — in rock form — for the first 12 years, after 18-months and 15-months of exploration and feasibility study. Experts observed that the investors would get enough profits on rock export sales to repay bank loans and recover the bulk of their outlay. The government would be paid 5.5 percent of the phosphate’s estimated market value. The fertiliser will also be sold domestically at a reduced price of five percent off FOB.

The deal also allowed the foreign firms to explore over an area of 56km sq, and scour a buffer zone” extending to 10 kms from the Eppawala deposit boundary. This  so-called ‘buffer zone’ equals a surface area of at least 750km sq, observed critics.  The foreign investors have asked for and have been given a buffer zone of ten kilometres in radius around Eppawala. That works out to more than 700 square kilometres. This is really madness. This company is not prospecting in unexplored territory.

The government also gave the foreign partners in this joint venture a package of concessions. Among other adjusted concessions, the BOI has waived the normal 20-year tax holiday for investors, replacing it with a five percent corporate income tax that will increase to 15 percent after 12 years of operations. There is also  a clause which stipulates that a larger quantity of rock could be exported with the express authority of the Secretary to the Ministry of Industrial Development.

The agreement also called for the construction of a processing plant and deep water dock at Trincomalee, to be linked to Eppawala via a specially-built railway line. After the plant is built in an estimated three years on 450 acres of land, with an extra 300 acres of beach front kept in reserve, it will produce up to 600,000 metric tons of hi-grade Di-Ammonium Phosphate .

The government justified the project on the grounds that the country lacks the know-how, the capital, and machinery to tap into this motherlode on its own and undertake such a high-risk industry as large-scale mining,

Certainly Sri Lanka lacks the technology to exploit the Eppawala deposit by itself and make money from it, said the  experts.  Foreign investment is necessary. But the government failed to maximize on  the deal . The government has played a weak hand in the deal. . The government has virtually dealt IMC and Tomen a monopoly over Sri Lanka’s important phosphate reserves, locking out other potential foreign investors. Eppawala is a relatively low-risk venture, the government should have pressed for at least 20 percent free equity to LPL.

Australian mining industry consultant, Richard Tinsley had       told the Cabinet-Appointed Negotiating Committee to insist on LPL being paid $12.5mn for the 25mn metric tons of confirmed reserves.  In the case of rock exports during the first twelve years of running, he has advised that profits from sales abroad be split 50-50. This would have guaranteed Sri Lanka an extra $13mn in revenue.

Tinsley had also  recommended that during the first decade of operations, two percent of profits from sales should also be placed in a trust fund to compensate those who may have to be uprooted, and to guard against possible environmental degradation.The investors did not agree to this and are only giving a $500,000 bond for the first ten years.

Batty Weerakoon writing in 2000 said the contract was against the law. The Mines and Minerals Act No. 33 of 1992 law does not permit such a contract. There is provision only for a mining licence.  Therefore, McMoran  was to operate on the license issued to Lanka Phosphate Ltd. Lanka Phosphate would transfer its license for exploration and mining to a  “Project Company” known, ironically, as Sarabumi. Mining Area” was loosely defined  as the land within the exploration area which is covered by the mining licenses issued to the company by the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau.” .

B.C. Perera Report said “A serious attempt was made to get the two foreign investors to also sign the MIA [Mineral Investment Agreement]. However they did not agree and stated that they have followed the present pattern everywhere. The Project Company which will be a signatory to the Agreement will represent them”. Certainly the Project Company will represent them, said Weerakoon, but they are not liable under the Agreement.

Weerakoon pointed out that only the locally incorporated Sarabumi will  be held liable on the Agreement. For the damage that is possible as resulting from the mining operations. McMoran and IMC Agrico will not be liable. By the time the question of damaged environment comes up ,the foreign shareholders would have cleared out of the scene .

This Agreement   had to get round  the law in other sectors too. That has to be done unnoticed by the law and the law makers. To amend the law to accommodate McMoran would be  scandalous, observed Weerakoon.  Regulations which are not legal have been smuggled in to accommodate this contract. One such regulation, said “Special negotiations in the form of an Investment Agreement may be conducted by the Secretary with any private sector proponent or participant with regard to the terms and conditions of and supplementary rights and obligations under such agreement.”

There is no provision in the law for the Secretary to the Ministry of Industrial Development to enter into such an Agreement, either observed Weerakoon.  The preamble to the draft Investment Agreement states that the Secretary to the Ministry of Industrial Development enters into the Agreement representing the Government of the Republic of Sri Lanka  on the orders of the Cabinet, by virtue of the powers vested in them by the Constitution of Sri Lanka.”

This purported authority, issuing from the Regulations is meant to give to the Investment Agreement a spurious legality for the purpose of protection under the Investment Treaty. However, once an Agreement of this nature is made and signed by a Government under its own Regulations,  it cannot, according to Clause 157 of the constitution, be disowned in court, said Weerakoon.

Anil Amarasekera  drew attention to alleged human rights abuses committed by Freeport-McMoran at its gold and silver mining operations in the Indonesian-occupied West Papua (Irian Jaya). Freeport is accused of having a hand in mass-disappearances, torture, and murder  in Irian Jaya  when in 1965 Suharto took power . Freeport stayed  on for 30  years, with USA support. The events in Sri Lanka are a carbon copy of what happened in Indonesia, Freeport may have a similar sinister motive here too, coming behind a  front” company, IMC Agrico ,said Amarasekera.

Scientists strongly objected to the Agreement. In May 1998, the President of the National Academy of Sciences Prof. V. K. Samaranayake wrote to the President  saying the “project in its present form was premature as the vital data relating to the actual size and quality of the mineral deposit have not been adequately surveyed and established”.

In July 1999, a committee of 12 scientists of the National Science Foundation submitted a report drawing attention to the fact that the proposal of the U.S. Mining Company was highly disadvantageous to Sri Lanka, with highly adverse impacts on the environment  and pointed out ways of exploring the resource with long lasting benefits to the country.

The scientists declared that there were serious economic and social implications in the Agreement. McMoran was getting the exclusive privilege to export 13.6 million tonnes of raw rock phosphate during the first 8 years earning around 400 million dollars by paying only 5% of the earnings to the Sri Lanka Government. This was supposed to be for the “financial comfort “of the company The FOB value of 21.6 million tonnes mined over a 30 year period amounts to $ 673 million, but the direct income to Sri Lanka is a meager $107 million.  The established full deposit will be depleted in 25 years. Mining in 56 square kilometres will displace a large number of villagers from their traditional areas.

The National Academy of Sciences in their recommendations to the Government  said a complete geological survey is necessary. They also  recommended the manufacture of single superphosphate as a fertilizer to satisfy the local requirement,  not fertilizers such as ammonium phosphates. Peradeniya scientists have shown that using home-grown technology Eppawala apatite crystals can be made soluble. And the deposit used to supply the agricultural needs of the country.

Eppawala is not a big deposit  by world standards , but for the use as fertilizer raw material for the farmers of Sri Lanka, it is a resource which should be managed with great care and utilized wisely, the possession of a strategic mineral deposit like Eppawala requires wise resource management taking into account the long-term interests of the nation.

Environmental conservationists warned that the project will bring environmental and infrastructural degradation to Zone-H of the  Mahaveli Development Scheme. If mining takes place as proposed, up to a depth of about 100 meters, within 20 years, it is most likely that this area will become uninhabitable,” says the Environmental Foundation Ltd. Due to the possibility of irrigation and other water resources getting affected, people of this area will face a problem regarding their daily requirements of water, both for drinking and other purposes.”

Eppawala residents also spoke up.  They feared that due to the project, around  12,000 families in the area would be forced off their land and re-settled elsewhere,.We will not go. We will not leave from our village lands and homes even if we were to be forcibly chased out,” says Venerable Mahamankadawala Sri Piyaratana Thera, the North-central Province’s Deputy Sanghanayaka, and President of the Committee for the Protection of Phosphate Deposits at Eppawala.

The public went to courts against the project. An FR application was made In October 1999. seven petitions alleging infringement of fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 12 (1); 14 (1) (g) and 14 (1) (h) were filed in the Supreme Court against the Eppawala project. They were made by seven persons of Eppawala including the Ven. Mahamankadawala Piyaratana Thera of Galkanda Purana Viharaya, Eppawala, and had the Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development, Sarabhumi Resources (Pvt) Ltd, Geo-Resources Lanka (Pvt) Ltd. and the Attorney General among the eight respondents.

The case was against a most disastrous agreement the GOSL was to have formally entered into with a foreign company and/thro its agents in SL for the exploration etc of the mineral phosphate deposits at Eppawala, said Haris de Silva.

The petitions cited as Bulamkulame and Others v. Secretary Ministry of Industrial Development and Others (Eppawala Case) SC (FR) Application No. 884/99 was heard in the Supreme Court by a panel of three judges: Amerasinghe J., Wadugodapitiya J., and Gunasekera J.

After a lengthy trial the judgment was delivered on 2nd June 2000 by Justice A. R. B. Amerasinghe, with Justices Wadugodapitiya and Gunasekera agreeing. Immediately after the delivery of the judgment it was hailed, both locally and abroad, as a landmark judgment in the area of fundamental rights.

Following is the Order given by the Court on March and April 2000:”For the reasons set out in my judgment, I declare that an imminent infringement of the fundamental rights of the petitioners guaranteed by Articles 12 (1), 14 (1) (g) and 14 (1) (h) has been established.”There is no assurance of infallibility in what may be done; but in the national interest, every effort ought to be made to minimize guesswork and reduce margins of error. Having regard to the evidence advanced and the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and respondents, in terms of Article 126 (4) of the Constitution, I direct the respondents to desist from entering into any contract relating to the Eppawala phosphate deposit up to the time,”(1) a comprehensive exploration and study relating to the (a) locations, (b) quantity, moving inferred reserves into the proven category, and (c) the quality of apatite and other phosphate minerals in Sri Lanka is made by the third respondent, the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau, in consultation with The National Academy of Sciences of Sri Lanka and the National Science Foundation, and the results of such exploration and study are published and”(2) any project proponent whatsoever obtains the approval of the Central Environmental Authority according to law, including the decision of the superior Courts of record of Sri Lanka (Amerasinghe. J) This is  SC case 884/99 (FR) dated 2nd June 2000]

In 2005 a second attempt was made to get at the Eppawala deposit. Public Enterprise Reform Commission (PERC)  called for expression of interest from foreign or local agencies for the development of the Eppawala phosphate deposit on a public/private partnership basis, it commences the second attempt to dispossess this natural resource belonging to the people of Sri Lanka, observed Haris de Silva.

Haris de Silva in 2005 drew attention to the Supreme Court judgment. The very detailed judgment of the learned judge clearly shows the devious ways thro which the GOSL was trying to maneuver its way to award the contract to Freeport MacMoran for the supposed economic benefits to the Sri Lankan people, when in fact it would have ruined not only the present generation living in that area, but would cause the degradation and destruction of an entire ecosystem centered in and around Anuradhapura. In fact, the judge did not mince his words when he said ‘in my view the proposed agreement seems to circumvent the laws and in its implementation is biased in favor of the company as against the members of the public

The analysis by the judge of the various clauses in the agreement, the very inept submissions made to court by the counsel for the respondents, the uninformed statements made by the S/Ministry of Industrial Development, all in their attempt get the agreement accepted as it was,  show for whose interests the government officials were working so hard.

If the contract was awarded on the basis of that agreement, the resultant activity would have devastated Eppawala and its environs, destroying part of Jaya Ganga. But those were not to be the considerations of the government officials who were privy to the project proposal. One would not fail to see that their interests were with the private contractors and not with the present or future generations of Sri Lankans, continued Haris de Silva.

Finally, it may be asked what the necessity is to bring in foreign participation to this project, when it has been so clearly shown by our scientists of no mean repute that the resource can be most effectively managed by our own expertise to benefit the country for well around a millennium or more years. The duty of any government is to work for the public good of the country and not for private gain, concluded Haris de Silva.

The present day Yahapalana government, which is notoriously  pro America, has announced in June  2018 that it  planned to use the  Eppawala rock phosphate deposit to produce Single Super Phosphate  the initial cost , estimated to be Rs. 2 billion, would  be borne by the government, Minister for Agriculture Mahinda Amaraweera  had appointed a  committee  headed by Prof. O.A. Illeperuma of Peradeniya University to  comment on the feasibility of the project. The report was favorable

Neville Ladduwahetty, sees the implications. He has used the media to draw attention to the earlier judgment. Justice Amerasinghe’s judgment stipulated conditions that must be followed before entering into any contractual agreement on this matter, Ladduwahetty said.

Justice Amerasinghe said, I direct the respondents to desist from entering into any contract relating to the Eppawala phosphate deposit up to the time (1) a comprehensive exploration and study relating to the (a) locations, (b) quantity, moving inferred reserves into the proven category, and (c) quality of apatite and other phosphate minerals in Sri Lanka is made by the third respondent, the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau, in consultation with The National Academy of Science of Sri Lanka and the National Science Foundation, and the results of such exploration and study are published, and (2) any project proponent whomsoever obtains the approval of the Central Environmental Authority according to law, including the decisions of the superior Courts of record of Sri Lanka.”

Ladduwahetty added, It is to be noted, that any environmental inquiry has also now to take cognizance and comply with Principle 17 of the Rio de Janeiro Declaration, vide principles 6 and 7 of Stockholm and principle 15 of Rio, as stated in the judgment. Thus, it is obligatory for PERC, as the present GOSL agency handling the subject, to comply with the directives of the Supreme Court. It would also be prudent for them to inform the public, to establish transparency, as to what their modus operandi is in this instance.

They, and the GOSL, should also bear in mind that they are not the owners of the Eppawala or any other phosphate deposit in the island, but are only administrators of such resources for the time being, and all natural resources in the island belong to the people of Sri Lanka, as so ably and effectively stated in the SC judgment,

The judgment of Justice Amerasinghe, as well as the reports and representations made to the President, the number of books and monographs published on the subject, and the numerous articles that appeared in the media showing the irreparable damage that would be caused to the environment etc. by the proposed project must surely be available to the President and to the members of the PERC. They cannot be swept under the carpet, ignored and forgotten, concluded Ladduwahetty.

Prof. O. A. Illeperuma of the Peradeniya University who headed the technical committee responded. Recent decision of the Minister of Agriculture has prompted reader Neville Ladduwahetty to point out the legal ramifications arising from the Supreme Court decision on Eppawala apatite he said. The expert committee which drafted the current report was fully aware of the legal aspects which have to be considered, Illeperuma said.

This Supreme Court decision arose due to six villagers challenging the handing over of the Eppawala deposit to the McMoran Company for a song, which would have completely wiped off this deposit from Eppawala in 25 years. However, this kind of law, stifling further action is not the way to go. If there are legal obstacles LPL can petition the Supreme Court again and I am sure that in light of the earlier decision, the Supreme Court will give a favorable decision.

For the Government to “go ahead with exploitation of (the) Eppawala rock phosphate deposit” it could only mean that the Government is confident that it has fulfilled the conditions imposed by the Order of the Supreme Court. The Government has to be absolutely sure that it has met all obligations set out in the Court Order if serious consequences are to be avoided. otherwise, it would mean that the Government is not only in violation of the Order imposed by the Supreme Court, but is also in violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioners who petitioned the Court.

The BC Perera committee included none with background knowledge on this deposit, or the scientists who have toiled hard for over two decades and showed that this deposit can be developed in Sri Lanka with our own experience. Although there was a committee of subject experts which recommended that the proposed project is detrimental to the country, and that we should go for a single superphosphate plant to satisfy the needs of Sri Lankan farmers, their report was conveniently sent to the waste paper basket.

The negotiating team never considered the manufacture of single superphosphate, which at that time could have been produced at $40 a tonne while the manufacture of ammonium phosphate would have cost $232 a tonne. The negotiating team members probably did not know the difference between these two fertilizers.

In 2007, when Lanka Phosphate Ltd. (LPL) planned to commence a single superphosphate plant, due consideration was given to all these aspects and there were no objections to the proposed project from anyone, including the villagers involved in the Supreme Court case. At a meeting this writer had with Mahagalkadawala Piyaratana Thero, popularly known as Eppawala hamuduruwo, along with Prof. Chandana Udawatte, Chairman, Lanka Phosphate limited, Piyaratana thero gave blessings for the proposed project after learning all facts.

Attorney General has also  informed LPL that as per Supreme Court decision, the deposit can be used for value addition as long as LPL does the mining and satisfies all environmental regulations. Then the authorities abruptly removed the Chairman of LPL who has a Ph.D. in Eppawala apatite and was the one who initiated the project. The only logical explanation is that some politician who wanted to rake in a substantial amount of money by selling the deposit to a foreign company, wanted the Chairman removed.

The process of making single superphosphate is technologically simple and involves simple mixing of the powdered rock with sulphuric acid. From 2001-2005, LPL made nearly 20 tons of it and tested the product in all agricultural areas of the country. The results were extremely encouraging with our product giving better yields compared to imported phosphate fertilizer. This is because our product had sulphur, another essential nutrient for plant growth.

This conclusively established that we can prepare good quality fertilizer from our deposit and also that it is suitable to substitute imported fertilizer. It also rubbished the myth that we cannot make fertilizer out of our deposit because of various impurities such as chlorine, iron and aluminium, and only a giant such as McMoran has the necessary technology to make phosphate fertilizers from our Eppawala ore. To satisfy the current requirement of phosphate fertilizers, it is necessary to produce about 200,000 tons of single superphosphate per annum, requiring about 125,000 tonnes of rock phosphate. At this rate the deposit could last for 480 years.

The cost of constructing a factory to produce this fertilizer in Sri Lanka is estimated to be around Rs. 1400 million, and this is only a small fraction of the Rs. 5 billion which the Government spends now on the fertilizer subsidy. The pay-back period of this project is estimated to be 2.5 years and hence a highly profitable venture.

So now with the action of the current Minister of Agriculture, Mahinda Amaraweera, it gives a ray of hope for the long failed operation to produce phosphate fertilizers in Sri Lanka, concluded Illeperuma. (concluded)

Patriotic SLFPers  and UNPers, unite behind Pohottuwa! Away from ‘Politics as Usual’ & a practical alternative to Old UNP and Old SLFP

August 28th, 2018

Ratanapala

28 Aug 2018

Under Yahapalanaya, country has gone to dogs literally and metaphorically! All what has happened to our Motherland since the coming to power of this traitorous administration is all around us to see. After three and a half years they still keep promising new things, new projects all very ethereal and not real. There is no law and order, there is no governance, there is no justice. Even the Sky Gods are angry and all what one can see is utter devastation all over Sri Lanka year after year. All what we see is clearly the opposite of ‘good governance’ – a Jadapalanaya.

What happened to Saadharana Samajayak ?

In 2015 people went chasing a mirage called Saadharana Samajayak – a Just Society and we know where we have ended up today. Even as they were speaking of a Yahapalana Administration – A Good Governance Administration, those at the very top were planning and laying the foundations of how to rob the Central Bank and thereby rob the entire nation. For a start it is obvious that the those who were behind Regime Change in Jan 2015, were planning to destroy and pauperize Sri Lanka. The facts and prima facie evidence before us show that the foundations of stealing the Central Bank and thereby improvising the nation were laid out, and were all there, and well before Maithree Palanayak came into effect. It is now quite apparent that Maithripala Sirisena was just the cat’s paw the UNP stalwarts used so cunningly to bring about this change. He is just Karapincha now – just biding his time, not knowing whether he is coming or going – just a big bag of bad wind!

Who is responsible for the Central Bank Bond Scam and other?

This is only a miniscule of what happened thereafter. First was the direct loss, and then the repercussions of the scam. This is akin to dropping the ‘atom bomb’ and then the ‘fall out’. It is like those who suffer from Radiation Sickness and die months and years after the first bomb drop, though not injured by the first blast! The fall out from the Bond Scam paved way to increased interest rates, depreciation of the Rupee, ballooning of foreign loans and increased taxes to the entire nation and many more.

They continue to rob through Coal Tender, BMW purchases, Rice purchases after destroying the local farmers by denying their fertilizer subsidies only to name a few.

If someone, makes all the ground work for a robbery – taking the Central Bank under one’s supervision and administration, then find suitable persons to carryout the robbery – Arjun Mahendran knowing his son-in-law is a primary dealer  gives necessary instructions – change the mode of bidding from Direct Placement to Auction, change the requisite bond amount, use government’s own funds – Employees Provident Fund and Bank of Ceylon among others to facilitate the bond transactions with deleterious consequences to those funds, then certainly that someone should be the Chief Robber, culprit and the mastermind. Then why is Ranil Wickramasinghe still not indicted of a financial fraud and a crime against the nation. Are the funds thus compromised and diminished in value, public property? Isn’t defrauding public funds an unbailable offence?

National Security – Food Security – Cultural Security?

There is no progress, nor food security nor security for the person. Year on year elections are delayed, but they still talk of democracy. Relentless attack on Buddhism continues unabated with dozens of Buddhist priests behind bars on frivolous charges. However, the mastermind of the Central Band Bond Scam continues to be the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. In any other self respecting nation, the Prime Minister would have voluntarily resigned even if not personally implicated. j

The Sri Lankan electorate must be realistic. There is no point in asking for the moon, we must be pragmatic and go for attainable goals here and now for the general welfare of the Sri Lankan people.  People of Sri Lanka should not be taking chances just in the way they stumbled in the dark and took a leap of faith in electing Sirisena. Electing a President should not be a gamble. It should be a well thought out and deliberate action. The educated, the clergy must help the nation in guiding the nation in the right direction and educating the masses on real politics not wishful thinking!

Democracy, Human Rights of Western Christian nations

Practically we must go for the least offensive political grouping who has a good chance of winning at the elections. There is no point in broad brushing all as ‘no good’ and trying to achieve the unattainable utopia advocated by crooked Yahapalana advocates, Western Powers and the NGO hordes both local and foreign. There is no country in the world where a Just Society could be found. There is no country in the world where there is Good Governance. Everywhere in the world there is corruption and they vary only in degree. The fact that the western world is crying about one percent owning the 99% is just the indication of the level of corruption and the influence peddling one finds in these countries.

We saw what happened in electing JR Jayawardene who promised a Dharmista Samajayak only to end up with capitulating to India, making Sri Lanka literally a vassal state of India  and a 30 year war – the longest war in the 20th Century!

The war crimes committed by the western countries pales into insignificance any that has been carried out by the security forces of Sri Lanka. Is there any country in the world that can rival the feats of our Armed Forces in how they carried out a humanitarian exercise that rescued over 300,000 civilians kept as human shields by the terrorist LTTE? Has anybody taken trouble to see how the victorious US treated those who were affected by the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. US doctors and other scientists came to inspect,  and observe those affected only to see the effects of radiation affected innocents and not to treat them. These are well documented. Previous to the bombing they meticulously photographed and documented these cities so that they can thereafter calculate accurately the ‘kill capacity’ of the bombs. These two cities were kept out of conventional bombing just for this purpose! The kind of thinking and morality these nations ascribed to do not equate well with what they advocate to other lesser nations as sacrosanct!

Pohottuwa – a practical alternative to Old UNP and Old SLFP

It is essential that the Sri Lanka needs a new political grouping. For me this grouping is Pohottuwa with Gotabhaya as the candidate for President with the blessings of Mahinda the former President.

Both the SLFP and the UNP are now beyond their ‘use by date’ and must be allowed to wither and die their natural death. When one looks at the parliamentarians in these two parties it is obvious to see, they have maneuvered themselves into their current positions of power only for personal gain and in doing so for the detriment of the country’s economy, security and its cultural degradation. They cared little other than to enrich themselves and their families and friends alone. Today they have painted themselves into a corner from which they cannot come out without getting soiled!

Sri Lanka is in the current plight since Independence and even before due to its weak and suicidal involvement in minority politics. Ever since the bifurcation of the Sinhala polity as a result of SWRD Bandaranaike breaking away from the UNP the country has been at the mercy of Racist Tamils and now since recently at the hands of the economically powerful fundamentalist Islamists. If this type of politics is to continue and it is going to be ‘politics as usual’ in the future too there is no light at the end of the tunnel for Sri Lanka and not definitely for the Sinhala majority who have tried their best to live and let live trying to accommodate minority wishes, demands and aspirations. For them what remains is only political hara-kiri if they are to give away what continues to be demanded. For the minorities is just as Separatist S J V Chevanayakam use to say – Little now, more later”. It is not difficult to see where these aspirations are leading the country to – they are definitely going towards total domination by Racist Tamils leading to balkanizing of Sri Lanka. This will eventuate in the North still feeding on the balance of Sri Lanka as their cash cow. Just let us say Sri Lanka gives way to Eelam and now there are two countries Eelam and Sri Lanka or what is left of it? Will there be peace thereafter? Only result will be an over 300 km border which is undefined, that bifurcates existing villages, divide waterways and other common resources and political affiliations. This will open up a hitherto non existing problems that will lead to open warfare.

What the Islamists are planning is even more sinister.  They are planning to take full control of Sri Lanka through gradual land grabbing such as is happening in  Wilpattu, Land buying in the economic centres and in the hinterland through population explosion and economic might supported with Middle East funds. Their plan for total Islamisation works like a cancer and has been proved to be extremely effective. This has happened elsewhere in Maldives, Bagladesh, Indonesia, Malysia and other. This is also the reason why Myanmar is extremely cautious about the Rohingyas and their status within Myanmar!

It is best that the old SLFP gives way to Pohottuwa so that all the bad things associated with its past can be left behind with Sirisena and Choura Ragina. Like the elephant carcass it should float away into the ocean with the last left over crows and vultures to perish and go into political oblivion. There is nothing, simply nothing that can be salvaged from those who are still clinging to Sirisena or of the Old SLFP! It has served its purpose, done more damage than good to the Sinhala people!

The reason Gotabhaya should be the candidate is, because even if possible –  a Mahinda administration still means ‘politics as usual’. For him politics is a numbers game which in fact it is.  He still has ‘old loyalties’ that are inimical to the well being of a future Sri Lanka. His gamble still is to get whoever on his side and continue with politics as usual. This is why the nation must be wary of who sides with Pohottuwa too! If it is a continuation of the old politics whereby we have no escape from minority politics of unending appeasing and gratifying the devil, then we are planning to fail.  There is another way and that is to unite the divided Sinhalese and undo what happened in 1951 and the conditions that led to the bifurcation of Sinhala Polity. What Bandaranaike did in 1956 is only to climb on Sinhala movement not very different to what Champika Ranawaka is attempting to do now – riding roughshod over others shoulders!

The solution for  Sri Lanka is for the majority of Sinhalese -those in the SLFP and the UNP to rally behind Gotabhaya for there  is no essential difference in their political outlook – be it in politics, in economic strategies or other. We need a new and young team of politicians, more educated and more patriotic than the self serving oldies left in both of these two political parties.

It is only a government dominated by the Sinhalese who can bring meaningful solutions, peace and genuine reconciliation to Sri Lanka’s peoples, Sinhalese, Tamils and Muslims.  Any dilution of this effort by the selfish demands of minorities – Racist Tamils and Islamic Fundamentalists will keep our Motherland mired forever in the quagmire of unending divisive and suicidal politics of yesteryear. Any administration that comes into power with the help and blessings of these ‘Shylocks’ is doomed for disaster and failure and will be a continuation of our sordid past.

Therefore it is of paramount importance for the majority Sinhalese to unite behind Gotabhaya to put an end forever to the internecine minority politics.  This way it is possible for Gotabhaya to get elected without agreeing to impossible concessions to minorities just for the sake of forming a government. It is these demands by never satisfied and never satisfiable minorities that devastated the Pearl of the Indian Ocean and made it the now oft spoken Tear Drop at the end of India.

 It behooves well for all – be they Sinhalese, Tamil or Muslim of whatever religious denomination to unite behind Pohottuwa and elect Gotabhaya to bring collective prosperity to Sri Lanka in the years ahead!

Trial in Absentia – Declare Guilty Colonial Britain & Governor Brownrigg for crimes against humanity

August 28th, 2018

Sinhale as it was called when the European colonials landed was never invaded but the island was ceded as a result of weak leadership & unpatriotic rulers & selfish advisors. Not much different from the scenario of late. Having ceded parts of the island & the whole of the island in 1815 by the Kandyan Convention, the agreement depended on the parties honouring it which the British failed to do. Reclaiming one’s own land cannot be construed as an act of crime & no invader nation has any right to declare natives as traitors. We must correct histories distortions.

The British & all other colonial imperialists have throughout their invader rule committed unimagineable war crimes & crimes against humanity. Nonetheless, they have thought fit to hold kangaroo courts & have put to death many a million. How valid are these kangaroo trials? Do these innocent victims not deserve due justice? These are a handful of thoughts that come to mind in thinking about the excellent suggestion by attorney Senaka Weeraratna who has proposed the setting up of a Tribunal against Colonial British crimes & Governor Brownrigg with the court exonerating the Sinhale natives who came forward to defend & re-claim their nation after the colonial British relegated on their commitments made in 1815 Convention & did not honor the agreement entered into. Therefore, Keppettipola & all others committed no crime & those that dishonored the agreement have no right to create their own kangaroo courts & declare these men who came to defend their nation as criminals. Keppettipola & 16 others were declared traitors by the British through their kangaroo court. They were captured by Captain O’Neil on 28 October 1818.

No school history syllabus can be complete without extolling the greatness of every Sinhale hero who fought for the freedom of the island from colonial rulers. Their heroic acts must be known by all citizens of this island & should be remembered as heroes. Their heroism is further accentuated by the fact that they rejected the pardon & chose death. They were branded as traitors by Governor Robert Brownrigg in 1818 & if it is to be removed it should be by the British. What the present government should have done was not to gain cheap publicity by claiming to clear the names of these 16 heroes but to hold a fresh trial & declare the colonials as guilty for dishonoring the agreement they promised to uphold. The Uva-Wellassa massacre applying the scorched-earth policy is just one crime that no one British & natives alike can ever be allowed to forget. It has become fashionable to say ‘let bygones be bygones’ when the truth is unpalatable but seek bitter revenge when it is to their advantage. The manner that Milosevic, Saddam Hussein & Gaddafi were eliminated are just a handful of recent crimes from which people should understand how colonial kangaroo courts would have been. Men, women & children were thrown to crocodiles, pregnant elephants were killed for sport, the supposed to be gentlemen-British ate breakfast while watching locals being hung to death!

Post-independent leaders of Sinhale–rechristened Sri Lanka should have known their history before jumping to exonerate Keppetipola & others without holding a fresh trial & revisiting all of the crimes committed that led to Keppetipola & others coming forward to defend the nation and refusing clemency as they had committed no crime. Defending one’s nation is no criminal act – why could the government of Maithripala Sirisena & advisors not understand this fact.

The moment the British dishonored the agreement they agreed to honor, the colonial British had legally breached their side of the agreement. What is important for everyone to take into consideration is that the island was never invaded by colonial rulers but was ceded as a result of a handful of selfish & unpatriotic Sinhale people. Therefore, the natives were well within their right to demand their right to regain their land. These natives committed no illegal act & therefore they cannot & should not be regarded as criminals. As Mr. Senaka Weeraratna has rightfully pointed out, Keppetipola & all others declared guilty by the colonial British kangaroo court must be exonerated from wrongful conviction.

As Mr. Weeraratna points out there is no statute of limitation to war crimes & crimes against humanity, therefore every former colony, victims of unimagineable crimes against humanity by every colonial ruler that forcibly occupied their countries, plundered their wealth, converted their natives & denationalized & de-culturalized them have a grouse & must get their day in the court of justice even 500 years after the crimes have been committed against millions of people across the continents of Americas, Africa, Asia.

No former colony can be termed truly independent if they are unable to take action against the perpetrators of crimes committed on their people by European imperialists. If these European imperialists can hold kangaroo courts throughout colonial rule & even thereafter following the end of World War 1 & 11 against the Nazis & Japanese & even the present manner that tribunals are being held through the auspices of the UN for only African & enemies of the West, why can’t the countries that were victims not take the perpetrators & hold them accountable for their crimes.

How can the West even oppose such when every diplomatic statement they deliver uses phrases & terms associated with accountability, transparency, bringing the guilty to book, fair trial etc. Why should the former European colonial rulers oppose such a trial even in absentia against the crimes they have committed.

Some countries have initiated demands for reparations & accountability

International Tribunal by Puerto Rico against US colonial crimes – https://iacenter.org/2018/08/01/international-tribunal-to-expose-u-s-colonial-crimes-in-puerto-rico/ The Caribbean countries too are uniting to seek apology & reparations.

There is even a website http://www.colonialismreparation.org/en/

No former colony can consider itself a free & ‘independent’ country without setting history’s record straight. That history has to depict every wrong that the Portuguese, Dutch & British did to our island & our people. Those that enjoy singing hosannas for these colonial rulers are doing so completely ignorant of the true past or proud to be associated with those crimes. The colonial crimes against our people were made possible by the willful assistance of a handful of unpatriotic natives for perks & privileges. The same appears to be happening even after 500 years.

Until & unless natives are able decolonize their minds & realize that being modern does not impede or prevent upholding indigenous cultures & values or forgetting their history & heritage, former colonial natives will forever be in a cesspit of living a rootless life. To be modern is certainly not to abhor or look down on one’s ancestral roots, the islands proud history & a glorious past that spans over thousands of years with many a milestone of achievements & world’s firsts to boast of. This must be digested by all.

Therefore, as Mr. Senaka Weeraratna has suggested Governor Brownrigg & all others must be put on trial in absentia and held accountable for their crimes against humanity. No one individual or an association can take up this excellent idea alone but a pool of people comprising lawyers, judges, historians, researchers, academics, media & other activists must now gather, inspired to take up this task which will not only inspire other former colonies but will definitely turn the tables on the bloc European nations that use the podium of the UN to manipulate the doctrine of R2P humanitarian intervention to once again invade & occupy nations without any international legal action being taken against them. 500 years of colonial crimes cannot be allowed to make way for centuries more of neocolonial crimes that are unaccounted, unapologised with no reparations for the damages caused.

Let us gather to set up a Tribunal against Colonial Crimes to our Sinhale nation & set the records straight & declare every man who defended the land as heroes.

Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lanka’s Presidential Elections: Western Province/Kalutara District – Voters & Demographic Influence

August 28th, 2018

By Shenali D Waduge

Western Province comprises 3 districts (Colombo, Gampaha & Kalutara)

Kalutara comprises 8 electoral polling divisions.

The analysis covers 3 main elections – Presidential, General & Provincial Councils.

Keeping to the official census statistics of 2012 the island’s population stood at 20,359,439 (20m)

  • 5,851,130 (5.8m) or 28.7% of the Islands 20m live in the Western Province.
  • Colombo District population is 2,323,826
  • Gampaha district comes second with 2,298,588 people.
  • Kalutara has an area of 4 Sq Km with a population of 1,217,260 as per 2012 census.

http://www.statistics.gov.lk/PopHouSat/CPH2011/index.php?fileName=pop42&gp=Activities&tpl=3

Kalutara District is located in the south west of Sri Lanka. Kalutara is bounded north by Colombo District, East by Rathnapura district and south by Galle district and West by the ocean.

Literacy in Kalutara is 97.8%.

Literacy in Gampaha district is the highest in Sri Lanka with 98.5%

Colombo is second with 98%.

Ethnic composition in Kalutara

Whereas both Tamils & Muslims have increased in Kalutara district the Sinhalese have declined.

  • Sinhalese in Kalutara have declined from 87% in 1982 to 86% in 2012
  • Tamils in Kalutara have increased from 1.2% in 1981 to 1.9% in 2012
  • Muslims in Kalutara have increased from 7.4% in 1981 to 9.3% in 2012

Religious composition in Kalutara

  • Buddhists in Kalutara were 84.3% in 1981 / in 2012 Buddhists have reduced to 83.4%
  • Hindus in Kalutara were 4.5% in 1981 / in 2012 Hindus have reduced to 3.2%
  • Islam in Kalutara were 7.5% in 1981 / in 2012 Islam adherents have increased to 9.4% (an increase of 1.9%)
  • Catholics in Kalutara remain 3.3% from 1981 to 2012.
  • Christians in Kalutara were 0.3% in 1981 / in 2012 Christians have increased to 0.7%

Buddhists, Hindus have reduced in Kalutara, but Islam & Christians have increased & Catholics remain the same.

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN KALUTARA DISTRICT

Main 2 contestants at the 7 Presidential Elections held 

  1. 1982 – JR (UNP) / Hector Kobbekaduwa (SLFP)
  2. 1988 – R Premadasa (UNP) / Sirimavo Bandaranaike (SLFP)
  3. 1994 – Srima Dissanayake (UNP) / Chandrika Bandaranaike (PA)
  4. 1999 – Ranil Wikcremasinghe (UNP) / Chandrika Bandaranaike (PA)
  5. 2005 – Ranil Wikcremasinghe (UNP) / Mahinda Rajapakse (UPFA)
  6. 2010 – Sarath Fonseka Common Candidate / Mahinda Rajapakse (UPFA)
  7. 2015 – Maithripala Sirisena Common Candidate / Mahinda Rajapakse (UPFA)

7 Presidential Election Results contestants

JR = JR Jayawardena

RP = R Premadasa

HK = Hector Kobbekaduwa

SB = Sirimavo Bandaranaike

CB = Chandrika Bandaranaike

RW = Ranil Wickremasinghe

MR = Mahinda Rajapakse

SF = Sarath Fonseka

MS = Maithripala Sirisena

Kalutara District comprises 8 polling divisions

  1. Panadura
  2. Bandaragama
  3. Horana
  4. Bulathsinhala
  5. Matugama
  6. Kalutara
  7. Beruwela
  8. Agalawatte

Of the 7 Presidential Elections held in Kalutara District

  • UNP has won Once in 1982
  • UPFA/SLFP has won 6 times (1988, 1994, 1999, 2005, 2010, 2015)
  • Only Bulathsinhala & Kalutara town voted for UNP in 1988
  • Only Panadura & Beruwela voted for the Common Candidate in 2015

Of the 7 Presidential elections in Kalutara district since 1982 in the 8 polling divisions held

  • The UNP has won 10
  • The SLFP/UPFA has won 44
  • Common Candidate Fonseka won 1
  • Common Candidate Sirisena won 1
  1. 1982 – JR Jayawardena (UNP) won all 8 polling divisions
  2. 1988 – Sirimavo Bandaranaike (SLFP) won 6 out of 8 polling divisions with R Premadasa winning 2
  3. 1994 – Chandrika Bandaranaike (PA) won all 8 polling divisions
  4. 1999 – Chandrika Bandaranaike (PA) won all 8 polling divisions
  5. 2005 – Mahinda Rajapakse (UPFA) won all 8 polling divisions
  6. 2010 – Mahinda Rajapakse (UPFA) won all 8 polling divisions
  7. 2015 – Mahinda Rajapakse won 6 polling divisions with Maithripala Sirisena Common Candidate winning 2

We will examine how Kalutara District has voted at

  • 7 Presidential Elections
  • 3 General Elections
  • 2 Provincial Council Elections

Election Dates

1982 Presidential Election – 20th Oct 1982
1988 Presidential Election – 19th Dec 1988
1994 Presidential Election – 9th Nov 1994
1999 Presidential Election – 21st Dec 1999
2005 Presidential Election – 17th Nov 2005
2010 Presidential Election – 26th Jan 2010
2015 Presidential Election – 8th Jan 2015

2004 General Elections – 2nd April 2004
2010 General Elections – 8th April 2010
2015 General Elections – 17th August 2010

2009 Provincial Council – 25th April 2009
2014 Provincial Council – 29th Mar 2014

Panadura Electoral Polling Division

Of the 7 presidential elections held Panadura polling division has voted 5 times for the SLFP/UPFA candidate, once for the UNP candidate & once for the Common Candidate in 2015.

Of the 3 General Elections held Panadura has voted twice for the UPFA in 2004 & 2010 & once for the UNP in 2015.

Of the 2 Provincial Elections held Panadura has voted for the UPFA in 2009 & 2014.

It is interesting that Panadura voted for the Common Candidate at the January 2015 Presidential election & continued to vote for the UNP at the August 2015 General Election.

 

Panadura – Presidential Elections

The lowest numbers of voters went to vote in Panadura in 1988 – 22,701 voting for UNP presidential candidate JR Jayawardena.

The highest number of voters in Panadura was cast at the 2015 Presidential elections with 46,820 50.15% voting for Maithripala Sirisena.

2005 Presidential elections saw an increase in voters to 46,097 voting for Mahinda Rajapakse & further increasing to 50,772 in 2010 but Panadura voted for Maithripala Sirisena in 2015 with 46,820 voting for him. Why did the 50,772 that voted for Mahinda Rajapakse in 2010 not vote for him in 2015? At the 2015 Presidential Election Mahinda Rajapakse secured only 45,908 votes from Panadura.

UNP vote base in Panadura has increased from 26,648 in 1982 Presidential Election to 33034 in 2005 (an increase of 6386 voters in 23 years).

The 2010 & 2015 Presidential Elections fielded Common Candidates.

SLFP/UPFA vote base in Panadura has increased from 23,861 at the 1982 Presidential Election to 45,908 at the 2015 elections. (an increase of 22047 voters in 23 years)

Panadura – General Elections

2004 – 35,687 48.03% (UPFA)

2010 – 37,818 59.59% (UPFA)

2015 – 40,809 46.62% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – were won by UPFA

UNP votes in Panadura has also increased from 24,020 in 2004 to 39,190 in 2015 (an increase of 15,170 votes)

UPFA votes in Panadura has increased from 35,687 in 2004 to 40,809 in 2015 (an increase of 5122 votes)

Clearly UNP vote base has been increasing though UPFA has been overall winners in Panadura district.

While UPFA will need to look into why its votebase has not increased, UNP will look to further increase its vote base in Panadura.

Panadura – Provincial Council Elections 2009 /2014

UPFA won all 8 polling divisions in Kalutara District at the 2009 & 2014 provincial council elections.

However, UPFA votes in Kalutara district have reduced from 351,215 (14 seats) in 2009 to 337,924 in 2014 (13 seats)

In Panadura polling division,

UPFA votes has reduced from 44,923 in 2009 to 37,690 in 2014 

UNP votes have increased from 18,968 in 2009 to 21,558 in 2014

UNP voting pattern in Panadura

  • The lowest votes UNP has received from Panadura polling division was at the 2010 General Election with only 18,022 voting for UNP.
  • In the 2009 Provincial Council elections & the 2010 General Elections UNP received less than 20,000 votes from Panadura.
  • The highest votes UNP has received from Panadura poling division was at the 2005 Presidential Election with 33,034 voting for Ranil Wickremasinghe
  • At the 1982 Presidential Election, Panadura gave 26,648 votes to UNP this has increased to 39,190 at the 2015 General Elections (an increase of 12,542 votes)
  • Noteworthy is that the UNP secured 18,022 at the 2010 General Elections which increased to 39,190 five years later at the 2015 General Elections (an increase of 21,168 votes in 5 years)

SLFP/ UPFA voting pattern in Panadura

Presidential Election in 1982 saw Panadura giving 23,861 votes to Hector Kobbekaduwa. This was also the lowest votes SLFP had received from Panadura.

From 28,366 at the 1988 Presidential Election, Panadura votes for UPFA increased to 42,951 in 1994 but reduced to 39,081 in 1999.

At the 3 general elections held in 2004, 2010 & 2015 UPFA vote base has been slowly increasing.

Whereas 37,818 voters voted for UPFA in 2010 General Elections, at the 2015 General Elections it increased to 40,809 (an increase of only 2991 votes)

However, noteworthy is that in 2010 Presidential Election Panadura gave 50,772 votes to Mahinda Rajapakse which reduced to 45,908 at the 2015 Presidentia Election. Why did 4864 voters not vote for UPFA Presidential Candidate/Mahinda Rajapakse?

With registered voters in Panadura being 114,828 (as per August 2015 General Election) there is certainly scope to increase voters.

Bandaragama Electoral Polling Division

Registered electors in Bandaragama at the 2015 General Elections were 133,887

Of the 3 General Elections held, Bandaragama has voted twice for the UNP in 2004 & 2015 & once for the UPFA in 2010.Of the 7 presidential elections held, Bandaragama polling division has voted 6 times for the SLFP/UPFA candidate & once for the UNP candidate

Of the 2 Provincial Elections held, Bandaragama has voted for the UPFA in 2009 & 2014.

Noteworthy is that in January 2015 Bandaragama voted for the UPFA Presidential Candidate but 7 months later voted for the UNP at the August 2015 General Elections. UPFA must wonder why voters lost faith in the UPFA to vote for the UNP in 2015.

Bandaragama – Presidential Elections

The lowest numbers of voters went to vote in Bandaragama in 1994 – 22,701 voting for UNP presidential candidate JR Jayawardena.

The highest number of vote in Bandaragama was cast at the 2010 Presidential elections with 62,363 65.03% voting for Mahinda Rajapakse.

UNP did not see much of a vote increase in 1982, 1988 or 1994 Presidential Elections though from 23,655 votes in 1994 UNP votes increased to 34,749 votes in 2005 Presidential elections. It reduced to 32,290 at the 2010 Presidential Elections but rose to 48,469 at the 2015 Presidential Elections for the Common Candidate.

However, Bandagarama votes for Sarath Fonseka as Common Candidate was 32,290 while at the 2015 Presidential Elections, Common Candidate Maithripala Sirisena received 48,469 votes.

SLFP/UPFA has seen a steady increase in voters from 1982 to 2015 (increasing from 25,500 in 1982 to 61,199 in 2015)

With registered voters in Bandaragama being 133,887 there is scope to increase votes.

Bandaragama – General Elections

2004 – 41,850 53.38% (UPFA)

2010 – 44,927 64.06% (UPFA)

2015 – 53,314 51.91% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – were won by UPFA

UNP votes in Bandaragama reduced from 27,240 in 2004 General Elections to 19,017 in 2010 General Elections but increased to 42,069 at the 2015 General Elections.

UNP has seen a 14,829 voter increase from 2004 to 2015 (11 years).

UPFA votes in Bandaragama increased from 41,850 in 2004 to 53,314 in 2015 General Elections.

UPFA has seen a 11,464 voter increase from 2004 to 2015 (11 years)

Bandaragama – Provincial Council Elections 2009 /2014

UPFA votes has reduced from 55,404 in 2009 to 54,019 in 2014 

UNP votes have reduced from 17,148 in 2009 to 16,087 in 2014

UNP voting pattern in Panadura

At the Presidential elections held in Bandaragama UNP has seen a steady increase from 1982 obtaining 26,631 votes to 2005 obtaining 34,749 votes (an increase of 8118 votes)

At the General Elections in Bandaragama, UNP has also seen a steady increase from 27,240 in 2004 to 42,069 in 2015 (an increase of 14,829 votes)

However at the Provincial Council elections UNP votes have reduced from 17,148 to 16,087 in 2014.

SLFP/ UPFA voting pattern in Bandaragama

Of the 7 Presidential Elections held UPFA has won 6.

SLFP/UPFA votes have seen an increase from 25,500 at the first Presidential Election in 1982 to 61,199 in 2015 (an increase of 35,699 voters)

There has been a slight reduction in votes from the 2010 Presidential Election to the 2015 Presidential Election with 1,164 voters voting less than they did in 2010. It would be good to survey why.

SLFP/UPFA votes have increased at the 3 General Elections held in 2004, 2010 & 2015 from 41,850 to 44,927 to 53,314.

However, SLFP/UPFA votes at the 2 Provincial Council elections in 2009 & 2014 has seen a slight reduction from 55,404 in 2009 to 54,019 in 2014.

Registered voters in Bandaragama stood at 133,887 in 2015.

At the 3 General Elections held, Horana has voted for the UPFA (2004, 2010, 2015)Of the 7 presidential elections held, Horana polling division has voted 6 times for the SLFP/UPFA candidate & once for the UNP candidate

Of the 2 Provincial Elections held, Horana has voted for the UPFA in 2009 & 2014.

Noteworthy is that apart from voting for the UNP in 1982 Presidential Elections, Horana has voted for the SLFP/UPFA at every election held since 1988.

Horana – Presidential Elections

UNP has secured less than 28,000 votes at the 4 Presidential elections held from 1982 to 1999. But in 2005 Presidential Election, Horana gave 34,300 votes to the UNP Presidential candidate. However at the 2010 Presidential election the Common Candidate received only 27,818 votes. But at the 2015 Presidential Election the Common Candidate Sirisena received 42,065 votes (an increase of 14,247 votes.  

The UPFA votes have been increasing from 1982 Presidential Elections to 2015 rising from 23,518 to 57,633 (an increase of 34,115 votes)

With Horana registered voters being 122,511 there is potential to increase this margin.

Horana – General Elections

2004 – 38,421 52.87% (UPFA)

2010 – 44,136 67.61% (UPFA)

2015 – 50,024 54.26% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – were won by UPFA

UNP votes in Horana reduced from 26,764 in 2004 General Elections to 16,613 in 2010 General Elections but increased to 36,325 at the 2015 General Elections.

UNP has seen a 9561 voter increase from 2004 to 2015 (11 years).

UPFA votes in Horana increased from 38,421 in 2004 to 50,024 in 2015 General Elections.

UPFA has seen a 11,603 voter increase from 2004 to 2015 (11 years)

Horana – Provincial Council Elections 2009 /2014

UPFA has won the Horana Provincial Council elections held in 2009 & 2014.

UPFA votes has reduced from 51,919 in 2009 to 44,988 in 2014 

UNP votes have increased from 14897 in 2009 to 14,948 in 2014

UNP voting pattern in Horana

UNP has secured above 30,000 votes at the 2005 Presidential, 2015 Presidential & 2015 General Elections.

UNP’s performance at the previous presidential elections have been less than 28,000 votes.

While UNP secured only 16,613 at the 2010 General Elections at the 2015 General Elections UNP secured 36,325 votes (an increase of 19,712 votes. However it is noteworthy that UNP gained only 14,948 votes at the Provincial Council elections held in March 2014. Within 15months UNP has managed to increase its votes by 21,377

SLFP/ UPFA voting pattern in Horana

SLFP/UPFA votes have increased from 23,518 in 1982 Presidential elections to 57,292 Presidential Elections in 2010 (an increase of 33,774 voters)

UPFA should be concerned that the 57,292 secured at the January 2010 Presidential Elections reduced to 44,136 votes at the April 2010 General Elections. Why did 13,156 decide not to vote for UPFA from Jan-April 2010? What made them change their mind in just 4 months? Noteworthy is that from the April 2010 General Election to the 2014 Provincial Council elections, UPFA managed to increase their votebase by just 852 votes to 44,988.

Nevertheless, Horana backed Mahinda Rajapakse at the January 2015 Presidential Election giving him 57,633 votes. However, that dropped to 50,024 at the August 2015 General Elections. UPFA will need to re-assess the Horana polling division & wonder why 7609 voters decided not to vote for the UPFA 7 months after voting for its Presidential candidate in 2015 January? UPFA certainly need to win back these lost voters.

Bulathsinhala – Presidential Elections (1982, 1988, 1994, 1999, 2005, 2010, 2015)

Bulathsinhala voted for UNP at the 1982 & 1988 Presidential elections though in 1988 the UNP voter turnout reduced from 21,486 in 1982 to 18,705 in 1988. From 1994 UNP vote base in Bulathsinhala increased from 20,094 to 25,918 in 2005 but reduced to 19,073 at the 2010 Presidential Election when Common Candidate Sarath Fonseka contested.

Bulathsinhala voted for Chandrika Bandaranaike in 1994 & 1999. Voters reduced from 27,072 in 1994 to 25,424 in 1999

Bulathsinhala voted for Mahinda Rajapakse in 2005, 2010 & 2015.

Mahinda Rajapakse received 37,311 votes in 2015 – 707 votes less than he got in 2010. It would be good to ascertain why voters reduced from 38,018 in 2010 to 37,311 in 2015 for Mahinda Rajapakse.

The common candidate Sirisena received 28341 votes in 2015. In 2010 the Common Candidate Fonseka received only 19,073.

With 82,123 registered voters (2015) there is plenty of scope to increase the numbers.

Bulathsinhala – General Elections 2004/2010/2015

2004 – 25,374 49.77% (UPFA)

2010 – 29,522 68.51% (UPFA)

2015 – 31,612 52.24% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – UPFA has won all 3.

UNP vote base has increased from 22,767 in 2004 to 26,254 in 2015 (an increase of 3487 votes)

UPFA vote base increased from 25,374 in 2004 to 31,612 in 2015. (an increase of 6238 votes)

Bulathsinhala – Provincial Council Elections 2009/2014

UPFA won all 8 polling divisions in Kalutara District at the 2009 & 2014 provincial council elections.

UPFA votes have reduced from 33,317 in 2009 to 33,226 in 2014

UNP votes have increased from 11,069 in 2009 to 11,357 in 2014

Bulathsinhala registered voters are 81,045

Matugama – Presidential ElectionsMatugama registered voters has increased from 61,809 in 1982 to 108,996 voters in 2015 (an increase of 47187 voters)

Matugama has voted only once in 1982 for the UNP Presidential candidate.

All 6 Presidential elections have been won by the SLFP/UPFA candidate.

A steady increase in UPFA vote base is seen.

From 19,908 in 1988, to 33,726 in 1994, to 32,352 in 1999, to 40,006 in 2005, to 47,988 in 2010 to 45,984 in 2015.

As can been seen Mahinda Rajapakse’s vote base has reduced by 2004 votes from the 2010 to 2015 election.

UNP votes in Matugama has seen increase-decrease structure with 1988 results less than 1982, 2010 results less than 2005 but a sudden increase from 26,016 in 2010 to 38,668 in 2015. Matugama votes for Common Candidate Sarath Fonseka has been less than its votes for Common Candidate Maithripala Sirisena in 2015 with 38,668 votes.

Kalutara – Presidential Elections

The highest percentage of voters cast their votes in 2010 with 62.53% voting for Mahinda Rajapakse.

Kalutara has voted for UNP twice at the Presidential Elections in 1982 & 1988.

Kalutara vote base for UPFA/SLFP has been increasing from 1988.

While 51,330 voters voted for Mahinda Rajapakse in 2010, in 2015 his vote base reduced to 48,851. Why did 2479 voters decide not to vote for Mahinda Rajapakse in 2015?

Registered voters have increased from 64,944 in 1982 to 117,931 in 2015. An increase of 52987 voters.

Kalutara – General Elections

2004 – 37,958 52.10% (UPFA)

2010 – 38,300 62.77% (UPFA)

2015 – 40,837 46.78% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – UPFA has won all 3.

UNP votes reduced to 16,838 at the 2010 General Elections from 26,255 at the 2004 elections & suddenly increased to 39,525 at the 2015 General Elections. The increase of 22,687 votes.

Kalutara – Provincial Council Elections 2009/2014

UPFA won all 8 polling divisions in Kalutara District at the 2009 & 2014 provincial council elections.

UPFA votes have reduced from 42,102 in 2009 to 38,777 in 2014

UNP votes have increased from 16,637 in 2009 to 21,639 in 2014

UNP voting pattern in Kalutara

Kalutara voted for UNP at both the 1982 & 1988 Presidential Elections. UNP vote base increased to 32,916 only at the 2005 Presidential Election but 4 years later at the Provincial Council elections the UNP received only 16,637 votes. This changed the following year when UNP fielded Common Candidate Sarath Fonseka with Kalutara giving 29,719 votes in January 2010. However, the same year at the General Elections in April, the UNP received just 16,838 votes. This increased to 21,639 at the 2014 Provincial elections.

At the January 2015 Presidential Elections 44,804 voters in Kalutara voted for the Common Candidate Maithripala Sirisena which reduced to 39,525 by August 2015 at the General Elections.

SLFP/UPFA voting pattern in Kalutara

Apart from the 1982 & 1988 Presidential Elections, UPFA has won all the 5 Presidential elections, 3 General Elections & 2 provincial elections being currently analysed.

UPFA votes have been increasing from 22,992 in 1982 to 45,143 at the 2005 Presidential Elections. However, UPFA votes reduced to 42,102 at the 2009 provincial council elections but increased to 51,330 at the 2010 Presidential Elections. What UPFA will seriously need to address is how 51,330 voters in January 2010 reduced to 38,300 at the April General Elections – a reduction of 13030 voters.

This increased to 48,851 at the 2015 January Presidential Elections but again reduced to 40,837 months later at the August General Elections. UPFA will need to address why its vote base is fluctuating in Kalutara in particular why it lost 8014 voters from January to August 2015?

Beruwela – Presidential Elections

The highest percentage of voters cast their votes at the 2009 Provincial Council elections with 61.52% voting for UPFA. In terms of numbers the most voted in 2010 Presidential Election with 43,787 voters from Beruwela voting for UPFA Presidential Candidate Mahinda Rajapakse.

Beruwela has voted for UNP Presidential Candidate only ONCE in 1982 while the last Presidential election Beruwela voted for the Common Candidate Maithripala Sirisena in 2015.

Beruwela vote base for UPFA/SLFP has been increasing from 1982 (22,349 voters) to 1994 (36,364voters) but saw a slight decrease to 34,369 voters in 1999 which increased to 37,402 at the 2005 Presidential Election & further increased to 43,787 at the 2010 Presidential Election.

UPFA/SLFP must wonder why its vote base decreased by 4363 voters at the 2015 Presidential Elections with only 39,424 voting for Mahinda Rajapakse whereas 53,280 voters from Beruwela voted for Maithripala Sirisena the common candidate.

UNP vote base in Beruwela fluctuating. The highest votes received was for the UNF Presidential Candidate Ranil Wickremasinghe in 2005 with 37390 but it was at the 2015 Presidential Election where 53,280 voted for Maithripala Sirisena in 2015. The 2010 Presidential Election the Common Candidate Fonseka received 35,678 votes

Beruwela – General Elections

2004 – 33,583 47.38% (UFPA)

2010 – 32,709 54.10% (UPFA)

2015 – 47,987 54.94% (UNP)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – UPFA has won the 2004 & 2010 while the 2015 General Elections were won by the UNP led UNF.

It is noteworthy that the UPFA vote base has declined from 33,583 in 2004 to 32,709 in 2010 though it increased to 33,142 in 2015.  

UNP vote base declined significantly from 30,210 in 2004 General Election to 21,737 votes at the 2010 General Elections but has seen a phenomenal increase to 47,987 at the 2015 General Elections.

Beruwela – Provincial Council Elections 2009/2014

UPFA won all 8 polling divisions in Kalutara District at the 2009 & 2014 provincial council elections.

UPFA votes have increased from 38,980 in 2009 to 39,715 votes in 2014 (an increase of just 735 votes)

UNP votes have increased from 14,253 in 2009 to 24,615 in 2014 an increase of 10,362 votes

With 114,791 registered voters as per 2014 elections department there is scope to increase

The highest percentage of voters cast their votes in 2010 with 65.24% voting for the UPFA Presidential Candidate Mahinda Rajapakse.Agalawatte  – Presidential Elections

In terms of numbers the most voted also in 2010 with 47,317 voting for Mahinda Rajapakse.

Agalawatte has voted for UNP only at the 1982 Presidential Elections.

Agalawatte vote base for UPFA/SLFP has been increasing from 1982 (21,041 voters) to 1994 (32,467 voters) but reduced to 30,128 voters in 1999 but increased to 37,518 in 2005 & further increased to 47,317 in 2010. UPFA will need to wonder why only 44,750 voted for its presidential candidate in 2015 a reduction of 2567 voters.

UNP vote base has been fluctuating in Agalawatte with lowest votes at the 1988 Presidential Elections (15,155 votes) which increased to 31,449 votes in 2005 Presidential Election but reduced to 23,717 votes in 2010 for the Common Candidate Fonseka. It would be interesting to find out how Agalawatte which gave 23,717 votes to the Common Candidate Fonseka gave 33,995 votes to the Common Candidate Sirisena – a difference of 10,278 votes.

Agalawatte – General Elections

2004 – 33,939 53.66% (UPFA)

2010 – 35,541 68.16% (UPFA)

2015 – 38,125 51.85% (UPFA)

The 3 General elections held in 2004, 2010, 2015 – UPFA has all 3 polling divisions. However, it is noteworthy that the UPFA vote base increased from 2009 to 2015 (33939 in 2009 / 35,541 in 2010 & 38,125 in 2015)

Agalawatte – Provincial Council Elections 2009/2014

UPFA won all 8 polling divisions in Kalutara District at the 2009 & 2014 provincial council elections.

UPFA votes have increased from 37,558 71.03% in 2009 to 39,488 65.09% in 2014

UNP votes have also increase slightly from 13,682 in 2009 to 14,840 in 2014. With 99,146 registered voters there is scope to increase

Of the 3 General Elections held in 2004, 2010 & 2015, UPFA has won all 8 polling divisions of Kalutara District except Beruwala which went to the UNP in 2015. While UPFA will need to assess its vote decline in Beruwela.

UNP voters have increased from 24,020 in 2004 to 39,190 in 2015 in Panadura, 27,240 in 2004 to 42,069 in 2015 in Bandaragama, 26,764 in 2004 to 36,325 in Horana, 17,295 in 2004 to 35,267 in 2015 in Matugama, 16,838 in 2010 to 39,525 in Kalutara , 21,737 in 2010 to 47,987 in 2015 in Beruwela which UNP won and 14,402 in 2010 in Agalawatte to 31,731 in 2015. These increases are in bigger numbers to the increases in UPFA vote base.

  UPFA has won 83 timesThus, of the 96 times elections have been held from 1982 to 2015 (33 years) in Kalutara District

UNP has won 11 times

Common Candidate has won 2 times

The above graph depicts the election victories of the 7 Presidential Elections, 3 General Elections & 2 Provincial Council elections. As can be seen apart from winning all 8 polling divisions at the 1982 Presidential Elections, the UNP voters in Kalutara district has voted for UNP only in Bulathsinhala & Kalutara at the 1988 Presidential elections & Beruwela at the 2015 General Electionss. However, UNP vote base is increasing inspite of UNP not winning polling divisions.

At the 2015 General Election registered voters were 897,349 with 760,365 going to vote.

Shenali D Waduge

බෙදුම්වාදී මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලනඥයන්ට අවි ආයුධ තොග රැස්කර ගැනීමට ඉඩ දීලා..

August 28th, 2018

අනුරුද්ධ බණ්ඩාර රණවාරණ මාධ්‍ය ලේකම් ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ lanka C news

බෙදුම්වාදී කොටි ත‍්‍රස්තවාදීන්ගේ ඝාතන හේතුවෙන් අවසානයේ දෙමළ සමාජයේ ඉතිරි වූයේ බෙදුම්වාදී පරඬැල් වැනි දේශපාලනඥයන් පිරිසක් බවත් දැන් තමන්ට සහයෝගය දෙන බෙදුම්වාදී මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලනඥයන්ට අවි ආයුධ තොග පිටින් රැස්කර ගැනීමට ඉඩ දීමෙන් මුස්ලිම් සමාජයටත් එකී ඛේදනීය ඉරණම උරුම කර දීමට මේ ආණ්ඩුව කටයුතු කරන බවට ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ චෝදනා කරයි.

පිටකෝට්ටේ පිහිටි ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණේ ප‍්‍රධාන කාර්යාලයේදී පැවැති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදී එහි ප‍්‍රචාරක ලේකම් මොහොමඞ් මුසම්මිල් මහතා මෙසේ චෝදනාකර සිටියේය.

බෙදුම්වාදී මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලනඥයන්ට අවි ආයුධ තොග රැස්කර ගැනීමට ඉඩ දීලා..

එහිදී වැඩිදුරටත් අදහස් දැක්වූ එ් මහතා මෙසේද සඳහන් කළේය.

‘‘පසුගියදා පුනරුත්ථාපනය වූ කොටි සාමාජිකයන් පිරිසක් කොළඹදී පැවැත් වූ මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදී අනාවරණය කළා ‘කොටි සංවිධානය සතුව තිබූ 5000කට අධික අවි ප‍්‍රමාණයක් මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලනඥයන් වන රිෂාඞ් බදුර්දීන් සහ හිස්බුල්ලා ඇතුළු පිරිසකට ලබා දී තිබෙනවා’ කියා.

මේ මාධ්‍ය හමුව පවත්වා, ඉහත කරුණුු අනාවරණය වෙලා දැනට සතියක් ඉක්ම ගොස් තිබෙනවා. එහෙත් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව හෝ ආණ්ඩුව විසින් මේ පිළිබඳව කිසිදු විමර්ශනයක් සිදු කොට නැහැ. පිස්තෝලයක් දෙකක් පාතාලයට ලැබෙනවා වගේ නොවෙයි ආයුධ පන්දාහක් යම් පිරිසකට ලැබෙනවා කියන්නේ. එය රටේ ආරක්ෂාවට පවා බලපාන කරුණක්. මේ පිළිබඳව ආරක්ෂක ඇමැති, නීතිය හා සාමය පිළිබද ඇමැති, පොලිස්පති නිහඬව සිටින්නේ මේ නම් සඳහන් වූ දේශපාලනඥයන් ආණ්ඩුවේ රැුකවරණය යටතේ සිටින නිසා ද? නැතිනම් මේ මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලන නායකයන්ගේ රැකවරණය යටතේ මේ ආණ්ඩුව පවත්වාගෙන යන නිසා ද? ගෙවී ගිය වසර 47 තුළ මේ රටේ ලේ ගලා ගිය ගැටුම් තුනක් සිදු වුණා. 1971, 1989 ජනතා අරගල මර්දනය කිරීමේ දී ලේ ගංගා ගලා ගියා. 30 වසරක් පුරා බෙදුම්වාදී ත‍්‍රස්තවාදය පැරදවීමට ගෙන ගිය සටන නිසා මේ රටම ලේ විලක් වුණා. එ් නිසා යළිත් මේ රටේ ලේ වැකි ගැටුම් ඇති වෙනවාට, සිංහල – දෙමළ – මුස්ලිම් සාමාන්‍ය ජනතාව කිසිසේත්ම කැමැති නැහැ.

බෙදුම්වාදී පරඬැල් ටිකක් විතරයි ඉතිරි වුණේ

ජාතිවාදී දේශපාලනඥයන් ආයුධ ළං කර ගන්නේ පොලිෂ් කරමින් තබාගන්න ද? අපට මතකයි බෙදුම්වාදී ත‍්‍රස්තවාදී කොටි සංවිධානයේ නායකයා වේලූපිල්ලේ ප‍්‍රභාකරන් වැඩ පටන් ගත්තු හැටි. එදා යාපනය නගරාධිපති ඇල්ප‍්‍රඞ් දොරේඅප්පාට පිස්තෝලයකින් වෙඩි තබා ඝාතනය කරමිනුයි ම්ලේච්ඡු ත‍්‍රස්තවාදී ගමන ඇරඹුවේ. නීලන් තිරුචෙල්වම්, ලක්ෂ්මන් කදිරගාමර් වැනි ප‍්‍රජාතන්ත‍්‍රවාදය අගයන, ජාතික සමගිය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි, ත‍්‍රස්තවාදය පිළිකෙව් කළ සියලූ දෙමළ දේශපාලන නායකයන් ගෙවී ගිය වසර 30 තුළ මේ රටට අහිමි වූවා. අවසානයේ ඉතිරි වුණේ කොටි දේශපාලන අංශ නායක තමිල් චෙල්වම්ගේ ගෝලයන් වූ සම්බන්ධන්ලා, සුමන්තිරන්ලා වැනි බෙදුම්වාදී පරඩැල් ටිකක් විතරයි. මුස්ලිම් සමාජයටත් මේ ඉරණම අත්කර දීමට ද මේ හදන්නේ ? මේ රටේ ජාතික සමගිය වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටින මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලනඥයන් ආයුධ බලයෙන් යටපත් කරලා තනි බෙදුම්වාදී මතයකට මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව රැගෙන යාමට ද මේ හදන්නේ ?

ඔබ දන්නවා බහුතර මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව හිටියේ ජාතික දේශපාලන පක්ෂ සමඟයි. පසුව වාර්ගික පදනමෙන් ඇති වූ මුස්ලිම් දේශපාලන පක්ෂ සිංහල, දෙමළ සමාජය වෙතින් බෙදී යාමේ සටන්පාඨ කරේ තබාගෙන මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව වෙත ආවා. ගැටුම් හදා, බෙදී වෙන්වීමේ වුවමනාව නැගෙනහිර මුස්ලිම් ජනතාව තුළ හදන්නයි එම පක්ෂ කටයුතු කළේ. ඇඳුමේ වෙනස පවා ගැටුමකට මඟක් කර ගත්තා. එසේ තිබියදී තමයි මේ ආයුධ රැස් කිරීමේ චෝදනා එන්නේ.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා තේරවිලි කියමින්, අගමැති විකාර කියමින්, පොලිස්පති නර්තනයේ යෙදෙමින් ඉඳලා හරි යන්නෙ නැහැ. මේ ජාතික ආරක්ෂාවට බලපාන කරුණු සම්බන්ධයෙන් වහා විමර්ශනයක් සිදු කළ යුතුයි. නමුත් මේ ආණ්ඩුව කරන්නේ ජාතිවාදී, බෙදුම්වාදී දේශපාලනඥයන්ට තම ක‍්‍රියාමාර්ග රිසිසේ ගැනීමට ඉඩ දී තම දේශපාලන ප‍්‍රාණය රැක ගැනීමයි.

ආණ්ඩුවට වුවමනා පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය කුමන ක‍්‍රමයකට හෝ කල් දමන්න

පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය දිගින් දිගටම කල් දැමූ මේ ආණ්ඩුව එම ඡුන්දය පැත්වූයේ නියමිත දිනට වසර දෙකහමාරකට පසුවයි. එහිදී ලැබුණු ප‍්‍රතිඵලය අනුව මේ අය ජනාධිපතිවරණය තෙක් කිසිදු ඡන්දයක් පවත්වන්නෙ නැහැ. පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය ඊට කලින් පැවැත්වුවහොත් එහිදී ලැබෙන පරාජය කවරාකාර ද, කියා මේ ආණ්ඩුව දන්නවා. එ් විතරක් නොවෙයි එ් පරාජය මෙන් දෙගුණයක පරාජයක් ජනාධිපතිවරණයේ දී ලැබෙන බවත් එ් අය දැනටමත් ගණන් හදලා තිබෙනවා. එ් නිසා පළාත් සභා ඡුන්දය කුමන ක‍්‍රමයකින් හෝ කල් දමා ගැනීම අද මේ ආණ්ඩුවේ ප‍්‍රමුඛතම උවමනාවක් වී තිබෙනවා.

මාස හයක් මොකද කළේ?

දැන් බලන්න, ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් පත් කළ පළාත් සභා කොට්ඨාස සීමානිර්ණ කොමිසමේ සභාපතිවරයා කියනවා, ඔහු මේ වාර්තාව පළාත් සභා, පළාත් පාලන ඇමැතිවරයාට බාර දුන්නේ 2018 පෙබරවාරි 19 වැනිදා කියා. නමුත් මේ ඇමැතිවරයා එය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කළේ ඉන් මාස හයකට පසුවයි. එ් විදියට මාස හයක් යට ගහලා තබා ගත්තු වාර්තාව පසුගිය 24 වැනිදා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරපු මේ ආණ්ඩුව ඊට විරුද්ධව ඡන්දය දුන්නා. එ් වැඩෙන් මේ ආණ්ඩුව ලෝක වාර්තාවකුත් තැබුවා.

මේ අය පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද විමසීම කල් දැමූ ආකාරය අපි විමසා බලමු. එ්ක කළේ ඉතාමත් කුඨ අකාරයකට. පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද විමසීම් පනත සංශෝධනය කිරීමට මේ අය පනත් කෙටුම්පතක් ගෙනාවා. එය ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය ඉදිරියේ අභියෝගයට ලක් වුණා. ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය තීන්දු කළා මෙම පනත සම්මත කිරීමට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ තුනෙන් දෙකක ඡන්දයක් හා ජනමතවිචාරණයක් අවශ්‍යයි කියා. කෙසේ නමුත් පළාත් සභා සඳහා කාන්තා නියෝජනය වැඩි කිරීම කියන පාඨයට මුවාවෙලා ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණත් හවුල් කරගෙන මේ ආණ්ඩුව තමන්ට උවමනා සංශෝධන සමග මේ පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද විමසීම් පනත සංශෝධනය කර ගත්තා.

බිමල් කියූ ලොකුම බොරුව

එ් අනුව නීතියේ හිල් අස්සෙන් රිංගලා, ජනමතවිචාරණයකට නොගිහින්, තමන්ට අවශ්‍ය සංශෝධන ටික කරගෙන මේ පනත සම්මත කරගත්තු ආණ්ඩුව ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය තීන්දුවටත් පිටුපාලා පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය කල් දැම්මා. ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණත් මේ සියල්ලටම ආණ්ඩුව සමඟ අත එසවූවා. ඔබට මතක ඇති එ් දිනවල පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී වගේම ‘හිරු බලය’ වැඩසටහනේදී ජවිපෙ මන්ත‍්‍රී බිමල් රත්නායක මහතා කියූ කතාව. ‘අපි පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද විමසීම් පනත සංශෝධනය සඳහා ආණ්ඩුවට සහයෝගය දුන්නේ 2018 ජුනි 30 වැනිදාට කලින් පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමේ සහතිකයක් ආණ්ඩුවෙන් අරගෙන’ කියලා බිමල් රත්නායක එහිදී කීවා. අපි දැන් අහනවා, ‘බිමල් රත්නායක මහත්තයෝ ඔයාලා ආණ්ඩුවෙන් ලබාගත්තු සහතිකයට කල් ඉකුත් වෙලා මාස දෙකක් ගිහින්. මේ විදිහට ආණ්ඩුවට කඬේ ගිහින් ජනතාව රවට්ටන්න ඇයි ?’ කියලා.

ජවිපෙ ඡන්දෙ නොදී පැනලා ගියා

එ් විතරක් නොවෙයි පසුගිය අගෝස්තු 23 වැනිදා ජවිපෙ ප‍්‍රචාරක ලේකම් විජිත හේරත් මාධ්‍ය සාකච්ඡාවක් පවත්වලා කීවා, ‘නව පනතට අනුව පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණයට යාම සඳහා සීමානිර්ණ කොමිසමේ වාර්තාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සම්මත කළ යුතුයි. එයට පක්ෂව ජවිපෙ අපි ඡන්දය දෙනවා’ කියලා. නමුත් ජවිපෙ 24 වැනිදා කළේ කුමක්ද? සීමානිර්ණ කොමිසමේ වාර්තාව පිළිබඳ ඡන්ද විමසීමේ දී ඡන්දය නොදී පැනලා යාම. මේක ජවිපෙ වත්මන් ස්වභාවය තේරුම් ගන්න හොඳම උදාහරණයක්. මේ සියල්ල අනුව, මේ ආණ්ඩුවේ පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය කල් දැමීමේ පාපයෙන්, ජවිපෙට කිසිදු ගැලවීමක් නැහැ කියා පැහැදිලි වෙනවා.

රුපියල් බාල්දු වීමෙන් මුල්තැනට

ජාත්‍යන්තර මූල්‍ය පර්යේෂණ ආයතනයක් වන මූඞීස් ආයතනයේ වාර්තාවක් උපුටා දක්වමින් ‘දි ඉකොනොමික්ස්’ සඟරාව පෙන්වා දෙනවා, ‘ලෝකයේ භාවිතා වන මුදල් එ්කක අතරින් ශ්‍රී ලංකා රුපියල වේගයෙන්ම අවප‍්‍රමාණය වන මුදල් එ්කකය බවට පත්ව තිබෙනවා’ කියා. මේ තමයි 2015 බලයට ආ ආර්ථික ඔස්තාර්ලා රට ඇදවට්ටවා ඇති තරම. මේ ආණ්ඩුවට මේ විදියට යන්න දුන්නොත් ඩොලරයට ගෙවිය යුතු රුපියල් අගය 200 දක්වා ඉහළ යා හැකි බවට ආර්ථික විශේෂඥයන් අනතුරු හඟවා තිබෙනවා. මේ තත්ත්වය හමුවේ මේ ආණ්ඩුව ගෙදර යැවීමේ හැර අන් විසඳුමක් නැහැ.’’

මෙම මාධ්‍ය හමුවට කැස්බෑව නගර සභාවේ මන්තී‍්‍රවරු වන අතුල සේනානායක, රංජිත් පත්මසිරි යන මහත්වරු ද එක්ව සිටියහ.

අනුරුද්ධ බණ්ඩාර රණවාරණ
මාධ්‍ය ලේකම්
ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ

FTA AGREEMENT WITH SINGAPORE – MOST COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT EVER

August 28th, 2018

Sarath Wijesinghe former Ambassador to UAE and Israel

Free Trade Agreements

SLSFTA the free trade agreement entered into with Singapore – a world economic giant in a small patch of land with a small population is the talk of the town today, considering the controversial nature of the 1083 page document in terms of asymmetrical economies and trade policies of two countries in the midst of fast growth towards trade liberalism in Sri Lanka with the a liberalized state, grouping second in world ranking on liberalization of economy. Foreign and Trade policies are two sides of the same coin today intermingled and interconnected giving priority to economies over traditional diplomatic considerations. WTO is in the apex of the trade agreements, arbitrations, and world trade affairs leading Singapore as the world center on Arbitration which is a highly technical and expensive affair for a poor and less legally equipped country like Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is a member of WTO, and GATT General Agreement on Tarff and multinational agreements in which Sri Lanka obtained membership on 1.1.1948. Trade agreements were signed by two trade Ministers of the two nations in the presence of the two leaders of the countries indicating the importance and priority being the 7th largest trading partner dealing with 4% of total trade between the two countries. Trade agreements outline certain obligations with respect of trade in goods and services and provide protection for investors and intellectual property rights by giving away rights of the host country expecting benefits from the proposed agreement expected to be ratified and implemented after rigorous scrutiny protecting the national interest. The basic thesis of FTA’s is economic integration for the participants whether bilateral or multi-lateral. Singapore is pressed for space and welcome fertile lands and ailing state enterprises to develop with their power of money and international bonds identifying Sri Lanka as an ideal candidate for their plans for expansion of the economic empire in a small community with large number of foreigners settled and citizens with combine ethnic origins. GOSL may genuinely expecting an opening to the commercial world via Singapore which a world economic giant in a tiny land in ASIAN. GOSL may be expecting to exploit ASIAN through Singapore document.

Do we have/need a Foreign/Trade policy?

Do we have a proper foreign policy or a trade policy are moot issues considered as basic foundations/requirements to be an active player in the current economic and world order whether small or big in the world family when Singapore – one of the most liberalized rules of origin in the world has a clear cut foreign and trade policy as an world economic giant despite the smallness of the minute nation with no resources except human resources properly utilized. Singapore has rated second best in Doing Business” when Sri Lankan is on 111 indicating that we have to be extremely cautious in dealing with the rest of the world in business affairs we have been cheated from 1815 with political administrative and business agreements and dealings with the rest the world. Trade agreements with India is a failure towards Sri Lanka an stalled with no progress and unable to make further progress due to political and economic mishandling due to want of the coherent and trade policy which Idea and Singapore is equipped with. It is mandatory and a requirement for a state to be we equipped with a proper foreign and a trade policy to prosper in the family of nations. Do we proper in the family of nations like Singapore well equipped with a proper and coherent foreign and trade policy?

Do we need Free Trade Agreements?

Certainly yes to be an active and productive state in the world community without isolating in the highly advanced and controversial maize of in the most competitive setup with selfish players with their state friendly temperaments however big or small. Bilateral and Multilateral agreements with states and international organizations and binding and effective in the current vibrant economic and political world order and it is better to be cautious in the interest of the future generation and the country as a whole the governance appointed as temporary trustee are responsible for. Did we have a proper dialogue and consultation with the professionals and the concerned citizens when dealing with the second fastest economy in the world with 982 billion trades in 20144 despite offers to cooperate and take part in deliberations and whether a real transparency is and consultation as in Australia, Canada and most democratic models. The discussions were fast tracked fast and one sided may be with good intentions due to pressure and time frame but hurriedly drafted and prepared with 17 chapters and 1083 pages available at (modsit.lk) as many similar legislation we are pressed on with adverse results when dealing with the second fastest economy in the world with political stability with People’s Action party balancing the rest of the world including UN with the economic power behind. Singapore a leader of the free economy has links and control over Airlines, Telecom, Engineering, Media and many strategic Ares and China having control of companies as government as a partner. UK and Europe claiming to be free economy is careful to maintain self interest in major dealing with Singapore friendly policies. We need Sri Lanka friendly foreign and trade policies for the future of the nation and the future generation awaking to take over from us with mistakes made and foundation for a bright future.

What is the practice in other countries?

Any country is careful in entering into comprehensive trade agreements with other states especially when the other party/s is asymmetrical and powerful economically and politically. Australia and Canada adequate consultation with the public and debates in Parliaments are requirements to be fulfilled before ratification and implementation. EU and the satellite countries prefer multilateral giving priority to national interest over other considerations. In Australia 20 sittings and Canada 21 sittings on the matter is required before going through such legislation prior to implementation. US has entered into trade agreements with 20 countries including Israel and Singapore with comprehensive agreements to open the economy to each other whilst SAFTA has integrated 1.6 billion SAARC as a vehicle when Sri Lanka India and Pakistan has entered into trade agreements which are still in primitive stages with many concerns to the less powerful parties. In any event the main consideration of any country is the national interest and to what extent the national interest of Sri Lanka is protected is not known to the citizen as there appear to be no transparence and consultations with the professionals or the public for reasons not known to the citizen when the other countries demand transparency and promote investment and competition. Public consultations are a requirement in other states of the world during the initial stages of trade agreement.

Effects on implementation and way forward for the future

Singapore which is the second fastest economy with 99% of goods with free access and the FTA’s with USA and economic power blocks with unlimited liberty will have free access to Sri Lanka in the implementation of other parallel agreements via Singapore. It appears the strategy of the GOSL may be to enter into as much agreement as possible to attract new investors. Will this strategy be effective and safe whilst protecting the national interest without other criteria to benefit/attract the prospective investors competing with the free trade zones of other counties with better and more attractive offers? Singapore is given access to bid for local enterprises running at a loss with valuable assets which other countries with trade links with Singapore too will behalf to bid thereby Sri Lankan assets will be for sale for the world via the Singapore Agreement. Have we gained confidence of the investor as a host country equipped with natural beauty, educated /trained lab our and good governance with peace and law and order for safety of business community. Wordings in the Singapore document is extremely carefully drafted by expert drafters including the definitions of the citizenship of Singaporean to include persons with indefinite leave and free access to the business community and the companies registers in Singapore giving free access to the business registered in Singapore which is the most liberal country/economy with free access to the business world. Sri Lanka is anticipation greater access to the business world via the agreement expecting investments businesses and prosperity of the country in the new world of business. Author could be contacted on  Sarath7@hotmail.co.uk

Sarath Wijesinghe

Vietnamese people are so united and think like one nation …

August 28th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

වියට්නාම – ලංකා වෙළෙඳාම ඩොලර් බිලියනයක් දක්වා ඉහළ නැංවීමට අවධානය    27 08 2018  – 20:20  – 153 views  – රුවන් කාශ්‍යපශ්‍රී ලංකාව සහ වියට්නාමය අතර ද්විපාර්ශ්වික වෙළෙඳාම 2020 වන විට අමෙරිකානු ඩොලර් බිලියනයක් දක්වා ඉහළ නැංවීම සඳහා නිරන්තර සාකච්ඡා සහ සැලසුම් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවය පිළිබඳව දෙරටේ අවධානය යොමුව තිබේ.ශ්‍රී ලංකා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා සහ වියට්නාමයේ නියෝජ්‍ය අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය සහ විදේශ කටයුතු අමාත්‍ය ෆාම් බින් මින් මහතා අතර පැවැති සාකච්ඡාවේදී මේ පිළිබඳව අවධානය යොමුවිය.

When the Prime Minister presented the National Export Strategy ( NES) he mentioned how Vietnam overtook Sri Lanka in a short span in the field of Export Earning .

My colleague who is doing business in Vietnam tells me that permission to start a export business is so fast and efficient, He blends perfume in Vietnam and brings then to Sri Lanka as the Ethyl Alcohol is freely available and cheap .

Vietnamese do not  consume hard liquor much  hence Ethyl Alcohol is hardly used but they consume lot of beer .

( This may be the reason why Mangala wanted Sri Lankan to be beer loving nation !)

During my days in Soviet Union I was studying for a first degree in Petroleum Resources Exploration in the Moscow State University. We had so many small made Vietnamese students who were always moving together as a team .Lack of English knowledge has limited much conversation until they were fluent in Russian language. ( some spoke French as it was a French Colony)

All of them had a photo of Ho Chi Min in the room

They hardly had wild parties with Vodka like liquor-loving Sri Lankans, and also quite studious .I was living in a new apartment block on the 11th floor and right above my room, there were some Vietnamese students .

One day I kept hearing a noise from the up stair room in the night, and the noise was so irritating and disturbing.

I ran upstairs and opened their door and found that two/ three small made viet-boys were playing with a steel disc  ( from a dumb bell),rotating it on the wooden floor and let it go .The disc kept rotating spirally for few minutes generating an annoying noise and fell flat on the floor.

I shouted at them and asked them to stop the annoying action and came down cursing.

After few minutes   they started the same noise .

I was furious and ran upstairs and dashed opened the door.

Alas !!, a bucket  was kept on the top of the door ,which poured onto me as soon as  I opened the door and soaked me with ice cold water !

There were none in the room.

They say that Vietkongs were quite skilled in deceiving Americans ,who were enticed to come to war front into firing line to get executed .

After that I never bothered them.

Dr Sarath Obeysekera


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress