20 වන සංශෝධනයට ජනමත විචාරණයක් අනිවාර්යයි..- ශේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය තීන්දු කරයි

September 15th, 2017

lanka C news

පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය කල් දැමීම සදහා යෝජනා කරන 20 වන ආණ්ඩු ක‍්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සදහා ජනමත විචාරණයක් උවමනා බවට ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ මතය වී ඇති බව ආණ්ඩු හිතවාදී වෙබ් අඩවි කිහිපයක්ම වාර්තා කර ඇත.

නීති ක්‍ෂෙත‍්‍ර ආරංචි මාර්ග උපුටා දක්වමින් එම වාර්තාවල තව දුරටත් සදහන්ව ඇත්තේ 20 වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට එරෙහිව ඉදිරිපත්ව ඇති පෙත්සම් සලකා බලමින් අනිවාර්යෙන්ම ජනමත විචාරණයක් පැවැත්විය යුතුයයි ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය නිගමනය කරනු ඇති බවයි.

ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරන ත‍්‍රිපුද්ගල විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලේ 2-1ක් ලෙස වන මෙම තීන්දුව ගැන දැනටමත් කතානායකවරයාට දන්වා ඇති අතර 20 වන දා මෙම තීන්දුව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට දැනුම් දීමට නියමිත බවද සදහන්ය.

ජනපති දියණියට ලේඛණ හැකියාවක් නෑ.. ‘ජනාධිපති තාත්තා’ නමත් හොරකම් කල එකක්.. ලියා ඇත්තේත් වෙන කෙනෙක්..- චතුරිකාට ප‍්‍රබල චෝදනාවක්

September 15th, 2017

 lanka C news

ජනාධිපති වැඩිමහල් දියණිය චතුරිකා සිරිසේන විසින් ‘ජනාධිපති තාත්තා’ නමින් අද දිනයේ එලි දක්වන කෘතිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් එජාපයට හිතවාදී වෙබ් අඩවියක් වාර්තා කොට ඇත්තේ අදාල පොතේ නම පවා ජනපති දියණිය විසින් සොරකම් කොට ඇති බවයි.

මෙම පොත ලියා ඇත්තේද ඇය විසින් නොවන බවත් ලිවීමේ හැකියාවක් ඇයට නැති බවත් සදහන් එම වාර්තාව බාහිර පුද්ගලියන් තුන් දෙනෙකු විසින් එය ලියා ඇති බවත් සදහන් කරයි.

ජනපති දියණියට ලේඛණ හැකියාවක් නෑ.. ‘ජනාධිපති තාත්තා’ නමත් හොරකම් කල එකක්.. ලියා ඇත්තේත් වෙන කෙනෙක්..- චතුරිකාට ප‍්‍රබල චෝදනාවක්

අදාල පුවත මෙතනින්

http://www.lankaenews.com/news/6348/si

චතුරිකා සොරකම් කළ ‘ජනාධිපති තාත්තා‘

(ලංකා ඊ නිව්ස් -2017.සැප්.15, පෙ.ව‍.4.20) මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතාගේ වැඩිමහල් දියණිය දර්ශනී චතුරිකා සිරිසේන විසින් ‘ජනාධිපති තාත්තා‘ නමින් පොතක් ලියා ඇතැයි කියන අතර එම පොත අද (15) කොළඹ බණ්ඩාරනායක සම්මන්ත්‍රණ ශාලාවේ දී එලි දැක්වීමට නියමිත ය.
මෙම පොත සම්බන්ධයෙන් ප්‍රචාරක වීඩියෝ දැන්වීම් පමණක් 6 ක් ඇයට අයත් දැන්වීම් සමාගම් විසින් නිමවා තිබේ. ඒ දැන්වීම් වලින් දැක්වෙන්නේ පරස්පර විරෝධී මතයන්ය. එකකින් පවසන්නේ මෙය චතුරිකා සිරිසේනගේ ස්වයං ආත්ම ප්‍රකාශනය බවයි. තවත් එකකින් පවසන්නේ මෙය ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ ජීවිත කතාව බවයි. කෙසේ වෙතත් මෙම පොත එලිදැක්වීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඊයේ රාත්‍රී මහාරාජාගේ රූපවාහිනී චැනලයක සම්මුඛ සාකච්ඡාවකට සහභාගී වූ චතුරිකාගේ ප්‍රකාශ වලින් අපට තේරුම් ගත හැකි වූයේ ඇය බොහෝ සිංහල වදන් වල නියමාකාර අර්ථ නොදන්නා බවයි. ඊට උදාහරණ රැසකි. ඇය ‘දෝලනය‘ වන වචනය නිතර භාවිතා කළ නමුත් එය බොහෝ විට යෙදුවේ වැරදි අවස්ථාවන් සඳහා ය.  ‘චරිතාපදානය‘ යන වචනය පවා ඇය දන්නේ නැත. ඇය ඒ වෙනුවට පැවසුවේ ‘චරිතප්‍රධානය‘ කියා ය. සිංහල බස නිවැරදිව හසුරුවන තාත්තා විසින් කියවා ඇති ගෙදර තිබෙන පත පොතවත් ඇය පරිශීලනය කර නැති බව මොනවට පෙණින.

මේ නිසා නිසි ලෙස සරල සිංහල වචන වල අරුත් පවා නොදන්නා චතුරිකා විසින්ම මේ පොත ලීවේ දැයි සැක පහල වූ බැවින් ලංකා ඊ නිව්ස් ඒ පිලිබඳව සොයා බැලීමට තීරණය කෙළේය.

 

 

NGO VULTURES COME FORWARD TO SUPPORT IMBECILE FONSEKA

September 14th, 2017

By : A.A.M.NIZAM – MATAARA

While people throughout the country hold demonstrations, and burn effigies of imbecile Sarath Fonseka against his allegations that our war heroes committed war crimes and his tirade against the highly respected Ven, Elle Gunawansa Thero and other prominent Buddhist monks, the  Dollar voracious NGO vultures such as self exiled PRAA activist and Switzerland domicile Sunanda Deshapriya, a member of the so-called  ‘co-existence’ committee, along with notorious and anti Sri Lankan Pakyasothy Saravanamuttu, that recommended the establishment of an International Tribunal to try Sri Lankan armed forces, and a member of the pro-government NGO outfit called Puravesi Balaya” Vi-Angoda and the self appointed executive Director of the National Peace Council (NPC), the NGO funded by successive Norwegian governments, and the recipient of substantial funding from other foreign ‘sources.’ Jehan Perera have come forward to support the mad hatter Sarath Fonseka.

Sunanda continuously attended UNHRC Geneva sessions to criticize the Sri Lankan armed forces writing an article in Sinhala in the pro-terrorist website vikalpa.org” under the caption War Crimes, Jayasuiya, Fonseka and Sirisena” criticizes Sirisena for his statement made at the 66th SLFP anniversary saying that he will not allow anyone to touch the war heroes. In this article, he reminds Sirisena of the statement made by him saying that he would have been buried under a 6 feet pit if he lost the election in 2015 and points out that the said Pit would have been dug and filled by none other than pro-Rajapaksa security service leaders.   He says that it was these war heroes who dragged Fonseka for imprisonment.

He states that Fonseka has now made a public statement saying that he possesses evidence to prove that General Jagath Jayasuriya committed war crimes and came to know that Jayasuriya mistreated the Tamil people who surrendered to the Army.  He points out that Fonseka has also stated he was planning to file a case against Jayasueiya in a war tribunal.

Referring to the statement made by the incumbent Army Commander Mahesh Senanayake (Divayina 4th September) that the Army is against the statement made by Fonseka saying that 28,000 of the Army sacrificed their lives not to hear statements like this, the NGO vulture Sunanda asks whether Army Commander is saying that cases should not be filed as Fonseka said and no punishment should be meted out against wrong doings?

The NGO vulture points out that General Jayasueriya has told the English Daily Ceylon Today” on 3rd September that he does not know whether the arrested Tamil suspects housed at the infamous Joseph camp were tortured or not. Sunanda says that General Jayasuriya does not say that such things did not happen.  He has only said that the suspects were held in that camp by the Intelligence Units and he had no connection with that.  Not only that he has said if any such things happened in that camp it was other Commanders who should be held responsible for that.   Sunanda says that Mahesh Senanayke may even object this.

Sunanda further states that when it was enquired from Jayasuriya whether he has read the report of the Paranagama Commission appointed by his leader Mahinda Rajapaksa about missing persons of the war time, the former Army Commander has responded that he does not know about it.  He says that this is a wonder but the truth.

Sunanda points out that from this interview and the interview given to the BBC earlier show that the only objective of Jayasuriya was to somehow escape from the war crime allegations against him regardless of whoever who becomes victimized.

This NGO vulture says that this Army Commander is an unwise person and it shows by the statement he made that Sri Lanka government should obtain an official statement from the United Nations Organization saying that Sri Lana has not committed war crimes.  He says what the UN has told Sri Lanka is to investigate through a credible Court about allegations saying that war crimes took place in Sri Lana during the war period.

He asks when the government of Sri Lanka instead of holding an investigation does not even shows an inclination to do so  who can say that war crimes have not taken place in this country? On the other hand the UN has not given such a certificate to any country. The reason for this was that in the recent history there were instances of such evidence coming to light even after thirty or forty years.

He says that it was for such a General that Sirisena was swearing on his head saying that he would protect him.

On the other hand it is not in an international court that a war crime case against Jayasuriya has been filed.  It has been filed in some South American Courts under local Laws.

Although people or organizations can make complaints to the War Crime Tribunals established in accordance with the Rome Convention it can be considered by the Tribunal only if the country concerned is a signatory to the Convention.

Sri Lanka is not a signatory to the Rome Convention.

The International War Crime Tribunal can investigate complaints received from individuals or organizations in respect of such countries only if the UN Security Council or the concerned country made a request to the War Crime Tribunal to do so.

It is stated that in the year 2006 a group of Sri Lankan patriots living in the United States filed a complaint against LTTE recruiting child soldiers in the International War Crime Tribunal.

Similarly other foreign domiciled Sri Lankan groups have also filed cases against the Sri Lankan government.  But none of these complaints was taken into consideration by the International War Crime Tribunal.

Therefore all vagaries being made saying that Jayasuriya will not be produced at the International War Crime Tribunal are only attempts being made to mislead the people.

The case that has been filed in Brazil and Colombia against Jagath Jayasuriya by Yasmin Souka’s South American Organization has no connection with the International War Crime Tribunal. As it was reported in the BBC it has been requested by this case to banish Jagath Jayasuriya from Brazil and to start an investigation about him.

The International media reported that similar cases will be filed in Argentina, Peru and Chile as well.

As per the local Laws of these countries it is possible even persons who violated international humanitarian laws in foreign countries to be taken into custody and cases can be filed against them.

These countries have enacted Laws of this nature in order to mete out punishments in any country for the region’s tyrant leaders and Army commanders for their human rights violations.

On 16th October 1998 the former Chilean Dictator General Pinochet was taken into custody in Britain as a result of a case against him filed in a Spanish Court 6 days prior to that.

Despite whatever being said by Sirisena now if Jagath Jayasuriya visits those South American countries devoid of Ambassadorial privileges, the possibility of taking him into custody and initiating trials against him is very much likely. If he happens to visit Brazil without Ambassadorial privileges he will definitely be taken into custody.

The reason being that the judiciary in those countries, do not dance to the tune of the President of this country, or to the Rulers of those countries. The judiciary of these countries are even powerful to take into custody the corrupt Rulers and former Army Commanders in respect of war crimes.  They are so independent.

If credible accountability process does not happen in Sri Lanka even after ten years a situation like this not only for our Army leaders but also for Heads of State could happen in the European countries as well.

We know that the LTTE carried out war crimes violating human rights.  It assassinated innocent Sinhala and Muslim people and their own Tamil people because their politics was Terrorism.

There is a question that has to be asked from everyone who claims that the Sri Lankan Army in that war did not do any mistake. That is whether the security forces of this country did not fall into the level of barbarism during armed uprising of the Sinhala youth in the South in 1971 and 1988 – 90 period?  Response for this question is written all over the light poles. The question that needs to be asked is that the State forces which inhumanly killed Sinhala youth taken into custody in the South, how could have they treated the Tamil youth taken into custody?

The answer for this question is mixed in the air waves as it has been sung by Bob Dillon. There is no champion who could erase this truth.

Meanwhile, V-Angoda and Jehan Perera too have emphasized in their regular articles and TV talk shows the need to pursue the allegations made by Fonseka and they have deplored the anti-Fonseka demonstrations being held throughout the country.  (

දිවයින ට ආවේශ වී අති  සොලොමන් ලා  ගේ පුහු චින්තන හොල්මන්- I

September 14th, 2017

බෝධි ධනපාල, කිබෙක්, කැනඩාව

දිවයින පත්තරයේ පාඨකයෝ පසු ගිය මෑත අවුරුදු දෙක තුන දී එහි පලවෙන, ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලයට ඇබ්බහි වී ඉන්නා සමහර මැක්කන් ගේ නිතොර ලියවෙන බොරු හෑල්ල අනිවාර්යයෙන්ම දකින්නට ඇත. නලින් ද සිල්වා මහතා නැමැති පුහු “චින්තකයා (see lanka web:  https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2017/09/07/නලින්-ද-සිල්ව-නැමති-පුහු-ච/ ) ද ඉහලට ඇද ගත්තේ,  මහ තැනක් දුන්නේ දිවයින  පත්‍රය ඔහුගේ හිස් “විද්‍යා” ලිපි එකල ප්‍රසිද්ධ කල නිසාය.  විද්‍යාව “පට්ට පල් බොරුවක්” යන මතය රට පුරා පතල කොට, එම පුහු “චින්තකය” ඉහල නැගුවේ දිවයින පත්තර කාරයාය. විදුසර කතුවරයා ද එම වරදට යම් තම් හෝ වග කිව යුතුය. නුමුත් අන්තිමේදී නලින් ද සිල්වා ගේ හිස් කම සහ පුස් කම එලි වුනේ ඔහු ඕල්කොට් තුමාට, අනගාරික ධර්මපාල තුමාට සහ සෝම හාමුදුරුවන්ටත් ඉහලින් බුදු දහම තමා දන්න බවත්, “පට්ට-පල් බොරු බට හිර විද්‍යව ඇත් හැර ද, ශාස්ත්‍ර කීම, පේන ඇහීම, නාථ-කතරගම දෙවියන් පසු පස යෑම, ජ්‍යොතිෂය ඇදහීම, “වෛදික ගණිතය” වැනි “දේශීය” විද්‍යාවන් පුහුණු කල යුතු යැයි ( ඊට උදාහරන වශයෙන් සිල්වා මහතා මාස කිහිපයක් තුල කරන ලද සාවද්‍ය ප්‍රකාශ 40ක්    “Newspapers, Dr. Nalin de Silva  and Pseudoscience”.  නැමැති 4-ජූලි-2015 මගේ ලංකාවෙබ් ලිපියෙන් දැක්වූවෙමි ) https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2015/06/07/countering-pseudoscience-in-some-of-our-news-media/ විහිලු මය ප්‍රකාශ කරමිනි. එම පුහු චින්තකයා  ඉහලට පුම්බා ගත්  කාලය තුල දී දිවයින පත්තරය ගෙන ගිය ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් ගැන විමසමු.  පුවත් පත් කලාවේ උසස් තම, නිර්දය ලක්ෂණයක් වන, අනිත් පැත්තේ මත වලට ද කරලියක් දීමේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය දිවයින කතුවරයා සහාසික ලෙස අවලංගු කොට, පුහු “චින්තකයන්ටම”  පමණ කරලිය සීම කළේය.

එදා අනුගමනය කල කුනු බෝක්කු ප්‍රතිපත්තියම අනුගමනය කරමින්, දිවයින පත්තර කාරයා ජනාදිපති කාර්යාලයෙහි මැක්කන්ගේ “වස-විස නැති රටක්” මැවීමේ ප්‍රෝඩාවට යට වී සිටින ආකාරය අපේ අනුකම්පාවට භාජන විය යුතුය. අනුකම්පාවෙන් නතර වීමට නොහැක්කේ එයින් රටට මහා හානියක් මොවුන් ගේ “යහපාලනය” නමින් කරන නිසාය. එම ප්‍රෝඩාවට යට වී දින පතාම වාගේ නොයෙක් දුර්මත වලින් පිරුනු ලිපි දිවයින පත්කරුවා පලකරයි. එපමනක් නොව, එයට ලියන අය ඔවුන් විසින් ම “චින්තක” යන නාමය ඔවුන් ගේ නම මුලට යොදා, පාඨකයා නොමඟ යැවීමට ද ඉඩ දී සිටී. උදාහරණයක් නම්,
“චින්තක සී. ගුණදාස”,
උපදේශක, “වසවිස නැති රටක්‌” ජාතික වැඩසටහන උපායමාර්ගික ව්‍යවසාය කළමනාකරණ ආයතනය (සෙමා) ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලය,
නැමැති අයෙක්  ගේ ලිපියක් සැප්තැම්බර් 13 දී …ආහාර ස්‌වෛරීබව රකින පරිසර ගොවිතැන….  යන සිරස් තලය ඇතුව පල කර තුබුනි. කෘෂිකර්මය, බීජ වර්ග, පලදාව, වස විස ආදිය ගැන මුල් ශ්‍රේණියේ  සප්පයෙක් දන්න දේ වත් මෙම “චින්තකයා” නොදන්න බව ඔහු ගේ ලිපියෙන් පෙනේ.   

හරිත විප්ලවය ගැන ඔහු කියන්නේ කැලිෆොර්නියාවෙහි සහ ඇමෙරිකාවෙහි “බයිබල් බෙල්ට්” හි ඉන්නා විද්‍යාවට එරෙහි මත දරන ඉවැන්ජෙලිකල් කාරයන් කියන අන්දමට හරිත විප්ලවයට සාවද්‍ය විග්‍රහයක් දෙමිනි. කරුනු කන පිට පෙරලා දක්වමිනි.

මෙන්න ඔහු කියන දේ
<මුල>
“හැටේ දශකයේ අග භාගයේදී හරිත විප්ලවය නම් මහා බොරුව මගින් හරිත විප්ලව තාක්‌ෂණය හා එම තාක්‌ෂණ කට්‌ටලයත් 1977 න් පසුව කැඳවාගත් විවෘත ආර්ථිකයත් හේතුවෙන් පසු කාලීනව ගොවිතැන විකෘතියක්‌ බවට පත් විය. එය වාණිජ කෘෂිකර්මයක්‌ බවට පත්වුණේ ලාභය මුල්කර ගනිමින් ය”.
<අග>
 එවැනි විග්‍රහයක් කාබනික පොහොර වඩා හොඳ බව කියමින් විකිනීමට ඉදිරි පත් වී සිටින කූට වෙලෙන්දන්  දෙන බව අපි දනිමු.   ඛනිජ පොහොර නමින් හංදුන් වන නයිට්‍රොජන් (N), පොස්පරස් (P), පොටෑසියම් (K) මිශ්‍රණය ලංකාවේ පාවිච්චිට පටන් ගත්තේ 1930 වකවානුවෙහිදීය. යූරියා (UREA) හැදීමේ හාබර් ක්‍රමය (Harber Process)  එම විද්‍යාඥයෝ සොය ගත්තේ 1909 දීය. ඉතින් ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලයේ ඉන්න මෙම දෙස්පාලන මැක්කා 1960, 1977 යේ  හරිත විප්ලවයක් ගැන කියන්නේ ඇයි? එය ලංකාවට අදාල නැත. ඊට අවුරුදු 40කට පෙර, 1930-1937 කාලය තුල ලංකාව N,P,K පොහොර පාවිච්චිය පටන් ගෙන තිබුනේය. මෙම  ඉන්දියාවට යෙදෙන දින වක වානුවක් ය. ඔන්න චින්තකයා දන්න දේ!

තවද, මෙම පුහු “චින්තකයා” ලංකාවේ සැබෑ ඉතිහාසය නොදනී. ඔහුගේ ඉතිහාසය හුදු හාසයකි. පැරැණ්නෝ මහත් උත්සාහයකින්, වැව් හදමින්, ජල ඇල කනිමින් ගොවිතැන් කල මුත් යන්තම් බඩ පුරවා ගැනීමට වත් හැකිවුනේ නැත. N,P,K  ගැන නොදත් ඔව්හු පොලව අස්සාර වන විට වෙන තැනකට හේන ගෙනයන්නේ කැලය ගිණි තබාය. එම අලු වලින් N, P, K  පසට ලැබී අවුරුද්දක් දෙකක් එහි වගා කරන්නට හැකිවුනි. පැරණි ඇට වලට මහා ජල අවශ්‍ය තාවක් ද තුබුනි. වල පැලෑටි පාලනය කලේ ජලයෙන් කුඹුර යට කිරීමෙනි. එම ජලය පසෙහි ඇති සාරය ද හෝදා ගෙන ගිය හෙයින් පස ඉතා කෙටි කාලයකින් නිස්සාර වේ.  ජලය කොච්චර දුන්නත් අස්වැන්න සුලු විය. එහෙයින් එකල මංද පෝෂ්ණය අධික විය. බලා පොරොත්තු විය හැකි සාමාන්‍ය ජීවන කාලය අවුරුදු 35ක් පැන්නේ නැත. රදල අය සහ සංඝයා ට නම් බඩ පුරවා ගැනීමට හැකි විය. නුමුත් බොහෝ විට නියඟ ඇතිවීම  නිසා ඉහල පෙලේ අයට පවා ව්‍යසන ඇති විය. බැමිනිටියා සෑය ගන විස්තර කරන පාලි වංශ කථ අනුව සංඝයා 25000 පමන මරු මුවට පත් විය හෝ රටින් පලා  (වෙන රට වලට)  ගියහ. ‍යම් යම් මට්ටමේ ඉඩෝර අවුරුදු දශකයෙන් දශකයට පමණ (නිවැරදි වශයෙන් නම්,  වර්ෂ 13නෙන් 13නට ) ඇති වූයේ සූර්‍යයාගේ ලප ඇතිවෙන කාල චක්‍රය අනුව බව නූතන විද්‍යාඥයෝ දනිති. රජරට සරසවියේ මහාචර්ය (සහ එවකට උපකුලපති වූ) සිරිවීර මහතා මේ ගැන ලිපි ලිය ඇත. ඔහු සහ අන් විද්වතුන්  අතීතයේ නිතොර තුබූ ආහාර අවදානම් කම ගැන ශාස්ත්‍රීය ලිපි පල කොට ඇත. එවැනි ලිපි ආශ්‍රයෙන් කරුනු දක්වනවා වෙනුවට, බොලඳ උද්වේග ශීලී සිහින ලොවටම හිමි අධි-අභිමානයම මූලිකවූ සාධක රහිත ඉති-හාස්‍යයමය  ලිපි මෙම පුහු චින්තකයා ලියා ඇත. ඔහු කියන සිහින කතා   අන්දමට අතීතයෙහි හොංදින් කා බී, අසනීප නැති, දීර්ගායුෂ තිබූ මිනිස්සු එකල සිටී ලු! එකල සිටියේ දරු කල ඇතිවෙන රෝග සහ මන්ද පොෂ්ණයෙන් බේරීමට තරම් උපතින්ම ශක්තිමත් ස්වල්ප දෙනෙක් පමණය. එසේ ඉතිරි වූ අය දිගු කලක් ජීවත් වූ මුත්, දරු කාලයේ ම මැරුනු ජනයා ද ගණන් ගත්තොත් සාමාන්‍ය වයස අවුරුදු 35ක් ඉක්මුවේ නැත. මුලු මහත් රටේම ජනගහනය ලක්ෂයක් ඉක්මුවේ බොහෝ කල තුරකිනි.

චින්තක නැමති පට්ටම තමන්ම ආරූඪ කර ගත් “සී. ගුණදාස”,  උපදේශක, වසවිස නැති රටක්‌ ජාතික වැඩසටහන උපායමාර්ගික ව්‍යවසාය කළමනාකරණ ආයතනය (සෙමා) ජනාධිපති කාර්යාල මැක්කා ඉතිහාසය නොදන්නේ පමණ්ක් නොව, ගොවිතැන හෝ ගොවි බීජ වර්ග ගැන ද කිවක් නොදන්න බව ඔහු ගේ ලිපියෙන් ම මොනොවට පැහැදිලි කරයි.

මෙන්න ඔහු කියන දේ
<මුල>
 හරිත විප්ලවය සමඟින් ආරම්භ වූ කෘෂිකර්මය අද දවස වනවිට කරුමයක්‌ බවට පත්වී නොමැතිද? පරම්පරාවෙන් පරම්පරාවට උරුම කරගෙන එන ලද පාරම්පරික දැනුමත්, රටටත්, ජනතාවටත්, සතා සිවුපාවටත් හිතකර බීජ හා රෝපණ ද්‍රව්‍යයන් හඳුනාගෙන ඒවා වගාකර ගනිමින් ඒවා ස්‌වභාවික ක්‍රමයට වැඩිදියුණු කර ගනිමින් එහි ගුණය ඖෂධීය අගය හා ශක්‌ති ප්‍රභවයන් හඳුනාගනිමින් වගා කළා වූ 3,000 කට අධික බීජ වර්ගයන් අපට උරුමව තිබිණි.
<අග>
 3,000 කට අධික බීජ වර්ගයන් ගැන මෙම ජනධිපති මැක්කා කියන්නේ අමූලික බොරුවකි.
 ඊලම් යුද්ධයේදී 40,000-100,000 ක් අහිංසකයන් හමුදාව මරා දැම්මයි කියන බටහිර එන් ජී ඕ (NGO) කාරයෝ කියන්නක් මෙන්ම සාක්ෂි නොමැතිව එය දණ නවා පිලිගත්තේ යහපාලන ජනාධිපතිගේ විදේශ ඇමති මංගල සමරවීරය. එවනි දේ අනුමත කර ගැනීමට බට හිර එන් ජී ඕ කාරයෝ ලංකාවට විත් ඔවුන් ගේ ඇම්බැට්ටයෙක් එක්ක කතා කිරීම සාමන්‍ය පිලිවෙතයි. එහෙයින්, හමුදා  මැරීම ගැන එන් ජී ඕ කාරයෝ පාකියසොති ගෙන් හෝ වියන්ගොඩ ගෙන් හෝ ජෙහාන් පෙරෙරා ගෙන් මෙරටින් කට වචන ගෙන රුකුල් ගනියි. වස-විස නැති රටක් මුවාවෙන් ගෙනියන බොරු ගොවිතැන ගැන ද කතාව එසේමය. ලංකාවේ පොලොව වස වී මාරණික මරු කුඹුරු (“killing fields”) වලට පත් වී ඇති  බව කියමින් බ්‍රයන් බාත් (Bryan Barth, modernfarmer.com/2017/the-killingfileds/ )නැමැති ඇමෙරිකන් එන් ජී ඕ මැක්කා ද එකල ලංකාවේ චිරාගත බීජ වර්ග 3000 ක් තුබුනේ යැයි කීය. දැන් ඒවා වැනසී නැතිවී ගොස් යැයි කීය. එයට රුකුලට සම්බන්ධ කලේ එවැනි පර එන් ජී ඕ කාරයන් සම්ඟ බැඳී වැඩ කරන චන්න ජයසුමන ගෙන් කට වචන ගැනීමය! ජනාදිපති කාර්යාලයේ ඉන්න මැක්කන් කියන කතා අනුවද, චන්න ජයසුමන කියන කතා අනුවද, අයබදු නොගෙවා ආනයනය කරගත් කාර් විකුනමින් ජාවරම් කරන පූජ්‍ය රතන අනුවද, අපේ ලංකාවේ පොලොව දැන් වස විසින් පිරී ගොස් මිනී මරු වස පසක් බවට හැරී ඇත.

හරිත විප්ලවයෙන් පසු “බෙහෙත්” දැමීම නිසා පොලොව වස වී ගොස් ලු! මෙයට හොඳ උත්තරයක් දෙන්නේ එවකට කෘෂිකර්ම් දෙපාතමේන්තුවේ අධ්‍යක්ෂක ජෙනෙරාල් වූ ආචාර්ය අමරසිරි මහතාය.  කුඹුරක් හාන විට නගුල වටා කොක්කු පිරෙන හැටි අපි කවුරුත් අදත්, එදාත් දැක ඇත. කොක්කු පිරෙන්නේ ගැඩවිලන් සහ අනෙකුත් (පසෙහි වැසෙනා ) කෲමීන් ගිල දැමීමටය. ඉතින්, මෙතරම් වස විස ඇති පොලවෙහි කෙසේ මෙම අන්දමින් කෲමීන් සහ ගැඩවිල්ලන් වසයි ද? පොලොවෙහි කැඩ්මියම් ආසෙනික් ආදිය හෝ විසක් යයි කියන (එහෙත් විසක් නොවන ) ග්ලයිෆොසේට් ආදිය පොලොවෙහි ඇතුව, පොලොව මාරකයක් වූවා නම් එයින් ගැඩවිල්ලන් ගිලින කොක්කු එතනම මැරී වැටෙනු ඇත! එවන්නක් කවදාවත් අපි දැක නැත!එම තර්කය මදි නම්, පස අරගෙන රසායනික විශ්ලේශනයන් කල හැකිය. එවැනි පුලුල්  විශ්ලේශන තුන හතරක්ම දැනටම වාර්තා වී ඇත. WHO-NSF මගීන් 2012-2014 දී කරන ලද පරීක්ෂණ වලින් ද, ජපානයේ ටෝකියෝ සරසවියෙහි උදව්ව ද ලබාගෙන 2014 දී පේරාදෙනියේ වෛද්ය පීඨයෙන් කෙරුණ පරීක්ෂණ වලින්ද, 2016 දී උතුරු කැරොලයිනා සරසවිය සහ ශ්‍රි ජයවර්දන පුර සරසවියෙන් කෙරුනු පරීක්ෂණ වලින්ද පෙනී ගියේ කැඩ්මියම්, ආසෙනික්, ලෙඩ්, මර්කරි යනාදී “බැර ලෝහ” වස ද්‍රව්‍ය හෝ ග්ල්යිෆොසේට්, ඩී.ඩී.ටී වැනි පලිබොධ නාශක ද්‍රව්‍ය හෝ ඒව දිරා යන විට නිරුක්ත වන දිරා-කොටස් වල සැලකිය යුතු සුලු මාත්‍ර පමාණයක් වත් නැති බවය (එනම්,බිලියනයකින් දහ කොටසක් වත් නැතිය!). ඉතින්, කෘෂි රසායනයෙන් එනවා යැයි කියන අපද්‍රව්‍යයක්, කිසිම වස විසක්, සුලු මාත්‍රයක් වශයෙන් වත්  පොලවේ හෝ ජලයෙහි නැති නම් කොහේ ද මේ වස-විස ඇති රට තියෙන්නෙ? රතන හිමියන්, අසෝක අබයවර්දන  සහ අනුර සොලොමන් වැන්නන් ගේ සිහින ලොවේ ද?  ඉතින්, දැනටමත් වස විස නැත්නම් මේ ජනාධිපති කාර්‍යාලයට රිංගාගෙන වස විස ගැන කථා කරමින් මහජනයා භීතිමත් කොට මහජනයාගේ ලේ උනුකරන මේ මැක්කො කරන්නේ කුමන ප්‍රෝඩාවක් ද? ගොවිතැනට සුදුසු පොහොර වෙනුවට බයෝ ෆිල්ම්  (BIOFILM) නැමැති ප්‍රකට ප්‍රෝඩාව විකුනා මුදල් ගරා ගන්නද?

බයෝෆිල්ම් ගැන ආචාර්ය වයිද්‍යනාථ (Dr. Waidyanatha) කරුණු විමසා බලා එය ප්‍රෝඩාවක් බවට කරුණු පසුගිය පෙබරවාරි මස අයිලන්ඩ් (ISLAND) පත්තරය මගින් එලි දරව්වක් කලේය. ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලයට රිංගාගෙන ඉන්නා,  උපායෙන් රට රවටන, රටට ව්‍යසන කරන්නට යෙදී ඇත්තන්ට අභියෝගයක් දැමූ මුත්  SEMA මැක් නිහඬින් සිටී. එය ගොවියා රවටවා, කාබනික පොහොරක් යැයි කියා ඔහුගේ මුදල ගරා ගැනීමේ ක්‍රමයකි. බයොෆිල්ම් එකෙන් පොහොරක් වෙන්නේ නැති බව ගොවියා දැන ගන්නේ සල්ලිත් ගෙවා කලක් ගොස් අස්වැන්නක් නොලැබුනු විටය.නමුත් මෙය ජාන්දිපති කාර්යාලයේ SEMA  මැක්කෝ අනුමත කොට අනුග්‍රහය දී සල්ලිත්  ඇතයි ආරන්චි ඇත.

 කාබනික පොහොරයයි කියමින් ඉන්දියාවෙන් ගෙන්නන හුඟක් කැඩ්මියම් වස ඇති නීම් (NEEM)  පොහොර සහ ගොම පොහොර විකුනා, පොලව වස කර ඉන් පසු, “හා, මෙන්න, පොලොව වස වී තිබෙනවා ” කියන්නද? “කාබනික පොහොර” යැයි කියමින් විකුනන පොහොර ද රසායනික විශ්ලේශණ්යකට භාජන කල යුතුය, එවිට මේ මැක්කන් සහ පූජ්‍ය උන්නන්සේ ලා කරන ප්‍රෝඩාව මහජනයාට දැන ගැනීමට හැකිය. අනුර සොලොමොන් ලා කොපමණ නොමඟ ගිය පුහු පුවත් පත් කාරයන් ද යන්න ද පාඨකයාට වැටහෙනු ඇත. එක මතයකට පමණක් ඉඩ දී පිලි ගත් විද්‍යා මතය යට ගැහීමට තරම් සහාසික සොලොමොන් ලා ඇත්ත වශයෙන් ම මෙරටට ඇති වූ මහ වශ කාරයෝ ය.

චිරාජත බීජ වර්ග 3000 ක් නොව වැඩිම උනොත් ඇට වර්ග 600ක් පමණ ඇත. එකම ඇටයට නම් රැසක් ම ඇති හෙයින්ද, උද්භ්ද විද්‍යාව නොදන්නා ජනාදිපති කාර්යාලයට රින්ගාගෙන ඉන්නා, නමින් පමණක “චින්තක” වන මැක්කන්ට ද, ඔවුන් ගෙන් කරුනු උකා ගන්නා එන් ජී ඕ කායරයන්ට ද ඇට අඳුනා ගැනීමට නොහැක. ‘පොක්කලි’ යන නම ඇති වී ඇටයට තව වෙනත් නම් 25 ක් පමණ ඇත.
 එහෙත් ඇත්තේ එකම බීජ වර්ගයකි.  යථා වශයෙන් ඇති  ඇට වර්ග 600ක් පමණ  ගන්නෝරුව කෘෂිකර්ම විද්‍යා (ජනුක සේවාවන්, genetic resources) ආයතනයේ උගතුන්ට පින් සිද්ධ වෙන්න්ට හොඳින් තෝරා බේරා සැකසුරුව ආරක්ෂා කොට ඇත. එම ඇට වර්ග වල සහලේ  ගුණ-අගුණ, වතුර අව්ශ්‍යතාව, අස්වැන්න ප්‍රති ශතය, ආදී සියල්ල ශාස්ත්‍රීය ලිපි වල පල කොට ඇත. එවැනි විදුවන් ගෙන් කරුනු නොඅසා බ්‍රයන් බාත් වනි එන් ජී ඕ කාක්කෝ ජයසුමන ලඟට යන්නේ ඇත්ත සොයා ගැනීමට නොව, ඔවුන්ට කැමති උත්තරය ලබා ගැනීමටය.  මහජන කැක්කුම සහ භීතිය උස්සන සිරස් තල ඇති ලිපි ලිවීමටය.

චිරාගත ඇට වර්ග වෙනුවට දෙමුහුන් (හය්බ්‍රිඩ්, hybrid) ඇට වර්ග ඇති කරන්නේ ඇට වර්ග දෙකකම ඇති ගුණදාවන් එකට ලබා ගැනීමට පමණක් නොව, එම ඇට දෙවර්ගයේ ඇති අගුණ ද බොහෝ ලෙස මකා දමමින්ය. මෙය හොඳින් කිරීමට ජනුක විද්‍යාව ද සහාය ට ගනිමින්, ගන්නොරුව, බතලගොඩ ආදී පර්යේෂණ ආයතන වල ද, ඊට පෙර තුබූ තැන් වල ද, 1920 කාලයේ සිටම නියුක්ත වූ ලාංකික ව්ද්‍යාඥයෝ අලුත් බීජ වර්ග ක්‍රමක් කර්මයෙන් ඇති කලෝය. මිලියන හතරකටත් අඩු වූ 1900 යේ ජනගහනය වැඩිවෙන්නට පටන් ගෙන අද මිලියන 22ක් වී ඇත. ජනගහනය පස් හය ගුනයක් වැඩි වී ඇත්නම්, අස්වැන්නද ඊට අනුපාතිකව වැඩි කල යුතුය. අලුත් ගොවි ජනපද ඇති කරමින්, එයිවාට අවශ්‍ය අලුත් හයිබ්‍රිඩ් වී ඇට යොදමින් මෙරට මහ ජනයාට කන්න දුන්නේ අපගේ කපටි දේසපාලනඥයන් නොව්, මැක්කෝ නොව, සිවුරු ඇඳගත් ප්‍රෝඩා කාරයන් නොව,  කෘෂි විද්‍යාඥයන් ය.  අලුත් බීජ වී වර්ග 60ක් පමණ ඇත. පස සහ කලාපය අනුව, එයින් වර්ග 10යක් -12හක් අපේ ගොවියෝ නිතොර පාවිච්චි කරති.   හෙක්ටාරයකට අස්වැන්න  ටොන් 5-7 දක්වා මෙම බීජ වලින් ලැබිය හැකිය. චිරාගත ඇට වලින් සහ චිරාගත ගොවි ක්‍රම වලින් හෙක්ටාර්යකට  අස්වැන්න ටොන් 0.6 පමණ ලද හැකි බව 1940 කාලයේ දී ලැබුනු අස්වැන්න සටහන් වලින් තීරණය කල හැකිය. එහෙයින්, අලුත් ගොවිතැන් කර්ම වලින් අවශ්‍ය වතුර සහ ඉඩම් ප්‍රමාණය ද අඩු කරමින්, අස්වැන්න ප්‍රමාණය 10 ගුණයකින් පමණ වැඩි කිරීමට හැකි වී තිබේ.   

එවනි කරුණු නොදනින, විද්‍යාව අබ මල් රේනුවක් තරම් වත් නොදන්න සොලොමන් ලා, පූජ්‍ය රතන ලා මෙතෙක් යහතින් රට බේරාගෙන කල වැඩ කටයුතු වලට වින කරන්න යන්නේ ඇයි? වඳුරා අතට දලි පිහිය දුන්නොත් වෙන්නේ කුමක් ද? පූජ්‍ය රතන, අසෝක අබයවර්දන වැනි වානරයන් අතට දලි පිහි දී, අනුර සොලොමන් ලාට දලි පිහියේ යථා තත්වය වහන් කිරීමේ කාර්‍ය දී, මේ ජනාධිපති කර්‍යාලයට ඇතුල්වී ඇති “උපාය කාරී රටටම ව්‍යසන කලමනා කරන ආයතනයේ” මැක්කො රටට මහා ව්‍යසනයක්ම කරනු ඇත. සෝවියට් රජය කාලයේ දී මාක්ස් වාදය ට අනුව ගොවිතැන කල යුතු යැයි කියමින් දලි පිහිය අතට ගත්ත වාණරයාගේ නම ලයිසෙන්කෝ (Lysenko) වේ. ලය්සෙන්කො නිසා සොවීට් (SOVIET)  ජනයා සාගතයට පත්වී දස් ගනනින් මිය යන විට ඔහුව නිකිට කෘශෙව් විසින් පහ කරන ලදී. සේමා (SEMA) ආයතනයෙහි මහ මැක්කෙකු වන අසොක අබයවර්දන ලංකාවට වැදුනු ලයිසෙන්කෝ ලෙස (එකල ස්‍රී ජයවර්ධන පුර සරසවියේ උපකුලපති සහ රසායනය මහාචාර්ය වූ) චන්ද්‍ර ධර්මවර්ධන මහතා විසින් හඳුන්වා දී ඇත. මාක්ස් වාදය වෙනුවට චිරාගත ක්‍රමවාදය වැලඳාගත් සොල්මන් ලා, අසොක ලා අර්ජුන ලා, රතන ලා ලංකාවට කුමන හෙනයක් අන්තිමේ දී දමා, ඔවුන්ගේ මඩිස්සල පුරාගෙන පිටවේ දැයි අපට  දැනටමත් කනගාටුවෙන් හිතා ගත හැකිය.

—————————————

Former President weighs in on Palpita-Weeratunga ruling

September 14th, 2017

By Sanchith Karunaratna Courtesy Derana

September 14, 2017   01:38 pm

 In a press release circulated earlier today (14), former President Mahinda Rajapaksa expressed his sentiments on the conviction of former Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga and former Director of the TRC Anusha Palpita stating that ruling shocked the nation.

In his statements, Mahinda Rajapaksa explicitly stated that both Anusha Palpita and Lalith Weeratunga had only carried out legitimate instructions given to them by the President at the time and that the current regime should act responsibly to protect state servants from simply executing their duties.

The release read as follows,

 MEDIA RELEASE

The ‘sil redi’ project

The former Secretary to the President Lalith Weeratunga and the former Director General of the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (TRC) Anusha Pelpita were declared guilty by the High Court under Section 386 of the Penal Code of ‘dishonestly misappropriating’ a sum of Rs. 600 million belonging to the TRC by remitting the said sum to a bank account of the Presidential Secretariat to be used for the purpose of distributing sil redi during the last Presidential elections. They have each been sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs. two million and either the payment of Rs 50 million in compensation to the TRC or a further two years of rigorous imprisonment. Many people including the media have asked me about this matter and I feel I should make my views known to the public.

To say that this conviction and sentence has shocked the country would be an understatement. The judgement itself states that neither Lalith Weeratunga nor Anusha Pelpita had appropriated for their personal use any of the money used to purchase sil redi. From my point of view, they only carried out legitimate instructions issued to them by the President of the country. The verbal instructions given by me in this regard have been recorded in the form of minutes placed by Mr Weeratunga on correspondence with officials of the Presidential Secretariat. On 20 March 2014, Mr Weeratunga wrote a minute to the Senior Assistant Secretary of the Presidential Secretariat outlining eight projects that I had ordered funded through the President’s Special Development Fund during the year 2014.

The sixth item on this list was providing ‘material aid’ to the devotees observing sil at temples on Poya days. The other projects on the list included funding for the IT section of the Kotelawala Defence University and assistance to construct houses for low income earners in the former ‘border villages’ etc. On 12 May 2014, in yet another minute to the Senior Assistant Secretary Mr Weeratunga had stated that I had given instructions that sil redi be distributed to devotees observing sil on Poya days. This was long before the declaration of the presidential election. The purpose of the President’s Special Development Fund which had an annual budget of Rs. 1,000 million and was started in 2012, was to fill the gaps left by other ministries and to meet requests made directly to the President. The Coordinating Secretary for Religious Affairs of the Presidential Secretariat Ven. Watinapaha Somananda Thera was in charge of implementing the sil redi project.

At the latter’s request, the Economic Affairs Ministry carried out a survey through Samurdhi Niladharis to identify the requirements of sil redi at temples countrywide. The suppliers were instructed to hand over the sil redi to a main temple in each Divisional Secretariat area from where they would be distributed to other temples. This was a project implemented countrywide, involving 11,021 temples. This was aid supplied to the temples, not to voters. After the sil redi reached the temples, the Chief Incumbent monk became the sole authority who could decide when, how, and to whom the sil redi would be distributed. No time frame was imposed on the temples to carry out the distribution. They could have been distributed either immediately or even a year later at the discretion of the Chief Incumbent of the temple.

The mode of distribution did not enable the beneficiaries to be selected on political grounds. School uniforms are also distributed towards the end of the year and cannot be withheld even if an election was on. Nobody would suggest that the receipt of school uniforms during an election would influence the result of the election. The sil redi was also general state aid distributed across the board to Buddhist devotees just like the school uniforms. In fact the suppliers of school uniforms to the government had been mobilised for the sil redi project as well. The sil redi was not meant just for adults of voting age but for daham pasal students observing sil on Poya days as well. It was stated in the judgement that the sil redi parcels contained a label which read Mahinda Rajapaksa methithuman Mahinda Chinthana prathipaththi walata anuwa yamin karana daham pandurak”. (A religious offering made by Mahinda Rajapaksa in pursuance of Mahinda Chintanaya policies.)

This was only a label stating the provenance of the sil redi, and in any event, is not in violation of Sections 72 and 68(1)(e) of the Presidential Elections Act No:15 of 1981, which deal with the display of printed matter during elections. Section 77 of the Presidential Elections Act on ‘treating’ voters, also does not apply to this case because the sil redi was handed over to temples without any time frame for distribution and were provided to all regardless of the political affiliation of the temples and the devotees. Lalith Weeratunga and Anusha Pelpita were never charged for election related offences even though this is being portrayed as a case relating to the misuse of public property during election time. Under Section 164(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the charges brought against the accused have to clearly state the law under which the offence said to have been committed, is punishable.

The reason why money had to be obtained for this project from the TRC is because on 14 October 2014, the Chief Accountant of the Presidential Secretariat sent Lalith Weeratunga a note stating that the allocation of the President’s Special Development Fund for the year 2014 was Rs. 1,000 million and that Rs. 400 million of this had to be given to a project of the Kotelawala Defence University and that there was insufficient funds for the sil redi project. Lalith Weeratunga replied to this with a minute on 15 October 2014 instructing the Chief Accountant to release the money to the Kotelawala Defence University and that the money for the sil redi project will be obtained from the TRC to be reimbursed later. Mr Weeratunga had written to the Director General of the TRC on 30 October 2014, stating that it had been decided to obtain financial patronage (mulya anugrahaya) for this project from the TRC.

Thereupon, Anusha Pelpita Director General of the TRC had prepared a board paper for this purpose on the same day seeking the approval of the board, (a) to allocate Rs. 600 million to the Corporate Social Responsibility budget of the TRC as an extra budgetary allocation, (b) to approve the donation of Rs. 600 million to the President’s Special Development Fund and (c) to spend this amount from the corporate social responsibility budget of the TRC. This paper had been presented to the TRC board meeting held on 15 December 2014 and all three proposals had been unanimously approved by the Commission. The money from the TRC had been remitted to the Presidential Secretariat account on 5 December 2014.  On 29 December 2014, Lalith Weeratunga sent a note to the Chief Accountant stating that the money from the TRC should be reimbursed as soon as the allocation for 2015 is received and that at least Rs. 200 million should be paid back in the first quarter of 2015.

According to Section 22F(3) of the Sri Lanka Telecommunications Act No: 25 of 1991 as amended by Act No: 27 of 1996, the board of directors of the TRC can authorise any payment in the performance of its tasks. Sections 218, 115, 65, 66, 68, 93 and 94 of the Financial Regulations of the Government of Sri Lanka also authorises ‘Chief Accounting Officers’ (who in the case of the Presidential Secretariat was Lalith Weeratunga) to transfer money between government agencies under his authority on the basis of reimbursement. Regrettably, the written evidence presented to courts in the form of Lalith Weeratunga’s minutes giving instructions to the Chief Accountant or the Senior Assistant Secretary of the Presidential Secretariat in relation to this project have not been considered in the judgement delivered by the High Court.

The prosecution brought 21 witnesses to prove their case against the accused. The High Court has not taken into account the evidence provided by prosecution witness No: 13 Hewage Emali Priyanthara, No: 20 Ruwani Saumya Gunaratne, No: 15 Rev. Watinapaha Somananda Thero, No: 04 Saputhanthrige Chandra Jagath, No: 14 Mallika Kanakanamlage Jayantha and prosecution witness No: 5 Amarasinghe Lekamge Don Gunaratne (the Chief Accountant of the Presidential Secretariat) on the grounds that they had worked with the accused in the Presidential Secretariat and the TRC and were also connected to the sil redi project and that they had been partial (lediyawak) or sympathetic to the accused. These were witnesses called by the prosecution – not the defence – and their evidence had been provided to courts under oath.

This has very serious implications for state employees at all levels. If for example an employee of the Customs Department is taken to courts for allegedly violating procedure, the only way to prove or disprove that such a violation took place is through written and verbal evidence from within the Customs Department itself. If in such cases, even the testimony of witnesses brought by the prosecution is not taken into account on the grounds that they had worked with the accused and were therefore partial, the accused government servant will have no defence at all.  Another matter of grave concern in the case of Lalith Weeratunga, is that the handwritten instructions given by the highest State official in the land to his subordinates have not been considered by the courts.

If this becomes a precedent, no State employee charged in a court of law will ever be able to prove his innocence. The unanimous approval of Anusha Pelpita’s board paper by the TRC board of directors on 15 December 2014 has also not been taken into account  in a situation where the authority with exclusive power to utilise the funds of the TRC is the TRC board of directors. This will have serious implications for all private sector and state sector bodies that are run by boards of directors. The severe sentence imposed on Lalith Weeratunga and Anusha Pelpita is not because they enriched themselves through corrupt means but because they carried out the instructions of the head of state to distribute sil redi to temples in pursuance of the government’s obligations under Article 9 of the Constitution to foster and protect Buddhism.

Under our constitution, the direction and control of the government is the responsibility of the cabinet of ministers (including the President) and the public service is expected to work in good faith to achieve the policy objectives of the government. Therefore public servants who carry out lawful instructions issued to them by the President and the Cabinet should be protected if there are no serious allegations of corruption against them.

Mahinda Rajapaksa
Former President of Sri Lanka

සිල් රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතියේ මුල සිට අගටම මෙන්න.. මහින්ද සියල්ල පහදයි..

September 14th, 2017

පසුගිය රජය සමයේ ක‍්‍රියාත්මක කරන ලද බෞද්ධ උපාසක උපාසිකාවන් සදහා සිල් රෙදි බෙදා දීමේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරමින් හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා විසින් නිකුත් කර ඇති නිවේදනයක් පහත දැක්වෙයි.

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය

සිල් රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතිය

හිටපු ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ලලිත් වීරතුංග හා විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල් අනූෂ පැල්පිට දණ්ඩ නීති සංග්‍රහයේ අංක 386 වගන්තියට අදාලව වරදකරුවන් බවට මහාධිකරණය විසින් තීන්දු කර ඇත. මෙහිදී චෝදනාව වූයේ  විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමට අයත් රුපියල් මිලියන 600ක මුදලක් ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ගිණුමකට බැරකර සිල්රෙදි බෙදා දීම සඳහා සාවද්‍ය ලෙස පරිහරණය කර තිබෙන බවයි. මේ සඳහා මෙම නිලධාරීන් දෙදෙනාට ලැබී ඇති දඩුවම වන්නේ බරපතල වැඩ ඇතිව අවුරුදු තුනක සිර දඩුවමක් සහ එක් අයෙකුට රුපියල් මිලියන 02 බැගින් දඩයකි. එයට අමතරව විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමට එක් අයෙකු රුපියල් මිලියන 50 බැගින් වන්දියක් ගෙවිය යුතු  වන අතර එම මුදල ගෙව්වේ නැතිනම් තවත් අවුරුදු 02ක බරපතල වැඩ ඇතුව සිර දඩුවම් නියම වෙනු ඇත. මේ කාරණය ගැන බොහෝ අය මගෙන් විමසා සිටින නිසා මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් මගේ අදහස් ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ තැබිය යුතු යැයි සිතමි.

මේ නඩු තීන්දුවෙන් හා දඩුවමෙන් මුලු රමට විමතියටත් කනස්සල්ලටත් පත් වී ඇත. ලලිත් වීරතුංග හෝ අනූෂ පැල්පිට සිල්රෙදි මිලදී ගැනීම සඳහා යොදවා ඇති මුදල් තමන්ගේ ප්‍රයෝජනයට ලබාගෙන නැති බව නඩු තීන්දුවේම සඳහන් වේ. මගේ දෘෂ්ඨිකෝණයෙන් බලන කල මොවුන් කර ඇත්තේ රටේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් ඔවුන් වෙත ලබාදුන් නීත්‍යානුකූල නියෝගයක් ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම පමණි. මා විසින් ඔවුන්ට මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලබා දී තිබූ වාචික උපදෙස් ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතා ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ලිපිගොනුවල වෙනත් නිලධාරීන්ගේ දැනගැනීම පිණිස සිය අත් අකුරින්ම තබා ඇති සටහන් වලින් පැහැදිලි වේ. 2014 මාර්තු 20 වනදා ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ සහකාර ලේකම්ගේ අවධානය පිණිස තබන ලද ලිඛිත සටහනක ජනාධිපති විශේෂ සංවර්ධන මූලාරම්භ ගිණුම යටතේ 2014 වසර තුළ ‍සිදුකල යුතු බවට මා විසින් නියෝග දුන් ව්‍යාපෘති අටක් පිළිබඳ විස්තර සටහන් කොට ඇත.

මේ ලැයිස්තුවේ 6 වෙනි අංගය වූයේ පෝය දිනවල පන්සල් වල සිල් ගන්නා බැතිමතුන්ට ද්‍රව්‍යමය  ආධාර සැපයීමේ ව්‍යාපෘතියකි. එම ලැයිස්තුවේ තිබුණු සෙසු අංග අතර කොතලාවල ආරක්‍ෂක විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ පරිඝනක අංශයට හා කලින් මායිම් ගම්මාන වශයෙන් හැඳින්වූ ප්‍රදේශවල අඩු ආදායම්ලාභී පවුල් වලට නිවාස ඉදි කිරීමට ආධාර කිරීම වැනි ව්‍යාපෘති විය. 2014 මැයි 12 වනදා වීරතුංග මහතා සිය ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ සහකාර ලේකම්වරයාට සටහනක් තබමින් පවසා සිටියේ පෝය දිනවල සිල් ගන්නා බැතිමතුන්ට සිල්රෙදි බෙදා දිය යුතු බවට මම උපදෙස් දී ඇති බවයි. මේ ජනාධිපතිවරණය කැඳවීමට බොහෝ කලකට පෙරය. වසරකට රුපියල් මිලියන 1,000 ක මුදල් ප්‍රතිපාදනයක් සහිතව 2012 දී ආරම්භ කරන ලද ජනාධිපති විශේෂ සංවර්ධන මූලාරම්භ ගිණුමේ කාර්යභාර්ය වූයේ වෙනත් අමාත්‍යංශ හා දෙපාර්තමේන්තු වල වැඩසටහන් වල හිඩැස් පිරවීම හා ජනාධිපතිවරයාට ඍජුව කෙරෙන ඉල්ලීම් වලට ප්‍රතිචාර දැක්වීමයි. මේ යටතේ ආරම්භ වූ සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරනු ලැබුවේ ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ආගමික කටයුතු සම්බන්ධීකරණ ලේකම් ධූරය දැරෑ වටිනාපහ සෝමානන්ද හිමියන්ය.

සෝමානන්ද හිමිගේ ඉල්ලීම පරිදි සමෘද්ධි නිලධාරීන් මාර්ගයෙන් රටපුරා පන්සල් වලින් සිල්රෙදිවල අවශ්‍යතාවය සමීක්‍ෂණය කරනු ලැබුවේ ආර්ථික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යංශය විසිනි. සිල්රෙදි සපයන පුදගලික කොන්ත්‍රාත්කරුවන් එක් එක්  ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කොට්ඨාශවල නම් කරන ලද එක් ප්‍රධාන පන්සලකට මේ සිල්රෙදි භාර දෙනු ලැබූ අතර, සෙසු පන්සල් මේ ප්‍රධාන මධ්‍යස්ථානයෙන් තමන්ට අදාල සිල් රෙදි ප්‍රමාණය ලබා ගැනීම මෙහි  ක්‍රමවේදය විය. මෙය පන්සල් 11,021 ක සහභාගීත්වයෙන් දීපව්‍යාප්තව සිදුකරන ලද ව්‍යාපෘතියකි. මෙකී සිල්රෙදි සපයන ලද්දේ පන්සල්වලට මිස ඡන්ද දායකයන්ට නොවේ. සිල්රෙදි පන්සලට ලැබුණු පසු එම සිල්රෙදි බෙදා දෙන්නේ කවදාද, කේසේද, කාටද යන්න තීන්දු කරනු ලැබුවේ විහාරාධිපති හිමිවරුන්ගේ අභිමතය පරිදිය. අසවල් දිනට පෙර මේ සිල්රෙදි බෙදා දිය යුතු යැයි පන්සල් වලට කිසිදු උපදෙසක් ලබාදී තිබුනේ නැත. විහාරාධිපති හිමිවරුන්ගේ අභිමතය පරිදි එම සිල්රෙදි එක්කෝ එවෙලේම නැතිනම් අවුරුද්දකට පසුව වුවද බෙදා දිය හැකි විය.

බෙදා හැරීමේ ක්‍රමවේදය තුළ දේශපාලන කාරණා මත සිල් රෙදි ලාභීන් තේරීමට කිසිඳු අවස්ථාවක් නොවීය. පාසල් නිල ඇඳුම් ව්‍යාපෘතිය යටතේ නිල ඇඳුම් බෙදා දෙන්නේද අවුරුද්දේ අන්තිමට වන අතර ඡන්දයක් තිබුණත් එය නැවැත්විය නොහැක. ඡන්දයක් පවතින අතර පාසල් නිල ඇඳුම් බෙදා දීමෙන් ඡන්දයේ ප්‍රතිඵලය වෙනස් වීමට ඉඩ තිබෙනවා යැයි කිසිවෙකුවත් කියන්නේ නැත. මෙම සිල් රෙදිද පාසල් නිල ඇඳුම් මෙන්ම බෞද්ධ බැතිමතුන්ට පොදුවේ බෙදා දෙනු ලැබූ රාජ්‍ය ආධාර විය. මේ සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතිය සඳහාද යොදාගනු ලැබුවේ ආන්ඩුවේ පාසල් නිල ඇඳුම් ව්‍යාපෘතියේ පුද්ගලික සැපයුම්කරුවන්ම බවද සැලකිය යුතුය. වැඩිහිටියන්ට පමණක් නොව පෝය දිනවල සිල් ගන්නා දහම් පාසල් සිසුන්ටද සිල්රෙදි ලබාදෙනු ලැබීය. මෙකී සිල්රෙදි පැකැට්ටුවේ, මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මැතිතුමන් මහින්ද චින්තන ප්‍රතිපත්තිවලට අනුව යමින් කරන දහම් පඞුරක්” කියමින් ලේබලයක් තිබුණු බව මෙම නඩු තීන්දුවේ සඳහන්ය.

නමුත් මෙය මේ සිල්රෙදි ලැබෙන්නේ කොතනින්දැයි පෙන්වන ලේබලයක් පමණක් මිස 1981 අංක 15 දරණ ජනාධිපති මැතිවරණ පනතේ ඡන්ද සමයේ මුද්‍රිත පත්‍රිකා ප්‍රදර්ශනය කිරීමට අදාල 72 හා 68 (1)(ඉ) වගන්ති උල්ලංගනය කරන්නක් නොවේ. ජනාධිපති මැතිවරණ පනතේ ඡන්ද දායකයන්ට ‘සංග්‍රහ’ කිරීමට අදාල 77 වන වගන්තියද මීට අදාල නොවන්නේ මේ සිල්රෙදි සපයනු ලැබුවේ පන්සල් වලට මිස ඡන්ද දායකයන්ට නොවන නිසාය. එමෙන්ම මේවා බෙදා හැරීමට කිසිඳු කාල වකවානුවක් ලබාදී නොතිබුණු අතර දේශපාලන භේද නොතකා සියලු පන්සල් හා බෞද්ධ බැතිමතුන් ආවරණය වන පරිදි මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක විය. මෙය ඡන්ද සමයේ පොදු දේපල අවභාවිතය සම්බන්ධ නඩුවක් හැටියට හුවා දැක්වීමට ඇතැම් අය උත්සාහ ගත්තද ලලිත් වීරතුංගට හා අනුෂ පැල්පිටට එරෙහිව ඡන්ද නීති උල්ලංගනය කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් කිසිදු චෝදනාවක් ගොනුකරනු ලැබුව නැත. අපරාධ නඩු විධාන සංග්‍රහයේ අංක  164(4) වගන්තිය අනුව, යම් චූදිතයෙකුට එරෙහිව චෝදනා ගොනු කිරීමේදී ඔවුන්ට දඩුවම් පැමිණවිය හැකි වරදට අදාල නිතිය පැහැදිලිව සඳහන් විය යුතුය. නමුත් එවැන්නක් මෙහිදී සිදුවී තිබෙන බවක් නොපෙනේ.

මේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය සඳහා මුදල් විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමෙන් ලබා ගැනීමට සිදුවුයේ ජනාධිපති විශේෂ සංවර්ධන මූලාරම්භ ගිණුමේ මුදල් වෙනත් කටයුත්තකට යෙදවීමට සිදුවීම නිසාය. 2014 ඔක්තෝබර් 14 වන දා ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ප්‍රධාන ගණකාධිකාරීවරයා ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතාට සටහනක් යොමු කරමින් පවසා සිටියේ 2014 වසර සඳහා ජනාධිපති විශේෂ සංවර්ධන මූලාරම්භ ගිණුමට ලබා දී ඇත්තේ රුපියල් මිලියන 1,000ක ප්‍රතිපාදනයක් බවත්, එයින් රුපියල් මිලියන 400 ක් කොතලාවල ආරක්‍ෂක විද්‍යාලයේ ව්‍යාපෘතියකට දීමට සිදු වී ඇති නිසා සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතියට ප්‍රමාණවත් මුදල් නොමැති බවයි. මෙයට පිළිතුරු දෙමින් 2014 ඔක්තෝබර් 15 වන දා සටහනක් තැබු ලලිත් වීරතුංග පවසා සිටියේ කොතලාවල ආරක්‍ෂක විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයට යැවිය යුතු මුදල් ඔවුන්ට ලබා දිය යුතු බවත්, සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතියට අවශ්‍ය මුදල් පසුව ප්‍රතිපූර්ණ කිරීමේ පදනම මත විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමෙන් ලබා ගන්නා බවයි. 2014 ඔක්තෝබර් 30 වනදා විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල්වරයාට ලිපියක් ලියමින් වීරතුංග මහතා පවසා සිටියේ මේ සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතිය සඳහා මූල්‍ය අනුග්‍රහය විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමෙන් ලබා ගැනීමට තීන්දු කර ඇති බවයි.

ඒ අනුව විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල් අනූෂ පැල්පිට එදිනම මාණ්ඩලික පත්‍රිකාවක් සකස් කරමින් මේ සඳහා විදුලි සංදේශ කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ අනුමැතිය ලබා ගැනිමට කටයුතු කලේය. මේ මාණ්ඩලික පත්‍රිකාවෙන් අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ මණ්ඩලයේ අවසරය ඉල්ලා සිටිනු ලැබුවේ, (1) ආර්ථික ප්‍රතිපාදනයක් හැටියට විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ සමාජසේවා ගිණුමට රුපියල් මිලියන 600ක් වෙන් කිරීමටත් (2) මෙකී රුපියල් මිලියන 600 ජනාධිපති විශේෂ සංවර්ධන මූලාරම්භ ගිණුමට ලබා දීමටත් (3) මෙකී මුදල් විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ සමාජ සේවා ගිණුම හරහා වැය කිරීමටත් යන කාරණා තුන සඳහාය. මෙකී මාණ්ඩලික පත්‍රිකාව 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 15 වනදා පවත්වනු ලැබූ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂක මණ්ඩල රැස්වීමට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබූ අතර එම යෝජනා තුනම කොමිසම විසින් ඒකමතිව සම්මත කරන ලදී. 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 5 වනදා අදාල මුදල විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමෙන් ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ගිණුමට යවා තිබුණි. 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 29 වනදා ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ප්‍රධාන ගණකාධිකාරීවරයාට සටහනක් ලියමින් ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතා පවසා සිටියේ 2015 වසර සඳහා මුදල් ප්‍රතිපාදන ලැබුණු විගස අදාල මුදල විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමට ප්‍රතිපූර්ණ කල යුතු බවත් 2015 පළමු කාර්තුව ඇතුලත අඩුම වශයෙන් රුපියල් මිලියන 200ක් වත් එසේ ලබාදීමට කටයුතු කල යුතු බවයි.

1996 අංක 27 දරණ පනතින් සංශෝධිත 1991 අංක 25 දරණ ශ්‍රී ලංකා විදුලි සංදේශ පනතේ 22ඊ(3) වගන්තියට අනුව විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ මණ්ඩලයට එම කොමිසමේ ඕනෑම වියදමකට අනුමැතිය දීමට බලය ඇත. ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආණ්ඩුවේ මුදල් රෙගුලාසිවල අංක 218,115,65,66,68,93 හා 94 යන වගන්ති වලට අනුව ඒ ඒ අමාත්‍යංශ වල ‘ප්‍රධාන ගිණුම් තබන නිලධාරීන්ට’ තමා යටතේ තිබෙන එක් ආයතනයකින් තවත් ආයතනයකට ප්‍රතිපූර්ණ කිරීමේ පදනම මත මුදල් ලබා දීමට බලය ඇත. ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ප්‍රධාන ගිණුම් තබන නිලධාරියා වූයේ ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතාය. ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලයේ ප්‍රධාන ගණකාධිකාරීවරයාට හා ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨ සහාකර ලේකම්වරයාට ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතා ලියා තිබුණු සටහන් උසාවියට ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබුණද තීන්දුව දීමේදී ඒ ලිඛිත සාක්‍ෂි මහාධිකරණය විසින් සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන නැත.

පැමිණිලි පාර්ශවය විසින් චූදිතයන්ට එරෙහි නඩුව ඔප්පු කිරීමට සාක්‍ෂි කරුවන් 21 දෙනෙකු උසාවියට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලදී. මෙසේ පැමිණිල්ල විසින්ම ගෙන එන ලද සාක්‍ෂිකරුවන් ගණනාවක්ම, එනම්, පිළිවලින් අංක 13,20,15,04,14 හා 5 දරණ හේවගේ එමාලි ප්‍රියංකර, රුවනි සෞම්‍යා ගුණරත්න, වටිනාපහ සෝමානන්ද හිමි, සපුතන්ත්‍රිගේ චන්ද්‍ර ජගත්, මල්ලිකා කංකානම්ගේ ජයන්ත හා අමරසිංහ ලේකම්ලාගේ දොන් ගුණරත්න යන පැමිණිල්ලේ සාක්‍ෂිකරුවන් මේ නඩුවේ චූදිතයන් සමඟ ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලය හා විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ සේවය කර ඇති බවත්, ඔවුන් මේ සිල්රෙදි ව්‍යාපෘතියටද සම්බන්ධ බවත්, ඔවුන් චූදිතයන්ට ලැදියාවක් ඇතුව සාක්‍ෂි ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති බවත් කියමින් මහාධිකරණය  ඔවුන් දුන් සාක්‍ෂි සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන නැත. මේ සාක්‍ෂිකරුවන් විත්තිය විසින් ගෙන එනු ලැබූ සාක්‍ෂි කරුවන් නොව පැමිණිල්ලේ සාක්‍ෂි කරුවන්ම වීම මෙහිදී සුවිශේෂ වෙයි.

මේ පූර්වාදර්ශය සියලුම රාජ්‍ය සේවකයන්ට ගැටළුකාරී තත්වයක් ඇති කරයි.  උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් රේගු දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ සේවකයකු ක්‍රියාපටිපාටි උල්ලංගනය කිරීමේ චෝදනාවක් මත උසාවියට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලැබුවහොත්, එවැනි චූදිතයෙකුට එරෙහිව ඇති චෝදනා ඔප්පු කිරීමට නැතිනම් නිශ්ප්‍රභා කිරීමට හැකි වන්නේ රේගු දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව තුලින්ම ලබා ගන්නා ලිඛිත හා වාචික සාක්‍ෂි වලට අනුවයි. රේගු දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ ක්‍රියාපටිපාටි හා භාවිතයන් පිළිබඳ විස්තර වෙනත් ආයතන වලින් ලබාගත නොහැක. මෙවැනි අවස්ථාවල, පැමිණිල්ලේ සාක්‍ෂිකරුවන් පවා සපයන සාක්‍ෂි, ඔවුන් වූදිතයන් සමඟ එකට සේවය කර තිබෙනවාය, එම නිසා ඔවුන් චූදිතයන්ට ලැදියාවක් දක්වනවා විය හැකිය යන පදනම මත එම සාක්‍ෂි සැලකිල්ලට ගැනීමෙන් වැලකී සිටිනවා නම්, මෙවැනි නඩුවල චූදිතයන්ට කිසිදා තමන්ගේ නිර්දෝශී භාවය ඔප්පු කිරීමට නොහැකිවෙනු ඇත. ලලිත් වීරතුංග මහතා එකල රටේ සිටි ඉහලම රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරියා වුවද, ඔහු තමා යටතේ සිටි නිලධාරීන්ට තම අත් අකුරින්ම ලියූ සටහන් හා නියෝග උසාවිය විසින් සැලකිල්ලට නොගෙන තිබීමද කාගෙත් අවධානයට යොමු වෙනු ඇත.

මෙය පූර්වාදර්ශයක් බවට පත්වුවහොත් යම් චෝදනාවක් මත උසාවියකට ඉදිරිපත් කරනු ලබන කිසිදු රජයේ සේවකයකුට තමාගේ නිර්දෝශීභාවය ඔප්පු කිරීමට ක්‍රමයක් නැතිවනු ඇත. විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ මුදල් භාවිතා කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අනන්‍ය හා සම්පූර්ණ බලය ඇත්තේ එම කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ මණ්ඩලයට වුවත්, 2014 දෙසැම්බර් 15 වැනි දින අනූෂ පැල්පිට මහතාගේ මාණ්ඩලික පත්‍රිකාවට අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ මණ්ඩලයේ ඒකමතික අනුමැතිය ලැබී තිබීමද උසාවිය සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන නැත. මේ හේතුවෙන් අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ මණ්ඩල හරහා පාලනය වෙන පුද්ගලික අංශයේ හා රාජ්‍ය අංශයේ ආයතනවල කටයුතු දැඩි අවිනිශ්චිතතාවයකට ලක්වීම වැලැක්විය නොහැක.

ලලිත් වීරතුංගට හා  අනුෂ පැල්පිටට දැඩි දඩුවම් පනවා ඇත්තේ ඔවුන්  අල්ලස් ලබාගත් නිසාවත්, දූෂනයේ යෙදුණු නිසාවත් නොව ශ්‍රී ලංකා ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ බුදු දහම ආරක්‍ෂා කිරීමට හා ප්‍රවර්ධනය කිරීමට අදාල 9 වන වගන්තිය යටතේ ආණ්ඩුවට පැවරෙන වගකීම් ඉටුකිරීම සඳහා පන්සල් වලට සිල්රෙදි බෙදා දිමට රාජ්‍ය නායකයා විසින් දෙනු ලැබූ නියෝගයක් පිළිපැදීම නිසාය. අපගේ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවට අනුව, ආණ්ඩුව මෙහෙයවනු ලබන්නේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාද ඇතුලත් කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලය විසිනි. රජයේ සේවකයන් විසින් සිදුකරනු ලබන්නේ ආණ්ඩුවේ ප්‍රතිපත්තිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමට සද්භාවයෙන් කටයුතු කිරීමයි. තමන් හොබවන තනතුර භාවිතා කර පුද්ගලික ලාභ ප්‍රයෝජන ලබා ගැනීමේ චෝදනා නැතිනම් ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ හා කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලයේ නීත්‍යානුකූල නියෝග ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන රජයේ සේවකයන් ආරක්‍ෂා කිරීම සෑම ආණ්ඩුවකම පොදු ප්‍රතිපත්තිය විය යුතුය.

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ
ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හිටපු ජනාධිපති

Opportunity to forward your questions to UN General Secretary..

September 14th, 2017

Chandrasena Pandithage

Dear friends at this moment you are given an opportunity to ask your question from UN General Secretary. Please go to the United Nations website and start to forward all your questions. I forward my question as follows.

Dear UN Secretary General,Antonio Gutteres, First I would like to thank you for the given opportunity to ask questions from you. I am a Sri Lankan and I have questions on your policy on my motherland and globe too. Sri Lanka is a member country in your organization. Giving membership or taking membership should provide some benefit to that member country. All the member countries are your organization’s children and your duty is to protect all the countries equally because they are your own children. My motherland have been going through very hard road with Tamil Tiger terrorist activities since 1972. This Tamil Tiger Organization is not your member. At the same time you did not involve to protect Sri Lanka your member country from this brutal terrorist attacks. At the beginning you treated this is as a Sri Lankas internal affairs. Finally we could crush the LTTE war machine and established peace and security in Sri Lanka. Establishing peace and security globally is your duty. At the same time protecting your member country from brutal terrorist activities also part of your duty. Instead of helping us to crush the terrorism, you force us to provide food, medicine, fuel to terrorist organization. Our government had power to crushed terror machine providing all your organizations requirements to terrorist organizations. Anyway our people had power to stop our killing field in my motherland. Once we finish the war the developments started and all child soldiers were released and The Tamil community reestablished to build up their own lives.Our armies help them removing landmines. When we started these process, instead of helping us United Nations Organization stand against it’s member country and strongly stand for non member Liberation Tamil Tiger Elam terrorist organization. My question is why you stand against your member country supporting non member terrorist organization. I feel you devalue your membership through these kind of actions. Please give us a logical clear answer. Once again thank you very much for given opportunity.

Four top officials at loss-making SriLankan Airlines enjoy hefty monthly allowances

September 14th, 2017

The national debt as of September 30, 2016 was Rs. 9,402 billion. While the debt burden of our nation increases on a daily basis, this burden has to be borne by the people of Sri Lanka.

A major contributor to the country’s debt burden is the country’s national carrier, SriLankan Airlines, which is inefficiently managed by a few executives who take home very high remuneration packages.

Many staff members of the airline who are dedicated to tirelessly serve the airline and the nation are disappointed with the sorry state of affairs of the company.

According to the financials of SriLankan Airlines, the company recorded a loss of Rs. 28 billion for the 2016/17 financial year.The company covers its current expenses through a Rs. 7.5 billion Over Draft obtained through state banks.

SriLankan Airlines, which is our nation’s global ambassador, has fallen into disrepute, mainly due to mismanagement by officials and irregularities pertaining to the transactions of aircrafts.

Even though the airline is drowning in debt, there are four officials in the top management of the airline, who continue to enjoy monthly allowances of over Rs. 3 million.

The main responsibility of the Chief Commercial Officer of SriLankan Airlines is to increase the commercial viability of the airline and transform it into a profit-making entity.

Following the incumbent government coming into power, Siva Ramachandran, who was residing in the United Kingdom, was brought down to Sri Lanka and appointed as the Chief Commercial Officer of SriLankan Airlines on January 1, 2016.

According to the two year contract, Siva Ramachandran signed with SriLankan Airlines.He is to receive a basic monthly wage of 9,500 Sterling Pounds. According to the current exchange rate, that translates to nearly Rs. 2 million.

In addition to the basic wage paid to Siva Ramachandran, the taxes he owes the government are borne by SriLankan Airlines.The perks afforded to Siva Ramachandran include a company maintained vehicle, fuel for the vehicle, chauffeur, a monthly allowance of Rs. 250,000 for accommodation and free air travel.

For 19 months, i.e. from January 2016 to July 2017, Siva Ramachandran has earned a sum of Rs. 41 million 892 thousand 166 (41,892,166) rupees from SriLankan Airlines.

During this time period, the airline paid over Rs. 6 million as income tax on behalf of Ramachandran.

Suren Ratwatte serves as Chief Executive Officer of SriLankan Airlines.

Suren Ratwatte is the brother of Charitha Ratwatte, who is the advisor to the Prime Minister.

While Suren Ratwatte is among the officials who enjoy a monthly remuneration of over Rs. 3 million, SriLankan Airlines failed to respond to legal requests made to provide information on his salary particulars.

Even though four top officials at the airline continue to enjoy monthly remuneration packages of over Rs. 3 million each, SriLankan Airlines had to bear an extra cost of nearly USD 2 million for failing to return an Airbus A320 aircraft rented from
an Indian company, within the stipulated time period.

Recently SriLankan Airlines lost its certification from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), based on a number of shortcomings.

What is the benefit SriLankan Airlines gained by paying four top officials a monthly remuneration ofRs. 3 million, if the company is suffering staggering loss of Rs. 28 billion?

Won’t this burden too, finally, have to be borne by the people of this nation?

Will this not affect the reputation of our country in the international arena?

PRESIDENTIAL EXPORT AWARDS TODAY  AT BMICH….

September 14th, 2017

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

EDB invited me as a boat builder to the award ceremony today and watched how exporters of Sri Lanka Tea ,Apparel ,fish ,cineman,coconut shells ,Gems ,few rubber products flowers ,ornamental fish ,herbal products,gift items  etc etc garbbing gold plated awards .

Apparel exporters took the centre stage reminding me the days of Premadasa who had a vision to develop the industry many decades back ,and yet we are still talking about apparel exports  and giving awards .Singapore also started with apparel industry and small handicraft exports and moved to high tech and financial services during next few decades ,and yet we are still earning 1% of GDP from  exports .

 Brandix named Sri Lanka’s Exporter of the Year for 5th successive year

Government should now leave apparel industry to look after themselves and harness the export potential of software ,hardware and other high tech commodities

When you hear speeches given by Harward trained ministers and bureaucrats one can see that none of them have any vision .

I will not be surprised if a Manpower Export Agency will grab the gold award for exports next year and the government may not even grace the occasion !

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Are the Russian Really Planning Another Armed Intervention?

September 14th, 2017

By Afshain Afzal

Nervous over the Russo-Belarus joint military exercise, Zapad-2017” which just started, neighbouring countries seems much perturbed. The theme of the exercise is uprising in Belarus by fifth columnists, followed by series of attacks by terrorists and backed by a fictitious country called Veishnoria. Russian forces are deployed to Belarus to help crush the rebellion. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has stepped up security on Ukraine’s borders while NATO troops deployed in Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which border on Belarus and Russia have been ordered to be watchful of any provocation and in case of air violation, disengagement measures by already deployed NATO-air-policing mission that guards the Baltic republics. Polish Defence Minister Antoni Macierewicz has termed the exercise as a threat to Poland”. Interestingly, invitations to 80 observers from Western and former Warsaw nations, including NATO, OSCE as well as all the diplomats serving in Balarus have been extended to watch the exercise but still alarm bells are being sounded that the exercise is threat to existence of neighbouring countries.

If we recall, last month, at Novo Selo Training Range in Bulgaria, some 11,000 (over-projected 25,000) troops including former Warsaw Pact countries, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria participated in a 10 day military exercise with a theme how to restart Cold War. The exercise code named Saber Guardian”, met some of the military objectives and there was a happy ending too, when troops departed to the respective countries. It would not be an over exaggeration that the exercise was repetition of decade’s old exercise of bi-polar world during the pre-Soviet Union’s disintegration. Old Exercise papers were reprinted in a new format”, claimed one of the participating commanders. Some troops dubbed the exercise as mission-less as it seems to be a failed attempt to restore American lost image in world affairs. There were much confusion as the American commanders, who projected the exercise as preparation to fight against terrorists in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, while European senior Army commanders and their troops believed it was an updated rehearsal of tactics and strategies once used to counter Soviet troops, using amour and artillery leading to aerial assaults by hundreds of paratroopers to occupy target country.

Back at the Pentagon, US Commanders have successfully convinced Present Donald Trump for a promise of additional deployment troops to the overseas and budgetary raise in military allocations. However, President Trump may not act as he seems agreed in his speeches. Pentagon has cleverly forecasted the danger from Russian, Chinese and even North Korean recent maneuvers. President Trump was also briefed about the Russian exercises, Zapad” in which has been anticipated by Western intelligence agencies that 100,000 troops would participate. It is being claimed that these exercises are Russia’s contingency plans for a major conflict with NATO and allies. The recent speech of President Donald Trump regarding US foreign policy in Afghanistan and South Asia is linked to over projections of many such fears and apprehensions,

The Zapad” exercise, jointly organized by Russia and Belarus  have already started, from 14 to 20 September 2017, in which T-14 Armata tanks and advanced air defense and electronic warfare equipment would be used for the first time. It is being claimed that T-14 Armata tanks would be used in the bridge formation attack (Kaliningrad to Lithuania). Interestingly, Moscow has informed NATO that the maneuvers would involve around 13,000 troops but NATO is adamant to confirm the figure of 100,000 troops.  The exercise which would be monitored by foreign observers has caused alarms as Zapad” means West. Although, Russian’s expansionist apprehensions have been neutralized by Belarusian Defence Minister Andrei Ravkov, who confirmed that the joint military exercise will be defensive by nature but Western nations have been warned by US commanders that the Zapad exercise” is a rehearsal to invade Ukraine and many European countries with an aim to share a common border with between Europe and Russia. However, as per the disclosure by Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister, Lt. Gen. Alexander Fomin, the drills will involve 5,500 Russian and 7,200 Belarusian troops, about 70 aircraft, 250 tanks and 200 artillery systems and 10 navy ships.

Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, Commanding General of the U.S. Army in Europe, describes Zapad-2017 as a ‘Trojan horse’ for Eastern Europe. Russia might also keep its military equipment without troops in Belarus, for a possible future military attack against neighbours as Poland or the Baltic states. Interestingly, out of the fears US Defence Intelligence had long ago forecasted that the exercises is preparation for the invasion of Germany and the deployment of nuclear strikes against the West. The eyes of Western agencies are all set on Russia that how much of the war arsenal Moscow would dump in Belarus. The anticipated date of 30th September has been set by the US spying satellites to account what Russia brought inside Balarus has actually have been taken back or remains deployed. The fact cannot be denied that Washington has increased diplomatic pressures and other tactics including use of good offices of Ukraine to convince Balarus to part from Russia and Join Western pole. One wonders that despite permission to some 80 Observers and all the foreign diplomats to observe the Zapad” exercise, why a routine exercise is being projected so negatively. afshainafzal@yahoo.com

SRI LANKA AHMADIYYA CONVENTION (JALSA SALANA) – 2017

September 14th, 2017

by A. Abdul Aziz

The Annual Convention (Jalsa Salana) of Sri Lanka Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at was held on Sunday the 10 September 2017 at Ahmadiyya Fazl Mosque premises Periyamulla, Negombo chaired by National President A.H. Nasir Ahmad. Ahmadi Muslims throughout the country attended this one day convention. Topics on various subjects include the blessings of Khilafath (Spiritual Leadership) and the History of Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in Sri Lanka were delivered.

In his address A.H. Nasir Ahmad – National President put forward the history of Jama’at Ahmadiya Sri Lanka.      He said: It was during the life time of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at that some of his books reached Ceylon as they reached Europe,  America and  Africa. A prominent Muslim gentleman who had been the trustee of the Mardana Mosque at the time Mr. I.L.M. Abdul  Aziz, after reading a few of such books had sent his Bai’at (oath of allegiance) to enter the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community in Islam by post direct to Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at in Islam in 1907.

Mr. I.L.M. Abdul  Aziz published an article entitled ‘A short sketch of Ahmadiyya Movement’, in a magazine named Muslim Guardian”, (Sept. 1907 issue) authored by him. This way the first introductory article about  Ahmadiyya  Jama’at appeared in Ceylon in September, 1907. He died in 1915 and buried at Mardana Mosque in Colombo.

In 1915, Hazrat Sufi Ghulam Muhammad, a companion of Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace be on him) arrived in Colombo and stayed there for 3 months on his way to Mauritius. The first public announcement of the advent of Imaam  Mahdi was made by the said Hazrat Sufi Ghulam Ahmad in the country during the course of his public lecture arranged by the Young Muslim Literary Association in Colombo. The teachings of Ahmadiyyath got influenced into leading Educationalist personals such T.B. Jeya, Lyc and Manthara – belongs to Malay Community. His tireless efforts were very helpful to establish the Jama’at in Sri Lanka in 1915. 15 members took Bai’at iin the beginning.

Another Companion of Promised Messiah (a.s.) Dr. Mufti Muhammad Saidq Sahib (r.a.) also visited Sri Lanka in the early period of Ahmadiyyath in Sri Lanka. A.P. Ibrahim Sahib and Moulavi B. Abdullah Sahib from India also visited Sri Lanka to serve Ahmadiyyath in the early period of its history. Moulavi Ismail Munir  from Pakistan served a lot for the propagation of Ahmadiyyath in the Island.

Moulavi Mohammed Ismail Munir arrived in Ceylon in 6th of August, 1951.  He had been appointed as the Missionary-in-Charge for Ceylon Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at by the International Headquarters in Rabwah, Pakistan.

In 1920, the community bought its own property in Slave  Island,  Colombo to be used as a place for prayers, press and propagation centre. In 1923, a branch was established in Negombo. In 1932, the first  Ahmadiyya  Mosque and a burial ground were built in Negombo.

This is the way history goes, National President added and said that there are five centers  in the Island and recalled the services rendered by the forefathers of Ahmadiyyath in Sri Lanka.

In his address Chief Missionary Moulavi A.B. Musthq Ahmad dealt the subject of martial life in Islam and quoted verses of Holy Qur’an on this issue. He also quoted from the advice of Hazrat Khalifathul Masih V on the subject of blessed married life.

Mr. Sriyananda – Chief Officer of Public Library, Colombo, in his address praised the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at for its tireless efforts to establish peace in the world and also expressed his thanks for the contribution of Ahmadiyya Community   to his social services. Since 2013, he is participating in important events organized by Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Sri Lanka and also extended his full cooperation to the Jama’at in launching the Holy Qur’an Sinhala Translation, he added. In his busy schedule he accepted the Jama’at invitation and the Jalsa Salana.

Mr. Sriyananda was presented a book – the Sinhala translation of Ahmadiyya Supreme Head’s address at U.K. Ahmadiyya Convention – 2015, titled: The Real Justice and Peace.

Mr. S. Nizam Khan and Moulavi M.Z. Munafjan also addressed.  Urdu Poem and Arabic Kasheeda composed by Promised Messiah (a.s) were recited.

Emeritus Prof. Jayadeva Thilakasiri – Personal Website

September 14th, 2017

 

http://arts.pdn.ac.lk/classical/jt.htm
·  Honorary member of UNIMA.

·  President, German Dharmaduta Society, Sri Lanka

·  Emeritus Professor of Sanskrit, Department of Classical Languages, University of Peradeniya

·  Professor of Sanskrit, Department of Classical Languages, University of Peradeniya (1968 – 1982)

·  Associate Professor in Sanskrit, Department of Classical Languages, University of Peradeniya

·  Senior Lecturer in Sanskrit, Department of Classical Languages, University of Peradeniya

 

Research Interests
Sanskrit Drama, Puppetry, Handicraft, Scientific Literature in Sanskrit, Vedic Literature, Literary Criticism

Research  Publications (selected)

Books

  • Kālidāsa’s imagery and the theory of poetics, New Delhi: Navrang, 1988
  • The puppet theatre of Asia. Colombo: Dept. of Cultural Affairs. 1968
  • Puppetry in Ceylon. Arts of Ceylon Series: 1. Colombo: Dept. of Cultural Affairs. 1961.
  • A bibliography of the handicrafts of Sri Lanka. Colombo: National Crafts Council, Ministry of Rural Industrial Development. 1988
  • Handicrafts of Sri Lanka. Moratuwa: Srimati Tilakasiri. 1994
  • Asian shadow and puppet theatre. Colombo: Dept. of Cultural Affairs, Sri Lanka. 2006
  • The Asian shadow play. Ratmalana: Sarvodaya Vishva Lekha. 1999.
  • Saṃskr̥ta nātya sāhityaya. Saṃskr̥ta Sāhitya Vaṃśaya Series, kāṇḍaya – 3. Colombo: Lakehouse. 1971
  • Vaidika sāhityaya. Saṃskr̥ta Sāhitya Vaṃśaya Series, kāṇḍaya – 1. Colombo: Lakehouse 1967
  • The Indian Vidusaka and the comic characters of the Asian shadow play. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Society for Asian Studies. 1969
  • Abhinavagupta – the literary critic and commentator (an assessment). Poona. 1967
    Articles
  • The Rāmāyaṇa tradition in Ceylon. International Ramayana Festival (1st:1971: Indonesia) Collection of miscellaneous materials on Asian dance, 1958-75] Folder 11 (Cross-cultural) no. 4
  • (with J. C. Wright) Review of: Añjali: Papers on Indology and Buddhism. A Felicitation Volume Presented to Oliver Hector de Alwis Wijesekera on His Sixtieth Birthday, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1972, vol. 35, no. 1, p.
    201-202
  • Añjali: papers on Indology and Buddhism: a felicitation volume presented to Oliver Hector de Alwis Wijesekera on his 60th birthday. Peradeniya: University of Ceylon, the Felicitation volume editorial committee, 1970
  • Śrī Laṅkāvē pāramparika śilpi gam hā pāramparika śilpīngen păvata ena pavul piḷibanda samīkṣanayak, koṭasaka Iṅgrīsi parivartanayak sahitava. Colombo: S. Godage & Brothers. 1994

On Rohingya Issue, Both China and India Back Myanmar Government

September 14th, 2017

Chinese foreign ministry says the international community should support the efforts made by Myanmar

China and India seldom see eye to eye with each other on international affairs, especially after the Doklam crisis, which deepened the mutual hostility. But on the Rohingya issue in Myanmar, both countries expressed sympathy toward Myanmar’s government in spite of the international community’s pressure.

On August 25, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) attacked 30 police outposts in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, leading to the killing of 10 police officers, one soldier, and one immigration officer.

After the attack, the government of Myanmar declared the ARSA as a terrorist organization under Sub-Section 5 of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Law of Myanmar and launched clearance operations” to provide security in the region.” However, according to multiple media reports, the clearance operations” have directly or indirectly caused around 300,000 Rohingyas to flee the region.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

On September 10, the ARSA declared a ceasefire for one month to facilitate a humanitarian response. But the government of Myanmar rejected the ceasefire offer, as Zaw Htay, director general of the State Counselor Office of Myanmar, said in a tweet, we have no policy to negotiate with terrorists.”

On September 11, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra‘ad al-Hussein, strongly condemned Myanmar’s government for the Rohingya crisis:

The situation seems a textbook example of ethnic cleansing…I call on the [Myanmar] Government to end its current cruel military operation, with accountability for all violations that have occurred and to reverse the pattern of severe and widespread discrimination against the Rohingya population.

Against the backdrop of the UN criticism, China still maintains its supportive position toward Myanmar’s government.

On September 12, when confronted with a question about Rohingya crisis again, China’s foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said:

The Chinese side condemns the violent attacks that happened in the Rakhine State of Myanmar, supports Myanmar’s efforts to safeguard the peace and stability of the Rakhine State and sincerely hopes that the Rakhine State can restore stability as soon as possible and the local people can live a normal life again.

Geng emphasized that China believes  the international community should support the efforts made by Myanmar to maintain national development and stability and create enabling external conditions for the proper settlement of the issue of Rakhine State. ”

Like China, the Indian government’s expressed understanding toward Myanmar’s government as well.

On a recent visit to Myanmar, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi said India shares Myanmar’s concern about extremist violence in Rakhine state and specially the violence against security forces and how innocent lives have been affected.”

We hope that all the stakeholders together can find a way out in which the unity and territorial integrity of Myanmar is respected and at the same time we can have peace, justice, dignity, and democratic values for all,” Modi added.

Suu Kyi Slams “Disinformation” As Information War Intensifies

September 14th, 2017

By Kalinga Seneviratne Courtesy indepthnews.net

BANGKOK (IDN) – The information war on Myanmar’s Bengali/Rohingya problem has intensified as Myanmar’s de-facto leader and Nobel Peace Laureate Aung Sung Suu Kyi finally broke her silence on the issue on September 6 and slammed the international media and human rights organisations for spreading misinformation” on the conflict.

One day earlier, the London-based Burma Human Rights Network (BHRN) launched a report in Bangkok bashing Myanmar’s Buddhist majority. The following day India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi making his first official bilateral visit to neighbouring Myanmar pledged Indian support to fight cross-border Islamic terrorism.

The Myanmar government information committee said that gunmen affiliated with the Islamic terrorist group of the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) invaded villages in Maungtaw Township in the Rankin state over the weekend and set fire to hundreds of houses. After clashes they have discovered a number of explosive devices and another 80 houses burned in neighbouring townships. The government has put the blame on this carnage on the ARSA a terrorist group of Rohingya refugees believed to be trained in Pakistan and funded by Wahabbi sources in Saudi Arabia.

Photo: Kutupalong Refugee Camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. The camp is one of three, which house up to 300,000 Rohingya people fleeing inter-communal violence in Myanmar. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Meanwhile, BHRN in launching their report on September 5 at a media conference in Bangkok claimed that there is a systematic persecution of Burma’s Muslim minority” with ID cards denied to them, constant monitoring of their mosques and young people across the country, spread of Muslim Free” villages and of course military attacks on Rohingyas in Rankin state leading to the exodus of thousands of refugees across the borders mainly to Bangladesh.

The so-called discrimination” against Muslims listed in the report was almost identical to what Muslim minorities are having to cope with in western countries, but, the report constantly referred to Buddhists” as perpetuators whereas when such discrimination is reported in the West it will be addressed as a national security issue rather than Christians” as perpetuators.

What the Myanmar government is complaining about is this double standard. That they are facing a terrorist threat from IS-linked ARSA. But, Human Rights Watch (HRW) Deputy Director for Asia, Phil Robertson argued during the media conference that they have monitored the carnage” via satellite images from Bangkok and showed such images where the red dots shown he claimed were Rohingya houses burned by the army. When pointed out by a journalist that the Myanmar government claims that Rohingyas themselves are setting fire to houses, all he could say is oh, this is Burmese government propaganda”.

After the UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned of ethnic cleansing and regional destabilization and in a rare letter to the Myanmar government has talked of a spiral of a humanitarian catastrophe”, Aung Sung Suu Kyi finally broke her silence on the issue on September 6 and blamed “terrorists” for “a huge iceberg of misinformation” on the violence in Rakhine state, but did not address the issue of fleeing refugees.

In a statement issued by her office on Facebook, Suu Kyi said the government had “already started defending all the people in Rakhine in the best way possible” and warned against misinformation that could mar relations with other countries. She referred to images on Twitter of killings posted by Turkey’s deputy prime minister that he later deleted because they were not from Myanmar. Earlier Suu Kyi had spoken by telephone with Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan.

She said in the statement that (such) kind of fake information which was inflicted on the deputy prime minister was simply the tip of a huge iceberg of misinformation calculated to create a lot of problems between different countries and with the aim of promoting the interests of the terrorists.”

The UN estimates that over 125,000 – most of them women and children – have fled across the border to Bangladesh. There are about 1.1 million Rohingyas in Myanmar whom the locals call Bengali because they believe most of them are illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. But, human rights campaigners point out most have lived there for a number of generations. BHRN said in their report that Muslims have to provide documentation that proves a family lineage dating back to before 1824 to gain Myanmar ID cards.

While reports in the Myanmar media said that attacks by ARSA terrorists on Bengali villages” continue. Mizzima news – which won a ‘free media pioneer” award from the International Press Institute in 2007 – reported on 5 September 5 that Indian and Bangladesh intelligence officials have disclosed they have intercepted three long duration calls between Hafiz Tohar, military wing chief of ARSA on August 23 and 24 that hold the key to why the militant group unleashed the pre-dawn offensive against Myanmar security forces.

The report said that Tohar has been trained in Pakistan by Lashkar e Tayyaba and while Bnagladesh government is also worried about these terror links, a lack of intelligence sharing network between India, Bangladesh and Myanmar may have prevented the latter from getting prior warning on the threat.

During his visit to Myanmar concluded on September 7, Modi told Suu Kyi that he wants to see a peaceful border between India and Myanmar and offered Indian cooperation in the area of security. We are partners in your concerns over the loss of lives of security forces and innocent people due to the extremist violence in Rakhine State. Our interests in the area of security are common as neighbours. It’s essential that we work together to ensure the stability of our long territorial and coastal borders,” Modi said during the joint media briefing with Suu Kyi in Myanmar’s capital Nay Pyi Taw on September 6.

While there have been public demonstrations by extremist Islamic groups in Malaysia, Indonesia and Bangladesh, the governments have been playing a behind the scenes quiet diplomatic role to defuse the situation knowing very well how religious passions could have a negative impact on ASEAN (Southeast Asian Nations) community building process. All three Muslim neighbours of Myanmar practice a very moderate form of Islam compared to its Middle Eastern counterparts, and this issue has the potential to empower the smaller extremist groups in their countries.

The same applies to the Buddhists in Myanmar, where the Myanmar government has been closely monitoring the Association for the Protection of Race and Religion — usually referred to by its Myanmar-language acronym, Ma Ba Tha, which is viewed by many of its supporters as a broad-based social and religious movement dedicated to protecting Myanmar’s Buddhist identity and heritage, as well as empowering poor Buddhist communities at a time of unparalleled change and uncertainty in the country.

Millions of Buddhists across the country also face same economic hardships the Rohingyas are supposed to be facing. Statistics released from 2014 census indicate that the number of homeless across the country have reached almost 1 million and tremendous housing deprivations exists across the country.

The International Crisis Group, a Brussels-based think tank, said in a report on “Buddhism and Politics in Myanmar” that the crisis triggered by Rohingya insurgent attacks and massive retaliation by the army has boosted anti- Muslim sentiment nationwide.

“While dynamics at play in Rakhine are mostly driven by local fears and grievances, the current crisis has led to a broader spike in anti-Muslim sentiment, raising anew the specter of communal violence across the country that could imperil the country’s transition,” warned the ICG report. It added that a failure by the civilian government of Aung San Suu Kyi to come to grips with economic inequality and provide adequate public services such as education, access to justice and disaster relief would allow Ma Ba Tha to gain legitimacy. [IDN-InDepthNews – 7 September 2017]

Photo: Kutupalong Refugee Camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. The camp is one of three, which house up to 300,000 Rohingya people fleeing inter-communal violence in Myanmar. Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

IDN is flagship agency of the International Press Syndicate

විශ්ව විද්‍යාල ආචාර්යවරු සහ ජාතික සංවිධාන නියෝජිතයෝ මියන්මාර තානාපති හමුවී සහාය පළකරති.

September 14th, 2017

වෛද්‍ය චන්න ජයසුමන 

මියන්මාරයේ (බුරුමයේ)  රඛිනේ පළාතේ ඇතිව ඇති තත්වය පිලිබඳ අන්තර්ජාතික මාධ්‍ය සහ අන්තවාදී කණ්ඩායම් මුල්වී සිදු කරන අසත්‍ය ප්‍රචාර හේතුවෙන් මියන්මාර බෞද්ධ ජනතාවට සිදුව ඇති අසාධාරණය පිලිබඳ කණගාටු වන බව අද සවස ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මියන්මාර තානාපති හමු වූ විශ්වවිද්‍යාල ආචාර්යවරු සහ ජාතික සංවිධාන නියෝජිතයෝ දැනුම් දුන්හ. මේ අවස්ථාවේ මියන්මාර බෞද්ධ ජනතාව සමග ශ්‍රී ලාංකික බෞද්ධ ජනතාව අත්වැල් බැඳ ගන්නා බව ද ඔවුහු පැවසුහ. පසුගියදා ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ මියන්මාර තානාපති කාර්යාලය ඉදිරිපිට අන්තවාදී කණ්ඩායමකගේ අශෝභන හැසිරීම පිලිබඳ ශ්‍රී  ලාංකිකයන් ලෙස තමන් ලජ්ජාවට පත්වන බව නියෝජිත කණ්ඩායම දැනුම් දුන්හ. 

මේ අවස්ථාවේ අදහස් දැක්වූ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ වැඩ බලන  මියන්මාර තානාපතිතුමා පැවසුවේ අන්තර්ජාතික මාධ්‍ය සහ  සමාජ ජාලාවල පළ වූ ඇතැම් ජායාරුප මීට දශයකට පමණ පෙර අප්‍රිකාවේ රුවන්ඩාවේ දී  ලබාගත් ඒවා බවත් මෙය බෞද්ධ විරෝධී කුමන්ත්‍රණයක් බවත් ය. මියන්මාර ජනාධිපතිතුමාට යැවීම සඳහා විශේෂ ලිපියක් ජාතික විශ්ව විද්‍යාල ආචාර්ය සංගමය තානාපතිවරයාට බාර දුන්නේය (ලිපිය අමුණා ඇත). මාදුරුඔය ධම්මිස්සර හිමි, රියර් අද්මිරාල් සරත් වීරසේකර, ආචාර්ය චන්න ජයසුමන, විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අශෝක කමලදාස, ශ්‍රී ලංකා මියන්මාර මිත්‍රත්ව සංගමයේ සභාපති කුමාර සේමගේ  ඇතුළු පිරිසක් මෙම අවස්ථාවට සහභාගී වූහ.

Rohingya Genocide – Links to corporatism, geopolitics & wahhabism

September 14th, 2017
Fake news corporate media uses atrocity propaganda to sell sensational stories, and politicians use faux outrage to bully Myanmar’s leaders.
The humanitarian crisis in Myanmar is harrowing, with more than 150,000 Muslims having to flee the country in the recent months. The stories of persecution and ethnic cleansing are very troubling, although sporadic conflicts between Buddhists and Muslims in Myanmar have existed for many decades. While the mainstream media is focusing exclusively on the religious context of this story, they are completely missing – or deliberately avoiding – the potential roles of oil/gas pipelines, geopolitical U.S.-China tug of war, and Saudi Arabia’s subversive influence in that region.

Let’s start with the obvious – the western media is not going to shed crocodile tears for some people in a far away place such as Myanmar, unless there is some hidden agenda related to billions of dollars and the Deep State.

SOURCENationofChange

Now some basic facts about Myanmar:

  • Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, is the largest country in South East Asia.
  • Although a poor country that hasn’t been in the radar of globalists for many decades, it has become a very strategic piece of land in China’s new Silk Road (a.k.a One Belt, One Road). Of course, any country that’s important to China becomes an object of exceptional interest to the elites in Washington D.C.
  • Myanmar was under military rule for many decades, and then slowly started opening up its economy in the 1990s. The reforms accelerated in 2006, after which foreign investments skyrocketed.
  • Dubbing Myanmar the last Asian frontier,” mining corporations and oil/gas companies from all over the world rushed into Myanmar and discovered plenty of untapped natural resources. Myanmar’s GDP quadrupled in the last ten years, thanks to revenues from natural gas, tin, forestry, rubber, gold, precious metals (jade) and more. Unfortunately, all these operations also result in ruthless exploitation of laborers, destruction of environment, and mass eviction of people from their lands.
  • Rohingya Muslims are primarily concentrated in a state on the west coast in Myanmar. It’s not a coincidence that the state is adjacent to Bangladesh, an Islamic country. Rohingya people are basically Muslims who came to Myanmar from Bangladesh (roughly speaking, since there’s a lot of history here, going back to the British colonies in the 19thcentury).

Corporatism

Now, let’s take a look at the map of some of the Myanmar oil fields (see below). What’s the red area? That’s the region where the Rohingya Muslims live. See how they are surrounded by offshore (light blue) and onshore oil/gas fields?

 NationofChange is a nonprofit organization, and this website is funded by readers like you. Please support our work. Donate or give monthly.

One of Myanmar’s largest offshore gas production is the Shwe Project, which is smack in that coastal area adjacent to the red region in the map. Shwe is owned by Chinese and South Korean corporations. Not too far from that facility is a dream Chinese project, a deep sea port (called Kyauk Pyu).

China has also built oil and gas pipelines that extend from this very region all the way to China, as shown below:

Corporations from dozens of other countries – U.S., France, Canada, Japan, India and so on – have similarly carved up various parts of Myanmar. So what happens when corporations and countries build oil wells, offshore rigs, sea ports, railways, highways and fancy hotels for the foreign workers? Well, the native poor people have to be evacuated. This happens all over the world and often creates political, financial, and legal nightmares for the corporations. For one, many people may refuse to leave, especially farmers and fishermen whose livelihood depend on the land and the sea. Second, the corporations have to pay people who are willing to be relocated. Say, for example, the Myanmar law says the corporations have to pay $1,000 per person. For 100,000 people, that comes to $100 million.

Now, rather than paying these people or trying to deal with those who’re refusing to leave, what if the corporations could pay $1 million to some shady characters to drive those 100,000 people out of the area? That way, the corporations can save money, stay above the fray, and avoid any PR disaster.

Geopolitics

China has two goals vis-a-vis the Myanmar pipelines and deep sea ports. The first is obvious: import natural gas from Myanmar.

The second goal is a little more complex. It’s about…

  1. a) Creating a shorter route for oil tankers and cargo ships from the Middle East and beyond, which can drop off the merchandise in Myanmar rather than having to go all the way around South East Asia. This saves 2000 miles or two weeks of travel.
  2. b) The second reason is that China wants to lessen its dependence on the sea lanes in South China Sea and especially the path through the narrow Strait of Malacca, which can be quickly blocked if there’s a conflict or a war. And, yes, that hypothetical conflict would involve the U.S.

Wherever China’s Silk Road goes, the U.S. is going to follow it, and Myanmar is no exception. For example, WikiLeaks emails exposed how the CIA funded grassroots” organization in Myanmar to disrupt a Chinese plan for a dam! Naughty as usual. Edward Snowden also revealed how the NSA uses the U.S. embassy in Myanmar as a spy central to snoop on all the countries in that region.

The fundamental goal of the U.S. is to pull Myanmar away from China’s sphere of influence. And if that can’t be accomplished, then chaos will be manufactured.

What else is in the CIA’s tool bag to destabilize a country? Islamic extremism and various avatars of the Mujahideen project. We have seen that in Syria and also recently in the Philippines. Which brings us to the puppet master, Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Wahhabism

Saudi Arabia’s biggest exports are oil and Wahhabism. One of the Asian victims of Saudi Wahhabism is Bangladesh, which has turned extremist in the recent years. Many progressive and secular bloggers and writers have been murdered in the last few years; ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups (ABTJMB) have targeted foreigners – for example, three Americans were hacked to death last year; and extremists have demolished many churches and Buddhist temples. As Bangladesh gets radicalized, so do Rohingya Muslims who live just across the border.

Rohingya separatist/militant/terrorist groups demand an Islamic state and have killed Myanmar soldiers, burned down Buddhist temples, murdered Buddhists etc. The leader of a powerful Rohingya terrorist group is a guy named Ata Ullah, and he is based out of Saudi Arabia. Other Rohingya leaders and insurgents are being trained by prominent terrorist groups in Pakistan and Bangladesh.

It’s also possible that poor and illiterate people are being used as weapons of mass immigration. 30-40 million people in Bangladesh earn less than $2/day. Are some of them being deliberately sent into the areas in Myanmar where Chinese infrastructure projects are happening?

Conclusion

Fake news corporate media uses atrocity propaganda to sell sensational stories, and politicians use faux outrage to bully Myanmar’s leaders. What we need instead is serious investigative journalism that exposes the multitude of players and their clandestine actions that are creating needless crisis in Myanmar and colossal suffering for the Rohingya people.

Rohingya Genocide – Links to corporatism, geopolitics & wahhabism

YOU CAN’T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER

September 14th, 2017

By Dr. Nalaka Godahewa Courtesy Ceylon Today

“Sir, after all those contributions to the nation, how could you lose the election?” a very emotional senior citizen asked the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa at a public event in Kurunegala just a few days ago. Rajapaksa gave an interesting answer to the senior citizen, “After the war, we focussed totally on the development of the country and particularly the North and East. We lost the election primarily because the Tamils and Muslims voted against us in large numbers. It looks like we forgot to do politics where it mattered most”. This perhaps was a reasonably good answer to a question that most people are still searching for an answer. Rajapaksa and his key advisors forgot that Sri Lankans in general and Sinhalese in particular, have very short memories.

Apparently, the LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran used to remind his cadres about this weakness of the Sinhalese all the time.

By January 2015, 6,217,162 people had forgotten that they had been suffering from a 26-year-long war until 2009. They had forgotten the fear and the hardships they had to endure for so many years due to the conflict. They had forgotten that they were facing frequent power cuts until President Rajapaksa built the Norochcholai Power Plant. They had forgotten that travelling long distances within the country was a nightmare until Rajapaksa built the highways. They had forgotten that Colombo was once a dirty city and all the canals were smelly. They had forgotten that a large number of farmers committed suicide every year unable to buy fertilizer for their paddy fields. They had forgotten that unemployment was as high as 8 per cent when Rajapaksa came to power in 2005 and it had been reduced to 4.3 per cent by 2014. They had forgotten that telephone penetration in the country was only about 3 per cent in 2005 and by the time Rajapaksa was defeated there was 20 per cent more telephones used in the country than the actual population. They had forgotten that inflation, which was in double digits when Rajapaksa came to power, had been reduced to 3.3 per cent by 2014. They had forgotten that poverty which was at 15 per cent in 2005 had been reduced to 6 per cent by 2014. They were just unhappy. All they wanted was a change.

Weaknesses

There are no perfect leaders in the world. All the great leaders that we know of in the history have had their own weaknesses.

Even Emperor Asoka, who contributed so much to the spread of Buddhism in India and the rest of the world, was a brutal killer until he converted to Buddhism. Deng Xiaoping who is considered the Father of Modern China had blood on his hands due to the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. There were enough criticisms about the dictatorial approach of Lee Kuan Yew who transformed Singapore from a fishing village to a super power. Dr. Mahathir Mohammad of Malaysia and Dr. Abdul Gayoom of Maldives, who changed the fortunes of their respective nations, also had their share of weaknesses.

But history was kind to these leaders. They had enough time at their disposal to transform their countries so that most people remember the good side of them than their negative aspects.

Unfortunately, Rajapaksa didn’t have that luxury. He was ousted at a peacefully held election four and a half years after he ended the 30-year-long war in Sri Lanka. Despite early accusations from some lowly politicians about a coup, there was no such effort to retain power by force. The former President accepted defeat gracefully and left for his village even before the final result was announced.

Political strategists

As Rajapaksa himself admitted in Kurunegala, the political strategists in his camp had completely forgotten that they need to keep addressing different segments of society. Even though so much development work was carried out in the North and East, there was no machinery in place to win the hearts and minds of the Tamil people living in those areas. Muslims were not reminded of the hardships that their communities had to undergo under the LTTE rule. They were not reminded how much President Rajapaksa had done to support the Muslims even internationally. The elite in Colombo were another group of people who were not addressed effectively. When the Opposition started brainwashing the middle class and the floating voters, the response of the Rajapaksa Government was far below expected.

That’s how the Opposition, armed with financial support and strategic input from their international allies, could muster a sufficient number of voters to defeat President Rajapaksa. They managed to convince the voters that there is a need for better governance in the country.

A beautiful picture was painted during the election campaign. People started believing in the rainbow alliance that was emerging.

Voting Rajapaksa out and voting Sirisena in appeared to be the simplest solution to make Sri Lanka great again. Just look at the expectations that were created. The country would prosper at a much faster rate than before. Corruption would be completely eliminated. Foreign investors would rush to Sri Lanka. Stock market would thrive. Industries would boom. One million jobs would be created within five years. Law and order would be restored. The country would be drug free. Cost of living would be reduced.

The national debt will be completely eliminated by 2023. Education sector would receive 6 per cent GDP from the budget allocations while the health sector would receive 3 per cent of GDP.

Beautiful picture

A beautiful picture indeed! Who would want to miss this? That’s probably how the 6.2 million voters who fell for these promises thought.

But after two years and nine months since the new government came to power, even those people must be realizing that something has gone wrong. As the old saying goes a book cannot be judged only by its cover.

Let us do a reality check to understand the ground situation today.

The government, which came to power promising a corruption free society, is already in serious trouble having to defend the biggest financial crime of the history of this country. The bond scam is one of the most spoken of topics at every forum. According to the State Minister of Finance Lakshman Yapa, the direct and indirect cost of the bond scam to the country is over Rs 1 trillion.

The total economy of this country is only Rs 11.5 trillion and the loss due to bond scam is almost 10 per cent of that according to this assessment of the State Minister. Even though some people tried to discredit the minister, saying he has got the numbers wrong, it can easily be established that the facts are stubborn.

Bending the law

Instead of restoring law and order as promised by the government leaders when they were in Opposition, the new Inspector General of Police (IGP) has publicly explained how he intends to bend the law. There are ample examples of bending the law from the time the new government came to power. The government seems to be bending the law at will to protect its supporters and also to harass its opponents. The Police and the Bribery Commission have not touched a single person connected to the bond scam yet, though they are busy investigating thousands of people connected to the previous regime.

Instead of new jobs that were promised, the country has lost even the jobs that existed before. A comparison between employment statistics of 2014 and 2016 in the Central Bank Annual Report of 2016 shows that the loss is as high as 476,000 jobs within these two years.

The government came to power promising a reduction in the cost of living. But it has not happened. In reality, the government has increased taxes by 40 per cent during the initial two years in power. This amounts to an increase of Rs 414 billion per year. Ultimately all these taxes are paid by the people of this country directly or indirectly. With the introduction of the new laws, the tax burden of the people will increase further.

National debt

Even though the leadership of the present government keeps talking about a debt trap created by the previous government, in reality it is the present government, which has increased the national debt by 32 per cent within just two years. According to the Auditor General, the national debt had increased from Rs 7,391 billion in 2014 to Rs 9,865 billion by December 2016. If taken as a percentage of GDP, then the debt burden has increased from 71.3 per cent to 83.3 per cent within just two years. What is important to note here is that national debt as a percentage of GDP had reduced from 102.5 per cent to 71.3 per cent during the 2005-2014 period. Once again it has started climbing up and it is not a good sign. In 2016, the government had been borrowing at a rate of approximately Rs 3 billion every day.

We can keep highlighting more facts but they are not going to please the reader. Indeed it is a really gloomy picture.
On 4 September 2017, the government introduced the latest economic policy document at a mega function held at the BMICH.

We have to call it the latest because the previous economic policy document was introduced just one month ago on 22 August 2017. In fact the current leadership of the country has presented nine policy documents since they entered the election campaign in late 2014.

How long are we going to believe these fairy tales of the government?

Dr. Nalaka Godahewa is a former Chairman of Sri Lanka Tourism and of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Sri Lanka. He has three professional qualifications in Engineering, Finance and Marketing and also an MBA. He holds a PhD in Economics

Blood, Money and Markets

September 14th, 2017

by Padraig Colman Courtesy Ceylon Today

Sri Lankans have grown cynical about the number of public commissions and inquiries which have failed to shed any light or improve anything. Perhaps Sri Lankan politicians have learned from their former colonial masters that a good way to defuse a controversy is to set up an inquiry to delay any need for real action, at the same time providing a good living for lawyers and the great and the good who sit on these commissions.

On 30 January 1972, British soldiers shot 28 unarmed civilians in Derry during a peaceful protest march against internment. Fourteen people died. There were inquiries that did not convince anybody. The Saville Inquiry was established in 1998 to reinvestigate the incident. Saville’s report was not made public until 2010.

On 11 July 2017, The UK Government announced a full inquiry into how contaminated blood products gave thousands of people hepatitis C and HIV. Fourteen people died as a result of Bloody Sunday. As many as 2,400 people died as a result of the tainted blood scandal. Andrew Evans of the pressure group Tainted Blood commented: ‘Had haemophiliacs all died on one day, there would have been an immediate investigation and we would not have endured this silent scandal’.

Haemophilia is a genetically acquired disease in which the blood does not clot properly. It was once popularly called “the royal disease” and figured prominently in the history of European royalty in the 19th and 20th centuries. Queen Victoria, through two of her five daughters (Princess Alice and Princess Beatrice), passed the mutation to various royal houses across the continent, including the royal families of Spain, Germany and Russia. Victoria’s son Prince Leopold, Duke of Albany also suffered from the disease.

Factor VIII and Factor IX concentrates

The first blood-clotting products were produced in 1966 and from the 1970s the UK imported vast quantities from the US. In the 1970s, sufferers took products known as Factor VIII and Factor IX concentrates, which were made by distilling and concentrating the plasma of large groups of donors. Factor concentrates were seen as a revolutionary treatment and a surge in demand led to pharmaceutical companies seeking substantial supplies of blood. Unfortunately, the blood was acquired from tainted sources.

Convicts, drug addicts, prostitutes and people known to be infected with HIV or hepatitis were paid to donate their blood. The WHO warned Britain of the dangers of using these imported products. Large numbers of people were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C because of blood products supplied by the NHS. Of the 1,243 victims who were co-infected with both hepatitis C and HIV, less than 250 are still alive as I write.

In 1982, the first UK haemophiliac patient was diagnosed with Aids. Dr N Galbraith of the Public Health Laboratory Service warned the Department of Health (DoH) that all blood products imported from the US should be withdrawn. A Department of Health official deemed this ‘premature’ and ‘imbalanced’.

Those who campaigned for 30 years for an inquiry were not pleased at the recent announcement because the proposed inquiry was to be overseen by the DoH, the government department to blame for what happened.The main groups representing victims and their families lack trust in the department because they believe its officials were complicit in covering up the scandal for decades. There is even evidence that children were used as guinea pigs to test blood-clotting products. There was secret monitoring and failure to inform patients and families of the results. Documents were destroyed and medical records altered.

The mayor of Greater Manchester, former Labour Health Secretary Andy Burnham (surely, he was complicit also), has urged Theresa May to step in to save the inquiry. ‘I’m appealing to the Prime Minister to salvage the process before trust gets corroded on all sides.’ He said the Government could help solve the impasse by simply switching oversight to the Cabinet Office.

Commissions and Omissions

When the British magazine Private Eye reported on the issue in 1987, the death toll of haemophiliacs stood at 23 but the Tory Government, despite repeated warnings, continued to use imported blood from skid row donors. The magazine points out that there are 2,000 surviving haemophiliacs whose lives have been ruined by the Government’s failure to fund the production of safe blood-clotting products in the UK. In early 2000, safe but more expensive synthetic clotting agents were made available for children but not adults. Some adults found that they had been given products that may contain the fatal neurodegenerative variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease – remember mad cow disease?

Much was exposed by an inquiry led by Lord Archer (the former Solicitor General for England and Wales – not Jeffrey). This was a privately-funded independent inquiry set up in 2007 and concluded in 2009. Archer had campaigned for an inquiry with Lord Owen, who was the Labour Health Secretary from 1974 to 1976, Lord Jenkin, former Shadow Health Secretary, and others. The inquiry had no legal status and could not subpoena witnesses or demand the disclosure of documents. It did address the issue of missing evidence and documents relating to the scandal. For example, the ministerial papers of Lord Owen had been destroyed.

‘We have been unable to ascertain who carried out the destruction of the papers, and who gave the instructions. But the conclusion appears inescapable that some official made a decision which he or she had no authority to make, or that someone was guilty of a serious error of judgment. The consequence is that Lord Owen has done his best to recollect details of events a quarter of a century ago, but both he, and we, have been deprived of the primary sources.’

The current Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, claimed that the Government could be ‘proud of our record in support of those who suffered from this injustice to date, both financially and in the search for truth’. To add further insult to the many injuries already inflicted, Hunt announced that proposed increases in payments to those with HIV and advanced hep C or both would be cut to better help those with first stage chronic hep C – robbing one set of victims to help another.

Richard Titmuss, British social researcher and teacher, published The Gift Relationship in 1970. He compared blood donations in Britain (entirely voluntary) and the US (some bought and sold). Titmuss’ conclusions concerned the quality of communities where people are encouraged to give to strangers. When blood becomes a commodity, he argued, its quality is corrupted (American blood was four times more likely to infect recipients with hepatitis than was British blood). Titmuss helped preserve the National Blood Service from Thatcherite privatisation.

Privatisation and Outsourcing

Titmuss wrote about the value of altruism, reciprocity and social duty symbolised by donating blood free of chargein order to benefit the sick. I worked in the Department of Health in the late 1980s and early 1990s when the so-called ‘reforms’ were introduced in order to impose market considerations on the care of the sick.

Under Labour and Conservative Governments, this had brought about a corrosive commercialisation.

Harvard Philosopher Michael J Sandel has written a stimulating book entitled What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets.

Sandel’s argument is that markets and finance are taking over everything and in the process, are creating a moral vacuum. It is interesting to see that with Vision 2025, the UNP is still trying to drag Sri Lanka along with the delusion that privatisation and outsourcing are the panaceas for all evils despite all evidence to the contrary. The launch of V2025, the blueprint for the future of a ‘rich Sri Lanka’ at BMICH gave an opportunity for old clichés to be trotted out. The President and the Prime Minister said that in Sri Lanka Finance Management was poor; perception of corruption was high, infrastructure inadequate; many laws were outdated and institutions were weak. ‘Reforms are needed on all these fronts and we must revitalise both governance and economic management.’ Privatisation and public private finance initiatives will solve all Sri Lanka’s problems apparently. This conveniently ignores the fact that privatisation and deregulation give license to corruption. The railway system in the UK is an utter shambles as a result of privatisation. So is the water ‘industry’. Many questioned whether it was morally justifiable for a God-given basic commodity like water to be traded for profit. Will they buy and sell the air that we breathe? They would if they could. I will explore the morality of markets further next week using Professor Sandel’s book as my guide.

National interests over global interests Sisyphus, Cerberus and the new world order

September 14th, 2017

with Ravi Ladduwahetty Courtesy Ceylon Today

Indeed, Russia and the U.S. were allies during the two tragic conflicts of the two World Wars, which allows us to think there’s something objectively bringing us together in difficult times, and I think – I believe – it has to do with geopolitical interests and also has a moral component.

– Russian President Vladimir Putin

In Greek mythology, Sisyphus or Sisyphosˈ was the king of Ephyra (now known as Corinth). He was punished for his self-aggrandizing craftiness and deceitfulness by being forced to roll an immense boulder up a hill, only to watch it come back to hit him, repeating this action for eternity. Through the classical influence on modern culture, tasks that are both laborious and futile are therefore described as Sisyphean.

On the other hand, also in Greek mythology, Cerberus often called the hound of Hades, is the monstrous multi-headed dog that guards the gates of the underworld to prevent the dead from leaving. Cerberus was the offspring of the monsters Echidna and Typhon, and usually is described as having three heads, a serpent for a tail, and snakes protruding from parts of his body.Cerberus is primarily known for his capture by Heracles, one of Heracles’ twelve labourers.

The new world order

It is moot to note that most of the global issues and the bones of contention are of a Sisyphean nature and they are described as Sisyphean.

This is manifestly and patently clear in the case of the clarion call for global change. We have again gone to the bottom of the hill, again like Sisyphus, with the US opting out of the Paris Accord which was heavily lobbied for by the new French President Emmanuel Macron. Reaching global consensus on each of these matters which are of global importance, are Sisyphean by nature.

There are some countries which have already opted out, while some other countries stand firm on international standards regarding these global matters.

Take for instance, parameters in relation to integrating economies and global economic development. It is then that national interests come in. Otherwise, what else would explain BREXIT? England opted out of the European Union, as it felt that an unnecessary number of Europeans were moving in and out of her territory. So, here again , there were the national interests which came ahead of the global or at least regional interests, as was very evident, in this instance.

This is the Sisyphean task. Each time that the man was asked to throw the huge stone off the mountain, God Olympus ensured that the stone kept rolling back before the mountain. It was a never ending task for Sisyphus. That is evidenced by the candid examples which are seen in global geopolitics and global geo-economics of today. Whether it is climate change or whether it is disarmament or economic integration, global leaders agree on certain parameters, then they beg to disagree like the Paris Accord on Climate Change! States in our global community accept theories when the national interests match up to theregional or global interests, be they climate change, disarmament or economic integration as the case may be.

Take the case of the Paris Accord in 2000 where most Member States of the UN and others agreed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Now the United States President Donald Trump himself says that the US cannot agree to global standards! Then, there are other countries, which also state that they need more time for the interpretation of the conditions. Sri Lanka, as well as some other developing countries, has stated that they have not reached the level of operation of the developed countries, in this regard.

This includes India and China which is a manifestation of a pathetic situation. The so-called developed countries have come together which have had multiplier effects on the environment in different countries. These are not figments of imagination, but time will tell what serious impact climate change would have on the world.

Disarmament

The next topic would be disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation.

It is a good thing that the NPT or the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty has worked. There is the IAEA or the International Atomic Energy Authority Board of Governors also at work.

There is a clarion call from these global institutions that there should be no nuclear weapons.

But evidence shows that these very countries are continuing to increase their nuclear arsenal. It appears as if North Korea is continuing with their agendas while maintaining that they do not heed to the global call.

Global economic integration

Global economic integration is one of the best forms of enhancing per capita incomes and living standards of the world. In this instance, the CARICOM (Caribbean Community) is better than the most powerful economic power in the world which is the EU, which is seen crumbling with BREXIT. In sharp contrast, there is CARICOM and ASEAN which are seen as huge success stories.

However, Myanmar is seen to be ethnic cleansing and the movement is seen to be losing its respect. It is in this context that the CARICOM say they are better. When they tried to do the same ethnic cleansing, it is the Dominican Republic which tried to ostracize and take away the membership of Seychelles.

So, under these circumstances, the implementation of the new global order is a gargantuan Sisyphean task, and will never happen until and unless the global order and interests match with the national interests. It is then that we could see the proliferation of globalization. It will be then that Sisyphus will be able to throw the stone beyond the hill where God Olympus will not send it back.

As for Cerberus, the dog which was guarding the underworld, there is one thing that he was vulnerable to and that was good music and he would fall asleep to it, permitting the return of Orpheus’ wife from the dead.

Now we see the manifestation of this in global geopolitics. A sop (an euphemism for a bribe) to Cerberus in the form of music ! That is to the countries which protect their own interests. This is also manifest with the presence of the United States in the Indian Ocean, which is not for the protection of the Indian Ocean and its border countries, per se, but to mitigate China’s presence in the Indian Ocean! What a tangled web we weave!

This columnist could be contacted on ravi.ladduwahetty@ceylontoday.lk

Convention on Enforced Disappearance clears way for extradition WHO IS TO BE EXTRADITED?

September 14th, 2017

The International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance is to be voted on in Parliament on the 21st of this month. Just 6 days away.

The Convention came into force on the 23rd December 2010. So far, of the 193 member states of the United Nations, only 57 countries have become State Parties by ratifying it. State Parties have voluntarily undertaken to be bound by its provisions.  Sri Lanka became a State Party on the 26th of May 2016. Just over a year ago.

Of cardinal significance is that the UK and the US have not become State Parties. When Lord Lester of Herne Hill asked Her Majesty’s Government whether it intends to sign the bill, Lord Triesman, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign and Commonwealth Office) had this to say:

article_image

Protest against wartime disappearances

“The Government needs to conduct a detailed analysis of the provisions of the treaty and their implications for implementation in order to determine the UK’s position towards ratification, including whether we would need to make any reservations. The UK did not sign the convention at the signing ceremony in Paris on 6 February because the UK does not sign international treaties unless it has a firm intention to ratify within a reasonable time frame. We understand that 57 states, including 10 member states of the European Union, have so far signed the convention…”

As for the US, this is how it went at the Daily Press Briefings, with Sean McCormack, saying on 7th February 2007 in Washington DC:

“QUESTION: Did you notice that 57 countries signed a treaty today that would basically bar governments from holding secret detainees and the U.S. did not join?

MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah. This is — I understand that there is a Convention for the Protection of All Persons and Enforced Disappearances. And I know — I have some information on it here, George. I confess I don’t have all the details. I do know that we participated in all the meetings that produced the draft. Beyond that, I can’t give you specific reasons here from the podium as to why we didn’t sign on to it. We’ve put out a public document that I can give you the citation for afterwards and it explains our reasons for not participating in the draft. But I think just as a general comment, clearly the draft that was put up for a vote or put for signature was not one that met our needs and expectations.”

And yet, Sri Lanka’s Yahapalana government which looks to those two countries for guidance, signed up for it. Some of the other countries which signed up, declared certain reservations at the time of signing which are included with their signature. For instance, Cuba has the following declaration:

“Declaration:  The Republic of Cuba hereby declares, in accordance with article 42, paragraph 2, that it does not consider itself obliged to refer its disputes to the International Court of Justice, as provided for in paragraph 1 of the same article.”

Morocco, Ukraine and Venezuela did the same. Sri Lanka, however, did not.

Consider the following in Article 13.4:

“If a State Party which makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty receives a request for extradition from another State Party with which it has no extradition treaty, it may consider this Convention as the necessary legal basis for extradition in respect of the offence of enforced disappearance.”

From what I understand, this means that in the case of Sri Lanka, even if we don’t have an extradition treaty with another State Party, if they request the extradition of, say, General Jagath Jayasuriya to Brazil (which by the way is a State Party), we have to oblige!

Isn’t that why this government is gagging to ratify this treaty? If it wasn’t, wouldn’t it have made a declaration that gave it a way out?

The only declaration Sri Lanka did make at the time of signing is to strengthen the role of the committee:

“Declaration under article 32: “… the Government [of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka] wishes to declare as per Article 32 of the Convention that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State Party claims that another State Party is not fulfilling its obligations under this Convention”.

This was despite the fact that article 32 goes on to say:

“The Committee shall not receive communications concerning a State Party which has not made such a declaration, nor communications from a State Party which has not made such a declaration.”

This makes it seem like Sri Lanka, in May 2016, wanted very much to avail itself of every opportunity to use this convention fully!

Even if it claims good faith, it is incumbent on a government to ensure that the country’s security as a state is not jeopardized when it signs international treaties. One has only to recall the Darusman report with its extravagant claims, to be alerted to the dangers of a distorted narrative skillfully mainstreamed by a separatist Diaspora which was able to co-opt even eminent international lawyers to underwrite its claims.

The claims in Brazil by a civil society group which calls for the extradition of General Jagath Jayasuriya is only the canary in the mineshaft.

The inordinate hurry to bring this Convention for a vote in parliament at this time, when most members are seized with the far more important work of the Constitution, only exposes this government’s bad faith in trying to slip it in without due consideration of the national interest, and without granting adequate time for the parliament (i.e. the people’s elected representatives) to study it and make the necessary amendments to it.

Reading Sir Desmond de Silva QC’s riveting book, ‘Madam Where Are Your Mangoes?’ where he recounts his experiences as the Chief Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone which indicted Charles Taylor, the President of Liberia, an evil character by all accounts, it is clear that the international criminal justice system has many ways to bring wrongdoers to justice. Sir Desmond’s Diary record for the 10th of March 2003 reads: “HMS Iron Duke is at anchor off Lumley Beach. Her 4.5 inch guns with a range of twenty two kilometers are trained on Freetown…”  Freetown is where the Special Court was located.  It continues: “C company of the Royal Gurkhas is conducting a set piece firepower demonstration…They will use antitank guided missile and medium range mortars… The projection of power is…a signal that any attempt to interfere with arrests to be carried out, or any attempt to come to the aid of the indicted War criminals will be met with force.”

In President Charles Taylor’s case, despite the African continent’s reluctance to hand him over, ways were found to persuade Nigeria to do the deed. The Appeals Chamber gave a judgment in this case that read: “The principle seems now established that the sovereign equality of states does not prevent the head of state from being prosecuted before an international tribunal or court.”

People such as Charles Taylor needed to be stopped since he sounds like he’d lost his mind— the crimes ascribed to him are utterly heinous. However Sri Lanka at this moment in history is facing a false narrative about its war against an ethnic separatist militia employing terrorism, including suicide bombing, as its weapon of choice. The anti-war, anti-Sri Lanka lobby has been able to win the sympathy of the powerful Western countries, even though this narrative conspicuously failed to win a vote at the UN Human Rights Council in 2009. Before the goodwill gained by that effort could be consolidated to firmly establish a fair account of the war against the LTTE, Sri Lanka’s Ambassador was recalled by the government of the day. Since then, the approach of that Sri Lankan government saw many resolutions censoring it, urging it to prosecute those alleged of War Crimes. It is during this time that we saw the Darusman report present a biased view, which the government of the day never countered! It is now like the gold standard of accounts against Sri Lanka and is quoted in every book and article on the subject.

Just as one thought it couldn’t get worse, the successor government was only too eager to co-sponsor resolutions of similar or worse claims.  And now we have this Convention on Disappearances about to be presented in parliament.

As the book Travesty by John Laughland shows, in the case of the International Court of Justice for Former Yugoslavia, in the West’s eagerness to prosecute, this court was illegally constituted and its judgments found wanting. Some who have been prosecuted have been exonerated, but too late, for they died while incarcerated.

In this context, it seems unethical and a crass political expediency for the government to bring this bill to parliament on the 21st of this month, sandwiched between the 20th amendment (Sept 20th) and the tabling of the consolidated Steering Committee report on the Constitution (Sept 22nd).

If the really existing Opposition is unable to successfully appeal for postponement, they should at least attempt to include reservations by way of amendments. It may be unusual procedure since we have already signed the convention. But since the convention itself allows amendments to it with the support of two thirds of the state parties, I don’t see why a parliament which was not consulted when the convention was signed by the Sri Lankan Foreign Ministry, should meekly accede to it without proper consideration of our national interest. It is for this purpose that we have sent our representatives to parliament. The least they can do is to declare its opposition and enter its reservations into the ratification to properly reflect the position of the people of this country.

At least some of us citizens don’t want this government to use this convention to eliminate the competition that it clearly cannot overcome at an election.

 [The writer is author of ‘MISSION IMPOSSIBLE-GENEVA: Sri Lanka’s Counter-Hegemonic Asymmetric Diplomacy at the UN Human Rights Council’, published by Vijitha Yapa and now available at the International Book Fair, BMICH.]

Highway robbery?

September 14th, 2017

Editorial Courtesy The Island


The central expressway project is riddled with corruption, the JVP tells us. We don’t intend to question the veracity of the Rathu Sahodarayas’ claim because they are quite au fait with the affairs of the present government as one of the yahapalana allies. It may be recalled that they were represented on the National Executive Council, which was formed after the defeat of the previous administration, to usher in good governance among other things! What one gathers from the questions they raise in Parliament is that they are privy to the findings of the special investigative units, established by the present government to probe corruption under the Rajapaksa government. Never has the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe government called into question the accuracy of information the JVP comes out with in Parliament about corruption; instead, it promptly acts thereon to pillory its political enemies before having them arrested. So, there is no way the government can claim that the JVP has got it wrong only where the central highway issue is concerned.

One of the main allegations the UNP used to turn public opinion against the Rajapaksa government and engineer the 2015 regime change was corruption in the expressway projects. Curiously, the yahapalana government has not had the questionable highway deals under the previous dispensation investigated. It owes an explanation. There has been a role reversal with the Rajapaksa loyalists in the Joint Opposition (JO) now making the same allegation against the yahapalana leaders. The JVP has been demanding to know whether the central expressway will be made of gold, given its massive cost.

The successful anti-corruption campaign launched by the UNP and its yahapalana chums including the JVP caused the Rajapaksa government to lose elections. The present administration is not holding elections for fear of losing them!

Chairman of the Sri Lanka Podu Jana Peramuna Prof. G. L. Peiris, too, has told the media that the government has, paying no heed to Technical Evaluation Committee recommendations, decided to award the contract for building the Central Expressway to some Japanese companies in a questionable manner and the country will suffer a huge loss.

True, corrupt deals under the previous government stank to high heaven and the JO heavyweights did their damnedest to defend them albeit in vain and vilified the anti-corruption activists including the then Opposition members. But, that should not be a reason for the incumbent government to ignore the serious allegations of corruption against its own members.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe told Parliament the other day that the present government had been able to slash the cost of the central expressway project considerably. If so, there is no need for the government to fear a probe. The general consensus is that the previous government launched mega development projects unlike the present dispensation, but there were massive cost overruns like that of the Uma Oya project and corruption was rampant. The present administration undertook to conduct investigations thereinto and bring those who had lined their pockets at the expense of the public to justice. But, it has not made good on that pledge. Is it because, after being ensconced in power, it has found that ‘the streets are paved with gold’ and does not want to order probes lest they should not be able to benefit from kickbacks?

Let President Maithripala Sirisena be urged to order an investigation into the central expressway project issue.

Meanwhile, Japan promptly responded to Sri Lanka’s distress call when the Meethotamulla garbage dump collapsed in April this year. It rushed in a team of experts here to carry out an investigation and submit a report. It has to act equally fast as regards the very serious allegations against some of its companies which have been named by the Opposition, and get to the bottom of it.

Dappula disagrees with CoI ruling …calls decision arbitrary

September 14th, 2017

By Shyam Nuwan Ganewatta and Sarath Dharmasena

Senior Additional Solicitor General Dappula de Livera PC the chief counsel of the Attorney General’s Department before the Presidential Commission of Inquiry probing the treasury bond scam yesterday said that he could not agree with the Commission’s decision not to compel the owner of Perpetual Treasuries Ltd Arjuna Aloysius to give evidence before the commission.

“We do not agree with the Commission’s decision not to compel Aloysius to give evidence. I have explained the necessity of obtaining a statement from Arjun Aloysius. This decision overlooking the matters presented before the Commission is an arbitrary one,” Livera PC said.

Livera PC said that he was stating the opinion of the Attorney General on the issue.

The Senior Additional Solicitor General said that he would not make any further statements on the issue and the future course of action with regard to the matter would be decided after a discussion with the Attorney General and that would be conveyed to the Commission.

The Senior Additional Solicitor General said so following a statement made before the Commission by Gamini Marapana appearing for Arjun Aloysius.

When the Commission resumed sittings yesterday, the Chairman of the Commission Supreme Court Judge KT Chitrasiri queried from Marapana whether the latter’s client would give evidence before the Commission or not and what was his standpoint over the matter.

Marapana: There is no change in the decision we had made in this regard. Arjuna Aloysius would not give evidence before the Commission. He does not want to give evidence before the Commission.

The Commission had summoned Aloysius to give him an opportunity to state his version with regard to some issues that transpired at the sessions, Marapana said adding that his client however changed his mind and decided not to give evidence after considering the advise given by him.

Marapana PC said that he appreciated the latest decision by the Commission not to compel Aloysius to appear before the Commission. Marapana said that the Commission’s ruling was exemplary and the landmark ruling would be very useful for lawyers and judges in the future.

මගෙන් ප‍්‍රශ්න කලොත් බැදුම්කර මහ හොරු සියල්ල හෙලි කරනවා.. ඇලෝසියස් තර්ජනය කරයි..

September 14th, 2017

 lanka C news

අර්ජුන් ඇලෝසියස් දන්නා සියල්ල හෙලි කලොත් බැදුම්කරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් බොහෝ දේ එලියට එනු ඇති බවත් මෙම වංචාවේ මහ මොලකරු පමණක් නොව පොදු අපේක්‍ෂකයා දිනවීම සදහා කටයුතු කල අය ගැනද තොරතුරැ හෙලිවනු ඇති බව ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණු නායක විමල් වීරවංශ මහතා පවසයි.

තමන්ගෙන් ප‍්‍රශ්න කරන්න ගත්තොත් තමන් ඒවා හෙලි කරන බවට අර්ජුන් ඇලෝසියස් තර්ජනය කරමින් සිටින බවද මන්ත‍්‍රීවරයා සදහන් කලේ එම පක්‍ෂ මූලස්ථානයේ පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදීය.

විපක්‍ෂයට එන ශ‍්‍රීලනිප ඇමතිලාට අන්තිම කොන්දේසි දමයි.. නැතොත් එන්න එපා දන්වයි..

September 14th, 2017

අනුරුද්ධ බණ්ඩාර රණවාරණ මාධ්‍ය ලේකම් ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ

මැතිවරණ සිතියම හකුළන 20 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට පක්‍ෂව අත ඔසවා පසුව මැතිවරණයක් ළං වී විපක්‍ෂයේ අසුන් ගැනීම කිසිදු ඵලක් නැති බවත් හැකි නම් එම සංශෝධනයට විරුද්ධව ඡන්දය ප්‍රකාශ කර පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ විපක්‍ෂයේ අසුන් ගන්නා ලෙසත් බුලත් කොළය ලකුණින් තරඟ වැද ජයගත් ශ්‍රීලනිපයේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්, නියෝජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන්, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන් හා කැබිනට් අමාත්‍යවරුන් වෙතින් ඉල්ලා සිටින බව ජානිපෙ නායක විමල් වීරවංශ මහතා පැවසීය.

පිටකෝට්ටේ පිහිටි එම පක්‍ෂයේ ප්‍රධාන කාර්යාලයේදී පැවැති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදී අදහස් දක්වමින් ඒ මහතා මෙසේ පැවසීය.

එහිදී වැඩිදුරටත් අදහස් දැක්වූ විමල් වීරවංශ මහතා මෙසේ ද සඳහන් කළේය.

මගේ අතේ තිබෙන්නේ දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී එම්. ඒ. සුමන්තිරන් සිදු කළ ප්‍රකාශයක් ඇසුරෙන් පසුගිය 12 වැනිදා තිනකරන් පුවත්පතේ මුල් පිටුවේ සහ 4 වන පිටුවේ පළ වූ ප්‍රවෘත්තියක ඡායා පිටපතක්. එම ප්‍රවෘත්තියේ ශීර්ෂ පාඨයෙන් කියැවෙන්නේ ‘ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ෆෙඩරල්, අනාගමික රාජ්‍යයක් බවට පත් කිරීමටත් උතුරු – නැඟෙනහිර ඒකාබද්ධ කිරීමටත් ආණ්ඩුවට එකඟ වුවහොත් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ සහයෝගය ලබා දෙන බව’ සුමන්තිරන් මන්ත්‍රීවරයා පැවසූ බවයි.

ලබන 20 වැනිදා ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 20 වැනි සංශෝධනය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට නියමිතයි. එම සංශෝධනය මගින් ආණ්ඩුව බලාපොරොත්තු වන්නේ, ‘පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය එකම දිනයක පවත්වනවා’ යන සුරංගනා කතාව කියමින් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව සැප්තැම්බර් මාසයේ පැවැත්විය යුතු උතුරු මැද, සබරගමුව හා නැඟෙනහිර පළාත් සභාවල මැතිවරණ හා ඉදිරියේදී පැවැත්වීමට නියමිත අනෙකුත් පළාත් සභාවන්හි මැතිවරණ කල් දැමීම. මැතිවරණ කල් දැමීම ජනමත විචාරණයකින් තොරව සිදු කිරීමට බැහැ. 20 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය අභියෝගයකට ලක් කරමින් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට පෙත්සම් කිහිපයක් ඉදිරිපත් වුණා. නමුත් ඒවා සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලැබෙන තීන්දුත් අපට දැන ගැනීමට ලැබෙන්නේ සැප්තැම්බර් 20 වැනිදා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදීයි. අපි විශ්වාස කරනවා මේ රටේ නීතිය පිළිබඳ අබමල් රේණුවක හෝ විශ්වාසයක් ඉතිරි වෙලා තිබෙනවා නම් ‘පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ එකම දිනයක පවත්වනවා’ යන සුරංගනා කතාවට මුවා වෙලා කරන්න හදන ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය ජනමත විචාරණයකට ලක් වේවි කියලා.

ඒ වගේම සැප්තැම්බර් 21 වැනිදාත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළ ඉතා බරපතළ කාරණා දෙකක් ඉටු වෙන්න නියමිතයි. මීට පෙර පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කර විවාදයට ගැනීමට දින නියම කර තිබූ පුද්ගල අතුරුදහන්වීම් පිළිබඳ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්තිය ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළ බලාත්මක කිරීම සඳහා රැගෙන ආ පනත් කෙටුම්පත විවාදයට ගැනීම කිසියම් හේතුවක් නිසා කල් දමා තිබුණා. එම පනත් කෙටුම්පත සැප්තැම්බර් 21 වැනිදා විවාදයට ගෙන සම්මත කර ගැනීමට ආණ්ඩුව සූදානම් වෙනවා. ඒක එක කාරණයක්. අනෙක තමයි, අගමැතිවරයා විසින් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදක මණ්ඩලයේ මෙහෙයුම් කමිටුවේ යාවත්කාලීන කරන ලද අතුරු වාර්තාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම.

‘බලහත්කාරයෙන් අතුරුදහන් කිරීම්වලින් සියලු තැනැත්තන් ආරක්‍ෂා කිරීම සඳහා වූ ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මුතිය’ කියන නමින් පවතින මේ ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මුතියට බිතාන්‍යය, ඇමෙරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදය වැනි ලොව බලවත් රටවල් කිසිවක් අත්සන් තබා නැහැ. එයට ඉන්දියාව අත්සන් තබා ඇතත් රට තුළ නීතියක් බවට බලාත්මක කර නැහැ. විදේශ අමාත්‍යවරයා රටට හොරෙන් මේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්තියට අත්සන් තැබුවා පමණක් නොවෙයි දැන් එය පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ගෙනවිත් ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළ බලාත්මක කිරීමටත් සැරසෙනවා. ඒ පනත් කෙටුම්පතේ 11 වැනි වගන්තියේ පැහැදිලිව සඳහන් වෙනවා ‘කිසියම් බලහත්කාරයෙන් අතුරුදහන් කිරීමක් (යුද අපරාධයක්) සම්බන්ධයෙන් විදේශ රටක අධිකරණයකට පැමිණිල්ලක් ඉදිරිපත් වුවහොත් ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය තම ආරක්‍ෂක හමුදාවන්හි අදාළ චූදිතයන් අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන එකී විදේශ රටට භාර දීමට බැඳී සිටී’ කියලා.

ඔබ දන්නවා, මේ වන විට හිටපු යුද හමුදාපතිවරයකු වන ජෙනරාල් ජගත් ජයසූරියට එරෙහිව රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධානවල නියෝජිතයන් ලතින් ඇමෙරිකානු රටවල් කිහිපයක අධිකරණවල නඩු පවරා ඇති බව. මේ පනත් කෙටුම්පත සැප්තැම්බර් 21 වැනිදා සම්මත වූ පසු එම ලතින් ඇමෙරිකානු රටවල් හතර පහ, තමන්ට ජෙනරාල් ජගත් ජයසූරිය භාර දෙන ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිටි විට ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය ඔහු භාර දීමට නීත්‍යනුකූලව බැඳී සිටිනවා. හෙට එන ආණ්ඩුව කවරක් වුවත් එය බැඳී සිටිනවා විදේශ රටවල් ඉල්ලා සිටින රණවිරුවන් ඒ රටවලට භාර දීමට.

‘සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන් රාජ්‍යතාන්ත්‍රික ගණිකාවක්’

සරත් ෆොන්සේකා ඔහේ කට ඇරලා ‘ජගත් ජයසූරිය යුද අපරාධ කළා’ කියලා කියන විට ඒක අහලා එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කොමසාරිස් සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට තර්ජනය කිරීමට පටන් අරන් තිබෙනවා. ‘ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ජාත්‍යන්තර වගවීම් යාන්ත්‍රණයකට යටත් කළ යුතුයි’ කියමින් තර්ජනය කිරීමට සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන්ට ඇති අයිතිය කුමක්ද? ඔහු එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහ ලේකම් පුටුවට යාමට ඇමෙරිකානු රාජ්‍ය දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව සතුටු කරන රාජ්‍යතාන්ත්‍රික ගණිකාවක්. රට ගැන කිසිම වගවීමක් නැති මේ ආණ්ඩුව තමන්ට ප්‍රතිඋත්තර නොදෙන බව සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන් දන්නවා. තමන්ට ප්‍රතිඋත්තර දෙන රටක් හමුවේ නම් සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන් මේ විදියට කටමැත දොඩවන්නේ නැහැ. එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ ආරක්‍ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ බලතල මේ සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන්ට කිසිසේත්ම නැහැ. නමුත් මේ සෙයිඞ් අල් හුසේන් කියන ‘එළුවා’ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ‘නිවට පාලක කරනවෑමියෝ’ දැක්කාම අද තමන්ගේ රැවුල පාන තත්වයක් ඇති වී තිබෙනවා.

දැන් අපට පැහැදිලියි කරන්න හදන දේ.  20 වැනි ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනය සැප්තැම්බර් 20 වැනිදා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ 2/3ක ඡන්දයෙන් සම්මතකර ගැනීමට හදනවා. අපි හිතනවා නීතිය නිවැරදිව ක්‍රියාත්මක වනවා නම් එය සම්මත කර ගැනීමට ජනමත විචාරණයක් ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය විසින් නියම කරාවි කියලා. ඒක ලැබේවිද දන්නේ නැහැ. ඒ වගේම සැප්තැම්බර් 21 වැනිදා මේ අතුරුදහන්වීම් වැළැක්වීමේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්ති පනත් කෙටුම්පත සම්මත කළාම විදේශ රටවල අධිකරණයන්හි පුද්ගලයන් අතුරුදහන් කිරීම්වලට අදාළව පවරන නඩුවලට අපේ රණවිරුවන් භාරදීමට ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය නීත්‍යනුකූලව බැඳෙනවා. ඒ විතරක් නොවෙයි, ශ්‍රී ලංකාව තුළත් පුද්ගල අතුරුදහන් කිරීම් ගැන හොයන්න වෙනම මහාධිකරණයක් පිහිටුවීමේ ප්‍රතිපාදනයක් මේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්තිය පනතේ ඇතුළත් වෙනවා.

මේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්ති පනත අතීතයට බලපාන්නේ නැති බව මංගල සමරවීර ඇමතිවරයා පැවසුවා. නමුත් ඒක සම්පූර්ණයෙන් බොරුවක්. ඒ බව මේ පනත් කෙටුම්පතේ කොතැනද සඳහන් වන්නේ? අතුරුදහන් වූවන් අතුරින් ප්‍රමුඛත්වය දෙන්නේ කාටද කියා තීරණය කරන්නේ අතුරුදහන් වූවන් පිළිබඳ කාර්යාලය මගින්. නමුත් රතු අලිපැටව් තමන්ගේ ගැලවුණු රෙද්ද ඇඳගන්න හදන්නේ 80 දශකය අගභාගයේ අතුරුදහන් වූ ජවිපෙ සාමාජිකයන් ගැන මේ මගින් සොයා ගන්න පුළුවන් කියමින්. නමුත් බුද්ධිමත් ජනතාව සිතා බැලිය යුතුයි. රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ බටලන්ද වධකාගාරයේ ලොක්කා. එයා තමන්ගේ බෙල්ලට තොණ්ඩුවක් දමා ගන්න මෙහෙම පනතක් ගෙනෙන්නේ නැහැ. මේවා විශ්වාස කරන්න තරම් රතු අලි පැටවුන්ගේ සාමාජිකයෝ අද ගොන් තකතිරු මැට්ටන් බවට පත් වෙලාද?

අද මේ නානාවර්ණ ගන්වන ලද කල්ලිය රට පාවාදීමේ මෙහෙයුම මේ ආකාරයට ඉදිරියට රැගෙන එමින් තිබෙනවා. ඒ වගේම ලබන 21 වැනිදා නව ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවට අදාළ කෙටුම්පත ද අගමැතිවරයා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරනවා. මේ මගේ අතේ තිබෙන්නේ මෙච්චර කලක් නැහැ කියපු, යාවත්කාලීන කරන ලද නව ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා කෙටුම්පත (මාධ්‍ය වෙත පෙන්වයි). මේ කෙටුම්පත ව්‍යවස්ථා සම්පාදක මණ්ඩලයක් බවට පත් කරන ලද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ සරල බහුතරයෙන් සම්මත කර ගැනීමට නියමිතයි. ඉන් පසුව මේක අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයට යනවා. එතැනදී යාවත්කාලීන කරලා ආපසු එනවා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට. ඉන්පසු පාර්ලිමේන්තුව තුළත් ඒ වගේම ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය තීරණය කළොත් ජනමත විචාරණයකිනුත් මෙය සම්මත කර ගැනීමටයි තිබෙන්නේ.

අපූරු වචන වෙට්ටු දැමිලි

මේ කෙටුම්පත තුළ අපූරු වචන වෙට්ටු දැමිලි තිබෙනවා. ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපතේ UNITARY කියන වචනය ඉවත් කරනවා. නමුත් සිංහල පිටපතේ ඒකීය කියන වචනය ඉවත් කරන්නේ නැහැ. ඒ කියන්නේ ජාත්‍යන්තර නීතිය ඉදිරියේ, ජාත්‍යන්තර මණ්ඩල ඉදිරියේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව ඒකීය නැහැ. සිංහල මිනිහාට මේ ව්‍යවස්ථාව ඒකීයයි. ඒ වගේම මෙමගින්  ඉඩම්, පොලිස්, පරිපාලන බලතල සියල්ල පළාත් සභාවලට ලබා දී තිබෙනවා. මේ බලතල අනාගත ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයකින් පවා පවරා ගැනීමට නොහැකි බවත් මෙහි සඳහන් වෙනවා. හොර පාරෙන්, හොරගල් අහුලමින් ඇවිත් තියෙන්නේ අර සුමන්තිරන් කියන ෆෙඩරල් – අනාගාමික රාජ්‍යය හදන, උතුරු – නැඟෙනහිර ඒකාබද්ධ කිරීමට අදාළ ප්‍රතිපාදන සහිත නව ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථා කෙටුම්පතයි.

ජගත් ජයසූරිය, චාගී ගාල්ලගේ, ෂවේන්ද්‍ර සිල්වා, වසන්ත කරන්නාගොඩ, දයා රත්නායක වැනි කීර්තිමත් රණවිරුවන් ඇතුළු සියලු විශ්‍රාමික රණවිරුවන් බිලි ගැනීම සඳහා හදපු පනත සැප්තැම්බර් 21 වැනිදා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී සම්මත වීමට නියමිතයි. ඒ විතරක් නොවෙයි රණවිරුවන් දිවි පුදා රැකගත් ඒකීයභාවය නමට විතරක් ඉතිරි කරලා රට ෆෙඩරල් කරන ව්‍යවස්ථාවත් එදිනට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට එනවා. දෙමළ ජනතාවට එරෙහිව යුද අපරාධ සිදු වුණා කියා මේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රඥප්ති පනත යොදා ගනිමින් ලොවටම පෙන්වලා, දෙමළ ජනතාව ස්වපාලනයක් ගෙන ගියා කියලා මේ නව ව්‍යවස්ථාව මගින් ලොවට පෙන්වලා එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලයට බෙදී වෙන් වී යාමේ යෝජනාවක් ගෙන ඒම කියන මාවතෙයි අද මේ යන්නේ. ඊට අදාළ අඩුමකුඩුම ටිකයි අද මේ විදියට හදා ගන්නේ. ‘දෙමළ ජනතාවට අසාධාරණ ලෙස සලකා ඇත. ඔවුන් ස්වපාලනයක් පවත්වා ගෙන යමින් සිටියි’ කියා  එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මහා මණ්ඩලය හමුවේ ඔප්පු කර පෙන්වලා ඊළම හදා ගෙන බටහිර බලවතුන්, දෙමළ ඩයස්පෝරාව හා දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය තම බලාපොරාත්තු ඉටු කර ගනිවි.

මොංගල් නළුවා රන්ජන් ලෝරන්ස් මහසඟරුවනට ගරහනවා

මේ ද්‍රෝහී ගමනට එරෙහිව පෙරට එන ප්‍රමුඛතම බලවේගය මහසඟරුවන බව දන්නා නිසයි, මේ පාලක රොත්ත අද මහසඟරුවනට පරිභව කරන්නේ. සරත් ෆොන්සේකා ඇල්ලේ හිමියන්ට ‘පිස්සු චීවරධාරියා’ කියන අතරේ අර මොංගල් නළුවා රන්ජන් ලෝරන්ස් මහසඟරුවනට කියනවා, ‘BMW පාවිච්චි කරන සංඝ මුදලාලිලා’ කියලා. සරත් ෆොන්සේකා නම් නමට හරි බෞද්ධයෙක්නේ. නමුත් මේ කතෝලිකයකු වන මොංගල් නළුවාට මහා සංඝරත්නයට වචනයකින්වත් අපහාස කරන්න කිසිදු අයිතියක් නැහැ. මොංගල් රන්ජන් අපි කියන්නේ නැහැනේ, ‘කිතුනු පූජකතුමන්ලා මුදලාලිලා’ කියලා. අපි එහෙම කිව්වොත් ඒක වැරදියිනේ. ඒක ඒ පූජකතුමන්ලාට කරන අගෞරවයක්නේ. අපට එසේ කීමට කිසිම අයිතියක් නැහැ වගේම මොංගල් ලෝරන්ස් ඔබට කිසිම අයිතියක් නැහැ ‘ BMW පාවිච්චි කරන සංඝ මුදලාලිලා’ කියලා මේ රටේ සංඝරත්නයට ගරහන්න. මේ විදියට මහා සංඝරත්නයට ගරහලා උන්වහන්සේලාට මේ ආණ්ඩුවේ ද්‍රෝහී ගමනට එරෙහි භූමිකාව ඉටු කිරීමට තිබෙන ඉඩකඩයි ෆොන්සේකලා, ලෝරන්ස්ලා අහුරමින් ඉන්නේ. අපි ඉදිරිපිට තිබෙන්නේ රටත් ජාතියත් ගලවා ගැනීමේ අභියෝගයක්. මල් ගස් වටේ දුවන ජවනිකා අද මෙහි නැහැ. ඒක තේරුම් ගන්න කියා අපි මේ මොංගල් නළුවාට කියනවා.

20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට අත ඔසවලා නම් විපක්‍ෂයට එන්න එපා

ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්‍ෂයේ සිට විපක්‍ෂයට එනවා කියන ඇමතිවරුන්ට, රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිවරුන්ට හා නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමතිවරුන්ට අපි එක දෙයක් අවධාරණය කරන්න කැමැතියි. ‘20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට අත ඔසවලා නම් විපක්‍ෂයට එන්න එපා.’ 20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට අත ඔසවලා මේ පැත්තට ආවාම තමුන්නාන්සේලා කිරි දියරෙන්, කහ දියරෙන් නාවලාවත් පිරිසිදු කරන්න බැහැ. 20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට තුනෙන් දෙකක් හදලා දෙන සෑම දෙනාටම සාප වෙනවා. මේ පැත්තට එනවා නම් 20 වැනි සංශෝධනයට විරුද්ධව අත ඔසවලා පැමිණ විපක්ෂයේ වාඩි වෙන්න. එවිට අපි තමුන්නාන්සේලා ඉතාමත් ආදරයෙන් වැළඳගෙන භාර ගන්නවා. රටට අබමල් රොනක හෝ ආදරයක් තිබෙනවා නම් මේ දේශද්‍රෝහී ගමනේ ආරම්භය හෙවත් 20 වැනි ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයට 2/3 ලැබීම, වැළැක්වීමට කටයුතු කරන්න කියා ඔවුන්ගෙන් නැවත ඉල්ලනවා”

මෙම මාධ්‍ය හමුවට ජානිපෙ ප්‍රචාරක ලේකම් මොහොමඞ් මුසම්මිල් මහතා ද එක්ව සිටියේය.

අනුරුද්ධ බණ්ඩාර රණවාරණ
මාධ්‍ය ලේකම්
ජාතික නිදහස් පෙරමුණ

රට යන අත – ආණ්‌ඩුවට අභියෝග රැසක්‌

September 14th, 2017

ජනිත සෙනෙවිරත්න උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

ආණ්‌ඩුව මේ වන විට විවිධ පාර්ශව ගණනාවක්‌ සමඟ ගැටලු නිර්මාණය කරගෙන ඇති අතර තවදුරටත් දිනෙන් දින එය වර්ධනය වෙමින් පවතී. විශේෂයෙන්ම මහා සංඝරත්නය ඉලක්‌ක කරගෙන මහා සංඝරත්නයට අපහාස කරමින් ප්‍රසිද්ධියේ ප්‍රකාශ නිකුත් කරන්නට ඇතැම් ඇමැතිවරු කටයුතු කිරීම රට තුළ මහත් ආන්දෝලනයට හේතුවී තිබේ.

මුලින්ම මහා සංඝරත්නය වෙත ආණ්‌ඩුවේ ප්‍රබලයකු වන සරත් ෙµdන්සේකා අපහාස කළේය. පූජ්‍ය ඇල්ලේ ගුණවංශ නාහිමියන්ට ඉතාම මෑතකදී පිස්‌සු චීවරධාරියා යෑයි බැණ වැදුණේය. ඇමැති සරත් ෙµdන්සේකා ඉන් අනතුරුව භික්‌ෂුන් වහන්සේලා ඉලක්‌ක කරමින් බරපතළ ප්‍රකාශයක්‌ සිදු කළේය. භික්‌ෂුන් වහන්සේලා දානේ වළඳනවාට වඩා මහින්දගේ බඩගෝස්‌තරවාදයෙන් යෑපුණ අය බවට ඔහු චෝදනා කළේය.

ඉන්පසුව නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමැති රන්ජන් රාමනායක විසින් භික්‌ෂුන් වහන්සේලාට දැඩි ලෙස අපහාස කරන ලදී.

රටේ ජනගහනයෙන් සියයට හැත්තෑපහක්‌ පමණ බෞද්ධයන් සිටින රටක මෙලෙස බෞද්ධ භික්‌ෂුන් වහන්සේලාට අපහාස කිරීම බරපතළ කාරණයක්‌ වුවද එක්‌සත් ජාතික පක්‌ෂය විසින් දේශපාලන පක්‌ෂයක්‌ ලෙස ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් කිසිවක්‌ සිදු නොකිරීම කැපී පෙනේ.

දඹුලු විහාරයේ ප්‍රශ්නය, කන්දෙ විහාරයේ පිංකැට ප්‍රශ්නය ආදී අතිශය සංවේදී ආගමික ස්‌ථානවලට වර්තමාන රජය යටතේ එල්ල වූ බලපෑම් මෙහිදී අමතක කළ නොහැක.

මේ සියලු කටයුතු සිදු වන්නේ රටටම හොරෙන් කෙටුම්පත් කරන ලද නව ආණ්‌ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්‌ථාව ඉක්‌මනින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නට සැරසෙන මොහොතකය.

නව ව්‍යවස්‌ථාවක්‌ සඳහා පත්කර ඇති පාර්ලිමේන්තු මෙහෙයුම් කමිටුවෙහි අවසන් වාර්තාව ඉදිරි සති තුන හතරක කාලය තුළදී පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ඉදිරිපත් කර දින කිහිපයක්‌ ඇතුළත එය සම්මත කර ගැනීමට රජයේ උත්සාහය බව දැනගන්නට තිබේ.

ඉන් අනතුරුව අවසන් ව්‍යවස්‌ථා කෙටුම්පත සැකසීමටද අදහස්‌ කර සිටින අතර එයද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවෙන් සම්මත කිරීමෙන් පසුව නොවැම්බර් මාසයේ දී ඒ සඳහා ජනමත විචාරණයක්‌ පැවැත්වීම රජයේ අරමුණයි.

ඒ අනුව පළාත් පාලන මැතිවරණයට පෙර ජනමත විචාරණය පැවැත්වීමට බොහෝ දුරට ඉඩ ඇති බව සඳහන්ය.

මේ නව ව්‍යවස්‌ථාව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ගෙන ඒමේ කතාව කරළියට එන්නට පෙර අධිකරණ ඇමැති විජයදාස රාජපක්‌ෂ මහතා හදිසියේම තනතුරින් ඉවත් කිරීම සිදු වූයේ විදුලි වේගයෙනි. රටේ තීරණාත්මක අවස්‌ථාවල රටත්, ජාතියත්, ආගමත් වෙනුවෙන් සටනට එන මහා සංඝරත්නය මේ රට බෙදන ෙµඩරල් ව්‍යවස්‌ථාව ගෙන එන මොහොතේ නිහඬ කරවීම මේ ඇමැතිවරුන් ලවා මහා සංඝරත්නයට අපහාස කිරීමේ අරමුණ දැයි සිතෙන තරමට තත්ත්වය බරපතළය.

බෞද්ධාගම රට, ජාතිය ආරක්‌ෂා කරන බවට සපථ කළ ආණ්‌ඩුවේ හවුල්කාර පක්‌ෂයක්‌ වන ජාතික හෙළ උරුමය මෙවැනි තත්ත්වයන් හමුවේ මුනිවත රකී. එදා බෞද්ධ රාජ්‍යයක්‌ කරා යන බව කී ජාතික හෙළ උරුමයේ වර්තමානයේ සම සභාපති හා නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමැති කරුණාරත්න පරණවිතාන අද කියන්නේ වනාන්තරවල සිටින වල් අලින් අල්ලා පිටරටට විකුණා දැමිය යුතු බවත්, ඌරන්, රිළවුන් ඝාතනයට අවසර දී ඇත්නම් ඔවුන්ගේ මස්‌ විකිණීමටද අවසර දිය යුතු බවයි. රාජ්‍ය බලය හමුවේ මේ අයට සියල්ල අමතකව තිබීම පුදුම සහගතය.

විසිවැනි ආණ්‌ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්‌ථා සංශෝධනය පළාත් සභාවල සම්මත කරගන්නා ආකාරය අනුව ඉදිරියේ දී නව ආණ්‌ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්‌ථාවද සම්මත කරගන්නට බලහත්කාරය භාවිත වේදැයි සැක මතුවී තිබේ. මේ සියලු සංශෝධන ගෙන ඒමේදී රට, ජාතිය, ආගම ගැන සිතා හෘද සාක්‌ෂියට අනුව කටයුතු කරන්නට පාලකයන් කටයුතු කළ යුතුය.

සිල් රෙදි නඩුව සම්බන්ධයෙන් සිර දඬුවම් ලැබ සිටින හිටපු ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ලලිත් වීරතුංග හා විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිසමේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‌ෂ ජනරාල් අනූෂ පැල්පිට යන මහත්වරු කොළඹ මහාධිකරණය හමුවේ ඇප අයෑදුම් කරමින් අභියාචනයක්‌ ඉදිරිපත් කර තිබේ.

ඒ අනුව මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් නීතිපතිට හා පොලිස්‌ මූල්‍ය අපරාධ කොට්‌ඨාසයේ අධ්‍යක්‌ෂවරයාට ලබන 20 වැනිදා අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටින ලෙස කොළඹ මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් කුලතුංග මහතා නියම කළේය.

මේ අතර හිටපු ජනාධිපති ලේකම් ලලිත් වීරතුංග සහ විදුලි සංදේශ නියාමන කොමිෂන් සභාවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‌ෂ අනූෂ පැල්පිට මහත්වරුන් වෙනුවෙන් අධිකරණයෙන් නියම කළ වන්දිය ගෙවීමට මැදිහත්වීමට ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‌ෂය සූදානම් වෙයි.

ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‌ෂය නියෝජනය කරන පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයකුගෙන් රුපියල් ලක්‌ෂයක මුදලක්‌ද, ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‌ෂයේ පළාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රීවරයකුගෙන් රුපියල් පනස්‌ දහසක්‌ද, පළාත් පාලන ආයතන සභිකයකුගෙන් රුපියල් 25,000 ක මුදලක්‌ද එකතු කිරීමට නියමිතය. පරිත්‍යාගශීලින්ගෙන්ද ඒ සඳහා මුදල් ලබා ගැනීමට අපේක්‍ෂා කෙරේ.

සිල් සමාදන් වන බෞද්ධ උපාසක උපාසිකාවන්ට සිල් රෙදි ලබාදිය යුතු බවට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සම්බුද්ධ ජයන්ති මහෝත්සවය සඳහා පත්කළ රාජ්‍ය කමිටුව නිර්දේශයක්‌ අනුව සිල් රෙදි ලබාදීම සිදුව ඇතැයි ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‌ෂයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන මහතා පසුගියදා ප්‍රකාශ කළේය. ඒ අනුව හිටපු ජනාධිපතිවරයා එම නියෝගය දී ඇති බවද ඒ මහතා පැවසීය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සිලයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද යෝජනාවේ නිර්දේශ කඩිනමින් ඉටු කිරීම සඳහා නිශ්චිත හා පැහැදිලි කාල රාමුවක්‌ සහ යාන්ත්‍රණයක්‌ ස්‌ථාපිත කළ යුතු යෑයි එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සිලයේ මහ කොමසාරිස්‌ සෙයිද් රාද් අල් හුසේන් මහතා ස්‌විට්‌සර්ලන්තයේ ජිනීවා නුවරදී පසුගියදා ප්‍රකාශ කර තිබේ.

දැනට පවතින ත්‍රස්‌තවාදය පිටුදැකීමේ පනත වෙනුවට ජාත්‍යන්තර මානව හිමිකම් ප්‍රමිති හා තත්ත්ව වලට අනුකූලව නව පනතක්‌ ගෙන එන්නැයි ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයට නැවත වරක්‌ දැනුම් දෙන බවද එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් පිළිබඳ මහ කොමසාරිස්‌වරයා පැවැසීය.

‘අතුරුදන්වූවන් පිළිබඳ සෙවීමේ කාර්යාලයේ කටයුතු කඩිනමින් ආරම්භ කළ යුතුයි. එමෙන්ම හමුදාව යටතේ තිබෙන ඉඩම් මුදා හැරීම ඇතුළු විශ්වාසය ගොඩනැඟීම සඳහා අවශ්‍ය පියවර කඩිනමින් ගත යුතු බවද ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයට අවධාරණය කරනවා. දීර්ඝ කාලයක්‌ තිස්‌සේ ත්‍රස්‌තවාදය පිටුදැකීමේ පනත යටතේ තිබෙන නඩු කටයුතු ආදිය කඩිනමින් විසඳීමට කටයුතු කළ යුතු බව ද සිහිපත් කරනවා. එමෙන්ම ජාත්‍යන්තර මානව හිමිකම් ප්‍රඥප්තීන්වලට අනුව දැනට තිබෙන පනත වෙනුවට නව පනතක්‌ ගෙන ආ යුතු බව නැවත වරක්‌ ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයට සිහිපත් කළ යුතුයි. උතුරේ පීඩිතයන්ගේ විරෝධතාවලින් ප්‍රතිසංස්‌කරණ සිදුවන්නේ මන්දගාමීව බව පෙනී යනවා. එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ මානව හිමිකම් කවුන්සිලයට ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ සම අනුග්‍රහය යටතේ ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද යෝජනාවේ නිර්දේශ කඩිනමින් ඉටු කිරීමට ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජය පියවර ගත යුතුයි’. එම නිර්දේශ සහ අනෙකුත් ක්‍රියාමාර්ග ඉටු කිරීම සඳහා නිශ්චිත හා පැහැදිලි කාලරාමුවක්‌ සහ යාන්ත්‍රණයක්‌ ස්‌ථාපිත කළ යුතු යෑයිද ශ්‍රී ලංකාව සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදහස්‌ දක්‌වමින් මානව හිමිකම් මහ කොමසාරිස්‌ සෙයිද් රාද් අල් හුසේන් මහතා පවසා තිබේ.

එක්‌සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය, ඇමරිකා එක්‌සත් ජනපදය හා යුරෝපා රටවල්වලට අනුව අපේ රට පලනය කරන්නට ඉඩ දෙනවාද යන්න පාලකයන් විසින් තීරණය කළ යුතුය. මේ ආකාරයට අපේ රටේ අභ්‍යන්තර ප්‍රශ්නවලට මැදිහත් වන්නට මොවුන්ට ඉඩදිය යුතුද යන්න රටේ ජනතාව තීරණය කළ යුතුය. යුරෝපා සංගමය ජී.එස්‌.පී. ප්ලස්‌ පෙන්වමින් ත්‍රස්‌තවාදය වැළැක්‌වීමේ පනත අහෝසි කිරීම, ජනාධිපතිවරයා සතු හදිසි අවස්‌ථා නියෝග, අත්‍යවශ්‍ය සේවා නියෝග පැනවීමේ බලය අහෝසි කිරීම, සමලිංගික විවාහ සිදු කිරීමට නීතිමය ඉඩකඩ හදාදීම, ෙµඩරල් ව්‍යවස්‌ථාව සැකසීමේ ක්‍රියාදාමය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම, ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ නීති පද්ධතිය වෙනස්‌ කිරීම සඳහා බලපෑම් කරමින් සිටී.

දක්‍ෂිණ හා කටුනායක – කොළඹ අධිවේගී මාර්ගයන් විදෙස්‌ සමාගමකට බදු දීමට සාකච්ඡා පැවැත්වෙමින් තිබේ. මෙම අධිවේගී මාර්ග වසර 15 කට හෝ 20 කට බදු දී මුදල් එකවර ලබා ගැනීමට නියමිතය.

මේ අතර ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් සංස්‌ථාව සතු ඉන්ධන පිරවුම්හල් චීනයට ලබාදීමට නියමිතය.

රජය යටතේ තබා ගනිමින් ලාභ ඉපයිය හැකි ව්‍යාපාර මේ ආකාරයට පිටරටට විකුණන්නේ කවර හේතුවකට දැයි අපට නම් නොතේරේ. වසර පහකට බලයට පැමිණි මේ ආණ්‌ඩුවට රටේ සම්පත් මේ ආකාරයට විකුණා දමන්නට කිසිදු සදාචාරාත්මක අයිතියක්‌ නොමැත. මේ ආකාරයට විකුණා දමන දේ අනාගතයේ බිහිවන වෙනත් රජයක්‌ යටතේ යළිත් ජනසතු කළ යුතු අතරම මෙලෙස ජනතාව සතු ජාතික දේපළ යළිත් විකුණා දමන්නට නොහැකි වන ආකාරයට නව නීති රීතිද ගෙන ආ යුතුය.

සයිටම් ප්‍රශ්නය යළිත් බරපතළ තැනකට පැමිණ තිබේ. යළිත් වරක්‌ වෛද්‍ය වර්ජන ආරම්භ වී තිබේ. එය ඉදිරියේ දී තවදුරටත් වර්ධනය වනු ඇත. උග්‍ර ණය උගුලකට සිරවී සිටින නෙවිල් ප්‍රනාන්දු රෝහල රාජ්‍ය බැංකුවකට සින්න වීමට ආසන්න අවස්‌ථාවේ රජය මැදිහත් වී එම රෝහල බේරාගෙන ඇතැයි දූෂණ විරෝධී හඬ සංවිධානයද පසුගියදා චෝදනා කළේය. මේවාට විරුද්ධව ජනතාව අධිකරණයට යා යුතුය.

මේ හේතුවෙන් සෑම මසකටම රුපියල් මිලියන 25 බැගින් වසර 10 ක කාලයක්‌ සඳහා රුපියල් මිලියන 3000 ක මුදලක්‌ ගෙවීමට රජයට සිදුව තිබේ. මේ පසුපස ඇති කතාව රටට හෙළිකළ යුතුව තිබේ. මේ ප්‍රශ්නය නිසා රජයේ වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාලවල වෛද්‍ය උපාධි අපේක්‌ෂකයන් හයදහස්‌ පන්සියයක්‌ මාස හතක කාලයක්‌ තිස්‌සේ අධ්‍යාපනය අහිමිව සිටිති. ආණ්‌ඩුවේ හිතුවක්‌කාර ඇමැතිවරුන්ගේ වහසි බස්‌ නවතා මේ ප්‍රශ්නයට සාධාරණ විසඳුමක්‌ ලබාදිය යුතුය.

ජීවන වියදම අහස උසට නැඟ තිබේ. සහල් කිලෝව රුපියල් 100 – 120 – 150 – 170 අතරය. පොල් ගෙඩිය රුපියල් 90 – 100 අතරය. අල හා බී ලූනු මිලද කිලෝව රුපියල් 160 – 180 අතරය. මෙලෙස ජීවන වියදම ඉහළ යැම සාමාන්‍ය ජනතාවට දරාගත නොහැක.

Forty empty years of Ranil’s politics

September 13th, 2017

H. L. D. Mahindapala

In a drama never seen in the Westminster tradition, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe had brazenly escorted his closest partner in cut-throat politics, Ravi Karunanayake, to the front benches of the House on the day the latter was forced to announce his resignation because of his involvement in the biggest financial scandal in the 70-year history of the Sri Lankan Parliament. Normally, the ruling elite would for the sake of self-preservation take prudent and cautious steps to dissociate itself from an accused party facing multi-million dollar scandals. This is an obvious necessity because any association with the accused party casts doubts on the credibility, integrity, viability and, most of all, the morality of the entire government. The government, therefore, keeps a healthy distance to make at least a pretense of having nothing to do with the accused party who is left to twist in the wind from the nearest hanging tree by the self-proclaimed moral majority.

A prime minister may, out of personal loyalty extend his backing privately but never in public. The moral backlash would be suicidal to any leader in the Westminster model if he decides to embrace publicly those who are tainted with corruption. But kicking all moral considerations and public opinion aside the Prime Minister, in a bizarre turn of events, escorted Ravi Karunanayake to his ministerial seat. Why did he go out of his way to assist his Assistant Leader? What message does this act convey to the public? Doesn’t this leave the unambiguous impression that the Prime Minister is hand in glove with the accused?  Or is the PM openly saying that there is no need for Karunanayake to worry now as he will be brought back to the front bench after the heat cools down later? Either way, it indicates that Wickremesinghe is, directly or indirectly, linked to the dealings that led to the resignation of Karunanayake.

The Prime Minister is a veteran parliamentarian, and a lawyer to boot, who should know, after all his years of experience in the Westminster system, that escorting corruption to one of the highest seats in Parliament reflects the lowest perversion of a kakocracy and not the highest values of a democracy. His act of enthroning corruption distorts and devalues the moral power of the fundamental principles of parliamentary practices and procedures needed for good governance.  Most of all, it is a reprehensible act that questions his integrity. Isn’t his failure to maintain the basic principles the primary cause for the dysfunctional state of Yahapalanaya today? On which side of political morality can he be when he escorts corruption and enthrones it in a ministerial seat in Parliament, eh?

As they say, fish begins to rot from the head and there is no doubt in the public mind that the major issues that are dragging the Yahapalanaya regime into incremental loss of public confidence have originated from the desk of Wickremesinghe. From day one of the Yahapalanaya regime the President put the responsibilities of initiating, implementing, policing (FCID) and the monitoring of major state affairs on Wickremesinghe’s shoulders. It was a huge responsibility going beyond the role of holding a seat in the Prime Minister’s office. His role was to be the moral arbiter steering the state into a new moral order. In short, the responsibilities were showered on him with the expectation of processing policies and programs through clean channels to achieve the highest moral standards promised in the Yahapalanaya manifesto. .

The promised venna-suck (pronunciation : when-a-suck, meaning change/difference) in the Yahapalanaya regime was to achieve a squeaky clean administration. In fact, Yahapalanaya was born out of the need for a higher morality and its fundamental task was to act within unimpeachable parameters of political conduct. Clearly, the mandate given to Ranil (Mr. Clean”) Wickremesinghe on January 8, 2015, was to give moral leadership. The most appealing promise given to the electorate was to lift the nation from the depths of the moral morass into which it has fallen. Not only that, it promised to place the state on the Himalayan heights of purity.

The political capital they earned on January 8, 2015 was mainly to implement this promise. The crisis that is facing the government today is because Wickremesinghe, the CEO of the Yahapalanaya regime, has failed in his duty to give moral leadership. His failure is totally unacceptable. For instance, on January 9, 2015 he was sworn in as Prime Minister. And the rot began in February 2015 – less than a month after he became Prime Minister — with Wickremesinghe importing the head of the Central Bank (CB) from Singapore, Arjuna Mahendran. Apart from being Wickremesinghe’s willing lackey, Mahendran is a highly overrated spinner of bogus theories that impressed the new fixer of the Yahapalanaya regime.

Mahendran walked into the Central Bank making it known to all and sundry that Wickremesinghe was his Uncle”. Every other statement that fell from his big mouth began with the declaration : As Uncle Wickremesinghe told me….”  etc. In other words, he was out to impress the officers of the CB that he was not a mere bureaucratic functionary of the state. He wanted to make sure that his words came from the highest source of the land. And with that kind of Uncle-Nephew” relationship anyone going against his word would be challenging the words of his Uncle”. In fact, he is on record saying that it was Uncle Wickremesinghe” who authorized the bond auction. All this goes to prove W. Dahanayake’s famous description of the UNP as the Uncle-Nephew Party”. Mahendran took it one step further and made the Central Bank also into an Uncle-Nephew” enterprise.

This appointment has been the primary cause of the current crisis faced by the nation. It signifies Wickremesinghe’s inability to make the correct choices on any critical issue. It confirms that all his solutions, whether in politics or economics, have ended in disasters. It indicates that hasn’t a clue of either the nature of the crisis facing the nation or its solution. Each time he comes up with a kokatath-thailaya (cure all) it has ended in dragging the nation and himself into worse situations. His standard solution is to pass the buck by appointing committees – endless committees that ended like his career in absolutely nothing. His choice of Arjuna Mahendran marked the beginning of the end of Wickremesinghe.

He has not explained why he imported Mahendran when there were competent and experienced bankers at home who had worked their way up to the top. But for reasons best known to Wickremesinghe he handpicked the Singaporean.  Lo and behold, that appointment begat the Singaporean’s son-in-law, Arjun Aloysius. Who begat the bond scam. Which begat the Presidential commission. Which begat Ravi Karunanayake. Which begat his resignation.  All of which begat the crisis we are in. Which makes Wickremesinghe the father of the political crisis facing Yahapalanaya regime and, more importantly, the moral crisis arising from his abject failure to honour  his promises.

The stinking moral crisis that is flying off the fan is not what he promised. This is the anti-thesis of the venna-suck (difference) he promised to the people. The venna-suckers who rush to defend the PM will, no doubt, cite the failures of Mahinda Rajapakse, his immediate predecessor. This is their last resort to defend and polish the tainted image of a leader who promised the ideal state free from corruption.  Pointing the finger at his predecessor’s past sins is a cheap trick to deflect attention away from the current corrupt hole into which he has fallen. It is not a valid defense, not after promising a venna-suck. In any case, two wrongs do not add up to one right.

The venna-suckers should know by now that their leaders stridently promised not to repeat the missteps of their predecessor when they dangled the Yahapalanaya as the alternative to Mahinda Rajapakse. The change / difference can come only from a new moral order. That is what Wickremesinghe has to deliver if he is to save his neck. In the next election people will be asked to vote not on Mahinda Rajapakse’s mistakes but on Ranil Wickremesinghe’s promises. He promised to do better than his predecessors by ruling from the highest moral plane. Who can save him if he fails to deliver his promises?

The sum and substance of the manifesto of the Yahapalanaya was to run the state on incorruptible principles. Today he stands as the lily that festered smelling far worse than Meetotamulla. The disillusioned people feel that they have been taken for a ride by Wickremesinghe whose own rotten record has risen, in leaps and bounds, way above that of his predecessor. Today he stands out as the irredeemable venna-sucker who had betrayed the principles he promised to keep.

The people have already given their verdict on Mahinda Rajapakase in the last election. It is Wickremesinghe who is in the dock now. People will be asked to vote on Wickremesinghe’s record and not on Mahinda Rajapakse’s performance. But Wickremesinghe is lurching from crisis to crisis unable to get a grip on the accelerating speed with which he is going down the slippery slope. When his moral worth hits rock bottom, sooner or later, will it be difficult to guess the verdict of people at the next election?

It is against this background that he fronted up, with pomp and bravado, at the gallery of pictures designed to celebrate his four decades in politics. Truth to tell, the missing pictures in the gallery would have been more dramatic and revealing than his self-adulatory poses hung on the wall. (More of this later.)

I must confess that I haven’t seen the exhibition but, without doing so, I can confirm that the whole show must be as interesting as the used tissues floating in Wickremesinghe’s toilet before they are flushed out. What is there in his career to make him look like a worthy leader of a nation, really? A leader is defined by the achievements he has scored in facing the challenges of the time and not by the number of times he became the prime minister. Any objective survey of his career will conclude that he has failed the big tests that confronted him and the nation:

Test 1: The nation was desperately in need of moral purity and economic salvation. He was hailed as Mr. Clean” with a special gift for managing the economy and producing results. That fiction was nailed when the bond scandal – the biggest financial racket in the nation’s history – exposed him as a person of interest in the fraud. With the bond scandal his moral status has nose-dived like a plane without fuel. Besides, his role in the bond scandal stands out as another example where he has exhibited his extraordinary capacity to create crises more than solving them.

Test 2 : The overwhelming challenge  faced by the nation in the post-independent era was the North-South conflict. Leader after leader got stuck in the longest running war of Asia. Wickremesinghe’s smart idea to solve it was the Cease Fire Agreement (CFA) he signed with Velupillai Prabhakaran. It was an abject appeasement which gave the upper hand to Prabhakaran. But in his blind arrogance Wickremesinghe believed that he had surpassed the record of Dutugemunu. Believing in his own fiction that he had solved the problem he removed the check-points and the barriers guarding the city. Prabhakaran knew better. He knew that Wickremesinghe was only a cardboard hero of the pin-heads in the UNP and not the people. He ran rings round Wickremesinghe and shot his CFA to indecipherable bits and pieces. Wickremesinghe has never recovered from the stigma attached to this political failure in which thousands died because of his stupidity. If the bond scandal ruined his reputation as Mr. Clean” and as a competent economic manager then the CFA proved that he was also a political idiot who believed that he could save the nation by selling a part of it to a fascist dictator. As stated earlier, his solutions exacerbated the status quo and made the consequences of his cock-eyed acts unbearable to the nation.

Test 3: Throughout his political career he put his faith in the West believing that they would come to his rescue the day he needs them. That day came on January 8, 2015 when he got back to Temple Trees” with the help of CIA, RAW, minorities and 50-odd NGOs. But to his dismay he discovered that the West was not going to risk their necks for him the way he had risked his neck for them. Let down by the friends he cultivated in the West, he had no alternative but to do a quick volte face and turn towards the East. That put an end to his reputation as a maestro on international relations.

Test 4 : He has overawed his UNPers by posing as a master political strategist who can outwit his rivals. But throughout his 40-year political career he has never been able to take the party to the peak of power. He could never rise above the No.2 position. He is a leader who had conceded publicly that non-UNPers are fit to lead the nation better than he could. In fact, in playing second fiddle to Gen. Sarath Fonseka and Maithripala Sirisena he has confirmed incontrovertibly that the people have no faith in him. He knows that he does not have the capacity to be No.1. With all the political heritage and assets of the Grand Old Party of the nation behind him why has he surrendered the leadership of the nation to non-UNPers? Why is it that the people had refused repeatedly to place any trust in him? He leads the UNP only to install SLFPers and outsiders in power. After 40 years in politics isn’t his greatest achievement in installing Maithripala Sirisena as President? What else is there to his glory?

In conceding the presidency to non-UNPers successively he has conceded openly that he is not fit to the lead the nation, or even his party. Maithripala Sirisena won because they UNPers voted en bloc for him. Even the UNPers flocked to vote for the non-UNP candidates because they never trusted Wickremesinghe’s commitment to save the nation from its internal and external enemies. The humiliating factor in all this is that he has never been ashamed of playing second fiddle as long as he got a share of power below No.1. He has been quite content to play the role of No.2. In the last election he was hoping to grab the presidential powers through constitutional manipulation. He was hoping that President Sirisena would devolve all the presidential powers to him and retire into a ceremonial role. But that strategy too failed. So what is the big achievement in Wickremesinghe’s political career?

If, as shown above, he has failed to manage the economy, failed to stem corruption in his regime, surrendered to Velupillai Prabhakaran, come a cropper in his foreign policy, dragged the nation down to the lowest moral depths and never won the ultimate prize in leadership throughout his 40 years in politics where can one find the glory in his career? There isn’t a single issue on which he can go down in history as the man who made a lasting contribution to the economic prosperity, domestic security, territorial integrity and national unity and harmony. The last saving grace would have been his image of Mr. Clean”. But after Wickremesinghe’s involvement in the bond scam that image has come crashing down like the mountain of muck at Meetotamulla.

It is obvious that the pictures hung at the gallery to glorify his past do not tell the full story. Those missing pictures would have traced his political trajectory far more dramatically and truthfully than the formal pictures hung on the wall. The missing pictures would have attracted more crowds than the ones exhibited on the walls. For instance, the pictures of Gonawila Sunil, one of his close chuckgolayas, coming out of jail before completing his term for raping a teenage girl would have had an electric impact on the visitors. So would the pictures of Gonawila Sunil receiving a JP-ship, with the blessings of his master.

These pictures are significant because they reveal that Wickremesinghe’s moral standards run on parallel lines with that of his underworld king-pin, Gonawila Sunil : one rapes teenagers and the other rapes the nation. His political path had run in a straight line from Gonawila Sunil to Karunanayake without wavering in between. Of course, there has been a slight deviation and that was to import his most costly albatross from Singapore.  But that is not the main issue. The issue that should be raised is simply this : what has he achieved in the intervening years, between Gonawila Sunil and Ravi Karunanayake, for him to crow and celebrate?

Let us begin by evaluating his claim that he has been the prime minister four times. Technically he is correct. But this claim fails to recognize that he was sacked from that post twice, first by his own party headed by Gamini Dissanayake and the second time when he was sitting blissfully at White House not knowing that his other partner in cut-throat politics Chandrika Kumaratunga (CBK) had stealthily cut all four legs of the chair in which he was sitting.

The details reveal that there is not much glory in the number of times he became prime minister. First, he became PM, after the assassination of President Premadasa because Sirisena Cooray who was offered the premiership by President D. B. Wijetunga refused to take it and nominated Wickremesinghe to the post. Wickremesinghe was not the first choice. He became the accidental PM with the blessings of Sirisena Cooray. Second time he failed to last long because he was sacked on charges of selling the nation to Prabhakaran by CBK. Third time too he became PM with the power of another Sirisena. It was also questionable because President Sirisena appointed him with a stroke of his pen when D. M. Jayaratne was still sitting in the chair as the legally appointed PM. Wickremesinghe was not the people’s choice.

Fourth time, the people again refused to make him the prime minister in his own right. He fell short of the majority he needed to be PM in a house of 225. He managed to become the PM because the President decided to give him the job. If he couldn’t become the PM with 50-odd NGOs, CIA, RAW, minorities what are his chances next time round when he would have eroded the feel good factor that gave him the bare minimum to creep in through the back door to the PM’s seat the last time?

When CBK sacked him the timing was perfect : she couldn’t have picked a more dramatic moment to humiliate her opponent. In her vindictive ways she tried to fix him by appointing a commission to investigate the Batalanda torture chambers. The she delivered the coup de grace : stabbed him in the back when he was in the White House knowing that the public would not rise to bring him back. She has also described him and his politics very aptly. Putting down his inability to articulate a clear political vision she said: Ranil-gay kattay pittu”. Also hitting him at the place where it hits most she said: Ranil katha-karan-nay katin noway.”

Now consider the other telling statistic which is bound to go down in the Guinness book of records. It is stunning. According to all known counts he has lost 29 elections in 40 years. Can anyone find another loser like Ranil Wickremesinghe? Of course, after forty years of experience he must be feeling now the hot winds of change breathing down his neck again. In his bones, he must be fully aware that the next psephological statistic will rise to thirty, whenever the next election is held.

If he couldn’t rise to power on his own steam with the consent of the people 29 times, if he always had to piggy-back on outside parties to perform short and temporary stints at Temple Trees”, if he was thrown out  of Temple Trees” by his own party headed by Gamini Dissanayake, if his gamble for peace with Prabhakaran – the most critical political mission of our time — led to utter failure, if the ground was cut under his feet by his then rival CBK when he was engaged in a charivari with Bush at the White House, inflicting the worst humiliation for a leader of a nation, if after 40 years he has failed to be Numero Uno, and if his economic management have shifted from  Perpetual Treasury to perpetual treachery,  if his future is as black as the back of well used clay pot in Gonawila Sunil’s kitchen, and, finally, if his climactic act capping forty years of parliamentary politics  is to escort Ravi Karunanayake to his ministerial seat what is there for him to celebrate, really?

The exhibition of pictures hung to highlight Wickremesinghe’s political career was meant to be an advertisement for his achievements. I am told that it is also meant to be a preliminary launch of his campaign to win the next presidential race. So far I have not seen media reports of the people flocking to see the amazing glories of forty years of nothingness. There were more people rolling up in bus loads to pay homage to Mahinda Rajapakse when he lost power than those lining up to view the glories of Ranil Wickremesinghe. Up until this moment of writing I’ve seen only Ravi Karunanayake standing behind him, perhaps as quid pro quo for escorting him to the well of the House on his day of reckoning.

If he wanted to draw a crowd he should have exhibited pictures of him burning the CBK- Neelan agreement in Parliament and then rushing to sign an agreement with Velupillai Prabhakaran giving El-lam to him. A picture of his banging pots and pans at street corners to bring down the cost of living would have brought at least some cynical smiles. Or to see him riding in bullock carts to protest against the government would have been hilarious. A replay of him offering TVs and jeans to farmers too would have been a sight to watch. His pathetic performance of spitting on the heroic soldiers wending their way to victory is something that our soldiers will never forget. Nor will they forget him dodging  February 4 celebration of Independence Day because there was no glory to him in watching Mahinda Rajapakse taking  the salute. And  his  doing a U- turn from the west to the east is also a memorable feat.

The fundamental flaw in RWs character has been his inability to read the signs of his time. Time and again he has failed to decipher what’s happening under his very nose. Our village boys knew the lie of the land better than him. As everyone knows, when they were advancing victoriously, capturing Thoppigala, he ridiculed them as some futile rock climbers. But they knew better. So how can he lead the nation when he fails grasp the meaning of events under his own feet? He, in short, does not know whether he is in Pamankada or Alimankada, to quote his buddy Ravi Karunanayake.

He has now come to the end of his political career. He has nowhere to go from here. The next election will be definitely his last election. It will decide his fate forever. Right now he thinks he can survive by perverting parliamentary practices and procedures. His aim is to use parliament as his rubber stamp. He has appointed a Leader of the Opposition, R. Sambanthan, who is like his government: neither of them commands a majority in the House to stand on their own two feet. The SLFPers and other catchers” will have to back him all the way for him to maintain his majority. Whether the marriage of convenience between the two temporary partners – UNP –SLFP – will remain intact is yet to be seen. Certainly their honeymoon is over. How long the friction and the bickering that is bedeviling the misalliance can hold them together is going to be a perpetual tricky point.

It is the corruption in which he wallows that stinks to high heaven. He has even corrupted the Parliament. To begin with he survives in Parliament with the backing of the MPs who were rejected by the people. Then for his survival he forced a dissolution of Parliament to make the COPE report on the Bond scandal null and void. The manipulated and indecent dissolution of parliament to cover-up his Bond scandal confirms his utter contempt for the best of parliamentary traditions. In his usual delusional way he fancies that his short-term poli-tricks can sustain him in power for at least the balance of his term. But he forgets that his previous three short-terms as premier failed to keep him going for the full term because his cheap poli-tricks boomeranged on him. Knowing his past failures, this time he began his fourth term by passing a law to last at least four-and-a-half years. However, there is no guarantee that shifting loyalties in a Parliament notorious for cross-overs can sustain him in power for his anticipated full term.

He is also at logger heads with the President who still has the power to pull the rug under his feet, if he decides to undercut him. Besides, Wickremesinghe right now is walking on pappadums which are crumbling each time he takes a step in whichever direction he turns. His options are not only limited but dwindling. He has not much room to flex his muscles the way he wants as at the time he was sworn in as PM.. In short, he is on the brink of extinction and his future hangs on the mercy of the President. The judgment of the people will, of course, will not be so merciful.

He is desperately hanging on to power because he fears that the guillotine (FCID) he introduced to behead his opponents will chop his neck off after the next election. One things is quite certain : he is one politician who will not need a grave digger. Why should he? After all, he has been his own grave digger for so long that any cost of hiring a grave digger will be a total waste of  money because he has been hard at work in digging his own hole for forty years.

Foolish Government antagonize China and Russia by obliging the United States

September 13th, 2017

By : A.A..NIZAM – MATARA

Sirisena-Ranil western and Indian slavish Junta claims that they have gained friendship with all countries in the world but openly displays their slavery to the western countries especially to the International thug the United States. This foolish government has issued a statement, clearly on the behest of the United States deploring the nuclear test carried out by North Korea on 3rd September (almost 10 days after the event) and warning that its repeated violations of UN resolutions pose a grave threat to the countries in the region and beyond.  No other country except the American puppet South Korea has issued a condemnation like this.

North Korea is a strategically important country for both Russia and China having their borders on both sides of North Korea.  Recent American threats to North Korea were extensively condemned by Presidents Putin and Xi Jinping at the recently concluded 9th BRICS summit held in China and they emphasized that they will not allow any harm to befall on North Korea

Instead of issuing a statement on the behest of the international thug the Sirisena-Ranil Junta should understand that North Korea carried the nuclear test on 3rd September only three days after two nuclear-capable US B-1B strategic bombers conducted their own test” alongside four F-35Bs and a few Japanese F-15s. It was pointed out at the BRICS Summit that only a freeze on US/Japan/South Korea military drills; will lead to a freeze on North Korea’s nuclear program; and then diplomacy can take over. The Summit also condemned the United States for evoking nuclear capabilities” as a conflict resolution mechanism.

The Russian President addressing a media conference in the sidelines of the BRICS summit on 5th September, after the North Korean nuclear test, said that North Korea Would Rather Eat Grass Than Give Up Nuclear Weapons”.. He also warned that  imposing sanctions on North Korea over its nuclear missile program would be counter-productive and said threats of military action could trigger “a global catastrophe.”  Russia, which shares a border with North Korea, has repeatedly joined China in calling the belligerent United States for negotiations with Pyongyang, suggesting that the United States and South Korea halt all major war games in exchange for North Korea halting its testing program.

The Sirisena-Ranil Junta’s condemnation of North Korea evidently shows that Sri Lanka has obligingly accepted the recent idea floated by the United States for all countries to cut economic links with North Korea to try to strong-arm Pyongyang into changing its behaviour.

Foreign policy analysts have pointed out that the unstable regime in Pyongyang has concluded that its only hope of self-preservation, in the face of provocative threats from the Trump administration, is to try and expand its nuclear arsenal as quickly as possible. They say that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is acutely conscious of the brutal end of Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, after they abandoned their so-called weapons of mass destruction.

US Defence Secretary James Mad Dog” Mattis has warned North Korea that it faced a massive military response” to any threat to the US or its allies. The bellicose Trump himself has warned of a US nuclear attack against North Korea when he declared last month that North Korea will confront fire and fury like the world has never seen.”

After September 3rd nuclear test, the White House, along with the American media have turned its fire on China and Russia, underscoring the fact that the US confrontation with North Korea is bound up with far broader strategic aims. American strategists regard domination of the vast Eurasian land mass as the key to US global hegemony and China as the chief obstacle to that goal. US media have also accused that China and Russia were providing economic help” to North Korea. Reports said that what is now being actively discussed in Washington is a total economic embargo, which itself is tantamount to an act of war, and the cutting of trade with those countries who continue to conduct any link with North Korea, above all China and Russia.

The belligerent Trump, who is reported to be preparing trade war measures against China has said that the United States is considering, in addition to other options, stopping all trade with any country doing business with North Korea, and the U.S Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin confirmed to the media that he was preparing a sanctions package to send to the President, for his strong consideration.

Economic Analysts point out that if that happens the implications for the global economy are immense and would result in a collapse of trade, plunging the world into economic depression, as in the 1930s. They say that such a possibility is being actively considered is a measure of the depth of the economic and geo-political tensions wracking the world. They also state that the threat of all-out trade war between the world’s two largest economies, China and the United States will be accompanied by the preparations for all-out military conflict.

The Trump administration has accelerated the diplomatic, economic and military challenge to China which was mooted by the former U.S President Barak Obama under his pivot to Asia.” Programme.  Under this programme a massive US military build-up in North East Asia, including the installation of anti-ballistic missile systems and huge and highly provocative joint US-South Korean war games, is directed more at fighting a nuclear war with China than a conflict with the small, backward country of North Korea.

As well as ramping up the confrontation on the Korean Peninsula, the Trump administration has given the green light for more freedom of navigation” operations in another of the region’s volatile flashpoints—the South China Sea. The Wall Street Journal reported that the US Pacific Command is preparing to sail warships and send military aircraft directly into waters and airspace claimed by China around its islets, two or three times in the next few months as part of a regular schedule.

In Europe, the International Thug US is reported to be escalating its confrontation with Russia by taking the first steps towards annulling the 1987 Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with the former Soviet Union. German sources have warned, the danger is that the US will construct new missiles and station them in Europe,” raising the terrifying spectre of a nuclear war in Europe between the two countries the US and Russia and that both possess thousands of nuclear warheads.

According to the joint Russian-Chinese de-escalation plan, North Korea would stop work on its missile program in exchange for the US and South Korea halting large-scale war games, allowing tensions to gradually subside.  Russia believes that the policy of putting pressure on Pyongyang to stop its nuclear missile programme is misguided and futile. President Putin has pointed out that the region’s problems should only be settled through a direct dialogue of all the parties concerned without any preconditions and has added that provocations, pressure and militarist and insulting rhetoric are dead-end roads.

Under these circumstances Sirisena-Ranil Junta should feel shameful for issuing a warning to North Korea on the behest of the International thug the United States and thereby antagonizing China and Russia the two countries that firmly stood with us throughout the war period and would help us in the future as well.  If an all out war breaks out unfortunately the government should take full responsibility for all the difficulties that may be confronted by the people of this country.

Government is trying to sell Fishery Harbour Corporation office and harbours ……JVP

September 13th, 2017

Dr Sarath Obeysekera 

I can see that JVP is so bankrupt because they have already lost the grass root level of support from youngsters ,hence they are trying their best to catch the audience by uttering nonsense .

That may be the reason why they talk utter nonsense about fishery harbours being sold .Mutwal/Modera fishery harbour was abandoned after  construction of the Dikovita Harbour and Sri Lanka Navy was using to park the arrested fishing boats which were used to transport migrants to Australia .Previous defence Secretary was plannings to acquire the harbour to be used to park such boats ,thus depriving The Corporation of any financial benefits.In this backdrop ,corporation offered the harbour for private development .

Bankrupt SPLA with  the connivance of a son of a fishery minister who sold the Fishery Corporation land to some scrupulous Russians to build a fish canning factory ,later bolted away because someone  was asking one rupee from  every fish-can produced ,keep accusing the ex fishery minister also for selling out Modera harbour .

The  investors, genuinely obtained the land for lease from  the corporation ,manage to secure a financing package from private sector to develop the harbour,Now the harbour is taking shape to become one of the state of art Fishery Boat Repair Yard with private investment is gearing to repair fishing trawlers plying in the area after lifting of EU sanctions.
JVP and some brainless politicians who have not even  visited the yard to see the unprecedented development are accusing various ministers for taking bribes .

One would like to also ask how JVP had Access to funds to build their head office in Battaramulle if they are so above board ?

JVP should be ashamed of telling utter lies to the public to get their attention. People feel sorry for the JVP as they will not get even a single seat new parliament seat after the amendment to the constitution,

That may be the reason why JVP keep uttering their funeral songs prior to their ultimate political death

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

SLFP’S FUTURE In Game of Thrones, game changes radically

September 13th, 2017

By Dr.Dayan Jayatilleka Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Chandrika faction fails to understand MR is the biggest brand the SLFP has

I had been requested by Mr. Bandaranaike to meet him every Wednesday with Mervyn de Silva.” 

– Elmo Gooneratne, Reminiscences,
CT,September 8, 2017.

When the British uncovered Soviet spies in the Establishment, they often looked the other way because imprisonment would send shock waves throughout the system and disturb social stability and consensus.

The British knew how to manage these things. The Lankans do not. Lalith Weeratunga was the last serving member of a distinguished tribe of gentlemanly civil servants, the survivors of which are Godfrey Gunatilleke, Neville Jayaweera, Tissa Devendra, Bradman Weerakoon and Susil Siriwardhana.

He has been imprisoned and heavily fined for a victimless crime. His careless compliance or impropriety pales into insignificance in comparison with the cold villainy of Mr. Clean Out, the Boss of the bond scam bosses.

The very image of the respectable, affable, hardworking Lalith Weeratunga in handcuffs would have sent psychological shockwaves through the State system and polarised society. It triggered the realisation in me that there are two types of players in this town: those who had better book their one-way tickets to the US or UK just before the national elections of 2019/2020 and those who need not do so.

The Government has failed to understand that even if Mahinda is out of the way, there is Gota, and if Gota is out of the way, there is Chamal, and if Chamal is out of the way, there is Dinesh, and if Dinesh is out of the way there is Dullas

Meanwhile, the Yahapalana Government assures us that the project of Constitutional change, a project that in any self–respecting country is the most sovereign of processes, is motivated and driven by purely national considerations and compulsions.

This claim is made nonsense of by the official testimony of US Assistant Secretary of State Alice Wells, who identified the wellsprings of the reform agenda and confirmed that our Constitutional reform process, among other things, will be under the oversight” of the UN.

These resolutions committed the Sri Lankan Government to transitional justice and prevention of the recurrence of the violence… Specific steps include Constitutional reform devolving more administrative power from the Central Government to Sri Lanka’s regions… and a credible mechanism to investigate and prosecute alleged war crimes. The United Nations will continue its oversight of the implementation of these steps through March 2019,” Ms. Wells said.’ (dailymirror.lk/article)

How did we wind up a UN protectorate as it were, having won Asia’s longest war? And what on earth is the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) doing in a Government that has made these commitments, despite the opposition or dissent signalled by President Sirisena (if we are to believe his speech on the party’s 66th anniversary— which I do). What is to become, electorally, of the SLFP, or that section of the SLFP which remains in the Government which is proceeding along the rails prescribed by the US and is driven by the Ruthless Rootless” UNP?

The SLFP was conceived of and born as a moderate alternative to and a democratic substitute for, the rightwing, pro-Western, comprador capitalist UNP. It is built for that purpose. That is its raison d’etre. According to the New Testament, Jesus poses the existential questions: What use is salt if it loses its savour? What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?” The essential principle involved in these questions is true in any and every realm of endeavour including the political. What befalls a political party if it loses its role and function and its way? What does it profit a politician if he gains all his Cabinet perks but loses his vote base?

The Government is trying to dodge an election of any sort, like a tethered man trying to dodge a bullet.

The JO-SLPP bloc may say to the Government what IRA’s said to Maggie Thatcher after the Brighton bomb blast: you have to be lucky every time, but we have to get lucky only once.” The Government can dodge elections only so long. It can run but it can’t hide. Sooner rather than later, an election will catch up with it. The UNP will lose, probably badly, but it will survive.

There is less at stake. The ‘official’ SLFP however will risk all. If it is beaten into third place as is likely, what will it do? Stay with the Government and go into extinction at the national elections of 2019-2020, hoping to resurrect itself after?

If Chandrika and her serfs hope that the JO-SLPP will be decapitated by legal action, they have failed to calculate the effect of UNP-driven punitive action on the SLFP vote-base, which will react against the SLFP collaborators with fury.

The Government has also failed to understand that even if Mahinda is out of the way, there is Gota, and if Gota is out of the way, there is Chamal, and if Chamal is out of the way, there is Dinesh, and if Dinesh is out of the way there is Dullas.

Who does the UNP have to run for President in 2019 when the dynamic will be one of throwing the rascals out”? Ranil, Fonny, or Champika? Who stands uncompromised and nationally popular?

What the Chandrika faction fails to understand is that just as the UNP ran on DS Senanayaka’s achievement of obtaining Independence (Hence the Father of the Nation”), Mahinda Rajapaksa is the biggest brand name that the SLFP has available to display—the man who swiftly won Asia’s longest war beating a dreadful, historically emotive enemy, reunified the state, resurrected the economy and transformed the face of the country.

How did we wind up a UN protectorate as it were, having won Asia’s longest war? And what on earth is the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) doing in a Government that has made these commitments, despite the opposition or dissent signalled by President Sirisena  What is to become, electorally, of the SLFP…

Insofar as the 2009 victory was a Second Independence, MR is the equivalent of D.S. Senanayake. Unlike DS he is also alive and active, and is the most loved pubic personality in the country.

In the SLFP canon he is second only to SWRD Bandaranaike, the founding father– and for the current generations of voters perhaps a more significant figure because they never knew SWRD. 2009 was the second 1956.

Running on the SLFP ticket without and against Mahinda Rajapaksa and hoping to retain the loyalty of SLFP voters would be as outrageously silly as Liu Shao Chi or Deng Hsiao Ping trying to wrest the Communist Party away from a live Mao Ze Dong and hoping to retain the loyalty of the party’s peasant base!

 In the SLFP canon he is second only to SWRD Bandaranaike, the founding father– and for the current generations of voters perhaps a more significant figure because they never knew SWRD. 2009 was the second 1956

 

The SLFP faction in Government has few choices. The LSSP exited the UF coalition in 1975 and even that proved too late—it was wiped out in 1977. Ditto the CPSL which quit in 1976. If the SLFP leaves the Yahapalana coalition after an electoral defeat at the upcoming Local Government or Provincial council elections, why should or would the JO accept it except as the tuft of a tail? And why should the UNP retain its services?

The only momentum to catch is the anti-UNP pendulum swing. The only wave to surf is the anti-Government wave. The SLFP has to pivot right now, get on the exit ramp and head for the exits. It has sins to wash off, credibility to restore, and catching up to do as an anti-UNP party.

The SLFP deserves a rousing cheer for its stand on Constitutional change: no abolition of the executive Presidency, no transfer of the Governor’s powers to the Chief Minister, no amalgamation of provinces, and no abolition of the Concurrent list.

In Game of Thrones, the game has changed radically, as we all know. With the White Walker zombies at the gates, the only dividing line that counts, as Jon Snow says, is between the living and the dead; those who are breathing and those who are not. With the Western White Walkers’ spear-carriers, the Green Walkers, on a state-liquidating rampage, the only dividing line that counts in Sri Lankan politics today is between those who have a politico-electoral future beyond 2020 and those who don’t. Until it quits this Government, the official SLFP will remain stranded in the camp of the electoral Walking Dead.

ASSESSMENT: GOTABHAYA ENTERS POLITICS

September 13th, 2017

Gomin Dayasri Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Bemoan the non-availability of fresh material in the upper tiers of politics to replace the decrepit. For survival, the decayed leadership is ready to reach alliance with a devilish opponent. Unsuitable descendants await, both kinsmen and sycophants, located craftily in the wings of the second tier.


  • TNA, the official minuscule opposition, unable to reach acceptability outside the province
  • Maybe a UNP govt under a new leader is a more pragmatic alternate
  • Wings of SLFP will re-merge under a Sirisena and Rajapakse combine
  • MR’s chief executive stands convicted of failing to keep his boss on the correct path

Among this wild bunch, TNA’s honest Sampanthan stands like a beacon, living under trying circumstances under his invented avenger Wigneswaran and his crazy coots, making TNA, the official minuscular opposition – an unstable parochial outfit, unable to reach acceptability outside the province.

Return of the UNP under a Wickremasinghe administration is out of the reckoning – a cause long lost. Process will be accelerated if an unacceptable constitution is presented to the South leading to a breakdown. Ongoing stupidity will bind the divided SLFP.

MR’s comprehension was not beyond what he last heard from the last meeeting Understatement of a man that won the war many said was unwinnable. Yet, there is an element of wisdom in the utterance

UNP as a party is ahead of its leader in public esteem. Maybe a UNP govt under a new leader is a more pragmatic alternate: prevents their first line of defence from crossing to enemy territory in disgust? Ranil is less self-centred than Mahinda, prepared to yield place to a stronger candidate, as he did in 2015, decision he rues in hindsight. President Sirisena short on votes; waits long to eat into the disgusted UNP’s bases to strengthen his domain. Wings of the SLFP will re-merge under a Sirisena and Rajapakse combine. Promises another corrupt regime in the making. Join the devil to keep afloat is a staying principle. It sidelines Gota – suits Mahinda and Basil. Necessity will make Gota play second fiddle.

If Gotabhaya stands instead of Mahinda as the Presidential/Premiership candidate, majorities will soar in the south as he reflects the want of the Sinhala youth and voters express confidence in his delivery service. He holds a proven track record as against a lackadaisical Mahinda, whose chief executive stands convicted of failing to keep his boss on the correct path. Amount of Rs. 600 million is not peanuts sanctioned out of public funds near election time in distributing sil clothes to devotees. That is not a form of charity that acquires merit. Amount is mind-boggling but the price is equidistant to the fringe benefits picked by Yes Minister” gentlemen.

Elbowing the entrenched elite is virtually impossible where experienced Mahinda upstaged the politically naïve Gotabhaya Rajapakse – came on invitation but took over the centrefold at a seminar organized by an inexperienced coterie displaying Gota’s bare cupboard of talent from an over-crowded think tank [more a reservoir] that took months to gather. Worse, carries segments of the contaminated muck of the last regime.

Initial reaction was a horror story notwithstanding the presence of astute Kamal Guneratne, the military heavyweight with a spotless record and the wavering intellectual stimulator Dr. Dayan Jayatilleke; appear to be the maestro’s attaches for beckoning. Neglected to tap encyclopedic Prof. Gerry Pieris, an intellect par excellence at a well-attended seminar organized with military precision.

Writer declined an invitation to the podium at the seminar, felt uncomfortable in the company of a few disreputable that makes Gota, no more than a provider of sub standard intellectual feeder to his brother’s ancient wannabe cabinet. Gota committed hara-kiri at a posh seminar while a few good men lost their independence in the allotted six minute cameos to be branded as Gota boys” while the corrupt thrived in showing they are soon in business on the back of Gota’s name to mar him success in politics.

The ‘man of the match’ was Mahinda Rajapakse – his domineering personality made his kid brother look juvenile. Gota in a cabinet will play a lesser role than as Defence Secretary: being feeble in the tricky unaccustomed art of politics. His organization lacks depth in knowledgeable politics. Wasted, a chance of a lifetime, with many expecting a change that did not augur well, looking at the front rows of invitees. He needs to change his palace guards discreetly. Most likely ‘Team Gota’ is congratulating each other for a pop show presented with the same old timers singing the same signature tunes. It is economics that matter: a new economic order counts; constitution is the instrument of jointer of the two wings of the SLFP, to place old faces in new places.

UNP can only cut down losses (not win of course) if it brings in more dynamic players into key offices – otherwise leaves the field wide open in bringing – the twice rejected MR back to office with Gota in a reduced role, that would falter from the beginning to fail miserably only to re-establish the UNP at the next session of electioneering. In short the prime cry is for a leadership change. Spirit of our electorate is to rightly fault the holders in office and look lovingly at the team they defeated once, forgetting their sordid past. This psyche leaves Mother Lanka in a state of a troubled trauma?

UNP dropped a ‘sitter’ in a dream situation. They had overcome MR, colossus that won the war overcoming terrorism that created a mini world record; brought a majority of the SLFP under the UNP fold to present a coalition govt; split the SLFP down the centre; won goodwill by restoring the independence of justice; made friends with the heirs of terrorism in the north; replaced the opposition in the hands of a sympathetic TNA; boosted the confidence of a shattered police force that was loyal to the UNP at the elections. UNP are the repository of financial wizardly but handed the subject to the least qualified for the assignment – Ravi Karunanayake. That was the beginning of serial undoing for the UNP. It is finance and economics that bodes ill for the UNP with Ranil Wickremasinghe shattering his claim of a clean image after the bond issue.

Both Ranil and MR are fighting for survival and have no time to think long. Ranil begotten with affairs of state, with a few to rescue him from the mess his countrymen are facing due to the economic collapse caused by two successive regimes. A more leisurely paced MR was never a thinking man, as a esteemed columnist once stated – his comprehension was not beyond what he last heard from the last meeeting. Understatement of a man that won the war many said was unwinnable. Yet, there is an element of wisdom in the utterance.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike rid the party of corrupt parliamentarians that were found guilty of bribery under the Commission of Inquiry Act. She held bye-elections on schedule, won most but lost a few, but never feared of an ouster. She lost a Bill in Parliament and called for general elections and lost it, handed over power and returned to be restored at the next election with a 2/3 majority. MR’s and Ranil’s problems are that they give cover to many alleged crooks and inevitably carry questions marks on their shoulders?

It needs a hostile take over for a genuine regime-change within the political parties: a friendly succession would carry the renewable sewage, reincarnated to resurface as the next coming leader adapts on coming to power. Leaders are preferable to their handlers as they held moments of worthwhile glory. ‘Follow the Leader’ should not be the motto. A parallel leadership must be placed on a gradient/incline where few more of the front liners are trained to succeed in times of need. MR out of office looks at dowdy kinsmen and the boot licking fraternity while Wickremasinghe in office goes for dude friends alienated from realities of local conditions making amiable friends for fellowship on dull evenings. Maithripala Sirisena is a victim of hanging on with too many of dead wood sycophants waiting to jump ship and MR waits to pick any discarded rubbish let loose as he hopes to come to power without the peoples vote if possible under the queer provisions of the constitution. Old men are often in a hurry.

Remember both MR (a great man that dethroned deadly terrorism with bare local hands) and Ranil (never in the mould of the great UNP’s of the past like Gamini Jayasuriya, U.B. Wanninayake, M.D.Banda and M.D.H. Jayewardene) came to politics in the 1970s in the midst of two violent insurrections in the North and South.

Two generations have by-passed them but yet there is no replacement in a country sprouting with emerging unexposed talent because the party structures are non-democratic to any challenge to the leadership, is off-set by a kept second tier. Both leaders need each other to keep them in office as they work in tandem. If one falls other is likely to fade away by compulsion. Ranil – the more likely candidate to back down made a compelling sacrifice being the less selfish in agreeing to make way for Sirisena at a time UNP peaked in popularity after the Badulla provincial election results. Parliamentarians matter as their sole desire is to be re-elected unlikely for many under Ranil’s leadership.

Nation can be proud of a born-again judiciary with brave and bold like Judge Gihan Kulatunga at the helm who listens to both sides attentively, studies the law and gives judgements on the merits, mindful of the needs of society, without delay. What more can be asked from a Judge? Most of his judgements stood in appeal and the respected young Judge has won esteem. We live in hope, as is in many Asian societies to be kept within civilized bounds by an un-kept judiciary.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress