හේෂා විතානගේ කළ ප්‍රකාශය ගැන පොලිස් මූලස්ථානයට පැමිණිල්ලක්

September 26th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී හේෂා විතානගේ මහතා ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඊයේ සිදුකළ ප්‍රකාශය පිළිබද අද පොලිස් මූලස්ථානයට පැමිණිල්ලක් ඉදිරිපත් වුණා.

මේ අතර එම ප්‍රකාශය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද විවිධ පාර්ශ්ව අදහස් පළ කළා.

සත්‍ය ගවේෂකයෝ සංවිධානය අද පෙරවරුවේ පොලිස් මූලස්ථානයට අදාළ පැමිණිල්ලක් සිදුකළේ අදාළ ප්‍රකාශය සම්බන්ධයෙන් කඩිනමින් නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන ලෙස ඉල්ලමින්.

මේ අතර, අදාළ ප්‍රකාශය සම්බන්ධයෙන් ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡා කිහිපයකදී අදහස් පළ වුණා.

https://youtu.be/SXcr7qnUJJo

එජාපයේ ජනපති අපේක්ෂකයාට විපක්ෂ නායකගෙන් චෝදනා

September 26th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

පාතාලය, දූෂණය හා කප්පම්වලින් තොර සමාජයක් බිහි කිරීම තම ප්‍රමුඛ අභිප්‍රාය බව ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ ප්‍රමුඛ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂක ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා පවසනවා.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණේ ව්‍යාපාරික ජාතික සම්මේලනය අද කොළඹදී පැවති අවස්ථාවේ ඔහු මේ අදහස් පළ කළා.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණට අනුබද්ධිත ව්‍යාපාරික ජාතික සම්මේලනය අද පැවැත්වුණේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා පොදුජන පෙරමුණ ප්‍රමුඛ ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්ෂයේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂක ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ සහ විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ යන මහත්වරුන්ගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන්.

මේ අතර ශාන්තිකර්මවේදීන්ගේ ජාතික හමුව පැවැත්වුණේද ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ හා මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ යන මහත්වරුන්ගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන්.

https://youtu.be/Yuu3Hw-39aQ

ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය වෙනුවට ලංකාවේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වන්නේ පචතන්ත්‍ර වාදයයි

September 26th, 2019

සුර්ය වංශ රත්න විභූෂණ පාලිත ආරියරත්න හිමිනමක් පන්සලේ ආදාහනය කළ නොහැකි මහා බෞද්ධ රාජ්‍යය ”ශ්‍රී ලංකාව”  සිට

දැන් කුකුල් පොරය අවසන්වී තවත් වලියෙන් කලඑලියට පත් නව ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂේකයෙක් අද දිනද අපේ මේ ලක්මැනියන් හට ලැබිය.

මේ සැම නව ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂේකයෙක් දෙසම වක්‍රාකාරයෙන් බැලුවිට පෙනී යන්නේ

 (මේ පොදු ලක්ෂණය යම් තාක් දුරට හෝ ඔවුන් තුල තිබෙන බවයි).

කිසිවක් නොව. ප්‍රසිද්ධියේ මොවුන්  කව්රුත් මෙරට  සිංහලබෞද්ධ රටක් යැයි කීමට ජාතිකව මැලිකමක් දක්වනවා බවයි.

වලියෙන් එන, කකුලින් අදින, මාට්ටුදන, බොරු කියන, හිතුමතේට ව්‍යවස්ථා හදන, පොරක් වීමට නලියන, කාලකන්නි දන්නේ ස්වල්ප දෙයක්මයි පෙනේ. එනම් දවසින් දවස ටිකින් ටික මේ රට නොරටුන්ට හා විජාතිකයන්ට මල් බන්දේසියක තබා  පුජා කිරීමයි.

ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය නමින් මතුවෙන  පචතන්ත්‍ර වාදයේ තැන් ස්වල්පයක් පහත ප්‍රශ්න ඔස්සේ සිහි බුද්ධියෙන් බැලීමෙන් පාඨක ඔබ හට දන ගත හැකිය.

1. බලය බෙදීම ඕනෑ  කාහටද ?

2. අලුත් ව්‍යවස්ථා ඉල්ලුවේ කවුද කවදාද ?

3. 19 න් වුන දේ මතකද ?

4. තවත් 20 ක් ඕනෙද ?

5. රට නිත්‍යානු කුලව හිමි කා හටද ?

6. රට හිමි මේ නව ජාතියක් වන ශ්‍රී ලාංකිකයන් ට ද නැත්නම්  සිංහලයන් ටද ?

7. රටේ ඊළඟ නම ‘ ඉල් ලංකාවද ?

8. රට ඉදිරියේදී බෙදීමේ කුමන්ත්‍ර හා පුද්ගලික න්‍යාය පත්‍ර හෝ සැඟවුණු න්‍යාය නැතිද ? නැතහොත් අපිව ගොනාට අන්දනවාද ?

9. මුස්ලිම් හා දෙමළ යනු ජනවර්ගයක්ද නැත්නම් අප හා සමාන ජාතීන්ද ?

10. ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය යනු අනුනට අයිති රටක් කාලයක් තුල ටිකින් ටික නොරටු හට ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදී දේශ පාලනය නාමයෙන් බෙදා දීමද ?
එය සුද්දන් විසින් දමා ගැසූ ගුන්ඩුවක් නොවේද ?

11. අද ඔබ කතා කරන බහු ජාතික කොලොප්පම් ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය යනු හොරෙන් හොරෙන් සිංහල දේශය විනාශ කිරීමක් නොවේද?

12. අපගේ මුතුන් මිත්තන් දිවී පරදුවට තබා රැකගත් මේ රට ඔබේ ඔය කියනා  සැබෑ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදයෙන් ඔබ්බට ගිය ඔබ විසින් අප රටේ පමණක් නිර්මාණය කර ඇති පචතන්ත්‍ර වාදය නිසා විනාශ වීමට උඩ බලාගෙන චන්දය ගැසීම යනු සැබෑ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය දන්නා මිනිසෙකු වීමට සුදුසු කමක්ද ?

13. ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍ර වාදය යනු විදෙස් වැසියන් (මෙහි ආ හෝ වෙළදාමේ පැමිණි ) මානව පාලනය කිරීම අත්  හිටුවිමක්ද ?

14. තුන් සිංහලේම නෑදෑයන් වන බව ඔබ නොදන්නේද ?  නෑදෑයන් , සහෝදරයන් නැති පක්ෂයක් ඔබට දැනට තිබේද ? එවන් ආකාරයේ පක්ෂයක් තැනීම අපහසු බව ඔබ දන්නේද ?

15. 2500 කට වඩා ඉතිහාසයක් තිබෙන සිංහල අපි රට කරවුයේ  නෑදෑයන් , සහෝදරයන්, දෙමවුපියන් සමග එක්වී බව ඔබ දන්නවද ?

16. පසුගිය ජාතිවාදී දෙමල ඊලම් ත්‍රස්තවාදයට මුහුණ දෙද්දී ඔය කියන රට අදෙරේ බව ඔබ විහිළුවකට පෙන්නුවද ? තවද ජාතික  හා රටේ ආරක්ෂාව හා බුදුදහමේ ආරක්ෂාව පතා අඩුම ගනනනේ එක අකුරක් හෝ ඔබ ලිවාද ? නැත්නම් ගෙදර ඉන්න අඹුව පමණක් රකිමින් සිටියාද ?

17. නීති විරෝධී අන්‍යාගමික කරණය ඔබේ ගජ මිතුරන්ගේ අතින් අදත් සිදුවෙන බව ඔබ දන්නේද ?

18. ඔබලාගේ පවුල්වල අම්මාගේ  සිට නැගණිය,සහෝදරයා ,දු දරුවන් ,අඹු සැමි සියලන්ම නීති විරෝධී අන්‍යාගමික කරණයේ  ගොදුරක් හා ඉත්තන් වී ඇති බව ඔබ දන්නවා නේද ?

  19. පන්සිල් රකින පුද්ගලයත් මස් බුදින දුර චාරයේ යෙදෙන මිනිසාත් යනු දෙන්නාම සමානද ?

20. විදෙශ් කුමන්ත්‍රණ රාශියක් හොරෙන් අප රටේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වන බව හා හා පසුගිය බෝම්බ ප්‍රහාරයේ අතකොලුවූ බොහෝ මැති ඇමතිවරු ඔබ පිටිපස්සේ කෙල හලමින් (අනාගතේ හිරේ විලංගුවේ වටෙවිදෝයි සිතමින් ) ඔබව රජ කිරීමට සැදී පැහැදී සිටින බව ඔබ දන්නවද ?

21. පසුගිය අප්‍රේල් ප්‍රහාරයේ වග උත්තර කරුවන් කව්රුන්ද ඔවුන්ගේ සහය කාටද ?

22. පසුගිය එල්.ටි.ටි ත්‍රස්වාදයට උඩගෙඩි දුන්නෝ කවුද? ඔවුන්ගේ සහය කාටද ?


23. විරෝදාර රණවිරුවන් අන්තර් ජාතික පොරේකට දැක් වීමට උත්සුක වන්නේ කවුද ? ඔවුන් ඔබ ලගම නේද ?

24. නපුංසක විවාහ නීති පද්ධති හා ලෙස්බියන් විවාහ සම්මත කරගන්න උත්සහා කෙරු නායකයන් දිගටම ඔඅබ හා සිටීමෙන් හා ඒවා නැවත ජනාධිපති  පුටුව වෙත ඒමට පෙර අනුමත වීමට නව ජනාධිපති බල සංසෝදන හේතුවක් වේද නොවේද ?

25. එන.ජි .ඕ මාරයන් කි දෙනෙක්‌ ඔබහට මෙදවස්වල් මුදල් විසිකරන්නේද ?

26. භික්ෂුන් වහන්සේ නමක් ආදාහනය කරගැනීමට දුෂ්කර වන භයානක තැනකට දේශපාලක ඔබ මේ රට ගෙනගොස් ඇති බව දන්නවද ?

27. උතුර දෙමල නිජබිමක්ද ?

28. ටැමිල් නෙට් වැනි අන්තවාදී වෙබ් තීරයන් අපේ රට තුල නැවතත් දර්ශනය වන්නේ කවද සිටද ? මේවා ලියන්නේ අන්තවාදී ත්‍රස්තවාදී නොවේද ?

29. වෙනම මුස්ලිම් කලාප අධිකරණ පද්ධති ,පාසල් ඉල්ලන්නෝ කවුද ? එම කණ්ඩායම් කා සමගද ?

30. 9 වෙනි ව්‍යවස්ථා උතුරට අදාල නැතිද ? නව ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂේකයන ඒ ගැන නිශ්ශබ්ද,තුෂ්ණීම්භූත ඇයි ?


අවසාන වශයෙන් කිව හැක්කේ :  

අපට හට ඇත්තේනව ශ්‍රී ලංකාවක්ගොඩනැගීමේ ක්‍රියාදාමයට අත වැනිම නොව අපේ සිහල බොදු අයිතීන් සුරක්ෂිත කොට මේ මා ඇතුළු ඔබ උපන් දේශය සිංහලයන්ට අයිති ලෝකයේ තිබෙන ථෙරවාදී බුදුදහම ලොවට බෙදන එකම රට (සිංහලේ ) බව නැවතත් ලොවට ඔප්පු කර සිටීමටය.

කරුණා කර ඔබ විසින් කරණ ගොන් කතා, ගොන් පොරය දැන් වත්  නවත් වමුද?

අනුන්ගේ  පෙර වැරදි කියමින් තපුලන ඔබලා බොරදියේ මාළු බාන්නන් වන බව අපි දනිමු.

අද දිනම ඔබලා හට සත්‍ය වැටහෙවා යැයි ප්‍රාර්ථනා කරමි.
 
ඔබගේ පචතන්ත්‍ර වාදයයට තවදුරටත් ඉඩ නැත.

ඔබ සැමට තෙරුවන් සරණයි !

සුර්ය වංශ රත්න විභූෂණ පාලිත ආරියරත්න
හිමිනමක් පන්සලේ ආදාහනය කළ නොහැකි මහා බෞද්ධ රාජ්‍යය ”ශ්‍රී ලංකාව”  සිට
2019-9-27

YAHAPALANA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Part 12

September 25th, 2019

KAMALIKA PIERIS

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

American Bar Association (ABA) has made repeated attempts to register a Branch Association of the ABA in Sri Lanka.The first request was in January 2018, where    ABA said that it would be in the interests of the ABA to set up a Branch office in Sri Lanka. The activities of the Branch would be monitored by Sri Lanka‘s Ministry of Justice and the Attorney General’s Department.

In October 2018, the Hon. Attorney General had addressed a communication to the Ministry of Justice stating that the ABA has undertaken to hold a capacity building programme for judges and prosecutors and asked the Ministry to issue a certificate for the purpose. However, the letter was headed Official Letter of Authorization for the Establishment of a Branch office of the ABA in Sri Lanka”.

BASL wrote in October 2018 to the Ministry of Justice saying that the BASL strongly objects to the initial application to set up a Branch office. BASL does not see any need to register a Branch Association of the ABA in Sri Lanka. Nowhere in the world will a legal system allow or permit a foreign Bar Association to set up a branch office.

It is an unprecedented request and if allowed will have serious consequences on the independence of the legal profession and the sovereignty of the nation. If this application is allowed the ABA will have their own office and will start making comments and statements on internal matters which will have an impact on a sovereign Nation.

Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) said that neither the Ministry nor the Attorney General’s Department represent the legal community.  BASL is the sole representative body recognized under our legal system as the body representing the legal profession.

the other ground upon which we would strongly object to the setting up of this branch office, added BASL, involves the question as to what the Ministry would do if other foreign Bar Associations make applications on similar lines. There are several countries with which Sri Lanka maintains close ties and what would be the position of the Ministry and the State if these countries make similar requests? The BASL strongly objects to the registering of a Branch Association of the ABA on the above basis.

 ABA then tried to come in as an NGO. ABA made a request to the Ministry of Justice, through a local legal firm, asking it to issue a letter to register the ABA here as an NGO. This request was also referred to the BASL which submitted its observations in April 2018. BASL said that this was an indirect means of establishing ABA presence in Sri Lanka “knowing very well that the application for registration as a branch association would fail”.

We strongly object to the application made on behalf of the ABA to register as a NGO. Unlike in the case of an ordinary NGO, the application in this instance has a serious impact on the legal profession and the very concept of sovereignty.

ABA and their legal representatives in Sri Lanka seek to justify the application to register as a NGO on the argument that the International Bar Association (IBA) wishes to provide assistance for training of Judges and prosecutors, continued BASL.

This is not the first time that such training has been provided by International Organizations. For more than 25 years entities such as the EU, USAID, UNDP and UNICEF had provided similar training and technical support to the legal profession in Sri Lanka. In all these instances, the issue of registration of such entity as a NGO did not arise. The support was provided through their local institutions. The respective institution would enter upon a MOU and provide assistance and training as agreed. If the ABA is genuinely interested in providing assistance and services what the ABA should do is to adopt the same mechanism.

BASL also observed that it is relevant to note that none of the above correspondence was directly addressed to the BASL. All correspondence in this regard was submitted by the Ministry of Justice. BASL also wrote to the National Secretariat for Non-Governmental Organizations, stating its objections.

Justice Minister Thalatha Atukorale   said that she had not agreed to establish of a branch of the American Bar Association in Sri Lanka. As the subject minister I have not granted permission for any such institution to be established in Sri Lanka,” she said in a statement.

The US Ambassador said in July 2019 that the   American Bar Association has no intention to establish a branch in Sri Lanka. US has not and will not interfere or become directly involved in Sri Lanka’s judiciary. However, US has sponsored training for Sri Lankan judges and lawyers at the request of the Sri Lankan government, she said.

Justice Minister Atukorale confirmed that in May 2019, two batches of senior judges had been to the US in August 2018 and April 2019 at the US taxpayers’ expense. A workshop for High Court judges was held at Taj Samudra, Colombo in Dec 2018. In July 2019 a group of Attorney General’s Department officials, attended a workshop in the US.  Members of Parliament said that this could be an attempt to influence the judiciary.

SDGAP

The US has initiated a Strengthening Democratic Governance and Accountability Project” (SDGAP) worth Rs 1.92 billion (USD 13 mn). The programme was launched in November 2016. This is first of its kind implemented in Sri Lanka, observed Shamindra Ferdinando. The project will be developed in close collaboration with the Sri Lanka Parliament, Independent Commissions and related Ministries.

This programme was implemented by the Maryland USA, based Development Alternatives Inc (DAI), in accordance with an agreement between Sri Lanka and the House Democracy Partnership of the US House of Representatives. The Sri Lanka Parliament and the House Democracy Partnership of the U.S. House of Representatives had in Washington D.C on September 14th,  launched a Collaboration Agreement to strengthen partnership between the two legislatures.

The purpose  of the project is to  reform Sri Lanka’s public sector. The project will help the Government of Sri Lanka to increase transparency and accountability, advance good governance reforms, and strengthen systems and processes for public accountability, financial management, policy development and implementation. The project also supports the government to strengthen communication with citizens, include the public in policy-making, and increase the participation of women in political processes.

The US embassy said that the SDGAP was subject to the laws and regulations of the United States, with oversight from Office of Inspector General, United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

PRASAD KARIYAWASAM

In June 2019 it transpired that  Prasad Kariyawasam has been appointed to Parliament as an International Affairs adviser to the Speaker. This is the first time in the history of Parliament that a Speaker has had the services of an international affairs advisor. MPs observed  that  there is no such position  as International Affairs adviser among the list of officials  in Parliament  and no other Speaker in Parliament has employed an International Affairs Advisor, that too using funds from a foreign country to pay for them.  Previously, international issues were handled by the Foreign Ministry and even the Minister in charge, the MPs said.

Speaker Karu Jayasuriya admitted that Kariyawasam was being paid by Development Alternatives Institute, (DAI) a foreign agency which is the implementing agency for USAID. The DAI currently obtains the services of two advisers to assist Parliament. They are former Additional Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration G. Hettiarachchi and former Foreign Ministry Secretary Prasad Kariyawasam.

The Speaker explained that  USAID is funding different projects in  Parliament  through its contractor DAI. DAI had given Rs. 2,000 million for a programme called Parliamentary Diplomacy”, intended to foster close relations with other Parliaments worldwide, while also facilitating exchange programmes for MPs and Parliament staff.

The  Parliament  of Sri Lanka currently has connections with 50-60 other Parliaments throughout the world under Parliamentary Diplomacy. It is these programmes that facilitate MPs to travel to foreign countries to understand how Parliaments function there, to obtain scholarships and strengthen Parliamentary Democracy. Around 60-70 MPs here have already gone on foreign tours to learn about strengthening democracy using these same funds. These funds have also been used for Parliamentary Committees. The media wanted to know how this project benefited the country.

Kariyawasam ,  a former Foreign Ministry Secretary, is assisting in this programme, said the Speaker. Currently he is coordinating the Parliamentary Diplomacy group involving around 50-60 countries. He assists me in obtaining scholarships for parliamentarians, coordinating tours to learn about other parliaments etc. He is not paid by the Parliament.” . This mean that  he is being paid by the US Government, responded critics. And  there are suspicions that  this was privately done, they said. 

DAI had initially selected Karunathilaka Amunugama, another former Foreign Ministry secretary for the role of adviser, but he had passed away a day before commencing duties.  Kariyawasam was appointed as his replacement, said  MP Kiriella in June 2019.

In July 2019 Speaker Karu Jayasuriya announced that the salary of Prasad Kariyawasam, would be met from Parliament funds henceforth. The move is an acknowledgement that Kariyawasam’s pay, paid with funds from a US federal agency is wrong, said the media.

In addition to organizing  programmes in Parliament, it appears that Prasad Kariyawasam had  also arranged for the  ambassadors of countries belonging to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Countries (OIC) to come to Parliament to meet the Speaker. The diplomats included those from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Kuwait, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Director of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) and the Director of Military Intelligence were also present. MPs questioned the  meeting. 

The task of summoning Colombo-based diplomats  is the sole responsibility of the Foreign Minister or his Ministry Secretary. It is also the responsibility of the President or the Prime Minister, particularly during exigencies. The intelligence chief of the country, who knows all the intelligence and secret information, including investigations that are ongoing, was summoned for the meeting, along with the IGP. Summoning the intelligence chief in front of foreign envoys has not been done by any other Speaker.

Speaker replied I convened a meeting of envoys of these Muslim countries in Parliament to brief them on the latest situation. The IGP came for this meeting, along with other senior officers. Meeting was to brief the envoys of the Muslim countries and ease their fears. The meeting was held with good intentions to explain the current situation and give a guarantee on security. There was no leaking of state secrets.” Would it not have been better to ask the Foreign Ministry to invite  these envoys should there be a need, countered MPs. This clearly shows that Kariyawasam was running a parallel operation.

VISIT OF MIKE POMPEO

US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo was to travel to Sri Lanka on a short visit, in June 2019, scheduled between his Delhi trip and travel to Osaka. Pompeo was accompanying President Trump for the G-20 summit in Osaka. The purpose of  Pompeo’s visit (book-ended between visits to New Delhi and Osaka, Japan) will be to pressure Sri Lanka into signing up on the utterly one-sided Status of Forces Agreement, said analysts.

But he did not come, He cancelled his visit. The reason given by the embassy was that his travel schedule did not permit a stopover in Sri Lanka. Pompeo  hopes to travel to Sri Lanka at a later date.”

The real reason, analysts agree, was the rising local sentiments against an American military base in Sri Lanka, the  growing protests here against the US seeking to finalize Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). The government had come under fire from the  opposition over the Status of Forces (SOFA) Agreement, which would give the US forces unrestricted access to Sri Lankan facilities as well as diplomatic immunity.

President Sirisena it appears was going to avoid meeting Pompeo. He was planning to be away from Sri Lanka  for the three and half hours  Pompeo would be in Sri Lanka . Sirisena was to travel to Cambodia and Laos. This move coupled together with planned protests during his visit compelled the US Embassy to advise Pompeo it was not the best time. With Pompeo calling off his visit, so did President Sirisena.

The cancellation of the Pompeo visit can be considered a victory for Sri Lanka. However, though Sri Lanka may have won this  small  battle, they have certainly not  won the war.

ELECTIONS COMMISSION OF SRI LANKA

The Election Commission of Sri Lanka had received assistance from the  International Foundation for Electoral Reforms, a USA funded  organization, to provide much required assistance to upgrade its technology. The project was done through USAID. The role played in this by Vasu Mohan, regional director for Asia Pacific, was questioned. Media reported that Chairman, Elections Commission had strongly defended the US project  and said that Vasu Mohan was a Sri Lankan.

HUMAN RIGHTS IN SOUTH ASIA

US State Department announced its South Asia subcommittee will hold a hearing on “Human Rights in South Asia”  in October 2019.  The Subcommittee will review the treatment of the Rohingya by the government of Burma (Myanmar) and credible accusations that this minority is subject to ethnic cleansing and genocide. The Subcommittee had the opportunity to review this situation in July as the plight of the Rohingya affects both the South and Southeast Asia regions,” Congressman Brad Sherman said in a statement posted on his personal blog. Officials in the meeting will also focus on the human rights situation in Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

PPD IN KANDY

The Ministry of Development Strategies and International Trade together with the USAID-SAIL project hosted a Public-Private Dialogue (PPD) on Global Trade for businessman in the Kandy District on Friday 23rd August 2019 at Hotel Suisse, Kandy.

USAID launched the four-year SAIL project in October 2016to support economic reforms and promote Foreign Direct Investment in Sri Lanka. SAIL provides policy and institutional support to improve the business enabling environment and promote investment in Sri Lanka.

The event titled, Kandy in the Global Economy ,how can the district maximize benefits and minimize risks?” was the second in a series of district-level PPDs being held to increase general awareness and understanding of trade, and obtain the views of wider and more representative groups of stakeholders across the country. The event was the first to be held outside Colombo and there were over 120 participants from ministries, government agencies, the business community, trade chambers, the private sector and other key stakeholders.

GALAGODAATTE GNANASARA THERA

Before 2012, Galagodaatte Gnanasara  thera was completely unknown to the public.  Journalist Chandraprema said even he never knew such a monk existed. When Gnanasara’s name came up in the public domain for the first time with the anti-Halal campaign of 2013,  journalists  had confused him with Gangaramaya’s Ven. Galaboda Gnanissara. That was how unknown Gnanasara was at that time, said Chandraprema.

However, the monk was known to the USA. Galagodaatte Gnanasara thera was given  a five- year multiple entry visa  to USA, in 2011 sometime after  he had begun a  campaign of hatred and incitement of violence, on religious issues

We assumed that he had entered the USA on the kind of single entry visitor’s visa that ordinary mortals like us get after answering a whole string of questions and producing copious documentation. Now it turns out that he had a five- year multiple entry visa which had been granted to him in 2011, elaborated Chandraprema.

On what basis did Gnanasara qualify for a five year multiple entry visa to the USA as far back as 2011? Asked Chandraprema. How is it that the US embassy issued a five-year multiple entry visa to an unknown monk whose only claim to fame at that time was having pleaded guilty to a change of drunk driving and having disrupted meetings of the Anti-War Front? For a Buddhist monk to plead guilty to a charge of drunk driving was very unusual and was probably the first time that such a thing occurred in Sri Lanka’s history.

Then in 2014 the visa was cancelled. The US authorities appear to have panicked that if this monk made another visit to the USA on this visa in the middle of all this controversy, their role in all this mayhem would be badly exposed, said Chandraprema.

ANURADHAPURA ARCHAEOLOGY MUSEUM

The Archaeological Museum of Anuradhapura, was reopened after renovation In September 2019.The preservation of artifacts at the Anuradhapura Archaeological Museum was funded by a $150,000 grant from the U.S. Embassy in Colombo through the Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation (AFCP). In addition, the Central Cultural Fund and the Treasury’s Consolidated Fund had also contributed to the funding of the renovation activities.

The Ambassadors Fund for Cultural Preservation (AFCP) funding system has helped to preserve and protect sites and building structures in the country such as the Dutch Forts of Batticaloa and Galle and also the Archaeological museum laboratories, said the  embassy. There is a AFCP site at monasteries at Payagala.

In response to a request made by the Archeology Department the U.S. Embassy in Sri Lanka, as part of its continuing efforts to preserve Sri Lanka’s cultural and religious heritage provided the $150,000 grant in 2015 to improve the storage and preservation of artifacts at the Anuradhapura Archaeological Museum. The U.S. Embassy previously supported the Museum, one of Sri Lanka’s most visited, with grants in 2009 and 2012.

The AFCP grants to Anuradhapura Archaeology museum project included $30,000 to help catalogue the museum collection, $40,000 to conserve the museum collection and train the archaeology staff and, $150,000 to create a safe environment for conserved artifacts. Experts from the Metropolitan University for Arts in New York City have trained the Department of Archaeology Conservation staff to apply preventive conservation treatment to important objects since 2016. US Embassy was delighted to be able to help preserve Sri Lanka’s dynamic heritage. (Continued)

Ex-Governor Ajit Cabral’s proposal for Expressways covering the Country.

September 25th, 2019

By Prof. Chandre Darmawaradana.

The former Governor of the Central Bank (2006-2015) has made proposals with the objective of  A new impetus to revive the Economy from 2020-2025” (Island, 25 Sept-2019). These include  (1) a new elliptical expressway parallel to the coast at a distance of about 40-50 km from it around Sri Lanka, (2) a new expressway to provide easy access to both coastal belt and hinterland. (3) A single expressway from Medawachchiya to Kilinochchi. (4) Fast-tracked construction in five years.

The present writer proposed the construction of a dike-type highway along the perimeter of the Island, not only to provide transport but also to defend against rising sea levels, tsunamis, and sea erosion. It should be an ecological highway taking account of socio-economic and environmental imperatives.  Hence a 10th province, covering a maritime strip running around the island was an integral part of the proposal, impacting on the constitution, integrating the country politically and environmentally (see, October 2017,  https://dh-web.org/place.names/posts/Climate-Constitution-Sri-Lanka.pdf ).

The need for farmers and industrialists to bring their goods to markets and ports, and for imports to reach the interior are recognized by all planners. Even the  US Millennium Corporation’s proposals emphasized the need for such transport infrastructure, featuring a highway connecting strategic Trinco (the ancient port of Gokanna) to Colombo, the modern engine of development driving the Western province.

Roadways, irrigation schemes, and human settlements can be planned to solve development issues and ease social conflicts. Such schemes can resolve political problems associated with national security,  control of floods, the effect of tsunamis, etc., and move goods and people while strengthening the ecological integrity of the landmass. Such holistic planning is rarely supported by politicians who have little knowledge, want quick results, and are dazzled by foolish visions of the tallest towers or fastest highways seen in their travels.

Knee-jerk projects, be it roadways, waterways or human settlements,  can have unintended disastrous consequences. The best we can do is to formulate an overall model treating as many factors as possible.  Improvement in transport can be a win-win situation instead of improving” one sector while causing irreparable damage to others.  

                                                   [A  Chinese express train moving at 370kmh]

(1) Highways can connect as well as divide communities –  a Gokanna-Colombo highway will divide the north and south of the nation along separatist lines. Instead, a fast bullet train” moving at 300 km/h connecting Colombo and Jaffna could be the basis of national integration.  Jaffna would become a suburb of Colombo! The Romans and the British built roadways to hold together their empires. US and Canada and Russia built railroads to ensure the integrity of their confederations. The trans-Siberian connected Moscow to Vladivostok. Pointedly, the Tigers destroyed the Yal-Devi rail link to enhance the separatist agenda while the ordinary Northerner – Tamil, Moor or Sinhala benefitted immensely from Yal Devi.

Mr. Wigneswaran rejected  Mahaweli coming to the North to ensure self-determination” in spite of projected future water shortages. The behaviour of Mr. Wigneswaran is no different from the leaders of the Tamil community during the days prior to 1948 when they opposed the building of causeways connecting villages in the Jaffna Peninsula (see Dr. Jane Russell’s book, Communal Politics under the Donoughmore commission, 1931-1948). They, absentee landowners of the North living in Colombo 7 feared that providing good road access to so-called low-caste” villages will make them uppity” and that they will lose control. They also opposed the upgrading of Jaffna to a municipality as they did not wish to pay municipal taxes! It was SWRD Bandaranaike, the Minister of local government in DS Senanayake’s first cabinet, who forced the building of causeways and also gave Municipal status to Jaffna.

Clearly, the leaders of the North and East bogged down in Casteist or Eelamist ideology, have often failed to work for the betterment of the people of the North and East.   Today these leaders –  haughty lawyers are driven by ideology –  are oblivious to the urgent threat to large parts of the North and East from rising sea levels due to global warming. While they could control or drive out the Moors, they see the threat of Sinhal-Buddhist nationalism as being most urgent in the context of a militant   Hindutva ideology and Tamil Nationalism that aims to preserve its traditional ethnic voter base as its source of power. There are technological solutions to such conflicts as well when examined from a social-planning point of view, but we will not address them in this essay. The Tamil community is blessed with technically highly qualified practical-minded men and women who should take the lead in politics, instead of leaving it entirely to the lawyers.

(2) Highways and river-valley developments cutting through diverse regions become permanently disconnected ecological pockets causing irreparable harm to ecosystems important for sustainable agriculture and human health. Conflicts between humans and large animals like elephants become frequent and animals get destroyed first, and the slow decline of human health follows. Galoya, Udawalawe, and Mahaweli were planned at a time when environmental concerns were a low priority.

(3) New highways and new river-valley developments spawn new settlements (colonization schemes” in old, incorrect parlance) with little regard to consequences, especially when we have accelerated” projects. The accelerated Mahaweli program settled people in higher grounds further from irrigation rivers, canals and tanks due to lack of space, spawning the use of tube wells and shallow dugout wells in locations naturally containing fluorides and other salts in the soil, triggering an epidemic of kidney disease in the dry zone areas of the accelerated Mahaweli project. Unfortunately, instead of focusing on providing clean water to the affected areas, the government took the cheap, politically expedient step of banning the use of the herbicide glyphosate – an act similar to changing cushions to cure dysentery.

Highway development was the Mantra” of the post War developments in the West. We knew little about the enormous dangers of such expansion that are evident today in the clogged multi-lane highways and the urban sprawl of Western cities and their neighbourhoods, e.g., around Los Angeles,  greater London or Cairo. These metropolitan regions constitute huge networks of asphalt-concrete gridlocks of traffic, creating carmageddons of pollution and highly inefficient use of resources. People stuck in traffic jams develop stress, high adrenaline, and chronically high blood sugar even without eating sweets, with obvious health consequences!  Tiny little Kandy, or big brother Colombo, even without Los Angeles traffic is a pocket of pollution spawning allergies, asthma and lung disease.

Just after the Eelam wars in 2009, this writer appealed  strongly  for a network of  high-speed electric trains as the first step in infrastructure development, coupled with installing  floating solar-panel arrays placed on existing  hydro-electric reservoirs, which daytime excess power stored as water saved in the reservoirs to provide firm electric power for the night (for more details, see http://dh-web.org/place.names/posts/dev-tech-2009.ppt )

Increased encroachment of the natural habitat by humans and the increased use of fossil fuels since the 1960s have to lead to a catastrophic loss of flora and fauna, acid rain, bleached coral reefs, etc.,  threatening the very planet blanketed and overheated with CO2 emissions. A strident and completely misguided call against agrochemicals orchestrated by a frightened public serves to ignore far more dangerous pollution from petrol and diesel vehicles, tractors, lorries, buses, and the effects of high levels of sub-micron particulate dust. Instead, everyone wants a car, while VIPs demand a fleet of them, duty-free” and  bulletproof”.

We depend on bees, insects, and butterflies for the pollination of flowers that give rise to crops that we eat. We depend on trees for re-oxygenation. The loss of habitat has caused a catastrophic decline in pollinating insects and birds. Today many countries like England pay for their folly in having to import bumblebees from  less developed”  Eastern Europe to sustain its agriculture! The day when Sri Lanka has to import bees and butterflies from  less developed” nations may not be far away. We are told of an energy mafia” in the Ceylon Electricity Board, working hand in hand with commission-seeking politicians. Is that why we build coal-burning power plants and stunt the land,  flora, and fauna when we have less polluting means of generating adequate amounts of firm power cheaply from solar and biomass, and within short time scales (see  Clean, practical solutions to Sri Lanka’s energy crisis,  Lankaweb, 6-May 2019  https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2019/05/06/clean-practical-solutions-to-sri-lankas-energy-crisis-i/ )?

The present writer supports the suggestion of Ajith Cabral, the ex-Governor, but modified to a ring road encircling the Island, integrated with mangrove replanting, carbon capture etc., located along the coastal periphery in the form of a dyke-highway, envisaging the rise in sea levels, tsunamis, high sea erosion and high waves that we anticipate from global warming.

Public transport in electric trans should be prioritized over Individual vehicle transport.  Fast electric train lines instead of roadways should be the first objective, inside and along the periphery. Such train lines or highways must have raised sections and large underpasses at every 10 km interval so that continuous ecosystems are maintained so that animals, insects and even root systems can safely pass across. Equivalent amounts of conserved wilderness to compensate the landmass used for building roads etc. should be legislated by reclaiming urban sprawl.

Sprawling human settlements, in the form of villages” designed with the traditional concept of Gama-Weva-Temple or Kovil” is disastrous to the environment in an age of high populations. Instead, urban sprawl in the form of settlements fed by highways should be strictly constrained. High-density high-rise habitations should be encouraged by higher taxation on individual homes. The GamUdawa” must be replaced by models where habitat encroachment and garbage production are minimized, and wilderness areas are preserved. This also implies high-yield no-till agriculture using minimum land and minimum water per kilogram of harvest, as is possible with modern scientific agriculture. These go well beyond the green-revolution model  and recycles the water and agrochemicals used, without significantly releasing them to the environment ( See Lankaweb,

26-February 2019,  https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2019/02/26/beyond-the-green-revolution-how-humanity-needs-cutting-edge-technology-to-save-itself ).

Consequently, we have to reject our nostalgic models of traditional agriculture as it yields low harvests, high methane outputs and CO2 production in composting, land tilling, weeding, slash-and-burn, etc. It poses the danger of bio-accumulation of naturally occurring metal toxins in plants due to the re-use of plant material in composting. 

Ex-Governor Ajit Cabrales plans for highway development to revive the economy have to integrate with all these considerations of ecology, food, health and high productivity needed for a densely populated island with a painfully finite land area inhabited by warring communities fighting for that land.

Colossal Waste of Food September 24, 2019, The island -Right to answer

September 25th, 2019

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

When I read the opinion written by one Sariputta I decided to pen an opinion reg EDB function held in BMICH

I was there  myself and noted not only the issue of food waste at the end of the function but also another important matter

I keep attending the same function as an invitee of EDB as a member of the working committee to develop boat building 

Salient point I am trying to make is that for years since Premadasa spearheaded apparel industry, we have not seen much of  any other Industries leading in achieving best exporter accolade 

I also mentioned that the export industry of our Labour to generate export revenue may also win a prize!

My contention is like Singapore and other Asian giants we should endeavor  to move in developing more high tech industries

Finally, reg waste of food I told my colleague who was a Secretary to a ministry once run by Premadasa that we should carry doggie bags” and take leftovers home as it is Colossal waste 

I packed two lots of food leftovers for our drivers who were waiting for hours in the car park because the President came very late and the award ceremony took a longer time to complete 

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera 

Colossal Waste of Food

article_image

September 24, 2019, 8:47 pm 

The Annual Exporters Awards ceremony organized by the Export Development Board was held at the BMICH on 19th September, in the presence of a large gathering of about 400 people, attended by the President and some ministers.

At the end of the function refreshments were served on plates to all who attended. Each plate had four short eat items and a large cup cake, which was far too much for one person to consume at that time.

Almost all who were there just ate about two or three items from the plate and left the rest on their plates. The waiters just took the plates away and dumped all the untouched food into waste bins. The food that was thrown away would have easily fed 200 – 300 people. What a colossal waste of food, at a time where thousands of our own people are struggling to have one square meal a day!

My heart cried to see how plate after plate of untouched food was thrown into waste bins by the waiters. The Organizers of the event the EDB, and the BMICH authorities should be ashamed of this, and many who were present commented on this pathetic happening.

We were taught by our parents to respect our food and not to even trample a grain of rice, may be old school thinking, but of very high value.

SARIPUTHRA

Colombo 05

IMF cuts Sri Lanka’s 2019 growth target to 2.7%

September 25th, 2019

Economy

COLOMBO, Sept 25 (Reuters) – The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said on Wednesday it has cut its forecast for Sri Lanka’s 2019 economic growth to 2.7% from 3.5% as a political crisis in the last year and Easter attacks weigh on the tourism industry and broader business activity.

The IMF forecast is lower than the central bank’s estimate of 3.1%, and would potentially be the slowest growth in nearly two decades. (Reporting by Shihar Aneez; Editing by Kim Coghill)

WATCH: JOSHUA HARRY BROWN’S DOCUMENTARY ON SRI LANKA AFTER THE TERROR ATTACKS

September 25th, 2019

DELAYED GRATIFICATION MAGAZINE

The Easter Sunday terror attacks against Christians and tourists in Sri Lanka had terrible repercussions for the country’s Muslim minority. In DG #35 we worked with photojournalist and documentary maker Joshua Harry Brown to examine the country’s latest cycle of religious violence. You can see the short film Brown made in the country below and for the full story get yourself a copy of the issue here.

Not ready for a political journey with conditions – Sajith

September 25th, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

United National Party (UNP) Deputy Leader Sajith Premadasa says that he is not ready for a political journey under conditions.

Premadasa mentioned this addressing the UNP Kalutara District rally currently ongoing at the Matugama Public Grounds.

Stating that he rejects ‘luxury politics’ Sajith Premadasa said that only he has the strength to work the most for this country.

Today some talk of national security. But there are so many aspects of national security. Military security, economic security, political security, and social security”, he said.

He says that the country cannot be strengthened by destroying, churches, mosques or Kovils. The national disunity created by these actions will only support modern terrorism.

The Minister stated that no matter who betrays him, the ‘Sajith Premadasa journey’ cannot be stopped.

“We are not the terrorists”: Interview with Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero

September 25th, 2019

By Frances Bulathsinghala/The Week

“We are not the terrorists”: Interview with Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero

Gnanasara Thero is the Secretary General of the Bodu Bala Sena

It is a weekday afternoon at the Sadh Dharamhajika Viharaya in the Colombo suburb of Rajagiriya. Viharaya means monks’ living quarters, but these particular premises serve as offices of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) and its secretary general, Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero. In the spacious garden, a group of youth are arranging chairs and tables, for a cooking demonstration by a young man who makes powders of grains and herbs. These are rural Sinhalese youth who have no one to support them,” says Dr Dilanthe Withanage, CEO of the BBS, who is an IT lecturer. We help them start their businesses and promote them the way we can.”

In finding solutions to the religious terrorism of today, Buddhism is the only answer. We want solutions to problems through discussions, not terrorism.

Interview/ Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero, Secretary General, Bodu Bala Sena

There must be a parliament that does not undermine in various guises the country and the rights of the Sinhala majority.

He says that he had initially got together with Gnanasara Thero to help Sinhala businesses. But gradually, the BBS took on a different shape to counter many issues”, including the ‘halal controversy’, he says.

Sinhalese businesspersons were complaining about how they had to pay the halal certification committee-appointed member in Sri Lanka to ensure that the food being produced was halal,” he says. If they did not get the halal certificate, their products would be rejected from food markets. We checked with traditional Muslims of Sri Lanka and they informed us that all this was not needed because they knew how to differentiate between what was halal and what was not, and did not want unnecessary complications.”

Please understand,” he adds, we did not start BBS to create any trouble. Only to strive for the rights of the Sinhalese, who are a global minority. We are currently fighting to quell Wahhabi extremism.”

Excerpts from an exclusive interview with the controversial Gnanasara Thero:

Q/ What made you become a monk?

A/ I was born in 1975 in a hamlet called Galagodaaththa in Galle and was educated at the local village school up to grade six. Then, somewhat against my parents’ wishes, I entered priesthood. After the main training as a young monk, in 1989, I joined the Wanawasa Sanga branch of our village temple and trained in the forest tradition for monks. I also studied Pali and Sanskrit.

In 1996, I came to Colombo to continue my education at the University of Kelaniya. Around 1999, I started teaching at an education centre for Buddhist monks. In 2001, I became the principal there, and at the end of 2003 I resigned fully from teaching.

Q/ Why did you give up teaching?

A/ I wanted to dedicate myself to my country. By this time I had become involved in the anti-terrorism movement (against the Tamil Tigers). This was the time president Chandrika Kumaratunga planned to bring a federal solution to the Tamil ethnic issue. She could not proceed with this because of opposition by Buddhist monks.

In 2000, the political movement Sihala Urumaya was launched. I became its clergy representative, from the Kotte area. Though it could win one parliamentary seat, it had internal issues. Some of the monks in it then organised the Jathika Sangha Sammelanaya (JSS), which became a strong national movement. I was its assistant secretary. We carried out protests against unethical conversions by Christian evangelists, which was a serious problem 15 years ago. We did not have any issues with the Catholics or Anglicans or other mainstream churches as they do not carry out unethical conversions.

In 2004, the main members of the JSS formed the political party Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU). Soon after, together with some monks and like-minded laity, I formed the BBS. Now the JSS is handled by the JHU monk Rathana Thero. I am not involved.

Q/ Are there fundamental differences between the JHU and the BBS?

A/ The JHU is now a political party. The BBS is not. It could be described as a national movement.

Q/ Did you have any non-Buddhist friends as a child or any non-Buddhist teachers?

A/ No. There was no opportunity for it as I grew up in a fully Buddhist village. There were no mosques or any Muslims around. There was a Catholic church, but I had no non-Buddhist friends as a child.

Q/ Among the Buddha’s teachings, what is the most important to you?

A/ The whole of the Buddha’s teachings is a living teaching. The Buddha said there is no sin more terrible than mythia drushtiya (mythical delusion). On April 21, in a place of worship one set of believers prayed to their God, another set killed them, again in the name of God, to please God. Nine suicide bombers carried out this barbaric act. All because they mythically believed this crime was what God wanted. Isn’t what the Buddha said correct?

In finding solutions to the religious terrorism of today, Buddhism is the only answer. We want solutions to problems through discussions, not terrorism. We are not the terrorists.

Q/ You often have said that Buddhism is threatened in Sri Lanka by the proliferation of religions such as Islam. There is the counterview that Buddhism is threatened only when Buddhists do not practise Buddhism as preached by the Buddha, as a science of the mind, self-control and compassion.

A/ Buddhist philosophy and Buddhist culture are two different things.

Q/ Of these two, which is more important?

A/ Both. Buddhist philosophy cannot be destroyed by anyone as it is a universal truth. However, Buddhist philosophy needs Buddhist culture to thrive. Forty generations or so ago, Buddhists lived in what are today Afghanistan and Pakistan. But in Afghanistan, the offspring of Buddhist ancestors who had become Muslim destroyed the Buddha’s statues their forefathers had sculpted. In those countries there were once Buddhist monks who stood for both Buddhist culture and Buddhist philosophy. But when Buddhist culture was vanquished with the invasion of Islam, Buddhist philosophy also died. Buddhist monks who were only focused on Buddhist philosophy died with their philosophy.

In India, the land of the Buddha, Buddhism has almost vanished. If Buddhism is to be protected, one has to protect its culture. Sri Lanka has through the ages protected Buddhism; both its philosophy and its culture. Therefore, as a Buddhist country we do many things such as sculpting Buddha statues, building temples, and organising Buddhist processions, in order to keep Buddhist culture alive.

Q/ The Buddhism in Sri Lanka today is largely based on the Buddhist revival movement carried out by the Dutch colonisers who wanted to quell the rise of Catholicism propagated by the Portuguese colonisers. It was revived again, during British occupation, by foreign Buddhist enthusiasts such as Henry Olcott, an American military officer who was the first president of the Theosophical Society.

A/ Yes, I agree. Our colonial history is a long and intriguing one where we were victims of divide and rule. In the Uva Wellassa area, there was a rebellion three years after we lost the country in 1815. We were crushed in the most brutal manner imaginable. Every tree, every herb, every fruit and every animal that served and protected us as a people was destroyed in an unprecedented human, cultural and environmental genocide. Following this, there were strong campaigns to portray Buddhism as a false philosophy and [to make] Buddhists believe in Christianity.

A Christian priest, D.J. Gogerly, carried out the Christianising of Lankan Buddhists through his writings. The Buddhist monk Migettuwatte Gunananda Thera then undertook a mission from 1848 to the 1870s to revive Buddhism. Under his leadership, a series of five debates was held all over Sri Lanka between Christians and Buddhists.

It is after the victory of the Buddhists in these debates that Henry Olcott and those such as Marie Musaeus Higgins came to Sri Lanka and embraced Buddhism and dedicated themselves to the Buddhist revival movement. Therefore, in the same way that we faced Christian indoctrination through debates, we must face the threat of Islamisation today in Sri Lanka.

Gnanasara Thero addresses Buddhist monks

Q/ Is there actually such a threat? Some people accuse you of creating Islamophobia.

A/ Please note that I am not talking about the traditional Muslims of Sri Lanka. They have lived peacefully ever since their arrival as traders. They married Sinhalese women, whom they converted to Islam. They have followed their religion while respecting Buddhist customs and traditions of the land, and without carrying out the vicious agendas of the Wahhabi, Salafi, Tabliq, Deobandi, Ikhwan and Thawheed groups. For the past 40 years these groups have been growing strong with funding from Saudi Arabia. These groups systematically changed the face of Islam in Sri Lanka and started killing off the Sufis and moderate Muslims. In Kattankudy, in the eastern Batticaloa district, Sufis are insulted and killed. Everyone knows it. Is talking about it Islamophobia? Is what happened on April 21 not a result of this warped ideology of the Wahhabi mentality manifesting in action?

Q/ There are allegations that the April 21 bombings happened because the BBS antagonised the Muslims and drove them to join extreme elements such as Zahran Hashim, the ring leader of the Easter Sunday carnage. There are also assumptions that Zahran himself may have taken to terror because of incidents like the Aluthgama riots of 2014, for which you are largely blamed.

A/ Is that what is now being said? So now we are the culprits of IS (Islamic State) terror? (Laughs.)

Q/ Looking back at your public speech prior to the riots in Aluthgama, do you have any regrets about the words you used?

A/ I did not say go and create a riot. Stones were hurled at the monks and Buddhists by some Muslim youth in Aluthgama after we peacefully dispersed after my speech. It is actions like these that got the Sinhalese crowds angry.

I made that speech after one of our monks in a vehicle was attacked in Aluthgama by a few Muslim men. I did nothing more than warn against such behaviour.

Q/ There is the view among media analysts that because the BBS in 2014 portrayed this issue of Wahhabi/Salafi/Tabliq extremism as Muslim extremism, many writers and others who knew of the discovery of ammunition in some locations early this year were reluctant to write about it fearing that the BBS would create an anti-Muslim backlash.

A/ The media was preoccupied with chasing us and labelling us as extremists. We raised our voice in 2014 because we knew what was happening. Our monks faced aggression from Muslim extremists. In 2014, there was information that some local extremist Muslims had joined IS fighters in Syria. This was ignored. Now everything we have said has [happened]. Hundreds had been killed and still we are being blamed and called racists.

We have information on some Muslim activists in this country and have pictures of them with questionable global Muslim extremists. We had information of how false passports were used by Lankan Muslim youth to enter foreign countries and return to Sri Lanka with Christian names and from Sri Lanka to go to Saudi Arabia under Muslim names. I have with me a note that I prepared around 2014 for a press conference on the extremism of the National Thowheed Jama’ath and in particular about Zahran, who was the mastermind of the blasts. I then asked why this extremist was not arrested—he was openly propagating Wahhabism and IS ideology, destroying the cemeteries of Sufi saints and asking Muslims to be armed and kill non-Muslims.

Q/ Did you inform the authorities?

A/ We had by 2014 informed the highest-level personnel in governance.

Q/ You have come out strongly against the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulama (ACJU), which is the top Islamic body of Sri Lankan Muslims. You have accused them of being carriers of the Wahhabi ideology.

A/ Over 90 per cent of the members of the ACJU hold the Wahhabi ideology. This is proven by the fact that they do not issue any message for the commemoration of the Prophet Muhammad’s birthday. The Wahhabis/Salafis and others who practise an extreme form of Islam do not commemorate the Prophet’s birthday. The traditional Muslims of Sri Lanka do. I have cited only one small example. There are hundreds of other examples. For instance, their fatwas against the Sufi Muslims of Sri Lanka.

Q/ In the Buddhist convention held in Kandy on July 7, you said your aim was a ‘Sinhala parliament’. Do you think this is practical and that Sri Lankans will support this?

A/ I did not say [we should not] have non-Sinhalese in the political structure. What I said was that there must be a parliament that does not undermine in various guises the country and the rights of the Sinhala majority.

We are lobbying for the local education system to be developed in a manner that does not propagate racism. We today have schools based on communal distinctions. This is the beginning of the problem.

Q/ It is said that you have got foreign funding.

A/ (Laughs) The only foreign funding we have comes from Sri Lankans living overseas. We do not touch one cent of money from any foreign entity.

Q/ After the blasts, there seems to be animosity towards all Muslims. The boycott on Muslim businesses is affecting them seriously.

A/ This is the sad result of Wahhabi terrorism. Ordinary people now suspect all Muslims.

Rights issue triggers UN ban on non-essential Lankan troops in UN keeping missions

September 25th, 2019

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

United Nations, September 25 (Foreign Policy): The UN peacekeeping department has decided to ban the deployment of non-essential Sri Lankan army troops in UN peacekeeping missions, citing the country’s appointment of an alleged war criminal to a top military post.

Lt. General Shavendra Silva was recently appointed chief of the Sri Lankan army, eliciting criticism from the UN, the United States, and the European Union.

Rights issue triggers UN ban on non-essential Lankan troops in UN keeping missions

Silva commanded Sri Lanka’s 58th division during the final stages of the country’s military campaign to crush the Tamil Tigers, a militant separatist movement known for pioneering suicide terror attacks.

The U.N. High Commissioner for the United Nations, Michelle Bachelet, announced last month that Silva’s appointment was deeply troubling” given the serious allegations of gross violations of international human rights and humanitarian law against him and his troops during the war.”

This week, a U.N. spokesperson confirmed to Foreign Policy that it would ban new Sri Lankan units from deploying in U.N. missions unless their presence is vital for ensuring the missions’ security.

There appeared to be no plan to repatriate the more than 650 Sri Lankan troops currently serving in U.N. missions, including in Mali, South Sudan, and Lebanon.

Farhan Haq, deputy spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, told Foreign Policy the U.N. is grateful” for Sri Lanka’s contribution of troops to six U.N. peacekeeping operations, but is troubled by Silva’s promotion.

We have expressed our concern to the Government of Sri Lanka over the appointment of Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva to the position of Commander of the Sri Lanka Army, despite well-documented, credible allegations of his involvement in serious violations of international humanitarian and human rights law,” Haq said.

In light of this appointment, the U.N. Department of Peace Operations is therefore suspending future Sri Lankan Army deployments except where suspension would expose U.N. operations to serious operational risk,” he said

එජාපය තවමත් කොන්දේසි සහ ගිවිසුම් මැද

September 25th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ ජනපති අපේක්ෂකයා ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරන විශේෂ කෘත්‍යාධිකාරී මණ්ඩලය හෙට පස්වරු 3 ට සිරිකොත පක්ෂ මූලස්ථානයේදී රැස්වීමට නියමිතයි.

ඒ සඳහා සියලූ කටයුතු මේ වනවිටත් සූදානම් කර අවසන් බවයි පක්ෂයේ ජ්‍යෙෂ්ඨයන් සඳහන් කළේ.

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ ජනාධිපති අපේක්ෂකයා ලෙස නියෝජ්‍ය නායක අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස නම් කිරීමට පක්ෂ නායක අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ එකඟත්වය පළ කර ඇති බවටයි මේ වනවිට වාර්තාවන්නේ.

කෙසේ වෙතත් ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් නිල දැනුම්දීමක් තමන් වෙත මෙතෙක් සිදුකර නොමැති බව අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස සඳහන් කළා.

මේ අතර සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාසට ජනාධිපතිවරණ අපේක්ෂකත්වය ලබාදීමට පක්ෂ නායක අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ කොන්දේසි කිහිපයක් පනවා ඇති බවට මාධ්‍ය වාර්තා අනාවරණ කරනවා.

විධායක ජනාධිපති ධුරය මාස 6 ක් ඇතුළත අහෝසි කිරීම, පක්ෂ නායකත්වයේ වෙනසක් සිදු නොකිරීම සහ ඉදිරි මහ මැතිවරණයකදී අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ හට ලබාදීම එම කොන්දේසි අතර වන බවටයි වාර්තාවන්නේ.

මෙම ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති කොන්දේසි සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමු කිහිපයකදීද අදහස් පළ වුණා.

මේ අතර එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ නියෝජ්‍ය නායක අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස සහ එක්සත් ජාතික පෙරමුණේ පක්ෂ නායකයින් අතර විශේෂ සාකච්ඡාවක් අද මුදල් අමාත්‍යාංශයේදී පැවැත්වුණා.

https://youtu.be/QM1z2sl8hEM

පැය දෙකකට ආසන්න කාලයක් පැවති එම සාකච්ඡාවෙන් අනතුරුව අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස තවත් සාකච්ඡාවක් සඳහා අරලියගහ මන්දිරය වෙත පැමිණියා.

එහිදීද අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ අතර හමුවක් සිදුවූ බවටයි වාර්තාවන්නේ.

එමෙන්ම තමන් හා එක්වන ලෙස සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ හිටපු මහ ලේකම් තිස්ස අත්තනායකට සිදුකළ ඉල්ලීම ඔහු විසින් පිළිගෙන තිබෙනවා.

නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් හිටපු මහ ලේකම්වරයා සඳහන් කළේ නියෝජ්‍ය නායක අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස හා එක්ව පක්ෂයෙන් ඈත්වූ ජයග්‍රහණය යළි ලබාදීමට කැපවීමෙන් කටයුතු කරන බවයි.

කෙසේ වෙතත් විකල්ප කණ්ඩායමක් ලෙස පෙනී සිටින දේශප්‍රේමී එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂය අද ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවා පක්ෂයේ පවතින අර්බුදය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදහස් පළ කර සිටියා.

මේ අතර ජාතික නිවාස සංවර්ධන අධිකාරිය සුරැකීමේ සංවිධානය අද මැතිවරණ කොමිසන් සභාවට පැමිණිල්ලක් ඉදිරිපත් කළේ විෂයභාර අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස විසින් මැතිවරණ නීති උල්ලංඝනය කරමින් සේවක පත්වීම් ලබාදීමේ උත්සාහයක නිරතවන බවට කරුණු දක්වමින්.

උතුරු පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාරවරයාට සැකයක්

September 25th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

මුලතිව් නයාරු ගුරුකන්ද රජමහා විහාරාධිපති නාහිමියන්ගේ දේහය අධිකරණ නියෝග නොතකමින් එම විහාර භූමියේම ආදාහනය කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් උතුරු පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාර ආචාර්ය සුරේන් රාගවන් මහතා අද කොළඹදී ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවක් කැඳවමින් අදහස් පළ කළා.

https://youtu.be/jP-EuwSwY_Q

කිසිදු කොන්දේසියකට යටත් නොවන බව ඇමති සජිත් කියයි

September 25th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

තමන් කිසිදු කොන්දේසියකට යටත්ව ජනාධිපතිවරණ අපේක්ෂකත්වය ලබා නොගන්නා බව එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ නියෝජ නායක අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස පවසනවා.

මතුගම මහජන ක්‍රීඩාංගණයේ අද පස්වරුවේ පැවති ජන රැළියකට එක්වෙමින් ඔහු මේ බව සඳහන් කළා.

https://youtu.be/sDiEQZNOzeY

නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන ආයතනවලට මාගල්කන්දේ සුදත්ත හිමියන්ගෙන් චෝදනාවක්

September 25th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

රටේ නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන සෑම ආයතනයක්ම දෙයාකාරව නීතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන බවට නව සිංහල රාවය සංවිධානයේ මහලේකම් පූජ්‍ය මාගල්කන්දේ සුදත්ත හිමියන් චෝදනා කරනවා.

උන්වහන්සේ මේ අදහස් පළකළේ අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබාදීම සඳහා පැමිණි අවස්ථාවේදි.

මේ අතර කොළඹ පැවති ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවකට එක්වෙමින් රාවණා බලය සංවිධානයේ කැඳවුම්කරු පූජ්‍ය ඉත්තෑකන්දේ සද්ධාතිස්ස හිමියන් අල්ලස් කොමිසමේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල් දිල්රුක්ෂි ඩයස් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහත්මියගේ දුරකථන හඬපට පිළිබඳව අදහස් පළකළා.

https://youtu.be/vaZi3thonBI

ආබාධිත රණවිරුවන්ට විපක්ෂ නායකගෙන් පොරොන්දුවක්

September 25th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

තම පාලනයක් යටතේ ආබාධිත රණවිරු ගැටළුවට ස්ථිර විසඳුමක් ලබාදෙන බව විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා පවසනවා.

අද කොළඹ පැවති සම්මේලනයකට සහභාගී වෙමින් විපක්ෂ නායකවරයා මේ අදහස් පළ කළා.

https://youtu.be/zzWW2kbc3gY

රණවිරු පවුල් සාමාජික සාමාජිකාවන්ගේ අනු සංවිධාන ජාතික සම්මේලනයද පැවැත්වුනේ, ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ සහ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ යන මහත්වරුන්ගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන්.

මෙහිදී පරම වීර විභූෂණ සම්මානයෙන් පිදුම් ලැබූ රණවිරුවන් තිදෙනෙකුගේ පවුල් වෙනුවෙන් උපාහාර දැක්වීමද සිදුකෙරුණා.

UNP to nominate Sajith as candidate on conditions

September 24th, 2019

Kelum Bandara and Yohan Perera Courtesy The Daily Mirror

There was general agreement among the seniors of the United National Party (UNP) to nominate Minister Sajith Premadasa as the presidential candidate but on certain conditions to be stipulated in writing, Daily Mirror learns. The UNP seniors backing both Party Leader Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mr.Premadasa met on Tuesday (24) to work out some arrangement to agree on candidacy.

The Prime Minister is reportedly in agreement that candidacy could be offered to Mr.Premadasa but on condition that he (Mr.Wickremesinghe) should remain the UNP Leader and the Prime Minister. Also there has to be commitment from Mr.Premadasa to abolish executive presidency .

Mr.Wickremesinghe’s position is that a power devolution package based on consensus reached at the parliamentary steering committee should be worked out to resolve the Tamil national question. ()

An Expressway covering the entire country – A new impetus to revive the Economy from 2020-2025:

September 24th, 2019

Courtesy The Island

article_image

* A new elliptical expressway parallel to the coast at a distance of about 40-50 km from it, around Sri Lanka.

* New expressway to provide easy access to both coastal belt and hinterland.

* A single expressway from Medawachchiya to Kilinochchi.

* Fast-tracked construction to be completed in five years.

* Project investment likely to be a massive boost to the entire economy.

* Project investment to be generated from funds saved as a result of reduced rates of interest due to sound management of the economy.

* Economy to reap a host of other short and long term benefits.

* People have a responsibility to elect leaders who are capable of implementing projects and positively dealing with emerging challenges.

An elliptical “circular” expressway for a county shaped like an ellipse

Sri Lanka is a country in the shape of an ellipse. While the central part is mountainous, the rest of the island is a flat plain. The distance from the North to the South is about 420 km, and from the East to the West, it is about 220 km at the maximum point.

Based on these geographic factors, if an expressway is to be constructed in the most practical and cost-effective manner to cover the entire country, it is logical that it must be in an elliptical shape, parallel to the coast at a distance of 40-50 km from it. It is possible that the Northern point of such New Elliptical Expressway (NEE) could be close to Medawachchiya, the Southern point close to Kirama, the Eastern point close to Pokurugama and the Western point close to Mirigama. As the feeder to the NEE, many of the existing roads can be easily connected to it as “entry” and “exit” points.

Already, there are highways from Kadawatha to Godagama (144 km) and Colombo to Katunayake (25 km). In a few months, a connecting highway will be seamlessly linked from Kadawatha to Kerawalapitiya (10 km), and another from Godagama to Hambantota (75 km). Once those sections are completed, the Expressway system of Sri Lanka will be completed from Katunayake to Hambantota, in close proximity to the coast. At the same time, since a considerable length of highway spanning the districts of Gampaha, Colombo, Kalutara, Matara and Hambantota has already been completed, it may now therefore be more practical and sensible to connect such existing highway to the NEE, without constructing the section of the proposed NEE parallel to the coast from a distance of 40-50 km in those districts.

Therefore, Kudaoya may be considered the possible starting point of the NEE connecting to the present highway from the South, while Mirigama may be the chosen Northern starting point. When that is done (as shown in the map), the NEE will run 40-50 km parallel to the coast covering a distance of around 500 Km through the hinterland avoiding forest and wildlife regions, historical and archaeological sites, densely populated areas and special places of attraction to local and foreign tourists.

The land area to the North of Medawachchiya is of a triangular shape, and therefore, the construction of an elliptical expressway beyond Medawachchiya will not yield a cost-effective advantage. Accordingly, a single direct expressway of about 105 km at the centre of that area providing access to both sides of the triangle can be built from Medawachchiya to Kilinochchi and connected to the NEE, so that it becomes an integral part of the NEE. Once this Medawachchiya/Kilinochchi section too is constructed, the entire country will be fully connected through a 100 kmph expressway system comprising a total of about 859 km.

The maximum travel time from one

point of Sri Lanka to another will be

only about 5 hours…

If a “connected” expressway is constructed as described above, any person from any part of Sri Lanka will be able to gain access to the NEE easily after travelling a distance of a maximum of 50 km from any part of the country, coastal or hinterland. For example, if a person wishes to travel from Siyambalanduwa to Mannar, he will travel a distance of about 30-40 km on ordinary roads, enter the highway at a suitable entry point, cruise along the highway, exit from Vavuniya, travel a further distance of about 30 km on ordinary roads and reach Mannar. Similarly, a person travelling from Balangoda to Trincomalee can first take an ordinary road covering about 40 km, enter the highway from an entry point near Kuda-oya, cruise along the highway, exit from an exit point near Demataweva and reach Trincomalee after finally travelling a distance of about 40 km along ordinary roads. In this manner, a person will be able to travel any long distance easily from any point in the country, where maximum time spent on travelling from any point to point, not being more than five hours.

The investment required for

this Project ?

The Southern Expressway from Kottawa to Godagama is 124 km. Its cost (incurred during 2007 to 2013) is reported to be USD 892 million. That is, USD 7.2 million per km. Therefore, we may reasonably assume it will be possible to construct the proposed NEE at a cost of around USD 7.2 million per km, since the terrain through which the proposed expressway is to be constructed is somewhat similar to that of the Kottawa/Godagama Expressway. The length of the proposed elliptical part of the expressway as shown in the map is about 500 km, while the section from Medawachchiya to Kilinochchi is about 105 km. Accordingly, the total length of the proposed NEE works out to approximately 605 km. Hence, the total cost of the Project may be estimated at around USD 4,350 million.

In order to implement such a project, it will also be necessary to undertake a scientific and geographical survey of the land lay-out and contours and decide on the proposed path of the highway. Such an exercise is likely to take at least one year and the expenditure covering the technical and architectural consultancies and other evaluations may amount to around USD 200 million. Further, if the project is to be fast-tracked to be completed in five years from 2021-2025, a sum of around USD 870 million per annum (or Rs 157 billion) will have to be invested by the government on physical earth works, infrastructure construction work, etc. Although such annual outlay may appear to be a considerable investment, it will not be such a daunting task for the government to raise the total requirement of funds from existing sources, if the public debt is managed in a sound manner.

Sri Lanka’s Gross Domestic Product exceeds Rs. 14,000 billion and the public debt exceeds Rs. 13,000 billion. The existing stock of Treasury Bills and Bonds amounts to Rs. 5,500 billion. Hence, if the authorities are able to successfully reduce the Treasury Bills and Bonds interest rates to a level close to the level that existed at the end of 2014, the rates will be tightened by about 3% p.a, which alone will save a sum of around Rs.165 billion per year for the government. Incidentally, such saving will be more than the annual requirement of Rs. 157 billion for this NEE Project!

It may be recalled that the previous government was able to save such large amounts of money through the proper management of the Sri Lankan economy during the term of President Mahinda Rajapaksa, and these surpluses were utilized for various development projects. Further, the shift of funds to investment will lead to a massive economic revival that will be visible and tangible across the economy, with new economic activities being spurred on by such investments.

The investment on the ‘NEE’ will infuse new life into the economy that is now in shambles !

Once the NEE is completed, there is no doubt that many areas of the country that are today identified as “difficult areas”, will undergo rapid development, since the entire country will become inter-connected.

Businessmen and entrepreneurs will locate their business establishments and factories throughout the country. Investors in the tourism sector will take a renewed interest in constructing hotel complexes and tourist infrastructure facilities in all parts of the country. International investors will find Sri Lanka a hugely attractive location. The consequent economic progress will cover every village, while the present beleaguered building contractors of high, medium and small scale constructions will enjoy a new lease of life. The beneficial impact of such a revival will soon trickle down to other sectors as well. Thus, the proposed expressway project will be a tremendous boost to the economy of the country.

The people, too, have a

responsibility!

At present, Sri Lanka is trapped in a serious economic downward spiral. The economy is paralysed and has no direction. The current leaders have not introduced any worthwhile strategy in a manner that generates any business confidence. Even on the rare occasions where various projects have been suggested, those have failed miserably, since there has been no strategy to raise the funds necessary to implement such projects.

From 2006 to 2014, Sri Lanka’s economic managers secured the required resources for the massive development projects launched and implemented during the term of President Mahinda Rajapaksa. Money circulated freely and confidently within the country. There was never a shortage of funds for the war, reforms, rehabilitation, resettlement, development, relief measures and repayment of debt. That government faced a plethora of challenges which it faced through systematic planning and strategic implementation of such plans. As a result, unprecedented improvement took place in infrastructure; Interest rates and inflation were at manageable levels. The Sri Lankan rupee was stable as never before (or after) in history. Overall, all macro-economic fundamentals were on a sound footing.

For a country to progress, it is necessary that there should be far reaching proposals that are realistic, useful and beneficial to the people of that land. If that happens, the entire country will become a dynamic worksite. This proposal for the NEE is aimed at achieving that end. At the same time, there is no doubt that there will be many challenges when this proposal is implemented. Many crucial decisions will have to be taken. At that time, lamentations and excuses, similar to those that the leaders of the current government make on a daily basis, will be of no use. Therefore, it is the bounden duty of the people to entrust the governance of the country to leaders who have a proven record of facing challenges and who are knowledgeable and experienced. That responsibility will need to be taken seriously by the entire population.

විධායකය අහෝසි කරන යෝජනාව කාගේද.. රට ගිණියම් කල අගමැතිවරයාගේ කැබිනට් පත‍්‍රිකාව මෙන්න…

September 24th, 2019

lanka C news

විධායකය අහෝසි කරන යෝජනාව කාගේද.. රට ගිණියම් කල කැබිනට් පත‍්‍රිකාව මෙන්න…

විධායක ජනාධිපති ක්‍රමය අහෝසි කිරීම සඳහා විසිවන සංශෝධනය සම්මත කිරීමට පසුගියදා කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලයට ඉදිරිපත් වූ හදිසි කැබිනට් පත්‍රිකා සමඟ දේශපාලනය උණුසුම් තත්ත්වයට පත්විය.

ඊට කැබිනට් සාමාජිකයන්ගේ දැඩි විරෝධය එල්ල වූ අතර ජනාදිපතිවරයා විසින් කියා සිටියේ ඒ අගමැතිවරයාගේ යෝජනාවක් බවයි.

නමුත් එය ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරමින් අගමැතිවරයා කියා සිටියේ එම යෝජනාව ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කල එකක් බවයි.

කෙසේ වෙතත් එදින කැබිනට් මණ්ඩලයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන ලද ඇමති මණ්ඩල සංදේශය මේ වනවිට අන්තර්ජාලයේ සමාජජාලා අතරට මුදා හැර ඇත.

එහි දැක්වෙන ආකාරයට අදාළ කැබිනට් පත්‍රිකාව ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත්තේ අගමැති රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා විසිනි.

එම කැබිනට් පත‍්‍රිකාව පහත දැක්වේ.

SLPP steps up pressure on UNP, highlights Avant Garde’s Ukrainian Captain’s plight Dilrukshi affair:

September 24th, 2019

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

article_image

SLPP Chairman Prof. G. L. Peiris, yesterday, said that the recent shocking admission by top Attorney General’s Department official Dilrukshi Dias Wickramasinghe that the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) during her tenure there as its Director General, acted at the behest of politicians in respect of Avant Garde case revealed extremely sorry state of affairs.

 At the time of the releasing of a recording of Wickramasinghe’s conversation with Avant Garde proprietor Nissanka Senadhipathy, the former functioned as the Solicitor General.

 Warning of dire consequences as a result of what the former External Affairs Minister called prostitution of the entire criminal justice process; Prof. Peiris said the thorough inquiry was required to ascertain the other cases filed following the change of government in 2015.

 The former law professor of the Colombo University said so in response to The Island query whether the SLPP/JO intended to push for examination of all cases filed against ministers and officials of the previous Rajapaksa administration.

 The SLPP Chairman said that it would be the responsibility of the Attorney General’s Department and the Public Service Commission (PSC) to establish as to why Wickramasinghe declared her power to function even over the parliament. Prof. Peiris pointed out that what Wickramasinghe meant by her statement that she could make or break laws was obvious.

 Prof. Peiris said that politically motivated police investigations and judicial measures deprived the country of an extremely valuable large revenue source. Over 4,000 personnel who served Senadhipathy’s outfit lost employment, Prof. Peiris said adding that a high profile operation undertaken by Sri Lanka on behalf of the UN was ruined by the current dispensation.

 Responding to another query, Prof. Peiris said that not only Wickramasinghe but the government owed an explanation regarding the Solicitor General’s revelations and accusations.

 When The Island pointed out that one-time Attorney General Tilak Marapana PC, who held the law and order portfolio in President Maithripala Sirisena’s 100-day government had to quit in Nov 2015 over him defending Avant Garde both in and outside parliament, Prof. Peiris, too, acknowledged crisis caused by probes influenced by politicians.

 President Sirisena named Sarath Jayamanne, PC, as Wickramasinghe’s successor after she resigned in Nov 2016 after the President flayed her over handling of the Avant Garde case.

 Prof. Peiris pointed out that Ukrainian captain of the MV Avant Garde ship, Captain Gennadiy Gavrylov arrested on 23 June 2016 continued to be held here as the government as the then CIABOC Chief admitted played politics with cases.

 Commenting on the CID probing Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s conduct during 2005 presidential election, Prof. Peiris said that the government and the political police should be ashamed of what was happening. Prof. Peiris said that the UNP feared to face Gotabaya Rajapaksa at the 2019 presidential poll. Instead of preparing for the election, the government was working overtime, somehow to disqualify the SLPP candidate. 

Those who lodged a complaint with the CID alleging the then US citizen Gotabaya Rajapaksa had engaged in 2005 campaign on behalf of his brother Mahinda Rajapaksa turned a blind eye to Western interventions in Colombo to change the government as openly boasted by ex-Secretary of State John Kerry, Prof. Peiris said.

 Responding to another query, Prof. Peiris stressed the need to probe assistance and advice received by the CIABOC from various interested parties following the change of government. The SLPP Chairman said that the CIABOC issue would be taken up in the presidential campaign. The former minister said that Gotabaya Rajapaksa had been among those targeted by the government as part of its overall project to suppress the legitimate Opposition.

 According to Prof. Peiris a wider investigation was required to establish the truth. Had they intervened to force judicial measures on false allegations targeting ministers and officials of the previous administration, the same lot could have saved the treasury bond thieves, Prof. Peiris said.

මහින්දගෙන් ඉල්ලීමක්.

September 24th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

අල්ලස් කොමිසමේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ජනරාල් ලෙස කටයුතු කරන සමයේ බලපෑම් සිදුකරන ලද දේශපාලනඥයින් පිළිබඳව සොලිස්ටර් ජනරාල් දිල්රුක්ෂි ඩයස් වික්‍රමසිංහ රටට හෙළිකළ යුතු බව විපක්ෂ නායක මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ පවසනවා.

https://youtu.be/Ox5kBn-lAno

විපක්ෂ නායකවරයා මේ බව කියා සිටියේ කොළඹදී අද පැවති සමුපකාර නිලධාරීන්ගේ සම්මේලනයකට එක්වෙමින්

වැරදි පිළිගන්න කිරිඇල්ල සූදානම්

September 24th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

එක්සත් ජාතික පාක්ෂිකයන්ට රැකියා ලබාදීම වැරැද්දක් නම් තමා එය පිළිගන්නා බව අමාත්‍ය ලක්ෂ්මන් කිරිඇල්ල අද රාජ්‍ය ආයතනවල වංචා දූෂණ සොයන ජනාධිපති කොමිසම හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශ කළා.

ඒ,  උසස් අධ්‍යාපන හා මහාමාර්ග අමාත්‍යවරයා ලෙස කටයුතු කරන සමයේ මාර්ග සංවර්ධන අධිකාරියට නීතියට පටහැනිව සේවකයින් බඳවාගැනීමේ සිද්ධියක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ලැබුණු පැමිණිල්ලකට අදාළ විමර්ශනයට එක්වෙමින්.

එහිදී වැඩිදුරටත් සාක්ෂි ලබාදෙමින් අමාත්‍යවරයා සඳහන් කර ඇත්තේ පසුගිය ආණ්ඩු සමයේද මෙවැනි පත්වීම් ලබාදී ඇති බවයි.

ඒ පිළිබඳව කිසිදු විමර්ශනයක් සිදුවී නොමැති බවද ඔහු සඳහන් කර තිබෙනවා.

මෙහිදි කොමිසමේ සභාපති විනිසුරු උපාලි අබේරත්න ප්‍රකාශ කර ඇත්තේ ඇමතිවරුන් වැරදි පූර්වාදර්ශ සිදු නොකර නීත්‍යානුකූලව කටයුතු කළ යුතු බවයි.

සිමින්ති තොග බෙදාදෙමින් ඇමති සජිත් මැතිවරණ නීති උල්ලංඝනය කරනවා

September 24th, 2019

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

හම්බන්තොට දිස්ත්‍රික්කය තුල සිමින්ති තොග වශයෙන් බෙදා හරිමින් අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතා මැතිවරණ නීති උල්ලංඝනයක නිරත වන බවට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන මහතා චෝදනා කරනවා.

ඒ කොළඔ අද පැවති ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්චාවකට එක්වෙමින්.

මේ අතර අද පැවැති ප්‍රවෘත්ති සාකච්ඡාවකදී පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ජයන්ත සමරවිර මහතා ද මැතිවරණ නීති උල්ලංඝනය කරමින් රාජ්‍ය ආයතනවලට පත්වීම් ලබාදීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදහස් පළ කළා.

https://youtu.be/J_xE7pngZ0E

If recommending UNPers for RDA jobs wrong Kiriella ready to accept his mistake RDA suffers staggering loss of Rs 62.87M

September 24th, 2019

By Mirudhula Thambiah Courtesy Ceylon Today

According to the PCoI, the Road Development Authority (RDA) faced a staggering loss of Rs 62.87 million by recruiting staff and that the appointments had also violated Management Service Circulars.


Leader of the House, Minister Lakshman Kiriella told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry yesterday (24), that if recommending  UNP Members for recruitment to the RDA was wrong, he was ready to accept it.


He noted that the appointments were made at a time when there were many roads to be constructed in the Central Province.


He added, “I made recommendations to recruit certain UNP Members as Public Liaison Officers to avoid issues cropping up when constructing roads within the Central Province,” Kiriella said he made recommendations of people known to him and the RDA offered them jobs.


However, the Commissioners pointed out that the recruitment drive had caused a loss of Rs 62.87 million and that the appointments had violated Management Service Circulars.


Denying the allegation, the Minister added that if the Ministry had misappropriated such an amount, there should be an audit query and that he has made these recommendations according to RDA guidelines.

 “The RDA has the authority to appoint people to complete a certain task. These were no permanent recruitments, as after completing their task they could be removed from the position,” Kiriella said.


Minister Kiriella said, during former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s regime, recruitments had been made in a similar manner and that he had followed the precedent during his term of office.

Cabinet grants approval to provide salaries to disabled soldiers for life

September 24th, 2019

Courtesy Ceylon Today

The Minister of Finance, Mangala Samaraweera has said today (24) that the Cabinet has granted approval to continue providing the last received salary to all disabled soldiers for lifetime.

Attempt to make deposit for Sajith Ajith turned away by EC

September 24th, 2019

By J.T. de Silva Courtesy Ceylon Today

Non-Cabinet Minister Ajith P. Perera, who had gone to the Election Commission to pay the cash deposit on behalf of UNP Deputy Leader Sajith Premadasa to contest the coming Presidential Poll, had been forced to return abruptly.


Sources from the Commission said, Perera had failed to furnish the letter of consent from the UNP General Secretary, which is a requirement when depositing cash for contestants from recognised political parties. This had prompted him to leave in haste.


These sources added, though Perera had met Chairman of the Commission Mahinda Deshapriya, he had been unable to make the cash deposit due to the want of the letter of consent from the Party General Secretary.

Before bowing out gracefully, if at all, will…? Ranil spare us another ‘Sirisenic faux pas’

September 23rd, 2019

By Shivanthi Ranasinghe Courtesy Ceylon Today

Last week an exhausted Sajith Premadasa, looking disenchanted and disheartened, sat with Mangala Samaraweera, Kabir Hashim and Malik Samarawickrema and addressed the media. He explained that he had requested in writing of Ranil Wickremesinghe to consider him as the 2019 Presidential Candidate. Premadasa, in almost every other statement emphasised that unlike other family-centric political parties that take closed door decisions, the UNP as a political party and a forerunner of the incumbent Government follows democratic principles and procedures.

If indeed the UNP as an established political party is embedded with democracy; then one has to wonder at the necessity for the press conference or for that matter, the letter. In it, Premadasa has, 

– expressed his own intentions to be a candidate;

– requested that if others are also interested to be nominated, then to follow the democratic procedures and make the selection.

Had the letter simply articulated Premadasa’s interest in being nominated, then, further comment is unwarranted. Yet Premadasa also wants, “an immediate meeting of both the parliamentary group and the working committee, as that’s the democratic way to go ahead”. The meeting between the parliamentary group and the working committee can be a consensus building meeting.

“If we can arrive at a consensus, there is no necessity to resort to any other procedure. Let there be a frank and transparent discussion within the parliamentary group and the working committee. Then all of us would be able to ascertain the plethora of opinions among the members of the parliamentary group and the working committee. If there is a consensus, then so be it.

“But if there is a diversity of opinions, we can adapt the greatest democratic principle and have a secret ballot.”

At the time of this press conference, declaration of the Presidential Election was imminent. Yet, one of Sri Lanka’s oldest democratic political parties was obviously not even close to deciding on the candidate to field. After all, fielding the candidate for the country’s highest office is not akin to appointing a class monitor. Therefore, Premadasa’s request should have taken place at least six months ago. The entire UNP camp should be by now grooming their candidate to victory and to holding the mantle thereafter without faltering.

This press conference was an obvious attempt to pressurising Wickremesinghe to take the due course specified in the letter. After all, this is an internal matter of the UNP and not something that the entire country needs to be involved.

Democratic strength

Mangala Samaraweera took great pains to refute that the UNP was in conflict over the matter. He claimed that the situation that has arisen, which he with his other partners thought fit to be brought to the attention of the media, is actually the strength of the UNP. He stated that the democracy in the Party is so strong that anyone can come forward as a candidate.

If that is indeed the case, the question arises for the need to request from Ranil Wickremesinghe to allow “a frank and transparent discussion within the parliamentary group and the working committee”, if such a mechanism already exists within the Party and is the norm of that Party’s practices.

Obviously, neither Premadasa who is UNP’s Deputy Leader, Kabir Hashim who was UNP’s former General Secretary, Malik Samarawickrema who until very recently was Ranil Wickremesinghe’s closest ally, nor Mangala Samaraweera who has a freehand to do as he pleases in the incumbent Government, believe that… “A frank and transparent discussion within the parliamentary group and the working committee” could exist within UNP without mounting public pressure on Wickremesinghe.

Reasons for Wickremesinghe’s reluctance to hand over the presidential candidature to anyone other than himself in the UNP are well known. He would rather support an outsider like the then General Sarath Fonseka or trust a man who was firmly established in the rivalry team like Maithripala Sirisena than support someone from the UNP. He will never risk losing Party leadership. It is as long as he is UNP’s Leader; he can either enjoy himself as the Premier or Opposition Leader.

Premadasa and his new found friends too know this fact very well. It will take much more than a mere letter to push Wickremesinghe to the democratic path. The Badulla, Matara, and Kurunegala rallies were actually to nudge Wickremesinghe.

Wickremesinghe would not have been fooled by the crowds. It would have been obvious to him that the Premadasa camp had borrowed a leaf from JVP and used the smallest grounds to erect the largest stages, and thereby creating a deliberate jamming of people. Yet, the intention was to create an illusion among people that Premadasa is very popular and use the people to pressurise Wickremesinghe to step down.

Demagoguery

It could well be the case that Premadasa has people’s support. However, this can only be proven by an election. In reality, size of rallies can be quite deceiving for voting and attending rallies are two very different things. However, to name a candidate based on the size of the crowds he attracts alone and not on his knowledge is not democracy – it is demagogy.

Most unfortunately, Sri Lanka’s politics have been marked with demagoguery than democracy. Demagoguery is when politicians appeal to popular desires and prejudices than rational reasoning. Premadasa’s pledges to provide free housing, free meals, and free clothes, are a classic example of demagoguery. During the entire question and answer session that followed the press statement, Premadasa’s adapted theme was to allow popular opinion decide the fate on issues than on any intelligent reflection

However for democracy to thrive, the need is not the greatest show of hands, but by the most knowledgeable on the subject. Premadasa’s stance on the Executive Presidency, as one reporter openly stated is ‘wish-washy’.

Executive Presidency is a very technical subject. One needs to have a fine understanding on how the Executive Presidency derives power and who derives power from the Executive Presidency. Can a layperson, especially one disinterested in politics, decide how to address the vacuum that would be created if the Executive Presidency is abolished? Could a layperson strategise to ensure that the ills of the Executive Presidency do not flow to the entity that inherits the executive powers?

Premadasa’s bluff

When Premadasa reminded the reporters that the Yahapalana Government drastically reduced the Executive President’s Powers, he did not address the confusion that arose with it. The chain of command is now broken. The Easter Sunday Massacres were a direct consequence of this division of power that has taken responsibility and accountability from everyone’s shoulders.

The reporters exposed Premadasa’s bluff when he was asked out of the five-year term, how long will he allocate to find people’s opinion and solutions for whatever bane people identify with the Executive Presidency. Premadasa’s hasty response was, “let’s focus on the candidature first.”

Another reporter asked Premadasa for his reasons to contest for the Executive Presidency if the powers of the position are reduced. His simple answer was to keep a certain family-centred political dynasty out of power.

Since the Yahapalana Government came to power

– half a million people have lost their livelihoods,

– terrorism is once again threatening our daily lives,

– human rights have been distorted to give credence to criminals and terrorists over the fundamental rights of the officers and men who ensure national security,

– economic indices are falling,

– free trade agreements with other countries are threatening to turn Sri Lanka into a garbage dump,

– our agrarian sector stands to lose their land to economic gift packages such as the MCC.

– separatists are demanding a new constitution that will effectively create nine semi-autonomous governments and a very weak central government.  

Yet, Premadasa’s sole objective is to prevent a certain political rival from coming to power. He claims that rival is driven by one family. It is questionable why Premadasa should take exception to family-driven governance, when his own wife had publicly pledged to personally solve the housing issue. At least the family he intends to obstruct will appoint their members to positions of responsibility and thus to accountability. Premadasa’s wife on the other hand intends to run State matters by dictating to her husband without taking responsibility or being held accountable.

When Maithripala Sirisena came out to contest in 2015, no one bothered to check his track-record. In his long political career, he had achieved zilch. As he once shamelessly declared our challenge now is to somehow return to where we were before Yahapalana Government. Sajith Premadasa too has been in politics for a very long time. His big achievement is creating unliveable houses. The parallel between Sirisena and Premadasa is uncanny – from their silly election promises to the people who are gravitating around them.

Wickremesinghe has not been a friend much less leader to Sri Lankan people. However, if his last act before bowing out is to spare us another Sirisena, he stands to be redeemed.

ranasingheshivanthi@gmail.com

Seven decades of UNP leadership feuds

September 23rd, 2019

By Sugeeswara Senadhira Courtesy Ceylon Today

“I do not intend on this occasion to indulge in any recrimination or personal bitterness. Political parties in Ceylon, both in the past and the present, had displayed a tendency not sufficiently to consult party organisations when important issues arose, the UNP was falling into the same tendency and in its best interest this should be remedied”. These were the prophetic words of S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike in his speech after resigning from United National Party to form the Sri Lanka Freedom Party seven decades ago.

Bandaranaike resigned from the UNP when he realised that first Prime Minister D. S. Senanayake did not have any intention of making him his successor. That was the first leadership struggle in the UNP, the national party which was just five years old.

Even after seventy years, the UNP has not remedied the wrong tendency Bandaranaike mentioned and the party is faced with a serious leadership feud, not merely between the leader (Ranil Wickremesinghe) and the deputy (Sajith Premadasa), but also with a third leader (Karu Jayasuriya) emerging as an alternative. 

Sinhala Maha Sabha 

With the emergence of UNP, which was formed by uniting D. S. Senanayake’s Ceylon National Congress, Bandaranaike’s Sinhala Maha Sabha and T. B. Jayah’s Muslim League, the new party expected to sweep the first general elections. But the UNP could win only 42 seats in the 95-member Parliament. However, DS could form a Government with the support of independent MPs as the powerful leftist parties could not come to a single platform.

Bandaranaike, thinking that DS was grooming Sir John Kotelawala as his successor, had met him and said, “Lionel (Sir John) my father (Solomon Dias Bandaranaike) is very old and is keen to see me as Prime Minister before he dies. You are a young man and can afford to stand down.” Quick-witted Sir John replied, “My mother too is old and would be very happy if she could see me as Prime Minister before she dies”. Subsequently Bandaranaike left the party to form the SLFP.

However, when DS died in 1951, there was a major leadership struggle between Sir John and Dudley Senanayake and the latter became the Prime Minister because Governor General Lord Soulbury invited Dudley to form the Government fulfilling a promise he had given to DS before he died.

There was a major leadership tussle between Sir John and Dudley and the former went on to publish a book titled ‘Premier Stakes’ giving out the deals behind the scene. However, Sir John finally joined Dudley’s Cabinet as Minister of Transport and Public Works. After Dudley resigned in 1953, John was the automatic choice for Premiership as the other senior leader J. R. Jayewardene, former Finance Minister, decided to wait patiently for his turn.

Mahajana Eksath Peramuna

Sir John, after losing to Bandaranaike’s SLFP-led Mahajana Eksath Peramuna in 1956, left for London, leaving the UNP in the hands of JR, who nurtured the party and rejuvenated it to be ready for future battles. Although JR was the man behind the UNP during difficult days, the party members did not want him as the leader of the party. When general elections were announced a few months after the assassination of Bandaranaike in 1959, the party leaders invited the retired Premier Dudley to take over the leadership of UNP once again. In 1960, Dudley became the Prime Minister of a minority UNP Government but after three months another election was held and the SLFP came back to power.

Although there was a cold war between Dudley and JR, the latter worked hard for the party and ensured its victory in 1965. Dudley became the Premier and JR was appointed State Minister (then equivalent to de facto Deputy Prime Minister). Two years later Dudley inducted his trusted junior, Ranasinghe Premadasa to the Cabinet to fortify his strength in the party and the Government. Dudley in his strategy to control JR utilised the capabilities of Premadasa to improve the UNP rural base, while JR was dependent on the urban elite.

However, after the UNP defeat in 1970, there were cracks in the party and this time it was Premadasa who openly revolted against Dudley, his mentor. Premadasa, without leaving the UNP, created a new force under the banner, ‘Purawesi Peramuna’ (Citizen’s Front). Ailing Dudley died in 1973 and JR gave an emotional speech at the funeral, that ended with ‘Good night, sweet prince, And flights of angels sing thee to thy rest!’ and went to Sirikotha, UNP Headquarters, to take full control of the party. Dudley’s nephew, Rukman Senanayake challenged JR for leadership, but JR easily wrested control and sacked Rukman from the party. Rukman formed a new party called, Dudley Peramuna but soon went into the political wilderness.

Lalith Athulathmudali 

Premadasa, a master strategist, joined forces with JR and the duo brought the UNP back to power in 1977. Prior to the general elections, JR held a party Executive Committee vote to elect a deputy leader. Two contestants, Premadasa received 122 votes and Gamini Dissanayake got 118. After becoming the Deputy Leader of UNP, Premadasa marked his time, although JR was obviously promoting Gamini and Lalith Athulathmudali as future leaders. There were in-fights between three of them as Lalith and Gamini considered each other as rivals too.

When JR finally named Premadasa as the Presidential candidate, both Lalith and Gamini put their full strength to get Premadasa elected President hoping to be the Prime Minister. However, Premadasa did not trust them and made D. B. Wijetunga, un-ambitious old UNP loyalist, as Prime Minister, taking everybody by surprise.

Infuriated Lalith and Gamini, throwing away their own differences, brought an impeachment motion against Premadasa after obtaining signatures of a sufficient number of UNP MPs. But Premadasa moved fast, prorogued Parliament and managed to get the UNP dissidents back to his fold and ousted Lalith and Gamini from the party.In this battle of giants, Ranil Wickremesinghe stood behind Premadasa, thus strengthening his place in the party.

After Premadsa’s assassination, Ranil supported Wijetunga to be the President and got himself appointed as Prime Minister. Meanwhile Gamini returned to the UNP, and wanted to be the Presidential Candidate in 1994. Ranil was initially reluctant, but finally gave in after realising that it was not easy to defeat the formidable challenger Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga.

After Gamini’s death, there was no challenge to Ranil and he managed to keep the UNP leadership despite the party’s losses at several elections. Today, his position is challenged by Premadasa’s son, Sajith. Meanwhile, Speaker Karu Jayasuriya has also entered the fray. With only two weeks to go for nominations for the 16 November election, the UNP leadership feud continues unabated, reminding the party loyalists that the advice of Bandaranaike seven decades ago is still valid.

End of SLFP and also UNP?

September 23rd, 2019

N.A.DE S. AMARATUNGA Courtesy The Island

article_image

We live at a time of unprecedented political turmoil and uncertainty. There is no visible government. The officials are probably running the country, and as there is no political direction the economy is gradually and perceptibly declining, making a huge impact on the lives of the poor people as all economic parameters indicate. Prime Minister is doing what he knows best, making more and more promises, and outdoing himself when compared to 2015. President is also doing what he knows best, trying to undermine friend and foe in a bid to survive. There seems to be an excess of acrimony, rivalry, and power hunger.

Due to these rivalries, acrimony, jealousy and power hunger, two of the major political parties that existed from the 1940’s are showing unmistakable signs of breaking up into factions and disappearing from the face of the earth. The UNP was formed of the leaders who collaborated and learnt from the European master and aped them in dress, manner and culture. They could not reach out to the common man and understand their economic and cultural needs. The SLFP was born to fill this void and look after the interests of the common poor people. “Sinhala Only” policy was meant to be only a rallying call and symbolic of the people’s needs, and not discriminatory towards the minorities. SLFP met with immediate success due to the resonance it struck with the inner feelings of the people, the “civilizational consciousness”. This vital character and identity of the SLFP was destroyed when it formed a union with the UNP, which from its inception was identified with foreign interests and culture, and formed the “yahapalana” government. It is not too late for the SLFP to correct its mistake at this opportune moment, but it seems to be thrashing about due to personal agenda, rivalry, petty jealousy and power hunger. If it misses this opportunity the SLFP would be in political wilderness.

The UNP also, almost fatally, damaged itself when it joined up with the SLFP in a marriage of convenience. The incompatibility has not only ruined the country in these last four and half years, but almost destroyed the two parties also. The policies of the SLFP have been taken over and preserved for the people by the SLPP. The remnants that remained in the government had made governance almost impossible and now it is in its last throes. Poor governance and economic decline have clearly impacted on the credibility of the UNP leadership, and what it could do at the critical eleventh hour is nothing but make promises. But the damage to the leadership is reflected in the mass defection of the loyalists, and their demand for a different nominee for the presidential election, resulting in a gross rupture of the party. If this crack is not repaired early the party will go to polls in a divided state risking a colossal defeat. But here too the power hunger, personal agenda, petty jealousy, acrimony created by the rebellion and future political stake may not allow room for compromise. If the rebellion succeeds it would be at huge cost and there is no guarantee that undermining tactics, reminiscent of what befell Kobbekaduwa, would not be resorted to by desperate people. Such is human nature infected with power hunger, acrimony and vendetta. If the rebellion within the UNP fails and the breakaway faction joins up with the SLFP, which is waiting to commit ‘hara-kiri”, it will be the demise of the UNP too.

Sri Lanka is at political crossroads and we may witness catastrophic political upheavals in the near future. But sometimes political catastrophe brings in its wake changes that are better for the people. Our people have relentlessly suffered untold misery due to political blunder, and personal vendetta among the politicians. They deserve a break from all this madness and pettiness, and a modicum of stability in their lives. So, it is good for the people let political parties breakup and disappear.

N.A.DE S. AMARATUNGA

Sajith is still living in 89 – Sudarshani

September 23rd, 2019

Courtesy Adaderana

Regardless of what the leadership of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) says, the village-level supporters are today with the Sri Lanka Podujana Permuna (SLPP) and its presidential candidate Gotabaya Rajapaksa, according to UPFA MP Sudarshani Fernandopulle.

Speaking during an event held in Katana, she said that the United National Party (UNP) is currently struggling unable to reach a decision regarding its presidential candidate. 

Some are saying its Ranil, some are saying Karu and some are saying Sajith,” she said, adding that the UNP does not have any leaders who are suitable for the year 2020. 

Sajith Premadasa is still living in the 1989 era, not in 2020,” she said.

Fernandopulle stated that none of them have presented programme for the country and that former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa has already presented his plans to take the country forward.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress