Measures to contain COVID-19 will continue despite relaxed curfew – President

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa has stressed that the measures to contain the local outbreak of COVID-19 will follow despite the curfew being relaxed in several areas from tomorrow.

He also noted that the objective of relaxing the curfew is to reactivate the economy.

Taking to his official Twitter account, the President urged the public that it is imperative to adhere to the health guidelines & act responsibly for the safety of society at large.


The government Saturday (18) decided to relax the ongoing curfew, which was imposed to curb the spread of COVID-19, in several districts and police areas.

Accordingly, the curfew for 18 districts will be relaxed from 5.00 am to 8.00 pm on a daily basis starting from tomorrow, until further notice.

The government has decided not to relax curfew imposed in Alawathugoda, Akurana, Warakapola and Akkaraipattu police areas in Kandy, Kegalle and Ampara districts. However, the curfew for the rest of the police areas in these three districts will be lifted at 5.00 am and re-imposed at 8.00 pm from April 20.

In the meantime, curfew for several police areas in Colombo, Kalutara, Puttalam and Gampaha districts the curfew will be lifted from 8.00 am to 5.00 pm on a daily basis from April 22, except for the following police areas:

Colombo District: Kotahena, Grandpass, Bambalapitya, Keselwatte, Maradana, Gothatuwa, Mulleriyawa, Wellampitiya, Mount Lavinia, Dehiwala and Kohuwala police areas

Gampaha District: Ja-Ela, Kochchikade and Seeduwa police areas

Puttalam District: Puttalam, Marawila and Wennappuwa police areas

Kalutara District: Bandaragama, Payagala, Beruwala and Aluthgama police areas


Measures have been taken to disinfect train stations and trains today, while also certain cities underwent the disinfection process as the public transport services are scheduled to resume tomorrow.

Meanwhile, the government also issued a set of guidelines to Heads of state entities especially in the district of Colombo on resumption of work once the curfew is lifted.

Two petitions filed seeking release of lawyer arrested over alleged links to Easter attacks

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Two Habeas Corpus petitions have been filed with the Appeals Court seeking the release of the attorney-at-law who was arrested by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) on suspicion of having links to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

The petitions, filed by his father and brother through, have cited the Acting Inspector General of Police (IGP), the Director of the CID and the Attorney General as respondents.

Petitioners have alleged that the arrest of the lawyer in question is unlawful and baseless.

The petitioners are further seeking an order directing the CID to grant access to legal counsels to obtain instructions from the corpus in confidence for the purpose of prosecuting his application and or any other proceedings before a court of law.

They have also sought an order directing the respondents to release the corpus.

COVID-19: Seventeen new cases bring total to 271

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Two more persons have tested positive for COVID-19 as of 9.40 pm today (19), says the Ministry of Health.

Accordingly, a total of 17 coronavirus cases were confirmed in Sri Lanka during the course of the day as the tally escalated to 271.

The 15 positive cases that were confirmed earlier today have been identified from Keselwatte, an isolated area in Colombo. It was reported they have had close contacts with COVID-19 infected patients.

In the meantime, the COVID-19 recoveries in the country have risen to 96, the Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry said.

Currently, 168 active cases are under medical care at Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH), Welikanda Base Hospital, Colombo East Base Hospital and Iranawila Hospital.

Earlier Fifteen persons have tested positive to have contracted the COVID-19 virus as of 5 pm today (19), said the Ministry of Health.

All 15 new patients have been identified from Keselwatte, an isolated area in Colombo, according to the Health Ministry. Reportedly, they have had close contacts with COVID-19 infected patients.

In the meantime, the total number of coronavirus recoveries in the country stands at 91.

Currently, 158 active cases are under medical care at Infectious Disease Hospital (IDH), Welikanda Base Hospital, Colombo East Base Hospital and Iranawila Hospital, the Epidemiology Unit of the Health Ministry says.

Sri Lanka has so far confirmed 7 fatalities from the novel coronavirus.

Second attack planned to follow Easter bombings, investigations reveal

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Investigations have revealed that a second attack had been planned following the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings, said Police Media Spokesman SP Jaliya Senaratne.

The Police Media Spokesman, holding a special press conference at the Department of Government Information today (19), said that according to investigations, a second-tier team had been recruited and trained for another attack to follow the Easter attacks.

However, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has been able to thwart those plans through their investigations, the Spokesman added.
 
As per previous investigations, Zahran Hashim’s team had divided and a portion parted ways, while Hashim’s team continued to plan and carry out the attacks. However, the latest investigations have revealed that the division of the team was fabricated to misguide intelligence units and mislead investigations.

Currently, 197 suspects have been arrested in connection to the attacks. Some suspects have established, led and funded organizations that misinterpreted Islam and spread extremist ideas among youth to create a second-tier team, said Senaratne. The suicide bombers who carried out the attack had also been directly involved in this process, he said.

Information has been uncovered on individuals who have aided, abetted and prompted such plans and investigations are carried out along this new information, according to Senaratne.

It has also been revealed that foreign nationals, too, have been involved in the process, he added.
Further, information has been recovered that there had been plans to hide some foreign nationals in Sri Lanka after they carry out an attack against a certain South Asian country, said Senaratne.

Responding to a journalist’s query regarding the arrest of a lawyer, the Media Spokesman clarified that the aforementioned suspect was not arrested over a telephone conversation with a client, as per certain social media posts. Senaratne said that relevant suspect was arrested with sufficient facts and evidence and that the Police completely reject accusation made through social media.

He further said that the CID has not carried out investigations targeting a certain person or a profession. All investigations are based on sufficient facts, information and evidence with legal validity, he added.

Act with aim of not getting infected after curfew lifts – Army Chief

April 19th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva says that the public should make sure not to loiter or idle outside once the curfew is lifted.

The Commander of the Army mentioned this joining the ‘Derana Aruna’ Breakfast Show on TV Derana this morning (19).

The decision to relax the curfew regulations was taken considering the hindrances caused to the public by the curfew, he said. He pointed out that many are unable to attend work or pay salaries without running businesses.

The Army Chief saluted the Sri Lankan public for their cooperation in measures to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 in the country.

Silva says that the government led by the President and the Prime Minister has taken this difficult decision to move the country forward and not for people to go out freely.

Therefore, the Sri Lankan citizens should consider it their duty to act with the ultimate aim of not becoming infected by the virus, he said.

Gota plays a captain’s innings at the crease

April 18th, 2020

H. L. D. Mahindapala

The sartorial signatures of the three main leaders of recent times  – Mahinda Rajapakse, Ranil Wickremesinghe, and Gotabaya Rajapakse — have escaped the notice of the commentariat. Each one of them has come out sporting three different garments signifying their respective brands of politics. Mahinda Rajapakse displays the most recognisable costume – the white national dress with the kurakkan satakaya of his father thrown round his neck. He is saying that his roots run deep into the soil.  Ranil, of course, sticks stubbornly to his Western attire refusing to concede to anything that smacks of being national”.  He walks around nervously with his hands in the pockets to prevent his trousers from slipping down to his ankles. It depicts the embarrassing plight of the UNP leader: how to keep his trousers up when everything else around him is falling down.  The most plain – and, therefore, the significant — is the shirt and trouser of President Gotabaya without the Rajapakse signature symbol wrapped around his neck. It announces to the world that he is a different kind of Rajapakse. He is messaging emphatically that he has not only his own style of clothing but style of governance as well.

He has opened his innings with calculated strokes signalling clearly that he is not  the run-of-the-mill batsman, either tha-at-tu-fying” defensively, or risking too much with rash flashes of the bat. He whacked the Swiss Embassy spin for a six. He stepped forward and lifted the American underarm ball to go over the head of the American Ambassadress. He left the crude ball lobbed by Rajitha Senaratna severely alone. He didn’t have to do anything with it either. It went on its own, flying past the wicketkeeper all the way to the boundary. In Geneva, he cut the ball nicely to outmanoeuvre the Western umpires and his foreign-funded fielders in the NGOs. Of course, like all state leaders he has been stalled by the corona balls. Even that has been managed by him to prevent any disastrous collapse. The commentators in the box are pleased that his performance so far has been surprisingly sound. Better than expected indeed! They were hoping to stump him if he stepped out of the crease. But his footwork so far has been cautious nearing almost perfection.

They were also hoping to catch him in the slips. And the anti-Rajapakse gang is now howling that they had caught him with a ball that had snicked off his bat. It came  from the Legal end of the  field. The controversy is whether he should have let the ball go and not touched it at all, or followed the precedent set in Lords – the hallowed grounds of this global game. To come down to the nitty-gritty, the controversy is focused on President Gotabaya’s decision to release Staff Sgt. Sunil Ratnayake, overriding the judgement confirmed by two of the highest courts.

This decision is overblown to project President Gotabaya as the ogre preparing the way to establish a dictatorship by undermining the judiciary. The usual mediocrities in the moral mafia are pretending that the President’s decision is an unprecedented political act of a wannabe dictator determined to whittle down the integrity and the independence of the judiciary. The other threadbare argument is that the punishment imposed on Sgt. Rathnayake would stand as a deterrent to others in the battlefields – a bogus claim that has never been proved in any recorded battle fought by human beings. They also argue that releasing Sgt. Rathnayake is not only against all known norms of democratic states but also a blow to the process of reconciliation. 

These are tiresome arguments recycled for political ends by the mythomaniacs in the moral mafia whose bread, butter and whiskey depend solely on dancing to the drum beat of Western masters who have not hesitated to discard, with absolute contempt, all known moralities and universal laws of justice whenever it suits them to pursue their self-interests. Besides, the pretentious political purists tend to go berserk when one branch of the triumvirate in a democratic state – i.e., the legislature, executive and the judiciary —  tries to challenge or override any one of the other two branches. In a sense it is a good sign of a vibrant and healthy democracy.  But it cannot  be pushed to extremes. In the perennial and ineluctable contest between these three branches the rising tensions should not be exploited for cheap political ends. In these confusing times it is the historical precedents set by the Westminster model – the reputed  mother of all parliamentary democracies – that can prevail as a model to the parallel or lesser democracies.

If there is any doubt or suspicion, one solid example from Westminster should suffice to validate President Gotabaya’s action. And there isn’t a better historical precedent than the landmark case of Augustino Pinochet, the head of the Chilean government, who was rated as a despicable political criminal of his time. Gen. Pinochet overthrew the elected government of Salvador Allende, a socialist. And with the backing of US government Pinochet went on a spree of liquidating the leftist dissidents. The sole political objective of the regime was to wipe out all traces of Allende’s socialism. In the process Pinochet earned three new middle names: Persecution. Disappearance. Execution. Chile became the leading terror state in Latin America. Corrupt capitalism triumphed under Pinochet. It was another feather in Henry Kissinger’s anti-communist cap.

But Pinochet’s world turned topsy-turvy the day he stepped into UK for medical treatment. On a charge made by Spain for torturing Spanish citizens he was put under house arrest in UK. Spain requested that Pinochet be extradited. Never in the history of modern international relations has a head of state being arrested by the host nation on behalf of another state. To cut to the chase, the British courts, going up to the House of Lords, the highest judiciary in the land, upheld the decision to extradite Pinochet. But pressure was mounting from the international Right-wing. Two former heads of state, Margaret Thatcher and George H. W. Bush appealed to the British government to release Pinochet. They urged that he  be sent to his homeland and  not to Spain. Thatcher even went to the extent of sending Pinochet a bottle of single malt whiskey with a note saying: Scotch is one  British institution that will never let you down.”

In 2000 all eyes were on Jack Straw, the Foreign Minister, who had taken office boasting that British Foreign policy under him would be run unwaveringly on principles of high morality. Legal scholars were agog as this was a unique case that would make history.  Human rights activist were beside themselves believing  that they had won the day. They were cock-a-hoop believing  that Jack Straw would abide by the decision of the judgement of the House Lords. After all the judicial hierarchy had decided that  Pinochet should be extradited to Spain. But Jack Straw rejected the judgement of the highest courts in the land and freed Pinochet.

What is relevant to President Gotabaya’s case is the key element of the British government dismissing the judgement of its highest court. It has set the precedent for President Gotabaya to act accordingly without being accused of being  dictatorial, or violating the principles of separations of powers, or undermining the authority and dignity of the judiciary. If her Majesty’s Government can dismiss the judgement of her Law Lords – the supreme judicial authority – what justification is there to accuse selectively President Gotabaya who has adopted the same precedent and exercised the identical political power to fulfil the mandate given by the people? Releasing soldiers who defended the nation was a mandate given in the last presidential election. President Gotabaya did no act arbitrarily to pave the way for the establishment of a dictatorship. Jack Straw did not have a mandate to reject a judgment of the courts. For what  it  is worth, President Gotabaya had a mandate from the sovereign people.

Besides, the underlying principle that applies to both cases is the same: under exceptional circumstances the government of the day can decide to overrule a selected decision or two of the judiciary without undermining  the overarching independence of the judiciary.  President Gotabaya is unerringly in line with the practices of the Mother of Parliaments in freeing Sgt. Rathnayake. When is adhering  to a notable precedent  set by the Mother of Parliaments a violation of the principles of parliamentary democracy? Besides, Jack Straw’s decision has  not brought down British democracy or destroyed the independence of the judiciary.

The morality of  it, of course, is a different issue. Critics can argue that Sgt. Rathnayake is the Pinochet of Sri Lanka and both deserve the same punishment for violating human rights. Or both should be judged on the identical moral metrics.  But Pinochet’s case cannot be compared by any rational metric to that of Sgt. Rathnayake. They are two different cases packed with two different circumstances, carrying two different set of moral and political values. For instance, the enormity of the crimes of Pinochet  cannot be compared to the dubious and questionable legal issued that surround the sentencing of Sgt. Rathnayake. The case against Pinochet was cut and dry. There were no issues of questioning the identity, culpability, and responsibility of Gen. Pinochet.  Violence committed in a battlefield by a sergeant in  an isolated incident in which the responsibilities and culpabilities of the accused are questionable cannot be compared to a criminal who had deliberately gone on the rampage to liquidate his opponents on a mass scale throughout his regime (1973 – 1990).

Pinochet’s  was an open and shut case. The Courts did not have to depend on some controversial clause of command  responsibility or collective responsibility to sentence Pinochet. The Law Lords did not have to ferret out an obscure law to sentence Pinochet on a charge of guilt by association. Besides, the evidence that was accepted to sentence Sgt. Rathnayake is open to considerable doubt. In the absence of certain proof the Courts resorted to a legal excuse of fixing his guilt by association.  It is tantamount  to giving a dog bad name and hanging him. Normally, punishment  is meted out  to fit the crime. But Rathnayake’s was sentenced for being a part of a gang who had committed the crime. The charge of guilt by association  is a controversial law. If there is no direct evidence to  prove that he had executed the Tamils then what was his crime? Did he  dig the  graves? Or was he the one who dragged the bodies to the grave? Or was he the one who gave instructions for the execution? If, for instance, he  did  not  commit the crime of killing the victims then is it fair to sentence him  to death for digging the graves? Unlike in the case of Pinochet there are a set of doubts that can justify the exoneration of Sgt. Rathnayake like the others who were with him. Not only the precedent set by the Lords but the doubts surrounding the role of Sgt. Rathnayake are two factors that validates his release.

Coronavirus pandemic and the postponed Parliamentary election

April 18th, 2020

Mahinda Rajapaksa Prime Minister

MEDIA RELEASE

The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine.

The financial powers vested in the President under Article 150(3) of the Constitution is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease.

People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic.

The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.  

The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that.

The yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the yahapalana government changed the provincial councils elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority.

As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial councils elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past.

Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.

On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfill its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.   

Mahinda Rajapaksa

Prime Minister

කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය හා කල් දමනු ලැබූ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය

April 18th, 2020

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය  අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ

කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය ඇමරිකාව, ඉන්දියාව, බංග්ලාදේශය වැනි රටවලට බලපෑවේ එම රටවල් කාලයක් මුළුල්ලේ වේගවත් ආර්ථික වර්ධනයක් සාක්ෂාත් කරගෙන, ශක්තිමත්ව සිටි අවස්ථාවකය. නමුත් ලංකාවට මේ උවදුරට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවූයේ දරුණු ආර්ථික කඩාවැටීමක් මධ්‍යයේය. 2015 සිට 2019 දක්වා සිදු වූ අවපාලනය නිසා අපේ ණය බර 71% කින් වැඩි විය.  රුපියලේ අගය 30% කින් කඩා වැටුණි.  ආර්ථික වර්ධන වේගය  2.7% ක් දක්වා අඩුවිය. 2019 නොවැම්බරයේදී අපි ජනාධිපතිවරණය දිනා අලුත් ආණ්ඩුවක් පිහිටෙව්වද, අපට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරයක් නොමැති වීම හේතුවෙන් පහුගිය ආණ්ඩුවේ බෙහෙත් හා පොහොර සැපයුම්කරුවන්ට හිඟ මුදල් ගෙවීම සඳහාවත් අතුරු සම්මත ගිණුමක් සම්මත කර ගැනීමට නොහැකි විය.

මේ අවස්ථාවේදී අස්වැසිල්ලට ඇත්තේ ව්‍යවස්තාවේ 150(3)  වගන්තිය යටතේ ජනාධිපතිවරයාට හිමිවෙන මුදල් බලතල පිළිබඳ විධිවිධාන පමණි.  අපිට කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතයට මුහුණ දීමට සිද්ධ වූයේ මේ සියලුම අවාසිදායක තත්ත්වයන් මධ්‍යයේය.  පසුගිය මාර්තු 11  වැනිදා පළමු කොරෝනා රෝගියා  හමුවීමත් සමගම,  අපි රෝගය කල්තියා හඳුනා ගැනීම, රෝගීන් වෙන්කර ප්‍රතිකාර කිරීම, අවදානමට ලක්වූ පුද්ගලයන් නිරෝධායනයට ලක් කිරීම,  රෝගීන් ඇසුරු කළ පුද්ගලයන් සොයා ගැනීම සහ සමාජ දුරස්ථ භාවය පවත්වා ගැනීම වැනි පාලන ක්‍රමවේදයන් හඳුන්වා දුන්නෙමු.  මේ ආකාරයේ මෙහෙයුමක් අපගේ ජීවිත කාල තුළ කිසිදාක අපි අත්දැක නැත.  රෝගය පැතිරීම වැළැක්වීමට සති ගණන් එක දිගට ඇඳිරිනීතිය පැනවීමටත් අපට සිදුවිය. 

රට පුරාම තම නිවෙස්වලින් පිටවීමට නොහැකි ජනතාවට ආහාර,  බෙහෙත් වැනි අත්‍යාවශ්‍ය ද්‍රව්‍ය ලබාගැනීමට ක්‍රමවේදයක් සැලසිය යුතු විය.  අඩු ආදායම්ලාභී පවුල්වලට ආධාර සැපයිය යුතු විය.  රටේ නිෂ්පාදන ක්‍රියාවලිය පවත්වාගෙන යෑම සඳහා වී ගොවීන්,  එළවළු ගොවීන්,  හා ධීවරයන්ගේ නිෂ්පාදන මිලදී ගත යුතු විය.  මේ සියලුම දේවල් එක විට ඉතා කෙටි කාලයක් තුළ සංවිධානය කර ගැනීමට හැකිවීම සැබැවින්ම කලමනාකරණයේ ප්‍රාතිහාර්යයකි.  කොරෝනා වෛරස් වසංගතය පාලනය කිරීමේදී ලංකාව ලබාගෙන ඇති සාර්ථකත්වය අද මුළු ලෝකයම පිළිගනී.

ජනාධිපතිවරයා  මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද්විතීය නායකත්වයක් සපයා ඇත.  අපේ රජයේ වෛද්‍යවරුන්, හෙදියන් ඇතුළු සෞඛ්‍ය කාර්ය මණ්ඩල මුලු ලෝකයේම අවධානය දිනාගෙන ඇත.  රෝගීන් ඇසුරු කළ පුද්ගලයන් සොයාගැනීමේදී අපේ බුද්ධි අංශ පෙන්වා ඇති දක්ෂකම හා කැපවීම නිසාත්,  නිරෝධායනය ක්‍රියාවලිය පවත්වාගෙන යාමේදී  ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාව පෙන්වා ඇති කාර්යක්ෂමතාවය නිසාත් රෝගය පැතිරීම පාලනය වී ඇත.  පොලීසිය ඇතුළු සෑම තරාතිරමකම රජයේ සේවකයන් කොරෝනා මර්ධන ව්‍යාපාරයේ සාර්ථකත්වයට දායක වී ඇත.  අද කොරෝනා වෛරසය නිසා අනාරක්ෂිත වී ඇති ලෝකය තුළ අපේ රට වඩාත්ම සුරක්ෂිත ස්ථානයකි.  අපිට මේ තත්ත්වයට ඒමට පුළුවන් වූයේ විනාශ කරන ලද ආර්ථිකයකුත්,  පුළුවන් හැම අවස්ථාවකදීම ආණ්ඩුවේ කකුලෙන් අදින,  රටට ආදරයක් නැති අවස්ථාවාදී විපක්ෂයකුත් මේ රටේ තිබියදීය. 

නිරෝධායනයට යෑම ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කළ අය දිරි ගැන්වීම තුළින් විපක්ෂනායකවරයා මුල් අවස්ථාවේ සිටම කොරෝනා වෛරස් මර්ධන ව්‍යාපෘතිය  කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට උත්සාහ දැරීය. ඉන්පසු, පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැර තිබෙන අවස්ථාවක රජයේ මුදල් වැය කිරීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාට බලය නැතැයි කියමින් ඔවුන් සෞඛ්‍ය සේවය ඇතුළු සියලු රජයේ  සේවාවන් කඩාකප්පල් කිරීමට උත්සාහ දැරුවේය. නව පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ජූනි දෙවැනිදාට කලින් හමුවිය යුතු බවත්, පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය ඊට කලින්  පැවැත්වීමට නොහැකි බවත්, එම නිසා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හරිමින් නිකුත් කළ ගැසට් පත්‍රය අහෝසි කළ යුතු බව අද ඔවුන් පවසා සිටී.

යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව අවුරුදු තුනකින් පළාත් පාලන ඡන්දය කල් දැමූ ආකාරය අපට මතකය. ඒ ඡන්දය උසාවියට ගොස් දින නියමයක් නැතිව කල් දමා ගැනීමට ඔවුන් ගත් උත්සාහය  ව්‍යාර්ථ වූයේ නඩු නැති පළාත් පාලන ආයතන වලට හෝ ඡන්දය පවත්වන බව මැතිවරණ කොමිසම ප්‍රකාශ කළ නිසා පමණි. 2017 දී පළාත් සභා විසුරුවා හැරීමට දින කිහිපයක් තිබියදී,  පළාත් සභා ඡන්දය පැවැත්වීම  වැළැක්වීමට යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව පළාත් සභා ඡන්ද ක්‍රමය වෙනස් කළේය.  ඒ සංශෝධන පනත සම්මත කිරීමට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ තුනෙන් දෙකේ බලයක් අවශ්‍ය බව නීතිපතිවරයා ප්‍රකාශ කළ විට ඔවුන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ කොරිඩෝවේ දැමූ ඩීල් තුළින් ඡන්ද වෙනුවෙන් ප්‍රතිපත්තිය පාවා දී අවශ්‍ය බහුතරය ලබාගත්තේය . 

ඒ අපකීර්තිමත් ගනුදෙනුවේ ප්‍රතිඵලයක් හැටියට 2017 අගෝස්තු 25 වැනිදා  සම්මත කළ පළාත් පාලන මැතිවරණ සංශෝධන පනතේ සමානුපාතික නියෝජිත  ප්‍රතිශතය 40% ක්  වන අතර,  ඊට මාසයකට පසු සම්මත කරනු ලැබූ පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ සංශෝධන පනතේ සමානුපාතික නියෝජිත ප්‍රතිශතය 50% ක් වේ. ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට  පෙත්සමක් ඉදිරිපත් කොට ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කර තිබුණු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයක් අවලංගු කර ගත් දේශපාලන පක්ෂ සිටින ලෝකේ එකම ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී රට වෙන්නෙත් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවය.  වත්මන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය කල් දමා ගැනීමට මේ ගෙනියන උත්සාහය ඒ අපකීර්තිමත්  යටගියාවේම දිගුවකි. 

කුමන අවස්ථාවකදී හෝ සාමාන්‍ය ජනජීවිතය මෙය රටේ නැවත ආරම්භ විය යුතුය.  අපේ පරිපාලන දිස්ත්‍රික්ක 25න්, එකොළහක එකම කෙරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයෙක් වත් නැත.  තවත්  දිස්ත්‍රික්ක හතක ආසාදිතයන්  හමුවී ඇත්තේ එක්කෙනෙකු හෝ දෙදෙනෙකි.  තවත් දිස්ත්‍රික්ක  දෙකක රෝගීන් පස් දෙනෙකුත් හත් දෙනෙකුත් අතර ගණනක් සොයාගෙන ඇත.  රෝගීන් සැළකිය යුතු ගණනක් සොයා ගෙන ඇත්තේ  දිස්ත්‍රික්ක පහක පමණි.  

පසුගිය මාර්තු දෙවැනිදා ජනාධිපතිවරයා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හරිමින් මැතිවරණය පවත්වන දිනය අප්‍රේල් 25 හැටියටත්,  අලුත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව මුල් වරට හමු වෙන දිනය මැයි 14 වැනිදා හැටියටත් නියම කළේය.  ඊට දින දහයකට පසු පළමු කොරෝනා රෝගියා සොයා ගත් අවස්ථාවේදී මැතිවරණය පවත්වන දිනය කල් දැමීමට ජනාධිපතිවරයාට බලය නොතිබුණි. 1981 අංක 1 දරණ  පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණ පනතේ 24(3)  වගන්තියට අනුව ජනාධිපතිවරයා නියම කළ දිනයට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට නොහැකි නම්,  ඒ සඳහා වෙනත් දිනයක් නියම කිරීමට මැතිවරණ කොමිසම බැඳී සිටී. දිනයක් නියම නොකොට පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය කල් දැමීමට මැතිවරණ  කොමිසමට  බලයක් නැත. 

සති ගණනක් හෝ මාස ගණනක් ඉදිරියට අනාගතයේ විය හැකි හෝ නොහැකි දේවල් පිළිබඳව ඇතිකරගන්නා උපකල්පන මත අනිවාර්යෙන්ම පිළිපැදිය යුතු නීතිමය ප්‍රතිපාදන නොසළකා හැරිය නොහැක.  මැතිවරණ කොමිසම මුලින්ම 24(3) වගන්තිය යටතේ ඔවුන් වෙත පැවරී ඇති කාර්‍යභාර්ය නීතියට අනුකූළව ඉටුකර, ඉන් පසුව සාකඡ්චා කළ යුතු කාරණයක් ඇත්නම් ඒ වෙත යොමු විය යුතුය.  

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ
අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය

THE GENERAL ELECTION OF 1956 Part 1

April 18th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

REVISED     17.3.21

The General Election of 1956 is associated with the name of SWRD Bandaranaike. SWRD came from a long line of native administrators appointed by the British administration.

SWRD’s two paternal great-grandfathers   held the positions of ‘Mudaliyar of Siyane Korale East’ and ‘Mohandiram of the Governor’s Gate.’ Their names were Don Solomon Dias Bandaranayake, and Phillipsz Gysbertus Panditaratne. SWRD’s grandfather   also held the positions of ‘Mudaliyar of the Governor’s Gate’ and ‘Mudaliyar of Siyane Korale’. Grandfather’s name was Don Christoffel Henricus Dias Abeywickrema Jayatilake Seneviratne Bandaranaike, with the prefix ‘Gate Mudaliyar’.

SWRD father, Solomon Dias Bandaranaike (1862-1946) was ‘Muhandiram of the Governor’s Gate’ then ‘Mudaliyar of the Siyane Korale East’ and finally, ‘Maha Mudali’. Maha Mudali was the highest position available to a native Ceylonese in British Ceylon .The post had been held earlier by his uncle, Conrad Petrus Dias Wijewardena Bandaranaike. Solomon had applied for the post and was successful.

 SWRD’s father was  knighted and became Sir Solomon.  He was also awarded the CMG. The letters CMG  stand for  ‘Companion of the Order of St Michael and St George’.This is a very high honor given by the British monarch. Clearly, the British have appreciated father’s loyalty.

Sir Solomon was one of the richest men in Siyane korale, now Gampaha .He was a wealthy land owner with large estates, mainly coconut and valuable urban property. He had inherited a walauwwa in Horagolla, (Attanagalla), which he converted to stables and built Horagolla Walauwa next to it. He was the first Ceylonese to own a house in Nuwara Eliya, which was an exclusive holiday destination for the British.

Sir Solomon was educated at S.Thomas College. He was a collector of antiquities. He donated Sir Henry Blake’s collection of palm leaf manuscripts to the Colombo National Museum. He was a life-member of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society.

A keen horse breeder, he was Life President of the Colombo Turf Club, which erected a statue of him, during his life time, in front of the Turf Club in Colombo. This statue was in a neglected state until Yahapalana arrived. Yahapalana in 2018, turned it into an imposing monument, enclosed with installations and water pools. The message is clear, ‘Honor British rule.’

Sir Solomon has been very proud of his special position and haughty too. When told  that H.V. Perera, later Sri Lanka’s leading lawyer, was going to study in London, Sir Solomon had told  H.V’s  father, haughtily ,  that his son could not possibly dream of ever  making it to London. H.V. had won a scholarship, explained the father, humbly. H.V.’s father had been a surveyor and the first to do ground water surveys. He would probably have been at Horagolla in his professional capacity. (Personal communication from Ralph Pieris, nephew of H.V. Perera.)

 historian  KM de Silva said  of the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera clan.  that no other indigenous family in the whole of the British Empire has had such a long record of collaboration with the imperial power, in crushing indigenous resistance movement, enthusiastic assistance in the processes of conquest and support of consolidation of colonial rule.

SWRDS great grandfather had been given a medal in 1803 for helping the British forces in the Kandyan war of 1802. The Sinhala representative in Legislative Council from 1833-1911 were form the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera group, (with one exception).

They were also subordinate part of the governing elite,  a position which they flaunted with much arrogance. They saw themselves as a group set apart by birth and rank from all others. the Sinhala representative,  in Legislative  council  from 1833-1911 were form the Bandaranaike Obeyesekera group,( with one exception) As time went on the family assumed aristocratic status,  said K.M. de Silva.

SWRD father was Maha Mudaliyar  for 32 years, continued de Silva. In his hands, the position was a blend of major domo, i.e. steward of a household and principal aid to governor in matter relating to the natives. He was very prominent in public life, gloried in his proximity to the governor and visiting royalty on ceremonial occasions, concluded KM de Silva.

The subject of this essay, Solomon West Ridgeway Dias Bandaranaike, (1899-1959) was named after the Governor, West Ridgeway, who also agreed to be the baby’s godfather. This indicates the privileged position held by Sir Solomon.  It also indicates that Sir   Solomon hoped that baby Bandaranaike would also enjoy similar privileges and in return,   continue the family tradition of loyalty to British rule.

SWRD was tutored at home by 2 English tutors. For a short time he attended S. Thomas’ College, Mutwal, boarding at Warden Rev. Stone’s residence.  He passed the Cambridge Senior examination with distinctions in English, Latin, Greek and French. He had come second in the exam, out of all the candidates in the British Empire.

He then read Modern greats at Christ Church, Oxford  but did not get the first class he hoped for.Sir Solomon had entered his son’s name for Oxford, ten years earlier in 1923. SWRD did well as on orator at the Oxford Union.  He had strongly criticized British rule In India. The applause had gone on for several minutes. Unfortunately Bandaranaike     did not become President of the Oxford union as he had   hoped. Bandaranaike  was the Secretary of the Oxford Union and the President of the Majlis Society. Majlis was a debating society founded by the Indian students of Oxford.

Bandaranaike did not change into a Brown Sahib at Oxford but remained an earnest easterner. He wrote of many bitter memories of his time at Oxford. He gained great prestige and standing at oxford for his debating ability but anti colonialism was always to be seen there, observed HSS Nissanka.

In 1924, he was called to the bar as a Barrister in the Inner Temple. He returned to Ceylon in 1925 and took oaths as an Advocate of the Supreme Court of Ceylon. He practiced as a lawyer and got an  adequate income which made him independent of his father, observed KM de Silva

SWRD did not join the British administration as his father would have hoped. Instead he took to politics. From the beginning, SWRD wanted a leading role in politics, nothing less.   In 1926 he started his own political party, Peoples Progressive Party, but this failed. This was the, the first of the three parties started by him.

SWRD   then joined the Ceylon National Congress. In 1927 SWRD became Secretary of the Congress. This was his arrival on the political scene, said Wiswa Warnapala.  SWRD was President of Ceylon National Congress in 1931.

SWRD went into electoral politics as soon as possible. In 1927 he was elected to the Colombo Municipal Council, from the Maradana Ward, defeating the trade unionist A. E. Goonesinha. SWRD had the money to win the election, Goonesinha did not, observed Meegama.

  SWRD also participated in local government. In 1928, SWRD became President of All Ceylon Village Committee Conference    (est. 1925).  Under Bandaranaike , it underwent a change and became an effective pressure group. It was an emerging pressure group with wide influence in rural areas, said Wiswa. And the Young Lanka group, who published a magazine of that name, had complained that Bandaranaike converted    the Conference to a political one.

 SWRD had got the Village committee Ordinance amended to remove restrictions and democratize it. In 1929, SWRD became Chairman of Veyangoda Egoda Peruwe Pattu Gamsabha. SWRD, in this manner, gained a political foothold at all three electoral levels, village, urban and national. 

SWRD established a network of contacts with village committee chairmen, monks of village temples, and the intelligentsia of the village, which was of immense support to him later when forming the SLFP, observed Meegama. SWRD was able to establish links with the emerging rural intelligentsia and the rural political leadership, agreed Wiswa Warnapala.,

SWRD formed the Sinhala Maha Sabha (SMS) in 1934.  SWRD was President. There were eight vice presidents and they included CWW Kannangara, and Sir John Kotelawela.  There was at the time no political party that could articulate the nationalist issues.  The objective of the SMS was the unity and advancement of the Sinhalese. It was a loosely knit pressure group which revolved around one personality, SWRD . All the other political groups that emerged in this time were also like this, said Wiswa.,

The name of the Association, Sinhala Maha Sabha” was given by Piyadasa Sirisena. At the inaugural meeting SWRD had wanted the word ‘Sinhala’ changed to ‘Swadeshi.’ But Munidasa Kumaratunga, who was present, had given a scholarly analysis of the word ‘Sinhala’ and asked ‘Why are people frightened of the word Sinhala.’ Munidasa Kumaratunga was the first to raise the Sinhala language to the status of a cause and a mission, observed Wiswa.

The parent organization of the SMS was the Lanka Mahajana Sabha formed by F.R. Senanayake in 1919, said Wiswa.  But SMS would surely have tapped into the full Mahajana Sabha network as well.

There were nearly 27 Mahajana Sabhas primarily in rural areas in the mid twenties. There were Mahajana sabhas in Matara, Moratuwa, Lunugala, Panadura, Gampola, Dodanduwa, Polgahawela, Rambukkana, Kalutara, Kandy, Negombo and Dehiwela. Some were branch organizations of   Ceylon National Congress and Ceylon National Association, as well, said Wiswa. This showed that a new trend was emerging with the rural segment also getting   politically activated, observed Wiswa. Proceedings were conducted in Sinhala in these sabhas. .

There were a few political Associations as well. There was Kurunegala Political Association (est. 1920), Ratgama Association (1928) Ambalangoda Association (1920,) and Anuradhapura Association (1912). The population was becoming politically activated, said Wiswa. The Sinhala Maha Sabha would undoubtedly have approached these as well.

Three   organizations which SWRD had been associated with also   joined. They were   All Ceylon Village Committees Conference, Urban District Councils of Ceylon Association and All Ceylon Ayurvedic Sammelanaya.

SWRD was always an ardent supporter of local government, specially  All Ceylon Village Committees Conference, Urban District Councils of Ceylon Conference, All Ceylon Town Councils Conference.  These were major pressure groups, and he used them for his political party, said Wiswa. SWRD regularly attended their annual sessions, and made speeches. He was mobilizing this emerging village leadership around his magnetic personality, said Wiswa.

SMS attracted a galaxy of nationalists such as Piyadasa Sirisena.  Other writers such as Ananda Rajakaruna, Munidasa Kumaratunga   and ayurvedic physicians such as W. Daniel Fernando Waidyasekera and Pundit G.P. Wickramarachchi joined SMS.

Hemapala Munidasa who had edited Sinhala Bauddhaya took over the SMS newspaper ‘Sinhala Balaya’ in 1941. This newspaper played a key role in awakening the Sinhalese, said Wiswa. It overtook ‘Sinhala Bauddhaya’ in no time.  Later Hemapala was imprisoned on a fraud charge and Sinhala Balaya went into decline. SWRD had to sell the press.

SMS became a platform for the Sinhala literati.  They met at a special meeting at Ananda College to discuss Sinhala language and literature. Another meeting presided   by Kalukondayawe Pannasekera was on Buddhism. This would have strengthened the Sinhala Buddhist nature of the organization.

Before long SWRD had successfully welded SMS into a monolith. SMS soon emerged as a political force and eventually, SMS superseded the Ceylon National Congress as an influential political organization. SMS provided a much needed link between nationalism, the Buddhist resurgence, and the national heritage associated with Buddhism” said Wiswa.  A national committee was formed in 1941.

Leftist forces openly campaigned against SWRD saying SMS has been formed to fight the minorities.  However, N.M.Perera, while criticizing SMS for its communal bias, said that SMS had aroused an apathetic Buddhist public to a full recognition of its rights. SWRD often held meetings in Anuradhapura, to draw public attention to the need to reawaken the ancient heritage, observed Wiswa. SMS held its meetings in rural centers.

The Sinhala Maha Sabha was not a political Party in the modern sense of the word, said Wiswa Warnapala.  It was a loosely knit pressure group which revolved around one personality, SWRD. SMS played a pioneering role in the construction of a mass base in politics. This was more significant than the arrival of the Marxists, said Wiswa.  It was the beginning of the road to 1956, said Meegama.  Wiswa, on the other hand, observed that SWRD   saw the SMS only as an intermediate venture, ‘a passing role’, on the way to wider national unity.

SMS met with much opposition from vested interest, as well as non Buddhists and non Sinhalese. SMS was dubbed an extreme Sinhala organization. SWRD was called a chauvinist   SMS was dubbed an extreme Sinhala organization. Leftists were scornful. The emerging professional class also protested.

The Christian sector spearheaded a virulent campaign against the SMS. They said there was no need for a SMS. The CNC and the Mahajana sabha are both completely Sinhalese.  The SMS was ‘avowedly and unashamedly Sinhala, much more than the CNC and the Mahajana sabhas’. This segment was also very critical of SWRD. They did not like his rise in politics.  They feared and resented his influence.

Wiswa Warnapala assessed the SMS. It provided a link between nationalism and Buddhist resurgence, and the national heritage associated with Buddhism. SMS held its meetings in rural areas. SWRD often held them in Anuradhapura, to draw public attention to the need to reawaken the ancient heritage.

This link was much more significant than the arrival of the Marxists, continued Wiswa. Even SWRD’s marriage helped. It was a union between a first rank family of the lowlands and a first rank family of the Udarata. SMS superseded CNC as an influential political organization. CNC specialized in the politics of the Europeanized middle class. Now it was necessary to have a nationalist platform for expressing Sinhala nationalism, concluded Wiswa.

SWRD was a member of the two State Councils set up under British administration. SWRD was elected unopposed from Veyangoda to the first State Council of 1931.  He was elected unopposed to the second State Council of 1936, too. He was also seen and heard on important political platforms. He spoke at the memorable Galle Face rally in 1937, in support of Bracegirdle.

SWRD was Minister of Local Government in the second State Council 1936–47,  One of SWRD actions as Minister was to declare Anuradhapura a sacred city. V.C. Jayasuriya, then Commissioner of Local government, said that SWRD had made many improvements to local government when he was Minister. The Abeywardene report (1999) also said that SWRD in 1936 was instrumental in preparing the necessary legislation and took steps to deliver development through the local government system.’

SWRD had revoked the Local Government Ordinance of 1920 under which local boards were created.  This led to the modernization of the local government institutions. SWRD had introduced the Gam Sabha Ordinance no 60 of 1938. The enactment of this Ordinance was a major landmark in the modernization of Gam sabhas. 

The subject of Health was added to his Ministry later on. George E de Silva was Minister of Health earlier. SWRD and George set up a countrywide network of maternity hospitals, rural hospitals and provided the service of trained midwives, said Meegama. together with the eradication of malaria,  these measures   of 1937-47,  helped to lower infant mortality and maternal mortality,  to what was a record low for a third world country, he said.

SWRD played an important role in the independence negotiations. This is not well known. In the 1940s, the issue of independence had advanced to the vital stage of drafting the conditions of independence. State Council needed persons who could interpret a document and spot hidden meanings and lapses.

The incisive mind of SWRD was particularly useful,” said Jennings. He saw our weak points with remarkable speed and expressed them with ruthless logic.  SWRD represented far more than DS the section of opinion which was suspicious of British intensions and therefore insisted on precautions that otherwise would not have been taken.”

Queens House also recognized SWRD .London had written to Colombo to say that the Secretary of State in London was not prepared to accept the ‘Ministers Draft’ but had read it with interest. SWRD who had called at Queens House on some other business, had been shown the document, even before DS Senanayake saw it. 

  When the independence negotiations were coming to a close, DS Senanayake had asked Sir Oliver Goonetilleke discuss with Bandaranaike as leader of the Sinhala Maha Sabha the draft agreements for independence. SWRD had viewed the draft with mixed feelings, but refrained from objecting. The agreement was signed, making way for Ceylon to gain self-rule.

When D. S. Senanayake presented the Soulbury Constitution to the State Council, Bandaranaike seconded the motion stating that he does so as the Sinhala Maha Sabha was the largest party in the State Council. It was also decided that DS would move the vote for Dominion status and SWRD would second it as the best debater and the leader of the Sinhala Maha sabha.

With Ceylon heading for self-rule, D. S. Senanayake invited Bandaranaike to combine his Sinhala Maha Sabha with other smaller parties into the United National Party (UNP) which Senanayake was forming to contest for the 1947 election  DS had asked CWW Kannangara and A. Ratnayake to speak to SWRD, who agreed to join the UNP.

The very first United National Party was therefore composed of Ceylon National Congress, Sinhala Maha Sabha, Muslim League and Moors Association. It was a coalition representing different shades of opinion from socialism to conservatism. Opposing the UNP were LSSP, BLP, CP and All Ceylon Tamil Congress.  The SMS was the most powerful group in the UNP, recalled Sirimavo Bandaranaike. His SMS was the most powerful group in the UNP. SWRD and his SMS constituted a vital segment of the UNP, agreed Wiswa. 

A general election was held in 1947. UNP won but did not get the sweeping victory it hoped for. it got  only 42 out of a total of 95 seats. This was a weak majority.  [1] The opposition said that the UNP   did not command the confidence of the country.  A certain group had wished to form an alternative government with SWRD at its head. They were going to build it ‘around the personality of SWRD’, said Meegama. This shows the importance of the personality of SWRD and the SMS.

This group met to discuss the possibility of creating an alternative government consisting of SMS, the Left and independent members, with SWRD as leader. Nearly 50 MPs had been prepared to support SWRD, said Wiswa.  The talks were held at ‘Yamuna’, the home of H. Sri Nissanka, on the initiative of H Sri Nissanka, IMRA Iriyagolle and Wilmot Perera,  who incidentally came from three different castes, Goigama, Karava and Salagama. These discussions were   known as the ‘Yamuna talks’. The exact dates are not available.

The Yamuna proposal became a near possibility but SWRD was reluctant said Wiswa.SWRD thought that DS should not be prevented from becoming the first Prime Minister of Ceylon. . This led to the breakdown of the talks. If the strategy of the Yamuna talks had succeeded, SWRD would have become the first Prime Minister of Ceylon, said Wiswa. Others agreed. H. Sri Nissanka thought that SWRD, had, on his own, missed an ideal opportunity, to become the first Prime Minister of Ceylon.

SWRD however rejected the proposal. Instead he  joined the UNP. SWRD later  explained that he thought the country needed a strong and stable government  at the time of independence. He added that the UNP would not have come into being, if not for him. D.S. Senanayake therefore became Prime Minister. SWRD was elected the Leader of the House. This made Bandaranaike the most senior member of the cabinet, after the Prime Minister.  

Vernon Mendis said, Even before he became Prime Minister SWRD gave a foretaste of his inborn statesmanship by his impressive role at the Asian Relations Conference held by Nehru in New Delhi in 1947,  where  SWRD presented his vision of Asia as a brotherhood of independent states.

Ceylon had sent a delegation of 20, for this Conference, led by SWRD. The calls for Asian Federation were endorsed by Solomon Bandaranaike of Ceylon and Aung San of Burma, reported one account.

SWRD wanted the portfolio of Agriculture and Land but was given Health and Local Government.  Dr. L.O Abeyratne, who was head of Lady Ridgeway Children’s Hospital, pleaded with SWRD to improve the hospital. So after much persuasion and difficulty SWRD managed to get funds allocated in the Budget for a completely new hospital.

He also got, again with difficulty, funds for improving Ratnapura hospital, which often got flooded by the Kalu Ganga.  But Kotelawala who headed the Ministry of transport and Works, including public works, was obstructing the Health Ministry building projects, so this   project did not even start. The UNP wanted to keep SWRD down, recalled Sirimavo Bandaranaike.

SWRD had thought that the UNP could be   turned into a truly national party,  under the direction of the SMS.  But his plan to convert  the UNP was not successful. SWRD had hoped to influence the UNP from within.  Instead he found his own position was being assailed from within. The leaders of the UNP were opposed to the SMS and its nationalist agenda. Opponents complained that SWRD had converted the All Ceylon Village Committee Conference to a political one.

SWRD was also unsuccessful when it came to policy. UNP was   reluctant to implement the clauses in the manifesto, with regard to language, religion and culture. SWRD failed to get legislation passed on these subjects.

SWRD made scathing reference to the UNP government. He said UNP was drifting to a one party dictatorship. SWRD also   complained that no important questions were ever placed before the  Executive Committee of the UNP. 

SWRD opponents objected to both SWRD’s politics and his speeches. SWRD had complained to the All Ceylon Village Committees Conference that the UNP had failed to implement the proposal of the SMS. UNP working committee asked SWRD to send in an explanation, which he did, saying the UNP should implement the policy set out in its manifesto, not hold tamashas.

The SMS held its annual sessions at Madampe in 1951. Several resolutions approved by the branch organizations of the SMS were unanimously passed. These Madampe resolutions included  the  need for an official language policy,  recognition of Buddhism, Sangha to be given  a special place, a national industrial policy, the  essential  services  to be in the hands of the state, implement recommendation of the Social services Commission, development of ayurveda,  improve  public services, banning horse racing and a sound foreign policy. SMS also decided to urge the government to implement the policies promised in the 1947 election.

UNP working committee said that under the UNP constitution, SMS could not place these resolutions before the UNP. According to the UNP constitution all constituent members were under the UNP and had to conform to its rules and ‘loyally accept all decisions of the UNP.’   further, the Madampe resolutions went against the policy of the UNP and they could not be accepted.

SMS  sent a deputation to DS,  without any result. SMS pointed out that SMS has been sending resolutions to the working committee for the last four years.  Also that UNP permitted resolutions to be presented at the annual conference.

The Madampe resolutions were the  precipitating event.  SWRD was urged to leave the UNP. It was clear that DS did not intend to retire and make way for SWRD, though SWRD was considered the successor to DS Senanayake. 

In July 1951, SWRD left the government benches and crossed the floor of the House to the Opposition, followed by five others, including DA Rajapaksa. They expected more to follow but they did not. There were 18 SMS members in Parliament.

Crowds had gathered in front of Parliament to garland him and also at his house, recalled Sirimavo. SWRD had taken the precaution of keeping the SMS going. He had also given leadership to the Swabhasha movement and the Buddhist resurgence of the time. Crowds had gathered in front of Parliament to garland him and also at his house, recalled Sirimavo.

The Sri Lanka Freedom Party was started on September 2nd, 1951 at Colombo Town Hall. The public were informed of the launch and invited to the Town Hall to participate at the launch. A crowd estimated at over 10,000 attended.  The crowd had overflowed onto the verandah and the lawn of the Town Hall. The meeting was attended by bhikkhus, also Buddhist nuns. Some bhikkhus were   seen standing outside with the rest of the crowd.

The SLFP was built on the SMS, this is   forgotten today. Sinhala Maha Sabha had a formidable base, a network of pressure groups of the villages. SWRD utilized this to form the SLFP said Wiswa. The SMS, had taken care to maintain its political identity as a separate organization, and had continued its activities while functioning as part of the UNP government. 

In addition, SWRD had built up strong links with the local government agencies.  He had spoken before the various local government Conferences, every year. This became very useful when the SLFP was formed.  SWRD also  recruited political activists for his political party through the Gam Sabhas.

Throughout out the 1930s and 1940s Bandaranaike had created powerful pressure groups at the local level and the leaders of these organizations became a vital segment of the Party. The All Ceylon Village Committees Conference and the All Ceylon Ayurvedic Physicians Conference were activated to support the party. 

The name Sri Lanka Freedom Party was given by H Sri Nissanka. It is important to note that the word ‘Sinhala’ has been left out. This aversion to the word ‘Sinhala’ should be noted. SWRD was appointed President, with Badiuddin Mahmud and S. Thangarajah as joint secretaries. The Udarata Socialist Front   led by TB Ilangaratne dissolved into the SLFP.

SWRD formed the SLFP for two reasons. To offer a political party in  the middle ground between the UNP and the Marxist parties, and to provide a means of political expression for Sinhalese and Buddhist vested interests.

This brand new SLFP had to face a general election in May 1952.  It made an attempt to form a common front with leftist’s parties but failed.   SLFP had no cash and no suitable candidates, but it did quite well, observed Meegama. SLFP won 9 of 48 seats   got 15.5% of the vote and came second. SWRD became Leader of the Opposition. LSSP also got 9 seats out of 30. But SLFP secured more votes than LSSP.

SLFP came into existence to fulfill certain historical tasks, said Wiswa. It had identified certain interest groups, which taken together formed a kind of social movement.  SLFP had to cater to the needs of these interest groups..  Unlike the other parties, SLFP knew how to make use of these interest groups.

SLFP  had the support of the rural peasantry and the rural elite. Grass roots support constituted an important source of  recruitment.  The rural intelligentsia were the main stay of the party for decades, Wiswa added.

SLFP throughout the period of its existence successfully maintained organization unity, comparable stability and continuity as the major political formation of this country.

The SLFP has survived several crises. Powerful politicians were unable to oust the SLFP.  The party faced internal dissention but it never went into oblivion, due to its political and ideological resilience. SLFP is not a fragile organization. The Party was expected to remain loyal to its rural base. Rural forces never allowed the party to move in any other direction.

Sri Lanka  unlike other counties in Asia has not shown a dislike for party government.  The traditional two party rivalry is a very powerful factor in the rural   sector, and the party alignments are very sharp in those areas. Control of village politics has been a vital factor in political power and influence , observed Wiswa. (Continued)


[1] W.A.Wiswa Warnapala. Sri Lanka Freedom Party. Godage. p 51

Pathfinder sets up eminent panel to prepare post-COVID-19 economic strategy

April 18th, 2020

Dilrook Kannangara

This is very dangerous. These people are known to align with a certain political ideology that in my view is not in the best interests of SL.

Moragoda was the foreign minister under Ranil’s 2001 to 2004 regime that is known to be the most treacherous.

They presented a National Security Strategy for Sri Lanka 2020 and a Study on Managing Foreign Policy and Relations with the UN System to President Rajapaksa. Any such policy must be widely discussed. A policy created by a small group of people who don’t even represent SL is not valid.

What is going on behind the scenes? Why weren’t these presented to media? I smell a rotten rat.

The Pathfinder Foundation has set up a study group chaired by Pathfinder Senior Fellow and former Central Bank Governor Dr. Indrajit Coomaraswamy, to prepare a set of action-oriented recommendations aimed at steering the Sri Lankan economy into the post-COVID-19 era.

Dr. Sisira Pinnawala, Department of Sociology University of Peradeniya, and Dr. Ganeshan Wiganaraja, Executive Director Lakshsman Kadirgamar Institute, will serve as principal authors for this initiative. The report is expected to be presented to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa by the end of April.

Other members of the Study Group, which will consist of twenty leaders from academia, research and the private sector, include Prof. Sirimal Abeyratne, Prof. Saroj Jayasinghe, Prof. Rohan Samarajiva, Prof. Muttukrishna Sarvanthan, Ashroff Omar, Dr. Hans Wijayasuriya, Krishan Balendra and Mohamed Mushin.

Recently the Pathfinder Foundation was responsible for preparing 1) a National Security Strategy for Sri Lanka 2020 and 2) a Study on Managing Foreign Policy and Relations with the UN System. Both of which were presented to President Rajapaksa.

Pathfinder sets up eminent panel to prepare post-COVID-19 economic strategy | Daily FT

මහමැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට ඇති සූදානම සම්බන්ධවයි

April 18th, 2020

ජනමාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයයි ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය

2020. 04. 18  

සභාපති,
මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව,
රාජගිරිය.

සභාපතිතුමනි,

මහමැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීමට ඇති සූදානම සම්බන්ධවයි


#කොරෝනා වසංගතය හමුවේ මැතිවරණ කොමිෂන් සභාව විසින් කල් දමන ලද මහ මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම සම්බන්ධව විශේෂයෙන් වසංගත රෝග විශේෂඥයින් හා අනෙකුත් රෝග විශේෂඥයින් ඇතුළු සෞඛ්‍ය අංශවල නිර්දේශ මත මිස අගමැතිවරයාගේ, ආණ්ඩුවේ මැති ඇමතිවරුන් හා විවිධ සංවිධාන හරහා සිදුකරමින් තිබෙන බලපෑම මත මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම සඳහා තීරණ ගැනීමට ඉක්මන් නොවන ලෙස ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය ඉතා  ඕනෑකමින් යුතුව ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.

02. මෙහිදී  විශේෂයෙන් වෛද්‍ය විශේෂඥයින් හා රජයේ වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරින්ගේ සංගමය ප‍්‍රකාශ කරන ආකාරයට මැයි මස පළමු සති දෙක විශේෂ අවදානම් සහිත කාල වකවානුවකි. එමෙන්ම මේ වනවිට දින 14 ක් ව තිබූ නිරෝධායන කාල සීමාව දින 21 දක්වා දීර්ඝ කිරීමට සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ තීරණය කිරීමද විශේෂයෙන් අවධානයට ගත යුතුව ඇත.

03. තවද මහ මැතිවරණයකදී දිවයින පුරා ගුරුවරුන් හා විදුහල්පතිවරුන් ලක්ෂයකට අධික පිරිසක් මැතිවරණ රාජකාරි සඳහා යොදා ගන්නා බව ඔබ හොඳින් දන්නා කරුණකි. මෙවැනි පසුබිමක විශේෂයෙන් ආණ්ඩුවේ මැති ඇමතිවරුන් මේවන විට සිදුකරමින් තිබෙන ප‍්‍රකාශ නිසා මැතිවරණයක් පැවැත්වීමේ අවදානම පිළිබඳව ඔවුන් නිරන්තරයෙන් විමසමින් මේ සම්බන්ධව අප සංගමයට මැදිහත් වන ලෙස බල කරමින් සිටින බවද පෙන්වා දිය යුතුව ඇත.

04. තවද මේ වන විට ව්‍යවස්ථානුකූලව මැතිවරණ කොමිසන් සභාවට පැවරී ඇති බලතල හමුවේ සෞඛ්‍ය අංශවල නිර්දේශ මත පිහිටා ව්‍යවස්ථාමය අර්බුද ඇති නොවන ලෙස මහ මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම පිළිබඳව ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයේ මතය විමසන ලෙස ජනාධිපතිවරයාට සිදු කරන ලද ඉල්ලීම හා කොමිසම තවදුරටත් එම ස්ථාවරයේ සිටීම පිළිබඳව අප සංගමය බෙහෙවින් අගය කරමු.

එහෙයින් අප පෙන්වාදුන් කරුණු මෙන්ම කොමිසන් සභාව ද තවදුරටත් සිටින ස්ථාවරයේ සිටිමින් රටේ ජනතාවගේ ආරක්ෂාව තහවුරු වූ දිනෙක මෙරට ජනතාවගේ පරමාධිපත්‍යය තහවුරු කළ හැකි අපක්ෂපාතී නිදහස් සාධාරණ මැතිවරණයක් පැවැත්වීමට සියලූ පියවර ගන්නා මෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින අතර ඒ සඳහා  ඕනෑම සහයක් ලබාදීමට ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය සූදානම් බව ද මෙහිදී තවදුරටත් පෙන්වා දීමට කැමැත්තෙමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
විධායක සභාව වෙනුවෙන්,
මහින්ද ජයසිංහ
ප‍්‍රධාන ලේකම්,
ලංකා ගුරු සේවා සංගමය.


රු. 5000/- ක දීමනාව ගෙවීමට අදාළව මතු වූ ගැටළුකාරී තත්වය හේතුවෙන් ඊට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලින් සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් ඉවත් වීමේ තීරණය අත්හිටුවයි

April 18th, 2020

සංවර්ධන නිලධාරී සේවා සංගමය.  ජනමාධ්‍ය නිවේදනයයි

2020. 04. 18  
රු. 5000/- ක දීමනාව ගෙවීමට අදාළව මතු වූ ගැටළුකාරී තත්වය හේතුවෙන් ඊට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලින් සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් ඉවත් වීමේ තීරණය අත්හිටුවයි. අපේ‍්‍රල් 18 සිට රාජකාරී වල පෙර පරිදි.


#Covid-19 වසංගත තත්වය හමුවේ ආදායම් මාර්ග අහිමි වූ ජනතාව වෙනුවෙන් එක් පවුලකට එක් වරක් පමණක් රු. 5000/- ක් ගෙවීමට රජය විසින් තීරණය කරන ලදි.

එම තීරණයෙන් පසු එම කටයුත්ත බරපතල ලෙස දේශපාලනීකරණය කරමින් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ද පසෙක තබා ආණ්ඩුවට සම්බන්ධ ඇතැම් ප‍්‍රාදේශීය දේශපාලඥයන් විසින් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් වෙත නිකුත් කළ මුදල් ගෙවීමේ වවුචර්පත අයදුම්පතක් ලෙස මුද්‍රණය කර බෙදාහැරීම් ඇතුළු කටයුතු වල නියැලූණි.

එමෙන්ම රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමේ දී සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන්ගේ කිසිඳු නිල හා රාජකාරී අනන්‍යතාවයක් නොතිබූ හෙයින් 2020.04.16 දින සිට එම රාජකාරියෙන් ඉවත් වීමට තීරණය කරන ලදි.

ග‍්‍රාම නිලධාරීන් හා සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් මෙම රාජකාරියෙන් ඉවත් වූ පසු උද්ගත වූ තත්වය හමුවේ 2020. 04. 17 දින රාත‍්‍රී රජය සමඟ පැවති සාකච්ඡාවේදී ගනු ලැබූ තීරණ අනුව සංවර්ධන නිලධාරී සේවා සංගමය මගින් ගනු ලැබූ තීරණය අවසන් කර රු. 5000/- දීමනාව ගෙවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදාළ රාජකාරීවල නියැලීමට තීරණය කර ඇත.

01. 2020. 03. 01 අග‍්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම්තුමාගේ අත්සනින් යුතුව නිකුත් කළ චක‍්‍රලේකයේ සඳහන් කමිටුව මගින් සකස් කළ ප‍්‍රතිලාභී නාමලේකනය යළි අදාළ කර ගැනීමත්, 2020. 04. 15 දින අග‍්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම්තුමාගේ අත්සනින් යුතු චක‍්‍රලේකයේ ප‍්‍රතිලාභී කාණ්ඩ අනුව නම් ඇතුළත් කිරීම හෝ ඉවත් කිරීම යළි කමිටුව විසින් සලකා බැලීම.

02. 2020. 04. 12 සමෘද්ධි සංවර්ධන අධ්‍යක්ෂක ජනරාල්වරයාගේ චක‍්‍රලේකය අනුව සමෘද්ධි සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීවරයා කැඳවුම්කරු කරමින් සකස් වීමට නියම්තව තිබූ කමිටුව අදාළ නොකරගැනීමටත් වසමට අයත් නිලධාරීන් පස්දෙනාම 2020.

03. 31 චක‍්‍රලේකයේ කමිටුව ලෙස ක‍්‍රියාත්මක වීමත්

03. රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමේ දී අදාළ වවුචරයේ වසමට අයත් රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් පස්දෙනාම අත්සන් කිරීමත්

යන ඉහත තීරණ මත රු. 5000/- ගෙවීමට අදාළ රාජකාරී කටයුතු වලදී සංවර්ධන නිලධාරීන් 2020. 04. 18 දින සිට සාමාන්‍ය පරිදි එම රාජකාරී කටයුත්තේ යෙදීමට තීරණය කළ බව දන්වා සිටිමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,
චන්දන සූරියආරච්චි  

අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධාන පිරිණමන තෑගි [MCC] සහ ණය පිළිගැනීමට අධිකරණ බලය අවලංගු කල යුතුද ?

April 18th, 2020

නීති පරීක්ෂණ කණ්ඩායම

   අප රටේ 

1] ඉඩම් ප්‍රතිපත්තිය,  2] ඉඩම් නීති 3] ඉඩම් ආයතන  සියල්ල     වෙනස් කිරීමට දැඩි උත්සහයක් දරති.   මෙසේ  කිරීමට  ආධාර  ලබාගැනී මට  අත්සන් තබන  අන්තර්ජාතික  ගිවිසුම් වල   කැපීපෙනෙන කොන්දෙසියක්වන්නේ   ඉඩම් සම්බන්දයෙන්  අදිකරණයට ඇති    බලය  අහෝසි කර    ඉඩම්හිමියන්ට    උසාවියට පිවිසීමට ඇති මූල්යමය අයිතිය   අවම   කිරීමය.  

මෙය ගෝලී  කරණ වැඩසටහනේ කොටසකි.    ශ්රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය  විනිසුරවරයකුවූ   ගරු    . ර් .බි  අමරසිංහගේ   බුද්ධිමත් වචන—-  ———– — ‘’අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධානයන්ගේ  ෂණික  උවමනාව  වන්නේඉඩම් විකිනීමට බාදාකරන සියලු නීති හා  ආයතන අහෝසිකොට, කඩිනමින් ඉඩම් විකිණීමේ හා උකස් කිරීමේ නව නීති  හඳුන්වාදීමය.’’      [1970 වර්ෂයේ  ‘ටයිටල්  ඉන්ෂුරන්ස්  ‘නමැති පොතේ   පෙරවදනෙයන්  ]

ලෝක බැ න්කුවෙන්,  USAID ,  ඇමෙරිකානු තානාපති කාර්යාලය සහ  වෙනෙත් ඇ මෙරිකා ණු   ආයතනවලින්  ආධාර ලබා,  පුරවැසියන්ට කිසිදු දැනුම් දීමක්   නොකොට,    විදේශ රටවල ඉඩම් නීති හඳුන්වා දීම දැනට සිදුවේ . බිම් සවිය  ඉඩම් නීතිය ඉන් පළමු ස්ථානය ගනී

1]  බිම් සවිය  ඉඩම් නීතිය හා අධිකරණ බලතල අහෝසි කිරීම    

බිම් සවිය නීතිය පැනවුවේ 1998 -අං ක 21  පනතින්ය.    මෙම  ‘  පනතේ  ‘ බිම් සවිය නාමය කොහෙවත්  සදහන් කර නොමැත.  1998 -අං ක 21  පනතින්   ලංකාවට හඳුන්වා දී ඇත්තේ විදේශීය  නීතියකි.  මෙම නීතියේ  අන්තර්ජාතික නාමය    'ටො ර න් ස් ‘ නීතිය  ' නොහොත්  ටයිටල්   රෙ ජි ස් ට්රේෂන්ය '. අන්තර්ජාතික නාමය භාවිතා නොකිරීමෙන්   මෙම  නීතිය පිළිබද දැනුම ඉඩම්  අයිති කරුවන්ටත්  නීතිවේදීන්ටත්  ලබා ගැනීමට අපහසුවී ඇත.   [therefore refer to   Torrens  law or Title Registration  on the  internet -  Few references  are mentioned below ]  .බිම් සවිය යන නාමය භාවිතා කරන්නේ මහජනයා නොමග යැවීමටද ?.  නීතිය රටට  නොගැලපෙන විදේශ  නීතියක්  යන්න වසා  දැමීමට ද ?.      
බිම් සවිය  නීතිය ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට මහත් පුදුමයක් විය හැකිය.  ලංකාවට හදුන්ව දී ඇ ති   මෙම නීතිය   නව ලිබරල්   ආථික ප්‍රතිපත්තිය    මත සැදුනු නීතියකි .  එනම් ගැනුම් කරුවන්ට  , උකස් කරුවන්ට  ලෙහෙසියෙන් ඉඩමවල අයීතිය සොයා  ගත හැකි ,  නව  ලියා පදිංචි  රෙජිස්ටරයක් සකස්කිරිමයි.   කඩිනමින් විකිණීම හා උකස් කිරීම,  ආථිකය  වැඩිදියුණු කිරීමේ  හා දුප්පත් කම ඉවත් කිරීමේ  මාර්ගයයි 
නව ලිබරල්   ආථික  ප්‍රවීණයන්ගේ ප්‍රකාශයයි  .

බිම් සවිය  නීතිය අනුව   රෙජිස්ටරයේ   ඇති අයිතිකරුවන් ගේ  අයිතිය  විභාග කිරීමට   උසාවියකටවත්  බලයක්  නැත.  මෙම බලගතු ලියාපදිංචි කිරීමට  ‘Indefeasible’  [වෙනස් කළ නොහැකි ]   යන නාමය භාවිතා  කරනු ඇත.   එබැවින් වංචනික  ඔප්පුවක් මත හෝ නීතියට පටහෙනි   ඔප්පුවක් මත රෙජිස්ටරයේ  නම ලියාපදිංචි කරගතහොත්  ,   වංචාකරුට  ඉඩම  අයිතිවේ.  .  [මෙය ඇතුලත් කර ඇත්තේ  අංක 21 පනතේ 33 වගන්තියේය.  උදාහරණයක්—– සරෝජාගේ  ඉඩම නිමල්ට් විකුණු පසු සරෝජාගේ නම මැකියයි. නිමල්ගේ නම පමණක් රෙජිස්ටේරයේ  සදහන් වේ.   උසාවියට ​​පිවිසීමේ මූලික අයිතිය   සරෝජාට නොමැත

තවද පනතේ  73  වන වගන්තිය  අනුව,   අං ක 21   පනත  වෙනත්  ලිඛිත නීති  කිසිවක් නොතකා  සියළුම  නීතිවලට වඩා ඉහළින් පවතී.    එබැවින්  ,   අං ක 21   පනත      පුද්ගලික ඉඩම් , රාජයේ ඉඩම් ,  පූජනීය ඉඩම්, දේවාල   ඉඩම් , කුබුරු ඉඩම් , වගාව හුවමාරු  කිරීමට අදාල , හා පොලොව  යට සම්පත් ආරක්ෂා කිරීමටයොදා ඇති  නීති සියල්ල බිම් සවිය නීතියට යට කරන්නේය  .   රෝම ලන්දේසි නීතිය,  අවුරුදු 100 ක් පැරණි උසාවි තීන්දු ,[ judicial precedence ] බෙදුම් නඩු පනත, [ Partition Acct  ] හවුල් අ යිතිවාසිකම් [co-ownership] බුක්තිය පිලිබඳ නීතිය [ Presciption  Ordinance] තහනම් නියෝග වාර [ injuctions]   මේ සියල්ල  අහෝසි  කරන්නේය    

බිම්  සවිය  නීතියෙන්  ඉඩම්  වලට  අදාල  අවුරුදු සීයයක් පමණ     පැරණි  රටේ  නීති  මෙසේ අහෝසි  වන  බව  දැනසිටින්නේ  සුළු පිරිසකි.

 ලංකාවේ පන්සල් වල ඉඩම් වලට මෙම නීති  කිසිසේත් නොගැ ලපෙන බව අස්ගිරිය  ගෞරවනීය  මාහිමියන් විසින්  ප්රචාරයකර කර  ඇති අතර පන්සල්  හා දේවාල  බූමි මෙම නීතියෙන්  වහාම  ඉවත් කරන ලෙස  අ න කර ඇත    https://srilog.com/sri-lankan-chief-prelate-threatens-to-launch-protest-over-government-failure-to-amend-land-laws_3206.htmlSri Lankan Chief Prelate threatens to launch protest over government failure to amend land lawshttps://srilog.com/sri-lankan-chief-prelate-threatens-to-launch-protest-over-government-failure-to-amend-land-laws_3206.htmlSri Lankan Chief Prelate threatens to launch protest over government failure to amend land laws

Posted on April 17, 2014 by jamal Leave a comment

විදේශ රටවල ඉඩම් නීති ලංකාවට  හදුන්වා  දීමේදී  ගෞරවනීය බෞද්ධ පූජක පක්ෂයටත් , වෙනත් ආගම් වල ගෞරවනීය පුජකවරුන්ටත්  මහජනයාට පැහැදිලිකිරීම   ඉතාමත් අවශ්වූ නමුත් එය එසේ නොවේ

ලංකාවේ අවුරුදු  සීයයක් පමණ  පැරණි  පෙලපත ලියවූ, ලියාපදිංචි පොත්   අහිමි වේ .

අංක 21  පනතේ,    53  වගන්තිය අනුව පසු ගනුදෙනු  ලියාපදින් චි   ලේඛන  විනාශ කෙරේ . 

ලියාපදිංචි  කන්තෝරු 45 ක්  ලංකාවේ ඇත . මෙහි  ලක්ෂ 2 ක් පමණ පොත් ගබඩා කොට ඇත . මෙම පොත්වල 18  හා 19  ශත වර්ෂයන්  වල සිට මෙ රටේ ඉඩම් වල  ඉතිහාසය  සහ පසු ගනුදෙනු සටහන් කර ඇත . එනම් ඉඩමේ පැ ටිකිරිය  නොහොත් ඉඩම් පැ වත ආ ආකාරයයි.

  ලංකාවේ ඉඩම් නීතිය බිම් සවියට වෙනස් කල විට  අයිතිකරු  පමණක්     බිම් සවිය නීතියෙන් ලියාපදිංචි පොත්වල පෙන්නුම් කරයි .  මුල්  ඉඩම්  කරුවන්ගේ නම්    මෙම නීතියෙන්  සම්පූර්යනයෙන්  අස්කර යි.  මේ රටේ ලාංකිකයන් ට  තමාට ඉඩම ලැබුනේ කෙසේද යන්න සොයා ගත නොහැකි වේ

ඉඩම් අයිතිකරුවන්ගේ පෙළපත ඉතිහාස ගතවන පොත්   වලට‍ යන ඉරණම  ගැන රජයේ  නිලධාරීන්ගේ ඉල්ලීම .  https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/documents/paperspresented/performance-report-land-title-settlement-department-2017.pdf  ඉඩම් අයිතිකරුවන්ගේ පෙළපත ඉතිහාස ගතවන පොත්  ගණන  ලක්ස දෙකක් [200000] පමණ වේ   බිම් සවියෙන් පසු ලංකාවේ ඉඩම් ඉතිහාසය ලියාඇ ති පොත් විනාස වීමට ඉඩ ඇත 

 පොත්වල චායරුපයක්  

  නොසලකා හරින ලද   පොත් ගබඩා— පොත් අහුරා  තිබෙන්නේ මෙසේය  —– 2017https://www.parliament.lk/uploads/documents/paperspresented/performance-report-land-title-settlement-department-2017.pdf

 ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරුවේ පොත් සංරක්ෂිතය කළ යුතුය. ------ ඉඩම් හිමිකම් නිරවුල් කිරීමේ කොමසාරිස්  ජනරාල්   මෙස්සේ කියයි --------
2017 වාර්තාව ----- -දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ වාර්තා කාමරය ජාතික වැදගත්කමක් ඇති මුල් ලේඛන සහිත ස්ථානයකි. එහි ඇති ලේඛන නිසි ලෙස පරිලෝකනය කර සුරක්ෂිත කළ යුතුය. කෙසේ වෙතත්, මේ සඳහා අවශ් භෞතික, මානව හා මූල් සම්පත් මෙන්ම අවකාශයන්  ඉතා සීමිතය.  අනුව, එක් එක් ලේඛනයේ ස්කෑන් කරන ලද පිටපතක් ලබා දෙන ලියකියවිලි භාරගෙන සංරක්ෂණය කරන ලෙස ඉල්ලා ජාතික ලේඛනාගාර දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව සමඟ අවශ් සාකච්ඡා පවත්වන ලදී. එහි ප්රති files ලයක් ලෙස ලිපිගොනු 650 ක් ඔවුන්ට ලබා දෙන ලදී. ලිපිගොනු 200,000 ක් වාර්තා කාමරයේ ඇති බැවින්, මෙම ක්රියාවලිය වේගවත් කළ යුතු අතර ජාතික වැදගත්කමක් ඇති ව්යාපෘතියක් ලෙස සැලකිය යුතුය.’
 ඩිජිටල්කරණය

.  දියුණු රටවල මෙම  වෙනස් කම්  කරන්නේ  , නීතිය හා පරිඝනික භාවිතය ගැන  පර්යේෂණ  කිරීමෙන් හා මහජනයා දැනුවත් කිරීමෙනි.     හොන්කොන්  වෙනි රටවල්  මෙයට  අවුරුදු 12 පමණ කාලයක් ගත කලේය .

 අවුරුදු 100ක් පැරණි පොත් සංරක්ෂිත නොකොට, ඉඩම් ලියාපදංචි කන්තෝරු සකස් නොකොට  විෂයේ  විශේෂිත වූවන් ද නීති  පොත්ද නොමැතිව , අප  රටේ නීති උපදෙස් හා අපගේ පනත්  බාවිතා නොකොට මෙවැනි දැවෙන්ත වෙනස්කම් කිරීම ‘කරත්තය ගොනා  ඉසරහෙන් සිටින්නා’  සේය  කියා  මා හට පෙනෙන්නේය. [ cart before the horse ]  .  

  පුද්ගලික හා ආණ්ඩුවේ ඉඩම්  ගණුදෙනු සියල්ල්ල රෙජිස්ටරයේ  සටහන් වී නැති අතර,  ව්යාජ  ඔප්පු තැන්පත් වී ඇති    බව රෙජිස්ටාරා ජෙනරාල්  කියාසි ටී.  මේ සියල්ලම  මගහැර  හිමිකම්  පරණ රෙජිස්ටරයෙන්   රෙජිස්ටරයට  පිටපත් කිරීම   ඊ රෙජිස්ට්‍රේ තත් වය කුමක්ද ?    අපරටේ පර්යේෂණ සමග   උත්හසහායක්    නොකරන්නේ  සියල්ල  පැවෙතෙන්නේ විදේශ  මුදල් හා විදේශ  පර්යේෂණ  මත  බැවිනි. අප රටේ  රහසිගතව  පනත් ඉදිරිපත් කරන බැවින් [බිම් සවිය එස්සේ පැමිණි නීතියකි ]  ඉඩම් හිමියන් පමණක් නොව නීතිඥයාවරුන් ට  මේ සම්බන්දව එතරම්  දැනුමක් නැති බව පෙනී යයි  

දැනට  බිම් සවිය රේජිස් ටරය  සකස් කලාට  පසු,  දෙවනුව ඉඩමේ නම වෙනුවට  .  ඉල්ලක්කම් 12 කින් යුතු  නොම්බෙරයක්   [ 12 digit number ]     අයිතිකරුට ලැ බෙන්ට සලස්ව යි.    කඩදාසි ලේඛන යුගය  අවසන් වන අතර   ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරුවල පරිගණක යුගය මෙතැන්සිට ආරම්බ වෙයි. 

මෙම හදිසි තීරණ වල   බලපෑම් කුමක් වේද යන්න දැනට යටපත් වී ඇත.

 මේ සම්බන්දව කිසිම දැනුමක් මහජනයයාට නැත. අප රටේ නව නීතිය [බිම් සවිය] සම්බන්දයෙන් සහ පරිගණක ඉඩම් ලේකන පිළියෙළ  කිරීම සම්බන්දයෙන් කිසිදු නීති පොතක් නැති  අතර , දැ නුම ලබා  දීමට උගතුන් ද  නොමැත.  අපි   සම්පූර්ණයන්  විදේශීය  උපදේශකයන්ට  සහ බාහිර කොන්ත්‍රාත්කරුවන්ට බාරදී   මේ  වෙනස්කම්ර  කිරීමට බලපොරෝතුවෙමු. 

මේ සියල්ල කෙරෙන්නේ එකම මතයක් උදෙසාය; ව්‍යාපාර දර්ශකයේ ඉහළට නැගීමටය .[ Doing Business Index] .   ඉඩමට නොම්බරය ක්  තබා  ලේඛන පරිලෝකනය කරන්න,  කඩදාසි ලේඛන නැතිව ඉඩම් ගනුදෙනු කරන්න ‘ ඩිජිටල් කරණය , ඉඩම් නීති විදේශ නීති වලට පරිවර්තනය කිරීම සියල්ල සිදුවන්නේ අන්තර්ජාතික සංවිධාන  පිරිණමන    තෑගි[MCC]   සහ ණය  පිළිගැනීමටය .

මෙහි ඇති බයානක කම    වෛරස් සහ සයිබර් ක්රයිම් වලට ගොදුරු වීමය    එ වැනි දෙයක් සිදූ වූ වොත් අප රටට  ඉඩම් වල අයිතිය රැකගන්න ශක්තියක් තිබේද?

2] බිම් සවිය ව්‍යප්ත  කිරීමට --- දෙවෙනි වරටත් අධිකරණ බලතල අවලංගු කරන තවත් ගිවිසුමක් ඉදිරිපත්වේ MCC  6.8

අවුරුදු 5 ක ට  දිස්ත්රික්ක 7 ක  අධිකරණයේ බලය ඉවත් කොට බිම් සවිය ලියාපදිංචිය සහ ඉ රෙජිස්ටර සකස් කිරීට විදේශිකයන්ට බාරදීම

. MCC සහ එක්සත් ජනපද රජය මෙම සංයුක්තය යටතේ සිදුවන ක්‍රියාකාරකම් හෝ අතපසු වීම් හේතුවෙන් පැන නගින කිසිදු හිමිකම් පෑමක් හෝ අලාභයක් සඳහා කිසිදු වගකීමක් දරන්නේ නැත. මෙම සංයුක්තය යටතේ සිදුවන ක්‍රියාකාරකම් හෝ අතපසු වීම් හේතුවෙන් ඇති වන පාඩු හානිය, තුවාල හෝ මරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් රජය විසින් එම්.සී.සී. හෝ එක්සත් ජනපද රජයට හෝ වර්තමාන හෝ හිටපු නිලධාරියෙකුට හෝ එම්.සී.සී. එවැනි අලාභයක්, හානියක්, තුවාලයක් හෝ මරණයක් සඳහා ඉහත කිසිදු ආයතනයකට හෝ පුද්ගලයන්ට එරෙහිව කිසිදු ආකාරයක හිමිකම් පෑමක් හෝ නෛතික ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් ගෙන නොයනු ඇත. එම්.සී.සී. සහ එක්සත් ජනපද රජය හෝ එම්.සී.සී. හෝ එක්සත් ජනපද රජයේ වර්තමාන හෝ හිටපු නිලධාරියෙකු හෝ සේවකයෙකු ශ්රී ලංකාවේ සියලුම අධිකරණ හා විනිශ්චය සභාවල අධිකරණ බලයෙන් නිදහස් විය යුතු බවට රජය එකඟ වේ.

විදේශිකයන්ට අප රටේ ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු බාරදීම

  ඉඩම් රෙජීස්ට්රිය  ආරක්ෂා කිරීම සඳහා ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයේ විශේෂ නීති තිබේ. වෙනත් රටවලත් එසේමය . [ රටවලට ගිය අපට පෙනීයන්නේ ඇතුල් වීම  තහනම් බවය  ] මන්ද යතහොත්,  ඉඩම් ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු වල රටේ ධනය [ රටේ ඉඩම් වල විස්තර ]  ගබඩා කර ඇති  බැවිනි . ඒවා රහසිගතව තබා ගත යුතු බැවිනි  . 

රටේ  ඉඩම් නීති වෙනස් කිරීම  හා  ලියාපදිංචි කන්තෝරු වල අවුරුදු 5 ක්  රටේ නීති වලට  යටත් නොවන ආකාරයට සම්පූර්නයෙම්ම   නිදහසේ ඇතුල් වීම    විදේශිකයන් අතට පැවරීම කණගාටු දායකය

විසඳුමක්

නීති  සංගමය සහ ගරු  ජනාධිපති මහින්ඳ රාජපක්‍ෂ කොමිටුව  පිලියෙල කල නීති පිළිගැනීම.  බිම් සවිය වැනි  අධිකරණ  බලය  නැති කරන නීති අප රටට  හඳුන්වා දීම අවම කල යුතුය. මේ සියල්ල සම්බන්දයෙන් රෑපවාහිණි ය හා පත්තර මහජනයාව දැනුවත් කලුතුය . 

 ඉඩම් ඔප්පු  දුප්පත් අය ට පිරිනමා ඔවුන්ට ඉ රෙජිස්ටෙරය භාවිතා  කොට විදේශීය නීති අනුගමනය කරන්ට කීම ඔප්පු නුදුන්නාසේය

ඉහත කරුණු උපුටාගත්තේ 

1]     වෙනත් රටවල්  Torrens law [බිම් සවිය ] හදුන්වාදී මෙන්  අධිකරණයට සහ ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට  සිදුකල බරපතල ගැටළු  දැක්වෙන අධිකරණය  වාර්තා  ———–

A]Mlaysian experience  —   උදාහරණයක් වසයෙන් එම රටේ ඉඩම් දැන්  වංචාකරුවන්ට බිම් සවිය නීතිය හරහා  බාරදෙයි .   මෙසේ සිදුවී ඇත්තේ අවලංගු  ව්‍යාජ   ඔප්පු  ලියාපදිංචි කරුවන්ට,   විරුද්දව ඉඩම් හිමියන්ට  උසාවියට යෑමට නොහැකි වීමය  http://www.hba.org.my/laws/CourtCases/2000/adorna.htm. —-Adorna Properties Sdn Bhd – vs -Boonsom Boonyanit]   –නඩු පැවරු ඉඩම් හිමියාට මැලයසියාවේ උසාවියට  උදව්  කිරීමට නොහැකි  වීමේ  නඩු තීන්දුව 

B] UK experience– අවලංගු  ව්‍යාජ   ඔප්පු සම්බන්දව  එන්ගලන්ත යේ   අධිකරණය මෙම නීතියට හිරවී ඇත .  එහි නඩුකාරවරු  නොතාරිස්  [ solicitors]වරුන්ට වන්දි ගෙවන ලෙසට තීන්දු දී ඇත.   නොතාරිස්වරු මවිත කෙරුණු , ඉතිහාස ගතවන නදුතීන්දුවක් 2018 ප්‍රථම වරට   ඉතිහාසගතවනු  ඇත.නඩුව  [ reamvar-v-mishcondereya-]—  https://www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/real-estate-law-blog/property-fraud-after-dreamvar-v-mishcon-de-reya

C]Singapore experience  --- බිම් සවිය නීතිය වංචාකරුවන් සඳහා අදහස් කරන ලදී-- ? https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2325/
2] what happened Papua New Guinean?----judicial assault on the citadel of indefeasibility of title under the Papua New Guinean Torrens System of conveyance By John Mugambwa[*]http://www.paclii.org/journals/fJSPL/vol05/2.shtml
3]  Evaluating Land Governess Issues by B Kirubanathan 2013 https://webapps.itc.utwente.nl/librarywww/papers_2013/msc/la/kirubananthan.pd
4] Title Insurance book  by  Justice A.R.B.Amerasinghe 
5] Equality and Freedom book by Justice C.G.Weeramantr
6]New  Perspectives On Land Registration contemporary problems and solution by Amy Gaymour Stephen Watterson NAD Martin Dixon https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/new-perspectives-on-land-registration-9781509906031/
7] World Bank reports land title project  Sri Lanka –see web sites years  2002  and 2007 and 2016
8] Annual reports of the Commissioner of Title and Survey General Sri Lanka see web sites
9] Australian Torrens system --https://api.research- repository.uwa.edu.au/portalfiles/portal/34721286/ Thesis_doctor_of_philosophy_Carruthers_Penelope_Jane_2018.pdf 
10]   http://www.colombopage.com/CGImgs_reps/MCC.pdf  Millennium  Challenge Compact 

මී ළග  ළිපිය MCC   හා බිම් සවිය

It’s time we returned to Wedakama and Ayurveda to fight COVID-19

April 18th, 2020

By Suryamithra Vishwa/Harmony Page-DailyFT Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

The ancient medical systems of Sri Lanka and India will help build immunity which is currently absent in the population

Colombo, April 18: In the background of one of the worst global pandemics in recent history, the COVID-19 virus, South Asian countries such as Sri Lanka and India could be described as nations gifted with a rich and diverse medical heritage, such as Desiya Chikitsa (Sinhala Hela Beheth), Ayurveda and Siddha.

Encompassed within the broad Ayurveda system are many life-saving healing methods, disease preventive methods and knowledge of the use of the many of nature’s gifts including medicinal herbs, plants, trees, fruits/vegetables, a significant number of which are considered luxuries in the West.

Most of these comprise our traditional diet and contribute to boosting our immunity against diseases. It is pertinent to mention that the meaning of the Sanskrit term AyurVeda could be translated as knowledge or science of life; Ayur meaning life and Veda meaning knowledge or knowing.

In the face of the global pandemic, where we do not know what more intriguing diseases are in store for us, in both Sri Lanka and India, there are those lobbying for our traditional values of well-being, agriculture and nutrition as well as avoiding harmful ‘modern’ diets of genetically modified and chemically induced foods that are not part of our agro heritage.

Even those who are more comfortable with Western medicine or allopathy would agree on the point that the philosophy of Ayurveda is largely around prevention of disease with a correct lifestyle, thought patterns and diet practices where the mind, body and spirit are all taken as an integral whole, a time-tested outlook. Sri Lanka and India share a near common medical history.

Sri Lanka, which was thought to be an ancient medicinal hub, has a medical system that pre-dates Ayurveda, known as Desiya chikitsa or Sinhala Wedakama (medicine of the Sinhala race). It is believed that Ravana, the prehistoric king of Lanka of Ramayana fame, was well versed in medical lore. It is mentioned that he represented Sri Lanka at a medical conference held in India during his time (where he met Seetha and unleashed the first Indo-Lankan war), points out Dr. C.G. Uragoda, author of the book, ‘History of Medicine in Sri Lanka’.

Uragoda, an allopathic doctor and past President of the Sri Lanka Medical Association and the Ceylon College of Physicians, explains in the book under the 2nd chapter ‘Ancient medical practices’, that a majority of the medical plants used in India and Sri Lanka are the same.

Sri Lankan author, Dr. Seela Fernando in her book ‘Herbal Food and Medicines in Sri Lanka’ quotes Dr. George Clarke, M.D., M.A. of Philadelphia, as stating as follows, after reading the Charaka Samhita, the ancient text on the Ayurvedic medical tradition: As I go through a part of Charaka, I come to the conclusion that if present day physicians drop all modern drugs and chemicals from their Pharmacopoeia and adopt the methods of Charaka in treating diseases, there will be less work for undertakers and fewer invalids in the world.”

Dr. Clarke was referring to the overall medical system of both India and Sri Lanka.

Against the coronavirus backdrop, what is being recommended by the Chinese and other experts who have studied the COVID-19 virus (and found it being eliminated when exposed to high levels of heat) are methods such as steaming which Indian and Sri Lankan traditional medical practice uses for respiratory health. The herb-infused inhalation clears the lungs and restores respiratory health.

Among the herbs (raw or dried) used are lime leaves, coriander, thulasi (holy basil), ginger, garlic, nidhikumba (mimosa) flowers, karapincha (curry leaves), kuppameniya (Indian copper leaf), kohomba (neem leaves/bark), devadara and vishnukanthi (to name a few). The general regular consumption of herbs/spices such as lime, turmeric, pepper, ginger, onion and coriander that is part of our diet, is known to enhance and fortify immunity.

Ayurvedic practices such as oil pulling (gargling with coconut oil, putting drops in nose and eyes) is used especially in India for ridding impurities from the body and boosting overall immunity.

Revive ancient medical heritage

Although it is allopathic medicine that has taken a central stage in India and Sri Lanka there are calls to revive our ancient medical heritage to face present and future threats of global pandemics.

Indian Padma Shri award winner for his services for promoting Ayurveda, J. Hareendran Nair, a renowned Ayurvedic doctor and entrepreneur from Kerala, opined that it is sad that Ayurveda medical practices have today become an ‘alternative medicine’ for countries such as India and Sri Lanka where Ayurveda is and was a key part of our collective inheritance.

Meanwhile, D.H. Tennakoon, former Director of Sri Lanka’s National Ayurveda Teaching Hospital, who is currently talking to the media to educate people on Ayurveda in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, points to an ancient Sanskrit sloka that advised, through Ayurveda, contact based prevention techniques when faced with human to human transmitted contagious diseases.

He points out that this is the same as those prescribed today by the World Health Organisation (WHO), pertaining to the prevention of the COVID-19 virus.

The sloka advising distancing/isolation/avoidance of touch, when threatened by contagious diseases is as follows:

Prasangath (close intimate contact, sexual) gathra

sansparsath (touch; such as shaking hands)

nisswasath (exhalation and droplets thereof)

sahabojanath (shared meals or community eating)

ekashaiyasanaschaiwa (close proximity habitation such as in a family; carrying children, etc.)

wastra (exchange of clothes/sharing of clothes)

malanu (ornaments such as chains and exchanging such)

lepanath (cosmetic application such as lipstick)

jawaran kushtancha shoshan cha (diseases such as rashes, TB, fever)

nethra abhisyanda mewacha (eye diseases such as sore eyes, conjunctivitis)

awupasargika rogas thu sankramanthi naran nara (all these that are passed from person to person).

Well, isn’t this what is told to us now by Western medical experts for the prevention of the coronavirus, which our ancient physicians told us so many hundreds of years ago in exact precise detail, advising us how to avoid the spreading of such diseases?” asks Dr. Tennakoon.

He also points to the Ayurvedic advice to communities during pandemics in ancient times. When a disease was widespread, ‘Janapada Udwansa’, there was a directive to ‘lockdown’ as we know now in today’s parlance, or ‘isolation’ of villages and towns. Within families the sick person would be isolated. He or she would use separate plates, cups etc.

If one looks at the ancient Sri Lankan/Indian medical practice; when there was a sick person in the family , herbs and leaves such as lime fruit/Kohomba (Neem) leaves were hung outside the door indicating that the particular house is temporarily under isolation because a member in that household is having an infectious sickness. Well that is exactly what the Public Health Inspector (PHI) of today is doing in Sri Lanka, pasting a sticker on the door (indicating that the house has a patient with the COVID-19 virus). The only exception is that the sticker is not a herb having medicinal properties and anti-bacterial benefits that all the medicinal leaves have,” Dr. Tennakoon points out.

Turn attention to nature

We have to turn our attention to nature of which we are all a part,” says Meera Sai Murali of Coimbatore, a former banking professional who is now an example of how to live with and in nature without disease, cultivating her own food/medicine through organic nature-based methods and following the path of nature cure for disease prevention.

Right now, when many of us in Sri Lanka and India are struggling with food shortages and fear of contracting the COVID-19 virus, Meera lives happily in the security that she will neither have a lack of food nor fear for her immunity.

This lockdown is not affecting me and my family as we are anyway in a permanent ‘lockdown’ with nature where we have in our forest garden everything we need; what mother earth gifts us are our foods. All the elements of mother earth are our medicine. We spend a maximum of only around Indian Rs. 2,000 a month and that too for expenditure such as fuel,” points out Meera who engages in what is called ‘nature-based cultivation’ (dictated by nature and not by man and his devious modern introductions of pesticides/weedicide).

Known in Sinhala as ‘Swabahdaham govithena’ that Sri Lankan experts on the subject such as Tilak Kandegama promote, is the pathway for the future for us to become what we were before colonization/globalization. We were strong, using our formidable ancestral knowledge.

The sun and the air and clean water are all compulsory for good immunity. Every plant has multiple uses. Nature is providing all of us multiple options; it gives us tooth cleaning material, body cleaning agents, fruits, greens, vegetables, medicines, toys.. the list is endless,” says Meera.

There are others who echo Meera on awakening to self-sufficiency in nutrition, both at an individual and national level.

Begin a new path

Countries like Sri Lanka and India have to begin a new path to secure their food and nutrition based on traditional/indigenous models. Ayurveda emphasizes disease prevention and it is time we resurrected our own philosophy of living right,” says Western and India trained Lankan food and nutrition specialist, Dr. Damayanthi Perera who holds a PhD in Human Nutrition from the University of London and M SC, B Sc, P.G. Diploma in Public Health and Policy from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in UK. She also holds a Masters degree in human nutrition from the University of Bombay and B.Sc from the University of Allahabad, India.

She opines that the Western economic, agriculture, food and nutrition models have failed to serve humanity.

During the early days of the Indian lockdown, a friend from India called me and the conversation was on COVID-19. He informed me that his Indian doctor friend had advised him to take zinc supplements to boost immunity,” recalls Dr. Perera.

I immediately responded by reminding him that he is from the ‘Land of Ayurveda’ and that there are plenty of foods recommended in Ayurveda for boosting immunity. I told him that we are taking ‘Golden Milk’ with turmeric, ginger and black pepper and milk… which is a traditional Ayurvedic recipe for boosting immunity. I also informed him to consume at least one teaspoon of virgin coconut oil (VCO) three times a day since it has been reported in scientific literature that VCO destroys lipid coated viruses,” she said.

Western consumers have been gulping down synthetic vitamins and minerals for long, but the comparative data from the global north and the global south on COVID-19 pandemic indicate that consumers from the global north are immune-compromised. Further, synthetic vitamins and minerals may be toxic in the short and long-run. Our traditional food cultures and traditional agriculture have been destroyed by the West. This is our last chance to reform our food and agriculture to prevent both non communicable (NCDs) and communicable diseases,” she emphasizes.

The coronavirus is a dark cloud over the world but let our Sinhala Wedakama and the Ayurvedic system and our nature based agro heritage be the silver lining on disease prevention and immunity boosting.

(The Harmony page will continue to publish interviews, articles, analysis and book reviews on our wealth of traditional indigenous medicinal and lifestyle practices recommended through Hela Wedakama, Ayurveda and Sidha as well as continue our mission to draw humanity closer to Mother Earth. We therefore will continue to actively promote the cultivation methods that are in sync with our ancient Lankan heritage where we did not poison the earth and ourselves or kill any other creature; weed or insect just because humans have to be fed.)

Are we all set for an early June Parliamentary Election?

April 18th, 2020

Gagani Weerakoon Courtesy Ceylon Today

Due to the imposition of curfew, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the Sinhala and Tamil New Year 2020 had to be celebrated in solitary comfort of their homes.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa also remained in his residence in Mirihana during this period. At the dawn of the New Year, Rajapaksa contacted his siblings, the Minister of Mahaweli, Agriculture, Irrigation and Rural Development, Chamal Rajapaksa and the Prime Minister, Mahinda Rajapaksa and extended his New year wishes.

The President also received calls from the public while he constantly was in contact with officials for the discussion on measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and the measures taken for the country to return to normalcy.
On 15 April he arrived at the Presidential Secretariat and called on the Presidential Task Force, appointed to combat COVID-19, to inquire into the updates of the measures taken.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa also celebrated the New Year with his family at the Carlton House in Tangalle. Although generally a huge crowd gathers at the Carlton House during New Year season, this year was an exception.

Certain New Year traditions have been consistently followed at the Carlton House every year and this year it took place in the presence of his whole family.

On 14 April, Minister of Passenger Transport Management, Power and Energy, Mahinda Aamaraweera arrived at the Carlton House to wish Premier while the former Governor of the Central Bank, Ajith Nivard Cabraal and Rajapaksa’s parliamentary affairs secretary, Kumarasiri Hettige travelled from Colombo to Tangalle to wish him.

On 15 April, Premier visited his elder brother Chamal Rajapaksa’s residence and spent a few days at the Carlton Estate in Weeraketiya while constantly making contact for updates on measures implemented to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.

The President, head of the Presidential Task Force, Basil Rajapaksa, the Minister of Health, Pavithra Wanniarachchi, Director General of Health Services, Anil Jasinghe and the current Commander of Army, Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva were constantly in contact during the New Year period.

Prasanna blames JVP

The National Organizer of Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) and the former Minister of Economic Development, Basil Rajapaksa appears to be held up in a busy schedule although he is not a Cabinet Minister or even a deputy minister.


While the SLPP has long been preparing for the upcoming General Elections, Rajapaksa, right after having handed over nominations, has been vested with a huge additional responsibility.


He has been appointed as the head of the Presidential Task Force formed by the President Gotabaya Rajapaksa in order to take necessary steps to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, including the curfews that have been imposed and other precautionary measures adopted by the government.


Basil has had experience in such involvement. Discussions in furtherance for measures that have to be adopted for the country to return to normalcy have thus taken place at Temple Trees under his leadership.


A similar discussion was also held on 15 April chaired by Rajapaksa. This discussion was more far-fetched as in addition to steps that have to be implemented for the country to return to normalcy, measures pertaining to that of Sri Lankans currently overseas were also discussed.


The discussion focused on the return of Sri Lankan citizens overseas who want to return to their homeland during the pandemic as there is a considerable number of such individuals. Minister of Foreign Relations, Dinesh Gunawardena and the Minister of Industrial Exports and Investment Promotion, Prasanna Ranatunga were also present at this discussion.


Basil stated that these individuals have to be brought back to Sri Lanka upon the instructions of health officials while the spread of COVID-19 will also be controlled.


Meanwhile Gunawardena noted that information on these individuals have been obtained from Embassies and High Commissions and the process of ensuring their return is being carried out methodically.


Ranatunga added that the SriLankan Airlines will begin preparations for their return upon the approval of the State while emphasizing that the instructions of the State and health officials in this regard is mandatory.


Upon approval, they will be tested at the airport following which the report could be obtained within six hours until which they will remain in the airport. They will then be subject to a 14 day quarantine period.


During the previous Cabinet meeting, matters pertaining to Sri Lankans stranded in International airports was also discussed.


Ranatunga said issue of over 33 Sri Lankans having been stranded in foreign airports and measures that have to be adopted for their return were discussed in this Cabinet meeting adding that two Sri Lankans who arrived from the London Heathrow Airport have also been subject to quarantine.


He also stated that JVP’s, Wasantha Samarasinghe had alleged that Sri LankanAirlines is operating as usual while not taking measures for the return of Sri Lankan citizens overseas.


”This is a complete hoax as this entity has carried out their social responsibility by ensuring the safe return of Sri Lankans from Wuhan China and will continue this by bringing back all other Sri Lankans overseas when time permits,” he said while blaming JVP for consistently making false accusations and not carrying out clean politics.
 Rajapaksa then instructed officials to take steps and formulate mechanisms for the quick return of all those who are employed overseas, involved in business and students studying in foreign universities.


It’s all about elections


The Party led by South Korea’s President, Moon Jae-In, has scored an emphatic victory in the parliamentary poll held early this week. More than 17 million had cast their vote despite some 30 persons being tested positive for the coronavirus every day.


Though political pundits had expressed doubts about people being eager to vote, due to the rapid spread of the killer virus, the voter turnout had been 66.2 percent, dispelling those predictions.


Despite the presence of some 3,100 COVID-19 infected people throughout the nation, the South Korean Government had taken measures to conduct the election at eight quarantine centres, too.


Also, unlike previous polls there, an additional five million voters had cast their vote at the poll. The Democratic Party led by President Moon Jae-In had won 180 seats in the 300-seat National Assembly.


Political pundits have pointed out that what had enabled the ruling party to post an emphatic win had been its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the prevention of the spread of the deadly virus throughout the country.


Political analysts have noted that the COVID-19 pandemic had proved to be a blessing in disguise for President Moon Jae-In and his party as they won comfortably.


However, at the onset of the disease, the handling of the pandemic by President Jae-In had come in for severe criticism.


An internet petition containing over 1 million signatures had been posted over the South Korean President’s decision taken not to prohibit travel between Seoul and Beijing.


But, despite such criticisms the handling of the spread of the pandemic by the South Korean Government sans any lockdown had come in for much praise from around the world.


Meanwhile, the South Korean Government had also made facilities available to some 44 million qualified voters to cast their vote at the election.


The talk in the town is that even Sri Lanka too, in the past, had conducted elections at the height of JVP insurgency, where people were massacred when involved in the democratic process and also when Prabhakaran obstructed the Tamils in the North and East from voting in 2005.


If both, the Director General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasingha and the head of the presidential taskforce, to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, Army Commander Lieutenant General Shavendra Silva, were to grant approval, the stalled General Election (GE) could be held during the last week of May, sources attached to the Election Commission (EC) say.


The Election Commission headed by Mahinda Deshapriya is already planning to hold a crucial discussion regarding the present situation in the country as well as the measures that could be taken to conduct the postponed General Election which was originally slated to be held on 25 April.      


These sources noted that Dr. Jasingha, who is the sole authority empowered to enforce the COVID-19 Quarantine Act in the country, as well as several other health officers have been invited for a discussion with Election Commission officials on 20 April.


Among others who have been invited for this discussion have been the Army Commander, Acting IGP Chandana Wickremaratna, DIG Priyantha Weerasuriya and PMG Ranjith Ariyaratna.


Meanwhile, Election Commission sources stated that all necessary measures to conduct the 2020 General Election has been undertaken by the Commission and they are also planning to publicize the preference numbers of all candidates through the publication of a gazette notification shortly.


A senior officer from the Commission added that if the General Election is to be held during the final week of May, the Election Commission would need a period of five weeks commencing from 20 April.


In the meantime political analysts have said that akin to South Korea staging its own General Election despite the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic there, Sri Lanka too would be able to take a lead from that book and hold its own General Election both successfully and effectively.


However, legal circles have pointed out that based on the gazette notification issued by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa the General Election would have to be held before 2 June this year.


Former Speaker Karu Jayasuriya on Friday (17) requested the Government and the Opposition to work together with the Election Commission (EC) to avoid a possible Constitutional crisis if the Parliamentary Election could not be held on time.


In a statement, Jayasuriya said that if a Constitutional crisis erupted at this particular time, there would be a risk of delegitimising and destabilising the country, which could gravely impact Sri Lanka’s prospects of obtaining economic relief.


“Sri Lanka is the only democracy to face the COVID-19 crisis without a Legislature to pass laws and financial appropriations to combat the pandemic and its economic consequences. It is my opinion that the Government and Opposition must engage with the EC and with each other urgently and in good faith. If there are any precautions or new laws that the Commission determines would allow it to safely hold the Election on time, these must be explored immediately,” he said.


Jayasuriya said he had recently been contacted by religious and political leaders, former Parliamentarians, academics, civil society and trade union representatives and members of the public seeking clarification on the impasse between the EC and the Executive on the Parliamentary Election.


“Sri Lanka is faced with an unprecedented health and economic crisis. As the prospect of a Constitutional crisis further compounding the plight of our country is a matter of grave national concern, I am setting out my position publicly rather than replying to each query individually,” he said, issuing the statement.


He noted that it was the position of the EC that the prevailing situation and logistical constraints prevented the Parliamentary Election from being held in time for the new Parliament to be summoned to meet by 2 June while the Government was of the view that there wasn’t necessarily any impediment to holding the Parliamentary Election on or before 28 May.


“In the interest of the nation, I appeal to the Government, the Opposition, and other stakeholders to set aside their political differences and to take urgent and meaningful steps to avoid an unnecessary third crisis for our country,” Jayasuriya said.


Meanwhile, all active election observation missions urged all relevant authorities to resolve their issues regarding a new election date, with the mutual understanding of not creating a Constitutional crisis against the backdrop of COVID-19.


Issuing a joint statement, they pointed out that: i) It is undesirable to head into an election with the EC and the Executive at odds with each other, ii) An environment of relief provision to those affected by the crisis is not ideal for an election campaign, as it can be exploited by candidates for their own political gain, as can already be seen; and iii) The National Operation Centre for the Prevention of COVID-19 Outbreak and health authorities must confirm that the new election date will not put voters and election officials at risk.


The tug-o- war, as to who should take initiative to declare the next date for General Election is continuing,  issuing a statement on the matter, Prime Minister Rajapaksa has elaborated on holding elections amid COVID-19.
Full Statement:


The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. 

Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine.


The financial powers vested in the President, under Article 150 (3) of the Constitution, is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease.


People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic.


The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. 

The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.


 The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that.


The yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. 

With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the yahapalana government changed the provincial councils elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority.


As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial council elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past.


Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.


On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. 

They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfill its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.


Sajith begins online campaign


The members of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya have continued to communicate with the public almost every day through online platforms amid the curfew regarding the current situation of the country and through this method Former opposition Leader and SJB Party Leader Sajith Premadasa has taken the initiative to educate people on the faults evident within the relief mechanism established by the Government.


Due to this reason, the members of the SJB decided to meet President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and share with him their opinions on how the country should function under the present circumstances.  Apart from this, Premadasa has also taken steps to advice his party members to help provide relief to people in any way they can sans political bias.


However the members of the SJB replied to Premadasa claiming that it is not the SJB who are favoring the people based on their political bias but rather the Government and added that the Government only provides relief to a selected group of people from which the majority is biased towards them. The members of the SJB further claimed that it is only Premadasa who truly helps people in need without having his own political agenda and further added that during the Presidential campaign there were individuals who voted for the opposing political parties while living in houses that were provided to them by Premadasa.


Premadasa then noted that political leaders should lend help to people in need without taking politics into consideration and added that he is not used to working with the hope of winning an election but rather he wants to help the people in need regardless of the time and place. Premadasa then questioned as to why the Government has failed to provide equal relief to everyone when they have successfully lead the health and defense sectors to control the spreading of COVID-19 and opined that the Government should not involve politics when helping the public.


During discussions held by Premadasa through the media, he also took the initiative to communicate to the people regarding a few important topics such as the reopening of the tourism and apparel industries.  Premadasa also opined, via a message posted on twitter on 16 April, that Sri Lanka should be made into a medicine producing center and added that if the relevant authorities focus on developing modern machinery that is capable of producing medicines then the country can use its existing resources to manufacture medicines.  


Meanwhile during a discussion held between party leaders Premadasa as the former Opposition Leader was given permission to use the Opposition Leader’s Office on a rent basis for the next few days due to not having a proper office to conduct his duties as the former leader of the opposition.

කොළඹ යාචයන් තාවකාලික ස්ථානයක නිරෝධායනයට

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම දිවයින

p1 13

– ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ උපදෙස් මත විශෙෂ පොලිස් මෙහෙයුමක්

රට තුළ පවතින වත්මන් තත්ත්වය සැළකිල්ලට ගනිමින් කොළඹ නගරයේ සිටි යාචකයන් 360 දෙනකු පමණ තාවකාලික ස්ථානයක ර`දවා නිරෝධායනයට ලක් කිරීමට පියවර ගෙන තිබේ.

ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතාගේ උපදෙස් මත බස්නාහිර පළාත් ආණ්ඩුකාරවරයාගේ අධීක්‍ෂණයේ පොලිසිය මැදිහත් වී මෙසේ යාචකයන් එක් තැනක ර`දවා තැබීමට කටයුතු කර තිබේ.

ඒ අනුව මෙම යාචකයන් කොළඹ ගුණසිංහපුර ප‍්‍රදේශයට රැුගෙන විත් නහවා පිරිසිදු කර අලූත් ඇ`දුම් ලබාදීමෙන් පසු ඔවුන් ර`දවා තබන තාවකාලික ස්ථානය වෙත යොමු කිරීමට පොලිසිය කටයුතු කර ඇත

සමන් ගමගේ
ඡායාරූපය – නිශාන් එස් ප‍්‍රියන්ත

Response to Mano’s statement on COVID-19 infection tally

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

https://youtu.be/OMrfwHkpBdo

5,000 buses & 400 trains to be deployed for public transport from Monday

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Minister of Transport Mahinda Amaraweera has instructed to deploy 5,000 buses and 400 trains for public transport services starting from Monday (20).

The decision comes days after the government announced that public and private services, which came to a halt due to the local outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, will resume under several phases. 

Minister Amaraweera on Friday (17) gave instructions to the officials of the ministry to recommence public transport services for the staff members who are returning to their workplaces.

He has further instructed them to strictly implement proper healthcare measures issued by health officials and the security forces.

In addition, all staff members of transport services will be provided with face masks and required steps will be taken for disinfection.

The Minister has also inquired into the use of trains as a solution to the shortcomings in transporting vegetables and fruits to Colombo and other urban areas from the countryside. The General Manager of Railways has responded that power-sets can be deployed for the purpose upon request.

Election Commission not authorized to postpone poll without fixing alternate date – PM

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

The Election Commission has no authority to postpone the General Election without fixing an alternate date, says Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

In a statement on the COVID-19 pandemic and the postponed parliamentary election, the Premier said that under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, the Election Commission is required to announce an alternate date for the election when it cannot be held on the date fixed by the President

Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future,” PM Rajapaksa says.

He added that the Election Commission should fulfil its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.


Read the Prime Minister’s full statement below:

The Coronavirus pandemic hit countries like the USA, India and Bangladesh in a situation where their economies had been experiencing strong growth for years. In contrast, Sri Lanka has had to face this crisis in a state of economic ruin. During the five years of Yahapalana misrule from 2015 to 2019, our debt burden increased by 71%, the Rupee lost one third of its value and economic growth had plummeted to 2.7%. Furthermore, though we had won the presidency in November 2019 and formed a government, we did not have a majority in Parliament and were not able to get a vote on account passed even to pay off the previous government’s debts to suppliers of fertilizer and medicine. 

The financial powers vested in the President under Article 150(3) of the Constitution is the only saving grace in this situation. It was with all these debilitating disadvantages that we had to face the Coronavirus pandemic. After the first Coronavirus patient was discovered on 11 March, we introduced a raft of measures to control the disease including early detection, isolation and treatment of patients, quarantine for those exposed to risk, the tracing of patients’ contacts and social distancing measures. An operation like this has not been seen in our lifetimes. Curfews lasting for weeks on end had to be imposed to prevent the spread of the disease. 

People unable to go out of their homes had to be supplied with essentials like foodstuffs, medicines, and even cash throughout the country. Aid had to be provided to low income earners. The produce of paddy and vegetable farmers and fishermen had to be bought to keep the production process going. The fact that all these tasks were dealt with simultaneously at short notice is nothing less than a managerial miracle. Today, the whole world acknowledges Sri Lanka’s success in containing the coronavirus pandemic. 

The President’s leadership in this regard has to be commended. Our government doctors, nurses, and health service workers have come to the attention of the entire world. The skill and dedication of the intelligence services in tracing the contacts of patients, the efficiency of the armed forces in implementing quarantine and lockdown measures has prevented the spread of the disease. The Police, and government officials at all levels have all contributed to the success of the anti-Coronavirus campaign. Today, our country is one of the safest places to be in the whole world. We have achieved this despite an economy that had been driven into the ground, and an unpatriotic and opportunistic opposition bent on undermining our government at every turn.  

The opposition leader tried to sabotage the anti-coronavirus campaign at the very outset by personally encouraging protests against the quarantine process. Then they tried to undermine government services including the health service with the argument that the President had no power to allocate funds for government services after the dissolution of Parliament. Now they say that the Gazette dissolving Parliament should be rescinded the as the new parliament has to meet before the 2nd of June, and the parliamentary election cannot be held before that. 

The Yahapalana government delayed local government elections by nearly three years. Their attempt to postpone that election indefinitely by moving courts failed only because the Elections Commission declared they would hold elections to the institutions that were not involved in litigation. With just days to go for the dissolution of the provincial councils in 2017, the Yahapalana government changed the provincial council elections system to prevent elections from taking place. When the Attorney General held that a two thirds majority in Parliament was required to pass that amendment, they bartered policy for votes in the corridors of Parliament to obtain the required majority. 

As a result of that unprincipled political horse trading, the local government elections law which was passed on 25 August 2017 has 40% proportional representation whereas the provincial council elections law passed four weeks later has 50% proportional representation! Sri Lanka is also the only democratic country in the world where political parties petitioned the Supreme Court to get the declaration of a parliamentary election annulled. The present scramble to have the parliamentary elections put off is a continuation of that deplorable past. 

Things have to come back to normal sooner or later. In eleven of the 25 administrative districts, there have been no coronavirus patients at all. In another seven districts, there have been only one or two patients, and five to seven patients in two more districts. Only five districts have a high incidence of coronavirus patients.

On 2 March the President dissolved Parliament and fixed 25 April for the poll and 14 May for the first meeting of the new Parliament. Ten days later, when the first Coronavirus patient was found, the President did not have the power to postpone the poll. Under Section 24(3) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No: 1 of 1981, when the poll cannot be held on the day fixed by the President, the Elections Commission is mandatorily required to fix another day for the poll. They have no power to postpone the poll without fixing another date. Such mandatory legal requirements cannot be ignored on the basis of speculation as to what may or may not happen weeks and months into the future. The Elections Commission should first fulfil its duties under Section 24(3) and thereafter take up for discussion any outstanding issues.

Coronavirus risk has not yet subsided – Dr. Jasinghe

April 18th, 2020

Courtesy Adaderana

Despite the spread of COVID-19 within the country has been controlled to a certain point, the risk still has not subsided, says Director-General of Health Services Dr. Anil Jasinghe.

He says that the risk will not cease to be until the end of the COVID-19 outbreak.

The virus may spread in the country as a second wave of infections, Jasinghe pointed out.

Further, responding to a statement by former MP Mano Ganesan, Dr. Jasinghe said that persons without knowledge of the health sector or epidemics should not make statements on COVID-19.

The Director-General of Health Services was referring to a statement made by the Leader of Tamil Progressive Alliance that the government is concealing the true figures of the spread and infections of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Epidemiologists cannot make successful studies of an epidemic without true facts and figures, pointed out. He further said that a health process that involves the people cannot succeed by hiding true facts from the people.

Meanwhile, issuing a statement, Dr. Anil Jasinghe said that no circulars had been issued halting routine surgeries in hospitals.

He said that circulars on how to maintain health services were issued at the beginning of the coronavirus outbreak and they were updated as necessary.

He added that the hospitals can perform such surgeries with certain protocols.

However, with the downsizing of the daily staff to maintain social distancing, there may be inadequate staff to perform routine surgeries, he pointed out.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවෙන් වාර්තාවූ කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 254ක් දක්වා ඉහළට

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවෙන් වාර්තාවූ කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 254ක් දක්වා ඉහළ ගොස් තිබෙනවා.

ඒ තවත් පුද්ගලයන් 6 දෙනෙකු කොරෝනා වෛරස් ආසාදිතයන් බවට තහවුරු කර ගැනීමත් සමගයි.

ඔවුන් 6 දෙනා ද වාර්තාවී ඇත්තේ වැලිසර නිරොධායන මධ්‍යස්ථානයේ නිරෝධායනයට ලක්වෙමින් සිටින පිරිස අතරින් බවයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ කියාසිටියේ.

ඒ අනුව අද දිනයේ පමණක් වාර්තාවූ ආසාදිතයන් සංඛ්‍යාව 10ක්.

මේ වන විට පුද්ගලයන් 161 දෙනෙකු වෛරස ආසාදනයෙන් රෝහල්ගතව ප්‍රතිකාර ලබනවා.

86 දෙනෙකු සුවය ලබා රෝහල්වලින් පිටව ගොස් ඇති අතර වාර්තාවූ මරණ සංඛ්‍යාව 7ක්.

කිසිදු රෝහලක ශල්‍යකර්ම නතර කිරීමට උපදෙස් ලබාදී නැහැ – සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

කිසිදු රෝහලක සාමාන්‍යයෙන් සිදු කරන ශල්‍යකර්ම සිදු නොකරන ලෙසට කිසිදු අවස්ථාවක චක්‍රලේඛ මගින් දැනුම්දී නැතැයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ පවසනවා.

කිසියම් පාලනයක් සහිතව අදාළ රෝහල්වලට එම ශල්‍යකර්ම සිදු කළ හැකි බවයි නිවේදනයක් නිකුත් කරමින් ඔහු කියාසිටියේ.

කෙසේවෙතත් කල් දැමීමෙන් ගැටළුවක් ඇති නොවන ශල්‍යකර්ම පසුව සිදු කිරීමේ හැකියාව පවතින බව ද අදාළ නිවේදනය මගින් සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

පිළිකා රෝගීන් සඳහා පිළිකා රෝහලේ සැත්කම් සිදු කළ ද අනෙක් රෝහල්වල සැත්කම් සිදු නොකරන බවට ඇතැම් පාර්ශව පළකරන අදහස්වලට ප්‍රතිචාර දක්වමිනුයි අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා මෙම කරුණු අනාවරණ කර ඇත්තේ.

මේ අතර පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කරනු ලබන්නේ විද්‍යානුකූල පදනමක් මත පමණක් බව සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල් විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ අවධාරණය කරනවා.

විවිධ ප්‍රදේශවල ජනතාව සහ ජන කණ්ඩායම් විසින් පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකර දෙන්නැයි කරන ඉල්ලීම් පිළිබඳ කරුණු පැහැදිළි කිරීමක් සිදු කරමිනුයි අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා මේ බව කියාසිටියේ.

මෙය ඉල්ලීම් කර සිදු කරගත යුතු පරීක්ෂණයක් නොවන අතර විද්‍යාත්මක සාධක අනුව සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ විසින් තීරණ කර සිදු කරන පරීක්ෂණයක් බව අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

විද්‍යාත්මක සාධක අනුව තීරණය කර ලබාගන්නා සාම්පල පරීක්ෂණයට ලක් කිරීමට පැය 5ක් 6ක් වැනි කාලයක් ගත වනවා.

මේ සඳහා ගතවන කාලය යෙදවිය යුතු කාර්ය මණ්ඩලය මෙන්ම වියදම පිළිබඳව ද සලකා බැලිය යුතු බවයි සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා පෙන්වා දෙන්නේ.

මේවන විට පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කරනු ලබන්නේ අවදානම පිළිබඳ සලකා බලා තෝරාගත් පිරිස සහ අවදානම පිළිබඳ සැක සහිත කණ්ඩායම්වලට බව ඔහු කියාසිටියා.

ඒ රෝහල්ගත වී රෝග ලක්ෂණ පෙන්නුම් කරන පුද්ගලයන් නිරෝධායන මධ්‍යස්ථානවල සිටින පුද්ගලයන් සහ රෝගය ඇතැයි සැක කරන අවදානම වැඩිම පුද්ගලයන් සඳහායි.

එමෙන්ම කොරෝනා වෛරසය වැළඳී නොමැති බවට සහතික ලබාදෙන ලෙසට යම් පුද්ගලයන් ඉල්ලා සිටින බව වාර්තාවන බව ද සෞඛ්‍ය සේවා අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජෙනරාල්වරයා නිකුත් කළ නිවේදනය මගින් පෙන්වා දෙනවා.

පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදු කළ යුත්තේ කුමන පුද්ගලයන් සඳහාදැයි සෞඛ්‍ය අංශ සහ නිසි බලධාරීන් තීරණය කරනු ලබන බැවින් එම පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකරන ලෙසට මහජනතාව ඉල්ලීම් සිදු කිරීම අවශ්‍ය නොවන බව විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනිල් ජාසිංහ මහතා අවධාරණය කරනවා.

මේ වන විට දිවයින පුරා පර්යේෂණාගාර 13ක පී.සී.ආර් පරීක්ෂණ සිදුකෙරෙන අතර මඩකලපුව ශික්ෂණ රෝහලේ ද අදාළ පරීක්ෂණ ආරම්භ කර තිබෙනවා.

තනිව ජීවත්වන ආබාධිත මවකට ආධාර දෙන්න ගිය STF නිලධාරීන් පිරිසකට ලැබුණු ආශිර්වාදය (වීඩියෝ)

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

ඇඳිරි නීතිය ඉවත් කිරීමෙන් පසු රාජ්‍ය ආයතන පිළිපැදිය යුතු මාර්ගෝපදේශ ඇතුලත් චක්‍රලේඛයක්

April 18th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම  හිරු පුවත්

කොවිඩ් 19 වෛරස ව්‍යාප්තිය හමුවේ සාමාන්‍ය ජන ජීවිතය යථාතත්ත්වයට පත්කිරීම සඳහා ඇඳිරිනීතිය ලිහිල් කිරීමේදී රාජ්‍ය ආයතන පිළිපැදිය යුතු මාර්ගෝපදේශ මාලාවක් ඇතුළත් චක්‍රලේඛයක් ජනාධිපති ලේකම් පී.බී. ජයසුන්දර මහතා විසින් නිකුත් කර තිබෙනවා.

ඒ, අමාත්‍යාංශ ලේකම්වරුන්, පළාත් ප්‍රධාන ලේකම්වරුන්, දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම්වරුන් ඇතුළු රාජ්‍ය නිලධාරීන් වෙතයි

Easter Sunday Attack by Islamic Jihadists in Sri Lanka – A Crime against Humanity – Lessons to be learnt

April 17th, 2020

The multiple attacks launched by the Islamic Jihadis on April 21, 2019 on a number of selected targets including places of worship and leading hotels in Sri Lanka resulting in mass murder were tantamount to genocide and a crime against humanity.  Over 300 innocent civilians lost their lives and scores were injured, some were maimed for life. A large number of families lost their bread winner. In some cases husbands who had remained in their homes lost the rest of their family members i.e. wives and children while at prayer in the church.  It was the worst of times. The country was plunged into despair and mourning, and converted to a funeral house overnight with mass burials. Even foreign guests to Sri Lanka ended up in coffins.

This was a watershed moment in the history of Sri Lanka. The country witnessed an unimaginable level of crisis arising between the Muslim community and all other communities inhabiting this country. In the past Muslims were seen as a relatively peaceful community unlike the fractious Tamils who are persistently engaged in an unrelenting tug of war with the Sinhalese. That image of the local Muslims as a law abiding ethnic community minding their own business was shattered beyond recovery on the last Easter Sunday. Never has violence instigated by a group distinctly Islamic been able to cause such a high number of fatalities of innocent people over 300 in one single day and bring the country to a standstill. The multiplier effect of this mass murder was felt far and wide. Every single idea of foreign origin that had been foisted on the people of this country in recent times, without consent proved fatal failures – such as Reconciliation, Multiculturalism, Secularism, Diversity and Appeasement, Accommodation and the like, fell overboard instantly.

All over the country people began to question the wisdom of placing trust and faith in foreign born rather than home grown propositions if the final outcome of such misplaced trust was a tragedy of genocidal proportions. The sequel was logical. Even the Christian Community the most affected by the Jihadist violence and closest to western religious values began to call for the first time for strong arm military type leadership nationalist in character that would resonate with the exceedingly tight protection given to the ‘Rata, Jathiya Agama’ by Sinhala Kings of yore. The unequivocal cry everywhere was that there should not be any further compromise with any minority, ethnic or religious, pursuing an Agenda, aimed at undermining at any level the control and management of this country by the elected representatives of the majority. Enough is enough. Time for experimentation with ideas more applicable in a foreign context no longer mattered. 

As we approach the 1st year anniversary of this horrifying and unspeakable tragedy that rocked Sri Lanka, we need to re – focus on some important issues.

Lessons for the Nation: NO MORE APPEASEMENT OF MINORITIES

In 2015 as a result of regime change a bandwagon of fragmented elements, united only by sheer greed for power and desire for siphoning of public funds e.g. Bond Scam,    joined hands to create a legally questionable ‘national government’ making sweeping legislative changes and propping sets of unsavory characters to various public and important roles. That laid the foundation of subtly and slowly collapsing the administrative system of Sri Lanka without notice. It also meant closure of intelligence units tasked to shadow suspected jihadi groups while at the same time well trained intelligence officers were simply thrown into prison without framing charges for arrest. With leadership lacking, it was natural that the defense establishments would not have been given the freedom to monitor and protect the territorial integrity & sovereignty of Sri Lanka. Numerous controversial appointments some even ending up contesting elections showed the nature of penetration into the heart of Sri Lanka. The diabolical intent was to break the back bone of the two pillars that have historically protected Sri Lanka, namely, both the military and Sangha.  A sizeable number of patriotic elements drawn mainly from the aforesaid two groups ended up being put into prison for trivial reasons. With the administrative set up neutralized it was only a matter of time that all the vultures and hyenas would descend on Sri Lanka. Wherever countries are weak, the same bandwagon of nefarious rogue elements creep in incrementally to further destabilize, maximizing and manipulating the shaky set up that was keeping Sri Lanka afloat.

What or where were Sri Lanka’s elected leaders? The rulers were following an un restricted appeasing line. Everything external elements requested was given with open arms. Nothing was refused. Nothing was questioned. Nothing was investigated and nothing was monitored. Nothing was non – negotiable, including the deeply respected national Sinhala Buddhist heritage of the country. In the light of what happened on 21/4 this more or less answers why the government was hypnotized or rather paralyzed by following an appeasement policy. In the end, it did not know what to do and in the power vacuum created the defense establishment took the reins to quickly round up the Islamic jihadis they had kept watch over until their units were closed.   

No Government can afford to adopt an appeasement policy. A Government is elected to represent the People and protect the People and not to give into whims and fancies of external troublemakers, that consistently maintain an unceasing line of demands on the footing ‘little now, more later’ and aimed at finally destroying the hold of the Sinhalese majority on the country.

Lessons for the Majority: Questioning Multiculturalism or Secularism

The majority must not fall prey to new concepts that are being shoved with foreign funding as an incentive for governments to launch but with a hidden objective to usurp or downplay the role held by the majority in building and protecting the nation. It is the primary duty of any Nation to duly acknowledge the role played by those who built the nation. The role of the majority in this endeavor cannot be downsized just because some elements promote the notion that it hurts others. The fact that the Sinhalese over a period of 2,500 years built the unique Buddhist Civilization that is the foundation of this nation is undeniable. It was they who defended the nation against every invader that tried to conquer/invade it. Surely, that role cannot be set aside just because some feel they or their forbears had no role in it. That is probably because they were not around when the majority was defending the nation or some were working in step with the foreign invader. Betrayal of the country, race and religion does not sit nicely in our Buddhist Sinhala sub – consciousness. That is why History must be taught again comprehensively with a patriotic flavor beginning in our kindergarten. It is the majority of the country who must be empowered to define who we are, our roots and our ambitions and aspirations. The moment this function is delegated to external elements trouble starts. Invariably the historical narrative will then be written distorting, sidelining and diluting the role of the majority.

Bhoomiputras (Sons of the Soil)

Though Sri Lanka is the homeland of all its citizens a special place has to be reserved for the Bhoomiputras (sons of the soil) – those who built the nation. Sinhala Buddhists are the undisputed Bhoomiputras of Sri Lanka just as much as Muslim Malays are constitutionally recognized now as the Bhoomiputras of Malaysia.

The fundamental collective group rights of the Sinhala Buddhists cannot be usurped by new nomenclatures. No one denies or wishes to change that people of many faiths and ethnicities live in Sri Lanka. All of them have rights to practice their faith but that cannot mean that they can demand the same status of the majority or those who built the nation, or demand that contributions of the majority be marginalized or erased and everyone brought in one line.   The contributions and sacrifices made by the Sinhala Buddhists in developing the civilization and the foundations of the country cannot be glossed over. They far exceed that of any other group that has entered this country later in point of time. On this score of group contribution to the common weal of the country over a period of time spanning more than two millennia, there are no co–equals to the Sinhala Buddhists. 

Multiculturalism – a flawed concept

The primary reason to promote notions like multiculturalism and secularism in short is to ensure that ‘nationalists’ i.e. people who are proud of their history & heritage and wish to maintain that status quo, do not come to power. The concept of multiculturalism was conceived and promoted by Jews. In the international arena it is called Jewish multiculturalism. Their unfortunate situation leading to ethnic cleansing during the Second World War is attributed by Jews and fellow travelers to the nationalism of the German Nazis, despite the undisputed fact that anti – Semitism is of Christian origin and rooted in Biblical scriptures.

We, in Sri Lanka need not necessarily follow Jewish or Western scripts to solve problems created mainly by troublesome elements of minority backgrounds. Patriotism and Nationalism constitute the ideological underpinning that have inspired the heroic Sinhalese warriors throughout the long drawn history of the country to defend the country sacrificing both life and limb in conflicts with country’s enemies. This hard stubborn fact must be acknowledged and repeated in the public discourse i.e. schools, places of worship, parliament. Patriotism is sweet. It is the life line that can keep the people and country together.  

Those who accept the flawed notions of multiculturalism and secularism are ever ready to appease and wish to bargain by reducing Sri Lanka’s innate values to enable external values to be brought on par till they completely annihilate the native values & replace them with foreign ones. This landscape can also be understood by the many initiatives and programs that get funded by UN/USAID/WF/IMF/and other international entities with plenty of funding as ruse. Several other Asian countries have also fallen victim to this shameful foreign conspiracy to undermine and destroy the traditional Asian value systems and then replace them with failed western monotheistic belief systems and western models of governance and development.

In particular, Right wing groups in USA, backed by the US Govt. continue to fund a huge missionary campaign in India, to convert the locals with use of financial inducements, despite widespread misgivings about the conversion strategy of Christian missionaries, among the majority Hindu public in India.   One of the silver linings of the on-going Coronavirus Pandemic is the universal acceptance of the failure of the Western model of development, which is based on destruction of the natural environment and its living creatures, to sustain the unrestrained greed of people living mostly in western countries.    

Lessons for the Minority

Divide and rule colonial policy fast forwarded to post-colonial powers ensured that the same divisions were manipulated and exacerbated to present the notion of siding with the ‘discriminated ’minorities against the ‘aggressive’ majority. In so doing, the minorities have come to use this as a tactical political ploy for the gaining of undue advantages upon themselves. Minorities have enjoyed making unfair and unreasonable demands and when these are not met they unhesitatingly take their ‘grievance’ to international levels, mostly former western colonial countries (who have yet to compensate the uncompensated victims or their descendants in Sri Lanka for colonial crimes), who are waiting anxiously to name and shame the majority again and again ad nauseam. We need not give instances of how external elements have manipulated internal friction to their advantage, using the country’s ethnic and religious minorities as their cat’s paw to destabilize Sri Lanka.  

The minorities are always taught to play the victim card at the point their actions reach levels of questioning by the majority. The next option has been to play the ‘we are all for peace’ ‘national unity-reconciliation’ chant. Flag these internationally and external media is able to quickly shift the notion against the majority in favor of the minorities.

The minorities are told to follow the Goebbels theory of repetition and so we see constant reference to a handful of incidents repeated and repeated sans much detail but plenty of sensational news. But total up these incidents and you get hardly 10 fatalities to count. But then when they strike it is to eliminate hundreds and hundreds of people. Mentioning these cannot offset against the killings of nearly 300 killed in a matter of a few hours.

Easter Sunday attack killed in one crippling blow nearly 300 people. One year on some are still in hospital beds while others are crippled for life. Not many like to have these statistics repeated and when they are done its always ‘let’s forget and move on’ but this standard is never applicable for their citing of incidents.

Not many like when mention is made of the Jihadis abortive plan to blow up the Buddhist Temples and unique heritage sites in the sacred Buddhist citadel of Anuradhapura. It was by sheer stroke of luck that the cache of explosives hidden at Lacktowatta in WanathawilluwaPuttalam were discovered in time. The narrative would have been different had that Plan succeeded. The Sinhala Buddhist majority have to be lucky all the time from Islamic Iconoclasts. The Maldives, once a Buddhist land and historically related to Sri Lanka is now a strict Muslim state that has totally erased its Buddhist heritage from the land. Even Buddhist statues kept in Museums in Maldives have been removed and destroyed by Jihadis.     

Lessons for international community claiming to be battling terrorism

If there is a war against terrorism there cannot be preferred terrorists and disliked terrorists and then some favorites becoming hated and some hated becoming favorites. What we see is that terrorists are getting imported and exported to fulfill the geopolitical goals of countries whilst pretending to be working towards eliminating terrorism and helping countries with countering terrorism. It simply does not make sense in saying something but doing the exact opposite. Eventually the terrorists’ pawns who learn from the master decide to take charge and become the master and innocent people end up dead.

ONE COUNTRY ONE LAW – NO PARALLEL SYSTEM OF LAW

If citizens of Sri Lanka truly believe in the concept of one country-one law, it means there can be no parallel systems of law e.g. Sharia law or personal laws. It is ridiculous to have some citizens be charged for marrying multiple times without divorce while another citizen can legally have multiple wives. The same marriage rule has to apply across the board for all men and women and polygamy cannot be allowed. Similarly, there cannot be exclusive banking system based on one religion or food labeling based on one religion simply because the issue has been internationalized to a level that unless a certificate is issued with compliance countries where the exclusive faith buys the product refuses to buy. The power of political correctness has been raised to such levels that because of the economic bullying the moral correctness ends up being set aside. If Article 12 of Sri Lanka’s constitution claims all citizens are equal before law there cannot be exclusive ethno-religious privileges for any particular minority community.

Lessons from Overseas in tackling the threat of extremist Islamism (Jihadism)

How Myanmar deals with extremist Islam

Myanmar Govt. has passed four Laws to Protect Race and Religion” in 2015

  1. Polygamy – Polygamy has been made illegal.  Under the new law, people found guilty of having more than one spouse or living with someone other than their spouse can face a maximum jail sentence of seven years.
  2. Religious conversion – the new law i.e. Religious Conversion Act, requires individuals wishing to change religion to seek official approval from a state body that is authorized to question applicants to determine whether the conversion is voluntary or coercive.
  3. Restriction on interfaith marriage – Buddhist Women’s Special Marriage Bill explicitly regulates the marriage of Buddhist women with men from other religions.
  4. Population Control – Population Control Healthcare Bill establishes a 36-month interval between childbirths for women in certain regions of the country.

How Russia deals with extremist Islam

Russia has been a victim of Islamic terrorism and consequently has adopted strict regulations. Kremlin uses the phrase ‘traditional Islam’ and says only ‘traditional Islam’ is an integral part of the Russian cultural code. Kremlin has also defined hijab as not part of ‘traditional Islam’. Russian law allows the government to prohibit any activity of a religious association for violating public order or engaging in missionary ‘extremist activity’. ‘Fundamentalist Wahhabist, Salafist, radical’ is seen as a challenge to Kremlin.

The Russian court is also able to declare any material (book, leaflet, song, slogan, video website, webpages) as ‘extremist’ or ‘not traditionally Islamic’. The Justice Ministry can list these ‘extremist materials’. In January 2019 a Russian court in city of Samara banned a translation of Quran & blacklisted it as extremist. Kremlin says all foreign Muslims are to blame for the radicalization of Muslims in Russia. Which is why Russia seeks to ‘domesticate’ Islam so that the Muslims in Russia are part of Russia and not another Islamic state. Polygamy is illegal in Russia

How China deals with extremist Islam

Only religions that are permitted in China will have status in China

No one may use religion to make an attack on the order of society, harm the physical health of citizens, or impede the activities of the state’s education system.

Religious groups and religious affairs shall not be subject to the power of foreign domination.

All adherents are first beholden to the State of China not to their foreign heritage faith

Religious sites, religious ministers, religious schools, religious publications and collective religious activities in general need government registration or approval

Religion is not allowed to interfere in the performance of a business duty. For example, If a Muslim obtains a registration to sell goods, he cannot decline to sell Pork or Alcohol on ground of religion.

Polygamy is illegal in China. No multiple wives.

Only one child per family. Women cannot be used as Baby factories on a planned and deliberate basis to beget multiple children to naturally increase the number of any minority community in the country with a view to challenging in the future the power of the majority and its replacement.  

China will rewrite the Bible and Quran to ‘reflect socialist values’. New editions must not contain any content that goes against the beliefs of the Communist Party. Paragraphs deemed wrong by the censors will be amended or re-translated. The party has called for a ‘comprehensive evaluation of the existing religious classics aiming at contents which do not conform to the progress of the times’. The order was given in November 2019 during a meeting held by the Committee for Ethnic and Religious Affairs of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, which oversees the ethnic and religious matters in China. 

Conclusion – Steps to be taken by the Govt. of Sri Lanka

  • The State shall invoke the Dasa Raja Dharma in the governance of the country and accordingly establish a Buddhist Social Order as prevailed in the country prior to 1505 A.D. that is inclusive of all citizens and harmful to none
  • The State shall take actions basing itself on the increasing popular phrase ‘ONE COUNTRY ONE LAW’
  • This will mean PERSONAL LAWS will need to be removed and only ONE LAW for ALL CITIZENS to be applied and enforced. Sharia law will not be allowed to function as a parallel legal system.
  • Polygamy cannot be allowed because multiple marriages for some ethnic groups is considered criminal while for an exclusive group it is allowed. This is inconsistent with the equality of everyone before the law (Article 12 of the Constitution) and the ONE LAW for all principle
  • Population control mechanisms must be developed such that no minority community, religious or ethnic, will surreptitiously indulge in achieving high birth rates and thereby through natural increase of their flock compete with the majority to dominate and rule the country. The steps taken by Myanmar to prevent the replacement of the majority by a minority community through a planned strategy of excessive natural increase is worthy of note.   
  • No religious banking – food labelling can be allowed only for internal circulation. If the argument is that foreign nations demand such then the exporting items should have label and the state must not allow a private party to tax all businesses a fee for such labeling – revenue must go to the State
  • All religious establishments and religious schools must be registered or be subject to closure. The subjects taught in such schools e.g. Madrassas, must be approved and closely monitored by the State.
  • Funding of Madrassas and Mosques by external sources i.e. Wahabi funds, shall be stopped.
  • Buddhist schools established under the patronage of Colonel Henry Steele Olcott and leading Buddhist monks of that era must continue to be retained in order to provide a proper exclusive Buddhist environment for the study and growth of the Buddhist child. (schools that have a long history cannot fall victim to any multicultural slogans)
  • Number of places of worship for any religion must be in direct proportion to the percentage of the population of that religious community in the country
  • Religious freedom must not be allowed to be abused by allowing a proliferation of places of worship of any religious community far in excess of the community requirements e.g. 58 Mosques in Kattankudy, and done with a view to changing the religious and cultural landscape of the country, which is predominantly Buddhist
  • Daily loudspeaker use in mosques and religious places to be toned down to not disturb neighbors or banned.
  • All visiting foreign religious preachers must initially be screened by the Foreign Ministry/Defense Ministry
  • Animal Sacrifice in places of worship and private households shall be totally prohibited
  • Slaughter of animals for food consumption must be permitted to take place only in registered abattoirs and done under strict supervision by trained and skilled persons. Slaughter by unskilled persons e.g. women and children in backyards of private homes must be strictly prohibited by amending the Butchers Ordinance, and the Municipal Ordinance.
  • Exclusive ethno-religious towns/cities/enclaves/ ghettos must not be allowed
  • The primary allegiance of any citizen should be to his/her country and not to any extra- territorial institution(s) e.g. Vatican or the universal ummah. Territorialized patriotism must be emphasized and must override the demand in Christian and Islamic theology for allegiance to the de-territorialised Vatican or ‘ummatism’, respectively. 
  • Ancient Buddhist sites for pilgrimage such as Sripada, must not be allowed to be diversified and ownership shared between the four religions under the banner of diversity and multiculturalism. This is tantamount to creeping invasion of Buddhist sites and final takeover at a later date. This country is full of sites of destroyed Buddhist Temples carried out under the direction of the Portuguese for which no compensation has been paid. Some destroyed sites have had Churches built on them (Queyroz).
  • Culture of the country must be rooted and linked to the National heritage and not to something foreign

On 21/4 a tragic mass murder took place. Let us remember this with significance. Make 21/4 a National Day of Mourning with a 2 minute silence at 8.45 a.m. in memory of those whose lives were destroyed by the Jihadi Suicide Bombers.

Shenali D. Waduge

ප්‍රජා -තන්ත්‍ර-වාදය නමැති නාස් ලණුවෙන් ගැලවෙමු! (හතර‌‌වෙනි කොටස)

April 17th, 2020

චන්ද්‍රසිරි විජයවික්‍රම, LL.B., Ph.D.

මේ සිංහල අපගෙ රටයි
මේ සිංහල අපගෙ රටයි
අප ඉපදෙන මැරෙණ රටයි
අප හද පණ ගැහෙන රටයි
මුළු ලොව ඒ රටට යටයි

අහස සිඹින ගිරි කඳුරූ
අහස සිඹින ගිරි කඳුරූ
පොලොව තෙමන වැව් සයුරූ
මුහුද අවට බැඳි පවුරූ
එරට අසිරි සිරි එයුරූ

මව්බිම වෙනුවෙන් පොරණේ
දිවිදුන් විරු දරුවන්නේ
ලේ වලිනුයි ඒ දෙරණේ
මිණිකැට මුතු ඇට මැවුනේ

සමනොළ ගිරි වළළු බිමේ
සමනොළ ගිරි වළළු බිමේ
සුදු සිරිපා පිපෙන හිමේ
සම කරුණා ගුණ මහිමේ
අප උපතින් ලද උරුමේ

මේ සිංහල අපගෙ රටයි…

ගායනය: නන්දා මාලිනී, පද බැඳුම: මහගමසේකර (සාරවිට චිත්‍රපටිය, 1965)

ඕ මයි ගෝඩ් ලංකාව හා බුදු අම්මෝ ලංකාව

පසුගිය (තුන්වන) කොටසේ සඳහන් කල උපුල් ශාන්ත සන්නස්ගලගේ වීඩියෝවෙන් එලිදරව්වන්නේ ලෝකයේ ලොකුම ස්ථූපය ලංකාවේ ඉදිකරනවා කියූ රනිල්, හිත ඇතුලෙන් මිහිඳු මහරහතන් වහන්සේව යුද සොල්දාදුවෙක් ලෙස සළකන බවය. වි. ජ. මු. ලොකුබණ්ඩාරලා යනාදීන් ගැන ඔහු කියන කතාව අදහන්නටත් බැරි තරම්‌ය. ඇල්ලේ ගුණවංශ හාමුදුරුවන් ඕ මයි ගෝඩ් ලංකාව ලෙස හැඳින්‌වූයේ, වෙන මොනවා නැතත්, රටේ ඉතිහාසය හා භූගෝල විද්‍යාව නොදත් මේ කළු සුද්දන් පිරිසවය. ලංකාවේ දේශපාලන ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය යනු මේ මයි ගෝඩ් සුළු පිරිස, බුදු අම්මෝ මහ ජනයා තම යටතට ගැනීමය. යමෙකුට යම් හදිසි අනතුරකට, යම් ඇබ්බැද්දියකට මුහුණදීමට සිදුවූවිට හෝ සුසාන භූමියක් ලඟින් යනවිට අවතාරයක් දුටු විට, බලාපොරොත්තු සුන්‌වීමක් වූ විට ඉබේම කටින් පනින්නේ මේ දෙකෙන් එකක්‌ය.
හ්ට්ට්ප්ස්://www.යොුටුබෙ.චොම්/wඅට්ඡ්?ව්=_උ2ඩ්MEOH3Cස්&ට්=235ස්
(2020 Sඅන්නස්ගල, Mඅර්ඡ් 6, 2020))

පන්සලේ ඉතිහාසය

1802 න් පසු ලංකාවේ ඉතිහාසය, මේ දෙපිරිස අතර ඇතිවූ ගැටුමේ ඉතිහාසය හෙවත් පන්සල හා සුද්දන්/කළු සුද්දන් අතර ගැටුමේ ඉතිහාසයය. මෙම ඉතිහාසයේ අවධි, විශේෂයෙන් 1815 න් පසු, දැන් කාලයේ මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් යන කඩතුරාව යටතේ මෙන්, යටත් විජිත කාලයේ සාමය හා මනාපාලනය යන කඩතුරාව යටතේ, සිංහල බෞද්‌ධයින්ගේ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය අහිමි කිරීමේ හා ඊට විරුද්‌ධව පන්සල කල සටනේ අවධිය. පේරාදෙණිය විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ ශාලාවක් ධ‌ර්‌මපාල ශාලාව කියා ඒ කාලයේවත්, දැන්වත් නම් නොකලේ කවුද? මේ සිංහල අපගෙ රටයි සිංදුවට භයවූ රාජ්‍ය පාලකයා කවුද? එය තහනම් කිරීම නිවට කමක් මිස, ඉන් සාමයක් ලැබුණාද? මිසිස් චන්ද්‍රිකාගේ මනෝ ගනේෂන්ගේ සංහිඳියා නැටුමම නොවේද? ජාතික ගීය දෙමළෙන් ගැයීමෙන් ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය වැඩි වුනාද? මේවායේ ප්‍රතිඵලය නම් විග්නේෂ්වරන් විසින් දේවානම් පිය තීෂන් කෙනෙක්ව මැවීමය.

රතන සූත්‍රය හා පැටන් ප්‍රෙයර්

අසල පන්සලේ පිරිත් නිසා, රෑ එලිවෙනකං පාටි දමා, මහදවල් වනතුරු නිදාගන්නට නොහැකි නිසා උසාවි ගිය කතෝලික, එහෙත් කෝට්ටේ රජමහා විහාරයේ ප්‍රධාන දායක කම හාමදුරුවන් රවටා (අල්ලසක් දී?) ලබාගත්තා යැයි අනුමාන කල හැකි රවි කරුණානායකලා වැනි අයට, (කැළණියේ දායක සභාවෙන් රනිල්ව ඉවත් කරණ ලදී), රතන සූත්‍රය අසණ ලෙස කාදිනල්තුමා කල දැනුම්දීම චමත්කාර ජනකය. ඇමෙරිකාවේ දැනටත් භාවිතා වන <පැටන් යාඥාව> මීට සමානය. දෙවන ලෝක යුද්‌ධයේදී ජෙනරාල් ජෝර්ජ් පැටන්ට තිබුණු ලොකුම හිසරදය වූයේ දිගටම නොකඩවා වහින වර්‌ෂාවය. සැප්තැම්බර් මාසයේ සිටම නොකඩවාම ධාරානිපාත වැසි වැස්සේය. 1944 දෙසැම්බර් 8 දා ප්‍රංශයේ නැන්සි අසළ යුද පෙරමුණේ සිටි ඔහු හමුදාවේ චැප්ලින් (පූජකවරයා) ට කතා කර ජර්‌මන් සතුරාට සාර්‌ථක ලෙස පහර දීම සඳහා යහපත් කාලගුණයක් පතා කල හැකි යාඥාවක් තිබේදැයි විමසුවේය. එවැන්නක් සොයාගත නොහැකිවූ ඔහු අළුතින්ම යාඥාවක් ලියුවේය. මෙය කියවූ පැටන් එහි කොපි ලක්‍ෂ දෙකහමාරක් මුද්‍රණය කර හැම සොල්දාදුචාටම නත්තල් පණිවුඩයක් ලෙස බෙදන්නට අණ කලේය. පුදුමයක මහත! හැම දෙනා විෂ්මයට පත් කරමින් වැසි නතරවී ඉතා පැහැදිලි අහසක් දිස්විය. සතුරා පරාද කෙරිණ. ලෝක යුද්‌ධය අවසානය කරා ගියේය.

භූගෝල විද්‍යාව දිණවූ කොරෝනාව

Yඔඋ චන්නොට් ලෙගිස්ලටෙ අගෛන්ස්ට් ගෙොග්‍රඵ්‍ය්

යුරෝපයේ භූගෝල විද්‍යාව (නව යටත් විජිත වාදය) විසින් ලංකාවේ භූගෝල විද්‍යාව යටත් කරගෙන සිටීම කොරෝනා වෛරසය විසින් නිවැරදි කලේය. මයි ගෝඩ්ලාගේ අතට අත දීම ආයුබෝවන් කීමට මාරුවීම භූගෝල විද්‍යාවට පටහැනි නීති පැනවිය නොහැකිය යන විශ්ව ධර්‌මයේ ශූක්‍ෂම ජය ගැනීමකි. ශ්‍රීෂ්ම රටේ ටයි කෝට් දැමීමේ නීතිය වැනිය. 1948 නිදහස ලැබුණා කියන උත්සවය දවසේ ටයි කෝට් දමාගත් අය දාඩිය දමමින් සිටි හැටි පරණ කැමරා පටිවලින් බලාගත හැකිය. ටයි දැමීමේ නීතියට නව පණක් දුන්නේ කෙහෙල්වත්තේ ලැවරියා විකුණුවා යයි කියන සරම ඇන්ඳ ප්‍රේමදාස උන්නැහේය! ඇමෙරිකාවේ විධායක ශ්‍රේණියේ රක්‍ෂා කරද්දී ශීත කාලයේ වත් මට නම් ටයි දමා බෙල්ල තද කරගෙන සිටිය නොහැකි විය. ටයි හා ත්‍රී පීස් සූට් වලින් වැසී තිබෙන්නේ මොන විධියේ පංචස්කන්‌ධද? බොහෝ විට ලෝක හොරු නොවේද? උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් ලංකාවේ මිනිසුන්ට සුද්දන් ඉදිරියේ තිබූ අතට අත දීමේ හීනමානය කොරෝනාව නිසා අන්තර්‌ධාන විය!

Oනෙ ලw ෆොර් ඨෙ ලිොන් අන්ඩ් ඔෂෙන් ඉස් ඔප්ප්‍රෙස්සිොන්

සිංහයාට හා ගවයාට තිබෙන්නේ එකම නීතියක් නම් එතැන ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයක් නැත
එවැනි නීතියකට ආධිපත්‍යයක් තිබිය හැකිද? ලොකු මාළුවා පොඩි මාළුවා ගිල ගනී. අසාද් සාලිට නෝනලා දෙන්නෙක් දෙපැත්තෙන් තියා ගෙන නිදහස් සමරු උළෙලට යාමට ඉඩදීමත්, සිංහල මිනිසෙකු එසේ කර අසුවුණොත් හිරේයාමත්, මුස්ලිම් අයට අවුරුදු 12 ටත් කලින් විවාහ වීමට ඉඩ තිබීමත්, අනිත් අය හිරේ දැමීමත් යනු මොන ප්‍රජාතන්‌ත්‍රවාදයද?

Tහෙ wඔර්ල්ඩ් ඉස් නොට් අස් මොබිලෙ ඔර් අස් ඉන්ටෙර්චොන්නෙච්ටෙඩ් අස් wඑ ලිකෙ ටො ඨින්ක්… Iන් ච්‍ර‌ැචිල් wඅය්ස්–ෆ්රොම් ඨෙ උනෙවෙන් ඩිස්ට්‍රිබුටිොන් ඔෆ් නටුරල් රෙසොුර්චෙස් ටො ඨෙ උනෙqුල් අවෛලබිලිට්‍ය් ඔෆ් ඔප්පොර්ටුනිට්‍ය්–ගෙොග්‍රඵ්‍ය් චොන්ටිනුෙස් ටො හොල්ඩ් බිල්ලිොන්ස් ඔෆ් පෙොප්ලෙ ඉන් ඉට්ස් ග්‍රිප්. Wඑ අරෙ අල්ල් බොර්න් ඉන්ටො නටුරල් අන්ඩ් චුල්ටුරල් එන්විරොන්මෙන්ට්ස් ඨට් ස්හපෙ wහට් wඑ බෙචොමෙ, ඉන්ඩිවිඩුල්ල්‍ය් අන්ඩ් චොල්ලෙච්ටිවෙල්‍ය්. Fරොම් ඔඋර් “මොඨෙර් ටොන්ගුෙ” ටො ඔඋර් ෆඨෙර්’ස් ෆෛඨ්, ෆ්රොම් මෙඩිචල් රිස්ක්ස් ටො නටුරල් හශර්ඩ්ස්, wහෙරෙ wඑ ස්ටර්ට් ඔඋර් ජොුර්නෙය් හස් මුඡ් ටො ඩො wඉඨ් ඔඋර් ඩෙස්ටින්‍ය්.
Hඅර්ම් ඩෙ ඹ්ලිජ්, Tහෙ Pඔwඑර් ඔෆ් Pලචෙ, (Oෂ්ෆොර්ඩ් U. Pරෙස්ස්, 2009)

ලංකාවේ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය මහජනයා ඉදිරියේ මිථ්‍යාවක් වී ඇත්තේ පාලක කළු සුද්දන්, රටේ ඉතිහාසය හා භූගෝල විද්‍යාව නොදැනීම නිසාය යන කියමනේ ප්‍රායෝගික සත්‍යය නම් රටේ පවතින ස්‌වාභාවික සම්පත් අසමාන ලෙස, විවිධ ලෙස, රටේ භූමිය මත විසිරී තිබීම හා ඒවා උපයෝගී කරගැනීමට නීති පද්‌ධති මඟින් සපයා දී ඇති අවස්ථා අසමාන බව යන සාධක දෙක වටහා නොගෙන, පාලකයා විසින් එය අවුල් කර දැමීමය. උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් ලංකාවේ ඇත්තේ මේ සාධක දෙක නිසා ඇති ප්‍රශ්ණයක් මිස, යම් සුළු ජන වර්‌ගයකට වෙනස්කම් කිරීමක් නොවේ. උතුරේ ජනයාට මතුපිට ගංඟා නැත්තේ එහි ඇත්තේ හුණුගල් පාෂාණ නිසාය. කැළණි ගඟ ශීඝ්‍රයෙන් දූෂණය වන්නේ, අපවිත්‍ර වන්නේ, ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය භාර දුෂ්ඨ ත්‍රිකෝණය (දේශපාලකයා-නිලධාරියා- එන්ජිිෝ කාරයා) නිසාය. පගා දෙන හෝටල්කාරයෝ, පැක්ටරිකාරයෝ ලාභ ලබති. මහජනයා දුක් විඳිති.

කොළඹට කිරි, අපිට කැකිරි

ඕ මයි ගෝඩ්-බුදු අම්මෝ ලංකාව, 1948 දී පිළිවෙලින් කොළඹ ලංකාවක්-ගමේ ලංකාවක් එසේත් නැත්නම් ඉංග්‍රීසි කතා කරණ හා නොකරණ, පෝසත් හා දුප්පත් ලංකාවක් හා 1971 න් පසු කොළඹට කිරි අපිට කැකිරි ලංකාවක් විය. ප්‍රභාකරන්ගෙන් මරණයෙන් ගැලවී පැන ආ කර්‌නල් කරුණාගේ උදෘත පාඨය වූයේද කොළඹට ලැබෙන දේ අපටත් දෙන්න (ගිව් අස් වට් කලම්බු ගෙට්ස්) යනුය. මේවා ආර්‌ථික-ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයේ අසාර්‌ථක බව පෙන්වන කියමන්‌ය. නාගානන්ද කොඩිතුවක්කු ඔහුගේ ව්‍යවස්ථා විප්ලවය ඉදිරිපත් කල විට ඔහුගෙන් ඇසූ ප්‍රශ්ණයක් නම් ඔහු ගන්නේ ධනවාදී, සමාජවාදී, කොමියුනිස්ට්වාදී පාරක්ද යනුය. ඔහුගේ පිළිතුර වූයේ එංගලන්තයේ හා යුරෝපා රටවල මිනිසුන් වැඩියෙන් ටැක්ස් ගෙවන බවත් එහෙත් ඒ වෙනුවෙන් රජය විසින් මරණය තෙක්‌ම ඒ මිනිසුන්ගේ දුක-සැප බලාගන්නා බවත්‌ය. එය කුමණ වාදයද යනුවෙන් ඇසීම අනවශ්‍යය යනුය! ඒබ්‍රහම් ලින්කන්ගේ මිනිසුන්ගේ ආණ්ඩුවක්, මිනිසුන් සඳහා වන ආණ්ඩුවක් හා මිනිසුන් විසින් කරණ ආණ්ඩුවක් යන කියමන ඉෂ්ටකරගත හැකිවන්නේ යම් රටක භූගෝල විද්‍යාවට අනුකූල වන පාලන ක්‍රමයක් මඟින් පමණය. ලෝක බැංකුව විසින් පවා රටවල් දියුණු කිරිමේ උපාය යයි කියමින් නොයෙක් බේත් යෝජනා කරමින් රවුම් ගසා, රටවල් තව තවත් අමාරුවේ දමා, දැන් භූගෝල ‌විද්‍යාව දඩමීමා කරගෙන අළුත් ගමනක් යෝජනා කරමින් සිටී (වර්ල්ඩ් ඩිවෙලොප්මන්ට් රිපෝට් 2009: රිෂේපින් ඉකොනොමික් ජෝග්‍රෆි [ඩෙන්සිටි-ඩිස්ටන්ස්-ඩිවිෂන්, භූමි ඒකක කේන්ද්‍රීය වූ සංවර්‌ධනය]).

ලංකාවේ අගනුවර රජරටට (අනුරාධපුරය දෙසට) ගෙනයන ලෙස 1955 දී බෞද්‌ධ තොරතුරු විමර්‍ශන (බුඩිසම් බිට්‍රේයිඩ්) කොමිසම විසින් කල යෝජනාව, අනාගාරික ධර්‍මපාලතුමාගේ, කළුකොඳයාවේ ප්‍රඥාශේඛර නාහිමියන්ගේ, කොළඹ ක්‍රමයට (කලම්බු පැරඩයුම්) ප්‍රතිවිරුද්‌ධ ගම් මඟින් රට ගොඩනැඟීමේ සංකල්පය සංකේතවත් කලේය. එහෙත් ඒවා කඩාකප්පල් කල කළුසුද්දෝ නොයෙක් නම් වලින් නොයෙක් ගම කරට ගැනීමේ ව්‍යාපාර ආරම්භකලේය. යහපාලකාරයින් ගෙනා ගම්පෙරළිය අළුත්ම නමය. ගමේ මට්ටමින් පක්‍ෂ පාට අනුව මිනිසුන් එකිනෙකා මරාගන්නට ලෑස්‌තිකර මහජන මුදල්ම එහෙන් මෙහෙන් විසිකර පක්‍ෂ සංවිධායකලා තොරන් ගසා කුට්ටි කඩාගන්නා මේ ක්‍රමය කෙතෙක්දුරට ගෙන යනවාද?

කොරෝනාව කඩා වැටුන විට ප්‍රත්‍යක්‍ෂවූ කරුණක් නම් ලංකාවේ පරිපාලන පද්‌ධතිය කෙතරම් අකාර්‌යක්‍ෂමද යන්නය. මීට අමතරව 1978 ජේ. ආර්-ප්‍රේමදාස කාලයේ සිට සමූපකාර ව්‍යාපාරය, සතොස, අලෙවි සංවර්‌ධන ශාඛා යනාදිය විනාශකර හෝ දූෂණය කර ඇති අන්දමය. පුද්ගලික අංශයට ඉඩදීමෙන් වූයේ ජනයා සූරාකෑම මිස නිසි සේවයක් ලබා දීම නොවේ. හරියට ලංගමට වූ දේමය. මිනිසුන්ට, ලොරි චෙසි උඩ, දෙකට නැමී, කන් බීරි කරණ සද්දෙන් කෂඩ සිංදු අසමින් බස්‌‌වල යන යුගය කවදා අවසාන වේවිද? ලංකාවේ ග්‍රාම සේවා වසම් 14,000 ක් ඇත. ග්‍රාම සේවකට අමතරව, එහි තවත් ආණ්ඩුවේ නිලධාරීන් 4 ක් (සමෘධි නියාමක, කෘෂි පර්යේෂණ නිලධාරී, ආර්‌‌ථික සංවර්‍ධන නිලධාරි, සෞඛ්‍ය නිලධාරී)සිටී. මේ අනුව සෑම ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කාර්‍ය්‍යාලයකම කෙතරම් ආණ්ඩුවෙන් පඩි ලබන ශ්‍රම බලකායක් සිටීද? මොවුන් හරහා ඕනෑම බඩු බෙදාහැරීමක්, ගොවි නිෂ්පාදන එකතු කිරීමක් කිරීමට නොහැකිද? මොවුන් කඩිනමින් විනය ගරුක හා කාර්‌යක්‍ෂම කලහැක්කේ බණ මඩුවෙන්ද, කැරට් අලයෙන් හෝ වේවැලෙන්ද? මේවා නිසි මඟට ගැනීමට ලීක්වාන්ලා අවශ්‍යද?

මේ ගැන සිතන විට මා දුටුවේ බක් පෝයදා (අප්‍රියෙල් 7, 2020) අරලියගහ මන්දිර භූමියේදී මහාචාර්ය ඉඳුරාගාරේ ධම්මරතන හිමියන් කල අනුශාසනාවය. කොරෝනා මිණියක් ආදාහණය කිරිමට විරුද්‌ධව ඇති උද්ගෝෂණ, මතවාදයෙන් පරාජය කිරීමට අමතරව හාමුදුරුවන් අගමැතිට පෙන්‌වා දුන්නේ රටට ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පයේ (ගම් සභාවේ) ඇති අවශ්‍යතාවයය. සිගරැට් විකිණීමේ බද්ද, ඒවා පවිච්චි කිරීම නිසා ඇතිවන පිළිකා වැනි රෝග වලට ප්‍රතිකාර කිරීම සඳහා රජය දරණ වියදම්ද රටක ආර්ථික වර්‌ධන වේගය මැනීමේදී දළ ජාතික නිෂ්පාදනය ලෙස එකතු කිරීම වෙනුවට භූතානයේ භාවිතා කරණ මිනිස් සතුට මිණුම් දණ්ඩක් ලෙස ලංකාවේ යොදා ගන්නා දිනයක්, බටහිර කෘෂිකර්‌මය වෙනුවට අපේ අනාදිමත් ගොවිතැන කරලියට එන අවධියක් උන්වහන්සේ අපේක්‍ෂා කරන්නේය. රටේ ආර්ථික, සාමාජීය හා දෙමළ බෙදුම්වාදයට විසඳුමක් වශයෙන් මෙම ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය යෝජනා කරමින් 2010 දී උගත් පාඩම් හා සංහිඳියා කොමිෂම ඉදිරියේදීත්, ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා හමුවී දෙවරකත් කරුණු (සංදේශ) ඉදිරිපත් කලත්, ඒ වෙනුවට රටට ලැබුනේ දිවි නැඟුම නම් වැඩ සටහන‌ය. උපදේශකයින් හීතල හොරුන්‌ය.

ඉඳුරාගාරේ හාමුදුරුවන් මූලිකව නිර්‌මාණය කල ධර්‌මපාල පරපුර යන සංවිධාන ජාලාවත්, කලකට පෙර ලංකාවේ හැම බෞද්‌ධයෙක්ම නිල නොලත් පොලිස් නිලධාරියෙක් ලෙස සිතා ක්‍රියාකලයුතුය යන බොදු බල සේනාවේ ඥානසාර හිමියන්ගේ අදහසත් මෙම ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය ඉදිරියට ගෙන යෑමේදී ඉතාමත් වැදගත්‌ය. ගමින් ගමට මේ අදහස පැහැදිලිකරදීම ගෝඨාභය මහතාගේ ජන මූල සභා අදහස වඩා අර්‌ථවත් කරණු නිසැකය. මධ්‍යම-පර්යන්ත බලය බෙදීමක් වශයෙන්, යහපාලන සුමන්තිරන්-ලාල් විජේනායක-(හා දැන් රටින් පැනගොස් සිටින රසායන විද්‍යා විභාගය වංචාකර අසුවූ) ජයම්පති වික්‍රමරත්න, විසින් තුන්වන පාලන තට්ටුවක් ලෙස නම්කර රටබෙදීමේ ප්ලෑන ඒ මඟින් සඟවන්නට සැදූවේය. රටවැසියා බිම් මට්ටමින් බලගන්වන මෙම ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය පශ්චාත් කොරෝනා ලංකාවේ ගැලවුම්කාරයා වශයෙන් දියුණුකර ගැනීම අප සැමගේ අරමුණ වියයුතුය. මේ නිසා චපා බණ්ඩාර විසින් මධ්‍යම රජය විනාශ කිරීමේ කුමණ්ත්‍රනයක් ලෙස සළකන යහපාලන-ද්‍රවිඩ සංවිධානයේ තුන්වන ස්ථර ප්ලෑන, පලාත් සභා හා ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා වෙනුවට යෝජිත ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය සමඟ පටලවා ගත යුතු නැත.

ඊට අමතරව මිලේනියම් චැලේජ් ඇමෙරිකන් ට්‍රෝජන් අශ්වයා ගෙන්ද මෙම ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය ක්‍රමය වෙන්කර ගතයුතුය. මිලින්ද මොරගොඩගේ පාත් ෆයින්ඩර් ඩොලර් සංවිධානය හා සම්බන්‌ධ පුද්ගලයින් ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභයගේ ලඟ උපදේශකයින්ව සිටිනවාය යන චාපා බණ්ඩාරගේ කරුණු දැක්‌වීමද මෙහිදී අමතක නොකල යුතුය. මෙම ඇමෙරිකන් ලණුවට මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ හරහා ගෝඨාභය පාලනය අසු නොවේය යනු කළු සුද්දන් නොවන හැම දෙනාගේම පැතුමය. මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ රටේ පවතින ආර්ථික අර්බුදය ගැන දක්‌වන සංඛ්‍යාලේඛන හා නිගමන (උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් ඉතා විශාල රාජ්‍ය සේවක පිරිසක්) නිවැරදි වුවත්, ඒවා නිවැරදි කල හැක්කේ ලෝක බැංකු පාරේ යමින් නොව, ලංකාවේ භූගෝල විද්‍යාවට අනුකූල පාරේ යමිනි. පාත් ෆයින්ඩර්‍වත්, ලෝක බැංකුවවත්, සුළු ජන ව‌ර්‌ගවල මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් රැකීමටය යන කඩතුරාවෙන් වසාගෙන ගේන යෝජනා හරහා, රටවල් කඩා දුර්‍වල කරන බටහිර-ඇමෙරිකන් මහාචාර්යවරුන්වත්, ඉන්දියාවේ පංචයාත්, ලංකාවේ ගම් සභාව ගැන වත් සඳහන් නොකරන්නේ ඇයි? ගම-වැව-දාගැබ යන ත්‍රිත්‌වය (සමාජ-ආර්ථික-දේශපාලන මොඩලය) මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ විසින් අධ්‍යයනය කලයුතුව ඇත.

බුද්‌ධාගම-නීතිය-භූගෝල විද්‍යාව

ඇමෙරිකාවේ හැදුන වැඩුන මිලින්ද මොරගොඩ නමැති භූමිකාවට, ගෝඨාභය කිරිකලයට ගොම බිංදුවක් දැමීමේ අවදානම ඉදිරියේ රටේ හාමුදුරුවරුන් විසින් දැන් ඉදිරියට ගෙනෙමින් සිටින ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය පාලන ක්‍රමය, බටහිරට-යුරෝපයට ගැති අය විසින් හෙලා දකින්නට සදන්නේ ඔවුන්ගේ නොදන්නා කමටමය. බලතල බෙදීමේ න්‍යාය ඔවුන් විසින් පිටපොට පටලවා ගත් අන්දම මීට පෙර කොටසක පෙන්‌වා දී ඇත. මොන්ටෙස්කිගේනියම අදහස ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය වන්නේ ඉන් විශාල ඒකක සංඛ්‍යාවකට රාජ්‍ය බලය බෙදී යන නිසාය (කාර්යක්‍ෂම මධ්‍යම ආණ්ඩුවක් සහිතව). රූල් ඔෆ් ලෝ, පාර්ලිමේන්තු ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදී කතා බෞද්‌ධ සමාජයේ තිබූ බව ලෝඩ් ෂෙට්ලන්ඩ් 1931 දී පෙන්‌වා දුන්නේය.

මින් ඉදිරියට ගොස් බුද්‌ධාගම, නීතිය හා භූගෝල විද්‍යාව, ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය තුලින් එක්වන බව අප වටහා ගතයුතුවා පමණක් නොව, ඒ බව හාමුදුරුවරුන් විසින් මිලින්ද මොරගොඩලාගේ තින්ක් ටෑන්ක් වලට දැණුම් දිය යුතුය. බුද්‌ධාගමේ මූලික දර්‍ශනයක් වන මධ්‍යම ප්‍රතිපදාව, නූතන නීති විද්‍යාවේ (ජුරිස්ප්‍ර‌ැඩන්ස්) රීසනබල්නස් ඩොක්ට්‍රින් සහ භූගෝල විද්‍යාවේ පදනම වන, පොලෝ තලයේ විවිධත්‌වය යන සංසිද්‌ධීන් තුන, ප්ලේස් (පෙදෙස/ප්‍රදේශය/ස්ථානය[ජන සභාව]) නමැති සංකල්පයේ ත්‍රිකෝණ පැතිය. සෑම නීතියකම මායිම වන්නේ එම නීතිය හා එය කැඩූවිට දෙන දඬුවම රීසනබල්ද (සාධාරණද) යන්නය. නීතියේ ආධිපත්‍යය හා කැළෑ නීතිය අතර වෙනස එයය. ගාන්‌ධි විසින්, මාටින් ලූතර් කිං විසින්, නීති කැඩුවේ මේ අනුවය. අනිත් අතට යමක් රීසනබල්ද යන්න එම ප්‍රදේශයේ භෞතික, සාමාජික සාධක අනුව තීරණයවේ. සව්දි අරාබියේ ගල් ගසා මැරීමත්, හොරකමට අත කැපීමත්, සිංගප්පූරූවේ මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ලඟ තබා ගැනීමට දරුණු දඩුවම් දෙන්නේත්, කොරියාවේ, වියට්නාමයේ බලු මස් කන්නේත්, ලංකාවේ මුස්ලිම් මිනිසුන්ට ගෑණු පහක් තියාගත හැක්කේත් ඒ ඒ රටේ සමාජීය/මානව භූගෝල විද්‍යා සාධක අනුවය. මධ්‍යම ප්‍රතිපදාව කියන්නේ කම්ප්‍රොමයිස් යනුය. යම් අන්තවාදයකට නොයෑමය. ලංකාවේ අද සුළු ජනවර්‌ග තම තමන්ගේ ඇදහීම් කරගෙන යන්නේ (මුන්නේශ්වරම් සතුන්ගේ බිලි පූජා, ඉස්ලාම් හලාල්, ශාරියා බැංකු, යාපනේ තේසවලම් නීතිය) බුදු දහමේ ඇති මේ ගුණාංගය නිසාය. ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය යනුද එවැනි අනොන්‍ය ඉවසීමකි. සහජීවනය කියන්නේ ජාතික ගීය දකුණේ භාෂා දෙකෙන්ම ගයන විට උතුරේ එය දෙමළෙන් පමණක් ගැයීම නොවේ. මෙය මධ්‍යම ප්‍රතිපදාවක් නැතිකමය.

පොලොව තලයේ විවිධ‌ත්‌වය, ස්‌වභාවික පරිසරය හා මිනිසා අතර ඇතිවන සම්බන්‌ධතාවයේ මතුපිට දර්‍ශනය (ලෑන්ඩ්ස්කේප්) නීතිවල ප්‍රතිඵලය. උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් කඳුකරයේ තේවතු ජාලය, ඊට සම්බන්‌ධ ප්‍රවාහන ජාලය, ඉන්දියන් ලැයින්, මිරිකී ගිය ගම්මානවල ජනයා වියලි කලාපයේ ගොවි ජනපදවලට ගෙනයාම, පාංශු ඛාදනය, නායයාම් පෙන්‌වා දිය හැකිය. සෑම මිනිසෙක්ම තවත් වෙනත් මිනිසෙකුගෙන් වෙනස්‌ය යන බෞද්‌ධ න්‍යාය, සෑම මිනිසෙකුගේම ගැලවීම ඇත්තේ ඔහුගේ/ඇගේ හැසිරීම, ක්‍රියාකලාපය උඩය යන අදහස අනුව බලනවිට, නීතිය, යමෙකු මවකගේ ගර්‍භාෂය තුල පිළිසිඳ ගැනීමට පෙර (මව සිගරැට් බීම නිසා දරුවාට වන හානිය ගැන සිගරැට් කොම්පැණියෙන් වන්දි ලබා ගැනීම) සිට ඔහු/ඇය මියගිය පසු (අන්තිම කැමති පත්‍රය) දක්‌වාම පුද්ගලයා හසුරවන්නේය! අනෙක් අතට එය නිදන කාමරයේ සිට කොම්පැනි බෝඩ් රූම් දක්‌වා ස්ථානවලට අතපොවන්නේය.

රටක ඉතිහාසය කියන්නේ ඒ රටේ අතීත භූගෝල විද්‍යව හෙවත් ලෑන්ඩ්ස්කේප් ය. වෙනත් වචනවලින් කියනවා නම් පොලෝතලය මත සිදුවන ක්‍රියාවලීන් (ප්‍රොසෙසස්) නිසා එක් එක් රටාවන් (පැටර්න්ස්) හටගනී. යම් ග්‍රාම සේවා වසමක්, ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කොට්ඨාශයක් වශයෙන් මෙම රටා වෙනස් වියහැකිය. එහෙත් වැදගත් කරුණ නම් කෘතිම මායිම් වෙනුවට පරිසර විද්‍යාවට අනුකූල වන සේ මෙම පරිපාලන ඒකක වල මායිම් හඳුනා ගැනීමය. තිරසර සංවර්‌ධනය නියම ලෙසම අර්‌ථවත් වන්නේ එවිටය. ඇමෙරිකාවේ සිට නිව්සීලන්තය දක්‌වා ලොකු කුඩා බොහෝ රටවල දේශපාලන ඒකක ජල විද්‍යාවට (හයිඩ්‍රොලොජි) අනුව මායිම් කර ඇත. ලංකාවේ අනාදිමත් ත්‍රිත්‌වය, ගම-වැව-දාගැබ යනු ජලවිද්‍යා ඒකකයකි! කොරෝනාවත් සමඟ රටවල් ගස් වලට, ගංඟා වලට, පුද්ගලයින්ට මෙන් නීතිමය අයිතිවාසිකම් දීමට ක්‍රියාකරමින් සිටී. ඉක්වඩෝර් එක් උදාහරණයකි.

ගෝලීය වශයෙන් හිතන්න, ගම් මට්ටමින් ක්‍රියාකරන්න යන අවවාදය, කර්ක්පැට්‍රික් සේල්ගේ හියුමන් ස්කේල් සංකල්පය හා එකඟය. සියළු දේශපාලන කටයුතු අන්තිමේදී බලනවිට ලෝකල් හෙවත් ගම් මට්ටමේය. ජේවීපී අය 1971, 1988/9 කාලයේදී සිතුවා මෙන් දේශපාලන බලය එන්නේ තුවක්කු බඳෙන් නොව ග්‍රාම රාජ්‍ය සංකල්පය තුලින්‌ය. ඊජිප්තුවේ පිරමිඩ් හා ලංකාවේ යෝධ දාගැබ් අතර වෙනස අපේ රජවරු ශ්‍රමය සූරාගත් වහල් හිමියන් නොවූ බව වන්දනාවේ යන අයගේ යටිහිතේ කිමිදී තිබීමය. ඊජිප්තුවේ සංචාරයේ යන අයට එවන් මානසික සහනයක් නැත. 1978 ට කලින් ලංකාවේ පැවති ලෝකල් දේශපාලනය දිස්ත්‍රික් මනාප බලු පොරයක් මඟින් විනාශ කර, මුළු රටමත් විනාශ මුඛයට හසු විය.

මෙම ලිපි කාණ්ඩයේ අවසාන ලිපිය, ලී ක්වාන්ලා ගැන නොසිතා, හිට්ලර් කතා නොකියා, ලංකාවේ දැන් ඇති නාස්ලණුවාදය (බොරු ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය), බෞද්‌ධ ප්‍රතිපත්ති අනුව සංශොධනය කලහැකි ආකාරය සළකා බලයි. දශරාජ ධ‌ර්‍මය හෝ මල නොතලා රොන් ගැනීම වැනි තර්‌ක නොව, විනය ගරුක සමාජයක් ගොඩනැගීම හරහා මෙම ශල්‍යකර්‌මය සිදුකිරීමට ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභයට මහජනයා බලය පවරා දී තිබේ.

Proclaim Martial Law to halt conspiracies – Part II.

April 17th, 2020

By : A,A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

As there is a long list of countries that used Martial Law for various reasons given below are details relating to a few countries to present a broad idea about this Law.

Australia

The Black War was a period of violent conflict between British colonists and Aboriginal Australians in Tasmania from the mid-1820s to 1832. With an escalation of violence in the late 1820s, Lieutenant-Governor George Arthur declared martial law in November 1828—effectively providing legal immunity for killing Aboriginal people. It remained in force for more than three years, the longest period of martial law in Australian history.

Canada

Canada is a country that widely used these laws on many occasions.  The War Measures Act was a Parliament of Canada statute that allowed the government to assume sweeping emergency powers, stopping short of martial law, i.e., the military did not administer justice, which remained in the hands of the courts. The act was invoked three times: During World War IWorld War II, and the October Crisis of 1970.

During the colonial era, martial law was proclaimed and applied in the territory of the Province of Quebec during the invasion of Canada by the army of the American Continental Congress in 1775–1776 and twice in the territory of Lower Canada during the 1837–1838 insurrections. On December 5, martial law was proclaimed in the district of Montreal by Governor Gosford, without the support of the Legislative Assembly of Lower Canada. It was imposed until April 27, 1838. Martial law was proclaimed a second time on November 4, 1838.

EGYPT
Egypt was under Martial or Emergency Laws continuously since the death of President Gamal Abdel Nasser, a great friend of Sri Lanka who thwarted American and European moves to impose fuel sanctions on Sri Lanka in the 1960s.

 State of Emergency had been in effect in Egypt since 1967. Following the assassination of President Anwar el-Sadat in 1981, a state of emergency was declared. Egypt had been under a state of emergency ever since; the Parliament had renewed the emergency laws every three years since they were imposed. In May 2010, the state of emergency was further extended, albeit with a promise from the government to be applied only to ‘Terrorism and Drugs’ suspects. A State of Emergency in that country gives military courts the power to try civilians and allows the government to detain for renewable 45-day periods and without court orders anyone deemed to be threatening state security. Public demonstrations are banned under the legislation.

On 10 February 2011, the ex-president of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, promised the deletion of the relevant constitutional article that gives legitimacy to the State of Emergency in an attempt to please the mass number of protesters that demanded him to resign. On 11 February 2011, the president stepped down and the vice president Omar Suleiman de facto introduced the country to martial law when transferring all civilian powers from the presidential institution to the military institution. It meant that the presidential executive powers, the parliamentary legislative powers and the judicial powers all transferred directly into the military system which may delegate powers back and forth to any civilian institution within its territory.

The military issued in its third announcement the “end of the State of Emergency as soon as the order is restored in Egypt”. Before martial law, the Egyptian parliament under the constitution had the civilian power to declare the State of Emergency. When in martial law, the military gained all powers of the state, including to dissolve the parliament and suspend the constitution as it did in its fifth announcement. Under martial law, the only legal framework within the Egyptian territory is the numbered announcements from the military. These announcements could for instance order any civilian laws to come back into force. The military announcements (communiques) are the de facto only current constitution and legal framework for the Egyptian territory. It means that all affairs of the state are bound by the Geneva Conventions.

Iran

On September 7, 1978, in response to public demonstrations protesting the perceived government involvement in the death of the son of Ayatollah Khomeini, Mostafa KhomeiniShah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi appointed Chief of Army Staff General Gholam Ali Oveisi as the military governor of the capital city of Tehran. On September 8, the government declared martial law on the capital along with several other cities throughout the country, after which further protests erupted that lead to the army opening fire on a group of protesters in Tehran’s Jaleh Square on the same day which is referred to as Black Friday. Unable to control the unrest, the Shah dissolved the civil government headed by Prime Minister Jafar Sharif-Emami on November 6 and appointed General Gholam Reza Azhari as the prime minister who ultimately failed in his efforts to restore order to the country. As he was preparing to leave the country, the Shah dissolved the military government and appointed ShapourBakhtiar, a reformist critic of his rule, as the new prime minister on January 4, 1979. Bakhtiar’s government fell on February 11 and gave rise to the Islamic Republic and the creation of a new constitution.

Article 79 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran forbids the proclamation of martial law without the approval of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.

Israel

As of 2013, Israel had been condemned in 45 resolutions by the United Nations Human Rights Council. Since the creation of the Council in 2006, it has resolved almost more resolutions condemning Israel than on the rest of the world combined. The 45 resolutions comprised almost half (45.9%) of all country-specific resolutions passed by the Council, not counting those under Agenda Item 10 (countries requiring technical assistance).[1] From 1967 to 1989 the UN Security Council adopted 131 resolutions directly addressing the Arab–Israeli conflict.

The military administrative government was in Israel in effect from 1949 to 1966 over some geographical areas of Israel having large Arab populations, primarily the Negev, Galilee, and the Triangle. The residents of these areas were subject to martial law. The Israeli army enforced strict residency rules. Any Arab not registered in a census taken during November 1948 was deported. Permits from the military governor had to be procured to travel more than a given distance from a person’s registered place of residence, and curfew, administrative detentions, and expulsions were common. Although the military administration was officially for geographical areas, and not people, its restrictions were seldom enforced on the Jewish residents of these areas. In the 1950s, martial law ceased to be in effect for those Arab citizens living in predominantly Jewish cities but remained in place in all Arab localities within Israel until 1966.

Following the 1967 war, in which the Israeli army occupied the West BankGaza Strip, Golan Heights in Syria, and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt, martial law over the Palestinian population as well as the Jordanian, Syrian, and Egyptian populations in these areas was put in place. In 1993, Israel agreed to give autonomy to the people of Gaza and disengaged militarily from Gaza from 2005 until 2007, when a military blockade was put in place on Gaza in response to the election of Hamas to the local government.

During the 2006 Lebanon war, martial law was declared by Defense Minister Amir Peretz over the north of the country. The Israel Defense Forces were granted the authority to issue instructions to civilians and to close down offices, schools, camps, and factories in cities considered under threat of attack, as well as to impose curfews on cities in the North.

Instructions of the Home Front Command are obligatory under martial law, rather than merely recommended The order signed by Peretz was in effect for 48 hours and was extended by the Cabinet and the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee over the war’s duration.[

Pakistan

Martial law was declared in Pakistan on 7 October 1958, by President IskanderMirza who then appointed General Muhammad Ayub Khan as the Chief Martial Law Administrator and Aziz Ahmad as Secretary-General and Deputy Chief Martial Law Administrator. However, three weeks later General Ayub—who had been openly questioning the authority of the government before the imposition of martial law—deposed IskandarMirza on 27 October 1958 and assumed the presidency that practically formalized the militarization of the political system in Pakistan. Four years later a new document, Constitution of 1962, was adopted. The second martial law was imposed on 25 March 1969, when President Ayub Khan abrogated the Constitution of 1962 and handed over power to the Army Commander-in-Chief, General Agha Mohammad Yahya Khan. On assuming the presidency, General Yahya Khan acceded to popular demands by abolishing the one-unit system in West Pakistan and ordered general elections on the principle of one man one vote.

The third was imposed by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the first civilian to hold this post in Pakistan after the Bangladesh Liberation War. On 21 December 1971, Bhutto took this post as well as that of President.[

The fourth was imposed by General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq on 5 July 1977. After several tumultuous years, which witnessed the secession of East Pakistan, politician Zulfikar Ali Bhutto took over in 1971 as the first civilian martial law administrator in recent history, imposing selective martial law in areas hostile to his rule, such as the country’s largest province, Balochistan. Following widespread civil disorder, General Zia overthrew Bhutto and imposed martial law in its totality on July 5, 1977, in a bloodless coup d’état. Unstable areas were brought under control through indirect military action, such as Balochistan under Martial Law Governor, General Rahimuddin Khan. The civilian government resumed in 1988 following General Zia’s death in an aircraft crash.

On October 12, 1999, the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was dissolved, and the Army took control once more. But no martial law was imposed. General Pervez Musharraf took the title of Chief Executive until the President of Pakistan RafiqTarar resigned and General Musharraf became president. Elections were held in October 2002 and Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali became Prime Minister of Pakistan. Jamali premiership was followed by Chaudhry ShujaatHussain and Shaukat Aziz. While the government was supposed to be run by the elected prime minister, there was a common understanding that important decisions were made by President General Musharraf.

On November 3, 2007, President General Musharraf declared the state of emergency in the country which is claimed to be equivalent to the state of martial law as the constitution of Pakistan of 1973 was suspended, and the Chief Justices of the Supreme Court were fired.

On November 12, 2007, Musharraf issued some amendments in the Military Act, which gave the armed forces some additional powers.

Philippines

During the Second World WarPresident José P. Laurel placed the Philippines (then a client state of Imperial Japan) under martial law via Proclamation № 29, dated 21 September 1944 and enforced Proclamation № 30 declaring the existence of a state of war between the Philippines and the United States and the United Kingdom, effective 10:00 that day.

The country was under martial law again from 1972 to 1981 under President Ferdinand MarcosProclamation № 1081 (“Proclaiming a State of Martial Law in the Philippines”) was signed on 21 September 1972 and came into force on 22 September. The official reason behind the declaration was to suppress increasing civil strife and the threat of a communist takeover, particularly after a series of bombings (including the Plaza Miranda bombing) and an assassination attempt on Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile in Mandaluyong.

The policy of martial law was initially well-received, but it eventually proved unpopular as the military’s human rights abuses (e.g. use of torture in intelligence gathering, forced disappearances), along with the decadence and excess of the Marcos family and their allies, had emerged. Coupled with economic downturns, these factors fermented dissent in various sectors (e.g. the urban middle class) that crystallized with the assassination of jailed oppositionist senator Benigno Aquino, Jr. in 1983, and widespread fraud in the 1986 snap elections. These eventually led to the 1986 People Power Revolution that ousted Marcos and forced him into exile in Hawaii where he died in 1989; his rival presidential candidate and Aquino’s widow, Corazon, was installed as his successor.

During this 9-year period, curfews were implemented as a safety measure. The majority of radio and television networks were suspended. Journalists who were accused of speaking against the government were taken as political prisoners, some of them being physically abused and tortured by the authorities.

Others have stated that the implementation of Martial Law was taken advantage of by the Marcos regime. Billion pesos worth of property and ill-gotten wealth was said to be acquired by Marcos’ consort, First Lady Imelda Marcos. This alleged money laundering issue was brought back recently, particularly in the Pilipinas Debates 2016 for the recently held Philippine Presidential Elections on May 9, 2016. Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos, Jr., Marcos’ son, ran for the Vice Presidency and lost.

There were rumours that President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo was planning to impose martial law to end military coup d’etat plots, general civilian dissatisfaction, and criticism of her legitimacy arising from the dubious results of the 2004 presidential elections. Instead, a State of National Emergency was imposed in 2006 from 24 February to 3 March, in order to quash a coup attempt and quell protesters.

On 4 December 2009, President Arroyo officially placed the Province of Maguindanao under a state of martial law through Proclamation № 1959.[18] As with the last imposition, the declaration suspended the writ of habeas corpus in the province.[19] The announcement came days after hundreds of government troops were sent to the province to raid the armories of the powerful Ampatuan clan. The Ampatuans were implicated in the massacre of 58 persons, including women from the rival Mangudadatu clan, human rights lawyers, and 31 media workers. Cited as one of the bloodiest incidents of political violence in Philippine history, the massacre was condemned worldwide as the worst loss of life of media professionals in one day.[18]

On 23 May 2017, President Rodrigo Duterte declared martial law throughout the main southern island of Mindanao, through Proclamation No. 216, due to the attack of Maute Group in Marawi CityLanao del Sur. It was announced in a briefing in Moscow by Secretary Ernesto Abella,[20] and will be in effect until December 2019.

South Korea

In October 1946, the United States Army Military Government in Korea declared martial law as a result of the Daegu Riot. On November 17, 1948, President Syngman Rhee regime proclaimed martial law in order to quell the Jeju Uprising On April 19, 1960, Syngman Rhee government proclaimed martial law in order to suppress the April Revolution.

Switzerland

There are no provisions for martial law as such in Switzerland. Under the Army Law of 1995the Army can be called upon by cantonal (state) authorities for assistance (Assistenzdienst). This regularly happens in the case of natural disasters or special protection requirements (e.g., for the World Economic Forum in Davos). This assistance generally requires parliamentary authorization, though, and takes place in the regular legal framework and under the civilian leadership of the cantonal authorities. On the other hand, the federal authorities are authorized to use the Army to enforce law and order when the Cantons no longer can or want to do so (Ordnungsdienst). With this came many significant points of reference. This power largely fell into disuse after World War II.

Syria

The martial law regime between the 1963 Syrian coup d’état and 2011 is the longest ranging period of active martial law.

Thailand

Martial law in Thailand derives statutory authority from the Act promulgated by King Vajiravudh following the abortive Palace Revolt of 1912, entitled “Martial Law, B.E. 2457 (1914)”. Many coups have been attempted or succeeded since then, but the Act governing martial law, amended in 1942, 1944, 1959 and 1972, has remained essentially the same. In January 2004, the Prime Minister of Thailand, ThaksinShinawatra, declared a state of martial law in the provinces of PattaniYala, and Narathiwat in response to the growing South Thailand insurgency. On September 19, 2006, Thailand’s army declared martial law following a bloodless military coup in the Thai capital of Bangkok, declared while Prime Minister Shinawatra was in New York City to address the United Nations, General AssemblyGeneral SonthiBoonyaratglin took the control of the government, and soon after handed the premiership to ex-Army Chief General Surayud. Sonthi himself as Chief of the Administrative Reform Council. At 3 am, on May 20, 2014, following seven months of civil and political unrest, Army Commander-in-Chief Gen. Prayut Chan-ocha, declared martial law nationwide.

Turkey

Since the foundation of the Republic of Turkey in 1923 the military conducted three coups d’état and announced martial law. Martial law between 1978 and 1983 was replaced by a State of emergency in a limited number of provinces that lasted until November 2002. On July 15, 2016 a section of the military in Turkey attempted a coup(failed) and said to have implied martial law in a broadcast on their national television TRT.

United States

The United States which claims to be the champion of Democracy, fair play, human rights and a prism of equality had been under Martial Law, partially confined to some areas or fully many times in its history.   In the United States martial law has been declared for a state or other locality under various circumstances including after a direct foreign attack (Hawaii after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, New Orleans during the Battle of New Orleans), after a major disaster (Chicago after the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, San Francisco after the earthquake of 1906), and in response to chaos associated with protests and mob action (San Francisco during the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike, Montgomery, Alabama following the mob actions against the Freedom Riders). It has also been declared by renegade local leaders seeking to avoid arrest or challenges to their authority (Nauvoo, Illinois by Joseph Smith during the Illinois Mormon War and Utah by Governor Brigham Young during the Utah War). 

The martial law concept in the United States is closely tied with the right of habeas corpus, which is, in essence, the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is related to the imposition of martial law. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” There have been many instances of the use of the military within the borders of the United States, such as during the Whiskey Rebellion and in the South during the Civil Rights Movement, but these acts are not tantamount to a declaration of martial law. The distinction must be made as clear as that between martial law and military justice: deployment of troops does not necessarily mean that the civil courts cannot function, and that is one of the keys, as the Supreme Court has noted, to martial law.

In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids U.S. military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.

The above details related to the proclamation of Martial Law justifies our need to proclaim this law at the earliest and save the country and the people now itself.  Already due to the visionary steps taken by the President appropriate security personnel have been assigned duties at many important places and only an official proclamation is needed to let the caravan move in the right direction.  At the same time, stern action should be taken against curfew violators and there is a possibility that these people are deliberately doing it to under an organized plan to challenge the authority of the government since the number of these violators has exceeded over 12,000 by now.  In Russia, although Corona threat is at a minimum level in that country compared to western European nations and America, President Vladimir Putin has declared that anyone who acts in a manner to spread the virus threat will be jailed for 7 years.  We too need such measures, Mr. President. 

පාස්කු ඉරිදා සිදුවූ ත්‍රස්ථ ප්‍රහාරයන් සම්බන්ධ සැකකරුවෙකුගේ නීතීඥභාවය අත්හිටුවීම පිළිබද ඉල්ලීමකි.

April 17th, 2020

රාජකීය පණ්ඩිත පූජ්‍ය ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥානසාර හිමි

ගරු අග විනිසුරු ජයන්ත ජයසූරිය මැතිතුමා,
සභාපති,
අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාව,
කොළඹ. (අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාවේ ගරු ලේකම් තුමාගේ මාර්ගයෙන්)
2020/04/17 ගරු මැතිතුමනි, පාස්කු ඉරිදා සිදුවූ ත්‍රස්ථ ප්‍රහාරයන් සම්බන්ධ සැකකරුවෙකුගේ නීතීඥභාවය අත්හිටුවීම පිළිබද ඉල්ලීමකි. නීතීඥ හිජාස් හිස්බුල්ලා මහතා 2019 අප්‍රේල් මස 21වන පාස්කු ඉරුදින සිදු කරන ලද ත්‍රස්ථ ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සැකපිට අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවෙහි අත්අඩංගුවට පත්ව ඇති බව මේ වන විට අප සියලු දෙනාම දැනුවත් කරුණකි.   මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් පොලිස් දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව 2020 අප්‍රේල් මස 15වන දින කරුණු පැහැදිලි කරමින් සඳහන් කර සිටියේ  එම නීතීඥවරයා මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බකරුවන් දෙදෙනෙකු සමග සබඳතා පැවැත් වූ බවටත්, බෝම්බකරුවන් සමග විවිධ සංවිධානවල නිළතල දරා ඇති බවත් එපමණක් නොව පාස්කු ඉරුදින සිය ගණනක් වන අහිංසක ජනතාව සමූල ඝාතනය කරනු ලැබූ  ම්ලේච්ඡ ත්‍රස්ථ ප්‍රහාරයෙහි සැලසුම් ක්‍රියාවලියට පවා දායක වී ඇති බවටත් කරුණු අනාවරණය වී ඇති බවයි.   ගරු අග විනිසුරුතුමනි,   යමෙක් අධිකරණයක් මගින් වරදකරුවෙකු කරනු ලබන තෙක් එකී තැනැත්තාගේ නිර්දෝෂීභාවය පිළිබදව පූර්ව නිගමනයක් ඇති බව අප දනිමු. නමුත් මෙම නීතිඥවරයාට එරෙහිව එල්ල වී ඇති චෝදනාවන්ගේ බරපතළ භාවය හමුවේ විමර්ෂණ නිලධාරීන් ඔහුගේ නිර්දෝශී භාවය තහවුරු කරන තෙක් හෝ අධිකරණයක් ඉදිරියෙහි ඔහුගේ නිරවද්‍යභාවය ඔප්පු කරන තෙක් හෝ මෙම නීතීඥවරයාට නීතීඥ වෘත්තියෙහි නියැලීමට ඉඩකඩ සැලැසීම භයානක ප්‍රතිඵල ගෙන දිය හැකි කරුණක් බව අප විශ්වාස කරමු.   විශේෂයෙන්ම ආගමික මුලධර්මයකින් ආරම්භ වූ ත්‍රස්ත කණ්ඩායමක් විසින් එල්ලකළ මරාගෙන මැරෙන ප්‍රහාරයක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් සැකපිට අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන ඇති තත්වයක් යටතේ මෙම පුද්ගලයාට අධිකරණ පද්ධතියට ඇතුළත් වීමට ඉඩකඩ සැලැසීම විනිශ්චයකාරවරුන්  ඇතුළු අධිකරණ නිලධාරීන්ගේ මෙන්ම නීතීඥවරුන් හා සාමාන්‍ය ජනතාවගේ ද ජීවිත අනතුරෙහි හෙළිමක් බව අප තරයේ විශ්වාස කරමු.   විශේෂයෙන්ම ඉස්ලාම් අන්තවාදීන් විසින් ෂරියා නීති පද්ධති ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම සදහා ඇති බාධකයක් වශයෙන් සාමාන්‍ය නීතින් ක්‍රියාත්මක කරනු ලබන අධිකරණ පද්ධති සළකන බව ද ඔබතුමන්ගේ අවධානයට යොමු කරමු. මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් එක් පූර්ව නිදර්ශනයක් වශයෙන් 2005 වසරේ ජමාත් උල් මුජහිදීන් සංවිධානය විසින් බංගලාදේශ ජනරජයේ අධිකරණ පද්ධතියට එල්ල කරන ලද මරාගෙන මැරෙන ත්‍රස්ථ ප්‍රහාර මාලාව පිළිබදව ද සිහිපත් කරමු.
තවද මෙවන් තැනැත්තෙකු හට ඔහුගේ නිර්දෝෂීභාවය තහවුරු වන තෙක් නීතීඥ වෘත්තියෙහි නියැලීමට ඉඩකඩ සැලසුනහොත් අධිකරණ පද්ධතිය කෙරෙහි පවත්නා ජනතා විශ්වාසය බිද වැටීමකට ලක්වනු ඇති බව ද ගරු මැතිතුමන්ට සිහිපත් කර සිටිමු.   ගරු අගවිනිසුරුතුමනි,   මෙකී කරුණු සියල්ලම සළකා බලා නීතීඥ හිජාස් හිස්බුල්ලා මහතාගේ නීතීඥභාවය විමර්ෂණ නිලධාරීන් ඔහුගේ නිර්දෝශී භාවය තහවුරු කරන තෙක් හෝ අධිකරණයක් ඉදිරියෙහි ඔහුගේ නිරවද්‍යභාවය ඔප්පු කරන තෙක් හෝ අත්හිටුවීමට පියවර ගන්නා මෙන් ගෞරවයෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.   ස්තූතියි,
මෙයට විශ්වාසී, රාජකීය පණ්ඩිත පූජ්‍ය ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥානසාර හිමි,
මහ ලේකම් – බොදු බල සේනා
පිටපත් –     අතිගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමා,
               අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිෂන් සභාවේ ගරු ලේකම් තුමා,
               අධිකරණ අමාත්‍යවරයා,   Email: info@bodubalasena.org Web:   www.bodubalasena.org Hot Line:
        076 6880030         011 866090

Office:
No 615, Nawala Road, Rajagiriya.

ENFANT TERRIBLE

April 17th, 2020

RANJITH SOYSA

Mr Ahmed Shaheed, ‘Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief’ had recently addressed a letter to the President of Sri Lanka adverting to the Government including the SL Health authorities’ decision to bury COVID 9 victims and freedom of religion and the rights of minorities. We have had the experience of many a UN Rapporteur attempting to pontificate to Sri Lankan government on how to manage the armed forces, how to compensate missing persons and how to run our judiciary et. These attempts are too many to mention and Sri Lanka had begun to treat such intimidating lectures with a pinch of salt.

It is on record that Mr. Ahamed Shaheed attempted to intervene irresponsibly sometime ago too when he warned Sri Lanka’s counteraction after the Eastern carnage violated the freedom of religion. Sri Lankan government rejected his position at the UN by stating that ..” the Government rejects the inaccurate references in the Special Rapporteur’s report to serious concerns” regarding Sri Lankan security forces colluding with mobs and not acting to prevent or stop the violence”; the lack of response from the authorities against this violence”; and the claims that acts of violence are indulged by the silence and inaction from the authorities”. It is regrettable that these inaccurate accounts have been included in the report, even after they have been fully rebutted and explained by the Government soon after the alleged incidents,”

The Sri Lankan delegation also said that it was regrettable that the report has sought to portray instances where criminal investigations have been conducted to prevent acts of terrorism in accordance with the law, as an endeavor to violate the freedom of religion or belief.”

When faced with a very serious issue such as COVID 9 which is receiving the attention of the whole world and Sri Lanka is engaging all its resources to control the pandemic, it is indeed unfortunate again to listen to such misguided pontifications made on behalf of narrow sectarian interests or the NGO WING, thus vitiating the bigger picture.

RANJITH SOYSA

තවත් චීන ගුවන් යානයක් වෛද්‍ය ආධාර තොගයක් රැගෙන කටුනායකට

April 17th, 2020

උපුටාගැණීම ලංකාදීප

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ පැතිර පවතින කොරෝනා වසංගත තත්වය මර්දනය කිරීම සදහා වෛද්‍ය ආධාර තොගයක් රැගෙන චීනයේ සිට ගුවන් යානයක් අද (17) රාත්‍රී කටුනායක ගුවන් තොටුපළ වෙත පැමිණ තිබේ.

අද දින රාත්‍රී 7.00 ට චීනයේ ෂැංහයි සිට චයිනා ඊස්ටන් ගුවන් සේවයේ එම්.යූ.- 231 දරන ගුවන් යානය එසේ වෛද්‍ය ආධාර තොගය රැගෙන කටුනායක ගුවන් තොටුපළ වෙත පැමිණ තිබේ.


Copyright © 2025 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress