Ranil’s Indianization project and the new constitution

April 29th, 2017

BY DR. DAYAN JAYATILLEKA

While the Ramayana narrative makes clear that a land link between India and Lanka was of decisive and devastating strategic consequence for the island of Lanka, the Romans and the British made it clear that the building of roadways was an essential part of annexation and empire building. What is true of imperialismsgone by is true of contemporary regional sub-imperialisms. Prime Minister Wickremesinghe has discussed a highway linking India and Sri Lanka, and more accurately Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka’s Northern Province, in his meeting with Indian Minister of Highways Nitin Gadkari. The PM has also invited India to build highways in Sri Lanka’s North and East, linking Mannar and Vavuniya, and Mannar and Trincomalee.

DS Senayaka used the British connection – and the contentious Citizenship acts–to balance off India and minimize Indian influence on the island. SWRD and Sirimavo Bandaranaike sought to dilute Indian influence by immersing Sri Lankan in Afro-Asianism and the Non Aligned Movement. JR Jayewardene played North India off against Tamil secessionism and Tamil nadu. Premadasa played Tamil secessionism against Indian expansionism/annexationism. Lakshman Kadirgamar and then Mahinda Rajapaksa strove to “Look East”, and use China to balance off India and the US.

What was common to all of Sri Lanka’s leaders was to rightly regard as the worst case scenario, a nexus between India, Tamil nadu and Sri Lanka’s Tamil North. Prime Minister Wickremesinghe has overturned all that. He has openly called for Sri Lanka’s economy to be linked with five South Indian states Indian states including Tamil nadu, and he is giving India a large foothold in Trincomalee and the island’s North in general, through highway building and economic projects. He is also hell-bent on signing ETCA which will allow greater penetration of the whole Sri Lankan economy by India.

I have not heard of nor can I think of a worse act of treachery by any Sri Lankan leader nor indeed any leader anywhere in the world today, and possibly during my lifetime (apart from perhaps Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam).

What is vital is to see the connection between this Indianization project and the proposal for a new Constitution.

The jury has been in on the question of the executive presidency as a system, for quite a long time. The evidence in favor is massive and incontrovertible. The question then is who wants us to abolish it and why.

The two most successful countries in the world are the USA and China, so much so that some refer to them as “G-2’, which means group of 2, and is a funny riff on the G-7. Both countries have executive presidential systems.

The most powerful and significant countries in the world are the Five Permanent members of the UN Security Council. Of the five, four have executive presidential systems: US, China, Russia, and France. Only Britain does not.

The fastest growing zone of the world economically is East Asia. Most, though not all countries in that region have executive presidential systems: China (including Taiwan), Vietnam, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines.

The continent of the Americas, both North and South, is enveloped by executive presidencies from the USA through Cuba to the rest of Latin America. The sole exception is Canada.

Nelson Mandela chose the Presidential system for South Africa.

So, on a world scale, it is obvious that most countries, and certainly the most important ones, have opted for the executive Presidential system whatever the respective ideologies of those societies and governments. Whatever the ideological contrasts and swings between and within societies, these countries have opted for the executive Presidency.

Furthermore, no country which opted for an executive Presidency has opted to reverse that choice and go for a parliamentary system. If at all—as in Turkey- countries opt to move to an executive presidency, and some even to remove term limits– Nicaragua, Venezuela.

All of this attest to the superiority of the executive presidency as system. If the criticism is of the working of the executive presidency in Sri Lanka, then that is quite obviously not evidence of the need to abolish the system. It is evidence of the need for reform, through amendments, of the system and within the system.

Indeed that has been attempted by the 19th amendment, which should be given a chance to work for at least a decade, preferably with different governments.

Let us then examine the evidence with respect to Sri Lanka. When we had a parliamentary system we had low economic growth, Sinhala only in 1956, the first race riots of 1958, the assassination of a Prime Minister, a coup attempt in 1962, a violent insurrection in 1971, the conversion of an ethno regional party to separatism in 1976, the founding of the Tiger movement in 1976 and the commencement of a Thirty Years War in the 1970s.

With the executive presidency we had high growth, maintaining approximately 5% even in wartime. We absorbed a foreign intervention and reversed it, won civil wars in South and North, defeated the world’s most powerful terrorist army, regained our territorial integrity, national sovereignty and territorial unity (borders), retained our multiparty democratic system and had successive elected governments, and had a postwar economic recovery which gave us the highest growth rate in Asia outside of China. By contrast, even the USA, the world sole superpower, has been unable to militarily defeat terrorism in any one of its ongoing wars. The Greater Middle East is a junkyard of wrecked states and societies. Sri Lanka by contrast is not a failed state, it is a successful one, which has passed many tests, each of which other states have failed.

The executive presidential system has been an important factor in our success. It has proven its superiority is ensuring relatively high economic growth and in the crucial matter of decision making in “extreme situations” –of a sort that most societies are faced with in today’s world due to terrorism and economic crisis, and this island would never be free from anyway, given our attractive geopolitical and geostrategic location and attendant vulnerabilities.

As for the nexus between instability, low economic growth and the parliamentary model on the one hand, and stability, high economic growth and the executive Presidency on the other, the case was made in 1966 by JR Jayewardene and proved by the evidence (listed above) of subsequent decades. JR Jayewardene’s thinking was heavily influenced not only by the American model but more so by that of General Charles de Gaulle who introduced the system to France in 1958 as a bulwark against the kind of internal instability and external vulnerability that had made that great country a victim. This is why Emeritus Professorof Political Science, AJ Wilson was correct when he defined the Jayewardene constitution of 1978 as ushering in “The Gaullist system in Asia”. This system has served us well, and France certainly does not want to dispose of it, as we see in the latest elections.

Who then wants to dispose of the executive presidency in Sri Lanka and to what end, with what probable result?

It is Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe who has tried several times to be elected President but has failed and knows his best shot is at a Prime Ministership with executive power; Madam Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga who knows she cannot be reelected President but wants a system where she can play Sonia Gandhi to someone else’s Manmohan Singh; the TNA which prefers a weak centre which cannot control the Northern Provincial Council; and those who want to prevent Gotabhaya Rajapaksa from being elected president in 2019 and proving a worthy successor to the strong, ‘developmentalist-modernizing’ Presidencies of JR Jayewardene, Ranasinghe Premadasa and Mahinda Rajapaksa– presidencies which were akin to the East Asian model.

It is now clear what the regime change of January 8th 2015 (or ‘democratic revolution’ as some silly folk would have it) was all about: India, or more correctly, the US-India-Japan axis, securing through a puppet Prime Minister, the strategic prize of Trincomalee as part of its competition with China and Russia in the Asia–Pacific region and especially the Indian Ocean.

This is what the new Constitution and the call for the abolition of the executive Presidency is about:(a) Securing the permanent possession of Trincomalee by empowering the Tamil-majority Northern and Eastern Provinces as a buffer, and rendering the area eminently detachable in a Cyprusization move and (b) strengthening the puppet Prime Minister by transferring executive power to him.

Let’s all vote on it, shall we?

The snake that swallows its own tail!

April 29th, 2017

By Dr. Ranil Senanayake Courtesy The Island

While the stench of the Meethotamulla tragedy is still in the air and while the politicians and their advisors are scurrying around pointing fingers, it is time for us to take to task those corrupt persons who issue EIA’s to facilitate any dirty business. A Government that voluntarily accepts to get environmental clearance for actions that will affect the populace, just to please ‘investors’ or to freethem from their obligations, is a government that is robbing our safety of its citizens for short-term gain.

Now that it is obvious that the ‘assurances’ given to the population of Meethotamulla, only brought disaster and loss, it is time to re-visit the ‘Port City’ and the assurances that this nation has received. In September 2015, the following observation was made in the national media. It asked for the sections of the EIA that dealt with the impact on air quality, water availability, power production and garbage disposal from this Port City. Of course there was not the slight response from the Ports Authority representing the Government of Sri Lanka, just an assurance that it was safe.

With the huge, highly consumptive population that is suppose to people these new high rises, the current garbage crisis will be increased exponentially and it is not the dwellers of these new cities and megapolises who will have to die under garbage mounds, it will be those unfortunate poor,living in the areas with least political power. The question that was posed to the promoters of the Port City in 2015 was this; “we are alreadychoking in our garbage, will Colombo be the repository of garbage for the new city?” There is no provision for garbage disposal other than to say that the government will deal with it. We all know now how the government deals with it!With this new city with no responsibilities nor obligations to us, must we say goodbye to the old city now destined to come a slum of the new city?

The other factor ignored by the creators of the EIA for the port city was our right to breathable air. The medical studies on the city of Colombo indicate that over 50% of the citizens living there suffer some degree of respiratory problems. This statistic is a consequence of the quality of air that we have to breathe. The air quality though poor is kept reasonable fresh, by the input of air from the ocean.

Constructing a multi storey barrier to the clean ocean breeze that Colombo currently enjoys, will be shut it off any fresh air entry forever. In its place Carbon monoxide, Ozone, dust and PM2.4 will increase. There is no reference at all in the port city project documents available to us that addresses blocking the inflow of fresh air into Colombo. There is nothing in the documents that indicate the levels of Carbon monoxide, PM2.4, Oxides of Sulfur and Nitrogen that will be produced by the port city. There are no studies to indicate how these pollutants will flow and if they will affect the citizens of Colombo.

Given our recent experiences at Meethotamulla, one has to be very cautious of the permissions and permits that they issue. The EIA on the port city demonstrates the partiality of the government towards the ‘investors’ against the interests of the citizens of this nation.

The guiding principles for its formulation of the SEIA for the Port City states:

“(b) The Terms of the Agreement entered into between the Ministry of Ports and Shipping, acting on behalf of the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL), and CHEC Port City Colombo (Pvt) Ltd (the Project Company), … stipulates inter alia that the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA)/GOSL is responsible for securing the required environmental permits and approvals.”

Such an undertaking by the GoSL can be seen to be in direct violation of its responsibilities under Article 27 subsection 14 (of the Constitution):

“The State shall protect, preserve and improve the environment for the benefit of the community.”

This means that when the Government of Sri Lanka agrees to get all the approvals that Parliament of Sri Lanka has set up to protect its citizens and preserve their rights,it is like a snake swallowing its own tail !

As the Government has agreed to supply the water to the new city, there is no indication as to where the water to run this city will come from. We all knowthat water is becoming harder to access due to the decreasing availability of water in the Kelani watershed. With our Government agreeing to provide water without stipulating where it will obtain the water from, at a time of a competitive demand for water between the new city and Colombo, it is not hard to guess who will get it, Colombo will have to get used to having fewer baths.

Then there is the question of power; will Sri Lanka have to suffer the health ill effects of fossil carbon-fired power plants to supply the new city with its needs? Is this the reason that there is such eagerness to build more and more polluting power plants?

If we leave the obtaining of environmental safeguards from the port city project only to the government the price that we will have to pay is obvious. Even at this late stage, there must be a strong public voice. We must ensure that the Phase 2 EIA is conducted properly and examine any construction on the reclaimed land done without the phase 2 EIA

Phase 2 EIA: Construction of the buildings and infrastructure of the Port City. This EIA study will be based on the concept master plan and infrastructure requirements submitted to the UDA (and described in this SEIA in Chapter 2). The construction of permanent structures/built environment on the landfill will take place only upon receiving necessary approvals for the Phase 2 EIA study.

To begin any activity stipulated above without the phase 2 EIA, would mean a contravention of the law. Meethotamulla is the illustration of the price to pay when officials become corrupt and subvert the law. Let us await the Phase 2 EIA for the port city and keep a close eye on the goings on at the landfill.

නීරෝ – අසමසම සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරු

April 29th, 2017

තිස්ස රවීන්ද්‍ර පෙරේරා

යුද හමුදාවේ අසමසම සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරු ලෙස (ස්නයිපර්) කොටි ත්‍රස්තවාදයට එරෙහිව සුවිශේෂ සේවාවක් ඉටුකරමින් වන්නි අවසන් සටනේ පුදුමාතලන්හි දී දිවිපිදූ කෝප්‍රල් රංජිත් ප්‍රේමසිරි හෙවත් නීරෝ කළ සේවය අගයමින් නීරෝගේ මව වන රීටා ප්‍රනාන්දු මහත්මිය වෙත ආනමඩුව ගම්උදාව භූමියේ ඉඩමක නිවසක් ඉදිකර දීමට නිවාස අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතා කටයුතු යෙදුවේය.

නිවාස සංවර්ධන අධිකාරිය සතු ඉඩමක මෙම නිවස ඉදිකිරීම සඳහා රුපියල් ලක්ෂ පහක මුදලක් ඇස්තමේන්තු ගත කර ඇති අතර ඊට අදාළ ලියකියවිලි අමාත්‍ය සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාස මහතා විසින් නීරෝගේ මව වෙත භාර දී ඇත.

2009 අප්‍රේල් 28 දා පුදුමාතලන් ආරක්ෂක වළල්‍ලේ දී දිවි පුදන විට නීරෝ යුද හමුදා ප්‍රහාරක සේනාංකවල ඉදිරි ගමනට විශිෂ්ට සම්පතක් වූයේ ඔහුගේ ස්නයිපර් අවියෙන් ත්‍රස්තවාදීන් 217ක් පමණ අවසන් ගමන් යවා තිබූ නිසාය. ස්නයිපර් පුහුණුව ලත් ඉලක්ක වෙඩික්කරුවන් අතළොස්සක් අතරින් වන්නි සටනේ ඉලක්ක සොයා යන්නට ඉලක්ක වෙඩික්කරු පුහුණු පාස‍ලේ සේනාවිධායක එවකට කර්නල් සංජය වනසිංහ සටන් බිමට ගෙනගිය දක්ෂ වෙඩික්කරුවකු ලෙස නීරෝට තැනක් ලැබුණේය.

කෝප්‍රල් රංජිත් ප්‍රේමසිරි
(නීරෝ)

තිදරු පියකු වූ 41 හැවිරිදි නීරෝ දිවි පුදන්නට මාසයකට පෙර මෝටාර් ප්‍රහාරයකින් තුවාල ලබා පැමිණ තුවාල හොඳ වන්නට පෙර සටන් පෙරමුණට ගියේ ඔහුට දියතලාවට ගොස් සම්පූර්ණ සුවය ලැබෙනතුරු ඉන්නැයි කර්නල් වනසිංහ දුන් අවස්ථාවද ලබා නොගනිමිනි.

අන්තිම සටනේ කොඩිය දානකොට මම එහේ ඉන්න ඕනෑ යැයි කියමින් අප්‍රේල් 21 දා යළි සටන් බිමට පැමිණ පුදුමාතලන්හි කොටින්ගේ ප්‍රාණ ඇපකරුවන් ලෙස තබාගත් ද්‍රවිඩ ජනතාවට මුවා වී පැමිණෙන කොටි ත්‍රස්තයන් සොයා ඉලක්ක ලබා ගන්නට වූයේ ය.

කොටි ත්‍රස්තයන් සොයා ඉලක්ක ගන්නට සුවිශාල කැපකිරීමක් කළ ඔහු පුදුමාතලන් සටන් පෙරමුණේ දී අප්‍රේල් 28 උදෑසන 6.20 ට අවසන් හුස්ම හෙළන්නේ කොටින්ගේ ඉලක්ක වෙඩික්කරුවකුගේම ප්‍රහාරයකිනි.

සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරුවකු ලෙස සුවිශාල කාර්යභාරයක් කළ නීරෝ වරෙක හමුදා ආරක්ෂක වළල්ල වෙත මරාගෙන මැරෙන ප්‍රහාරයක් එල්ල කරන්නට ආ මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බ ඇඳුම් කට්ටල දෙකක් රැගත් ට්‍රැක්ටරයක් ඈත තියාම නවත්වන්නේ කොටි රියැදුරා හා මරාගෙන මැරෙන බෝම්බකරුවන් මරුමුවට පත් කරවමිනි. එම ප්‍රහාරයෙන් පසුව කොටින්ගේ මරාගෙන මැරෙන ඇඳුම් කට්ටල දෙකද සොයා ගත්තේය. නීරෝ මුල්වරට ජනප්‍රිය වූයේ එම ප්‍රහාරයෙන් පසුවය.

තවත් වරෙක කොටි ත්‍රස්තයන් පුදුකුඩිඉරිප්පු ඉදිරි ආරක්ෂක වළල්ලක් තැනූ බැකෝ යන්ත්‍ර දෙකද විනාශ කළේ නීරෝ ලබාගත් ඉලක්කයකිනි.

සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරුවකු ලෙස වසර නවයක් ලද අත්දැකීම් නිසා දිවිපරදුවට තබා සටන් පෙරමුණේම කටයුතු කළ අතර ඒ වන විට ස්නයිෆර්වරයකු යුද බිමේදී ලබාගත් වැඩිම ත්‍රස්ත ඉලක්ක ගණන වූ ඉලක්ක 217ක් ලබාගෙන තිබුණි.

ආනමඩුව මඩලාන විද්‍යාලයේ ඉගෙනුම ලැබූ වික්‍රමසේකර හිටිහාමිලාගේ රංජිත් ප්‍රේමසිරි හෙවත් නීරෝ 1991 පෙබරවාරි 12 දා යුද හමුදාවට බැඳෙන විට වයස අවුරුදු 22 කි.

යුද හමුදා ස්වේච්ඡා බළසේනාවට බැඳුණු ඔහු 5 වැනි ගජබා රෙජිමේන්තුවට අනුයුක්ත වන්නේ ඉන්පසුවය.

දක්ෂ සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරුවකු ලෙස පුහුණුවන්නට 2000 වසරේ දී ස්නයිපර් පාඨමාලා අංක 08 හදාරන රංජිත් එහිදී නීරෝ යන රටම දන්නා සංකේත නාමයෙන් හැඳින්විණි. විශේෂ බළකා ට්‍රැෆලින් පුහුණුව ප්‍රගුණ වෙඩික්කරු උපදේශක පුහුණුව, සැඟවුණු වෙඩික්කරු පුහුණුව, ඒකක වෙඩික්කරුවන්ගේ පාඨමාලාව ඇතුළු පුහුණුව සාර්ථකව හදාරා වන්නි මානුෂීය මෙහෙයුමේ දී මඩු, මන්නාරම, පරන්තන්, කිලිනොච්චි, පුනරින්, අලිමංකඩ, මුලතිව්, පුදුකුඩිඉරිප්පු ප්‍රදේශවල ක්‍රියාන්විත සඳහා උපරිම සේවාවක් ඉටුකරන්නේ දක්ෂ ඉලක්ක වෙඩික්කරුවකු ලෙසය.
නීරෝ රණබිමේ දැක්වූ දක්ෂතා නිසා වීරවික්‍රම විභූෂණ, රණවික්‍රම, රණශූර පදක්කම්වලටද නිර්දේශ විය.

තිස්ස රවීන්ද්‍ර පෙරේරා
tissaravindra@gmail.com

Note from Editor

අද අප්‍රියෙල් මාසයේ 28 වැනිදායි.
අවසන් සටනේදී එල් ටි ටි ඊ ත්‍රස්තවාදීන් 217 දෙනෙකු සිය ස්නයිපර් ගිනි අවියෙන් වෙඩි තබා මරා දැමුව , යුද හමුදාවේ සැඟවුණු වෙඩිකකරුවකු  වූ කෝප්‍රල් රන්ජිත් ප්‍රේමසිරි, එල්ටීටීඊ ස්නයිපර් වෙඩි ක්කරුවකු අතින් පුදුමාතලන්හිදී මිය ගියේ 2009 යේ අද වැනි දිනකදීය
.මේ සමග අමුණ ඇති ලිපිය මිට පෙර රිවිර පුවත් පතේ නීරෝ හෙවත් රන්ජිත් ප්‍රේමසිරි අරබයා පල වූ වකි.
මෙම ලිපිය ලියු තිස්ස රවින්ද්‍රට හා නීරෝගේ පුහුණුකරු වූ බ්‍රිගේඩියර් සංජය වනසින්හ ට ( 0714220209 ) මම මිට පෙර දිනයකදී කතා කලෙමි. ඔවුන් ගෙන් දැන ගන්නට ලැබුන පරිදි නීරෝගේ දරුවන් දෙදෙනා අද අනාථ වී ඇත්තේ නීරෝගේ බිරිඳ වෙනත් විවාහයක් කරගෙන දරුවන් අත හැර දමා ගොස්  බැවිනි. දරුවන් අද අමාරුවෙන් රැක් බලා ගන්නේ නීරෝගේ මහලු මවය. 
උතුරේ යුද්දය පිළිබඳව ගුවන් විදුලියට වාර්තා කිරීමට පෙරමුණට ගිය පෙර දිනකදී මට නීරෝ මුණ ගැසී තිබුණි.  .

President Sirisena Part 1

April 28th, 2017

Dr Sudath Gunasekara President Mahanuwara Sinhala Bauddha Jestha Puravesiyange Sanvidhanaya and retired Perm Sec to Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranayaka.  27. 4. 2017.

The President Sirisena should immediately take meaningful and effective steps on the following three disastrous and burning issues facing the country right now to liberate this land of the Sinhalese from minority terrorism and retain our Sri Lankan or Sinhala Identity of this Island nation.

I would like to deal with three very crucial and urgent issues the country is facing today in this note, as a proud heir to a 2500 year unique, Sinhala Buddhist heritage  on behalf of the Sinhala Buddhist majority of this country who constitute 75 % of the total population as of today and who were the Autochthonous people who alone are responsible for the great Sinhala Buddhist Civilization (one of the greatest in the world) in this Island Nation from the 6th Century BC to date but whose present day leaders have miserably failed to restore the legitimate and due place to them even after 70 years of self-rule since the British colonial rulers left this country in1948.

In part 11 of this article to be followed I will deal with a wider range of demands.

The three issues are

1Agitation by Tamils and Muslims to withdraw military and other Armed forces from North and East and returning land armed forces are occupying in the North and the East and Mannar area.)

2 Agitation by Tamils and Muslims against the Government declaring certain forest areas as reservations and sanctuaries in the north and east and in Mannar District particularly by the Gazette Notification of 24 March 2017 declaring four forest areas north of the Wilpattu sanctuary as reserves

3 Vandalizing ancient Buddhist Monuments, Encroaching on Temple land donated to Buddhist temples by the ancient Kings in the yore for their sustenance and protesting against restoring and rehabilitation of ancient religious monuments in the Northern and Eastern Provinces  jointly by Tamil and Muslim politicians and even media men and women and activists of the two ethnic groups like Sulochana Ramiah Mohan and Muslims vandalism against Buddhist places even in the interior of the country, (for example in Kuragala and Katarantenna in Mawanella area).

The Government of this country headed by President Sirisena should immediately take effective steps to arrest this invasion and colonization of this Sinhala Buddhist Land by Malabar slaves brought by the Portuguese, Dutch and the British from the late 17th century up to1948 to work initially on their Tobacco lands in the Northern and Eastern Provinces and later by the British to work as indentured labour on coffee and Tea plantations in the Central hill country that had been covered with primordial virgin forest from the time it’s physiography was formed billions of years ago providing the main source of all rivers on this Island and remained untouched by humans, jealously protected by Kings and the subjects alike until the British vandals completely destroyed it to give room for their plantations as a major component of colonial exploitation.

Also the President must act immediately against minority terrorism by Tamils and Muslims against the Native Sinhalese and take immediate steps to stop illicit immigrations, from south India and Maldives and some Arabian countries aided and abetted by Tamil and Muslim politicians, and restoring the original demographic situation in the country that was their using the 1981 Census as the base line as a first step. It is his bounded duty to protect the Sinhala Buddhist legacy as he is the President of not only 1.3 % m Tamils and Muslims who had voted him, about whom he often speak but also the President of 75 % of Sinhalese Buddhists (4.7 M UNP &5.8 M SLFP votes)

Referring to the right of the armed force to be there in the North and East, first of all it must be clearly stated that in the Sinhale Kingdom all land in the country belonged to the King. Today the King has been replaced by a Government headed by a President periodically elected by the people with all the authority to govern the country. Security of a country whether in the past or today is its main responsibility. It involve defense against foreign invasion and internal rebellion today more appropriately called terrorism and maintaining law and order to protect the State and people for which it need to maintain the armed forces. In the process the Government has the power to place them in any place in any form at any given time to suit the needs of the hour. No citizen has a right to question the State on this authority of the Government. Once the Government locates them at selected stations no man or woman has a right to question that. Public security and the security of the country, is paramount over personnel  rights.

Since all land in the north and the East or any other place, in the country belongs to the State the Government as the instrument of the State has the full legal authority to station any contingent in any place it wants. As such it is the Government that decides the location and not the local people. Furthermore the Government also has the full authority to acquire any land or building situated anywhere in within its territory it wants at any time for security reasons or a  public purpose.

So my question is as to why the Government cannot tell this to the mad communal Tamils and Muslim racist politicians like Wignesvaran and Sambandan who think no end of themselves and take action against trouble makers within its legitimate powers.

Second, it must also be said that the same argument holds good for the allegations made against land declared as wild life sanctuaries or reserved forests as well. The government can declare any forest or land within its territory for a public purpose and declare as strictly forbidden for people to enter or do any activity. It can also be for other objects as well for example protection of watersheds like in the Central hill country above a certain elevation like 5000 feet msl, and over 60 % slope to protect soil erosion, a given area to protect endangered flora and fauna as a wild life sanctuary, a coastal belt against sea erosion, any place or land for religious reason or security reasons etc. So no one has a right to question that either.

Third, here lies the heritage of a unique nation founded, fostered and protected against invasions from India and the western colonial powers. These places and cultural treasures have been preserved at very high cost paying a heavy toll where tens of thousands patriotic native people, all Sinhalese, have died in battle, some even brutally murdered by sword, bullet and fire and sometimes even using poison by the invaders like Portuguese in late17th century and by the British in 1818 and 1848.

Once these treasures are destroyed they are gone forever and the heritage is lost for humanity. You can never replace or rediscover. The imprint of the national identity of a great nation is lost due to the vandalism committed by a set of uncivilized ungrateful set of communal barbarians.

Here I must clearly say that no Government or present day politician will take a decision to stop this vandalism as long as they depend on the vote of these minority groups. Even the President, though he has got about 1.2m minority votes both Tamil and Muslim put together he should have polled at least 5 million Sinhala votes out of the 6.2m, he polled at the 2015 Jan.  But he has openly and repeatedly declared several times that 90 % of Tamils and Muslims voted him and therefore he is under obligation and it is his avowed duty to fulfill the aspirations of the Tamils and Muslims conveniently forgetting the nearly 5 m Sinhalese who  voted him. This clearly shows that he has betrayed the Sinhala voter. His feeling for the minorities easily understood as it was the minority which was the critical factor in his victory. But my question is how can, he make it an excuse to betray 10.8 m sons of the soil (UNP and JVP 5 m and 5.8 m SLFP). It is a tragedy that he never realizes this crime.  Although the critical factor of his victory was the minority vote the stark fact is that in the final analysis it was the anti-Sinhala anti-Buddhist UNP block vote that brought victory for him.

Going by the history of UNP from its inception as a political party in1948 throughout it has betrayed the Sinhala nation and the country Sinhale, together with Buddhism.  The very fact that the fathers of the UNP in 1948 accepted the presence of many nations in this country when they accepted the party name UNP which implies that there are many nations and their failure to restore the name of this country, that is Sinhale- that was handed over to the British in 1815 to start with clearly prove that they are not patriotic.  They also changed the National flag handed down from the Kandyan Kingdom with two strips to accommodate Tamils and Muslims in 1952.

The case of the neglect of the Kandyan peasants and the special treatment given to Estate Tamils afterwards which continues to date is a classic example for this lack of any feeling for the Sinahala nation or the motherland on the part of the UNP. That may be why some people have appropriately named it as the ‘Un-Patriotic Party’.

1 It gave Citizenship to all Estate Tamils by the JR/Rajiv Accord of 1987

2 Made Tamil also an official Language of Sri Lanka

3 Gave Estate Land first at 10 perches to each Tamil labour family just before the 2015 General election

4 Now Ranil Wickramasinha has promised to give 2 Acres per family from the tea estates. This will be made 2 acrers for each Indian Estate Tamil at the end.

5 3 Cabinet  Ministries and 3 Ministers for the Estate Tamils under this Government

6 Housing and Infrastructure facilities like roads, Hospitals, schools with Government funds, Indian aid, foreign aid and International NGOOs for them.

7 A special Authority set up for implementing a urgent 10 year (2105-2025) infra-Structure development programme for these people with foreign aid the government has to pay back that will fall on the heads of 75 % of the Sinhala people as well.

However no action has been taken at all to alleviate the problems of Kandyan Peasants in spite of the Kandyan Peasantry Commission Report of 1951 (Chaired by N.E Weerasooriya QC) recommending an Special Development Authority with special power and resources including a cess on the tea Industry and  a tax on Industries carried out in those areas to be set up under the Prime minister to be headed by a Permanent Secretary up to date.

Even the toothless C grade sleeping Kandyan Peasantry Department set up 1958 was closed down on Jan 1914.

(Please read the attachment for further details on the plight of the Kandyan Peasants)

It also betrayed the country’s economic and strategic interests by giving 10 oil Tanks in from Trico and the oil distribution to IOC in 2002 and put the country to a very dangerous situation by handing over storing and distribution of fuel to our adversary India, thus pausing a severe threat to the security of the country.

This is why I address this note to President Sirisena, as he had cut his political teeth in the SLFP that is more patriotic and national minded than any other political party in this country, may be with the only exception of MEP, though I have my doubts as he has already got converted to be a better UNP man or at least a stooge and a puppet of the UNP   under Ranil Wickramasinha carrying out his orders under the Indian imperialists and western dictates.

SLFP is more patriotic

Generally speaking since SLFP on the other hand is more patriotic the only hope people had was the SLFP.  Whatever is said and done President Sirisena being a child of the SLFP has a bounden duty to keep to the political vision of the founders of this party if he has a soul and a thing called conscience. He also should not forget the fact that a substantial number of SLFP votes also have contributed towards his victory on Jan 2015. As such he cannot stay deaf, bling and dumb till the country and the nation is invaded by foreign interests and it is laid before the altar of Indian Empire by Ranil and UNP that has a permanent black record in history of betraying the Sinhalese and the Buddhist traditions and values of this country right through history as from 1948.

Therefore he must take immediate action to stop Ranil and his gang of unpatriotic politicians like Rajita Senaratna, Ravi Karunanayka, Champika Ranawaka and Mangala Samaraweera from destroying this country by selling it to India and other countries and dancing according to the tune of the West.

If he does not do that I have no doubt Sinhala Buddhist masses led by Buddhist monks, as it was the tradition in this country in the past will soon surround his mansion and demand him go home and if he doesn’t he might be dragged out and put in the dust bin of history.

The whole country know the incurable avenging desire he has in him against MR. But as a true Buddhist as he says, he should have heard the celebrated Dhammapada verse ‘Nahiverena Verani Sammantida Kudachanam”  Therefore he must be magnanimous enough at least now to forget the past in the name of the country and reconcile and get together with MR to save the country. I hope he will rise up to the occasion in the name of the country and the Sinhala nation before giving priority to all other petty considerations and rise up to the occasion as a Great Leader

I can vouch for certain, though I am not a soothsayer, going by my past experience, that his present the foolish programme of going round a spree of appointing third grade yes men by removing seasoned and popular local SLFP leaders who are with MR is not only digging his own grave but also the mass grave of his own mother party that has given him political life, fed and nursed him for nearly fifty years. I warn him to be in readiness to sing the swan song and the elegy of the SLF, if he is not prepared to reconcile with his former boss and go back to the old home. I must also warn him, whether he likes it or not that this is the end of his political carrier.

As first step in my view he should immediately recall all seasoned and popular leading SLFP organizers whom he has already sacked and stop appointing unknown raw men as District and electoral Organizers and immediately resign from the President ship of SLFP so that he can satisfy himself saying that he is the President of all Sri Lankans, whether they are UNP. SLFP or any other P. Thereafter he can call off the May day rally at Getambe in Mahanuwara to publicly announce this historic message to the nation in the name of the future of the country, the Sinhala Nation and the Samma Sambuddha Sasana .That is the only way available for him to avoid this great political catastrophe that is in the making in the country and to avoid his being thrown in to the Dustbin of History” He must also remember that whether he  has his may day at Getambe or not it is not going to make any difference. If he go ahead with it in the first place it will be an utter flop as most of the SLFP voters will go to Gall face and not a single UNP man will come there and all Tamils and Muslims except the political lackeys will go Hyde park. The only official SLFP people he will get will be those Ministers who gnaw the bones falling from the Sirisena table. It will have only negative effects on all future elections. Perhaps he will see the true colours of his position as the SLFP leader in him. The way things are gathering momentum all over the country he might have to very soon witness the day when this Government comes to a total stand still.

I am of cause an insignificant human soul neither the past nor the incumbent President or any other big man will ever take seriously. But no one should forget that it was an unknown tiny naked tot by the roadside in the olden days who finally said the ‘King is naked’ when all his stupid purohitas, the whole lackeys and yes men in the Cabinet and even his chief Queen had said that the King was wearing the most expensive and beautiful clothe (Setambara patasaluwa) in the whole world, when he was actually riding the elephant fully naked’

“The Emperor’s New Clothes” is an old parable about two crafty weavers who promised a foolish Emperor a new suit of clothes that is the most beautiful in the whole world but say it is invisible to fools and who are unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent, deceived the Emperor for a tiny sum having got the foolish king to erect a huge hall to weave that cloth and keep them fed for a long time with lavish food and finally bolted away before the Emperors display procession started.

When the Emperor paraded the streets on a caparisoned elephant before his subjects in his new clothes”, every one blessed him Jayasri  maharajaneni, pasvan dahasakata buduwenta Jayasri”. No one dared to say that they don’t see any suit of clothes on him for fear that they will be seen as fools “unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent”. Finally, a mall child by the roadside cried out, he isn’t wearing anything at all!” after which everybody started shouting and thereafter the Emperor having realized the truth returned to the palace in shame.

That foolish Emperor never understood the trick played by the weavers. This is why the celebrated epic Mahabharata has said that all Kings by nature are all ways deaf, dumb and blind’. I must say that it is a timeless universal truth.

This is an admonition that has to be given by the Mahasangha led by Mahanayaka Theras of this country to the President. That was the time honoured great tradition in this country.  We all know that, that was how this country had been saved and ruled in its entire 2500 years of illustrious history.

But how can you expect that to happen when we have political Mahanayaka Theras as the chief prelate of Malwatta, supposed to be the Head Quarters of Buddha Sasana in this country and the Head Quarters of the Thervada Sect in the whole world, who always defend Ranil the traitor as the savior and modern Mosses of Sri Lanka.

That is why finally, knowing fully well the social and religious consequences of saying a thing like this, I decided to give this message to President Sirisena through the press in the name of my country, nation and the Sambuddha Sasana.

 

Trudeau in Photo with Former VP of Terror Group April 26,2017

April 28th, 2017

Ira de Silva London, Ontario

The Editor

National Post

Toronto, Ontario

Dear Sir:

Your news item of Mr. Trudeau,  with a “former” leader of a terror group is a damning indictment on the political leaders of Canada and of the Liberal Party in particular.

Tamil terrorist supporters in Canada funded Tamil terrorism in Sri Lanka for thirty years with Canadian politicians openly assisting them to collect funds. The goals of supporters of the Tamil terrorists remain the same. They continue to use naive, unprincipled politicians to achieve their goals and Canadian politicians support anyone for votes in Canada.

Paul Martin, Maria Minna, and numerous Members of Parliament continually championed the  Tamil  terrorists in Sri Lanka. They have been succeeded by the current leadership who are continuing to make Canada a supporter of terrorism to get votes in Canada while claiming that it is opposed to international terrorism. The consequences of Canada’s support of terrorism did not matter then or now.

Yours truly,Ira de Silva
London, Ontario

WHO ARE THESE NEW NGO NINCOMPOOPS?

April 28th, 2017

Malin Abeyatunge

Refers to a report in your 20th April Island by Shamindra Fenando.

Where were these Aluth parapura dollar crows (dollar kakko) when LTTE committed worst crimes on earth against the innocent civilians of the civil society. May be that none of their kith & kilns, siblings have become victims of the brutal LTTE but thousands and thousands of innocent people became victims. With my due respect to writer Shamindra Ferdinando ( a versatile   patriotic writer on human issues) shouldn’t have given undue prominence to these new NGO pack called Aluth Parpaura without verifying the veracity of their stance against our patriotic ranaviruwo who saved the country from brutal LTTE. These guys behind this NGO pack may be enjoying their freedom without  any bombs exploding in public areas and buildings as in the past  and no fear of any more suicide bombers. For that they should be grateful for our ranaviruwo who have sacrificed their lives and limbs  to save the country from LTTE terrorists.

When Kebithigollawa daylight massacre and Gonagala village massacre to name a few  among thousands of atrocities committed by LTTE where unborn babies by slitting pregnant mothers wombs  were removed and massacred  by LTTE, where were these ALUTH PARAPURA kaakkos?. May be enjoying the warmth of their mothers’ laps.

There may be an invisible hand who is supporting these pack and find out more information of the people behind this latest NGO pack as to who is financing them , may be Tamil Diaspora like Global Tamil Forum as we know the popular Sri Lanka NGOs are thriving  on dollars from countries like Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and of course GTF.

Various comments made by this new pack is a carbon copy of those NGOS who have been supporting LTTE while in action and now teaming up with GTF in Geneva.

Malin Abeyatunge

India Tells Sri Lanka: You Can Take Your Port And Shove It

April 28th, 2017

https://www.forbes.com/sites/wadeshepard/2017/01/21/india-tells-sri-lanka-take-your-trincomalee-deep-sea-port-and-shove-it/#58d40c5b5f88

Last Wednesday, January 18th, Sri Lanka’s minister for regional development, Sarath Fonseka, told journalists at a conference in New Delhi that terms were being discussed to give Sri Lanka’s northeastern Trincomalee port to India. Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe reportedly vouched for the veracity of the remarks on the sidelines of Davos. But by Friday India was denying them, stating that they had no interest in taking on a fledgling port that wouldn’t be profitable for a very long time.

Sri Lanka, an island nation at a strategic location in the Indian Ocean, has gotten into the habit of offering its sea ports to larger economic powers who have the financial clout to properly develop them. The talk about Trincomalee port being developed by India was intended to be a geopolitical counterbalance to Sri Lanka recently handing over of 80% of its Hambantota port to China for 99 years — a move which New Delhi wasn’t particularly enamored with.

Sri Lanka is currently attempting to stem the momentum of becoming viewed as a Chinese outpost of progress. In addition to the new Hambantota port going to China, plans are underway for China to be given a long-term lease on 15,000 acres of land in Hambantota for an industrial zone, a $1.4 billion, 269-hectare new financial district is being built by a Chinese company with Chinese money in Colombo (110 hectares of which will be granted to China for 99 years), and Colombo’s South Container Terminal is a 35-year Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) arrangement with China Merchants Holdings, the same company that’s taking over the Hambantota port. In addition to this, China currently owns over $8 billion of Sri Lanka’s debt, putting the country at its mercy to an even higher degree.

Being located right next to one another and sharing common historical ties, Sri Lanka and India have always enjoyed close political and economic relations. However, this close relationship has recently been getting strained, as Sri Lanka’s buddying up with China has not sat well with New Delhi, who feels their influence in their own region waning as China encroaches on all sides with major development projects in Bangladesh, Myanmar, the Maldives, and Pakistan, in addition to Sri Lanka.

For China, Sri Lanka is a vital part of its broader international ambitions. The island nation is strategically positioned right between China and its Middle Eastern energy suppliers, and has been positioned as a key financial, administrative, and logistical hub on China’s 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, which seeks to build a string of Chinese-directed maritime operations from Asia to Europe.

Trincomalee port, which was initially developed during WWII as a base by the British Royal Navy, has the deepest natural harbor in all of South Asia and boasts ten times the amount of water and land reserves as Colombo port. However, the full economic sap has yet to be extracted from this place, as it is currently only a smallish port that is being used for the shipment of local commodities, like flour and cement, as well as some random bulk cargo. The ambition here is to develop Trincomalee harbor into a major deep sea port in a region that is currently in need of them, as well as a 175 square kilometer luxury tourism zone. The problem is that Sri Lanka is currently in a severe debt crisis and doesn’t have the money to carry out this project on its own, so they’ve been pursuing potential international investors to step in where they fall short — which is where India comes in.

The offer of Trincomalee port to India was a move designed to offset India’s very outspoken reservations about the amount of Chinese economic and political power that is being consolidated right off their coastlines. To salve India’s fears that some of these Chinese projects could someday have military implications, Sri Lanka attests that they are not partial to any one country in particular when it comes to investment and are willing to do business with a wide array of potential suitors — be they from India, the USA, Japan, Singapore, or China. India was never overtly excluded from any major Chinese-led development project in Sri Lanka, and for some, such as Colombo Financial City, the Hambantota port, and the projected Hambantota industrial zone, they have actually been invited in.

While India has shown inclinations to invest large amounts of money in Sri Lanka — just a few months ago India’s Commerce and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced that they would be pumping $2 billion into Sri Lankan infrastructure development — they haven’t exactly jumped right in to make good on this offer. India has its own infrastructure challenges at home, they have a dire need to modernize their own ports, and taking on Sri Lanka’s port at Trincomalee does not appear to be on their near-term to-do list.

I’m the author of Ghost Cities of China. I’m currently traveling the New Silk Road doing research for a new book. Follow by RSS.

SB says President was joking…..

April 28th, 2017

ආරක්‍ෂක බලතල ෆොන්සේකාට
දෙන්න ජනපති පැවසුවේ විහිළුවට 

– ඇමැති එස්‌. බී. දිසානායක

SB says President was joking…..

We have a King and a bunch of court Jesters? It is high time that such statements  are only made by the President himself following consultations with the \prime minister

If President is unwilling to go to history as a Hittorian Suppressor let someone takes over the reins  of managing the anarchy

Please read the article I wrote in 2015

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2015/12/22/needed-a-benevolent-dictator/

Needed: A benevolent dictator
Posted on December 22nd, 2015

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera Courtesy Island

If one looks at history, many countries developed under autocratic rule. Sri Lanka, under Sinhala kings, prospered due to strict rules and control of the masses.

Even a private company develops in keeping with the vision of the CEO.

Russia, Iran, Iraq, Libya and especially Oman, developed under dictatorships.

As I have written before, what we need is a benevolent dictator. Under MR, we had autocratic rule, but alleged corruption brought an end to the regime which had discipline, and vision to develop infrastructure despite nepotism etc.

But, today we have no discipline or vision, but a lot of talk and frustration.

I see garbage on roads, encroachments along the roads developed by the previous regime, bribery and corruption, nepotism and greed. We talk about an orange revolution and some have even written books about it, but the country is at a standstill.

We read the newspapers with photographs of farmers in loincloth in Colombo, demanding solutions to their problems.

Time was when farmers did not have to protest. Leaders like Dudley and Premadasa met them in paddy fields. President Maithripala Sirisena is from a farming family. Maybe he does not want to get back to the paddy field!

Let the Prime Minister’s and the President’s Offices be shifted to a place like Muthurajawela so that everyone goes there to demonstrate and Colombo will be free from traffic blocks. Someone has to take over the reins of to lead the masses and trade unions and do something. Otherwise, there will be anarchy.

Dr. Sarath Obeysekera

දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානයේ මැයි රැළිය තලවාකැලේදී

April 28th, 2017

අරුණ රත්නායක

දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානයේ (TPA) මෙවර මැයි දිනය තලවාකැලේ මහජන ක්‍රීඩාංගනයේදී පැවැත්වීමට නියමිතයි.

ඒ අනුව දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානයේ නායක අමාත්‍ය මනෝ ගනේෂන් මහතා, නියෝජ්‍ය නායක අමාත්‍ය පී තිගාම්බරම් මහතා සහ නියෝජ්‍ය නායක රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය වී රාධ ක්‍රිෂ්ණන් මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් මෙවර මැයි දිනය පැවැත්වේ.

එළැඹෙන මැයි 01 දා මැයි දින රැස්වීම ආරම්භ කිරීමට ප්‍රථම තලවකැලේ දමිළ මහා විද්‍යාලය අසල සිට තලවකැලේ මහජන ක්‍රීඩාංගනය දක්වා මැයි දින පෙළපාලියක්ද සංවිධානය කර තිබෙනවා.

දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානය, වැවිලිකරයේ ජීවත්වන ජනතාව උදෙසා විශාල මෙහෙවරක් ඉටුකරන අතර වතු කම්කරුවන්ගේ වැටුප් වැඩිකරගැනීමේ අරගලයෙහි ලා සුවිශේෂී සේවයක් ඉටුකරයි.

කඳුරට නව ගම්මාන යටිතල පහසුකම් හා ප්‍රජා සංවර්ධන අමාත්‍ය පලනි පී තිගාම්බරම් මහතාගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් ලැයිම් කාමර තුළ ජීවත්වන ජනතාව උදෙසා පර්චස් 07 ක හිමිකම් ඔප්පු සහිත වර්ග අඩි 550 ක තනි නිවාස ඉදිකර දීම ඉන් විශේෂ තැනක් හිමිකරගෙන ඇති අතර වැවිලි ප්‍රජාවගේ යටිතල පහසුකම් හා සෞඛ්‍ය නඟාසිටුවීමට හෙතෙම කැපවී කටයුතු කරයි.

එමෙන්ම වැවිලි කරයේ ජීවත්වන ජනතාවගේ අධ්‍යාපනය නඟාසිටුවීම සඳහා අධ්‍යාපන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය වී රාධක්‍රිෂ්ණන් මහතා කටයුතු කරනු ලබන අතර දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානයේ නායක අමාත්‍ය මනෝ ගනේෂන් මහතා වැවිලි ප්‍රජාවගේ ගැටළු සඳහා නිරන්තරයෙන් තම හඬ අවදිකරමින් කටයුතු කරනු ලබයි.

දමිළ ප්‍රගතිශීලී සංධානය මෙහෙයවනු ලබන මෙම මැයි දින රැළියට සහ රැස්වීමට සහභාගීවන ලෙස එම සංධානය ජනතාවට ආරාධනා කරයි.

අරුණ රත්නායක

ගරු අමාත්‍යතුමාගේ මාධ්‍ය ලේකම්

 

Sri Lanka’s loss – Australia’s gain

April 28th, 2017

By Dr. Tilak S. Fernando

During the last week’s Sinhala and Tamil New Year ‘Nonagathe‘ period I stopped all work, in conforming to the centuries old Sinhala traditions prevalent in our society where the majority still observes with deep respect and follow such customs with profound emotion. Next, I picked up a book from my home library titled ‘Cousins written by a Sri Lankan intellectual who was attached to the School of English, Linguistics and Media in Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia.

Cousins’ is a fiction based on a female character (Amitha) spanning over four decades of her life’s experiences since her father’s demise, concentrating on realities of real life. Focusing on Amitha’s university days at Peradeniya, the author gives a comprehensive insight to the gulf between the ‘exclusive‘ type and the ‘Vidyalaya‘ kind of students, thus exposing the difference between the two groups – a true reality in Sri Lankan society.

As an arts graduate, Amitha becomes influenced by her deep feelings for the poor and disgusted with the recurring social injustices. This automatically draws her into a destructive social revolution between the under-privileged and the elite. Although she detests violence, yet, her sympathies go beyond her convictions towards its cause simultaneously. The author combines and projects this particular chaotic social and political phase linking with the infamous unrest between the privileged and the under privileged classes during 1972 and in 1982 in Sri Lanka.

Cousins’ is a mixture of fiction interwoven with Sri Lankan history. The Macquarie Light House Press published the book posthumously in 1999 (Macquarie University) as a tribute to her literary work after she became a victim of the terminal disease – bone cancer – in 1998. Her sister in London, Suranganie Fernando, invested on its second edition and got the book published by Sarasavi Publishers, Nugegoda in 2004, proceeds had been donated to the cancer charity in memory of her sister.

Early life

Chitra Fernando was born in Kalutara South to Arthur Fernando, a practising lawyer in Kalutara and Olive Fernando in 1935. Her early schooling commenced at Balika Vidyalaya, Kalutara, subsequently in Bandarawela and finally at Visakha Vidyalaya where her mother, Olive Fernando, was the matron at the boarding school. From Visakha she joined the University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, and graduated in 1959 with an Honours degree in English. After a brief career as an English lecturer at Visakha Vidyalaya, she worked as a temporary Assistant Lecturer in the Literature Department of the University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, until she was awarded a scholarship to the Sydney University, in 1961, where she achieved her MA status.

With much hope and enthusiasm she returned to Sri Lanka and joined the Department of Education to serve her people and the country, but murky politics in the Department of Education made her frustrated and disappointed when she was posted to rural area schools to teach English to Central School children with her MA degree! Coincidently, by a stroke of fortune, her professor at the Sydney University, under whom she did her MA degree, was appointed as the Head of the English Department to a new University in Sydney (Macquarie).

Unknown to what was taking place in Sri Lanka; the professor contacted her offering her a position in the English Language Department, Linguistic, on her merits. It was the moment that Sri Lanka’s loss became a gain to Australia, when Chitra Fernando decided to bid goodbye to Sri Lanka. Her individual case was only the tip of the iceberg as far as the brain drain was concerned from Sri Lanka on roller coasters over the decades, due to political skullduggery in Sri Lankan administrations on the intellectuals and professionals.

In Australia

In Australia she became well known, accepted and admired internationally as a female writer and critic from Sri Lanka with her unembroidered contributions to worldwide journals. Throughout her career she published wide and varied literary pieces catering for children, adults, as well as to the English orientated academics. The Australian Radio adopted one of her stories in her book titled Kundalani, (a verse play) and broadcast on the National Australian Radio under the name ‘Golden Bird.’

Although she settled down in Australia, out of frustration due to professional harassment during her short career in the Department of Education, she always focussed her writings with a Sri Lankan background and rural names to enrich and uphold the Sinhala literature while living in a foreign land. The plots in her novels and short stories were simple topics woven into fiction with factual experiences driving a broad cultural and/or moral message to the Sri Lankan society.

She published a children’s book series, in collaboration with the Lake House Bookshops in Colombo, under the pseudonym ‘Chitraleka’, always-using rural names and Sri Lankan backgrounds, so that the simple minds could absorb what they read. A typical example could be highlighted as the story titled, ‘A day in Siripala’s life’. These stories were incorporated into books under various titles such as ‘Glass Bangles’, ‘The Adventures of Senerat Bandara’, ‘Bempi Appu’, ‘The Crane and the Crab’ and Kundalani.

Her fiction series included ‘Three women’, ‘Between Worlds’, ‘Women There and Here’,  all of which contained thought-provoking stories such as ‘ Road to Rome’ ‘Umbrella’, ‘Perfection of giving‘, ‘Birds of Paradise‘ etc. Her other cutting-edge publications included ‘An anthology of modern writing from Sri Lanka’ co-edited with Ranjanie Obeysekera.

Dr. Chitra Fernando’s reference book, ‘Idioms and Idiomatacity’ (Oxford University Press Publication – ISBN 0-19-437199-9), which was her thesis for the PhD, aims to explore the functions of idioms, what purpose they fulfill and aims to show how they are used. Her description of English in this book and the conclusions were drawn on material gathered from talk, letters, the media, and literature and academic writings. Throughout her thesis, her aim had been to demonstrate naturally occurring English, arguably also the most idiomatic.

The late Dr. Chitra Fernando used an adaptable and flowing style of writing in her novels, which is easy to read and understand, a remarkable talent for an academic to adopt so as not to overshoot the majority of readers’ heads out of a rich language she was always accustomed to.

Reading Dr. Chitra Fernando’s fiction ‘Cousins‘ once again, not only helped me to kill time during the Nonagathe period, but gave an insight to what I had read about the terror, the killings and the total disruption as to how the general public had been through, which I had not seen or experienced, while I was abroad at the time.

tilakfernando@gmail.com

දෙමලුන්ගේ පට්ට පල් බොරු වලින් සොච්චමක් (මගේ” ජාතියපාවාදීම “” පොතෙන් )

April 28th, 2017

ධර්මසිරි සෙනෙවිරත්න

                              1952  පෙබරවාරි මස ”ටැමිල් කල්චර් ” නම් සඟරාවට  ඥාන ප්‍රගාසර්  පියතුමා  ලියා ඇති ”’ශ්‍රී ලංකාව පටන් ගත්  දා සිටම දෙමලුන්ගේ රටකි ”ය සදහන් වේ එමෙන්ම”” ශ්‍රිලංකාවේ ග්රාමනාම සිය ගණනක් ”ට පෙර සිටම පැ වතී බවත් ඒවා දෙමල බවත් පසුව පැමිණි සිංහලයන් විසින් ඒවා සිංහල බවට හරවා ඇති බවත්  සඳහන් කර ඇත .  1878 දී පලවූ   සැමුවෙල් ජෝන්  නම් දෙමල ක්‍රිස්තියානි  කතුවරයාගේ  ”යාල් පාන චරිත්තිමේ ” ග්‍රන්ථය ඔහුගේ පුතා විසින්  තවත් කොටසක්ද  එකතු කර යලි පල කරන ලදී.  යාල් නම් වීනාව අනුව  යාපනයට එම නම ලැබීම  විජයා ගමනයටද පෙර සිදුවූවක් බව ත්  ඒ කාලයේ එහි සිටි සිංහලයන් අභ්‍යන්තර සතුරන් බවත්  සිංහලයන් මරා දැමීමෙන්  සංකිලි දෙමල ජනයා සුරක්ෂිත කල බවත්  සඳහන් කරය් ..මේ පොත අනුව එලාරද යාපනෙන් ආ රජෙකි ..රාසනායගම් ”එන්ෂන්ට් ජැෆ්නා ”’ ලියමින් යක්ෂ නාග ගෝත්‍රිකයන්  දෙමළුන් බවත්  ඊලාම් යන්න  පැරණි දෙමල භාෂාවක් වූ   එළු  බසින්  බින්දී ආවක් බවත් පවසය් ..සචී පොන්නම් බලම්   සියල්ල විකුර්ති කරමින්, ලංකාවට බුදුසමය හඳුන්වා දෙනවිට  රාජ්‍ය පාලනය කේන්ද්‍ර ගතව තිබුනේ  දෙමල රජවරුන් විසින් ගොඩ නගන ලද  අනුරාධ පුරයේ බවත්  එකල රජ ”දේවානම් පියතීෂන් බවත්  ””ශ්‍රීලංකා  නැෂනල් කොන්ෆ්ලික්ට් ඇන්ඩ්  ටැමිල් ලිබරේෂන් ස්ට්‍රගල් ” හි සඳහන් කරය් . සේනන්  හා කුඩි ක්කන්ද ඉන්පසු එල්ලාලන්  ද (සෙන ,ගුත්තික හා එළාර )   මෙහි රජ කල බවත්  සඳහන් කරන ඔහු  පාලි වංශ කතා කරුවන්  දෙමල ඉතිහාසය  යට පත් කර  සිංහලයන් පමණක් හුවා දක්වන ලද බවත් කියය් .අපේ පාසල් පොත් වලද සීගිරි කාශ්‍යප ”කාසි අප්පන් ” ලෙස දක්වා තිබුනේය .පොල්ජයරාජන් ප්‍රකාශ කලේ සියලු ග්රාමනාම  දෙමලෙන් සිංහලට බිඳගෙන ”’කල්ලුතුරෙය් ”’-කළුතර –ඈ  විසින්  සිංහලයන් දැන් වහරන බවය් . මුළු සිංහල සංස් කෘතියත් බුදු හිමියනුත්  දෙමල යය  ක්රෝසට් තම්  බය්යා  කියය් (((((සිංහල දේශපාලකයෝ සිංහල ඉතිහාසය වලලති  .දෙමලු ඉතිහාසය විකුර්තිකර ලියා උන්ගේ උන්ට උගන්වමින් සිංහලයන් මරන්නට ත්‍රස්තවාදීන්  බිහි කරත 

කරති  …)))))))
(පසුව තව ) 

BlackRock Sovereign Risk Index- Sri Lanka ranks 54 out of 60 countries.

April 28th, 2017

This quarter we have added 10 additional countries to the BSRI, taking advantage of the increasing depth and quality of available data on emerging market economies. The new members are the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Lithuania, Panama, Romania, Serbia, Sri Lanka and Uruguay. The BSRI now spans 89% of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core index and 82% of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified index, as well as major developed economies, providing a common framework of fundamental insights.

Sri Lanka’s weakest score comes in Fiscal Space.

https://www.blackrockblog.com/blackrock-sovereign-risk-indicator/

Sri Lanka makes a mockery of the UN Human Rights Council

April 28th, 2017

by Taylor Dibbert  Courtesy The Washington Examiner

The UN Human Rights Council’s 34th session ended on March 24. Ostensibly, the session was an important moment for Sri Lanka’s coalition government, which is led by President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe. Sri Lanka’s compliance with a previously passed Council resolution (designed to promote human rights and transitional justice) came under review.

Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera addressed the body on Feb. 28 and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, provided a critical assessment of the government’s performance during the session. On March 23, as expected, another cosponsored resolution was passed on Sri Lanka.

But here’s the bottom line: The passage of another resolution on Sri Lanka, the fifth since 2012, should be viewed as a stark reminder – of both the limits of international influence via the Council and that now would be an opportune time for international actors to consider other methods of engagement with the Sri Lankan government.

Colombo’s wide-ranging reform agenda has been stagnating for some time. Nowhere is this truer than when it comes to transitional justice, and building a lasting peace in a country that went through a brutal civil war – fought between Sri Lankan military forces and the separatist Tamil Tigers – from 1983 to 2009.

In a major upset, Sirisena defeated Mahinda Rajapaksa in a January 2015 election. Rajapaksa is still venerated by many ethnic Sinhalese, the majority community, for winning the war. Nonetheless, he put the country on an increasingly authoritarian, corrupt and nepotistic course, which led to his electoral demise.

With the resolution it cosponsored in October 2015, Colombo committed to an expansive transitional justice agenda, including four important mechanisms: a truth commission, a judicial mechanism to deal with alleged wartime abuses and offices to handle both disappearances and reparations. Yet none of those mechanisms are operational. Besides, there are plenty of other moves the government could have already made to prove its sincerity about transitional justice.

Sustained militarization – the military is almost exclusively Sinhalese – throughout the Tamil-dominated northern and eastern provinces remains a major issue. Relatedly, the military’s continued occupation of civilian land is a big problem too. Security sector reform is an important matter that’s being ignored. Based on my recent exchange with a Colombo-based human rights lawyer, fifty to seventy Tamil political prisoners are still being held in various detention centers throughout the country. The government should immediately release all of these individuals or at least bring them to trial.

More generally, Colombo has taken an intransigent approach towards international involvement in the transitional justice process, although a degree of international participation is essential to ensure that the process is credible. Furthermore, the country’s political leadership, including the president and the prime minister, are still not making an articulate case for these reforms.

Transitional justice is in deep trouble and additional scrutiny via the Geneva-based body is unlikely to change that very much. From 2012 to 2014, Rajapaksa categorically rejected three resolutions on Sri Lanka. The Sirisena administration has spent nearly two years basically ignoring a resolution it had cosponsored. For better or worse, the U.S. played an important role in the passage of all five resolutions.

Sri Lanka is making a mockery of the Council. If international actors actually want to keep the pressure on the island nation, they should consider moving beyond nonbinding human-rights resolutions – perhaps by reexamining engagement (diplomatic, military, even economic) at the bilateral level – an admittedly unlikely scenario at present.

For the victims of Sri Lanka’s war, particularly those residing in the country’s war-torn north and east, Sirisena’s ascendance has not resulted in dramatic changes to daily life. And, for the duration of his tenure, that’s probably not going to change. These are inconvenient realities for many, not least because foreign money for transitional justice projects keeps pouring into the country.

Taylor Dibbert, a writer based in the Washington, D.C. area, is affiliated with the Pacific Forum at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The views expressed here are his own. Follow him on Twitter: @taylordibbert.

If you would like to write an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, please read our guidelines on submissions.

Repeating the error of self-inflicted torture

April 28th, 2017

BY MALINDA SENEVIRATNE

Any conflagration and especially one marked by the clash of arms that lasts over several decades can be defined in multiple ways.  For some, the conflict in Sri Lanka, was a matter between the Sinhalese and Tamils.  They call it ‘Ethnic Conflict’.  Others could say that it was a battle between state entities and a terrorist outfit or one between democracy and insurgency.
 
Portrayal is naturally informed by ideological bent and of course, since identity is involved, the play of communal angst often decides the issue of definition.  
 
Emotion typically bests reason in the process.  To the extent that the protagonists were to a large extent identifiable in terms of a particular community and since the conflict was framed emphatically (at least by one party and often by the other) in communal terms, the ‘ethnic’ label is not without logic, although the complexity of it all rebels against such convenient descriptions.  
There could be one area where there’s agreement.  It was a tragedy.  Lives were lost.  Properties were destroyed.  An economy was strangled, development arrested.  People were maimed and displaced.  There was despair and gloom, fear and foreboding. 
Only the obdurate afflicted with strong identity fetishes would claim absolute innocence on behalf of his or her community.  Even if that weren’t the case afflictions of such nature do inform exercises in ‘rational’ apportionment of blame.
One thing that has been left out of the entire ‘in retrospect’ business is the self-inflicted.  Just the other day,  Lord Justice Sales, one of Britain’s most senior judges, in what could be a landmark 22,000-word appeal ruling, has observed that a Sri Lankan had allowed himself to be tortured with iron bars to support his bid to stay in that country.  The court ruled that the man probably consented to the torture as part of a ruse called Self-infliction by proxy” or SIBP to buttress a case for asylum.  
KV, as the claimant is identified, is not a one-off asylum-seeking Tamil from Sri Lanka and neither is Britain the only country where his ilk have applied for asylum.  Asylum seekers are required to submit solid evidence and in a world where the visual dominates testimony inscribed on body can be quite compelling.  There’s enough evidence to prove that ‘torture-marking’ is a lucrative business, run of course by ‘well-meaning’ Tamil expatriates.  There are agencies that ‘take care of things’.  For a price.  And part of that price can be self-inflicting torture.  
An investigation launched by the Sri Lankan military a few years ago unearthed a lot of information regarding the process.  One woman who was asked to follow a ‘rape-script’ to secure asylum in the UK refused because the objective was outweighed by the shame of ‘admitting’ have been raped even if it was just theatre.  Self-respect counted.  In the course of that investigation, it was found that a veritable army of operators were involved in the ‘asylum business’.  
 
There were torture-artists, lawyers who argued ‘torture,’ physicians who would affirm ‘torture’ and handlers who had profiled courts and judges and figured out which were ‘easy’. There still are, apparently.
   
All this could be dismissed as ‘constructed propaganda by the Sri Lankan government’.  At the time, for reasons that had nothing to do with immigration policy or upholding the dignity of judicial processes, the submissions from Sri Lanka were ignored.  Lord Justice Sales, however, is not ‘in the pay of the Rajapaksas’ (as has been the excuse for summary dismissal of such claims).
Britain’s Home Office will have to act, sooner or later, especially in a context where terrorism (a menace selectively spawned, nurtured and apologized for) has secured a kind of residency that was unanticipated but impossible to ignore.  
The relevant question here is this: ‘Why would anyone suffer the shame of lying about being raped or submit him/herself to being torture-inscribed unless he/she believes it is a better option than living in their home country?’  One could argue that the truth or otherwise of torture-claims, submission to such pain is a superior choice to suffering the ‘hurt’ of discrimination.
The key issue is that once a certain threshold of escalation has been crossed the claim is legitimate regardless of who did what to whom and when.  People flee conflict for a reason, to put it simply.  What’s important is to understand that the true self-infliction of torture preceded cases such as the one on which Lord Justice Sales deliberated.  
Let’s ask ourselves some questions to drive home the point.  Who wanted a 50-50 split for a community that made just over one tenth of a total population? Who created and/or played on the nationless-angst of a particular community, drawing inter alia, a nation-map traced on the arbitrary exercises in cartography indulged in by the British? Who interchanged (often inflated) grievance and (ridiculous) aspirations easily and frequently enough to legitimate a demand unsupported by history, archaeology and demography?  When such sentiments as were generated found articulation in an election result in 1977, why did not the Government of the time call for a historical audit?  When extremism reared its ugly head why did successive governments respond with utmost brutality that conflated ‘Tamil’ with ‘Terrorist,’ especially in the 1980s?  
 
Who dropped parippu and effectively postponed by twenty years the eradication of the terrorist menace and therefore paved the way for tens of thousands of deaths and other destruction?  
 
Why did those who claimed to stand for a negotiated settlement give credence to that conflation (which had been un-tangled to a large extent) by legitimating terrorism and ‘conceding’ that the LTTE was indeed the sole representative of the Tamils?  Why wasn’t what was essentially a hostage-rescue operation named as such (Read about ‘The wretched of the Wanni Earth’ by D.B.S. Jeyaraj)?  Why (let us ask again) is no one calling the Tamil nationalist bluff by commissioning a historical audit?  
There was a turning point in 2009.  History however is not rolled out in a bell curve.  There can be other twists.  Tragedy is a visitor who does not require a formal invitation.  Escalation is easily orchestrated.  In all this there’s self-inflicted torture.  ‘KV’ is, in this sense, an embarrassment to Tamil chauvinists but all things considered, nothing more than a distraction.  This country has let itself become a classic case of self-inflicted national torture.  A re-definition is needed not just for national dignity but national survival. 
Malinda Seneviratne is a freelance writer.  Email: malindasenevi@gmail.com.  Blog:malindawords.blogspot.com.  Twitter: malindasene

ජී එස් පී හා ටී එන් ඒ

April 28th, 2017

නලින් ද සිල්වා

යුරෝපා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ලංකාවට ජී එස් පී + දෙන්න තීරණය කරලා. ආණ්ඩුව තොරතෝංචියක් නැතිව කියාවි ඒ ලැබුණේ කිසිම කොන්දේසියක් නැතිව බව. කිසිම කොන්දේසියක් නැතිව ජී එස් පී ලබා දීමට මේ ආණ්ඩුව ගැන යම් විශ්වාසයක් යුරෝපා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට හා යුරෝපා සංගමයට තිබිය යුතුයි. ඒ විශ්වාසය ලැබෙන්නේ කොහෙන් ද? රවි කරුණානායක ආසියා ශාන්තිකරයේ හොඳම මුදල් ඇමති නිසා ද? නැත්නම් මංගල සමරවීරගේ දක්‍ෂ රාජ්‍ය තාන්ත්‍රික භාවය නිසා ද? රනිල් කෘතහස්ත දේශපාලනඥයකු නිසා ද? මෛත්‍රිපාලට එලිසබෙත් වින්ඩ්සර් අත්වැසුම් නැතිව අතට අත දුන් නිසා ද?

අපට ජී එස් පී නැති වුණේ  ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනය කිරීමෙන් පසුව 2010 දී. පහුගිය ආණ්ඩුවට සියලු ආකාරයේ මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් චෝදනා එල්ල වීමට පටන් ගත්තේත් ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ ඝාතනයෙන් පසු.  චැනල් 4 ඇතුළු බටහිරයන්ට මානව අයිතිවාසිකම්  මතක් වුණේත් ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනයෙන් පසුව. දරුස්මාන් වාර්තාව බෑන් කි මුන් මැදිහත්වීම් ආදියත් ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනයෙන් පසුව සිදු වූ දේ. අපට ජෙනීවා මානව අයිතිවාසිකම් කොමිසමත් කරදර කරන්න පටන් ගත්තේත් ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනයෙන් පසුවත්. සරත් ෆොන්සේකා සුදු කොඩි කතාව කියන්න පටන්ගත්තේ ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනය කිරීමෙන් පසුව. ඔහු ඒ ප්‍රකාශය කෙළේ ෆ්‍රෙඩ්රිකා ජෑන්ස්ට පමණක් නොවෙයි. රත්නපුරේ දී හා අම්බලන්ගොඩ දීත් ඒ ප්‍රකාශය කළා.  

බටහිරයන් ප්‍රභාකරන් බේරා ගැනීමට නොකළ දෙයක් නැහැ. ප්‍රංශ හා එංගලන්ත විදේශ ඇමතිවරුන් තකහනියක් මහින්ද හමුවීමට ලංකාවට පැමිණියා. මහින්ද ඔවුන් ඇඹිලිපිටියට ගෙන්වා හිස් අතින් ආපහු හැරියා. පසුව විජය නම්බියාර් ලංකාවට පැමිණ කටුනායක ගුවන් තොටුපොළේ දී දුර කාටදෝ දුරකතනයෙන් කතා කළා. ප්‍රභාකරන් බේරා ගැනීමට නැවක් එවීමේ සැලැස්මක් තිබුණා. ප්‍රභාකරන් සයනයිඩ් නොකා බටහිරයන් කොයි මොහොතක හරි තමන් ගලවා ගැනීමට ඒය යන බලාපොරොත්තුවෙන් සිටියා. එමගින් ඔහු තම අනුගාමිකයන් සයනයිඩ් ගිල්ලවා මරා දැම්මත් සයනයිඩ් ගිල මැරෙන්න තරම් ධෛර්යයක් නොතිබූ නිවටයකු බව ලොවට හෙළි කළා.

මෙයින් පැහැදිලි වන්නේ ප්‍රභාකරන් ඝාතනය නො කෙළේ නම් මේ කිසිවක් නොමැති බව ය. බටහිරයන් විජේවීර ඝාතනයෙන් පසුව කිසිවක් කෙළේ නැහැ. විජේවීරත් අහිංසකයන් ඝාතනය කළ මිනීමරුවකු වුවත් ඔහු ඝාතනය කෙරුණේ අත් අඩංගුවේ සිටිය දී බව බටහිරයන්ට විතරක් නොව ඔහුගේ අනුගාමික ගෝල බාලයන්ටත් අමතකයි. අදවත් විජේවීර ඝාතනය ගැන සොයන්නට ගෝල බාලයන් උනන්දුවක් දක්වන්නේ නැහැ. ඒත් ප්‍රභාකරන්ගේ අනුගාමික දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය ඇතුළු පිරිස් තවමත් ප්‍රභාකරන් වෙනුවෙන් තමන්ට කළ හැකි දේ කරනවා.

මේ ආණ්ඩුව වැඩ බැරි ටාසන්ලාගේ ආණ්ඩුවක් බව බටහිරයන් නොදන්නවා නො වේ. රවි කරුණානායකට සම්මාන ලැබෙන්නේ සිංහල විරෝධී චිත්‍රපටිවලට ඊනියා ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මාන ලැබෙනවා මෙන්. බටහිරයන් මේ සියලු නොවැඩ්ඩන්ට (වැඩ්ඩා යන්නෙහි විරුද්ධාර්ථය) සම්මාන දෙන්නේ ඔවුන්ට රට තුළ ඇති විරෝධය මග හැරවීමට.ඉතා ඉහළ සම්මානයක් රනිල්ට දීමට ඔවුන් කටයුතු කරාවි. ජී එස් පී සහනයත් එවැන්නක්. මේ ආණඩුව බලයට පත් කළ බටහිරයන් මේ අදක්‍ෂයන්ට සම්මාන සහ සහන ලබා දෙන්නේ ඔවුන්ගේ නිවට බව බටහිර ගැති බව සිංහල විරෝධී බව රටට අමතක කරවීමට. ජී එස් පී සහනය ආණ්ඩුවේ නිවට බවට හා සිංහල විරෝධී බවට ලැබෙන තෑග්ගක් පමණයි. ආණ්ඩුව බටහිරයන් වෙනුවෙන් දෙමළ ජාතිවාදයට කප්පන් දෙනවා. ඒ වෙනුවෙන් බටහිරයන් ආණ්ඩුවට සහන දෙනවා.

යුරෝපා සංගමයෙන් එංගලන්තය ඉවත් වීමට තීරණය කරලා. ඒ තීරණය ගැන තවදුරටත් සහතිකයක් ලබා ගැනීමට එහි අගමැතිණිය තෙරේසා මේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැරලා. අවශ්‍ය අවස්ථාවක පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැරීමට ජනාධිපතිට තිබූ බලය දහනවවැනි ව්‍යවස්ථා සංශෝධනයෙන් ඉවත් කරලා මෛත්‍රිපාලගේ බලතල කපා දැම්මා. තව බලතල සරත් ෆොන්සේකාට ලබා දීමට කටයුතු කරනවා. ජනාධිපතිගේ ආරක්‍ෂක ඇමති ධුරය හා සේනාධිනායකකම ගැන එ ජා පක්‍ෂයට විශ්වාස නැහැ. යුරෝපා සංගමය මහා බලගතු හවුලක් නො වෙයි. කොහොමටත් ජී එස් පී සහනයෙන් අපට ලැබෙන්නේ සොච්චම් මුදලක්. එය ඇමතිවරුන්ට සුඛොපභෝගී වාහන ගෙන්වීමටත් මදි. කොන්දක් නැති ඇමතිවරුන්ට බාල වාහනවල ගමන් කර කොඳු ප්‍රශ්න ඇතිවන්නේ කොහොමද කියන එක කොඳු කඩන ප්‍රශ්නයක්.

මේ අතර දිය වී යන යුරෝපා  සංගමයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ජී එස් පී තීරණය ගැනීමට රැස්වන විට දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය අතුරුදහන් වූවන්ගේ ප්‍රශ්නය හා කඳවුරු ඉවත් කිරීම මුල් කරගෙන හර්තාලයක් පැවැත්වුවා. ඔවුන් හිතන්න ඇති හර්තලයෙන් යුරෝපා පාර්ලිමේන්තු තීරණය වෙනස් කරවා ගන්න. ඔවුන් හිතන්නේ බලු නකුටට බල්ලා වනන්න පුළුවන් කියා. දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය අවසාන වශයෙන් පවත්වා ගෙන යනු ලබන්නේ බටහිරයන් විසින්. බටහිර රටවල විශේෂයෙන් ම එංගලන්තයේ හා කැනඩාවේ දෙමළ විසුරුණු ජනයා පවත්වාගෙන යන්නේ ඒ රටවල ආණ්ඩු මගින්. ඒ මිස දෙමළ ජනයාගේ ඡන්දයෙන් ඒ ආණ්ඩු පත්වනවා නො වෙයි. බටහිරයන් අපට කියන්නේ දෙමළ ජනයාගේ ඡන්දය නිසා ඔවුන්ට සවන් දීමට සිදු වී ඇති බව. මෙය පට්ටපල් බොරුවක්. දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානය උතුරු පළාතේ හා නැගෙනහිර සමහර ප්‍රදේශවල පැවැත්වූ හර්තාලය යුරෝපා සංගමය සත හකට ගණන් ගත්තේ නැහැ. මේ ආණ්ඩුව බටහිරයන්ගේ ආණ්ඩුවක් බව බටහිරයන්ගේ ම අතකොළුවක් වූ දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානයට අමතක වෙලා. දෙමළ ජාතික සංධානයට මේ ආණ්ඩුවට විරුද්ධව බටහිරයන්ට කරුණු කියන්න බැහැ. රනිල් හා නඩය තමන් පත් කළ සිංහල විරෝධී ආණ්ඩුව බව බටහිරයන් හොදාකාරව ම දන්නවා. 

ප්‍රභාකරන්ට නැවත පණ දෙන්න බැහැ. කමල් ගුණරත්නගේ භටයන් ඒ වැඩය අකුරට ම ඉටු කරලා. ඒ නිසා ම බටහිරයන් කමල් ගුණරත්නටත් විරුද්ධයි. ගෝඨාභයටත් මහින්දටත් විරුද්ධයි. තවත් ගුණරත්න කෙනකු හිටියා රොහාන් නමින්. ඔහු යුද්ධ විශේෂඥයකු ලෙස පෙනී සිටියා. ජනමාධ්‍ය ඔහු පිම්බවා. ඔහු කියා සිටියේ ප්‍රභාකරන් පැරදවීමට නොහැකි බවයි. මා ඒ බව මතක් කෙළේ ගෝඨාභයගේ දැනගැනීම පිණිසයි. ජී එස් පි අපට ලැබෙන්නේ ආණ්ඩුවේ නිවට කමට. රොහාන් ගුණරත්න කී දේ ගෝඨාභය හා මහින්ද විශ්වාස කෙළේ නම් අපට ජී එස් පි අහිමි වන්නේ නැහැ.

 

නලින් ද සිල්වා

2017 අප්‍රේල් 28     

 

Military Suicides during the Eelam War in Sri Lanka 

April 28th, 2017

Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge 

During the Eelam War (1983 -2009) a significant numbers of   the Sri Lankan military forces had committed suicide and some of the victims believed to have suffered from combat related stress. Psychological autopsies of some of the cases revealed that the victims had depression, posttraumatic stress, psychiatric illnesses, addiction issues, relationship problems and severe   work related stresses. Most of these suicides could have been avoided with early interventions.

From 1987 to 2009 the Sri Lankan Military had launched nearly 25 major military offensives against the LTTE. In these military missions the members of the armed forces underwent severe battle stresses that affected them physically and psychologically. Some combatants witnessed the deaths of their buddies as a result of sniper fire, mortar and artillery attacks. Many witnessed the gruesome realities of the war.  Following the overwhelming combat stress many had nostalgic and pessimistic feelings about life. Some soldiers could not cope with the devastating events related to the war and took their own lives on the battlefield. These actions were condemned by the military law and criticized as acts of cowardice. Downheartedly most of these victims did not receive military honor posthumously or pensions for their dependents. But the fact remains that a notable percentage of combatants committed suicide were psychological casualties of the war probably shattered by the combat stress or battle fatigue. Therefore proper investigations would be needed to extract the truth behind these military suicides and cases should be reviewed through a compassionate eye.

Suicides in the midst of the battle

Some military suicides had been recorded during the active combat. Following abstract from an eyewitness’s account during theElephantPassdebacle that occurred in 2000 due to the inefficient strategic evacuation plan. During the EPS debacle, 359 military personnel were killed, 349 were listed as Missing in Action and some 2500 were injured. Corporal KXX29 described the events that took place between the 21st of April 2000 and 22nd of April 2000.

……. The enemy was advancing and we were retreating towards Palei. I saw a number of soldiers fell down on the way due to exhaustion and to the heat wave. We could not help anyone and we had to move forward. The enemy was attacking us with mortar and sniper fire. Our soldiers were scatted all over. In the meantime the enemy followed us. We attacked them with our light weapons. Soon our ammunition was over. Our only option was to go to Palei and join the battalion strong hold there. 

My buddy was exhausted, he asked me to leave him and walk away. I left him near a bush. He had a grenade in his hand. He told me that when the enemy comes near him he would explore the grenade. I had no option, the enemy was coming nearby. I had to abandon my buddy and go. While I went further I heard a grenade explosion. I was upset but the physical exhaustion and dehydration had blocked my sorrowful thoughts. When I went to Palei I merely lost my consciousness. I was admitted to the hospital. Upon my discharge I looked for my buddy but he was not among the survivors. Later he was pronounced as MIA. 

Combat Related PTSD and Suicides

Research and investigations revealed that the combat related PTSD was emerging in the Sri Lanka Army (Fernando & Jayatunge 2010). Numerous researches indicate that there is a correlation between combat trauma and suicidal behaviors (Knox, 2008). Studies suggest that suicide risk is higher in persons with PTSD (Ferrada,  Asberg, ., Ormstad, & Lundin 1998).   Many researchers believe that    disturbing symptoms of PTSD increase the suicide risk and others of the view that comorbid psychiatric symptoms that are associated with PTSD drive the victims to commit suicide.

A study done during 2002 – 2006 discovered that among the 56 Sri Lankan combatants with full blown symptoms of PTSD, 17 of them had past suicide attempts. They have had suicidal ideation, specific suicidal plan, mode and action. Their lives had been saved either by an intervention by a family member or a military buddy.   (Fernando & Jayatunge 2010)

Many Sri Lankan combatants suffered from PTSD or gross battle fatigue often tried to hide the fear feelings that were associated with combat stress. The avoidance of combat events and places or manifestation of fear feelings were considered as an act of cowardice. There were a number of disgraceful names that had been used to call the battle fatigued soldiers. The words like Lossa (loser)  Chokalat Soldaduva (Chocolate Soldiers) had been widely used.  Therefore the suffers often took extreme effort to hide their battle fatigue symptoms.

In the early stages of the war military doctors paid their attention to the physical wounds rather than the mental wounds. Generally those who had flashbacks, nightmares and avoidance were blacklisted as cowards, malingerers or drug (cannabis) uses. Therefore many soldiers repressed their horrendous memories about the war and served in the battle field facing the enemy. Some went in to dissociation (psychogenic epilepsy, psychogenic tremors, and fugue states) and having medically unexplainable symptoms such as pain related somatic symptoms. It has been reported that overwhelmed soldiers had acute stress reactions in the war fronts. Combatants with   posttraumatic stress and comorbid depression who had no escape route often took their lives on the battlefield.

Lt BXX26 witnessed the death of seven soldiers in Paranthan (in Northern Sri Lanka) following mortar attacks. Although he was physically unharmed he witnessed how the incoming mortar killed seven of his men immediately. Their bodies were blown in to pieces and this horrible event caused an acute stress reaction in him. Later he was evacuated to Colombo. After the Paranthan incident Lt BXX26 experienced intrusions, flashbacks, nightmares and avoidance. He was diagnosed as having PTSD.  Lt BXX26 felt that he was personally responsible for the deaths of seven soldiers in Paranthan and had severe survival guilt. Following overwhelmed negative feelings several times he tried to commit suicide. His treatment took years and finally the doctors were able to diminish the survival guilt and suicidal ideation.

L/ Cpl WXX43 became a psychological casualty of the war after handling human remains at Mulative.   For many years he felt depressed and troubled by nightmares. L/ Cpl WXX43 could not forget the decomposed and swollen bodies that he buried at Mutative. Some of the victims were known to him. He felt utterly despaired after this horrific experience and after sometime diagnosed with PTSD.  He was consuming large amounts of alcohol to evade startling reactions and nightmares. In 2003 he decided to take his own life and took poison. His life was saved by immediate hospitalization.

Private MXX33 underwent traumatic battle events in the North and as a result of war trauma he suffered full blown symptoms of PTSD. His condition was undetected and untreated for a number of years. After he became a psychological casualty of the war his behavior changed drastically. He became hostile and several times he was charged with disciplinary infractions. He could not serve in the operational areas following avoidance (which is a marked clinical feature in PTSD).   He felt uncomfortable to travel in military vehicles (which trigged after seeing a land mine explosion in Mannar) and to carry fire arms. But the military duties demanded him to serve in the operational areas with fire arms. He could not get a help from his unit and finally decided to become AWOL.

He found a job in a private company as a driver.  While he was employed in the company his PTSD symptoms troubled him once again. He had nightmares, intrusions and flashbacks. His memory was fading and he could not concentrate. His hostile behavior led his wife and children to leave him.  Following stress, isolation and depression he tried to commit suicide by hanging. His neighbors immediately intervened and hospitalized him. At the hospital he revealed that every night in his dreams he used to see the horrible events of the war. When he was experiencing flashbacks he could hear gun fire and the helicopter sounds.    He could not tolerate noises and his emotions had become numbed. After structured clinical interviews Private MXX33 was diagnosed with PTSD and sent for appropriate treatment.  He rejoined the Army and today serves as a productive member. He is now free of suicidal thoughts.

Suicides Triggered by Post Combat Depression 

The component of depression was evident to Dr. Mendez Da Costa who introduced the term Irritable heart during the US Civil War and Lt Col (Dr.) Fredric Mott who coined the term Shell Shock during the World War one. Depression is common among the combatants. The feeling of guilt and despair plays a major role in post combat depression. Post combat depression is evident among some combatants who were exposed to traumatic battle events. Apart from common depressive signs, Post Combat Depression is usually characterized with unresolved mental conflicts, survival guilt, negative interpretation of combat events and pessimistic outlook on the post combat environment (Jayatunge 2010)

Depression is a mood disorder in which pathological moods and related vegetative and psychomotor disturbance dominate the clinical picture. The Post combat depression  is described as a group of symptoms such as anhedonia (feeling of sadness and loss of ability to experience pleasure) low energy, decreased libido, reduced life interests, somatic pain, alienation, numbing, self-blame and survival guilt that is experienced by combat solders after exposing to traumatic battle events. Depression causes a disturbance in a soldier’s feelings and emotions. They may experience such extreme emotional pain that they consider or attempt suicide.

Soldiers could suffer from depression as a result of survival guilt, collateral damage to the civilians and constantly living in a socially deprived environment. Many soldiers become desolated about their lives and tend to have nostalgic feelings. They gradually shift away from the rational reasoning and find death as an answer to their agonizing problems. Social isolation, moving away from their buddies and lack of unit help and cohesion aggravate the situation leading the soldier to commit suicide.

Private KXX32 took an immense effort to save his buddy who sustained a gunshot injury to the stomach during the Operation Jayasikuru. (The Operation Jayasikuru or the Victory Assured military campaign was launched in 1997 to regain the LTTE-held Wanni and Mullaitivu areas and subsequently to open a land route through Wanni and Kilinochchi districts to link up with the Jaffna Peninsula).  He carried his wounded friend for more than a kilometer to the nearest medical point. On the way his buddy passed away. This event caused devastating results. Private KXX32 felt that he was personally responsible for the death of his friend and went in to severe depression. But he did not seek any medical or psychological help.  Survival guilt troubled him so enormously and on one occasion he made an unsuccessful secret attempt to remove the pin of a grenade.

In the later years he was contemplating to commit suicide. When he participated in operations he took unnecessary risks anticipating enemy fire. Several times he walked to the enemy lines and deliberately exposed himself in to  dangerous and suspected enemy sniper points.   Meanwhile his clinical depression progressed with severe headaches and that forced him to seek medical attention. During the medical assessment his depressive elements were elicited and then treated accordingly. His illogical and irrational thoughts were challenged in friendly mediation and finally Private KXX32 realized that he was not responsible for his buddy’s death.

Lt JXXY54 served 19 years in the Army and most of his time was spent in the operational areas. After participating in many military operations he became physically and mentally tired. He had low energy, pessimistic view of the military life, feelings of worthlessness and guilt, impaired concentration, insomnia, diminished interest in pleasurable activities and recurring thoughts of death. He had been planning to commit suicide. In his own words Lt JXXY54 described his wistful feelings thus.

I have been serving in a fighting unit of the Sri Lanka Army since 1982 and participated in numerous battles. I joined as a private and then was able to get promotions due to the bravery that I had demonstrated on the battle. I was decorated several times.  Over the years I saw deaths and annihilation. Most of my unit members are dead and only a few are remaining. I think I am tired and exhausted. I don’t see glory in war anymore. Everything ends in death.  I have a great compassion for my friends who perished in front of my eyes in Welioya, Palampiddi, Kanagarayankulam , Mankulam and other  places.  I know they would never come back and their families would never have peace. I wish I was dead with them. My world has fallen apart and I feel that I am lost and I am unable to feel happiness anymore. I don’t see a specific reason that I should keep on living”.    

In 2002 Lt JXXY54 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and treated with medication and psychotherapy.

Bunker Suicides in the North 

Bunker suicides were common during the Eelam War. The bunkers were used to protect the military camps and often situated inner and outer perimeter of a camp.  These bunkers were made of Palm or coconut logs and covered with sheets. The living conditions were extremely hash in the bunkers. It had minimum comforts. The day time inside the bunker was   awfully hot  and when it rained the water stagnated inside the bunkers. Two or three soldiers did bunker duties and often they had to be vigilant for long hours.  They did not receive adequate rest or sleep.  Chronic sleep deprivation was very much common among the soldiers who did bunker duties. They had to serve months and months without leave and many soldiers became exhausted. Boredom, monotony, isolation and uncertainty, distressing feeling of unexpected enemy attacks hugely affected   the combatants and their mental health. Following overwhelming stress some soldiers shot themselves while on bunker duties.  Frequently the combatants used their firearm to commit suicide. In some extreme cases explosives (grenades) had been used. According to the unit members most of the victims had suicidal warning signs prior to their deaths. Some had openly talked about their deaths and displayed a number of suicidal warning signs.

Private CXX27  served in Muhamale area in Jaffna before committing suicide in 2005 during the ceasefire agreement. He had served in the military for over five years and participated in the Operation Agnikeela in 2001. According to his friends he was troubled by personal issues and became more and more isolated.  Once when his buddy went to have his lunch Private CXX27 was alone in the bunker. While the other members were having lunch they heard a gunshot from Private CXX27 bunker. When they went inside his bunker they saw Private CXX27 had shot his head with his personal weapon.

Suicides following Hazing   

Bulling and hazing had been reported from the Northern war front. Hazing was one of the issues that led some soldiers to commit suicide. It has been noticed that lack of monitoring by the officers and fruitless platoon leadership had led to critical situations.

In many armies around the world hazing has become a common but extremely damaging factor. Some senior NCO s use hazing to implement discipline and surge the physical and mental endurance. Physical punishments, vigorous exercise were frequently used to discipline the soldiers. Beatings were not uncommon. But often hazing had caused disastrous outcomes.  Sometimes Sexual harassments had occurred in the battle fields and victims had no escape route.  Many of these unfortunate events ended up in desertion, self-harm or sometimes suicides.

Private WXVX shot his stomach following hazing by two corporals in 2005. The bullet pierced through his bowels but likely the vital organs were not damaged. The Renowned Military Surgeon Dr. S.S Jayarathne performed urgent laparotomy and saved the soldier’s life. After his recovery Private WXVX was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder. The investigations revealed that the senior Corporals had used inhuman methods to harass Private WXVX.

Work Related Stress

The ongoing war condition in the Northern Sri Lanka had created severe demands and tension among the soldiers and officers. Although the resources and manpower were limited the Sri Lankan military did their best to defend the enemy attacks.   The enemy attacked in unexpected moments and these attacks caused human lives and destruction of property. There were no adequate numbers of soldiers to hold the ground especially during the Operation Jayasikuru in 1997. It became one of the major problems in the Army. The soldiers had to fulfill numerous duties. Lack of men power caused heavy burden on solders.  Severe work related stresses were mounting among the officers and soldiers who faced a gruesome enemy.

The soldiers who served 30 – 45 days in the war zone had 10 days of leave. When the military operations surged this leave system changed and many soldiers had to serve a number of months without any recuperation or leave. The soldiers had no regular leave and sometimes their leave got cancelled unexpectedly.  The soldiers could not attain their family commitments and it led to deep frustration and disappointments.   Commonly the soldiers felt angry and disenchanted when their leave were cancelled.  The burnouts were in abundance. Some work related stresses ended up in fatal outcomes.

Relationship Problems 

A large number of the members of the military forces who served during the war were young people. The nature of their work and duty prevented them frequently meeting with their loved ones accumulating severe relationship issues.  Some surveys indicate that lack of trust, self-esteem issues and jealousy had caused many relationship problems. In addition Conflict and stress aggravated relationship problems caused risk of suicide among the soldiers. It has been reported that some young soldiers had committed suicide following failed love affairs.

Private CXX24 became extremely devastated when his girlfriend left him.  He frantically tried to call her but did not get a reply. Then he applied for leave to get two day vacation to meet his girlfriend. Regrettably his   leave was not approved by his commanding officer.  Private CXX24 made one last try to call his girlfriend and then went to the wash room and hanged himself with his shoelace. One of the soldiers who became suspicious of Private CXX24‘s movements informed the unit Sergeant. When they broke in they saw Private CXX24 was hanging. Soon they gave first aid and hospitalized him. He was treated for three weeks at the hospital and later diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder. After the medical management Private CXX24 was referred for counselling.

Murder–Suicides

A murder–suicide is an act in which an individual kills one or more other persons before or at the same time as killing himself or herself. Over the past thirty years several murder -suicides had been reported from the combat zones in Sri Lanka. Mostly these unfortunate incidents were triggered by work related disputes and in severe harassments. In 2012 a soldier on duty in the North turned the gun on his colleague following a personal argument before killing himself.

Modes of Military Suicides 

During the War combatants used numerous methods to end their lives. Frequently they used their fire arms to shoot themselves. Mostly head neck, chest, abdomen or under the chin were the selected anatomical sites where the combatants frequently decided to put the bullet through. In many cases soldiers shot themselves in front   of their buddies or sometimes in isolated places. Some left suicide notes before taking their lives. These letters reflected the depression and anxiety they were experiencing. Often these letters were addressed to their mothers or girlfriends.

Hanging and taking poison were not uncommon. There were numerous occurrences where soldiers took medication overdose to commit suicide. The victims often took Paracetamol or prescribed psychiatric medication (SSRI, Lithium, Sodium Valproate, Risperidone, Clozapine etc.) to overdose. We have found that some soldiers walked to the enemy lines (later they confessed) expecting a sniper fire. In another event we found a soldier planned a road traffic accident to masquerade the suicide. He sustained fractured femur and broken ribs after the attempt. There is an unbreakable link between suicidal intention and taking unnecessary risks on the battle field.

Following is a narration by a Corporal who witnessed an attempted suicide in a bunker in Jaffna in 2003.

Several days we observed that Lance Corporal GXX was not in his proper senses. I noticed extreme changes in him over the past few weeks. He had a problem with his girlfriend and he was planning to go home for his leave turn. But his leave was cancelled two days ago. He did not speak with us like early days. He wished to be alone and he was thinking of some problem that affected him relentlessly. He smoked heavily sometimes violating night rules. I noticed that when he was doing the bunker duties he was not paying attention. He was severely scolded by the unit Sergeant this morning. But Lance Corporal GXX did not show any emotions in front of the Sergeant. When the breakfast was brought as usual we ate ordering Private Priyantha to be on guard. Lance Corporal GXX did not eat much. He was thinking about something. Finally I asked what the hell is wrong with you. But he did not reply. Suddenly he got up and got hold his T56 then loaded the gun and   put the muzzle of the gun under his chin and then tried to pull the trigger. Immediately I got up and grabbed the gun from him, then I slapped him. You are a coward I scolded him. Then Lance Corporal GXX started crying and said let me die.  But we took him to the Sergeant and then to the Commanding Officer.  Later he was taken to the Palali Military Hospital. 

Manipulative Behavior and Suicide Threats 

Some combatants use suicide threats as a part of malingering and manipulative behavior in order to fulfill their petty egoistic needs. The malingerers often use conscious deception to avoid unpleasant duty, hazardous work, or active combat situations. But often these people have underlying issue especially work related stress or work related confrontations. Therefore rather than punishing the person under the military law its necessary to assess the condition and pending threats while providing answers to their imminent  problems.

Suicides in the Post War Era 

The Historian Tony Judt illustrates the post-war period as the interval immediately following the ending of a war. Post-war period marks the cessation of conflict entirely. Sri Lanka has entered the phase of post war in 2009 after militarily defeating the LTTE. Although the war is over one should not forget that   the aftermath of post combat stress factors. The combatants who fought a prolonged battle do not become normal citizens overnight. There are considerable numbers of soldiers with undiagnosed post combat reactions who could become psychologically vulnerable with ongoing life stresses.

The late manifestations of combat stress reactions could emerge in the post war era. According to Dr. Michael Robertson of the Mayo Wesley clinic ex- servicemen can experience delayed reactions of combat stress. He had documented delayed combat trauma reactions in WW2 veterans. The post war experiences in Korean and Vietnam wars indicate that combat stress could emerge in the post war era in great proportions. The US veterans who fought in the Korean and Vietnam wars had delayed combat trauma reactions and many ended up in self-harm or suicides. Similarly the British veterans who participated in the Falklands War and the Soviets veterans who fought in the Afghan War experienced traumatic combat trauma reactions in the post war periods.  Therefore the Sri Lankan   combatants who underwent immense combat stresses during the 30 year Eelam War are having impending mental health risks. Some of these reactions are still asymptomatic and could surface with aggravating factors.

The recent reports indicate that there were several military suicides after the war.  In May 2012 a soldier attached to the 51st Division of the SLA  shot his colleague and then took his life after an argument  at a security check post near the Naga Viharaya in Jaffna.

The post war era is often linked with economic and psycho social problems. The war destroys the social fabric and the ex-combatants and civilians experience the hardships of war wrecked society. Economic recession may significantly elevate suicide rates in many regions. For example, high suicide rates during economic recession in Japan were documented during the post-World War II period, 1975-1990 (Goto et al, 1994).   Long-term exposure to war and postwar stresses could cause serious psychological consequences among the soldiers.  Therefore the combatants of the Sri Lankan military who fought the Eelam War need widespread psychosocial support system and case identification by the experts to prevent aftermath of the war trauma.  The research in Bosnia and Herzegovina indicated that postwar stressors did not influence the prevalence of PTSD but they did contribute to the intensity and number of posttraumatic symptoms. (Klaric et al., 2007).

Preventing Military Suicides 

Military suicides denote the unproductive way of managing the soldiers during the war and in the post combat era. It is the duty of the military organization to prevent suicides and self-harm among the soldiers.  Suicides do not occur in a vacuum and sometimes soldiers plan their suicides for months and in some instances for years. Many victims show suicide warning signs prior to their fatal acts. The unit members and the unit leaders should be trained and educated about the suicide warning signs. When a soldier with potential threat is identified, he should be handled carefully without punishing or any kind of harassments, and then refereed for medical / psychological management.

Combat trauma can cause depression and anxiety related ailments and often the victims are overwhelmed by stress and could become psychologically vulnerable.  As a result of these complications a combatant could think of suicide as the final solution. Therefore combat stress reactions should be detected effectively and extensive screening and potential case identification would be important to prevent suicides in the military.

The military should create awareness on suicide issue and should have a healthy communication system among its members. When there is a crisis the affected member should feel free to seek help. Obtaining services of the experts in suicide prevention is highly important. Over the last three decades the Sri Lanka Army launched an elongated battle with the World’s Deadliest Terrorist Organization without recruiting  Military Psychologists and for long years the Army had a few visiting Psychiatrists. These short sighted measures increased the psychological casualties in the military. Therefore to prevent further damage efficient military counselors, peer listeners should be trained to prevent suicides and selfharms.  All Medical Officers,   and Nurses attached to the Army should be trained to recognize the signs of mental illness, and trained in methods of suicide prevention.

War trauma is not specific to ranks and it could affect soldiers as well as the officers. The stigmatization of mental health issues is a debilitating problem in treatment of traumatized war veterans. Sometimes stigma and discrimination prevent combatants to seek psychological help. Therefore de stigmatization and health education are key components in preventing suicides in the military.

A special attention should be given to the combatants with the past history of hazardous combat exposure and if any signs of PTSD or Depression emerge they should be referred for medical treatments. The health staff should   actively screen for potential victims and offer support with respect and empathy.

The combatants helped to end a disastrous elongated armed conflict in this country. During the war many became psychological casualties and could not get   adequate psychological helps. Following the aggravating mental health problems many could not cope and went in to negative stress coping methods such as alcohol abuse, social violence, domestic violence and self-harm. A considerable percentage went further and selected death as a way out to end their psychological anguish. These military suicides   signify individual as well as a collective tragedy in the Sri Lankan society questioning our moral beliefs. In this context preventing suicides in the military are essential. We ought to take immediate actions to heal the members who risked their physical and mental health for the sovereignty of the country.

References 

Dean, C. (2000). Nam Vet : Making Peace with Your Past Wordsmith Publishing.

Ferrada-Noli, M., Asberg, M., Ormstad, K., Lundin, T., & Sundbom, E. (1998). Suicidal behavior after severe trauma. Part 1: PTSD diagnoses, psychiatric comorbidity and assessment of suicidal behavior. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 103-112.

Fernando, N., Jayatunge, R.M. (2010). Combat Related PTSD among the Sri Lankan Army Servicemen.

Fernando, R., Hewagama, M.,Priyangika, W.D.D. (2010) Study of suicides reported to the Coroner in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Med Sci Law, January vol. 50 no. 1 25-28

Glass, A. J. (1973). Army Psychiatry before World War II,” in Neuropsychiatry in World War II

Jayatunge, R.M. (2010). Post Combat Depression (PCD) retrieved from  https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2010/10/19/post-combat-depression-pcd/

Klaric M, Klarić B, Stevanović A, Grković J, Jonovska S. (2007).  Psychological consequences of war trauma and postwar social stresses in women in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Knox, K.L. (2008). Epidemiology of the relationship between traumatic experience and suicidal behaviors. PTSD Research Quarterly, 19(4).

Politico   Military suicides rising, even as combat eases. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77188.html

Rothberg JM, Rock NL, Del Jones F. (1984). Suicide in United States Army personnel, 1981–1982. Mil Med ;149(10):537-541.

Somasundaram, D. (2007). Collective trauma in northern Sri Lanka: a qualitative psychosocial-ecological study International Journal of Mental Health Systems , 1:5.

Win Over PTSD retrieved from http://winoverptsd.com/wp/persian-gulf-war-veterans-ptsd-rates-are-similar-to-vietnam-and-iraq-combat-vets/

Defeat Sirisena’s march to Autocracy

April 27th, 2017

By: A.A.M.NIZAM – MATARA

Sirisena-Ranil Junta which grabbed power in Sri Lanka after more than two years of continued conspiracy in Singapore and New Delhi now finds that they are unable to fulfil any of their promises such as abolition of the Executive presidency, getting massive foreign direct investments from western counties, provision of one million jobs, raising the standard of living and making the people rich etc.

Similar to the fibs such as Rajapaksa family foreign deposits, golden horses, lambogini vehicles and so on they shamelessly and unflinchingly uttered during the election period, immediately after the election they established a State repression unit called FCID and attempted to frighten the opposition and at the same time create a horrendous bad image of the former President Mahinda Rajapakse, his family members and other prominent leaders in the opposition.  In this exercise the government even went to the extent of digging lands belonging to various people saying that they are looking for Mahinda’s hidden gold and treasure in then and even went to search the family property of Mr. Welgama in Matugama saying that they were looking for bullet proof vehicles purported to have been hidden in that land.

All these attempts became futile, no one has so far been found guilty of any crime, misappropriation or fraud while the popularity of Mahinda Rajapaaksa and people’s yearning for him to return to rule this country has reached its zenith. These desires of the people were abundantly displayed at the joint opposition rallies held throughout the country starting with the historic Nugegoda rally, the protest rally held at Hyde Park, and through the mammoth Kandy-Colombo foot walk.

The government also attempted vainly to suppress the popularity of the prominent opposition personalities such as parliamentarians Wimal Weerawansa and Udaya Gammanpila, former Minister Basil Rajapaksa by remanding them on various allegations for different periods.  The genuine and legal opposition in the Parliament was denied time to express their view points on crucial debates and Acts, and the speaker acting like despot even suspended the leader of the joint opposition MP Dinesh Gunawardene for one week from attending for Parliamentary sittings.

Meanwhile, the government in addition to its inability to fulfil its promises to the people finds it impossible to cope with people suffering from natural disasters such as floods and draught, Aranayake avalanche, and people suffering from disasters caused by negligence, abandonment, and sloppiness of the government such as Saalawa blast, and Meethotamulla garbage mountain collapse.

People’s antipathy to the government is growing steadily and they voluntarily resort to various types of demonstrations to vent their anger towards the government including staging road blocks, disrupting transport,  heckle and boo government politicians and ignore not only government directives but even court orders at some times. On top of this,  demonstrations are being held almost daily over grievances and injustices being faced by University students, demonstrations against the SAITEM issue, and over desperate attempts being made by the government to sell State institutions, lease out viable projects, traditional and valuable lands, ports and harbours to foreigners, and privatise state institutions under the guise of revitalizing and management reinvigorating.

Most of these demonstrations almost daily are being held in Colombo as well as in the main outstation towns.  A new dimension to these demonstrations were displayed by the University students in Colombo on the night of April 26th by holding a demonstration in the night carrying fire sticks and lamps in addition to their banners.

The government having succeeded in suppressing a demonstration and a protest in Hambantota by using the Navy Commander himself to inhumanly and brutally attack the protesters and media personnel unsuccessfully attempted to quell demonstrations held in Colombo by deploying use water cannons, tear gas and rubber bullets.

While the ground situation remains in this status World Bank estimates indicate that the 2017 economic growth under this government will only be 4.7% which will be a lowest economic growth of a country in the South Asian region.  Only Maldives and Afghanistan with 4.5% and 2.4% respectively will be lower than Sri Lanka..  It is estimated that India’s economic growth will be 7.2%.

In addition to this, indices related to various aspects of the economy at the end of December 2015 indicate a significant downfall when compared to the Mahinda Rajapaksa government figures relating to end of 2014.  Details of these figures are as follows:

GDP growth fell from 4.9 to 4.8; remittances from US $ million 7,018 to 6,980; FDI inflows US $ million 1,635 to 1,161; All Share Price Index from 7299 to 6894; unemployment rose from 4.3 to 4.6 per cent; exchange rate from 131.05 to 144.06; fiscal deficit from 5.7 to 7.4 and total public debt from US $ million 7,391 to 8,503. This is the result of mismanagement by this government within one year.

The 2014 economy was applauded by multi-lateral institutions and rating agencies as that year’s publications by the IMF, S&P, Moody, ADB, Fitch, Millennium Development Goal – UNDP, Capital Finance International of UK and Annual Travel Study of MasterCard clearly stated that in 2004, when Mahinda Rajapaksa assumed Presidency the economy was very bad and in 2014, the economy was promising. These achievements were made by Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa while fighting a 30 year old war against the tiger terrorists who were notorious as the world’s ruthless terrorist outfit, and many of the NGO vultures in the country and the UNP branded it as an unwinnable war.

Economic experts and analysts point out that the country is facing this adverse economic situation due to the following:

  • Increase government expenditure caused by impossible election promises;
  • bad fiscal policies trying to generate a quick revenue,
  • reckless defending of the rupee,
  • short-term borrowing in foreign currency,
  • suspending major infrastructure projects and thereby killing the growth momentum,
  • losing credibility amongst foreign investors,
  • Central Band TreasuryBond scams
  • Dampening of business sentiments by FCID
  • inept 2016 Budget,
  • growing political uncertainty and
  • global economic slowdown.

Under these dwindling economic situations and the government’s committed policy of selling everything that can be sold mass protests against the government are bound to increase and the government too envisages increased protests and demonstrations in the near future.  The Eunuch Sirisena is now well immersed in the greediness of power and would not care for the well being of the country but somehow want to protect his position by resorting to dictatorial means and suppress such demonstrations even by shedding blood and incarcerating opposition politicians including Mahinda Rajapaksa, trade union and student leaders.

It is for this vicious intent that he has decided to form a Special Unit called the Special Unit for protecting essential services, and head this Unit by wild cat (Kalavedda) Sarath Fonseka with wide assistance from the Security Forces.  This Unit in fact will be a Repressive Armed contingent.

The political chameleon Rajitha Senaratne who aided and abetted to topple Mahinda Rajapaksa government within has endorsed the formation of this Unit and told the media that previous leaders such as Dudley Senanayake, Madam Sirimavo Bandaranaike, J.R.Jayawardene and R.Premadasa also used armed forces at times of need and the government cannot allow outside powers to challenge its authority.  It is surprising to find the bone chewing lap dogs in the government who conveniently call themselves as SLFPers keeping silent about this prelude to dictatorship. All peace loving patriotic masses devoid of party, colour, religiosity and ethnicity should join together to defeat this dictatorship craze.

 

THE RAJPAL ABEYNAYAKE COLUMN: CLEARING OF GARBAGE AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE; CLEAR THIS YAHAPALANA GARBAGE OUT!

April 27th, 2017

The political culture of this country cannot be redeemed. The Meethotumulla tragedy is one of the proportions which called for the immediate resignation of the Prime Minister, or the President. However, what’s more sickening than the fact that they did nothing about removing the mountain of garbage is the fact that their reaction was absolutely gross, pathetic, and plunged the lowest depths of political crassness.
For both these reasons the Prime Minister, if he has an iota of self respect, should resign with immediate effect.
(Of course we do know the wholly incompetent/indifferent/aloof/
traitorous Ranil Wickremesinghe does not have an iota of self respect, and that’s a different issue.)

SRI-LANKA-ACCIDENT-ENVIRONMENT-POLLUTION-FIRE
Sri Lanka’s Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and Minister of Law and Order and Southern Development Sagala Ratnayaka (L) visit the site of a massive garbage mountain collapse in the Meethotamulla suburb of Colombo on April 19, 2017.

image

The Rajpal Abeynayake Column

The tragedy has all of the relevant ingredients for the apportioning of Ministerial if not Prime Ministerial and larger governmental responsibility. The Commission appointed by the President may come to any conclusion, and the less said about the faith that can be reposed in such ad hoc institutions the better.
So, whatever is said in the pornographic language of Yahapalana officialese, the people know that the responsibility for ensuring the safety of the folks around the Meethotumulla garbage dump was passed up on many occasions. More importantly the garbage dump was forcibly — continually –foisted on them even as they protested as one – literally – when they held hands together when they were hit by water cannon, and the footage is there to be seen.

Meanwhile, with the clearing of garbage being made an essential service, the President acts as if the clearing out of Colombo’s waste is more important than the lives or general well being of people.

The only objective of this despicable dispensation that calls itself a government, has been to ensure that there is no garbage problem for the people of Colombo. The folks threatened by the dumping of garbage in the proximity of their residences in Dompe and elsewhere, have been trod on hard, their right to protest rudely and unconstitutionally shut down.

This has all the hallmarks of the insensitive government of the obnoxious and the inept, that has been in existence from day one. But why? As far as the garbage problem goes, who doesn’t know that many potentates make money out of the disposal of garbage, which made the recent tragedy murder by definition.
It’s not as if this is a government that is in any way useful to the people. it’s quite the opposite and that’s only too well known. The economy has been battered, while the only mantra has been to blame the predecessor government. (Yes, predictably even for Meethotumulla, the clearing of which was an election promise of the Yahapalanites!)More importantly the war heroes have been mistreated and those who have anything to do with the successful prosecution of the war have been persecuted. No words are minced. It’s a dispensation of ingrates, incompetents and the downright grossly deplorable.

But back to the Meethotumulla tragedy.

The Puttlam lime quarry solution, says the government, was aborted because the Puttlam lime quarry was in the Wilpattu buffer zone. (Repeat, buffer zone.)
What Ranil and his henchmen do, doesn’t cease to amaze us. This explanation, from a government that has turned a convenient blind eye to the aggressive massacre of Wilpattu from a Minister who can do no wrong because his support was vital to get this Govt elected?

Sagala Ratnayake could not visit Meethotumulla without the full honour guard so to say — he had to be protected from the people.
That did not protect him from the volley of epithets that were hurled by wronged, victimized, cowed and terrorized folks.
Here is the link to that, which was censored in the supine and collaborationist so-called conventional media.

This dispensation of general no-goods, cheap turncoats and the otherwise vile in terms of how traitorous they have been, have to resign for the tragedy they visited upon the innocents of Meethotumulla. They have to resign and flee, for a lot of other reasons too, but in god’s name let them resign with a modicum of respectability, for this alone.
Am I’m wrong?

Here is a quick run through of resignations based upon the concept of Cabinet or Ministerial responsibility which speaks for itself. (The list is by no means exhaustive.)

— In 2015 the South Korean Premier resigned over the sinking of the Sewol ferry.

— The Romanian prime minister announced his resignation over a nightclub fire that killed more than 30 people in Bucharest in 2015.

— The Director of the U.S Federal Emergency Management Agency resigned, after heavy criticism of his handling of emergency management operations in the wake of hurricane
Katrina in 2005.

— Latvia’s prime minister resigned after accepting political responsibility for the collapse of a supermarket roof in the capital that killed 54 people and wounded at least 40 others, in 2013.

— In 1982, Lord Carrington (then Foreign Secretary UK) and two other Foreign Office ministers resigned shortly after the invasion of the Falkland Islands.

— Following a period of growing concern over the risk of Salmonella in eggs, Edwina Currie, then a junior Health Minister (UK) resigned on 16 December 1988.

November 25, 1956: Railway minister Lal Bahadur Shastri resigned from his post claiming moral responsibility for the rail disaster at Ariyalur, 174 miles from Madras, in which 152 passengers died and several others were injured.

– January 9,1993: Minister for civil aviation and tourism Madhavrao Scindia resigned over the TU – 154 crash. The Russian plane had been wet – leased by Indian Airlines to break the pilots’ strike. Luckily all the passengers survived.

“FAMILY SILVER AND GOLD FOR SALE”

April 27th, 2017

Sarath Wijesinghe former Ambassador to UAE and Israel and former Chairman Consumer Affairs Authority

’John Locke’s economic and political theory’

John Locke 1632 English philosopher-father of liberalism- remarks a distinction between money and asserts in a Nation. Money is a steady movable friend travel about and gold silver and other assets must be solid and substantial part of the wealth of a nation and to multiply that metal ought, he thinks great objects of its potential economy”. This part of his philosophy has direct impact of on our country and economy with less money but enormous natural, historical, and other invaluable asserts the Nation” owns despite continuous exploitation by foreign powers from time to time directly and indirectly. Decades of exploitation and domination has resulted in our traditional asserts such as Gem, Jewellery, and other forms of wealth are in the hands of foreigners and foreign museums when we are left with our beautiful seas, rivers, forests, potential for gem mining, beautiful and strategic harbours right round the island, Historical monuments and civilization running back to thousands of years, which are untapped and unexploited immovable resources with the potential to convert to money by sale and auction to foreigners foreign states and companies. Foreign assistance and cooperation is essential but on our terms and short term contracts benefiting both countries bilateral and multilateral. UK and EU still follows Locke’s thinking, followed by BRICS (met recently) – nations Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa that each country has primary responsibility for its own economic social development when India practices” protectionism” but demand trade and political liberalisation in other countries when Sri Lankan authorities are in haste to liberalise, killing successful local industries to pave the way for foreign FTA’s binding local industries with long term ramifications for decades with irreparable international bindings. BRICS consist of great leaders and leadership national minded and patriotic leaders which is the secret of the success of countries with complicate issues.

Most beautiful island with invaluable natural resources untapped and preserved for the future”

It is no exaggeration that Sri Lanka is one of the most beautiful islands, with natural resources, abundance in water which is lacking in many parts of the world, different climates conditions with few hours’ drive, fertile soil, ancient irrigation systems no second to modern irrigation systems, with paddy plantations over the island to be self-sufficient in food, great cultural heritages despite domination of decades by foreigners, with great culture led by concepts of tolerance and loving kindness of Buddhists and Buddhism with tolerance to other religions and races from the time of Kings who sheltered all religions and races in the island. Country has small and large national and international harbours such as Baruwela, Galle, Oluwil, Colombo, Magampura, Trincomalee, and many other small fisheries harbours, and the river network consisting of Mahaveli, Malwathu, Kala, Kelaniya, Yan, Daduru, Walawa, Maduru, Maha, Kirindi Oya, Kumbakkan Oya, Ma Oya Gin Oya and small rivers, canals and reservoirs, with UNESCO recognized sites such as Kandy- Maligawa, Sigiriya, Anuradhapura, Galle, Pollunnaruwa, Singharaja, Central Highlands, and many other small and large sites, Gems in abundance, consisting of our natural wealth amongst many in abundance preserved and protected all of which are unique to Sri Lanka..

Vision and a Visionary”

Vision, a visionary, patriotism, and discipline are the main ingredients for a country to prosper from poverty and indiscipline. Ben –Gurion” of Israel, Mohamed bin Rashid Al Maktone” of UAE, Lee Kuan Yew” of

Singapore, and Mahathir Mohamed” of Malaysia brought their nations to be powerful and developed with their vision, love to the country with full of honesty integrity and patriotism. Dubai was once a fish market with sea pirates with no resources until 1961 when they found oil which UAE invested well when Dubai has only 4% oil in UAE developed exploiting the strategic situation of the harbour and airport in the Middle East (less strategic than the Silk Route” we are naturally and stragercally blessed with) in the sea route and developing the service sector harbours and airports they developed without selling or leasing to power blocks though they were sandwiched with powers right round. They got the best from world powers on their terms. They had land policy, trade policy, giving security priority. Land and resources were precious for Israel, Singapore, Malaysia and Dubai. Father of Dubai brought it to the highest in the business and industrial world was one of the richest and powerful countries today. Foreigners were invited and used on their terms with stringent rules on land and use of local resources, when land has become so cheap in Sri Lanka. There is an news item that 65000 acres in Wellassa” the land our ancestors shed blood for is to be given to a foreign company with the excuse that it is a lease for 100 years which is only a small example of number of multiple happenings. Success of Singapore is well known and well documented. Though a small Nation they were leaders in legal documentation, trade practices, international trade and business leading and guiding the rest of the world with arbitration and legal centres in Singapore and Lee Kuan is credited and respected as the father of Modern Singapore, when we are no short of intellectuals/educated local and international. Israel in 1/3 of Sri Lanka with no water 70 years ago now a nuclear and a world power guiding the world powers on agriculture and technology with full of innovators backed and encouraged by the State to groom as SME’s to groom and produce to the world. Land was precious to them and priority was given to defence and security, she helped Sri Lanka with Pakistan and China when the world was looking the other way when we were desperate for help.

MOU with India on Economic and Political Issues

MOU was long and broad signed between Hon Malik Smarawickrama and Hon Sushma Swara, keeping the Prime Minister’s promise to the powerful Sri Lankan unions that he will not sigh any documents connected on the Trincomalee Oil tanks and the 500 acre land within, when the contents of the powerful MOU contains broadly proposals to develop Oil Tanks in keeping with and continuation of tripartite international agreement entered into Chandrika Ranil” government in 2003, Develop CNG in Keravalapitiya, Piped distribution(gas) in suburban areas, with retail outlets, transportation sector and development of 84 tanks with long lease as continuation of the previous agreements still binding on Sri Lanka, Petroleum Refinery, Indian companies to control container terminals with 70% of Colombo port business to Indians for transhipment with far reaching ramifications of giving access and control over the strategically vulnerable and important best harbours running at the terrific profit, with bitter reminders of failed CEPA,SAPTA,APTA,ISFTA and Indo Sri Lanka accord signed hurried with high hopes all of which will have effects on the MOU and contents within. According to news Sri Lankan PM will try to get the best possible terms on ETCA in keeping with the principle of Fire Fighting” where a fire is the crew rushes through with equipment with no proper plan to be planned at the fire depending on the fire damages and situation, with no long term plans or strategy. Once the MOU is signed it is binding under international law and coming out of it by one party is an uphill task especially the two parties re unequal. Everything follows should be the four walls of the MOU and parties has a duty to abide by under international law and practices. Parent company of IOC in India is as large a Microsoft in USA with $ 61 billion( Sri Lanka GDP is only around 80 billion) with LKR 7000 million in country with thousands of outlets is India shows the asymmetrical and uneven magnitude of the parties concerned backed supported directly by mighty India.

Geo- Political and Foreign Policy realities/ramifications and Way forward”

Now that Magampura harbour, airport, with lands of around 15000 acres and FTA’s are negotiated with China on a firm footing awaiting for final documentation, it may be necessary to come to terms with the Giant and powerful neighbour- India – a regional power aspiring to be a world power with a position on the UN Security

Council as a balancing strategy/exercise. China -India’s traditional arch enemy is already a member of the Security Council (with the blessings with Sri Lanka in UN when others turned their back indication the success of our foreign policy then) and second economic power of the Globe” giving loans to the entire world lavishly with mega and mini investments grooming friendship with Asia, Africa and Latin American states. The reality is that it is impossible to satisfy both parties possibly demanding more and more facilities’ in the near future depending on the unforeseen and unexpected international and political competitions and complications where economy is given priority today as selfish and patriotic nations looking after themselves. Like the elephant unknown and unconcerned of his power importance and power, most probably Sri Lankans may not have realised their value and strength when the world thinks otherwise. Unless Sri Lanka and Sri Lankas are vigilant it is unavoidable Sri Lanka becoming a battle ground’ of two world powers with enormous potential and expectations. Battle today will not armed struggles- It is on Trade and economy as states have now given priority to trade and economy” over all other considerations. Now traditional domination has turned to economic and trade dominations in the world. It may be not too late at least now to strengthen our foreign policy either to be fully neutral and non- aligned following Hon. SWRD and Hon. Sirimao or to follow Hon D S Senanayaka- father of the Nation who followed patriotic balanced pro-western foreign policy. Do we have a foreign policy is a million dollar question today when leaders speak to the world in different tones which are considered a part of international law. Leaders do not speak on foreign policy with one word and there appear to be no firm and coherent foreign policy for the country which is paramount. We can position in between learning from the past using our learned intellectuals locally and spread worldwide. Even opposition is to be blamed for the confused state for non-intervention and non-interference guiding the state in the right direction!. Opposition is aiming and planning to come into power sooner or later without proposing or forcing the State to be in the right direction giving the citizen a plan of action and a vision. Still it is not too late for us to come back to the tract provided the opposition and the professionals including intercalates come forward with no fear or favour to any group or ideology in the name and interest of the Nation in grief and danger! We urge and request the Trustees of the Nation to be more vigilant and extra careful in making decisive decisions for the citizen entrusted the honourable duty on trust! (Author takes the responsibility to the contents and could be reached on sarath 7@hotmail.co.uk and mobile 0777880166)

රනිල් – ෆොන්සේකා මර්දනයේ ප්‍රථම බිල්ල

April 27th, 2017

නලින් ද සිල්වා

 සරත් ෆොන්සේකාට දීමට යන තනතුර ගැන නිශ්චිත තීරණයක් නැති බව පේනවා. ඒත් ආණ්ඩුව දරුණු මර්දනයකට සූදානම් වන බව පැහැදිලියි. සරත් ෆොන්සේකා ඇමතිවරයකු ලෙස සිටිය දී තවත් ඇමති ධුරයක් ඔහූට පැවරීමට යනවා ද? ඒ ඇමති ධුරය උද්ඝෝෂණ මැඩලීමේ ඇමති ධුරය ද? ඒ යටතට ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාවේ හා පොලීසියේ කොටස් ගෙනෙනවා ද? නැත්නම් සරත් ෆොන්සේකා දැනට දරණ ඇමති ධුරයෙන් ඉවත් වී උද්ඝෝෂණ මැඩලීමේ ඇමති ලෙස පත් කෙරෙනවා ද? එසේත් නැත්නම් ඇමති ධුරයක් නැතිව ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාවේ හා පොලීසියේ ඉහළ ම අණ දෙන නිලධාරියා ලෙස පත් කෙරෙනවා ද? ඒසේත් නැත්නම් හමුදාවේ හා පොලීසියේ කොටසක් සරත් ෆොන්සේකාගේ අණට යටත් කරනවා ද?

කලකට පෙර ත්‍රිවිධ හමුදාවලට අණ දිය හැකි ඒකකයක් තිබුණා. එහි අණ දෙන නිලධාරියකු සිටියා. මේ පිහිටුවන්න යන්නේ පොලීසිය ද ඇතුළත් එවැනි නිළයක් ද? කුමන දෙයක් කළත් සරත් ෆොන්සේකාට සමස්ත හමුදාවලට හා පොලීසියට හෝ ඉන් කොටසට හෝ සෘජුව අණ දිය හැකි වන පරිදි තනතුරක් ඇති කිරීමට යන බව පැහැදිලියි. මේ තනතුර අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය තුළ ම හෝ ඉන් පිටත හෝ  ඇති කිරීම ඊනියා ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයට නම් එකඟ වන්නේ නැහැ. රනිල්ට අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ ෆොන්සේකා අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ ම තබාගනිමින් බලතල පැවරීමක් වෙන්න පුළුවන්.

උද්ඝෝෂණ යනු ජනතාවගේ අයිතියක් ක්‍රියාත්මක වීමක්. වෘත්තීය සමිතියකට හෝ යම් සංවිධානයකට හෝ පුද්ගලයන්ට හෝ තමන් අනුමත නොකරන ක්‍රියා මාර්ගයකට එරෙහි ව උද්ඝෝෂණය කරන්න පුළුවන්. එයට අකුල් හෙළීම  බටහිර රටවල ක්‍රියාත්මක වන ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයට පටහැණියි.  උද්ඝෝෂණ විවිධ ස්වරුපයන් ගන් පුළුවන්. ඒත් හැම උද්ඝෝෂණයක් පිටුපස ම යම් දේශපාලනයක් ක්‍රියාත්මක වෙනවා. ඒ ඊ ගුණසිංහගේ කාලයේ සිට ම මෙරට වෘත්තීය සමිති ක්‍රියා කරන්නේ දේශපාලන වුවමනා ඇතිව. සමහර විට දේශපාලන පක්‍ෂයක් නැතිව වුවත් වෘත්තීය සමිතිවලට දේශපාලන අරමුණක් තිබෙනවා.

බොහෝ වෘත්තීන්වල වෘත්තීය සමිති රාශියක් තිබෙනවා. ඒ සමිති දේශපාලන පක්‍ෂ විසින් පිහිටුවන ලද ඒවා. එකල සමසමාජ පක්‍ෂයත් කොමියුනිස්ට් පක්‍ෂයත් වෘත්තීය සමිති අටවා ගෙන ක්‍රියාත්මක වුණා. අපට අන් සෑම කරුණක දී මෙන් ම මෙහිදීත් වෘත්තීය ක්‍රියා හා දේශපාලනය වෙන් කර ගැනීමට බැහැ. බටහිර ග්‍රීක යුදෙවු ක්‍රිස්තියානි චින්තනයේ ප්‍රධාන කරුණක් වන්නේ වෙන් කිරීම. ඒ අතර කොටස්වලට කැඩීම ද සිදුවෙනවා. ඊනියා විශ්ලේෂණයේ දී සිදු වන්නේ එයයි. නිවුටන් මෙය ඉතා මැනවින් කළා. නිවුටෝනීය සුසමාදර්ශයෙහි (පැරඩයිම්) පදනමෙහි එය තිබෙනවා.

 අපට වෙන් කිරීම බැහැ. අප අතර ඇති වහරකින් මෙය හොඳ හැටි පැහැදිලි වෙනවා. අප අනාගන්නවා. මොන තරම් බටහිර විද්‍යාව ඉගෙන ගත්තත් අපට එහි නිර්මාණ කරන්න බැහැ. මෙරට බටහිර විද්‍යාඥයන් බිහි නොවීමටත් ප්‍රධාන හේතුවක් වන්නේ මේ අනාගැනීම. මෙරට විද්‍යාඥයන් කියන අය බටහිර රටවලට ගියත් එහි මොන තරම් පහසුකම් ලැබුණත් අඩුම තරමෙන් ලන්ඩනයේ රාජකීය සංගමයේ අධිසාමාජිකයකු වන්න බැහැ. මා ඒ අධිසාමාජිකත්වය ඉහළින් සලකනවා නො වෙයි. මෙරට ඊනියා විද්‍යාඥයන්ගේ මිනුම් දණ්ඩක් බවට එය පත් වී තිබෙනවා.

 අපට ග්‍රීක යුදෙවු ක්‍රිස්තියානි චින්තනයෙහි ක්‍රියාත්මක වන්න බැහැ. අප වෘත්තීය ක්‍රියා හා දේශපාලන ක්‍රියා අනාගන්නවා. මෙරට වෘත්තීය සමිතිවලට ජනතාවට හිරිහැර නොවන ආකාරයකට කටයුතු කරන්න බැහැ. එය දොස්තරලාගේ සිට කොන්දොස්තරලා දක්වා විහි දී යනවා. බටහිර ක්‍රමයට උසස් අධ්‍යාපනයක් ලබා ගැනීම නිසා දොස්තරලා කොන්දොස්තරලාගෙන් වෙන් වන්නේ නැහැ. ඔවුන්ගේ මානසිකත්වවල වෙනසක් නැහැ. කොන්දොස්තරලා මෙන් ම දොස්තරලාත් අනාගන්නවා.

 මේ ආණ්ඩුව මෙන් ම විපක්‍ෂයත් දුර්වලයි. අද ඇත්තේ දුර්වලයන් අතර සටනක්. විපක්‍ෂයට දේශපාලන වශයෙන් ඉදිරි ක්‍රියා මාර්ගයක් නැහැ. එබැවින් ඇතැම් වෘත්තීය සමිති දේශපාලනය තම වෘත්තිය බවට පත් කරගෙන. ආණ්ඩුවට අද මේ වෘත්තීය සමිති මර්දනය කිරීම අවශ්‍යයයි. එක් පැත්තකින් වෘත්තීය සමිති මෙන් ම විපක්‍ෂයත් එයට වග කිව යුතුයි. එහෙත් ආණ්ඩුවත් අනාගන්නවා. අද ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයක් නැහැ. පොහොට්ටු පක්‍ෂය විපක්‍ෂයේ බලය අතට අරගෙන. ඒත් පොහොට්ටුව පිපෙන්නේත් නැහැ.

 ෆොන්සේකාට මර්දන බලතල දෙන්නේ රනිල්ගේ වුවමනාවට. එය අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයට ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ මෛත්‍රිපාල. මෛත්‍රිපාලට අද හැමෝම සතුටු කරන්න වෙලා. චන්ද්‍රිකා දුමින්ද දිසානායක මගින් ශ්‍රී ල නි පක්‍ෂය කියන එක හසුරවනවා.  ඊනියා ශ්‍රී ල නි ප සංවිධායකයන් වෙනස් කරනවා. ඒකාබද්ධ විපක්‍ෂයත් පොහොට්ටුවත් බලා ඉන්නවා. ෆොන්සේකාගේ පත් කිරීමත් බලා ඉන්නවා. බොරු මාධ්‍ය සංදර්ශන පවත්වනවා.

 රනිල් – ෆොන්සේකා මර්දනය 1987 -90 මර්දනයට වඩා කෘර වේවි. මේ ආණ්ඩුව බලයට පත් කිරීමට සම්මාදන් වූ ජ වි පෙරමුණත් එයට වග කිව යුතුයි. රතන හාමුදුරුවනුත් වග කිව යුතුයි. දැන් ෆොන්සේකාට මාධ්‍යයෙන් විරුද්ධ වීමෙන් වැඩක් නැහැ. ෆොන්සේකාගේ නව පත්වීමට විරුද්ධව ජෙනීවා යෑමට කිසිවකු යෝජනා කරාවි ද? අඩු තරමෙන් කාට හරි ජෙනීවා ගිහින් එන්න පුළුවන්.

ආණ්ඩුව ෆොන්සේකා අමාත්‍යවරයකු ලෙස තබා ගනිමින් ම ඔහුට බලතල දීමට උත්සාහ කරන බව පෙනෙනවා. මේ ආරක්‍ෂක අමාත්‍යාංශයේ බලතල කප්පාදු කිරීමක්. ආරක්‍ෂක ඇමති මෛත්‍රිපාලට ම සිද්ධ වෙනවා තම බලතල අඩු කර ගැනීමට අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයට යෝජනා කිරීමට. ඔහුගේ සේනාධිනායක බලතලත් කප්පාදු වේවි. අද ශ්‍රී ල නි පක්‍ෂය කියන එක චන්ද්‍රිකා පාලනය කරනවා. ආණ්ඩුව රනිල් පාලනය කරනවා. මෛත්‍රිපාල කරන්නේ මොකක් ද? රනිල් -ෆොන්සේකා  මර්දනයට මුලින් ම හසුවන්නේ මෛත්‍රිපාල. ඔහු දැන්වත් රනිල් ඉවත් කිරීමට කටයුතු කරනවා ද? ඔහු සූදානම් වුවත් ඔහුට විපක්‍ෂයෙන් එයට සහායක් ලැබේවි ද?

නලින් ද සිල්වා

2017 අප්‍රේල් 27      

සමනලීගේ ශාපය

April 27th, 2017

චන්ද්‍රසිරි විජයවික්‍රම, LL.B.,Ph.D.

සමනලී ෆොන්සේකා නමැති තරුණිය හැඩරුව ඇති පංචකළ්‍යාණියක් නොවුනත් ප්‍රියංකර මුහුණක් හා නන්දා මාලිනීගේ හා මාලිනී බුලත්සිංහලගේ ගී ඉතා හොඳට ගයන්නට පවා හැකියාවක් ඇති පංචස්කන්දයකි. එසේ නැත්නම් තිස් දෙකක් කුණප ඇති පොලොවට පස් වන මස් හා ඇටකටු ගොඩකි. ඇගේ ළදරු පින්තූර වල පෙන්වූ තරබාරුකම අනුව සිතනවිට ඇය ඇත්තටම දළඹුවා සමනලයා වුනා වගේමය. ඇය කියන්නේ මේ ජිවිතය හැර නැවත ඉපදීමක්, ස්වර්‍ගයට යෑමක් නැති බවය. ඇය ඕමාර් කයි‌යාම් කෙනෙකි.

යම් පිස්සෙක් විසින් ජේතවනාරාමයට මීතොටමුල්ලේ කුණු දැමූ පින්තූරයක් මුහුණු පොතේ පලකර ඇත. මේ කවුරුත් නොදන්නා පිස්සාට සපෝට් එකට සමනලී ඉදිරිපත්‌ව එය ඇගේ මුහුණු පොතේද දමා ඇත. සමනලී යනු ගිය චන්දකාලයේ දේශපාලනයද කරපු ප්‍රසිද්ධ තරුණියෙකි.  ඇය මෙසේ හැසිරීම පටාචාරා නිරුවතින් ගියා වගේ නොවේ.  හරිහමන් හැදීමක් නැති, අක්මුල් සිඳගත් ඉරාජ් වීරරත්න-උපුල් සන්නස්ගල අළුත් පරම්පරාවට අයත් වන මේ තරුණිය රුක්මණී දේවිය ගැන සිහිපත් කරගත යුතුය.

රුක්මණී දේවිය කාටවත් වචනයෙන්වත් හිංසාවක් කල බවක් අප අසා නැත. නමුත් ඇය මියගියේ ශරීරය කැබලි කැබලි වලට වෙන්වීය. කර්‍මයට අමතරව තවත් නියාම හතරක් බුදු දහමේ ඉගැන්වෙයි. විජය කුමාරතුංග නළුවාගේ මිනියේ මුහුණක්, හිසක් නොවීය. ප්‍රේමදාස පංචස්කන්දය හඳුනාගත්තේ මිනීකාමරයේ මේසයක් යට තිබුණු ශරීර කෑල්ලකිනි. මේ දෙන්නා නම දේශපාලනය නිසා මියගිය අයය. රන්ජන් විජේරත්න, ජෙයරාජ් ෆර්නැන්ඩු පුල්ලේ එසේ මියගියේ කරුමය නිසාද?

රුවන්වැලි මහසෑය, ථූපාරාමය, සෝමාවතිය, සමාධි පිළිමය, අවුකන පිළිමය දකිනවිට ශ්‍රද්ධාවට අමතරව ඇඟ කිළිපොළායන ජාතික අභිමානයක්ද ඇතිවන මිනිසුන් සිටින රටක මෙවැනි ජඩහැසිරීමක් එළිදරව් කරන්නේ කුමන මානසික මට්ටමක්ද? මෙවැනි දෙයක් යුදෙව් ජාතියට විරුද්ධව ඇමෙරිකාවේදී කළොත් ඊට විරුද්ධව ක්‍රියාකරන බලවත් ලෝක/ඇමෙරිකන් යුදෙව් සංවිධානයක් තිබේ. මුස්ලිම් රටක නම් සමනලීගේත් අනිත් පිස්සාගේත් හිස් වලට ෆත්‌වා නිකුත් වන්නේය.
බුද්ධාගම මෙසේ පාච්චල් කිරීමට සමනලීලාට ඉඩදිය යුතුද? මෙය වල්බූරු නිදහසක් නොවේද? ජේතවනාරාමයට සමකල හැකි අපහාසයට ලක්කල හැකි මිනිස් නිර්‌මාණයක් ඇමෙරිකාවේ නැත. බකින්හැම් පැලස් එකද එවැන්නක් නොවේ. මක්කම හෝ වටිකන් එකට මීතොටමුල්ලේ කුණු නැවෙන් ගෙනියන්න යෝජනා කලොත් කොහොම හිටීවිද?

රුක්මණී දේවීත් මේ සමනලී මෙන් ඇගේ පංචස්කන්දය නැවත උපදින්නේ නැත, එය කාර් එකක් වගේ මේ ජීවත්වන කාලයේදී උපරිම ලෙස පාවිච්චි කලයුතු බඩුවක් ලෙස සැළකුවාදැයි අපි නොදනිමු. නමුත් රුක්මණී දේවිට අත්‌වූ ඉරණම තමන්ටත් අත්වේය කියා සිතීමටවත් සමනලී අකමැති බව නිසැකය. සමනලීගේ ක්‍රියාවට විරුද්ධව ඇගේ නිවාසය ඉදිරිපිට විරෝධය පළකිරීමටවත් බෞද්ධ සංවිධානයක් නැතිසේය. අඩුතරමින් සමනලීගේ අළුත් දෙවැනි සැමියාවත් මැදිහත්‌වී ඇගේ නොසන්ඩාල ක්‍රියාවට රටේ බෞද්ධ ජනතාවගෙන් සමාව ගන්නට ඇගේ මොළය පාදා දුන්නොත් ලක්‍ෂ සංඛ්‍යාත ජනයාගේ හිතෙන් ඉබේම මතුවන ශාපයෙන් මිදීමට ඇයට ඉඩක් ලැබෙනු ඇත

ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සාදන තෙක් එට්කා සාකච්ඡා එපා!

April 27th, 2017

Professionals’ National Front

පසුගියදා ජනමාධ්‍ය වාර්ථා කර තිබුන ආකාරයට අගමැති රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා ඉන්දියාව බලා පිටත්ව යනුයේ ඉන්දීය අගමැති මෝදි මහතා හමුවී අපේ රටට තීරනාත්මකව බලපාන්නා වූ කාරනා කිහිපයකටම සිය අවසාන එකගතාවය පලකිරීමටය. ඒ අතර අපේ රටට  තීරනාත්මකව බල පාන්නාවූ එට්කා ගිවිසුම ද වේ. රට තුල මහත් ආන්දෝලනයකට තුඩුදුන් එට්කා ගිවිසුම පිළිබදව රටේ පිළිගත් වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ ප්‍රබල සංවිධාන රැසක එකමුතුවෙන් ගොඩ නංවන ලද වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ ජාතික පෙරමුණ (PNF) ලෙස අප අපගේ බලවත් අවධානය පසුගිය කාලය පුරාම යොමු කළෙමු. එහි අහිතකර පලවිපාක පිළිබදව වරින් වර ජනතාව දැනුවත් කිරීමට ද පියවර ගත්තෙමු. පාලකයින්ගේ ද සෙසු  බලධාරීන්ගේ ද ඇස් ඇරවීමට ද වරින් වර උත්සාහ ගත්තෙමු. විශේෂයෙන්ම අපේ රටට මහජනතාවගේ අදහස් උදහස් මත පදනම්ව සකසන ලද පාර්ලි‍මේන්තුවේ අනුමැතිය ලද පිළිගත හැකි ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් නොමැත. එවන් තත්වයක් තුල එළඹෙන්නාවූ ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළද ගිවිසුම් නිසා  රටට අත්විය හැකි ප්‍රතිපල ඉතාමත්ම අහිතකර වන බවද පෙන්වා දුන්නෙමු.

එබැවින් අන් රටක් සමග වෙළද හා/හෝ සේවා ගිවිසුමක් සම්බන්ධව එකගතාවයකට ඒමට පෙර, වඩාත් නිවැරදිව ගතහොත් එවන් ගිවිසුමක් සම්බන්ධව සාකච්ඡාවකට යාමට පෙර ජනතාවට වගකියනු ලබන බලාත්මක පැහැදිලි සහ නිශ්චිත ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සැකසීම අත්‍යවශ්‍ය ය. වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ ජාතික පෙරමුණ (PNF) ඇතුලු තවත් සංවිධාන කිහිපයක්  ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් දිගින් දිගටම කරණු ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමේ ප්‍රතිඵලයක් ලෙස පසුව ගරු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මැතිතුමා ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සැකසීම සදහා ජනතාවට වගකියන කොමිසන් සභාවක් පත් කරන බවටත් ඒ සම්බන්ධයෙන් වූ ගැසට් පත්‍රිකිවක් නිකුත් කිරීමට කටයුතු කරන බවටත් පොරොන්දු විය.  ගැසට් පත්‍රය සැකසීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් අවශ්‍ය කටයුතු සම්පාදනය සදහා ගරු සංවර්ධන උපායමාර්ග හා ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළඳ අමාත්‍යා මලික් සමරවික්‍රම මහතා ට අවශ්‍ය උපදෙස් ද ගරු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මැතිතුමා විසින් දෙනු ලැබීය. එසේම ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සකසා අවසන් වන තුරු එට්කා ගිවිසුම හෝ වෙනත් කිසිදු වෙළද හා/හෝ සේවා ගිවිසුමක් කිසිදු රටක් සමග අත්සන් නොකරන බවටත් පොරොන්දු විය. එහෙත් රජය පොරොන්දු ප්‍රකාරව ගැසට් පත්‍රයක් නිකුත් කිරීම දිගින් දිගටම ප්‍රමාද කරනු ලැබූ අතර ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සැකසීම සදහා කොමිසන් සභාවක් පත් කිරීමට මේ තාක් කිසිදු පියවරක් ගෙන නොමැත.

රජය සිය වගකීම පැහැර හැර අති තත්වය යටතේ  වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ ජාතික පෙරමුණ (PNF) මැදිහත්ව ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සැකසීම සදහා මහජන කොමිසන් සභාවක් පසුගිය මාර්තු මස පිහිටවනු ලැබීය. කිසිදු රජයකට පවා පත් කළ හැකි යැයි සිතිය නොහැකි මට්ටමින් කීර්තිමත් හා පලපුරුදු විද්වතුන්ගෙන් හා වෘත්තිකයන්ගෙන් සමන්විත වූ මහජන කොමිසන් සභාවක් ස්ථාපිත කිරීමට වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ ජාතික පෙරමුණ (PNF) සමත් විය. එහි සභාපති ලෙස කෙ‍ාළඹ විශ්ව විද්‍යාලයේ හිටපු උප කුලපති ආර්ථික විද්‍යාව පිළිබදව මහාචාර්ය ඩබ්ලිව්. ඩී ලක්ෂ්මන් මහතා කටයුතු කරනු ලබන අතර සම සභාපතිත්වය දරනුයේ හිටපු නීතිපති ජනාධිපති නීතිඥ සරත් පාලිත ප්‍රනාන්දු මහතා ය. කොමිසමේ ලේකම් ලෙස කටයුතු කරනුයේ විශ්‍රාම වැටුප් දෙපාර්තුමේන්තු‍වේ  හිටපු ප්‍රධානාධිකාරි කේ. ඒ. තිලකරත්න මහතා ය. සෙසු සාමාජිකයන් වනුයේ විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනුලා විජේසුන්දර මහත්මිය, වානිජ කටයුතු දෙපාර්තුමේන්තුවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්ෂ ජනරාල් පී. ඩී. ප්‍රනාන්දු මහතා, දේශීය ආදායම් කටයුතු දෙපාර්තුමේන්තුවේ හිටපු කොමසාරිස් ජනරාල් ආර්. පී. එල්. වීරසිංහ මහතා, ශ්‍රී ලංකා ටෙලිකොම් ආයතනයේ හිටපු ප්‍රධාන ගෝලීය කටයුතු නිලධාරි ඉංජිනේරු ලක්ෂ්මන් පෙරේරා මහතා හා මහජන උපයෝගිතා කොමිසමේ හිටපු කොමසාරිස් ආචාර්ය බන්ධුල පෙරේරා මහතා ය.

එම මහජන කොමිසන් සභාව අප්‍රේල් මාසය තුල සිය කටයුතු ආරම්භ කළ අතර මේ වන විට සැසි වාර දෙකක් පවත්වා මහජන අදහස් විමසා ඇත. එහිදී පූජ්‍ය ඇල්ලේ ගුණවංශ හිමියන් ද රජයේ  අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන දයා ගමගේ මහතා හා සුසිල් ප්‍රේමජයන්ත මහතා ද හිටපු අමාත්‍ය මහාචාර්ය ජී. එල්. පීරිස් මහතා ද කොළඹ විශ්ව විද්‍යලයේ ආර්ථික විද්‍යාව පිළිබද ජේෂ්ඨ කතිකාචාර්ය ආචාර්ය ලලිතසිරි ගුණරුවන් මහතා  හා  ආචාර්ය දයාන් ජයතිලක මහතා ඇතුලු විද්වතුන් ද ශ්‍රී ලංකා ඉංජිනේරු ආයතනයේ හිටපු සභාපති ඉංජිනේරු ආචාර්ය ආනන්ද රණසිංහ මහතා වෘත්තිකයන්ගේ සංවිධානයේ (OPA) හිටපු සභාපති වරලත් ගෘහ නිර්මාණ/ නගර නිර්මාණ ශිල්පි තිලිණ කිරිංගොඩ මහතා ඇතුලු වෘත්තිකයන් ද ද DSI සමූහ ව්‍යාපාරයේ කළමනාකාර අධ්‍යක්ෂක කුලතුංග රාජපක්ෂ මහතා, පැලවත්ත කිරි සමාගමේ සභාපති ආරියශීල වික්‍රමනායක මහතා හා නේචර්ස් බියුටි ක්‍රියේෂන්ස් සමාගමෙහි සභාපති සමන්ත කුමාරසිංහ මහතා  ඇතුලු ප්‍රකට ව්‍යාපාරිකයන් හා අපනයනකරුවන් ද ලංකා ඛනිජ තෙල් වෘත්තීය සමිති එකමුතුවේ කැඳවුම්කරු ඩී. ජේ. රාජකරුණා මහතා ඇතුලු වෘත්තීය වෘත්තීය සමිති නියෝජිතයන් ද ඇතුලු ව වෘත්තිකයන් හා විද්වතුන් රැසක්ම කොමිසම හමුවේ මේ වන විටත් අදහස් දක්වා ඇත. ඉදිරියේ දී පැවැත්වීමට නියමිත කොමිසන් සභා සැසිවාර වලදී තවත් වෘත්තිකයන්, විද්වතුන්, ව්‍යාපාරිකයන් හා විවිධ සංගම් නියෝජිතයන් ඇතුලු මහජන නියෝජිතයන් රැසක්ම සාක්ෂි දීමට නියමතව ඇත. එම කරුණු දැක්විම් මත පදනම්ව ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව

ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් සැකසීම සදහා වූ සිය නිර්දේශ මහජන කොමිසන් සභාව විසින් රජයට බාර දීමට නියමිතය. එම නිර්දේශ සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක් නීතිගත කිරීම රජයේ වගකීමක් වේ. එම ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තිය මත පදනම්ව රටේ යහපත උදාකිරීම උදෙසා ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම සම්බන්ධයෙන් කටයුතු කිරීම රජයකට අත්හල නොහැකි වගකීමකි.

මේ අනුව ජාත්‍යන්තර ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළදාම පිළිබදව ජාතික ප්‍රතිපත්තියක්  සකසා නීතිගත කරන තෙක් එට්කා ඇතුලු ජාත්‍යන්තර වෙළෙඳ ගිවිසුම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් සාකච්ඡා කිරීම වහාම අත්හිටවන ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිටිමු.

 

NO TALKS ON ETCA, TILL THE FORMATION OF A NATIONAL POLICY

April 27th, 2017

Professional’s National Front 

 According to the recent press reports, PM Ranil Wickremasinge visited India in order to meet his Indian counterpart, Modi, and to give the final consent on several issues of critical importance to Sri Lanka.  Among such issues, one is the ETCA agreement. Throughout the recent past, Professionals National Front (PNF), a collection of leading professional bodies, has paid our close attention on this matter. Necessary steps were taken to acknowledge the general public, on its negative impacts. This was specially so in the absence of any national policy regarding the international trade and trade agreements, established through the parliament and portraying the national interests.

Before reaching any trade agreement with other countries, or even before initiating any discussion on such agreement, it is imperative to have such national policy. As a result of continuous pressure by PNF and by some other organizations, the President Hon. Maitreepala Sirisena agreed to appoint a commission, which is responsible to the public, to formulate a National Policy on the International Trade and Trade Agreements and issue the relevant gazette notification on that appointment. Hon. Malik Samarawickrama, the Minister on Development Strategies and International Trade, has been duly instructed by the president with respect to this gazette notification. In the meantime, the President Hon. Maitreepala Sirisena promised not to sign either ETCA or any other agreement on trade or/and services, until the formulation of National Policy on the International Trade and Trade Agreements. However, the issuance of this gazette notification has been continuously delayed and no actions have been taken whatsoever to appoint the said commission.

In the gross negligence by the government on the matter, a public commission for the purpose of formulating of National Policy on the International Trade and Trade Agreements has been formed by the involvement of PNF, in the last March. This was consisting of the scholars and professionals of highest caliber, an attempt even any government would not be successful at. The commission has initiated the summons at the beginning of April and various parties representing the religious dignitaries, scholars, professionals, organizations and politicians from government and from opposition have made their presentations so far. The proceedings are continuing and the recommendations will be handed over to the government once the proceedings concluded. It is the undeniable responsibility of the government to pay due attention on the recommendations when forming the National Policy and reach the agreements with the best interest of the country and the nation.

As such, it is strongly requested to restrain from discussions on any international trade agreements, including ETCA, until the formation of National Policy on the International Trade and Trade Agreements.

Professional’s National Front      

Eng. Kapila Perera

Secretary – Professionals’ National Front

යෝජිත විශේෂ හමුදා බලඇණියට විරෝධය

April 27th, 2017

කේ. ඞී. ලාල්කාන්ත සභාපතිජාතික වෘත්තීය සමිති මධ්යස්ථානය.

තමන්ගේ ඉල්ලීම් මුල්කරගනිමින් විවිධ සංවිධාන හා ජන කණ්ඩායම් විසින් සංවිධානය කරනු ලබන උද්ඝෝෂණ හා අරගල, මර්ධනය කිරීම සඳහා ඇමති සරත් ෆොන්සේකාගේ නායකත්වයෙන්, විශේෂ හමුදා බලඇණියක් ගොඩනැගීමට ආණ්ඩුවේ අනුමැතිය ලැබී ඇති බවට මාධ්‍ය විසින් වාර්තාකර තිබුණි.

නොයෙකුත් කරුණු මත රට පුරා හතර දිග්භාගයෙන් ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහි උද්ඝෝෂණ හා අරගල එක පිට එක නිර්මාණය වෙමින් පවතී. මේ කිසිදු ගැටළුවකට පිළිගත හැකි සාධාරණ විසඳුම් ලබා දීමට සූදානම් නැති රනිල්-මෛත‍්‍රී හවුල් ආණ්ඩුව, එම අරගල මර්ධනය කිරීම සඳහා අඳබාල තීරණයක් ගෙන තිබේ. ‘‘අරගල හේතුවෙන් ජනතාව පීඩාවට පත්වේ’’ යැයි යන කරුණට මුවා වී සාධාරණය ඉල්ලා සටන් වදින ජනතාව මර්ධනය කිරීමට දරන උත්සහයට අපගේ බලවත් විරෝධය පළකර සිටිමු.

සාධාරණය ඉල්ලා අරගල භූමියට එක්වන ජනතාව, හිටපු හමුදා නායකයෙකු යොදවා බිය ගන්වා, මර්ධනයට ලක්කර, නිහඬ කළහැකි යැයි විශ්වාස කරන්නේ නම් එය ආණ්ඩුව විසින් තමන්ගේ වලිගය පාගා ගැනීමකි.

යුක්තිය හා සාධාරණය නියෝජනය නොකරන කිසිදු නීතියක්, ව්‍යවස්ථාවක්, අණ පනතක් හෝ හමුදා බලඇණියක් පිළිගැනීමට අප කිසිසේත් සූදානම් නැත. එවැනි ඕනෑම ජනතා විරෝධි තත්වයකට එරෙහිව සටන් වැදීමේ හැකියාවද ඒ සඳහා වූ පූජනීය අයිතියද අප සතුය.

ඒ නිසා කළ යුත්තේ ජනතාවගේ සාධාරණ ඉල්ලීම් සඳහා පිළිගත හැකි විසඳුම් ලබා දීමයි. එසේ නොකොට මර්ධනයේ හස්තය දිගු කරන්නේ නම්, ඒ නිසාම ඇති වන සියළු අනිටු ඵලවිපාකයන්ට ආණ්ඩුව විසින් වගකිවයුතු බවත් මර්ධනකාරී ආණ්ඩුව ගෙදර යැවීම සඳහා වන සටනට කොන්දේසි විරහිතව පනපොවන බවත් අප අවධාරණය කර සිටිමු.

ස්තූතියි.

මෙයට,

කේ. ඞී. ලාල්කාන්ත

සභාපති

ජාතික වෘත්තීය සමිති මධ්යස්ථානය.

India assures Sri Lanka on world class road infrastructure in Jaffna

April 27th, 2017

Courtesy Adaderana

India has agreed to cooperate with Sri Lanka in developing world class road infrastructure in Jaffna region of Sri Lanka.

The Indo-Sri Lanka Cooperation in road construction came up for discussion when India’s Road and Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari called on visiting Sri Lankan Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe.

During the discussions, the Sri Lankan Prime Minister invited the Government of India to take up development of three stretches of major road stretches namely Jaffna to Mannar, Mannar to Vavuniya and Dambulla to Tricomalee.

The Minister informed the Sri Lankan Prime Minister that India’s Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, during the last three years, has showcased tremendous amount of acceleration of road construction in India and is capable of taking up the roads and completing before time.

The Sri Lankan Prime Minister suggested that these stretches are important for Sri Lanka to develop the region of Jaffna.

Gadkari assured the Sri Lanka Prime Minister that Government of India and his Ministry shall fully cooperate with Sri Lankan Government’s efforts in developing world class infrastructure in Sri Lanka.

The Minister also suggested that taking up all these stretches for development may only be possible with the active support of Sri Lankan agencies for land acquisition and local clearances.

Without acquisition and other clearances in place, it will be difficult to complete the project in time.

Indian delegation proposed that a suitable financial model for developing these roads may be put in place.

On receiving the final formal proposal, the Minister assured that we may look at appointing an international consultant to take up detailed study and preparation of feasibility report and DPR for these stretches.

Gadkari reiterated Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s commitment of India’s active support in strengthening bilateral relations between India and Sri Lanka.

Meanwhile India and Sri Lanka will hold a dialogue on how to check the growing threat of the Islamic State in South Asia and any attempt by the terror outfit to destabilise the region.

The issue was discussed when Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh called on visiting Prime Minister of Sri Lanka Ranil Wickremesinghe in New Delhi today.

The home minister welcomed the Sri Lankan prime minister and emphasised on the close political ties between the two countries.

Both the leaders expressed concern over the growing ISIS threat and agreed that there should be a continuous dialogue between the security organisations of the two countries to thwart any attempt by the terror outfit to destabilise the stability and peace in the region, an official statement said.

The issues concerning the fishermen who inadvertently cross the international maritime boundary line were also discussed and it was felt that the same should be resolved at the earliest with no more loss of lives, it said.

Source: ANI/Outlook

-Agencies

සයිටම් සාකච්ඡාව

April 27th, 2017

නලින් ද සිල්වා

 ජනමාධ්‍ය කිහිපයක සහභාගීත්වයෙන් ජාතික රූපවාහිනිය විසින් සංවිධානය කෙරුණු නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය පිළිබඳ මාධ්‍ය සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගි වීමට නොහැකිවීම ගැන කණගාටුවෙනවා. මට ඒ සඳහා ආරාධනය ලැබුණේ ඉරිදා. එහි දී පළමුව කියැවුණේ සාකච්ඡාව විසිපස්වැනි දා පැවැත්වෙන බව. ආරාධනය ලැබුණු විගස මා එය පිිළිගත්තේ නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය පිළිබඳ ඇති දුර්මත රාශියක් ඛණ්ඩනය කිරීමට ඉන් අවස්ථාව ලැබෙන බව මා දත් බැවින්. එහෙත් සාකච්ඡාව පැවැත්වෙන්නේ අඟහරුවාදා බව කී විට මට වෙනත් නාළිකාවක පටිගත කිරීමකට සහභාගි වීමට ඇති බව මතක් වුණා. එවිට මා ඒ බව පවසා අදාළ නාළිකාවට කතා කර හැකිනම් පටිගත කිරීම් දිනය වෙනස් කර ගැනීමට උත්සාහ කිරීමට එකඟ වුණා. එහෙත් අවාසනාවකට අදාළ වැඩ සටහන් නිෂ්පාදක පැවසුවේ දිනය වෙනස් කිරීමට නොහැකි බව. සඳුදා ද තවත් වැඩ සටහනක් පටිගත කිරීමට තිබුණු බැවින් දිනය වෙනස් කිරීමට නොහැකි බව ඔහු පැවසුවා. එබැවින් මා නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය පිළිබඳ සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගි වීමට නොහැකි බව ආරාධනය ලත් දින ම දැන්වූවා.

පසුව පියෝටීවී තාක්‍ෂණය ඔස්සේ මා නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපන සාකච්ඡාව නැරඹුවා. රාජිත තම මතය සනාථ කළා.  ඔහු සාධක සහිතව තම මතය ජනතාවට ඒත්තු යන ආකාරයට ඉදිරිපත් කළා. බොහෝ කරුණුවල දී මා ඔහු සමග එකඟ නොවන නමුත් සයිටම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඔහු දරණ මතය අනුමත කරනවා. එය කාටවත් කඩේ යෑමක් නොව මගේ මතය කියා පෑමක් පමණයි. මා මහින්දටවත්, මෛත්‍රිපාලටවත්, වෙනත් කිසිවකුටවත් කඩේ යන්නේ නැහැ. ඇතැම් ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන් සූදානමක්, දැනුමක් නැතිව පැමිණි බව පෙනී ගියා. දිස්ත්‍රික් කෝටා ක්‍රමය, විශ්වවිද්‍යාල ප්‍රවේශය  ආදිය පිළිබඳ ව ජනමාධ්‍යවේදීන් කිසිවක් දැන සිටියේ නැහැ. එය කලකට ඉහත වික්ටර් අයිවන් විශ්වවිද්‍යාල ප්‍රවේශයේ ප්‍රමිතිකරණය යනු කුමක් දැයි නොදැන ඒ ගැන කතා කළා වගේ.

 රාජිත සමග මා ප්‍රධාන වශයෙන් එකඟ නොවන්නේ ඔහු  කැලණිය විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ කථිකාචාර්යවරියක් ගැන කී දේ පිළිබඳ ව පමණයි. ඇය කැලණිය විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයේ කථිකාචාර්යවරියක් නො වෙයි. ඇයට අදෘශ්‍යමාන ප්‍රාණීන් සමග සන්නිවේදනය කිරීමේ හැකියාවක් ඇති බව මා පෞද්ගලික ව දන්නවා. එහෙත් ඇයට ඇගේ ම දේශපාලනයක් තිබෙනවා. ඇය යහපාලනයට ආධාර කළා. ඒ අතර ඇය ඇතැම් වෛද්‍යවරුන්ට ජනාධිපති විය හැකි බව පැවසුවා/පවසනවා. ඇගේ දේශපාලනය සහ තවත් කරුණු කිහිපයක් නිසා මා පසුව ඇයගේ සන්නිවේදන ගැන උනන්දුවක් දැක්වූයේ නැහැ. එහෙත් කිහිප වරක් ඇය මට ප්‍රතිකාර කර තිබෙන බව ද කෘතඥතා පූර්වක ව පැවසිය යුතුයි. ඇතැම් ළමා රෝග විශේෂඥයන් තම දරුවන්ට ඇගෙන් ප්‍රතිකාර ලබා ගන්නා බවත් මා දන්නවා. රාජිත දන්නා විද්‍යාව අනුව ඔහු පංචෙන්ද්‍රිය ගෝචර නොවන සංසිද්ධි නොපිළිගන්වා විය හැකියි. එහෙත් මා දන්නා විද්‍යාවේ ප්‍රවාද පංචෙන්ද්‍රිය ගෝචර නැහැ. හැරත් බෞද්ධයකු ලෙස මා පංචෙන්ද්‍රිය ගෝචර නොවන සංසිද්ධි පිළිගන්නවා. එහෙත් මේ කරුණ සයිටම් සමග සම්බන්ධ නැහැ.

 අද සයිටම් ප්‍රශ්නයට වග කිව යුත්තේ වෛද්‍ය සභාව බව මගේ පිළිගැනීමයි. මා සාකච්ඡාට සහභාගි වුණා නම් ඒ බව ප්‍රකාශ කරනවා. ඒ අතර ප්‍රශ්නය අවුල් කරන්නේ වෛද්‍ය නිලධාරීන්ගේ සංගමයයි. ඔවුන් ඇතැමකුට දේශපාලන න්‍යාය පත්‍ර තිබෙනවා. ඔවුන්ගේ සංගමයේ නිලධාරීන් අතර පිටරට විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවලින් උපාධි ලත් අය සිටිනවා. ඔවුන් කියාවි ඒ විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවල ප්‍රමිතිය උසස් කියා. ඒ ඇතැම් විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවල උපාධිධාරීන් ලංකාවට පැමිණීමෙන් පසු සායනික පුහුණුව ලබන බවට සාක්‍ෂි තිබෙනවා. සයිටම් ප්‍රශ්නය පිටුපස සිසුන් පිටරට යවා මුදල් උපයන අයත් සිටිනවා. ඔවුන් පවත්වාගෙන යන්නේ කඩ ද සාප්පු ද කියා මා දන්නේ නැහැ.

 මා සයිටම් හා නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය ගැන ලිපි කිහිපයක් ම ලියා තිබෙනවා. ඒ කරුණු නැවත සඳහන් කිරීම අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ නැහැ. සයිටම් ගැන අභියාචනාධිකරණ තීන්දුව ගැන ශ්‍රෙෂ්ඨාධිකරණය තීන්දුවක් දේවි. ඒ ගැන මා දැනටමත් කියා ඇති දේට වඩා යමක් ඒ තීන්දුව ලබා දෙන තෙක් මට කියන්න බැහැ. එය උසාවියට අපහාස කිරීමක් වන්නත් පුළුවන්. සයිටම් ගැන මා යෝජනා කළ බොහෝ දේ ද ආණ්ඩුවේ තීරණයේ අඩංගු වෙනවා. මා එකඟ නොවන්නේ සයිටම් උපාධිධාරීන්ට වැඩිදුර  සායනික පුහුණුවක්  ලබා දීමට කර ඇති යෝජනාවට පමණයි. ඒ පුහුණුව ලබා දීමට කටයුතු කළ යුත්තේ වෛද්‍ය සභාව බවයි මගේ වැටහීම.

 මා යෝජනා කර සිටියේ සයිටම් උපාධිධාරීන්ට නඩු තීන්දුව අනුව තාවකාලික ලියා පදිංචිය දී ඔවුන්ගේ සීමාවාසික පුහුණු කාලය මාස හයකින් හෝ අවුරුද්දකින් හෝ දීර්ඝ කිරීමට. එය උසස් අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශයේවත් සෞඛ්‍ය අමාත්‍යාංශයේවත් කටයුත්තක් නොව වෛද්‍ය සභාවේ කටයුත්තක්. ඒ පුහුණුව ලබා දීම මගින් සයිටම් උපාධිය පිළිගැනීම වැරදි යැයි කියැවන්නේ නැහැ. උපාධියක් පිළිගැනීම විශ්වවිද්‍යාල ප්‍රතිපාදන කොමිසමේ වගකීමක්. වෛද්‍ය වෘත්තියට බඳවා ගැනීමේ නිර්ණායක ඉදිරිපත් කිරීම වෛද්‍ය සභාවේ කටයුත්තක්. ඒ දෙක දෙකක් බව ඇතැමුනට අවබෝධයක් නැහැ. රජයේ විශ්වවිද්‍යාලවල වෛද්‍ය උපාධිධාරීන්ටත් සීමාවාසික පුහුණුවක් ලබා දෙනවා. එයින් රජයේ වෛද්‍ය පීඨවල උපාධි පිළිගැනීම වරදක් වෙන්නේ නැහැ. උපාධි ලත් අයකුට වෘත්තියකට බඳවා ගැනීමට පෙර අදාළ බලධාරීන්ට ඔහුට හෝ ඇයට හෝ  පුහුණවක් ලබා දිය හැකියි. වෛද්‍ය වෘත්තියට බඳවා ගැනීමේ කොන්දේසි සහිත තාවකාලික ලියා පදිංචිය ලබා දෙන්නේ වෛද්‍ය සභාව. එහි දී උපාධිධාරියකුට දිය යුතු සීමාවාසික කාල පරිච්ඡෙදය වෛද්‍ය සභාවට තීරණය කළ හැකියි. එය සෑම විශ්වවිද්‍යාලයකට ම පොදු වු කාල පරිච්ඡෙදයක් විය යුතු නැහැ. ඇතැම් රජයේ වෛද්‍ය පීඨවල උපාධිධාරීන්ටත් අවුරුද්දකට වැඩි සීමාවාසික පුහුණුවක් ලබා දීමට වෛද්‍ය සභාවට හැකියාව තිබෙනවා. ඒ පුහුණුව සාර්ථක ව නිම කිරීමෙන් පසුව වෛද්‍ය සභාව ස්ථිර ලියා පදිංචිය  ලබා දෙනවා. සයිටම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද ඇත්තේ තාවකාලික ලියාපදිංචිය පිළිබඳ නඩුවක්. අධිකරණය තීරණය කෙළේ වෛද්‍ය සභාව සයිටම් උපාධිධාරිනියට තාවකාලික ලියා පදිංචිය දිය යුතු බවයි. 

සයිටම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් වෛද්‍ය සභාවේ නිර්දේශ ගැන නඩු තීන්දුවේ තිබෙනවා. සයිටම් උපාධිධාරීන්ට වැඩිදුර සායනික පුහුුණුවක් ලබා දිය යුතුය යන්නත් ඔවුන්ගේ නිර්දේශයක්. වෛද්‍ය සභාවට ම සීමාවාසික  පුහුණු කාල සීමාව දීර්ඝ කිරීමෙන් හා අදාළ රෝහල් ලබා දීමෙන් ඒ කාරයය කරන්න පුළුවන්. ඒත් මේ වෛද්‍ය සභාව ක්‍රියා කරන්නේ ඉතාමත් අවිධිමත් අසංගත ආකාරයකින් බව පැහැදිලියි. එබැවින් ආණ්ඩුව ඒ තීරණය වෛද්‍ය සභාවට ගැනීමට ඉඩ නොතබා තමන් ම ගත්තා විය හැකියි. එහෙත් එහි වරදක් ඇති බව මගේ වැටහීමයි.

 සයිටම් කියන්නේ වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාලයක් පමණක් නො වෙයි. එහි තවත් පීඨත් තියෙනවා. තවත් පෞද්ගලික උපාධි ලබා දෙන ආයතන රාශියක් මෙරට තිබෙනවා. ඒවාහි ප්‍රමිතිය අඩු කියා හෝ එයින් නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය ඉවර බවක් හෝ කිසිවකු කියන්නේ නැහැ. මේ කිසිවක් ගැන නිරවුල් ව කල්පනා කිරීමට නොහැකි බොරු සමාජවාදීන් පිරිසකගේ උද්ඝෝෂණවලට ආණ්ඩුව යටවිය යුතු නැහැ. මේ බොරු කාරයන් චීනයේ පෞද්ගලික වෛද්‍ය පීඨ ගැන කිසිවක් කියන්නේ නැහැ. ඒවාහි උපාධිධාරීන් ද ලංකාවේ ඉන්නවා. චීනයේ නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය  ඉවර ද? නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනය කී ගමන් හැඟීමෙන් පමණක් වැඩ කරන ඇතැමුන්ගේ ලේ කිපෙනවා. ඔවුන් කල්පනා කරන්නේ නැහැ. ඒ අතර බටහිර වෛද්‍යවරුන්ගේ ඊනියා සමාජ තත්වයක් ද බොහෝ රටවල තිබෙනවා. මෙරට ඇතැමුන් මේ ඊනියා සමාජ තත්වය, වෛද්‍යවරුන් දරණ සමාජ බලය ද තම දේශපාලන ව්‍යාපෘති සඳහා යොදා ගන්නවා. 

මේ සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගි වීමට නොහැකි වීම ගැන නැවතත් මා කණගාටු වෙනවා. ඇතැමුන් සිතන විධියට මා සිතන්නේ නැහැ. මා රාජිතට බොහෝ දේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් විරුද්ධයි. එහෙත් සයිටම් සම්බන්ධයෙන් ඔහු සමග එකම වේදිකාවක පෙනී සිටීම කාට ප්‍රශ්නයක් වුවත් මට ප්‍රශ්නයක් නො වෙයි.  

 

 නලින් ද සිල්වා

 2017 අප්‍රේල් 26 

මා බාර දුන්නේ 2/3 බලැති ශ‍්‍රීලනිපයක්.. මෛත‍්‍රී ශ‍්‍රීලනිපය සහමුලින්ම වැනසුවා.. පක්‍ෂය දෙකඩ කලා..- මහින්ද සියලූ රහස් හෙලි කරයි..

April 27th, 2017

ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්‍ෂය දෙකඩ කිරීම’ මැයෙන් හිටපු ජනාධිපති මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ මහතා විසින් නිකුත් කර ඇති නිවේදනයකි මේ.

2017 අ‌ප්‍රේල්  27

මාධ්‍ය නිවේදනය

 ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්‍ෂය දෙකඩ කිරීම

2015 ජනවාරියේදී නව නායකයෙකු යටතට පත්වූයේ නොබෙදුණු ශ්‍රිලනිපයකි. පක්‍ෂ නායකත්වය මා සතුව තබා ගැනීමට මම ඒ අවස්ථාවේදී උත්සාහයක් නොගත්තේ අපි කාගෙත් දේශපාලන තෝතැන්න වූ ශ්‍රිලනිපය රැකගැනීමේ උවමනාව නිසාය. දශක හතරක් මුළුල්ලේ ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ සාමාජිකයෙකු මෙන්ම අවුරුදු 13ක් මුළුල්ලේ පක්‍ෂයේ මහලේකම්වරයෙකුද වූ අයෙකු පක්‍ෂයේ නායකයා වූ විට පක්‍ෂයට හානියක් නොවනු ඇතැයි මම මෙන්ම පක්‍ෂ සාමාජිකයනුත් බලාපොරොත්තු විය. 2015 අගෝස්තු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයේදී වෙනම ඡන්දය ඉල්ලිය යුතු යැයි අප අතර ප්‍ර‍බල මතයක් තිබුණද, ශ්‍රිලනිපය හා එජනිසය තුළින් අපි එම මැතිවරණයටත් තරග කලේ, මේ පක්‍ෂය රැක ගැනීමට අප තුළ තිබුණු උවමනාව නිසාය. ඒ වන විටත් අප තුළ ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ නව නායකත්වයේ ක්‍රියාකලාපය ගැන බරපතල සැක නොතිබුණා නොවේ.

ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ මේ නව නායකයා ජනාධිපති වූ විගස පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ ආසන 43ක් පමණක් තිබුණු එජාපයට අගමැතිකම දීම නිසා ඒ වන විටත් පාක්‍ෂිකයන් තුළ තිගැස්මක් තිබුණි. ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ නායකත්වය ලැබීමෙන් පසුවවත් මේ එජාප නැඹුරුව වෙනස් වනු ඇතයි පක්‍ෂ සාමාජියන් බලාපොරොත්තු වුණත්, එවැන්නක් සිදු නොවීය. ඒ වන විට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ තුනෙන් දෙකේ බලයක් තිබුණු එජනිසයේ නායකත්වය ලැබීමෙන් පසු, නව නායකයා කළේ එජනිසයේ බහුතරයත් පාචිච්චි කරමින් යූඑන්පී ආණ්ඩුව පවත්වාගෙන යාමයි. එපමනක්ද නොව 2015 මාර්තු මාසයේදී එජනිස පාලනය යටතේ පැවති පලාත් පාලන ආයතන සියල්ල විසුරුවා, ඉදිරියට පැවැත්වීමට නියම වූ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයේදී එජනිසයට වාසිදායක වූ සාධකයක් අපිට අහිමි කිරීමටත් නව නායකත්වය කටයුතු කළා. එවන් පසුබිමක් තුළ වුවත්, 2015 අගෝස්තු මැතිවරණය අපි එජනිසය යටතේම තරග කළේ, ශ්‍රිලනිපය නොබෙදා තබා ගැනීමට උපරිම උත්සාහයක් ගතයුතු නිසාය. එමෙන්ම නව ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකයා එජාපයේ ග්‍ර‍හණයෙන් ගලවා ගැනීමට හැකිවේ යැයි බලාපොරොත්තුවක්ද එදා නොතිබුණා නොවේ.

නමුත් 2015 මහ මැතිවරණය එජනිසය ජය ගන්නා බවට ළකුණු පහල වෙමින් පැවති අවස්ථාවේදී ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකයා කටයුතු කල ආකාරයෙන් පාක්‍ෂිකයන් බරපතල අපේක්‍ෂා භංගත්වයකට පත්විය. ඡන්දයට දින කීපයක් තිබියදී එජනිසය ඡන්දයෙන් දිණුවත් එහි ඡන්ද ව්‍යාපාරය මෙහෙය වූ මට අගමැතිකම දෙන්නේ නැති බවට විවෘත ලිපියක් ලියමින් ශ්‍රීලනිපයේ නව නායකයා කීවේ ඡන්දයෙන් ශ්‍රිලනිපය දිනුවත් ඔහු ජයග්‍ර‍ණය දෙන්නේ එජාපයට බවය. එයින්ද අපේ ජයග්‍ර‍ණය නැවැත්වීමට නොහැකි වේ යැයි ඔහු තුළ වූ සැකය නිසා ඡන්දයට පැය 48ක් තිබියදී ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ හා එජනිසයේ මහ ලේකම්වරුන් දෙදෙනාම ධූරයන් වලින් පහ කරනු ලැබුවේද ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ පරාජය තහවුරු කිරීමටය. මේ ආකාරයට ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකයාගේ උදවු ඇතුව 2015 අගෝස්තු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණය එජාපය ජයගත් පසු වත්මන් ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකත්වය කලේ ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් පිරිසක් යූඑන්පී ආණ්ඩුවට මුක්කු ගැසීමට යෙදවීමයි.

2015 පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයේදී තේරී පත්වුණු සියළුම මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් ජනතාව ඉදිරියේ පෙනී සිටයේ 2015 ජනවාරි 08 කුමන්ත්‍ර‍ණයට විරුද්ධවය. ඔවුන් සියළුදෙනාම ඡන්දය ඉල්ලුවේ මේ යමපාලන ආණ්ඩුවේ වැඩපිළිවෙලට විරුද්ධවය. එසේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට තේරී පත්වුණු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් තිස් ගණනක් ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකත්වයේ ආරාධනය මත යූඑන්පී ආණ්ඩුවට මුක්කු ගැසීමට ඉදිරිපත් වී සිටීම ගැන මම කණගාටුවට පත්වෙමි. නමුත් ශ්‍රිලනිප හා එජනිස මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් 52 ක් තමන්ට 2015 ලැබුණු යමපාලන විරෝධී ජනවරමට ගරු කරමින් විපක්‍ෂයේ අසුන්ගෙන සිටී.

මෙසේ විපක්‍ෂයේ සිටින ශ්‍රිලනිප මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් විටින් විට, ඔවුන්ගේ ආසන සංවිධායක ධූර වලින් ඉවත් කිරීම දැන් අවුරුදු දෙකක් මුළුලුල්ලේ සිදු වී ඇත. ශ්‍රිලනිප පාක්‍ෂිකයන්ගේ ඡන්දයෙන් පත්කර ගනු ලැබූ අතිශයින්ම ජනප්‍රිය චරිත ආසන සංවිධායක ධූර වලින් ඉවත් කරමින් ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ නායකත්වය මේ කරන්නේ ශ්‍රිලනිපය ශක්තිමත් කිරීම නොව එජාපයේ ජය තහවුරු කිරීමට කටයුතු කිරීමය. අද වන විට එජාප ආණ්ඩුවට මුක්කු නොගැසීමේ වරදට ආසන සංවිධායක ධූර වලින් නෙරපා හැර ඇති ශ්‍රිලනිප මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් අතර, ප්‍ර‍සන්න රණතුංග, බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන, ගීතා කුමාරසිංහ, ගාමිණී ලොකුගේ, සනත් නිශාන්ත, පියල් නිශාන්ත, ජොන්ස්ටන් ප්‍ර‍නාන්දු, මහින්ද යාපා අබේවර්ධන, කෙහෙළිය රඹුක්වැල්ල, පවිත්‍රා වන්නිආරච්චි, රෝහිත අබේගුණවර්ධන, ජගත් බාලසූරිය, සී.බී. රත්නායක, ජනක බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන්, ලොහාන් රත්වත්තේ, අනුර විදානගමගේ, සාලින්ද දිසානායක, මොහාන් සිල්වා, ටිකිරි අධිකාරී, ඩී.බී.හේරත්, කංචන විජේසේකර යන මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ද වේ.

මේ ආකාරයට ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ ස්ප්‍රිත්තුව, ආසන සංවිධායකකම් වලින් ඉවත් කිරීමෙන් වාසිය සැලසෙන්නේ ශ්‍රිලනිපයටද නැතිනනම් එජාපයටද? මෙසේ ඊයේ පෙරේදා ආසන සංවිධායක ධූරයෙන් ඉවත් කළ ජනක බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන් මාතලේ දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ ශ්‍රිලනිපය වෙනුවෙන් කළ මෙහෙවරවත් සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන නැති බව පැහැදිලිය. එතුමාගේ දිවන්ගත පියා ටී.බී.තෙන්නකෝන් ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ ආරම්භක සාමාජිකයෙකු මෙන්ම 1956 විප්ලවයේ පුරෝගාමීයෙකුද විය.  ලොහාන් රත්වත්තේ ඉවත් කිරීමට පෙර ඔහුගේ දිවංගත පියා ශ්‍රිලනිපයටත් රටටත් කල සේවය ගණන් ගෙන තිබෙනවාද? ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකයාගේ මේ වැඩ පිළිවෙල නිසා ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ ආසන සංවිධායක කමත් බාල්දු වී ඇති තරම ඩලස් අලහප්පෙරුම, ජනක වක්කුඹුර හා  රෝහණ දිසානායක ස්වේච්චාවෙන්ම තම සංවිධායක ධූරවලින් ඉවත් වීමෙන් පෙනේ. ප්‍ර‍මිත බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන් සිය පියාට වූ අසාධාරණය නිසා දෙවරක් නොසිතා තමාට තිබුණු පලාත් ඇමති ධූරයෙනුත් ඉල්ලා අස්විය.

පක්‍ෂයේ පතාක යෝධයින් ආසන සංවිධායක කම්වලින් ඉවත් කරමින් මේ ගෙන යන වැඩපිළිවෙල නිසා ශ්‍රිලනිපය දෙකඩ කිරීමේ සමපූර්ණ වගකීම පක්‍ෂ නායකයා භාරගත යුතුය. යූඑන්පී ආණ්ඩුවට මුක්කු ගසන මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ගේ ආසන සංවිධායක කම් එසේම තිබියදී ආණ්ඩුවට විරුද්ධ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ගේ ආසන සංවිධායකකම් නැති කිරීමෙන් ශක්තිමත් වෙන්නේ ශ්‍රිලනිපයද නැතිනම් එජාපයද යන්න පොඩි ළමයෙකුට වුවත් තේරුම් ගැනීමට අපහසු නැත. තමන්ට 2015 අගෝස්තු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයේදී ලැබුණු ජණවරමට ගරු කරමින් විපක්‍ෂයේ සිටින ශ්‍රිලනිප මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් ශ්‍රිලනිප මධ්‍යම කාරක සභාවෙනුත් ඉවත් කොට ඇත. මේ කුමන ක්‍රියාමාර්ග ගත්තත් ශ්‍රිලනිප නායකයාගේ අනුග්‍රාහකත්වය යටතේ පවතින මේ දුර්දාන්ත ආණ්ඩුව දිනෙන් දිනම පිරිහීම වැලැක්විය නොහැක.

ශ්‍රිලනිපයේ මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් පිරිසකුත් ආණ්ඩුව ශක්තිමත් කිරීමට යෑමෙන් පසුත් ආණ්ඩුවට වැඩ බැරිනම්, බලා සිටියදී ගිලෙන ඔය නැවේ තවදුරටත් සිටින්නේ කුමටදැයි, ඒ ශ්‍රිලනිප මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්ද කල්පනා කර බැලිය යුතුය. ඡන්දයකදී කිසිදාක ශ්‍රිලනිපයට ඡන්දය නොදෙන, ජාතික දේශපාලන පක්‍ෂ මෙන් මැයි දිනය සමරන්නේ නැති, උතුරු නැගෙනහිර ජාතිවාදී පක්‍ෂවල සාමාජිකයන්ට නොමිලේ විනෝද සවාරි ලබා දී ගෙන්වාගෙන ඔලුගෙඩි පෙන්වා ජනතාව රැවටීමට උත්සාහ ගත්තත්, දිගින් දිගටම මේ ආණ්ඩුව ඡන්ද කල් දමමින් සිටන්නේ, ඔවුන්ට රට තුළ තිබෙන සැබෑ බලය ගැන අවබෝධයක් තිබෙන නිසා විය යුතුය.

මම 2015, අපට ලැබෙනු ජනවරම අනුව ‍මේ ආණ්ඩුවට එරෙහි විපක්‍ෂ බලවේගයට නායකත්වය දෙමින් මේ දුර්දාන්ත ආණ්ඩුව පරාජය කිරීමට කැප වෙන බව මෙහදී නැවතත් ප්‍රකාශ කර සිටමි. ශ්‍රිලනිපය එජාපයේ වලිගයක් බවට පත් කිරීමට විරුද්ධ සියළුම ශ්‍රිලනිප පාක්‍ෂිකයන්ටත්, මේ ආණ්ඩුවේ ජාතිද්‍රෝහී වැඩපිළිවෙලට විරුද්ධ මහජනතාවටද ගාලු මුවදොර මැයි රැලියට සහභාගී වී මේ ආණ්ඩුවට ප්‍ර‍බල පණිවුඩයක් යවන මෙන් මම ආරාධනය කර සිටිමි.

මහින්ද රාජපක්‍ෂ
ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ හිටපු ජනාධිපති

මේ ගයන්නේ හංස ගීතය

April 27th, 2017

උඋපුටාගැණීම  මව්බිම

ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ හංස ගීතය ගැයෙමින් තිබේ. මේ ගෙවෙන්නේ එහි උච්චතම මොහොතයි. ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂය ගෙඩිය පිටින්ම එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ සිරකරුවකු බවට පත් වී හමාරය. මේ වෙනකොට පක්ෂයේ අනන්‍යතාව නැතිවී ගොස් හමාරය. පක්ෂයට එරෙහිව එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයෙන් ඡන්දය ඉල්ලා, දිනා නැවත පක්ෂය අල්ලාගත් නායකත්වයකින් මීට වඩා දෙයක් බලාපොරොත්තු විය නොහැකිය.

ඒ විතරක් නොවේ. පරාජයේ සදාකාලික ලේබලය නිල මුද්‍රාවක් සේ අලවන්නට වුවමනා පිඹුරුපත් සැකසී අවසන්ය. එහි උච්චතම මොහොම මේ වන විට සිදුවෙමින් පවතී. නායකයෝ දෙකොනින් හිනා යන සංවිධායකකම් බෙදා දෙමින් ”සිඟිති ආතල්” ගනිමින් සිටිති. පාක්ෂිකයා අන්දමන්දව සිටී.
මාතලේ දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ අංක එකේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාකාරයා වූ ජනක බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන් සංවිධායකකමෙන් නෙරපා හැරීමට පක්ෂ නායකත්වය කටයුතු කොට තිබේ. මහනුවර දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පතාකයෙක් වූ ලොහාන් රත්වත්තේටද ඒ හැන්දෙන්ම බෙදා තිබේ. බදුල්ලේ තේනුකටත් ඒ හැන්දය.

පක්ෂය කනත්තට රැගෙන යෑම සම්බන්ධ මේ උදාහරණම හො¼දටම ප්‍රමාණවත්ය. නිකවැරටියෙන් එළවා දැමූ ජොනී යූ.එන්.පි.යෙන් ආව අයෙක් කියා හිතන්නට පුළුවන. එහෙත් ජනක සහ ලොහාන් නොම්මර එකේ ශ්‍රී ලංකා බල කණුය. ඒ දෙදෙනා එළවා දැමීම පාක්ෂිකයන් කරකවා අතහැරීමක් බව අමුතුවෙන් කිව යුතු නැත.
ජනක ටී.බී. තෙන්නකෝන්ගේ පුතාය. ටී.බී. ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ ආරම්භක සාමාජිකයෙක්ය. 1956 සිට 1977 දක්වා අඛණ්ඩව විසි එක් වසරක් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව නියෝජනය කළ ඒ මහතා ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ පතාකයෙක්ය. ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂය පොඩි මිනිහාගේ පක්ෂයක් බවට වූ සලකුණ ටී.බී.ය. ඔහු කවිකොළකාරයෙක්ය. සෙල්ලම් නැත. ඔහු පිට පිටම 6 වතාවක් පාර්ලිමේන්තු ආ ඔරිජිනල් ශ්‍රී ලංකාකාරයෙක්ය. 1956 මැතිවරණයෙන් ඡන්ද 9155කින් ”දඹුල්ල” මන්ත්‍රි ලෙස ජයග්‍රහණය කළ මේ කවිකොළකාරයා 1960 මාර්තු මැතිවරණයේදී ද, 1960 ජූලි මැතිවරණයේදී ද, 1965 මැතිවරණයේදී ද, 1970 මැතිවරණයේදීද ශ්‍රී ලංකා එක බිංදුවට වැටුණු 1977 මැතිවරණයේදී ද ටී.බී. තෙන්නකෝන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු ආවේය. ඔහු හැප්පුණේ යූ.එන්.පී. පතාකයන් එක්කය. අතිශය අහිංසක මිනිසකු වූ ඔහු පාර්ලිමේන්තුව දෙවනත් කළේ අසාධාරණයට එරෙහිවය. තෙන්නකෝන්ලා ඔය කොයි කාටත් වඩා පක්ෂයට කිට්ටුය. හිටපු පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රිවරයකු සහ ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ පරිපාලන ලේකම්වරයකු වූ යසරත්න තෙන්නකෝන් ජනකගේ සහෝදරයා ය. ජනක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට පැමිණියේ 1994 දීය. මධ්‍යම පළාත් සභාවේ ඇමැති ප්‍රමිත බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන් ජනකගේ පුතණුවන්ය. මධ්‍යම පළාත් සභාවේ තිළිණ බණ්ඩාර තෙන්නකෝන් යසරත්න තෙන්නකෝන්ගේ පුතණුවන්ය.
ඉතින් ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ පොත්තක් මෙන් තෙන්නකෝන්ලා බැඳී සිටිති. ඔවුන් කවම කවදාවත් පක්ෂයෙන් පිටමං වී නැත. යූ.එම්.පී. ආණ්ඩුවක් ආව හැම වෙලාවකම ඔවුන්ට හිරගෙදරනම් උරුම විය.

ජනක කවදත් අසාධාරණයට එරෙහි විය. එමෙන්ම ඔහු සංවේදී අයෙකි. රාජපක්ෂ පාලන සමයේ තම පක්ෂයේම මාතලේ ප්‍රදේශයේ තවත් දේශපාලනඥයකු සමඟ එළිපිටම ඔහු ගැටුණු අතර මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සමඟ ආණ්ඩුවෙන් ඉවත්වන පිරිසටද ජනකගේ නම කියැවුණේය. එහෙත් ඔහු හඬා වැළපෙමින් පක්ෂය හැරදා නොයමින් එහි රැඳුණේය.

ඡන්දයෙන් පසු පතාකයන් පනිද්දීත් ඔහු නිහඬව සිටියේය. අන්තිමට දැඩි අසනීප තත්ත්වයෙන් සිටි ජනක 1999දී සිදුවූ මිනීමැරුමක් සම්බන්ධයෙන් කියා හදිසියේම පැමිණි රහස් පොලිසිය විසින් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත්තේය. වරින් වර හෘද රෝග හේතුවෙන් බයිපාස් සැත්කම්වලටත්, පිළිකා රෝගියකු බැවින් එම ප්‍රතිකාරවලටත් එසේම ආඝාත තත්ත්වයත් නිසා එම ප්‍රතිකාරවලටත් ලක්වෙමින් රෝහලේ ප්‍රතිකාර ලැබූ ජනකට මාංචු වැටුණේ සිරිසේන මහතාගේ ආණ්ඩුවෙනි.
අන්තිමට ඔහුට සංවිධායකකමත් නැති විය. එහෙත් එදා මහින්ද ආණ්ඩුවේ වැඩියෙන්ම උදවු ගෙන රැස් පෙන්වූ වසන්ත, ලක්ෂ්මන්ලා අදත් යහතින් වැජඹෙති. ඒ යහපාලනයට ”සෙට් වීම” නිසාය.

”ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂය කියන්නේ අපේ හදවත. අපේ පණ. අපි මේ ඉවත් කරලා තියෙන්නේ ඒකෙනුයි. ශ්‍රී .ල.නි.ප.ය කියන්නේ සියලු දෙයින් සර්ව සම්පූර්ණ පක්ෂයක් නෙවෙයි. හැබැයි අපි කවදාවත් මේ පක්ෂය දාලා ගියේ නෑ. ශ්‍රී .ල.නි.ප.ය අද මේ යන ගමන දැක්කම මට කනගාටුවෙන් වුවත් කියන්න තියෙන්නේ මීතොටමුල්ලේ කුණු කන්දට වෙච්ච දේ තමයි ශ්‍රී .ල.නි.ප.ය.ට වෙන්නෙත් කියලා. මේක ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයේ අවසානය කරා යන ගමනක්.”
සංවිධායකකම ගැලවුණු ජනක කීවේ එහෙමය.

උඩින්ම දිනූ ජනකට සංවිධායකකම අහිමි වෙද්දී ප්‍රමිත කළේ මධ්‍යම පළාත් සභාවේ යෞවන කටයුතු ඇමැති ධුරයෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්වීමය. නායකයන්ට අමතක වුණාට ප්‍රමිත මාතලේ අංක එකය. ”අප්පච්චි නැති ක¼දවුරක මට හෘද සාක්ෂියට එකඟව තනතුරක් දරන්න පුළුවන්කමක් නැහැ.” ප්‍රමිත එහෙම කීවේය.
ඒ සියල්ලටම වඩා ජනකලා ප්‍රකටවන්නේ මැයි දිනයට වැඩිම ජන ගඟක් ගෙන්වන අය ලෙසය. මැයි දිනය කට උඩ තියාගෙන ජනකලා එළෙව්වේ මැයි දිනයට උතුරන්නට සෙනඟ ඉන්න නිසා වෙන්න ඇත.

ලොහාන් රත්වත්තේ අනුරුද්ධ රත්වත්තේගේ පුතාය. රත්වත්තේලාද පාරම්පරික ශ්‍රී ලංකාකාරයෝය. හැමදාම දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ ඉහළින්ම දිනූ අය ය. ජෙනරාල් අනුරුද්ධ රත්වත්තේ මහතා ලෝකයේ පළමුවන අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරිය වූ සිරිමාවෝ රත්වත්තේ ඩයස් බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනියගේ ඥාති සොයුරෙකි. චන්ද්‍රිකා බණ්ඩාරනායක කුමාරතුංගගේ මාමා කෙනෙකි. ඔහුගේ පුතා වූ ලොහාන් ගිය මැතිවරණයේදී ද ඉහළින්ම ජය ගත්තෙකි. ඔහුගේද සංවිධායකකම අහෝසි විය.

තමන්ගේ අණට කීකරු වී සිටීම පාක්ෂිකත්වය ලෙසත් වැරැදි පෙන්වා පක්ෂය හරි මඟට ගැනීම විපක්ෂය ලෙසත් දැකීම තරම් වරදක් තවත් නැත. ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂයට අද අත්වී තිබෙන්නේ ඒ අවාසනාවන්ත තත්ත්වයය. මොන තරම් වැරැදි කළ අයෙක් වුවත් හීලෑ වී සිටින්නේ නම් ඔහු සුරක්ෂිතය. අද පක්ෂය තුළ තවදුරටත් සැබෑ සඟ, වෙද, ගුරු, ගොවි, කම්කරු යන බලවේගවලට හඬක් නොමැති තත්ත්වයක් දක්නට ඇත. මහින්ද යුගයේදී ද එහෙම බලවේග නොතිබුණා යැයි කෙනෙක් කියන්නට පුළුවන. එහෙත් පක්ෂය ජයග්‍රාහී තලයක තිබුණේය. අනෙක් අතට අද ඉන්නා කල්ලිය ජාමෙ බේරා ගන්නට මෛත්‍රි වෙතට ආව අය ය.

අවසන් වශයෙන් එකක් කිව හැකිය. මේ අලුතින් පත්කරන සංවිධායකලාගේ අති බහුතරයට ”සමුපකාර ඡන්දයක්වත්” දිනන්න බැරිය. මේ යන විදියට පාක්ෂිකයා විකල්ප සොයන එක නවත්වන්න ශක්‍රයාටවත් බැරිය. අසරණ වූ පාක්ෂිකයාගේ වේදනාවේ තරමත් ඔවුන් විකල්ප තෝරන හැටිත් මෙදා මැයි දිනයේදී නම් බලාගත හැකිය. ඒ ගැටඹෙට ගියොත්ද ගාලු මුව‍ෙදාරට ගියොත්ද යන්න කීමට කල වැඩිත් නැත.

Who wants a new Constitution?

April 27th, 2017

By Ananda Ariyarathne Courtesy Ceylon Today

“It is needless to say a ‘Constitution’ is not just a set of rules for a game for amusement or passing time but a basis for a framework that would affect the people, capable of creating a hell for the very people for whom it is supposed to be meant. More it is thought about, more it becomes convincing that the Soulbury Constitution the British gave Sri Lanka had more honesty than in any other Constitution which came by including the one under which it has become more or less like an effort to make a simple game more confusing and complicated.”

The editorial comment that appeared in the ‘Sri Lanka Guardian’ of 17 January 2017, which was used by Laksiri Fernando is definitely thought provoking. The excerpt highlighted has the following to say: “There are some people who are afraid of change by nature. Some may be perennially conservative and lazy to undergo change. This laziness could easily come from the bureaucracy or the public servants and particularly the mandarins in the legal establishments. For a new constitution, they have to work hard. Their incompetency may get exposed.”

Twists and turns

It went on to draw the attention to the genuine realities in “…capturing the questioning minds of the ordinary masses on the dubious ‘twists and turns’ of politicians and other public figures on the question of a new Constitution…”

Whether we like it or not, this issue of a new Constitution has come into our middle. Geographically Sri Lanka does not provide for any kind of divisions with demarcated areas to contain political authority as the political authority has to be common and its services have to be available freely and fairly. That does not mean that the administrative divisions are also not possible.

Administration has to be unbiased and set in a workable circuit.

Constitution does not have to be confused about administration. In other words, having ten divisions will mean ten different administrations which would be functioning in ten different ways making a variety of obstacles everywhere. Self determination can be achieved, but for what purpose? What is wrong with the existing mechanism?

Undue influence

Due to undue influence, we got Provincial Councils, but do they have the required features to be independently administering their own regions? If it is the well-being of the people in the Provincial Council that matters, why do they need Police powers and land powers?

The Constitution that brought in a system of a special kind of Executive Presidency was not definitely what voters wanted and it was clearly visible with the other developments which took place such as the fate of the first woman Prime Minister of the world, Sirima Bandaranaike who had started showing signs of power that was not going to be shaken easily. Compared to the excesses this helpless nation was destined to witness later, the real reasons behind such a ruthless action did not prove anything other than the fear of her coming to power again.

Such a change became possible due to the main maladies linked to what was described as the inherent reluctance to changes, aggravated by the lethargy of the bureaucracy led by the so-called mandarins, which resulted in a vacuum where more positive and progressive thinking and activities were needed.

Easily manipulated

Our system depended mainly on a voting base that could be easily manipulated. In general, Sri Lankan voters are a highly emotional set of decision makers who would not think twice when it is a case of an election. It was very easy to punish the tormentor by rejecting him. That rejection happened only by voting the main party opposing. It was never because voters accepted the principles, but that was the way to get rid of the unwanted.

Therefore, our talking about the mandates of the people is only an attempt to sugarcoat a bitter pill. It may be amusing but very educative to know about what happened at such mandate seeking elections in the past. Vijayananda Dhahanayake from Galle was addressing a public meeting in Kandy. That time the biggest issue was the ‘Chinese Problem’. He said the problem had become so acute with Chinese coming to dominate the country. He sounded very serious when he uttered a thing like “…Now dear friends…the Chinese are everywhere and in Galle there is a place called China Garden called ‘Cheena Koratuwa’. How many of the crowd could know that China Garden in Galle was an area where Chinese lived for more than three centuries.

It was no different at any other mandate seeking election meeting we saw. The clearest mandate was the desire of the people to get rid of those who lost their trust. Mahinda Rajapaksa had to go. Even some within the UNP wanted to see the very maker of the executive presidency J.R. Jayewardene and the even Ranasinghe Premadasa go.

Who wants mandates?

They were mostly, those who were not in power, except for situations like Gamini Dissanayake and Lalith Athulathmudali’s rebellion within the UNP and the most recent are the developments that took place in the recent political history of Sri Lanka where the people wanted to get rid of Mahinda Rajapaksa and his team. We are still fresh with the memories of that drama that were linked to the mandate we are talking about.

The last mandate we are talking about was a result of joint efforts by so many stakeholders and it is very clear that it was not the opinion of the people. Even if we agree that it was the opinion of the people, it is just an attempt to make ourselves not guilty of manipulations.

Although, the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and the strategists who have been around tried to maintain the position that it was the votes in non -Sinhala areas which changed the fate, it is conveniently forgotten that why should there be such a justification in the first place. What if the Tamil votes were also cast for Mahinda Rajapaksa? The picture would not have been what they are lamenting now about. Also, what if he got more out of non-Tamil votes? The fact is that there were more people rejecting Mahinda Rajapaksa. That became possible due to the blunders made under his leadership. His negligence was aggravated by his incurable over-confidence. Well, again, those are not the issues of the people.

Stakeholders

All the stakeholders had their own agendas and one common factor was the unanimous need to get rid of Mahinda Rajapaksa and his government. All the enemies had a solid reason to be friends. That was what decided the basis to seek a mandate. It was not to seek a new Constitution but to get rid their common enemy. A new Constitution emerged as a consequence sparked by the so-called need to trim the powers of the executive presidency. They had other reasons related to all parts of the country. Peace and harmony could be identified as what all the people cherished.

Those who got European help knowingly or unknowingly played into their hands strengthening the Tamil Diaspora. Those who solicited help from European countries and India did so in the same manner. Those who wished to use the United Nations mechanisms to get rid of Mahinda Rajapaksa did so feeling highly confident. In all those negotiations, there could have been many commitments and all those could easily be merged into one common effort and that was to pave way for Tamil extremists’ aspirations. If anyone says that there is no such aspiration, it will amount to hypocrisy. As it is the case, where is that mandate?

Mixing up inherited realities

The continuous drifting of Sinhalese Kingdoms from the North to the South can be understood by trying to learn how and why the Tooth Relic of the Buddha ended up in Kandy. The Sinhalese population remained over 70 per cent.

The efforts made by the Tamil Diaspora, show that it has become a strategy not to allow Sinhalese to settle down in the North and East. On one hand, the Sinhalese people want to live in many provinces in the country. However, the minority communities are not in favour of such a move.

For instance, Muslims have been living in harmony with the majority community. They led a very peaceful life for centuries engaged in trade. When they were harassed by the Portuguese, it was King Senerath who provided them with sanctuary in the South-Eastern Sri Lanka. Now, the extremists among Muslims want them to be entitled to their traditional lands. They also want a separate province. This is nothing but absurd.

Concentrated effort

There is a concentrated effort to corner, subdue and intimidate the Sinhalese. The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) are trying to create as much divisions as possible in society. Those political parties are not allowing their community members to live in harmony with the Sinhalese.

The pressure brought on the majority community ended up in an inevitable backlash eliminating the world’s most ruthless terrorist organization. Could it have happened if the LTTE had the support of the Tamil people?

Should the armed forces be penalized for doing an efficient job? They have been accused of human rights violations. However, the government does not counter such allegations, but pushes for Constitutional changes.

When we have proof to show that the Tamil Diaspora is actively behind the Constitutional change, can it be ignored?

Modi raises concerns in talks with Ranil

April 27th, 2017

By Paneetha Ameresekere reporting from New Delhi Courtesy Ceylon Today

China ranked high in Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe’s meeting with Indian Premier Narendra Modi, at Hyderabad House, New Delhi yesterday, official sources who didn’t want to be named told this reporter.

Reporters were not allowed to cover these meetings, with opportunities provided only for the taking of photographs and to be present when pleasantries were exchanged between Wickremesinghe and Indian officials, including Modi, before the beginning of talks, during the former’s various engagements in Delhi.

Wickremesinghe’s official engagements concluded yesterday.

The Hambantota Port project, in particular, which Colombo is planning to lease to Beijing in exchange for debt, figured high in these talks, the sources said. However, the Colombo Port City project, now dubbed Colombo International Financial City, being currently developed by the Chinese in a US$ 1.4 billion project, didn’t figure by name in these talks, they said.

Wickremesinghe had assured Modi and other Indian officials that the Hambantota Port will be used only for commercial purposes, and, from a military perspective, only Sri Lanka will have the prerogative to use it for defence purposes, and, no other country.

However, it isn’t clear whether there is a written agreement with the Chinese that they won’t use Hambantota for military purposes.

Earlier, Wickremesinghe met Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and former Indian Premier Manmohan Singh, where the Indian fisher poaching and the Chinese issues were discussed. With regard to the latter, Wickremesinghe assured that the Chinese interests would be restricted only to commercial issues and not military, they said.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress