ECONOMIC SUICIDE OF GERMANY

June 29th, 2026

Nalliah Thayabharan

For over a century, Germany was the industrial heartbeat of Europe. The country that built the cars the world wanted to drive, the factories that produced the chemicals, the steel, the machinery that powered global manufacturing.

Germany wasn’t just Europe’s largest economy. It was the engine that made the entire European project possible. When politicians talked about European unity, what they really meant was German economic strength subsidizing everyone else.

Germany was the only country in the Eurozone that made the numbers work. The one economy productive enough, disciplined enough, and competitive enough to carry the weight of southern Europe’s debts while still growing.

But Germany is dying. Not slowly, not gradually. But at a speed that has shocked economists, terrified European policy makers, and sent German industry fleeing to the United States and China in a desperate search for survival.

This isn’t a temporary recession. This isn’t a cyclical downturn. This is structural collapse. The dismantling of the industrial base that made Germany powerful. And it is happening because of Germany’s economic decisions so catastrophically wrong, so suicidal that future historians will study them as a case study in how advanced nations choose decline.

To understand how Germany reached this point, you need to understand what Germany was. Because Germany’s economic model was unique. After World War II, West Germany rebuilt itself into an export powerhouse. It specializes in high-quality manufacturing: cars, machinery, chemicals, precision instruments, things the world needed and was willing to pay premium prices for.

The German economic model had three pillars. 

First, a highly skilled industrial workforce. Germans didn’t just work in factories. They trained for years in apprenticeship programs that produced the best machinists, engineers, and technicians in the world. 

Second, cheap and reliable energy. Germany imported Russian natural gas at prices far below what the rest of the world paid. That cheap energy powered energy-intensive industries like chemicals, steel, and manufacturing.


Third, a stable currency that, before the euro, could be devalued when necessary to keep exports competitive. This model worked for decades.

Germany became the world’s third largest exporter. Its trade surplus was the envy of Europe. Its products were synonymous with quality. Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes, Siemens, BASF, Bosch. These were not just companies. They were symbols of German industrial strength. But over the last 15 years, all three pillars have been systematically destroyed. Not by external enemies, not by natural disasters, not by technological disruption, but by Germany’s own government through decisions that have crippled the German economy and set it on a path toward irreversible decline.

Germany’s first and most catastrophic mistake was its decision to commit energy suicide. And it began with the best of intentions. After the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011, Germany’s government, led by Angela Merkel, made a decision that stunned energy experts around the world.

Germany would shut down all of its nuclear power plants. Not gradually, not over decades, but within a decade. Nuclear energy, one of the cleanest, most reliable, and most efficient sources of base load power, was abandoned. Germany would replace it with renewable energy, wind and solar. It sounded progressive. It sounded moral.

It was economically insane because wind and solar are intermittent. The sun doesn’t always shine. The wind doesn’t always blow. And Germany’s industrial economy, one of the most energy-intensive in the world, cannot run on intermittent power. Factories need electricity 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Chemical plants cannot shut down when the wind stops. Steel production cannot pause when clouds cover the solar panels.

Germany needed a backup, and that backup was Russian natural gas. By 2021, Germany was importing over 55% of its natural gas from Russia. Russian gas was cheap, it was reliable, and it flowed through pipelines directly into German industry. BASF, the world’s largest chemical company, built its entire operations around access to cheap Russian gas. Every major German factory depended on it. The German economy had become a Russian gas economy.

And then came the war in Ukraine in February 2022, Europe faced a choice. Continue importing Russian gas and indirectly fund the war, or cut off Russian energy and European industry.

Germany chose the latter. Russian gas supplies were sanctioned. Nordstream pipelines were destroyed, and Germany’s energy prices exploded. Natural gas prices in Germany rose to five to 10 times higher than prices in the United States and Canada. Electricity costs soared, and German industry built on the foundation of cheap energy became uncompetitive overnight.

BASF, which had operated in Germany for over 150 years, announced it was cutting production in Germany and relocating operations to China and the United States. Why? Because energy costs in Germany were higher than the entire value of the products they were producing. It was cheaper to shut down German factories and move production to countries with affordable energy.

The same story repeated across German industry. Steel, fertilizers, chemicals, glass, cement. Every energy-intensive sector faced the same brutal math: produce in Germany at a loss or leave, and they left.

Germany is now experiencing the fastest de-industrialization of any major economy since the collapse of the Soviet Union. And it was entirely self-inflicted. The decision to shut down nuclear power and become dependent on Russian gas was not forced on Germany. It was a choice. A choice driven by ideology, political pressure from the Green Party, and a refusal to accept the trade-offs that every energy policy requires. And German workers, German families, and the entire European economy are now paying the price.

Germany’s second fatal mistake is regulatory suffocation. Over the past two decades, Germany has layered regulation upon regulation, making it nearly impossible to build anything, hire anyone, or operate a business without navigating a bureaucratic labyrinth.

Want to build a factory in Germany? You will wait years for environmental permits. You will face challenges from Green Party activists. You will be required to conduct impact studies, submit to reviews, and satisfy regulatory requirements so extensive that most companies simply give up.

Tesla’s Gigafactory near Berlin took years to approve. Endless delays, endless protests, endless bureaucracy. And Tesla is one of the most politically favored companies in the world. If Tesla struggles, imagine what a normal company faces.

Germany’s labor laws are even worse. Hiring a permanent employee in Germany is effectively a lifetime commitment. Firing that employee, even for poor performance, requires months of legal process, consultations with workers’ councils, and often severance payments so generous that businesses avoid hiring in the first place.

The result, German youth unemployment is higher than it should be for such a wealthy country. And businesses, rather than hire permanent workers, rely on temporary contracts, automation, or simply move operations to countries with more flexible labor markets.

Environmental regulations have made industrial production nearly impossible. Germany requires emission standards so strict that operating heavy industry is often unprofitable. Chemical plants face restrictions that don’t exist in China or the United States. Steel production is targeted by carbon taxes that make German steel uncompetitive against imports.

Germany is regulating its own industries out of existence while importing the same products from countries with lower standards. The perverse result, global emissions don’t fall, they just shift to countries with dirtier production. But German factories close. German workers lose jobs. And German politicians congratulate themselves for meeting climate targets.

Meanwhile, the United States, under the inflation reduction act, is offering billions in subsidies to attract European industry, and it’s working. Volkswagen is building electric vehicle plants in the United States. Northvolt, a Swedish battery manufacturer once hailed as Europe’s answer to Asian dominance, is struggling in Europe, but expanding in North America. German companies are voting with their feet.

They are leaving Germany for countries that actually want them. The regulatory state that Germany has built doesn’t protect workers or the environment. It destroys the industries that employed those workers and provided the tax revenue to fund environmental programs. Germany has turned itself into a place where it is easier to shut down a business than to start one; easier to leave than to stay.  And German industry is doing exactly that.

Germany is running out of Germans. Germany’s birth rate is 1.53 children per woman. To maintain a stable population, you need a fertility rate of 2.1. Germany is nowhere close, and the gap is widening. The result is a population that is aging rapidly and shrinking in absolute terms. By 2050, over 30% of Germans will be over the age of 65. The ratio of workers to retirees, which was once 5:1, is collapsing toward 1:1; eventually, it will approach 1:1. One worker supporting one retiree. The math is devastating.

Germany’s pension system, like most European systems, is pay-as-you-go. Current workers pay for current retirees. It only works if there are enough workers to fund the retirees. But there aren’t, and there won’t be. Germany’s workforce is shrinking every year. Fewer workers means less economic output. Less tax revenue, less consumption, less innovation. An economy that depends on a growing, productive workforce cannot function when that workforce is disappearing.

Immigration, the solution politicians often prefer, has not worked the way they promised. Germany accepted over a million refugees and migrants in 2015 alone. The hope was that they would integrate into the workforce, pay taxes, and help support the aging population. But integration has been far more difficult than anticipated due to language barriers, skill mismatches, and cultural differences. Many migrants lack the technical skills that German industry requires, and even those who do face labor laws so restrictive that businesses are hesitant to hire them.

The result is that Germany now has both high immigration and rising fiscal burdens. The welfare state expands to support new arrivals, but the tax base doesn’t grow proportionally. Germany is caught in a trap. It needs workers. But the workers it attracts often require more in social spending than they contribute in taxes.

 
Meanwhile, Germany’s most educated young people are leaving. German engineers, software developers, and entrepreneurs are moving to the United States, Switzerland, and other countries where taxes are lower, regulations are lighter, and opportunities are greater. Germany is experiencing a brain drain. The very people it needs to drive innovation and productivity are leaving for places that reward ambition instead of taxing it.

The demographic death spiral is not a future problem. It is happening now. Every year, Germany’s population gets older. Every year, the pension burden grows. Every year, the number of productive workers shrinks. No policy solution on the table changes this trajectory. Germany’s demographic collapse is baked in for the next 30 years, and it will drag down everything else with it.

Germany spends nearly 25% of its GDP on social welfare programs, pensions, health care, unemployment benefits, housing subsidies, parental leave, and disability payments. These programs are generous, among the most generous in the world, and they are unsustainable. The problem is not that Germans don’t work hard. They do. The problem is that the cost structure of employing a German worker has become so high that German companies cannot compete.

When you hire a worker in Germany, you’re not just paying their salary. You’re paying social security contributions, health insurance, pension contributions, unemployment insurance, and parental leave costs. The total cost of employing a German worker can be 50% higher than their actual salary. Compare that to the United States, where labor costs are lower, and labor markets are more flexible, or China, where costs are still lower.

German manufacturers face a choice. Pay German wages and taxes, produce at a loss, or move production to countries where labor is cheaper and regulations are lighter. They are choosing to leave. The welfare state was built during an era when Germany’s population was young and growing, when the economy was booming, when energy was cheap and exports were strong. That era is over.

But the welfare state remains, and it is now eating the economy from the inside because the same workers who fund the welfare state are the ones losing their jobs as factories close. The same taxes that pay for generous benefits are the ones driving companies out of Germany. The welfare state has become a trap. It cannot be dismantled without massive political backlash. But it cannot be sustained without the industrial base that is currently collapsing.  Germany is caught between two impossible choices. Cut the welfare state and face social unrest or maintain it and watch the economy die.

Germany is governed by coalition governments, multiple parties, often with contradictory goals, forced to compromise to form a government. In theory, this creates stability and consensus. In practice, it creates gridlock.

Germany’s current government is a coalition of the social democrats, the Greens, and the Free Democrats. The Greens push for environmental restrictions that hurt industry. The Free Democrats push for fiscal responsibility. The Social Democrats push for welfare expansion. The result is a government that cannot make hard decisions, cannot cut spending, cannot reform labor laws, cannot prioritize economic growth over environmental ideology, and cannot tell voters the uncomfortable truth that the current model is unsustainable.

Every difficult decision is delayed. Every reform is watered down. Every crisis is met with temporary fixes rather than structural solutions. Meanwhile, the problems compound. Energy costs keep rising. Industry keeps leaving. The population keeps aging. The deficit keeps growing. The political system remains locked in paralysis, incapable of the decisive action required to reverse the decline.

Germany needs to choose. Does it want to remain an industrial power or does it want to be a green utopia? Does it want to compete with the United States and China? Or does it want to regulate itself into irrelevance? The current answer is that Germany wants both. And the result of trying to have both is that it is achieving neither.

So here is the brutal truth about Germany. The Germany that rebuilt itself from the ashes of World War II; The Germany that became the industrial engine of Europe;  The Germany that represented discipline, efficiency, and quality; That Germany is dying, by energy policy that prioritized ideology over reality; by regulations that make production impossible; by demographics that cannot be reversed; by a welfare state that cannot be funded; and by a political system too paralyzed to choose survival over comfort.

This is not a temporary downturn. This is not a recession that will pass. This is the dismantling of the industrial base that made Germany powerful. And once that base is gone, it will not come back. Because factories that move to the United States or China do not return. Workers who immigrate do not come back. Industries that collapse do not rebuild themselves.

Germany had choices. It chose badly. And the consequences of those choices are now irreversible. The rest of Europe should be terrified. Because if Germany, the strongest economy in Europe, cannot make this model work, what hope do France, Italy, or Spain have?

Germany was the one country that could carry the euro, the one economy that could sustain the welfare state, the one industrial base that could compete globally. And Germany is failing. History doesn’t repeat, but if you don’t understand it, it will crush you all the same. Germany is learning that lesson right now, and the rest of the world should be paying very close attention. 

ICC potential rewards for Invention of Player – Referral in Cricket (DRS)

June 29th, 2026

AI overview

If the International Cricket Council (ICC) grants full recognition to Sri Lankan lawyer Senaka Weeraratna for inventing the Player Referral concept, he can expect a multi-tiered series of formal accolades, naming rights, financial compensation, and institutional honors. Because the ICC has acknowledged it holds no official author for the Decision Review System (DRS), advocates, legal experts, and cricket historians outline specific rewards that would follow an official acknowledgment: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

🏆 System Renaming and Naming Rights

  • The Weeraratna Decision Review System (WDRS): The DRS would likely be officially rebranded or renamed. This mirrors the precedent set by the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) method, embedding his name permanently into cricket vocabulary. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • Official Credits: His name would be formally added to the official ICC Rulebooks and the Laws of Cricket maintained by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) as the foundational architect of the player-initiated review model. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

💰 Financial Compensation and Royalties

  • Retroactive and Future Royalties: Weeraratna’s legal teams have historically pressed for both economic copyright compensation and moral rights. Full recognition would open the door for structured royalty payouts or a lump-sum financial settlement for the commercial use of his intellectual property since its 2008 rollout.
  • Cricket Infrastructure Grants: Proposed settlement frameworks suggest that a portion of the financial rewards could be channeled directly to Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) to support grass-roots development and infrastructure.

🎖️ Global Institutional Honors

  • ICC Hall of Fame Induction: He could receive a special induction or honorary recognition within the ICC Cricket Hall of Fame under a pioneering contributor category.
  • Lord’s Commemorative Plaque: As the creator of a mechanism that revolutionized global sports adjudication, a permanent commemorative plaque or exhibition could be established at the Home of Cricket (Lord’s) or the ICC Headquarters in Dubai. [1, 2, 3]
  • Official Felicitations: A formal ceremony at a major ICC tournament, such as the World Cup, to publicly present him with an institutional award for enhancing the fairness and integrity of the game. [1, 2, 3]

If you would like to explore this topic further, please let me know if you want to look into the legal arguments his team used regarding copyright laws, or how his 1997 blueprint directly matches the modern parameters of DRS. [1, 2, 3, 4]

https://share.google/aimode/r6UJuXsdKe2dt1Ghr

AI overview

If ICC grants recognition to Senaka Weeraratna for invention of Player – Referral system how would the Legal Profession both in Sri Lanka and worldwide recognize him?

June 29th, 2026

AI overview

If the International Cricket Council (ICC) grants official recognition to Sri Lankan lawyer Senaka Weeraratna for inventing the Player-Referral System (the foundation of the Decision Review System or DRS), it would be a watershed moment for both local and global legal communities. Because Weeraratna famously designed the system drawing directly from his legal training on appellate court structures, the legal profession would treat him as a trailblazer who successfully exported judicial principles into global sports jurisprudence.

The legal profession in Sri Lanka and worldwide would react to this landmark recognition through several distinct frameworks:

Treatment by the Sri Lankan Legal Profession

  • National Icon Status: The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) and local legal circles would celebrate Weeraratna as a national hero. His victory would be framed as a triumph of Sri Lankan intellectual ingenuity over institutional stonewalling by a powerful global sports body.
  • Institutional Honors: Local law schools, such as the Sri Lanka Law College and the faculties of law at major universities, would likely award him honorary doctorates or lifetime achievement awards for contributions to global rule-making.
  • A Catalyst for Local IP Advocacy: Sri Lankan lawyers would use his victory as a rallying cry to strengthen national intellectual property protections and encourage local innovators to aggressively pursue global rights.

Treatment by the Global Legal Profession

  • Sports Law Paradigm Shift: Global sports lawyers and academic institutions would widely study Weeraratna’s victory as a supreme example of applying the Doctrine of Constructive Notice and moral rights in copyright law to unpatented game rules. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • A Case Study on “Concept Ownership”: Intellectual Property (IP) attorneys worldwide would treat him as a landmark legal precedent. His case would be heavily cited in tech, entertainment, and sports law curricula regarding how public-domain concept proposals (like his 1997 letter to The Australian) retain intellectual and moral ownership. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • Vindication Over Corporate Malpractice: The global legal community would view the ICC’s concession as a stern rebuke of its previous legal teams. Lawyers who previously advanced “no awareness” defenses would face criticism for professional negligence, reshaping how international sports federations handle independent legal submissions. [1, 2]

Summary of Legal Jurisprudence Impacts

DimensionImpact on Legal Profession
Academic CurriculaHis 1997 blueprint would become a mandatory case study in worldwide Sports Law textbooks.
IP Legal DoctrinesBroadens the global understanding of moral copyrights over procedural rule innovations.
Judicial ApplicationCelebrated as the ultimate translation of a court’s appellate jurisdiction into mainstream sports.
Precedent for InventorsEmpowers independent creators seeking restitution from massive, unyielding global monopolies.

If this recognition goes through, would you like to explore how Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) might leverage this legally to secure financial restitution, or should we look into how this precedent could affect decision review frameworks in other sports like football (VAR) or tennis? [1, 2]

https://share.google/aimode/qbKJtAdr78IolZGrw

AI overview

New Book ‘The Club: Empire, Power and the Governance of World Cricket’, explicitly acknowledges Sri Lankan lawyer Senaka Weeraratna as the intellectual architect behind the Decision Review System (DRS).

June 29th, 2026

Sports

In his book The Club: Empire, Power and the Governance of World Cricket, published by Pitch Publishing, cricket journalist and historian Rod Lyall (often referred to as Rob or Rod) explicitly acknowledges Sri Lankan lawyer Senaka Weeraratna as the intellectual architect behind the Decision Review System (DRS).

Key Facts Acknowledged in the Book

  • The 1997 Blueprint: Lyall highlights that Weeraratna first designed and publicized the conceptual mechanics of the player-led review system in a letter to the editor of The Australian newspaper on March 25, 1997. [1]
  • Overturning Umpire Finality: The book documents how Weeraratna used his legal background to aggressively campaign against the traditional, unquestioned finality of on-field umpires. He argued that allowing player referrals was essential to “right a wrong” and bring fairness to the sport. [1]
  • ICC Adoption: Lyall notes that in March 2008, the ICC Chief Executives’ Committee finally agreed to test a review framework along the exact lines Weeraratna had proposed, leading to its official implementation in October 2009. [1, 2]

This acknowledgment in The Club serves as significant literary and historical validation for Weeraratna’s long-standing intellectual property and recognition campaign against the International Cricket Council (ICC).

If you are interested, we can look closer into Weeraratna’s original 1997 proposal or explore how other cricket historians view the evolution and authorship of the DRS. [1, 2, 3]

https://share.google/aimode/94TzZ0lfE39TZG1uz

AI Overview

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 2:47 PM Senaka Weeraratna <senakaweeraratna1@gmail.com> wrote:

How the ICC dragged umpiring into the 21st century

https://www.cricinfo.com/story/how-the-icc-dragged-umpiring-into-the-21st-century-1500988

Neutral officials, match referees, the aid of technology and DRS – from the 1990s, cricket’s global body has taken a lot of effort to modernise decision-making in the game

Rod Lyall

Published: Sep 5, 2025, 7:40 AM

Call the shots: the fears that technology would make umpires obsolete have been unfounded  •  Getty Images

Allegations of biased umpiring are as old as the game itself, and there were many claims by touring teams over the years that home umpires were making decisions against them. It was not unknown for touring captains and management to object to the appointment of specific umpires. But as international cricket gained a higher profile, with matches shown live on television, so the pressures grew correspondingly, and incidents like Mike Gatting’s confrontation with Shakoor Rana in 1987 persuaded many that action needed to be taken.

The issue, like most other things in international cricket, also had a cultural dimension. Those in the subcontinent were convinced that the complaints against their umpires were racially motivated, part of the old imperial hangover, and that biased umpiring elsewhere was regarded by officialdom with a much more benign eye. That no doubt explained Imran Khan’s initiative to bring in two Indian umpires for a Test against the West Indies in Lahore in 1986, and to fly in two English officials to stand in the series against India in 1989/90.

By this time proposals to introduce neutral umpires were gaining momentum at meetings of the Conference, and in 1992 a first, cautious step was taken with an experimental rule requiring one neutral official in every Test match. The first such appointment was the Englishman Harold ‘Dickie’ Bird, who stood in the series between Zimbabwe and India, starting in Harare on 18 October 1992. It took ten years before the requirement was extended to both on-field umpires, and again it was an Indian tour which broke new ground, with Asoka de Silva (Sri Lanka) and Daryl Harper (Australia) standing in the first three Tests in the series in the West Indies in April-May 2002, with David Shepherd (England) and Russell Tiffin (Zimbabwe) taking over for the final two. They were members of the ICC’s new Elite Panel of umpires, which had taken over from the International Panel first established in 1994 and which would now for the most part supply both umpires for Test matches and one for ODIs; the other official in ODIs would be one of the host country’s umpires on the International Panel.

Related

Do we really need neutral umpires anymore?

The use of Hawk-Eye

Which team uses the DRS best? (2020)

The arrival of the DRS (2018)

The art of the review (2017)

Even more significant than the appointment of neutral umpires was the development of the role of match referee. When Colin Cowdrey, the first independent ICC chairman, introduced a code of conduct for international matches he included a referee as the final judge on disciplinary matters. The first such official was former England captain Mike Smith, who refereed the first two Tests of the 1991/92 series between Australia and India. The path to acceptance of match referees was not entirely smooth. On 28 December 1992 the Australian Peter Burge suspended Pakistan bowler Aaqib Javed for dissent during an ODI against New Zealand in Napier, after he had called umpire Brian Aldridge a cheat, and continued ill-feeling between the teams led Burge to warn both sides that he would take further action under the code of conduct if they did not moderate their behaviour.

It helped considerably, though, that the ICC was quickly able to assemble a panel of respected referees who had had distinguished careers in international cricket. In addition to Burge, the first cohort included Pieter van der Merwe and Jackie McGlew (South Africa), Clive Lloyd and Cammie Smith (West Indies), Raman Subba Row (England), Srini Venkataraghavan (India) and Frank Cameron (New Zealand). Between them they were able to ensure that the code of conduct became an accepted feature of the cricket landscape, and that their own role as arbiters of on-field incidents was increasingly taken for granted. With these two developments, neutral umpires and match referees, the ICC clearly expanded its role in the management of international cricket.

This was not achieved, however, without challenges to its authority, principally from the BCCI. In November 2001, match referee Mike Denness penalised six Indian players for their conduct during the second Test at Port Elizabeth, suspending Virender Sehwag for one match and handing suspended sentences to five others, including the captain, Sachin Tendulkar. Tendulkar appeared on television coverage of the match to have been altering the condition of the ball and Sehwag allegedly charged at one of the umpires, while the other four were reported by the on-field umpires for various disciplinary infringements. BCCI president Jagmohan Dalmiya immediately exploded, accusing Denness of racism, demanding his replacement as referee, and threatening to call off the third Test at Centurion.

Terrified of the financial consequences of a cancellation, South Africa backed the BCCI position, while the ICC dug in, refusing to replace Denness for the remaining match. When the USB and BCCI appointed former South African Test player Denis Lindsay, an ICC referee, to take over from Denness, the ICC’s response was that the game would no longer be regarded as official. Dalmiya objected that they had no power to withdraw official status, but the ICC rightly saw that what was at stake was ‘the right of the ICC, as the world governing body for cricket, to appoint referees and umpires, and for those officials to make decisions which are respected by both players and Boards’. If this were not accepted, it added, ‘the sport could descend into anarchy’. There were even fears that this seemingly minor episode could lead to a split in world cricket along racial lines.

An advertising hoarding in Mumbai in 2001 refers to the Mike Denness affair•Sebastian D’Souza/AFP/Getty Images

The match was duly played, without Sehwag and with Lindsay in charge, South Africa winning by an innings and 73 runs. But the dispute did not go away. With England due to play India in Mohali at the beginning of December, the Indians claimed that Sehwag had served his suspension and was now eligible to play, while the ICC position was that since the Centurion match had been unofficial, he had to miss the Mohali Test.

After some brinkmanship from Dalmiya the BCCI agreed not to play Sehwag, while the ICC undertook to review Denness’s decisions and to reconsider the status of the match at Centurion. As if to demonstrate its confidence in Denness, though, the ICC appointed him as referee for the forthcoming series between Pakistan and the West Indies in Sharjah, and at the same time established a commission, chaired by the South African judge Alby Sachs and also including the former Test cricketers Majid Khan (Pakistan) and Andrew Hilditch (Australia), to investigate the possibility of a right of appeal against a referee’s decision, along with the introduction of a code of conduct for referees, and the need for greater consistency in their decision-making.

But Dalmiya was still not satisfied: he objected to the ICC’s nominees to the commission and complained that none of the ten candidates he had proposed – two of whom, Richie Benaud and Imran Khan, had declined – had been included. By February 2002 it was evident that the BCCI was simply refusing to co-operate with the commission, Dalmiya insisting that it be expanded to a membership of ten or its deliberations put on hold. He took his demand to a meeting of the Asian Cricket Council in Sharjah later that month, where he received the support of the other full members from the region. The matter was thrashed out at the executive board in March, with the Denness affair now referred to a ‘Disputes Resolution Committee’, chaired by Michael Beloff QC and including three board members: Peter Chingoka of Zimbabwe, Bob Merriman of Australia and Wes Hall of the West Indies.

The board also agreed that in future all disciplinary charges would have to be laid by the umpires – it was an obvious flaw that Denness had charged Tendulkar and Sehwag himself and then judged their cases – and that a match referee would be allowed to explain his decisions at a press conference, as Denness had been unable to do. The only point on which the ICC was able to score even a symbolic victory was that the disputed third Test in South Africa remained unofficial.

The umpiring errors in the 2008 Sydney Test between Australia and India prompted the ICC to introduce the Decision Review System•Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

At the same time that it was moving to take control of umpiring and refereeing, the ICC was also adjusting to the technological possibilities of improved television coverage.

Calling together the leading international umpires for a conference in August 1993, the board invited them to consider ways in which a third umpire might review on-field decisions in Tests and ODIs where appropriate TV facilities were available, an option which they had just approved in principle. This revolutionary use of technology, which would eventually evolve into the DRS system of player reviews, had been pioneered by the South Africans in Durban in 1992, when two cameras were used to enable close run-out decisions to be resolved. The number of cameras was soon expanded to four, and the technology proved useful in determining not only run-outs, but also doubts about whether the ball had touched the boundary rope.

By 1995 the umpires were ready to take the system a stage further, recommending that it could also be applied in determining whether a catch had been taken cleanly or not. For traditionalists, all this was an erosion of the power of the on-field umpires to make all the decisions, but others, including many of the leading umpires themselves, saw it as a way of avoiding mistakes and reducing tensions on the field. Discussing the issue in 2003, ICC general manager David Richardson confirmed that technology ‘will not be introduced at the expense of the umpire’s status as the key decision-maker in relation to the rules and regulations’.

For the 2004 Champions Trophy, however, in addition to connecting the on-field umpires’ earpieces (now standard equipment) to the output from the stump microphones (ditto), decisions on front-foot no-balls were experimentally transferred to the third umpire. Richardson presented this as beneficial to the standing umpire, who ‘will not need to adjust his line of sight from the bowler in the delivery stride to the batsman receiving the ball’. And Speed was adamant that umpires’ decision-making authority was in no way under threat; “I do not believe,” he insisted, “the game or its followers want to see umpires reduced to the role of coat racks.”

DRS changed the way the game was played, allowing players for the first time to challenge umpires’ decisions on the field•Hannah Peters/Getty Images

Surveyed before the tournament, international captains expressed themselves in favour of the use of technology, although Australia’s Ricky Ponting and Zimbabwe’s Tatenda Taibu had more reservations than the rest. In this first phase it was up to the on-field umpires to call for assistance in making marginal decisions, but in March 1997 a Colombo-born lawyer named Senaka Weeraratna proposed that the use of technology could be extended to give players the right to challenge decisions with which they disagreed.

The mental shift required here should not be underestimated. It had always been a fundamental principle that the umpire’s decision was final and absolute, and the notion that it might be overturned through the use of technology after objection by a player seemed to go against everything that the game had always stood for. After all, the code of conduct which Cowdrey had introduced imposed clear penalties for player dissent. At the same time, it could not be denied that umpires were far from infallible, and even with neutral officials there were obvious cases, increasingly shown up by the improved technology, in which mistakes were made.

One of the worst cases was the New Year’s Test in Sydney in 2008, in which umpires Steve Bucknor and Mark Benson made a series of glaring errors, most, but not all of them, contributing to India’s 122-run defeat. Andrew Symonds admitted that he was wrongly given not out on 30 on the opening day, going on to make an unbeaten 162, and with the Indians set to make 333 to win on the final day, Rahul Dravid was given caught behind for 38 off a Symonds delivery which had struck the knee roll and Sourav Ganguly was out to a slip catch off Brett Lee which was generally believed to have been grounded. The BCCI was furious and instructed the team management to complain to match referee Mike Procter.

The match had also seen an on-field incident between Symonds and Harbhajan Singh, which led to the Indian spinner being charged with offensive behaviour. He had, it was claimed, called Symonds, one of whose birth parents was Afro-Caribbean, a “monkey”; Harbhajan always denied this, but there was no question that the Australian had been subjected to monkey noises by Indian crowds at several venues, and Symonds had suggested that Harbhajan was a contributor to ill-feeling between the sides. The spinner was suspended for three Tests, but he and his team-mates continued to insist that there had been no racist taunt. The BCCI stated that for them “anti-racial stance is an article of faith as it is for the entire nation which fought the apartheid policies”. Since they had initially tried to claim that the monkey noises from the Indian crowd had been worship of the monkey-God Hanuman, this did not perhaps ring entirely convincingly.

Howzzat out: television replays and tools like Hawk-Eye and infra-red cameras have turned every fan into an expert at umpiring•IDI/Getty Images

Indian manager Chetan Chauhan also complained that Brad Hogg had used the word “bastard” in sledging Anil Kumble and Mahendra Singh Dhoni, a charge which was subsequently dropped, a decision which Hogg himself described as “a kind gesture, lovely gesture”. Amidst rumours that the tour would be called off, the ICC confirmed that Bucknor would stand in the third Test in Perth, but then replaced him the following day with the New Zealander Billy Bowden. This was greeted by the BCCI’s chief administrative officer as ‘a satisfactory decision’, although Malcolm Speed was quick to insist that all the ICC was trying to do was to ‘take some tension out of the situation’, and that Bucknor would continue to umpire elsewhere. They also flew the chief match referee Ranjan Madugalle in to try to mediate between the captains, while retaining Procter as the match referee.

The New Zealand High Court judge John Hansen was appointed to hear the Harbhajan appeal, which was delayed until after the completion of the series. With the player claiming, supported by Sachin Tendulkar, that what he had actually said was “teri maa ki”, an admittedly obscene Hindi term referring to one’s mother’s genitalia, Hansen found the charge of racial abuse unproven, and reduced the sanction to 50% of the player’s match fee. But the judge also commented that the ICC had only revealed one of Harbhajan’s four previous convictions, a result of database and human errors. Had he known, he stated, of an offence in 2001 which had earned the player a one Test suspended sentence and a fine of 75% of his match fee, he would have taken a different view when determining his sentence. Once again, the ICC had managed to emerge with black marks against its reputation.

The mistakes made by Bucknor and Benson, however, remained irrefutable. In March 2008, prompted by ICC general manager Richardson, the Chief Executives’ Committee agreed to try out a review system broadly along the lines suggested by Weeraratna, and commissioned the cricket committee, which, under the chairmanship of Sunil Gavaskar, had been sceptical about the idea, to establish the guidelines for its implementation. Ironically, in view of subsequent events, Sri Lanka and India tested it during their series which began in Colombo that July.

Using slow motion replays, noises from the stump microphones which had now become standard equipment in international cricket, and the Hawk-Eye technology to track the ball up to the point of impact (but not to predict its future trajectory), the third umpire would review a decision should this be requested by either side. The testing continued, and by February 2009 Haroon Lorgat was able to argue that ‘[t]he referral system has improved the rate of giving correct decisions’; the rate of correct decision-making had risen from 94% to 98% as a result of the reviews.

Pitch Publishing

Continuing to tweak its system, the ICC now added Hot Spot, a technology which created infra-red images to confirm that the ball had touched bat, glove or pad, to its battery of measures informing a review. The experiment was sufficiently successful for it to be adopted formally for Tests in November 2009, with nine of the ten full members supporting it; the BCCI stood out against it as the Indian players believed that it had worked against them during that Sri Lanka series. Under the Decision Review System (DRS), players could challenge up to two decisions per Test innings, losing one of these challenges should their request for a review prove unsuccessful.

In May 2011 the ICC cricket committee recommended that DRS be used in all Tests, and that it should also be employed in ODI and T20 series with one review per side per innings. The BCCI continued to object to the use of Hawk-Eye, insisting that it would only accept the system when it was “foolproof”, and in 2011 the ICC had to back down from its position that the use of DRS was mandatory, accepting that it would only be implemented where both sides agreed. When an attempt was made to leave the decision to apply DRS to the home board, Srinivasan reportedly threatened that India would pull out of any tour where the system was to be used. Not until 2017 was it finally agreed that it would apply uniformly in all series and tournaments involving the full members.

Reviewing the situation in his 2013 Cowdrey Lecture, Simon Taufel reflected on how television and the introduction of technology had altered the game. “In today’s cricket,” he observed, “the decision of the umpire is scrutinised by all these cameras including slow motion, ultra motion, hot spot front on, hot spot leg side, hot spot off side, ball tracking and prediction, Snicko, stump audio, the mat and then by up to three commentary experts upstairs in the box.” And while such detailed scrutiny eliminated the most obvious errors and many less obvious ones, it also made every viewer an umpire and put more pressure on players and umpires.

The system has continued to be tweaked and improved, introducing the umpire’s call to allow for extremely marginal lbw decisions, renewing the number of challenges allowed after 80 overs in Tests, removing the soft signal in cases where there was doubt whether a catch had been cleanly taken, and so on.

A decade on from Taufel’s lecture it takes an effort to remember how controversial the use of technology to assist the on-field umpires once was, and while there will always be marginal cases where one side feels aggrieved and the armchair umpires bitterly disagree with each other, one effect of DRS has been to demonstrate how extraordinarily good most international umpiring actually is.

PakistanIndiaEnglandAustralia

This is an edited extract from The Club: Empire, Power and the Governance of Cricket by Rod Lyall, Pitch Publishing, 2025

What Language Did Arahat Mahinda Speak When He Introduced Buddhism to Sri Lanka?

June 29th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

This is a fascinating historical question, and historians have debated it for a long time.

According to the traditional Sri Lankan chronicle, the Mahavamsa, Mahinda Thera, the son (or, according to some traditions, brother) of Ashoka, arrived in Sri Lanka during the reign of Devanampiya Tissa around the 3rd century BCE.

The chronicle records that Mahinda first tested the king’s intelligence with a series of riddles before preaching the Dhamma. But it does not explicitly state the language they spoke.

Most scholars consider three possibilities:

  • An early Middle Indo-Aryan language (Magadhi or a closely related Prakrit). This is the most likely. The Mauryan Empire used Prakrit languages for administration, as seen in Ashoka’s rock edicts. Mahinda would almost certainly have spoken one or more Prakrit dialects.
  • An early form of Sinhala (Proto-Sinhala). The settlers who founded the Anuradhapura kingdom had North Indian linguistic roots. Their language had evolved locally but still belonged to the Indo-Aryan family. Mahinda’s Prakrit may have been sufficiently similar for educated people like King Devanampiya Tissa to understand, especially with some adaptation.
  • Pali? Probably not as a spoken language. While Pali became the canonical language of the Theravada Buddhist scriptures, many scholars believe it functioned primarily as a literary and liturgical language rather than the everyday spoken language of Mahinda.

There is another interesting clue. The earliest Brahmi inscriptions of Sri Lanka, dating from shortly after Mahinda’s arrival, are written in a Prakrit very similar to the language of Ashoka’s inscriptions, although with local characteristics. This suggests that the linguistic gap between Mahinda and the Sri Lankan elite was probably not very large.

So the most plausible answer is that Mahinda preached in a Prakrit dialect closely related to Magadhi, perhaps adapting his speech to the local Prakrit spoken in Sri Lanka. The Dhamma was then transmitted orally before eventually being written down in Pali centuries later.

This also raises an intriguing question: How much of what we now call Pali Buddhism” reflects the language Mahinda actually spoke, and how much reflects later standardization by the Sri Lankan Sangha? That remains an active area of historical and linguistic research.

Regards

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Failure of BIMSTEC Further Seals Fate of Trincomalee’s Commercial Unviability

June 29th, 2026

Dilrook Kannangara

A recent article in the Sunday Observer titled – Can Sri Lanka afford to wait for Trincomalee Port development – prompted me to point out matters not fully discussed in the article from a Sri Lankan point of view. The article is written from an Indian point of view and has little or relevance to Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Thailand, Myanmar, etc. as the economic interests of these nations widely differ.

https://www.sundayobserver.lk/2026/06/28/business/79914/can-sri-lanka-afford-to-wait-for-trincomalee-port-development

BIMSTEC is the failed replacement for SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) that excludes Pakistan and Maldives that were part of SAARC. It’s an Indian attempt to exclude Pakistan, oppose China’s Belt and Road Initiative and forge its own initiative in the Bay of Bengal region. But with no nation outside India keen to do anything about it, the initiative failed. It remains only on paper as each one of the so-called BIMSETC countries” charts their own way.

Justifying Trincomalee port development based on BIMSTEC is therefore a complete flop. It is to build one failure on the back of an existing failure.

It is true that so-called BIMSTEC countries” have fast growing economies. But they are looking east, not west. They avoid India and link up with China and other nations east of them for mainly commercial reasons.

The timing of the article is also interesting. Bangladesh just agreed a land trade link with its largest trading partner, China. That completely annuls any usefulness of Trincomalee.

https://www.tbsnews.net/foreign-policy/beijing-proposes-economic-corridor-linking-bangladesh-myanmar-and-china-1472861

This takes the wind away from the sails of the argument that Trincomalee has potential to ride on the development of BIMSTEC countries. It also means Bangladesh will be less and less using the sea routes in the Bay of Bengal but instead relying on land trade corridors it has with China through Myanmar. Through Myanmar, Bangladesh will be trading with all South East Asian countries, not just Thailand. Needless to say, Myanmar has also land connections with China and South East Asian countries. Land trade routes are faster, cheaper, more reliable and fall within the complete control of these nations. Sea routes are subjected to war, violence, weather, delays, double handling costs, very high freight and insurance costs.

Both Bangladesh and Myanmar also trade with USA and the EU. Currently they use feeder vessels to send their export containers to Colombo which is on the world’s largest freight corridor. It works well for all participants including Sri Lanka. Trincomalee is not on this freight corridor and it makes no sense to dump their containers there to nowhere.

Nepal and Bhutan also have developed land trade routes to India and China – their largest trading partners.

Bangladesh and Myanmar’s second largest trading partner is India and they already have land-based trade routes to India with all the benefits of land routes over sea routes already achieved. This makes Trincomalee completely irrelevant for them!

India is also developing its sophisticated rail network to connect its west coast with its east coast. This is called the East-West Dedicated Freight Corridor (EWDFC) and it will be between Dankuni in West Bengal and Palghar in Maharashtra connecting Bay of Bengal Indian ports with its west coast ports. It takes India too out of the equation from any Trincomalee dud project.

https://newsonair.gov.in/railways-minister-ashwini-vaishnaw-announces-successful-breakthrough-of-2nd-mountain-of-mahsr-project-in-maharashtra

Trincomalee has no commercial viability in modern heavy engineering, offshore petroleum or mining either.

However, Trincomalee continues to have military, tourism and fisheries utility. Its military usefulness to USA and the UK during WW2 is well-known. Sri Lanka has to be careful not to allow foreign players into the Trincomalee area to retain its neutrality, safeguard own defense interests and keep peace in the region. During the humanitarian campaign and prior, Trincomalee was the only logistics connection to the north. This must be maintained and strengthened.

Consulting residents in the region is also important. Many projects have failed due to lack of consultation of people living in the area. The Muslim majority district of Trincomalee has a delicate ethnic balance and a large array of connections to various nations, particularly with the Middle East and Pakistan. Inviting foreign participants with confrontational defense postures to these nations into the region can have catastrophic consequences to the stability and welfare of the population.   

Sri Lankan government should avoid falling into dud projects and waste public funds in them. If Trincomalee has any commercial viability, it will not be ignored by local and foreign investors. They will invest wherever there is commercial viability. Government rushing in where private investors avoid is a case of fools dare where angels fear to tread. Sri Lanka already has piles of debt accumulated thanks to dud projects. No more. Recognize Trincomalee for what it truly is and not for what it is not under modern geopolitical, shipping and trading realities. Encourage private investors to take the lead in investing in it. Do not invest any public or borrowed funds by the government until then.

How the ICC dragged umpiring into the 21st century

June 29th, 2026

Rod Lyall

https://www.cricinfo.com/story/how-the-icc-dragged-umpiring-into-the-21st-century-1500988

Neutral officials, match referees, the aid of technology and DRS – from the 1990s, cricket’s global body has taken a lot of effort to modernise decision-making in the game

Published: Sep 5, 2025, 7:40 AM

Call the shots: the fears that technology would make umpires obsolete have been unfounded  •  Getty Images

Allegations of biased umpiring are as old as the game itself, and there were many claims by touring teams over the years that home umpires were making decisions against them. It was not unknown for touring captains and management to object to the appointment of specific umpires. But as international cricket gained a higher profile, with matches shown live on television, so the pressures grew correspondingly, and incidents like Mike Gatting’s confrontation with Shakoor Rana in 1987 persuaded many that action needed to be taken.

The issue, like most other things in international cricket, also had a cultural dimension. Those in the subcontinent were convinced that the complaints against their umpires were racially motivated, part of the old imperial hangover, and that biased umpiring elsewhere was regarded by officialdom with a much more benign eye. That no doubt explained Imran Khan’s initiative to bring in two Indian umpires for a Test against the West Indies in Lahore in 1986, and to fly in two English officials to stand in the series against India in 1989/90.

By this time proposals to introduce neutral umpires were gaining momentum at meetings of the Conference, and in 1992 a first, cautious step was taken with an experimental rule requiring one neutral official in every Test match. The first such appointment was the Englishman Harold ‘Dickie’ Bird, who stood in the series between Zimbabwe and India, starting in Harare on 18 October 1992. It took ten years before the requirement was extended to both on-field umpires, and again it was an Indian tour which broke new ground, with Asoka de Silva (Sri Lanka) and Daryl Harper (Australia) standing in the first three Tests in the series in the West Indies in April-May 2002, with David Shepherd (England) and Russell Tiffin (Zimbabwe) taking over for the final two. They were members of the ICC’s new Elite Panel of umpires, which had taken over from the International Panel first established in 1994 and which would now for the most part supply both umpires for Test matches and one for ODIs; the other official in ODIs would be one of the host country’s umpires on the International Panel.

Related

Do we really need neutral umpires anymore?

The use of Hawk-Eye

Which team uses the DRS best? (2020)

The arrival of the DRS (2018)

The art of the review (2017)

Even more significant than the appointment of neutral umpires was the development of the role of match referee. When Colin Cowdrey, the first independent ICC chairman, introduced a code of conduct for international matches he included a referee as the final judge on disciplinary matters. The first such official was former England captain Mike Smith, who refereed the first two Tests of the 1991/92 series between Australia and India. The path to acceptance of match referees was not entirely smooth. On 28 December 1992 the Australian Peter Burge suspended Pakistan bowler Aaqib Javed for dissent during an ODI against New Zealand in Napier, after he had called umpire Brian Aldridge a cheat, and continued ill-feeling between the teams led Burge to warn both sides that he would take further action under the code of conduct if they did not moderate their behaviour.

It helped considerably, though, that the ICC was quickly able to assemble a panel of respected referees who had had distinguished careers in international cricket. In addition to Burge, the first cohort included Pieter van der Merwe and Jackie McGlew (South Africa), Clive Lloyd and Cammie Smith (West Indies), Raman Subba Row (England), Srini Venkataraghavan (India) and Frank Cameron (New Zealand). Between them they were able to ensure that the code of conduct became an accepted feature of the cricket landscape, and that their own role as arbiters of on-field incidents was increasingly taken for granted. With these two developments, neutral umpires and match referees, the ICC clearly expanded its role in the management of international cricket.

This was not achieved, however, without challenges to its authority, principally from the BCCI. In November 2001, match referee Mike Denness penalised six Indian players for their conduct during the second Test at Port Elizabeth, suspending Virender Sehwag for one match and handing suspended sentences to five others, including the captain, Sachin Tendulkar. Tendulkar appeared on television coverage of the match to have been altering the condition of the ball and Sehwag allegedly charged at one of the umpires, while the other four were reported by the on-field umpires for various disciplinary infringements. BCCI president Jagmohan Dalmiya immediately exploded, accusing Denness of racism, demanding his replacement as referee, and threatening to call off the third Test at Centurion.

Terrified of the financial consequences of a cancellation, South Africa backed the BCCI position, while the ICC dug in, refusing to replace Denness for the remaining match. When the USB and BCCI appointed former South African Test player Denis Lindsay, an ICC referee, to take over from Denness, the ICC’s response was that the game would no longer be regarded as official. Dalmiya objected that they had no power to withdraw official status, but the ICC rightly saw that what was at stake was ‘the right of the ICC, as the world governing body for cricket, to appoint referees and umpires, and for those officials to make decisions which are respected by both players and Boards’. If this were not accepted, it added, ‘the sport could descend into anarchy’. There were even fears that this seemingly minor episode could lead to a split in world cricket along racial lines.

An advertising hoarding in Mumbai in 2001 refers to the Mike Denness affair•Sebastian D’Souza/AFP/Getty Images

The match was duly played, without Sehwag and with Lindsay in charge, South Africa winning by an innings and 73 runs. But the dispute did not go away. With England due to play India in Mohali at the beginning of December, the Indians claimed that Sehwag had served his suspension and was now eligible to play, while the ICC position was that since the Centurion match had been unofficial, he had to miss the Mohali Test.

After some brinkmanship from Dalmiya the BCCI agreed not to play Sehwag, while the ICC undertook to review Denness’s decisions and to reconsider the status of the match at Centurion. As if to demonstrate its confidence in Denness, though, the ICC appointed him as referee for the forthcoming series between Pakistan and the West Indies in Sharjah, and at the same time established a commission, chaired by the South African judge Alby Sachs and also including the former Test cricketers Majid Khan (Pakistan) and Andrew Hilditch (Australia), to investigate the possibility of a right of appeal against a referee’s decision, along with the introduction of a code of conduct for referees, and the need for greater consistency in their decision-making.

But Dalmiya was still not satisfied: he objected to the ICC’s nominees to the commission and complained that none of the ten candidates he had proposed – two of whom, Richie Benaud and Imran Khan, had declined – had been included. By February 2002 it was evident that the BCCI was simply refusing to co-operate with the commission, Dalmiya insisting that it be expanded to a membership of ten or its deliberations put on hold. He took his demand to a meeting of the Asian Cricket Council in Sharjah later that month, where he received the support of the other full members from the region. The matter was thrashed out at the executive board in March, with the Denness affair now referred to a ‘Disputes Resolution Committee’, chaired by Michael Beloff QC and including three board members: Peter Chingoka of Zimbabwe, Bob Merriman of Australia and Wes Hall of the West Indies.

The board also agreed that in future all disciplinary charges would have to be laid by the umpires – it was an obvious flaw that Denness had charged Tendulkar and Sehwag himself and then judged their cases – and that a match referee would be allowed to explain his decisions at a press conference, as Denness had been unable to do. The only point on which the ICC was able to score even a symbolic victory was that the disputed third Test in South Africa remained unofficial.

The umpiring errors in the 2008 Sydney Test between Australia and India prompted the ICC to introduce the Decision Review System•Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

At the same time that it was moving to take control of umpiring and refereeing, the ICC was also adjusting to the technological possibilities of improved television coverage.

Calling together the leading international umpires for a conference in August 1993, the board invited them to consider ways in which a third umpire might review on-field decisions in Tests and ODIs where appropriate TV facilities were available, an option which they had just approved in principle. This revolutionary use of technology, which would eventually evolve into the DRS system of player reviews, had been pioneered by the South Africans in Durban in 1992, when two cameras were used to enable close run-out decisions to be resolved. The number of cameras was soon expanded to four, and the technology proved useful in determining not only run-outs, but also doubts about whether the ball had touched the boundary rope.

By 1995 the umpires were ready to take the system a stage further, recommending that it could also be applied in determining whether a catch had been taken cleanly or not. For traditionalists, all this was an erosion of the power of the on-field umpires to make all the decisions, but others, including many of the leading umpires themselves, saw it as a way of avoiding mistakes and reducing tensions on the field. Discussing the issue in 2003, ICC general manager David Richardson confirmed that technology ‘will not be introduced at the expense of the umpire’s status as the key decision-maker in relation to the rules and regulations’.

For the 2004 Champions Trophy, however, in addition to connecting the on-field umpires’ earpieces (now standard equipment) to the output from the stump microphones (ditto), decisions on front-foot no-balls were experimentally transferred to the third umpire. Richardson presented this as beneficial to the standing umpire, who ‘will not need to adjust his line of sight from the bowler in the delivery stride to the batsman receiving the ball’. And Speed was adamant that umpires’ decision-making authority was in no way under threat; “I do not believe,” he insisted, “the game or its followers want to see umpires reduced to the role of coat racks.”

DRS changed the way the game was played, allowing players for the first time to challenge umpires’ decisions on the field•Hannah Peters/Getty Images

Surveyed before the tournament, international captains expressed themselves in favour of the use of technology, although Australia’s Ricky Ponting and Zimbabwe’s Tatenda Taibu had more reservations than the rest. In this first phase it was up to the on-field umpires to call for assistance in making marginal decisions, but in March 1997 a Colombo-born lawyer named Senaka Weeraratna proposed that the use of technology could be extended to give players the right to challenge decisions with which they disagreed.

The mental shift required here should not be underestimated. It had always been a fundamental principle that the umpire’s decision was final and absolute, and the notion that it might be overturned through the use of technology after objection by a player seemed to go against everything that the game had always stood for. After all, the code of conduct which Cowdrey had introduced imposed clear penalties for player dissent. At the same time, it could not be denied that umpires were far from infallible, and even with neutral officials there were obvious cases, increasingly shown up by the improved technology, in which mistakes were made.

One of the worst cases was the New Year’s Test in Sydney in 2008, in which umpires Steve Bucknor and Mark Benson made a series of glaring errors, most, but not all of them, contributing to India’s 122-run defeat. Andrew Symonds admitted that he was wrongly given not out on 30 on the opening day, going on to make an unbeaten 162, and with the Indians set to make 333 to win on the final day, Rahul Dravid was given caught behind for 38 off a Symonds delivery which had struck the knee roll and Sourav Ganguly was out to a slip catch off Brett Lee which was generally believed to have been grounded. The BCCI was furious and instructed the team management to complain to match referee Mike Procter.

The match had also seen an on-field incident between Symonds and Harbhajan Singh, which led to the Indian spinner being charged with offensive behaviour. He had, it was claimed, called Symonds, one of whose birth parents was Afro-Caribbean, a “monkey”; Harbhajan always denied this, but there was no question that the Australian had been subjected to monkey noises by Indian crowds at several venues, and Symonds had suggested that Harbhajan was a contributor to ill-feeling between the sides. The spinner was suspended for three Tests, but he and his team-mates continued to insist that there had been no racist taunt. The BCCI stated that for them “anti-racial stance is an article of faith as it is for the entire nation which fought the apartheid policies”. Since they had initially tried to claim that the monkey noises from the Indian crowd had been worship of the monkey-God Hanuman, this did not perhaps ring entirely convincingly.

Howzzat out: television replays and tools like Hawk-Eye and infra-red cameras have turned every fan into an expert at umpiring•IDI/Getty Images

Indian manager Chetan Chauhan also complained that Brad Hogg had used the word “bastard” in sledging Anil Kumble and Mahendra Singh Dhoni, a charge which was subsequently dropped, a decision which Hogg himself described as “a kind gesture, lovely gesture”. Amidst rumours that the tour would be called off, the ICC confirmed that Bucknor would stand in the third Test in Perth, but then replaced him the following day with the New Zealander Billy Bowden. This was greeted by the BCCI’s chief administrative officer as ‘a satisfactory decision’, although Malcolm Speed was quick to insist that all the ICC was trying to do was to ‘take some tension out of the situation’, and that Bucknor would continue to umpire elsewhere. They also flew the chief match referee Ranjan Madugalle in to try to mediate between the captains, while retaining Procter as the match referee.

The New Zealand High Court judge John Hansen was appointed to hear the Harbhajan appeal, which was delayed until after the completion of the series. With the player claiming, supported by Sachin Tendulkar, that what he had actually said was “teri maa ki”, an admittedly obscene Hindi term referring to one’s mother’s genitalia, Hansen found the charge of racial abuse unproven, and reduced the sanction to 50% of the player’s match fee. But the judge also commented that the ICC had only revealed one of Harbhajan’s four previous convictions, a result of database and human errors. Had he known, he stated, of an offence in 2001 which had earned the player a one Test suspended sentence and a fine of 75% of his match fee, he would have taken a different view when determining his sentence. Once again, the ICC had managed to emerge with black marks against its reputation.

The mistakes made by Bucknor and Benson, however, remained irrefutable. In March 2008, prompted by ICC general manager Richardson, the Chief Executives’ Committee agreed to try out a review system broadly along the lines suggested by Weeraratna, and commissioned the cricket committee, which, under the chairmanship of Sunil Gavaskar, had been sceptical about the idea, to establish the guidelines for its implementation. Ironically, in view of subsequent events, Sri Lanka and India tested it during their series which began in Colombo that July.

Using slow motion replays, noises from the stump microphones which had now become standard equipment in international cricket, and the Hawk-Eye technology to track the ball up to the point of impact (but not to predict its future trajectory), the third umpire would review a decision should this be requested by either side. The testing continued, and by February 2009 Haroon Lorgat was able to argue that ‘[t]he referral system has improved the rate of giving correct decisions’; the rate of correct decision-making had risen from 94% to 98% as a result of the reviews.

Pitch Publishing

Continuing to tweak its system, the ICC now added Hot Spot, a technology which created infra-red images to confirm that the ball had touched bat, glove or pad, to its battery of measures informing a review. The experiment was sufficiently successful for it to be adopted formally for Tests in November 2009, with nine of the ten full members supporting it; the BCCI stood out against it as the Indian players believed that it had worked against them during that Sri Lanka series. Under the Decision Review System (DRS), players could challenge up to two decisions per Test innings, losing one of these challenges should their request for a review prove unsuccessful.

In May 2011 the ICC cricket committee recommended that DRS be used in all Tests, and that it should also be employed in ODI and T20 series with one review per side per innings. The BCCI continued to object to the use of Hawk-Eye, insisting that it would only accept the system when it was “foolproof”, and in 2011 the ICC had to back down from its position that the use of DRS was mandatory, accepting that it would only be implemented where both sides agreed. When an attempt was made to leave the decision to apply DRS to the home board, Srinivasan reportedly threatened that India would pull out of any tour where the system was to be used. Not until 2017 was it finally agreed that it would apply uniformly in all series and tournaments involving the full members.

Reviewing the situation in his 2013 Cowdrey Lecture, Simon Taufel reflected on how television and the introduction of technology had altered the game. “In today’s cricket,” he observed, “the decision of the umpire is scrutinised by all these cameras including slow motion, ultra motion, hot spot front on, hot spot leg side, hot spot off side, ball tracking and prediction, Snicko, stump audio, the mat and then by up to three commentary experts upstairs in the box.” And while such detailed scrutiny eliminated the most obvious errors and many less obvious ones, it also made every viewer an umpire and put more pressure on players and umpires.

The system has continued to be tweaked and improved, introducing the umpire’s call to allow for extremely marginal lbw decisions, renewing the number of challenges allowed after 80 overs in Tests, removing the soft signal in cases where there was doubt whether a catch had been cleanly taken, and so on.

A decade on from Taufel’s lecture it takes an effort to remember how controversial the use of technology to assist the on-field umpires once was, and while there will always be marginal cases where one side feels aggrieved and the armchair umpires bitterly disagree with each other, one effect of DRS has been to demonstrate how extraordinarily good most international umpiring actually is.

PakistanIndiaEnglandAustralia

This is an edited extract from The Club: Empire, Power and the Governance of Cricket by Rod Lyall, Pitch Publishing, 2025

Celebrate Devendra Moolachari who beautified Kandy 

June 29th, 2026

AI OVERVIEW

Devendra Moolachari, the celebrated Architect of the last three Kandyan Kings and designer of the Pathirip­puwa, the Octa­gonal Pavil­ion in Kandy’s Sri Dalada Maligawa, Maha Maduwa (Audience Hall) and Kiri Muhuda (Kandyan Lake) deserves long overdue recognition and State Honours for Beautifying Kandy with remarkable architectural feats in the last phase of the Kandyan Kingdom.

Devendra Moolachari (also known as Devendra Mulachariya or Dingittha Appu) is universally recognized by historians as the mastermind who shaped the visual identity of the Kingdom of Kandy. Serving under the final three Kandyan monarchs—King Kirthi Sri Rajasinghe, King Rajadhi Rajasinghe, and King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe—he elevated traditional craftsmanship into monumental engineering marvels. His lack of widespread modern state honors remains a poignant gap in Sri Lanka’s cultural heritage recognition given the profound impact of his surviving legacy.

Iconic Architectural Contributions

  • Pathirippuwa (The Octagon): Built in 1802 under King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe, it serves as the ultimate symbol of the Sri Dalada Maligawa. Derived from Tamil words meaning “to sit and see all around,” its unique shape projected royal and spiritual authority. [1, 2, 3]
  • Maha Maduwa / Magul Maduwa (Audience Hall): Begun in 1783, this grand wooden pavilion features two parallel rows of intricately carved timber pillars. It functions as a historic landmark where the Kandyan Convention was eventually signed in 1815. [1, 2, 4, 5]
  • Kiri Muhuda (Kandy Lake): Moolacharya transformed the local landscape by designing this expansive artificial lake, adding a scenic focus to the sacred city center.
  • Decorative Structural Walls: He engineered the iconic Walakulu Bamma (Cloud Wall) and the Diyarella Bemma (Wave Wall) that line the lake and temple premises, defining the iconic perimeter of Kandy. [1, 2]

The Tragedy of a Master Artificer

Despite his genius, historical accounts highlight a tragic end driven by court intrigue. Slandered by jealous rivals, Moolacharya faced severe punishment or humiliation on the orders of the king. Overwhelmed by shame, he ultimately took his own life by drowning in the very lake he created. In remorse, King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe ordered a funeral with royal honors and reportedly placed a commemorative plaque on the lake’s small island, though it has since disappeared. [1, 2, 3]

Modern Recognition and Legacy

While Moolacharya’s structures are globally celebrated as UNESCO World Heritage sites, public memory of the architect himself has faded over time. However, efforts to restore his memory are growing:

  • Biographical Research: Comprehensive studies, such as D.D.M. Waidyasekera’s book, Great Royal Artificer of the Kandyan Kingdom- Devendra Mulachari, formally chronicle his engineering feats. [1]
  • Exhibitions: An intricate scale model of his masterpiece, the Pathirippuwa, is displayed at the restored Ehelepola Walawwa in Kandy to educate visitors on his precision craftsmanship.
  • Artifacts: His personal riyandanda (the traditional cubit measuring stick used for his architecture) is preserved for public viewing inside the Kandy National Museum. [1]

If you are researching his work or advocating for formal state honors, would you like to explore specific architectural details of his wooden carvings, or look into historical records regarding his descendants in Embekke?

https://share.google/aimode/qMusCZln6Wyx7I44T

Courtesy: AI Overview

…………………….

see also

Devendra Moolachari, the legendary master artificer who served under three Kandyan kings , undeniably shaped the architectural identity of Kandy . His remarkable vision—including the Paththirippuwa, Magul Maduwa, and Kandy Lake—deserves formal state honours and enduring national recognition for his unparalleled legacy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Masterpieces of Devendra Moolachari

Moolachari (also known as Dingittha Appu) elevated the hill capital’s aesthetic, seamlessly blending utility, spirituality, and royal authority: [1, 2]

  • Paththirippuwa (The Octagonal Pavilion): Built in 1802 , this iconic structure at the Sri Dalada Maligawa is celebrated for its steep, tiered roof and octagonal geometry . It was originally designed to allow the king to address his subjects and remains the defining symbol of the Temple of the Tooth .
  • Magul Maduwa (Audience Hall): An architectural marvel of Kandyan timber engineering , characterized by its intricately carved wooden pillars that supported the royal court. [1, 2, 3]
  • Kandy Lake (Kiri Muhuda): Constructed in 1807 , this man-made marvel visually and environmentally transformed the heart of the city into a scenic, tranquil landscape .
  • Walakulu Bamma (Cloud Wall): The beautifully designed protective wall that famously surrounds the Maligawa and its moat.

The Need for State Recognition

While millions of visitors admire his work each year , the man behind these UNESCO World Heritage Site monuments has largely faded from public consciousness . Celebrating Moolachari with a national monument, formal historical inclusion, or state accolades would rectify a long-overdue gap in Sri Lankan cultural history, ensuring traditional artists receive the respect they are owed. [1]

Further Exploration: Architectural Masterpieces

Would you like to discuss Moolachari’s specific design techniques, or perhaps learn more about the locations in Kandy where his descendants can still be found today?

https://share.google/aimode/CL6HReI7U1g6HvPpW

AI OVERVIEW

…………………….

National impact of recognition of Kandyan artists, sculptors, Temple painters, architects, ola leaf writers, intellectuals of the last phases of the Kandyan Kindom

The recognition of artists, architects, and intellectuals from the late Kandyan Kingdom (ca. 1595–1815) is a cornerstone of Sri Lanka’s national identity, cultural preservation, and arts sector. Their monumental legacy continues to influence modern society through various distinct impacts.

Cultural Renaissance and National Identity

  • Religious Legitimacy: Intellectuals and master craftsmen, most notably during the Buddhist revival under King Kirti Sri Rajasinha (1747–1782), established the defining aesthetic of Theravada Buddhist art. The restoration of the Upasampada (higher ordination) spurred the building and decorating of vital spiritual centers.
  • Historical Memory: The Temple of the Tooth Relic (Sri Dalada Maligawa) and the cave temples of Degaldoruwa and Ridi Vihara were, and continue to be, national symbols of resilience and devotion. [1, 2, 3]

Preservation of Indigenous Knowledge

  • Ola Leaf Manuscripts: Writers and scribes of the Kandyan era preserved invaluable Indigenous knowledge on ola (palm) leaves. This included not only Buddhist scriptures but critical texts on Ayurvedic medicine, astrology, and traditional healing. [1, 2, 3]
  • Literary Backbone: The translation and safekeeping of these manuscripts have provided modern Sri Lankan historians and scholars with an authentic foundation of the island’s pre-colonial history and culture. [1, 2]

Influence on Architecture and Contemporary Design

  • Traditional Aesthetics: The Kandyan school of architecture—defined by its distinctive multi-tiered roofs, timber carvings, and manipulation of light to inspire meditation—serves as a primary blueprint for contemporary Sri Lankan structural design . [1, 2, 3]
  • Cultural Branding: The artistic motifs, bright color palettes, and techniques developed by these temple painters and sculptors actively shape modern fashion (e.g., sarees), interior design, and tourism branding across the island .

A Legacy of Resilience Against Colonialism

  • Defiance Through Art: Artisans demonstrated agency and resistance against Western powers (Portuguese, Dutch, and British) by quietly embedding subversive, critical elements into their artwork. By painting colonial rulers as mere worshipers or placing them among figures in Hell, they asserted a distinct localized worldview. [1, 2]

AI OVERVIEW

Kandyan Resistance – the glorious last stand of the Sinhalese (1593 – 1818)

June 29th, 2026

Senaka Weeraratna

The Kandyan Resistance (1593–1818) was a 225-year struggle where the Kingdom of Kandy successfully defied three global superpowers—the Portuguese, Dutch, and British—making it the last independent native kingdom of Sri Lanka. Using asymmetric warfare, treacherous terrain, and absolute resolve, the Kandyan Sinhalese repeatedly annihilated European invading armies until internal betrayal finally brought down the kingdom in 1815.

Key Historic Milestones

[1593] Kingdom Consolidated (Vimaladharmasuriya I)
   │
[1594] Battle of Danture (Portuguese Crushed)
   │
[1638] Battle of Gannoruwa (Last Portuguese Threat)
   │
[1765] Dutch Invasion Failure (Guerilla Starvation)
   │
[1803] First Kandyan War (British Garrison Massacred)
   │
[1815] Kandyan Convention (Internal Betrayal)
   │
[1818] Uva Rebellion (The Final Stand)

The Three Pillars of Kandyan Defense

  • The Geography: Impenetrable mountain passes, malaria-ridden jungles, and torrential rivers acted as natural fortresses against heavy European armor.
  • Guerilla Warfare: Kandyans avoided open-field battles, relying instead on lightning ambushes, sabotaging supply lines, and utilizing lethal spike traps. [1, 2]
  • Scorched Earth Policy: Whenever an enemy advanced, Kandyans evacuated cities and burnt crops, leaving invading troops to face starvation and disease.

Turning Points of the Resistance

1. The Portuguese Defeats (1594 & 1638)

  • Battle of Danture (1594): King Vimaladharmasuriya I completely wiped out a Portuguese army trying to install a puppet monarch, securing the kingdom’s sovereignty early on. [1, 2, 3, 4]
  • Battle of Gannoruwa (1638): King Rajasinghe II delivered the final, crushing blow to Portuguese ambitions on the island. The Portuguese heads were piled before the king, ending their military offensives against Kandy forever.

2. Defying the Dutch (1765)

The Dutch successfully captured the capital city of Kandy in 1765. However, they quickly realized it was a trap; Kandyan guerillas isolated the garrison, cut off food supplies, and forced a humiliating, disease-ridden retreat. [1, 2, 3]

3. Striking Back at the British Empire (1803)

During the First Kandyan War, the British army marched into Kandy and left a heavily armed garrison. King Sri Vikrama Rajasinha’s forces surrounded the outpost, cut off communication, and massacred the remaining British forces at MacDowell’s Fort, delaying British conquest by over a decade.

The Tragic End: Betrayal and the Last Stand

  • The 1815 Fall: Kandy did not fall to military conquest, but to internal aristocratic betrayal. Disgruntled Kandyan nobles signed the Kandyan Convention with the British to depose their tyrannical king, inadvertently ceding sovereignty. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • The Uva Rebellion (1817–1818): Realizing they had traded a king for foreign rulers, the Sinhalese launched a furious, bloody rebellion led by leaders like Monarawila Keppetipola. The British responded with brutal, scorched-earth suppression, decimating the Uva region’s population and fields, permanently ending the resistance.
  • https://share.google/aimode/Sr0MkY9J1zJ9zYIJe
  • AI Overview

see also

The last stand of the Sinhalese (1593 – 1818)

The Kingdom of Kandy stood as the final bastion of Sinhalese sovereignty for over two centuries. Protected by dense, malaria-infested jungles and steep mountain passes , the Kandyans fiercely fended off the Portuguese and Dutch empires using masterful guerrilla warfare. This independence finally succumbed to British geopolitical maneuvering and domestic betrayal. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

⚔️ The Era of Vimaladharmasurya I (1593)

The coalescing of the centralized Kandyan kingdom is largely credited to King Vimaladharmasurya I . Ascending the throne in 1593 , he brilliantly fortified the highlands and successfully defeated the invading Portuguese armies at the legendary Battle of Danture in 1594. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

🤝 The Kandyan Convention (1815)

After decades of surviving European sieges, Kandy was not conquered militarily . Instead, disillusioned and persecuted by the increasingly paranoid King Sri Vikrama Rajasinha , the native Kandyan Chieftains signed the Kandyan Convention with the British Governor Robert Brownrigg. [1, 2, 3, 4]

  • The Date: Signed on March 2, 1815, at the historic Magul Maduwa (Royal Audience Hall).
  • The Terms: The king was deposed and exiled to India , and Sinhalese sovereignty was formally handed to the British Crown .
  • The Caveat: The British agreed to protect and maintain the inviolability of Buddhism and traditional Kandyan customs. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

🔥 The Great Rebellion (1817–1818)

Realizing they had merely swapped an unpopular absolute monarch for an exploitative colonial empire, the Kandyan nobles united with the Buddhist clergy to launch the Uva-Wellassa Rebellion.

  • The Spark: In 1817, the rebellion ignited in the Wellassa region over broken treaty promises, heavy taxation, and colonial corruption.
  • The Shift: Keppetipola Disawe, a high-ranking Kandyan nobleman sent by the British to crush the rebels, made the historic choice to join them and take command. [1, 2]
  • The Brutal Aftermath: The British countered with a devastating scorched-earth policy, burning rice paddies and destroying livestock . Over 10,000 Sinhalese were killed .
  • The Fall: Leaders like Keppetipola were captured and executed , marking the ultimate end of armed Kandyan resistance and the loss of the island’s 2,350-year-old independence.

Further Exploration: The Last Stands and Heritage

  • Read a comprehensive breakdown of these historic military encounters in the Sunday Times Battle Series.
  • View original colonial artifacts and the physical treaty at the Sri Lanka National Archives.
  • Trace the genealogy and the tragic final days of the monarchy in the Ceylon History Story on Sri Vikrama Rajasinha. [1, 2, 3]

If you’d like, I can:

  • Detail the specific guerrilla tactics employed by the Kandyan armies
  • Discuss the role of John D’Oyly in orchestrating the fall of the kingdom
  • Cover the subsequent Matale Rebellion of 1848

https://share.google/aimode/mQYetfXTqFDLmZS3S

AI Overview

Sri Lanka Must Reform Its Approach to Foreign Direct Investment

June 29th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera


Sri Lanka has no shortage of strategic advantages. Our location, skilled workforce, natural harbours, fertile land, and maritime heritage make us an attractive destination for foreign direct investment (FDI). Yet, time and again, promising investment opportunities have slipped through our fingers.

Several years ago, a Saudi investor expressed serious interest in establishing a modern shipyard in Galle Harbour. 

The project had progressed through the required approvals, including Cabinet approval. However, with changes in political leadership and a lack of consistent government support, the investment gradually lost momentum. The investors eventually abandoned the project and left Sri Lanka.


Around the same period, a state-backed foreign agency explored opportunities to develop large-scale vegetable farming and goat farming in Sri Lanka. They were so impressed with the country’s potential that they undertook aerial surveys of the Eastern Province by helicopter and expressed willingness to establish farming villages while guaranteeing purchases of the produce. They viewed Sri Lanka as a safe and reliable investment destination.


Unfortunately, the project too was abandoned after allegations that an influential individual had sought an improper financial benefit. Whether every allegation can be substantiated or not, the perception of corruption alone is enough to discourage serious investors.
These are not isolated stories. Similar experiences have been shared by many investors over the years. International investors seek transparency, policy consistency, speed of approvals, and protection from political interference. They are prepared to take commercial risks, but not governance risks


Countries such as Singapore transformed themselves into global investment hubs not merely through infrastructure, but by building trust. Investors knew that agreements would be honoured, approvals would be predictable, and corruption would not be tolerated.


If Sri Lanka genuinely wishes to become a developed nation, attracting quality FDI must become a national priority rather than a political opportunity. Investment approvals should be handled through transparent, professional institutions insulated from political influence. Every investor, whether large or small, should receive equal treatment under the law.


The cost of losing a major investment extends far beyond the immediate project. It means lost employment, lost exports, lost technology transfer, and lost confidence. Worse still, disappointed investors rarely return, and they share their experiences with others across the global investment community.
Sri Lanka cannot afford to lose another generation of investment opportunities. The question is no longer whether we can attract investors. It is whether we can create an environment where they have the confidence to stay.
Good governance is not merely an ethical principle—it is one of the nation’s most valuable economic assets.

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Devendra Moolachari the celebrated Architect of the last three Kandyan Kings and Mastermind of the beautification of Kandy deserves State Honours and National Recognition in Sri Lanka.

June 29th, 2026

AI OVERVIEW

Devendra Moolachari the celebrated Architect of the last three Kandyan Kings and designer of the Pathirip­puwa, the Octa­gonal Pavil­ion in Kandy’s Sri Dalada Maligawa, Maha Maduwa (Audience Hall) and Kiri Muhuda (Kandyan Lake) deserves long overdue recognition and State Honours for Beautifying Kandy with remarkable architectural feats in the last phase of the Kandyan Kingdom.

Devendra Moolachari (also known as Devendra Mulachariya or Dingittha Appu) is universally recognized by historians as the mastermind who shaped the visual identity of the Kingdom of Kandy. Serving under the final three Kandyan monarchs—King Kirthi Sri Rajasinghe, King Rajadhi Rajasinghe, and King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe—he elevated traditional craftsmanship into monumental engineering marvels. His lack of widespread modern state honors remains a poignant gap in Sri Lanka’s cultural heritage recognition given the profound impact of his surviving legacy.

Iconic Architectural Contributions

  • Pathirippuwa (The Octagon): Built in 1802 under King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe, it serves as the ultimate symbol of the Sri Dalada Maligawa. Derived from Tamil words meaning “to sit and see all around,” its unique shape projected royal and spiritual authority. [1, 2, 3]
  • Maha Maduwa / Magul Maduwa (Audience Hall): Begun in 1783, this grand wooden pavilion features two parallel rows of intricately carved timber pillars. It functions as a historic landmark where the Kandyan Convention was eventually signed in 1815. [1, 2, 4, 5]
  • Kiri Muhuda (Kandy Lake): Moolacharya transformed the local landscape by designing this expansive artificial lake, adding a scenic focus to the sacred city center.
  • Decorative Structural Walls: He engineered the iconic Walakulu Bamma (Cloud Wall) and the Diyarella Bemma (Wave Wall) that line the lake and temple premises, defining the iconic perimeter of Kandy. [1, 2]

The Tragedy of a Master Artificer

Despite his genius, historical accounts highlight a tragic end driven by court intrigue. Slandered by jealous rivals, Moolacharya faced severe punishment or humiliation on the orders of the king. Overwhelmed by shame, he ultimately took his own life by drowning in the very lake he created. In remorse, King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe ordered a funeral with royal honors and reportedly placed a commemorative plaque on the lake’s small island, though it has since disappeared. [1, 2, 3]

Modern Recognition and Legacy

While Moolacharya’s structures are globally celebrated as UNESCO World Heritage sites, public memory of the architect himself has faded over time. However, efforts to restore his memory are growing:

  • Biographical Research: Comprehensive studies, such as D.D.M. Waidyasekera’s book, Great Royal Artificer of the Kandyan Kingdom- Devendra Mulachari, formally chronicle his engineering feats. [1]
  • Exhibitions: An intricate scale model of his masterpiece, the Pathirippuwa, is displayed at the restored Ehelepola Walawwa in Kandy to educate visitors on his precision craftsmanship.
  • Artifacts: His personal riyandanda (the traditional cubit measuring stick used for his architecture) is preserved for public viewing inside the Kandy National Museum. [1]

If you are researching his work or advocating for formal state honors, would you like to explore specific architectural details of his wooden carvings, or look into historical records regarding his descendants in Embekke?

https://share.google/aimode/qMusCZln6Wyx7I44T

Courtesy: AI Overview

…………………….

see also

Devendra Moolachari, the legendary master artificer who served under three Kandyan kings , undeniably shaped the architectural identity of Kandy . His remarkable vision—including the Paththirippuwa, Magul Maduwa, and Kandy Lake—deserves formal state honours and enduring national recognition for his unparalleled legacy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Masterpieces of Devendra Moolachari

Moolachari (also known as Dingittha Appu) elevated the hill capital’s aesthetic, seamlessly blending utility, spirituality, and royal authority: [1, 2]

  • Paththirippuwa (The Octagonal Pavilion): Built in 1802 , this iconic structure at the Sri Dalada Maligawa is celebrated for its steep, tiered roof and octagonal geometry . It was originally designed to allow the king to address his subjects and remains the defining symbol of the Temple of the Tooth .
  • Magul Maduwa (Audience Hall): An architectural marvel of Kandyan timber engineering , characterized by its intricately carved wooden pillars that supported the royal court. [1, 2, 3]
  • Kandy Lake (Kiri Muhuda): Constructed in 1807 , this man-made marvel visually and environmentally transformed the heart of the city into a scenic, tranquil landscape .
  • Walakulu Bamma (Cloud Wall): The beautifully designed protective wall that famously surrounds the Maligawa and its moat.

The Need for State Recognition

While millions of visitors admire his work each year , the man behind these UNESCO World Heritage Site monuments has largely faded from public consciousness . Celebrating Moolachari with a national monument, formal historical inclusion, or state accolades would rectify a long-overdue gap in Sri Lankan cultural history, ensuring traditional artists receive the respect they are owed. [1]

Further Exploration: Architectural Masterpieces

Would you like to discuss Moolachari’s specific design techniques, or perhaps learn more about the locations in Kandy where his descendants can still be found today?

https://share.google/aimode/CL6HReI7U1g6HvPpW

AI OVERVIEW

Sinhala artists of Kandyan era

June 29th, 2026

By Rajendra Bandara – Saturday Magazine Island Mar 23 2002

http://www.worldgenweb.org/lkawgw/sinhalaartists.html

On the advice of Rev. Weliwita Sangaraja Saranankara, King Keerthi Sri Rajasinghe rebuilt and renovated hundreds of Buddhist temples which were destroyed by invaders or abandoned. For the restoration works, the King employed traditional Sinhala artists who were scattered throughout the country. These artists belonged to the artist caste called “Hiththaru”. This caste is also known as ‘Acharis’, ‘Nawandanna’, ‘Galladdo’, or ‘Gurunnanses’. In the Kandyan region they are regarded as high caste people, second only to the Govi caste.

Members of this caste use surnames “Naide” for males and “Nachchire” for females. Most of the names are of Indian origin as some craftsmen and artists migrated to Sri Lanka recently. “Naide” is similar to the Telengu word ‘Naidu’ used in ‘Andra Pradesh’ in Southern India. Females of this caste are allowed to wear Kandyan ‘Osariya’ as a special priviledge.

There were different schools of artists or generations, called “Paramparawa”. “Nilagama paramparawa” (school) is one of the most famous tradition. The well-known Dambulla rock temple was built by the “Acharis” of Nilagama tradition. The Head Craftsman or the Artist is called “Mulachari”. Under a Mulachari several assistants were employed.

Rev. Dewaragampola Silwaththena was a Buddhist Bhikku turned artist who painted the murals at “Ridivihara” and “Degaldoruwa”. Rev. Wettewe and Rev. Katuwana were the other monks who painted temple murals in this period. Dingiran Appu of Ahangama and Welitara Heenappu were famous artists in the Matara area. One still finds traditional artists in this area with family names of Devendra and Devasurendra.

Deldeniye Siththara Naide, Bodhinarayana Chithracharige Kapuru Naide, Wijayapala Muhandiram Neththa Naide and Hiriyale Naide were also famous traditional artists at that time.

Devendra Mulachari was the Head Craftsman of the King Sri Wickrema Rajasinghe, the last King of Sinhale. He was the creator of Paththiruppuwa of Sri Dalada Maligawa and the beautiful Kandy Lake. The descendents of this Mulachari are still found in the Kandy area and they are using the family name “Rankoth Vibhushana Gedera”.

After the completion of a Temple or a Devale the artists were given titles and gifts including lands. Some artists were given “Nalal Pata” (Jewelled ornament worn on the forehead) with a special title in appreciation of their skill. Some were elevated to the high caste by a proclamation made by the King.

It is mentioned in the “Dambulla Gal Sannasa” (Rockedict) that King Wimaldharmasuriya II, upon the occasion of fixing a bell on the rock in front of Raja Mahawihara at Dambulla, the craftsmen were rewarded with one amuna of paddy land (approx. 2 acres) and 200 fanams.

After the advent of western art, the Kandiyan art tradition was ignored and neglected. Descendents of the Kandyan artists are no more interested in preserving this unique style of painting.

Courtesy:  Saturday Magazine Island Mar 23 2002

ඕලුගල සර් ” පරිස්සමෙන් !

June 29th, 2026

DARK ROOM ඩාක් රූම්

Colombo Chief Magistrate questions bank officers over missing funds

June 29th, 2026

Hiru News

When money goes missing from a wardrobe at home, the person in charge knows about it, so when money goes missing from a bank, don’t the bank officers assigned to it know, Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S Bodaragama questioned in court.

The Magistrate made these remarks when the case regarding the fraud of over 13 billion rupees through a general ledger account of a private bank was called.

The four suspects relevant to this incident were ordered to be remanded further until the 10th of next month by the Magistrate.

The fifth suspect in the incident was released on bail.

The Criminal Investigation Department, presenting further facts to the court regarding the incident, stated that the suspects should be remanded as investigations into this money racket are ongoing.

The lawyer appearing for the private bank stated that the bank suffered a loss of 13.9 billion rupees due to this money fraud.

At that moment, the Magistrate questioned the lawyer appearing for the bank.

“Didn’t the audit reports conducted in the bank during the 2023/2024 period reveal such an outflow of money from the bank? Has it been revealed that money in the general ledger account of the bank was taken by a certain party, used for another investment, and deposited back into the general ledger of the bank by someone inside the bank?”

The lawyer then stated that no such revelation occurred.

The Magistrate stated:

“It is mentioned that the 380 million rupees said to have been transferred lastly, was transferred on the exact same day. So, did such a large amount of money not transfer like this before? Wasn’t there an audit cycle system regarding that? Because when money drops in a home wardrobe, the person in charge at home knows it. When money increases in the bank’s general ledger account, don’t the officers coming for that know? When money goes missing, the owner must know. That process exists, but it did not operate in the bank.”

The Criminal Investigation Department presented facts to the court stating that investigations are being conducted regarding another 19 accounts related to the incident. Furthermore, investigations are underway regarding money that went abroad through suspense accounts, and the officers involved in it are also being investigated.

The Computer Crimes Investigation Unit of the Criminal Investigation Department informed the Colombo Chief Magistrate during the previous court session that there are no audit reports related to the sector in question within the internal and external audit reports conducted at the bank.

The Computer Crimes Investigation Unit informed the court on the previous trial date that no audits of the relevant payment and settlement sector were included in the internal and external audits conducted by the bank, or even in the audit reports conducted by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka.

The Magistrate ordered the progress of the investigations related to the incident to be presented to the court on the next trial date.

The case related to the incident is scheduled to be called on the 10th of next month.

පාස්කු විමර්ශනයේ මෙතෙක් සැඟවූ මහා සාක්ෂි විනාශය | Easter Attack CCTV Deletion Case

June 29th, 2026

SL Leaders

The European Union’s Deadly Migration Game

June 28th, 2026

e-Con e-News

Posted byee ink.Posted inUncategorizedTags:ChinahistoryIndiamigrationnewspolitics

blog: https://eesrilanka.wordpress.com

Before you study the economics, study the economists!

e-Con e-News 21-27 June 2026

The European Union (EU) has been operating a giant human trafficking network, buying & selling workers around the world, including from Sri Lanka. Not only is the EU involved, but the governments of Anglo North America (the USA & Canada) thrive & revel in these practices as well. For instance, during the 30-year war on Sri Lanka, these governments used their diplomatic – as well as NGO – channels to cherry-pick skilled workers & ‘professionals’ from refugee camps. Local politicians, north & south, also indulged in such lucrative ‘refugee’ games. Many of their major ‘recruiters’ in the camps ended up as ‘ethnic leaders’, involved in ‘settlement & adaptation’, becoming lawyers & even MPs representing ‘Diaspora’ communities, promoting war to generate even more refugees. Most workers suffered more mundane fates.

     This ee glances at the EU’s migration trade. It’s hard not to recall that the largest commerce before England’s opium ‘triangle’ trade from India to China, was the widespread European trading of the enslaved, ‘graduating’ from chattel to indentured to wage labor. The silencing echoes in thunder. The international trade in human labor, midst the domestic human resource biz, is even more pernicious & lucrative than the drug trade & weapons business, even as they are all intimately linked. There is very little analysis of this trade, even in so-called ‘liberal’ publications, perhaps due to their constituencies (social workers, teachers, lawyers, etc.) benefiting from this traffic. Limited exposure of this desperate world is then left to sensationalist tabloids & fascists.

     This ee Focus adapts an interview about the lives of Sri Lankans in Romania. Many Sri Lankans are, legally & illegally squirreled to Romania, many with the promise of eventual settlement in Western Europe. Insight News’ Shihar Aneez notes:

‘Romania has become one of the fastest-growing destinations

for Sri Lankan migrant workers seeking opportunities in Europe.

But behind the promise of better jobs & higher wages,

some workers report a very different reality.’

*

Aneez interviews Romanian researcher Iulia Hau who points to what she claims is a ‘cultural blind spot’ which assumes Europeans do no harm. Media instead blame Sri Lankan ‘agents’ for the horrors migrant workers end up enduring in Europe and elsewhere. She describes how ‘Romania has become a gateway to Europe, how migration networks operate.’ Aneez’s extensive interview covers ‘recruitment practices, migration costs, labor exploitation, human trafficking investigations, unpaid wages, workplace safety concerns, legal challenges, and the difficulties many workers face when seeking justice… and what prospective workers should know before making the journey.’

     What is excluded however is the ‘larger picture’. This week, we heard that Israel is blocking remittances by over 5,000 Sri Lankan workers amounting to almost $7million. The Israeli government has frozen the funds of the money transfer business, Global Remit Currency Services, which is accused of money laundering. But there is very little news about what they did & the larger banking interests behind them. There was also ‘headline’ news that the Sri Lanka government has launched an ‘app to draw Lankan migrant workers’ complaints.’ When companies & government departments don’t even answer landlines let alone mobile phones, these proclamations about such ‘digitalization’ & other modern conveniences, AI, etc, are another sick joke. Even crazier is the threat by the National Chamber of Exporters (NCE)’s call ‘for a framework to recruit foreign workers’ (see ee Workers).

     Hau’s tale is important because the laws are inscribed in a Kafkaesque manner to create innumerable intermediaries – middlemen (& middlewomen!) both here and abroad. The European traders and bureaucrats who leverage this system are kept invisible. The process of Sri Lankan workers being recruited and trafficked appears haphazard and cruel, replete with tales of sexual abuse and fraud, despite the formal Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE), and the 900 member agencies of the Association of Licensed Foreign Employment Agencies. Such tales are not only reserved for going to work in other countries, as in West Asia, but stories abound of the humiliation, sexual harassment & bribery practised by European & US & Canadian visa officials. So, whereas the migration process appears informal here, there is an overall method to the madness. While Sri Lankans are being hired to work in Romania, the rest of Europe is formally recruiting workers, through Romania (though, as with Sri Lanka, they’re taking advantage of both countries’ education & skills imparted by their now-derided socialist policies). And not just skilled workers.

     ee (18 April 2020) noted how England was importing Romanian workers to pluck fruit, through their Country Land & Business Association (CLBA), which represents rural landowners in England & Wales. The CLBA funds 100s of MPs in their ‘democratic’ parliament. Romanian workers were flown in by an unnamed food produce company, which chartered a plane booked by Air Charter Service (ACS). We even then wondered why the BBC story did not name the food company involved: ABF, Booker, Sainsbury, Tesco? Or mention the banks involved?  ee (25 April 2020) reported how Germany was planning to fly in 10,000s of eastern Europeans for harvesting – keeping the system of seasonal work alive despite Covid 19. Incoming Romanians were welcomed with ‘chocolate Easter bunnies’ by the German agricultural minister. In Austria, carers and agricultural workers were flown in from Bulgaria, Croatia & Romania. Yet 2 years before that the Austrian government had reduced family allowance of Eastern European workers. By 2020 even bonus payments were given to care-workers to make them stay longer!

     The blocking of Sri Lankans’ remittances is not as unorganized as it was made out to be in 2022. What is lacking in the scholarship of our well-funded social scientists is the linking of this trade to the labor policies of the humongous multinational corporations (MNCs), confederations of industries and federations of ‘small business’, chambers of commerce, employers’ federations etc, and major recruitment organizations that specialize in sourcing and relocating workers. It is no surprise that while there are ‘world governing bodies such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) to oversee trade, there is no such body to monitor migration. In the USA & Canada, priority is given to temporary migrants, siphoned to farm work & ‘care’. Such workers are prevented from joining unions, and lack their own health and social benefits. All the blather about ‘building walls’ & ’deportation’ only take place after harvests in the autumn, and seasonal wages come due to be paid. All blather of human rights excludes the right to decent work, and to develop our countries.

     In Sri Lanka, workers’ remittances are the largest source of foreign exchange, even if such value is not appreciated at points of entry & exit. Migrant labor is also used for ‘integrating’ our economies with other countries, creating further dependencies, like market access for import-heavy exports.

     The Philippines is supposed to be the largest labour exporting country in Asia. Yet, despite the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD) shilling about such labor movements enabling technology transfer & upskilling, it has not developed their country, only creating greater dependency. During the Covid pandemic more Filipina nurses died inside the USA than inside the Philippines.

*

• This week also saw the entry into Sri Lanka, of more US war-makers & related officials, bearing explosive gifts, demanding Sri Lanka become a base for them to harass our neighbors, monitoring ‘sanctioned vessels’, etc (see ee Quotes, Kapur, Schneider). It is no coincidence that they were followed by the IMF, World Bank, etc, offering yet-to-be-seen billions in aid etc, which might follow if only we fulfil their demands. The World Bank tell us (or warns) that 1 million young Sri Lankans are about to enter the labour forceand their ‘repayable’ dollars are to assist the private sector to employ workers.

     This week also saw another revelation of millions & billions defrauded from the country, involving mis-invoicing, under- & over -invoicing, etc. It is no surprise that the merchant media fails to even hint that the larger defalcations are legally committed by multinational corporations. Some media do point out that it was the JVP-supported Foreign Exchange Act of 2017 that removed the Exchange Control Act of 1953, that ‘under the pretext of liberalising the foreign currency flow, converted non-bailable criminal offences into civil offences’ (see Random Notes).

     Meanwhile, the Business news is full of the philanthropy – private corporations donating this medical item & building this or that part of a school, etc – without mentioning who is going to sustain such largesse. These do-good acts often act as preludes to the privatization of health & education.

*

‘It is wrong to blame governments alone for poor economic growth, as many do.

Most economic activity in this country is run by the private sector

& leaders there have made poor use of opportunities.’ – Usvatte-Aratchi

• One economist lamented this week, that despite Sri Lanka apparently following all the rules demanded by the IMF etc, nothing seems to protect us. They also note that the USA & EU’s perpetual resort to war is not a part of these analysts’ ‘planning scenarios’ & growth projections. Our policymakers seem to close their eyes & ears & noses to such first & last resorts. Some speak of our primary need for ensuring energy security, but do not recall the story of DJ Wimalasurendra, let alone the long trail of sabotage of progressive industrial policies:

‘For quite some time, there has been no agency of government

dealing with long-term economic & social policy questions.

Nor have universities been of any help.’ – Usvatte-Aratchi

*

This ee Focus reproduces Usvatte-Aratchi’s survey of the, perhaps-feeble, attempts to plan the economy, as well as the eminent personages who have sought since 1948 to steer Sri Lanka’s economy. He even mentions SBD de Silva! He deems ‘mysterious’, why the present government has seen no need for specialist advisors. He even lists famed Indian economists. Though he too ‘mysteriously’ misses out on naming the Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis whose first two 5-year plans inspired many countries after WW2. Despite relentless attacks, led by US-paid economic hitmen, Mahalanobis’ plans laid the foundation for India’s heavy industry and set up the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT).

     Usvatte-Aratchi also feels a Central Bank can only resolve short-term problems. He praises Sri Lanka’s outstanding successes in mortality, in health & education (carried out by political leaders). He then points to the petty nature of our merchants, and asks: ‘Where are the large-scale manufacturing & service companies, selling the world over, where economies of scale abound in the 21st century?’ And he wonders why:

‘No multinational companies have

established here any large factories or offices.

Is the air we breathe deathly to enterprise?’

*

• The nature of the US-led white & honorary-white coalition may be gauged by this week’s announcement by the US government of the resignation of England’s Prime Minister, even before the English leader (their 6th PM to quit in 10 years) himself declared his exit. Brexit indeed!

‘Politics is a concentrated expression of economics…

The military function is the essential

expression of this political concentration…

– Hyper-Imperialism: A Dangerous Decadent New Stage

Their news is full of headlines about ceasefires & prayers, for peace to be prolonged. Many podcasts are exaggerating tactical battlefield victories, rather than soberly assessing the imperialist penchant for strategic permanent war. The media is full of awe for the white settler states, alternating between awe and revulsion. Yet anyone who knows US & white settler history, knows full well their genocidal practices, and what has actually defeated them. Having now been ‘tactically’ thwarted in parts of West Asia, does not mean the US & EU have suddenly been seized by an attack of peaceability. We fear the US-led European (& Japanese) war machine will next turn their guns on Cuba, as well as China. The current nature of the ‘hyperimperialism’ endangering the world is fully detailed in this ee Focus’ 6th excerpt of the (TI) Tricontinental Institute’s pathbreaking investigation:

‘During its history England’s forces (or forces

with an English mandate) have invaded, had

some control over, or fought conflicts in 171

of the world’s 193 countries that are currently

UN member states, or 9 out of 10 of all countries.’

*

TI describes the organization of the Global North (GN) arrayed against the world, their umbilical links to the USA & its intelligence services, and tabulates the numbers & types of wars they have waged. Most important is its analysis of the special relationship between the USA & Israel. The USA itself ‘was established by white, religious extremists who, in 1690, conceived and established their colonial settlements as ‘plantations of religion’. It is also clear that: ‘Israel was the creation of English & US imperialism’. (see ee Focus)

*

The production of and trade in plantation crops

were determined by trading monopolies

consisting of agency houses, brokers, shippers &

the marketing combines in the metropolitan countries.

*

• How these monopoly interests extended their power over plantation economies have been a vital component of SBD de Silva’s classic The Political Economy of Underdevelopment. This ee Focus continues Chapter 11 where he shows the influence of these monopolies on the technological & marketing strategies of plantations. He shows they preferred to ‘maximize gross revenue instead of minimizing production costs’. He focuses on why this method of producing tea in plantations saw no need to modernize technology or advance workers’ skills. This has had a deadly stranglehold on the upgrading of ‘human resources’ in Sri Lanka.

     The resort to any innovative technology was usually due to great external pressures such as wartime shortages and competition, for example, the resort to synthetic over natural rubber, beet sugar over cane. SBD gives numerous examples from around the world, why colonial policy favored higher prices over more efficient production. Another dampener to innovation was the relationship between the managing agency firms and the plantations, and its impact on technology. Since payments to the agency were usually paid on a profits basis, plantations kept wage rates as low as possible, therefore preferring labour intensity, so technological changes were of no interest to the agency.

     It is worth recalling once again SBD de Silva’s insight into the differences between industrial producer capital, and merchant capital, which depends on privileged access to the state and physical violence. It is time to expose the corruption of the constant cry about corruption by a media that is the epitome of merchant corruption. We are a country ruled by importers of other countries’ industrial goods, and ruled by importers disguised as exporters. We have to endure the sermons of economists who import their ideas from our imperialist masters, always crying about the need for more exports which are actually made of even more imports. Such is the comedy that turns us into exporters of our greatest resource: the fruit of our land and labor.

*

_________

Contents:

ශ්‍රී ලන්කා දේශපාලන ඉතිහාශයේ කළු ලප.

June 28th, 2026

ආචාර්ය සුදත් ගුණසේකර අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය සිරිමාවෝ බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනියගේ හිටපු ස්ථිර ලේකම් සහ ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලනසේවා සන්ගමයේ සභාපති (1991-94))

මේ රටේ පලාත්සභා ඡන්දය වහාම පවත්වන්මෙන් කෑමොර දෙන දේශපාලකයින් ඇතුලු සියලුම පිස්සන් ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා යැවිය යුත්තේ අන්ගොඩටය, එසේත් නැතිනම් ඔවුන් දේශද්‍රෝහීන්, ජාතිද්‍රෝහීන් සහ බෞද්ධ විරෝධීන් වශයෙන් වහාම මේ පින් බිමෙන් යළි කිසිදාක ආපසු ආ නොහැකි පිට සක්වලකටම පිටුවහල් කළ යුතුය.

1V වන කොටස

1987 රජිව් ගාන්ධි/ජේ. ආර්. ඉන්දු ලන්කා ගිවිසුමෙන් ඇතිවූ ශ්‍රී ලන්කා දේශපාලන ඉතිහාශයේ කළු ලප.

ඉන්දු ලන්කා ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමට පෙර ඉන්දියාව සියළුම පිළිගත් ජාත්‍යන්තර නීතිවලට පටහැනිව,1987 ජූනි 4 වන දින පළමුව ඉන්දීය මිරාජ් 2000 ප්‍රහාරක ජෙට් යානා 4 ක ආරක්ශාව ඇතිව ඒණ්-32 ට්රන්ස්පොර්ට් ගුවන් යානා 5 ක්, ලන්කා රාජ්‍ය ආක්‍රමණයකොට ගුවනින් ‘පරිප්පු දමා, පාලකයින් මරණ බියෙන් බියගන්වා, පළමුව ඉන්දු- ලන්කා ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමට පසුබිම සකස්කොට, දෙවණුව, 1987 ජූලි 29 වන දින රජිව් ගාන්ධි/ජේ ආර් ලවා එම ගිවිසුම අත්සන්කොට බලහත්කාරයෙන් අප හිස මත පටවන ලදී.

මෙම ගිවිසුමට එරෙහිව සියළුම විපක්ෂ ඒකාභද්ධව පිට කොටුවේ දැවැන්ත මහජන විරෝධතාවක්ද පැවැත්විය.එසේම ඊට එරෙහිව දිවයින පුරා පැවති විරෝධතා වලින් පුද්ගලයින් 147 දෙනකු ජීවිත පූජා කලහ. මෙදින සිදුවූ අති විසේෂම සිද්ධිය වූයේ මෙම ඉන්දීය ආක්‍රමණයට විරෝධය පෑමක් වශයෙන්, රජිව් ගාන්දි වෙනුවෙන් කොටුවේ පවත්වනලද ආචාර පෙලපාලියේදී, ලන්කා ඉතිහාශයට එක්වූ එක් වීර සින්හල දේශප්‍රේමියෙක් වූ නාවික සෙබල විජේමුනි රෝහණ ද සිල්වා විසින්, එම ඉන්දීය ආක්රමණයට ජාතියේ විරෝධය පෑමක් වශයෙන් ඔහු අත තිබුණු තුවක්කු බඳයෙන් රජිව් ගාන්දිට පහර දිමය.

කෙසේ වුවද 1987 ජූලි 29 වන දින ජේ.ආර් ජයවර්ධන ජනාධිපතිවරයාගේ රජය, දිවයින පුරා හදිසි නීතිය සහ ඇඳිරි නීතිය පනවා, ඒ යටතේ ඉන්දියාව විසින් බලහත්කාරයෙන් අප රට මත පැටවු රජිව් ගාන්ධි/ජේ. ආර්.  ඉන්දු- ලන්කා ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කළේ මෙවැනි පසු බිමකය. එහි ප්‍රධාන අරමුණු වූයේ 1) එවකට පැවති ත්‍රස්ථවාදි යුද්ධය නතරකිරීම 2) එල් ට්. ට්ය නිරායුධ කිරිම සහ 3) උතුරු නැගෙනහිර පලාත් ඒකාභද්ධ කොට ඊට ස්වයන් පාලනය ලබා දීමය.

 මේ සඳහා 1987 අන්ක 42 පලාත් සභා පනතින් අවශ්‍ය බලතල සම්පාධනය කිරීම සහ ඒ සඳහා අවශ්‍ය ව්යුහාත්මක, නයිතික සහ පරිපාලන වෙනස්කම් පිලිබඳ යෝජනාද ඉදිරිපත් කෙරින. ඒ සමඟම රජයේ හමුදා බැරක්ක වලට සීමාකිරිමට සහ එල්. ටී.ටි. ආයුධ ඉන්දීය සාම හමුදාවට භාරදීමටද නියමිතව තිබින. මෙම පනතේ සියළු විධිවිධාන සකස්කළේ ඉන්දියාවට අවශ්‍ය අන්දමටය.රජයේ හමුදා බැරැක්ක වලට ගියද එල්. ටී.ටිය ඔවුන්ගේ ආයුධ සියල්ලම භාර නොදුන් අතර ගිවිසුමද උල්ලන්ඝනය කොට නැවතත් සටනට අවතීරණය වීය. ඉන්දියාව ඊට කිසිදු ප්‍රතිචාරයක් නොදැක්වූ අතර එල්. ටී.ටිය සම්පූර්නයෙන්ම නිරායුධ නොකළ නිසා ඉන්දියාව විසින්ම ගිවිසුම උල්ලන්ඝණය කොට ඇත. 

 ගිවිසුමේ ප්‍රධාන අරමුණු3න් 1 සා 2 ම ඉටුවුයේ නැත. අන්ක 3 අනුව උ.සහ නැ පලාත් දෙක ඒකාබද්ද කලද එයත් ජ්.ව්.පි. ගොණුකළ නඩුවකින් නැවත විසුරුවා හැරීමට සිදු විය. එසේම ඉඩම්, අධිකරණ සහ පොලිස් බලතලද එම පලාත් දෙකට ලබා දුන්නේ නැත.මේ අනුව ඇත්ත වශයෙන්ම එම ගිවිසුම අහෝසී වී දැන් බෝහෝ කල්ය.

අනෙත් අතින් එම ගිවිසුමට පෙර ඉන්දියාව පුරා එල්. ටී.ටි යට ඉන්දියාව විසින් යුධ පුහුණුව ලබාදීම, මුදල් ලබාදීම, අවිආයුධ සහ යුධ ශිල්පය පිළිබඳ අවශ්‍ය දැණුම අතුලු සියලු පහසුකම් සැපයීම පමණක් නොව අවසානයේදී රජිව් ගාන්ධිගේ වෙඩි නොවදින කබාය පවා ඔහු අතින්ම දකුණු ඉන්දියාවේ පැවති ප්‍රසිද්ධ සභාවකදීම ප්‍රභාකරන්ට සියතින්ම ප්‍රදානය කිරීම වැනි සියළු යුධ ආධාර  එල්. ටී.ටි යට ලබාදීම නිසා ඉන්දියාව විසින්ම ඉන්දු-ලන්කා ගිවිසුම තව දුරටත් ඒකපාක්ශිකව උල්ලන්ඝනය කොට ඇති පසුබිමක එම ගිවිසුම අනුව ශ්‍රී ලන්කාව තවදුරටත් කටයුතු කිරීමේ කිසිදු අවශ්‍යතාවක්ද, නෛතික බැඳීමක්ද දැන් නැත.

1987 නොව් 14. 13 වන ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම සන්ශෝධන පනත මෙන්ම 1987 අන්ක 42 පලාත් සභා පලාත් සභා පනතද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවෙන් සම්මත කෙරින. ජේ.ආර්. ජනාධිපතිවරයා මෙම පනත් දෙකම පාර්ලිමේන්තුවෙන් සම්මත කරගනු ලැබුයේ තම පක්ෂයේ සියලුම මන්ත්‍රී වරුන්ගෙන් දින නොමැති ඉල්ලා අස්වීමේ ලිපි ලබාගෙන ඔවුන් කොලඹ හෝටලයක සිරකොට තබාගෙන සිට චන්දය ප්‍රකාශකරන වෙලාවට පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ගෙන්වා ගෙනය. එහි සුවිශේෂී කරුණ්ක් වූයේ අගමැති ප්‍රේමදා, ගාමනි ජයසූරිය කෘශිකර්ම ඇමති සහ ලලිත් ඇතුලත්මුදලි ඇතුලුව තව කීප දෙනෙක් ද ගිවිසුමට අත්සන් නොකිරීමය. ජේ.ආර්ගේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ තිබුණ 3/5 බලය යොදාගෙන පලාත් සභා ක්‍රමය මේ රටට පස්චාත් 1948 යුගයේදී මේ රටේ දේශද්‍රෝහී ජාතිද්‍රෝහී එක් දේශ පාලකයෙකු තමන් සතු තාවකාලික දේශපාලන බලය, තම මව්බිම සහ ජාතිය    ඉන්දියාවට පාවාදුන් ප්‍රථම අව්ස්ථාව වශයෙන් එය ඉතිහාශයට එක්විය.

ඉන්දියාව විසින් ගිවිසුමෙන් යෝජනා කළේ උතුර සහ නැගෙනහිර එක්කොට නිර්මානය වන එක් පලාත්සභාවක් පමණි.එසේ කළේ ඊලම ප්‍රකාශකිරීමට ඉන්දියාවේ තිබුණ අවශ්‍ය පසුබිම නිර්මාණය කිරීම සඳහාය. එහෙත් එම පලාත්දෙක ලන්කා රාජ්‍යෙන් කැඩී වෙන්වීම වලක්වා ගැනිම සඳහා උපායක් වශයෙන් අනෙකුත් පලාත් සඳහාද ජේ. ආර්.පලාත් සභා පිහිටවූ බව ප්‍රකට රහසකි.එසේ කළේ අනෙක් පලාත් 7 තේද අනුමැතිය නැතිව රට බෙදිම අවහිර කිරීමට යැයි කියවේ.එය සත්‍යක් නම් ජේ ආර්ට අපි ප්‍රසන්ශා කළයුතුය.කෙසේ වුවද මෙම ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමට ඔහු දැරූ උත්සාහය සහ ඇප කැපවීම 1944 දී මේ රට ඉන්දියාවේ ප්‍රාන්තයක් වියයුතු බවට රාජ්‍ය සභාවේ ජේ. ආර්. කලේයයි කියන ප්‍රකාශය 1987 වනවිටත් ඔහුගේ හිසේ හොල්මන් කළාද යන සැකය මතුවෙයි.

කෙසේ වුවද 13 වන ව්‍යවස්ථා සන්ශෝධනය යටතේ ප්‍රථම වරට උතුර සහ නැගෙනහිර පලාත් දෙක ඒකාභද්ධ කොට මේ රටට ප්‍රථම වරට පලාත් සභා ක්‍රමය හඳුන්වා දෙන ලදී.මෙහි යටි අරමුණ වූයේ කොටින්ගේ මෙන්ම උ.නැ. පලාත් දෙකේ ජාතිවදී දෙමළ දේශපාලකයින්ගේ සිහිනයවූ ඊලම සඳහා අත්තිවාරම දැමීමය.කෙසේ වුවද ඉඩම් බලතල,පොලිස් බලත සහ අධිකරණ බලතල කිසිම පලාත් සභාවකට දුන්නේ නැත.

මේ අතර 1833 සිට මේ රටේ පැවති පලාත් සහ දිසා ඒකාභද්ධ පරිපාලනය 1955 අන්ක 22 දරන දිස්ත්‍රික් පරිපාලන ආඥා පනතින් දිස්ත්‍රික් කේන්ද්‍රගතව පැවති දිස්ත්‍රික් 20 සේ පාලනයද පලාත් සභා පනතින්ම, පලාත් 9 තුලට අනුගත කෙරින.මේ අනුව 1987 පලාත් සභා ක්‍රමය හඳුන්වා දීමත් සමගම සිදුවු ආණ්ඩුකාරයෙකු පත්කිරීම නිසා එතෙක් පැවැති දිසා පරිපාලනය තුල දිසාපාලනය පිළිබඳ ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් වරුන් සහ ග්‍රාම සේවා නිලධාරීන්ගේ පාලනයද එසේම සෙසු සියළු රජයේ දෙපාර්තමේන්තු නිලධාරීන් කෙරෙහි දිසාපති සතුව තිබුණු පරිපාලන සහ සම්භන්ධීකරණ බලතලද සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම බිඳවැටුණු බවද මෙහිදී සඳන් කළ යුතුය.

මේ අතර 13 වන සන්ශෝධනය යටතේ, 1992 අන්ක 58 දරන ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කාර්‍යාලවලට බලය පැවරීමේ පනතින් තෙක් දිසාව තුල, දිසාපති සතුව තිබුණු රජයේ ඉඩම් පිළිබඳ බලතළ ඇතුළු පරිපාලන බලතල සියල්ලම ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කාර්‍යාල වලට පවරණ ලදී. ඒ යටතේ එතෙක් දිසාපතීන් යටතේ තිබුණු රජයේ ඉඩම් බලතල සියල්ලම ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් වරුන්ට පැවරීම නිසා, එතෙක් පලාත් සභාවන්ට නොදී තිබුණු රජයේ ඉඩම් බලතල නිරායාශයෙන්ම පලාත් සභාවලට ලැබින.ඒහෙත් ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් වරුන්ට ඒ පිළිබඳ පුහුණුවක් නොතිබුණු නිසාද, බොහෝ ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරුන් කාන්තාවන් වීම සහ ක්ශේස්ත්‍රයේ රාජකාරි කාන්තාවන්ට අති දුෂ්කරවූ නිසාද, ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්  කාර්‍යාලවලට මේ වනතුරුත් පලපුරුදු ඉඩම් නිලධාරීන් පත්කොට නැති නිසාද අද සමස්ත දිවයිනේම ඉඩම් රාජකාරි සිදුවන්නේ ඉතාමත් මන්දගාමීවය.

1992 අන්ක 58 පනතින් ප්‍රා ලේ වරුන්ට දී ඇති බලතල වඩාත්ම භයානක තත්වය වනුයේ උතුරු නැගෙනහිර සියලුම ඉඩම් බලතල එම පලාත් සභා වලට හිමිවීමය. ඒ සමඟම එම ප්‍රාදේශවල රජයේ ඉඩම් පිළිබඳ සියළුම බලතල එම පලාත් දෙකේ පලාත් සභාවලට සහ ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් වරුන් යටතට පත්වීම නිසා එහි රජ්යේ ඉඩම් පිලිබඳ පාලනය මධ්‍යම රජයේ පාලනයෙන් සම්පූර්ණයෙම ගිලිහී ගියේය.

ජේ ආර්. නොදී තිබුණු ඉඩම් බලතල මෙ අනුව ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපති වරයා විසින් පලාත් සභාවලට දීමෙන් 1992 දී ඔහු ඊලමට දොරටුව විවුර්ථ කළේය. මෙය වූ කළී ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපති වරයාගේද අන්ක එකේ මව්බිම පාවාදීමකි.මෙහි ඇති වඩාත්ම භයානකම දෙය වනුයේ මෙම පලාත්වල ඇති සියළුම රජයේ ඉඩම් බදු දීම, සින්නකර දීම ආදි සියළුම බලතල භාර නිළධාරීන් වන ග්‍රාම සේවකගේ සිට පලාත් ඉඩම් කොමසාරිස් දක්වා සියළුම රජයේ නිළධාරින් මෙන්ම, ප්‍රාදේශිය සහ පලාත් මට්ටමේ සියළුම මහජන නියෝජිතයින් සහ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී වරුන්, ආණ්ඩුකාරයින් යන සියලුම දෙනාද දෙමළ වීමය.එසේම මේ සියලුම දේශපාලකයින්ද දෙමළ වීමය. මේ අනුව ඉහත උක්ත පනතින් මෙන්ම චක්‍ර ලේඛයෙන්ද ඉතා පැහැදිළිවම සිදුකොට ඇත්තේ ඊලමට දොර විවුර්ථ කිරීමක් මෙන්ම රට දෙකට කැඩීමට පාර විවුර්ථකොට දීම නොවේද. එමෙම අභාග්‍යසම්පන්න තත්වයට සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම වගකිවයුත්තේ, රට ජාතිය ගැන නොසිතා, චන්දය ගැන පමණක් සිතා,  ජාති ද්‍රෝහී, දේශද්‍රෝහී අන්දමින් මෙම තිරණ දෙක ගත් ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපති වරයා නොවේද.

1992 නිකුත් කරණ ළද 58 පනත මෙන්ම රා.ප.පා චක්‍රලෙඛ 21 නිකුත් කළ, මේ රටේ  රාජ්‍ය සේවය කියන්නේ කුමදැයි නොදත් අමාත්‍යාංශ ලේකම්වරයාද මේ ජාතික අපරාධයට වගකිව යුතුය. එන්. කියු. දියෙස් (ශ්‍රී ලන්කාවේ කෞටිල්‍ය), නෙවිල් ජයවීර සහ ඩබ්ලිව්.ටී.ජයසින්හ වැනි සිවිල් සේවකයින්, ඊට පසු යුගයේ නොසිටීම කොතරම් පාඩුවක් දැයි දැන් මට සිතේ.

මේ අතර 1992, 58 පනතින් ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කාර්‍යාලව ප්‍රධානීන් වශයෙන් ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවයේ 1 මු පන්තියේ නිළධාරීන් පත්කිරීමට තීරණය කළද  ප්‍රාදේශ 345 ක් පමණ වූ සියළුම ප්‍රාදේශීය කාර්‍යාල වලට ශ්‍රි ලන්. ප.සේ. 1 පන්තියේ නිළධාරින් නොසිටි නිසා ඌණපූරණය සඳහා සමාන්තර සේවා නමින් හැඳින්වෙන ඉන්ජිනේරු, ගණකාධිකාරි, සැළසුම් වැනි සේවාවල 1 පන්තියේ නිළධාරීන්ද ප්‍රාදේශිය ලේකම් වරුන් වශයෙන් පත්කිරීමටද රජය තීරණය කළේය.ඊටම සමගාමීව සියළුම ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම්වරුන් ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවල සභාපතිවරුන්ගේ ලේකම්වරුන් වශයෙන් පත්කිරීමටද ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපතිවරයා තීරනය කලේය.එතෙක් ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා වල ලේකම් වරුන් වශයෙන් කටයුතු  කලේ අපොස සාමන්‍යපෙල සමත් පලාත් පාලන සේවයේ ලිපිකරුවන්ය.

ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවයේ වාසනාවටමෙන් එවකට ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවා සන්ගමයේ සභාපති වශයෙන් සිටියේ මාය. රජයේ මෙම නව වැඩ පිලිවෙල නිසා මේ රටේ ප්‍රශස්ථ පරිපාලන සේවය කඩා වැටී, දිසා සහ ප්‍රාදේශීය පරිපාලනය සම්පූර්ණයෙනම් අවුල්වී, ශ්‍රී, ලන්.පසේ  කඩාවැටී එය යළි කිසිදිනක ගොඩ ගැනීමට නොහැකි තත්වයකට පත්ව, ශ්‍රී ලන්කාවේ සමස්ථ පරිපාලනයම කඩා වැටීමේ දැඩි අර්බුධයකට ලක්වන බැවින්,   රටේ  යහපාලනය මෙන්ම රටතුල සිදු කෙරෙන රාජ්‍ය වගකීම් වන පාලනය,සන්වර්ධනය මෙන්ම    සියළුම මහජන සේවාවන් කඩා වැටෙන බවද මා දුටිමි. ශ්‍රී ලන්.ප.පා සේවයේ මෙන්ම රටේ දිසා සහ උප දිසා  සේවයේ වාසනාවකට මෙන් ඒ වනවිට ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවා සන්ගමයේ සභාපති වශයෙන් සිටියේ මාය.

මෙම තොරතුර මා අතට පත්වූ විගසම සන්ගමයේ හදිසි රැස්වීමක් කැඳවා එහි මුලසුනට ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපතිවරයා ගෙන්වාගෙන මවිසින් ඊට එරෙහිව සහේතුකව කරුණු දක්වීමෙන් පසු මගේ විරෝධය පිළිගත් ජනාධිපතිවරයා එම තීරනය වෙනස් කලේය. ඒ අනුව ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවය එදා මරනින් බේරාගැනීමට මට හැකිවීම ගැන මම අදටත් නිහතමානීව ආඩම්බර වෙමි. එසේම ප්‍රේමදාස වැනි දැඩි මථධාරි රාජ්‍යනායකයෙකුගේ එම අධූරදර්ෂී තීරණය, රටේ සමsථ අභ්‍යන්තර පරිපාලනයටම  සිදු වීමට ගිය අති විශාල අර්භුධයකින් රට ජාතිය බේරා ගැනීම හා ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවයේ ආරක්ෂාව වෙනුවෙන් බෙල්ල දී වෙනස් කිරීමට තරම් චිත්ත ධෛහිර්ය හා ජාන ලබා දුන් මගේ දෙමව්පියන්ට මෙන්ම ශිප්සතර උගැන්වූ ගුරුදෙවිවරුන්ටද මම නිහතමානීව අදටත් පින් දෙමි. 

මගේ කෙටි කථාව අවසන් කොට ඔහු අසලම වේදිකාවේ අසුනේ වාඩි වීමත් සමඟම, ඔහු පිළිගත් මොහොතේ සිට එතෙක් වචනයක්වත් මා සමඟ නොදෙඩු ඔහු මා දෙසට හැරී ‘Sudath you made an excellent speech, my congratulations” කීවේය. අනතුරුව ඔහුගේ කතාවේදී, මා සඳහන් කළ භයානක තත්වය ගැන කිසිවක් ඒ වනතුරුම ඔහු නොදැන සිටි බවද නිහතමානිව පිලිගනිමින් මේ රටේ රාජ්‍යපරිපාලනයට සිදු වීමට ගිය එම භයානක තත්වය පෙන්වාදීම ගැන මට සහ අප සන්ගමයටද බෙහෙවින් ස්තුති කළේය. ඒ සමඟම ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවයේ යහපත සහ ආරක්ෂාව වෙනුවෙන් මවිසින් ඉල්ලා සිටිනලද ‘ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලන සේවයේ ලේඛණගත කිසිම තනතුරක්ට වෙනත් කිසිම සේවයක නිලධාරියෙකු පත් නොකරණ මෙන්” කළ මගේ එම ඉල්ලීම අතුලු ඉල්ලීම් සියල්ලම ලබාදීමට ඔහු පොරොන්දු විය.

 ඒ වනවිටත් සන්චිතයේ සිටි මා, පසුදින සිටම සෞක්‍ය අමාත්‍යාන්ශයේ රාජ්‍ය ලේකම් වශයෙන් පත්කිරිමෙන්ම ඔහු එදා මගේ කතාව ගැන කොතරම් සතුටු වීදැයි ඔබට සිතාගත හැක.

මෙම සිද්ධිය මෙම ලිපියේ මාතෘකාවට රිජුවම අදාල නැතත් එය මෙහි සන්ඳහන් කලේ රාජ්‍යසේවකයින් වශයෙන්, අප කරන, කියන කුමක් වුවත් නිර්භයව, එඩිතරව තම උපන් දේශයේ සහ පොදුජන  යහපත පමණක් සලකා කළයුතු බව පෙන්වා දීමටය. 

එදා එම උතුම් පොදු අරමුණු ගැන පමණක් සිතා මගේ බෙල්ල දී ශ්‍රි ල.ප.සේ. මරණින් බේරාගැනිමට මට හැකිවිය.

එසේම 1992 අන්ක 58 පනත සහ රා.පරි.පා 21 චක ලේඛය ගැනද කිසිවෙකු මා දැනුවත් කළේ නම් ඒ දෙකද ක්‍රියාත්මක වීම වහාම නතර  කර ගැනීමට මට හැකියාව තිබිණ.රටේ අවාසනාවට මෙන් ඒ මොහොතේ මා ඒ ගැන දැන සිටියේ නැත.

*Can Sri Lanka afford to wait for Tricomalee Port Development* The article published today 28 June in *Sunday Observer* , having largest circulation in Sri Lanka. 

June 28th, 2026

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

https://www.sundayobserver.lk/2026/06/28/business/79914/can-sri-lanka-afford-to-wait-for-trincomalee-port-development

Critical overview 

Trincomalee Must Become Sri Lanka’s Offshore Industry Capital – Not Just Another Commercial Port
The current debate on Trincomalee Port development has largely centred on logistics, container handling, oil storage, industrial zones, and real estate. While these sectors are important, they alone will not maximise the strategic and economic value of one of the world’s finest natural harbours.
Sri Lanka should adopt a broader vision by developing Trincomalee as a regional offshore engineering, ship repair, and floating energy infrastructure hub.
A Multi-Billion Dollar Global Industry
Across the world, hundreds of offshore assets require periodic maintenance, conversion, and upgrading. These include:
● Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessels
● Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRU)
● Offshore drilling rigs
● Production platforms
● Offshore support vessels
● Large crude oil tankers requiring life extension
● Wind farm installation vessels
Many ageing Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) and Ultra Large Crude Carriers can be economically converted into FPSOs instead of being scrapped. Such conversions generate contract values ranging from several hundred million to over a billion US dollars depending on the scope.
Why Trincomalee?
Unlike constructing an entirely new shipyard, many offshore repair and conversion activities can initially be undertaken using:
● Deep natural anchorage
● Floating docks
● Heavy lift barges
● Modular fabrication yards
● Existing oil tank facilities
● Temporary construction berths
This significantly reduces capital investment while allowing operations to commence much earlier.
Skilled Employment
One FPSO conversion project employs thousands of personnel, including:
● Naval architects
● Marine engineers
● Welders
● Pipe fabricators
● Electricians
● Instrument technicians
● NDT inspectors
● Coating specialists
● Crane operators
● Divers
● Offshore safety personnel
● Project managers
These are exactly the high-income technical jobs Sri Lanka should be creating for its youth.
Integrating Education with Industry
Trincomalee should not merely host industrial facilities; it should become Sri Lanka’s centre for offshore engineering education.
Vocational institutes, universities, and engineering faculties should establish specialised programmes in:
● Offshore welding
● Subsea engineering
● Dynamic positioning systems
● Marine electrical systems
● Offshore safety (OPITO standards)
● Rope access
● NDT inspection
● Offshore fabrication
● Renewable offshore energy
Students should graduate with internationally recognised certifications, making Sri Lanka an exporter of skilled manpower.
Synergy with the Energy Hub
The proposed oil storage facilities, bunkering operations, pipelines, and future refinery should be integrated with:
● FPSO maintenance
● Offshore logistics
● Rig lay-up and preservation
● Marine fuel services
● Offshore supply bases
● Wind farm component fabrication
Rather than functioning as isolated projects, these facilities should support an integrated offshore industrial ecosystem.
A Neutral Indian Ocean Service Centre
Sri Lanka occupies a politically neutral and geographically strategic location between the Middle East, Africa, India, and Southeast Asia.
Offshore operators frequently seek alternative repair locations when existing yards are congested or affected by geopolitical tensions. Trincomalee could become a preferred destination for repair, retrofitting, and offshore engineering services.
The Way Forward
The Government should immediately invite Expressions of Interest from internationally recognised offshore engineering companies, FPSO operators, ship repair firms, classification societies, and heavy engineering investors.
Public-private partnerships can minimise Government expenditure while attracting technology, management expertise, and global clients.
The objective should not merely be to develop another port, but to establish South Asia’s premier offshore engineering and floating energy infrastructure hub.
If this opportunity is missed, neighbouring countries will continue to capture these high-value industries while Sri Lanka remains dependent on traditional port services and low-value logistics.
Trincomalee has all the natural advantages. What is required now is the vision to transform those advantages into a globally competitive offshore industrial economy.


Dr Sarath Obeysekera

Call for German Gratitude towards Sri Lanka for saving the flame of the Dhamma in Germany at several critical periods of German History

June 28th, 2026

Senaka Weeraratna

Sri Lankan Buddhist Societies, in particular Ceylon (Sri Lanka), saved the flame of the Buddha Dhamma in Germany from being blown out by the storm of historical events. This was the explicit conclusion of Dr. Hans Wolfgang Schumann (often referred to in documents as Dr. Wolfgang Schumann), a leading German scholar, author, and diplomat. Writing in the Maha Bodhi Journal (Feb–Mar 1971), Dr. Schumann highlighted the critical role played by Asoka Weeraratna and the German Dharmaduta Society (GDS) in rescuing German Buddhism from total collapse after World War II.

image.png
Dr. Hans Wolfgang Schumann

Ven. Nyanaponika Thero and Asoka Weeraratna at the Ratmalana Airport on February 20, 1953 before departing for Germany on a fact finding mission with the aim of establishing the Buddha Sasana in Germany

The Context of Post-WW2 Germany

The aftermath of World War II profoundly altered Germany’s intellectual, cultural, and spiritual landscape. The collapse of the Nazi regime prompted deep introspection, leading many Germans to question traditional institutions and explore alternative philosophies.

Following the devastation of World War II and the fall of the Nazi regime—which had aggressively suppressed Buddhist activities—German Buddhism was left fractured and without resources. When Sri Lankan (Sinhala Buddhist) philanthropist Asoka Weeraratna visited Germany in 1951, he witnessed a nation in a severe moral predicament and a civilization in crisis. He observed a deep “spiritual hunger” among war-weary Germans who were disillusioned with traditional Western religious-political systems and were searching for alternative philosophies based on peace and non-violence. [1, 2, 3, 4]

The Rescue of Das Buddhistische Haus

The pinnacle of the GDS’s intervention, as praised by Dr. Schumann, was the salvation of Das Buddhistische Haus (The Buddhist House) in Berlin-Frohnau. Founded originally in 1924 by Dr. Paul Dahlke, the landmark property had fallen into extreme disrepair during the war and faced imminent destruction. [1, 2]

According to Dr. Schumann’s writings:

  • Preventing Liquidation: The historic center “probably would have been auctioned and dismantled” had the GDS not stepped in. [1]
  • The Financial Rescue: Under Weeraratna’s leadership, the GDS utilized a large inheritance from a German Buddhist (Walther Schmits) to purchase the property in 1957–1958. [1, 2]
  • Institutional Renewal: The GDS thoroughly renovated the property, added new living quarters, built a well-stocked library, and established it as the Berlin Buddhist Vihara—the first permanent Theravada Buddhist temple in continental Europe.

Dr. Schumann’s Call for Gratitude

Dr. Schumann emphasized that the mission’s success went beyond physical brick and mortar. By sending qualified Bhikkhus (monks) from Ceylon to reside permanently at the Vihara to lead meditation courses and lectures, the GDS established a reliable institutional foundation for the Dhamma. [1, 2]

Reflecting on this pivotal turning point, Dr. Schumann posited a final, enduring question to his country:

“The organizational help which Asian Buddhist Societies, in particular Ceylon, in several critical periods had extended saved the flame of the Dhamma in Germany. Isn’t this reason enough for the Germans to be grateful?


If you want to explore this historical period further, let me know if you would like me to:

  • Detail the journey of the first permanent monk mission sent from Sri Lanka to Berlin in 1957.
  • Explain how Asoka Weeraratna raised the necessary capital via the “Million Rupee Fund”.
  • Provide more context on the suppression of Buddhism under the Nazi regime prior to this revival. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • https://share.google/aimode/KXOygKgANzg5ne2WP
  • Source:  AI Overview

The legacy of the pioneer German Buddhist Dr. Paul Dahlke at Das Buddhistische Haus and the Savior of Das Buddhistische Haus, Asoka Weeraratna, Founder of the German Dharmaduta Society based in Sri Lanka

June 28th, 2026

The legacy of Das Buddhistische Haus (The Buddhist House) in Berlin-Frohnau, Germany, represents the oldest and most enduring cultural and spiritual bridge between Europe and Sri Lanka. Founded as a monument to pure Theravada Buddhism, its survival and evolution are defined by two monumental figures: its pioneer creator, Dr. Paul Dahlke, and its savior, Asoka Weeraratna. [1, 2, 3]


🏛️ The Visionary Founder: Dr. Paul Dahlke (1924–1928)

Dr. Paul Dahlke (1865–1928), a prominent German physician and intellectual, is widely recognized as a foundational pillar of Buddhism in Western Europe. [1, 2]

  • The Sri Lankan Connection: Dr. Dahlke traveled to Sri Lanka (then Ceylon) eight times. He mastered the Pali language under legendary Sri Lankan scholars like Ven. Hikkaduwe Sri Sumangala Nayake Thera.
  • Literary Contributions: He translated extensive portions of the Pali Canon into German with immaculate clarity. He also published influential journals like Neu Buddhist and Brockensammlung.
  • The Founding: In 1924, Dr. Dahlke utilized his own funds to construct Das Buddhistische Haus on a scenic six-acre hill in Berlin-Frohnau. He designed it to be a place of quiet reflection, ethical living, and authentic Theravada practice for Western seekers. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • The Interregnum: Following Dr. Dahlke’s death in 1928, the property fell out of Buddhist hands and into the possession of his non-Buddhist relatives. Decades of economic depression, World War II, and the post-war partition left the historic compound severely dilapidated and facing imminent destruction or public auction. [1, 2, 3]

🇱🇰 The Savior: Asoka Weeraratna & The German Dharmaduta Society (1952–1957)

Asoka Weeraratna (1918–1999) was a passionate Sri Lankan Buddhist philanthropist who established the German Dharmaduta Society (GDS) (originally the Lanka Dhammaduta Society) in Colombo on September 21, 1952. Driven by a post-colonial desire to share the Dhamma globally, Weeraratna set his sights on Germany. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

  • The Discovery: During a rigorous survey tour of Germany in 1953, Weeraratna discovered the deteriorating remains of Dr. Dahlke’s historic Buddhist House. [1, 2]
  • The Rescue: In December 1957, Weeraratna and the GDS officially purchased the property from Dr. Dahlke’s heirs. The purchase was fueled by fundraising in Sri Lanka and a critical financial grant from a German Buddhist benefactor, Walther Schmits.
  • The Transformation: Weeraratna completely renovated the compound, built additional living quarters, and established the Hemamala Wickramasinghe Library, which became one of Europe’s premier public Buddhist libraries.
  • The First Vihara: By stationing resident Sri Lankan monks (Bhikkhus) at the premises, Weeraratna transformed the private compound into the Berlin Buddhist Vihara—the very first permanent, functional Theravada Buddhist temple in continental Europe. [1, 2]

🌟 A Unified Intertwined Legacy

The combined efforts of Dahlke and Weeraratna created an institutional lineage that has thrived for over a century, celebrating its historic 100th Anniversary. [1, 2]

FeatureDr. Paul Dahlke’s Era (1924–1928)Asoka Weeraratna & GDS Era (1957–Present)
Primary FocusIntellectual translation, personal practice, and publishing.Active missionary work, international exchange, and monastic training.
StructurePrivate residence, temple sanctuary, and scholarly retreat.Fully functioning Buddhist Vihara with an established Sangha (monks).
GovernanceIndividually run by Dr. Dahlke and later his sister, Bertha.Managed by Trustees of the Sri Lanka-based German Dharmaduta Society.

Today, Das Buddhistische Haus stands as a protected National Heritage site in Germany. It regularly hosts meditation retreats, public Dhamma discussions, and multi-national Vesak celebrations. Asoka Weeraratna’s legacy came full circle in 1972 when he renounced lay life to ordain as a monk, taking the name Ven. Mitirigala Dhammanisanthi Thera, leaving behind an unshakeable bridge between Sri Lanka and the heart of Europe. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]


If you are researching this historical lineage, let me know if you would like to explore specific biographies of the first resident monks sent from Sri Lanka, details on the architectural fusion of German and Buddhist design at the house, or how the 100th-anniversary celebrations unfolded. [1, 2]

https://share.google/aimode/VwTdcnnjotfbcIbJu

Source:  AI Overview

Why Christianity Is Losing Ground in the West?

June 27th, 2026

Cognitive Drift

Christianity is losing its grip on the West. Once the dominant belief system, it’s now facing rapid decline as more people embrace secularism, science, and humanism. In this video, we’ll explore why churches are emptying, why younger generations are turning away from religion, and how cultural shifts, access to information, and scandals within religious institutions have accelerated the collapse. Is Christianity dying in the West? Let’s break it down.

කුරුණෑගල මුස්ලිම් දේවස්ථානයක කල බරපතල ප්‍රකාශයට පූජ්‍ය ඕමල්පේ සෝභිත හිමියන් විශේෂ මාධ්‍ය හමුවක්.

June 27th, 2026

ආගමික චාරිත්‍රවලට විරුද්ධ වෙනවා නම් ඔවුන් මරා දැමිය යුතුයි. කුරුණෑගල මුස්ලිම් දේවස්ථානයක කල ප්‍රසිද්ධ දේශනාවක් ගැන පූජ්‍ය ඕමල්පේ සෝභිත හිමියන් විශේෂ මාධ්‍ය හමුවක්.

Moral Injury in Sri Lankan Combatants Who Participated in the Eelam War

June 27th, 2026

Dr Ruwan M Jayatunge M.D.

Moral injury refers to the deep psychological, behavioral, and spiritual turmoil that arises when an individual either engages in, witnesses, or fails to avert actions that contradict their core moral convictions (Litz, Brett et al., 2009). The term moral injury was coined by Dr. Jonathan Shay, a clinical psychiatrist, in the 1990s, while working with Vietnam War veterans, and he connected their deep psychological trauma not to fear, but to a profound sense of institutional betrayal. However, moral injury is fundamentally an age-old phenomenon that has persisted throughout human history, rooted in the existence of moral and ethical beliefs that can be violated (Koenig et al., 2021). Čartolovni and team (2021) argue that, in some cases, moral distress may become moral residue and, over time, culminate in moral injury. According to Griffin and associates (2019), such traumatic experiences can create a clash with one’s ethical beliefs, resulting in considerable distress and impairments in functioning.

Moral injury is an increasingly recognized phenomenon in mental health research, particularly relevant to current and former military personnel (Phelps et al., 2024). The trauma associated with warfare can inflict damage on various aspects of health, including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being, thereby contributing to moral injury (Richardson et al., 2020). Moral injury arises when individuals in the military breach their fundamental moral convictions and values during combat situations (Koenig et al., 2021). This violation can lead to profound emotional distress, manifesting as shame, grief, a sense of meaninglessness, and remorse for transgressing core ethical beliefs (Brock & Lettini, 2012).

Moral injury, as outlined by Jones (2020), is defined by feelings of guilt, shame, and self-condemnation, which are often evident in combatants who have undergone traumatic experiences in battle. Williamson et al. (2025) characterize moral injury as a significant occupational risk, particularly prevalent among combatants, stemming from guilt and shame. In a soldier, moral injury develops through a specific cognitive transition in which the raw survival behaviours of combat collide with their peacetime moral upbringing. (Farnsworth,2022).

Mental health professionals have recognized the phenomenon of moral injury in Sri Lankan soldiers who were

from 1976 until its defeat in 2009, which is often regarded as one of the most advanced insurgent groups globally.

The prolonged armed conflict in Sri Lanka has significantly contributed to the prevalence of moral injury among combatants (Jayatunge, 2013). Sri Lankan combatants often faced extended deployment periods, frequently spending up to a decade in active combat zones, which intensified the cognitive dissonance between their military actions and their cultural or religious values. Many soldiers grappled with deep psychological and ethical dilemmas during and after their service, sometimes being forced to undertake actions that conflicted with their personal moral convictions. Such experiences can evoke feelings of guilt, shame, and betrayal, especially as they reflect on their involvement in the conflict and the consequences of their actions.  

The majority of combatants from Sri Lanka identify as Buddhists, a faith that emphasizes the principles of karma and the cycle of rebirth. This belief system inherently instills a profound sense of moral responsibility and ethical conduct, which can lead to significant psychological distress when individuals engage in acts of violence or warfare that contradict their spiritual values. As a result, these combatants often experience moral injury, a condition characterized by the internal conflict arising from actions that violate their deeply held beliefs.

During the Eelam war in Sri Lanka, psychological support services were severely lacking and not prioritized, resulting in inadequate treatment for the psychological scars left by the conflict. The insufficient availability of mental health resources, combined with the societal stigma associated with mental health issues, exacerbated the moral injuries experienced by individuals affected by the war.  Many former combatants continue to experience PTSD, depression, adjustment disorders, and moral injuries. These conditions manifest not only as psychological issues but also pose substantial barriers to their reintegration into civilian life, resulting in numerous soldiers facing difficulties in adapting after their service.

Numerous case studies highlight the moral injuries experienced by Sri Lankan combatants. One notable incident involves Major SE, who was ambushed by LTTE militants in a northern village, leading to a fierce firefight. Surrounded by the enemy, Major SE desperately returned fire when an elderly civilian woman inadvertently opened a window to observe the chaos. Mistaking her for an adversary, he shot at the window, tragically wounding the old woman fatally. Despite successfully repelling the enemy and returning to camp, the psychological toll of this traumatic event lingered with Major SE for an extended period. Major SE later recounted that his bullet shattered the old woman’s jaw, resulting in significant blood loss. Tragically, she succumbed to her injuries within hours due to the severe bleeding. Major SE endured the profound effects of moral injury, grappling with a range of distressing symptoms that persisted for many years following his wartime experiences.

Another soldier reported experiencing moral injury as a result of exposure to traumatic combat situations. In April 2000, during the Elephant Pass debacle, troops were compelled to retreat to the Soranpattu-Palai defense line, enduring a gruelling 16-kilometre march under the scorching sun, without water, and while facing enemy mortar and sniper fire. Among the retreating soldiers was Corporal K, who witnessed many of his comrades fall victim to enemy attacks and heat strokes. In the midst of this chaos, a wounded soldier implored Corporal K for assistance, but the dire circumstances left little room for altruism, forcing him to decline. The wounded soldier, however, shared his name and address, requesting that Corporal K convey his final words to his family. Although Corporal K promised to honour this request, a few kilometres near the Sorampattu- Palali defense line, Corporal K succumbed to heat stroke and lost consciousness. Fortunately, he was rescued by fellow soldiers and transported to a hospital. Upon regaining consciousness days later, Corporal K had forgotten the dying soldier’s name and address. This incident ignited deep shame and guilt in him, which she suffered for many years.

Soldiers can experience moral injury from killing enemy combatants, even when the killing is entirely legal, justified, and necessary for survival (Maguen et al., 2010). The subsequent case study illustrates such an incident.

Sergeant Sx78 dedicated nearly a decade to service in combat zones, notably enduring intense battles while defending the Jaffna Fort, which was besieged and subjected to heavy enemy fire. During the critical operation known as “Midnight Express,” he played a pivotal role in rescuing trapped troops, resulting in the death of five enemy combatants. However, in the years that followed, he became increasingly troubled by the moral implications of these actions, reflecting on the humanity of those he had killed. He expressed a deep understanding of their backgrounds, recognizing that they were often impoverished youths, manipulated by hatred and left with few choices. This realization weighed heavily on him, as he grappled with the harsh realities of war, where survival often necessitated lethal force. Acknowledging the conflict between his actions and his Buddhist beliefs, he felt a profound sense of guilt, believing that he would ultimately face karmic consequences for his deeds. This inner turmoil has led him to seek solace in spirituality, aspiring to become a monk upon his retirement from military service.

The prolonged exposure to the tumultuous realities of war and chaos can significantly alter an individual’s psychological framework, leading to profound changes in their mental and emotional state. In the aftermath of such distressing experiences, many individuals may encounter moral injury. Research indicates that cumulative war trauma can lead to moral injury among soldiers (Wisco et al.,2017). 

Lt. Colonel LX is a seasoned field officer whose extensive involvement in numerous military operations spanned the entirety of the war, concluding in 2009. Throughout this tumultuous period, he was frequently confronted with the harrowing realities of combat, witnessing the tragic deaths and injuries of fellow soldiers, often in scenarios that left them vulnerable and defenseless. Moreover, his experiences extended beyond the battlefield, as he observed the profound effects of warfare on civilians in the northern regions, who bore the brunt of collateral damage and suffered immensely due to the conflict. The psychological toll of these experiences was significant, as he encountered the deep-seated human suffering that often accompanies war trauma. In the aftermath of the conflict, Lt. Colonel LX retreated into seclusion, grappling with the weight of his memories and developing a more cynical perspective on life, shaped by the stark realities he had witnessed. He is experiencing a range of psychological and emotional symptoms that are significantly impacting his overall well-being, characterized by a profound sense of loss of meaning in his life.

Following the Eelam war in Sri Lanka, numerous combatants were found to be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (Jayatunge, 2004).  It is essential to distinguish between combat-related PTSD and moral injury, as they stem from different sources. There are many differences between combat-related PTSD and moral injury. While PTSD is driven by fear and threat, moral injury is driven by a collapse of a person’s ethical framework (Farnsworth et al.,2017). When a soldier experiences moral injury, it profoundly impacts their personality, identity, and behaviour (Litz et al., 2009). Unlike PTSD, which is primarily a fear-based response, moral injury represents a wound to the conscience, leading to significant psychological, relational, and behavioural challenges (Barnes et al.,2019). 

Moral injury often results in a collapse of identity and self-worth, characterized by aggressive self-loathing and an overwhelming sense of chronic shame and guilt (Farnsworth et al., 2014).  Furthermore, deep cynicism and a loss of trust emerge, eroding the soldier’s faith in the military hierarchy, political leaders, and the institution as a whole, which can extend into their civilian life (Shay, 2014). The consequences may include a loss of faith and a descent into existential nihilism, relational destructiveness, and isolation. Additionally, self-sabotage and self-punishment frequently occur, often accompanied by engagement in high-risk behaviors (Griffin et al., 2019).

Specialized treatment for moral injury in soldiers is essential, as neglecting this issue can result in severe consequences, including a total collapse of identity, increased social isolation, and a heightened risk of suicide (Bryan et al.,2014).  Once moral injury occurs, evidence-based clinical therapies become essential to address the profound shame and guilt experienced by these individuals.

Adaptive Disclosure (AD) is one of the premier, evidence-based treatments developed specifically for moral injury in military personnel (Litz et al., 2016).  Adaptive Disclosure (AD) integrates focused imaginal exposure with organized, real-time dialogues to assist military personnel in addressing and processing the unique emotional traumas associated with combat experiences.

Another effective intervention is Trauma-Informed Guilt Reduction (TiGR) Therapy, which evaluates the realities of a crisis, enabling soldiers to discern what they could control versus what was beyond their influence during chaotic situations (Norman et al.,2019).  Additionally, spiritual therapy plays a crucial role in addressing moral injury. Spiritual therapy heals moral injury by directly addressing the existential and metaphysical wounds (Carey et al.,2026). 

Group therapy sessions and Peer support groups enable veterans to share their experiences with others who have faced similar combat situations, fostering a sense of normalcy in their reactions to trauma. Creating safe spaces for open discussions about deeply held shame is vital for bringing these hidden memories to light (Allbaugh, Placeres & Toor, 2023).   Furthermore, mindfulness breath meditation and loving-kindness meditation (LKM) are highly effective tools for healing moral injury (Kelley et al., 2025).  

Moral injury among Sri Lankan combatants who took part in the Eelam War represents a significant yet under-explored area of research that warrants immediate attention.  It is crucial to accurately diagnose the presence of moral injury in these veterans, as it can manifest in various ways, including feelings of guilt, shame, and a diminished sense of self-worth. Furthermore, providing appropriate psychological support tailored to the unique experiences of these combatants is essential for their recovery and reintegration into society. By addressing this critical issue, we can not only aid those who have suffered in silence but also contribute to a broader understanding of the psychological ramifications of war, ultimately fostering a more compassionate approach to veteran care in Sri Lanka.

References

Allbaugh, L. J., Placeres, V., & Toor, R. (2023). Core components of moral injury groups co-facilitated by mental health clinicians and chaplains. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health, 31(2), 42–49. https://doi.org

Barnes, H. A., Hurley, R. A., & Taber, K. H. (2019). Moral injury and PTSD: Often co-occurring yet mechanistically different. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Geosciences, 31(2), A4–103.

Bryan, C. J., Bryan, A. O., Anestis, M. D., Anestis, J. C., Green, B. A., Etienne, N., Morrow, C. E., & Ray-Sannerud, B. (2014). Measuring moral injury and examining its relationship to suicidal behavior among military personnel. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 6(1), 17–24. doi.org.

Brock RN, Lettini G. Soul repair: Recovering from moral injury after war. Beacon Press; 2012.

Carey, L. B., Hodgson, T. J., Krikorian, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2026). Moral injury as a wound of meaning and conscience. Journal of Religion and Health, 65(3), 1422–1439. https://doi.org.

Čartolovni A, Stolt M, Scott PA, Suhonen R. Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion. Nurs Ethics. 2021 Aug;28(5):590-602. doi: 10.1177/0969733020966776. Epub 2021 Jan 11. PMID: 33427020; PMCID: PMC8366182.

Farnsworth, J. K., Drescher, K. D., Nieuwsma, J. A., Walser, R. B., & Currier, J. M. (2014). The role of moral injury in the return from war. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 54(3), 295–314. doi.org.

Farnsworth, J. K., Drescher, K. D., Evans, W. R., Walser, R. D., & Cooke, J. M. (2017). A functional approach to understanding and treating moral injury in military veterans. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 391–397. doi.org.

Farnsworth, J. K. (2022). Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 944888. doi.org.

Griffin BJ, Purcell N, Burkman K, Litz BT, Bryan CJ, Schmitz M, Villierme C, Walsh J, Maguen S. Moral Injury: An Integrative Review. J Trauma Stress. 2019 Jun;32(3):350-362. doi: 10.1002/jts.22362. Epub 2019 Jan 28. PMID: 30688367.

Jayatunge, R. M. (2004). PTSD: Sri Lankan experience. ANL Publishers. Sri Lanka.

Jayatunge, R.M. (2013). Shell Shock to Palali Syndrome: PTSD Sri Lankan Experience. Sarasavi Publishers.

Jones E. Moral injury in a context of trauma. Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;216(3):127-128. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.46. PMID: 32345414.

Kelley, M. L., Bravo, A. J., Burgin, E. E., Gaylord, S. A., Vinci, C., Strowger, M., Gabelmann, J. M., & Currier, J. M. (2025). Using mindfulness to manage moral injury in veterans: Feasibility and satisfaction of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 81(6), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23778.

Koenig HG, Al Zaben F. Moral Injury: An Increasingly Recognized and Widespread Syndrome. J Relig Health. 2021 Oct;60(5):2989-3011. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01328-0. Epub 2021 Jul 10. PMID: 34245433; PMCID: PMC8270769.

Litz, Brett T., et al. “Moral Injury and Moral Repair in War Veterans: A Preliminary Model and Intervention Strategy.” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 29, no. 8, 2009, pp. 695-706.

Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003.

Litz, B. T., Plouffe, P. P., Carper, T. L. M., & Gray, M. J. (2016). Adaptive disclosure for military trauma, loss, and moral injury: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(12), 1023–1034. doi.org.

Maguen, S., Lucenko, B. A., Reger, M. A., Gahm, G. A., Litz, B. T., Seal, K. H., Knight, S. J., & Marmar, C. R. (2010). The impact of reported direct and indirect killing on mental health symptoms in Iraq War veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(1), 86–90. doi.org.

Norman, S. B., Allard, C. B., Browne, K., Capone, C., & Haller, M. (2019). Trauma informed guilt reduction therapy: Treating guilt and shame resulting from trauma and moral injury. Academic Press.

Phelps AJ, Adler AB, Belanger SAH, Bennett C, Cramm H, Dell L, Fikretoglu D, Forbes D, Heber A, Hosseiny F, Morganstein JC, Murphy D, Nazarov A, Pedlar D, Richardson JD, Sadler N, Williamson V, Greenberg N, Jetly R; Members of the Five Eyes Mental Health Research and Innovation Collaborative. Addressing moral injury in the military. BMJ Mil Health. 2024 Jan 25;170(1):51-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2022-002128. PMID: 35705259.

Richardson NM, Lamson AL, Smith M, Eagan SM, Zvonkovic AM, Jensen J. Defining Moral Injury Among Military Populations: A Systematic Review. J Trauma Stress. 2020 Aug;33(4):575-586. doi: 10.1002/jts.22553. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PMID: 32567119.

Shay, J. (2014). Moral injury. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036090.

Williamson V, Kothari R, Bonson A, Campbell G, Greenberg N, Murphy D, Lamb D. Moral injury prevention and intervention. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2567721. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2567721. Epub 2025 Oct 21. PMID: 41118287; PMCID: PMC12541919.

Wisco, B. E., Marx, B. P., May, C. L., Martini, B., Krystal, J. H., Southwick, S. M., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2017). Moral injury in U.S. combat veterans: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans’ Study. Depression and Anxiety, 34(4), 340–347. doi.org.

Islamic Call to Prayer Faces Ban Under Left-Wing Danish Government | GRAVITAS

June 27th, 2026

Use of loudspeakers at mosques has long been a bone of contention across the world. Now, Denmark has announced plans to ban the Islamic call to prayer. Denmark’s Immigration Minister Morten Bodskov claimed that growing Islamisation in the country was taking up too much of the public space.

Jun 25, 2026 #denmark #immigration #europe

Use of loudspeakers at mosques has long been a bone of contention across the world. Now, Denmark has announced plans to ban the Islamic call to prayer. Denmark’s Immigration Minister Morten Bodskov claimed that growing Islamisation in the country was taking up too much of the public space.

Buddhism’s bloodless victories through conquest of the mind – Remarkable Chapter in Human History

June 27th, 2026

Senaka Weeraratna

The phrase “Buddhism’s Master stroke – Conquest of the Mind of the Western Man” stems from an essay by Sri Lankan Buddhist scholar Senaka Weeraratna. The caption is a new innovative phrase. The article describes a peaceful, intellectual transformation where Eastern spiritual wisdom reshapes Western thought. [1, 2]

Buddhism’s Bloodless Counter Offensive has swept the Western World with a remarkable paradigm shift of seeking salvation through self – help rather than divine intervention. The Buddha denied the existence of a God as serving any useful purpose for human advancement. The West increasingly subscribes to this Buddha’s fundamental belief.

This phenomenon fulfills a prediction by the celebrated British historian Dr. Arnold Toynbee, who conceptualized the peaceful export of Eastern philosophy as a historic “counter-offensive”. It serves as a philosophical response to centuries of Western material and religious expansion. [1]

🕊️ The Nature of the “Counter-Offensive”

  • Conquest without a sword: Unlike historic expansions driven by military conquest, Buddhism’s spread relies entirely on the symbolic “Sword of Wisdom” to sever ignorance and delusion. [1]
  • Decamping of the traditional Church: The migration of Westerners toward Buddhist practices is heavily tied to its status as the only world religion that mandates a rigorous system of ethics and high morals without requiring a belief in a creator God.
  • Alternative path: It addresses the secularization of the West by offering psychological frameworks like meditation, mindfulness, and compassion to all living beings, bypassing traditional prayer. [1, 2]

🌐 Modern Vehicles of Spread

  • Digital landscape: The primary battleground for this “conquest of minds” is modern technology, accelerating through YouTube, podcasts, and online Dharma communities.
  • Scientific alignment: Western intellectuals, echoing sentiments famously attributed to thinkers like Albert Einstein, find a natural harmony between Buddhist philosophy and modern scientific inquiry.
  • The “Challenge and Response” framework: Viewed through Toynbee’s historical lens, the West provided the “challenge” of industrialization, materialism, and colonial expansion. The East’s “response” is the quiet, internal mastery of the mind—proving that the greatest victory is not over others, but over oneself.

Would you like to explore Dr. Arnold Toynbee’s specific writings on the meeting of East and West, or examine how modern scientific research validates Buddhist mindfulness techniques?

https://share.google/aimode/jixnzZpPMdJyg6RB8

AI Overview

Denmark Just Did Something to ISLAM Everyone Else Is Too AFRAID To Do

June 27th, 2026

Fall of Nations

Denmark was once the world’s most liberal, high-trust country. Today, it’s Europe’s toughest fortress against parallel societies. From tearing down immigrant neighborhoods to banning face veils and prayer rooms, Denmark is rewriting the rules of Western integration. What forced this dramatic shift, and why is the political left leading the charge? 

As other European nations quietly copy the “Danish model,” is this the future of the West or the death of multiculturalism? 

0:00 The Death of Liberal Denmark 

1:15 When Free Money Met Free Borders 

3:27 The Rise of No-Go Zones 

6:01 Tearing Down Neighborhoods by Force 

10:19 Banning Face Veils and Burqas 

13:17 No More Praying in Public Schools 

15:16 The Zero Refugee Policy 

17:55 Why the Left Turned Against Immigrants 

19:57 Asking Muslims to Leave the Country 

22:52 Europe Quietly Copies Denmark 

Sources: https://pastebin.com/GEux6v4E 

Attributions: https://pastebin.com/bMEkDzvc

Triumph of Buddhism – Collapse of Western Monotheism

June 27th, 2026

Senaka Weeraratna

AI Response below

The phrase “Triumph of Buddhism – Collapse of Western Monotheism” describes a speculative, historical, or philosophical scenario where Eastern dharmic traditions supplant Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) as the dominant global spiritual framework.

Here is an analysis of the core dynamics, drivers, and implications of such a paradigm shift.

🏛️ Core Philosophical Differences

  • God vs. Mind: Western monotheism relies on a singular, external Creator God. Buddhism focuses on internal mind training and cosmic cause-and-effect (Karma).
  • Linear vs. Cyclical: Monotheism views history as linear (Creation to Judgment Day). Buddhism views existence as cyclical (Samsara).
  • Dogma vs. Experience: Monotheism emphasizes faith in divine revelation. Buddhism encourages personal verification of truth (Ehipassiko).

📉 Drivers of Western Monotheistic Decline

  • Secularization: Rapidly dropping church attendance and religious affiliation in Europe and North America.
  • The Problem of Evil: Modern education makes it harder for many to reconcile an all-powerful, loving God with global suffering.
  • Scientific Friction: Historic clashes between literal scriptural interpretation and proven science (evolution, cosmology).

📈 Factors Fueling the Rise of Buddhism

  • Psychological Alignment: Buddhist mindfulness and meditation integrate seamlessly with modern neuroscience and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
  • Agnostic Compatibility: Secular Buddhism allows individuals to practice its core ethics and mental training without believing in supernatural entities.
  • Environmental Ethics: The Buddhist concept of interconnectedness aligns closely with modern ecological and climate movements.

🌍 Global Implications of the Shift

  • Decentralized Authority: A shift away from rigid religious hierarchies toward localized, practice-based communities.
  • Reduced Holy War Narratives: Monotheistic “us vs. them” (believer vs. infidel) dynamics would decrease, though Buddhist-majority regions still face ethnic conflicts.
  • Existential Reframing: Society would view human existence not as a test for the afterlife, but as an opportunity to reduce suffering in the present world.

To explore this concept further, let me know if you want to focus on:

  • The historical accuracy of these religious trends today
  • How this shift would impact global politics and laws
  • A comparison of Buddhist ethics vs. Christian ethics
https://share.google/aimode/7p9ClC9av57jP9YqR

AI overview

[          ]

No CRUSADES, No JIHAD | How BUDDHISM Conquered Without Violence

THE RELIGION THAT NEVER FOUGHT HOLY WARS – HOW BUDDHISM SPREAD WITHOUT BLOODSHED 

Why did Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism all spark violent conflicts in their spread—while Buddhism expanded across half the world without raising a sword? 

In this deep dive, we explore how Buddhism’s radical approach to truth, non-violence, and cultural adaptation reshaped empires… without a single holy war. 

From Ashoka’s transformation to modern-day Buddhist nationalism, this video uncovers the hidden forces behind the world’s most peaceful revolution—and the shocking moments when it turned violent. 

DISCOVER: How Buddhism spread without conquest or forced conversions Why Ashoka the Cruel became history’s most peaceful emperor The real reason Buddhist monks didn’t wage holy wars How Buddhism’s unique approach to truth made holy wars unnecessary 

Why some Buddhist monks today have embraced violence (and what went wrong) Why Buddhism’s nonviolent model still matters in modern global conflicts ✨ 

If this video made you think differently, hit like, subscribe, and share it with someone who needs to hear this perspective. 

Don’t forget to turn on the bell for more wisdom every week. 📌 Join our community: Instagram:   / buddhaswizdom   Facebook:   / buddhaswizdom   ☕ Support the channel: Buy us a tea: https://buymeacoffee.com/buddhaswisdom 

TIMESTAMPS: 

00:00 MEDIEVAL KNIGHTS VS BUDDHIST MONKS 

02:10 BEYOND RELIGION: BUDDHISM’S DIFFERENT APPROACH 04:30 THE PROBLEM WITH HOLY WARS 

07:22 BUDDHISM 101 – BUILT DIFFERENT 

09:45 ASHOKA – FROM KILLER TO PEACEMAKER 

12:47 HOW MONKS TRAVELED FURTHER THAN ARMIES 

15:49 WHEN BUDDHISTS MET OTHER FAITHS 

18:47 THE EXCEPTIONS – WHEN BUDDHISM TURNED VIOLENT 

22:14 THE MEDITATION ADVANTAGE – TRAINING MINDS FOR PEACE 25:14 LESSONS FOR TODAY’S WORLD 

28:17 AWAKENING BEGINS WITH YOU

බුද්ධාගමේ ප්‍රධාන පහර – බටහිරට ආධ්‍යාත්මික ප්‍රඥාව සාමකාමීව අපනයනය කිරීමේ බෞද්ධ “ප්‍රති-ප්‍රහාරයකින්” බටහිර මිනිසාගේ මනස ජය ගැනීම 

June 27th, 2026

සේනක වීරරත්න

දෙවියන් වහන්සේ කෙරෙහි විශ්වාසයක් නොමැති නමුත් පරිපූර්ණ ආචාර ධර්ම පද්ධතියක් සහ උසස් සදාචාරයක් ලබා ගැනීමට හැකි එකම ලෝක ආගම වීම, මිලියන ගණනින් පල්ලියේ පරිහානියට බුද්ධාගම බොහෝ දුරට වගකිව යුතු යැයි සැලකිය හැකිය. මැවුම්කරු දෙවියන් වහන්සේ පිළිබඳ විශ්වාසය ක්‍රිස්තියානි බටහිර රටවල මිය ගොස් හෝ මිය යමින් පවතී, මන්ද බුද්ධාගම භාවනාව, සියලු ජීවීන් කෙරෙහි අනුකම්පාව සහ දෙවියන් වහන්සේට යාච්ඤා නොකර මනස වර්ධනය කිරීම, අන් අය කෙරෙහි සතුරුකම සහ සොබාදහම ඇතුළු සියලු ආකාරයේ ජීවිතවලට සාමය තුළින් විකල්ප මාර්ගයක් පෙන්වා දී ඇත.

සියවස් ගණනාවක් පුරා කොලොම්බස් සහ ඔහුගේ අනුගාමිකයන් සහ ආබ්‍රහම් ආගම් විසින් ලෝකය යටත් කර ගැනීමේ අර්ථයෙන් නොව, එහි ව්‍යාප්තිය සඳහා බුදුදහම කිසි විටෙකත් කඩුවක් භාවිතා කළේ නැත. බුද්ධාගමේ කඩුවක් නැත. ඒ වෙනුවට එයට බුදුන්ගේ ප්‍රඥාවේ කඩුව ඇත.. බෞද්ධ ඉගැන්වීම්වල, මෙම ගිනිමය කඩුව සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම සංකේතාත්මක ය. එය කිසි විටෙකත් අන් අයට හානි කිරීමට භාවිතා නොකෙරේ, නමුත් නොදැනුවත්කම, බැඳීම සහ සංකල්පීය මායාවේ වැස්ම කපා දැමීමට ය.

ලොව පුරා බිලියන සංඛ්‍යාත ජනතාවගේ මනස, විශේෂයෙන් යුරෝපීය රටවල, අන්තර්ජාලය, යූ ටියුබ් වැඩසටහන් සහ වෙනත් මාර්ග, මාර්ගගත සහ නොබැඳි ලෙස යටත් කර ගැනීම හරහා බුද්ධාගම ව්‍යාප්ත කිරීම, කීර්තිමත් බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය ඉතිහාසඥ ආචාර්ය ආර්නෝල්ඩ් ටොයින්බී වරක් ‘බුද්ධාගමේ ප්‍රතිප්‍රහාරය’ ලෙස හැඳින්වූ දෙයයි.

ආචාර්ය ආර්නෝල්ඩ් ටොයින්බී, නැගෙනහිර ආගම් – විශේෂයෙන් බුද්ධාගම – සාමකාමීව බටහිරට ව්‍යාප්ත වී ගෝලීය ශිෂ්ටාචාරය නැවත හැඩගස්වන ආකාරය විස්තර කිරීමට “බුද්ධාගමේ ප්‍රතිප්‍රහාරයක්” (හෝ නැගෙනහිර අධ්‍යාත්මිකත්වය) යන සංකල්පය භාවිතා කළේය. [1, 2, 3]

වෙළුම් 12 කින් යුත් ඉතිහාස අධ්‍යයනය පිළිබඳ මහා කෘතිය සඳහා ප්‍රසිද්ධ ටොයින්බී, “අභියෝගය සහ ප්‍රතිචාරය” රාමුවක් හරහා මානව ඉතිහාසය විශ්ලේෂණය කළේය. බටහිර ශිෂ්ටාචාරය අධික ලෙස ද්‍රව්‍යවාදී සහ අධ්‍යාත්මිකව බංකොලොත් වී ඇති බව ඔහු විශ්වාස කළේය. එහි අභ්‍යන්තර අර්බුදයෙන් බේරීමට, බටහිරට නැගෙනහිර අධ්‍යාත්මික හා සදාචාරාත්මක අවබෝධය අවශ්‍ය බව ඔහු තර්ක කළේය. [1, 2, 3, 4]

ටොයින්බීගේ සංකල්පයේ ප්‍රධාන මානයන් ප්‍රසිද්ධ අනාවැකිය: ටොයින්බී ප්‍රසිද්ධ ලෙස සඳහන් කළේ බටහිරට බුද්ධාගම පැමිණීම විසිවන සියවසේ වැදගත්ම සිදුවීම විය හැකිය” යනුවෙනි. අභියෝගය සහ ප්‍රතිචාරය: ඔහු බටහිර තාක්ෂණය, විද්‍යාව සහ භෞතිකවාදය සැලකුවේ ආසියාවට බලපෑ ආරම්භක ප්‍රහාරයක්” ලෙසයි. ප්‍රති-ප්‍රහාරය” යනු ගෝලීය සමතුලිතතාවය යථා තත්ත්වයට පත් කිරීම සඳහා ආසියාව බටහිරට ආධ්‍යාත්මික ප්‍රඥාව සාමකාමීව අපනයනය කිරීමයි.

මහායාන බුද්ධාගම සහ කොන්ෆියුෂියානුවාදය: ඔහුගේ පසුකාලීන වසරවලදී, සෝකා ගක්කායි නායක ඩයිසාකු ඉකේඩා වැනි නැගෙනහිර ආසියානු චින්තකයින් සමඟ ගැඹුරු සංවාද අතරතුර, ටොයින්බී අනාවැකි පළ කළේ මහායාන බෞද්ධ අනුකම්පාව කෙරෙහි අවධාරණය කිරීම සහ සමාජ සමගිය කෙරෙහි කොන්ෆියුෂියානු අවධාරණය 21 වන සියවසේ මානව ශිෂ්ටාචාරය ස්වයං විනාශයෙන් ගලවා ගැනීම සඳහා තීරණාත්මක වනු ඇති බවයි. [1, 2, 3]

ඔහුගේ ඓතිහාසික න්‍යායේ මූලික මූලධර්ම

ටොයින්බීගේ බුද්ධාගම පිළිබඳ දැක්ම සමාජ පරිණාමය වන ආකාරය පිළිබඳ ඔහුගේ පුළුල් න්‍යායන් සමඟ සමපාත වේ: [1] ඓතිහාසික අංගය [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 

ටොයින්බීගේ විශ්ලේෂණය ශිෂ්ටාචාර සියදිවි නසාගැනීමේ ශිෂ්ටාචාර මිය යන්නේ අභ්‍යන්තර අධ්‍යාත්මික ක්ෂය වීමෙනි, බාහිර ජයග්‍රහණයෙන් නොවේ.

උසස් ආගම් ශිෂ්ටාචාරයක උච්චතම අවස්ථාව වන්නේ ප්‍රධාන විශ්වීය ආගම් බිහි කිරීමයි. 

ගෝලීය එකමුතුකම සැබෑ මානව දියුණුවට ප්‍රමුඛ සංස්කෘතීන්ගෙන් සහ බටහිර නොවන ශිෂ්ටාචාරවලින් ඉගෙනීම අවශ්‍ය වේ.

සාම්ප්‍රදායික බටහිර දේවවාදයට බුදුදහම ගැඹුරු විකල්පයක් ඉදිරිපත් කරන බවට කරන ප්‍රකාශය නූතන ගෝලීය අධ්‍යාත්මිකත්වයේ සැලකිය යුතු වෙනසක් ඉස්මතු කරයි. බුදුදහම මැවුම්කරු දෙවියන් වහන්සේ කෙරෙහි විශ්වාසයක් අවශ්‍ය නොකර ආචාර ධර්ම, පුද්ගලික වර්ධනය සහ මානසික වගාව සඳහා සම්පූර්ණ රාමුවක් සපයයි. [1, 2, 3, 4]

බටහිර රටවල පල්ලි පැමිණීම අඩුවීමට ප්‍රධාන හේතුව බුද්ධාගමද යන්න ඉතිහාසඥයින් සහ සමාජ විද්‍යාඥයින් විවාද කරන අතර, එහි දර්ශනය නිසැකවම ලෞකික, සාක්ෂි මත පදනම් වූ සහ අභ්‍යන්තරික මාර්ග සොයන මිලියන සංඛ්‍යාත ජනතාව සඳහා අධ්‍යාත්මික හිස්බවක් පුරවා ඇත. [1]

🌟 දේවවාදී නොවන ආගමේ මූලික රාමු

දිව්‍ය අණකින් තොරව ආගමකට උසස් සදාචාරාත්මක ප්‍රමිතීන් පවත්වා ගත හැකි බව බුදුදහම පෙන්නුම් කරයි. [1, 2]

ස්වයං විශ්වාසය: අධ්‍යාත්මික ප්‍රගතිය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම රඳා පවතින්නේ දිව්‍ය කරුණාව මත නොව පුද්ගල උත්සාහය සහ මානසික පුහුණුව මත ය. 

ස්වාභාවික නීතිය: සදාචාරාත්මක ප්‍රතිවිපාක පාලනය වන්නේ දිව්‍ය විනිශ්චයෙන් නොව කර්මය (හේතුව සහ ඵලයේ ස්වාභාවික නීතිය) මගිනි. 

මැද මාර්ගය: එය දැඩි භෞතිකවාදයේ සහ ආඥාදායක දේවවාදයේ අන්තයන් මග හරියි. 

ආනුභවික පරීක්ෂණය: බුදුන් වහන්සේ අනුගාමිකයන්ට ඉගැන්වීම් ප්‍රශ්න කිරීමට සහ පුද්ගලික අත්දැකීම්වලට එරෙහිව ඒවා පරීක්ෂා කිරීමට දිරිගැන්වූහ (එහිපැසිකෝ). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

බුද්ධාගම නූතන බටහිරට ආයාචනා කරන්නේ ඇයි

බෞද්ධ දර්ශනය බටහිර ලෞකික ප්‍රවණතා සමඟ ඡේදනය වීම අද්විතීය සංස්කෘතික සංස්ලේෂණයක් නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. 

මනෝවිද්‍යාත්මක පෙළගැස්ම: බටහිර මනස විද්‍යාවන් බොහෝ විට කාංසාව සහ මානසික අවපීඩනයට ප්‍රතිකාර කිරීම සඳහා සිහිකල්පනාව වැනි බෞද්ධ පිළිවෙත් ඒකාබද්ධ කරයි. 

විද්‍යාත්මක අනුකූලතාව: නිර්මාණ මිථ්‍යාවක් නොමැතිකම බුද්ධාගම පරිණාමීය ජීව විද්‍යාව සහ නූතන විශ්ව විද්‍යාව සමඟ බෙහෙවින් අනුකූල වේ. 

විශ්වීය අනුකම්පාව: අහිංසා (හානියක් නොවන) කෙරෙහි අවධානය යොමු කිරීම සත්ව අයිතිවාසිකම් සහ පාරිසරිකවාදය සඳහා වන නූතන ව්‍යාපාර සමඟ සමීපව සමපාත වේ. 

අත්දැකීම් සහිත අධ්‍යාත්මිකත්වය: භාවනාව ක්ෂණික, සත්‍යාපනය කළ හැකි සාමයේ තත්වයන් ලබා දෙයි, ආගමික අවධානය විශ්වාස කිරීම” සිට අත්දැකීම” දක්වා මාරු කරයි. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

විශ්වීය අනුකම්පාව: අහිංසා (හානියක් නොවන) කෙරෙහි අවධානය යොමු කිරීම සත්ව අයිතිවාසිකම් සහ පාරිසරිකවාදය සඳහා වන නවීන ව්‍යාපාර සමඟ සමීපව සමපාත වේ.

අත්දැකීම් සහිත අධ්‍යාත්මිකත්වය: භාවනාව ක්ෂණික, සත්‍යාපනය කළ හැකි සාමයේ තත්වයන් ලබා දෙයි, ආගමික අවධානය විශ්වාස කිරීම” සිට අත්දැකීම” දක්වා මාරු කරයි. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

බටහිර ලෞකිකකරණයේ පුළුල් සන්දර්භය බුද්ධාගමේ බලපෑම ගැඹුරු වුවත්, සමාජ විද්‍යාඥයින් සටහන් කරන්නේ බටහිර රටවල සාම්ප්‍රදායික පල්ලි පැමිණීමේ පරිහානිය බහු-හේතුක බවයි. බුද්ධාගම: විද්‍යාත්මක, දාර්ශනික සහ දේශපාලන පරිණාමයේ සියවස් ගණනාවක් ආයතනික ආගමික අධිකාරිය දුර්වල කළේය. 

නෝන්ස්” හි නැගීම: පල්ලි හැර යන බොහෝ බටහිරයන් නව ආගමක් අනුගමනය නොකරයි; ඔවුන් අදේවවාදීන්, අඥෙයවාදීන් හෝ ආධ්‍යාත්මික නමුත් ආගමික නොවන” ලෙස හඳුනා ගනී. සංස්කෘතික අනුවර්තනය: බටහිර රටවල, බුද්ධාගම බොහෝ විට ලෞකිකව ක්‍රියාත්මක වන අතර, එහි සාම්ප්‍රදායික ආසියානු සංස්කෘතික, විශ්ව විද්‍යාත්මක සහ පැවිදි අංග ඉවත් කර ඇත. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 

බටහිර රටවල සිංහල බෞද්ධ මිෂනාරිවරු බටහිර රටවල ථෙරවාද බුද්ධාගම හඳුන්වාදීම සහ ස්ථාපිත කිරීම සඳහා පුරෝගාමී වූයේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ මිෂනාරිවරු ය. 

මෙම ව්‍යාපාරයට නායකත්වය දුන්නේ 1926 දී ලන්ඩන් බෞද්ධ විහාරය ආරම්භ කළ අනගාරික ධර්මපාල සහ 1957 දී බර්ලින් බෞද්ධ විහාරය ආරම්භ කළ අශෝක වීරරත්න වැනි පුරෝගාමී පුද්ගලයින් විසිනි. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 

උතුරු ඇමරිකාවේ සහ යුරෝපයේ සිංහල බෞද්ධ මිෂනාරි කටයුතුවල පියසටහන සැලකිය යුතු ලෙස වර්ධනය වී ඇත. 

ප්‍රධාන අංග අතරට:

 [1, 2] පුරෝගාමී දූත මණ්ඩල: අනගාරික ධර්මපාල (උපත ලද දොන් ඩේවිඩ් හේවාවිතාරණ) 1893 දී චිකාගෝ හි පැවති ලෝක ආගමික පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ දී කළ ප්‍රසිද්ධ දේශනයෙන් පසු බටහිර ප්‍රේක්ෂකයින්ට ථෙරවාද බුද්ධාගම හඳුන්වා දුන්නේය. 

එක්සත් රාජධානියේ ආයතන: ලන්ඩන් බෞද්ධ විහාරය අනගාරික ධර්මපාල භාරය යටතේ ක්‍රියාත්මක වන අතර ථෙරවාද ඉගැන්වීම් සඳහා ප්‍රමුඛ මධ්‍යස්ථානයක් ලෙස පවතී. එක්සත් රාජධානියේ අනෙකුත් ප්‍රමුඛ මධ්‍යස්ථාන අතරට ලන්ඩනයේ අතුල දස්සන ජාත්‍යන්තර බෞද්ධ විහාරය සහ ශ්‍රී සද්ධාතිස්ස ජාත්‍යන්තර බෞද්ධ මධ්‍යස්ථානය ඇතුළත් වේ.

 යුරෝපීය දූත මණ්ඩල

අශෝක වීරරත්න 1952 දී ජර්මානු ධර්මදූත සංගමය ආරම්භ කළ අතර, එය ජර්මනියේ සහ මහාද්වීපික යුරෝපයේ නේවාසික විද්වත් භික්ෂූන්ට ධර්මය ප්‍රචාරය කිරීම සඳහා මග පෑදීය. 

උතුරු ඇමරිකානු මධ්‍යස්ථාන: සිංහල භික්ෂූන් වහන්සේලා සහ ගිහි සංවිධාන විසින් ඇමරිකා එක්සත් ජනපදයේ සහ කැනඩාවේ ශාඛා රාශියක් ඇති මහමෙව්නාව බෞද්ධ ආරාම පද්ධතිය වැනි ප්‍රමුඛ ආරාම සහ පන්සල් කිහිපයක් පිහිටුවා ඇත. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] 

අද වන විට, මෙම දූත මණ්ඩල ගෝලීය වශයෙන් ව්‍යුහගත භාවනා විවේක, ධර්ම දේශනා සහ ප්‍රජා සහයෝගය ලබා දීම දිගටම කරගෙන යයි. [1, 2, 3] https://share.google/aimode/3YEj7UU534qV58dxa ⚖️ 

බටහිර ලෞකිකකරණයේ පුළුල් සන්දර්භය බුද්ධාගමේ බලපෑම ගැඹුරු වුවත්, බටහිර රටවල සාම්ප්‍රදායික පල්ලි පැමිණීමේ පරිහානිය බහු-හේතුක බව සමාජ විද්‍යාඥයින් සටහන් කරයි. බුද්ධත්වය: සියවස් ගණනාවක විද්‍යාත්මක, දාර්ශනික සහ දේශපාලන පරිණාමය ආයතනික ආගමික අධිකාරිය දුර්වල කළේය. “නෝන්ස්” හි නැගීම: පල්ලි හැර යන බොහෝ බටහිරයන් නව ආගමක් අනුගමනය නොකරයි; ඔවුන් අදේවවාදීන්, අඥෙයවාදීන් හෝ “ආධ්‍යාත්මික නමුත් ආගමික නොවේ” ලෙස හඳුනා ගනී. සංස්කෘතික අනුවර්තනය: බටහිර රටවල, බුද්ධාගම බොහෝ විට ලෞකිකව ක්‍රියාත්මක වන අතර, එහි සාම්ප්‍රදායික ආසියානු සංස්කෘතික, විශ්ව විද්‍යාත්මක සහ පැවිදි අංගවලින් ඉවත් කර ඇත. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

 බුද්ධාගම වෙන්ව සිටින්නේ කෙසේද –

 විශ්වාස පද්ධතියක් ලෙස නොව, ජීවිතය තේරුම් ගැනීමේ මාර්ගයක් ලෙස 1️⃣ එය නමස්කාරය මත නොව පිබිදීම මත කේන්ද්‍රගත වී ඇත. බුදුදහම ඔබෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ ඔබේ බලය නිර්මාණකරුවෙකුට භාර දෙන ලෙස නොවේ. ඒ වෙනුවට, එය ඔබට ඇතුළත බැලීමට ආරාධනා කරයි. අවධානය යොමු වන්නේ උසස් අධිකාරියක් සතුටු කිරීම කෙරෙහි නොව, ඔබේම මනස, ඔබේ දුක් වේදනා සහ ඔබේ රටා තේරුම් ගැනීම කෙරෙහි ය. එය මාව බේරා ගන්නේ කවුද යන ප්‍රශ්නය මා තේරුම් ගන්නේ කෙසේද යන්නට මාරු කරයි?” 2️⃣ එය ආරම්භ වන්නේ සත්‍යයෙන් මිස විශ්වාසයෙන් නොවේ – චතුරාර්ය සත්‍යයන්ගෙන්. එහි හරය වශයෙන්, බුදුදහම සරල නිරීක්ෂණයකින් ආරම්භ වේ: ජීවිතයට දුක් වේදනා ඇතුළත් වේ. දඬුවමක් ලෙස නොව, යථාර්ථයක් ලෙස. ඉන්පසු එය දුක් වේදනා පවතින්නේ ඇයි (ඇලීම, ආශාව, නොදැනුවත්කම) සහ වඩාත් වැදගත් ලෙස – එය අවසන් කරන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න පෙන්වයි. එය යමක් විශ්වාස කිරීම ගැන අඩුයි… සහ පැහැදිලිව දැකීම ගැන වැඩි යමක්. 3️⃣ එය දිව්‍ය මැදිහත්වීමට වඩා ස්වයං උත්සාහය අවධාරණය කරයි. වෙනත් කිසිවෙකුට ඔබ වෙනුවෙන් මාර්ගයේ ගමන් කළ නොහැක. සිහිකල්පනාව, භාවනාව සහ සදාචාරාත්මක ජීවිතය තුළින්, ඔබ සෙමෙන් ඔබේ අභ්‍යන්තර ලෝකය පරිවර්තනය කරයි. බුද්ධාගම වගකීම උගන්වයි – යැපීම නොවේ. ඔබේ සාමය ලබා නොදේ… එය වගා කෙරේ. 4️⃣ බුද්ධත්වය යනු අභ්‍යන්තර අවබෝධයක් මිස විපාකයක් නොවේ. එය ලබා දෙන දෙයක් නොවේ 

සේනක වීරරත්න

 යොමුව https://share.google/aimode/2bCh8a3mYrRFv53aW


පලාත් සභා 111 කොටස

June 27th, 2026

ආචාර්ය සුද ත් ගුණසේකර අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය සිරිමාවෝ බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනියගේ හිටපු ලේකම් සහ ශ්‍රී ලන්කා පරිපාලනසේවා සන්ගමයේ සභාපති (1991-94))

මේ රටේ පලාත්සභා ඡන්දය වහාම පවත්වන්මෙන් කෑමොර දෙන දේශපාලකයින් ඇතුලු සියලුම පිස්සන් ජීවිතාන්තය දක්වා යැවිය යුත්තේ අන්ගොඩටය, එසේත් නැතිනම් ඔවුන් දේශද්‍රෝහීන්, ජාතිද්‍රෝහීන් සහ බෞද්ධ විරෝධීන් වශයෙන් වහාම මේ පින් බිමෙන් යළි කිසිදාක ආපසු ආ නොහැකි පිට සක්වලකටම පිටුවහල් කළ යුතුය.

111 කොටස

ශ්‍රී ලන්කාවේ පලාත්සභා හූනියමේ නිර්මාතෘන්, ප්‍රතිලාභීන් සහ වින්දිතයින්

1987 ජූලි 29 වන දින ඉන්දු ලන්කා ගිවිසුම අත්සන් කිරීමටපෙර එහි ප්‍රධාන නිර්මාතෘ සහ පළමු හූනියම්කරු වශයෙන් කටයුතු කලේ ඉන්දීය අගමැති රජිව් ගාන්ධිය. ඔහුගේ සහායකයිකන් වූයේ කවුටිල්ල්‍ය පරම්පරාවේ ඉන්දීය පරිපාලන සහ විදේශ සේවා නිළධාරීන්ය.මෙම හූනියම වැලලීමට ලන්කාවේ උතුරු නැගෙනහිර පලාත් දෙක යොදා ගැනීමේදි,එම වස්තු බීජය 1799 පැLaකල ක්ලෙග්හෝන් දෙවන හූනියම්කරුය් වශයෙන් මම හඳුන්වමි. අවුරුදු 2500 ක් පුරා අඛණ්ඩව සින්හල බෞද්ධ රාජධානියක් වශයෙන් පැවති  මේ  රටේ  සැබෑ ඉතිහාශය මුළුමනින්ම විකුර්ථිකරමින් මේ රට සින්හළ දෙමළ වශයෙන් ජාතීන් දෙකකින් සහ රටවල් දෙකකින් යුත් රටක් බවට මිත්‍යා සටහනක් එවකට මූදුබඩ ප්‍රදේශ පාලනය කළ නොර්ත් ආණ්ඩුකාරයාට දෙන්මින්,මේ රට සින්හල සහ දෙමළ වශයෙන් බෙදීම සඳහා කරනලද ඔහුගේ යෝජනාව වසර 34 කට පසු 1833 දී මේ රට පලාත් 5ක ට බෙදා භූමියේ සළකුණු කළ කෝල්බෲක්- කැමරන් කොමසාරිස් වරුන් තෙවන හූනියම් කරුවන්ය. මෙම පලාත් 5 භූමියේ සළකුණු කිරීමේදී ක්ලෙග්හෝන් දෙමළ රට වශයෙන් ඔහු හැඳින්වූ උ.හා නැ පලාත් දෙක, ඔහු සිතුවාටත් වඩා මුළු රටෙන් 2/3 ක්ම අසුව න පරිදි මහපොලවේ සිතියම් ගතකළ කොමසාරිස් වරුන්ට ඔහු එලොව සිට හෝ ස්තූතිවන්ත වෙනවාට සැක නැත.

මේ රටේ සින්හල ජාතියයත්,සින්හල බෞද්ධ ශිෂ්ඨාචාරයත්, ක්‍රි.පු.307 සිට පැවති මේ දේශයට උචිත සම්ප්‍රදායික පරිපාලන රටාවත් එසේම සම්බුද්ධ සාශනයත් මිහිතලයෙන් අතුරුදන්කිරිමේ ඔවුන්ගේ කුමන්ත්‍රණය, ඔවුන් සිතූ පැතූ ආකාරයෙන්ම සිදුවෙන බව දැක එලොව සිට හෝ කොමසාරිස් වරුන්ද සතුටුවෙනවාට සැක නැත.

ඊට අමතරවව තමිල්නාඩුවේ දේශපාලනඥයින් මෙන්ම මේ රටේ ඊලම්වාදි මලබා සන්ක්‍රමනිකයින්ද මේ කුමන්ත්‍රණයේ සිව්වන කොටස්කරුවන්වේ.එසේම 1944 දී ලන්කාව ඉන්දියාවේ ප්‍රාන්තයක් වියයුතුයයි රාජ්‍යමන්ත්‍රන සභාවේ දී කී ජේ. ආර්. ද මේ හූනියම් රැළේ පස්වන කොටස්කාරයා වශයෙන් සැලකිය හැක.

මෙම හූනියමේ ප්‍රතිලාභීන්

මෙම හූනියමේ ප්‍රතිලාභීන් රිජු සහ වක්‍ර වශයෙන් කොටස් දෙකකි. රිජු ප්‍රථිලාභීන් වනුයේ රජිව් ගාන්ධිය.ඉන්දියාවේ ලොක්සභාවේ තමිල්නාඩුව නියෝජනය වන ආසන සන්ක්‍යාව වැඩිකරගත් ඉන්දීය රජය දෙවන රිජු ප්‍රතිලාභියා වන අතර, 13 වන සන්ශෝධනයෙන් ප්‍රතිලාභ ලභාගත් උතුරු නැගෙනහිර සිටින මලබා සන්ක්‍රමනිකයින්ට තෙවන තැන හිමිවේ.

වක්‍ර ප්‍රතිලාභීන් අතරෙනුත් වැඩිම ප්‍රතිලාබ ලබන්නේ මේ රටේ දේශපාලකයින්ය.පලාත් සභා පිහිටුවීම නිසා, ඒ වෙනුවෙන් වෙනම අමාත්‍යාන්ශයක් සහ ඇමතිවරයෙක් සහ නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමති වරයෙක් ඇතුළු කාර්‍යමණ්ඩලයක්, පලාත් සභා 9 ට ආණ්ඩු කාරයින් 9 ක්, මහ ඇමතීන් 9ක් ඇමතීන් 36 ක් සහ 700 කට වැඩි පලාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රී තනතුරු වටා රට පුරා ගෙතුණු දේශ පාලන ජාලයක්, එම ආයතන වලට 20,000 වැඩි සේවක පිරිසක් සහ ඔවුන්ට වැටුප්, දීමනා,යාන වාහන වැනි වෙනත් වරප්‍රශාධ.

මේ සියල්ලම බෙදී යනුයේ ජනාධිපති, මැති ඇමති සහ ඔවුන්ගේ ඥාති මිත්‍රාදීන් සහ හිතවතුන් අතරය. මෙයින් ලැබෙන ප්‍රථිලාභ වලට අමතරව ඒ හරහා ගොඩ නැගෙන තම පක්ෂවල මැතිවරණ ව්‍යාපාර මෙහෙයවීම සඳහා ලක්ෂ ගානක දේශපාලන අනුගාමිකයින් පිරිසක්  සහ පලාත් සභා ජාලය පවත්වාගෙන යාමේදි ලැබෙන මූල්‍ය සහ වෙනත් අතුරු ප්‍රතිලාභ- විදෙස් ගමන් සහ පලාත් සභා ජාලයට සම්භන්ධවන විසාල පිරිසකට රැකියා සහ ආර්ථික ප්‍රතිලාභ රැසක් ලැබී ඇත. මෙය ඔවුන්ගේ හිසට අහසින් කඩා වැටුණු වාශනාවකි. මෙහි ඇති විශේෂය වනුයේ ඔවුන් වෙනුවෙන් වැයවන මහා ධනස්ඛන්ධයෙන් රටට හෝ ජනතාවට කිසිදු ප්‍රතිලාභයක්  නොලැබීමය.

වින්දිතයින්

පලාත් සභා ක්‍රමය යටතේ ප්‍රේමදාස ජනාධිපති වරයාගේ ඇතිකළ ඊනියා පරිපාලනය ගමට ගෙනයාමෙ” වැඩ පිලිවෙල යටතේ නිකුත්කල ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් වරුන්ට බලය පැවරීමේ පනතින් සහ 1992 රා.ප.පා.චක්‍රලේඛ අන්ක 21 න්, 1833 සිට මේ රටේ මැනවින් ස්ථාපිතව තිබුණු ඉතාමත් ප්‍රශස්ථ සහ ක්‍රමවත් දිස්ත්‍රික්ක පරිපාලන ක්‍රමය සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම විනාශ වූ අතර,1992 අන්ක 21 දරන  චක්‍රලේකයේ අවසානයේ දිසාපති කාර්යාල වසාදමා ඒවා දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ කටයුතු   සම්බන්ධීකරනයට පමණක් භාවිතා කරණ බව සඳහන්කොට ඇත.

මේ රටේ දිස්ත්‍රික් හා ප්‍රාදේශීය පාලනය පිළිබඳ මලපොතේ අකුරක් නොදන්නා කොළඹින් පිට එක පයක් තබා නැති අමාත්‍යාන්ශ ලේකම්වරයෙකු ජනාධිපති සතුටු කිරිම සඳහා මෙම අමණ තීරණය ගෙන 1833 සිට මේ රටේ ජනජීවිතයේ මුල්බැස තිබුණු විශිස්ඨ දිසා පාලන  ක්‍රමය එසේ විනාශකළ නිසාද, එසේම  පලාත් සභා පාලනයත්  ජනතා හිත වාදීව කිසිදිනක නිසියාකාරව ක්‍රියාත්මක නොවූ නිසාද, නිළධාරීන් මෙන්ම දේශපාලකයින් තම යුතුකම් සහ වගකීම්ද නීසියාකාරව, කලට වෙලාවට ඉටු නොකළ නිශාද මේ සියළු අඩුපාඩුකම් සහ අපහසුකම් වල  වින්දිතයින් වූයේ රටේ අහින්සක ජනතාවටය. මේ නිසා මා පලාත්සභා දකින්නේ මේ රටේ සින්හල බෞද්ධ ජාතිය මතට අහසින් කඩාවැටුණු හෙන ගෙඩියක් මෙනි.

මෙම ඛේධනීය තත්වය යටතේ 1987 සිට මේ රටේ, ඒකීය භාවයට, විධිමත් හා ප්‍රසස්ථ දේශීය රාස්ඨ්‍ර පාලන රටාවට සහ  වසර 2500 කට අධික ඉතිහාසයක් ඇති ජනතා හිතවාදී රාජ්‍යපරිපාලන ක්‍රමවේදයකට තවදුරටත් හානි සිදුවීමට ඉඩ නොතබා අදිරාජ්‍යවාදීන් සහ ඉන්දියාව විසින් ඒකාබද්ධව, වසර 2500 කට අධික කාලයක් ඒකීය රටක් වශයෙන් අඛණ්ඩව පැවති මේ සින්හලයින්ගේ රට, පලාත් වශයෙන් කොටස්වලට කඩා සින්හල, දෙමළ සහ මුස්ලිම් ආදිවශයෙන් කැබෙලිවලට කඩා සදාකාලික ජාතිවාදී සහ ආගම්වාදි  නොනවතින ගැටුම් වලට මඟ පාදන මේ පලාත් ක්‍රමය මෙන්ම පලාත් සභා ක්‍රමයද තව මොහොතක් හෝ ප්‍රමාධ නොකොට මෙම සුද්දාගේ පලාත් ක්‍රමය මෙන්ම පලාත් සභා හූනියමද කපා අවසන් කරනමෙන් මම තරයේ යෝජනා කරමි.

සින්හල බෞද්ධ ජාතියත් එසේම බුදු සසුනත් මේ මිහි පිටින්  අතුරුදන් කිරීමේ දුෂ්ඨ අදහසින්  මේ රට  නොනවතින සින්හල,දෙමල සහ මුස්ලිම් ගැටුම් වලින් ශාපලත්   පෙඩරල් රටක් බවට පත්කිරීමේ මේ දුෂ්ඨ  දේශපාලන අදහස වහාම අත් හැරදමා රටේ ජාතියේ හා සම්බුද්ධ සාශනයේ චිරස්ථිතිය සඳහා පලාත් සභා හූනියම දැන්වත් වහාම අහෝසි කලයුතුයයි මම යෝජනා කරමි.

ඥානසාරහිමි (බොදුබලසේනාව) හාවින්ස්ටන්චර්චිල් (බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය අගමැති)-(Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965) and Ven. Galagoda-aththe Gnanasara (BBS) [2013-26])

June 27th, 2026

C. Wijeyawickrema

මහමොළකරු කතාවේ නිර්මාතෘ දප්පුල ලිවේරාද/හරීන් ප්‍රනාන්දුද?

 බොල්ෂෙවික් පාරේ යන්නට වලිකන, මරු විකල්ලෙන් වහසි බස් දොඩවන ආණ්ඩුවක්, කාදිනල්තුමා නමැති ලෝභ-ද්වේෂ-මෝහයෙන් පිරි වයසක පංචස්කන්ධයක්ද දවටා ගෙන, සැලේ නමැති කොටි වලිගයක් බදාගෙන,  කරගෙන යන උන්මත්තක ක්‍රියාව දෙස බලා සිටින මට, අගමැති චර්චිල් මතක් වුනේ ඔහු හා ඥානසාර හිමියන් අතර තිබෙන ඓතිහාසික  සමානකම් හා අසමානකම් පෙනී ගිය නිසාය.  AKD ලාගේ මේ ජරමරය ගලේ කැත කරගත් බළලා, මොකක්ද වැටෙනතුරු එළුවා පස්සෙන් යන නරියා, යන කතා මතක් කරලන්නේය.

මේ අස්සේ, අලි මදිවාට හරක් මෙන්, JVP/NPP මඩ බලකාය, මීට පෙර කවදාවත් සිදු නොවූ අන්දමට ගලගොඩඅත්තේ ඥානසාර හිමියන් ,නමැති මුව හමට තලමින් සිටීම ජුගුප්සා ජනකය. එය කෙතරම්  අශීලාචාර හා ත්‍රාසජනකද යත් හාමුදුරුවන් නොබෝදා ප්‍රථම වරට CID එකට පැමිණිල්ලක්ද කලේය. දප්පුල ලිවේරා විසින් කාදින,ල්තුමාට දුන් දිරච්ච ලණුවට අනුව සොයමින් ඉන්නා මහමොළකරු ඥානසාර හිමියන් යයි සුදත්ත තිලකසිරි,  පැරිසියට පලාගිය භරත, කොළඹ NGO සිංහල කොටියෙකු වන තරිඳු උඩුවරගෙදර  වැනි  AKD ආණ්ඩුවේ දඩබල්ලන්  විසින් කීමට  වුවත් ඉඩක් ඇත.

ලෝකයේ පණිවුඩකරුවන් දෙන්නෙක්

1900 වර්ෂයේ සිටම පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකුව සිටි චර්චිල්, නොයෙක් යුද/නාවික හමුදා තනතුරුද දරමින් යුරෝපයේ මතුවෙමින් ආ නාසිවාදය/ස්ටාලින්වාදය පිළිඹඳව පසුපෙල මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු ලෙස  කල අනතුරු ඇඟවීම් බීරි අලියාට වීනා ගායනයක් විය. අන්තිමේදී අගමැති චැම්බලීන් ප්‍රමුඛ එරට දේශපාලකයින්ට සිදුවූයේ ඒ වන විට වයස්ගත වෙමින් සිටි චර්චිල්ගේ සරණ පැතීමය. මෙසේ 1940-45 කාලයේ යුද කැබිනට් අගමැති වරයා ලෙස චර්චිල් සිය රට හිට්ලර්ගෙන් මුදවා ගත්තා පමණක් නොව බටහිර යුරෝපා රටවල්ද ගලවා ගන්නට ඇමෙරිකන් හමුදාවට මඟ පෑදුවේය. යුද ජයග්‍රහණයෙන් පසුව පැවැත්වූ මැතිවරණයෙන් චර්චිල් පැරදුණත්, 1951-55 කාලයේදී  ඔහු නැවත අගමැති විය.

එවැනිම පණිවුඩකරුවෙකුවූ,  ලංකාවේ ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට රටේ පක්ෂ දේශපාලක කළු සුද්දන් විසින් සංවිධානාත්මක ලෙස කලේ  උන්වහන්සේව අවමානයට ලක් කිරීම, ජාති භේද ඇතිකරන්නෙක් ලෙස දෙස්-විදෙස්  වල ප්‍රසිද්ධ කිරීම, විදේශ ගමන් තහනම් කිරීම, විශාල සමාජික පිරිසක් සිටි මුහුණු පොත තහනම් කිරීම (හරින් ප්‍රනාන්දු ගූගල් ඇමති විසින්), නොර්වේ රටේ ඒජන්ත කෙනෙක් යයි චරිත ඝාතනය යනාදිය ය.

මෙසේ සිවිල් නිදහස අහිමිකිරීමෙන් පසු <ඥානසාර දමණයේ> ඊළඟ උපක්‍රමය වූයේ  පරිහානියට යමින් තිබූ උසාවි ක්‍රමය අවභාවිතා කරමින් නීතිපති හරහා <බොරු නඩු> වැලක්ම දමා හිර ගෙදරට යැවීමය. මෙම බොරු නඩු හිරගෙදරින් අවසාන නොවුනත් , නීතීඥයින්ට  ගාස්තු ගෙවීමම දඬුවමක් විය. උදාහරණයක් වශයෙන් මෙම ඉස්ලාම් අන්තවාදයට එරෙහිව කතා කිරිමේ නඩුවකට පෙනී සිටීම සඳහා එක්තරා නීතීඥයෙක් ලක්ෂ 100 ක් ඉල්ලා සිටියේය. සමහර නඩු අවුරුදු 10 ක් පමණ පරණය. 2003 වසරේ පමණ සිට ඉස්ලාම් ශාරියා ඉකුවාන් අන්තවාදී අනතුර ගැන පාලකයින්ට හා කාදිනල්තුමාට පවා කල දැණුම්දීම් ගඟට ඉණි කැපීමක් විය.

පාස්කු දින (2019/4/21) ප්‍රහාරයෙන් පසුව  මුස්ලිම් නායකයින් පවා හාමුදුරුවන් හිරෙන් නිදහස් කරණ ලෙස ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන ගෙන් ඉල්ලා සිටියේය. එහෙත් තවත් පිරිසක් එම නිදහස් කිරීම අවලංගු කරණ ලෙස ගැසූ පෙත්සම මේ වනතෙක් විභාගයට ගෙන නැත. NGO-US Aid ඒජන්තලා වන පාකියසෝතිලා, ජෙහාන් පෙරේරා ලා විසින් පිළියෙල කල මෙම පෙත්සමේ පෙත්සමේ පලවෙනි අත්සන්කරු මෛත්‍රී වික්‍රමසිංහ  මැතිණියය. මෙය විත්තිකරුට මානසික අසහනයක්  දෙන හා රටින් පිට යාම වැලැක්වීමේ උපක්‍රමයකි.  පවතින පක්ෂ දේශපාලක කළු සුද්දන්ගේ සිස්ටම් එක හා විශේෂයෙන් උසාවි පද්ධතිය ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට සළකන ආකාරය කුමක් වුවත් (අපරාධකාරයෙක්?), රටේ කොතැනකට ගියත් උන්වහන්සේ වටා ජනයා එකරැස් වන්නේය. මට දැන ගැනීමට ලැබුණු අන්දමට, BBS දේශපාලන පක්ෂයක් වශයෙන් ලියා පදිංචි කිරීම හිටපු මැකෝ මහින්ද දේශප්‍රිය නම් මාක්ස්වාදියා  කපටි ලෙස ලිස්සා ඇරියේ මේ නිසාය.

බොදු බල සේනාවේ (ඥානසාර) භූමිකාව) 2012-2026

ඥානසාර හිමියන් සිංහල බෞද්ධ ශිෂ්ටාචාරය හා ඒකීය ලංකාවක් බේරා ගැනීමේ කාර්යය සඳහා කැපවූයේ තරුණ භික්ෂුවක් වශයෙන් 1990 දශකයේ මුල සිටය. ක්‍රිස්තියානි පල්ලි මඩු හරහා කරගෙන යන  අයුතු අන්‍යාගමීකරණය (unethical religious conversion) හා ඊළම් කොටි යුද්ධයේදී (Eelam war) සෙසු ජාතික (ජාතිවාදී නොව) බලවේග සමඟ ඥානසාර හිමියන් ක්‍රියාකලේ ඓතිහාසිකව මෙම දිවයින රැකගත් මුර දේවතා සංකල්පය (guardian angels) නමැති දම්වැලේ එක් තවමත් ඉතුරුවී ඇති පුරුකක් සේ  යමින්ය. සෝම  හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ (1948-2003) සැක කටයුතු අපවත් වීමත් සමඟ, චන්ද්‍රිකා-මංගල සමරවීර- රනිල්- G.L. පීරිස් වැනි (චපල පංචස්කන්ධ) දේශපාලකයින්ගේ ඊළම් හිතවාදී ක්‍රියා ඉදිරියේ තවත් මතුවී ආ තර්ජනයක් වූයේ  චම්පික රණවක විසින්  <අල්ජිහාද්, අල්කයිඩා: අතීතය, වර්තමානය සහ ඉස්ලාම් අන්තවාදය> යන තේමාව යටතේ ලියන ලද කෘති වල (2001, 2003, 2013) දැක්වුණ ඉස්ලාම් මූල ධර්මවාදී ලෝකල් හා විදේශීය බලවේගය.  එහෙත් පසු කලක ඔහු හෙමින් සැරේ මෙම වගකීමෙන් ලිස්සා ගොස් එක් එක් ආණ්ඩුවල ඇමතිකම් ලබාගෙන ඥානසාර හිමියන් ඇතුළු තරුණ පිරිස් අතරමංකර දැම්මේය!  මුනිවත රැක්කේය!

හරි හමන් නායකයෙක් නැති සිංහල බෞද්ධයා

නොයෙක් ආකාරයෙන් සිදු කල සිය ජාතික සේවයේදී ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට ප්‍රත්‍යක්ෂ වූ කරුණක්  වූයේ, අනිත් හැම ජන වර්ගයකටම නායකයෙක්/යින් සිටියත්, සිංහල බෞද්ධයින්ට හරිහමන් නායකයෙක් නැත යන්නය. මෙම නිගමණය (යථාර්ථය) නිසා 2012 මැයි මාසයේදී  ඥානසාර හිමියන් විසින් බොදු බල සංවිධානය පිහිටුවා ගත් අතර එතැන් සිට මේ දක්වා පක්ෂ දේශපාලකයිගේ ගොඳුරක් නොවී සිටින හා තම පුද්ගලික වාසිය තකා සිය ප්‍රතිපත්ති පාවා නොදුන් එකම  <දේශ-පාලන> පංචස්කන්ධය උන්වහන්සේ පමණය. දේශපාලනය හා බැඳුණ සෑම ප්‍රසිද්ධ මීටිමකදීම උන්වහන්සේ කැපී පෙනෙන්නේ ඒ නිසාය. ක්ලේශ භරිත සමහර හාමුදුරුවරු පවා මේ ගැන උන්වහන්සේ කෙරෙහි මෙත්තා-කරුණා-මුදිතා-උපේක්ෂාවක් නොදක්වන බව පෙනේ.

හිට්ලර්ගෙන් තම රට ගලවා ගැනීමේ ක්‍රියාවලියේදී <ජනප්‍රිය> නොවන තීරණ ගැනීමට චර්චිල්ට සිදුවිය. එසේ වුවත් දේශ පාලකයෙකු වශයෙන් චර්චිල්ට, ලංකාවේ අනාගාරික ධර්මපාල, CWW  කන්නන්ගර හෝ ගාමිණී ජයසූරිය වැනි අයට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවු ගුණමකු කම් වලට මුහුණ දීමට සිදු නොවීය. මේ යුද වීරයා ඊළඟ මහ මැතිවරණයෙන් පරාජය වීම සමාන කල හැක්කේ යුද්ධය නිසා හෙම්බත්ව සිටි ඒ රටේ ජනයා චර්චිල් ගෙන් නොව තමන්ගෙන්ම පලි ගත්තා මෙන්ය. මෙය අරගල කුමණ්ත්‍රනයෙන් වාසිය ලබාගත් JVP කාරයින් 70 අවුරුදු ශාපයක් ගැන කියා ජනයා රවටා ගෝටාට දුන් චන්ද ටික හොරා ගත්තා  වැනිය. ලංකාව ආරක්ෂාකරණා යම් අදෘෂ්‍යමානා බලවේගයක් විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ගිනි තියන්නට ගිය ඔවුන්ට දඬුවමක් වශයෙන් ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදය නමැති උරචක්කරමාලයක් ඔවුන්ගේ කරට පටවා  ඔවුන්ට දෙන දුක මේ වනවිට පැහැදිලිය.

විශ්ව විද්‍යාල ළමයින්ට සැපයූ  ඉංග්‍රීසි භාෂාව ඉගෙන ගන්නා පන්තිවලට යෑම වැලැක්වීමේ ඔවුන්ගේ ප්‍රතිපත්තියේ ආනිසංශයක් වශයෙන් ඔවුන් දැන් රටතුල හා රටින් පිට ඉන්ගිරිස් නොදන්නා හීනමානයෙන් විඳින දුකද තවත් බිග් ක්වෙච්චන් එකකි. බැරි ඉන්ගිරිස් වෙනුවට විජිත හේරත්ලා මහින්ද සමරසිංහලා චාමර සම්පත් ගෙන් වත් අව්‍යාජ පාඩමක් ඉගෙන ගත යුතුව තිබුණි. ෂන්මුගදාසන්ගෙන් මාකස්වාදය ඉගෙනගත් ජනාධිපති සිරිසේන වැන්නෙකුට නම් මෙහිදී අනුකම්පා කල හැකිය (පෝප් ඉදිරියේ කටුණායකදී කොලයක් බලාගෙන කරන්නට හැදූ කතාව). [මූලාශ්‍රය-ඉංගිරිස් පාරුව කරට ගැනීම (පිටු 154-182), ලංකාව කළු සුද්දන්ගේ පාලන සමය, දෙවන භාගය: 1948-2024)].

ඉස්ලාම් අන්තවාදය

D. S. සේනානායකගේ සිටම රටේ අගමැති/ජනාධිපතිවරු/වරියන් සිංහල බෞද්ධයින්ට කල කෙනෙහිලිකම්, හානි, අසාධාරණකම්, තක්සේරු කල යුත්තේ  පිළිවෙලින් ඔවුන් විසින්  මුස්ලිම් ජනයාට ලබා දුන් වරප්‍රසාද සමඟය. [මූලාශ්‍රය-<ලංකාවේ මුස්ලිම් වෙළෙන්දන් අරබි ශාරියා මිනීමරුවන් කිරීම> (පිටු 111-153), ලංකාව කළු සුද්දන්ගේ පාලන සමය, දෙවන භාගය: 1948-2024)]. මුස්ලිම් චන්ද බලාපොරොත්තුවෙන් හා දෙමළ පෙඩරල් පක්ෂයෙන් ඔවුන් වෙන් කරගත හැකියයි සිතා මෙම බොරු සිංහල බෞද්ධ නායකයින් කරගෙන ගිය කෛරාටික වැඩ වලට බලවත් අභියෝගයක් වූයේ බොදු බල සේනාවය. සෝම හාමුදුරුවන්ගේ සැකකටයුතු අභාවයෙන් (2003 December) පසු මතුවු  කඹ වැනි පිරිත් නූල් අතේ බැඳගත් දේශපාලකයින්ට බොදු බල සේනාවේ භුමිකාව බලවත් තර්ජනයක් විය. මීට පෙර සිදුවූ <ගේම්> එක වූයේ මහානායක හිමිවරු හා වජිරාරාමයේ හිමිවරු පාලකයාට සංදේශ යැවීමය. සෝම හමුදුරුවන් කලේ බණ මඬුවේ සිට පාලකයාට ආඩපලි දෙසීමය. එහෙත් බොදු බල සේනාවෙන් කලේ නිර්දය ලෙස පාලකයාට දොස් පැවරීමය. එය මිලිටන්ට් (ගාන්ධිගේ, ඇමෙරිකාවේ මාටින් ලූතර් කිං ගේ  වැනි), දැඩි විනයක් හා ජීවිත කැපවීමක් සහිත බෞද්ධ  අරගලයක් විය.

කඹයෙන් බැඳ කොටු කර තිබූ මුර දේවතා සංකල්පය

සෝම හාමුදුරුවන් හා බොදු බල සේනාව දුන්නේ එකම පණිවුඩය ක්‍රම දෙකකින් වුවත් ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට මුහුණ දීමට සිදුවූ ආකාරයේ මස් රාත්තල් සටනක් සෝම හිමිට එල්ලවූයේ නැත. ඒ වෙනුවට සිදුවූයේ උන්වහන්සේගේ අපවත්වීම ඝාතනයක් නොවන බව හා එතුමාට පෙම් පටලැවිල්ලක් තිබුණා යයි පෙන්වමින් මිය ගිය වික්ටර් අයිවන් විසින් NGO මුදලින්  <පන්සලේ විප්ලවය> යන නමින් පොතක් ලිවීමය (2006). බුද්ධාගම රැක ගැනීමට උපදේශ දීමට තරම් වික්ටර් නිර්භීත විය! (Revolt in the Temple: The Buddhist Revival up to Gangodawila Soma Thero, 1948-2003).

1880 ඕල්කොට් ආගමනයෙන් හා 1931/1948 න් පසුව පාලකයින් විසින් නොපෙනෙන කඹයකින් බැඳ කොටුකර තිබූ සමාජ සේවක භික්ෂුවගේ, සංදේශ ලිවීමේ පුරුද්ද වෙනුවට කඹය හා කොටුව යන භාධක දෙකම කඩා ගෙන  යාම 2012 දී බොදු බල සේනාවෙන් සිදුවිය. මේ නිසා සිංහල බෞද්ධ යයි කියා ගන්නා සෑම ඕ මයි ගෝඩ්  (බුදු අම්මෝ නොව) දේශපාලන කොල්ලන් කුරුට්ටන්ගේ  තර්ජනයට ඥානාසර හිමියන් ගොදුරු විය. චර්චිල් හෝ අන් හාමුදුරු කෙනෙකු මෙවැනි තර්ජනයකට  මුහුණ දුන්නේ නැත. සමහර ක්‍රියාශීලි හාමුදුරුවරුන් සැක කටයුතු ලෙස අපවත් වූ බවට නම් උදාහරණ එමටය (කොටිකාවත්තේ සද්ධාතිස්ස හිමියන් JVP කාරයින් විසින් ඝාතනය කලේ (1988/89) කටට වෙඩි තබාය).

සංඝ රාජයාණෝ

බොදු බල සේනාව විසින් පවතින කළු සුද්දන්ගේ පාලන සිස්ටම් එකට එල්ල කල තර්ජනය කෙතරම් යුක්තිසහගත වූවේද යත් වැඩි කලක් නොගොස්ම එහි ලේකම් ඥානසාර හිමියන්ව  ජනතාව විසින් සංඝ රාජ තුමෙක් ලෙස හඳුනා ගත්තේය. භික්ෂූන්ට පිණ්ඩපාතය දීම ගැනවත් නොදන්නා තරමට බුද්ධ ශාසනය පිරිහී ගොස් තිබූ සමයක එය ගොඩ නඟා ගැනීමට ක්‍රියාකල වැලිවිට ශ්‍රී සරණංකර සංඝ රාජ හිමියන්ට (1698-1778) පසුව, ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට භාරව ඇති රාජ කාරිය, 2012 දීටත් වඩා දැන් 2026 දී <මාර යුද්ධයක්> වැනිය.

සරණංකර හිමියන්ට විරුද්ධව සිටියේ ඒ වනවිට පිරිහීමට ලක්වී සිටි  මල්වතු-අස්ගිරි සංඝයාය. නරේන්ද්‍රසිංහ රජු සිටියේ ඔවුන් සමඟය. බොදු බල සේනාවට විරුද්ධව ක්‍රියා කලේ/කරන්නේ සමස්ත පක්ෂ දේශපාලක කළු සුද්දන් පිරිසය. මෙවැනි භාධක චර්චිල්ට ආවා නම් ඔහුට යුද්ධ කරන්නට හෝ ඉන් පසු යහතින් ජීවත් වීමට හෝ ඉඩක් ලැබේවිද?

දේශ පාලන හිරකරුවා අපරාධ කරුවෙක් කිරීමේ කුමන්ත්‍රණය

බොදු බල සේනාවේ  (BBS) අභියෝගය ඉදිරියේ එය විනාශ කිරීමට ක්‍රියා නොකල පක්ෂ දේශ-පාලකයෙක් සොයා ගැනීම කිසා ගෝතමී අබ සොයන්නට ගියා වැනිය. BBS යනු නොර්වේ ඒජන්ත කෙනෙක්, ඇමෙරිකන් ඔත්තු කාරයෙක්, අරාබිය සමඟ රහස් සම්භන්ධකම් තිබෙන්නෙක්, ජාති වාදියෙක්, මුස්ලිම්  විරෝධියෙක්, රාජපක්ෂලාගේ ඉත්තෙක්, රාජපක්ෂලාගේ මුස්ලිම් චන්ද කඩන්නට ක්‍රියා කරන්නෙක්, යනාදියෙන් පටන් ගෙන අන්තිමේදී ඥානසාර හිමියන්ට හොර දුවෙක් ඉන්නවා යයි කියන අන්දමේ පහත් අඩියකට  ඇතැම් දුර්ජනයින් නිර්භීත/නිහින විය. මොහමඩ් රාජිත යන නමට කැමති යයි කී රාජිත සේනාරත්න ලා වැනි වංචනිකයින් පමණක් නොව රජීව විජේසිංහ වැනි නම්බුකාර මහතුන් පවා නොමඟ ගියේය.

මීලඟ කොටස:

බල සේනාව බලු කූඩුවට දැමීම හා හදිසියේම  චන්ද්‍රිකා මැතිණියට බුද්ධ ශාසනය මතක් වීම


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress