Protecting whose privileges are more important in a democratic society. Is it those of Politicians or citizens?

July 23rd, 2021

Dr.Sudath Gunasekara. Mahanuwara,

The answer is very simple and straight. That is the privileges and rights of the citizen are above the politicians. The purpose of founding a State is for the protection of the natural rights of people, in the society. In a modern democracy sovereignty is in the people. Politicians are elected by the people to make legislation and run the government in order to carry out its programmes and policies to fulfill the aspirations of the people. As such citizens are the masters. To that extent politicians in theory are servants of the people and not masters as the politicians in our country think. Therefore in a democratic society politician cannot have special privileges over and above those of the masters and calling to stop detention of MPs for alleged criminal offences and protection of their privileges is unrealistic and unethical. Treating politicians like any other citizen under law will clean up the Parliament of this type of criminal elements and make it the supreme legislature of the country, as its conventional definition stands, sans criminals and rogues.

Allowing such undesirable elements to remain in Parliament seriously infringes on the rights of the people and as such to give special privileges to members of Parliament or in any other political institution as Ranil calls for is undemocratic, unethical and illegal. It is particularly so with regard to anti-social politicians who are in jail  for convicted offenses or remanded for alleged crimes, like Rishard Badurdeen and Ranjan Ramanayaka or any other. In reality the MP ship of such politicians should be first, terminated immediately and second they should be debarred from entering politics or holding any public post in future by removing their civil rights for life. Such action will clear the political stable for future generations.

But sadly the situation gradually changed after 1956. It got worsened after 1977, that opened the door for all sort of politicians like Ranil Wickramasinha, Ravi Karaunanayaka, Malik Samarawikrama Mervin Silva, Rishard Badurdeen, Hakeem, Hisbulla, Wignesvaran,  Rajita Senaratna, Duminda Silva, Champika Ranawaka, to name a few noted characters and many others who claim for more privileges, in addition to all unlimited princely packages like enhanced salaries,  many other allowances even for attending Parliament and enormous fringe benefits such as Pensions after five years for them and their spouses and five more family members as Private Secretary, Coordinating Sect, Public relation Officer, and Media Officer given by JR to these looters, appointed violating all recruitment procedures  to public service. Most of these people come to politics to make money with Government contracts, Permits for timber, sand, rubble, liquor bars, filling stations and government jobs. In addition they get luxury official vehicles and duty free Vehicle permits once in three years (They all sell these permits for 20,30 40 millions although they are meant to be used for official duties in their jobs. You can add to these privileges which I have not included.

 In addition to the 196 puppet MPP who are said to have been elected on a district basis on proportional representation basis with another political gimmick called the preference vote. None of these 196 represents any electorate. As such today people don’t have an MP of their own. Furthermore these District MPP are people nominated by the Party leadership, often parachute’s from outside the electorate who don’t have even their vote in the District. None of the MPs represents a given electorate, Sometime even people from far corners of the Island are also nominated. For example a person from Hambantota can contest a seat in Kurunegala or even Anuradhapura. In addition there are also 29 so-called National list nominees of the party leaders provided by the Constitution to accommodate their henchmen, family members, class mates, friends and people who contribute to their party funds. Most of them end up as powerful Cabinet Ministers. The funniest thing about them is they are not representatives of the people. You can just imagine how representative democracy operates in this country.

 It is for this bunch of fake representative , who don’t represent any given area or a seat or people, Ranil is asking for more privileges as if the present overflowing privileges are not enough. Just think as to how the mind of this politician who had been the PM in  this country for several times often by accident and above all who has played the leading role in two Central Bank robberies in this country by overriding the president poor Sirisena in  2015 and 2016.

 Once these privileges are given to these looters it is not going to stop there. It is like giving a razor to a monkey. It will trickle down to Provincial Council and Pradesiya Sabha Council levels as well. That is nearly another 15,000 politicians or more, are bleeding the national coffers with no service to the people or the country for the money spent. They are maintained only to collect the vote for those who go to Parliament.

 As such a country that was at the peak of prosperity in 1948 is already at rock bottom, of chronic poverty and debt being only second to Afghanistan, a land locked barren desert. Where are we being driven blindfolded by these politicians together with an overloaded public service (1 public servant for every 16 people and I politician for every 2235 men who together consume 85 % of the national tax income. This country has the highest per capita politicians and public servants in the world.

 To my knowledge no country in the world provides such enormous privileges and facilities to their politicians or public servants like this.

This situation was quite different in the early days. Because politicians at that time were of a different class and a different breed. Luxuries of Colombo life were not something new to them as they were well to do people in their electorates who got in to politics mostly for prestige. Unlike the present day politicians they never asked for new vehicles, big salaries or allowances or official quarters in Colombo.  For example even in early 1960s the allowance (Note it was not a salary) of an MP was R 500, a junior Minister was 750 and a Minister got only 1000. Only the Governor General Prime Minister and the Chief justice had official cars. At that time no politician or state officer was given official vehicles. They were given a loan to purchase a vehicle. No driver, no fuel. For official travelling they were paid a mileage allowance. In fact most of the politicians either came in their own vehicles or by train to attend Parliament. Just to mention few names, (which I give below) who have left behind a name and an indelible mark in history for work they did for the country and their electorates under that system. They all represented a particular electorate unlike today. 

D.S Senanayaka, C.W.W.Kannangara. S.w.R.D. Bandaranayaka, Wilmot  A. Perera. R.G.Senanayaka. H.B Rambukwella (Disava)  Mrs Sirimavo Bndaranayaka, D.A.Rajapaksa, R.Premadasa, T.B ilangaratna, Hector Kobbekaduwa, M.B.W.Mediwaka, M.D Banda, H.B.Wanninayaka, I.M.R.Iriyagolla, Philip Gunawardhana, C.P. De  Silva, Maitiipala Senanayaka, Lalith Atulat mudali and Gamini Disanayaka. Of the present day politicians the only name I would include in this list is Mahinda Rajapasa, for three things he did namely, defeating the 30 year old LTTE,  terrorism, the countrywide first class carpeted road network (after Governor Henry Ward 1865 who did the main road network all over the Island) and Sanda Hiru   Seya at  Anuradhapura, are few such names worth mentioning. All these people have left their own indelible mark in their service to the country and the people. But all others were only mere passengers on board in the respective Governments.

But in our system inherited from the West operating in the post-independent political culture, particularly after 1977 it had been just the opposite. Here in this country people’s sovereignty ends immediately after an election. Once the politicians are elected they become the masters. Thereafter they become Mantriituma and Amathi tuma mostly alienated from the voters for five years, overnight. We all know what happens there after, until the next election. All privileges and the control over state resources and public servants are at their command to serve their personal agendas. The real masters, the people, suffer at the other end   with spiraling cost of living, poverty and social disabilities due to absence of good governance by their elected representatives, most of them migrate to Colombo or the nearby towns and most of their time they live in Colombo after the elections enjoying the luxuries of modern life including educating their children in big schools, only day dreams for the voters.

The people who get disgusted with the politicians get another bunch of rouges elected expecting a change for betterment in their hopes and expectations But the new set always become worse than the predecessors. The vicious circle goes on and on. It never ends. This is what really happened in this country since 1948. This is the Sri Lankan political culture.

It is in this appalling and ridiculous backdrop Ranil is now crying for more privileges for the 226 in the Parliament

I am compelled to ask this question from the public as Ranil Wickramasinha, who has called for protecting the privilege of Members of Parliament as former Prime Minister who has ruined the age old UNP presently in Parliament as the National list MP accorded to him by his followers as a gift for burying the 74 year old UNP and not for any service he has rendered to this country or the people as a politician who has enjoyed the privileges of Prime minister, even by accident, for five short spells.

In his speech in Parliament under reference he has referred to the British constitutional theorist Thomas Erskyne May’s seminal work on parliamentary procedure. Wickremesinghe said: Erskyne May has said attempts to influence members in their conduct by threat is a breach of parliamentary privilege. So this is intimidation of a member which violates the privilege of the house. Where did Erskyne May, in his wisdom, advised the Parliament to keep criminals and rogues in Parliament with impunity. Can Ranil give at least one such instant? Did he know that Kyne’s venerated thesis that was considered the ‘Sumnum Bonum of liberal economic policy immediately after the second World war period it was later (as early as 1958)   heavily contradicted by John Kenneth Galbraith in 1958 in his classic The Affluent Society”

Isn’t it a tragedy for a Sri Lankan politician to quote from a British constitutional theorist of 1940s to substantiate his argument without being able to quote from a native authority who shined as a national leader during its 2500 years of glorious history? His quotation clearly demonstrates the poverty of present day leaders on their own heritage and the servility and colonial mentality these Kalusuddhas still carry in their empty heads.  Isn’t this poverty of philosophy that ails the heads of our politicians, the biggest tragedy why we cannot advance as a new Nation while countries like Korea, Singapore (an Island port city only 25,000 reclaimed land from the sea) and Israel a virtual desert who were lagging behind us as shanties, when we were the second developed nation in Asia by 1948 now have become economic giants within few decades since 1960 s. As for me I put the entire blame on our visionless and unpatriotic politicians who are supposed to have mishandled this nation for this tragedy.

Open Letter seeking clarification: Yasmin Sooka & EU Funding for ITJP-Sri Lanka via Foundation for Human Rights South Africa

July 23rd, 2021

Shenali D Waduge

16 July 2021
Ms. Fiona Knab-Lunny
European Commission
MEMBER OF CABINET
+32 (0) 2 29 60220
Email: fiona.knab-lunny@ec.europa.eu 
cc: cab-borrell-fontelles-contact@ec.europa.eu 

Dear Ms. Fiona Knab-Lunny

Open Letter seeking clarification: Yasmin Sooka & EU Funding for ITJP-Sri Lanka via Foundation for Human Rights South Africa

This email letter is to seek clarification and appropriate action by you with regard to Yasmin Sooka former Executive Director of Foundation for Human Rights who via this EU-Funded entity created for the people of South Africa, was administering an entity called International Truth & Justice Project-Sri Lanka and issuing more reports against Sri Lanka than the work she was paid to do by EU for FHR-South Africa. 

The primary question is did EU sanction Yasmin Sooka to create ITJP-Sri Lanka under FHR-South Africa? If so, can you explain why an EU funded project for South Africa should plug a project that is anti-Sri Lanka? Sri Lanka & South Africa are located in two different continents.

Yasmin Sooka was an EU employee in 2001 & became the Executive Director of the Foundation for Human Rights South Africa (formed by EU-South African Govt in 1996)

The Foundation is funded by EU & Belgium & receives funding from Ireland CARE, UN bodies & even American Foundation. The foundation’s scope of work is SOUTH AFRICA not Sri Lanka.

Her position as Executive Director of FHR-South Africa ended in September 2019 but her position as Director ITJP-SL continues – is she still being paid by EU via FHR & why?

How can a EU funded South African human rights project administer another project (International Truth & Justice Project-Sri Lanka since 2014) that has nothing to do with South Africa or South Africans? 

If EU is funding human rights initiatives in South Africa via the Foundation for Human Rights who allowed ITJP to be administered through the Foundation for Human Rights? 

If the EU paid for Sooka to function as Executive Director of FHR did the EU also pay for her to function as Director ITJPSL within the FHR? 

Is this funding approved by EU tax payers? (2 salaries?)

Was EU funding for FHR-South Africa, used for ITJP-Sri Lanka with or without EU knowledge by Yasmin Sooka? 

Is the EU aware that Yasmin Sooka is/was Executive Director of FHR while also being head of ITJP-SL?  http://www.itjpsl.com

If EU is not funding ITJP(SL) which is administered within FHR why is EU allowing ITJP-SL to be administered through FHR-South Africa? 

https://www.fhr-mirror.org.za/?ccm_paging_p_b2194=3

https://itjpsl.com

Though Sooka relinquished duties as Executive Director of FHR in September 2019, the ITJPSL reports on Sri Lanka has only increased. Is FHR really involved in South Africa or churning reports against Sri Lanka via ITJPSL?

From 2014-2021 (7 years), the ITJPSL and Sooka has issued a record breaking 164 reports on Sri Lanka in English, Tamil & Sinhalese. How many reports has she issued on South Africa? South Africans should start counting!

What is the connection with EU funded FHR & ITJP(SL) Sri Lanka?  

https://www.fhr.org.za(put a search for the name ITJPSL on Foundation for Human Rightswebsite – all that appears is sorry, but nothing matched your search items”)  

If FHR website does not mention ITJPSL – how can ITJP-SL on its website claim that it is being administered by FHR & its Executive Director Sooka? 

(pl note that since 2021 the ITJPSL introduction has been changed. Below a screen shot of previous introduction is given as proof)

As per Sigrid Rausing Trust website from 2014 to March 2019 the Sigrid Rausing Trust has given £471,500 to ITJP (Sri Lanka) and a further £300,000 from 1stApril 2019 to 2020. But the Trust’s NewsStories from 2013 to 2020 does not cover a single story on Sri Lanka.   

Highlighting some of her biased & controversial reports via ITJP-SL

·     ITJP-SL 2014 report gave 40 selected cases most of whom were former LTTE illegal combatants seeking asylum in UK. This report was funded by the British Foreign Office through the Bar Human Rights Committee of England & Wales.

·     In June 2018 Yasmin Sooka & ITJP-SL submitted a list of 351 missing persons to the Office of Missing Persons Sri Lanka (inspite of Sooka & ITJP claiming 40000-200,000 dead/missing in Sri Lanka’s conflict) 

Her association with other anti-Sri Lanka campaigns 

·     Advisory Council Member of Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace & Justice along with anti-SL documentary maker Callum MaCrae of Channel 4 UK. 

·     2013 – she was a guest speaker at Global Tamil Forum (proscribed as LTTE front by the Government of Sri Lanka in April 2014). She was introduced as ‘comrade’. 

·     2013 – Yasmin Sooka called upon Commonwealth Heads of Government to boycott CHOGM in Sri Lanka & praised Canada for boycotting. This is not how a public figure presumably unbiased conducts herself.

·     2014 – Yasmin Sooka joined a petition (2ndsignatory) by Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace & Justice http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/28557

·     2014 – Yasmon Sooka endorsed another report against Sri Lanka http://cja.org/downloads/Crimes%20Against%20Humanity%20in%20Sri%20Lanka_s%20Northern%20Province.pdf

·     2014 March – Yasmin Sooka writes an article to the Mail & Guardian about ‘White Vans” – she has never even landed in Sri Lanka but she cannot name anyone who she claims to have ‘disappeared’ http://mg.co.za/article/2014-03-31-sri-lanka-living-in-fear-of-the-white-vans.

ITJPSL had to make an apology to Brig. Ravindra Dias for wrongfully using his picture claiming it to be Maj. Gen. Suresh Salley, the Director of State Intelligence Service. Maj. Gen. Suresh Salley is taking legal action against Sooka separately!

To cover up this embarrassment, her outfit is now targeting patriotic diaspora groups and singling out individuals figuring prominently to safeguard the sovereignty of Sri Lanka. 

As a public figure and the manner Yasmin Sooka has been issuing reports against Sri Lanka without even visiting Sri Lanka, we have every right to raise questions as to why she is so particular about only Sri Lanka over & above every other country in the world, including the countries she serves as Member of Truth Commissions etc. We find this concern” for Sri Lanka by her very puzzling and her actions questionable. She became involved with Sri Lanka in 2010 as one of former UNSG Ban Ki Moon’s personally selected 3 panel members for his personally commissioned report on Sri Lanka after the conflict ended in 2009. This report was leaked to the public in 2011 and in 2013 became referred to as a ‘comrade’ by a pro-LTTE Group designated and banned as a LTTE front in 2014. 

Be that as it may, the EU funds global initiatives using EU tax payers money. It is appropriate for the Ministers in charge to see if funds sent by EU for social initiatives in South Africa have been used against Sri Lanka as well as answer how the FHR-South Africa funded by EU can operate an entity called ITJP-SL of which Sooka is head when FHR-South Africa website has no records of ITJP-SL or links to it. 

Can you please be kind enough to respond to any of the questions raised, or in the least commence an inquiry to ascertain the validity of the questions posed to you in this mail. We find it very strange that an international public figure who has never been to Sri Lanka and was involved with Sri Lanka only after 2010, could hate Sri Lanka so much to use her position in a manner that citizens of Sri Lanka find hurtful in view of the conclusions she promotes internationally using her public office. 

Therefore, we would like the EU to make clear of the links between FHR-South Africa & ITJP-Sri Lanka an explanation as to why EU would fund ITJP-SL within the FHR-SA and why FHR-SA does not carry any mention or link to ITJP-SL in its records/website yet ITJP-SL claims it is administered via FHR-SA with Yasmin Sooka functioning as Executive Director of FHR from 2001-2019(Sept) and Director of ITJP-SL from 2014 to present (based on the reports)

Thanking you

Shenali D Waduge

Sri Lanka 

ERASING THE EELAM VICTORY Part 20 C14

July 23rd, 2021

KAMALIKA PIERIS

(Continued from C13)

MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT,  (2018)

In May 2018, the government gazetted sweeping amendments to the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, No. 25 of 2002.  This amendment  became Act no 24 of 2018.

CA Chandraprema has commented at length on the Bill..The purpose of the original Act, said Chandraprema, was to facilitate the provision of mutual assistance from foreign countries in the location of witnesses or suspects, the service of documents on such persons, the examination of witnesses, the obtaining of evidence, the execution of requests for search and seizure, the temporary transfer of persons in custody to appear as a witness, facilitation of the personal appearance of witnesses, the location of the proceeds of any criminal activity, and mutual enforcement of orders for the forfeiture or freezing of property, etc.

Requests for assistance were to be made to the ‘Central Authority’ in Sri Lanka by the appropriate authorities in the countries that come under the ambit of this Act.The Secretary to the Ministry of Justice was to be the ‘Central Authority’ for the purposes of that Act. The Central Authority is also enjoined to ensure prompt action in respect of all requests from abroad and to have a dedicated unit to maintain a proper system to manage incoming and outgoing requests.

 The original Act applied only to specified Commonwealth countries and non-Commonwealth countries which have signed the relevant agreements with Sri Lanka  but the  2018 amendments extend the scope of the Act to all countries that have signed any international convention relating to a criminal matter to which Sri Lanka has become a party.  Furthermore, while the original Act applied only to States, the amendments  bring  in international organizations as well.

The amending Bill seeks to lay the country completely open to all foreign states and organizations, when it comes to granting  assistance in investigations and judicial proceedings, connected with criminal matters,  observed Chandraprema.

This Bill  also seeks to make documentary evidence obtained in a foreign country admissible in a judicial proceeding. And to make admissible evidence led from a foreign country through video conferencing technology.

 Another new feature in the amending Bill is that the Central Authority in Sri Lanka (the Secretary to the Ministry of Justice) can authorize any other officer not below the rank of a Senior Assistant Secretary, to act on his behalf and the Central Authority can also designate ‘competent authorities’ (which can be a law enforcement authority) who will process information to requests as directed by the Central Authority.

 Requests can also be forwarded by electronic means directly to the relevant competent authority through the appropriate authority of a foreign country or organization. The competent authority is then obliged to immediately proceed to implement the request after forwarding a copy of the relevant request to the Central Authority.

The Central Authority and the officers holding delegated authority from him including the competent authorities are to maintain strict confidentiality with regard to requests made under this Act. If confidentiality cannot be upheld, the appropriate authority of a specified country or specified organization will be informed and this foreign body will then determine whether the request should nevertheless be executed.

Any person who fails to comply with this confidentiality requirement commits an offence and the High Court of the Province can impose a fine on that person ranging from a minimum of Rs. 100,000 to a maximum of Rs. 5 million. The Right to Information law will therefore, not apply to anything done under this amended Act.

These sweeping amendments to the 2002 Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act are being brought in a specific context. This government has already established the Office of Missing Persons Act No: 5 of 2018 and Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances Act.

It is in that context that we have to view the changes contemplated to the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, No. 25 of 2002. On the one hand the number of foreign countries coming within the ambit of the original Act has been expanded to include every country that is a party to an international Convention relating to mutual assistance in criminal matters, to which Sri Lanka has become a party – which automatically includes the countries in the  International Convention for the Prevention of Enforced Disappearances.

Furthermore, the amendment will make the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, applicable to organizations associated with combating international crime as well  and this will automatically  take Sri Lanka to the International Criminal Court.

The  actions stipulated in  the International Convention for the Prevention of Enforced Disappearances cannot  be implemented without the facilities that are created through the proposed amendment to the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, No. 25 of 2002.

In view of the dangers posed by this proposed amendment to the 2002 Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, several petitioners including Admiral Sarath Weerasekera and Ven. Maduruoye Dhammissara ,went before the Supreme Court asking for a determination that the Bill before Parliament was unconstitutional.

 One of the provisions in the proposed amendment which engaged the attention of the Supreme Court was Clause 5(3) which stipulated that when requests are forwarded by foreign nations or organizations by electronic means directly to the relevant competent authority, the latter is mandatorily required to immediately proceed to implement the request. (The word used was ‘shall; which denotes a mandatory requirement).

The Supreme Court observed that Section 6 of the original Act of 2002 obliges the Central Authority to refuse a request if it violates the Constitution, but that no such restrictions have been put in place to regulate the conduct of the Competent Authority who is to be appointed by the Central Authority under the terms of the proposed amendment.

The SC observed that this omission carries significant constitutional implications because Clause 5 (3) of the Bill makes it mandatory for the Competent Authority to directly receive and immediately proceed to implement requests from overseas and furthermore, this is given further impetus by Clause 5 (4) of the Bill which only requires the Competent Authority to inform the Central Authority by forwarding a copy of the relevant request before he responds to it. Therefore, the SC determined that Clause 5(3) is inconsistent with Article 12 (1) of the Constitution which guarantees that all persons are equal before the law and are entitled to the equal protection of the law. The SC held that it is imperative that the Competent Authority have the power under Section 6 of the original Act to refuse a request. This would enable both the Competent Authority and the Central Authority to filter requests.

The SC also made a reference to Clause 5B in the proposed amendment which went as follows: “Nothing in this Act shall prevent the Central Authority from directing a competent authority to spontaneously transmit the information requested relating to a criminal matter to an appropriate authority of a specified country or specified organization on the assurance of reciprocity and on such conditions as may be necessary for the purposes of confidentiality.”

In this regard, the SC held that to the extent that clause 5B sets an exception to the normal process, there must be a corresponding justification or a circumstance which warrants the invocation of clause 5B. The clause in its present form permits digression from the normal process in an ad hoc manner and thereby violates Article 12 (1) of the Constitution. The SC stated that if Clause 5B is amended reserving it as a response to exigencies, this inconsistency would cease to exist.

The question that we have to ask ourselves is where we stand now after the Supreme Court determination on the Bill to amend the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, No. 25 of 2002.  With the SC determination on the proposed amendment to the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act, No. 25 of 2002 which will enable it to be passed with suitable amendments, we see that the Yahapalana government’s war crimes project is now ready for take-off.

 If there was opposition to having foreign judges to hear war crimes cases, that problem has been solved by having a mechanism whereby members of the armed forces can be tried overseas and even if the person concerned is living in Sri Lanka where he can be requested by a foreign country to stand trial in that country. The only way to prevent what the government has been angling for is through political action concluded Chandraprema.  ( end of Section 20C  , series continues)

ERASING THE EELAM VICTORY Part 20 C13

July 23rd, 2021

KAMALIKA PIERIS

 (continued from C12)

UN CONVENTION ON ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES (2018)

Sri Lanka signed the UN International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances (ICPPED) in December 2015 and in March 2018 passed a Bill to incorporate its provisions into Sri Lanka law. The Bill was passed, without amendments, amidst disturbances from the Joint Opposition.

The bill was withdrawn twice by the government, due to protests from the Maha Sangha and the Joint Opposition. They observed that all matters that relate to an enforced disappearance,   such as abduction, illegal confinement, murder and the illegal disposal of dead bodies  are adequately covered by the Penal Code and the existing criminal law in Sri Lanka. 

Many countries have kept away from this Convention altogether, because of its intrusive nature, observed critics,  Australia, Britain, Canada, China, Russia and Pakistan and United States have not signed this Convention. Denmark, Finland, Ireland, India, Norway and Sweden signed but never ratified it.  Sri Lanka was therefore signing a convention which other countries, including  countries which  sponsored resolutions against us in the UNHRC, had refused to sign, observed  critics.

In Sri Lanka however,   ambassadors of several EU nations had been present at the meeting held in December 2016, to finalize the new Bill. Ambassadors of France, European Union, Netherlands, Germany, Italy, Romania and the British High Commissioner had been present.

Critics point out that the proposed law is an attempt to subject our armed forces to an international court by rephrasing ‘war crimes’ as ‘disappearances’. The use of the word ‘disappearances’ makes this look like an attempt to trace missing persons. But the purpose of this Bill is not to trace missing persons but to hunt down and prosecute those who won the war. Any state which has signed this Convention can get a Sri Lankan extradited to their country and try him in court.

 The only ‘disappeared’ persons, whose cases will be dealt with under this proposed law, will be those of the LTTE. LTTE combatants who have either died in battle or fled overseas continue to be labeled as having ‘disappeared’. The armed forces have already categorized the thousands of soldiers who disappeared as ‘assumed to be dead’.

Article 2 of the Convention makes it applicable only to State Actors which means that this is aimed only at the armed forces and terrorist movements like the LTTE are expressly excluded. No action will be taken by any foreign country against LTTE, because ICPPED does not have any provision to include non-State actors within its ambit. Not only are Non-state actors, like the LTTE expressly excluded from this legislation, they are protected as well. This Bill is designed to protect future terrorists said critics.

Under Article 10 of the ICPPED any person suspected of causing enforced disappearances can be arrested in the home state or any other member state, regardless of whether there is an extradition treaty or not.

After the arrest, the individual concerned can under Article 11 be a) prosecuted in that country b) extradited to another country) or handed over to an international criminal tribunal.  if that foreign country happens to be a member of the International Criminal Court, then the person charged can be handed over to the ICC. This means that now no one can say that Sri Lanka cannot be handed over to the ICC simply because it has not signed the Rome Statute.

Articles 10, 11 and 13 of the Convention read together with Clauses 8 and 21 of the  Sri Lanka Act means that foreign countries which are members of the International Convention will have complete jurisdiction over Sri Lankans who are alleged to have been involved in causing enforced disappearances in Sri Lanka.

Clauses 20(1) & (2) of this Bill read together with Clause 14 confirms that  this law will have retrospective effect, which means it can be used for the Eelam war. Within three months of a person becoming aware that he has still not received news of what happened to someone 10 or even 20 years ago, that person can make an application to the High Court under Clause 20, asking for relief.

To charge a person abroad, it is necessary to extradite him, and for this, laws are necessary.  Sri Lanka has its Extradition Act No. 8 of 1977. Therefore Clause 23of the Enforced Disappearance Act   says the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other written law and accordingly in the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of this Act and such other written law, the provisions of this Act shall prevail.” 

This means this Act will override all other written law  and the Extradition Act No. 8 of 1977 becomes ineffective.  The right of a Sri Lankan to move court against extradition is taken away. The safeguards, afforded to Sri Lankans, in case foreign governments sought their extradition are now removed.

Article 32 of the Convention (which the Sri Lankan government has accepted by a separate declaration) enables any member State to complain to the 10-member ‘Committee on Enforced Disappearances’ in Geneva that Sri Lanka is not fulfilling her obligations under this Convention and the Committee can investigate such complaints.

This means that foreign countries which are members of the ICPPED will have complete jurisdiction over Sri Lankans who are alleged to have carried out enforced disappearances in Sri Lanka. This Bill gives foreign countries complete and untrammeled criminal jurisdiction over Sri Lankans in relation to the offence of ‘enforced disappearances’.

Critics observed that anyone can be extradited to another state on a mere accusation. Such accusations could originate in Sri Lanka or elsewhere. The Bill has no provision for any formal procedures  that should be followed within Sri Lanka or outside, not even a preliminary investigation, except for what the Minister in charge of the subject decides. The lack of any formal procedures to establish the credibility of the accusation prior to extradition presents ample opportunities for victimization.

Ladduwahetty saw many weaknesses in the Bill. This Bill   contains articles that contradict each other, he said. Also provisions in the Bill violate the Constitution of Sri Lanka. The Constitution permits arresting and locking up people   during an emergency, but the Bill does not.  Constitution does not permit retrospective legislation.  The Bill is   retrospective. since the Bill contradicts the Constitution of Sri Lanka, either the Bill has to be revised, or the Constitution has to be amended.  

Since provisions in the ICPPED also violate provisions in the Constitution of Sri Lanka, the Government should be asked explain why it signed the UN Convention on Disappearances. Further under provisions of Article 33 (f) the President does not have the authority to sign and ratify this UN Convention, concluded Ladduwahetty.

People confuse the Bill on the Office of Missing Persons with the Bill on Enforced Disappearances. The OMP Act is nowhere near as dangerous as the Enforced Disappearance Act. The OMP Act is only a very specific instance of a “missing person”. A person could be “missing” for a variety of reasons, but an “enforced disappearance” is carried out by agents of the State. It is on account of this very difference that there are 2 separate Acts. (continued in C14)

‘’ROLE OF AMBASSIES AND CONSULATES IN PROMOTING EXPORTS AND INVESTMENTS’’

July 23rd, 2021

Sarath Wijesinghe former Ambassador to UAE and Israel and President Ambassador’s Forum

Knowledge and competence of an Ambassador

Ambassadors and Consuls are those nominated by the country of origin to the host country by the head of the country to represent the Head and the country and the nation, for matters specifically expected by the representatives with enormous responsibility thrust upon by the Nation. Ambassador is a diplomat and the official envoy of a nation and the head of the state, who represents the state and the head of the state usually accredited to another sovereign state or to an international organization. Embassies are headed by Ambassadors and High Commissioners with enormous responsibilities on internal and international political and economic responsibilities mainly on promoting the good will and foreign policy other state politics and economy of the state. The candidates chosen are of the highest quality and education standers and competence to engage in diplomatic duties, such as meeting foreign leaders, Negotiate the agreements and treatises, Monitor International situations, Direct the foreign service staff, oversee foreign aid and business projects,engage and entertain visitors and many other conventional and traditional duties expected by an ambassador during the tenure of the office. Appointment of the Ambassador is the prerogative and responsibility of the head of the state, who will bear responsibility of the conduct and competence, approved by the High Post Committee of the Parliament consisting of a group of selected members of the Parliament of the competence which is rarely rejected or contested. Ambassadors should be extremely learned on the practice and conventions guided by such as the Vienna Convention and relevant treatises. Foreign policy officials may be conversant with the diplomatic process and the others selected from and out of the learned, professionals or academics will be given a brief training and expected to study by themselves. A main criteria and a requirement for an Ambassador in a commonwealth country such as Sri Lanka being an educated nation with citizens is a good commented of English language and academic excellence with high competence on written and spoken English to go through and academic or impromptu speech before audiences. Ambassadors are normally resident in the host country or supervise the neighbouring countries for convenience and the Consulates are managed by diplomats, officers in the trade Ministry, or other appointees appointed to deal with specific duties mainly on trade commerce and connected matters. Some Counsel Generals are paid by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Ministry of trade and in some cases they hold honorary positions for specific duties. The head of the state has the sole prerogative on the appointment of Ambassadors at his wish and generally advised by the Minister of foreign affairs which is a practice and not mandatory. Ambassadors appointed are to be of highest education qualifications of an area of discipline, and learned on foreign policy and relations and competence in spoken and written language in main languages accepted by the United Nations, preferable English Language well-mannered with excellent backgrounds in professional academic or educational standards. Today the nations have given highest priority to economic diplomacy through the state outlets including embassies and consulate offices. There is trade war and influences of world economic powers on smaller nations to align themselves to their click as the word economic powers have grouped together such as G7 and many other ways. In this context the Ambassadors and Consul Generals have a pivot role in promoting the respective states with the network of outlets worldwide using diplomatic skills and influences. In that context the economic role of the Ambassador is numerous. The privileges and responsibilities have to be developed communicated and utilized to the advantage of the country they represent. It is a part of the mandate to develop people to people contacts and take steps on economic promotion. Exploiting for FDI, investment opportunities and export promotions are to be campaigned with the help of the assigned and tamed staff on commercial dealings. Business Promotions during the global Economic Shift on activisms of China, Brazil, India, Russia, and South Africa despite the shifts of the traditional west and the world effects of the corona pandemic which has shaken the world over looking for new avenues.

Diplomacy

The term diplomacy refers to dealings with other states on trade economy culture environment human rights strategies, s advantages and many other areas this is generally led by the leader of the state with the foreign minister and the embassies around the world. In some countries the foreign minister is entrusted with the work personally handled by the head of the estate. Some countries the head handles in person. State deal with the rest of the countries via foreign ministers, the Ambassadors and embassies. Ambassadors have adopted a similar method in running the Embassies and performing duties with other Embassies and host countries including the business communities Chambers of Commerce and Trade Organizations. Today the Foreign Ministry of a country performs a pivotal role on economic development and therefore will go beyond traditional diplomacy in dealing with the member states. Countries have given highest priority to Economic Trade investment and business resulting in an amalgamation of economic and traditional diplomacy in the interaction between states. With the advent of modern developments in technology and communication, states have been brought closer than ever where news and information is imparted in seconds breaking all traditional barriers. Trade war has replaced traditional wars as the priority of any modern nation is promotion of trade, commerce and other sectors such as agriculture and hi-tech innovations. Economic Diplomacy is a form of diplomacy to utilize the full spectrum of economic facts and realities in a State to achieve success in international goals in foreign policy which is an extension of national policy and interest. This includes all policy issues and economic activities in the private and public sector which in turn concerns economic policy issues. In UAE the heads of business Chambers have been elevated to the positions of Ambassadors and the State is patronizing the business community. Sri Lanka have an Embassy in Abu – Dhabi rich in oil, and the consulate in Dubai the business commercial and tourist canters with large number of Asian and African labor force.

Her Highness ‘Sheikha Lubna’ (Minister of Foreign Trade) personally led the powerful forty member trade delegation to Sri Lanka,

 Initiated by then Ambassador in UAE, with a strong delegation of over forty and in return to Sri Lanka with similar assignments and goodwill. This trend was followed by the initiation of the Embassy and Ambassador to invite the President of Sri Lanka to UAE for the Energy Summit and bilateral discussions which are duties and responsibilities of the Embassy and the Ambassador. The Israeli Chambers made a number of trade missions to Sri Lanka and a rousing welcome was given to the Sri Lankan Head of State concentrating on trade and commerce in addition to traditional diplomacy having had a series of serious discussions with then Prime Minister Mr ‘Nethinharue’. The visit was initiated by the embassy and Ambassador of Israel especially to exchange the innovations and knowledge of the agricultural and other innovations with strengthening bilateral relations. Ambassadors in EU ware actively canvassing Sri Lankan Government on business avenues and facilities. Even the Ambassadors in world powers such as USA, UK, France, China Germany and other major powers have given targets to the Ambassadors for mega projects on aviation, Infrastructure and development schemes for projects. All the states in the world family has given top priority to economic progress through economic diplomacy process. Economic policies are formulated and implemented with the guidance and direction of the Ambassadors with the Foreign Ministry/Minister for development and to obtain resources, funds and business which is a competitive factor and a science today. Economic policy is independent on the foreign policy of the country and should generally be consistent irrespective of the change of governments. In India governments will change but not the foreign and economic policies. This is the case in many parts of the world and it is time we follow suit in our own interest. State craft in economic diplomacy by the term diplomacy refers to dealings with other states on Trade, War, Economy, Culture, Environment, Human Rights, Strategic advantages and many other areas. This is generally led by the leader of the State with the Foreign Minister and the Embassies around the world. In some countries the Foreign Minister is entrusted with the work personally handled by the head of the state. Some countries the head handles it in person and some through the Foreign Minister depending on the trust and the relationship with the head of the state and respective ministers.

Embassies and Consulates

States deal with the rest of the world via the Foreign Ministries, the Ambassadors and Embassies. Ambassadors have adopted a unique  methods in running the Embassies and performing duties with other Embassies and host countries including the business communities Chambers of Commerce and Trade Organizations traditionally on and with the advice of the respective Foreign Ministries and head of states , which gives an impact of the country and the future on investments and exports. Today the Foreign Ministry of a country performs a pivotal role on economic development and therefore will go beyond traditional diplomacy in dealing with the member states on trade commerce including exports and investments. Sri Lanka has 50 Embassies and 103 consulates in the network dealing with the rest of the world. Countries have given highest priority to Economic Trade investment and business resulting in an amalgamation of economic and traditional diplomacy in the interaction between states. With the advent of modern developments in technology and communication, states have been brought closer than ever where news and information is imparted in seconds breaking all traditional barriers. Trade war has replaced traditional wars as the priority of any modern nation is promotion of trade, commerce and other sectors such as agriculture and hi-tech innovations. Diplomatic missions spread worldwide as EU319, China 276, USA273, France 267, japan 247, Russia 282,UK 205,and Sri Lanka 67 of the states indicate the diplomatic network and connections which is linked to economy and foreign relations, UN acting in the middle playing an important an pivotal role as the world organization actively involved  with the states via IMF,WTO, and other subsidiary organizations linked and supervised via the Vienna Convention and diplomatic relations of 1961,with links with  the 1815 initiative. International Relations is relations with states with each other and with international organizations and groups with the basis of and connected to diplomacy and diplomatic relations with and among states, which are a set of formal legal institutions now consisting of over 190 nation states which are sovereign based on the UN Charter, with political and economic entities full of economic and political nationalism toward themselves.

Promoting investments and exports

The main and pivot roles expected by the Embassies and Consulates of respective states are, promoting the policies and businesses of respective nations, the trade policies exports and investments as the main outlets of the state. Whether this is adequately done in Sri Lanka by the network of Sri Lankan Ambassadors and Counsel Generals is a moot issue, but we find many Embassies worldwide small or large stationed in Sri Lanka works hard in promoting their policies and businesses in promoting their respective nations. Though we are not aware and known the allegations of a leading lady ambassador in a most powerful country approaching the Oil Minister in influencing a mega deal, we are aware these things are happening in Sri Lanka discreetly and openly canvassing their respective countries that we have not heard of on our Ambassadors and Counsel Generals worldwide which is not a satisfactory situation. In the circumstances steps taken by the International Chamber of Commerce in Sri Lanka in partnership with Sri Lanka- China Business Counsel of the Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, Colombo stock Exchange, European Chamber of Commerce of Sri Lanka, and the daily Financial Times in organizing a webinar to discuss the role of Embassies and Consulates in promoting exports and Investments on 31str of July 2021, from04.PM – 06.00 PM (SL time) and will live casted via ICCL Facebook TV CH.20on Peo – TV is on the right direction salutary and encouraging indeed.

The Keynote address to the webinar to be delivered by Ambassador Robert Blake, – currently US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian affairs from 2009-2013, while presentations to be delivered by Mr Crispin Conroy AM Ambassador/Permanent observer to the United nations at Geneva and Representative to  the World Trade Organization at ICC, with  PENALIATS Mr Rohitha Bogollagama – former Minister of Foreign Affairs in  Sri Lanka, H.E Saroja Sirisena – High Commissioner of Sri Lanka to United  Kingdom, – H.E  Shashikala Premawardena High commissioner of Sri Lanka to Singapore, – H.E.Riaz Hamimidullah Ambassador of Bangladesh to the Netherlands  – H.E Dr Palitha Kohona, – Mr Bernadrd Goonatilaka a former Secretory to Foreign Ministry of Sri Lanka , – H.E Saroja Sirisena –  High Commissioner of Sri Lanka to the  United Kingdom, H.E.Shashikla Premewardena  – High Commissioner of Singapore, H.E.Riaz Hamidullah Ambassador of Bangaladesh to the Netherlands ,H.E Dr Palitha Kohona Ambassador of Sri Lanka in the Peoples Rebublic of China – Mr Sarath Wijesinghe President’s Counsel and former Ambassador to UAE and Israel, President Ambassador’s Forum Mr  Lasiri Mendis Former Ambassador to Austria, Mr Sanjaya Mohattala Chairman Board of Investments Sri Lanka, Mr Rajive Bandarneika CEO Colombo Exchange Mr Laxman Hulugalle  Counsel General to Sydney Australia, Dr Jurgen Morhard Consulate General German Consulate General Mumbai India, Dr Prakesh Pandey first Secetary Economic and Commercial Indian High Commission of Sri Lanka, – Mr Li Guangjun Economic and Commercial Consular Embassy of Peoples Republic of China with  Moderators Mr Buddhitha K Atauda former Ambassador to Netherlands France and Spain Mr Dinesh Weerakoody, and Mr Nister Cassim. Webinar is open to those who register themselves in advance which will cater the diplomats, academics, students, and those interested in foreign policy and foreign relations.

ERASING THE EELAM VICTORY Part 20 C10

July 23rd, 2021

KAMALIKA PIERIS

The war cry” for war crimes came from the west which is smarting from the defeat of the LTTE in Eelam war IV. This   essay looks at the various measures used to bring the Sri Lanka army before a war crimes tribunal.

The International Criminal Court  is the   sole  international tribune for war crimes but it is not possible to shoot Sri Lanka straight in, because Sri Lanka   has not signed the Rome Statute. So the west turned to the UNHRC.                                                         

UN Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) charged that war crimes had been committed in the Eelam war and that war tribunals were needed.  However, the UNHRC and OHCHR   do not have the authority to set up war tribunals. The only UN body that can send Sri Lanka   to an international war crimes tribunal is the UN Security Council. Security Council refused to do so when approached by USA in 2015.  

The only other way for the west to get   war crimes charges through, against Sri Lanka was to get it done internally. West has no way of instituting such an inquiry except by getting it done internally, said analysts, by getting the Sri Lanka government to set up a war crimes inquiry   as in Sierra Leone, Cambodia and Lebanon. Sri Lanka however, said bluntly that no war crimes were committed during the Eelam War and they were not going to hold a war crimes inquiry.

HYBRID COURTS

UNHRC then recommended that Sri Lanka cooperate voluntarily with the UN to set up a hybrid war crimes tribunal.  Hybrid courts are composed of both foreign and domestic judges, and the cases are conducted by local and foreign lawyers using both international and national law. 

Hybrid courts have functioned in Kosovo, Timor Leste, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Burundi, and Lebanon. Sri Lanka is not comparable to any of these countries, observed critics, contemptuously. The local judiciary could handle this matter, outside judges were not needed.  In any case, what is the significance of having foreign investigators and judges. Are the judgments pronounced by such foreign judges more valid”, than those pronounced by Sri Lankan judges, critics asked.

Hybrid courts have now lost credibility, said critics. The hybrid court in Cambodia  (2003)  delivered only three convictions after 14 years of effort  and the  costs  exceeded USD 200 million.  Hybrid courts  cost too much for the host country  alone.  They are generally funded, managed and run by Western countries and cater to Western interests.  

Hybrid courts undermined the domestic judicial system, wherever they have been established, observed  critics.  Evidence rules are lower than those in the  national legal systems and life sentences can be handed down on little evidence.

U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy, of the    US  Senate Judiciary Committee, speaking on Sri Lanka at the U.S. Senate, in June 9, 2015 strongly recommended a  hybrid  court.  Human Rights Watch,  campaigned  in 2016 for a hybrid court  where the majority of judges were foreign. HRW also wanted an international chief prosecutor.

There was support in Sri Lanka too for a Hybrid Court. The Tamil separatists wanted a   Hybrid court. They said the local judges are not to be trusted . Jehan Perera said the  Tamil civilians (victims”) are demanding an international or hybrid system of courts with  foreign judges as they  do not trust  local courts.  J.C. Weliamuna,  former head of Transparency International said   the Sri Lanka judiciary lacked the capacity to investigate system crimes.   Also  that the  international community could not be expected to have faith in our judiciary since we ourselves have no faith in it.  

Neville Ladduwahetty pointed out   that the local legal system is  perfectly capable of hearing war crimes cases. Cases involving military personnel can  also be investigated and tried within the military court system, as is the practice in many other countries, especially those whose forces are involved in active military duties.  

UNIVERSAL  JURISDICTION.

 The UNHCR Resolutions on Sri Lanka recommended Universal Jurisdiction. Zeid al Hussein,  UNHCHR asked for this twice in one UN  session.

The doctrine of universal jurisdiction allows the law courts of one country to  try persons  of another nationality, who have committed war crimes in another country, provided there is evidence or reasonable ground for the suspicion of guilt . Many countries do not permit their nationals to be extradited  for this purpose. Therefore some countries  allow Universal jurisdiction  in absentia.

 The Economist” reported in  2021 that the number of universal jurisdiction cases is rising. There have been 815 cases from 2008-2017. At least 16 countries have heard cases.  There were 71 completed cases,  mostly with convictions,  40% African, 25% Middle East, 20% Europe and 8%  Asia.

Ladduwahetty writing in 2021  pointed out that thought universal jurisdiction  is accepted  in the case of international armed conflicts (Protocol I),   there is  still no  decision on whether it applies to non-international conflicts as in Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka takes the position that there is no possibility of universal jurisdiction in the Eelam war, because there is no case. No self-respecting court anywhere in the world will entertain these charges, said Sarath Weerasekera . Cases already filed under universal jurisdiction against a number of our commanders  failed, because, the allegations simply do not pass basic evidence standards. Also the accusers are politically motivated.

Allowing our war veterans to be tried in other countries for alleged crimes committed here is worse than being tried by an international criminal tribunal. An international criminal tribunal is a multilateral body whereas a single country is a different matter altogether, said Chandraprema.

SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

 It appears that in 2017   Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe  has given a personal assurance to Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Countering Terrorism, that the Government would set up an Office of the Special Prosecutor to bring criminal charges against those involved  in  war crimes during the Eelam War. Emmerson reported this at a media conference. This information was also posted on a UN website and re-posted on Groundviews.

The wording of the written statement clearly presupposes that “serious atrocities” were committed by both sides, meaning by the Sri Lankan armed forces as well. Since the Tigers are either dead,  in jail, in self-exile, rehabilitated and released , this means the only target that’s left standing is Sri Lankan military, observed  Dayan Jayatilleke.   ( Continued in C11)

නුතන ගුරුවරයා

July 23rd, 2021

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

අපි නුතන ගුරුවරුන්ගේ වැඩ වර්ජන දුටුවෙමු. ඔවුන්ගේ පෙලපාලිද දුටුවෙමු. මේ හැමදෙනාම ඉල්ලන්නේ මිට අවුරුදු 24කට පෙර  එවකට පැවතී රජයක් ඔවුන්ට දෙනවායි පොරොන්දුවූ දෙයක් ඉල්ලාගෙනය. ඔවුන්ට මේ පොරොන්දුව දී ඇත්තේ 1997දී මෙරට පැවතී රජය විසින්ය.එම රජයේ අගමැති සිරිමා බණ්ඩාරනායක මැතිනිය හෙබවූ අතර ජනාධිපතිවරිය වුයේ චන්ද්‍රිකා කුමාරතුංග මැතිනියයි. මේ ගුරු සංගම් පවසන ආකාරයට තමන්ට එදා පොරොන්දුවූ දේ එම රජයන් ලබාදී නොමැත.

සාමාන්‍යන්  පොරොන්දුවූ දෙයක් දීම පැහර හරිනවා නම්, එම රජය නිත්‍යානුකුල ලියවිල්ලක් මගින් පොරොන්දුවුවා නම්ද  කලයුත්තේ, ඊට එරෙහිව නිත්‍යානුකුල ක්‍රියාමාර්ගයක් ගැනීමයි. මේ ගුරු සංගම් එම රජයට එරෙහිව කිසිදු නීතිමය පියවරක් නොගෙන සිටීම තුලින් එහි සාමාජිකයන්ගේ මුලික අයිතිවාසිකම් කඩකර ඇත. මෙය බරපතල වරදකි. මේ වරදකල ගුරු සංගම් නිලධාරි මණ්ඩලයම පලවා හැරීමට ඒ සාමාජිකයින් එම වකවානුවේදීම සිදුකල යුතු කාර්යක්ව තිබුණි.

දැන් බලන විට මේ ගුරු සංගම් පවසන කරුණු සත්‍යනම්, එදා රජයත් වරදක් කර ඇත. එදා ගුරු සංගමය ඊට එරෙහිව නීතිමය පියවර නොගැනීම හේතුවෙන් ගුරු සංගමයද වරදක් කර ඇත. එම වරද කල නිලධාරි මණ්ඩලය පලවා නොහැර සිටීමෙන් එහි සාමාජිකයින්ද වරදක් කර ඇත.

ඊට පසු බලය ලබාගත් රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාගෙන් ගුරු සංගම් වලට කිසිදු පොරොන්දුවක් ලැබී ඇති බවක් කිසිම සඳහනක් නැත. නමුත් චන්ද්‍රිකා-සිරිමා රජයෙන් පොරොන්දුවුදේ, චන්ද්‍රිකා-රනිල් රජය ගුරුවරුන්ට ලබාදීමට පොරොන්දුවී නැත. නමුත් ගුරු සංගමයද එම රජයටවත් එරෙහිව නීති මගින් කටයුතු කිරීමට පියවරද ගෙන  නැත. දැන්  පෙනෙන්නේ,,චන්ද්‍රිකා-සිරිමා රජය කඩකළ පොරොන්දුවට එරෙහිව ගුරු සංගමයට චන්ද්‍රිකා-රනිල් රජයට එරෙහිව නඩු පැවරිය හැකිද යන්නයි.

දැන් පැහැදිලි වන්නේ, චන්ද්‍රිකා-සිරිමා රජය ගුරු සංගම්වලට දුන් පොරොන්දුවත් දියාරු වී  යාම එදා ආරම්භාවී ඇති බවයි.  එසේම, එදා එම රජයට එරෙහිව නිත්‍යානුකුලව කටයුතු කල හැකිව තිබු තත්වයත් ආණ්ඩු මාරුවීමත් සමගම දියාරු වීමට පටන් ගත් බවත් දිස්වේ.,එදා කල යුතු දේ නොකිරීම තුලින් ගුරු සංගමයක් ලෙස සිය වගකීම පැහැර හැරිම දිගටම කිරීම නිසා, .එම ගුරුවරුන්ට හිමිවිය යුතු දෙයක් තිබුනා නම් එය ඔවුන්ට අහිමි කර ඇත.

මීළඟට බලයට පත්වුයේ, චන්ද්‍රිකා-මහින්ද රජයකි.එහි ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණද ප්‍රබල ඇමති දුර 8කම් දැරුවද පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරු 41ක බලයක් හිමිව තිබුනද මේ කියන ගුරු වැටුප් ප්‍රශ්නය විසදීමට එම රජයවත්, ලංකා ගුරු සංගමයටවත් කිසිදු උවමනාවක් නොතිබිණි. ඔවුන් මේ කියන කාරණය සත්‍ය නම්, මෙය විසදා ගැනීමට තිබුන හොඳම අවස්තාව වූ ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණද අමාත්‍ය ධුර හෙබවූ එම රජයෙන් ඉටු කර නොගැනීමෙන් අද පෙළපාලි යන හැම දෙනාම සිය වගකීම ඉටුකර නැති බව පැවසීමට සිදුවේ.

මීළඟට බලයට පැමිණියේ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ජනාධිපති බලතල හෙබවූ රජයයි. එම රජය සමග සම්බන්ධ වී රටේ ප්‍රශ්න විසදීමට දායක වෙන ලෙස ඉතා බැගෑපත්ව මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණෙන් ඉල්ලිවද එය නොතකා විපක්ෂගතවී, මේ ඇති කියන ගුරු වැටුප් ගැටලුව විසදීමට දායක වීමට තිබු තවත් අවස්තාවක මග හරියේද අද පෙළපාලිවල යන ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණයි. ඒ වකවානුවේද මේ කියන ගුරු සංගම් කිසිම ආකාරයෙන් මෙවැනි ගැටලුවක් විසඳීමට ඇති සේයාවක්වත් නැත්තා සේ පසුවිය.

2015දී බලයට පත් යහපාලන ආණ්ඩුව බලයට පත් කිරීමට ලංකා ගුරු සංගමයද, ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණද විශාල දායකත්වයක් ලබා දෙන ලදී. ඔය කියන ගැටලුව විසදීමට අවශ්‍යම  ගැටලුවක් නම් ඔවුන්ට ඉතා පහසුවෙන් විසඳා ගත හැකිව තිබුනේ එදාය. එදා තිබුනේ අමුතුම ආකාරයේ ඔවුන්ගේමවූ  ආණ්ඩුවකි. ආණ්ඩුවත් ඔවුන්ගේම විය.විපක්ෂයත් ඔවුන්ගේම විය ඔය ආණ්ඩු-විපක්ෂ සුසංයෝගී රජය ගොඩනැගුවේද ලංකා ගුරු සංගමයේ,හා ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේද විශාල සහයෝගයකිනි. නමුත් එම වකවානුවේ නොවිසදගත් මේ ඔවුන් කියන 1997 පොරොන්දු වූවායයි කියන ගුරු වැටුප් ප්‍රවර්ධනය ගැටලුව 2019දී බලය ලබාගත් ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ රජය පෙළීමට අවියක් සේ යොදාගෙන ඇත.

දැන් අපි කතාකර පෙන්නාදීමට යන්නේ සම්පුර්ණයෙන්ම වෙන්ත දෙයකි. ඔබ බලන්න මේ පෙළපාලි යන ගුරුවරුන් දෙස ඔවුන් අතර වයස 30-45 දක්වා වූ තරුණ පිරිසක් සිටින බව ඔබට දැක ගත හැක. වයස අඩුම එක්කෙනා අවුරුදු 20 ලෙසද වැඩිම එක්කෙනා වයස 45 ලෙසද ගනිමු. එලෙස ගත් කල මේ පෙළපාලි යන වයස අවුරුදු 30 තරුණයා 1997දී, අවුරුදු 6ක දරු පටියෙක්ව අම්මාගේ අතේ එල්ලී, පාසල් යන දරුවෙකි. ලංකා ගුරු සංගමය කියන විදිය සත්‍ය නම්, මොහුට උගැන්වූ ගුරුවරයා තම වැටුප් වර්ධකය ඉල්ලා සටන් වදින අතරම, එය ලබාගැනීමට වැඩ වර්ජන නොකර මේ අද වැඩවර්ජනය කරන එදා පොඩි කොල්ලාට උගන්වා ඇත. 1997 වැටුප් වර්ධක ලැබීමට එදා සටන් කල් ගුරුවරු අද සේවයේ ඇත්තේ ස්වල්පයකි. ඒ වෙනුවට එදා වයස අවුරුදු 6යේ කොල්ලා අද ගුරුවරයෙක්ව තමන් වයස 6 අවදියේ සිටම්වූ වැටුප් වර්ධකයක් සම්බන්ධව දොඩවමින් වැඩ වර්ජනයක නිරත වේ, එදා මේ කොලුපැටියාට වැඩ වර්ජනය නොකරමින් ඉගැන්වූ ඒ ගුරුවරයාට අයත් වැටුප් වර්ධකය ඉල්ලා සටන් වදී.. මොවුන් සියල්ලෝම මුසිලයින් නොවන්නේදැයි සිතා බලන්න.ගුත්තිලයින් නිහතමානිව විශ්‍රාම සුවයෙන් පසුවේ. වරද වන්නේ ගුත්තිලයින් සියල්ලක්ම නිර්මාණය කර ඇත්තේ රටට ජාතියට වැඩක් නැති මුසිලයින් වීමයි. 

මෙවර ඇසළ පුර පසළොස්වක පොහෝ දින යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි ජාතික වැඩසටහන බෙල්ලන්විල රජ මහා විහාරස්ථානයේදී.

July 23rd, 2021

තරුණ හා ක්‍රීඩා අමාත්‍යංශය, ඩිජිටල් තාක්ෂණ හා ව්‍යවසාය සංවර්ධන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යංශය

තරුණ හා ක්‍රීඩා අමාත්‍ය නාමල් රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ උදාර සංකල්පයක් අනුව ක්‍රියාත්මක යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි ජාතික වැඩසටහන් මාලාවේ හත්වැනි වැඩසටහන මෙවර ඇසළ පුර පසළොස්වක පොහොය යෙදුණු අද (23) දින බෙල්ලන්විල රජ මහා විහාරස්ථානයේදී පැවත්විණි.

තරුණ පරපුර සුගතිගාමී කරවීම පෙරදැරි කරගනිමින් රට පුරා සියලු විහාරස්ථානවල සෑම පසොළොස්වක පොහොය දිනකදී ම තරුණ තරුණියන් ශීල සමාධියෙහි පිහිටුවීම හා දාන ශීල භාවනා වැඩසටහන්වලට යොමු කිරීම යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි  ජාතික වැඩසටහනේ අභිමතාර්ථයයි.

ඒ අනුව, තරුණ පිරිස සිල් සමාදන් කරවීම හා තෙරුවන් වන්දනාව අද පෙරවරු 06.00ට බෙල්ලන්විල රාජ මහා විහාරාධිකාරි ශාස්ත්‍රපති බොරලැස්ගමුවේ පේමරතන හිමියන්ගේ මූලිකත්වයෙන් පැවැත්විණි.

පෙ.ව.06.30 සිට පෙ.ව.07.00 දක්වා බෙල්ලන්විල රාජ මහා විහාරාධිපති, කඩුගන්නාව පාරමිතා ජාත්‍යන්තර භාවනා මධ්‍යස්ථානයේ නිර්මාතෘ හා සිංගප්පූරුවේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝ නායක, අතිපූජ්‍ය ආචාර්ය බෙල්ලන්විල ධම්මරතන හිමියන් විසින් පොහෝ දින අනුශාසනාව සිදුකළහ.

අනතුරුව පෙ.ව.08.00 සිට පෙ.ව. 08.50 දක්වා ගෞරවාර්හ ආචාර්ය බෙල්ලන්විල ධම්මරතන හිමි සහ ගෞරවාර්හ මහාචාර්ය මැදවච්චියේ ධම්මජෝති යන හිමිවරුන්ගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන් ධර්ම සාකච්ඡාව පැවැත් වූහ.  මෙම ධර්ම සාකච්ඡාව මහාචාර්ය ආරියපාල පෙරේරා මැතිතුමන්ගේ මෙහෙයවීමෙන් පැවත්වුණු අතර, මහාචාර්ය චන්දිම විජේබණ්ඩාර මැතිතුමන් ද ඊට සහභාගී විය.

ඉන් අනතුරුව පෙ.ව.09.00 සිට පෙ.ව. 10.00 දක්වා සිල් සමාදන් වූ පිරිසට අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේ සිට විසුරුවා හරින ලද ධර්ම දේශනාවට සවන්දීමේ අවස්ථාව හිමිවිය.

දිවුල්පිටිය ශ්‍රී බෝධිරාජාරාමාධිපති ගෞරවාර්හ ශ්‍රාස්ත්‍රපති ඕකන්දයායේ බුද්ධසිරි හිමියන් විසින් පෙ.ව. 11.00 ට සිල් සමාදන් වූ පිරිස සමග බුද්ධ පූජාව තැබුහ.

ප.ව.01.15 සිට ප.ව. 02.15 දක්වා සාරනාත් බෞද්ධ මධ්‍යස්ථානාධිපති, ගෞරවාර්හ තලාවේගම සද්ධාතිලක ස්වාමීන්ද්‍රයන් වහන්සේ විසින් භාවනා වැඩසටහන පැවැත්වූහ.

ප.ව.03.00 සිට ප.ව. 04.00 දක්වා ධර්ම සංග්‍රහය ඇසුරින් දහම් පැන විසඳුම් හරහා සිල් සමාදන් වූ පිරිස සමග එක්ව ධර්ම ගැටලු හා පිළිතුරු පිළිබඳ සාකච්ඡා කිරීම ගෞරවාර්හ ආචාර්ය බෙල්ලන්විල ධම්මරතන හිමි විසින් සිදුකළහ.  රාජ්‍ය සේවා බෞද්ධ සංගමයේ සභාපති එම්.බී.කේ. දිසානායක මැතිතුමන් සහභාගි විය.

ප.ව.04.00 සිට 05.00 දක්වා ඉංග්‍රිසි මාධ්‍යයෙන් ධර්ම දේශනය රත්මලාන පරමධම්මචේතිය  පරිවේණාධිපති, ගෞරවාර්හ ආචාර්ය මාඉටිපේ විමලසාර නායක හිමිපාණන් විසින් සිදුකළහ.

ප.ව.05.00 සිට 05.30 දක්වා සිල් සමාදන් වූ පිරිස දම්සක්පැවතුම් සූත්‍ර දේශනාවට සවන්දීමේ අවස්ථාවත් හිමි විය.

ප.ව.05. 30 සිට 06.00 දක්වා වූ ආශිර්වාද අධිෂ්ඨාන පුජාවෙන් අනතුරුව මෙවර ඇසළ පුර පසළොස්වක පොහෝ දිනය නිමිත්තෙන් බෙල්ලන්විල රජ මහා විහාරයේ පැවති යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි ජාතික වැඩසටහන නිමාවට පත්විය.

මෙවර බෙල්ලන්විල රජ මහා විහාරයේ පැවති යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි ජාතික වැඩසටහන දැහැමි සමාජයකට මං පෙත් විවර කිරීමේ අදිටනින් සියලුම කොවිඩ් – 19 මාර්ගෝපදේශවලට සහ පවතින සංචරණ සීමාවලට යටත්ව පැවත්විණි.

මෙම යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි ජාතික වැඩසටහන බුද්ධශාසන හා ආගමික කටයුතු අමාත්‍යාංශයේ උපදේශකත්වය, තරුණ හා ක්‍රීඩා අමාත්‍යාංශයේ ජාතික තරුණ සේවා සභාවේ මෙහෙයවීමෙන්  රාජ්‍ය සේවා බෞද්ධ සංගමයේ සම්බන්ධීකරණය ඇතිව ජාතික වෙළඳ හා ව්‍යවසායකත්ව සම්මේලනයේ ක්‍රියාකාරී දායකත්වයයෙන් සහ පහන්සිත් පදනමේ සහය අනුග්‍රහය ඇතිව යොවුන් ශීල සමාධි පදනමේ සංවිධායකත්වයෙන් සිදු විය.

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය,

තරුණ හා ක්‍රීඩා අමාත්‍යංශය, ඩිජිටල් තාක්ෂණ හා ව්‍යවසාය සංවර්ධන රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යංශය

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා “අමාදම් සිසිලස” 212වැන්නට එක්වෙයි

July 23rd, 2021

අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මාධ්‍ය අංශය

සෑම පුන් පොහෝ දිනකම ගරු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාගේ සංකල්පයකට අනුව පවත්වන අමාදම් සිසිලස” ධර්ම දේශනා මාලාවේ 212 වැන්න ඇසළ  පුන් පොහොය යෙදෙන අද (23) දිනයේ නුවරඑළිය අගමැති මැදුරේදී පැවැත්විණි.

පළමුව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා මල් ,පහන්, සුවඳ දුම් පූජාකර අනතුරුව ධර්ම දේශනාව සඳහා වැඩම කළ අනුරාධපුර ශ්‍රී සම්බුද්ධ ජයන්ති විහාරයේ විහාරාධිපති, සමස්ත ලංකා ශාසනාරක්ෂක බලමණ්ඩලයේ උප සභාපති , අනුරාධපුර දිස්ත්‍රික් ශාසනාරක්ෂක මණ්ඩලයේ  සභාපති , උතුරු හා උතුරු මධ්‍යම දෙපළාතේ ප්‍රධාන සංඝ නායක පණ්ඩිත නුගේතැන්නේ පඤ්ඤානන්ද නාහිමියන්ට දැහැත් වට්ටියක් පූජා කරමින් ධර්ම දේශනාවට ආරාධනා කළේය.

ප්‍රඥාවන්ත දැහැමි ජන සමාජයක් උදෙසා බුදු දහමේ සිසිලස බෙදාදීමේ අරමුණ පෙරදැරිව සෑම පුන් පොහෝ දිනකම  අමාදම් සිසිලස” ධර්ම දේශනා මාලාව පැවැත්වේ.

මෙම ධර්ම දේශනා මාලාව බාධක ,කම්කටොලු සහ  ජීවිත තර්ජන මැද අග්‍රාමාත්‍යතුමා සහ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ආර්යාව විසින් අඛණ්ඩව පවත්වාගෙන පැමිණි බව දේශකයානන් වහන්සේ ධර්මදේශනාව ආරම්භයේදීම කරුණු පෙන්වා දුන්හ.

“ඔබතුමා මේ රටේ රාජ්‍ය පාලකයා වශයෙන් මේ රටේ අසරණ දුක්විදින අප්‍රමාණ මිනිසුන්ගේ සියලු දුක්ඛ  දෝමනස්සයන් දරාගෙන මේ රටේ කාටවත් හිතන්න බැරි තරම් මහා විශාල පරිවර්තන යුගයක් ආරම්භ කරලා අදත් ඒ යුගයේ අරුණාලෝකය විඳින වකවානුවක ලෝකයම වසංගත තත්ත්වයකින් වෙළාගෙන තිබෙන කාල වකවානුවක  මේ රටේ ජනතාවගේ ජීවිත බේරා ගැනීමට දිවා රාත්‍රී දෙකේම අතිගරු ජනාධිපතිතුමාත් සමඟ අත්වැල් බැඳගෙන කරන උත්කෘෂ්ඨ සේවය මේ  ඉතිහාසයේ කිසිදිනෙක  නොමැකෙන සේවාවක්.

 ඒ වගේම තමයි අපි දන්නවා විපත් ඇතිවන සෑම කාලයකදීම  ඔබතුමා තමයි ඒ හැමදේකටම මුහුණ දුන්නේ. තිස්  අවුරුද්දක් කාටවත් අවසන් කරන්න බැරිවුණු යුද්ධය සාර්ථකව අවුරුදු තුනයි මාස ගණනකින්  ඔබතුමා නිමාවට පත්කළා. ඒවගේම තමයි කාටවත් හිතාගන්න බැරි තරම් සංවර්ධන යුගයක්, අපිට හීනයක්ව තිබුණ ඔය අධිවේගී මාර්ග ඒ වගේම ගුවන්තොටුපොළවල්, වරායවල් වගේම මේ රටේ දුප්පත් අසරණ මිනිස්සුන් වෙනුවෙන් කරපු මහා උත්කෘෂ්ඨ සේවය  සදා අනුස්මරණීය  මහා උත්තුංග සේවාවක්” යැයි නුගේතැන්නේ පඤ්ඤානන්ද නාහිමියෝ සිහිපත් කළහ.

සෞඛ්‍ය මාර්ගෝපදේශයන්ට අනුව පැවති අමාදම් සිසිලස” 212 ධර්ම දේශනාව ශ්‍රවණය කිරීමට අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ආර්යා ශිරන්ති රාජපක්ෂ මහත්මිය, අමාත්‍ය සී.බී.රත්නායක, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍ය සිරිපාල ගම්ලත්, නුවරඑළිය දිස්ත්‍රික් ලේකම් නන්දන ගලබඩ මහත්වරු  ඇතුළු සීමිත පිරිසක් එක්ව සිටියහ.

New UK scheme aims to drive trade with Sri Lanka and boost jobs and growth

July 23rd, 2021

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, July 23 (newsin.asia): The UK Government launched a consultation on new trading rules on July 19. The UK Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS) is a major opportunity to grow free and fair trade with 70 qualifying countries including Sri Lanka.

The proposed scheme will mean more opportunity and less bureaucracy. This includes improvements such as lower tariffs and simpler rules of origin requirements for countries exporting to the UK, allowing countries to diversify their exports and grow their economies, the British High Commission said in a release.

The British High Commissioner in Sri Lanka H.E. Sarah Hulton said: The proposed DCTS scheme signals the UK’s appetite to promote global free and fair trade, as well as demonstrating our commitment to Sri Lanka, by enabling Sri Lankan businesses to access the UK market more easily. Bilateral trade between the UK and Sri Lanka stood at GBP1.2 billion in 2020, and there is room for growth.  I encourage people here in Sri Lanka to contribute to this important consultation, which is open to all”.

The consultation on the UK’s new scheme runs for eight weeks and seeks the view of all sectors of society, including businesses, the public, civil society groups, consumers, associations, partner governments and any other interested stakeholders. Currently the UK operates a similar scheme rolled over from the EU, but as an independent trading nation can now take a simpler, more generous, pro-growth approach to trading with developing countries.

The UK’s International Trade Secretary Liz Truss said: Trade fundamentally empowers people and has done more than any single policy in history to lift millions of people around the world out of poverty. Now the UK is an independent trading nation we have a huge opportunity do things differently, taking a more liberal, pro-trade approach that leads to growth and opportunity. Countries like Bangladesh and Vietnam have proven it’s possible to trade your way to better living standards, and our new Developing Countries Trading Scheme will help others do the same.”

Responses to the consultation can be given via GOV.UK until the closing date of 12 September 2021.

Additional Points:

             The UK Developing Countries Trading Scheme will apply to 47 countries in the Least Developed Country Framework (LDCF) and 23 additional countries classified by the World Bank as low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Other low-income and lower-middle-income countries are not included in the scheme because they benefit from preferential terms offered by free trade agreements with the UK.

•             Bangladesh and Vietnam reported changes in poverty are based on the international poverty line of $1.90 and $3.20 respectively per person, per day in 2011 Purchasing Power Parity dollars.

•             Growth in exports to the UK reported for Bangladesh and Vietnam are in nominal terms.

•             Sources of statistics: ONS UK trade in goods and services, non-seasonally adjusted, Q4 2020; World Bank World Development Indicators, May 2021; World Bank Macro Poverty Outlook: April 2021; World Bank Bangladesh: Reducing Poverty and Sharing Prosperity” (published 2018).

The consultation will offer respondents the opportunity to provide views on:

•             Simplifying rules of origin requirements for least developed countries;

•             Reducing tariffs for low income and lower middle-income countries;

•             Amendments to the approach to goods graduation, which suspends preferential rates on particular goods from certain countries on the basis of their competitiveness;

•             Amendments to the conditions and reporting requirements that enable a low-income or lower-middle-income country to benefit from more generous provisions through the values-based incentivised arrangement;

•             and simplifying the conditions that could lead to variation or suspension of preferences for any beneficiary country.

ජෝෂප් ස්ටාලින් ත‍්‍රස්තවාදියෙක්.. ඔප්පු කරන සාක්‍ෂි TIDයට..

July 23rd, 2021

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

ලංකා ගුරු සංගමයේ ප්‍රධාන ලේකම් ජෝසප් ස්ටාලින් මහතා මෙරට පැවති යුද්ධය අවසාන කාලයේදි ඊට බාධා කළ පුද්ගලයකු බව පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී මධුර විතානගේ මහතා සඳහන් කරයි.

එවන් සිදුවීම් කිහිපයක් පිළිබඳ තොරතුරු තමන්ට ලැබී ඇති බවත් එම තොරතුරු ත්‍රස්ත විමර්ශන අංශයට ලබාදීමට කටයුතු කරන බවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරයා පැවසීය.

යුද සමයේ දී රටේ ආරක්ෂාවට යොදවා තිබූ මාර්ග බාධක ඉවත් කරන්නැයි ජෝසප් ස්ටාලින් පැවසූ බවත් එනිසා ඔහු හැඳින්විය හැක්කේ ත්‍රස්තවාදියෙකු ලෙස බවත් මන්ත්‍රීවරයා තවදුරටත් කීය.

වර්තමානයේදී ද ඔහු සිදුකරන්නේ සිසු දරුවන් හා ගුරුවරුන් බිල්ලට ගනිමින් ත්‍රස්තවාදී ක්‍රියාවක් යැයි ද පැවසූ මන්ත්‍රීවරයා සිසු දරුවන්ට හෝ ගුරුවරුන්ට ඔහු ආදරය කරන කෙනෙකු නොවන බවද සඳහන් කළේය.

කොළඹ පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදී මන්ත‍්‍රීවරයා මෙම අදහස් පල කරන ලදී.

SL in further trouble as more Delta variant cases reported from 14 areas

July 23rd, 2021

Sheain Fernandopulle Courtesy The Daily Mirror

Sri Lanka has recorded 30 more fresh cases of the Delta variant in 14 areas in the country, the Health Ministry said.

The patients have been identified in areas such as Kotte, Kolonnawa, Angoda, Nawagamuwa, Mahabage, Katunayaka, Negombo, Ratmalana, Beruwala, Galle, Matara, Dambulla, Vavuniya and Mullaithivu.

Accordingly, this takes total number of cases of the delta variant to 68.

Though total number of cases is at 68, there may be more such cases which are undetected in the community,” Deputy Director-General of Health Services Dr Hemantha Herath told Daily Mirror.

“What should be done is to strictly adhere to health practices. It is apparent that many more cases of Delta variant would be found in future too,” he added.

The first case of Delta variant was detected in Aramaya place in the Dematagoda area on June 21. 

Sri Lanka’s COVID death toll crosses 4,000

July 23rd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Sri Lanka’s COVID-19 death toll surpassed the grim milestone of 4,000 today (July 23) with 43 more victims confirmed by the Director-General of Health Services.

According to official data, new fatalities have moved the total to 4,002.

Data released by the Department of Government Information showed that the latest victims confirmed today include 26 males and 17 females.

Among the victims are 08 people aged between 30-59 years and 35 others aged 60 and above.

Daily coronavirus cases count reaches 1,785 today

July 23rd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

A total of 475 more people tested positive for COVID-19 today (July 23), raising the daily count of positive cases reached 1,785.

According to the Government Information Department, the new cases reported today have been associated with the New Year cluster, which has recorded a total of 284,770 virus infections since mid-April this year.

The new development has brought Sri Lanka’s confirmed coronavirus cases tally to 293,083.

Epidemiology Unit’s data showed that as many as 265,708 patients who were infected with the virus have regained health so far. Meanwhile, the death toll now stands at 4,002.

More than 23,000 are currently under medical care at selected hospitals and treatment centres across the country.

බදියුදීන්ගේ නිවසේ දැරිය මියයාමේ සිද්ධිය ගැන හෝඩුවාවක්…

July 23rd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

Rishad’s brother-in-law arrested over alleged sexual abuse of young woman

July 23rd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The brother-in-law of MP Rishad Bathiudeen has been arrested on charges of allegedly sexually abusing a young woman, the Police Spokesman Senior DIG Ajith Rohana says. 

The incident was brought to light amidst the probes carried out into the death of a 16-year-old domestic worker at the parliamentarian’s private residence.

https://youtu.be/NpAfJcltpvA

Investigating officers have learned that the brother-in-law of MP Bathiudeen had sexually abused a female who worked as a domestic helper at the parliamentarian’s official residence between 2015 and 2019.

The girl, who is now 22 years of age, had shed light on the matter during police interrogations.

The 44-year-old suspect is reportedly a residence of Medawachchiya area.

In the meantime, three including MP Bathiudeen’s wife, her father and the intermediary who brought the teenage girl to the Bathiudeen residence were taken into custody earlier today.

Suspicions were rife after a 16-year-old girl, who was serving as domestic help at the Bathiudeen residence, succumbed to severe burn injuries on July 15 while receiving treatment at the Colombo National Hospital.

Reports revealed that she had been under medical care for 12 days since her admission to the hospital on July 03.

The post-mortem on the girl’s death had concluded that she had been sexually exploited.

Reading the ‘re-election’ statement

July 23rd, 2021

MALINDA SENEVIRATN​E

‘The boss has said it loud and clear that he will contest a second time! Now the other side (opposition) would have to nominate Basil. If not, even someone from the tuk-tuk party could also do the job!’

The above is the rough English translation of an FB post by someone who has essentially backed individuals and parties opposed to the Rajapaksas and the SLPP (i.e. Maithripala Sirisena and Sajith Premadasa, the UNFGG and the SJB). He’s obviously referring to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s statement intimating that he would see re-election. He’s essentially saying ‘lost cause.’ He may be implying that the SLPP would have a better chance if it was someone other than the President.

Speculation. Speculation. Speculation. Ifs and buts. What ifs and if nots. Entertaining in its own right of course. Predicting political outcomes is sometimes about positioning preferred outcomes. It has a role in campaigns and this is why we see lots of ‘polls’ when elections are at hand. That said, predictions say more about predictors than about relevant candidates, parties and political realities. Let me elaborate.

Way before the SLPP announced that Gotabaya Rajapaksa would be the party’s candidate for the 2019 Presidential Election, there was an intense back and forth in social media which could be captured as a debate titled ‘Gota or Basil?’ Obviously the participants sided with the SLPP. Most of the more vocal of the debaters pointed out the positive attributes of one as well as the negatives of the other. There was a lot of exaggeration as well. Fun banter, anyway.

It was essentially a battle between Gotabaya-loyalists and Basil-loyalists. Now this is speculation, but I couldn’t help but wonder along the following lines. It made every sense for Gotabaya-backers to want him to contest. Gotabaya contests and if he wins, they profit one way or another. At the very least they have the satisfaction of backing the winner. If it was Basil, they would get nothing, unless he lost and they could say ‘We told you so; Gota would have won.’ Flip names and you get the flip-side.

Now let’s switch to the other camp, i.e. the UNP-SJB or let’s say ‘the anti-Rajapaksa bloc.’ They revelled. For them it was a case of a Rajapaksa split. They believed that once a candidate was announced the ‘hopeful’ who lost out and his backers would back away from the campaign.  This was interesting because they were also among those who ranted and raved about pavulvaadaya (familism?) and insisted that the power should not fall into the hands of a single family. If indeed the Rajapaksas had a clan mentality then it probably meant that they would resolve their disagreements one way or another, decide on the more ‘winnable’ and back him to the hilt.

We don’t even know if this ‘spat’ flowed from the two individuals — neither mentioned anything of the kind. In fact Basil, in an interview, quashed such speculation and jokingly said ‘Gota has less experience than Mahinda; so if he is the President I could have a bigger role than before.’

It was a wish, nothing more. The spat narrative and extrapolations, I mean. Didn’t pan out. Previously, they had speculated that Gotabaya would be stopped by none other than Mahinda. Here’s the ‘logic’ in brief:

‘Mahinda wants to be in control. This is why he got his people to vote for the 19th Amendment. He knows he can’t contest, but he felt that if power is wrested from the Ranil-Maithri combine, he could, as PM, call all the shots.’ [Note: obviously they hadn’t read the 19th Amendment carefully — Patali Champika Ranawaka had done so; he knew all about how much of the presidential powers had been clipped and moreover had a stake in the whole matter given his own presidential ambitions].’

Of course they didn’t address the obvious question: ‘If not Gotabaya then who?’ Anyway, it was the same mind-set that spun these scenarios. Wishes. Preferred outcomes. Extrapolations. Glee.

What happen next? Well, the SLPP picked Gotabaya. And then? Up came the citizenship issue. But why? Simple. They had to find some way to block Gotabaya. Why? Isn’t it obvious? The implication is that if Gota did get to contest, he would win. He did.

So what now? Will the President win a second term? If not, could we conclude that, say, Basil would have had a better chance? Well, whether or not he wins, we can never know if his brother could have bested him, either by securing more votes in a defeat or a greater margin of victory. All that’s speculation. Good entertainment in the main possible but not probably framed by ‘campaign strategy’ as alluded to above.

What should we make of this decision? Power nourishes greed? We don’t know. We could talk however about realities. The President would have had to make an announcement either way, sooner or later and probably sooner rather than later. If he ended speculation by going the other way, reiterating that he would not seek reelection, a scenario that would probably be followed quickly by the ‘emergence’ of an SLPP front runner, that would be a signal to one and all to line up next to him or if not at least behind him.

What would that do to governability? Wouldn’t help, that much can be said. Structures will remain but the people within them would not be as stable — they would move around, there could be foot-dragging and much time and effort will be expended by those who are tasked to get things done to secure their futures. That’s the political culture we live in, isn’t it?

This, then, is about the lame-duck factor. Typically the ‘decline’ in this sense begins the moment after re-election. If ‘no-show’ was announced, the decline begins right there. Then and there. That’s decline in terms of backing from within. It might impact the track-record of the regime negatively, but then again, that does not necessarily translate into an inevitable defeat in the next major election.

It must also be understood that the Opposition is in disarray, moving from one issue to another as though punch-drunk. No talk of Lankagama now. No talk of deforestation. No talk even of provincial council elections. No talk of constitutional reform. No talk of mishandling the pandemic (after all, those who got the jab, especially after saying ‘there won’t be jabs’ and ‘Sinopharm won’t work’ can’t really afford to complain).

Even angst regarding the fertiliser policy is not exactly translating into the rant-rave that is, sadly, the best that oppositions in this country do. A war-analogy would help explain, I believe. Back in the day the so-called peace activists said ‘war is bad’. They then said ‘the LTTE cannot be defeated’. Then they stopped saying ‘cannot’ and instead toned down to ‘do it right.’ Took years. In the case of the fertiliser issue it has reached ‘do it right’ in less than two months!

Back to the beginning. Could someone from a tuk-tuk party defeat the President? Let’s not get into the prediction game. It shows angst at best; says more about the sayer. What’s politically relevant at this point is that it strengthens the President. Loyalists won’t look for another pohottuwa hopeful at this point and unless there’s a significant change in the fortunes of the opposition and/or a series of significant blunders by the government, they won’t look outside the party either.

malindasenevi@gmail.com

[Malinda Seneviratne is the Director/CEO of the Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute. These are his personal views.]

Why does US want to annex Cuba?

July 22nd, 2021

Shenali D Waduge

Have you ever wondered why the most powerful nation in the world with 328m people is so obsessed with Cuba a tiny island with 11million people? The quest to annex Cuba to US has been taking place since 1820. In 1840s the US offered $100 million to Spain to buy Cuba. This little island has been withholding pressures for over 200 years and Cuba & Cubans must be commended & nations facing similar threats must take inspiration from the Cuban people.

Manifest Destiny – US in Cuba

Cuba is a former Spanish colony. The British captured & temporarily occupied the capital Havana in 1762. The American Revolution was in 1776. It was the same year that Spain opened Cuba’s ports to trade with North America. It is a habit of the US to want to acquire any country that can secure profit and thus from 1820 US Presidents have been eyeing to take over Cuba. So much so the Americans despatched were even executed by the Spanish.

In 1854 the US offered $130 million to Spain to buy Cuba via a proposal known as Ostend manifesto or threatened war. By 1897 the US offered $300m to buy Cuba (119 years later in 2016 US offered $480m for MCC/Sri Lanka) The US offer was rejected & kickstarted the US-Spanish War. In 1898 the Treaty of Paris was signed with Spain renouncing rights to Cuba and US commencing its dominance in the region. Immediately following the treaty US began selling Cuban land to Americans via Cuba Real Estate Company. US military rule in Cuba ended in 1902. Yet US ensured Cuba remained committed to leasing Cuban land for US naval bases. This is how US controls Guantanamo Bay since 1898. Guantanamo Bay was leased to US in 1903 as part of Platt Amendment. Cuba claims that the lease violates Article 52 of 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Coercion of a State by the threat or use of force) – can’t Sri Lanka apply same against India for the signing of Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987 under similar coercion.

Cuban Rebellion against Spanish occupation  

The Cubans rebelled against Spain in 1868 which lasted 10 years. Beneath the scenes the US was making its own plans and as usual playing both sides! The 2ndattempt by Cuba for independence was in 1897.

In fact, the 1990 Republican Party election campaign poster in fact depicted US rule over Cuba.

US-Cuba trade

Trade that began under Spanish occupation resulted in 83% Cuban exports going to US by 1877. By 1926 US companies owned 60% of Cuban sugar industry & imported 95% of total Cuban crops.

President Kennedy continued trade restrictions by President Eisenhower & banned all trade with Cuba. Travel & financial transactions by US citizens with Cuba was also prohibited.

Cubans rebel against Cubans

Cubans overthrew the government of G. Machado in 1933 & successor Ramon Grau immediately nullified the Platt amendment – immediately US militarily intervened sending 29 warships. The rule of Gen. Fulgencio Batista from 1940-44/1952-59 saw increase in US corporations in Cuba and Cuba became a sanctuary for organized US crimes. It was against this that an armed conflict broke out in 1953 led by Fidel Castro against the Batista government which was overthrown in 1959.

Batista can best be described in the words of US State Department advisor William Wieland

I know Batista is considered by many as a son of a bitch… but American interests come first… at least he was our son of a bitch”.

Castro ended US influence in Cuba. Castro visited US and even held meetings with President Nixon.

If US did not like Cuba’s agrarian reforms, nationalization of industries that were owned by US companies – it should show other countries how the US political psyche works. This was how US initiated trade restrictions against Cuba. It should show countries that once anything is given to the hands of US – there is no returning it or no taking it back. Yet Castro proceeded to take over privately-owned businesses. US response was to stop buying Cuban sugar and attempts to devastate Cuban economy. These are good lessons for all countries – for short term gains, the long term repercussions of dealing with US!

US behavior soon led Cuba closer to Soviet Union. Soon the nod was given to the CIA to organize, train & fund Cuban rebels to overthrow Castro. Isn’t this how JVP & LTTE emerged in Sri Lanka? Mrs Bandaranaike’s nationalization initiatives that impacted US resulted in the birth of JVP.

The model is replicated repeatedly – any US interest compromised by a nation, they can expect ‘democracy’ in the form of insurgents trained by US & allies.

Castro held his ground & even arrested US diplomats charging them with encouraging terrorism and expelled them. US closed down its embassy in Havana in 1961 followed by an armed invasion by 1500 CIA trained Cuban exiles at the Bay of Pigs (Operation Mongoose)

How important Cuba is to US can be seen by the manner the US attempted to take over Cuba – hijackings, assassinations, terrorist attacks, sabotage & numerous psy-ops. Between 1960-1965 (5years) there had been 8 attempts to kill President Castro. This is the nation preaching human rights.

US-Cuba in UN

It has become customary for the US to vote against Cuba in the UNGA.

For 24years US has been voting against Cuba at UNGA. In 2016 US abstained under former President Obama.

US & allies in the UN & associate agencies began using ‘human rights’ against Cuba in addition to the sanctions and embargoes against Cuba. In 1984 a US-NGO lobbied to have Cuba’s representative removed from the UNHRC and US went on to appoint a Cuban refugee in US as US ambassador to UNHRC.

At the 2000 UN Millennium Summit President Clinton & President Castro spoke & shook hands and in 2001 US companies began selling food to Cuba. President Bush reversed the changes by imposing travel restrictions. In 2003 the US Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba was formed to bring ‘democracy’ to Cuba. The transition coordinator” (the same McCarry who engineered overthrow of President Arstide in Haiti) was given a budget of $59million – we all know what this would be used for! It was no surprise when Cuba was accused of possessing biological weapons was alleged against Cuba in 2009.

In 2006, the US Congressional auditors accused USAID of channeling tens of millions of dollars through exile groups in Miami – is USAID continuing this modus operandi elsewhere including Sri Lanka?

Pope Francis in 2013 brokered secret talks between Cuban & US officials resulting in normalizing diplomatic relations in 2014. Noteworthy is the lifting of restrictions by Americans travelling to Cuba and export of US computer & telecommunications technology to Cuba in 2015. Is there a link to the hacking that ensued recently? The Cuban government claims they have traced the origin of the attacks with IP addresses that generated the attack located in Florida/USA, UK,  France & Turkey. This was also linked up with protests naturally funded by the same culprits and relayed across the world to showcase Cubans against its government. This was the same module used to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected leader Mossadegh. However, pro-Government rallies showed Cubans still supportive of Cuba.

In April 2015 US removed Cuba from its list of State Sponsors of Terrorism” & diplomatic relations were formally established in July 2015. President Obama visited Cuba in 2016 & direct commercial flights resumed months later & the first commercial flight from Miami landed in Havana after over 50 years. Then came President Trump & more restrictions followed. In January 2020 US State Dept returned Cuba to its list of state sponsors of terrorism.

Cuba’s iconic leader Castro passed away on 27 November 2017 at the age of 90 having bravely stood up to 10 US Presidents but able to keep Cuba’s flag flying!

Take lessons from Cuba

There are many lessons for smaller nations to take from Cuba despite suffering decades of embargoes, restrictions, terrorism and assassination attempts & more.

  • Cuba’s literacy rate (youth & adult) is 100% (UNICEF)
  • Life expectancy parallels first world nations despite limited funding/supplies
  • Cuba has enviable health & education systems – excellent medical care & ability to sustain itself in times of natural and medical emergencies despite the odds
  • Despite serious shortages of food & drugs, Cuba has consistently kept its 11m population healthy into old age.Almost all Cuban medical residents do family medicine.
  • Cuba’s life expectancy is 81 years for women & 77 years for men
  • Cuba dedicates 11.1% of GDP to its health (UK spends only 9%) http://pnhp.org/news/cuba-has-better-medical-care-than-the-u-s/
  • Cuban doctors go into medicine to treat people in their communities and make a fraction of what most doctor make in the U.S. but most Cubans aren’t going into medicine to earn money. They’re going into it to treat people in their communities.
  • 14% of Cuba’s productive lands are affected by drought & ¾ of 6.6m hectares of arable land affected by soil erosion forcing Cuba to import 80% of food at a cost o $2b a year – but Cubans are strong-willed & widespread reforms, training of over 12,000 Cuban farmers with locals also given opportunity to start farming has reaped benefits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ0tovrhf5Yhttp://blogs.edf.org/growingreturns/2020/03/11/cuba-teach-us-about-climate-smart-agriculture/
  • Cuba system, education is paid by the government, so students don’t have debt. Cuba allocates over 13% of its GDP to education.
  • Cuba knows the importance of good teachers – the country’s student:teacher ratio as of 2015 is an astonishing 12:1 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/12/what-the-world-can-learn-from-the-cuban-education-system/
  • In 1999, Cuba created a school of medicine for Latin America. They bring students in, train them for six years, give them room and board and a stipendthe students are required to go home and practice in poorer areas. It’s a remarkable program, with 10,000 students now from 33 countries.

Why is such a super power hell bent on Cuba? Why does the US want to dismantle all that the Cuban people believe in? Is it only the ideology of Capitalism vs Communism? If communism stood for nationalist interests securing a socialist state for near equal status for all, why would US wish to force capitalism down Cuba? Does America fear the example that Cuba is showing the world regarding self-sustenance? Is Cuba downplaying and highlighting the imperfect western democratic system? Is America afraid that the Cuban example will get replicated across the world and bring about the collapse of the capitalist system which is creating more disparities than equal opportunities.

Quoting Fidel Castro Cuba is the only country in the world which does not need to trade with the United States”

There is no oil in Cuba. Cuba is not a major political power globally? Cuba is not a major economic power centre yet US is fixated with Cuba? Why?

Castro will always be remembered because he was a leader to the people. He was not controlled by global corporates and he was not shy to stand up to 10 US Presidents. Countries & their leaders have much to learn from Cuba and the Cuban people who know their nation has shortcomings but they also know that those that bring promises & gifts to Cuba do so not for any love for Cuba or Cubans.

Shenali D Waduge

Non-LTTE Tamils/Diaspora vs LTTE-Tamils/Diaspora

July 22nd, 2021

Shenali D Waduge

While all LTTE were Tamils but all Tamils are not LTTE, it is important to also differentiate who are the non-LTTE Tamils from the LTTE Tamils and the non-LTTE Tamil Diaspora from the LTTE-Tamil Diaspora. The LTTE, LTTE-supporting Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as the LTTE Diaspora made their millions from the war manipulating & sacrificing the lives of even Tamils for this objective. This same bandwagon of opportunists should not be allowed to walk away with the dividends of the post-conflict benefits as well. The GoSL must ensure that they cater to the needs of the victims of LTTE before looking after any LTTE and their remnants.

If the Government is enabling and facilitating life in the conflict-torn areas it should be for non-LTTE Tamils FIRST.

If the Government is giving state land for development or agricultural purposes on lease as well as supporting via other state mechanisms it should be to non-LTTE Tamils first. GoSL must ensure LTTE & LTTE families are NOT RULING over non-LTTE Tamils & their families.

While there will be a bandwagon of others screaming why” the discrimination to LTTE and holding posters infamously known as ‘reconciliation’, the question asked of these poster boys is was there no discrimination during LTTE rule towards Tamils? How many Tamils ended in their graves by LTTE bullet? How many Tamil children lie in their graves because of LTTE? How many mothers and fathers and siblings are weeping the loss of their loved ones because of LTTE? Have the foreigners weeping for LTTE Tamils ever wondered what LTTE did to the Tamils?

When the former UNSG female head arrived in Sri Lanka – she wept only for LTTE & their families. She saw only them. She spoke to only them. Did she visit a single Tamil family member of the Tamil leaders killed by LTTE? Today, she is ridiculing her international position by making mullaivaikkal LTTE-mourning speeches. This just proves how biased she was!

No doubt the LTTE illegal combatants, their family members and others supporting them need to be assimilated into society BUT they cannot be given preferential or privileged positions over the non-LTTE Tamils who suffered, caught between the LTTE and the armed forces. These people simply wanted to get on with their lives but they could not because they had no money to migrate to other parts of Sri Lanka, they had no money to fly overseas and they were too poor for any LTTE diaspora to be bothered about them via the bogus charities that they operated simply to channel money and equipment to LTTE. A good audit of the charities that these LTTE Diaspora operated and how much they channeled to Sri Lanka and for what purposes will disclose the nature of their ‘charity’.

Isn’t this why Jane’s Intelligence declares LTTE annual profits to be $300m – this was back in 2004-5 and profits after spending for LTTE arms & ammunition, feeding and clothing combatants and other logistics. Now imagine how big this kitty is now that the expense for LTTE combatants is no more and most living combatants are of no use to the LTTE tie coat diaspora unless they hold high profile positions in the LTTE fronts that are operating.

The largess of this kitty is now being used to lobby and when the British Parliament is lit for a few seconds to weep for Prabakaran – that should show how pockets can be filled. It should also put to shame those stiff upper lips of the Brits. These opportunists are no better than the handful of people who end up plugging themselves to whatever political party that comes to power & enjoying perks & privileges and love to appear on every photo grinning to glory.

Thus, it is extremely important to also realize that the non-LTTE Tamils and the non-LTTE Tamil Diaspora number far more than the handful of people who have found a new hobby carrying ‘genocide slogans’ and creating youtube videos with heavy foreign accents by youth who have never set foot in Sri Lanka to even know where a single town they quote are located.

The foreign ambassadors are guilty of showing ‘concern’ for only LTTE-combatants & their families. Is this out of ignorance or is this purposely done? If it is out of ignorance, the GoSL must have a mechanism to clearly state the need to differentiate the needs of non-LTTE Tamils vis a vis post-conflict development rather than concentrate only on LTTErs & their families.

As is clear, even the Tamil political parties concentrate or prefer to articulate mostly in favor of LTTE Tamils & their families. This is probably due to the lobbying of the LTTE Diaspora and course nothing much can be expected from these political parties who spew hatred in public against the Sinhala politicians and then go to their homes to have tea & a hearty tete a tete!

The GoSL must listen to the pulse of the people. Whatever funds or lobbying happens from LTTE Diaspora, any breakthrough for better relations comes from mending ties of miscommunication. There is no hatred between any community in Sri Lanka but there are plenty of miscommunications to purposely divide so that the opportunists can bear the fruit. The Sinhalese having travelled North immediately after the conflict ended and the Tamils travelling South learnt that they are no different, they all suffer the same problems and they all had been fooled.

The task is to identify who fooled them and to ensure they are not fooled again. Though there is a tiger in tie & coat calling himself ‘prime minister’ and thinking he can reign Tamils from yankee land while his outfit remains banned as a LTTE front.

GoSL we are waiting for you to go after the money trail of the LTTE international money making racket which is the backbone of the LTTE Diaspora’s powerbase & should be exposed and dismantled. If 32 countries continue to ban LTTE even after 12 years of its demise, why is diplomatic pressure not exerted for the countries that house these LTTE fronts to investigate their sources of income & legality of their operations.

KASHMIR-MOURNING NIGHTS AND WEEPING DAYS

July 22nd, 2021

ALI SUKHANVER

No doubt all credit of keeping Jammu-Kashmir Independence movement alive even after seventy two years goes to the illegally deputed Indian troops there. If those troops had not behaved brutally rather callously, situation would have been all together different. The injustice directed by the government of India and acted upon by the Indian troops has simply added more fuel to the fire. Be it the 13th July 1931 or the 8th July 2016 or any other day commemorated as the Black Day in Kashmir, is just a reaction to the atrocities of the Indian soldiers in the valley. 8th July is the death anniversary of young Kashmiri student Burhan Wani who was brutally murdered by the Indian troops defamed as a Liberation Leader rather terrorist. The fact of the matter is that Wani was neither a terrorist nor commander of any militia; he was simply a 22 year old boy popular among the Kashmiri youth as a social media activist with a large number of followers on social media. The Indian government blamed him as the leader of a Kashmiri militant group; Hizbul Mujahidin and on the basis of this baseless blame, he was killed in a fake encounter with the Indian security forces. His death made him immortal and now the people of Kashmir worship and praise him like a hero because he fought for them with his words. His death anniversary is observed every year not only in Jammu Kashmir but also in every part of the world where lives even a single Kashmiri. Every year a very remarkable increase could be noticed in the number of those who participate in his death anniversary processions all over the world. From July 2016 to July 2021 the graph of his popularity is continuously soaring high and high.

13th July 1931 had another more pathetic tale to narrate. According to the details, on 21 June 1931, a public meeting was convened at Khanqa-e-Mualla to choose the representatives of Kashmiri Muslims. At the end of the meeting, a young Muslim, Abdul Qadeer, delivered a speech against the Maharaja and was arrested on 25 June for agitation. On 13 July 1931, Kashmiris gathered in front of Srinagar Central Jail to show solidarity at the time of his trial. As the time for obligatory prayers approached, a young Kashmiri stood up for Azaan (call for prayer); that young man was killed by the Dogra police at the spot. Another youth came forward to continue the Azaan and was also shot dead. In this way, 22 Kashmiris embraced martyrdom during the process of completion of the Azaan. Since then, 13th July is commemorated as Martyrs’ Day every year. The incident ignited a chain of protests for which Muslim notables were arrested and Srinagar was given under military control while civil administration was suspended. Increase in violence by Dogra Forces led to ‘No Tax Campaign’ in districts Mirpur, Poonch, Rajuri and Bhimber from January 1932. To calm down the Muslim protesters and to inquire into their grievances the Galancy Commission was formed which published its fact-finding report in April 1932. The Maharaja accepted the Commission’s recommendations to give adequate representation to Muslims in state services but never implemented them. Same behavior of bias and injustice is still in practice. People say that time always keeps on changing but in the valley of Kashmir, time seems paralyzed as nothing ever changes there with the passage of time; same pains and same troubles, the same agony and the same distress for the people of Kashmir.

The wretched people of Occupied Kashmir have been a victim to the Indian atrocities and cruelties for the last many decades. Countless mothers waiting for their sons; numerous daughters waiting for their fathers but the local police authorities say ‘The missing ones are the militants; they are the terrorists; we too are searching for them; we have their names in the list of the Most Wanted’. But the facts are otherwise; the missing ones and the disappeared ones are neither the terrorists nor the militants; they are the murdered ones. The Indian security forces are the murderers. If some day the international peace-keepers start excavating the valleys of the Indian Occupied Kashmir, they would find thousands of unmarked graves and unidentified dead bodies hidden under the rotten leaves and in the depths of stagnant water ponds.

The most pathetic thing is that the Indian intelligence agencies and Hindu extremists groups are doing all possible for degrading anyone having any linkage with Islam or Kashmir. In a recent incident, on 4th July 2021, a 23-year-old Muslim girl Afreen Fatima participated in an online forum about the persecution of Muslims in India. No sooner had she wrapped up her session than she found her mobile phone flooded with obnoxious messages, informing her that she had been ‘put up for sale’ on a fake online auction. According to media details her photographs had been uploaded on an app called Sulli deals” and it all was done without her permission and without bringing it to her knowledge. Same complaint was launched by 80 other Muslim women also; those women included students, activists and journalists. Such degrading behavior of the Indian intelligence agencies would certainly give birth to more Wanis.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවේ ගුරු ගැටලුව.

July 22nd, 2021

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

අප රටේ ඇති ප්‍රධානම ගැටලුවක් වන්නේ ගුරු ගැටලුව බව අද දින පවත්වන ලද ගුරු වර්ජනය හා ගුරු පෙළපාලිය ජාතියට හඬගා කියා පෑවාය. මුළු රටම විනයානුකුලව පවත්වාගෙන යාමට අවශ්‍ය අනාගත පරපුර නිර්මාණය කිරීමේ බැරෑරුම් වගකීම පවතින්නේ ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන් අතය. ඔවුන් හා ශිෂ්‍ය ශිෂ්‍යාවෝ යනු ගහට පොත්ත මෙන් එකට බැදුන සුසංයෝගයකි.

කලකට පෙර වැඩවර්ජන, පෙළපාලි අයත්ව තිබුනේ කම්කරු පන්තියට පමණක් වන අතර,ගුරුවරු පෙළපාලියක ගියේ මැයි දින පෙළපාලිවල පමණි.අද කම්කරුවන් වැඩවර්ජන හා පෙළපාලි යාමේ යාන්ත්‍රනය ගුරුවරුන්ට විකුණා ඇත.මේ යාන්ත්‍රනය අතට ගත ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන් වදුරාට ලැබුන දැලි පිහිය සේ එය පාවිච්චි කරමින් මුළු ශරීරයම එයින් කපාගෙන ඇත. එය මනාව පෙන්වා දෙන්නේ, පෙළපාලියෙන් ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලයට පැමිණි ගුරුවරු කණ්ඩායමයි.

ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන් යනු මෙරට සිටින සියලුම ඉහල නිලතල දරණ  හැම දෙනාගේම ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්ය. එය හරියට සැරියුත් හා මහා මුගලන් යන රහතුන්වහන්සේලා අප වර්තමාන භික්ෂුන් තුලින් දකිනවා හා සමාන කාර්යකි. අපි සියලුම ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන් ඉදිරියේ ගෞරවයෙන් සිටගන්නේ, ඔවුන් අපේ ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්නේ වර්තමානය බැවිනි.

අතිගරු ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා යනු මෙරට ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්ගේ නිර්මාණයකි. එතුමා තුලද මෙරට ගුරුපරපුර කෙරෙහි ඇත්තේද එවන් ලෙන්ගතු කමකි. හැමවිටම ගුරුවරයා මග පෙන්වන්නෙක් මිස මග අහුරන්නෙක් නොවේ.නමුත් නුතන ගුරු පරපුර මෙහෙයවන ලංකා ගුරු සංගමය මෙරට රාජ්‍ය විරෝධී සවරුපයෙන් කටයුතු කරන ආයතනයක් ලෙස දුටුවද එයට සම්බන්ධ ගුරුවරු මෙතරම් ම්ලේච්ච ලෙස හැසිරෙන්නන් ලෙස අපි කිසිදා නොසිතුවෙමු.

ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලය යනු මෙරට ඇති උත්තරීතර ආයතනයකි. මෙයට පෙර මෙරට පාලනය කල එකද ජනාධිපතිවරයෙක්, මේ ආකාරයට නිදහසේ ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලයට පෙළපාලිවලට පැමිණීමට ඉඩ දුන්නේ නැත. නමුත් ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ඕනෑම පෙළපාලියකට නිදහසේ ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලය දක්වා පැමිණීමට ඉඩදී තිබේ. ඒ අනුව අද දින මේ ගුරුවරුද තමන්ට ඇති කියන ගැටලුව විසදා ගැනීම සඳහා පෙළපාලියෙන් සටන් පාඨ කියමින් පැමිණියහ.

මෙතන ඇති සුවිශේෂිත්වය වන්නේ,රටේ පළමුවැනි පුරවැසියා සිටින මධ්‍යස්ථානයට රට ජාතිය ගොඩනැගීමට සිටින මහා උපදේශකයන් නිර්මාණය කරන ගුරුපරපුර පැමිණීමයි. මෙය තවත් ආකාරයකින් කියනවා නම් රජු මුණගැසීමට රටපුරා විසිරි සිටින බ්‍රාහ්මණයන් පැමිණි බවයි. රජුත් ගෞරවනීය තලයක් සිටින අතර බ්‍රාහමනයන් ඊටත් වඩා ඉහල ගෞරවනීය තලයක් සිටින අයය.

අද අප දුටුවේ එයද ගෞරවනීය ගුරුවරු තමන්ට තරම් දුරකට පැමිණීමට ඉඩදීම සම්බන්ධව ස්තුතිවන්තබාවයකින් තොරව පුජනිය දඹුල්ලේ රජමහා විහාරයේ සිටින රිලවුන්ගේ තත්වයට පත්ව මුළු ගුරු පරපුරටම නිගා දෙන ලෙස හසුරුනහ.කොතරම් පහත තත්වයට වටුනාද යත්, ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලයට පැමිණි සමහර පිරිස් ඔවුන් හරවා යැවු අතර, සමහර වාහන වල හුලන් යැවීමද සිදු කළහ.

ස්වභාවය මේ තත්වය නිර්මාණය කොට පෙන්වා දුන්නේ මෙරට පාසල් පද්ධතිය තුල සිටින්නේ, විනය ගරුක ගුරු පරපුරක් නොවන බවයි. තවද ඔවුන්ගෙන් විනයගරුක අනාගත පරපුරක් හෝ රටක් බලා පොරොත්තු විය නොහැකි බවද පෙන්වා දුන්හ. මෙය බරපතල ගැටලුවකි. මෙවැනි ගුරුවරුන්ට පාසලක් පන්තියක් දරුපරපුරක් ගොඩනැගීමට ඉඩදිය නොහැක. එබැවින් ජනාධිපතිතුමා වටහාගත යුත්තේ මෙතන ඇති බරපතලම ගැටලුව වන්නේ වැටුප් විෂමතාවය සම්බන්ධව කටයුතු කිරීම නොව පිරිහුණ විනයක් ඇති ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්ගෙන් මේ රටත් ජාතියත් ගලවා ගන්නේ කෙසේද යන්න සම්බන්ධවයි.

නිවැරදිව කටයුතු සිදුකරනවා නම් පළමුව ජනාධිපති ලේඛම් කාර්යාලය අභියස්දී විනය විරෝධිව හැසුරුන සියලුම ගුරුවරුන් සොයාබලා ඔවුන්ව සේවයෙන් නෙරපා හැර, ඊළඟට ගුරු වැටුප් විෂමතාවයක් ඇත්නම් ඒ සම්බන්ධව කතා කල යුතුය.ඉතාම පැහැදිලි කරුණ වන්නේ මෙවන් ගුරුවරුන්ට දීප්තිමත් අනාගතයක් මේ රටට ලබාදිය නොහැකි බවයි.,

නවෝදාගම යෝජිත රක්ෂිතයේ මහා පරිමාණයෙන් පරිසර හානි සිදු කරමින් බොරලු කපා ප්‍රවාහනය කළ පුද්ගලයින් පොලිස් විශේෂ කාර්ය බලකා නිළධාරීන් එක්ව අත්අඩංගුවට

July 22nd, 2021

තිස⁣⁣ර සමල් එප්පාවල 

විලච්චිය ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කොට්ඨාශයේ  වන සංරක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව යටතේ පාලනය වන  නවෝදාගම යෝජිත රක්ෂිතයේ, නවෝදාගම වැව් ඉස්මත්තේ වන සංරක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තු අවසරයකින් තොරව  මහා පරිමාණයෙන් පරිසර හානි සිදු කරමින්  බොරලු කපා ප්‍රවාහනය කළ පුද්ගලයින් පස් දෙනෙකු හා ටිපර් රථ තුනක් හා බොරලු කැපීමට යොදා ගත් ස්කැවේටර් යන්ත්‍රයක් අනුරාධපුර අඩවි  වන  කාර්යාල නිළධාරීන් හා උළුක්කුළම පොලිස් විශේෂ කාර්ය බලකා නිළධාරීන්  එක්ව අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන ඇත.

විලච්චිය ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කොට්ඨාශයේ  නවෝදාගම වැව් ඉස්මත්තේ පිහිටි නවෝදාගම යෝජිත වන රක්ෂිතයේ විශාල ලෙස පරිසර හානියක් සිදු කරමින් බොරලු කැපීම සිදු කරන බවට ලැබුණු පැමිණිල්ලක් මත අනුරාධපුර අඩවි  වන  කාර්යාල නිළධාරීන් හා උළුක්කුළම පොලිස් විශේෂ කාර්ය බලකා නිළධාරීන්  එක්ව වැටලීමක් සිදු කර ඇත, 

අදාළ නවෝදාගම හා හැළඹගස්වැව යන වැව් දෙකෙහිම ජල පෝෂක කළාපයක් වන අතර,  වන අලින් නිරන්තරයෙන් ගමන් ගන්නා අලිමංකඩක මෙම බොරලු කැපීම සිදු කරමින් සිට ඇත. දින කීපයක් එහි බොරලු කපා ඇති අතර, පරිසරයටද ඉන් විශාල හානියක් සිදුව ඇත.

වැටලීම සිදු කරන අවස්ථාවේදී ස්කැවේටර් යන්ත්‍රයක් මගින් බොරලු කපා ටිපර් රථ තුනකින් බොරලු ප්‍රවාහනය කරමින් සිට ඇති අතර, ඔවුන් සතුව බලපත්‍ර ඇත්දැයි කළ ප්‍රශ්න කිරීමකදී ප්‍රාදේශීය ලේකම් කාර්යාලය හරහා භූවිද්‍යා හා පතල් කැනීම් කාර්යංශයෙන් ලබා ගත් බලපත්‍රයක් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇත.

නමුත් අදාළ භුමිය යෝජිත වන රක්ෂිතයක් බැවින්  වන රක්ෂිතයක අනවසරයෙන් බොරලු කැපීම හේතුවෙන් ස්කැවේටර් යන්ත්‍රය හා ටිපර් රථ 03 ඇතුළු සැකකරුවන් 05 දෙනා අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන ඇත.

අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් සැකකරුවන් ඊයේ (22) අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට නියමිතව තිබිණි.සැකකරුවන් වන රක්ෂිතයට සිදු කළ හානිය මෙතෙක් ගණන් බලා නොමැති අතර, එය තක්සේරු කර අධිකරණය⁣ට ඉදිරියේදී දැන්වීමට නියමිතය. අඩවි වන නිළධාරී සුමිත් සුවාරිස්, විලච්චිට බීට්ටු වන නිළධාරී යූ.බී.වී.පී රත්නායක, උලුක්කුළම බීට්ටු වන නිළධාරී එච්.එස්.පී රත්නසේකර,  පණ්ඩුලගම බීට්ටු වන නිළධාරී එම්.එන් ජයශාන්ත යන මහත්වරුන්  ඇතුළු වන සංරක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තු නිළධාරීන් පිරිසක් සමඟ පොලිස් විශේෂ කාර්ය බලකායේ පොලිස් පරීක්ෂක ජී.ජී.වයි.ආර් දයාරත්න මහතා ඇතුළු පොලිස් විශේෂ කාර්ය බලකා නිළධාරීන් පිරිසක් වැටලීම සිදු කර සැකකරුවන් අත්අඩංගුවට ගත්හ

තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශිය සභා කසල අංගනයේ ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන කාබනික පොහොර නිෂ්පාදන වැඩසටහන

July 22nd, 2021

තිසර සමල් – අනුරාධපුර 

තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශිය සභා කසල අංගනයේ ක්‍රියාත්මක කරන කාබනික පොහොර නිෂ්පාදන වැඩසටහන තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශීය සම්බන්ධීකරණ කමිටු සභාපති, රාජ්‍යය අමාත්‍යය දුමින්ද දිසානායක මහතාගේ නිරීක්ෂණයට ලක් විය.

අතිගරු ජනාධිපති ගෝඨාභය රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමන්ගේ “සෞභාග්‍යයේ දැක්ම”  ජාතික ප්‍රථිපත්තියට අනුව කාබනික වගාව ප්‍රචලිත කිරීම වෙනුවෙන් තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාව මගින් තිරප්පනය, නාච්චාදුව, ගල්කුළම  යන නගරයන්ගෙන්  එක්කාසු කරන දිරාපත් වන කැලි කසල හා ප්‍රදේශයේ වැව් වල පවතින පාසි හා ජපන් ජබර  යොදා ගෙන කාබනික පොහොර නිෂ්පාදනය කිරීමේ වැඩපිළිවෙලක් ආරම්භ කර ඇත.

තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා කසල අංගනයේ මෙම ව්‍යාපෘතිය ක්‍රියාත්මක කරනු ලබන අතර, එහි කටයුතු රාජ්‍යය අමාත්‍යය දුමින්ද දිසානායක මහතාගේ නිරීක්ෂණයට ලක් විය.

දිරාපත් වන කසල හා අවශ්‍ය අනෙකුත් අමුද්‍රව්‍යයන්ද යොදා ගෙන කාබනික පොහොර විශාල වශයෙන් නිෂ්පාදනය කිරීමේ හැකියාවක් තම සභාව සතු බවද එහිදී තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවේ සභාපති රොෂාන් ඉලංගසිංහ මහතා පැවසීය. කාබනික පොහොර මහා පරිමාණයෙන් නිෂ්පාදනය කිරීමට අවශ්‍යය යන්ත්‍ර සූත්‍ර කීපයක අඩුවක් තම සභාව සතුව  පවතින බවද එහිදී රොෂාන් ඉලංගසිංහ සභාපතිතුමන් රාජ්‍යය අමාත්‍යයවරයාට පැවසීය. 

ඒ අනුව ජනපතිතුමන් ඇතුළු අදාළ බළධාරීන් සමඟ සාකච්ජා කර කඩිනමින්  ප්‍රාදේශීය සභාවන වෙත කාබනික පොහොර නිෂ්පාදනයට අවශ්‍යය යන්ත්‍ර  සූත්‍ර කඩිනමින් සපයා දීමට කටයුතු කරන බවද රාජ්‍යය අමාත්‍යය දුමින්ද දිසානායක මහතා පැවසීය.

කාබනික පොහොර ව්‍යාපෘතිය සමාරම්භය සිහි වීම පිණිස තිරප්පනය ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා කසල අංගන භූමියේ පොල් පැළයක් රෝපනය කිරීමද රාජ්‍යය අමාත්‍යය දුමින්ද දිසානායක මහතා ඇතුළු පිරිස අතින් සිදු කෙරිණි.

මෙම අවස්ථාවට මිහින්තලය ආසන ශ්‍රී ලංකා නිදහස් පක්ෂ සංවිධායක, හිටපු පළාත් සභා අමාත්‍යය සරත් ඉලංගසිංහ, ප්‍රාදේශීය සභා මන්ත්‍රීවරුන්, ලංකා රාජ්‍යය පොස්පේට් සමාගමේ හිටපු සභාපති උපාලි අනුරාධ දිසානායක, අමාත්‍යයතුමන්ගේ පෞද්ගලික ලේකම් කවින්ද දිසානායක යන මහත්වරුන් සහභාගී වූහ.

The Federation of University Teachers Associations (FUTA) expresses its utter dismay at the sudden gazette notification amending the Universities Act of 1978

July 22nd, 2021

MEDIA STATEMENT

The government has issued a gazette notification on 20/07/2021, amending the Universities Act of 1978 to include universities for a specific purpose” within the purview of the University Grants Commission (UGC). This sudden and ad-hoc amendment to the Universities Act appears to be a calculated move to bring the Kotelawela National Defense University (KNDU) within the purview of the UGC. Reacting to the major public opposition building against the KNDU Bill, it appears that the government is attempting to push ahead with its distorted project of mixing military and civilian education through this amendment. The government and its advisors are meddling with the higher education regulatory framework of this country either with malicious intent to destabilize the entire university system or in absolute ignorance of the far-reaching consequences of their actions.

In our last statement FUTA highlighted its opposition to ad-hoc changes to the Universities Act of 1978. This amendment realizes our worst fears. By surreptitiously attempting to bring the KNDU within the purview of the UGC the government hopes to achieve the same objectives contained in the KNDU Bill. The University Grants Commission is an entity that regulates civilian university education in the country. It has neither the expertise nor the capacity to regulate a defense establishment. If the KNDU is brought within the purview of the UGC, it will result in a situation where the UGC’s authority is undermined and questioned. Time and again we have witnessed how the military hierarchy is unwilling to submit to civilian authority. This is understandable. Within a military structure there is no consultative decision making. A military decision-making system by default follows a command and execute model. However, the Universities Act of 1978 and the UGC follow a completely oppositional model. They work through a democratic model based on consultation and compromise. These are values deeply enshrined within the Universities Act of 1978. Therefore, this amendment, if passed in parliament, will result in a direct conflict between civilian and military spheres of authority – an unwelcome and unnecessary conflict created by the hasty bull-in-the-china-shop attitude towards regulatory reform adopted by this government.

In addition, there is another major contradiction in this amendment, which the government’s advisors appear to have missed in their haste. If KNDU is to be brought under the UGC as a ‘specific purpose university’, which would naturally mean a university set up for the ‘specific purpose’ of educating military officers, how can civilian programs of study be a part of this university? The classification of KNDU as a ‘specific purpose university’ will automatically invalidate and render illegal all the civilian programs currently operating without regulatory sanction in the university. It is apparent, therefore, that through its hasty, non-consultative tinkering with the Universities Act of 1978 the government has created a situation that can result in further confusion, uncertainty and instability in the higher education and university sector in this country.

ආදරණිය පාසැල් දරු දැරිවියණි,

July 22nd, 2021

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ විසිනි

ඔබ සැම ඉලක්ක කරගත් කාලකන්නි තත්වයක් රටතුල නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. මේ තත්වය ඔබ ඉතා හොදින් තේරුම් ගත යුතුය. ඔබ, අප, කාලාන්තරයක් මුළුල්ලේ ගුරු මව්වරු හා ගුරු පියවරු ලෙස හැදින්වූ සියලු දෙනාම ඔබට ඉගැන්වීමෙන් ඉවත්ව ඇත. මේ වැඩ වර්ජනය කරන ගුරුමව්වරු හා ගුරුපියවරු පාසල් යන අවධියේදී මෙරට කිසිදු පාසල් ගුරුවරයෙක් කුමන හේතුවක් මත වුවද ඉගැන්වීමෙන් බැහැර වීම කිසි කලෙක සිදු නොකළහ. එවන් අගනා ගුරු මව්වරුන්ගෙන් හා පියවරුන්ගෙන් බිහිවූ නුතන ගුරුපරපුර ඔවුන්ගේ ප්‍රතිපත්ති වලට පටහැනිව කටයුතු කරමින් මුළු ජාතියටම ඉගැන්වීම අත්හැර දමා ඇත. මුළු ජාතියටම ඉගැන්වීම අත්හැරීම තරම් ජාතික අපරාධයක් ලෝකයේ කිසිදු ස්ථානයක සිදුනොවන්නකි නමුත් ඒ දේ මෙරට සිදුව ඇත. එහි බලපෑම ඇත්තේ ඔබට පමණක් නොව මුළු රටටමය. ජාතියටමය. මෙය ව්‍යසනයක් වන අතර අසීමිත ලෙස ගුරු වැටුප් වැඩි කලද නොනවතින අරගලයක් නිසා, ගුරු වැටුප් වැඩි කිරීමෙන් මෙම ප්‍රශ්නය විසදිය නොහැක. මෙයට ස්ථිරසාර විසදුමක් නිර්මාණය කලයුතුය. එය කලහැකිය. ඒ කෙසේද යන්න ඔබ අප එකතුව කතා කල යුතුය.

ඔබ ජීවිතය ආරම්භ කර වසර හතරක් යනවිට ඔබට කුමන හෝ ආකාරයේ ළදරු පාසලකට ඇතුළත්වීමට සිදුව තිබේ. එදා සිට අද දක්වා වූ ඒ ගමනේදී ඔබ මුහුණදුන් සියලුම මතකයන් සිහි කරන්න. ඔබේ මව හා පියා පියවරෙන් පියවර ඔබව ගොඩනැංවීම සඳහා මහා පරිශ්‍රමයක් දරා තිබේ. ඔබේ අනාගතය රඳා පවතින්නේ ඔබ ලබන අධ්‍යාපනය මත බැවින්,ඔබේ දෙමව්පියන් ඔබ වෙනුවෙන් නොකරන දෙයක් නැත. ළදරු පාසලෙන් පසු ඔබට ජාතික තලයේ පාසලක් ලබා ගැනීම පහසු කටයුත්තක් නොවේ, ඔබ කොතරම් දුප්පත් වුවද ඔබට ඒ සඳහා කිසියම් මුදලක් පාසලට ලබාදීමට සිදුවේ. සමහර මිල ගණන සාමාන්‍ය පවුල් අවලට දරාගත නොහැකි බව ඔබගේ යහළු යෙහෙලියන් සමග කතා කරන විට ඔබට වටහා ගත යුතුය.

එවන් කැප කිරීමක් සිදුකර ශිල්පය ලබා ගැනීමට පැමිණෙන ඔබට ඒ ශිල්පය ඔබගේ ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්ගෙන් ලැබෙන්නේදැයි මනාව දන්නේ ඔබය. බොහෝවිට ඔබට සැලසුම් සහගතව ඒ අධ්‍යාපනය ලබාදීමට ඔබේ නුතන ගුරුතුමා හෝ ගුරුතුමිය අසමත්වී ඇත. එබැවින්,අති බහුතරයක් සිසුන්ට පෞද්ගලික පන්ති වලට යාමට සිදුව තිබේ. ගුරුවර ගුරුවරියන්ගේ අකාර්යක්ෂමතාවය විසින් මේ සමාජය තුල පෞද්ගලික පන්ති නිර්මාණය කර ඇත. සමහර පෞද්ගලික පන්ති මෙහෙයවන්නේ ඔබට පාසලේ උගන්වන් ගුරුතුමා හෝ ගුරුතුමියමයි. මෙයද ඛේදවාචකයකි. ඔබගේ ඉලක්කය කෙසේ හෝ අධ්‍යාපනය ලබා ගැනීමයි. එබැවින් ඔබගේ දෙමව්පියන් ටියුෂන් සඳහාද අවැසි මුදල් සොයාගෙන, මේ ඔබට ලබාදීමට වෙරදරන්නේ ඔබ අපේක්ෂා කරන අධ්‍යාපනයයි. ඔබ කෙසේ හෝ එය ඉටුකර ගත්තද, ඔබෙ සමහරක් ශිෂ්‍ය සහෝදර සහෝදරියන්ට එය ඉටුකර ගැනීමට නොහැකිව අන්ත අසරණ  සිටින බවද ඔබට දැකිය හැක. මෙවන් තත්වයක් නිර්මාණය වන්නේද ගුරුවරුන්ගේ අකාර්යක්ෂතාවයය්. මේ සියලුම තත්වයන් තුලදී  ලෝක වසංගතයක් වන කොවිඩ් 19 ව්‍යසනය   ආරම්භ විය. එහි පලයන් මෙරට තුලද ව්‍යාප්තවීම ආරම්භවීම නිසා. පාසල් පද්ධතිය වසා දැමීමට රජයට සිදුවිය. ඔබ හා දෙමව්පිය පරපුර ඔබේ අනාගතය සම්බන්ධව ගැටලුවකට මැදිවිය. මෙයට හොඳම විසදුම ඒ වනවිටත් තාක්ෂනය විසින් නිර්මාණය කර තිබුණි. එය ඕන ලයින් අධ්‍යාපන ක්‍රමය ලෙස හැදින්විණි. මේ ක්‍රමතුලින් ඔබට යම් ප්‍රමාණයකට අධ්‍යාපනය ලබාගැනීමේ පහසුවක් උදාවිය. නමුත් මේ ගුරුවර්ජනය හේතුවෙන් එම ක්‍රමය උපන්ගෙයිම මරා දමා තිබේ. දැන් ඔබට වෙනත් විකල්පයක් අවශ්‍යය. මේ වනවිට ඔබට ඉගැන්වීමේ එවැනි මධ්‍යස්ථානයන් නිර්මාණය වී පවතින, අතර,තවදුරටත් එම පසුබිම, වැඩි දියුණු වෙමින්ද පවතී. මේ ලිපියේ අරමුණවන්නේ, ඔබව ඒ සම්බන්ධව දැනුවත් කිරීම හා ඔබව එවන් නිර්මාණිත ආයතනවලින් අධ්‍යාපන කටයුතු කරගැනීමට පෙළඹවීමයි.

අප මේ ලිපිය ලියන්නේ විශේෂිතවූ අරමුණක් ඇතිවය. අපේ රටත් ජාතියත් ඔබය. ඔබව අතරමං කරන තත්වයක් තුල ජාතියක් වශයෙන් අපට නිහඬව බලා සිටිය නොහැක. මේ සිදුකරන්නේ ලෝකයේ ජාතියක් විනාශ කල හැකි වැදගත්ම මුලස්තානයට පහර පිට පහරදීමයි. එය කිරීමට අපට ඉඩදිය නොහැකි. එබැවින් ඔබ වෙනුවෙන් නිර්මානයව ඇති මෙරට සිටින ලොකුම පොහොසතා බව පැවසෙන ධම්මික පෙරේරා මහාතා නිර්මාණය කර ඇති, අධ්‍යාපන මධ්‍යස්ථානයෙන් ඉගෙනීම ආරම්භ කරන්න. එහිදී ඔබට ගුරුවරයා ඒවිදැයි දෙගිඩියාවෙන් නිශ්චිත වෙලාවක බලා සිටීමට සිදු නොවේ. ඔබට අවශ්‍ය වෙලාවට ඕනෑම වෙලාවක ගුරුවරයාගෙන් ඉගෙන ගත හැකිය.මෙවන් මධ්‍යස්ථාන ගණනක් ලොවපුරාම ඇති බැවින් කිසිදු බියකින් තොරව මෙහි අධ්‍යාපන කටයුතු නොමිලේම ලබාගන්න..

1.https://www.dpeducation.lk/

මෙය පමණක් නොව තව විශාල අධ්‍යාපන මධ්‍යස්තාන ගණනාවක් ඔබ වෙනුවෙන් ලොව පුරාම ඉදිවෙමින් පවතින බැවින් නොබියව මෙයට අත ගසන්න.අනාගතය ඇත්තේ වැඩ වර්ජනය කරමින් ඔබව පෙලන ගුරුවරුන් ඇත නොව පිදෙන මල්වන්වූ ඔබ සැම අතය. ඔබ සැමට තිසරණ සරණයි. අපි හැම ඔබ සමගයි.

‘ගුරු දෙවිවරු’ වසල වැඩ කරති.. ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලයට එන වාහන නවතා හුලං අරිති… [Video]

July 22nd, 2021

උපුටා ගැන්ම ලංකා සී නිව්ස්

අද දහවල් ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලය ඉදිරියේ දී ඇවන්ගාඩ් සමාගමේ සභාපති නිශ්ශංක සේනාධිපති මහතාගේ වාහනයේ හුළං බැස්සවීමකට ලක්කර තිබේ.

සිය වැටුප් වර්ධක ලබා දෙන ලෙස ඉල්ලමින් ගුරු විදුහල්පතිවරුන් ජනාධිපති ලේකම් කාර්යාලය ඉදිරියේ පැවැත්වූ විරෝධතාවයක් අතරතුර ඔහු මෙම ගැටළුවට මැදි විය.

ඒ අවස්ථාවේ ජනාධිපති කාර්යාලය ඇතුළු වීමට පැමිණි සේනාධිපති මහතාගේ වාහනය විරෝධතාකරුවන් විසින් අවහිර කරනු ලැබීය.

කිහිපදෙනකු ඔහුගේ වාහනය ටයර් වල හුලං බැස්සවීමට උත්සාහ කරනු දක්නට ලැබිණි.

විරෝධතාකරුවන් ජනාධිපති වරයාගේ ලේකම්වරයෙකු සමඟ සාකච්ඡා කර ඇති අතර ඔවුන් ඉන් පසුවද කියා සිටියේ වර්ජනය තවදුරටත් ඉදිරියටත් සිදුකරන බවයි.

අන්තර්ජාල හරහා ඉගැන්වීමේ කටයුතු ද තවදුරටත් වර්ජනය කරන බවද වෘත්තීය සමිති නායකයන් කියා සිටියහ.

Fertilisers and Chronic Kidney Disease: Truth

July 22nd, 2021

Dr. C. S. WEERARATNA Courtesy The Island

I have heard the Minister of Agriculture, speaking in Parliament, defending the ban on importing inorganic fertilisers, say that fertilisers are one of the causes of the increased incidence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKDu), reported mainly in the North Central Province.

Cadmium, which is nephrotoxic, is found in Eppawala Apatite (rock phosphate- EP). Rock phosphate is used to manufacture phosphate fertilisers such as Triple Super Phosphate (TSP).

Although EP, and TSP contain cadmium, it is present in insoluble complex forms. When these phosphatic fertilizers are applied to soils, only a very small percentage of cadmium, in the fertiliser gets into water as cadmium ion (Cd ++). The balanced cadmium is not easily available and remains as an insoluble complex. Hence, Cd is not available for plants to be absorbed. A number of soil factors, such as soil pH, determine Cd availability. TSP is used as a fertiliser in all agricultural areas in the country including upcountry, but CKDu is reported mainly in the Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa districts.

The exact cause of the disease is not known. A number of seminars/symposia on CKDu have been held during the last few years. Results of studies carried out by a number of Sri Lankan scientists were presented at these seminars, and CKDu was attributed to a toxic element/s or compound/s in drinking water. However, there is no conclusive evidence on what causes CKDu.

The Ministry of Health, in collaboration with the World Health Organisation, carried out a multidisciplinary research study during 2010-2012. This study, costing nearly Rs. 100 million, was assisted by around 40 Sri Lankan scientists. There was no conclusive evidence from this study as to what causes CKDu. A recent review by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (ref. IWMI Working Paper 158) indicates that no specific substance/compound has been proved to cause CKDu.

Some, including the Minister of Agriculture, attribute CKDu to fertilizers. If so, it is not possible to explain why CKDu is not prevalent in many other districts such as Kalutara, Kandy, Nuwara Eliya , Hambantota, etc., where TSP is applied in large amounts. Even in the NCP, the occurrence of CKDu is considerably higher in some DS divisions than in others.

It is very important that those who attribute CKDu to fertilisers, including the Minister of Agriculture, refrain from citing unconfirmed unscientific views/ideas, which tend to give wrong information to the general public and to policymakers.

Dr. C. S. WEERARATNA

csweera@sltnet.lk

Sri Lanka reports 42 more COVID-19 related deaths

July 22nd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The Director General of Health Services has confirmed another 42 coronavirus related deaths for July 21, increasing the death toll in Sri Lanka due to the virus to 3,959.

The deaths reported today includes 25 males and 17 females with one of them below the age of 30. 

Six victims are between the ages of 30-59 years while 35 are aged 60 and above.  

Coronavirus: daily cases count climbs to 1,714

July 22nd, 2021

Courtesy Adaderana

The Ministry of Health says that another 586 persons have tested positive for the novel coronavirus today, increasing the daily count of Covid-19 cases to 1,714. 

This brings the tally of Covid-19 positive cases confirmed in Sri Lanka to 291,298.

22,646 infected patients are currently under medical care while total recoveries stand at 264,755. 

Majority that succumbed to COVID didn’t receive a single vaccine dose’

July 22nd, 2021

Courtesy Hiru News

Health Minister Pavithra Wanniarchchi stated that a majority of patients that succumbed to COVID-19 have not received even one dose of the COVID vaccine.

The Minister requested the people over the age of 60 and others with various complications to take part in the vaccination rollout and to get vaccinated to protect themselves and others.

She reiterated that the main objective of the vaccination rollout is to save the lives of people.

At present, the Government has implemented priority vaccination programmes throughout the island. The Minister of Health stated that the required quantities of vaccines have been received and will continue to be provided.

Despite the successful implementation of the vaccination programme by the Government in the last few days, there has been a slowdown in the number of people coming for vaccinations.

Minister Pavithra Wanniarachchi stated that the health authorities have pointed this out with data and information.

The data and information show that people who have died of Covid infection and are in the intensive care unit have not received a single dose of the vaccine.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress