පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ රංජන්ගේ හඩපට අතර හංගලා – කැෆේ කියයි

January 21st, 2020

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය කැෆේ සංවිධානය

රංජන් රාමනායක මහතාගේ හඩ පට වලට මුවාවී රජය පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණය තවදුරටත් කල් දමමින් සිටින බව කැෆේ සංවිධානය අවධාරණය කරයි. එහි විධායක අධ්‍යක්ෂ අහමඩ් මනාස් මකීන් මහතා පෙන්වා දුන්නේ ‍‍ මේ වනවිට සියලු පළාත් සභාවල නිල කාලය අවසන්ව ඇති බවයි. නමුත්  මේ වන ‍තෙක් වත්මන් රජය එම පළාත් සභා  සඳහා මැතිවරණය පැවැත්වීම සම්බන්දයෙන් මුනිවත රකිමින් සිටින බව හෙතෙම සඳහන් කළේය.

රජය විසින් පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ පවත්වනු වෙනුවට පළාත් සඳහා ආණ්ඩුකාරවරුන් පත්කිරීම මඟින් ජනතා පරමාධිපත්‍ය බලය පැහැරගැනීමකට ලක් කර ඇති බව හෙතෙම අවධාරණය කළේය. පැවති රජය ද දිනෙන් දින මැතිවරණ කල් දමමින්  සිටි අතර මේ නිසා ඇතැම් පළාත්  වල පළාත් සභා නිල කාලය අවසන් වී වසර ගණනාවක් ගතවන බවද හෙතෙම මෙහිදී සඳහන් කළේය. එම  කාලය තුළ  ද පළාත් සභා එවක හිටපු ආණ්ඩුකාරවරුන් යටතේ පැවැතිණ. මෙලෙස දිගින් දිගටම සිදුවීම නිසා පොදු මහජනතාවගේ පළාත් නියෝජනය අහෝසි වී සියලු බලතල එක් රජයෙන් පත්කළ නිළධාරියෙකු යටතට පත්වීම බරපතල කරුණක්  බව මනාස් මකීන් මහතා අවධාරණය කරයි.

පළාත් සභා පරිපාලනය හුදෙක්ම දේශපාලනික පත්වීම් වන ආණ්ඩුකාරවරුන් හරහා ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීම මඟින් සාමාන්‍ය පොදු ජනයා දැඩි අසීරුවට පත්වන බව ද ඒ මහතා මෙහිදී සඳහන් කළේය.  එලෙස අසීරුවට පත් වන ජනයා වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටිනු වෙනුවට ඇතැම් ජනමාධ්‍යයද රංජන් රාමනායක මහතාගේ හඩපට ආදිය ප්‍රචාරය කරමින් සැබෑ ජනතා ප්‍රශ්න අමතක කරමින් සිටින බව කැෆේ සංවිධානය පෙන්වා දෙයි. මෙ සම්බන්ධයෙන් වැඩිදුරටත් අදහස් දැක්වූ අහමඩ් මනාස් මකීන් මහතා සඳහන් කළේ  රජය පළාත් සභා මැතිවරණ ද රංජන්ගේ හඩපට අතර සඟවා දමා ඇති බවයි.

මාධ්‍ය ඒකකය

කැෆේ සංවිධානය

හතේ පොතට ලුණු වැඩි වුනාලු!

January 21st, 2020

ආචාර්ය වරුණ චන්ද්‍රකීර්ති

පහුගිය දවස්වල අපේ රටේ මහා ආන්දෝලනයක් ඇති කරපු හතේ අපේ පොත” ගැන සාකච්ඡාවකට මමත් සහභාගී වුනා. අද (ජනවාරි 21 වැනි දා අඟහරුවාදා) ඒ සාකච්ඡාව පැවැත්වුනේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු සංකීර්ණයේ දී. ඒ සාකච්ඡාව කැඳවලා තිබුණේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අධ්‍යාපන සහ මානව සම්පත් සංවර්ධනය පිළිබඳ ආංශික අධීක්‍ෂණ කාරක සභාවයි කාන්තා සහ ස්ත්‍රී පුරුෂ සමාජභාවය පිළිබඳ ආංශික අධීක්‍ෂණ කාරක සභාවයි ඒකාබද්ධ වෙලා. හවස 2 ට පටන් ගත්ත ඒ සාකච්ඡාව හවස 5:30 විතර වෙද්දි අවසන් වුනා.

මේ සාකච්ඡාවේ දී මම නියෝජනය කළේ හතේ අපේ පොත” සම්බන්ධයෙන් සමාජ විරෝධයක් ඉදිරිපත් කරපු පාර්ශ්වය. පූජ්‍ය මැදගොඩ අභයතිස්ස හිමියන්, පූජ්‍ය ඉඳුරාගාරේ ධම්මරතන හිමියන්, වෛද්‍ය වසන්ත බණ්ඩාර මහත්තයා සහ රාජකීය විද්‍යාලයේ ගුරුවරුයෙක් (මම එතුමාගේ නම දන්නේ නෑ) එක්ක තමයි මම ඒ පාර්ශ්වය නියෝජනය කළේ. ඒ කියන්නේ අපේ පාර්ශ්වයට පස් දෙනෙක් සම්බන්ධ වෙලා හිටියා.

හතේ අපේ පොත” සම්පාදනය කරන්න දායක වෙච්ච සෞඛ්‍ය සහ අධ්‍යාපන ආයතන නියෝජනය කරන නිලධාරීන් සහ ඒ පොතේ ගුණ දකින අය තිහක් හතළිහක් විතරත් සාකච්ඡාවට සම්බන්ධ වුනා. මහ සද්දෙට පොතේ ගුණ වනපු අය අතර ප්‍රවීන සිනමා නිළි අනෝමා ජිනාදරී මහත්මියත් හිටියා.

තවත් පිරිසක් පැත්තක් ගන්නේ නැතුව බලාගෙන හිටිය බවක් තමයි මම දැක්කේ. විශේෂඥ වෛද්‍ය අනුරුද්ධ පාදෙණිය මහත්තයා වගේ අය තමයි ඒ පාර්ශ්වය නියෝජනය කළේ. ඒ අය කිසිම දෙයක් කිව්වේ නෑ.

සභාව මෙහෙයවපු ඉස්සරහ මේසයේ දහයක දොළහක විතර පිරිසක් රැඳිලා හිටියා. ඒ අතර කාරක සභා දෙක නියෝජනය කරන පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරු සහ ඇමැතිවරු පිරිසකුත් කාරක සභා දෙකේ ලේකම් තනතුරු හොබවන අයත් හිටියා. ඒ හැම කෙනෙක්ගේ ම මූණු මම අඳුරන්නේ නෑ. සභාපති පුටු දෙක හෙබෙව්වේ ආශු මාරසිංහ මන්ත්‍රීතුමාත් වෛද්‍ය තුසිතා විජේමාන්න මන්ත්‍රීතුමියත් (අද තමයි එතුමිය අපේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ මන්ත්‍රිතුමියක් කියලා මම දැන ගත්තේ). මේ සභාපති පුටුව හොබවපු දෙන්නා ම එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂය නියෝජනය කරමින් ඒ පක්‍ෂයේ ජාතික ලැයිස්තුවෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට ආපු අය.

කාන්තා සහ ස්ත්‍රී පුරුෂ සමාජ භාවය පිළිබඳ ආංශික අධීක්‍ෂණ කාරක සභාව නියෝජනය කරන මන්ත්‍රීවරු අතර රන්ජන් රාමනායක මන්ත්‍රිතුමාත් හිරුණිකා ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍ර මන්ත්‍රිතුමියත් ඉන්න බවක් පස්සේ දැන ගත්තා. කොහොම වුනත් ඒ අය අද සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගී වුනේ නෑ.

අද සාකච්ඡාවට සහභාගී වෙලා ඉස්සරහ මේසයේ හිටිය අනිත් මන්ත්‍රිවරුන්ගේ මූණුවලින් මම අඳුරන්නේ සුදර්ශිනී ප්‍රනාන්‍දුපුල්ලේ මන්ත්‍රිතුමියත් ලසන්ත අලගියවන්න ඇමැතිතුමාත් විතරයි. මොන තරම් දේවල් මතක තියාගන්න පුළුවන් වුනත් මට මිනිස්සුන්ගේ මූණු මතක තියාගන්න ටිකක් අමාරුයි. සමහර විට ඒ අය මීට කලින් මම කවදාකවත් දැකපු නැති අය වෙන්නත් පුළුවන්. ඒකට කමක් නෑ. කොහොම හරි අපිට ඉස්සරහින් දහයක් දොළහක් විතර පිරිසක් වාඩි වෙලා හිටියා.

සභාපති පුටු දෙක හොබවපු ආශු මාරසිංහ මන්ත්‍රීතුමාත් තුසිතා විජේමාන්න මන්ත්‍රීතුමියත් හතේ අපේ පොත” අගය කරමින් අදහස් දක්වපු පාර්ශ්වයට පක්‍ෂ බවක් තමයි මම නම් නිරීක්‍ෂණය කළේ. තුසිතා විජේමාන්න මන්ත්‍රීතුමිය නම් ඒ වෙනුවෙන් කෙළින් ම පෙනී හිටියා. ආශු මාරසිංහ මන්ත්‍රීතුමා නම් ඒ තරම් ප්‍රබල විදිහට තමන් පෙනී ඉන්න පැත්ත එළිදරව් කළේ නෑ.

ආශු මාරසිංහ මන්ත්‍රීතුමාට පිං සිද්ද වෙන්න මමත් විනාඩි පහක විතර කාලයක් අදහස් ඉදිරිපත් කළා. අනිත් පාර්ශ්වය නියෝජනය කරපු පිරිස වැඩි හින්දා අපිට වැඩි වෙලාවක් දෙන්න එතුමාට බැරිවෙන්න ඇති කියලා මම හිතනවා. හැමෝට ම සාධාරණය ඉෂ්ට කරන්න ඕනනේ!

ඉස්සරහ මේසයේ හිටිය අයගෙන් මූලික පරිපාලන සහ තීන්දු තීරණවලට අදාළ කරුණු අහලා ලසන්ත අලගියවන්න ඇමැතිතුමා මැදිහත් භූමිකාවක් නිරූපණය කළා. පෙළ පොත්, පුස්තකාල පොත් සහ අමතර කියැවීම් පොත් පළ කරන වැඩේට අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශය සම්බන්ධ වෙන විදිහ පැහැදිළි වුනේ එතුමා අහපු ප්‍රශ්නවලට ලැබිච්ච උත්තරවලින්.

කොහොම හරි අපි පස් දෙනා ම අපිට පුළුවන් විදිහට අපේ අදහස් ඉදිරිපත් කළා. ඉඩ කඩ සහ කියවන අයගේ වෙලාව ගැන සළකලා ඒ ඔක්කොම අදහස් මේ ලිපියෙන් ලියන්නේ නෑ. මගේ අදහස් දැක්වීමේ දී මම අහපු ප්‍රශ්න ටික විතරක් මෙතැන සඳහන් කරන්නම්.

1.    ජීවිතයට අදාළ හැම දෙයක් ම පාසලේ දී ම ඉගෙන ගත යුතු ද?
2.    දෙමව්පියන් කියන්නේ ගුරුවරුන් නෙවෙයි ද?
3.    සමාජයේ ගුරුවරු නැති ද?
4.    යහළුවන් අතර ගුරුවරු නැති ද?
5.    තමන්ටත් තමන්ගේ ම ගුරුවරයෙක් වෙන්න බැරි ද?
6.    කවි, කෙටි කතා, නව කතා වගේ දැනුම හරහා මේ දැනුම සන්නිවේදනය කරන්න බැරි ද?
7.    මේ දේවල් අමු අමුවේ කියන්නේ සන්නිවේදන හැකියාවක් නැති අය නේ ද?

මේ ප්‍රශ්න එකකටවත් කාගෙන්වත් උත්තර ලැබුණේ නෑ. ඒකටත් කමක් නෑ. අපි එච්චර දේවල් දන්න අය නෙවෙයිනේ.

කොහොම හරි සාකච්ඡාව ඉවර වුනේ එකඟතා දෙකක් ඇති කරගෙන. අපේ හතේ පොතට ලුණු වැඩි වුනා” කියලා ඒ පොත ලියපු අය පිළිගත්තා. කෑමකට ලුණු වැඩිවුනාම සීනි දාලා ලුණු අඩු කරනවා වගේ මේ වැරැද්ද හදාගන්න ඕන කියලා එක නෝනා කෙනෙක් කිව්වා. අපේ අම්මා අපිට කියලා දීලා තියෙන්නේ කෑමකට ලුණු වැඩි වුනාම අල පෙත්තක් කපලා දාන්න කියලා. කොහොම හරි ලුණු අඩු කර ගන්න පුළුවන් නම් කමක් නෑ. ලුණු වැඩි වෙච්ච පොත් ටික ඔක්කොම ආපහු එකතු කරගන්න අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශය නියෝජනය කරපු නිලධාරීන් එකඟවුනා. ඉතින් ඒක තමයි පළමුවැනි එකඟතාව.

දෙවැනි එකඟතාව ඇතිවුනේ වෛද්‍ය වසන්ත බණ්ඩාර මහත්තයා ඉදිරිපත් කරපු අදහසක් මුල් කරගෙන. එතුමා කිව්වේ මේ වගේ පොත් ලියන්න කලින් ඒවාට අදාළ ප්‍රතිපත්ති, නිර්දේශ සහ සම්මත සකස් කරගන්න ඕන බවක්. යුනිසෙප් සංවිධානයත්, නවසීලන්තයේ අධ්‍යාපන අමාත්‍යාංශයත් සකස් කරපු ඒ වගේ ලේඛන ගණනාවක් එතුමා සභාවට ඉදිරිපත් කළා. ඒ ලේඛන ආශු මාරසිංහ මන්ත්‍රීතුමා භාරගත්තා. ඉතින් ඒ විදිහට අපේ ම අපේ ශ්‍රී ලාංකික ප්‍රතිපත්ති, නිර්දේශ සහ සම්මත ඇති කරගන්නත් හැම දෙනා ම එකඟවුනා. ඒක තමයි දෙවැනි එකඟතාව.

ඉතින් ඉදිරියේ දී කවදා හරි අලුතින් අපේ හතේ පොතක් හරි අපේ අටේ පොතක් හරි ලියැවෙන්නේ මේ ප්‍රතිපත්ති, නිර්දේශ සහ සම්මත සම්පාදනය කර ගත්තාට පස්සේ. ඒ සඳහා අවශ්‍ය උපදෙස් ලබාදෙන්න අපිත් එකඟවුනා.

හවස පහයි තිහට පමණ සභා තොමෝ සතුටින් විසිර ගියා!

මේ ලිපිය ඉවර කරන්න කලින් අපි පුංචි ම පුංචි කාලේ කියවපු කවියක් දෙකක් ලියන්නම්. මේ කවි තියෙන්නේ ගණ දෙවි හෑල්ල” පොතේ.

ආයුබෝ වන සෙතා
ඉසුරු වරමින් යුතා
උමාගන දළ නෙතා
ඉසුරු එබිසෝ වෙතා

ගැබැ කුමර හට ගතා
දිනෙන් දින මෝරතා
දොළ උපත හට ගතා
රස මියුරු ගෙන දෙතා

එදොළ සංසිඳුවතා
එසත් මස පිරිගතා
දෙතන පුඩු කළු වෙතා
කිරි බරින් සිට ගතා

නව සඳෙව් රුවිනිතා
දස එකඩ මස වෙතා
විලි රදය පහරිතා
ගුරු දිනේ බිහි වෙතා

මේ මොන අධ්‍යාපනයක් ද කියන එකත් ටිකක් හිතලා බලන්න.

ආචාර්ය වරුණ චන්ද්‍රකීර්ති

Sri Lanka appoints high level task force to boost tourism

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Sri Lanka tourist arrivals break records in January

Colombo, Jan. 21 – The Sri Lankan Tourism Ministry on Tuesday appointed a seven-member high level task force to transform the island’s tourism sector into a $10 billion industry by 2030.

Minister of Industrial Export, Investment Promotion, Tourism and Civil Aviation, Prasanna Ranatunga said in a statement that the task force consisted of key state sector stakeholders, including the chairman of flag carrier SriLankan Airlines, reports Xinhua news agency.

The Minister told the local Daily Financial Times that the task force was expected to identify problems faced by the tourism industry and offer solutions and implementation guidance on the future development of the sector.

Given the importance of the sector for the development of the economy, Minister Ranatunga had also instructed the task force to submit its recommendations within two weeks.

In addition, the Minister has directed the task force to identify new areas to develop tourism apart from traditional tourist attractions.

The task force has been instructed to submit proposals and programs to promote tourism based on areas such as amusement parks, religion, cultural and national heritage, adventure sports, agriculture and forestry tourism, indigenous Ayurveda and so on,” he said.

Ranatunga also said that he intended to implement a strategic marketing programme to promote Sri Lankan tourism within a wide range of countries.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa said here last week that his government would aim to increase the annual tourist arrival figure to seven million by 2030, while also making it a $10 billion industry.

Last year, Sri Lanka attracted over 1.9 million tourists with India, China and Britain being the leading markets.

Double trouble: Too many show for Sri Lanka twins record bid

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, Jan 21 (AFP) – A Sri Lankan attempt to set a world record for the largest gathering of twins may have failed Monday after an unexpectedly large turnout overwhelmed organisers who vowed to try again.

Organisers from the Sri Lanka Twins group had called on multiples across the island to pack a sports stadium in the capital Colombo to try to break Taiwan’s Guinness World Record set in 1999 of 3,961 pairs of twins, 37 sets of triplets and four sets of quadruplets.

Pic - AFP

But a bigger than expected crowd flocked to the stadium, with a long registration queue snaking around the arena as birth certificates were checked and participants posed for photographs.

Organisers said the huge turnout meant they were unable to meet strict guidelines set by Guinness World Records.

We had more than we expected. Getting them all to go through a single entry point was not easy,” Sri Lanka Twins spokeswoman Wasana Ranasinghe told AFP.

A mother of twin girls aged 10, Ranasinghe said just over 6,000 pairs — ranging from ages of three months to 89 years — had been registered during a five-hour period.

However, not all of them remained at the stadium to pose for a mandatory group photo or waited for at least five minutes, as required by the guidelines, she added.

We will know in two weeks if we actually qualified for the record or not, but even otherwise, we have managed to raise awareness,” she said.

Ranasinghe and many others told AFP they wanted to try to break the record again if they fail this time, confident they would be able to attract a similarly large crowd.

Some twins travelled for hours just to be part of the record attempt.

Two army generals, Jayantha and Pooraka Seneviratne, led a contingent of twins in the Sri Lankan military.

Now that we know our strength, we can even make another attempt,” Jayantha said while posing for photos with other twins.

Software engineer S. Sathiyan and his village official twin Sayanthan travelled 400 kilometres (250 miles) to Colombo from Jaffna in the country’s north.

We travelled for 10 hours by train to get here on time,” Sathiyan said.

We thought it was an opportunity to see so many twins and be part of something that would be good for the country.”

BBC Sinhala accepts Azzam Ameen’s resignation

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, Jan.21 (newsin.asia) – The BBC Sinhala service has accepted the resignation of its Colombo based correspondent, Azzam Ameen following a controversial telephone conversation which was leaked out in the public between Ameen and UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake last week.

Ameen had tendered his resignation to BBC with effect from January 1, but it had not been accepted by the BBC Sinhala Service at the time.

However the resignation was accepted on Tuesday after a huge public outcry following the exposure of the telephone conversation, with many supporting Ameen while others called for him to quit the BBC service.

News reports said the private conversation between Ameen and Ramanayake was disclosed by the controversial Sinhale Organization two days ago.

Ameen had been with the BBC Sinhala service for several years, earning praise for his journalism.

Over 121,000 telephone conversations, secretly recorded by UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake have been taken into custody after he was arrested by the police a few weeks ago. Ramanayake was released on bail but was later arrested again after allegations that his telephone conversations revealed him interfering with the judiciary during the past government.

Azzam Ameen resigns from BBC Sinhala

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy Ada Derana

BBC Sinhala Service’s correspondent in Sri Lanka, Azzam Ameen has resigned from his position in the organization.

According to reports, he had tendered his resignation to the company with effect from the 1st of January, however, it was not accepted by BBC Sinhala Service at the time.

In the meantime, the Sinhale Organization disclosed a controversial telephone recording between UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake and Azzam Ameen two days ago.

Considering the situation, the organization has processed Ameen’s resignation.

Ameen, speaking to Ada Derana, confirmed that he is no longer employed at BBC Sinhala.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – Interdicted Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala questioned for over 3 hours

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy Ada Derana

Interdicted Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala has left the Colombo Crime Division (CCD) after recording a statement for over three hours.

He had arrived at the CCD at around 2.30 p.m. to record a statement over his controversial video conversation with UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake.

Earlier this month, a series of audio recordings of phone conversations between the MP and several high-profile officials in the country including former Director of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and justices, were leaked to the media.

Recordings contained phone conversations between the parliamentarian and Justices Gihan Pilapitiya, Padmini Ranawaka, and Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala.

Baddegama Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala was later interdicted by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) last week over the issue while the commission had also sent its recommendations to the President on High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya.

The Attorney General has instructed the CCD to record statements from the three justices.

Accordingly, HC Judge Pilapitiya and Retired Judge Padmini Ranawaka recorded their statements with the CCD yesterday and the day before.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – HC Judge Gihan Pilapitiya interdicted

January 21st, 2020

Courtesy Ada Derana

Embilipitiya High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya has been interdicted over the controversial phone conversation he has had with UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake says the Judicial Service Commission.

A series of audio recordings of phone conversations between the MP and several high-profile officials in the country including former Director of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and justices, were leaked to the media earlier this month.

Recordings contained phone conversations between the parliamentarian and Justices Gihan Pilapitiya, Padmini Ranawaka, and Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala.

Baddegama Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala was later interdicted by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) last week over the issue while the commission had also sent its recommendations to the President on High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya. He was accordingly interdicted today (21).

As per the Attorney General’s instructions, the CCD recorded statements from HC Judge Pilapitiya and Retired Judge Padmini Ranawaka yesterday and the day before. Magistrate Hemapala gave his statement to the CCD this afternoon.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – රන්ජන්ගේ වීඩියෝවක් නිසා වැඩ තහනම් කළ විනිසුරු ධම්මික හේමපාලගෙන් සී.සී.ඩී.යට පැය 3 ක ප්‍රකාශයක්

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

>පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායක සමඟ සංවාදයේ නිරතවීම හේතුවෙන් සේවය අත්හිටුවා ඇති බද්දේගම මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ධම්මික හේමපාල අද කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශයට පැමිණ ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබාදුන්නා.

ඒ, මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරයා සහ රන්ජන් රාමනායක මන්ත්‍රීවරයා සංවාදයේ නිරත වන වීඩියෝ පසුගිය දිනවල සමාජ මාධ්‍යයේ හුවමාරු වීමත් සමඟයි.

>මේ අනුව අදාළ ප්‍රකාශය ලබාදීමට ඔහු පස්වරු 2.30 ට පමණ කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශය වෙත පැමිණි අතර, පැය 3 කට ආසන්න කාලයක් අදාළ ප්‍රකාශය ලබාදුන් බවයි හිරු වාර්තාකරු සඳහන් කළේ.

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායකගේ දුරකථන හඬ පට සංවාද සිද්ධියට අදාළව හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිනී එන්. රණවකගෙන් ද කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශය ඊයේ පැය 2කට අධික කාලයක් ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබා ගත්තා.

එහිදී ඇය තමන් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායක සමඟ දුරකථනයෙන් සංවාදයේ නිරත වූ බවට පිළිගෙන තිබුණා.

එසේම පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායක සමග දුරකථන සංවාදවල නිරතවීමේ සිද්ධීන්වලට අදාළව, ඇඹිලිපිටිය මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටියගෙන් ද කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය පෙරේදා පැය 05ක කාලයක් ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කරගෙන තිබුණා.

මේ අතර කොළඹ අද පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවකදී සිංහලේ සංවිධානයේ මහ ලේකම් පූජ්‍ය මැඩිල්ලේ පඤ්ඤාලෝක හිමියන් කියා සිටියේ හිටපු විනිසුරු පද්මිණී එන් රණවක වහාම අත්අඩංගුවට ගත යුතු බවයි.

හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිණී එන් රණවක අත්අඩංගුවට ගන්නා ලෙස බල කරමින් සිංහලේ සංවිධානය අද දිවයිනේ ස්ථාන රැසක පෝස්ටර් අලවා තිබෙනු දක්නට ලැබුණා.

එසේම හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිණී එන්. රණවක දේශපාලන හේතුන් මත ලබාදුන් නඩු තීන්දුවලින් අගතියට පත්වූවන්ට සාධාරණය ඉටුකරන ලෙස ඉල්ලා සිංහලේ ජාතික සංවිධානය අද නීතිපතිවරයා වෙත ලිපියක් භාරදුන්නා.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටියගේ සේවය අත්හිටුවයි

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

ඇඹිලිපිටිය මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටියගේ සේවය වහාම ක්‍රියාත්මක වන පරිදි අත්හිටුවා තිබෙනවා.

ගානියාගේ විමර්ශනයේදී ශානිගේ ලේක්හවුස් සබඳතා හෙළිවේ – ප්‍රකාශයක් දෙන්නැයි අධිකරණයෙන් නියෝග

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

පැහැර ගැනීමට ලක්වූවායැයි පැවසූ ස්විස් තානාපති කාර්යාල නිලධාරිනි ගානියා බැනිස්ටර් භාවිත කළ දැනට අධිකරණ භාරයේ ඇති ඇයගේ ජංගම දුරකථනය රජයේ රස පරීක්ෂකවරයා වෙත භාරදෙන ලෙස කොළඹ ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ලංකා ජයරත්න නියෝග කළා.

ඊට අදාළ නඩුව අද කැඳවූ අවස්ථාවේදී අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂක ශානි අබේසේකරට මෙම සිද්ධිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් සිදුකරන විමර්ශනවලට අදාළව ප්‍රකාශ ලබාදෙන ලෙසද මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය නියෝගයක් නිකුත් කරනු ලැබුවා.

අදාළ ස්විස් තානාපති කාර්යාල නිලධාරිනියද අද අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටි අතර, එම ජංගම දුරකථනය සැකකාරියගේ නමට ලියාපදිංචිවූවක් නොවන බැවින් සහ තානාපති කාර්යාලය ලබාදී තිබූ නිල ජංගම දුරකථනයක් නොවන බැවින් එය කාර්යාලීය නිල සන්නිවේදන කටයුතු සඳහා යොදාගත් බවක් නිගමනය කළ නොහැකි බවයි එහිදී මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය සඳහන් කළේ.

එබැවින් අදාළ ජංගම දුරකථනය තානාපති මුක්තියට යටත් බවට සැකකාරියගේ නීතීඥයින් නැගූ තර්කය තමන් ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරන බවයි මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය සිය නියෝගය ප්‍රකාශයට පත් කරමින් දැනුම් දුන්නේ.

එමෙන්ම සැකකාර ගානියා බැනිස්ටර් ට එරෙහිව මෙම නඩුවට අදාළව අසත්‍ය තොරතුරු ලබාදීම මත අපරාධමය චෝදනා ගොනුකර ඇති බැවින් ජංගම දුරකථනය විශ්ලේෂනය කිරීම වඩාත් යෝග්‍ය බවද කොළඹ ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ලංකා ජයරත්න පෙන්වා දුන්නා.

අධිකරණය භාරයේ පවතින සැකකාරිය විසින් භාවිත කළ ජංගම දුරකථනය රජයේ  රස පරීක්ෂකවරයා වෙත යොමුකර පූර්ණ විශ්ලේෂණ වාර්තාවක් කැඳවන ලෙසයි මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය එහිදී නියෝග කළේ.

එමෙන්ම එම පූර්ණ විශ්ලේෂණ වාර්තාව ලද පසුව එම නඩු කටයුත්තට අදාළව පමණක් අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට උපදෙස් ලබාදෙන ලෙස ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය නීතිපතිවරයාට නියම කළා.

ඉන් අනතුරුව මෙම සිදුවීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් විමර්ශනය කරන අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් වැඩිදුර විමර්ශන වාර්තාවක් අධිකරණයට ඉදිරිපත් කරමින් සැකකාර ගානියා ප්‍රැන්සිස් පවත්වා ඇති දුරකථන සබඳතා පිළිබඳව අනාවරණයක් කළා.

එහිදී අනාවරණ වුණේ දෙහිවල ප්‍රදේශයේ පදිංචි ලක්නා තරිඳු පරණමාන නැමැත්තෙකුගේ නමට ලියාපදිංචි වූ දුරකථන අංකයකින් ලේක්හවුස් ආයතනයේ මාධ්‍යවේදි දරීෂා බැස්ටියන් නැමත්තියක් සැකකාර ගානියා බැනිස්ටර්ට වැඩි වාර සංඛ්‍යාවක් ඇමතුම් ලබාදී ඇති බවයි.

එම දුරකථන ඇමතුම් ලබාගෙන ඇත්තේ සැකකාරිය පැහැරගැනීමට ලක්වූවා යැයි පවසන කාලවකවානුව තුළම බවද අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අධිකරණය හමුවේ ප්‍රකාශ කළා.

එමෙන්ම  අදාළ ලේක්හවුස් මාධ්‍යවේදිනිය එවකට එම ආයතනයේ සභාපති ධුරය දැරූ ක්‍රිශාන්ත කුරේ සමඟ අවස්ථා 21 කදී දුරකථන සංවාද පවත්වා ඇති බවද එම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අධිකරණයට කරුණු වාර්තා කළා.

ප්‍රශ්නගත කාල පරිච්ෙඡ්දය තුළ මෙම මාධ්‍යවේදිනිය අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ හිටපු පොලිස් පරීක්ෂක නිශාන්ත සිල්වා සමඟද ඍජු දුරකථන සබඳතා පවත්වා ඇති බවත්, එවකට ලේක්හවුස් සභාපති ධුරය දැරූ ක්‍රිශාන්ත කුරේ අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ශානි අබේසේකර සමඟ දුරකථන සබඳතා පවත්වා ඇති බවත් විමර්ශනවලදී අනාවරණ වී තිබෙනවා.

එබැවින් මෙම සියලු කරුණු එකිනෙක ගලපා බැලීමේදී සැකකාර ගානියා ප්‍රැන්සිස් සහ ඉහත කී නිලධාරීන් අතර පැවති දුරකථන සංවාදයන් හි ජාලාත්මක සම්බන්ධයක් ඇත්දැයි සැක මතුව ඇති බව විමර්ශන නිලධාරීන් මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය හමුවේ සඳහන් කළා.

එසේම මෙම තානාපති කාර්යාල නිලධාරිනිය පැහැරගැනීමට ලක්වූවා යැයි පැවසූ පසුගිය වසරේ නොවැම්බර් 25 වන දිනට ආසන්න දිනවලදී ඉහත කී ලේක්හවුස් මාධ්‍යවේදිනිය හිටපු ලේක්හවුස් සභාපතිවරයා සහ පොලිස් පරීක්ෂක නිශාන්ත ද සිල්වා ස්විට්සර්ලන්තයට ගොස් ඇති බවද විමර්ශන නිලධාරීන් වැඩිදුරටත් පෙන්වා දුන්නා.

ඒ පිළිබඳව වැඩිදුර කරුණු දක්වමින් අපරාධ පරික්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ නිලධාරීන් සඳහන් කළේ ලේක්හවුස් මාධ්‍යවේදිනි දරීෂා බැස්ටියන් පසුගිය නොවැම්බර් 21 වන දිනයේද පොලිස් පරීක්ෂක නිශාන්ත ද සිල්වා, පසුගිය නොවැම්බර් 24 වනදාද, ලේක්හවුස් ආයතනයේ හිටපු සභාපති ක්‍රිශාන්ත ද කුරේ, ඉකුත් දෙසැම්බර් 5 වනදාද ස්විට්සර්ලන්තය බලා ගියද මෙතෙක් ඔවුන් මෙරටට පැමිණ නොමැති බවයි.

එසේම විමර්ශනවලදී අනාවරණ වූ කරුණු සම්බන්ධයෙන් ප්‍රකාශයක් සටහන් කරගැනීම සඳහා අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ශානි අබේසේකරට අනිද්දා එම දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවට පැමිණෙන ලෙස නියෝගයක් නිකුත් කරන්නැයි විමර්ශන නිලධාරීන් මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරියගෙන් ඉල්ලීමක් කළා.

කරුණු සළකා බැලූ කොළඹ ප්‍රධාන මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ලංකා ජයරත්න නියෝග කළේ අනිද්දා අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුවේ හිටපු අධ්‍යක්‍ෂ ශානි අබේසේකරට එහි පෙනී සිට ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබාදෙන ලෙසයි.

එමෙන්ම සැකකාරියගේ ජංගම දුරකථනය රස පරීක්ෂකවරයා වෙත යොමුකර ලබාගන්නා වාර්තාව සහ විමර්ශනවල ප්‍රගතිය පිළිබඳව පෙබරවාරි 11 වනදා නැවත අධිකරණයට කරුණු වාර්තා කරන ලෙසද මහේස්ත්‍රාත්වරිය එහිදී දැනුම්දුන්නා.

එමෙන්ම එම තානාපති කාර්යාල නිලධාරීන් සමඟ ලේක්හවුස් මාධ්‍යවේදී දරීෂා බැස්ටියන් සහ හිටපු ලේක්හවුස් සභාපති ක්‍රිශාන්ත කුරේ දුරකථන සබඳතා පවත්වා ඇති බවද අනාවරණ කළ අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව ශානි අබේසේකර සහ නිශාන්ත ද සිල්වා සමඟ ද ඔවුන් දුරකථන සබඳතා පවත්වා ඇති බව අධිකරණයේදී අනාවරණ කළා.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – තමන් අගවිනිසුරුටත් කතා කළ බව රංජන් රාමනායක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී පිළිගනී

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

අධිකරණයට බලපෑම් කිරීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් රක්ෂිත බන්ධනාගාර ගත කර සිටින රංජන් රාමනායක මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ආන්දෝලනයට තුඩු දුන් හඬපට සම්බන්ධයෙන් අද පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී ප්‍රකාශයක් සිදුකළා.

රක්ෂිත බන්ධනාගාර ගත කර සිටින පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රංජන් රාමනායක බන්ධනාගාරය මගින් අද පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසිවාරය සඳහා කැඳවාගෙන එනු ලැබුවා.

අනතුරුව මන්ත්‍රීවරයා අදාළ හඬපට සම්බන්ධයෙන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේදී ප්‍රකාශයක් සිදුකළා.

එජාපයේ ආසන සංවිධායකවරු විපක්ෂ නායක හමුවෙයි

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ ආසන සංවිධායකවරුන්ගේ රැස්වීමක් අද පාර්ලිමේන්තු සංකීර්ණයේදී පැවැත්වුණා.

ඒ, විපක්ෂ නායක සජිත් ප්‍රේමදාසගේ ප්‍රධානත්වයෙන්.

ආසන සංවිධායකවරුන්ට අමතරව මෙම රැස්වීම සඳහා පක්ෂයේ පළාත් සභා මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් හා දිස්ත්‍රික් සංවිධායකවරුන්ද එක්ව සිටි බවයි හිරු වාර්තාකරු සඳහන් කළේ.

ඉදිරි මහ මැතිවරණය සම්බන්ධයෙන් එක්සත් ජාතික පෙරමුණේ සියලු පළාත් පාලන නියෝජිතයින් ලබන 26 වැනිදා කොළඹට කැඳවා දැනුවත් කිරීමට මෙහිදී තීරණය කර තිබෙනවා.

තවමත් විසඳුමක් නැති එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ පවතින නායකත්ව අර්බුදය

January 21st, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ පවතින නායකත්ව අර්බුදය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අදත් විවිධ පාර්ශ්වයන් අදහස් පළකළා.

How many nations are there in this country?

January 20th, 2020

Dr. Sudath Gunasekara:  President Senior Citizens movement Mahanuwara.

In the present context of the debate on the language in which the national Anthem should be sung I am compelled to ask this question from all our politicians starting with former President Sirisena and all those  who either want to sing it in both Sinhala and Tamil or Sinhala only.

If we sort out what the jatiya of this country the matter ends there

This has been a very big puzzle for me for quite some time. I have no doubt that majority of you who read this note might have had the same problem.  This is mainly because very often people who mater in society, when they speak at public forum use to say ”me rate Siyaluma jatinta” meaning to all nations in this country” which obviously implies that there are many nations in this country. What baffle and confuse me is the question as to how many nations are there in this country. Because usually any given country anywhere in the world has only one nation. To give few selected examples Russia Russians, America Americans, Briton British, Canada Canadians, Italy Italians, India Indians, Japan Japanese, China Chinese, France French and Australia Australians. In this backdrop then why we describe this country only, as a country of many nations,

From the inception of history up to 1815, this country was called Sinhale or Sinhala deepa or Sinhala dveepa, meaning the land of the Sinhala people and its nation was Sinhala, going by the dominant race and the Language of the Bhoomiputra’s. This is why even the British called it Ceylon meaning the land of the Sinhala people. It also had a second name Lanka from very early times, probably given by the ancient Indians. The word Lanka had three meanings. Purana named it as Lanka in two contexts. Compilers of Puranas said ‘Bhumadyaye lankiiyatiti Lanka, meaning it was called Lanka as it is located at the centre of the world. It was also called Lanka by early Bharatians for example Ramayanaya. Valmiki fascinated by its unsurpassed beauty named it as Lanka the beautiful land” in Ramayanaya. Tamilian EElamists like Purnalingam Pille in his Ravana the Great King of Lanka assumes it to be a part of the main land later separated during the Great Biblical deluge and formed in to an Island at the southern tip of the Indian sub-Continent. Thus the word Lanka also has the meaning of the Island in the South Indian context though it appears to be an artificial invention of EELAMISts Tamils in their futile struggle to prove that this country  was a part of the their ancient imaginary EELAM . Either going by the Ramayana tradition or their own imagination the Sinhalese also called it Lanka for its beauty, the resplendent Isle. The Sinhala word Lake behe,’ also means what a beauty, aptly proves the authenticity of this argument. The word Lankika presently been used to designate its citizens means born in Lanka, just like sagarika which means born in the sea. It is important to note that one does not legally become a citizen of a country merely because he or she was born in a given country. To that extent he or she cannot claim citizenship in a country merely on the ground that he /she were born there. Nationality is a much wider concept than that. In this case the question arises as to what nationality one belongs. Obviously his or her nationality will be registered as a person of the country from which he or she come. Therefore obviously all those who are born in this country cannot be called citizens { Ratavesiyo) of this country merely because he/she was born here.

It is difficult to ascertain as to when the word Lankika that is now used to designate the nationality of this country came in to vogue. But I presume it must definitely be of recent origin invented either by those who were looking for an alternative to the word Sinhala which is hated by the Tamils as they are allergic to it or by those Anglicized Sinhala ‘scholars’ who were averse to been identified as Sinhala and promoting minority sentiments. Whatever the reasons may be certainly the invention of the word Lankika to designate all those born in this country as citizens of this country was a clever conspiracy to drop the word Sinhala being used to designate its citizens. 

Coming back to nationality I always thought there is only one Nation in this country too. You would have heard and noticed this lose utterance over the TV, Radio, and the press, at public meetings and even at private conversations. I have seen this happening very often. Our politicians starting from the President, Prime Minister downwards, academia in universities including even some professors of Sinhala and History, some religious dignitaries and some so-called intellectuals who have got disoriented or brain washed in the course of their political and ideological transformations and many more go on uttering these lose words repeatedly like parrots most probably without knowing the seriousness of the damage they do to the Nation that is Sinhala by doing so. In my opinion politicians who woo for minority votes to come to power, people who do not have that spiritual attachment that infuses the sense of nationality and  those who do not have a proper Jatakaya (birth) are the people who indulge in such nonsense. Of course those who really do not know the actual meaning also use it. But they could be corrected whereas the other categories cannot be ever corrected.

When all these big shots either driven by their personal agendas or in their ignorance of the real long term implications go on repeating it like parrots, minorities also begin to think they are separate nations. The most dangerous thing about this trend is the psychological transformation of the perception and attitude of the people that would settle down permanently in their minds and become irreversible. It gets settled in society by usage. In this instance I would like to draw a parallel between the division of the Sinhala people living on the hills and the lowlands, who were divided in to two rival groups as Kandyans and low country Sinhalese by the British. Until Robert Percival in 1803 divided them as Kandyans and cinhalese (those who lived in the lowlands) they were one nation. But since then these artificially created two groups behaved as if they were two different nations and at the early stages of political agitation for constitutional reforms they even asked for two separate federal states, one for the Kandyans and another for the low country people. Thanks to the fact they all belonged to one race, spoke the same language, professed the same religion and had common roots, the differences were patched up in the course of time by common bondage and emerging nationalism it went back to square number one. As such why can’t this band of ignoramus who talks of many nations understand that this country, like most other countries in the world has only One Nation’? They say jati bhedayak neti ekama jatiyak. How on earth can there be differences within a nation” which preciselyimplies one group of people.

So it is no wonder that the ordinary people get confused and also begin to think that this country has more than one nation. The situation is made even worse when top Politicians from high flat forms describe this country as a multinational society. Minority communal elements meanwhile make the maximum use of his confusion. It is like the famous saying panina rilawunta iniman bendeema.

As for me from my small days I thought we have only one nation in this country. That was how the teachers of our day have taught us in school. According to them we are called the Sinahala nation and the country Sinhale, meaning the land of the Sinhala people. They also told us that that could be either because we descend from Vijaya (a man from the Sinha race whose father Sinhabahu is said to have killed the lion father) who is supposed to have found this nation or because we descend from the Sivhela namely, yaksha, Raksha, Deva and Naga who had been living in this Island long before Vijaya arrived in the 6th century B

Since this Island had been known as Lanka or Lankadeepa or Lanka dvipa (the resplendent Isle) even from the time of legendary Ravana we were also called Lankan or Lankika Jatiya, meaning those who were born in Lanka. They also taught us that there had been north Indian invaders like Sena Guttika and Elara starting from 2nd century BC and South Indian invaders like Chola and Pandya in much later times, who had been trying to capture this country from time to time. But every time they attempted to do so they were defeated by the Sinhala Kings and they ruled this country continuously until 1815, when the British conquered it by deceit.

Those invaders who were left behind from very early times got absorbed and integrated in to the main stream and became Lankans or Sinhala people while some of them retained their religion and culture. Also in between there were others especially the Arab traders who came from time to time in small numbers, not as invaders but as traders who were later known as Muslims going by their religion. Most of them got married to local Sinhala women and even took Sinhala ge names and lived among the Sinhala people. But all these men got absorbed in to the main stream while retaining their religious identity only. In addition to the language of the country, that is Sinhala, they also spoke Tamil. This may be due to the fact that most of them came from South India and also they did business with both local and Indian Tamils across the sea.  But the important thing to note here is that almost all these people, both Tamils and Muslims knew the language of the Land. So, even today at least 95 % of the population in this country, if not more, is conversant in Sinhala. The estate Tamils who were brought by the British after 1840s, even though they were deliberately kept separated from the local people as a community also learnt Sinhala as they came in contact with the neighboring Sinhala villages.  So if you take the language as the dominant factor that unifies a nation, in this case Sinhala, what is the other name by which you should name this country and its people? Look at our immediate neighbor India, then countries like Thailand, Japan, China, Korea, Russia, Germany, France, Italy, Greece, Spain and England to name only a few. All these countries are named after the dominant language spoken in those countries.

 It is only at the Donoghmore reforms the Tamil politicians tried to establish a separate identity. With the growth of Tamil communal politics they assumed a Tamil National” attitude and Tamil nationalism emerged which in later years tried to assert as a separate nation within this country. No wonder these minions behave like goliaths when there are no statesmen of stature to draw the line and tell everybody that this country has only one nation and those who talk of many nations will be charged for treason or deported to their original places.

Although the idea of nationality is difficult to define the term nation in modern society is generally used to describe a community of race and language, geographic unity, community of religion, common political aspiration and, above all,  historical development over a long time. This is of course not universal. But however it is essentially a sentiment of unity, spiritual in character and the will of a people to live together as Laski put it. The unity is the outcome of a common history. The Sinhala people even in this context had been a nation at least from the 6th century BC in this country. Even the four groups who lived here previously got identified as one nation as Sivhela or Sinhala. That is why the land was called Sinhale meaning the land of the Sivhela or Sinhala. With the introduction of Buddhism in 307 BC they became Buddhists and ever remained as Sinhala Buddhists Nation’ in this country. With all the vicissitudes of history even in 1815 more than 90 % of the people in this country came within this category.

The other thing is Tamils have a motherland in South India and Muslims a motherland in Arabia, while this country had been the historical motherland of the Sinhala people from the dawn of history. Thousands of archaeological, epigraphical and literary evidence often running even to prehistoric times spread over the entire length and breadth of this country bear enough evidence to this conclusion that has been proved beyond all doubts. Therefore it is irrefutable and unchallengeable.

In this historical backdrop Tamils, Muslims and any other minor ethnic group in this country that forms a part of the Sri Lanka nation or the Sinhala nation is only an integral part of the ”Nation Lankan or Sinhala’ as this country had been known as the land of the Sinhala people right through out in history.  No man or woman can contradict it unless he or she is an incurable lunatic. Therefore at least now these minority ethnic groups should understand their limitations and  due role within the Lankan nation, and concede to this historical reality and learn to live with the major community without running to America, India and other countries asking to tame the Sinhala nation and thereby creating unwanted problems for us as well as for themselves. I am positive that the big majority, of both Tamils and Muslims who are sensible, are prepared to do so. For those who are not prepared to concede to this irrefutable reality, especially the Tamil and Muslim politicians, I think, it is high time that they should renounce their craving for this day dream and go back to their own motherlands without trying to dream of a motherland on somebody else’s country and claiming illegal ownership of someone else’s soil by going round the world just denigrating our country.

On the part of our politicians I think it is high time that first they should rise above present day party politics and assert and behave as statesmen and write this provision in to the Constitution of this country and declare that anyone agitating, behaving or instigating, aiding and abetting others to talk, act or behave as separate nations such as Tamils or Muslims who agitate for separation, contravening the law of the land, shall be charged for high treason.Furthermore the often spoken Bahujatika nonsense should stop. There is only one nation in this country of the Sinhalese, and that is Sinhala. Since all Tamils and Muslims are either invaders or intruders who are scheming to own this country belonging to Sinhalese. It is high time that a Sinhala politician should rise above petty politics and tell this stark truth to the whole world and make the clarion call that The name of this country is Sinhale as it had been from time immemorial up to 1815 and its nation is Sinhala.

ERASING THE EELAM VICTORY Part 13 A

January 20th, 2020

KAMALIKA PIERIS

PART 13  of this series is on the Sri Lanka armed forces.

The Sri Lanka army was established under the Army Act No. 17 of 1949. Brigadier James Sinclair, Earl of Caithness was first Commander of the Army.  The army started with an artillery regiment, an engineer squadron, an infantry battalion, a medical unit, and a service corps company.  Members of the earlier Ceylon Defence Force, (1910- 1949) formed the nucleus of the army. The Ceylon Defence Force was an experienced force. It had   fought in the two World Wars alongside British. The fledgling Sri Lanka army therefore consisted of experienced persons, from the beginning. It was not an army composed of raw recruits, new to warfare.

Ceylon had entered into a Defence Agreement with Britain in 1947. This Defence agreement had provisions for training the new army.  Training in Ceylon was provided by  British Army Training Team (BATT). However, senior officers went to the British Army Staff College, Camberley and to the British Army of the Rhine to gain field experience.

From 1949 officers were sent for training to Sandhurst. They were selected through competitive examination and interview. After the exam, we had a preliminary interview with senior officers of the Army, chaired by the Chief of Staff. The final interview was at the Ministry of Defence, said former Commander Gerry de Silva.

In the 1950s and 1960s Sri Lanka was very proud of the fact that it officers were ‘Sandhurst trained.’ The Sandhurst training was for leading and commanding  troops. Sandhurst trained 80  Ceylonese officers between 1949 and 1968.  ‘I think Sandhurst training helped greatly in the formative years of the Sri Lanka Army. We didn’t have an officer core as such till the Sandhurst cadets returned,’ said Gerry de Silva.

We maintained British traditions right along said Gerry   de Silva in an interview. Those trained at Sandhurst introduced to the Sri Lankan Army the British traditions they had learnt in Sandhurst, and followed them. The ranks, training methods such as the drill system and the weapons training were all on the Sandhurst or the British model.

The army commanders who received this training included Commanders Denis Perera, and Gerry de Silva. Perera also attended the Royal School of Military Engineering  and British Army‘s Staff College, Camberley.   Lt Gen Denzil Kobbekaduwa was trained entirely in Britain.  In addition to Sandhurst, he trained at the Royal College of Defence Studies for Senior Officers Thereafter, officers were sent for training to National Defence College, India. Commanders Tissa Weeratunga, Hamilton Wanasinghe and Sri Lal Weerasooriya trained in India.  

In the 1980s Sri Lanka developed its own training  institutes. There was the  Kotelawala Defence University ( 1981), Defence Services Command and Staff College  at Batalanda, Makola (1997) for Junior field officers and Sri Lanka Military Academy ,Diyatalawa   for basic officer training.

There is also Army Training School in Maduru Oya, Infantry Training Centre in Minneriya,  Combat Training School in Ampara and  Non-commissioned Officers Training School at Kala Oya. Specialized training was given at Marksman Sniper Training School ,Armoured Corps Training Centre, School of Artillery, Sri Lanka School of Military Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineers, School of Signals, Commando Regiment Training School, Special Forces Training School, Engineer Service School, Sri Lanka Army Service Corps school, Sri Lanka Army Ordnance School, Sri Lanka Electrical And Mechanical Engineers School

The 1980s saw a massive expiation of the army from 15,000 personal to over 30,000 and more. New regiments were raised, while others were expanded with new battalions. New weapons and equipment were introduced as the war shifted from counter-insurgency to conventional warfare tactics, with multi battalion, brigade and division scale operations. New regiments were formed which included the Commando Regiment, Special Forces Regiment, Mechanized Infantry Regiment, Gajaba Regiment, Vijayabahu Infantry Regiment, Military Intelligence Corps, Sri Lanka Army Women’s Corps,

In late 1987, the army had a total estimated strength of up to 40,000 troops, about evenly divided between regular army personnel and reservists on active duty. The approximately 20,000 regular army troops represented a significant increase over the 1983 strength of only 12,000. Aggressive recruitment campaigns following the 1983 riots raised this number to 16,000 by early 1985. By 1990 the army had expanded to over 90,000 personnel and by 2007, it had expanded to over 120,000.

In 2010, the Army had approximately 200,000 regular personnel, between 20,000–40,000 reserve personnel and 18,000 National Guardsmen[ and comprises 13 operational divisions, one air-mobile brigade, one commando brigade, one special forces brigade, one independent armored brigade, three mechanized infantry brigades and over 40 infantry brigades.

In the 1980s, the army expanded its range of weapons from the original stock of World War II-era British Lee–Enfield rifles, Sten Submachine guns, Vickers machine guns, Bren machine guns, 6-inch coastal guns, Daimler Armoured Cars, Bren Gun Carriers,[66] 40 mm anti-aircraft guns, 3.7-inch heavy anti-aircraft guns and 4.2-inch heavy mortars as well as post war Alvis Saladins, Alvis Saracen, Ferrets and Shorland S55s. New sources of weaponry in the mid-to-late 1970s included the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and China – countries with which the leftist Bandaranaike government had close ties.

To meet the threat posed by predominantly the LTTE, Army purchasemodern military hardware including 50-caliber heavy machine guns, rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) launchers, Night Vision Devices, 106 mm recoilless rifles, 60 mm and 81 mm mortars, 40 mm grenade launchers and some sniper rifles.

 

Refurbished armored personnel carriers were added to the ‘A’ vehicle fleet of the 1st Reconnaissance Regiment, Sri Lanka Armoured Corps. These APCs enabled the Armoured Corps to have their own assault troops to provide close contact protection to their Alvis Saladin and Ferret Scout Cars which were vulnerable to anti-tank weapons.

The capability of the Sri Lanka Artillery was enhanced with the introduction of Ordnance QF 25 pounders.[ Chinese-made 122 mm, 130 mm and 152 mm howitzers were introduced to the Sri Lankan Army in 1995 and 1998 whilst 122 mm Multi Barrel Rocket Launchers (MBRL), were first used in 2000 by the Sri Lanka Army. Though the weapons were obsolete at the time of purchase, security forces found them to be successful in combat.

LTTE has set land mines weighed approximately 50 – 100 kg, against which no armoured vehicle that the SLA possessed was able to withstand the blast effect. Armscor BuffelsSouth African armoured personnel carriers constructed on a Unimog chassis – were imported in quantity to withstand land mines. By 1987 Sri Lanka’s indigenous Unicorn APC had been engineered from the Buffel, followed by the improved Unibuffel class. Both the Unicorn and the Unibuffel are assembled by the Sri Lanka Electrical & Mechanical Engineers.

The  Sri Lankan Navy was established on 9 December 1950 when the Navy Act was passed for the formation of the Royal Ceylon Navy. Its nucleus was Ceylon Naval Volunteer Force  established,  in 1937.This Volunteer Force was absorbed into Britain’s  Royal Navy as the Ceylon Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve during World War II. The first warship  was HMCyS Vijaya. Training was given at Diyatalawa  and Trincomalee. From  1967  senior officers were trained at Royal Naval College Dartmouth. Recent navy commanders were also trained there.

Sri Lanka Air Force was founded in 1951 as the Royal Ceylon Air Force (RCyAF) with the assistance of Britain’s Royal Air Force (RAF). Flight training was  given at RAF Station Negombo, and  RAF airfield at Katunayake,  In addition, a number of cadet officers received flight training at the Royal Air Force College in Cranwell,  UK . When Sri Lanka took over the British air and naval bases in 1956, SLAF took over the former RAF stations, Katunayake and China Bay. These became SLAF operational stations while ancillary functions were carried out at Diyatalawa and Ekala. In 1967,  a Flight Training School was established at China Bay.

Senior officers of the ranks of Squadron Leader and Wing Commander are given advanced training at the Defence Services Command and Staff College (DSCSC) at Batalanda, Makola. This was established in 1997. Others are trained at SLAF Junior Command & Staff College at  China Bay

Basic officer training is carried out at the Air Force Academy at Bay. The academy offers a two-year program of basic flight training and a variety of specialized courses. Initial Ground Combat Training   is given at Diyatalawa. Diyatalawa also conducts advanced training for SLAF regiment officer cadets.

 Following training at SLAF Diyatalawa, general duties (pilot) branch officer cadets are sent to the Air Force Academy for flight training, and airmen and airwomen are sent to Advanced and Specialized Trade Training School for specialized training in different trades. Air traffic controllers receive schooling at special facilities in Colombo. Approximately twenty-five officers a year receive advanced training abroad, most commonly in Britain, Indian Air Force and, in recent years, at the United States Air Force Academy.

In the 1950s the army was preoccupied with the task of building itself and training its personnel. It was not called on to defend the country. The army first came  to public attention  with the failed military coup d’état of 1962.

A group of Christian officers in the military and police planned to topple the government of Prime Minister Sirimavo Bandaranaike during the night of 27 January 1962, organized by Colonel F. C. de Saram (Deputy Commandant, Ceylon Volunteer Force), Colonel Maurice De Mel, (Commandant, Ceylon Volunteer Force), Rear Admiral Royce de Mel (former Captain of the Royal Ceylon Navy), C.C. Dissanayake (DIG, Range I), Sydney de Zoysa (retired DIG) and Douglas Liyanage (Deputy Director of Land Development), it was to take place in the night of 27 January 1962, but was called off as the government gained information in the afternoon and initiated arrests of the suspected coup leaders.[1] However, key leaders were arrested before the coup was carried out.  Thereafter, the government made sure that command structure of the army did not consist of Christians alone.

The army played a role in the 1971 insurrection and the need for  national security was realized.  In 1984, Israeli security personnel (reportedly from Shin Bet, the Israeli counterespionage and internal security organization) trained army officers in counterinsurgency techniques.   

The first time the Sri Lanka army was asked to fight for the security of the country, was in 1987, when the Eelam wars started  in the north. At the same time, there was a second  insurgency by the CIA funded  JVP,    in the south, forcing the army to deploy its forces in the south of the island and to fight on two fronts between 1987 and 1989.    Note: the main source for the military  data in  this essay is Wikipedia. (Continued)

Strategic stability in the new decade: Ports of Asia in a period of escalation

January 20th, 2020

ASANGA ABEYAGOONASEKERA

The previous Government gave it [Hambanthota Port] on a 99-year lease, and even though China is a good friend of ours and we need their assistance for development, I am not afraid to say that was a mistake.” Gotabaya Rajapaksa[i]

2020 dawns with a US airstrike. The significance of this strike, killing the head of Iran’s elite Quds Force Soleimani and Mohandes the Deputy Commander of Popular Mobilisation Forces presents a turning point in the geopolitics of Middle East.

Soleimani himself had once said to President Trump “You will start this war but we will be the ones to impose its end”. US-Iran tensions will escalate and Tehran’s will retaliate with its asymmetric capability. According to RAND scholar Ariane Tabatabai it will be more strategic, more careful, planned approach,”[ii] by Iran.

As a trading partner and largest buyer of Iranian oil, China’s reaction must be monitored. China is also Iran’s ally as a part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) which gives a clear interest to secure Chinese-Iranian interest in the long term.

The Gate of Supreme Harmony in the Forbidden City in Beijing is guarded by a pair of bronze lions of the Ming era, the female playing with a cub and the male who holds the world in his paw symbolizes power. Does China wish to hold the world in his paw? China is seen as a rising revisionist power [iii].The ancient silk road brought many symbolic and cultural values including the statues of lions to China from Central Asia and from the Buddhist traditions closer to Ming Dynasty. While I learned this during my recent visit to Forbidden City during the newyear. The modern-day Silk Road, the BRI has placed the Chinese economic inroads to many nations while certain Scholars believe China’s footprint to many developing nations is for global dominance, just as the symbolic gesture of the male lion.

China’s Vice-President Wang Qishan highlighted the importance of multilateralism at the Davos forum in 2019. The year before President Trump declared at the same forum that We support free trade, but it needs to be FAIR and RECIPROCAL,the United States will no longer turn a blind eye to unfair economic practices, including massive intellectual property theft”. The US trade war with China has escalated and since, ripple effects have spilt towards many nations, especially those with Chinese large-scale infrastructure projects. This includes USA’s ally Israel and the Indian Ocean island of Sri Lanka, seen as a strong partner of China.

Chinese are altering a static nanometer to understanding geopolitics- which is geography. It is altering geography unlike any other nation from CPEC in Pakistan to Sri Lanka. In a recent example from Sri Lanka, Chinese projects effectively altered Sri Lanka’s western coastal geography by adding 269 hectares reclaimed from the sea for the Colombo Port City. Newly elected Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa who elevated Sino-Lanka relationship to a strategic height during his tenure is back in power and visited the project site he himself inaugurated with the Chinese President Xi in 2014. Rajapaksa along with Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka Cheng Xueyuan officially declared the newly reclaimed land by the Chinese as part of the Colombo district last month.

The Hambanthota port- another Chinese project in Sri Lanka was leased out for 99 years by the previous government. It was a discussion point when the newly elected President Gotabaya Rajapaksa commented that he would revisit the agreement to ensure national security.

It is the first time in the island’s recent history that a Sri Lankan leader of National Security prioritized national security in negotiations to foreign projects- this is required and is commendable. What the previous Government rushed as a bailout due to difficulty in repayment of the Chinese loan came to the forefront with President’s comment, this was further explained by Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa saying it was the media hyping of Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s remarks on Hambantota Port deal as “quoting out of context.The President didn’t mean there is any problem with sovereignty. What the President meant was that our government, unlike the previous one, has a principle of not privatizing assets,” further Prime Minister fully dismissed that China’s BRI as a ‘Debt trap’ refuted by Western media, “We are very confident that Sri Lanka can very clearly repay the loans for the Hambantota Port and other development projects. Today, the economy has collapsed but when we rebuild it, paying back loans won’t be a question,” Rajapaksa said [iv]. What President Gotabaya said on ‘national security’ will be an interesting factor when carefully examining another silent port project unfolding in different geography which has become a security concern, Haifa.

When the eastern border of Israel was blocked the strategic port of Haifa along its western shores was a single gateway to the rest of the world. Conquered by the Crusaders in the year 1100 Haifa became the main port for the ancient city of Tiberius. As rightly predicted by Theodore Herzl in 1902 in Altneuland, Haifa was to become a strategic port in the future for the nation of Israel. We see this prediction unfolding particularly in this century. Haifa in naturally endowed with 700,000 SQM of natural bay along the Mediterranean coast. It is a blessing with its natural deep-water geography. A new container terminal ‘Bay Terminal’ was built to handle 800,000 TEU container movements annually by 2021. The terminal will be operated by the Chinese, Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) who has won the international tender to operate for 25 years. This adds Haifa to the Chinese Belt and Road initiative. While the US Sixth Fleet is docked at the same port, the Chinese will be operating a port which has raised a significant security concern for the US and Israel security experts. Shin Bet- Israel’s top intelligence agencies chief Nadav Argaman warns Chinese influence in Israel is particularly dangerous in terms of strategic infrastructure and investments in larger companies[v],”  His comments further requested Israel’s The Knesset (Israel’s Parliament) to pass legislation to monitor foreign investment in Israel. The same fear was articulated by US congress report on National Defense Authorization Act 2020 section 1289 [vi], stating ‘The committee recommends a provision that would express the sense of the Senate that the United States has an interest in the future forward presence of the United States naval vessels at the Port of Haifa in Israel but has serious security concerns with respect to current the leasing arrangements of the Port of Haifa. Therefore, the provision would express the view that the United States should urge the Government of Israel to consider the security implications of foreign investment in Israel.’

Thus, despite the US fear, Israel has increased its trade with China to 73% in 2018 to US$2.8bn. This shows bilateral economic interest regardless of US sensitivity to Chinese acquisitions and infrastructure diplomacy in Israel. It appears Israel is moving ahead strengthening the Chinese relations. In the same manner, Sri Lanka has increased its trade with China despite the external security concerns and fear especially from its neighbour India.

China has become the largest donor and trading partner to Sri Lanka. Economic attractiveness and availability of Chinese loans leaves other nations with limited space to win large scale infrastructure projects. Viraj Solanki from IISS rightly observes that ‘New Delhi cannot match the level of spending offered by Beijing for infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka – these include US$1.4 billion in backing for the ambitious Colombo Port City project – but it clearly views security cooperation($50m offered during President Gotabaya’s inaugural visit), and in particular counter-terrorism cooperation, as an area in which it does have scope to strengthen relations with the new Rajapaksa government.[vii]

Highlighting the importance of Chinese investments Prime Minister’s Economic Advisor Ajith Nivard Cabraal, former Governor of Central Bank during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s Presidency said that ‘Hambantota Port, which reported 60% growth in shipment volumes in 2019, is one of the most important and strategic assets for the country and that the Government is keen for the port to play a leading role in the economy in 2020.’[viii] While there is a higher expectation of return from the Chinese projects, Sri Lankan experience is often highlighted as an example of the dark side depicted by many western analyst and media as a ‘debt trap’ diplomacy or ‘predatory loans’ to lock in strategic assets.

Jean Francois Dufour Economist and Director of DCA China Analysis comments that the sums invested by China are not donations but loans with consequences. The opponents of China, like India painted the entire operation as deliberate plan to acquire strategic positions in the region”[ix] warning the same could happen to Italy’s Trieste port as Italy is already a partner of BRI.

However, this critical view is not accepted by many receiving nations such as Sri Lanka. BRI is seen as an ambitious foreign policy strategy to bring the developing world under the Chinese orbit. One of the fears in the developing world is that BRI would likely institutionalize a Chinese authoritarian model undermining the existing democratic and economic model in many nations. These nations could disregard these fears if the respective Government’s adopt a transparent model. In the case of Sri Lanka, the 99-year lease agreement was not discussed at parliament and it was rushed and signed without any strategic inputs by the previous Government.

In light of the comment of the newly elected President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, we can anticipate the present Government will follow a novel process to reign in a strategic dimension in assessing the long-term strategic implications to national security before leasing out strategic assets.


Asanga Abeyagoonasekera is the Director General of the National Security Think Tank of Sri Lanka (INSSSL) under the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defense. He is the author of ‘Sri Lanka at Crossroads’ (2019),The views expressed here are his own. This article was initially published by ORF ‘Raisina Debates’ https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/strategic-stability-in-the-new-decade-ports-of-asia-in-a-period-of-escalation-60183/


End Notes

[i] http://www.ft.lk/front-page/President-Rajapaksa-says-leasing-H-tota-Port-was-a-mistake-calls-for-renegotiation-with-China/44-690388

[ii] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/01/what-iranian-way-war-looks-like/604438/

[iii] US IPSR 2019 Indo-Pacific Strategy Report refers China as a Revisionist Power

[iv] https://menafn.com/1099389015/On-Hambantota-port-Prez-Gotabaya-Rajapaksa-was-quoted-out-of-context-says-PM-Mahinda-Rajapaksa

[v] https://www.timesofisrael.com/shin-bet-chief-said-to-warn-chinese-investment-in-israel-poses-security-threat/

[vi] https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/116th-congress/senate-report/48/1?overview=closed

[vii] https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2019/12/sri-lanka-and-india-address-shared-ct-challenge

[viii] http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/asiapacific/2020-01/02/c_138674497.htm

[ix] https://www.france24.com/en/20190324-sri-lanka-new-chinese-silk-road-disappointment-economy-debt-italy-france-investment

BRUTAL LEGISLATION

January 20th, 2020

ALI SUKHANVER

The storm of protest against the CAA has severely affected the whole of India. This protest in not limited only to India, it is spreading like a wild fire all over the world. People are calling it one of the world’s darkest discriminatory laws based on religion. Even the Indian Constitution does not support such type of brutal legislation. Social workers, members of different human rights organizations, teachers, writers, actors, students and even traders are expressing their reservations over this new amendment. Bollywood actor Zeeshan Ayub said criticizing the CAA, Everyone has been exposed and the common man has understood everything and the right-wing people cannot make a fool out of them by giving vague statements.” He complained that even the BJP leaders are not having any clear concept of this amendment; they are pushing the general public into a blind alley of confusions. Zeeshan Ayub said talking to the ANI, The Home minister said something, the next day something else is being said in the Ram leela; people are getting confused.”

A renowned Indian novelist Chetan Bhagat said criticizing the BJP government, All universities must be protected. Those who fantasize about India with a Hindu king and his subservient subjects must remember this; even if I dignified your bigotry (I don’t), you can’t wish 200 million Muslims away. Try that and India will burn, GDP will crash and your kids will be unsafe and jobless. Stop these fantasies!” The general secretary of All Assam Students’ Union Lurin Jyoti Gogoi has warned the BJP government that protest against the CAA would not stop unless the government reviews the amendment bill. He said, The movement in Assam will intensify, and the legal fight against the citizenship act will continue.”

One of the most important positions-holders in the Microsoft Mr. Satya Nadella said speaking at a Microsoft event for editors in New York I think what is happening in India is sad, primarily as sort of someone who grew up there… I think it’s just bad.” BJP leaders have reacted in a very harsh manner on this statement of the Microsoft Boss. Newspapers and TV channels are replete with the resentment rather condemning statements of BJP leaders over the issue. BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi said in a tweet that Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s statement on CAA is a ‘perfect example’ of How literate need to be educated.”

Narrow-mindedness and prejudice against the minorities in India, particularly against the Muslims and the Christians, is not a new trend and new behaviour. In the last week of December 2019, Delhi BJP vice-president Shazia Ilmi also had to face the same prejudice when she was not allowed to go on to the stage from where Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the gathering during his Sunday rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan. She complained that ‘other’ Delhi unit leaders were given the passes for the main stage. Analysts are of the opinion that she had to face this discrimination just because she is a Muslim. Shazia Ilmi had been a very active member of the Aam Aadmi Party till May 2014. Later on she left the AAP and joined the BJP. She has accused the senior leadership of BJP Delhi unit of discrimination and favouritism. According to the Media reports Ilmi expressed her anger saying that she felt humiliated as her pass was not made while the other office-bearers of Delhi unit were allowed on the main stage.

Situation is so tense there that the Modi government had to cancel a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe which was scheduled to take place this month in Assam’s largest city Guwahati. The reason was nothing but the ongoing unrest in the region. Assam is one of the seven states in India’s northeast that share borders with Bangladesh, Myanmar and China. Recently introduced CAA bill has sparked violent protests in Assam which has yet taken lives of two people and left 25 injured. Feeling the severity and gravity of the situation, the U.S. and British governments have urged their citizens to exercise caution” if traveling to India’s northeast. Unfortunately, the BJP government is not feeling the severity of the matter. No one seems willing to listen to the protesting voices. The flood of protest against the CAA may drag India towards a catastrophic ending.

India’s concerns and Lanka’s compliance

January 20th, 2020

By P.K.Balachandran Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

What Ajit Doval told Gotabaya Rajapaksa

India’s concerns and Lanka’s compliance

Colombo, January 19 (Daily Express): India’s National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval, who was on short visit here on Saturday, has told the Sri Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa that it is important that India, Sri Lanka and the Maldives review the Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA) regime, enhance it, and include other regional countries as observers.

The MDA regimen keeps track of vessels in the area. It was lack of cooperation in this area which led to a deep rift between India and Sri Lanka in 2014 when the Indians charged that a Chinese nuclear” submarine had docked in Colombo without its being made aware of it. The submarine incident was the last straw on the back of India which had been watching with alarm the Mahinda Rajapaksa government’s dalliance with rival China since 2010.

The Presidential Media Division said in a press release on Doval’s talks with the President that both countries expressed an interest in stepping up military to military corporation; cooperation in maritime security and establishing inter-operability between the Indian and Sri Lankan Coast Guards.

Doval brought up the need for inter-operability of the two Coast Guards in order to check smuggling, drug-trafficking, gun-running by Non-State Actors and illegal fishing.

India also pledged assistance to Sri Lanka in acquiring intelligence gathering technology. An USD 50 million credit line to purchase intelligence gathering equipment was reiterated. Establishment of a Maritime Research Coordinating Centre” was also discussed.

In all probability, Sri Lanka will implement India’s demands because one of the basic tenets of the Gotabaya Rajapaksa regime is that it must respect and address India’s strategic concerns while throwing open the economy for investments from all parts of the world, including China.

Growing Chinese Activity

India’s concerns, as reflected in Doval’s requests, stem from growing Chinese activity in the South Asian and Indian Ocean region. Apart from protecting the East-West Sea Lane for the sake of uninterrupted oil supplies from West Asia, China also needs to protect the growing number of Chinese nationals and Chinese economic and strategic assets in the Indian Ocean region.

China has port development projects in Gawadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, Kyaukphyu in Myanmar and Chittagong in Bangladesh. These are all in India’s backyard. India fears encirclement. Beijing gifted two Type 053 frigates to Bangladesh in 2019, after giving a P 625 vessel to the Sri Lankan navy in June that year.

China’s trade with countries participating in its ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been expanding and totaled 9.27 trillion yuan (US$ 1.34 trillion) in 2019. It has outpaced the country’s aggregate trade growth by 7.4 percentage points, according to published data.

More than US$ 60 billion in investments have been promised under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), said Zou Zhiwu, Vice Minister of the General Administration of Customs.

According to Russia Today website, China has signed nearly 200 deals for new BRI projects in 167 countries and international organizations, and is eying further expansion.

The construction of a 25-meter deep water port in Kyaukpyu in the Rakhine State of Myanmar should worry India as it adversely affects its dominance in the Bay of Bengal. During Chinese President Xi Jinping’s state visit to Myanmar on January 17 and 18, the two sides agreed to strengthen their Belt and Road Initiative cooperation, and work hard” to push forward the construction of the Kyaukpyu Special Economic Zone (SEZ), according to a joint statement issued by the two countries on Saturday.

In 2014, the Myanmar government invited bidders from around the world for its plan to set up the Kyaukpyu SEZ, one of the country’s three national SEZs, in an effort to kick-start the Rakhine economy troubled by internal strife between the government forces and the Muslim Rohingyas and other Rakhine groups.

In 2015, a consortium of six companies led by the China International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC) won the tender for building the Kyaukpyu SEZ. Three years later, after marathon negotiations, the CITIC-led consortium struck a framework agreement with Myanmar on the project, Xinhua reported.

Port development is divided into four phases, according to the CITIC Group, and the first stage involves the construction of two berths with a total investment of US$ 1.3 billion. The construction of the port will commence after completing economic and social impact assessments.

The CITIC consortium told Xinhua that the port and the industrial park, combined, will create more than 100,000 jobs each year for local residents and create tax revenues of US$ 15 billion during the initial franchise period of 50 years.

India’s Counter Measures

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has been making efforts to cultivate ties with its Asian neighbors as part of its Look East” policy. It is hoping to work with Japan on the Eastern container terminal in Colombo port and is to support the development of the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport project that is designed to connect Kolkata port with Sittwe port in Rakhine in Myanmar.

India is concerned about China’ maritime surveillance capability in the Indian Ocean. This is the reason why the Establishment of a Maritime Research Coordinating Centre” was discussed by Doval in his meeting with Lankan President Gotabaya Rajapaksa. It is known that there is a China-Sri Lanka Joint Center for Research and Education in ocean sciences in Ruhuna University in South Sri Lanka. India perhaps wants a similar center with its participation.

Wang Yi’s Visit

The immediate reason for Doval’s rushing to Colombo could be the visit of the Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on January 14 which had taken place in the backdrop of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s statements against the 2017 deal with China on the Hambantota port.

Gotabaya not only had reservations about the granting of the port on a 99 year lease but also the security aspects. He was not sure if the security of the port is entirely in the hands of the Sri Lankan Navy as is the case with other ports in Sri Lanka. He wanted some two or three clauses on security added to the existing agreement.

However, later, he said that while the commercial part of the 2017 deal cannot be changed, the security aspect has to reworked as per Sri Lanka’s requirements because border control is Lanka’s sovereign right.

Wang Yi’ special envoy who immediately made a dash to Sri Lanka to get clarifications on the President’s remark concurred with him and added that China would like to invest more in Sri Lanka. Wang Yi who came later, further cemented the relationship by unequivocally declaring that China will not allow outsiders” to meddle in Lanka’s internal affairs and promised to help it in international forums. This in effect means that China will protect Sri Lanka in its battles on war crimes allegations at the UN Human Rights Council’s 43 rd.session in Geneva between February and March this year.

Plight Of Small Countries

The great strategic interest shown in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Nepal by big powers like China, India and the US is worrying their peoples and governments. Having gone through violent internal turmoil for years and just emerging from chromic instability, there is an understandable yearning among them to steer clear of big power rivalries and follow a neutral policy of equidistance.

But such neutrality is impractical. What they do is to walk the tight rope and play one big power against another to get the maximum benefits from the rivalries.

‘Sri Lankan Black Panther’ rediscovered in forests of Adam’s Peak

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, Jan 20 ((News 1st) – The Wildlife Department has been able to retrace the Sri Lankan Black Panther that was once considered to be long extinct.

Out of the eight species of panthers living in the world, the sub-species, Sri Lankan Panther is extraordinary due to its very limited population. The Sri Lankan black panther is believed to have gained it’s unique characteristics due to a colour mutation.

Srilankan Black Panther. Pic - Daily News

News about the last black panther was reported previously from Mawuldeniya, Pitadeniya when the animal was found dead in a trap. Thereafter, this animal’s hide was then displayed at the Girithale wildlife museum, as the final trace of the Sri Lankan Black Panther.

The wildlife department, which is currently engaging in an islandwide survey on Sri Lankan panthers, recently discovered evidence of the Sri Lankan black panther’s existence. The wildlife department installed a number of remote motion-sensing cameras in places believed to have been the Black Panther’s roaming, on the 26th of October one of these cameras was able to catch footage of the animal that was believed to be extinct.

The department which acted on this footage was finally able to prove that the Sri Lankan Black Panther is no longer an animal limited to history, by capturing more footage of the animal. They’ve also managed to discover the exitance of a black panther family consisting of a male, female and two cubs.

The investigation was headed by Dr Malaka Abeywardene and Dr Manoj Akalanka of the Wildlife Department, while technical support for the process was provided by the Tropical Eco-System Research Networks Organization.

Speaking to News 1st, Dr Malaka Abeywardene says;

The reason for these animals being black is mainly an adaptation for hunting purposes and for protection of their kind since they mostly roam in cold and dark places. We request the general public to come forward to protect these animals since they are an important gift given by mother nature”

Tags:Adams PeakBlack PantherSri LankaWildlife

SL Black Leopard not extinct; spotted again

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The Sri Lankan Black Leopard which was believed to be extinct had been captured on a trap camera in October in the Central Hills, the Department of Wildlife Conservation said today.

The footages were recorded in October 2019. However, the Department did not announce the existence of the species until they confirmed the footages.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror the department’s Spokesperson Hasini Sarachchandra said the animal was spotted by a tracking camera placed in a location inside a forest reserve.

This is the first time that this type of leopard was captured on camera during research conducted by Veterinarian Dr Malaka Abeywardena and Dr Manoj Akalanka.

“The Sri Lankan Black Leopard is believed to have gained its unique characteristics due to a colour mutation. Out of the eight species of panthers living in the world, the sub-species, Sri Lankan Leopard is extraordinary due to its very limited population,” she said.

Earlier, three Black Leopards were found in the Sinharaja conservation but they were all dead when found. These species are endemic to rain forests.

Thereafter, the dead animals were displayed at the Giritale wildlife museum, as the final trace of the Sri Lankan Black Leopard.

The academics installed several remote motion-sensing cameras in places believed to have been the Black Leopard’s roaming.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror Dr Akalanka Pinidiya of the Giritale Wildlife Veterinary Hospital said they installed several remote motion-sensing cameras in places believed to have been the Black Leopard’s roaming in the forests of Adam’s Peak following information received from the villagers,” Dr Pinidiya said.

Several officers of the Forest Conservation office of Nallathanniya had seen this animal on several occasions. The motion-sensing cameras were installed to confirm the animal. According to the footages, the Leopard might be five or six-foot-long. There were several leopards also captured in the footages,” Dr Pinidiya said.

Following these footages, the Department was finally able to prove that the Sri Lankan Black Leopard is no longer an endemic species in Sri Lanka.

They also have managed to discover the existence of a Black Leopard family consisting of a male, female and two cubs, Dr Pinidiya added. (Chaturanga Samarawickrama)

Keheliya released from bribery case

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy Ada Derana

The Colombo Magistrate’s Court Parliamentarian Keheliya Rambukwella and the former Director-General of State Printing Corporation Jayampathi Bandara Heenkenda have been released from the case filed against them by the Bribery Commission.

On December 20, 2019, the Colombo High Court closed the bribery case against the duo citing the relevant case was filed without the consent of the Commissioners of the Bribery Commission.

The Bribery Commission had filed the case with the Colombo Magistrate’s Court against the Parliamentarian Keheliya Rambukwella and the former Director-General of State Printing Corporation Jayampathi Bandara Heenkenda for allegedly using funds from the State Printing Corporation to pay off a private monthly phone bill of then-Minister of Mass Media Keheliya Rambukwella during the time period from 15th March to 14th April in 2012. The total bill reportedly accumulated to Rs. 230,000.

The defense attorneys had raised preliminary objections before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court, claiming that the Director-General of the Bribery Commission had not submitted the written approval obtained from the three Commissioners of the board when the case was lodged. They stated that hearing of the case cannot proceed in this background. However, the magistrate had rejected the preliminary objections and ruled that hearings of the case would continue.

The two defendants then filed a revision application before the Colombo High Court challenging the order delivered by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court.

When the revision application was taken up Colombo High Court Judge Shashi Madendran mentioned that the recent ruling by the Court of Appeal has mandated the written approval of the Commissioners of the Bribery Commission when a case is being filed. Citing that this procedure has not been followed in the case against State Minister Rambukwella and the former Director-General of the State Printing Corporation, the High Court judge ruled the case is legally void.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – Colombo Crime Division (CCD) records statement from Judge Gihan Pilapitiya

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy Ada Derana

The Colombo Crime Division (CCD) has recorded a statement from High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya with regard to controversial phone recordings of MP Ranjan Ramanayake, on the instructions of the Attorney General. 

The Police Media Unit said that accordingly CCD officers had recorded a statement from the High Court Judge for nearly 5 hours last evening (19).

Last week, the Attorney General directed the CCD Director to record statements from the judges who were involved in the controversial telephone conversations with UNP MP Ranjan Ramanayake, without delay.

Earlier this month, a series of audio recordings of phone conversations between the MP and several high-profile officials in the country including former Director of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Shani Abeysekara and justices, had been released to the media.

Recordings contained phone conversations between the parliamentarian and Justices Gihan Pilapitiya, Padmini Ranawaka, and Magistrate Dhammika Hemapana.

Baddegama Magistrate Dhammika Hemapala had been interdicted by the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) last week over the issue while the commission had also sent its recommendations to the President on High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya.

As the Commission has no power to interdict a High Court Judge, it had sent its recommendations to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – Colombo Crimes Division (CCD) RECORDS A STATEMENT FROM FORMER HIGH COURT JUDGE PADMINI N RANAWAKA WITH REGARD TO HER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH RANJAN RAMANAYAKE

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

The Colombo Crimes Division recorded a statement from Former High Court Judge Padmini N Ranawaka for over two hours, regarding the telephone conversations recorded by MP Ranjan Ramanayake.

Meanwhile, a statement was recorded from Ambilipitiya High Court Judge Gihan Pilapitiya for five hours yesterday, regarding the telephone conversations he allegedly had with MP Ranjan Ramanayake.

The Attorney General had earlier instructed the Colombo Crimes Division to record statements from judges who had telephone conversations with Ranjan Ramanayake regarding court proceedings.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – PERSONS WHO MANIPULATED JUDGES TO CONDEMN SOME INDIVIDUALS TO DEATH AND, THE JUDGES WHO INTERPRETED LAW ACCORDINGLY SHOULD ALSO BE CONDEMNED TO DEATH, SAYS THE PRIME MINISTER

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa says if any person has been condemned to death by manipulating judges; such persons who made the manipulation as well as the judges who interpreted the law to sentence the victims should be served with capital punishment.

He was meeting with the heads of media institutions at Temple Trees this morning.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Rajapaksa said that the government will intervene to help the Colombo Stock Market to bounce back from its collapsed trading activities.

He was meeting a group of stockbrokers in Colombo today.

ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL NOT APPEAR FOR FORMER PRESIDENT AND PRIME MINISTER

January 20th, 2020

Courtesy Hiru News

The Attorney General informed the Supreme Court today that his department would not appear on behalf of the former president Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in the petition against them for not preventing the Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

Both Sirisena and Wickremesinghe are among the respondents named in the fundamental rights petitions filed in connection with the Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

The petitions were taken before a full bench of seven Supreme Court Judges today.

Additional Solicitor General Farzana Jameel informed the court that the Attorney General who appeared for former President Sirisena and Prime Minister Wickremesinghe on the previous occasion would not do so as both Sirisena and Wickremesinghe are currently not in office.

Meanwhile, Attorneys-at-law Pulasthi Rupasinghe and Suren Fernando who appeared for former president Sirisena and former Prime Minister Wickremesinghe respectively requested the court to grant them time to file objections for their clients.

Accordingly, the judges ordered them to do so before 6th of March and informed the petitioners to file any oppositions if any before the 27th of March.

Later, the court decided to take the petitions for hearing on 12, 13 and 14th of May

Meanwhile, suspended IGP Pujith Jayasundera and former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando were further remanded until the 3rd of February

The suspects were produced before Colombo Additional Magistrate Priyantha Liyanage today.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – රන්ජන්ගේ දුරකථන සංවාදය ගැන, හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිනී එන්. රණවකගෙන් සී.සී.ඩී.ය ප්‍රකාශ ගනී

January 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායකගේ දුරකථන හඬ පට සංවාද සිද්ධියට අදාළව හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිනී එන්. රණවකගෙන් කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශය අද පැය 2කට අධික කාලයක් ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබා ගත්තා.

%E0%B6%BB%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A%E0%B6%A2%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A%E0%B6%9C%E0%B7%9A+%E0%B6%AF%E0%B7%94%E0%B6%BB%E0%B6%9A%E0%B6%AE%E0%B6%B1+%E0%B7%83%E0%B6%82%E0%B7%80%E0%B7%8F%E0%B6%AF%E0%B6%BA+%E0%B6%9C%E0%B7%90%E0%B6%B1%2C+%E0%B7%84%E0%B7%92%E0%B6%A7%E0%B6%B4%E0%B7%94+%E0%B6%B8%E0%B7%84%E0%B7%8F%E0%B6%B0%E0%B7%92%E0%B6%9A%E0%B6%BB%E0%B6%AB+%E0%B7%80%E0%B7%92%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%92%E0%B7%83%E0%B7%94%E0%B6%BB%E0%B7%94+%E0%B6%B4%E0%B6%AF%E0%B7%8A%E0%B6%B8%E0%B7%92%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%93+%E0%B6%91%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A.+%E0%B6%BB%E0%B6%AB%E0%B7%80%E0%B6%9A%E0%B6%9C%E0%B7%99%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%8A+%E0%B7%83%E0%B7%93.%E0%B7%83%E0%B7%93.%E0%B6%A9%E0%B7%93.%E0%B6%BA+%E0%B6%B4%E0%B7%8A%E2%80%8D%E0%B6%BB%E0%B6%9A%E0%B7%8F%E0%B7%81+%E0%B6%9C%E0%B6%B1%E0%B7%93

හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරුවරිය අද පස්වරු 3ට පමණ කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශය වෙත පැමිණි අතර එහිදී ඇය පැය 2කට අධික කාලයක් ප්‍රකාශයක් ලබාදී පිටව ගොස් තිබෙනවා.

පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී රන්ජන් රාමනායක සමඟ දුරකථන සංවාදවල නිරතවීමේ සිද්ධීන්වලට අදාළව, ඇඹිලිපිටිය මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටියගෙන් ද කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාසය ඊයේ පැය 05ක කාලයක් ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කර ගනු ලැබුවා

රන්ජන් රාමනායක සමඟ අධිකරණ කටයුතු සම්බන්ධයෙන් දුරකථන සංවාදවල නිරත වූ විනිසුරුවන්ගෙන්, කල් නොයවා ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කර ගන්නා ලෙස නීතිපතිවරයා මීට පෙර කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශය වෙත දැනුම්දීමක් කර තිබුණා.

ඒ අනුව හිටපු මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු පද්මිනී එන්. රණවක, මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටිය සහ මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ධම්මික හේමපාලගෙන් වහාම ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කර ගන්නා ලෙසයි නීතිපතිවරයා කොළඹ අපරාධ කොට්ඨාශයට නියෝග කර තිබුණේ.

එමෙන්ම, ආන්දෝලනාත්මක දුරකථන සංවාද හේතුවෙන් බද්දේගම මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ධම්මික හේමපාලගේ සේවය අධිකරණ සේවා කොමිසම විසින් පසුගියදා වහාම ක්‍රියාත්මක වන පරිදි අත්හිටුවනු ලැබුවා.

එමෙන්ම එම කොමිසම ඇඹිලිපිටිය මහාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ගිහාන් පිලපිටිය සම්බන්ධයෙන් අවශ්‍ය වන නිර්දේශ ජනාධිපතිවරයා වෙත යොමුකොට තිබුණා.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – මරණ දඬුවම පැනවීමට විනිසුරුවන්ට බලපෑම් කළ පුද්ගලයන්ට සහ එම විනිසුරුවන්ට ද මරණ දඬුවම දිය යුතුයි – අගමැති

January 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

අධිකරණ විනිසුරුවරුන්ට බලපෑම් සිදුකොට යම් පුද්ගලයෙකු වෙත මරණ දඬුවම නියම කර ඇත්නම් එම බලපෑම් සිදුකළ පුද්ගලයාට මෙන්ම එම වරද සිදුකළ විනිසුරුවරයාට ද මරණ දඬුවම ලබා දිය යුතු බව අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ ප්‍රකාශ කළා.

ඒ, අරලියගහ මන්දිරයේදී මාධ්‍ය ප්‍රධානීන් සමඟ අද පැවති විශේෂ සාකච්ඡාවේදියි. එම සාකච්ඡාවට අමාත්‍ය බන්දුල ගුණවර්ධන, රාජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන මහින්දානන්ද අලූත්ගමගේ සහ කෙහෙලිය රඹුක්වැල්ල ද එක්ව සිටියා.<

මේ අතර, පසුගිය වසර හතර හමාරක කාලය තුළ මෙරට ආර්ථිකය වසර 15කින් පමණ ආපස්සට ගොස් ඇති බව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා කියා සිටියා.

ඒ, කොළඹ කොටස් වෙළඳපොළ තැරැව්කාර සමාගම් නියෝජිතයින් පිරිසක් සමඟ අද පැවති සාකච්ඡාවකදියි.

කඩා වැටී කොළඹ කොටස් වෙළදපොළ නැවත යථා තත්ත්වයට පත් කිරීම සඳහා කඩිනමින් රජය මැදිහත් වන බව ද අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා එහිදී ප්‍රකාශ කර තිබෙනවා.

හිටපු ජනපති සහ අගමැති වෙනුවෙන් නීතිපති නැහැ

January 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

පාස්කු ඉරිදා ත්‍රස්ත ප්‍රහාර වලක්වා නොගැනීම සම්බන්ධයෙන් ගොනුකර ඇති මූලික අයිතිවාසිකම් පෙත්සම් දොලහේ වගඋත්තකරුවන් ලෙස නම් කර සිටින හිටපු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන සහ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ වෙනුවෙන් නීතිපතිවරයා පෙනී නොසිටින බව නීතිපති දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට අද දැනුම් දුන්නා.

ඒ, එම පෙත්සම් සත් පුද්ගල පූර්ණ විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලක් හමුවේ කැදවූ අවස්ථාවේදීයි.

මීට පෙර මෙම පෙත්සම් සලකා බැලූ විනිසුරු මඩුල්ලේ සාමාජිකයෙකුව සිටි ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ප්‍රසන්න ජයවර්ධනගේ අභාවයෙන් ඇති වූ පුරප්පාඩුවට ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරු ප්‍රීති පද්මන් සූරසේන පත් කර තිබුණා.

පෙත්සම කැදවූ අවස්ථාවේදී නීතිපතිවරයා වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටි රජයේ අතිරේක සොලිසිටර් ජනරාල් ෆර්සානා ජමීල් අධිකරණයට දැනුම් දුන්නේ මෙම පෙත්සම්වල වගඋත්තකරුවන් ලෙස නම් කර සිටින හිටපු ජනාධිපතිවරයා සහ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා වෙනුවෙන් මින් ඉදිරියට නීතිපතිවරයා පෙනී නොසිටින බවයි.

මීට පෙර අදාළ වගඋත්තරකරුවන් ජනාධිපති සහ අගමැති ධුරයේ කටයුතු කරන අවස්ථාවේදී නීතිපතිවරයා ඔවුන් වෙනුවෙන් පෙනී සිටියද, මේ වනවිට ඔවුන් අදාළ ධුරයන්හි කටයුතු නොකරන බැවින් නීතිපතිවරයා තවදුරටත් පෙනී නොසිටින බවයි අතිරේක සොලිසිටර් ජනරාල්වරිය සඳහන් කළේ.

ඇය පෙන්වා දුන්නේ ඒ අනුව එම වගඋත්තරකරුවන්ට පෞද්ගලික නීතිඥයින්ගේ සහය ලබා ගැනීමට සිදුවන බවයි.

කෙසේ වෙතත්, මෙහිදී හිටපු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන වෙනුවෙන් නීතිඥ පුලස්ථි රූපසිංහ සහ හිටපු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ වෙනුවෙන් නීතිඥ සුරේන් ප්‍රනාන්දු අධිකරණය හමුවේ පෙනී සිටිමින් තම සේවාදායකයින් වෙනුවෙන් විරෝධතා ගොනු කිරීමට යම් කාලයක් අවශ්‍ය බවට ඉල්ලීමක් කළා.

එය සලකා බැලූ සත් පුද්ගල ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරු මඩුල්ල මාර්තු මස 6 වන දිනට පෙර එම විරෝධතා ගොනුකරන ලෙසත්, ඊට ප්‍රතිවිරෝධතා මාර්තු මස 27 වනදිනට පෙර ගොනුකරන ලෙසත් පෙත්සම්කාර පාර්ශවයන්ගේ නීතිඥයින්ට දැනුම් දුන්නා.

එසේම, මේ සම්බන්ධයෙන් වූ ලිඛිත දේශන අප්‍රේල් මස 30 වන දිනට පෙර ගොනුකරන ලෙස පෙත්සම්කාර පාර්ශවයන්ගේ නීතිඥයින්ට දැනුම් දුන් සත් පුද්ගල ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණ විනිසුරු මඩුල්ල පෙත්සම් විභාගය මැයි මස 12,13, සහ 14 දිනයන්හිදී ද, සිදුකිරීමට දින නියම කළා.

මේ අතර, දැනට රක්ෂිත බන්ධනාගාර ගත කර සිටින අනිවාර්ය නිවාඩු යවා ඇති පොලිස්පති පූජිත් ජයසුන්දර සහ හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම් හේමසිරි ප්‍රනාන්දු අද යළි කොළඹ අතිරේක මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ප්‍රියන්ත ලියනගේ හමුවට ඉදිරිපත් කෙරුණා.

එහිදී අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අධිකරණයට දැනුම් දුන්නේ පාස්කු ප්‍රහාරය සම්බන්ධයෙන් වන විමර්ශනවලට අදාළව හිටපු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන, හිටපු අමාත්‍යවරුන් වන රිෂාඞ් බදියුදීන්, රවුෆ් හකීම්, නැගෙනහිර පළාත් හිටපු ආණ්ඩුකාර එම්.එල්.ඒ.එම් හිස්බුල්ලා, බස්නාහිර පළාත් හිටපු ආණ්ඩුකාර අසාද් සාලි ඇතුළු 7 දෙනෙකුගෙන් මේ වනවිට ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කරගෙන ඇති බවයි.

එමෙන්ම, හිටපු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහගෙන් සහ හිටපු අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ලේකම්වරයාගෙන් ප්‍රකාශ සටහන් කර ගැනීම සඳහා දින ඉල්ලා ඇතත්, මෙතෙක් ඊට දිනයක් ලබා දී නොමැති බව ද අපරාධ පරීක්ෂණ දෙපාර්තමේන්තුව අධිකරණයට දැනුම් දුන්නා.

කරුණු සලකා බැලූ කොළඹ අතිරේක මහේස්ත්‍රාත් ප්‍රියන්ත ලියනගේ, දැනට අනිවාර්ය නිවාඩු යවා ඇති පොලිස්පතිවරයා සහ හිටපු ආරක්ෂක ලේකම්වරයා ලබන මස 3 වනදා දක්වා තවදුරටත් රක්ෂිත බන්ධනාගාර ගත කිරීමටයි නියෝග කළේ.

RANJANGATE SCANDAL – රංජන්ගේ හඬ පට ගැන අදත් විවිධ අදහස්

January 20th, 2020

උපුටා ගැන්ම හිරු නිව්ස්

රක්ෂිත බන්ධනාගාර ගත කර සිටින රංජන් රාමනායක මන්ත්‍රීවරයා විසින් පටිගත කර ඇති ආන්දෝලනාත්මක හඬ පටි සම්බන්ධයෙන් විවිධ පාර්ශ්ව අදත් අදහස් පළ කළා.


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress