West upset its SL agenda thwarted: Prelate

October 31st, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

The International Community, mainly the Western Countries, was worried that their agenda in Sri Lanka was no longer operative and therefore, kept interfering in the internal affairs of Sri Lanka, Ven. Elle Gunawansa Thera said today.

Addressing a news briefing of the Yuthukama Organisation, the Thera said the International Community shed more tears than the people of Sri Lanka over the change of premiership.

The interference of Western Countries is so vast that we wonder whether the President, the Prime Minister and the Speaker of Sri Lanka were elected by us or them,” he said.

The US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and the European Union have expressed their concerns. They are simply worried that their Sri Lankan agenda has come to an end today,” he said.

The Thera said the Government headed by Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe continued to act on a foreign-agenda rather than on a national one.

The Government put forward many Acts and Bills, which are detrimental to the country. It also attempted to dilute the capacity of the armed forces. It is a blessing that the term of the previous Government has ended,” he said.

He also said foreign countries should learn to respect Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and Sri Lankan leaders should not rope in foreign countries into domestic affairs. (Lahiru Pothmulla)

Pix by Kihtsiri De Mel

එජාපයේ නිල බස ඉංග්‍රීසි නිසා හිටපු අගමැති රනිල් අලි අමාරුවක..

October 31st, 2018

lanka C news

පිවිතුරු හෙළ උරුමය පක්ෂ මූලස්ථානයේ පැවැති මාධ්‍ය හමුවේ දී පක්ෂ නායක නීතිඥ උදය ගම්මන්පිල මහතා මෙම අදහස් පල කලේය.

මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධූරයේ දිවුරුම් දුන්නා කියන පණිවුඩය ලැබෙන්නට ටික වෙලාවකට කලින් මාධ්‍ය හරහා රටට ලැබුණු පණිවුඩය වූයේ එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානය ආණ්ඩුවෙන් ඉවත් වූ බවයි. වත්මන් ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවට අනුව අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ උපරිමය තිහකට සීමා වෙනවා. නමුත් ජාතික ආණ්ඩුවකදී අමාත්‍ය ධුර කීයක් පැවතිය යුතුද යන්න පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට තීරණය කළ හැකියි.

පැවැති ජාතික ආණ්ඩුවෙන් එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානය ඉවත්වන විට හතලිස් දෙනෙකුගෙන් යුත් අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයක් සිටියා. ජාතික ආණ්ඩුවක් නොමැති අවස්ථාවක අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ සිටිය හැක්කේ අමාත්‍යවරුන් තිස් දෙනයි. ඒ අනුව හතළිස් දෙනකු ගේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයකට පැවතීමේ හැකියාවක් නැහැ. නිසා එම හතළිස් දෙනාගේ අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසිරී යනවා.

එජාපයේ නිල බස ඉංග්‍රීසි නිසා හිටපු අගමැති රනිල් අලි අමාරුවක..

අපේ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම විව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 46(2) වගන්තියෙ මෙලෙස සඳහන් වෙනවා.

ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 46(2) වගන්තිය

අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා –

(අ) ස්වකීය අත්සන යටතේ ජනාධිපතිවරයා වෙත යවන ලිපියක් මඟින් ස්වකීය ධූරයෙන් ඉල්ලා අස්වූ වුවහොත් හෝ
(ආ) තවදුරටත් පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයෙකු නොවුවහොත් හෝ

මිස ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ විධිවිධාන යටතේ යම් තාක් කල් අමාත්‍යමණ්ඩලය පවත්නේ ද ඒ තාක් කල් ස්වකීය ධූරය දරන්නේය.

මේ අනුව ඇමැති මණ්ඩලය පවතින තාක් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාට සිය දූරය දැරිය හැකි බව පැහැදිලියි. එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානය ජාතික ආණ්ඩුවෙන් ඉවත් වීමත් සමග ඇමති මණ්ඩලයත් විසිර ගොස් තියෙනවා. එවිට අගමැති තනතුර පුරප්පාඩු වෙනවා. එසේ ඇතිවන පුරප්පාඩුවක දී කටයුතු කළ යුතු ආකාරය පිළිබඳ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ 42(4) වගන්තියෙ මෙලෙස සඳහන් වෙනවා.

ජනාධිපතිතුමාගේ මතය අනුව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ විශ්වාසය උපරිම වශයෙන් ඇති පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රීවරයා ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ලෙස පත් කළ යුත්තේය.”

ඒ අනුව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරයකගේ විශ්වාසය ඇතැයි ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් සිතන කෙනාවයි අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ලෙස පත් කරනු ලබන්නේ. මෙහිදී රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමාට අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරය අහිමි කලා නොවෙයි අහිමි වුණා. ඒ සඳහා පුරප්පාඩුව ඇති වූ විට ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් තීරණය කළා දැන් පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය පවතින්නේ මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාට බව. ඒ අනුව එතුමාව අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරයට පත්කළා.

මාගේ උගත් මිත්‍ර ජනාධිපති නීතිඥ ආචාර්ය ජයම්පති වික්‍රමරත්න මැතිතුමා මාධ්‍ය ඉදිරියේ කියනවා මම දැක්කා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය වරයා ඉවත් කළ නොහැකි බව. ඉවත් කිරීමත් කරන්න පුළුවන්. අවාසනාවකට ඒක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ නිල භාෂාව ඉංග්‍රීසි භාෂාවයි. රටේ නිල භාෂාව සිංහල භාෂාවයි. ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාවේ සිංහල පිටපත සහ ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත අතර බරපතළ වෙනසක් තියෙනවා. එසේ මෙසේ වෙනසක් නෙවෙයි බරපතළ වෙනසක් තියෙනවා.

මොකක්ද ඒ වෙනස, 48 (1) වගන්තියේ කියනවා පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හරිනු ලැබීමත් මහ මැතිවරණය අවසාන වීමත් අතර කාලය තුළ හැර ධූරයෙන් ඉවත් කරනු ලැබීමෙන් හෝ ඉල්ලා අස්වීමෙන් හෝ අන්‍යාකාරයකින් හෝ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයා ධූරය දැරීම නතර වූ විට, 70 වන ව්‍යවස්ථාව යටතේ ස්වකීය බලතල ක්‍රියාත්මක කරමින් ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැර ඇතොත් මිස අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලය විසිරෙන්නේය. එසේ වූ විට ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් 42 වන, 43වන, 44 වන සහ 45 වන ව්‍යවස්ථා අනුව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයෙකු ද අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ අමාත්‍යවරයන් ද අමාත්‍ය මණ්ඩලයේ සාමාජිකයන් නොවන අමාත්‍යවරයන් ද නියෝජ්‍ය අමාත්‍යවරයන්ද පත් කළ යුත්තේ ය.

48 (1) වගන්තියෙන් ජනාධිපතිවරයාට බලය දීලා තියෙනවා ධූරයෙන් ඉවත් කරන්න. හැබැයි ඉංග්‍රීසි එකේ මොකද්ද කියන්නේ. මේ තානාපතිලාට පෙන්නන රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතා එදිනෙදා පරිශීලනය කරන ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත කොහොමද මේක ලියලා තියෙන්නේ. On the Prime Minister ceasing to hold office by death, resignation or otherwise, මෙය අපි සිංහලට පරිවර්තනය කළ හොත් අගමැතිවරයා මරණය ඉවත් වීම හෝ අන්‍යාකාරයකින් අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරයේ කටයුතු කිරීම නතර වූ විට යන්නයි. සිංහල පිටපතේ තිබුනේ ධූරයෙන් ඉවත් කිරීම ,ඉවත් වීම හෝ අන්‍යාකාරයෙන් කියලයි. නමුත් ඉංග්‍රීසි එකේ තියෙන්නේ ඉවත් කිරීම වෙනුවට Death කියලා. මැරුනට පස්සෙ අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරයේ කටයුතු කරන්න බෑ කියලා මේකෙ ලියන්න ඕනෙ ද? මැරුනොත් හොල්මනක් ඇවිත් අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධුරයේ කටයුතු කරන්න බෑනේ. මේ ලෝකයේ කිසිම තැනක මියගිය හොල්මනක් ඇවිත් ධුරයේ කටයුතු කරලත් නෑ කරන එකකුත් නෑ. ඒක නිසා ඒක අදාලම නෑ.

සිංහල පිටපතේ ඉවත් කිරීමට පුළුවන් කියලා තියෙනවා. ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත් එහෙම නෑ. ඒක නිසා ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත කියවන රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමා හිතාගෙන ඉන්නවා ජනාධිපතිතුමන්ට තමන්ව ඉවත් කරන්න බෑ කියලා. අවාසනාවට ජයම්පතී වික්‍රමරත්න මැතිතුමා, රාජ්‍ය නොවන සංවිධානවල පිරිස් ඒ වගේම තානාපතිවරු ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත පමණක් බලමින් ඉවත් කිරීම සඳහා කිසිම බලයක් නැතැයි කියා තර්ක කරනවා. නමුත් අපේ රටේ 1978 වන විට තිබුණේ එක් රාජ්‍ය භාෂාවක් පමණි. ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව සම්මත කරපු වසරේ රාජ්‍ය භාෂාව වුනේ සිංහල භාෂාව විතරයි. ඒ නිසා ඉංග්‍රීසි පිටපත හෝ දෙමළ පිටපත් තිබෙන දේ නෙවෙයි වැදගත් වන්නේ සිංහල පිටපතේ කුමක්ද තියෙන්නේ කියන එකයි. ඊට පසුව උනත් සිංහල පිටපත සහ දෙමළ පිටපත අතර අනනුකූලතාවයක් (නොගැලපීමක්) ඇතිවුවහොත් බලපැවැත්වෙන්නේ සිංහල පිටපතයි.

ඒ අනුව මේ ක්‍රම දෙකෙන්ම බැලුවත් රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාට අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය ධූරය අහිමි වීම ව්‍යවස්ථානුකූලයි නීත්‍යනුකූලයි.

එහෙම නොවෙනවා කියා සිතමු. මොකක්ද කළ යුතු වන්නේ. නීතීඥයෙකු වන මාගේ උගත් මිත්‍රයා නීතිඥ රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමා දන්නවා පරිපාලන නීතියේ සංකල්පයක් තියෙනවා Comply and Complain. ඒ කියන්නේ අනුගතවී පැමිණිලි කරන්න. අපි මෙහෙම උදාහරණයක් ගමු. යාපනය කච්චේරියෙ අවුරුදු දහයක් වැඩ කරලා ආපු තරුණ මෙනවියක් කසාද බැඳලා බබෙක් හම්බෙන්න ඉන්න කොට ආපහු යාපනයට මාරු කරනවා. අපේ නීතිය අනුව ඒක වැරදියි. අසාධාරණයි. නමුත් එය පිළිගන්නැතිව යන්නෙ නැතුව ඉන්න පුලුවන්ද? එහෙම කරන්න බෑ. මාරුවීමක් ලැබුනා යාපනේ කච්චේරියට ගිහින් වැඩ බාර ගන්ඩ ඕන. ඊට පස්සේ ඉහළ බලධාරීන්ට අභියාචනාධිකරණයට, මානව හිමිකම් කොමිසමට, මේ ආයතන වලට පැමිණිලි කරන්න පුළුවන්. First Comply then Complain. එහෙම නම් රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමාට හිතෙනවනම් මට අසාධාරණයක් වුණා කියලා, එතුමා කළ යුත්තේ ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රජාව ඉදිරියේ හඬා වැටීම නොව, මාධ්‍ය ඉදිරියේ බොරු තර්ක ගෙන ඒම නොව, මුලින් බඩුමුට්ටු අකුලාගෙන ගෙදර ගොස් ඊට පස්සේ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණය ඉදිරියට යෑමයි. ඇයි ඒ? අපේ ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව පිළිබඳව දැන් අපි අර්ථකතන දෙකක් දෙනවා. දැන් තමුන්නාන්සේලාට අපි ඒක අර්ථ කථනයක් දෙනවා. එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ මාධ්‍ය හමුවකට අරලියගහ මන්දිරයට ගියාම තව අර්ථකථනයක් ලබා දෙනවා. දැන් තමුන්නාන්සේලාට තීරණය කරන්න පුළුවන්ද මොන අර්ථකථනය ද හරි කියලා. ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව අර්ථකථනය කිරීමේ ඒකාධිකාරය තියෙන්නෙ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට විතරමයි. මේ නිසා ව්‍යවස්ථාකුල නැත කියල එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයට හිතෙනවනම්, කළ යුත්තේ ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට පෙත්සමක් ගොනු කිරීමයි. ඇයි ඔවුන් ඒක කරන්නේ නැත්තේ. දන්නවා මේක සීයට සීයක් ව්‍යවස්ථානුකූලව සිදු කරපු දෙයක් බව. එතෙන්ට ගියොත් වැඩේ ලෙඩේ වෙන බව. එතරම්ම මේක පැහැදිලි.

දෙවන කාරණය තමයි ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයටත් වඩා ලොකු අධිකරණයත් මේ රටේ තියෙනවා. ඒ තමයි ජනතා අධිකරණය. දැන් මේ අපි කතා කරන අගමැතිකම ලැබිය යුත්තේ කාටද කියලා තීරණය කරන්නේ ජනතාව. ජනතාවගේ පරමාධිපත්‍ය බලය පාවිච්චි කරල තමයි අගමැතිකම තීරණය කරන්නේ. අපි ලෑස්තියි ජනතාව ඉදිරියට ගිහිල්ලා මේ ප්‍රශ්නය විසඳ ගන්න. ජනතාවට තීරණය කරන්න දෙන්න යමු අපි පාර්ලිමේන්තු මැතිවරණයකට. අපි කියනවා මහින්ද අගමැති කරන්න අපිට ඡන්දෙ දෙන්න කියලා. ඔබ කියන්න රනිල්ව අගමැති කරන්න එජාපයට ඡන්ද දෙන්න කියලා. රටේ ජනතාව තීරණය කළොත් අගමැති විය යුත්තේ රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මැතිතුමා කියලා කිසි ප්‍රශ්නයක් නෑ එදා 2015 ජනවාරි 09 වගේම සතුටු සිතින් ගෞරවනීයව වේදිකාවෙන් බැස යෑමට අපි සූදානම්.

තුන්වැනි විකල්පයකුත් තියෙනවා දැන් කියනවා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය පෙන්නනවා වහාම පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කැඳවන්න කියලා. පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය පෙන්නලා අගමැති ඉවත් කිරීමේ ක්‍රමයක් නෑ. අගමැතිවරයෙක් පත් වුණාම ජනාධිපතිවරයාට ඉවත් කරන්න පුළුවන්. එහෙම නැතිනම් කරන්න වෙන්නේ අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයාට විරුද්ධව විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාවක් ගෙන ඒමයි. දැන් මේ අය මේ වනතුරු මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමාට විරුද්ධව විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාවක් අත්සන් කරලා තිබෙනවාද? නෑ. පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කැඳවන්න කියල කෑ මොර දෙන්නේ නැතුව ඉස්සෙල්ලාම විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් කළොත් අගමැතිට විරුද්ධව ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව අනුව සම්ප්‍රදාය අනුව ඒක පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අනෙකුත් කටයුතු සියල්ලම පැත්තකින් තබලා අගමැති තුමාට විරුද්ධව විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාව විවාද කරලා ඡන්දයක් ලබා ගන්ඩ ඕන. එහෙනම් එතුමන්ලාට ඇත්තටම උවමනාවක් තියෙනවා නම් මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මැතිතුමා එළවීමට එහෙනම් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කැඳවන දවසට විවාදයට ගන්න මේ වන විට විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාවක් අස්සන් කරලා කතානායකතුමාට බාරදෙන්න ඕන. එහෙම කරන්න ඇත්තෙ එහෙම කරන්න අවශ්‍ය අත්සන් 113 ඔවුන්ට නැති නිසා.

එනිසා මේ ක්‍රම 3 ශ්‍රේෂ්ඨාධිකරණයට යෑම, ජනතා අධිකරණයට යෑම, පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට විශ්වාසභංග යෝජනාවක් ගෙනඒම කියන ක්‍රම තුනෙන් එකක්වත් මේ දක්වා එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂය අනුගමනය කරල නෑ. ඒ වෙනුවට වෙන්න මොකක්ද ජාත්‍යන්තර ප්‍රජාව හමුවට යෑම. එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ නායකයන් තමයි මේ රට පාවල දුන්න පවුල් වල අය. මේ අය හිතාගෙන ඉන්නවා මේ රට තාමත් බටහිර අධිරාජ්‍යවාදීන්ගේ කොලනියක් කියලා. ඒ නිසා බටහිර රටවල් වලින් තමයි නියෝග ගන්න යන්නේ. ජනතාව ගෙන් නෙවෙයි. අද ඇමරිකාව කියනවා වහාම පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කැඳවන්න. රටේ ඡන්දෙන් පත්වුණා ජනාධිපතිවරයා කල් තබපු පාර්ලිමේන්තුව කැඳවන්න කියන්න අමරිකානු ආණ්ඩුව කවුද?

– අරවින්ද අතුකෝරල

එජාප හිටපු ප‍්‍රබල ඇමති හා මන්ත‍්‍රී පිරිසක් ජනපති මෛත‍්‍රි ඉදිරියේ..

October 31st, 2018

 lanka C news

පැවති රජය නියෝජනය කළ එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂ ප‍්‍රබලයන් කිහිප දෙනෙකු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රීපාල සිරිසේන මහතා සාකච්ඡාවක් පවත්වා ඇතැයි වාර්තා වෙයි.

මෙම පිරිස අතර හිටපු ප්‍රබල ඇමතිවරයෙක් ප්‍රබල රාජ්‍ය ඇමතිවරයෙක් නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමතිවරයෙක් ඇතුළු මන්ත්‍රීවරුන් කිහිප දෙනෙකු ද සිටි බව වාර්තා වෙයි.

එජාප හිටපු ප‍්‍රබල ඇමති හා මන්ත‍්‍රී පිරිසක් ජනපති මෛත‍්‍රි ඉදිරියේ..

මෙම සියළු දෙනා නව රජයට සහයෝගය පළ කිරීම සඳහා එකඟ වී ඇති බවත් ඇමතිධූර ලබාදීමට තීරණය වී ඇති බවත් සදහන්ය.

මෙම පිරිස හෙට දිනයේ හෝ අනිද්දා නව ඇමති ධුර වල දිවුරුම් දෙනු ඇතැයි ද පැවසෙයි.

හමුව සම්බන්ධීකරණය කර ඇත්තේ ශ‍්‍රීලනිප 15 කණ්ඩායමේ ප‍්‍රබල මන්ත‍්‍රීවරයෙකි.

‘‘ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්බාධක කතා බොරු..‘‘ රාජිතගේ ප්‍රකාශය පුස්සක් කරමින් විද්වත්හු කියති

October 31st, 2018

Lanka Lead News

ශ්‍රී ලංකාව කෙරෙහි ඇතැම් රටවල් දැනට කරමින් සිටින මැදිහත්වීම් ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට හිතවත්ව සිදුකරන මැදිහත්වීම් බව දේශපාලන විචාරක මාධ්‍යෙව්දී මොහාන් සමරනායක මහතා පවසයි.

ඇමෙරිකාව, බ්‍රිතාන්‍ය,කැනඩාව වැනි රටවල් මේ ආකාරයේ බලපෑම් කරන්නේ ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ඔවුන්ට පාලනය කළ හැකි තත්ත්වයක තබා ගැනීම්ට බවද ඔහු වැඩිදුරටත් සදහන් කළේය.

ශ්‍රී ලංකාවට එරෙහි මෙම අවස්ථාවේ එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ සංවිධානය වෙත කිසියම් යෝජනාවක් ඉදිරිපත් වුවද එවැනි යෝජනාවක් පවා සම්මත නොවනු ඇතැයි ද ඔහු ප්‍රකාශ කළේ ය .

ඒඅනුව සම්බාධක පිළිබඳ මතු කරන බිය ජනතාව මුලා කිරීමක් බව පැවසූ මොහාන් සමරනායක මහතා නිවැරදි විදේශ ප්‍රතිපත්ති මගින් ජාත්‍යන්තර අභියෝග ජයගත හැකි බවද කියා සිටියේය.

ආණ්ඩු පෙරළියත් සමග ශ්‍රීලංකාවේ ඇතිව තිබෙන තත්වය සැලකිල්ලට ගෙන ජාත්‍යන්තරය විසින් සම්බාධක පැනවීමට කටයුතු කරන බවට හිටපු ඇමති රාජිත සේනාරත්න මහතා විසින් කළ ප්‍රකාශයකට පිළිතුරු දෙමින් සමරනායක මහතා මෙම අදහස් පළ කළේය.

President briefs UN envoy on political situation

October 31st, 2018

Courtesy The Daily Mirror

President Maithripala Sirisena today met UN Representative in Sri Lanka, Hanna Singer and briefed about the current political situation in the country.

President Sirisena had explained to the envoy that all the decisions had been taken in accordance with the Constitution, the President’s Media Division said.

The President also said that the government is working within a democratic framework by protecting the law and order in the country.

Ms. Singer had informed the President that the UN would continue to provide assistance to Sri Lanka in future. The President appreciated the assistance given by the UN.

Speaker urges foreign delegates not to take hasty action against SL

October 31st, 2018

Several delegates have called on Speaker Karu Jayasuriya at the Parliamentary premises this evening (31), stated Office of the Speaker, issuing a release.

Accordingly, UN Resident Coordinator in Sri Lanka Hanaa Singer, Ambassador for the EU Tung-Lai Margue, British High Commissioner James Dauris, Canadian Ambassador David McKinnon and German Ambassador Jorn Rohde engaged in a special discussion with the Speaker on the current political situation in Sri Lanka.

The delegates had expressed their concern over the unexpected political transformation and pointed out the adverse consequences Sri Lanka may face due to this.

In response, the Speaker had informed them that he will be calling on President Maithripala Sirisena later this evening and that he hopes to arrive at a constitutional and democratic solution for the current situation soon.

Speaker Jayasuriya had further requested the delegates not to hasten into taking action –diplomatic or otherwise –against Sri Lanka.

Meanwhile, a group of representatives from civil organizations also met with the Speaker and handed over an online petition urging to reestablish democracy by convening the parliament and requesting state officials no to follow any illegal orders. The petition had collected 16,000 signatures within 2 days.

Defiant Sirisena claims 75% popular support as EU threatens trade sanctions

October 31st, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, October 30 (newsin.asia): At the meeting between Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena and foreign envoys here on Monday,  the European Union (EU) Ambassador  Tung-Lai Margue warned that if democratic norms and constitutional provisions are not observed in handling  the on-going political crisis in Sri Lanka, the EU may consider withdrawing  the trade concessions the island nations enjoys under the General System of Preferences Plus (GSP Plus).

According to the International Trade Centre, in 2009, a year before the EU withdrew  GSP Plus concessions from Sri Lanka on human rights issues,  Lanka’s exports to EU were worth US$ 2.3 billion. Despite the withdrawal of GSP Plus, exports expanded thereafter to reach US$ 2.4 billion by 2015.

But the rate of increase had declined in comparison with other countries including Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Defiant Sirisena claims 75% popular support as EU threatens trade sanctions

And between 2010 and 2017, when the GSP Plus was not there, Sri Lanka lost up to LKR 250 billion (US$ 1.45 billion) in export earnings from the EU.

But as in the case of President Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2010, Sirisena was unfazed by the EU threat on Monday.

In 2010, Rajapaksa had dismissed the withdrawal as a matter of no great consequence, when seen against the benefit of fighting the Tamil Tiger rebels to the finish.

In fact, Sri Lanka’s exports to EU increased, albeit marginally during the ban.

On the perceived unpopularity or unacceptability of his act of removing Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in the way he did,  Sirisena reportedly said that the Western envoys appeared to be unaware of the pulse of the people”.

The President suggested that the foreign missions  get surveys done to ascertain the common man’s thinking, and added the surveys would reveal that 70 to75%” of the people are with him.

EU Statement

The EU had issued a statement saying that the sudden deterioration of the situation in Sri Lanka over the weekend had put the country at risk of instability and unrest.

Along with other key international partners of Sri Lanka, the Ambassador of the European Union met with the President of Sri Lanka to express our expectation that a solution respectful of the country’s constitution would be found quickly.”

To this end, it is important that the President allows the immediate reconvening of the Parliament so that the elected representatives of the Sri Lankan people can fulfill their duties,” the EU statement said.

In the current context of tensions and uncertainties, it is of utmost importance that violence and provocation are avoided and that law enforcement agencies act with restraint.”

The EU expects Sri Lanka to pursue its positive path towards reconciliation and democracy for the full benefit of the Sri Lankan people, the statement added.

This was the refrain of the other envoys from the developed world also. The envoys of non-White countries merely listened to the exchanges between the White block and the President.

President Sirisena told the envoys that it is best to leave the governance of Sri Lanka to Sri Lankans. The government and the people of Sri Lanka know best what is good for them, he added.

On the criticism that the ethnic reconciliation process will suffer as a result of the on-going political turmoil and instability, Sirisena said that he is committed to reconciliation  and has initiated many steps to bring it about.

In his presentation lasting more than an hour, the President explained why he could not work with Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and why he had hand over the reins to Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Sirisena said that he is confident that the constitution has provisions which allow him to sack the Prime Minister. A paper written on this written by his lawyer Manohara de Silva was circulated which justified the President’s steps from the legal and constitutional point of view.

Sirisena also said that he is going to swear-in a new cabinet after the meeting, leaving the foreign envoys with no doubt that Sirisena is determined the tread the path he had chosen on the  issue of Ranil Wickremesinghe.

(The featured image at the top shows Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena meeting foreign envoys on Oct 29, 2018. Photo. Presidents Media Division)

Sri Lanka’s Speaker of Parliament warns of ‘bloodbath’ if political crisis taken to streets

October 31st, 2018
 Colombo, Oct 29 (newsin.asia) – Sri Lanka’s Speaker of Parliament, Karu Jayasuriya, on Monday warned that there would be a ‘huge bloodbath’ in the island if the present political crisis is taken out to the streets.

Speaking to reporters in Colombo, Jayasuiya said the present political crisis should be settled through Parliament or else many lives would be lost.

Sri Lanka’s Speaker of Parliament warns of ‘bloodbath’ if political crisis taken to streets

Already we have seen violence erupting due this crisis. On Sunday there were two deaths.At the same time some media institutions have been illegally taken over. Some people have been prevented from going to their jobs. This has led to a huge problem for the country.” Jayasuriya said.

A severe political crisis erupted in Sri Lanka since last Friday when President Maithripala Sirisena sacked the Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe and appointed former President Mahinda Rajapakse to the post.

Wickremesinghe said the move was illegal and has since then, called for Parliament to be summoned immediately to prove his majority.

Last Saturday, President Sirisena prorogued Parliament till Nov 16 following which there have been increasing calls for Parliament to summon to solve the ensuing political crisis.

විදේශීය සාම සාධක හමුදාවන්ට ශ‍්‍රී ලංකාවට මැදිහක් වෙන්නැයි රනිල් ඉල්ලලා..

October 31st, 2018

මෙරට තුල සාමය ආරක්‍ෂා කර දෙන්නැයි හිටපු අගමැති රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා විසින් විදේශීය සාම සාධක හමුදාවන්ට පැමිණෙන්නැයි ඉල්ලීමක් කර ඇති බව පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත‍්‍රි දිනේෂ් ගුණවර්ධන මහතා පවසයි.

මෙය ඉතා අභාග්‍ය සම්පන්න ප‍්‍රකාශයක් යයිද ඔහු කියා සිටී. රනිල් වික‍්‍රමසිංහ මහතා විසින් බටහිර තානාපතිවරුන්ට ලියනලද ලිපිය පහත දැක්වේ

Call for Ranil to be indicted for high Treason

October 31st, 2018

Ranil should be arrested immediately for trying to get UN troops into our. Country when there is no war but only to safeguard his clique.

International Community please leave Sri Lanka alone, leaving it sort out its own problems its own way, do not try making  Sri Lanka a Libya or a Syria. 

October 31st, 2018

By Charles.S.Perera

USA had always been working against the people of developing countries by eliminating elected popular leaders  as it had been with Mohammed Mosaddeq in Iran, in 1950, Jacob Arbenz in Guatamala in 1950, Patrice Lumumba in Congo in 1960,Salvador Allende in Chile, in 1973, Hudson Austin in Grenada in 1983, and more recently Colonel Gaddafi in Libya in 2011.

They were all  leaders of their people who wanted to develop their countries in their own way to provide their people a decent living. But USA intervened with its CIA and they were either murdered or expelled from their countries. USA had the support and the approval of the  other countries of the West- the International Community for their reactionary activities against developing countries.

USA and the West cannot   feel  the pulse of those people who are of a different culture, or understand what they want and what are their expectations. The West therefore acts in their own political interest judging countries not from the people’s likes and dislikes  but  judging  the countries from  whether their systems of government in place are in line with their own capitalist systems.

If a government  is not in keeping with their political system, they immediately set in motion the elimination process of the  peoples’ leaders through CIA or CIA sanctioned Jackals. The International Community  still  intervenes to destabilise poor countries through their secret agents the CIA, MI6,and the Indian RAW too  tagging  along.

It is the west that intervenes to  warn  Sri Lanka today which has  a political problem it is quite capable of solving. What business for instance has the Canadian Embassy got to do with the internal affairs of Sri Lanka ?  If the foreign embassies are unable to mind their own business, it is better that they are asked to close their embassies and leave until the present situation is settled in Sri Lanka.

Incidentally today  India too seems to worry about democracy in  Sri Lanka despite knowing very well the democratically elected  President Maithreepala Sirisena and the former President Mahinda Rajapakse who eliminated terrorism and brought back peace, security and democracy to every corner of Sri Lanka. India has issued a statement to  says that, …. it closely follows the recent political developments in Sri Lanka , as a democracy and a close friendly neighbour  hoping that democratic values  and constitutional process will be respected .”

India should know that Sri Lanka follows  nothing other than a democratic process, despite a stubborn Prime Minister who has no backing of the majority of the  people and who had lost nearly thirty elections in the past  is holding on to his position that he is still the Prime Minister, despite another has already been sworn in,  in terms of the Constitution and with the support of the legal fraternity.

The West just barges in like a bull in a china shop in to developing countries moment there are political disturbances,  to destabilise the countries more and effect a regime change, but they never intervene to help countries when they are  in dire need of financial aid for its development by giving unconditional financial loans on easy terms at low interest

The USA and West encourage  small groups of people in developing countries  taking arms or simply manifest against a people friendly government so that they could intervene  by sending experts to work out  a regime change. They did that in Sri Lanka in January,2015 and the US Secretary of State John Kerry came to Colombo to brag that he had been a part of the regime change in Sri Lanka and that USA distributed 585 million dolloars amoung Sri Lanka, Nigeria and Burma just for that.

Today USA has called the President of Sri Lanka Maithripala Sirisena to immediately reconvene the parliament in consultation with the Speaker so that the people’s representative can decide  who has the majority to lead the government. Strangely the demand coincides  with the same demand of the dismissed Prime Minister Ranil Wickramasinghe, who  remains self arrested in Temple Trees  the Official Residence of the Prime Minister calling himself  still the Prime Minister.

Is this no proof that Ranil Wickramasinghe and his UNP  are staging this  last ditch political stand  hoping to come back to power at the behest of the International Community ? 

In the meantime the Secretary General of the UN the cat’s paw’ of the International Community has  also  called on the government to respect democratic values  and constitutional provisions and process , uphold the rule of law  and ensure the safety and security of Sri Lankans.

The Human Rights Watch too has jumped into the band wagon of  reactionary USA and the Western forces.  Brian Adams of the Human Rights watch says , Rajapakse’s return to high office without any justice for past crimes raises chilling concern s for human rights in Sri Lanka”.

With such a statement one has the right to ask what right Brian Adams  has to represent an organisation calling itself  Human Rights Watch,  when the very statement is slanderous without any proof of  alleged past crimes”.

Does  Brian Adams know what it is to have pangs of hunger , sadness  to be without enough means to even feed the children ? This is where Ranil Wickramasinghe’s Government had left the poor people in Sri Lanka after three and half years of his good governance.

The majority of the people of Sri Lanka are happy today, that Ranil Wickramasinghe has been ousted and  the people friendly Mahinda Rajapaksa has been appointed the new Prime Minister.

The legal fraternity of Sri Lanka in a majority supports the decision of the President of Sri Lanka Maithreepala Sirisena as Constitutional, to have  dismissed the former Prime Minister and appoint a more people friendly Mahinda Rajapakse as the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. The USA and the West  looks at only the negative side of an issue  without understanding the people  who suffered for three years since 8 January, 2015, with a government which was corrupt and brought people back to misery and poverty with  the value of  the rupee tumbling to the lowest level.

The International Community is more interested in supporting the puppet government it set up without  feeling kindly towards the people who wanted  the former President Mahinda Rajapakse back in power as the Prime Minister, to take Sri Lanka back to what it was before the regime change on the 8th January,2015.

USA has its own problems as yesterday on the 28 October,2018 eleven people had been killed inside a Synagogue by a gunman, their only crime  being  that they are of Jewish nationality. These Jewish people  are  being  massacred since time immemorial for no crimes committed by them. They were the people who suffered the greatest and most inhuman  genocide in the world,  which Sri Lanka Tamil politicians shamelessly and  disrespectfully to the unfortunate Jewish people,  claim to have suffered genocide themselves-which is absolutely false.

It is time that the UN , the International Community instead of worrying about Sri Lanka which knows very well how to solve its problems, set about finding a solution to stop this continued hatred towards the Jewish people massacring them  inhumanly  without any reason as it happens  often in  the USA and the West.

What has USA and West got to gain  from creating communal dissension in Sri Lanka. If they seek global leadership they should stop dividing and destroying the sovereignty of developing countries. The best they can do if they cannot give financial aid for developing countries is to help the developing countries preserve their  unity between Majority and Minority Communities.

Therefore the International Community instead of  being concerned with the reconciliation amoung Tamils, Muslims and Sinhala in Sri Lanka, should inform their Agents the Tamil diaspora to leave Sri Lanka alone without creating Communal disunity and  advise the Tamils in Sri Lanka  to fall in line with the majority Sinhala Community as it is with all minority communities in the Countries of the International Community.

Therefore, we request the International Community to turn their attention to problems within their countries without interfering into Sri Lanka destabilise the country and  distancing  the Communities from each other. Sri Lanka is neither a Syria nor a Libya that needs foreign intervention to solve its problems. Therefore please keep away from Sri Lanka. 

Speaker laments over ousting Ranil

October 31st, 2018

By : A.A.M.NHIZAM – MATARA

The defunct Speaker of Parliament Mr. Karu Jayasuriya who was the worst ever speaker in Sri Lanka’s parliament history who was extremely bias and unruly, who in his utter arrogance deliberately ignored to recognize the majority opposition group in thee Parliament, arbitrarily conferred the post of the Leader of the Opposition to the minority party Tamil National Alliance which had only 16 members in the Parliament as against the 54 members of the Joint Opposition and similarly appointed the Chief Opposition Whip from the JVP with only 6 members in gratitude for that party’s blatant support to his party UNP and extensively restricted time allocations of time for the JO members to speak in Parliament and gave extensive time allocations for JVP and Government Ministers and MPs, suspended and expelled JO members from attending Parliament on baseless grounds, took his own unreasonable decisions to enlist or delay motions presented by MPs particularly JO MPs in the Order Papers, deliberately and on signals from the Prime Minister obstructed the speeches of JO members seems to be highly worried about the legitimate sacking of the former Prime Minister and proroguing of Parliament by the President.

Despite the fact that he is no more the Speaker with the cabinet being dismissed and the Parliament is prorogued and a new Speaker is to be elected, most probably Mr. Chamal Rajapaksa, when the Parliament resumes sittings on 16th next month, this defunct Speaker has written to President Maithripala Sirisena, asking the latter to protect the rights and privileges of Ranil Wickremesinghe and reconsider the decision to prorogue Parliament till November 16 saying that would lead to ‘serious and undesirable’ consequences. This man thinking very high of him has stated that such an action should have been taken in consultation with him.

The ousted Prime Minister has told foreign correspondents that the Speaker would summon the Parliament on the 30thTuesday.

Upon having a meeting with party larders on Tuesday 30th October Mr. Jayasuriya has written asking the President to convene the Parliament.

Mr. Jayasuriya earlier in the week has travelled to Kandy to meet the Mahanayake theros saying that he is visiting them to seek guidance due to the current political chaos in the country, Thinking that he can fool the Mahanayake theros, he has said that he had no intention to take the side of a person or a party and his sole intention was to solve the issue in a peaceful manner. He has also lied to the Mahanayakes saying that already people have died due to the clashes between the two sides, there is unrest and foreign countries are issuing travel warnings and this might set back the country diplomatically and economically.

The Mahanayake of the Ramanngna Nikaye Ven. Keppetiyagoda Siriwimala Nayake Thera of Rajopawanaramaya Peradeniya and members of the Sri Lanka Ramagnna Nikaya have hailed the action taken by President Maithripala Sirisena at a time of political crisis in the country.

In a statement issued by Venerable Keppetiyagoda Siriwimala Nayake Thera has stated that the Yahapalana administration led by former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe was responsible for the political chaos in the country during the past three and a half years and that the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his capacity as the New Prime Minister would be competent to restore the country to normalcy after resolving the many issues created by his predecessor. The statement has further stated that the entire Sri Lankan nation had the confidence in Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa efficiently resolving the many burning issues created by the Wickremasinghe regime during the past years with his far-sighted patriotism and courage that brought an end to the LTTE led terrorism in the country.

The Nayake Thera has said that the Maha Sangha the guardian of the nation and the island of Sri Lanka conferred blessings on President Maithripala Sirisena for taking appropriate action to replace the groups that damaged the country’s identity and democratic process by process by replacing in office a group that maintained democracy with patriotism in the past.

The prelate has said that the removal of the former administrators by President Sirisena ended the attempts of a group to divide the country in the name of a sham Sanhindiyawa.

Meanwhile, the JVP which is being alleged as a party in the payroll of the UNP and whose current leader Anura Kumars Dissanayake well known as Lapayaa was alleged by the former party leader the late Mr. Somawansa Amarasinghe for taking aa bribe of Rs. 25 Million from a UNP leader in Kandy to clandestinely help the UNP election campaign in the 2015 General Election and who was also alleged by the former UNP Parliamentarian for the Rathnapura district the late Mr. Gamini Ratnaltilleke of functioning as a Goni Billa” and betraying party cadres has criticized President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to sack Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister on October 26 and stated that proroguing the Parliament is an extension of this course of action. But the people can see, from the behaviour of Rajapaksa, Sirisena and Wickremesinghe since Friday that they will do anything to hold onto power. No one is budging, and everyone is ready to see the country descend into chao, he has said.  After extending his fullest support to Ranil Wickremasinghe and even having an office at Temple Trees to provide advice to Ranil Wickremasinghe he has said that the prevailing situation is not beneficial to the people and the country and this chaos will also indirectly benefit external forces that want to intervene in Sri Lanka. (end)

Prez can dissolve parliament if vote on account is defeated – Wijeyadasa

October 31st, 2018

Courtesy The Island

Minister of Education and Higher Education Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, who defected from the UNP to the UPFA on Monday, told the media in Colombo, yesterday, that if the vote on accounted to be presented by the new government to Parliament was defeated by any chance, the President was constitutionally empowered to dissolve Parliament immediately.

Minister Rajapakshe, State Minister of Plantation Industries Vadivel Suresh and Deputy Minister of Wildlife and Tourism, Ananda Aluthgamage claimed they had acted out of principle in switching their allegiance to President Maithripala Sirisena and Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Rajapakshe said that he had left the UNP mainly because the Wickremesinghe administration had leased out Hambantota Port to a Chinese company without a proper appraisal, the bond scams, deplorable move to hand over the East Container Terminal of the Colombo Port to India without presidential or Cabinet approval, the new land laws, government action in Geneva and the despicable manner in which laws governing the local and provincial government elections had been made.

article_image

Vadivel Suresh said that he was disappointed with Wickremesinghe’s treatment of estate workers. “I asked the former PM to intervene on behalf of the estate workers to increase their wage to Rs 1,000 a day. But he ignored me. Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and President Sirisena agreed to consider our request.

Deputy Minister Aluthgamage said that he was angry about the manner in which a cabal loyal to Ranil Wickremesinghe had run the government. “No attention was paid to the grassroots,” he said.

Rajapakshe said that President Sirisena had appointed Wickremesinghe Prime Minister in 2015, when the UNP only had 47 MPs. “Therefore, the President had a right to appoint Rajapaksa who has the support of a lot more MPs. The Sinhala version of the 19th Amendment clearly states that if the Cabinet is dissolved, the PM can no longer hold his position.”

Dr. Rajapaksa also said that the Speaker could not summon Parliament once the President prorogued it and that the Speaker had only requested the President to summon Parliament.

“I voted against the previous no-confidence motion against Wickremesinghe because at that time the Joint Opposition did not provide an alternative candidate as Prime Minister and I didn’t want to support a move which had the potential to cause instability in the country. When Wickremesinghe asked me about the NCM, I told him in no uncertain terms that I would vote against it not because I liked him but because I did not want the country to be plunged into chaos and it would take months for us to find a new PM at the time.”

Western Nations breaching Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations interfering into internal affairs of Sri Lanka

October 31st, 2018

The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) Article 41 clearly states that diplomats cannot interfere into the internal affairs in the receiving country and such interference is construed as a violation of diplomatic protocol. If so the US, UK, EU, Canada, Indian envoys are all breaching diplomatic protocols with their regular demarches against the Sri Lankan Government issuing statements & visiting Sri Lankan political parties, their leaders, local NGO heads, local media etc and often dictating how they should function. If Western diplomats are breaching the very rules that they have created they might as well remove them altogether.

 

The Vienna Convention – https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-94-011-8792-3%2F1.pdf

 

Article 4I – I. Without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, it is the duty of all persons enjoying such privileges and immunities to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving State. They also have a duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of that State

 

Article 41 – 2. All official business with the receiving State entrusted to the mission by the sending State shall be conducted with or through the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the receiving State or such other Ministry as may be agreed. (how many instances of Western envoys & Indian envoys did as they liked in Sri Lanka?

 

In addition to the Vienna Convention, Article 2.7 of the Charter of the United Nations also provides that – “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state”

 

Immediately reconvene Parliament” US urges Sri Lankan President (NDTV)

 

US calls on President to reconvene parliament immediately (Daily Mirror)

 

EU, UK envoys urge Sri Lanka to follow due process according to the constitution

 

https://twitter.com/EU_in_Sri_Lanka

https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/sri-lanka/52898/joint-statement_en

 

The biggest breach of protocol was seen when inspite of the President of Sri Lanka sacking Ranil Wickremasinghe as PM and appointing Mahinda Rajapakse as PM and issuing gazette notifications to this effect, the envoys of EU, UK gather & visit Temple Trees where Ranil Wickremasinghe the sacked PM refuses to vacate claiming he is still the PM.

What is baffling is that none of the envoys wishes to make any statement regarding the reason given by the President in a very emotional speech to the effect that what prompted him to sack the PM was as a result of his plan to assassinate him.

It is not for the US, UK, EU or Indian envoys to decide what is constitution or legal in Sri Lanka. There is the Attorney General & the Sri Lankan Supreme Court to advise the President on this. Therefore, the President does not require to take the US, UK, Indian or EU permission to appoint anyone or obtain their nod of approval either. We don’t decide who Trump, Theresa May, Macron or Modi appoint or sack, do we?

 

These all constitute violations of the Vienna Convention – so what happens when envoys violate diplomatic protocols? In the least the UN Members of the General Assembly should be appraised of these regular interferences other than social media & alternative media exposing the bias & hypocrisies at play.

 

We all recall how President R Premadasa declared David Gladstone the UK high commissioner ‘persona non grata’ when he tried to interfere in the elections of Sri Lanka.  https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/05/30/British-envoy-ordered-to-leave-Sri-Lanka/6697675576000/

 

 

 

Shenali D Waduge

Acting AG doesn’t find fault with President’s action –– Govt. Spokesman CC to be reconstituted

October 30th, 2018

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

Government spokesman Ports and Shipping Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe yesterday said no less a person than the Acting Attorney General Dappula de Livera had pointed out the basis for the President’s action, citing relevant gazettes (2094-43 dated Oct. 26.2018 and 2094-44 dated Oct. 26. 2018) and the 19th Amendment 48 (1).

Samarasinghe said Speaker Karu Jayasuriya had sought the Attorney General’s opinion on the legal status of Mahinda Rajapaksa’s appointment as well as his predecessor Wickremesinghe.

article_image

Samarasinghe displayed copies of emails sent by Speaker Jayasuriya and the one received by him from the Acting Attorney General.

Minister Samarasinghe and Co-Government spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella, MP, explained that the UNP could seek judicial interpretation of President Sirisena’s action or move a no-confidence motion (NCM) in parliament.

They explained the UNP couldn’t resort to an NCM overnight but follow procedures applied to all political parties represented in parliament.

Responding to another query, Samarasinghe pointed out that President Sirisena would ceremonially inaugurate the parliament on Nov 16. The minister ruled out any other business on that day.

Samarasinghe said that the ten-member Constitutional Council (CC) was likely to be reconstituted following Mahinda Rajapaksa’s appointment as the Prime Minister last Friday.

Rajapaksa will succeed UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe in the CC.

Samarasinghe said the Opposition Leader’s position in the CC currently held by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) leader R. Sampanthan could go to the UNP.

Samarasinghe, who is also the SLFP spokesman and President Maithripala Sirisena’s nominee in the CC, said so when The Island sought an explanation as to how the CC chaired by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya had responded to the change of government.

Samarasinghe said that he couldn’t speculate about the Speaker’s position while asserting there was a likelihood of change in all three positions––Speaker, Prime Minister and Opposition Leader.

Asked whether the Prime Minister Wickremesinghe’s nominee, the then Justice Minister attorney-at-law Thalatha Atukorale and Opposition Leader Sampanthan’s representative Chamal Rajapaksa, too, were likely to be replaced, Samarasinghe said that the CC would have to decide.

CC established in 2015 in terms of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution is empowered to make appointments/recommendations in respect of independent commissions as well as Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal.

At the time of President Sirisena withdrawing his support to the UNP last Friday leading to the automatic collapsing of the National Unity Government, the CC comprised Speaker Karu Jayasuriya, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Opposition Leader R. Sampanthan, President’s nominee Mahinda Samarasinghe, PM’s nominee Thalatha Atukorale, parliament’s nominee Bimal Ratnayake, Opposition Leader’s nominee Chamal Rajapaksa and three civil society members namely one-time top UN official Ambassador Jayantha Dhanapala, former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia Javid Yusuf and Naganathan Sellavakumaran.

MP Rambukwella denied that the country was experiencing a constitutional crisis. Prorogation of parliament which was to meet on Nov 5 couldn’t be considered a crisis though various parties, including the media did so.

Asked whether they were sure of the required simple majority in parliament, Messrs Samarasinghe and Rambuwella pointed out the new government had the backing of over 120 lawmakers. Of those 126 lawmakers who had allegedly signed a petition on behalf of Wickremesinghe calling for immediate reconvening of the parliament, already four accepted portfolios in the new government, they said.

President Sirisena swore in 12 ministers, one State Minister and one Deputy Minister on Monday night.

Asked how the remaining appointments would be made, Samarasinghe said that President Sirisena and PM Rajapaksa would decide on them.

In terms of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, a single-party government though free to accommodate members from other political parties could appoint maximum 30 member cabinet.

Lankaweb Weekly Editorial

October 30th, 2018

It has been the President’s strong conviction despite former differences between himself and Mahinda Rajapaksa now obviously settled notwithstanding what terms and agreements were involved between them towards the final choice that within his capacity as the new Prime Minister, he would be competent to restore the country to normalcy after resolving the many issues created by his predecessor. This seems fair gamut from many perspectives as Mahinda Rajapaksa has indeed proved his equitabillity beyond any reasonable doubt given the state of the country today compared to what it was when he left office.

A vast proportion of the Sri Lankan nation apart from the disgruntled opposition in support of Ranil Wickremasinghe now  has the confidence in Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa towards efficiently resolving the many burning issues created by the Wickremasinghe regime during the past years with his far-sighted patriotism and courage that brought an end to the LTTE led terrorism in the country.

The Maha Sangha  who are the virtual  guardians of the nation and the island of Sri Lanka  have unequivocally conferred blessings on President Maithripala Sirisena for taking appropriate action to replace the groups that damaged the country’s identity and democratic process by replacing in office a group that maintained democracy with patriotism in the past, something which many news sources  and political leaders within the country concurred in agreement.

There are of course those who disfavour the turn of events that have transpired including Ranil Wickremasinghe who has bitterly opposed  them with a multitude of supporters behind him probably miniscule compared to the vast majority that favours the Presidential decision believing it is the best thing that could happen to the Nation embroiled in corruption and crooked wheeling and dealing involving many politicians within the hierarchy where the former Prime Minister is said to have turned a blind eye to the goings on where perhaps his day of atonement has in all probabilities arrived.

It is also popular opinion in the country in its aftermath that the removal of the former administrators by President Sirisena has ended the attempts of a group to divide the country in the name of a sham Sanhindiyawa according to a recent media report. where the Yahapalana administration led by former Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe was responsible for the political chaos in the country during the past three and a half years.

It is hoped that former President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his capacity as the New Prime Minister would be competent to restore the country to normalcy after resolving the many issues created by his predecessor towards which he has the blessings and good wishes of all peace loving and patriotic Sri Lankans while it is also hoped that the outgoing  former Prime Minister will bow out gracefully towards a peaceful transition in the best interests of Sri Lanka.

 

YAHAPALANA ELECTIONS AND ‘REGIME CHANGE’ Part 12

October 30th, 2018

KAMALIKA PIERIS

The last essay in this series comes at a time when things have   drastically changed. The Yahapalana regime appears to have ‘fallen’ and Mahinda Rajapaksa has replaced Ranil Wickremasinghe as Prime Minister. This essay summarizes four important political events leading to this transfer of power.

The local government election of February 2018 was a landmark election in Sri Lanka. The electorate did not see the election as a mere local government election, they saw it as a chance to tell Yahapalana and the watching United States of America, what they thought of Yahapalana. The election was conducted with very high standards, reported the media. There were no serious incidents of election related violence, only some minor skirmishes.

A larger than estimated number of voters turned up at polling booths, contrary to expectations. They gave the less than a year old Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP, Pohottuwa) an overwhelming victory in terms of the wards won in the councils, though with shaky total number of seats in some councils.

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), utterly new and untested, emerged victorious, sweeping the polls in the vast majority of local government institutions. A new untested force had beaten two established political parties to become the single largest political formation in the country. Governments in power have never lost local government elections before.

The SLPP had won 239 of 340 councils on offer while the United National Party (UNP) won 41 councils. The Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and the United Peoples’ Freedom Alliance (UPFA) together, emerged victorious in 10 councils while the Illankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK) won 34 councils, mostly in the North and East of the country. The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), despite their high profile campaign, failed to gain control of any council. The SLPP obtained 4.9 million or 44.65 percent of the votes and came first in a record 239 councils with 3,369 seats.

The SLPP polled 44.69% of the votes cast at the LG election.  The UNP obtained 32.61%. The UPFA polled 8.90%. The SLFP polled 4.48%. The two governing parties secured together 45.99%  SLPP had   got nearly 2% less than the other three parties put together.

There was a definite swing towards Pohottuwa and Rajapaksa. The SLPP nominations for Maharagama Urban Council were rejected. Mahinda Rajapaksa backed an independent group which had the motorcycle as its symbol .The motorcycle group won. Rajapaksa had gone for their rallies riding a motorcycle.

It was argued that Rajapaksa’s vote at this election showed a decline. At the Presidential Election held in 2015, Rajapaksa polled 47.58% and that was more than the votes polled at the LG election. This was rejected by analysts. Mahinda Rajapaksa not only holds the largest chunk of votes in the country, 45%, but he has also probably jumped the 50% mark by now, said Dayan Jayatilaka. These critics had conveniently forgotten that the vote received by the SLFP and the UPFA couldn’t be under any circumstances counted as anti-Mahinda vote.

The number of votes that the newly formed Sri Lanka Podujana Party actually got at the last local government elections may not be representative of the actual number of votes it should have got, analysts said. In reality, Rajapaksa and his party have a broader footprint countrywide. The SLPP and the Rajapaksas have proved that, three years out of office and out of power, they are still a force to reckon with. The election has paved the way for the return of Mahinda Rajapaksa, their leader, to more active Sri Lankan politics concluded analysts.

Rajitha Senaratne said Gotabhaya will be arrested and jailed after the election. Gotabhaya arrived the day after the Pohottuwa victory. He was not arrested. The Pohottuwa momentum did not end there. All 210 seats at the Atakalanpanna Multipurpose Cooperative Society elections were won by the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), with the UNP and the SLFP failing to win any seats at all. This election was probably held in September 2018.

This Pohottuwa victory was followed by another important development in Parliament. 16 SLFP MPs crossed over and took their seats among the Opposition in Parliament on 8th of May, 2018.  They sat as an independent SLFP group in the Opposition.

This   SLFP cross over marks the largest number to cross over from Government to the Opposition at any one time, in the history of the Sri Lankan Parliament, observed Dinesh Gunawardena. Usually, traffic flows from opposition to government, therefore this reverse flow is noteworthy. Such reverse flows, as in 1964 and 1975 are signs of a government doomed to be defeated at the next election. This defection as also noteworthy for quality, not only in numbers, observed Dayan Jayatilaka. As Dayasiri Jayasekara pointed out on Derana 360, of the 16 rebels, 14 have university degrees, eight are lawyers and one is a specialist doctor.

When these 16 dissident MPs moved to the Opposition, the public were waiting outside to cheer them. The public were prevented by the police, from entering Parliament   premises. They yelled and protested and refused to move. The 16 MPs came out and were greeted with crackers, garlanded and carried on the shoulders of supporters. The 16 MPs then   got on to a mobile platform and addressed the yelling crowd. They made long political speeches, accompanied by loud cheers. These 16 MPs had helped in the   plans to  make Rajapaksa Prime Minister

The third event was the “Janabalaya Kolambata” held in Colombo by the Joint Opposition on September 05, 2018. The massive Janabalaya was organized by the youth wing of the Sri Lanka Podujana Party led by MP Namal Rajapaksa. “Janabalaya Kolambata” was a roaring success said Rohana Wasala. That it was going to draw huge crowds was clear to all. The turnout was estimated to be around 200,000 .

As a precaution against possible legal obstructions the organizers kept the routes of the march and the venue of the rally and sit-in protest under wraps until the morning of September 5. The protesters marched along five routes in Colombo, Kandy, Baseline, Negombo, Maligawatte, and Town Hall roads, and congregated at the Lake House Roundabout where they held a non-violent protest, reported Wasala. On the way, they hooted at the SLFP office in Union Place.

The protest marchers came from every corner of the island, from Jaffna in the north, from Devundara, Matara, in the south, from Trincomalee and Batticaloa in the east, and converged in Colombo with others from the western province. A large number of Muslims from the East and Tamils from North and hill country   took part. People from every community participated in the Janabalaya said Rohana Wasala.

The gathering included political and non-political groups. A large crowd of Sri Lankan expatriates working abroad, intellectuals, professionals and entrepreneurs from Viyathmaga, retired army generals and other veterans of the military (people who normally do not take part in such public demonstrations) were also reported to be taking part in it observed Wasala. A large number of youth and professionals – especially lawyers, some doctors and engineers, took part, observed Vitarana.

These crowds extended close to the Hilton on the West and to the Cinnamon Lake Hotel on the South and for about 300 meters to the East on Wijewardena Mw. and the road to the Pettah on the North. Mahinda Rajapaksa came to ‘Janabalaya Kolambata’, surrounded by security in an open roof car, to   enthusiastic cheers.  It was a triumphant arrival.

The organizers provided food parcels, but they were not really adequate. A stage was set up on the road to the Hilton Hotel and various cultural programs with political messages were performed for about an hour. A novel feature was the night vigil by candle light which went on till about 11.30 pm when the crowd dispersed. The participants showed the highest level of discipline and restraint.

The performance of a peaceful ,quiet (as no loudspeakers were permitted) “sathyakriya” in front of Lake House, where people sat for hours patiently, though packed together like sardines in a tin, was also a good sign for the future and an indication of their commitment to the success of the event.

Participants were carrying lighted torches during the night vigil, which in the hands of the irresponsible, could have set the whole place to go up in smoke. However, to their credit, these were handled in a disciplined manner. Noteworthy features were the virtual absence of any incidents, the orderliness without disturbing pedestrians or vehicles, and the voicing of relevant political slogans in addition to “Kawdha raja, Mahinda Raja”, observed Vitarana.

Finally, all this goes to prove that our people are able to conduct themselves in a disciplined and responsible manner, sans any outside inputs or unsolicited advice. The threats of the government to attack if attacked also kept the protestors in check,

Through their well attended and meticulously organized demonstration the Joint Oppossiton made a direct hit on the government, said Rohana Wasala. There was enthusiasm and militancy. The public showed the government that they were fed up with it and they showed this to the whole world. This Janabalaya has helped to sustain, if not increase, the momentum generated by the victory at the Local Government Elections of February 10 this year, observed Tissa Vitarana.

On social media, Jana Balaya arguably created the most amount of engagement around any event of its kind on Facebook and Twitter. During the day, around live video feeds on Facebook alone, close to two million watched the political theatre of Jana Balaya as it unfolded. This included close to 400,000 on Namal Rajapaksa’s Facebook page alone. A staggering 600,000 watched live feeds over the Facebook page of a private TV station, said Sanjana Hattotuwa.

On Twitter, there were over 5,000 tweets with one or all of the three official hashtags used by the protest. There may have been many more that tweeted on the protest without using one or more of these hashtags. Each of these accounts acts as an amplifier, showing to their friends and followers what was posted or republished. The likely digital footprint of content around Jana Balaya potentially, if not demonstrably, runs into the millions over just two of Sri Lanka’s most used social media platforms.

Preliminary metrics around the scale and spread of content on Instagram – a photo sharing network that is also very popular – suggest Jana Balaya generated tens of thousands of likes.Overall then, the campaign was digitally unprecedented in Sri Lanka, generated the kind of engagement organically, that campaigns which boost content through paid advertising, can’t often reach.

Yahapalana has also seen the rise of Namal Rajapaksa, he has got a lot of exposure as a speaker  from 2015, he speak senses and uses words well.He is no longer ‘Namal baby’.Millions were interested, engaged, watched, commented, shared and reacted to  Namal Rajapaksa as an individual. Namal Rajapaksa as a vehicle or platform to communicate the JO’s discontent is unassailable, with an active, devoted fan base by order of magnitude larger than anyone else, even in his own family, observed Hattotuwa.

Janabalaya faced considerable obstruction by the government .The police went to courts to take out bans on the protests. Road Passenger Transport Authority ordered private bus services in various provinces not to accept private tours during the days that the Janabalaya people were expected to travel to and from Colombo. At Nittambuwa a trench was dug on the road”.

A bus carrying demonstrators to Colombo was intercepted at Hali-Ela in the Badulla area and was attacked by hooligans, inflicting grievous injuries on the commuters, and smashing up the bus beyond repair. Several young men who were decorating a stage in the city on the September 4th night were assaulted by an unidentified gang and were hospitalized. Several participants were physically attacked while on the peaceful march.

There was also the case of alleged distribution of poisoned or contaminated milk packets among the protestors on the march. Pohottuwa had used CCTV cameras to detect the activity. Milco said that a needle had been used to introduce something into the packets of milk, distributed among those participating at Jana Balaya Colombata”. This had taken place outside Milco premises.

Milco said As soon as they got to know the incident, Milco had collected the relevant milk packets and examined them. A JO delegation had met the Milco chief to inquire about their complaint.  Addressing the media outside Milco premises, MP Namal Rajapaksa reiterated accusations that the UNP made an attempt to harm those who joined Janabalaya. Rajapaksa said that the JO expected the company to fully cooperate in the inquiry or face the consequences.

An individual who was affected by this wicked deed has instituted an action at a court in Matara, reported the media.  UNP MP Mujibar Rahuman denied the allegation against him that he distributed milk packets injected with poison among  Janabalaya supporters

The fourth factor that led to the return of Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister was the surge towards Mahinda Rajapaksa. The call for his return started the day after Sirisena became President. The call did not fade. Instead, it accelerated and was turning into a howl of despair, when Mahinda Rajapaksa suddenly became Prime Minister.

Mahinda Rajapaksa was seen daily, on television news attending some function or other usually in a temple, surrounded by cheering crowds. The media was always there and he was always asked for an opinion. So Rajapaksa was always in the public eye. Mahinda Rajapaksa was at Sri Sugatharama, Kalawana on 9.9.18 to open the bauddha mandiraya. There were crowds to greet him.

Mahinda Rajapaksa was invited to a gathering of theatre artistes on 20.9.18 to give away   nidahas kala bhushana awards. ‘Rata nathivegana yanawa’, he told the media.  Viewers would often see President Sirisena at a function, and then Ranil Wickremasinghe at another function and thirdly, Rajapaksa also like a head of state, gracing a similar function.  Viewers were getting quite used to this spectacle.

The public took every opportunity to show support to Rajapaksa. The Rajapaksa May Day in Galle, in 2018 was the largest May dally rally in our history, said Rajapaksa. Derana news 10.8.18 showed paddy farmers coming to Mahinda Rajapaksa‘s home after alut sahal mangalya expressly to show gratitude.  They came with bundles of produce for him.

The Kettam Mahara Bonegala Bridge at Attanagalla built by Rajapaksa was to be opened by Chandrika Kumaratunga in September 2018, Rajapaksa supporters objected to this. They   launched a noisy protest and came across the bridge hooting and jeering.

When the Polwatu Modera Bridge at Matara was to be opened by UNP’s Sagala Ratnayake, two Pohottu local government members arrived before Sagala and had tried to carry out the ceremony saying that the bridge was planned and the money obtained during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s time. There was a scuffle and the two Pohottus were arrested on the grounds of disturbing official activity and taken to courts by police.

As the presidential and parliamentary elections draw near, former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s daily activities are increasing, reported the media. Other than political events, one of the demands on him is to sign as witness for weddings. One day, weeks ago, he had to go for 13 different wedding ceremonies signing either on behalf of the groom’s or the bride’s side. There were two different requests last month from two different places. On Mr. Rajapaksa’s suggestion, two different nekath (auspicious) times were found. He signed the wedding register with a time gap at his official residence at Wijerama Mawatha.

Within a few weeks of Janabalaya Kolombata, Mahinda Rajapaksa was invited by India and given a reception that, as some in the media said, is normally accorded to a visiting head of state.

HINDU commented: In an indication of warming of ties, former Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapaksa will visit New Delhi this week and hold important discussions. Rajapaksa, will deliver a public lecture on India-Sri Lanka relation: the way ahead” organized by the Virat Hindustan Sangam, led by BJP MP Subramanian Swamy. He is likely to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi, National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi. The External Affairs Ministry has not spoken about the meetings so far. A source said the visit was being planned by private parties”. The visit comes less than a week after thousands of demonstrators, led by Rajapaksa, protested in Colombo against the government’s economic policies and the delay in holding provincial elections. Though out of power for more than three years, Mr. Rajapaksa, who represents Kurunegala district in Parliament, remains a formidable political actor in Sri Lankan politics, often challenging the fractured coalition in power.”

Rajapaksa went to India on this three-day visit, in September 2018 accompanied by his son Namal. He delivered a public lecture in Delhi on India-Sri Lanka relations: the way ahead”. He met Prime Minister Modi. There is a photo of them shaking hands and posing.

Rajapaksa went on the invitation of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Leader Subramanian Swamy, Swamy said he had invited his great friend” Rajapaksa in his personal capacity. “Ties with Sri Lanka have been weak over the last two years and I think we need to strengthen them,” Swamy added.  Swamy said that “an association with Rajapaksa would help improve ties between the two countries”.  Swamy has even attended the funeral of Chandra Rajapaksa, the younger brother of Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri Lanka.

Speaking to The Hindu, the former President,  said  he was 100% confident his party will come to power in 2019,  Rajapaksa proposed a new mechanism for India and Sri Lanka to resolve all issues, especially economic issues. The mechanism would mirror the Troika” formed in 2008-2009 of three Indian officials — National Security Advisor M.K. Narayanan, Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon and Defence Secretary Vijay Singh — and three Sri Lankan officials — Advisor Basil Rajapaksa, Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa and Permanent Secretary Lalith Weeratunga — to coordinate India-Sri Lanka ties during the war against the LTTE in 2008-2009.

India is our closest relation, Rajapaksa continued, I would say, and our neighbor. And China has been a long-standing friend. In all our dealings with China, we never forgot about the interests of India. We had a very good understanding with the Indian government and we always told them that we would never allow our territory to be used for any activity against our neighbor.

My priority was always to develop my country and I always kept India informed and asked them first to build the port, to build the airport, to build the highways, we always came to India. We offered them first, and then the next offer went to China, because they were the only people who could do it. And within eight months the Chinese had started [construction].

I am not opposing India. I am opposing the privatization that is the policy of the Sirisena government. I never privatized the way they have. In fact I bought back the shares of the gas company, insurance company, and also the SriLankan Airlines that was sold to Emirates Rajapaksa concluded.

There is no single political personality in today’s Sri Lanka who can come close to the popularity of Mahinda Rajapaksa. There is no combination of personalities that cannot benefit from being partnered with him. With the right choice of Presidential candidate, it could be the most popular political and electoral combination that Sri Lanka has ever seen, said Dayan Jayatilaka.

When Mahinda Rajapaksa is no more, he will be elevated from folk hero to folk deity, for centuries to come, if not millennia. Yahapalana spokespersons may counter that Mahinda was defeated in January 2015, but his legend has grown and his iconic status elevated after that defeat—when the people realized just how much they missed him, just how much they had lost, said Dayan. (CONCLUDED)

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අතිගරු කතානායක තුමාට විවෘත ලිපියක්-වර්තමාන පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය කුමක්ද යන ගැටලුවට ඇති සාධාරණ විසදුම සම්බන්ධවයි

October 30th, 2018

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ.

ශ්‍රී ලංකා පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ අතිගරු කතානායක තුමනි,

වර්තමාන පාර්ලිමේන්තුවේ බහුතරය කුමක්ද යන ගැටලුවට ඇති සාධාරණ විසදුම සම්බන්ධවයි

වර්තමාන දේශපාලන තත්වය ඔබතුමාව ගැටළු සහගත තත්වයකට පත්කර ඇති බවක්, අපට දිස්වේ. ඔබ තුමාට නොවැම්බර් මස 16 වෙනිදා දක්වා කල් තැබූ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව වහා කැදවීමේ අවශ්‍යතාවයක් පැන නැගී ඇති බව අපට පෙනේ. එසේ සිදුව ඇත්තේ වර්තමානයේදී සිදුව ඇති බල පෙරළියත් සමගය. ඔබට දැන ගැනීමට අවශ්‍ය වන්නේ, බහුතරය ඇත්තේ වර්තමාන අගමැති මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතාටද නැත්නම්, හිටපු අගමැති රනිල් වික්‍රමසිංහ මහතාටදැයි යන බලය උරගා බැලීමේ අවස්තාවක් මතු කර බැලීමටය. ඔබතුමා කතානායකතුමාය. විනිසුරුවරයෙක් වන්වූ මහා ගාම්භිරවූ තනතුරක් දරන්නෙක් වන අතර මෙය අවබෝධ කරගැනීමට ඔබතුමා සතුව ඇති දත්තයන් හොදටම ප්‍රමාණවත්ය. ඒ මෙසේය.

  1. ආණ්ඩුව : එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂය ආසන 106

                මුස්ලිම් කොංග්‍රසය                   1

                EPDP                                1

               එකතුව                             108

  1. විපක්ෂය: ද්‍රවිඩ සන්ධානය (නිල විපක්ෂය )  16

               ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණ               6

               එක්සත් ජනතා නිදහස් සන්ධානය  95

              එකතුව                                 117

මේ අනුව ඉතා පැහැදිලිව මෙතන ඔබට පෙන්නුම් කර දෙන්නේ ආණ්ඩුවට වඩා විපක්ෂය බලවත් බවයි. නමුත් මේ සිද්ධාන්තය ඔබතුමා පිළිගැනීමට සුදානමක් නැති බැවින්, ඔබතුමා මේ ඉතා සරල ගැටලුව, රටක් කළඹන මහා අරගලයක් දක්වා වර්ධනය කිරීමේ මෙහෙයුමක් අරඹා ඇති බවක් මෙරට පරමාධිපත්යවූ ජනතාවට පැහැදිලිවම දිස්වීමට පටන්ගෙන ඇත.

ඔබ මේ සත්‍ය කරුණු වලට එරෙහිව සිටගන්නේ නම් ඔබට ද්‍රවිඩ සන්ධානයේ සහයද ජනතා විමුක්ති පෙරමුණේ සහයද එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයට හිමිව ඇති බව සිතන්නට පෙළඹේ. නමුත් කතානායකවරයා වන ඔබතුමාට නිල විපක්ෂය, හා නිල විපක්ෂ සංවිධායකත්වය හොඹවන පක්ෂ ආණ්ඩුවේ කොටස් සේ, සැලකීමට හෝ සිතීමටද ඉඩක් නැත. ඒ ඔබ කතානායක තුමා වන බැවිනි. මේ සත්‍යට එරෙහිව ඔබ සිතුවොත් හෝ ක්‍රියා කලොත්, ඔබ ප්‍රජාතන්ත්‍රවාදයේ, මුලික ගුණාංගයක් වන විපක්ෂයේ පැවැත්ම විනාශ කල මහා ජාතික අපරාධ කාරයෙකුගේ තත්වයට පත්වේ. එම නිසා ඔබට මේ කරුණු මත තීරණ ගැනීමට සිදුවේ.

තවද මේ සිදුව ඇති බල පෙරලිය ඉතා පැහැදිලිවම පෙන්වන්නේ, ඉතිහාසයේ සිදුවූ ජනතාවාදී මහා විපර්යාසයක් ලෙසයි. ඒ මෙසේය,

2015 ජනවාරි මස 8 වෙනිදා චන්ද ප්‍රතිපල වලට අනුව, අතිගරු ජනාධිපති මෛත්‍රිපාල සිරිසේන මහතා චන්ද 6.217,162 ලබාගත් අතර එය 51.28% ප්‍රතිශතයකි. තවද මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා ලබාගත්තේ,චන්ද 5,768,090කි මෙය 47.58% ප්‍රතිශතයකි. වර්තමානයේ සිදුව ඇත්තේ මේ දෙදෙනා එකතුව රජයක් පිහිටුවා තිබීමයි. මෙවැනි අවස්තාවක් යනු ඉතිහාසයේ සිදුවන ඉතා අහඹු සිදුවීමකි. ඒ අනුව මේ රජය තුල චන්ද 11,985,252ක ජනතා බලයක් ගැබ්ව ඇති අතර, එය ප්‍රතිශතයක් ලෙස 98.86%කි. මෙවන් ජනතා බලයකින් ආධ්‍යා රජයක් රටටම මහා ආශිර්වාදයකි.

තත්වය ඉතා පැහැදිලිව මෙසේ තිබියදී තවත් කරුණු සෙවීමට වෙර දැරීම නිරර්ථක කාර්යයක් බව පැවසීමට සිදුව තිබේ .

ඔබ තුමාට තෙරුවන් සරණයි!

චන්ද්‍රසේන පණ්ඩිතගේ.

 

DR  BRIAN SELVARATNAM OF BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA- “AN UGLY BLAST OF THE PAST”

October 30th, 2018

By M D P DISSANAYAKE

Today October 30, Tamil dominated talk back radio of Australia known as 3CR Community Broadcast, found one of its friends and enemies of Sri Lanka, Dr Brian Selvaratnam currently residing in Brisbane Australia, for a lengthy interview to attack Sri Lanka, Sinhalese   and Rajapakse’s.

He was given prime time talk back slot, 5.30 pm peak after office  driving time  in Melbourne .   Thamby Brian sounded very angry of the turn of events in Sri Lanka today. Thamby Brian praised Mr Ranil Wickreamsinghe to the hilt. Thamby Brian virtually undressed Rajapakse’s.

According to Thamby (Tampi) Brian:

-the current events events were intiated by China

-the Rajapakse sons will bring some more Ferrari, Lambouginie Cars very soon;

-Rajapakse’s will swindle the rest of the money remaining in the country;

-Rajapakse’s will harass minorities

Thamby Brian seems very angry that:

-Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison is not introducing any sanctions against Sri Lanka;

-United Nations is not taking any action against Sinhala dominated Rajapakse regime.

According to this idiotic Doctor Ranil regime has been doing an excellent job.

Naturally Tamil extremists  are very hurt.      Lets say Cheers to a sip of Adelaide Hills glass of wine, after 3 and half years.

Defiant Sirisena claims 75% popular support as EU threatens trade sanctions

October 30th, 2018

Courtesy NewsIn.Asia

Colombo, October 30 (newsin.asia): At the meeting between Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena and foreign envoys here on Monday,  the European Union (EU) Ambassador  Tung-Lai Margue warned that if democratic norms and constitutional provisions are not observed in handling  the on-going political crisis in Sri Lanka, the EU may consider withdrawing  the trade concessions the island nations enjoys under the General System of Preferences Plus (GSP Plus).

According to the International Trade Centre, in 2009, a year before the EU withdrew  GSP Plus concessions from Sri Lanka on human rights issues,  Lanka’s exports to EU were worth US$ 2.3 billion. Despite the withdrawal of GSP Plus, exports expanded thereafter to reach US$ 2.4 billion by 2015.

Defiant Sirisena claims 75% popular support as EU threatens trade sanctions

But the rate of increase had declined in comparison with other countries including Bangladesh and Pakistan.

And between 2010 and 2017, when the GSP Plus was not there, Sri Lanka lost up to LKR 250 billion (US$ 1.45 billion) in export earnings from the EU.

But as in the case of President Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2010, Sirisena was unfazed by the EU threat on Monday.

In 2010, Rajapaksa had dismissed the withdrawal as a matter of no great consequence, when seen against the benefit of fighting the Tamil Tiger rebels to the finish.

In fact, Sri Lanka’s exports to EU increased, albeit marginally during the ban.

On the perceived unpopularity or unacceptability of his act of removing Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe in the way he did,  Sirisena reportedly said that the Western envoys appeared to be unaware of the pulse of the people”.

The President suggested that the foreign missions  get surveys done to ascertain the common man’s thinking, and added the surveys would reveal that 70 to75%” of the people are with him.

EU Statement

The EU had issued a statement saying that the sudden deterioration of the situation in Sri Lanka over the weekend had put the country at risk of instability and unrest.

Along with other key international partners of Sri Lanka, the Ambassador of the European Union met with the President of Sri Lanka to express our expectation that a solution respectful of the country’s constitution would be found quickly.”

To this end, it is important that the President allows the immediate reconvening of the Parliament so that the elected representatives of the Sri Lankan people can fulfill their duties,” the EU statement said.

In the current context of tensions and uncertainties, it is of utmost importance that violence and provocation are avoided and that law enforcement agencies act with restraint.”

The EU expects Sri Lanka to pursue its positive path towards reconciliation and democracy for the full benefit of the Sri Lankan people, the statement added.

This was the refrain of the other envoys from the developed world also. The envoys of non-White countries merely listened to the exchanges between the White block and the President.

President Sirisena told the envoys that it is best to leave the governance of Sri Lanka to Sri Lankans. The government and the people of Sri Lanka know best what is good for them, he added.

On the criticism that the ethnic reconciliation process will suffer as a result of the on-going political turmoil and instability, Sirisena said that he is committed to reconciliation  and has initiated many steps to bring it about.

In his presentation lasting more than an hour, the President explained why he could not work with Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and why he had hand over the reins to Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Sirisena said that he is confident that the constitution has provisions which allow him to sack the Prime Minister. A paper written on this written by his lawyer Manohara de Silva was circulated which justified the President’s steps from the legal and constitutional point of view.

Sirisena also said that he is going to swear-in a new cabinet after the meeting, leaving the foreign envoys with no doubt that Sirisena is determined the tread the path he had chosen on the  issue of Ranil Wickremesinghe.

(The featured image at the top shows Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena meeting foreign envoys on Oct 29, 2018. Photo. Presidents Media Division)

සන්ධානය 150 කිට්ටු කරනවා.. එජාපයට 40-50ක් පමණයි..- විජේදාස හෙලි කරයි

October 30th, 2018

 lanka C news

සන්ධානය 150 කිට්ටු කරනවා.. එජාපයට 40-50ක් පමණයි..- විජේදාස හෙලි කරයි

ජනාධිපතිවරයාට පැවරී ඇති බලතල අනුව අග්‍රාමාත්‍යවරයෙක් පත්කළ පසු ඔහුට බහුතරය ඇත්දැයි ඡන්දයක් විමසීමේ ‍ක‍්‍රමයක් හෝ ව්‍යවස්ථානුකූල උවමනාවක් නැතැයි ඇමති විජේදාස රාජපක්ෂ මහතා සඳහන් කරයි.

නමුත් නව අගමැතිවරයාට එරෙහිව පාර්ලිමේන්තුවට විශ්වාසභංගයක් ගෙන යා හැකි බවද පවසන ඇමතිවරයා ඉදිරියේදී කරන අයවැය හෝ අතුරු අයවැය යන මුදල් පනස් දෙකෙන් එකක් පරාජය කිරීමට හැකි බව ද සඳහන් කළේය.

මුදල් පනතක් පරාජය වුවහොත් පාර්ලිමේන්තුව ඉබේම විසුරුවා හැරෙන නිසා සන්ධානයේ අරමුණ ද එයම විය හැකි යැයි ඔහු සඳහන් කළේය.

යම් හෙයකින් එසේ පාර්ලිමේන්තුව විසුරුවා හැරියහොත් එක්සත් ජාතික පක්ෂයේ මන්ත්‍රී ආසන සංඛ්‍යාව 40-50ක් දක්වා අඩු වනු ඇති බවත් සන්ධානය අති විශාල ආසන ප්‍රමාණයක් ලබා ගනු ඇති බවත් ඇමතිවරයා පැවසීය.

කොළඹදී පැවති මාධ්‍ය හමුවක් අමතමින් විජයදාස රාජපක්ෂ මහතා මේ බව කියා සිටියේය.

රනිල් සුලග නොනැවතේ.. එජාපයේ තවත් හතරක් දිවුරන්න සූදානම්..

October 30th, 2018

 lanka C news

එක්සත් ජාතික පක්‍ෂයේ තවත් මන්ත‍්‍රිවරුන් සිවු දෙනෙකු නියෝජ්‍ය හා රාජ්‍ය ඇමති ධුරයන්හි හෙට (31) දිනයේ දිවුරුම් දෙනු ඇතැයි ජනාදීපති කාර්යාලයේ ආරංචි මාර්ග සනාථ කරයි.

මේ වන විට කැබිනට් ඇමති ධුරයන්හි පුරප්පාඩු වේගයෙන් සම්පුර්න වෙමින් ඇති බවත් නව ඇමතිවරුන් දිවුරුම් දීම ඔවුන් විසින් යොදා ගන්නා වේලාවන් අනුව හෝ ජනාධිපතිවරයා විසින් ලබා දෙනු ලබන වේලාවකට අනුව ඉදිරි දින කිහිපය තුල සිදුවනු ඇතැයිද එම ආරංචි මාර්ග කියා සිටී.

ඇමතිවරුන් දිවුරුම් දීම සිදුවන්නේ දිනකට කෙනෙකු හෝ දෙදෙනෙකු බැගින් බවත් ඉදිරි දින කිහිපයේදීම මෙම සිදුවීම් දැකගත හැකි වනු ඇති බවත් තව දුරටත් වාර්තා වෙයි.

මේ අතර නියෝජ්‍ය ඇමති ආනන්ද අලූත්ගමගේ මහතා සදහන් කරන්නේ එජාපයේ තවත් 06 දෙනෙකු හෙට දිනයේ ඇමතිවරුන් ලෙස දිවුරුම් දෙන බවත් එජාපයේ 20 ඉක්මවූ පිරිසක් මීලග පාර්ලිමේන්තු සැසියට පෙර ඇමතිවරුන් ලෙස නව ආණ්ඩුවට එක්වනු ඇති බවත්ය.

Change of premiership and other matters

October 30th, 2018

By Shamindra Ferdinando Courtesy The Island

Newly appointed Premier Mahinda Rajapaksa congratulating new Education and Higher Education Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapaksa, PC, one of the four elected on the UNP ticket at the last parliamentary polls in August 2015 to join the Sirisena-Rajapaksa administration. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse quit the SLFP-led UPFA during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s first tenure (2005-2010) as the President (Pic by Sudath Silva)

Justice Minister Thalatha Atukorale profusely appreciated Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe for accommodating her in the 10-member Constitutional Council (CC).

The UNPer declared that she was the first woman named to the CC, chaired by Speaker Karu Jayasuriya – elected from the Gampaha District at the 2015 August parliamentary polls. Parliament and political parties constituted the first CC by way of enactment of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.

article_image

The Ratnapura District MP said so at a Sirikotha meeting on the morning of Oct 12, 2018. Atukorale said that she had to leave the Sirikotha meeting early to attend a CC meeting to decide on the next Chief Justice. The CC recommended Nalin Perera, a career judge, fourth in line for the top job. President Maithripala Sirisena endorsed that appointment.

Obviously, Atukorale hadn’t been aware of one-time Under-Secretary General of the United Nations, Radhika Coomaraswamy, being a civil society member of the CC until late Sept., 2018. Coomaraswamy functioned as the Special Representative of the Secretary General on Children and Armed Conflict from 2006 until her retirement in 2012.

Attorney-at-law Atukorale, a leading member of the UNP, obviously hadn’t been interested in the CC. Had she been, she couldn’t have missed Coomaraswamy’s role in the CC where she served it as one of the three civil society representatives.

Coomaraswamy, before her term here ended as CC member, in Sept, 2018, flayed Myanmar’s political and military leaderships for the current situation there. Coomaraswamy joined hands with Marzuki Darusman and Christopher Sidoti to call for war crimes probe targeting Myanmar. The call was made on behalf of the UN. Marzuki Darusman, one time Attorney General of Indonesia, is no stranger to Sri Lankans. Darusman spearheaded the UN project, targeting Sri Lanka, leading to the hotly disputed Panel of Experts (PoE) Report put out in late March 2011.

A section of the international media quoted Coomaraswamy as having said at the launch of the UN report on Myanmar: “The scale, brutality, and systematic nature of rape and violence indicate that they are part of a deliberate strategy to intimidate, terrorize, or punish the civilian population. “They’re used as a tactic of war that we found, include rape, gang rape, sexual slavery, forced nudity and mutilations.”

How could our Justice Minister completely miss Coomaraswamy’s role in the CC when such statements were made?

When the writer queried Justice Ministry media on the afternoon of Oct 12, 2018, as to how Atukorale didn’t know there had been a woman on the CC before her inclusion, courtesy Wickremesinghe, the ministry issued an amended statement in which Atukorale described herself as the first woman parliamentarian to serve the CC. But, the original video is clear. Atukorale really believed she is the first woman on the CC. The original CC comprised Speaker Karu Jayasuriya, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Opposition Leader R Sampanthan, President Sirisena’s nominee Patali Champika Ranawaka, Prime Minister’s choice Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse (subsequently WR was replaced by Tilak Marapana), Opposition Leader’s nomination John Seneviratne, Parliament’s nomination Vijitha Herath and civil society members, Coomaraswamy, A.T. Ariyaratne and the late Shibly Aziz, Attorney General 1995-1996.

Atukorale predecessor Wijeyadasa Rajapakse quit the CC in late Dec 2017 after losing the Justice and Buddha Sasana portfolios in late Aug 2017. Rajapakse earned the wrath of Wickremesinghe by publicly criticizing the handing over of the Hambantota Port, on a 99-year lease, to China. Rajapaksa was also accused of shielding the Rajapaksas. The President’s Counsel is on record as having alleged that his removal was meant to sweep the mega treasury bond scams under the carpet.

Interestingly, Rajapakse was replaced in the CC by National List MP Tilak Marapana who quit the Law and Order portfolio, in early Nov 2015, following accusations of his involvement with Avant Garde Maritime Services (AGMS) that is alleged to have received privileged status under the Rajapaksas. Some of his ministerial colleagues accused him of protecting AGMS owned by retired Army Commando Maj. Nissanka Senadhipathy.

On the night of Monday (Oct. 29) UNPer Wijeyadasa Rajapake retained his cabinet portfolio – Education and Higher Education. Rajapakse was among four UNPers, Wasantha Senanayake (Minister of Tourism and Wildlife), Suresh Vadivel (State Minister of Plantation Industries) and Ananda Aluthgamage (Deputy Minister of Tourism and Wildlife) to join the Sirisena-Rajapaksa administration. Wijeyadasa Rajapakse quit the SLFP-led UPFA during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s first tenure (2005-2010) as the President.

Following Marapana’s resignation, the former Attorney General was quoted as having told the media: “I never interfered with the ongoing investigations. But there is a doubt among people and parliamentarians that the Police investigations are being affected because of me. That’s why I decided to resign from my ministerial portfolio.”

Those who found fault with Marapana for allegedly representing the interests of AGMS did not oppose him on the CC – the highest body responsible for making recommendations for all independent commissions in addition to key appointments to the Supreme Court, Courtof Appeal, etc.

Now, Marapana has been succeeded by Atukorale who didn’t at least know the composition of the original CC.

Second CC in turmoil

Having repeatedly alleged that he would have been buried by the Rajapaksas if defeated at the 2015 January presidential election, President Sirisena last Friday appointed Mahinda Rajapaksa as the Prime Minister. Wickremesinghe has strongly challenged the Sirisena-Rajapaksa move, vowing to prove his majority in parliament. In spite of rhetoric, the UPFA wouldn’t find it easy to prove they have a majority in parliament. However, the coming showdown in parliament could result in a debilitating setback for one party and one emerging victorious, the CC will be in dilemma as regards the status of the Prime Minister.

As far as President Sirisena is concerned, Wickremesinghe is no longer the Prime Minister with effect from Oct. 26 and therefore he didn’t belong to the CC.  At the time of Friday’s stunning move, the Second CC comprised Speaker Karu Jayasuriya, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Opposition Leader R. Sampanthan, President Sirisena’s nominee Mahinda Samarasinghe, Parliament’s nominee Bimal Ratnayake, Prime Minister Wickremesinghe’s nominee Thalatha Atukorale, Opposition Leader Sampanthan’s nominee Chamal Rajapaksa and three civil society nominees, Jayantha Dhanapala, Javid Yusuf and Naganathan Sellvakumaran. With President Sirisena recognizing twice President Rajapaksa as Premier, he is automatically a member of the CC.

The Constitutional Council/Parliament will have to decide whether Thalatha Atukorale can continue as the PM’s nominee as Wickremesinghe no longer holds that position.

It would be pertinent to mention that some decisions, taken at the last CC meeting on the afternoon of Oct 25, before President Sirisena divorced the UNP, didn’t go down well with President Sirisena. Having met at 1.30 pm, the CC announced the endorsement of two of the four names recommended to the Supreme Court by the Office of the President. The CC also approved one of the four names recommended by the Office of the President as judges of the Court of Appeal.

Appointments to the CC are effective for a period of three years.

In case the Sirisena-Rajapaksa duo manage to prove their simple majority, in parliament, next month and the UNP is forced to recognize Rajapaksa as the Prime Minister, the CC will find a different environment to work in. In the event they succeed, the TNA will lead the Opposition Leader’s post. In that case, the Constitutional Council/Parliament may have to decide on the Opposition Leader’s nominee, currently Chamal Rajapaksa.

Among the Second CC are two persons – Jayantha Dhanapala (former United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Disarmament Affairs (1998-2003) and Javid Yusuf (attorney-at-law and former Ambassador to Saudi Arabia) who was involved in the Norway-led peace process that led to all-out war in August 2006. Norway finalized the Ceasefire Agreement between Sri Lanka and the LTTE on Feb 21, 2002 close on the heels of the LTTE attempt to assassinate President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga who was having talks with the group. Yusuf functioned as the Director General of the Muslim Peace Secretariat at that time. The Muslim Peace Secretariat struggled to secure the LTTE’s consent to participate in the Norway-mediated talks overseas and to tackle problems faced by the community, especially those driven out of the Northern Province during Ranasinghe Premadasa’s presidency.

Dhanapala headed the Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP) tasked with coordinating, facilitating, and strengthening the Norway-led peace process. Dhanapala, a retired career Foreign Service officer, succeeded B.A.B. Gunatilleke as SCOPP chief in 2004.

The writer believes of all those who appeared before the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), Dhanapala, made the two most important recommendations on the subject of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and the controversial issue of responsibility to protect concept.

The writer was among the media present at the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute of International Relations and Strategic Studies (LKIIRSS) to cover Dhanapala’s presentation. It was named in memory of our late Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar assassinated by the LTTE in 2005 Aug. Today, it is called the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute (LKI).

Dhanapala asserted that IHL should not apply to Sri Lanka’s war against the LTTE and that a conventional army couldn’t be bound by IHL in fighting a terrorist organization.

Sri Lanka paid a huge price for the previous government’s failure to properly examine accountability issues and also neglecting its responsibilities in this regard. The Sirisena-Wickremesinghe combination in October 2015 treacherously co-sponsored the Resolution against Sri Lanka, thereby paving the way for direct Western intervention in the constitutional making process.

Impact on Constitutional making process

President Sirisena and Kurunegala District MP Rajapaksa made their surprise move ahead of the presentation of the second interim draft, prepared by the Steering Committee tasked with preparing a draft constitutional proposal for Sri Lanka. With President proroguing parliament the interim draft cannot be presented to parliament on Nov 5 as planned. Parliament will meet again on Nov 16.

Wickremesinghe in his capacity as the head of the Steering Committee, was scheduled to present the report to the Constituent Assembly. Now that President Sirisena has unceremoniously sacked Wickremesinghe, who would be at the helm of the Steering Committee to lead the constitution making process? Having repeatedly berated the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe duo for giving into Western and Indian pressure to introduce constitutional changes, Rajapaksa will find it extremely difficult to continue with the process. It would be pertinent to mention that the National Freedom Front (NFF) quit the Constituent Assembly in July last year claiming the process posed a grave threat to Sri Lanka’s unitary status. However, Wimal Weerawansa’s NFF couldn’t convince Rajapaksa to quit the Constituent Assembly as well as the Steering Committee. Two Joint Opposition seniors serve the Steering Committee. Against the backdrop of the UPFA factions shedding their differences, it would be interesting to see whether they seek a consensus on the constitution making process. In spite of the NFF quitting the Constituent Assembly, the UNP continued with the project though the Constituent Assembly should consists of all 225 elected and appointed lawmakers.

The NFF parliamentary group, in a letter to Speaker Jayasuriya, said: “As per the motion passed in Parliament for the setting up of the Constituent Assembly, it is mandatory that all MPs in Parliament become its members. When we leave the assembly, that condition is violated and the legitimacy of the Constituent Assembly is now in question. We hope the Speaker would inform Parliament that the legality of the Constituent Assembly is now in question with our exit.”

“We, as representatives of the public, accept the call by Mahanayakes of all three chapters that the present situation is not suitable for a new constitution or amending the constitution. The Mahanayakes conveyed that message to the government, all MPs and the general public in a statement dated July 04, 2017.

The writer raised the issue with the Joint Opposition, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna as well as Yuthuma organization. Their spokesmen steadfastly asserted that they should remain in the constitutional making process. JO heavyweight Bandula Gunawardena once told the writer that the decision to remain in the Constituent Assembly and the Steering Committee had been taken at a meeting chaired by Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Nationalist Groups backing Mahinda Rajapaksa, too, believe that the JO should have quit Wickremesinghe’s project along with the NFF. Against the backdrop of the complete change in the political environment, President Sirisena and Premier Rajapaksa will have to review the UPFA’s stand on the constitution making process.

In terms of the Geneva Resolutions 30/1 and 34/1, Sri Lanka will have to fulfill obligations in relation to accountability issues by March 2019 Geneva session.

Now, it would be the responsibility of President Sirisena and Premier Rajapaksa to take tangible measures to clear Sri Lanka of unsubstantiated war crimes allegations. Both the Rajapaksas and the Sirisena-Wickremesinghe duo cannot absolve themselves of the responsibility for depriving Sri Lanka of best possible defence much to the disappointment of the people who enjoyed genuine peace.

US-led Western powers and India went to the extent of facilitating the change of government in January 2015 as part of their overall strategy to do away with the Rajapaksas relationship with China. They achieved success in January 2015 after experiencing defeat in January 2010 when General Sarath Fonseka lost badly.

Will they simply allow President Sirisena’s move to jeopardize a high profile project in which interested parties invested millions of USD. Bringing the constitution making project to a successful conclusion will certainly offset the battlefield debacle the LTTE suffered on the Vanni east front with its bloody end militarily at Nandikadal in May, nearly a decade ago.

Former UNHRC Chief Zeid-Hussein, at the 32 session of the Geneva sessions, on June 28, 2016, dealt extensively with Sri Lanka. The former Jordanian career diplomat, in a statement captioned ‘Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka’, explained, in no uncertain terms, what Geneva expected Sri Lanka to do.

Let me reproduce verbatim what Zeid-Hussein stated in his June 28, 2016, address in Geneva:

* “Significant momentum has been achieved in the process of constitutional reform. On 10 March 2016, Parliament adopted a resolution establishing a constitutional assembly to draft and approve a new constitution or amendments by the end of 2016, which would then be put to a referendum in 2017. The drafting process has benefited from an inclusive public consultation process overseen by a Public Representations Committee that received submissions and held district level consultations in the first quarter of 2016.”

* “From a human rights perspective, the constitutional reform process presents an important opportunity to rectify structural deficiencies that contributed to human rights violations and abuses in the past and reinforce guarantees of non-recurrence. These could include a more comprehensive Bill of Rights, stronger institutional checks and balances, enhanced constitutional review, improved guarantees for the independence of the judiciary, effective individual complaints mechanisms and greater direct enforceability of international human rights treaty. Also, as demonstrated by other countries’ experience, is the strengthening of civilian oversight over the military in the form of multiple oversight and accountability mechanisms over defense policy, discipline and promotion, budgeting and procurement. The new Constitution will also be important in facilitating the establishment of the transitional justice mechanisms envisaged by the Government, for instance the criminalization of international crimes in national law or allowing for the involvement of international judicial personnel. At the same time, the High Commissioner hopes that the political process of adopting constitutional changes will not involve tradeoffs and compromises on core issues of accountability, transitional justice and human rights.”

Sri Lanka needs to be watchful and move swiftly and decisively to obliterate allegations with real evidence and accept responsibility for individual battlefield excesses in case there were any during the eelam war IV (2006 – 2009). Taking up Lord Naseby’s revelations in Geneva can be the first step in a daunting task, something Sri Lanka cannot afford not to do. Strategic thinking is necessary as Sri Lanka has already fulfilled some of the key measures prescribed by Geneva, including Office for Missing Persons and Office for Reparations.

To be continued on Nov 7

Welcome Back, Mahinda

October 30th, 2018

You have come back in a way even you didn’t anticipate, but hats off to you for going with the flow and taking up the challenge/opportunity. There’s a palpable sense of relief with the public when you’re at the helm. Probably they expect you to do the same miracle you did before, bring the country back from the brink. This time it’s not the terrorist/separatist threat, but an economic catastrophe. We feel you are quite up to it and wish you good luck. But at the same time would like to extend a reminder and a warning of the fears of the public regarding your rise to power again.

First we hope you will not release your former friends and colleagues who have been convicted of rape, murder, drug trafficking, fraud and corruption, creating communal rifts etc. Refrain from giving presidential pardon and setting them loose among the public of this country again. They have been convicted fairly and squarely, and this country should not be made to suffer them again. Ever.  Hope you can resist the allure of their ill gotten money. Their offers to sponsor you, to print your posters, to finance your party and election campaigns, should be totally shunned. Please spare this country of them.

article_image

Keep your distance from all religious extremists whether Buddhist, Tamil, Muslim or Christian. Scrap all these ministries too. The government should be for all citizens of this country, irrespective of any religion. Any government assistance given to religions should be available for all religions and people.

Do not interfere in the ongoing cases of corruption, even if these people have come back to support you. Let the legal proceedings take its course without any interference from you or your hangers on.

All members of parliament are also normal citizens of this country and do not deserve any special treatment than any other government servant for carrying out their duties. (Which was the case many years ago. Now they come into power only to fatten themselves) .This Idea has been already vocalized and have taken root. It is gathering momentum with lots of selfless people getting behind it and offering to do away with all the special perks members of parliament get, like pensions after just 5 years in office, duty free vehicle permits, and all kinds of allowances etc. There are people, who are coming forward to work without all that. In fact, there are people who have worked like that already. Prime example the retired Chief justice, Priyashath Dep and some JVP parliamentarians. At a time when people are desperate for a 3rd option, from the two parties that has ruled/ruined the country for so long, Mahinda, you have two options here. 1) Pick people like Priyashath Dep, who are willing to work for the country without the perks, for your team. Sri Lanka is blessed with many like him. Or, 2) do away with all these perks for the fat and salivating lot, who comes forward only to enjoy these callous perks created by the fattened for the fattened.

Do away with all antics done, with the claim of terrorist threat to their lives by all politicos. Like police escorts for going about on the roads, and breaking of all traffic rules.  This is the biggest harassment of the normal public of this country by the politicos of all hues. They all want to go about their business like the royalty. A parliament sitting day is well recognizable by the chaos on the roads on the day, these speeding buffaloes create with the assistance of the police.

Do not interfere, or let any of your cronies interfere, in the normal carrying out of duties by the police.

Prohibit making little children worship politicos. This bending over is trained at such young age by their own teachers/parents that it stays with them for the rest of their lives. Make their backs strong, so some day they will hold themselves up with pride, no matter what their job is.

Reduce the number of ministers, and Ministries.

Weeding out corruption should be as important a goal as developing the country. Give it top priority, like you did with the LTTE, Declare a war on corruption.

Do not make nationally important decisions on the sayings and predictions of astrologers. Good luck

Debate on constitutionality of dismissal of Ranil based on misconception – GL

October 30th, 2018

Courtesy The Island


Former External Affairs Minister and Prof of Law. G.L. Peiris yesterday told The Island that a deliberate attempt was being made to mislead the public as regards the dismissal of PM Wickremesinghe. The following is the full text of the statement issued by Prof. Peiris: There is extensive discussion in the media regarding the legality of the action taken by President Maithripala Sirisena during the evening of Friday 26 October to remove Ranil Wickramasinghe from the position of Prime Minister and to appoint instead Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa.

Continuing discussion of the legal issues is taking place on the basis of a fundamental misconception. It has been assumed that there is no provision in the Constitution of Sri Lanka, empowering the President to remove the Prime Minister.

This is entirely incorrect.

Section 48(i), which is part of the 19th Amendment, explicitly refers to removal or dismissal as one of the methods by which the Prime Minister ceases to hold office

The Constitution, therefore, in express terms recognizes removal or dismissal by the President as a mode of ending the tenure of office of the Prime Minister.

This vital provision has escaped notice in the current discussion, because it is not reflected in the English version.

There is a crucial difference between the Sinhala and English versions. The English version uses the words : “On the Prime Minister ceasing to hold office by death, resignation or otherwise”. The reference to removal or dismissal is deleted.

I was a member of Parliament when the 19th Amendment was discussed and enacted by Parliament. This happened during the so-called 100 day period between the Presidential Election of 8 January 2015 and the Parliamentary Election of 17 August 2015.

I was personally aware that it was the Sinhala version which was put to the House, clause by clause, during the Committee Stage by Mr. Chamal Rajapaksa, Speaker of Parliament at that time. It was the Sinhala version which was considered and adopted by Parliament. The English version did not receive the attention of Parliament at all.

In any event, in the event of any discrepancy, it is the Sinhala version that prevails. Indisputably, the Sinhala version is the authoritative version of the law.

This vital fact is lost sight of, in all the discussion which is now taking place.

When the governing provisions of the Constitution are accurately stated in their complete form, and taken into account, there can be no conceivable doubt that the President’s power to dismiss the Prime Minister is expressly contemplated by the Constitution.

Dismissal of Mr. Ranil Wickramasinghe and appointment of Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as Prime Minister on 26 October 2018, is therefore entirely in keeping with the Constitution, and there has been no infringement of its provisions in any respect.

දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය කිසිවෙකුටත් සහය නොදැක්වවීමට යයි

October 30th, 2018

දිනසේන රතුගමගේ

දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය දේශපාලනමය වශයෙන් පාඩම් ඉගෙන ගෙන ඇත්නම් මේ අවස්ථාවේදී කිසිවෙකුටත් සහය නොදැක්විය යුතු බව ඊ.පී.ආර්.එල්.එෆ්.සංවිධානයේ නායක සුරේෂ් ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍රන් මහතා 30 දා සවස පැවසීය.

දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානයේ නායක ආර්.සම්බන්ධන් විපක්ෂනායකවරයා 30 දා අග්‍රාමාත්‍ය මහින්ද රාජපක්ෂ මහතා හමුවීම පිළිබදව යාපනයේ මාධ්‍යවේදීන් සුරේෂ් ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගෙන් අදහස් විමසූ විය ඔහු මේ බව කියා සිටියේය.

දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය එකල නියෝජනය කරමින් මන්ත්‍රී ධුරයට පත් වූ  වන්නි දිස්ත්‍රික්කයේ පාර්ලිමේන්තු මන්ත්‍රී ශිවශක්ති ආනන්දන් මහතා දැන් තමා සමහ සිටින බව කී ඊ.පී.ආර්.එල්.එෆ්.නායකයා තමන් ඔහු සමගද කතා කළ අවස්ථාවේදී ඔහුද කීස්වෙකුටත් සහය නොදීමට තීරණය කොට ඇති බව කියා සිටියේය.

දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය අතීතයේදී මේ සියළුම දේශපාලනඥයින් සමග කටයුතු කොට ඇති බව පවසන සුරේෂ් මහතා කියා සිටින්නේ ඔවුන් ඔවුන්ගේ දේශපාලන වාසිය තකා මෙතෙක් කළේ දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය රැවටවීම බව උදාහරණ සහිතව  විස්තර කරණ ලදී.

උතුරු නගෙනහිර වෙසෙන දෙමළ ජනතාව වෙණුවෙන් දෙමළ දේශපාලන පක්ෂ එදා සිට ඉල්ලා සිටින්නේ ප්‍රධාන කාරණා පහක් බව කී හෙතෙම ඒ එකම කරුණක් හෝ නිසි ලෙස ඉටුකිරීමට දකුණේ දේශපාලනඥයින් හෝ දේශපාලන පක්ෂ කටයුතු කොට  නොමති බවද කියා සිටියේය.

උතුරු නැගෙනහිර පළාත් දෙක එකට එකතු කොට ඒකීය රාජ්‍යයක් තුළ බලය බෙදා හැරෙන දේශපාලන විසදුමක් දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය ඇතුළු සියළුම දෙමළ දේශපාලන පක්ෂ ඉල්ලා සිටියදී දේශපාලන නායකයින් සිදු කරන්නේ ඔවුන් බලයේ සිටීමට අවශ්‍ය පරිදි පාවා දී ගැනීමක් නම ඔවුන්ට සහය දෙන්නවුන් ජාතිද්‍රෝහීන් ගණයට වැටෙන බව සුරේෂ් ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍රන් මහතාගේ අදහසයි.

යුද සමයේදී අතුරුදහන් වූවන්ගේ ප්‍රශ්නයට විසදුම් ලබාදීම,උතුරේ වැසියන්ගේ ඉඩම් ආපසු ලබා දීම හා දෙමළ දේශපාලන සිරකරුවන් නිදහස් කිරීම යන ඉල්ලීම් වහාම ඉටු කරණ බවට පොරොන්දු වූ වත්මන් ජනාධිපතිවරයා ඔහුගේ  පරම හතුරා සමග එකතු වී ඇති පරිසරයක් තුළ දෙමළ ජාතීන්ගේ ඉල්ලීම් ඉටු නොවන බව දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය දැන සිටිය යුතු බවද ඊ.පී.ආර්.එල්.එෆ්.නායකයා කියා සිටියි.

පටු අරමුණු ඉටු කරගැනීම සදහා මෙසේ එකතුවන පිළිකුල් දේශපාලනඥයින් හමුවීමට යාම පවා ආත්ම ගරුත්වය බිද වැටීමට හේතුවක් බව ඔහු පෙන්වා දෙයි.

රටේ වත්මන් නායකයින් රටේ අභ්‍යන්තර දේශපාලන පක්ෂ වලට වූ පොරොන්දු කිසිවක් ඉටු කරණ තත්ත්වයක් දක්නට නොතිබියදී දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය  ඒ දේශපාලාන්ඥයින් සමග ගණුදෙණු කිරීමෙන් හා ඔවුන්ට  සහය පලකිරීමෙන් කිසිදු ප්‍රයෝජනයක් නැතැයිද ඔහු කියා සිටියි.

ජිනීවා මානව හිමිකම් මණ්ඩලයේදී ශ්‍රී ලංකා රජයට යෝජනා වූ ත්‍රස්තවාදය වැලැක්වී මේ පනත අහෝසි කිරීම දෙමළ දේශපාලන සිරකරුවන් නිදහස් කිරීම වැනි ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මතයන් පවා නොසලකා හරින රාජ්‍ය නායකයින්ගෙන් දෙමළ ජාතික සන්ධානය ඉදිරියටත් රැවටීමක් හැර වෙනත් යමක් බලාපොරොත්තු විය නොහැකි බවද සුරේෂ් ප්‍රේමචන්ද්‍රන් මහතා මෙහිදී වැඩිදුරටත් කියා සිටියේය.

උතුරු මුහුදු සීමාවේ අනවසරයෙන් මසුන් මරමින් සිටි ඉන්දීය ධීවරයින් 17 දෙනෙකු හා ඔවුන්ගේ යාත්‍රා තුනක් නාවික හමුදාව විසින් අත් අඩංගුවට .

October 30th, 2018

දිනසේන රතුගමගේ

උතුරු මුහුදු සීමාවේ අනවසරයෙන් මසුන් මරමින් සිටි ඉන්දීය ධීවරයින් 17 දෙනෙකු හා ඔවුන්ගේ යාත්‍රා තුනක් නාවික හමුදාව විසින් 29 දා අත් අඩංගුවට ගෙන තිබේ.

උතුරු නාවික විධානයට අයත් වේග ප්‍රහාරක මුර නෞකාවට අනුයුක්ත නාවිකයින් විසින් ඩෙල්ෆ්ට් දුපතට ආසන්න මුහුදු ප්‍රදේශයේදී ධීවර යාත්‍රා දෙකක් සහ කච්චතිව් දූපතට ආසන්න මුහුදු ප්‍රදේශයේදී එක් ධීවර යාත්‍රාවක් ද මෙලෙස අත්අඩංගුවට ගෙන ඇත.

ඒ අනුව, ඉන්දීය ධීවරයින් සහ ට්‍රෝලර් යාත්‍රා ශ්‍රී ලංකා නාවික නෞකා එලාරආයතනය වෙත රැගෙන ඒමට කටයුතු කර ඇති අතර, එම ධීවරයින් පිරිස වෛද්‍ය පරීක්‍ෂණයකට භාජනය කිරීමෙන් අනතුරුව ඉදිරි නීතිමය කටයුතු සඳහා යාපනය, සහකාර ධිවර අධ්‍යක්‍ෂක වෙත භාර දීමට කටයුතු කරන ලදී..

අත්අඩංගුවට ගත් ඉන්දීය ධීවරයින් පිරිස සහ යාත්‍රා ඉදිරි නීතිමය කටයුතු සඳහා යාපනය සහකාර ධීවර අධ්‍යක්ෂ වෙත බාර දී ඇති අතර ඔවුන්ව 30 දා කන්කසන්තුරේ පොලීසිය වෙත බාර දී තිබේ.

පොලීසිය පැවසුවේ අනාව්සරයෙන් මසුන් මරන ලද ධීවරයින් පිරිස අධිකරණය වෙත ඉදිරිපත් කිරීමට පියවර ගෙන ඇති බවයි.

මන්නාරම සමූහ මිනී වළෙන් 29 දා සවස් වන විට මිනිස් ඇටසැකිළි 207 ක් හමු වී තිබේ

October 30th, 2018

දිනසේන රතුගමගේ

මන්නාරම සතොස තොග වෙළද සැල අසලින් හමුවූ සමූහ මිනී වළෙන් 29 දා සවස් වන විට මිනිස් ඇටසැකිළි 207 ක් හමු වී තිබේ.

මෙම මිනිස් ඇටසැකිළි 207 න් 199 ක් සමූහ මිනීවළෙන් ගොඩගෙන ඇති අතර  ඒවා පරීක්ෂණ කටයුතු සදහා ඉදිරිපත් කොට තිබේ.

මෙම සමූහ මිනීවළේ කැණීම් කටයුතු පරීක්ෂා කොට බැලීම සදහා මන්නාරම දිසා විනිසුරු ආර්.ස්වර්ණරාජ් මහතා ඇතුළු පිරිසක් 29 දා මේ ස්ථානයට පැමිණි අතර එහිදී කැණීම් කටයූතු හා එහි වත්මන් තත්ත්වය පිළිබදව කැණීම් බාර නිලධාරීන් සමග සාකච්ඡා කොට තිබේ.

මෙහිදී දැනට හමුවී ඇති මිනිස් ඇට සැකිළි 207  අතර කාන්තා පිරිමි හා ළමා යන තුන් කොටසටම අයත් ඇටසැකිළි ඇති බව කැණීම් බාර නිලධාරීන් දිසා විනිසුරුවරයාට ප්‍රකාශ කොට ඇති අතර කැණීම් කටයුතු වලට බාධාවක් වී ඇත්තේ ඉද හිට මන්නාරමට ඇද හැලෙන වර්ෂාව පමණක් බවද ඔවුන් ප්‍රකාශ කොට තිබේ.

වර්ෂාවෙන් මේ ස්ථානය ආරක්ෂා කර ගැනීම පිණිසකූඩාරම් ඉදි කොට ඇති බවද නිලධාරීන් විනිසුරුවරයාට ප්‍රකාශ කොට ඇති අතර  නිලධාරීන්ට හා මෙම සමූහ මිනී වළට පොලීසියෙන් විශාල ආරක්ෂාවක් ලැබෙන බවද ප්‍රකාශ කොට තිබේ.

Constitutionality: Comparing appointment of Prime Minister in 2015 & 2018

October 30th, 2018

Suddenly a bevy of ‘constitutional experts’ have come into the scene. Where were they in 2015 one wonders. The situation is this. We have the same President but 2 different Prime Ministers. The issue is this. Those that are now coming forward holding the slogans of ‘abiding by the constitution’ quoting the ‘constitution’ questioning the ‘legalities’ etc were not to be seen or heard in 2015 and since when a list of illegalities were taking place. Let us compare these two scenarios.

January 2015 Sri Lanka held a Presidential election.

The presidential election is a very straightforward election where all registered voters in Sri Lanka vote for a President who must secure 50% of the votes cast. At the 2015 Presidential election the President obtaining 62lakh votes became Maithripala Sirisena who left the SLFP-UPFA & contested under the swan symbol backed by the UNP, TNA, SLMC, JVP and endorsed by some 50 civil society organizations.

At the time of taking oaths an unprecedented move occurred. Immediately after taking oaths as President, the President-elect appointed then Opposition Leader Ranil Wickremasinghe as the Prime Minister. Ranil Wickremasinghe in January 2015 had only 46UNP MPs represented in Parliament. The question everyone asked was how can the President-elect  appoint Ranil Wickremasinghe because the election was a Presidential & not Parliament while Ranil had only 46MPs in Parliament.

The response was ridiculous. Of course the President can appoint Ranil Wickremasinghe, he promised so in his election pledges & on election platforms”. What if the President in the run up to elections promised to make Donald Trump, Theresa May, Putin or Trudeau as Prime Minister, would their answer also be the same? We are unlikely to get a response.

Be that as it may, there was another more serious issue. Ranil Wickremasinghe was appointed without removing the sitting Prime Minister D M Jayaratne and D M Jayaratne neither resigned nor was removed from his position as PM. So how was Ranil appointed PM without removing the sitting PM? None of the constitutional experts now questioning the constitutionality of matters wish to answer this question.

What is the legality & constitutionality of the January 2015 Prime Minister’s appointment.

Sri Lanka held a Presidential election not a General Election and previously too the country functioned with a President from one party & a Prime Minister from another. Moreover, if we are to presume that a Presidential election held after which the President-elect can immediately appoint a Prime Minister, then we should next ask the question why waste money & time on holding General Elections!

Ranil was clearly without any majority support in Parliament – with 46MPs he lacked the majority support. Therefore, from January to August 2015 there is a big question as to the legality & constitutionality of Ranil Wickremasinghe as Prime Minister which is a more important legal & constitutionally unanaswered question than the present appointment of Mahinda Rajapakse as PM. No one wants to answer or even raise this as a debate topic.

It is interesting that Constitutional maestro Jayampathy Wickremaratne quotes 42(4) claiming that the appointment of a PM can arise ‘only when there is a vacancy by virtue of a fresh election, resignation or no-confidence motion’. How come all 3 did not exist in January 2015 and Ranil was appointed as PM?

http://www.dailymirror.lk/157477/Two-gazettes-issued-removing-Ranil-and-appointing-MR-as-PM?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook two gazette notifications removing Ranil and appointing Mahinda

Therefore, there is a serious question of legality & constitutionality to the appointment of Ranil as PM in January 2015 and he functioned as PM till August 2015 Parliamentary Elections after which he became the PM. However, from Jan to Aug 2015 every action & seal by Ranil as PM has to be legally questioned including the 19amendment.

Look at the hypocrisies at play

In January 2015 according to N. Selvakkumaran (Sri Lanka Guardian – Appointment of the Prime Minister: Constitutional or Not?”) says it is the opinion of the President that matters here. There is no express provision in the Constitution which requires a Prime Minister to demonstrate, through an affirmative vote of confidence, his or her ability to command the majority support of Parliament”

If this argument applies to the appointment of Ranil Wickremasinghe in 2015 as PM shouldn’t it also apply to Mahinda Rajapakse’s appointment as PM?

Note how Selvakkumaran answers the constitutional position & political legitimacy of Ranil as PM in 2015, he says candidate Maithripala Sirisena made it very clear in many political platforms and through media interviews, during the period of canvassing that he would appoint Ranil Wickremasinghe as the Prime Minister once he won the Presidential Election & took oaths as the President. He had to keep his word to the people of this country”. If this is so then we don’t need a constitution or a supreme court to determine things legal. A President can make campaign promises & follow through on them. But what if he doesn’t??? This clearly displays a very lame & immature response to a very legal argument.

October 2018 appointment of Mahinda Rajapakse as Prime Minister by the same President that appointed & removed the immediate-past Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe.  

How was this appointment done? Only after getting all of the SLFP MPs in the National Unity Government to resign and issuing a gazette notification to the effect that the Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe was removed as PM & issuing another gazette notification informing the appointment of Mahinda Rajapakse as Prime Minister.

The constitutional experts in the form of Friday Forum, Church of Ceylon and the various online petitions now in circulation completely ignore the fact that there is no National Unity Government to claim that the President cannot remove Ranil as Prime Minister. So they are quoting part of the 19a & totally disregarding the Article clauses relevant to the National Government. In this manner they are totally fooling the masses who need to understand what context of 19a is applicable to the situation.

Arguments in favor of Mahinda Rajapakse’s appointment as Prime Minister

  • Article 42 (4) is cited as reason for the removal of Ranil Wickremasinghe as Prime Minister
  • Article 42 (4) clearly states that it is nothing but the ‘President’s opinion’ that decides who he feels has confidence in Parliament. It is irrelevant that any party has the numbers to stake claim as having the confidence of the House.
  • National Unity Government’ ceased to exist after the 26MPs of the SLFP withdrew support to it.
  • We have forgotten that the 2 year MOU signed between UNP & SLFP also ceased to exist from August 2017.

The powers of the President is superior to that of the Prime Minister established clearly via

  1. Article 30 (1) 19a – There shall be a President of the Republic of Sri Lanka who is the Head of State, Head of the Executive & of the Government”
  2. Article 42 (3) – President is Head of the Cabinet of Ministers” while the Cabinet of Ministers is charged with the direction & control of the Government” – Article 42 (1)
  3. This empowers the President to deem whom he feels is suited to direct & control the Government & nowhere in the 19a does it say that the President’s choice in the Prime Minister has to be from the party that has the largest MPs in Parliament. But the discretion of the President is important because he has to appoint someone as PM who will face obstacles in functioning as the PM. What needs to be clearly pointed out is that the President’s choice in selecting a PM who does not have a majority in Parliament is not unconstitutional.

Arguments against President Proroguing Parliament

  • Article 70(a) empowers President to prorogue Parliament
  • Article 70(3) requires President to fix date for next session which cannot be more than 2 months (President has fixed Parliament to reconvene on 16 Nov 2018)
  • Article 70 (3) (i) permits the President to summon Parliament even 3 days after he prorogues Parliament.

19a key provisions to note

  • Government to comprise only 30 MPs unless in case of National Government
  • Cabinet formed by National Government will automatically get dissolved when a party leaves the National Government (withdrawal of SLFP MPs from National Government meant that the cabinet automatically stood dissolved)
  • If cabinet is automatically dissolved the post of Prime Minister also falls vacant.
  • President is legally & constitutionally empowered to appoint new Prime Minister whom he feels commands the confidence of the House.

If we are talking about legality & constitutionality of appointments then we need to return to the appointment of Ranil Wickremasinghe in January 2015 & question that legality & constitutionality first – this would legally question every agreement he has signed as PM, every appointment made, every decision taken & it would even question the validity of the 19a. Legal experts need to address this without partition politics.

As for people who are coming forward to defend either party in particular the US, UK, EU, India, Japan, Canada et al they must be reminded that they are flouting Geneva diplomatic protocols interfering into the internal affairs of sovereign states.

Their credibility is questioned when they have been silent throughout a plethora of illegalities & irregularities that their favourites have been committing with virtual impunity – from August 2015 to February 2018 no elections were held throughout Sri Lanka inspite of enforcing independent commissions (not a hum from the angels of democracy), a new constitution is being drafted by them according to what suits their agenda (all violations of Sri Lanka’s sovereignty), Bill to compensate the LTTE which remains banned in Sri Lanka and by the very countries that are not taking action against the LTTE fronts is an affront to all the victims of LTTE, Bills are being passed without transparency, cheating the public & without majority vote, trade pacts are being signed in secrecy compromising national security and natural assets of the country and no one in the West/India are questioning these, all types of controversial figures are getting appointed to key roles & total silence because they are the one’s selected to take care of the finer details before these too are sold.

On top of all this, the person they packaged a campaign to bring to power as President is even going to the UN and saying there is a plot to kill him and he comes on State TV & addresses his people to say that the reason to sack the PM was the attempt to assassinate him. Not one of the countries or the civil society organizations that campaigned to bring him to power as President are calling for an investigation or arrest of those planning to kill the President.

Furthermore, everyone today presenting arguments questioning the legality of matters need to wake up to some realities and eat humble pie for they know very well that the 19a came about not for the interest of the country or to uphold democracy but was a very craftily drafted document that plotted to subtly transfer powers of the President to the Prime Minister, insert provisions that would deny members of the opposition to contest future elections (clauses like dual citizenship, limiting presidency term, removing president’s right to dissolve parliament, cap on age limit to contest presidency) and also including the provision of who will lead in case of a vacancy which gels well with the conspiracy to bump off the President. For the luck of the country & the karmic punishment of the perpetrators they find their plans all exposed & they are in a total mess because what they thought would be their cake has now passed on to their enemy.

All we can say is – what goes round comes round & it isn’t very pretty for those who connive & try to cheat their way into climbing to power & remaining in power.

Shenali D Waduge

How the King Maker can put things right

October 30th, 2018

Dr Sarath Obeysekera

When SWRD led somewhat national revolution against green party, my father who was an ardent DS fan who worked in the field of Irrigation has changed his western attire to a Sinhala National Dress to go to work. When things were changing after SWRDS’s demise he turned his colours again and backed JR.

People have to change their mind set to suit the political conditions and adapt.

Country was booming in development despite purported corruption allegations and yet a King Maker rise and change the path of Sri Lankan political landscape in 2015.Kingmaker noticed that the democracy and so called Yahaplanaya cannot exist .So many disruption in the country because of unions creating havoc in the society.

Starting with Three Wheeler Drivers to highly educated Doctors and even revenue collectors were disrupting the government .And yet King Maker was watching and foreseeing a disaster in few years when next election take place.

Known devil for many years who was chased away using a political voo doo could save the King Maker and the country .That may have been his opinion.

He did not hesitate .He became a Dictator to a certain extent (hopefully he will be a benevolent- one in time to come) and get the new regime takes control.

People may complain that democratic principles were violated ,but there  may be better management because the journalist will have to be careful when they report nationally sensitive aspects and unions will have  think twice before they start  any demonstrations for minor issues disrupting day to day life of the people in the country .

New King should address the country and announce that there should not be any more nonsense.

All foreign investments should be accelerated and highway constructions and other projects such as refineries, LNG plants, etc should commence.

Law and Order should to be strictly maintained, behaviour of young members of elite should be controlled.

If the people cannot see any changes in the country, in two years new King may rise and punish the incumbent one.

As we always say Let us see how new regime performs

 

 


Copyright © 2026 LankaWeb.com. All Rights Reserved. Powered by Wordpress